The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20092646.tiffRESOLUTION RE: APPROVE PRE -APPLICATION FOR UPGRADES TO WELD COUNTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM (COMMUNICATION TOWERS) AND AUTHORIZE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Pre -Application for Upgrades to the Weld County Emergency Response System (communication towers) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Administrative Services, to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, with terms and conditions being as stated in said pre -application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said pre -application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Pre -Application for Upgrades to the Weld County Emergency Response System (communication towers) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Administrative Services, to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the electronic submittal of this pre -application be, and hereby is, authorized. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 7th day of October, A.D., 2009. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the BY Dep' APPR County Attorney all the Boar David E. Long Date of signature: ibbideci BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUN1W. COLORADO William F. Garcia, Chair ou asa emac e ro- D gl d h , P Tem Sean P. Conway 110 1 01/n / evncvvLs) 2009-2646 F10049 / 1 /o (07 onitrig Wilk COLORADO October 2, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 521 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick, OFFICE OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PHONE: 970-336-7204 FAX: 970-352-0242 915 10TH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 On behalf of Weld County, one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the State of Colorado, I am proud to submit the attached grant proposal to enhance and upgrade our vital E- 911 communication infrastructure for your consideration under Senate Bill 09-232 funding criteria. Weld County has maintained a regional public safety communications center consisting of 44 partnering agencies since 1993. As a public safety radio system, we are integrated into the State of Colorado DTR public safety radio network. Our county has seen substantial growth since our current radio system was established and service demands consistent with that growth have taken our system beyond capacity. In response to these demands; and to ensure the vital communication and safety of our emergency responders, we are submitting this application for consideration. We hope our application meets the criteria of the granting process, and look forward to working with your office bringing this worthwhile project to successful completion. If you have questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Captain Mike Savage Director of Communications Weld County Government Attr4 111111c COLORADO OFFICE OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PHONE: 970-336-7204 FAX: 970-352-0242 915 10TH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 Project # and Title: Weld County Emergency Response System Contact Information: Contact Person and Title: Mike Savage Captain City of Greeley PD 2875 W 10th Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 350-9668 M ike.savage(a�greeleypd.com Monica Mika Director of Adm Services Weld County Government Address: 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 356-4000 Ext. 4210 mmika@co.weld.co.us 1. Description of Sustainable Community Development Project, Including Documented Need and Quantifiable Data: This project results is an overall upgrade, including simulcast technology to the E-911 communication system servicing Weld County and a portion of Larimer County. Specifically, funds requested for this project will be partnered with local funds to develop a multi -site simulcast radio system capable of being integrated into the state public safety radio system. The current Weld County system has been in place since 1983, and due to its age, accelerated regional growth rates, and advances in technology there is a need to enhance the system to ensure a long-term and sustainable commitment to safety for our community. Fundamental to this mission, is the enhancement of the radio equipment utilized in the emergency dispatch center for Weld County. Four (4) existing towers will be upgraded to simulcast delivery systems. This upgrade will improve coverage in those areas currently experiencing service delivery issues and reduce redundancy of messaging. The development of the new tower sites affords the opportunity to recycle equipment and upgrade other existing towers needing enhancements. The introduction of new simulcast towers, coupled with other tower improvements, will upgrade the service abilities of the entire system and greatly improve radio coverage along Weld County's northern boundary. 2009-2646 Simulcast technology allows multiple tower sites within a network to function as a single tower. In our current radio structure the towers function independently with the individual radio affiliating with the tower with the strongest signal. In a simulcast system the integrated towers function as one, broadcasting the signal from all the towers in the simulcast cell. In areas, with unique geography or man-made structures having poorer radio coverage, the non simulcast system currently in place does not provide sufficient signal strength to support public safety operations. When this system was built the emphasis was directed at the areas with the largest county population which was in and around the City of Greeley. In the years since the system was completed, Weld County has grown significantly in the south and along the 1-25 corridor. The growth necessitates the need for increased public safety operations including more radio system demands. In 2004, the center handled 266,341 police and fire calls for service (fire includes the ambulance calls), in 2008 this had increased to 356,976 police and fire calls for service. In 2008, there were 686,033 citizen calls processed through the communication center, which required service from 44 different responder groups. Unless, changed, through efforts such as this one, this situation will continue to degrade over time. 2. Description of Sustainable impact from the production of energy resources on Federal Mineral Lease land: As mineral production continues to be a viable industry in Weld County the impacts created by productions must also be addressed. Production in Weld County is not limited to the unincorporated areas, but rather, occurs throughout many of the 32 municipalities in Weld County, and as a result of direct distribution, a total of $6,373,581.75 was received by the municipalities and Weld County Government in 2009. The vast majority of these funds are used to ensure roadways most directly impacted by oil and gas actives are stabilized to support all users of the roadways. There are approximately 76,487.28 acres, or 119.50 square miles, of BLM Federal Mineral Lease parcels located in Weld County. Combined within this acreage is the Pawnee National Grassland, comprised of 198,000 acres. In 2008, Weld County received $55,421.70 from federal mineral distributions, and an additional $702,845.93 was received in 2009. (Exhibit A) Additionally, EPA has defined 24,432 acres on BLM land with solid mineral leases for uranium mine locations. (Exhibit A-1). While exploration on these sites has not commenced, the possibilities presented by exploration will clearly present unique public safety challenges. As recognized by our State legislators, energy exploration influences our communities beyond those impacts directly attributable to our roadways. While direct distribution funds may generally support roadway impacts, the vast majority of all other impacts created by energy production result in the increased utilization of general governmental support infrastructure, such as the communication systems. Specifically, based upon Colorado Labor and Employment data, we find that Weld County residents are employed by the mining/oil and gas industry at 2.5 times the rate of elsewhere in the State. Given that the oil and gas population is documented as being criminogenic (as illustrated by their own industry journals, law enforcement personnel, and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), it is safe to conclude that Weld County is at an increased risk of providing law enforcement and communication services at an accelerated rate to service this population. (Exhibit B) Of course, not only is this group likely to be involved in a crime, they are equally as likely to be victims of crimes and/or be in need of emergency services, all of which is provided through the communication system. Additionally, the owners of the 31,128.26 acres dedicated to oil and gas production are all too often victims of vandalism and property theft. Weld County is approximately 4,000 square miles, with a population base spread throughout its boundaries. Intertwined within the County are the ever increasing numbers of oil and gas wells. To date, there are 22,946 wells located in Weld County. (Exhibit C) The industrial nature of energy production presents an immediate need to access the count -wide emergency response system. To say these wells produce unsafe conditions is far from the truth; however these sites create industrial impacts presenting not only design and neighborhood conflicts, but the increased challenge of maintaining safety for the workers and general public. Unfortunately, accidents, such as unforeseen explosions, fires, and gas leaks are all too common in Weld County. While we have learned to minimize these impacts, since the LaSalle Lumberyard incident of the 1980's, the reality remains that, at times, these sites require immediate public response. Not only do the wells themselves require public safety and communication systems, but equally as pressing is the need to support the approximately 4,415 miles of existing pipelines. Many of all lines located within Weld County (1,291 miles) have a diameter of 12 inches or larger. (Exhibit D) Because of their unseen nature, it is the conveyance capacity of these gathering lines, dissecting the County, which greatly impact potential safety. As we have all seen in the recent past, an exploding pipeline creates insurmountable problems for public safety. Affording emergency personal the ability to quickly respond to these sites is critical to ensure overall safety and wellbeing. A time of a disaster is no time for a communication system failure. 3. Total Project Cost: The total project cost is approximately eight (8) million dollars. The E-911 partnership will match this project with two (2) million dollars, for a total project request of six (6) million dollars. As the project matures an exact budget will become available. 4. Type of Match Cash or In -Kind Status (Committed or Pending): The cash match will be provided from E-911 consolidated funds received from a telephone surcharge of 70 cents. According to Section 20-11-102, C.R.S., this is the maximum surcharge available without unique approval from the Public Utility Commission. (Exhibit E) $2,000,000.00 cash committed (via 2010 budget) funds Sustainable financial support is provided by the ten community funding partners. The estimated E-911operating (2010) budget is $3,948,098. 5. Funding Partners: Instead of developing numerous communication centers, as has been the standard model for our State, Weld County and forty-four (44) entities came together in an unprecedented fashion to fund and maintain one communication system serving the entire County. This agreement, attached, (Exhibit F ) shows the long term commitment and determination of a region to provide our citizens with a unique level of service and partnership. This mere action serves as an exemplary understanding of the importance of regionalism, and demonstrates our ability to sustain this effort for the past three decades. When faced with unprecedented growth and numerous challenges, the partners comprising this agreement have consolidated their ability to access funds. In favor of maintaining individual centers, the region has remained committed to a single point communication system, uniquely designed to address the collective good. In this fashion, Weld County government has, and continues to provide, direct financial support for all jurisdictions within the County. As communities grow, and increase in demand for services, they assume a larger funding commitment for the system. Currently, there are ten (10) agencies directly funding the E-911 communication center. Participation and funding for the center has been established based upon a level of calls. Weld County funds calls for services for all communities up to $10,000 per year. When service calls exceed this bench mark, then the communities pay for the increased usage of the center. Greeley $1,589,723 Weld County 1,349,831 Evans 8,341 Fort Lupton 5,427 Firestone 4,953 Windsor 4,642 Frederick 2,637 Johnstown 855 Dacono 832 Platteville 55 Based upon 2010 Budget Figures Additionally, all users of the system are responsible for providing and maintaining their own radio systems. Since 2001, almost seven (7) million dollars ($6,930,550.00), has been spent by local users to maintain individual radio communications. (Exhibit G) 6. Estimated time frame for completion of the project: This project will be a multi -year project. As proposed, the project will begin in the Fall of 2010 and be completed within one (1) year. 7. Signed Statements of Partners Berthoud Fire Protection District City of Dacono Town of Eaton City of Evans Town of Firestone Firestone Police Department Fort Lupton Fire Protection District Frederick -Firestone Fire Protection District Town of Frederick/Police Department Town of Gilcrest/Police Department Greeley Fire/Rescue Authority Greeley Police Department Johnstown Fire Protection District Town of LaSalle Lochbuie Police Department City of Longmont Mountain View Fire Protection District/Longmont Town of Mead Town of Milliken Town of Nunn Town of Pierce Platteville/Gilcrest Fire Protection District Town of Windsor 8. Exhibits Exhibit A: BLM Federal and Mineral Lease information Exhibit B: Crimenogenic information and support Exhibit C: Oil and gas map Exhibit D: Pipeline identification map Exhibit E: Section 29-11-102, C.R.S. Exhibit F: E-911 Resolution and Agreement Exhibit G: Weld County DTR Expenditures by Agency Exhibit H: Support letters BLM Federal Mineral Leases Oil and Gas Leases Producing Non Producing Authorized Leases BLM Oil and Gas Stipulations Communitization Agreements Other Agreements Unit Agreements Count Acres Square Miles 72 28,204.11 44.07 125 48,274.17 75.43 197 76,478.28 119.50 240 50,009.30 78.14 187 33,175.23 51.84 12 1,449.73 2.27 4 18,633.73 29.12 EXHIBIT 1 A Page 1 of 4 From: Paul C. Harvey Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:14 PM To: Monica Mika Subject: RE: Need your help with some information Monica, During our conversation on Thursday, I wrote down two questions that I thought could aid in your grant writing: 1) Are Oil and Gas industry workers more criminogenic? 2) What is the % of the population in Weld that are Oil industry workers? As for question #1, the immediate reaction seems to be a whopping YES! Ok, here's the supporting info: According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, from 02 - 07, deaths in the Oil industry rose 70%. According to an industry magazine article (looks like it has been pilfered from an uncredited source, but this same article is everywhere, what is important is that the Oil industry themselves printed this one!) appearing in Colorado Energy News, September 151h, 2008, "Experts blame several factors for pushing the toll ever higher in an industry long considered one of the most dangerous in the nation. Among them... rampant drug and alcohol use among workers, some of whom turn to methamphetamine to get through 12 -hour shifts and labor up to 14 days in a row." Next, appearing in the High Country News, a local paper for Paonia, CO situated in Delta County and serving the mountain counties, was an article titled, "Methamphetamine fuels the West's oil and gas boom", October 3, 2005. In this article, Sheriff Buddy Grinstead estimated that 20% of their jail's inmates were serving time due to meth related crimes. Many of the inmates themselves will attest to using meth to "get through the long shifts" on oil rigs. Yet a third article, "Methamphetamine use on rigs driving oil prices up", appeared in the Financial Times, Oct 18, 2005. In this article, "Ron Waldsmith, director of oil and gas training at the Mid -Continent Oil & Gas Training Center, said entire rig crews of up to 12 people had been fired for making or using the drug [referencing meth]." The Meth -Oil industry worker connection is a no-brainer. Spinning the meth -crime issue from there shouldn't be hard. I can keep pulling sources, but just let me know how many you need or how much time you want spent on this in particular. As for question #2, the Colo Dept of Labor and Employment has lists an estimated 3,032 individuals employed in the "Mining" industry in the Greeley Metro Statistical Area (only 544 in the subsection of "Oil and Gas Extraction") compared to 27,617 for Colorado as a State (with 7,939 in the subsection of "Oil and Gas Extraction"). Simultaneously, the Dept estimates Colorado's population at 2,513,900 with an estimated work force of 2.7 million (numbers don't match, I know, but this is the State's website!) and Weld County having a work force of 119,798. This gives us rough numbers of: 2.5% of Weld's employed work in Mining, compared to 1.0% of the rest of the State. In essence, according to the Colorado Dept of Labor and Employment, in Weld County miners and oil/gas industry workers are employed at 2.5 times the rate of the rest of the state. So, putting this together, we could say that Weld County residents are employed by the mining / oil & gas industry at 2.5 times the rate of anywhere else in the State. Given that this industry's population is a well documented criminogenic population as illustrated by their own file://C:\Documents and Settings\egesick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.... 9/30/2009 Page 2 of 4 industry journals, law enforcement personnel, and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, it would be safe to conclude that Weld County is at greater risk of crime from those individuals who work in this industry. Additionally, as the number of active well heads in Weld County is very high and the nature of the wells being that they are spread out both rurally and intermingled with urban areas, the risk of higher crime rates due to the mining / oil and gas industry as a crime generator is probably very significant. Is this what you were looking for? Paul Paul C. Harvey Crime Analyst Weld County Sheriffs Office 1950 "O" St. Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 356-4015 x2812 fax: (970) 304-6467 "Work for something because it is good, not just because it stands a chance to succeed." - Vaclav Havel From: Monica Mika Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:18 AM To: Paul C. Harvey Subject: RE: Need your help with some information Great to meet you, and I look forward to working with you on this project. It is going to be fun. From: Paul C. Harvey Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:45 AM To: Monica Mika Subject: RE: Need your help with some information Monica, I have the well head site data from Dan. I'll see what I can do in terms of our Calls For Service (CFS) and Crime Report (CR) data so that this won't become a nightmare; for instance, we've been averaging 55,000 CFS/year, so this can get out of hand in a hurry... I'll keep you updated. Paul Paul C. Harvey Crime Analyst Weld County Sheriffs Office 1950 "O" St. Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 356-4015 x2812 fax: (970) 304-6467 "Work for something because it is good, not just because it stands a chance to succeed." - Vaclav Havel file://C:\Documents and Settings\egesiek\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.... 9/30/2009 Page 3 of 4 From: Monica Mika Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:53 PM To: Paul C. Harvey Subject: Need your help with some information Paul, I spoke to John Cooke and he suggested that I get in touch with you regarding some information for a grant we are working on for the Crime Lab. I understand you are not familiar with this project, and I am happy to talk to you about this. The funds for this grant some from mineral and severance impact show we need to show a link between the crime lab and oil and gas activities of some type. Here are the questions, and I heard you can get the answers. My cell phone is 302-2725 and extension is 4210... Thanks for looking at this Monica h. Does the project duplicate service capacity already established? Is the service inadequate? (Has consolidation of services with another provider been considered?) N/A - This project does not duplicate an existing service, it helps to maintain an existing road network system. 6. Measurable Outcomes. a. Describe measurable outcomes you expect to see when implementation of this project is complete. How will the project enhance the livability of your region, county, city, town or community (e.g. constructing a new water plant will eliminate an unsafe drinking water system and provide safe and reliable drinking water; the construction of a new community center will provide expanded community services, or projects involving energy conservation, community heritage, economic development/diversification, traffic congestion) b. How many people will benefit from the project? (i.e., region, county, city, town, community, subdivision, households or specific area or group; or any portion thereof) c. How will the outcome of the project be measured to determine whether the anticipated benefits to this population actually occur? b. Brief Description of how this project addresses the Community's Documented or Demonstrated Need: 2. Project Significance/Demonstration of Community Need. a. Why is the project needed at this time? This project is needed to b. How does the implementation of this project address the need? The goals of this project are to ensure file://C:\Documents and Settings\egesick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.... 9/30/2009 Page 4 of 4 c. Does this project, as identified in this application, completely address the stated need? If not, please describe additional work or phases and the estimated time frame. Do you anticipate requesting Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance funds for future phases? d. What other implementation options have been considered? file://C:\Documents and Settings\egesick\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.... 9/30/2009 H 51 cI 1 O 9 0 d a tra a O bo a ----------------•••• • U) U -1 Ire -•••11.•••..-%. _ ci 1 Q IL a cP -EL_IC EP b 2 in it op El a,a� • r q RD C5 1a ❑ o s d cci Fria 0 ,r. 0 �iI 0 , El J II, O❑we0 -p C 4-,cn C C6 W ice U (n 7C L L03 in E • L Q, U - O .L Too _C � O N ciSo 45 1E C °° -O I— D CO �Q U� o c6 ckTs -2 o a CU — to rn CD C O c • o 1 9 0 . O 92 N o w O �. • 4J • r 73 C 0 4-I cc N (a C E_ co O > C cn o .,_, a•L U To �+ U N D 2 E d) 8O cr. o o co w (s C .c co 'r O O N.0 03 N (0 CD U O C C6 E a O m c O m 7 ESI I I I o H J.° ri :.d ❑ ❑ a ', U . 4,4 a , a !k (b§ |!c, , ■r! § t °\k/ 11111iikill r]\g22R A2,_mAotoEf; !}g(2�k)(){ �))'}| mf.�!««)rzsec \]|)!\o3ta»t( aE�!» !2;!0 »!!�3®»��§ 8-j!|2w29d«E fPJQEE CQZ{$ »�,f;§e)w-.- :!:;k:(!�)::( !\$•°a-,`��U caSO' mJo!!(, 2!r! - k!!)!!: ! " tgz »«fp$§§]7§f§ i :l2lzs $2 »a---zxeoiee g;|g!»%r- /2k2;§58§z||2 �------� --F .