Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20092443.tiffRESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING PROPOSED ROAD IMPACT FEE FROM INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION STUDY - SPICER RANCHES, LTD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on September 3, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners approved the application of Spicer Ranches, LTD, 37440 County Road 43, Eaton, Colorado 80615, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1633 for an Agricultural Service Establishment primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry, and horticultural services on a fee or contract basis, including Commercial Rodeo and Equine Center (indoor and outdoor), in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following described real estate, to -wit: SW1/4 of Section 27, Township 7 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Use by Special Review Permit#1633 for Spicer Ranches, LTD, was assessed a transportation impact fee in the amount of $33,517.65, in accordance with Table 20.1 of the Weld County Code, and WHEREAS, Spicer Ranches, LTD, submitted an Independent Fee Calculation Study, pursuant to Code Section 20-1-320.A, wherein the amount of the fee was proposed to be $16,470.59, and WHEREAS, Janet Carter, Weld County Department of Public Works, reviewed the applicant's Independent Fee Calculation Study, and disagreed with its resulting proposed fee, and in a Memorandum, dated August 18, 2009, stated the applicants Study is incomplete and does not satisfy generally recognized principals of Transportation Analysis, and WHEREAS, Spicer Ranches, LTD, c/o AGPROfessionals, LLC, submitted to the Board of County Commissioners an appeal of the denial by the Interim Planning Director of the proposed fee of $16,470.59, pursuant to Code Section 20-1-340, and WHEREAS, upon consideration of such appeal, including a review of all information submitted by Spicer Ranches, LTD, do AGPROfessionals, LLC, and the Departments of Planning Services and Public Works, the Board deems it advisable to reverse the decision of the Interim Planning Director, with the finding that Agricultural Commercial is the most appropriate classification for the structure, and therefore, the rate of $509.00 per 1,000 square feet is the correct rate for this use, and the Board directed staff to work with the appellant to recalculate the amount of square footage attributed to the Agricultural Commercial classification. 2009-2443 PL0756 ee Pt 1 Pte, Roo/,99P1- ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING PROPOSED ROAD IMPACT FEE FROM INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION STUDY - SPICER RANCHES, LTD PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that in the appeal of Spicer Ranches, LTD, the Board reverses the decision of the Interim Planning Director. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that staff is hereby directed to work with the appellant to recalculate the amount of square footage attributed to the Agricultural Commercial classification at the rate of $509.00 per 1,000 square feet. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that if a consensus cannot be reached among the appellant and staff from the Departments of Planning Services and Public Works, the appellant may choose to resume the appeal with the Board of County Commissioners. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of September, A.D., 2009. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Boar BY: `t, -7-&5' t y f' DeputyfClerk to the Board APPROVED AS TCYFORM: County Attorney Date of signature: / c// 9/C7 BOARD OF2UNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD. SLLJM1', COLORADO iam F. Garcia, Chair ademacher, Pro-Tem Sean P. Conway 1 Li't!kc Bar'Igneyer% / °`'/ David E Long 2009-2443 PL0756 460t, COLORADO MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 14, 2009 FROM: Kim Ogle, Planning Servicesk, SUBJECT: Staff Recommendation Chronology for Appeal: On July 23, 2008 , the Board of County Commissioners approved an Agricultural Services Establishment for a Commercial Rodeo and Equine Center for Spicer Ranches Limited, do Rebecca J. Meyring. On December 3, 2008, building permit BCR08-01098 for a change of use for a 65,850 square foot (1.5 acres) indoor riding arena was issued. On December 3, 2008, Ms. Wendi Inloes, Planning Coordinator assessed the transportation impact fee of $ 33,517.65 dollars. This fee was based on compliance with Table 20.1 of the Weld County Code and information provided by the applicant on the use of the building. On December 24, 2008, Mr. Jacob Augenstein with Casseday Creative Designs requested a re-evaluation of the Road Impact Fees. On January 12, 2009, Ms. Janet Carter, Traffic Engineer provided a response to Casseday Creative Designs addressing the items needed for the Independent Fee Calculation, and explanation of the assessed Road Impact Fee. On May 21, 2009, Spicer Ranches Ltd. submitted a check, # 8074, for $10,000.00 dollars to be applied to the Road Impact Fees associated with the Spicer Arena. On May 27, 2009, Mr. Kim Ogle, Planning Manager, sent a letter to Ms. Rebecca (Becky) Meyring stating that Weld County had not received written evidence of an Independent Fee Calculation, therefore the Road Impact Fee remains outstanding and must be paid prior to recording the plat. On July 20, 2009, Mr. Kim Ogle, Planning Manager, sent a letter to Ms. Becky Meyring requesting payment for Road Impact Fees. On August 7, 2009, Ms. Wendi Inloes, Planning Coordinator and Ms. Janet Carter, Traffic Engineer met with the applicant's representative, Messrs. Tim Naylor and Tom Haren of AGPROfessionals, LLC about the requirements of the Independent Fee Calculation. On August 10, 2009, Ms. Becky Meyring provided written documentation of a contractual agreement between AGPROfessionals, LLC and Spicer Ranches Limited, to process all work related to the Road Impact Fee assessed to Spicer Arena. Ms. Meyring requested the County to apply $ 500.00 dollars of the original $ 10,000.00 deposit for the Road Impact Fee to the application for an independent fee calculation. On August 10, 2009, Ms. Monica Daniels -Mika received the Independent Fee Calculation from Mr. Tim Naylor of AGPROfessionals, LLC On August 18, 2009, Ms. Janet Carter, Traffic Engineer issued a Memorandum stating that the Independent Fee Calculation was incomplete. 