� L ■ isI III ma a m a a Cut. ,i■ • err ■iuruuia ■ ler LearEVIMI Ern fug AL waft • i tot gi rt!, r� rat_ !' § 29-11-102. Imposition of charge --liability of user for charge -- collection --uncollected amounts --rules (1)(a) In addition to any other powers for the protection of the public health, a governing body may incur any equipment, installation, and other directly related costs for the continued operation of an emergency telephone service as further described in section 29-11-104, and may pay such costs by imposing an emergency telephone charge for such service in those portions of the governing body's jurisdiction for which emergency telephone service will be provided. The governing body may do such other acts as may be expedient for the protection and preservation of the public health and as may be necessary for the acquisition of equipment, for the provision of initial services, and for the operation of the emergency telephone service. (b) If the emergency telephone service is to be provided for territory which is included in whole or in part in the jurisdiction of the governing bodies of two or more public agencies which are the primary providers of emergency fire fighting, law enforcement, ambulance, emergency medical, or other emergency services, the agreement for such service with a BESP or any equipment supplier shall be entered into by each such governing body unless any such body expressly excludes itself therefrom. Any such agreement shall provide that each governing body that is a customer of such service shall make payment therefor from charges imposed under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1), unless all such customers make payments therefor from general revenues. Nothing in this paragraph (b) shall be construed to prevent two or more such governing bodies from entering into a contract under part 2 of article 1 of this title and to establish a separate legal entity thereunder to enter into such an agreement as the customer of the BESP or any equipment supplier. (2)(a) The governing body is hereby authorized, by ordinance in the case of cities and by resolution in the case of counties or special districts, to impose such charge in an amount not to exceed seventy cents per month per exchange access facility, per wireless communications access, and per interconnected voice-over-internet-protocol service in those portions of the governing body's jurisdiction for which emergency telephone service will be provided. (b) In the event the governing body determines that a charge in excess of seventy cents per month is necessary in order to provide continued and adequate emergency telephone service, the governing body shall obtain from the public utilities commission approval of such higher charge before the imposition thereof. (c) Regardless of the level at which the charge is set, the amount of the charge imposed per exchange access facility, per wireless communications access, and per interconnected voice-over-internet-protocol service shall be equal. (d) The proceeds of the charge shall be utilized to pay for emergency telephone service, as set forth in section 29-11-104(2), and may be imposed at any time after the governing body requests such service from the provider or, in the case of wireless carriers, at any time after the governing body requests wireless ANI or wireless ALI from the wireless carrier. (3) Such charge shall be imposed only upon service users whose address is in those portions of the governing body's jurisdiction for which emergency telephone service shall be provided; however, such charge shall not be imposed upon any state or local governmental entity. (4) Every billed service user shall be liable for any charge imposed under this article until it has been paid to the service supplier. (5) The duty to collect or pay any charge imposed under the authority of this article shall commence at such time as may be specified by the governing body. Charges imposed under the authority of this article and required to be collected by the service supplier shall be added to and may be stated separately in the billings, if any, to the service user. (6) The service supplier shall have no obligation to take any legal action to enforce the collection of any charge imposed under the authority of this article. Such action may be brought by or in behalf of the public agency imposing the charge or the separate legal entity formed pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section. The service supplier shall annually provide the governing body a list of the amounts uncollected along with the names and addresses of those service users that carry a balance that can be determined by the service supplier to be the nonpayment of any charge imposed under the authority of this article. The service supplier shall not be held liable for such uncollected amounts that have been billed to the service user. (7) Any charge imposed under the authority of this article shall be collected insofar as practicable at the same time as, and along with, the charges for the rate in accordance with the regular billing practice of the service supplier. The rates determined by or stated on the billing of the service supplier are presumed to be correct if such charges were made in accordance with the service supplier's business practices. The presumption may be rebutted by evidence which establishes that an incorrect rate was charged. § 29-11-103. Remittance of charge to governing body -- administrative fee --establishment of rate of charge (1) Any charge imposed under the authority of this article and the amounts required to be collected or paid are to be remitted monthly. The amount of the charge collected or paid in one month by the service supplier shall be remitted to the governing body no later than thirty days after the close of that month. On or before the sixtieth day of each calendar quarter, a return for the preceding quarter shall be filed with the governing body in such form as the governing body and service supplier shall agree upon. The service supplier required to file the return shall deliver the return, together with a remittance of the amount of the charge payable, to the office of the governing body. The service supplier shall maintain a record of the amount of each charge collected pursuant to this article. Such record shall be maintained for a period of one year after the time the charge was collected. (2) From every remittance to the governing body made on or before the date when the same becomes due, the service supplier required to remit the same shall be entitled to deduct and retain two percent of said remittance. (3)(a) At least once each calendar year, the governing body shall establish a rate of charge, not to exceed the amount authorized, that together with any surplus revenues carried forward will produce sufficient revenues to fund the expenditures authorized by this article. Amounts collected in excess of such necessary expenditures within a given year shall be carried forward to subsequent years and shall be used in accordance with section 29-11- 104(2). Immediately upon determining such rate, the governing body shall publish in its minutes the new rate, and if the rate has been changed from the prior rate, it shall notify by registered mail every service supplier at least sixty days before such new rate will become effective. (b) The governing body may, at its own expense, require an annual audit of the service supplier's books and records concerning the collection and remittance of the charge authorized by this article. Public inspection of the audit and of documents reviewed in the audit shall be subject to section 24- 72-204, C.R.S. RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS CONCERNING E911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with Intergovernmental Agreements with various governmental agencies located within Weld County concerning the establishment of E911 emergency telephone service in Weld County, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Intergovernmental Agreements, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Intergovernmental Agreements with various governmental agencies located within Weld County concerning establishment of 5911 emergency telephone service in Weld County be, and hereby are, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Intergovernmental Agreements. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of May, A.D., 1988. ATTEST.: - � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS futnd4,t WE .y9 COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County 'C lark and Recorder and Clerk to the Board -G71nn,oI i t 1.AJ Deputy County Blerk APPROVED ,AS TO FORM: /1c ounty Attorney C/1000$ Gene R. Brantner, Chairman C.W. R Hy, Er -Tern 880403 Gkee/e/ MFMOLnNDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCEkNING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOARD. This Memorandum of Understanding concerning the intergovernmental agreement regarding the establishment of the Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Sevice Authority Board, is made and entered into as of the ,Z3 day of Ally , 198P, by and between the County of WetS and the City of Greeley. WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to instal' an enhanced 911 system to provide improved response capabilities to jurisdictions for public safety by establishing the "Weld 911 Emergency Tele?hone Service .Authority Board", and WHEREAS, both parties wish to support intergovernmental agreement establishing the Telephone Service Authority Board" to reduce seven members to five members. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of hereinafter contained, the parties agree as an amendment to the "Weld 911 Emergency the membership from the mutual covenant follows: Both parties agree tc support an amendment to Secticr III of the Intergovernmental Agreement for Establishment of the Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board to reduce the members from seven to five by the elimination cf a representative from emergency medical services and a member of the Board of County Conmissioners from the Board. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter rot forth. • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD IQIJNTY, COLORADO BY: iY Ant eharrman ATTEST: Weld County`'hlerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Bo- d eputy County erk CITT',,�F T,R LEY RX,J� !•. �I�i ayor ATTEST: City of G.ee1e Clerk 3Y:lehturt- /Met, -, CTty Clerk. t %i V'7 L"•11 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOARD TNs AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the ,/911- day of i Veen (N.4 , 1987 by and between the undersigned County, Municipal Corporations, and Special Districts WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11 of Title 29, C.R.S., as amended the undersigned County, Municipal Corporations, and Special Districts are delegated the power to enter into agreements for the purpose of providing 911 emergency telephone service; and WHEREAS, Part 2 of Article 1 of Title 29, C.R.S., as amended, encourages and authorizes agreements of this nature; and WHEREAS, it would serve the public welfare and be in the best interest of all of the undersigned County, Municipal Corporations, and Special Districts to participate in the organization, administration and common use of a central 911 emergency telephone service authority board; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement for the following purposes: (1) to establish a separate legal entity to be knowr as the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board" (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" which shall be responsible for administering the operation of the 911 emergency telephone service program; and (2) to define the manner in which each of the parties will participate in the Board; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties. as soon as it is technically and financially feasible, to commence installation of an enhanced 911 system which will include jurisdictions currently not receiving 911 service and provide improved respunse capability to those jurisdictions on the current service. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS The definitions for the terms "911 cnergency telephone charge", "911 emergency telephone service", "exchange access facilities", "governing body', "public agency", "service supplier", "service user", and "tariff rates" as used in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be the same as the definitions Page 1 cf 9 Pages 88C4(3 provided for those terms in Section 29-11-101, C.R.S., as amended. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS The parties hereby establish a separate legal entity to be known as the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board" (hereinafter referred to as the "Authority Board") which shall be responsible for administering the operation of the 911 emergency telephone service program as described. The operation of said 911 emergency telephone service shall be as herein set forth. III. WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOAPD The Authority Board shall consist of seven (7) members to be selected in the following manner: 1. One menber shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent law enforcement from a list of nominees submitted by cities and towns, except the City of Greeley and City of Ft. Lupton, but each such entity may submit no more than one nominee for each vacancy; 2. One menber shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent fire protection services from a list of nominees submitted by special districts providing fire protection and municipal fire departments, except the City of Greeley and City of Ft. Lupton, but each such entity may submit no more than one nominee for each vacancy; 3. One member shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent emergency medical services; 4. One member shall be selected from the City of Greeley by the Greeley City Council; 5. One member shall be selected from the City of Ft. Lupton by the Ft. Lupton City Council; 6. One member shall be selected from members of the Board of County Commissioners by the Board of County Commissioners; 7. One member shall be selected by the County Sheriff. 8. Members may be appointed to serve a consecutive term on the Authority Board, but no member shall serve for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The terms of all Page 2 of 9 Pages 8804,73 members shall be two (2) years and shall expire on the second Tuesday of January. 9. Nothing in this section shall preclude either the law enforcement agencies or Special Districts and municipalities providing fire protection from determining by a simple majority vote of all those nominatirg entities, the entities' choice(s) for appointment for the law enforcement and fire protection positions. Upon written notification to the County Commissioners of the majority's choice(s) for appointment, the County Commissioners shall make the appointments in accordance with the majority's choice(s). IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS The Authority Board may pass supplementary rules and regulations as it deems necessary provided the supplementary rules and regulations are in compliance with Articles 1 and 11 of Title 29, C.A.S., as amended, and this Intergovernmental Agreement. The Authority Board shall not be in conflict nor attempt to set operating procedures or policies for city, town, fire protection district, fire department, police department, sheriff department, or any county operated entity. 'l. POWEPS OF THE CORPORATIOV The parties hereto agree that the Authority Board shall be empowered with the authority to contract for the installation and operation of an 911 emergency telephone service and may pay such costs by collecting an emergency telephone charge for such service in the service area which is within the jurisdiction and authorized by this Intergovernmental Agreement and by ordinance or resolution of the respective parties hereto. The Authority Board is hereby authorized to collect an emergency telephone charge as imposed by the governing bodies of the respective parties in an amount not to exceed two percent (2%) of the tariff rate in those portions of the service area for which 911 emergency telephone service is to be provided. The funds so collected shall be spent solely to pay for the installation costs and for the monthly recurring charges billed by the service suppliers for the 911 emergency telephone service. The funds so collected shall be credited to a cast fund separate and apart from the general fund of any of the public agency parties or the Authority Board under this Intergovernmental Agreement. Any funds remaining in the account at years erd shall be carried over the the next succeeding year for the same purposes in supplying 911 emergency telephone service. If the 911 emergency telephone service is ever discontinued, any balance in the account shall be transferred to the parties to the agreement, on Page 3 of 9 Pages 880r3 a proportionate basis, based on main telephone station access lines within that agency's jurisdictions. In addition, the Authority Board may do any other act as may be necessary for the provision of initial services and for the continued operation of the 911 emergency telephone service including, but not limited to, the ability to negotiate with equipment vendors and service suppliers for the purpose of obtaining the benefit of technological developments which the Authority Board deems necessary to improve or enhance the quality and efficiency of 911 service to be provided to the users. VI. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Authority Board may create a technical committee from entity representatives. The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Authority Board. The committee shall make recommendations regarding the design, equipment selection, installation, maintenance and issues directly related to the continued operation of the 911 emergency telephone service. These recommendations shall be based upon the needs of the entities hereto. This committee has no authority to incur any expense nor the commitment of any funds associated with the equipment costs, installation costs, or any other costs related to the 911 emergency telephone service. VII. BASIS FOR CONTRIBUTION AND CHARGES TO BE IMPOSED BY THE AUTHORITY BOARD The parties hereto agree .hat the basis for contribution and charges to be imposed on "service users" shall be in accordance with the provisions governing the same in Sections 29-11-101 et. seq., C.R.S., as amended. The parties agree that the Authority Board may request from the service suppliers those figures required to impose a contribution or service charge and to make a determination of the contribution or service charge bases on those figures. The parties further agree whenever thoss figures are required for any contribution or service charge, the figures used shall be the most recent available at the time such figures are needed, unless otherwise specified herein. VIII. 911 SYSTEM OPERATING COSTS The monies paid into the Authority Board pursuant to the emergency telephone charge shall be placed in a separate designated cash fund with the County Treasurer and shall be paid Page 4 of 9 Pages 8804U3 from said fund only for system operating costs. System operating costs shall be defined as installation costa, equipment costs, repair and maintenance costs, and for the monthly recurring charges billed by the service suppliers of the 911 emergency telephone service. No disbursement shall be made from the funds of the Authority Board except by check or warrant and unless a verified claim for services or commodities actually rendered or delivered has been first submitted and approved for payment by the Authority Board, said approval being evidenced by the President and Secretary of said Authority Board, or by majority vote of the Authority Board. The Authority Board shall not borrow money nor shall it approve any claims or incur any obligations for expenditures unless there is sufficient anticipated unencunbered cash in the appropriate fund, credited to the Authority Board, with which to pay the same. The County Treasurer may invest any monies paid into the Authority Board fund only in accordance with any applicable laws of the State of Colorado governing the investment of public funds. IX. BUDGET The Authority Board shall prepare annually a budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law of Colorado. Each year in which the Authority Board believes funds for operating costs in excess of revenues anticipated from the emergency telephone charge are necessary, i= shall prepare a budget and submit a budget request to the Board of County Commissioners by July 1 of each year that this Agreement is in effect. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider funding the budget recuest in the County's anrual appropriation. Should funding from the Board of County Commissioners not be forthcoming, or if any funding so provided shall be deemed insufficient by the Authority Board, the Authority Board may then present its request to the parties hereto who shall consider the budget submitted and determine a basis for contributing to the budget request at that time; however, no party may be obligated for the payment of any monies in excess of the funds generated by the uniform service charge without its written approval. X. BOOKS AND RECORDS Weld County, under direction of the Authority Board, shall maintain adequate and correct accounts of the Authority Board's Page 5 of 9 Pages 880403 funds, properties and business transactions, which accounts shall be open to inspection at any reasonable time by the parties hereto, their attorneys, or their agents. The County shall cause to be conducted an annual audit, which audit shall be conducted by an independent Certified Public Accountant licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. The County shall provide a copy of said audit to the Authority Board and to the governing bodies of the respective parties hereto upon request. XI. REPORTS Within thirty (30) days after the end of each fiscal year as designated by the Authority Board, the Authority Board shall prepare and present to the respective City Councils, Town Boards of Trustees, Board of Directors of the Special Districts, and County Commissioners of Weld County, a comprehensive annual report of the Board's activities and finances during the preceding year. The Authority Board shall also prepare and present such reports as may be required by law, regulation or contract to any authorized federal and/or state agency or to whom such report is required to be made in the course and operation of the Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board. The Authority Board shall also render to the parties hereto, at reasonable intervals, such reports and accounting as the entities hereto may from time to time request. XII. DEFAULT IN PERFORMANCE In the event any party fails to pay its share of the administrative or operating costs then due, or to perform any of its covenants and undertakings under this Agreement, the Authority Board shall cause written notice of the Authority Boar3's intention to terminate said Agreement as to such party in default to be given to that party's governing body unless such default is cured within thirty (30) days from the date of such notice. Upon failure to cure said defaults within said thirty (30) day period, the membership in the Authority Board of the defaulting party shall thereupon terminate and said party shall thereafter have no voting or nominating rights as a member of the Authority, nor be entitled to representation on the Authority Board, and said party shall thereafter be denied service by the Authority Board. Furthermore, any party who is terminated under the provisions of this Section of the Agreement shall forfeit all right, title and interest in and to any property of or within the Agreement to which it may otherwise be entitled upon the dissolution of this Agreement. This article is not intended to 8804r3 Page 6 of 9 Pages limit the right of any party under this Agreement to pursue any and all other remedies it may have for breach of this Agreement. XIII. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the execution of this Agreement by all of the parties listed in attachment "A" hereto, and the parties entering into this Agreement shall have the option to continue this Agreement, subject to amendments, or until sooner terminated by a majority of the parties hereto. B. Any party's participation in this Agreement may be terminated by written notice from the party or parties to the Authority Board at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to January 1 of any given year. Upon final termination of participation, such entity shall forfeit all right, title and interest in and to any property, monies, and equipment acquired by the Authority Board. C. Disbanding of the Authority Board shall only be by mutual agreement of a majority of the parties to this Agreement. In the event of disbanding, the powers granted to the Authority Board under this Agreement shall continue to the extent necessary to make an effective disposition of the property, equipment and monies held pursuant to this Agreement. The property, equipment and monies, upon disbanding, shall be distributed according to the following priorities: (1) If any public entity possessing the appropriate authority indicates an intent to continue 911 service county -wide, then all property, monies, and equipment shall go to said entity; (2) Any entities intending to provide 911 service in a portion of the County shall receive a share based upon the percentage of the County -wide telephone accesses to be served; (3) If no entity intends to continue 911 service, then monies, equipment, and property shall be returned to the parties to the Agreement at the time of disbanding in proportion to their contribution during the duration of the Agreement. D. In the event that any party hereto elects to terminate its participation in this Agreement prior to the end of any period of this Agreement not in accordance with subsection 3 of this section, that any such entity shall be considered in default of this Agreement and, accordingly, shall immediately forfeit its entire interest in the 911 emergency telephone service. XIV. AMENDMENT This Agreement may be amended by the parties from time to time, but any amendment shall be in writing and executed by all the entities hereto. Page 7 of 9 Pages 8804^3 XV. LIABILITY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES The Authority Board as an entity shall indemnify and :hold harmless individual members of the Authority Board and officers of the Authority Board from claims or judgments of third parties resulting from acts and omissions attributable to the good faith performance of the work of the Authority Board. The County, as part of its contribution to. the Authority, shall purchase insurance to provide coverage for the governing board members and the Authority Board against suit or suits which may be brought against said members of the board involving or pertaining to any of their acts or duties performed or omitted in good faith for the Authority Board. The County may obtain a bond or other security to guarantee the faithful performance of the duties of the members of the Authority Board. XVI. NOTICE Any notice required to be given under this agreement shall be deemed to be made by dispatch of a register or certified letter, return receipt requented to the address of the entity below stated or as may be amended by notice to each of the other parties. XVII. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE If any provision of this Agreement or the application hereof to any party or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the Agreement are declared to be severable. XVIII. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and Venue shall be proper for any dispute arising out of this agreement in the District Court in and for the County of Weld. XIV. EXECUTION OF DUPLICATE ORIGINALS Execution of this Agreement shall be by execution of a separate duplicate original by each of the parties hereto. Page 8 cf 9 Pages 8804e3 IN WITNESS WRIREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COI]J!T!, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Aa a Deputy County Cletht BY: almaa 8804"'3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COHNISSIONERS WELD COJNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Du C Duty County Cie BY: BERTHOUD FIRE DISTRICT BY:2/ftL/Ii ry ed Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Hoard of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the -parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter ant forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C,QyNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: feu.na�.�,J Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board BX' C7;tyx„, u Deputy County - erk Atresr BY: Chairman Dnco.o 4400 PAd4-Ctrey Dis{aic'{ Page 9 of 9 Pages PAet 'ChM! 886403 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOM 82OOWOODO��g��myy0lJ'c OO/�'NM2MtMXPOMIRM BY: 44,02 a rman, a on Fire istrict ATTEST: Weld County(.tlerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy Count BOARD O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD //JJTY, COLORADO BY: aye SSt3S ' C airman Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804^3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNT. COLORADO 7 - „V•fi ATTEST: /- 44-44".`' Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Orit!-cpi 1. puty County Cle BY: ha runs g SAS GALETON FIRE DISTRICT BY:litWuresee.1Cit(.At1 r.,.9 f trilAti,,-). icy% 8804'^3 :N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COFDfISSIORERS WELD COUNTY. COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County CI"erk end Recorder and Clerk to the Board cBY BY: Flt-nt'#1 puty County Cle 44,40 BY: /t £ hairuar FREDERICK EIRE DISTRICT BY: 8804"3 Ili WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County C1Wrk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ;DDutty Cle FT. LUPTON FIRE DISTRICT BY: DoThwAhn President 880V3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATIEST: 177ILu Weld County C1Qrk and Recorder and Clerk to the Boar, At rt Aleta.J cjy�ditraaes/ _Litt) eputy County C tic BY: XI_athe thairnan enkt HUDSON FIRE DISTRICT D BY: C �e""� 8804f oil ',_n IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives co affix their respectCve signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board D pfy�y�t I l t County Cle JOHNSTOWN FIRE DISTRICT BY,4E;attiAfLi 8804r3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: �Zu!/Idli.(..if Weld County C erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ��..c.�/ lerl DDputtyCounty C BY: airman LASALLE FIRE DISTRICT BY: 8804°3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of [he day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board `4Y P)W/ft,vi duty County Cler BY: tha ream ,e eystt- LONGM.ONT RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT BY: C. dela ?X 8804'73 liken Fi IN WITNESS W}EREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures Fereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CODJ, COLORADO ATTEST: c Weld County CI rk and Recorder and CLerk to the Board 1:„ (2,14,4*) •D putt' County Cle MILLIREN. FIRE DISTRICT 8804' 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSICNERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: t lecunMttint. Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 07%q)l.s ar 41-11 ✓ D uty County Cler! yr /geed_ NUNN FIRE DISTRICT BY• Peec,rd&} 8804^3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO , COLORADO ATTEST: rtetheus rti,. J Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board BY: Cha PAWNEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ' BY: iii 880V3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Ctdrk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board `R •b,A , .,J �eputy County Cler BY: Chairman PLATTE ALLEY FIRREEQ DISTRICT BY: �a a...., 8804'3 :N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused near representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COIDIISSIOYERS WELD COUNT!, COLORADO ATTEST: rlMVia�f�ini Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board nwmti.ti Ta.,, s/ puty County Cler BY: ha anal PLATTEVILLE FIRE DISTRICT BY: Ktn -7A C. ( I ar. 88(!4"'3 IN WITNESS RTIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUj71R, COLORADO ATTEST: /%6n,,,,']7.eitA. ...1 Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board •Dekuty Couurn y C12sk •ai BY: ha mat POUDRE VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT 8804r3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto. as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CQUN T. COLORADO ATTES': TtAAL44 ti,. ) Weld County CYerk and Recorder and C:erk to the Board O7wm.. , D putt' County Cle BY: ChaIrma, RATHER/STOFEHAM FIRE DISTRICT BY: l -0.ry Cy(tw�F4.� 8804r3 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.C. Box 759, Greeley, Cclorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BMMUUMMXEMM 0VIDO M]pgIXIXIprif WYUDXXMBAdd xrOLDRIDM BY:_/L,�'i� Chairman S.E. CDT d Fire District ATTEST: 04µ1,1A 1 Weld County lerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO Y, COLORADO BY:� ,,,�� Chairman Clerk Page 9 cf 9 Pages ereffil„ 88047'3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures fereto, as of the day and year hereinafter sec forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board D-.uty County Cle BY: Man L t TRI-AREA AMBULANCE DISTRICT BY: u'�rtl ulSa.. 880413 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete ander XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CAU$TY, COLORADO BYs ATTEST: Weld County(blerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board i,'.s.) Deputy County Clerk hairman Western Hills Fire Protection District Board Chairman Page 9 of 9 Paces 88C4'' 3 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties vhen execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD "UNIT, Ch.,+RADO ATTEST: BY: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy Co nt erk ATIEST: By iye... Treasurer 4 ca.e-,U Page 9 of 9 Pages 2 88C4n3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County E].erk and Recorder the Board and Clerk to 9 -BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CD Y, COLORADO• BY: airman TOWN OF DACONO 88Q4C,3 E::ccution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, C)lorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice tc the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C,OUJ(TY, COLORADO ATTEST:�j BY: . rP.t.:.Utd([.fief Weld County'Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board • Deputy.. o i leek Deputy County lerk APPROVED.A9. FORM: City At orney ATTEST: Y h City Cle Cha dean �� APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE: Ci�tMaanna � CITY OF EVANS, CCLORADO -7 By: i r Page 9 of 9 Panes 8864^,3 [N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto hove caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTS, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clark and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 50-0,..0, yn, it/ yuty County Cle �ral CITY OF FT. LUPTON y/>�' p Q BY:.C-! i Mayor 8804'3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto. as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY CONNISSIONERS WELD COUNTY. COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 56-1 �Lounty Cles BY: � 14 CITY OF GREELEY aYs it eyor 8834"'3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter met forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board utYyCounty Clei BY: /ASS TOWN OF AUULT BY: /\• `d Mayor Sh 8804"3 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice tc the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, an of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CC��{��{//�''�� COLORADO —y�J--�� HY:�A[/� 1) Set hairman ATTEST: I Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ATT 4 City Clerk - Narie A. Baum TOWN OF EATON, COLORADO By: tW C1L-1. ,.,.._ Mayor - H.P. Christensen Page 9 of 9 Pages 8303^.3 Execution shall not be effective until -the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, an of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD 9JINTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County ATTEST: �r.,....... le BY: Chairman fw TOWN-OFFIRESTONE- `n - Mayor 8804^3 Page 9 of 9 Paces IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board (7i) Dep ty County Clerk BY: airman lc list TOWN OF FREDERICK BY: Mayor acad. Jn.m,, (et. k. 880r3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEiT: /' Weld County Clerk end Recorder and Clerk to the Boari v.; 0771 rA ..i De uty County C1e$k BY: glade' a lre4aR TOWN OF GARDEN CITY BY:ifrairt ,rte 8804x3 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties vhen execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD ��//Oo UNTY, COLORADO BY: t,,,, zS st„ C a rman ATTEST: Weld County erk and Recorder and Clerk to tho Board ATTEST: 1 a.A. fry y /�Ci, n i wn Clerk Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804"?3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ,pfuty County Cl r BY: airman TOWN OF GMOVER Mayor /I 880423 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CAUj7TY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board r' aY: 07h-tst, of eputy County SEAL Attest: ..LB ) errs BY: gm/Pt i ns t Chairman TOWN OF HUDSON, COLORADO btk sbLr, Page 9 of 9 Pages 880423 Execution shall rot be effective until the criginals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete ander XIII A. IN WITNESS 'AEREOF, the parties hereto have caused _heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF CJUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C nJ TY, COLORADO BY: 7_t! R i C airman r. ATTEST: l""}'""w'"" •t.ttM4[m) Weld County CI.e _rk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy Coun Clerk TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN, COLORADO BY: SEAL BY: `7erjINL Page 9 of 9 Pages L w Mayor 8804^3 Execution shall not be affective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties wren execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused :heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD '1NTTT,,' COLORADO BY: �(/yp� F/ i✓ c a anon ATTEST: Weld County dlerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County `Clerk PASSED, ADOPI:D AND APPROVED THIS , A.D., 1987. ATfFSr: 'La�C e IL ToWN yor /./U, DRY OF OF Ark wes l3L:IZG Page 9 of 9 Panes 8834':3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures kereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUJtfY, COLORADO ATTEST: �P.wna4t..tf Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board putt' County Clerk BY: n TOWN OF KERSEY BY: ccAt ICI, ,t"-.0«\ Nayot- 880493 IN WITNESS WUEREOE, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COI]{^TY, COLORADO BY: ai OJ[, e -t thairmar Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board uty County Cle TOWN OF LASALLE BY 1 \=a17 Mayor Y x04°3 i):ocution shall not be e_ `c:et.Cva until the originals are ft?r,i with the Clerk to the Tic -rd o.` C:•unr y Crr,,ai s r..:1'lr:or 751, Greeley, Colcrado E't.1 F.: i,i Clerk will Prcv°:� ne.tia• r rrtie,: wh, r:,ee..;t.cr. by .,ti t.erties in comp'.--.. .... IN Wlt ::S WFEPEOP, thr !-art:i.•n hereto have et u..... recro;.c ntat is to 'siz e..-., ,c I etive signature:: of thr, raav ..r..l , or ,licit,!;. of trr :;vt tort h. LCARD OF COUNTY CCU,"• C'S10NERS WELD QDJ:1NSY, COLOIt7. •J HY: ,7P.ulA.tJ County „nd U€ec...dcr and Clerk to the hoard Chairman I ATRCDUCEU READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED THTs / il',Y 6F eff • r ,.. if , 1987. 7 as • ATTE`d: •Ef •___. 1: TOWN OF LOCIIBUIE Ur•UN !:;1 1611 DIILY5ECDI:DED, PASSED ANC ORDERED IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE THIS DAY or -2fi1_1..i22L.taty.�__. _. 1987. AIUV! : "HAYO, r1-5- 1•.ntu 7 e: 9 T'aacs 638C4^3 IN WITNESS WREREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1/44 ATTEST: fh Tev4adf(,t) Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ,a. auty County Cler ATTEST: MEAD TOWN CLERK I TREASURER BY: ee ilc BY: TOWN OF MEAD BY:,4t %.te. / a (;660 �6% Mayor a 8804^c3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COJjN Y, COLORADO ATTEST: )2 Weld County Clark and Recorder and Clerk to the Board puty County Clerk BY: n TOWN OP MILLIKEN BY: Mayor 8804'13 4 3• ri IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CQgNyr, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board uty County Clerk By: hairsen TOWN OF NEW RAYNE.R BY Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution ay all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD QOJNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: BY: Weld County clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ATTEST: hairman TOWN OF NUNN, COLORADO \ 'LC —Town Clerk Page 9 of 9 Pages 88O1r3 Execution shall aot be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 756, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: MONROE . 4. 0f101000....* , t BY: �. talan �iJts , e PetneG.J wursocuuffusioccanioehaopuueeast shiecxxcewoueutmeonams Deputy -County Clerk 1 Rio...Le_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C NTY, COLORADO BY: ATTEST: Weld County'Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Beard t724 -Hide, eputy County'Clerk Chairman Page 9 of 9 Pages N ithrept 88043 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, at of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD fOJJNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: 4t %) Weld County`Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board l itnt-H4cs I Deputy County Clerk ATTEST.: nt✓ BY: Chairman I21 ens._ TOWN OF PLATTEVELLE, COL 0 BY: x224177/11.e.it Mayor Page 9 of 9 Pages 880473 Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide rotice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CTY, COLORADO ATTEST: BY: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board i �puty County ler JI • airman Page 9 of 9 Pages / u 0J= Selve7CNf1CG. 880473 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ' TOWN OF WINDSOR 'Bit ////44):.— 90,,..I Ndfor, o of Windsor ATTEST: By: Cf I !fa- ,Y tier- A.As Town Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C(Jj1NTY, COLORADO BY: ATTEST: Chairman Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the (Board tl . Deput y e {/al 4,9_,/County 1E erk 9 8804"3 Execution shall rot be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused .heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board By: puty County BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: ['-r j / Chairman' prot- BEEBE DRAW LAW AUTHORITY BOARD BY: tfXai Chairmanprofem SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 77th day of January, 1988. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Pubi My commission expires: 8/7/89 Page 9 of 9 Pages 915 Tenth St. Greeley, CO 80631 880473 PARTIES TO 911 AGREEMENT FIRE ASD AMBULANCE DISTRICTS: Ault/Pierce Fire District P.O. Bo: 463 Ault, CO 80610 Berthoud Fire District P.O. Box 283 Berthoud, CO 80513 Dacono Fire District P.O. Box 40 Dacono, CO 80514 Eaton Fire District P.O. Boc 582 Eaton, :0 80615 Galeeon Fire District P.O. Boa 697 Galeeon, CC 80622 Fred.,ri:k Fire District P.O. Box 129 Freder_:k, CO 80530 Fc. Lupton Fir= District 1121 Denver Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Hudson Fire District P.O. Bo:: Seven Hudson, CO 80642 Johnstown Fire District P.O. Bea "F" Johastcs-n, CO 80534 LaSalle Fire District P.O. Eoc 414 LaSalle, CO 80645 Lonrncrt Rural Fire Oeparr_enc 91:9 County Line Road Lonznont, CO 80501 Milliken Fire District P.C. Sox 55 Milliken, CO S0543 8.^Q"7^" Nunn Fire District 487 Lo;an Avenue P.O. Box 128 Nunn, CO 80648 Pawnee Fire Protection District P.O. Box 67 Grover. CO 80729 Platte Valley Fire District P.O. Box 281 Kersey, CO 80644 Platteville Fire District P.O. Box 122 Platteville, CO 80651 Poudre Valley Fire District c/o Poudre Fire Authority 505 Peterson Ft. Collins, CO 80521 9aymeriSconeham Fire District Pox 92 New Rayner, CO 80;42 S.E. Weld Fire District P.O. Box 5 Ror,gen, CC 80652 Pri-Area Ambulance District 350 Fotrtn Sestet P.O. Bcx 475 Frederick, CO 80530 ¶rester[ Hills Fire District 1804 Cherry Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Viudsor.'Severance Fire District 729 Malt P.O. Bcx 308 Windsor, CC 80550 MUYICFALITIES: City of Dacono 512 Cherry Street P.O. Box 186 [Iacono, CO 80514-0117 City of Evans 3700 Golden P.O. Box 59 Evans, CO 80620 City of Ft. Lupton 130 South McKinley P.O. Box 148 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 City of Greeley 919 Seventh Street Creole', CO 80631 Town of Ault 201 First Avenue P.O. Box 98 Ault. CO 80610 Town of Eaton 223 First Street P.O. Box 946 Eaton, CO 80613 Town of Firestone 150 Buchanan Avenue P.O. Boa 100 Firestone, CO S0520 Town of Frederick P.O. Bo:c 435 Frederik, CO 80530 Tow of Garden City 621 27th Street Road Greeley, CO 80631 Town of Gilcrest 380 8th Street P.O. Box 8 Gilcrest, CO 50623 Tow of Grover P.O. Boa 57 Craver, CO 80729 8804"3 Town of Hudson 609 Cedar Street P.O. Box 351 Hudson, CO 80642 Town of Johnstown 108 Charlotte Street P.O. Box 306 Johnstown, CO 80534 Town cf Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg, CO 80643 Town of Kersey 332 Third Street P.O. Box 67 Kersey, CO 80644 Town of LaSalle 119 Mein Street P.O. lox 717 LaSaLe, CO 80645 Town of Lochbuie 0152 Poplar Route 4, Box 99 Lochbuie, CO 80601 Town of Mead 441 3:d Street P.O. 3o,: 217 Mead, CO 80542 Town of Milliken 1109 Broad Street Lock Drawer 290 Milliken, CO 80543 Town of New Rayner 227 Baird P.O. Box 146 New Rayner, CO 80742 Town of Nunn 185 Lincoln Avenue Nunn, CO 80648 Town of Pierce 240 Main Avenue P.O. Box 57 Pierce, CO 80650 Town of Platteville P.O. Drawer 70 Platteville, CO 80651 Town of Severance 336 S. lot Street P.O. Box 122 Severance, CO 80546 Town of Windsor 301 Walnut Street P.O. Box 627 Windsor, CO 80550 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES: Beebe Draw Law Enforceoent Authority c/o Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Co 80632 COUNTY: Weld County Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 esOLr3 WELD COUNTY DTR EXPENDITURES BY AGENCY Air Life of Greeley $ 8,451.00 Ault PD $ 39,294.00 Ault -Pierce Fire Prot. Dist. $ 47,194.00 BRIGGSDALE FIRE $ 33,804.00 Dacono PD $ 103,839.00 Eaton Fire Prot. Dist. $ 111,488.00 Eaton PD $ 34,565.00 ERIE PD $ 19,719.00 Evans Fire $ 183,575.00 EVANS PD $ 151,434.00 FIRESTONE PD $ 133,612.00 Fort St. Vrain Security $ 79,535.00 Frederick Firestone Fire $ 218,492.00 FREDRICK PD $ 142,453.00 FT Lupton Fire $ 199,753.00 FT Lupton PD $ 114,790.00 Galeton Fire Prot. Dist. $ 80,349.00 Gilcrest PD $ 42,052.00 GREELEY PD $ 1,083,981.00 Hudson Fire S 135,188.00 Johnstown Fire $ 110,254.00 Johnstown PD $ 102,899.00 Keenesburg Fire $ 53,856.00 KERSEY FIRE $ 129,915.00 Kersey PD $ 28,928.00 KODAK FD $ 49,287.00 LaSalle Fire $ 102,843.00 LaSalle PD $ 35,379.00 Lochbuie PD S 60,111.00 Milliken Fire Dept. $ 113,114.00 Milliken PD $ 58,467.00 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE $ 57,529.00 NCMC $ 24,120.00 New Raymer/Stoneham Fire $ 58,194.00 Nunn FD $ 34,764.00 NUNN PD $ 13,371.00 PAWNEE FIRE $ 28,467.00 PLATTEVILLE PD $ 74,052.00 Plattevllle/Gilcrest Fire $ 141,586.00 Prospect Valley Fire $ 43,209.00 Roggen Fire $ 32,582.00 UCFRA $ 429,390.00 WC Corner $ 7,000.00 WC DISP $ 86,792.00 WC HEALTH DEPT. $ 28,170.00 WC OEM $ 11,268.00 WCAS $ 206,184.00 WCSO $ 771,919.00 WCSO JAIL $ 43,368.00 WELD AIRPORT $ 37,464.00 Weld CO Coroner $ 5,634.00 Weld County Public Works $ 546,556.00 Weld County Transportation $ 162,776.00 Weld Dept Social Services $ 10,008.00 WINDSOR PD $ 141,238.00 Windsor/Severance Fire $ 148,518.00 Gross Amount Spent $ 6,930,550.00 Support Letters (Exhibit H) Berthoud Fire Protection District City of Dacono Town of Eaton City of Evans Town of Firestone Firestone Police Department Fort Lupton Fire Protection District Frederick -Firestone Fire Protection District Town of Frederick/Police Department Town of Gilcrest/Police Department Greeley Fire/Rescue Authority Greeley Police Department Johnstown Fire Protection District Town of LaSalle Lochbuie Police Department City of Longmont Mountain View Fire Protection District/ Longmont Town of Mead Town of Milliken Town of Nunn Town of Pierce Platteville /Gilcrest Fire Protection District Town of Windsor • • Berthoud fire Protection District August 28, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance add upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely, • Stephen Charles Fire Chief Box 570 • 275 Mountain Ave. • Berthoud, CO 80513 (970) 532-2264 Phone • (970) 532-4744 Fax • www.berthoudfire.org • • CITY OF DACONO 512 Cherry Street Dacono, CO 80514 Phone - 303.833.2317 Fax - 303.833.5528 September 10, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, Colorado 80203 As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. The City of Dacono is proud of our partnership and support Weld County 100% on this application. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. Sincerely, IL ade Carlson Mayor of Dacono THE TOWN OF EATON COLORADO • • September 17, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: 223 1ST STREET EATON, CO 80615 PHONE: (970) 454-3338 FAX: (970) 454-3339 As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues -.long }he T 25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincgrely, Mayor Scott Moser .innoilecin./ed 1892 • • • September 14th, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As Chief of the Evans Police Department, I am pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Rick Brandt Chief of Police 1100 37th Street • Evans, Colorado 80620-2036 • (970) 339-2441 • Fax: (970) 339-5177 • • • FIRESTONE A COMIIIIINT, M MOTION August 26, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Mayor Chad Aue , n of Firestone • • Chief David L Montgomery www.ci.firestone.co.us FIRESTONE POLICE DEPARTMENT 151 Grant Avenue, P.O. Box 100. Firestone, CO 80520 August 26, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: Phone 303.833.0811 Fax 303.531.0271 As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. • • • David L. Montgomery Chief of Police Firestone CO 8052 September 1, 2009 • • jtvd e7'14e c?"tederliolv t 6 i 1121 DENVER AVE. EMERGENCY 911 FT. LUPTON, CO 80621 OFFICE 303-857-4603 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a fire chief in one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government .n munities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. Specifically, the Fort Lupton Fire Protection District has been impacted on several occasions by significantly large incidents as a direct result of energy resources. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application, which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill C•9-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. Fire Department communications are vital to ensure safety and efficient cooperation amongst agencies. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns ci.arently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continu:.d fu'LL re service to our citizens. Sincerely, r ' Phil Tiffany ' Fire Chief clef, cel "e/intinedie4r Cl/Jed „ FREDERICK -FIRESTONE • FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT • • OFFICIIPM. VENF6ATIO. PIETAS Office of the Fire Chief Office: (303) 833-2742 Fax: (303) 833-3736 E -Mail: tposzywal@fffd.us '4ESCUEI September 15, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Ms. Kirkpatrick; As a member of one of the most extensive and productive mineral producing regions in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. We are aware that with the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, 44 Weld County public safety agencies came together as a region to develop a countywide emergency communication system, for the purpose of enhancing response and mitigation of emergency situations affecting the communities we serve. We recognized then as today the imperativeness of having a centralized and technologically advanced point of communication so that the appropriate resources can be dispatched efficiently and safely to emergencies. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, a system upgrade is desperately needed to be able to keep up with the rising demand and classes of threats placed on our services. This essential upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. They hope to use these funds to further enhance the system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in our area of Southwest Weld County and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor, both of which threaten the safety of our responders and the citizens they protect. We thank you for your support of this effort and look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further our efforts to respond to those in need and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. If you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Fire Chief Ted Poszywak at 303-833-2742. Sincerely, mothy J. President, Board of Directors 31 Walnut Dr., P. O. Box 129, Frederick, CO 80530; www.Rid.us • • • TOWN OF FREDERICK 333 FIFTH STREET • P.O. BOX 639 • FREDERICK, CO 80530-0639 PHONE: (303) 833-2468 • FAX: (303) 833-2516 WEBSITE: WWW.FREDERICKCO.GOV Police Department August 26, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmissionequipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. Sincerely, //mil/Q�jjjJ,14 Gary R. Barbour Chief of Police • • • TOWN OF POLICE ////Gilcrest OLORADO FORGING THE FUTURE 304 8th Street • PO Box 128 • Gilcrest. Colorado 80623 • (970) 737-2426 • (970) 737-2427— FAX Chief Joseph M. McIntyre August 26, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concems currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. /aid Joseph M. McIntyre Chief of Police UNION • COLoN'Y FIRE RESCUE ADMINISTRATION Greeley, CO September 22, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: On behalf of Union Colony Fire/Rescue Authority (UCFRA), I am writing to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. It is my understanding that $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. • UCFRA provides fire, rescue and other associated emergency response in the City of Greeley and Western Hills Fire Protection District located in Weld County. In addition, UCFRA is the Designated Emergency Response Authority (DERA) for Hazardous Materials response in all of Weld County. Weld County is known across the nation as being a leader in the production of farm and ranch products. Additionally, Weld County plays a leading role in the production of energy resources and is one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the State of Colorado. These types of processes require specialized response capabilities and a coordinated response effort. UCFRA operates on a communication system developed in 1987 as a regional partnership with various emergency response organizations. This system is co -managed and operated by Weld County and the City of Greeley. Effective communications are a critical component of emergency response. The after action report of the September 11`h event show significant failures in the communications system. The continued expansion of requests for emergency service and the age of the current system cause concern for our future effective response capabilities. A much needed system upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. It is my understanding that these funds will be used to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. The Union Colony Fire/Rescue Authority thanks you for your support of this effort. Your support of this project will further ensure effective, safe and efficient emergency response throughout Weld County. Respectfully, Duane McDonald, Fire Chief 919 7th Street • Greeley, CO 80631-3967 • www.ucfra.org • Phone 970-350-9514 • Fax 970-350-9525 Mission Statement: "To Prevent Harm Through Professional, Compassionate Service:' City of / f' *Greeley Great. From the Ground Up. • August 28, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a jurisdiction situated in one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to support this application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, funds became available to assist local government communities most directly impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regional application which reinforces our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system. This partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to the age of the current system and need to expand to simulcast technology, the cost of the upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This equipment will eliminate the radio coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urban areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely `)1/4" Jerp9 Garner Chief of Police Greeley Police Department Greeley Police Department • 2875 West 10th Street, Greeley CO 80634 • (970) 350-9605 We promise to preserve and improve the quality of life for Greeley through timely, courteous and cost-effective service SEP-02-2009 WED 11:03 AN ESWC Sep OL 09 10:34a FAX NO. 970 356 3975 9705870337 P. 02 p.2 vn .... �, August 31, 2009 Susan B. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 .-�' 171l.rr?,. !7f'. -q, ynyt i,:r 2i Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties inthe state t t to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the 1 infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,' available to assist local government communities most directly and su . ' '•- production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks o current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication .: In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the • materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace o • . equipment and towers, and add communication co csld es. This in some new of egquipmennE t building coverage concerns currently being experience interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to wonting with yo regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts o the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to' you further at your convenience. Damn Rutt, Fire Chief c -. 5 e! -At -587-4477 we are pleased mmunication Is,000 became impacted by is a one time historical and stem, and this d an increasing at $7.2 dal application further enhance transmission eliminate the as and reduce on this worthy, the past and lay this matter with • • �i€ € 44a Salt 6614117 saao 128 N. SECOND ST. LASALLE, CO 80645 (970) 284-6931 FAX (970) 284-6983 September 9, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: TOWN HALL As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, the Town of LaSalle is pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely, Carl Harvey Operations Director JOCHSUIE� POLICE DEPARTMENT 703 WCR 37, Lochbuie, CO 80603 Phone (303) 659-1395 Fax: (303) 655-1755 Chief of Police Joseph P. Morris August 26, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Respectful submitted, Joseph P. Morris Chief of Police • OFFICE OF THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL August 31, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication •system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09- 232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely, eQ Roger Lange City of Longmont, Mayor MAYOR Roger Lange 303-772-0065 MAYOR PRO TEM & WARD II Karen Benker 303-774-7745 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ward I Brian Hansen 303-847-7186 Ward III Sean McCoy 303-847-6076 At -Large Mary Blue 303-772-3890 At -Large Sarah Levison 303-847-1647 At -Large Gabe Santos 303-774-1795 Longmont M-AmerlcaCity tI I' 2006 City Council Meetings: Tuesday evenings, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers 350 Kimbark St., Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: (303) 651-8601 Fax: (303) 651-8590 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 • FAX (303) 651-7702 August 27, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely, ark A. Lawley, rate Chief Station 1 9119 Cnty Line Rd. Longmont, CO 80501 Station 2 14308 Mead St., Unit B Longmont, CO 80504 Station 3 P.O. Box 575 299 Palmer Ave. Mead, CO 80542 Station 4 P.O. Box 11 8500 Niwot Road Niwot, CO 80544 Station 5 10911 Dobbin Run Lafayette, CO 80026 Station 6 50 Bonanza Dr. Erie, CO 80516 Station 7 P.O. Box 40 100 So. Forest St. Dacono, CO 80514 • • • Mod - "A Little Town With a Big Future" Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 441 Third Street Mead, Colorado 80542-0626 (970) 535-4477 Office (970) 535-0831 Fax August 31, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Richard W. Macomber, Mayor Town of Mead • • se ttkE two Milliken c +aFTIE# Town Hall, 1101 broad St., Drawer 290 • Milliken, CO 80543 • 19701 587-4331 • (970i 587-2678 fax September 21, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80205 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a municipal official of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, I am eager on behalf of the Town of Milliken, to state our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232. $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we joined to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing tite initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the 1-25 corridor. We appreciate your consideration of this worthy and regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. Sincerely, mes Burack Town Administrator & Police Chief Page 1 of 1 Monica Mika From: Jeff Pigue [jpigue@Iprconstruction.com] Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 4:23 PM To: Monica Mika Subject: E-911 communication Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick and Weld County Commissioners: As a member of Weld County and in the State of Colorado our community is pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance our E-911 Communication infrastructure here in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232 Funds became available to assist local government communities like the Town of Nunn. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regional application, this will continue the effort to upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In the past we have shown a willingness to work together to develop a countywide emergency system this partnership has remained strong in the willingness to provide a level of safety to all of our residents. Now as we move into an age of changing technology the current system is in need of important upgrades these estimates are in the several millions. As Weld County prepares these grant materials for the Senate Bill process for the partners, the hope is to use these funds to upgrade outdated equipment, towers and consoles. The new equipment will eliminate the expansion problems to the coverage along 1-25 and to the urban areas as a hole. We would like to thank you for all the support that you have given. And will continue to show. These efforts will keep the health and welfare of our residents foremost. Nita/ /1, Peete: Wevist Town of Nunn 970.897.2385 This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain infornation belonging to the sender which may be confidental and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e- mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this e- mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or e-mail and destroy the original message without making a copy. Thank you. 8/31/2009 • August 28, 2009 TOWN OF PIERCE 144 Main, PO Box 57 Pierce, CO 80650 Phone: 970-834-2851 Fax: 970-834-2755 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Mayor Craig Cleveland Town of Pierce Platteville/Gilcrest Fire Protection District September 23, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver CO 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: The Plattville Gilcrest Fire Protection District is a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. It is our understanding that with the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, all of the Weld County Fire Service providers and Law Enforcement Agencies came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment, replace aging towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you in advance for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Sincerely, Jot Gary Sandau, District Fire Chief 303 Main Street, P.O. Box 407 • Platteville, CO 80651 • 970-785-2232 • Fax 970-785-0139 215 Main Street, P.O. Box 43 • Gilcrest, CO 80623 • 970-737-2966 • Fax 970-737-9006 SEP-24-2009 THU 11:37 AM ESWC FAX NO. 970 356 3975 09-22-09;11:0 AM: P, 02 ;97o-000-7470 O 2/ 2 August 31, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, CO 80203 TOWN OF WINDSOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SRN E. MKS+AEls CHIEF OF POLICE Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick: As a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state, the Windsor Police Department is pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-' 911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of Senate Bill 09-232, $17,000,000 became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the Senate Bill 09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replace outdated transmission equipment and towers, and add communication consoles. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. Sincerely, Joitn E. Michaels Chief of Police 301 WAuarr STREET • WNosoR, CO 8O55O • OFFICE: (970) 686-7433 • Pax: (970)686-7478 • RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS CONCERNING E911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with Intergovernmental Agreements with various governmental agencies located within Weld County concerning the establishment of E911 emergency telephone service in Weld County, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Intergovernmental Agreements, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. POW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Ccunty Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Intergovernmental Agreements with various governmental agencies located within Weld County concerning establishment of E911 emergency telephone service in Weld County be, and hereby are, approved. • • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Intergovernmental Agreements. The above and foregoing Resolution was, of motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of May, A.D., 1968. ATTEST: Weld County"Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County lerk ounty Attorney C M 0006 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE 4 COUNTY, COLORADO Brantner, Gene airman C.W. Kirby, Fr -Tem Frank Y'magdchi 880403 • • • MEMOr..iNDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCEiiNING INTERGOVERNMENTAI, AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOARD. This Memorandum of Understanding concerning the intergovernmental agreement regarding the establishment of the Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Sevice Authority Board, is made and entered into as of the 23 day of inRy 1988 by and between the County of Weld and the City oT Greeley WHEREAS., it is the intent of the parties to install an enhanced 911 system to provide improved response capabilities to jurisdictions for public safety by establishing the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board", and WHEREAS, both parties wish to support an amendment to the intergovernmental aoreemen_ establishing the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board" to reduce the membership from seven members to five members. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the muti:sl covenant hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: Both parties agree tc support an amendment to Sect±_cr ITT os the Intergovernmental Agreement for Establishment of the Weld 911 Emergency Teiephcr.e Service Authority Board to reduce the members from ...ten to five by the elimination of a representative from emergency medical services and a member of the Board of County Con-missioners from the Board. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the: parties hereto have caused their representativeE to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: ECARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD Qrt1JjJNTY, COI-(`RADC BY: n Ld had' i rman Weld County`'Clerk and Pecorder and Clerk to the Ho • dy� • VfHHwti ..l.Zne.Lv' eputy County erk ATTEST: City of Greele Clerk t -.1°-t(14--. /1 BY : k.�erL-(.tu:- City clerk 0 C �! • • • INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOARD T 1ks AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of o . 1987 by and between the undersigned County, Municipal. Corporations, and Special Districts WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11 of Title 29, C.R.S., as amended the undersigned County, Municipal Corporations, and Special Districts are delegated the power to enter into agreements for the purpose of providing 911 emergency telephone service; and WHEREAS, Part 2 of Article 1 of Title 29, C.R.S., as amended, encourages and authorizes agreements of this nature; and WHEREAS, it would serve the public welfare and be in the best interest of all of the undersigned County, Municipal Corporations, and Special Districts to participate in the organization, administration and common use of a central 911 emergency telephone service authority board; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement for the following purposes: (1) to establish a separate legal entity to be known as the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Beard" (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" which shall be responsible for administering the operation of the 911 emergency telephone service program; and (2) to define the manner in which each of the parties will participate in the Board; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties. as soon as itis technically and financially feasible, to commence installation of an enhanced 911 system which will include jurisdictions currently not receiving 911 service and provide improved respDnse capability to those jurisdictions on the current service. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties agree a; follows: I. DEFINITIONS The definitions for the terms "911 emergency telephone charge", "911 emergency telephone service", "exchange access facilities", "governing body', "public agency", "service supplier", "service user", and "tariff rates" as used in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be the same as the definitions Page 1 cf 9 Pages 88C4'`3 • • • provided for those terms in Section 29-11-101, C.R.S., as amended. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS The parties hereby establish a separate legal entity to be known as the "Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board" (hereinafter referred to as the "Authority Board") which shall be responsible for administering the operation of the 911 emergency telephone service program as described. The operation of said 911 emergency telephone service shall be as herein set forth. III. WELD 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOAPD The Authority Board shall consist of seven (7) members to be selected in the following manner: 1. One member shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent law enforcement from a list of nominees submitted by cities and towns, except the City of Greeley a,:d City of Ft. Lupton, but each such entity may submit no more than one nominee for each vacancy; 2. One menber shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent fire protection services from a list of nominees submitted by special districts providing fire protection and municipal fire departments, except the City of Greeley and City of Ft. Lupton, but each such entity may submit no more than one nominee for each vacancy: 3. One member shall be selected by the County Commissioners to represent emergency medical services; 4. One member shall be selected from the City of Greeley by the Greeley City Council; 5. One member shall he selected from the City of Ft. Lupton by the Ft. Lupton City Council; 6. One member shall be selected from members of the Board of County Commissioners by the Board of County Commissioners; 7. One member shall he selected by the County Sheriff. S. Members may be appointed to serve a consecutive term or. the Authority Board, but no member shall serve for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The terms of all Page 2 cf 9 Pages 8804'3 • • • members shall be two (2) years and shall expire on the second Tuesday of January. 9. Nothing in this section shall preclude either the law enforcement agencies or Special Districts and municipalities providing fire protection from determining by a simple majority vote of all those nominating entities, the entities' choices) for 'appointment for the law enforcement and fire protection positions. Upon written notification to the County Commissioners of the majority's choice(s) for appointment, the County. Commissioners shall make the appointments in accordance with the majority's choice(s). IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS The Authority Board may pass supplementary rules and regulations as it deems necessary provided the supplementary rules and regulations are in compliance with Articles 1 and 11 of Title 29, C.R.S., as amended, and this Intergovernmental Agreement. The Authority Board shall not be in conflict nor attempt to set operating procedures or policies for city, town; fire protection district, fire department, police department, sheriff department, or any county operated entity. V. POWEPS OF 111E CORPORATION The parties hereto agree that the Authority Board shall be empowered with the authority to contract for the installation and operation of an 911 emergency telephone service and may pay such costs by collecting an emergency telephone charge for such service in the service area which is within the jurisdiction and authorized by.this Intergovernmental Agreement and by ordinance or resolution of the respective parties hereto. The Authcrity Board is hereby authorized to collect an emergency telephone charge as imposed by the governing bodies of the respective parties in an amount not to exceed two percent _(2%) of the tariff rate in those portions of the service area for which 911 emergency telephone service is to be provided. The funds so collected shall he spent solely to pay for the installation costs and for the monthly recurring charges billed by the service suppliers for the 911 emergency telephone service. The funds so collected shall be credited to a cash fund separate and apart from the general fund of any of the public agency parties or the Authority Board under this Intergovernmental Agreement. Any funds remaining in the account at years er.d shall be carried over the the next succeeding year for the same purposes in supplying 911 emergency telephone service. If the 911 emergency telephone service is ever discontinued, any balance in the account shall be transferred to the parties to the agreement, on Page 3 of 9 Pages 8804V' 3 • • • a proportionate basis, based on main telephone station access lines within that agency's jurisdictions. In addition, the Authority Board may do any other act as may be necessary for the provision of initial services and for the continued operation of the 911 emergency telephone service including, but not limited to, the ability to negotiate with equipment vendors and service suppliers for the purpose of obtaining the benefit of technological developments which the Authority Board deems necessary to improve or enhance the quality and efficiency of 911 service to be provided to the users. VI. TECHNICAI, ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Authority Board may create a technical committee from entity representatives. The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Authority Board. The committee shall make recommendations regarding the design, equipment selection, installation, maintenance and issues directly related to the continued operation of the 911 emergency telephone service. These recommendations shall be based upon the needs of the entities hereto. This committee has no authority to incur any expense nor the commitment of any funds associated with the equipment costs, installation costs, or any other costs related to the 911 emergency telephone service. VII. BASIS FOR CONTRIBUTION AND CHARGES TO BE IMPOSED BY THE AUTHORITY BOARD The parties hereto agree _hat the basis for contribution and charges to be imposed on "service users" shall be in accordance with the provisions governing the same in Sections 29--11-101 et. seq., C.R.S., as amended. The parties agree that the Authority Board may request from the service suppliers those figures required to impose a contribution or service charge and to rake a determination of the contribution or service charge based on those figures. The parties further agree whenever those figures are required for any contribution or service charge, the figures used shall be the most recent available at the time such figures are needed, unless otherwise specified herein. VIII. 911 SYSTEM OPERATING COSTS The monies paid into the Authority Board pursuant to the emergency telephone charge shall be placed in a separate designated cash fund with the County Treasurer and shall be paid Page 4 of 9 Pages 88041'3 • • • from said fund only for system operating costs. System operating costs shall be defined as installation costs, equipment costs, repair and maintenance costs, and for the monthly recurring charges billed by the service suppliers of the 911 emergency telephone service. No disbursement shall be made from the funds of the Authority Board except by check or warrant and unless a verified claim for services or commodities actually rendered or delivered has been first submitted and approved for payment by the Authority Board, said approval being evidenced by the President and Secretary of said Authority Board, or by majority vote of the Authority Board. The Authority Board shall not borrow money nor shall it approve any claims or incur any obligations for expenditures unless there is sufficient anticipated unencunbered cash in the appropriate fund, credited to the Authority Board, with which to pay the same. The County Treasurer may invest any monies paid into the Authority Board fund only in accordance with any applicable laws of the State of Colorado governing the investment of public funds. IX. BUDGET The Authority Board shall prepare annually a budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law of Colorado. Each year in which the Authority Board 'oelieves funds for operating costs in excess of revenues anticipated from the emergency telephone charge are necessary, is shall prepare a budget and submit a budget request to the Board of County Commissioners by July 1 of each year that this Agreement is ir. effect. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider funding the budget request in the County's anrual appropriation. Should funding from the Board of County Commissioners not be forthcoming, or if any funding so provided shall be deemed insufficient by the Authority Board, the Authority Board may then present its request to the parties hereto who shall consider the budget submitted and determine a basis for contributing to the budget request at that tine; however, no party may be obligated for the payment of any monies in excess of the funds generated by the uniform service charge without its written approval. X. BOOKS AND RECORDS Weld County, under direction of the Authority Board, shall maintain adequate and correct accounts of the Authority Board's Page 5 of 9 Pages 8804'"3 • • • funds, properties and business transactions, which accounts shall be open to inspection at any reasonable time by the parties hereto, their attorneys, or their agents. The County shall cause to be conducted an annual audit, which audit shall be conducted by an independent Certified Public Accountant licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. The County shall provide a copy of said audit to the Authority Board and to the governing bodies of the respective parties hereto upon request. XI. REPORTS Within thirty (30) days after the end of each fiscal year as designated by the Authority Board, the Authority Board shall prepare and present to the respective City Councils, Town Boards of Trustees, Board of Directors of the Special Districts, and County commissioners of weld County, a comprehensive annual report of the Board's activities and finances during the preceding year. The Authority Board shall also prepare and present such reports as may be reouirea be law, regulation or contract to any authorized federal and/or state agency or to whom such report is required to he made in the course and operation of the Weld 911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority Board. The ,'+uthorit_' Rnard shall also render to the parties hereto, at reasonable intervals, such reports and accounting as the entities heretc may from time to time request. DEFAULT TM PERFORMANCE In the event any party fails to pay its share of the administrative or Dperating costs then due, or to perform any of its covenants and u:u?ertakings under this Agreement, the Authority Board shall cause written notice of the Authority Boarl's intention to terminate said Agreement as to such party in default to be given to that party's governing body unless such default: is cured within thirty (30) days from the date of such notice. Upon failure to cure said defaults within said thirty (30) day period, the membership in the Authority Board of the defaulting party shall thereupon terminate and said party shall thereafter have no voting or nominating rights as a member of the Authority, nor be entitled to representation on the Authority Board, and said party shall thereafter be denied service by the Authority Board. Furthermore, any party who is terminated under the provisions of this Section of the Agreement shall forfeit all right, title and interest in and to any property of or within the Agreement to which it may otherwise be entitled upon the dissolution of this Agreement. This article is not intended to Page 6 of 9 Pages 8804"3 • • • limit the right of any party under this Agreement to pursue any and all other remedies it may have for breach of this Agreement. XIII. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the execution of this Agreement by all of the parties listed in attachment "A" hereto, and the parties entering into this Agreement shall have the option to continue this Agreement, subject to amendments, or until sooner terminated by a majority of the parties hereto. B. Any party's participation in this Agreement may be terminated by written notice from the party or parties to the Authority Board at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to January 1 of any given year. Upon final termination of participation, such entity shall forfeit all right, title and interest in and to any property, monies, and equipment acquired by the Authority Board. C. Disbanding of the Authority Board shall only be by mutual agreement of a majority of the parties to this Agreement. In the event of disbanding, the powers granted to the Authority Board under this Agreement shall continue to the extent necessary to make an effective disposition of the property, equipment and monies held pursuant to this Agreement. The property, equipment and monies, upon disbanding, shall be distributed according to the foilcwinq priorities; (1.) If any public entity possessing the appropriate authority indicates an intent to continue 911 service county -wide, then all property, monies, and equipment shall go to said entity; (?) Any entities intending to provide 911 service in a portion of the County shall receive a share based upon the percentage of the County -wide telephone accesses to be served; (I) If no entity intends to continue 911 service, then monies, equipment, and property shall be returned to the parties to the Agreement at the time of disbanding in proportion to their contribution during the duration of the Agreement. D. In the event that any party hereto elects to terminate its participation in this Agreement prior to the end of any period of this Agreement not in accordance with subsection 3 of this section, that any such entity shall be considered in default of this Agreement and, accordingly, shall immediately forfeit its entire interest in the 911 emergency telepione service. XIV. AMENDMENT This Agreement may be amended by the parties from time to time, but any amendment shall be in writing and executed by all the entities hereto. Page 7 of 9 Pages 88(/ 4' • • r XV. LIABILITY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES The Authority Board as an entity shall indemnify and cold harmless individual members of the Authority Board and officers of the Authority Board from claims or judgments of third parties resu_ting from acts and omissions attributable to the good faith performance of the work of the Authority Board. The County, as part of its contribution to. the Authority, shall purchase insurance to provide coverage for the governing board members and the Authority Board against suit or suits which may be brought against said members of the board involving or pertaining to any of their acts or duties performed or omitted in good faith for the Authority 3oard. The County may obtain a bond or other security to guarantee the faithful performance of the duties of the members of the Authority Board. XVI. NOTICE Any notice required tc be given under this agreement shall be deemed to be made by dispatch of a register or certified letter, return receipt requested to the address of the entity below stated or as may be amender'. by notice to each of the other parties. XVII. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE If any provision of this Agreement or the application hereof to any party or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions Dr applications of the Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the Agreement are declared to be severable. XVIII. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and Venue shall be proper for any dispute arising out of this agreement in the District Court in and for the County of Weld. XIV. EXECUTION OF DUPLICATE ORIGINALS Execution of this Agreement shall be by execution of a separate duplicate original by each of the parties hereto. Page 8 cf 9 Pages 88(24{'3 IN WITNESS W1L?REOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COljjiTY, COLORADO L ATTEST:! Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board b}1t�yt,ti¢� Deputy County Cle I • • 4) BY: hairman AULT/PIEB.CE FIRE DISTRICT BY: 8804?'3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives CO affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: if Weld County CIerk ai:d Recorder and Clerk to the Board eputy County Cie BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO NTT, COLORADO BY: hairman eYobiL BERTHOUD FIRE DISTRICT BY:9 8804'"3 • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the .parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTESTf Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 8 ! Deputy County Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD NTY, COLORADO BY: Chairman pncono fade', F=tae PAKa-.7 1 0/:t Page 9 of 9 Panes 8804^3 • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: P i„LJ Weld Countylerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 1 r\ J Deputy County' -Clerk BY: x airman, aton Fire District BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD Q1 TY, COLORADO BY: A/05 "S"-g4I711: Chaixman Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804"'3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board By 1C puty County Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNT! , COLORADO EY: harcaao GALETON FIRE DISTRICT BY: a.;A+.E CAA\ g . tia-•igrc 8804"3 • • • :N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: pit) W 1 Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 1OL, L [eputy County Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: hairmar FREDERICK %FIRE DISTRICT �,L_% BY: �(/� �,e 6C� V Re 1s�oar{/ /X 880V3 • • • TN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: c.rt44t/114"-J Weld County CIL{rk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board • uty County Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO NY: FT. LUPTON FIRE DISTRICT BY: )gyp*,.el.•LA3 't-0-4.c.,.wcti.� Presid&nr SS04f..3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and ear hereinafter set forth. LI ATTEST: 1 72�.(.:,+- jP.t.t,t/I /�(F.(I r IIf /Q Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Boarc eputy County Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO HUDSON FIRE DISTRICT BY: ti�r� 8804'` 3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respectve signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board D 1 puty County Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO E?: IWJ 1j: 'Chairman JOHNSTOWN FTRF. DISTRICT 8804"' a • • • IN WITNESS WiEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and rear hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County C erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board D putt' County Clear BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO RY: hairmen A/Aid- LASALLE FIRE DISTRICT BY: 6804f)3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, [he parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and »ear hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Hoard DIvey County Cl er BOARD OF COUNTY COM.NISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: IVY e torah LONCONT RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT BY: Th f �ru/J a 8804"3 • • • IN WITNESS WIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures tereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County Cie BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VELD COUJ4TY, COLORADO BY: Chairman MILLIKEN FIRE DISTRICT 8804'`3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter eet forth. ATTEST: Weld County C4ferk and Recorder. and Clerk to the Board Deuty County Cler BOARD OF COUNTY COP44ISSICNERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO NUTTY FIRE DISTRICT BY: 88C4"'3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: tiei,,teLceitelfr 44‘ Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board D puty County Cle k BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: Cha rma iff /5yal PAWNEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BY: LOLLY'1L 111d.6A) 8804?3 • • 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respertive signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: �PJ Weld County Crk and Recorder and Clark to the Board eputy CountyClerk- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO HY: Chairman PLATTE 'ALLEY FIRE DISTRICT BY: • • • :N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto nave caused t..eir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: rl Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board tlgtidAdL1 (�BY J �eputy County Clerk •l BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTT, COLORADO BY: ha rman PLATTEVILLE FIRE DISTRICT BY! 8804'3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter sat forth. ATTEST: re(i(iy victlui:I�. 1 Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board (____,� ‘,13Y: D uty County Cl k BOARD OF :OUP:TY COMMISSIOYFRS WELD COUITY, COLORADO BY: haTrmar. POUDRE VALLEY FIRE DISTEICT 8Q' Ci,V3 • • • [N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: itM.h::-Al wn467e. Weld County C erk and Recorder and C:erk co the Board CAL --R) 0-lKm Lr CA Lx4.2 '4 -puts County Clekk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: Chairman RAYMER/STOFEHAM FIRE DISTRICT BY: 0,CLA3yQ r• Q� 8504r • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.C. Box 753, Greeley, Cclorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BDXMOINXItIRMI XDDIOXISSIUDIC SIS IQEDNUSUNNI4XfiDSDMIDIO ATTEST: _44.44 / P.ut l s I Weld County (Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board eputy Count BY: Chairman, S.E. ld Fire District BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COLIN Y, COLORADO BY: Page 9 cf 9 Pages itori Chairman 8804'�,3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respec_ive signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. 1 ATTEST: �� Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Dekuty County Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTt, COLORADO BY: hairsaa TEI-AREA A MULANCE DISTRICT BY!y{., tr 71 r r�1 n�d• • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused .heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CQlUWTY, COLORADO BY: ATTEST: JP ` euvtke,"J • Weld County and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County Z`lerk hairman Western Hills Fire Protection District Board Chairman Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804 '3 • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, ac of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County vClerJ and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County lerk ATTEST: Tree surer BOARD iF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS /frIELD ' UNTY, C +RADO BY: WINDSOVERANCE FIRE PROTECTION DIET DY: Page 9 of 9 Panes 88O1'3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth.. HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO -Y, COLORADO • rm ATTEST: i°v,A;‘l Weld County 'lerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Hoard 'Syr— ,97X—Act_v eputy County lerk 9 BY: haIrman TOWN OF DACoNO r !4. ayor S8Q4^3 • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Boe.rd of County Commissioners, P.O. Sox 758, Greeley, CDlorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice tc the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST:>,itR.� Weld County`Clcrk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County clerk AFPROVED_h44. T[y FORM: 4:7 --fete.::( %It•y4 City Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CPU){TY, COLORADO BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE: City Mena;e CITY OF EVANS, CCLORADO Hy: --7 Page 9 of 9 Panes 88C4',3 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ?uty County Cle City Cle BOARD OF COUNTY COPT:ISSIONF.RS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: awl hafrman CITY OF FT, LUPTON BY: ./.Y" Mayor 8804'3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: 1.(�t.r QAA AkJ U Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board eputy County Clet BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: hairman� CITY OF GREELEY BY: ^ eyor 8804^3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. /1(ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board De'uty County BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: TOWN OF ALT BY: Ed Mayor 880114's3 • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice tc the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD Y, COLORADO BY: r02J157174,7t Chairman ATTEST: Weld Cc.uny Clerk and Recorder and Cl'ri: to the Board eputy County erk TOWN OF EATON, COLORADO By: C .—J64,.. ATT ST: Mayor - H.P. Christensen U" �-. ✓ ��% v7CLs City Clerk - Marie A. Baum Page 9 of 9 Paces 8301'3 • • • Execution shall not be effecti'ie until -the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to :he parties when execution oy all parties is complete •snder XIII A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused :heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board O71,17L ±< JL eputv County lerk ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD (jINTY, COLORADO BY: Chairman T0}4N- OF f IREST0NE , ayor - Page 9 of 9 Paces 8804"3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder nr,d Clerk to the Board Deoity County Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: hairman TOWN OF FREDERICK BY: Mayor Ut n atAk 8804P3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTE3T: /Jr Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Boari BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TOWN OF GARDEN CITY BY: Alyor 8804x'3 • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to .the Board of County Commissioners, P.Q. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632, Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County clerk• and Recorder and Clerk to the Board epu/�ty County C-•rk Towtv.00 a,I eesr By: ay r • LI, r ATTEST: T wn Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: Chairman Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804°3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk an Recorder and Clerk to the Board ey CounCy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CQUNfY, COLORADO BY: hairman TOWN OF GFOVER BY: Mayor �. 8864"' • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures heretc, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C U TY, BY: Irg Chairman ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board SEAL Attest.: (gcit) eputy County 1erk TOWN OF HUDSON, COLORADO QM. &A Mayor Page 9 of 9 Pages 8804"' 3 • • • E::ccution shall rot be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all parties is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused .heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CTY, COLORADO BY: ATTEST: 1 n<,MT,(1,i.rth�7l*r,., Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board — Deputy Count • Clerk w9 BY at' 'f bit3 SEAL Clerk, Chairman �i TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN, COLORADO a eas. Page y of 9 Pages 88C4'3 • • • Execution shall not be effective until the originals are filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissicners, P.O. Pox 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. Said Clerk will provide notice to the parties when execution by all pantie: is complete under XIII A. IN WITNESS RHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused :heir representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD QQUNTY, COLORADO BY: ATTEST: :ham:.., Weld County clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board 1Deput_y County lerk C airman PASSED. ADUYIED AND APPROVED THIS /fj/t t. DAY OF A.D., 1987. A LEST: roowN OP XehNCs c�LtrG Mayor Page 9 of 9 Pages t38U4'3 4"3 • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board eputy County Cler BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY; hd'lrman 1?6i41L TOWN OF KERSEY BY: MayorU 880403 • • i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their representatives to affix their respective signatures hereto, as of the day and year hereinafter set forth. Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board ,uty County Cle k BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COTY, COLORADO BY: Chairmar. TOWN OF LASALLE BYQ� Mayor M 7 8804('3 N N 0 O N N 2010 Estimate LA LID 03 413 U3 0 NI NI NI en al NI N v^1 CO 00 .m'I O m N. 01 CO Cal N CO N ILA V CO 001 N •N -I V CO tt. N. CFI A gl to R O LA N LA Ci N '-I O 01 LA T O f-1 00 N LA N O Ci m t0 N M M M fA N N N4.13 .-I N N01 M 01 N M LA V N O N 01 N 01 N0 O N O N N E O N N 01 'Q en CO N N 01 M LA 01 V IA 0 en LOUD M N M N N C M d' N O N I R Co N M rI LA N CO ti V Oo N tn. N LA co' 01 O N L.6 in ri N N tD lO LA W M V1 in N N N N en N VT N R N N VT VT N N VT N N N N N N NI R ,.y N I/T in. N N N 14 Vf aA in N N N N 0 O N N N V en V o en N N Co Ci 0 of 0 LA N 01 0 tD N CI LID O CO LA N M N w N CO tD 00 N O N CO M CO ✓1 N b LD M N V CD CI CO CO N N N N N N j LA LA 0 CI M 01 V 00 0 N 0 N LD O IA 0 CO NJ 0 01 N N M M LA 01 N O CT N O M N M N in a en Lei N LIDO M N l0 N CI Co Al 03 N N N N M E, N Cl 00 co CO N N 0 LA O LD V N LA 01 or 4.0 V Ol N M N 0 N N V N N i O CA- M of 01 N- .y Nr N LD in N V M N 6-4 N 00 t4 .ti N M N Ol N N N iA IA NI N N N or N N N N VT N in VT N N V? N N N .-I N N O m ,.y VT N N N N VT N VT N IA UT VT VT `V Ly O O N N LA 0 M N CO CO O N 01 LID 01 or 0 01 01 M CO O 01 CD Q 0 N CO 01 en CO N m l0 O N N a CFI N N LID N O O M N M N C N C0 CO lD CO N N O O ja c l0 N a cO LA V 11i a0 a0 N N LA V N V LA M N CO O Oi i i O ri N M V E O O M C N N M M N LA V LA o ry 01 LA ry LA N N N to c N N 001 N en rl h i N. LAtD 00 Q1 tD M 4 L cor-: tO 00 r1 N co6""; .4N LA n N N W N 4-1N or ri l NI 'i CO N VT N 0 O in N lA lA .-I N 44/1 N N N NI N M NI N �.i NNNNNN UT M N VTN N N UT LA N O44 V O N N M 00 NM 0 0 N 00 N N to CO N to C N N CO N tO V 00 N 0 N of O N N 00 N N N N ll1 N 0 O M N LD Lll 437 CO N M LO 01 N 01 N N O N .2.3. M N N O Of N CO CO 01 Ol M Ma N N N6 M N LO O N O 01 V o LA O �° N V M N 00 00 't at 0 N O CO N IA N O N O tD N N 00 O N 00 N 0 E o 4.0 N 0 el LA N IA 01 01 N LA Vl 01 N LA N N N 00 a s Lll M 01 N M M `-1 N Ni t1 co' CO rl 4 N ri to .4 00 O R Qi M a cr.- N ti 4 M tD 00 M Ot N' N N N N al N N N N u> C N M VT IA N N UT N H N .-I N M O VT VT N V> VT N N en VT N N N VT UT N N VT of CO N en O N N N M CD 03 0 0 LID N N 0 V N [t 0 en or N V LA V N CI N V O N V M N LO N N CI 0 N V M Lll V CO O LA N N N rI M or N O O CO N t0 N a O LA CO N O N al V N N N LD N N N O ri N 0 O M N M a N CO N N N V tO N C N M M tO LALA LA0 tp tD N t0 O M t0 Ot M N tO N CO N at 111 ID 01 0 N N tO N m 01 V N tO 00 N V V1 N US M CO O m M N 00 N tp m i Ol M ce O V Ll1 O V"111. r1 M CO Ci O N ' VT N N N O N N N V1 VT N N Mail N N N N N iA iA N 4.4 of M 0 N UT UT N 44 44 if) 14 iM .14 i A N N N N VT VT N 0 N LO O IA CO M tO CO M VT $1,095,983.40 $1,217,759.33 $1,503,406.58 o ID Co N CO Q N N N Ol N M CO co 01 ONO N N M N N CO N N M 0 M tR n O N a N N. 01 M Cfl CO M N co tO 00 N t0 V N M Co N tD N V N 0 to c a 00 01 IA LA N 01 Co Cfl M CO 01 V O Cr N N 01 N N N LA M or N V 0 IA 01 0 0 0 0 N N N N V ID N 00 V LAN CO N N NO 0 LAN en a or N in tD CI O N M N CA CA 0 N't N CI N M M M LA N N N el LA 01 o M CO LA V 01 000 N N a W .ti Oi Oi O 0 ri CD al iA CO N 0 CO NI LID N IA in ri a N 0 CO N to C iA N N N N N LAM N iA M VT N VT 14 N N N N iA N UT N M I N U4.4Is VT T 1A VT A IA VT fn VT h N N VT VT N 0 V IA IN U G N N O N I LO CT N ID N N V M N R ID LA O en IA N N LA N N N N CO en lD M MN CO 0 V O 01 LA N N R Ol M a M N o N M CO N O N N 01 V M V 00 CO N O N t0 00 M O IA 00 Lo O O Lei 01 V N N LA N R ri LA o N en N 0 N O 01 N NCO N N a Q N 0 CONN N 0 LA N ID O O V 0 N 0 4.0 N N 0 0 en LD ID N 0 en O M N V N N N 01 0 m CO 01 CO m LA 4 N tp M N rlR D1 u5 e -I I- N N in r1 O O V N CVT N N N N M N O N N N Nn M N N N N N N u> V? N N V LL N N IA 44 N t4 N 4.4 or N N N N 44 UT UT N N V T N V) V) V> O N t0 LAN N 01 0 N N N v1 tO 00 t0 t0 tD IA 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 N O O N t0 N V CO N N N N N N t0 0 4.0 0 N N O N 0 0 0 N O CO N O 00 N 00 M 01 00 N a0 CO Ot CO LA a LA LA N c0 O N O O O 00 O 01 a 0 N O Ol Lll N N O O tD O N 01 N N or 0 N N 111 N J 003 01 N 01 N M CO CO 01 01 N O N 01 N N LA Cl) 00 to M V f 8 N r1 LD n N N CA N N a rl M US IA U. N C Ll O w C O O c t, 46 c 0 `. 0 c O `O H `O c C `o ,, o u o H c 0,..c c H c 3 c c C C '- re) 0 3 T o r c C >. c H �T' o� c 0 :. 