2009-2443 On August 21, 2009, Mr. Kim Ogle, Interim Planning Director, sent a letter to Mr. Tim Naylor to schedule a Board of County Commissioner hearing for the Independent Fee Calculation. On August 27, 2009, Mr. Tim Naylor requested by electronic mail to schedule the Appeal of the Road Impact Fee hearing with the Board of County Commissioners on Monday September 14, 2009. Action: The Department of Planning Service is forwarding this case to the Board of County Commissioners for your review and determination as found in Section 20-1-340 of the Weld County Code. In subsection B of this Section, "The Board of County Commissioners, after hearing, shall have the power to affirm or reverse the decision of the Director. In making its decision, the Board of County Commissioners shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and apply the standards in Section 20-1-330 above. If the Board of County Commissioners reverses the decision of the Director, it shall instruct the Director to recalculate the fee in accordance with its findings." The Department of Planning Services has determined that the applicant has failed to satisfy the requirement of Section 20-1-330 of the Weld County Code for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has failed to rely upon general principles of impact analysis, and 2. The data, information and assumptions used by the applicant to calculate the Independent Fee Calculations study are not consistent with the impacts of the proposed use. More specifically, Weld County Public Works has determined that the submitted materials were not prepared by a qualified traffic planner or engineer pursuant to an accepted methodology of transportation planning or engineering, and the Independent Fee Calculation was not calculated by the use of traffic count data, and there was no summary of the trip distribution anticipated from the project site nor was there an analysis of the existing and future traffic volumes for the immediate, short term (2015) and Long Term (2035). The applicant relied upon an average number of vehicles per event per year which are not consistent with the application materials. The Department of Planning Service's is recommending that the Board of County Commissioners direct staff to accept the methodology and findings developed by the Weld County Department of Public Works, for this Independent Fee Calculation study. It is the judgment of staff that these findings meet the standards of Section 20-1-330, and the proposed fee of $ 33,517.65 dollars is consistent with the impacts generated from this case. pc: Pat Persichino Bruce Barker Janet Carter Wendi Inloes M \Kimo\Current Board Hearings\Use by Special Review \USR Approved Cases \Spicer Ranches USR-1633\Staff Recommendation RIF Calculation Memorandum Kim Ogle From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kim Tim Naylor [tnaylor@agpros.com] Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:46 AM Kim Ogle Tom Haren; Olivia Cain; Brandy Bair; bjmeyring@yahoo.com Spicer USR-1633 Appeal of Road Impact Fee Please schedule the Spicer Arena, USR-1633 Appeal of the Road Impact Fee hearing with the BOCC for Monday, September 14, 2009, 9AM in the Commissioners hearing room. Thanks Tim Naylor AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Highway 66 Longmont, Colorado 80504 (970)535-9318 (970)535-9854 fax tnavlor(?i agpros.com 4tt:i�1 lURe. COLORADO August 21, 2009 Tim Naylor AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 State Highway 66 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Subject: Spicer Ranch Arena, USR-1633 Appeal of Road Impact Fee Dear Mr. Naylor: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Greeley Planning Office 918 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us E-MAIL: kogle@co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3549 FAX (970) 304-6498 The Department of Planning Services has received a memorandum from the Department of Public Works concerning the Independent Fee Calculation submitted by your office dated August 10, 2009. It is the determination of this office that the fee calculation method is incomplete and does not meet the requirements of Section 20-1-330 of the Weld County Code. Given this determination AGPROfessionals, LLC as representative for Becky Meyring, owner of Spicer Ranch may appeal the decision to the Board of County Commissioners who has the authority to affirm or reverse the decision of this office. The decision of the Board of County Commissioners shall be final and not subject to further administrative appeal. In conversation with the Clerk to the Board's office, the dates available for this hearing are: September 2, September 14, September 16 and September 21, 2009. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners will be scheduled for 9 o'clock in the Commissioners Hearing Room. Please notify this office of your availability and that of your client such that this issue may be resolved. Should you have additional questions or require clarification on any of the points presented herein, please contact this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim Ogle Planning Services Enclosures pc: J. Carter, Public Works W. Inloes, Planning USP-1633 111k. MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Ogle, Planning Services DATE: August 18, 2009 FROM: Janet Carter E.I., Public Works COLORADO SUBJECT: Independent Fee Calculation Spicer Ranch Arena USR-1633 Comments Public Works received an Independent Fee Calculation dated August 10, 2009 from AgProfessional, LLC. The submitted Independent Fee Calculation was incomplete and does not satisfy generally recognized principals of Transportation Analysis. The County has determined that the imposition of a road impact fee is justified in Weld County Code Section 20 in order to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the costs of the road capital improvements necessary to accommodate new development while at the same time maintaining the adopted level of service on the Road System while promoting and protecting the public health, safety and welfare. After reviewing the Independent Fee Calculation submittal materials; I have prepared the following comments: I. Traffic Count Data collected by the applicant's representative was not included with the submittal. 2. Calculations for VMT, VMC, and length of impacted roadways from the Highway Capacity manual formulas were not provided with the submittal. 3. The submitted materials were not performed by a Transportation Engineer or Transportation Planner. Weld County Code Section 20-1-310 B. 2 states "The independent source is a local study on trip characteristics carried out by a qualified traffic planner or engineer pursuant to an accepted methodology of transportation planning or engineering." 4. The Independent Fee Calculation must be calculated by the use of traffic count data and land use defined in Trip Generation, a report prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). However the Independent Fee Calculation for Spicer Arena was based incorrectly on an estimated trip volume proposed by the applicant's representative. 5. The submitted Independent Fee Calculation did not contain a summary of the study area and the trip distribution anticipated from the project site. 6. An analysis of existing traffic volumes and mitigation of any level of services deficiencies that may occur due to the project were not submitted. 7. Analysis of future traffic volumes in the Short Term (2015) and Long Term (2035) were not submitted. Project Background Since May 9, 2007, there has been an ongoing Violation Case (ZCV-07-01045) for the Spicer Ranch property owners. The Spicer Ranch USR was passed by the Board of County Commissioners on August 30, 2008. Public Works received a letter from Casseday Creative Designs, representative for Spicer Ranch, requesting that the road impact fee for the Spicer Ranch facility be re-evaluated on December 24, 2008. The applicant had not submitted a traffic study for the project at that time. Public Works evaluated the applicant's proposed traffic volumes and compared trip generation values for equivalent land uses as presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Public Page - 1 - of 2 August 18, 2009 M VPLANNING — DEVELOPMENT REVIEW VUSR-Use by Special Review VUSR-1633-Spicer Ranch ArenaVIndependant Fee 081409.doc Works also considered the consistency of the request with current Weld County Code as contained in Table 20.1 Section 20-1-220. The evaluation performed by Public Works was provided to the Applicant on January 12, 2009. The following narrative was included with the evaluation supplied to the applicant: The Spicer Ranch arena building is 65,850 square feet in size (1.5 acres). The applicant proposes holding special events in the arena with many participants in addition to hosting daily visits with relatively few participants. Participants will bring livestock in trailers towed behind pickups, some coming from as far as Wyoming and Morgan County. Equestrian arenas are not specified in County Code and are not addressed in the ITE manual. Due to the large size of the facility and proposed events on weekends, the land uses that would be similar to the arena would be a church or commercial entertainment venue such as a theater. The arena can also be evaluated as a light industrial use and agricultural -commercial use. Current Weld County Code would assess a road impact fee of $1,126 per 1000 sq ft based on the church land use or $509 per 1000 sq ft based on the general light industrial (agricultural commercial) land use. A theater would be assessed a road impact fee of $4,524 per 1000 square feet of building. The current Weld County Road impact fee schedule, which is based off of the ITE manual, is comparable with neighboring counties and other rural counties in Colorado. The following is a list of other Colorado counties road impact fee schedules: Larimer County Church General Light Industrial Jefferson County Church General Light Industrial Montrose County Church General Light Industrial Mesa County Church General Light Industrial Discussion $2, 397 per 1,000 sq ft $2,247 per 1,000 sq ft $2,430 per 1,000 sq ft $2,060 per 1,000 sq ft $3,310 per 1,000 sq ft $1,800 per 1,000 sq ft $1,258 per 1,000 sq ft $849 per 1,000 sq ft The applicant was also informed in January 2009 that the fees contained in Table 20.1, Section 20-1-220 of the Weld County Code was developed in 2004; and that the Independent Fee Calculation will utilize current costs. Therefore, it is unlikely that the independent fee calculation would vary greatly from the existing road impact fee schedule and could in fact stipulate a larger fee due to costs of construction that have increased since the creation of the current road impact fee schedule. At this time Public Works informed the applicant that a Traffic Impact Study was a required component for the Independent Fee Calculation if the applicant wanted to pursue that process. The applicant has failed to submit a Traffic Impact Study for the project site. Recommendation The applicant has not provided a complete, consistent, or repeatable transportation analysis demonstrating that the Road Impact Fees charged for the Spicer Ranch Arena are inaccurate. Public Works recommends that USR-1633 Spicer Ranch Arena be assessed $509.00 per 1000 square feet, a total of $33,517.00. Page - 2 - of 2 August 18, 2009 MAPLANNING — DEVELOPMENT REVIEW \ USR-Use by Special ReviewVUSR-1633-Spicer Ranch ArenaVIndependant Fee 051409.doc GPROfessionals, LLC August 10, 2009 To Whom It May Concern Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE AUG 2891109 RECEIVED I have contracted with AGPROfessionals. LLC to process all work related to a Road Impact Fee accessed to Spicer Arena in \Veld County. AGPROfessionals, LLC is authorized to represent Spicer Arena throughout this process. Please apply S500 of the original S 10.000 deposit for the Road Impact Fee to the application for an independent fee calculation. Sincerely. Becky \leyring Spicer Arena ENGINEERING, St: RN:EYING, PLANNING & CONSULTING 4350 I[ighway 66 Longmont. CO 80504 970.535.9315 office 303.485.7838 metro 970.535.9854 fax wscw.agpros.com Address: Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley Ccl:rrado 80^31 Phone: (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540 Fax: (970) 304-6498 REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD IMPACT INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION STUDY AND SETTING OF ACCORDING FEES Date submitted Fee Paid: Receipt Project/Site Name Location: uk.) I-13 1 -a -\-On '001S Parcel # non 2i (x)CC)/mil Proposed Use:l?OpR19 tT(Q(c Size;Acres Anticipated Number of Users Projected Vehicle Miles Travel: Property Owner Information: f,,, Name: (L.1/20,C60-Mel t't►1C1 3-1 440 JC ► - CityiState:Zip Code: Ea, 1--oy 4sr0(ol 5 Telephone: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) Name: Lim A- K Address: 4 U (Qt City/State/Zip: 44064 00100 (10 T0s0t Telephone: q10 53c. -7-(45,s Phase of Land Use. J Sketch Ran J Change of Zone J Final Prat J Site Plan XI Other -4 intpac,-i- tP�' Roads) Access will be from (A)Cg 143 Proposed Fee AGPROfessionals, LLC DEVELOPERS OPERS u; AG;;ii'lll.it3R August 10, 2009 Monica Daniels -Mika Weld County Department of Planning Services 910 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Spicer Arena Road Impact Fees Dear Ms. Daniels -Mika: I am submitting the Road Impact Independent Fee Calculation Study as agreed upon with you and Tom Haren of AGPROlessionals, LLC. The fee calculation is based on the average number of vehicles per event at the facility per year which is approximately 28 trips per event. The vehicle -mile of capacity was derived from the Highway Capacity Manual and the cost per mile of Weld County road was supplied by Janet Carter in Public Works. Based on the Sec. 20-1-310. Formula, the calculated fee is S 16,470.59. See attached spread sheet for details. The original fee was based on the Road Impact Fee Schedule for agricultural commercial using a total of 65,850 square feet of building space; however, the agricultural commercial is as follows, Sec. 20-1-130. Definitions. Agricultural commercial means,,for the proposes ()/this Chapter. any nonresidential commercial development permitted by right in the .4 (Agricultural) :one district described in Chapter 23 of this Code, having less than two thousand Jive hundred (2,500) square J'eet o/floor space per lot. The square footage applied to the roping arena far exceeds the 2.500 square foot allowance in the Code. Spicer Arena would be willing to pay the agricultural commercial fee based on the commercial arca within the roping arena which is 3,200 square feet as provided in the attached documents and would generate a fec of S1.628.80. AGPRO was provided several examples of agricultural commercial classification of which the highest road impact fee was approximately 54.100 for an eight thousand square foot milking parlor and one facility was charged the agricultural commercial classification and a S333 fee instead of the S509 fee. The fee is not consistent for each application. ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, PLANNING & CONSULTING 4350 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80504 970.535.9318 office 303.4S5.7838 • metro 970.535.9854 fax w w.agpros.eom tG•rxgn.r. u.,l•. I.Ll Spicer Road impart Ice Study a .10_09 August 10, 2009 Page -2 -oft The fee being charged to Spicer Arena is excessive and not in line with other assessed agricultural commercial fees. Spicer Arena requests that the fee be assessed based on the provided fee calculation or based on the commercial square footage of the facility. You can contact me at (970) 535-9318 if you have any questions that I can assist in answering. Sincerely, /41- -1 • Tim Naylor Planning Consultant Cc: Becky h'leyring Janet Carter Spicer Arena Road Impact Fee Event Team Roping Practice Team Roping Weekend Jackpot Team Roping Weeknight Jackpot Barrel Race Weeknights Barrel Race Weekends Cutting Horse Practice Cutting Horse Event Open Ride Nights #Weekend Events/Year #Weekday Average # Average Events/Year Riders #Teams Average #trailers Total Trailers/year 0 20 30 30 600 6 500 75 600 20 150 30 600 0 26 40 30 0 12 100 50 600 4 50 15 60 6 40 25 150 26 20 20 520 Total 24 96 3130 Max Event Team Roping 4 Vehicles per hour 9 Peak Time Traffic / hour 0.2 VPM or vehicle every 5 min. Year 9 AVG daily traffic per year 0.4 AVG hourly traffic Fee Calculation Trips %new Length 10 28 100 VMT VMC CosLNMC VMCNMT Cost/Mile of Road CosWNMT Credit VMC Credit/VMC % Credit Credit $ net costNMT 140 1700 $588.24 12.14 $1,000,000.00 $7,142.86 1672 $598.09 98.35% $7,025.21 $117.65 FEE (VMTxNet CosUVMT) $16,470.59 Total Area Under Roof 200 x 325 Stalls - West Side of barn Permenant Portable Stalls - East Side of barn Alleys East \Vest Arena floor Return alley Total Arena Indoor livestock pens Tack Room Feed Room Wash Rack Hay Storage Bathrooms Childress play area Concession%eating area Office(s) 6- 12x12 12- 10x10 18- 12x12 10x325 10x325 10x225 150 x 225 50 x 65 25 x 10 25 x 10 25 x 10 25 x 10 20 x15 40 x 40 20 x 40 50 x 10 Total Commercial Area 3200 sf July 24, 2009 ROfessionals, LLC Monica Daniels -Mika Weld County Department of Planning Services 910 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Spicer Arena Road Impact Fees Dear Ms. Daniels -Mika: We are responding to the letter from Kim Ogle dated July 20, 2009, regarding Building Permit BCR08-01098 and the assessed Road Impact Fee of $33,517.65. Spicer Arena is requesting a hearing with the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section 20-1-340.B. of the County Code, to appeal the decision of the Director regarding this fee. Please notify Becky Meyring and myself of the date of the scheduled hearing. You can contact me at (970) 535-9318 if you have any questions that I can assist in answering. Sinceryly, /1e s Tim Naylor( Planning Consultant Cc: Becky Meyring �j Vicky Sprague ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, PLANNING & CONSULTING 4350 Highway 66 o Longmont, CO 80504 970.535.9318 / office L 303.485.7838 / metro n 970.535.9854 / fax n www.agpros.com AGPROIe,smnals. LLC 120 n Sib-rwta., kickAcidn 113, 1a:15 Mkt LA I) crNiA co._) tat st-nvil. 4(1,A -to -viz° bdat Q,rt` nom. pdv&suact.. esE. Usay Cl pi&ttr IIDc. COLORADO July 20, 2009 Spicer Ranch 37440 CR 43 Eaton, CO 80615 Dear Applicant: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 918 10 STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (970) 353-6100 FAX (970)304-6498 Building permit BCR08-01098 for a change of use for an indoor arena was issued on December 3, 2008, at which time you were also assessed a Road Impact Fee of $33,517.65. To date, an obligation of $10,000.00 has been paid. In order to rectify this situation, we require full payment of these funds immediately. We understand there was some confusion regarding the assessment of this fee in the past; therefore, we have extended your opportunity to appeal this decision. You must either pay the fee in full or officially appeal this decision and submit the corresponding fee and application within fourteen (14) days of the date of this letter to the Weld County Commissioners for consideration under Chapter 20, Division 4, of the Weld County Code. We have reviewed the assessment given to you on December 3, 2008, and affirm that an appropriate fee consistent with the Weld County Code has been assessed to your building permit BCR08-01098 for the use of the structure. An assessment for Road Impact Fee was based on an Agricultural/Commercial category, which is not only consistent with the use, and the code, but is historically consistent when reviewing other agricultural uses assessed in the past. Should we not hear from you within the next 14 days we unfortunately will be forced to begin revocation of your Use by Special Review Permit (USR-1633) and building permit. It is our sincere desire to work with you to resolution of this issue. Enclosed you will find the Road Impact Fee Assessment and an Independent Fee Calculation for an appeal for Spicer Ranch, as well as some recent assessments you have requested. Please direct all inquires to Monica Daniels -Mika, Director of Administrative Services, at 970-356-4000, X4210, or email address mmika@co.weld.co.us. I.Sinc Kim Og Interim Planning Director Pc: Tom Haren Ag Professionals LLC 4350 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80504 Address: 11`k. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 918 10TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970)304-6498 Transportation Road Impact Fee Assessment Chapter 20 of the Weld County Code Permit# i �KLJUI C`12 Case# 1,�- It/2-Z Date: 1 PropertyOwner/Tenant: 3pI 6/ Port 34O c�_ , co I CC 3foIS Situs Address (if different from above): Subdivision: Lot: Block: Property is located within Benefit Area# of /Section a--7 T 1 N, R � f W Total Square Footage: 21-7D Use: C�Cann )exf 9n I hi e-rCI Classification: A 1( (.. (U,1—�`I` re, I I ( n'ne-(cllc I /� �7 / Sq. Footage O4 �)=1000= % 2� x Fee ZV` .ov =$ J� ! `-e5 Classification: Sq. Footage =1000= _ x Fee _$ _ Total Fee assessed: $ /9 i r uc core 1 O 1 to io (t 0. p o £J l **The assessed fee is based on the information provided by the applicant on the use of the building. For office use only: 1 s` letter from applicant received: Sent to Public Works: Decision of PW: Fee Change (if any) 10 day to Appeal to BOCC: Appeal by applicant: Sent to PW for appeal process: BOCC hearing: Outcome: WF`PC COLORADO May 27, 2009 Becky Meyring Spicer Ranches and Arena 37440 County Road 43 Eaton, Colorado 80615 Subject: Field Investigation, USR-1633 Dear Ms. Meyring: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Greeley Planning Office 918 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us E-MAIL: kogle@co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3549 FAX (970) 304-6498 The Departments of Public Works and Planning Services visited this property on the morning of Tuesday May 19, 2009 for the purposes of determining if the proposed site improvements were constructed as the approved plans. Our findings are as follows: Culvert, Drainage Swale and Detention Pond Visual inspection of the property determined that the drainage detention pond was not constructed as designed. Further, the side slopes, top of bank and associated disturbed areas have not been drilled or stabilized with the Pawnee seed mix as proposed. The proposed concrete rubble rip -rap was not hand placed on site per the approved change order. The concrete rubble appeared to have been placed by front end loader and is not compacted, thereby not meeting the design intent of he approved plans. Staff will perform a follow-up inspection for these items. Cast -in -place concrete for the weir structure, including the metal top grates, riprap of concrete rubble and grading of the detention pond require rework, the County will require collateral to be posted for these line items and also require collateral to be posted for the stabilization of all areas disturbed by the construction, including the drainage swale, side slopes and edge conditions. Parking Areas The parking area has had several courses of Class 6 road base placed in areas associated with vehicular and trailer parking. Visual inspection of the property determined that approximately forty -percent of the site has material placed in situ. Additional material is to be placed and graded on site in all areas where vehicular circulation and parking will occur. Staff will perform a follow-up inspection for this item. On -Site Signs The "No Overnight Parking — WARNING Parking Lot May Flood" signs have not been installed and currently lay on the ground near the building. These signs shall be permanently installed in the appropriate areas on site, one near the access bridge and the second within the south parking area. The north parking area will not be posted. The "Trailer Parking" directional signs (2 present on site) and are mobile as the post is in concrete inside of a vehicle tire. This is acceptable. All signs will be in -situ and posted prior to release of collateral associated with this project. Building Ingress, Egress and ADA Standards There are several man doors present for this arena facility. Each has a door swing that swings away from the building thereby meeting the intent of emergency egress in case of internal emergency. The concrete 36" x 36" (3 feet by 3 feet) pad outside of the door does not meet the intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act as the pad is not of the correct size, the slope of the pad may be greater than allowable, and, there are no hand rails, no taper and no accessible ramp in place that would allow non -ambulatory or restricted ambulatory persons from effectively exiting the structure and moving away from the building. The area, per the ADA Standards has not been paved and is at a greater slope than is allowable. The property owner will be required to place stop blocks at each space to protect the building for intrusion by vehicle. The utilization of Class 6 road base in this location is not acceptable. This issue shall be resolved immediately given that the property owner continues to hold events in this facility. The Department of Planning Services requests that the property owner, their architect or their engineer contact this office immediately to determine the applicable approach for resolution of this issue. Landscape Treatment, Islands, Seeding, Fencing, Temporary Lighting As previously stated the side slopes and bottom of the drainage swale do not appear to be seeded or crimped. The landscape islands, consisting of double rows of wood timbers are not in place. Given the significant progress to the new improvements required of the applicant, this office will require the submittal of a signed improvements agreement and the submittal of collateral. Road Impact Fee Public Works in a Memorandum dated January 12, 2009 to Thomas Honn, Planning Director, recommends that USR-1633 Spicer Ranch Arena be assessed $509.00 per 1000 square feet, a total of $33,517.00. A fee payer affected by the administrative decision of the Director on an Independent Fee Calculation Study may appeal such decision to the Board of County Commissioners, by filing with the Director within ten (10) days of the date of the written decision a written notice stating and specifying briefly the grounds of the appeal. There has been no written evidence of an appeal of this decision, therefore the fee remains outstanding. This is a separate fee that requires payment prior to recording the USR-1633 plat. It is the intention of both County departments to work with you and your consultants to rectify these issues in a timely and orderly manner. It is also our intention to allow the continued operation of the facility, with the compliance issues identified here corrected and/ or resolved to a mutual agreed understanding. Should you have questions or concerns, please contact Don Dunker with Public Works at 970.356.4000 extension 3750 or myself, Kim Ogle, Department of Planning Services at 970.353.6100 extension 3549. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim Ogl Planning Services Enclosures, Old Format Improvements Agreement and Check pc: S. Arries, Attorney's Office D. Dunker, Public Works R. Hastings, Public Works T. Honn, Planning Services A. Siron, Compliance L. Dodge, Building File: USR-1633 MEMORANDUM COLORADO TO: Thomas Honn, Planning Director DATE: 1/12/2009 FROM: Janet Carter, Don Dunker Public Works SUBJECT: Spicer Ranch USR-1633 — Road Impact Fees Public Works received the December 24, 2008 letter from Casseday Creative Designs, representative for Spicer Ranch, requesting that the road impact fee for the Spicer Ranch facility be re-evaluated. That letter included the proposed traffic volumes for the Spicer Arena. Since the applicant has not submitted a traffic study for the project, we have evaluated the proposed traffic volumes and compared trip generation values for equivalent land uses in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. We also considered the consistency of the request with current Weld County Code as contained in Table 20.1 Section 20-1-220. The Spicer Ranch arena building is 65,850 square feet in size (1.5 acres). The applicant proposes holding special events in the arena with many participants in addition to hosting daily visits with relatively few participants. Participants will bring livestock in trailers towed behind pickups, some coming from as far as Wyoming and Morgan County. Equestrian arenas are not specified in County Code and are not addressed in the ITE manual. Due to the large size of the facility and proposed events on weekends, the land uses that would be similar to the arena would be a church or commercial entertainment venue such as a theater. The arena can also be evaluated as a light industrial use and agricultural -commercial use. Current Weld County Code would assess a road impact fee of $1,126 per 1000 sq ft based on the church land use or $509 per 1000 sq ft based on the general light industrial (agricultural commercial) land use. A theater would be assessed a road impact fee of $4,524 per 1000 square feet of building. The current Weld County Road impact fee schedule, which is based off of the ITE manual, is comparable with neighboring counties and other rural counties in Colorado. The following is a list of other Colorado counties road impact fee schedules: Larimer County Church General Light Industrial Jefferson County Church General Light Industrial Montrose County Church General Light Industrial $2,397 per 1,000 sq ft $2,247 per 1,000 sq ft $2,430 per 1,000 sq ft $2,060 per 1,000 sq ft $3,310 per 1,000 sq ft $1,800 per 1,000 sq ft Mesa County Church General Light Industrial $1,258 per 1,000 sq ft $849 per 1,000 sq ft Public Works recommends that USR-1633 Spicer Ranch Arena be assessed $509.00 per 1000 square feet, a total of $33,517.00. Independent Fee Calculation Public Works understands that the applicant would like to appeal the above fee. The applicant is requested submit a Transportation Impact Study prepared, stamped, signed, and dated by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado to be utilized by Public Works in conducting an Independent Fee Calculation. The traffic study shall include but not be limited to a trip generation model, current traffic counts on area roads, identification of travel routes to and from the facility, origin/destination of facility users, vehicle miles traveled, dates and hours of proposed operation, numbers of events, types of vehicles, description of facility traffic growth plans. The fees contained in Table 20.1, Section 20-1-220 of the Weld County Code were developed in 2004; however, the Independent Fee Calculation will utilize current costs and ITE guidance. Therefore, it is unlikely that the independent fee calculation would vary greatly from the existing road impact fee schedule and could in fact stipulate a larger fee due to costs of construction that have increased since the creation of the current road impact fee schedule. Appeal of Road Impact Fee Weld County Code allows an applicant to appeal the road impact fee as described in the Code Section 20-1-340 which states the following: A. A fee payer affected by the administrative decision of the Director on an Independent Fee Calculation Study may appeal such decision to the Board of County Commissioners, by filing with the Director within ten (10) days of the date of the written decision a written notice stating and specifying briefly the grounds of the appeal. B. The Board of County Commissioners, after hearing, shall have the power to affirm or reverse the decision of the Director. In making its decision, the Board of County Commissioners shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and apply the standards in Section 20-1-330 above. If the Board of County Commissioners reverses the decision of the Director, it shall instruct the Director to recalculate the fee in accordance with its findings. In no case shall the Board of County Commissioners have the authority to negotiate the amount of the fee or waive the fee. The decision of the Board of County Commissioners shall be final and not subject to further administrative appeal. (Weld County Code Ordinance 2002-11). UEC-24-20U8 WED U3: 4 111 WELD UUUNIY rLHNNINU hMx NU. ylu Ju4 b4d0 r. UI Casseday Creative Designs, LLC 55 South Elm Avenue, Suite 210 Eaton, CO 80615 PATE: PROJECT: ISSUED To: RE: DECEMBER 24, 2008 SPIDER RANCH LJ5R, 07-08-1 24 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMI ATTN: THOMAS E. HONN SPICER RANCH INTENOEL THE ROAD IMPACT FEE A To WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: THE INTENDED USE OF SPIDER ARENA WILL SE TO HOST VARIOUS EQUESTRIAN ACTIVITIES THROUGHTDUT THE YEAR. THESE EVENTS WILL INCLUDE, BUT ARE Not LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: TEAM ROPING, BARREL RACING, CUTTING, EDUCATIONAL CLINICS, AND OPEN RIDING FOR THE GENERAL pU LIC. ANTIDIPAYED TRAILER TRAFFIC WOULD LOOK SIMILAR TO THE CHART BELOW. TEAM ROPING CUTTING BARREL RACE EQUES. CLINICS OPEN RIDING 25 20 20 40 1C 15 50❑ B❑ 1000 1 0 375 4 25 10 25 TOTALS Q5 21 (AVERAGE) 2055 MOST IF NOT ALL OF THESE EVENTS WILL HAVE VERY LITTLE IF ANY SPECTATORS. MOST OF THE SPECTATORS WILL TRAVEL TO ANO FROM THE ARENA IN THE SAME VEHICLE AS THE PARTICIPANTS. Casseday Creative Designs, LLC A rcl,i teetitre — i4,i, sting -- Environmental Compliance •-Grnl rn ie IJ. a,qn (07(1) 454-8740 (970) 454-8742 fax whfl!rc.:u::::n,IgvCrodiew P,:ach ,,r..,,, - 1OO11,C.,�e. f,n Cr,a u,mhn::ign..rum UCG-C4-0000 icy ui.34 rll WGLV UVUnI I rut -mink; rnn PIU, CIU JU4 U4CU i VC THE ADDMAXIMUM IIHOCCUPANTS ADDITIONAL 1 00 OCCUPANTS FOR THE FUTURE OUTDDOR ARENA. WITH MAKING AN MAXIMUN TOTAL OF 250 OCCUPANTS. HOWEVER. ON ANY GIVEN EVENT THE AVERAGE OCCUPANCY WILL SE BETWEEN 50-100 OCCUPANTS. THE ARENA IS GB,BSO SQUARE FEET, BUT OF THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE 45,000 S.F. Is FOR THE USE OF THE EQUESTRIAN ACTIVITIES, OF' WHICH THERE WILL ONLY BE 2-1 ❑ OCCUPANTS AT ANY GIVEN TIME, THE REST OF THE OCCUPANTS WILL BE LOCATED IN THE REMAINING 20,850 SF. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING AND THE OCCUPANCY NUMBERS THE TYPICAL EQUATIONS THAT THE COUNTY USES TO ASSESS THE ROAD IMPACT FEE A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ARE IMPRECISE, FOR H THE ROAD IMPACT FEE FOR THIS PROPERTY BE RE-EVALUATED TO ADEQUATELY TAKE T INTO CONSIDERATION THE UNIQUE ASPECTS DF THE SPIDER RANCH USR. SINCERELY, JACOB AUGENSTEIN Casseclay Creative Designs, LLC A rchitectn re Planning — Environmental Ccant+linnee— Graphic 1.)evl lI (070) 454-Ii74U •- (970) 454:-8742 frS na rnmi): wt+vi.,.,inycrenl I n,•. P.•.ignn..• — r,nprn,Cnrxv I„ ic. vrnlix,.•UrI I,Qn s. c.vu C 4 ,,iM 4-A) SPICER ARENA Transportation Road Impact Fee do AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Highway 66, Longmont CO 80504 1 2 *Veekend rYlfa.loday Average r Av.rane_ Averse.I Events/Year EvantslYeaar Rides gleams (fags Trader•Areal EYso1 Team Roping Practice 0 20 30 30 800 Team Roping Weekend Jackpot 8 150 500 75 450 Team Roping Weeknight Jackpot 20 45 150 30 600 Barrel Race Weeknights 0 26 40 30 780 Barrel Race Weeitends 12 100 50 600 Cutting Horse Practice 4 50 15 60 Cutting Horse Event 8 40 25 150 Open Ride Nights 26 20 20 520 Total 24 96 3780 Team Max Event Roping 4 Vehicles pet hots 18 Trip Generation Rate (PM Peak Hour) 0.2 VPM or vehicle every 5 run 9 AVG (tarty traffic per year 0.4 AVG hourly traffic per year .., pt Hour Trips per Um: : AD square feet) INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS TRIP GENERATION RATE (PM Peak Hour) ono Canoes Itatst s fdraS Tap Per afr V; lWT at 1. IN - _ ___ >• Ld Trim !n 4.51 Fnsre Salsa s4 ea+r. Paell a as (awl twat, at .I Oen*tr.)-asst -ergs i4_ SF S� I=:VA et 1.. - 4I n _4%�� rst 4 as Il i lwDS Ili a aaa --.0' is i. efiat Diem tit DI Dad Cb tsian t1ararat Castro as *Si ]tD pi ,Pr a .tti l9 3t1 laaa rat Maa-eta rasa. t— Ear 22 Sea /.v aa- talnaaa astatNi a•I PaSolfir Ca F+oar Pdga tie I tr 3'J /TENNJ .S ea 11213 ze Casa Can raPIIII Casa Dsart Sir Olt tl -2_ at Ilia az Sit___424_ Mary aa, ry�p' ran I— Moil la rsaw 411 4V ht rats as aV a Ain Cu ('s as P.t taw 11C a'a Grtaome Pae.ra *la M h+�_ a 411 1►e111 rail Aga} t� OP (leas tai t N 40 anus Nt C CI ear Cat Gamy it en ores Cos at. al1ttssa (w� a*--W_I!Tmt kio^ias [a~la�Eva 31 Eva Casa 271 a wsAiww tiaras r Ot Pt 1-14Ia, SM fiMt fist 16 r.n v,la .. • ' ra se Mplas M . ,7as 413 ase at- Asa a bl(fPP� Mialasi tabsat ....Naar Yawl=a'.-al2,¢•J.C! to ,j tar! .7•at 'met l Nal CI Cara -. - ecuo an M idst lame t Can 2.16 42 Itts.OA 1m0 LID f�a anil ue. u>r t.It :at 1 MX h WM Arts 1tstMtM (elf sr ' q !}rtOd� t91ti U? �fY.al ar6Q1 Mir 31. t. Slane fast 10n IF 1 S >a lass' }eas le '-Si .9�Mt9rzfa tear. S CI .'�11 s ♦ 3R gran $ i ) SC I fa i PaYmr oa•ataan Say 30! _ISO O _ . mi es • 't a ,tete KAN :BQ.` 14 Nr Cs+t OP if alt IC tar wants 'Vent Ca 1.030V an 3 Section 20-1-220. B. If the fee is not specified in the fee schedule, the Director shall determine the fee on the basis of the fee applicable to the most nearly comparable type of land use on the fee schedule. 1. The County has a fee schedule 2. Sec. 20-1-220. B. The Director shall determine the fee on the basis of the fee applicable to the most nearly comparable type of land use on the fee schedule. 3. County Staff said "Precedence" existed for an Arena- pone presented. 4. Comparables presented all show mis-application or adjustment of fees or classifications • •a t.pn Leta — 1..i taaat r.et O.Y. J.J taw 'spar l...& Wr Lai lv(M. re Pa ...ea.a:.l 666 lib -O.; ,..•' La•a..al 1>,.o.t ,It— NS\ 666 6 ens Ss,(ti.l tetet U .. . 04.41 Me..a I. . .•► lyytalla • s.wPPP w tM to • 1 .. a. Sy rota Ilalpa4lu. a: aw• I ... I:1666•0 al _�t� t`+God ,t�Jl, tiro • Vw La lab tay a a_i•. w •..ratarta. try HOC se • $Ut M i.. • $.:w ta.aNa r1 111.1.. • $ talOI 6a.a .... YT .I a *V .1..- 66.-• 6. an.a• P. tYr^aa IaM.a • tlt t bets. paled W*., • Kt 6rsa ..ear se n a I:.1' �. 119 6646 el pee-aa.!t4.••. :as 6 rip. tra r... a.es.aar•.•11 Ua.. I aa---st.... a .11 aa..l • 4141 UT...ed. a.,-, 6. IS 6 166 PM.. • ta.!5 all as .a • War Ass Ms I6 .a a -D (lay sry a 111% 6.[x•66 I•d., a tt,lal that Sae es aim is lean tla•., • 11,. a'tea..r !* • 1I lal 4r•are.. Min • U" trans 1'aa•v OM ••• • P wWa Lys a•ettras Leta t as, aa.i•.1. 1044 • t'. Is. A7 cos. iti• rr Oatrt4 6ya N. A liar we d apatesetinara 4..d...n b SK* . rre.lj r « ..yw nee .,a4.i 1• b car flr tar tr $bmna d.•1 Gran tc 6c ca rr ►et, N Sc rs tiewale I., t► sett at. .auptaais 411ir oiled an is Oa fa .tyre The Dewier aL.C ba NNE la S.Sat N•as—C CM aT W lur+� I IANgSaa as anals fan t at Nara 4It rq.($wlal rt► U..—..iI-I. Isd b Ss ES.; Ta riawala T.p••m sttl .r no 14r.14+. sawn, I. et I TT Nast ,arb a rasa Ng by beU1 'Sea a adlyd* INetmaa J TrassavMei. ttd •ffstrwiTT Sc awai al a a Simms ?—till* 2 S_.. Sr 1. by to d a Ialpal►r Ittr .►vane deter as pros SA a Naas 4 see Murk tWiSCar Cale Ovens Yet I I: Wad tl.ar2 c.l► las* YM I) la MIDI Pt.Sea &Ns NNW, bs.ait.►t s AN Tann Itiol +••ai neat • IRN. O••aa•j £..l1aw krtlif tataaila'f tfnaet.•..• we awe csla•sorcs sy vaporer a re rts✓r erne alt =ran to 1. Na Kb SMat Nara A fln ra..a1 • Rin.bgar ea a it .i.Otna .S agrbs M alai be • Ns* d 1•Ir' ♦a 1 :Oa 4 Agricultural Commercial classification with a $333 fee DEDARfMEMT OF PLUMING fERWICE OS la'" STREET :#sn.. O3IeRAJ0 801531 WE85i1<...ror.�M cow PI IA& (ON 551.4 't EXT.ial0 FAX S15)X"-54 e Transportation Road Impact Fee Assessment Chapin 20 of the W.Id Canny Coos pernq ti % $ f j F t .•J_ t Crd1 ✓OMF It '� • `i. Papatyannadttnent-1'Itf . tww-fIt"") ffltll�'T mdresa f (1�,r i . - Yic` -161-1- kin) Yt' I .."'1_ Sas hair..aaiswat.tinwsst= ^ 7i' YC? L4 `W sAae.un PPIperly a kcaanaaalMtit itendaiMis. Secson Tod St}ifeetrsolili; T _ --tom C1t t ?.k-n'C• i t y I- f�, Utaxfua0tl A'- <C • ' Lot Omar, so-Fomat iow SC F«4tpe -t00o- Tout Foe sweat $ "Tho assested tot is baled ni. the InIamutlon pro Wnod by the applicant on the int ni Ins as rose w onto tt \rlf� artarat inceoe _ Sal b Pala Walt Mclean at Rv _- roe Charge It any)_ IC 'Lan loAepa s b acct _ Atywll br trage-ra Cent b POI lo appeal p wces SOCC Marc eilaora DEPUrrim T of PLASMIC URVRra 9fy lsmut . ce E'.tl: CrACRA.09 Situ A PSIILC —. case° tat hose sit' a'oe, ttlit;c FOX !?Tbl04Wia Transportation Road Impact Fee Assessment Charter t ef tM *&C recall Coax, s Poona: ll:'c`1 i.'tc ?i:•c _. - .-- r`_ o t c'ythirvste.tn f- )' ! i It t li -.., . t • c 3 - - Maca. - . -1 t t . t .` r ' iAL l :;,: S *Ajt1;' rl dtrc.el nWows 52ba fsi a rnopnt) a teal& triton panned A ,sat irsat...pi.nFooIage....:S. 1 L Lae l.il'2r F till."': £;. J, j nassetalinn iL' ki 'r F Y IC1 ' I '' ' sp Focrt�Qi ..: {_' . f of%k .1'�. x)ys' "_ ' X r$ 1 i'_ 1. - 5:1 f Mane tut.t rut,. escad.$ I J t'.L t' "The encased in abbots! on Uto talontrabon p.ovtdad Dy U.c 0119..scant on the Olio at I:.. *Font Fer rAe iot-natpc' . AWoaf Flose?soitys na:L Oar tlrewarAsoe AnsmuytrpKlvt SYdbP tEcaVom`" Aimed hM1YanSnub nsaaestart AWNSto MJC4 Fa. pot. 5 J awe COLORAP OFF eIST1rWT OF Ptwi.SNQ SPJFeltttt = 4es Ilfrats<f r iisC£eEt mews* eor P••C4C teltt 410C F aT 3540 raf ,-D7C14e-.Slut Transportation Road Impact Fee- Assessment C*.at. )J ut Lin ANit1 C-1400). CM+ tfbn/ee ia�d.,y_ t.:- [- Caro!{' L Frclury Ow wiTat✓i u [• •..t• .1, (.•r. / Si 4.SAttiY.slr1[hemsiIlan r 9) 2 ��tt?'rit0R - St J:cyerty a k•Gv4c Item Eten*it f ertalso.ate roetaGe •) sMr u{ ;JL I ' Li ( l - &) FaWp. "1..%•i -v •1 Xi(- �':i ! rice r -d '7:.' `S `_'. '_:an.t -afar •t.d1Ct- - rt�il rauFre*tsvesed'S -' r 11 ' 'The asessod bur le based on the tnhrmfibn provided by the apptt all on QN use of t Malang r7 tttu ate Fry- _ - i f.veflw/% as poi iaatlNct $' .. htr Clwn?alre +tceetlrfa_Nakt.t 3.e bRtee VRv - Jau .4pr`1H►C Villa sretem.t KNat ta bOCZ. rid earl Precedent Missing • USR #1540 — for a Roping/Rodeo Arena and a public and quasi -public building, including a church — Church Barn, LLC. June 2006. • USR # 1393 — for a Commercial Roping Arena (indoor/outdoor) — Beau Rappel. September 2004. 6 Sec. 20-1-30. Definitions Agricultural Commercial means, for the purposes of this chapter, any nonresidential commercial development not permitted by right in the A (Agricultural) Zone District described in Chapter 23 of this Code , having lass than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of total floor space per lot. tier Spicer Arena Transportation Road Impact Fee Assessment $33,517.65 S 1 O aa.ORADO oevlRTralIwPUNNING s He toll" &ZFE 7 (.'Raley. SISOP.S.DO K6%i - Minor. we. cowed emus P* OE (te) 3IFS.etcO, EXT S441 FAX !D7DpQt one Transportation Road Impact Fee Assessment Cs.t+er NJ of S. WUS Gatti Cal Psaie Df'C.i 1 1(`YG' ca.s E.L k _. Pniatyc. nfTTmanketc r`* .(: (T^rid - -U/ /doltsn• NIL - _.�- -I �-J' ii - :1 r / SLsAat en1Moon ban SvoC Sutartabn _� t,aisny Estates* ell en Dem&Mme ^ .-. - Seam" --. [ ' 7 N RL•t-, VI TodiSd are Foarce: f f __ u.: f1ti i1! -I112'.!! /a7 f SQ Fad.°D�f�-?` `t�'•;000-i.' /�`-"7-r rb.-=- :IL-X11-4'2'LP ;t- • sq. — lcts Fee act S 7`'.-47;t1!C "'The asewrdteo l bad on Ro Intorteillon provided bytsap0cw co tho us. et tho budding tK cale a.ttS) t• Meer Men spoken aedei: See m Putt Stair !).cac(!ot.F 5 9N nia- JJ. Yl-t rw inn?! (I nVL 'A dry in Nicol b POCC Marl OF .cckfl Sri b FlW b AVM' Gams eOCC taat.; 7 Road Impact Fee Assessment Classification- Agricultural Commercial Square footage=1600/1000sf=1.6 x fee $509.00=$ 814.40 Square footage=2500/1000sf=2.5 x fee $509.00=$1,272.50 Square footage=3200/1000sf=3.2 x fee $509.00457212-46 l,lo2-b Findings of Fact • Structure pre -dates fee, use not changed • Equine arenas are not in the code • Equine arenas are not in the ITE • Church/Theatre/Arena not applicable • Public Works determination not applicable • No precedent provided by county • Info provided as precedent inconsistent • No fee for prime examples • Fees Based on "Ag Commercial" portion only most applicable and consistent. 8 Conclusion • Findings of Fact / Conclusions of Law • Reverse Decision of Director • Instruct Recalculation in accordance with findings • "Ag Commercial" limited to 3,200 s.f. 9 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Greeley Planning Office 918 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us E-MAIL: kogle@co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3549 FAX (970) 304-6498 October 1, 2009 Tim Naylor AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 State Highway 66 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Subject: Spicer Ranch Arena, USR-1633 Appeal of Road Impact Fee Dear Mr. Naylor: The Department of Planning Services during the Appeal hearing on September 14, 2009 received direction from the Board of County Commissioners to return to the evaluation of the Transportation Road Impact Fee Calculation for the Spicer Arena, USR-1633. Representatives with the Departments of Planning Services and Public Works met with the applicant, Ms. Meyring, and her representative, AgProfessionals in an attempt to seek resolution. The position of the applicant's representative was to apply the fee to the Office and Lavatories, Concession and Sand Box areas of the arena structure only stating that this was the "commercial" component. Staff held a different opinion. Given this divide, a decision was not tendered which was acceptable to both entities on the date of the hearing, September 14, 2009. Given this lack of an agreement, the Public Works department developed an alternative assessment of the road impact fee, which was forwarded to the Commissioner Coordinator's for Public Works and Planning Services for review and comment. The Coordinator's for each department concluded that a fair assessment or applying the Transportation Road Impact Fee Calculation by application of Chapter 20 of the Weld County Code would be to assess the Arena floor, the Office and Lavatories and Concession areas only. With direction from the Commissioner's office, Weld County is requesting payment in full in the amount of outstanding balance. The applicant previously submitted a check for $10,000.00 dollars on May 21, 2009. At the request of the applicant, the appeal fee of $500.00 dollars was deducted from this balance on August 10, 2009. The remaining balance on retainer is $9500.00 dollars. The assessed fee is 663)14 i Catty 3 $16,848.00 dollars as outlined in the Scenario, less $9500.00 dollars leaves an outstanding balance of $7348.00 dollars. This outstanding balance must be submitted to the Department of Planning Services within ten business days of the date of this letter. Should this office not hear from you within this time frame, we unfortunately will be forced to begin revocation of Use by Special Review Permit (USR-1633) and building permit (BCR08-01098). Should you have additional questions or require clarification on any of the points presented herein, please contact this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim Og Planning Services Enclosure pc: Commissioner Garcia, Chair Commissioner Long Everwrkissiostsr-Rademachett • M. Daniels -Mika, Administration J. Carter, Public Works W. Inloes, Planning USR-1633 BCR08-01098 E [Scenerio: Road Impact Fee using Ag Commerical Fee Excluding Ag Areas (Staff Recommendation) N O V o O O in M M O LD N O O O O O O N O O V N n: O V O O $16,848 CU u- OOOC1O O O Ln O O O O O O O Ln O Ln OO y O i— (Payable Area I LO Ln V M N ti Ln La Ln ti M V1 N N Lf1 N M Ln N O Ln N O in N O Ui N O CO 0 CO 6 l0 ry 'C V LD N N-1 Unit (sqft) OOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O rH O O '-I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r -I O O r-1 O O r -I O O r -I O O '-I Total Area (sqft) 3456 O N ri O Ln co 31500 2250 O N M O N 250 O N 250 O CO O CO O LC) r -I 12644 Size (sqft) V a r -I O O r -I O Ln N M O O Ln r -I M O Ln N N 3250 250 O in N O Ln N O Ln N O o co O O CO O O LD r -I 12644 Amount Cr N N r -I N .-I r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r•1 r -I 'Area Uses 'Stalls Permenant 'Stalls Portable > CU Q 'Arena Floor [Return Alley Livestock Pens Tack Room Feed Room Wash Room Hay Storage Office & Bathrooms [Concession I 'Sand box al u tn N O D Hello