5 3 3 o E 3 3~~ O o cog H c U C n u 3~ y~ = 2 i- 0,217.0i- C >.OI- = 2,' r p, f- C C h is O J'd O a) y O N y 5__2 15 Y C V Si A 2 U O O o C in u "O -0 al > '' C C N O L (0 = 3 C C -0 V O 4_, .C `l O v 0 _u 11 0 j L a) N u c C c = ry C> C a 0 W W W LL LL LL U' U (7 D 2 ]C Y 3 JO C G Z Z d d N 3 N c 0 u al N O t0 a 00 (0 co a 0 _c a CO m N CO C al a) a N O a, c al C a a CD C Y N N v 0 O •-I N al N a co A U w .C m C a ti 0 Ol v N O N a 00 co a O _c a m O a 0 C io 40 L_ a v C OD C N ICJ a) E c O a al N O C v 41.1 _O Co N al O E O C Y (0 -C Y al 10 a 10 C N al it a N 0 al a 0 U C LL u Lo a C To O N C C w O C a C E o c E a) (0 > J O Cr 0 z U a N C al CO O -C D w N O C .. ra C N F.2 c C N C n = 1E LL O N C a O C E a C a o cu m c C c4. oN c - E 0.1 E O 41 `O c 2 tn. M O i. m U > c o al iA ° o m E o a A c u al tM-I a! CO o > 44 p, C 0 — Y O U in E = O co 4-4 O N a J v a) > r C a• c r T'^ E E a, m o D O w I.C. of O y "O 4-.0 v E CO n — -0 C, O O w C t N u ) '^ C in C -0 N O C O C a-. ` a N a T v w o E = = O N O O o c o_ -C C C N 'A al m 7 0 ≥ C E C o > >- O 0 w a CO o J O aY J in O 0 O > 0 O ii CO 00 in V • • • 444 Mat COLORADO August 10, 2009 Susan Kirkpatrick Division of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman, Room 500 Denver CO 80203 Re: LETTER OF INTEREST Dear Ms Kirkpatrick: OFFICE OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PHONE: 970-336-7204 FAX: 970-352-0242 915 10TH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 On behalf of the Weld County Commissioners and the Communications and E-911 Boards, it is my pleasure to submit this letter of interest for your consideration of our SB-09-232 project. We find this project to meet the project assumptions and to be a unique regional project worthy of funding considerations. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Weld County Public Safety Radio Infrastructure Project We are proposing the expansion to simulcast technology, and system upgrade to the Emergency E-91 I Communication system servicing all of Weld County and portions of Larimer County. Specifically, the funds for this project will partner with local funds for the development of a four tower site simulcast radio system which would still be integrated into the State public safety radio system. Included in the project is the enhancement of the radio equipment utilized in the emergency dispatch center for Weld County. The four simulcast tower sites will be located to provide improved coverage in those areas identified. Serviceable equipment which has been replaced in the enhancement will be recycled to other less busy tower sites throughout Weld County, to include an additional site to improve radio coverage along Weld County's northern boundary, thereby further enhancing the overall regional system. PROJECT MERIT AND BACKGROUND Weld County provides public safety radio communications to 42 law enforcement, fire, and ambulances services. These agencies comprise the first responders who respond to oil and gas incidents, such as fires, accidents, and stolen or vandalized property on oil and gas sites. Since 1983, a managed partnership of participating agencies with the Greeley Police Department taking the direct supervision of the program and with oversight from the County Commissioners and Weld County Communications through the E-91 I and Communications Boards has been in place. Fundamental components of this system include the Weld Regional Communications Center, personnel, radio equipment, towers and infrastructure needed to support local and state radio networks and activities. Direct funding for this system is derived through a participation formula as prescribed in Section 29-11-104, C.R.S. which allows for funds collected as telephone surcharges to be used to provide ongoing maintenance and support of this system. In addition to this financial support, since November 4, 1987, participating communities have also spent approximately $6,923,557 on equipment utilized to communicate within this system. Our collative efforts are not limited to our county boundaries; Weld County has been an original member of Consolidated Communications Network of Colorado (CCNC) and a key participant in the State of Colorado public safety radio system (DTR). In this role, we provide support and infrastructure directly connecting with the local, State and interstate radio networks. Maintaining a radio system is a daunting task, and with rapid technological advances, meeting the demands of expanded system usage is challenging. As the current system approaches use life and capacity limitations, weaknesses within the system become more apparent. Due in a large part to the nonconcentratic growth patterns, issues of insufficient radio coverage have been identified in our system, particularly in the communities of Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, Berthoud, and Greeley, where they have been impacted by the exploded growth along the 1-25 and US 34 area. More pressing is the apparent current system limitations to adequately support a future disaster. Unfortunately, as we experienced with the Weld County tornado, the capacity of our system was insufficient to meet the demands placed on it. The current radio system design fails to meet our current needs, including maintaining a system interface Susan Kirkpatrick • Page 2 • August 10, 2009 with eastern Larimer County's radio infrastructure. The proposed system enhancement strengthens this connection and ensures mutual aid agreements for disaster assistance, with Larimer, Ft. Collins, and Loveland work properly. Realizing our system performance concerns, in the spring of this year, we conducted a current and future needs assessment of our system. This effort systematically and regionally identified a course of action resulting in a system wide resolution to convert to simulcast technology. The magnitude of this solution is beyond the fiscal capabilities of any single or group of local governments. While simulcast radio technology is not new, our current system cannot accommodate continuous coverage over large geographic regions using a single set of frequencies. Converting to a simulcast system enables us to broadcast identical information, on the same carrier frequency, from multiple sites. With signals coming from multiple sites, areas with weak signal strength are improved. As individual towers become integrated with simulcast, the signal strength from individual towers are blended into a combined signal. The simulcast system greatly improves radio coverage in low areas and inside buildings and structures which is critical to ensure life safety support for our community. Additionally, the issues of coverage along the 1-25 corridor in and around the boundaries of Weld and Larimer counties will be eliminated with simulcast communications. In the Town of Windsor, where the issue of inadequate radio coverage is approaching critical levels, simulcast will eliminate their system needs. Estimated Funds Requested: The cost of the project is currently estimated at $8,000,000. In the current financial plan, the required match of the grant will be funded by Weld County and the Weld County E91 I Board. Both of these entities have the required funds to generate the match and are willing to do so. The amount of money requested from the Department of Local Affairs is the balance of $6,000,000. Involved Local Governments: Many areas in Weld County and northeastern Larimer County including the cities of Loveland, Fort Collins, Windsor, and Johnstown, are also hindered with inadequate radio coverage issues. The scope of the project would positively affect all municipalities in Weld County and those named in Larimer County. The potential residential population impacted by this project is estimated at 463,000 inhabitants, and well over 42 governmental agencies. The lead governments in the project will be Weld County and the City of Greeley. Currently, agreements exist involving all the municipalities in Weld County establishing a consolidated E9I l dispatch center. The project would proceed under the counsel of this board. Weld County and the major towns and municipalities within her borders have also entered into a shared cost agreement which not only obligates the communities to pay their fair share for dispatch operational costs, but tower and radio infrastructure as well. As a component of the state-wide radio system, (DTR), the project will have a regional impact as well, especially in a time of regional emergency. Efforts are currently underway to achieve interoperability with the E9 I dispatch communications systems in Colorado and Wyoming. The emergency response to these sparsely populated yet heavily traveled geographical areas of Northern Colorado and Southern Wyoming present communication challenges for all emergency services which will also be aided through the simulcast system. On behalf of the included communities and 42 special agencies listed herein, it is my pleasure to present this grant to you for consideration. Should you have specific questions please direct these to Monica Daniels -Mika, Director of Administrative Service, at 970-356-4000, Ext. 4210, or Captain Mike Savage, Greeley Police Department, at 970-350-9668. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS arsChr Douglas Rademacher, Pro T cc: E-911 Chairman Weld County Communication Board Roy Otto Don Warden Jerry Gamer • WELD COUNTY SYSTEM CONFIGURATION The proposed radio system is comprised of system elements described as the Simulcast Prime Site and the Simulcast Remote Sites. The simulcast cell will interface into the DTR network, which is not described here. The integration of these elements into an ASTRO 25 system contributes to an operation that provides a high degree of flexibility, features and operational utility. The Weld County Simulcast Cell will connect into Zone 3 of the DTR system. The DTR Zone 3 Master Site is located in Fort Collins. The proposed system includes 1 prime simulcast site and 4 remote simulcast sites, each with 12 channels. The Simulcast Prime site and a co -located remote site are located together. The other remote sites will be at sites to be determined. The remote sites will be linked to the Prime site as detailed in the Link Requirements section of this document. Simulcast Overview • • A simulcast radio system provides continuous coverage over a large geographic region using a single set of frequencies. Simulcast stands for SIMULtaneous broadCAST of identical information on the same carrier frequency from multiple, geographically separated sites. One of the important benefits of a simulcast solution is to extend a system's RF coverage, especially in areas where available frequencies are scarce. Simulcast technology also provides for better in -building coverage. Motorola's ASTRO 25 digital simulcast combines various state-of-the-art technologies yielding superb results in audio quality and site overlap performance. An ASTRO 25 simulcast system provides more reliable communications as the composite simulcast signal from multiple sites helps to improve coverage in weak signal areas. The Simulcast Prime site acts as a control and digitized audio center for the simulcast subsystem. Control and digitized audio over IP terminates at this site from the master site. Control and audio is routed from the prime site to each simulcast remote site. The simulcast remote sites are configured with identical channels. A simulcast subsystem appears to the ASTRO 25 Master Site as a single remote site, regardless of how many sites are in an individual simulcast system. Simulcast Prime Site The simulcast prime site will be located at a site to be determined. The prime site equipment controls the simulcast network. The prime site will contain dual Prime Site Simulcast Controllers and the GCM 8000 Comparators to interface to the three remote sites. The simulcast prime site will communicate with the simulcast remote sites via TI links provided by Weld County. In a simulcast network, audio is received at remote simulcast sites through the antenna network and Linear Simulcast Stations. The received audio is sent to the prime site for audio processing. The prime site votes the audio from the multiple remote sites. The audio is then sent back out to the remote sites for simulcast transmission. Simulcast Remote Sites The simulcast remote sites are where the transmitters are located. These sites simultaneously transmit identical information from each site. Audio and site control come from the Prime and Master sites. If the control channel repeater fails, one of the other stations will take over as the control channel. Motorola proposes four simulcast remote sites for Weld County. • • Weld County la/4t66aK • • GTR8000 ASTRO 25 Site DTR System Expansion Budgetary Proposal MOTOROLA, INC. Networks & Enterprise Business North America Government & Commercial Markets April 14, 2009 Data Restrictions The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. This budgetary proposal is considered Motorola Confidential Restricted. It is submitted with the restriction that it is to be used for evaluation purposes only, and is not to be disclosed publicly or in any manner to anyone other than those employed by Weld County required to evaluate this budgetary proposal without the express permission of Motorola O 2007 Motorola, Inc. All rights reserved. © MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Captain Mike Savage Greeley Police Department Greeley -Weld County Communications 2875 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Subject: Budgetary Proposal for GTR8000 ASTRO 25 Site DTR System Expansion Dear Capt. Savage: Thank you for allowing Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") the opportunity to provide Weld County with this budgetary proposal. This proposal is provided to further your consideration of Motorola products and services for Expansion of DTR System. The information in this proposal is provided to assist in your budget planning process. It is anticipated that Motorola will provide a final design and comprehensive proposal with firm pricing, based upon a more detailed analysis of Weld County's requirements. As the industry's premier supplier of radio and integrated solutions, we believe Motorola possesses many unique capabilities. It is these capabilities over the years, which have allowed us to offer our customers effective solutions to their complex business problems. Motorola's primary goal is to provide solutions that help our customers improve the safety level of their employees and citizens. Simultaneously, we are committed to contributing to increased productivity and organizational profitability, while always ensuring customer satisfaction. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-689-2806. Thank you for your consideration of this budgetary proposal. Sincerely, MOTOROLA, INC. Ron Painchaud Senior Account Manager Networks & Enterprise Enclosure: Motorola Budgetary Proposal, dated April 14, 2009 Motorola, Inc., Networks & Enterprise • • • INTRODUCTION This budgetary proposal, presented for your consideration, is intended to assist you with defining your project funding requirements, as well as your solutions requirements for equipment and services. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive will provide a detailed proposal with firm pricing that is tailored to your specific needs, which will include verification of all assumptions relative to unknowns that are contained within this proposal. The repeater site proposed, as an add-on to the Colorado Digital Trunked Radio (DTR) system, will include five GTR8000 700 MHz ASTRO®25 Repeater Stations to be located in Weld County at the West Water Tower site. • • © MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW The radio system provided by Motorola for DTR is comprised of system elements described as Repeater sites, Dispatch sites, and the Zone Master Site. The Integration of all these elements into an ASTRO 25 System provides wide area operation with incredible flexibility, features, and operational utility. Once all phases are completed, the system will operate with virtually transparent boundaries, creating homogenous system operation over the entire State of Colorado. The users of this system will enjoy the use of one of the highest performance, premium quality radio networks available today. ASTRO 25 is Motorola's third generation digital trunking radio system. This system will use leading edge technology packet switching infrastructure to route both voice and data based on multicast Internet Protocol. This architecture provides the bandwidth efficiency and extremely wide scalability of packet networks. Voice over packet technology promises vast improvements in large-scale integration of resources and services, making it the network architecture of choice for next generation wireless communications systems. Though our system makes extensive use of packet network architecture, Motorola is committed to the Project 25 standards, including those defining Common Air Interface. All over the air voice, data and control packets will conform to the Project 25 Common Air Interfaces and the trunking protocol standards suite. ASTRO 25 is an integrated network formed by a series of individual trunked radio systems tied together. ASTRO 25 operates in a way that is similar to a cellular network. Both types of networks provide a system where various sites or cells are linked to provide communications while roaming over a large geographic area. ASTRO 25 provides the flexibility to roam transparently from cell to cell, as the system performs an automatic hand-off between cells. The Master Sites contain the ASTRO 25 Zone Controller, Network Management system computers, Embassy audio switch, CENTRACOMTM Gold Gateway, as well as local and wide area networking equipment. This master site equipment controls the entire ASTRO 25 network Wide Area and Zone sites. Each Zone Controller is capable of handling multiple Repeater sites or simulcast cells. The master site will communicate with the repeater sites via digital T1 circuits. The IntelliSite Repeater Site provides trunking operation with the presence of redundant GCP 8000 ASTRO 25 site controllers and GTR8000 IntelliSite Repeaters. The GCP will maintain the link and communication to the Zone Controller. It will also control the site's states (wide area trunking, site trunking), manage call control functionality when in wide area trunking and provide call processing functionality when in site trunking. The GCP8000 will be shipped • MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 2 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE-DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION standard in a fully redundant configuration. The redundant GCP8000 will communicate with the active one at regular short intervals to detect any failures. If the active GCP8000 should fail the redundant GCP8000 will pick up all current functionality and state information to maintain continuous operation of the site. The GTR8000 repeaters provide a modular, flexible design for today's communication systems and those of the future. The innovative design allows for upgrades within systems via hardware and/or software to avoid total infrastructure replacement. The station is divided into functional modules, which separate the frequency band specific and transmitter power specific circuits from other circuits and has a separate module for control. These modules are self-contained functional blocks with module -specific alarms. This design facilitates the field replaceable unit (FRU) concept of field repair to maximize system up time. Audio, Network Management information and control data from each of the IntelliSites is forwarded through the site router to the Master Site. Calls are then processed within the Master Site and routed through the IP network to associated sites. The processed call information is multicasted and transmitted at the sites where the talkgroup is registered. Channels are keyed only at sites where field units belonging to the talkgroup initiating the call exist. Equipment at the Master Site sorts radio calls by talkgroup assuring that users are free from interference caused by unrelated radio calls originating from other agencies operating on the system. The dynamic channel assignment process is managed by the Zone Controller. Radio calls are not sent to sites unless there are field units registered at those sites. Channel resources are used with the most efficiency possible in a Motorola system. The connection of the West Water Tower site to the DTR Master site will require a TI connection. This proposal is not providing a microwave hop. It is the responsibility of Weld County to negotiate with the State for connectivity to the master site. Coverage predictions have not been included as part of this proposal as Motorola is making no coverage commitments for the West Water Tower site. There will be no coverage testing performed after the site is installed. © MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 3 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION SYSTEM COMPONENTS This budgetary proposal includes the following summary of components: 1. The repeater site proposed as an add-on to the DTR system will include five GTR8000 Repeater Stations - Equipped to run off of 120 VAC power. 2. MOSCAD Alarm and Control Equipment - This equipment will be powered by I20VAC. 3. GCP 8000 Controller— Supplied in a redundant configuration - 120 VAC power. 4. Networking Equipment — Site router and Switch - 120 VAC power. 5. Transmit Combiner - 6 Channel transmit combiner 6. Receiver Multicoupler and Tower Mounted Pre -amp 7. Antenna System — Including 4 dB gain omni directional antennas for both transmit and receive sides of the system, two runs 250' 7/8" transmission line and all mounting accessories. There is also a 1/2" test port cable supplied with all mounting accessories. 8. Battery backup for five repeaters. 9. Spare board set for a GTR8000 repeater. MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 4 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION SERVICES Professional Integration Services To ensure a smooth installation and deployment, this budgetary proposal includes estimates for the following services: • Includes system staging at the Motorola Customer Center for Systems Integration (CCSi). • Includes Project Management for system installation and optimization. • Includes Field Engineering and System Technologist support for system installation and optimization. • Includes system installation and optimization. This solution will be installed, optimized, and tested by our dedicated Project Implementation Team. Motorola System Support Motorola's standard warranty covers on -site response during normal business hours and provides for the repair or replacement of defective hardware components. • Technical Support • Onsite Infrastructure Response (24x7) © MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 5 WEIR COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION ASSUMPTIONS Motorola has made several assumptions in preparing this budgetary proposal, which are noted below. In order to provide a firm quote, Motorola will need to verify all assumptions or seek alternate solutions in the case of invalid assumptions. • The DTR Master Site, supporting this Repeater site, will have enough port and license capacity to support this site • All existing sites or equipment locations will have sufficient space available for the system described. • All existing sites or equipment locations will have adequate electrical power and site grounding to support the requirements of the system described. • All existing towers will have adequate space and size to support the antenna network requirements of the system described. • Any site/location upgrades or modifications are the responsibility of the customer. • Any tower stress analysis or tower upgrade requirements are the responsibility of the customer. • Approved FCC licensing provided by the customer. • Approved local, State or Federal permits as may be required for the installation and operation of the proposed equipment are the responsibility of the customer. • Any required system interconnections not specifically outlined here will be provided by the Customer. These may include dedicated phone circuits or microwave links. • Where necessary, the Customer will provide a dedicated delivery point, such as a warehouse, for receipt, inventory and storage of equipment prior to delivery to the sites. • © MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 6 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The following is a summary of equipment and services that Motorola will quote separately, upon request: • Site Connectivity • Site acquisition or preparation costs, such as buildings, towers, grounding, or licenses / permits or costs to upgrade sites to comply with the Motorola document "Standards and Guidelines for Communications Sites" • Site power generation or utility costs such as electrical power terminations, generators, battery chargers, back-up battery banks, etc. • Customizes service package based upon customer -specific requirements • Coverage Prediction and Testing • Lifecycle System Management Services • Applicable Federal, State, and local taxes • © MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 7 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION SYSTEM ESTIMATE Motorola estimates the system solution and services identified above will be within the following ranges: System Budgetary Pricing Total $359,045.00 (LOW) to $448,806.00 (HIGH) NOTE: The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. • © MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 8 WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SITE- DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION OUR COMMITMENT Motorola products are growing and changing, as they have over the years, and Motorola's drive for excellence has strengthened and intensified. From the five -pound Handie-TalkieTM radio to the lightweight models of today, Motorola has been the leading provider of two-way radio services to public safety, government, transportation, utility, and manufacturing enterprises. Motorola changed the way the world communicates, from the introduction of the DynaTAC cell phone in 1983 to today's sleek handsets and innovative technology for mobile telephone service. Motorola is also a key supplier of integrated systems for automobiles, portable electronic devices, and industrial equipment. Throughout our history, Motorola has transformed innovative ideas into products that connect people to each other and the world around them. Moving forward, Motorola strives to fulfill our commitment to make products and services better and to make sound recommendations that will guide you in linking your current and future communication needs and objectives with technology's ever -evolving promise. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive can provide a firm proposal tailored to meet your total solution needs. MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 9 ,x;11 laplruzfe. 0 Weld County Astro 25 Digital Simulcast 3 Site System Budgetary Proposal MOTOROLA, INC. Government and Public Safety Enterprise Mobility Solutions February 10, 2009 Data Restrictions The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. This budgetary proposal is considered Motorola Confidential Restricted. It is submitted with the restriction that it is to be used for evaluation purposes only, and is not to be disclosed publicly or in any manner to anyone other than those employed by Weld County required to evaluate this budgetary proposal without the express permission of Motorola © 2007 Motorola, Inc. All rights reserved. © MOTOROLA February 10, 2009 Capt. Mike Savage Greeley Police Department Greeley -Weld County Communications 2875 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Subject: Budgetary Proposal for ASTRO 25 Digital Simulcast Dear Capt. Savage: Thank you for allowing Motorola, IncJ"Motorola") the opportunit to provide Weld County with this budgetary proposal for 3 Site ASTRO 25 Simu s stem. his proposal is provided to further your consideration of otorola products and services as outlined for the 3 Site System. The information in this proposal is provided to assist in your budget planning process. It is anticipated that Motorola will provide a final design and comprehensive proposal with firm pricing, based upon a more detailed analysis of your requirements. As the industry's premier supplier of radio and integrated solutions, we believe Motorola possesses many unique capabilities. It is these capabilities over the years, which have allowed us to offer our customers effective solutions to their complex business problems. Motorola's primary goal is to provide solutions that help our customers improve the safety level of their employees and citizens. Simultaneously, we are committed to contributing to increased productivity and organizational profitability, while always ensuring customer satisfaction. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-689-2806. Thank you for your consideration of this budgetary proposal. Sincerely, MOTOROLA, INC. Ron Painchaud Senior Account Manager Government and Public Safety Enclosure: Motorola Budgetary Proposal, dated 02/10/09 Motorola, Inc., Enterprise Mobility Solutions [Division Address] • • • INTRODUCTION • Motorola builds, markets, and sells products, services, and applications that make simple and seamless connections to people, information and entertainment possible through broadband, embedded systems, and wireless networks. Our vision is to provide cutting -edge technologies that empower mobile consumers to go anywhere and do anything without sacrificing connectivity. This is seamless mobility. Motorola is the leading provider of wireless communications systems and services for government, enterprise and commercial mobile service providers around the world. We deliver high -availability network infrastructure systems to commercial service providers and mission - critical end -to -end wireless communication networks, primarily for the government and public safety markets. Through our enterprise product portfolio, we deliver leading -edge mobile computing, mobile office and enterprise product network solutions. We are also an industry leader in the development of next -generation IP wireless broadband mobility technologies, offering an entire suite of end -to -end WiMAX infrastructure and customer premises equipment products. In addition, we offer a family of point-to-point and point-to-multipoint wireless broadband products to serve WiFi and wireless DSL operators. With over 75 years of experience, Motorola offers a unique combination of innovative technology, extensive market experience, and the ability to design, integrate, and seamlessly implement the various technologies Weld County needs today and in the future. As the recipient of the 1988 and 2002 prestigious Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the nation's premier award for performance excellence and quality achievement, Motorola has the resources and unmatched experience to help you address your unique situation in order to create a total solution that is right for you. This budgetary proposal, presented for your consideration, is intended to assist you with defining your project funding requirements, as well as your solutions requirements for equipment and services. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive will provide a detailed proposal with firm pricing that is tailored to your specific needs, which will include verification of all assumptions relative to unknowns that are contained within this proposal. • ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. I WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYs • SYSTEM OVERVIEW In response to your request for a budgetary price estimate and system recommendation, Motorola is proposing an APCO Project 25 compliant digital trunked simulcast cell for Weld County. As an add-on to the Colorado Digital Trunked Radio (DTR) system, Motorola is providing a proposal to add a three site, 12 channel, 800 MHz ASTRO® 25 IP based simulcast cell. ASTRO 25 is Motorola's fully digital, Project 25 compliant trunked two-way radio system. Motorola's ASTRO 25 system esign provides a ig evel of reliability: full featured trunking with simulcast repeater sites, redundant equipment, and a comprehensive diagnostic network. As public safety user requirements evolve, it is essential that the selected system solution is scalable and supports a migration to advanced applications. Motorola's proposed ASTRO 25 Simulcast Cell operated on the 800 MHz frequency band and supports Integrated Voice and Data (IV&D) applications. WELD COUNTY SYSTEM CONFIGURATION • The proposed radio system is comprised of system elements described as the Simulcast Prime Site and the Simulcast Remote Sites. The simulcast cell will interface into the DTR network, which is not described here. The integration of these elements into an ASTRO 25 system contributes to an operation that provides a high degree of flexibility, features and operational utility. The Weld County Simulcast Cell will connect into Zone 3 of the DTR system. The DTR Zone 3 Master Site is located in Fort Collins. The proposed system includes 1 prime simulcast site and 3 remote simulcast sites, each with 12 channels. The Simulcast Prime site and a co -located remote site are located together. The other remote sites will be at sites to be determined. The remote sites will be linked to the Prime site as detailed in the Link Requirements section of this document. Simulcast Overview A simulcast radio system provides continuous coverage over a large geographic region using a single set of frequencies. Simulcast stands for SIMULtaneous broadCAST of identical information on the same carrier frequency from multiple, geographically separated sites. One of the important benefits of a simulcast solution is to extend a system's RF coverage, especially in areas where available frequencies are scarce. Simulcast technology also provides for better in - building coverage. • ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 2 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYS Motorola's ASTRO 25 digital simulcast combines various state-of-the-art technologies yielding superb results in audio qualit an a formance. An ASTRO 25 simulcast system es more re iable communications as the composite simulcast signal from multiple sites helps to improve coverage in weak signal areas. The Simulcast Prime site acts as a control and digitized audio center for the simulcast subsystem. Control and digitized audio over IP terminates at this site from the master site. Control and audio is routed from the prime site to each simulcast remote site. The simulcast remote sites are configured with identical channels. A simulcast subsystem appears to the ASTRO 25 Master Site as a single remote site, regardless of how many sites are in an individual simulcast system. • Simulcast Prime Site The simulcast prime site will be located at a site to be determined. The prime site equipment controls the simulcast network. The prime site will contain dual Prime Site Simulcast Controllers and the GCM 8000 Comparators to interface to the three remote sites. The simulcast prime site will communicate with the simulcast remote sites via T1 links provided by Weld County. = Co* In a simulcast network, audio is received at remote simulcast sites through the antenna network and Linear Simulcast Stations. The received audio is sent to the prime site for audio processing. The prime site votes the audio from the multiple remote sites. The audio is then sent back out to the remote sites for simulcast transmission. Simulcast Remote Sites The simulcast remote sites are where the transmitters are located. These sites simultaneously transmit identical information from each site. Audio and site control come from the Prime and Master sites. If the control channel repeater fails, one of the other stations will take over as the control channel. Motorola has proposed three simulcast remote sites for Weld County. Power 0 All of the equipment runs on 110VAC. No UPS or generator has been proposed. • ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 3 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSTE • Link Requirements Two dedicated T1 circuits (for redundancy) from the Simulcast Prime Site to the Zone 3 Master Site are required and are Weld County's responsibility (The collocated Simulcast Remote Site will not require an additional T1). A dedicated T1 circuit from the Simulcast Prime Site the remote Simulcast Remote Sites are required and is Weld County's responsibility. A second T1 can be used for redundancy if desired. Frequencies The frequencies that will be utilized by Weld County will be from the 800MHz frequencies currently used at the Greeley 35'h and Greeley North sites. All 12 channels will not fit into one combiner so there will have to be two transmit antennas and one receive antenna at each location. Coverage The sites have not been determined yet so no coverage commitment is possible. Once the sites have been determined, we will generate simulcast coverage maps to see if the sites a in a compatible simulcast layout. If these sites do not simulcast properly, we will have to look at different design options. • ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 4 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYs • • ASTRO 25 IP Simulcast Prime Site with Co -Located Remote Site Diagram Combining an IP Simulcast prime site and an IP Simulcast remote site in the same physical location is often economically desirable. In this configuration, the T1 link from the co -located remote site router is connected directly to a router patch panel. The remote site access routers are used to route IP traffic between the prime site and the co -located remote site. IP Simulcast Prime Site & Co -located Remote Site s_d OSJP Sund_Pdme_eolmated_remote • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 02/10/09 5 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYS e 4 • • • IP Simulcast Remote Site Site Link to Prime Site VOIR mg Ms* S IP Simul Remote_Ske Site Link to Prime Site 5 • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 02/10/09 6 • WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSI • SYSTEM COMPONENTS This budgetary proposal includes the following summary of equipment for 3 Site Simulcast: SIMULCAST PRIME SITE ■ Two (2) ASTRO 25 GCP 8000 Simulcast Controllers • Twelve (12) GCM 8000 Comparators • Two (2) Prime Site Routers/Switches • Trak GPS SIMULCAST REMOTE SITE 1 —Co -located with the Prime Site ■ Twelve (12) 800 MHz GTR 8000 Repeaters • • TRAK GPS • Routers and Switches • 2 Antennas ■ Transmission Lines, Combiners and Multicouplers • 1 Tower Top Amplifier • 1 MOSCAD Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) SIMULCAST REMOTE SITE 2 ■ Twelve (12) 800 MHz GTR 8000 Repeaters • TRAK GPS • Routers and Switches • 2 Antennas • Transmission Lines, Combiners and Multicouplers • 1 Tower Top Amplifier ■ 1 MOSCAD Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 02/10/09 7 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSTEM • • • • SIMULCAST REMOTE SITE 3 ■ Twelve (12) 800 MHz GTR 8000 Repeaters ■ TRAK GPS • Routers and Switches • 2 Antennas • Transmission Lines, Combiners and Multicouplers • I Tower Top Amplifier • 1 MOSCAD Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) • ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 8 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SAM SERVICES Professional Integration Services To ensure a smooth installation and deployment, this budgetary proposal includes estimates for the following services: • Includes system staging at the Motorola Customer Center for Systems Integration (CCSi). • Includes Project Management for system installation and optimization. • Includes Field Engineering and System Technologist support for system installation and optimization. • Includes system installation and optimization. • Includes system training based upon a train -the -trainer format (limited to one (1) session with a maximum of 15 students per session). This solution will be installed, optimized, and tested by our dedicated Project Implementation Team. Motorola System Support Motorola's standard warranty covers on -site response during normal business hours and provides for the repair or replacement of defective hardware components. In addition to this warranty, Motorola provides Enhanced System Support (ESS), which is a service package designed to support both the software and hardware components of your new System for a one-year warranty period. The ESS services are included in the price of the System. After the ESS period expires, these services may be purchased under a separate agreement. Motorola's ESS is comprised of the following services. • Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement • Dispatch Service and Call Management • Network Security Monitoring • Technical Support • Software Subscription • Onsite Infrastructure Response (24x7) • Network Preventative Maintenance • MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page, 9 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSTEM • • • Infrastructure Software Installation • System Audit • Security Assessment . ® MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. /0 WELD COUNTY • ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSM ASSUMPTIONS • Motorola has made several assumptions in preparing this budgetary proposal, which are noted below. In order to provide a firm quote, Motorola will need to verify all assumptions or seek alternate solutions in the case of invalid assumptions. • All existing sites or equipment locations will have sufficient space available for the system described. • All existing sites or equipment locations will have adequate electrical power and site grounding to support the requirements of the system described. • All existing towers will have adequate space and size to support the antenna network requirements of the system described. • Any site/location upgrades or modifications are the responsibility of the customer. • Any tower stress analysis or tower upgrade requirements are the responsibility of the customer. • Approved FCC licensing provided by the customer. • Approved local, State or Federal permits as may be required for the installation and operation of the proposed equipment are the responsibility of the customer. • Any required system interconnections not specifically outlined here will be provided by the Customer. These may include dedicated phone circuits or microwave links. • Where necessary, the Customer will provide a dedicated delivery point, such as a warehouse, for receipt, inventory and storage of equipment prior to delivery to the sites. © MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 11 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYSTEM • • • ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST • The following is a summary of equipment and services that Motorola will quote separately, upon request, or that can be provided by Weld County: • Site Connectivity • Site acquisition or preparation costs, such as buildings, towers, grounding, or licenses / permits or costs to upgrade sites to comply with the Motorola document "Standards and Guidelines for Communications Sites" • Site power generation or utility costs such as electrical power terminations, generators, battery chargers, back-up battery banks, etc. • Console Furniture • Application software such as Computer -aided Dispatch (CAD), Records Management System (RMS), etc. • Customizes service package based upon customer -specific requirements • Subscriber Programming and Installation • Coverage Prediction and Testing • Microwave Maintenance • Security Relnediation • Subscriber Repair Services and Upgrades • Lifecycle System Management Services • Customer Training (http://www.motorola-wls.com) • Applicable Federal, State, and local taxes • MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 12 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYS7 • SYSTEM ESTIMATE • Motorola estimates the system solution and services identified above will be within the following ranges: System Budgetary Pricing Total - 3 Site Simulcast $3,970,000.00 Optional System Budgetary Pricing Total - 4 Site Simulcast $4,490,000.00 NOTE: The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. • © MOTOROLA 02/10/09 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 13 WELD COUNTY ASTRO 25 DIGITAL SIMULCAST SYS OUR COMMITMENT Motorola products are growing and changing, as they have over the years, and Motorola's drive for excellence has strengthened and intensified. From the five -pound Handie-Talkie radio to the lightweight models of today, Motorola has been the leading provider of two-way radio services to public safety, government, transportation, utility, and manufacturing enterprises. Motorola changed the way the world communicates, from the introduction of the DynaTAC cell phone in 1983 to today's sleek handsets and innovative technology for mobile telephone service. Motorola is also a key supplier of integrated systems for automobiles, portable electronic devices, and industrial equipment. Throughout our history, Motorola has transformed innovative ideas into products that connect people to each other and the world around them. Moving forward, Motorola strives to fulfill our commitment to make products and services better and to make sound recommendations that will guide you in linking your current and future communication needs and objectives with technology's ever -evolving promise. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive can provide a firm proposal tailored to meet your total solution needs. • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 02/10/09 14 ix x x II WIRELESS ADVANCED M MOTOROLA .::Orf r I, ". �i(;Nti SALES QUOTE \ 1, NI 11(f 111 Q.J 1 ( { Authorized Two•Way 3901 West Service Read Confidential and Proprietary Radio Dealer (970) 30. 80620ve., nom 656 nein Prices Valid for 30 Days from Quotation Date (990)930.9415 (800)456024] North Ridge High School BDA November 18, 2005 Customer Name: City of Greeley PD [ ] NEW Contact: Steve Black Address: [ X ] EXISTING City, State Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email: Page 1 of 1 Item Qty Model Description Unit Extended 3900 Plenum Rated Radiating Cable $2.85 $11,115.00 200 Plenum Rated non -Radiating Cable $1.92 $384.00 1 800 MHZ Bi-directional Amplifier $9,500.00 $9,500.00 28 Coaxial Splitters $251.00 $7,028.00 30 50 Ohm Loads $35.00 $1,050.00 111 Coaxial Cable connectors $30.00 $3,330.00 1 Out side Antenna for Doner Site $100.00 $100.00 1 Mount for outside Antenna $150.00 $150.00 650 Click Assemblies $0.96 $624.00 300 Plenum Ties $0.67 $201.00 1 Shipping $900.00 $900.00 1 Poly Phaser $70.00 $70.00 1 Services Labor for Installation and Optimization $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 II $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUB TOTAL $64,452.00 Salesperson: ANDY BELLENDIR Sales Tax Activation Monthly Airtime: N/A Installation Programming Customer Signature: Shipping IICustomer P.O. # & Date: GRAND TOTAL $64,452.00 Your signature indicates that Wireless Advanced Communications has your approval to order the equipment/services listed above Weld County GTR8000 ASTRO 25 Site DTR System Expansion Budgetary Proposal MOTOROLA, INC. Networks & Enterprise Business North America Government & Commercial Markets April 14, 2009 Data Restrictions The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. This budgetary proposal is considered Motorola Confidential Restricted. It is submitted with the restriction that it is to be used for evaluation purposes only, and is not to be disclosed publicly or in any manner to anyone other than those employed by Weld County required to evaluate this budgetary proposal without the express permission of Motorola. © 2007 Motorola, Inc. All rights reserved. • • • • • © MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Captain Mike Savage Greeley Police Department Greeley -Weld County Communications 2875 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Subject: Budgetary Proposal for GTR8000 ASTRO 25 Site DTR System Expansion Dear Capt. Savage: Thank you for allowing Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") the opportunity to provide Weld County with this budgetary proposal. This proposal is provided to further your consideration of Motorola products and services for Expansion of DTR System. The information in this proposal is provided to assist in your budget planning process. It is anticipated that Motorola will provide a final design and comprehensive proposal with firm pricing, based upon a more detailed analysis of Weld County's requirements. As the industry's premier supplier of radio and integrated solutions, we believe Motorola possesses many unique capabilities. it is these capabilities over the years, which have allowed us to offer our customers effective solutions to their complex business problems. Motorola's primary goal is to provide solutions that help our customers improve the safety level of their employees and citizens. Simultaneously, we are committed to contributing to increased productivity and organizational profitability, while always ensuring customer satisfaction. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-689-2806. Thank you for your consideration of this budgetary proposal. Sincerely, MOTOROLA, INC. Ron Painchaud Senior Account Manager Networks & Enterprise Enclosure: Motorola Budgetary Proposal, dated April 14, 2009 Motorola, Inc., Networks & Enterprise • • • INTRODUCTION This budgetary proposal, presented for your consideration, is intended to assist you with defining your project funding requirements, as well as your solutions requirements for equipment and services. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive will provide a detailed proposal with firm pricing that is tailored to your specific needs, which will include verification of all assumptions relative to unknowns that are contained within this proposal. The repeater site proposed, as an add-on to the Colorado Digital Trunked Radio (DTR) system, will include five GTR8000 700 MHz ASTRO® 25 Repeater Stations to be located in Weld County at the West Water "Tower site. • • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal Is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 • • WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SrrE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • SYSTEM OVERVIEW The radio system provided by Motorola for DTR is comprised of system elements described as Repeater sites, Dispatch sites, and the Zone Master Site. The Integration of all these elements into an ASTRO 25 System provides wide area operation with incredible flexibility, features, and operational utility. Once all phases are completed, the system will operate with virtually transparent boundaries, creating homogenous system operation over the entire State of Colorado. The users of this system will enjoy the use of one of the highest performance, premium quality radio networks available today. • • ASTRO 25 is Motorola's third generation digital trunking radio system. This system will use leading edge technology packet switching infrastructure to route both voice and data based on multicast Internet Protocol. This architecture provides the bandwidth efficiency and extremely wide scalability of packet networks. Voice over packet technology promises vast improvements in large-scale integration of resources and services, making it the network architecture of choice for next generation wireless communications systems. Though our system makes extensive use of packet network architecture, Motorola is committed to the Project 25 standards, including those defining Common Air Interface. All over the air voice, data and control packets will conform to the Project 25 Common Air Interfaces and the trunking protocol standards suite. ASTRO 25 is an integrated network formed by a series of individual trunked radio systems tied together. ASTRO 25 operates in a way that is similar to a cellular network. Both types of networks provide a system where various sites or cells are linked to provide communications while roaming over a large geographic area. ASTRO 25 provides the flexibility to roam transparently from cell to cell, as the system performs an automatic hand-off between cells. The Master Sites contain the ASTRO 25 Zone Controller, Network Management system computers, Embassy audio switch, CENTRACOMTM Gold Gateway, as well as local and wide area networking equipment. This master site equipment controls the entire ASTRO 25 network Wide Area and Zone sites. Each Zone Controller is capable of handling multiple Repeater sites or simulcast cells. The master site will communicate with the repeater sites via digital Tl circuits. The IntelliSite Repeater Site provides trunking operation with the presence of redundant GCP 8000 ASTRO 25 site controllers and GTR8000 IntelliSite Repeaters. The GCP will maintain the link and communication to the Zone Controller. It will also control the site's states (wide area trunking, site trunking), manage call control functionality when in wide area trunking and provide call processing functionality when in site trunking. The GCP8000 will be shipped MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the Ube page. 2 • • WELD COUNTY GTRS000 ASTRO 25 SITE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • • • standard in a fully redundant configuration. The redundant GCP8000 will communicate with the active one at regular short intervals to detect any failures. If the active GCP8000 should fail the redundant GCP8000 will pick up all current functionality and state information to maintain continuous operation of the site. The GTR8000 repeaters provide a modular, flexible design for today's communication systems and those of the future. The innovative design allows for upgrades within systems via hardware and/or software to avoid total infrastructure replacement. The station is divided into functional modules, which separate the frequency band specific and transmitter power specific circuits from other circuits and has a separate module for control. These modules are self-contained functional blocks with module -specific alarms. This design facilitates the field replaceable unit (FRU) concept of field repair to maximize system up time. Audio, Network Management information and control data from each of the IntelliSites is forwarded through the site router to the Master Site. Calls are then processed within the Master Site and routed through the IP network to associated sites. The processed call information is multicasted and transmitted at the sites where the talkgroup is registered. Channels are keyed only at sites where field units belonging to the talkgroup initiating the call exist. Equipment at the Master Site sorts radio calls by talkgroup assuring that users are free from interference caused by unrelated radio calls originating from other agencies operating on the system. The dynamic channel assignment process is managed by the Zone Controller. Radio calls are not sent to sites unless there are field units registered at those sites. Channel resources are used with the most efficiency possible in a Motorola system. The connection of the West Water Tower site to the DTR Master site will requir connection. This proposal is not providing a microwave hopi_It is the responsibility of Weld `\ County to negotiate with the State for connectivity to the master site. ,„,\ „� Coverage predictions have not been included as part of this proposal as Motorola is making no ` coverage commitments for the West Water Tower site. There will be no coverage testing performed after the site is insta e . ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 3 • • WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SrrE- DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • SYSTEM COMPONENTS This budgetary proposal includes the following summary of components: 1. The repeater site proposed as an add-on to the DTR system will include five GTR8000 Repeater Stations - Equipped to run off of 120 VAC power. • • 2. MOSCAD Alarm and Control Equipment - This equipment will be powered by 120VAC. 3. GCP 8000 Controller— Supplied in a redundant configuration - 120 VAC power. 4. Networking Equipment— Site router and Switch - 120 VAC power. 5. Transmit Combiner - 6 Channel transmit combiner 6. Receiver Multicoupler and Tower Mounted Pre -amp 7. Antenna System — Including 4 dB gain omni directional antennas for both transmit and receive sides of the system, two runs 250' 7/8" transmission line and all mounting accessories. There is also a 1/2" test port cable supplied with all mounting accessories. 8. Battery backup for five repeaters. 9. Spare board set for a GTR8000 repeater. ® MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgeteryproposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 4 WELD COUNTY GTRS000 ASTRO 25 SrrE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • SERVICES Professional Integration Services To ensure a smooth installation and deployment, this budgetary proposal includes estimates for the following services: • Includes system staging at the Motorola Customer Center for Systems Integration (CCSi). • Includes Project Management for system installation and optimization. • Includes Field Engineering and System Technologist support for system installation and optimization. • Includes system installation and optimization. This solution will be installed, optimized, and tested by our dedicated Project Implementation Team. • • Motorola System Support Motorola's standard warranty covers on -site response during normal business hours and provides for the repair or replacement of defective hardware components. • Technical Support • Onsite Infrastructure Response (24x7) © MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Resticted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14,2009 5 • • WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO25 SITE-DTRSYSTEM EXPANSION • ASSUMPTIONS • • Motorola has made several assumptions in preparing this budgetary proposal, which are noted below. In order to provide a firm quote, Motorola will need to verify all assumptions or seek alternate solutions in the case of invalid assumptions. • The DTR Master Site, supporting this Repeater site, will have enough port and license capacity to support this site • All existing sites or equipment locations will have sufficient space available for the system described. • All existing sites or equipment locations will have adequate electrical power and site grounding to support the requirements of the system described. • All existing towers will have adequate space and size to support the antenna network requirements of the system described. • Any site/location upgrades or modifications are the responsibility of the customer. • Any tower stress analysis or tower upgrade requirements are the responsibility of the customer. • Approved FCC licensing provided by the customer. • Approved local, State or Federal permits as may be required for the installation and operation of the proposed equipment are the responsibility of the customer. • Any required system interconnections not specifically outlined here will be provided by the Customer. These may include dedicated phone circuits or microwave links. • Where necessary, the Customer will provide a dedicated delivery point, such as a warehouse, for receipt, inventory and storage of equipment prior to delivery to the sites. ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 6 • • WELD COUNTY GTR9000 ASTRO 25 SrrE— DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST • The following is a summary of equipment and services that Motorola will quote separately, upon request: • Site Connectivity • Site acquisition or preparation costs, such as buildings, towers, grounding, or licenses / permits or costs to upgrade sites to comply with the Motorola document "Standards and Guidelines for Communications Sites" • Site power generation or utility costs such as electrical power terminations, generators, battery chargers, back-up battery banks, etc. • Customizes service package based upon customer -specific requirements • Coverage Prediction and Testing • Lifecycle System Management Services • Applicable Federal, State, and local taxes ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 7 • • WELD COUNTY GTR8000 ASTRO 25 SHE - DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • SYSTEM ESTIMATE Motorola estimates the system solution and services identified above will be within the following ranges: System Budgetary Pricing Total $359,045.00 (LOW) to $448,806.00 (HIGH) • NOTE: The information provided in this proposal is for informational (or budgetary) purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product. It is not binding on Motorola and Motorola makes no representations, warranties, or commitments with respect to pricing, products, or terms and conditions, which would require more information and further detailed analysis of the requirements for which this estimate is requested. • ® MOTOROLA Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. April 14, 2009 8 • • WELD COUNTY GTRS000 ASTRO 25 Srra — DTR SYSTEM EXPANSION • OUR COMMITMENT Motorola products are growing and changing, as they have over the years, and Motorola's drive for excellence has strengthened and intensified. From the five -pound Handie-Talkieradio to the lightweight models of today, Motorola has been the leading provider of two-way radio services to public safety, government, transportation, utility, and manufacturing enterprises. Motorola changed the way the world communicates, from the introduction of the llynaTAC cell phone in 1983 to today's sleek handsets and innovative technology for mobile telephone service. Motorola is also a key supplier of integrated systems for automobiles, portable electronic devices, and industrial equipment. Throughout our history, Motorola has transformed innovative ideas into products that connect people to each other and the world around them. Moving forward, Motorola strives to fulfill our commitment to make products and services better and to make sound recommendations that will guide you in linking your current and future communication needs and objectives with technology's ever -evolving promise. Upon request, your Motorola Account Executive can provide a firm proposal tailored to meet your total solution needs. • emu! MOTOROLA April 14, 2009 • Motorola Confidential Restricted Use or disclosure of this budgetary proposal is subject to the restrictions on the title page. 9 • • • TO: Don Warden, Weld County Finance and Administration Director FROM: Captain Mike Savage DATE: Junel, 2009 SUBJECT: Public Safety Radio System Infrastructure Project I am writing in response to our discussions concerning the Public Safety Radio System currently serving Weld County. As your office is aware Weld County migrated to the State of Colorado 800 MHz DTR radio system in 2000-2001. The infrastructure that the County owns that is shared with the State system is substantial. As that system approaches the end of its use life, the cost of replacement is significant. The cost significance will necessitate a multi -year approach or an outside source of funding. From a technical point there are basically two approaches that we could take in the resolution of this problem. The first would be the simple replacement of the existing system phased over approximately 5 years. The second approach would be to enhance the existing system and with the acquisition of an outside funding mechanism, like a grant, approach the replacement with the upgrade to a more effective system. The first approach or simple system replacement would involve a multi -year approach initiated in 2013 to 2014 lasting through 2017-2018. The process would be the replacement of dispatch consoles in the Communications Center and a phased replacement of tower site equipment over the next 3-4 years. The Communications Center replacement is an activity that would have to be done as a single event and could not be completed in multi -year phases. The current estimated cost for this piece of the infrastructure project is 2.4 to 2.8 million dollars. The second phase of this approach would be the replacement of equipment at DTR tower sites. The tower equipment process could be scheduled out over a 3 to 4 year cycle replacing a site a year. This portion of the project would cost approximately $1,775,000.00 with individual site costs ranging from $450,000.00 to $750,000.00 depending on the site. The total cost of this option would be approximately $4,575.000.00. It must be noted in the first approach, the effort would be directed at replacing existing equipment with new equipment as the old equipment met the end of its projected use life. This effort is not directed at a planned enhancement of the system other than the improvements gathered by the new technology in the replacement equipment. The current system issues such as in building coverage in Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, University of Northern Colorado, or west Greeley such as Northridge High School would still exist. l'he interference issues along the 1-25 Corridor where Weld's infrastructure and Larimer County's infrastructure meets would still exist. Potential solutions for the City of Windsor and Northridge have been identified. The Windsor solution is currently • • • estimated at an additional $400,000.00 and Northridge at an additional $64,452.00. Who would pay for these enhancements is still under discussion. The second option would involve not only a replacement of existing equipment but an enhancement of capability of the existing system. The second option involves the development of a 4 site Simulcast system which would address those concerns noted in the previous paragraph. In this option the replacement of Communications Center console equipment would still have to occur at the estimated 2.4 to 2.8 million dollars. However, DTR tower site replacement would not be required. The second portion of this option would be the construction of a 4 site simulcast system at a projected cost of $4,490,000.00. The total projected cost for this option would be approximately $7,290,000.00. The simulcast option would resolve the problems of in building coverage, which is very important to the fire community, in Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, UNC and west Greeley. The simulcast system design was discussed when the original radio infrastructure was purchased but the cost at that time was prohibitive. The simulcast option would also resolve many anticipated future growth concerns where the simple replacement option may not. Finally the simulcast option might provide the best alternative for a feasible funding plan involving grants or multiple partners to share the cost of the project. I have attached Motorola's proposals for the simulcast system, Windsor's solution under the current system, and Northridge's solution under the current system. Motorola has completed an entire equipment inventory of Weld County's owned radio infrastructure; however I am still waiting on a proposed cost document from them for the replacement only option. I will relay this to your office once I have a written proposal. In conclusion, I hope that the preceding document will provide some topics for discussion and may lay the groundwork to develop a financial plan for cost sharing this project. If you have questions, concerns or additional direction please do not hesitate to contact me. C WCA CA -e, SOWtot • =, t rwb I lice, i n O jut Siu.fic-1,L,3 p ct_Ct rite A.A-- Vt Ikean ay Ictqb = `tD cW o k' s Q 1 0 Nis L.*124 ,teA Cthea n 6/b'l 1-19O 4 A- 1 x111^ 0 &Dub C v 4 O\o'n, k, Ci C\a cA fl49' nn utiv_pcain 0 1ct f QXc�►-w_ cut5Jat49)(Lewzyko-Lot (01)- S Sirc,43+h 14 cam RETAIN THIS COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS. r E i S s It's 9 � I -g to I mogt E_.:. a 4 If aDa _fl Ig O 3i LL� l o ; ❑ p - �� I m 3 U am 5 A❑ :L c f5 3t4p I a a Ln as ' gar -,..3 a] og m a '� e l � C� AO o 12 to ova. stLilPLC. gea QnE I w`na Y ,a 1311H IF B. Rt v 3 : 3 m NI N I o� I d O 0 O g sip • • • DOLA LETTER OF INTEREST DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Weld County Public Safety Radio Infrastructure Project Weld County provides public safety radio communications to 42 law enforcement, fire, and ambulances services within its County borders. The system is managed by the Greeley Poli Dsepartment with input from the Weld County Communications Board Component this system include the Weld Regional Communications Center and the radio equipment, towers and infrastructure to support local and State radio networks. Weld County has been an original member of CCNC and participant in the State of Colorado public safety radio system (DTR). In this role, Weld County has provided funding and infrastructure that directly supports the State radio network. As a public safety radio infrastructure owner, the issue of maintaining radio system technology and meeting the demands of expanded system usage has been challenging to local governments As the current system approaches use life and capacity limitations, weaknesses within the system become more apparent. Issues of insufficient radio coverage have been identified in our area, particularly in the communities of Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, and within Greeley, the University of Northern Colorado as well as west Greeley. There are also issues of coverage along the I-25 corridor along the boundaries of Weld and Larimer counties. In the case of some of our communities (Windsor) the issue of radio coverage is approaching a critical level. During the Windsor tornado the capacity of our system was insufficient to meet the demands placed on it. In our current radio system design, we are taxing Larimer County's eastern radio infrastructure in an attempt to meet the needs in the western areas of our county. From a technical standpoint we have identified a course of action which would resolve those issues we have identified, however the solution is beyond the fiscal capabilities of our local governments. The project we are proposing is the development of a four tower site simulcast radio system which would still be integrated into the State public safety radio system. Included in the project is the enhancement of the radio equipment utilized in the emergency dispatch center for Weld County. The four simulcast tower sites will be located to provide improved coverage in those areas identified. Serviceable equipment which has been replaced in the enhancement will be recycled to other less busy tower sites throughout Weld County, to include an additional site to improve radio coverage along Weld County's northern boundary. The area affected in the improved radio coverage will be all of Weld County and northeastern Larimer County to include the cities of Greeley, Loveland, Fort Collins, • Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, and Berthoud. The potential residential population that would be positively impacted by this project is estimated at 463,000. • • Draft Support Letter • July 20, 2009 Susan E. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Rm 521 Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Ms. Kirkpatrick, S , c NO? S"cv v t fa rig C cy--O-k s a member of one of the most productive mineral producing counties in the state we are pleased to offer our support for the application to enhance and upgrade the E-911 communication infrastructure in Weld County. With the passage of SB-09-232, seventeen million dollars became available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal mineral lands. We understand this is a one time opportunity to participate in a regionally significant application which benchmarks our historical and current efforts to maintain and upgrade our emergency regional communication partnership. • In 1987, we came together as a region to develop a countywide communication system, and this partnership of 44 entities remains strong today. Due to age of the current system, and an increasing need to expand to simulcast technology, the current system -needed upgrade is estimated at $7.2 million dollars. Weld County, on behalf of the regional partners, is preparing the initial application materials for the SB-09-232 grant process. We hope to use these funds to further enhance our system with increased technological advancement to simulcast, replacement of outdated transmission equipment, additional communication consoles, and tower replacements. This new equipment will eliminate the building coverage concerns currently being experienced in some of the urbanizing areas and reduce interference issues along the I-25 corridor. We thank you for your support of this effort. We look forward to working with you on this worthy, regionally significant project. Your support of this project will further the efforts of the past and lay the foundation for continued future service to our citizens. We are happy to discuss this matter with you further at your convenience. Elected official signature s ec e VY\Gitki • Letters to be included in the application materials should be directed to Monica Mika at 915 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80631, or e -mailed to mmika@co.weld.co.us by August 8'h . • • • Grants/commonicationtower/draft letter Fir••••••••••••••••••r•. • • Ik-U!}n1..Q 11 I- - 00 kuetrYtryul w t- 9 /1 oa. Cam maiuthiy) J anx gnS _nu v u 06, 194 ti bx _ corx. r e c Tov3i2, Mccp - • CN, S.) • • • • �J estimated at an additional $400,000.00 and Northridge at an additional $64,452.00. Who would pay for these enhancements is still under discussion. The second option would involve not only a replacement of existing equipment but an enhancement of capability of the existing system. The second option involves the development of a 4 si e Simulcast system which would address those concerns noted in the previous paragraph. In this option the replacement of Communications Center console CD equipment would still have to occur at the estimated 2.4 to 2.8 million dollars. However, DTR tower site replacement would not be required. The second portion of this option would be the construction of a 4 site simulcast system at a projected cost of $4,490,000.00. The total projected co—sn'or this option would be approximately $7,290,000.00. The simulcast option would resolve the problems of in building coverage, which is very important to the fire community, in Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, UNC and west Greeley. The simulcast system design was discussed when the original radio infrastructure was purchased but the cost at that time was prohibitive. The simulcast option would also resolve many anticipated future growth concerns where the simple replacement option may not. Finally the simulcast option might provide the best alternative for a feasible funding plan involving grants or multiple partners to share the cost of the project. I have attached Motorola's proposals for the simulcast system, Windsor's solution under the current system, and Northridge's solution under the current system. Motorola has completed an entire equipment inventory of Weld County's owned radio infrastructure; however I am still waiting on a proposed cost document from them for the replacement only option. I will relay this to your office once I have a written proposal. In conclusion, I hope that the preceding document will provide some topics for discussion and may lay the groundwork to develop a financial plan for cost sharing this project. If you have questions, concerns or additional direction please do not hesitate to contact me. i(41born ini/n(4 874 IC iiP/&� IS • • v,*--L-A, at4) O -Q_ IN_o_iL-cik 'Au; Yuko -e ritS USA Sb ,,c4- oy ,f > cA p e--°\ I I -)Ap6� $(0\0\e‘A C-1*, p • • • Page 1 of 1 • Monica Mika From: Monica Mika Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:06 PM To: Don Sandoval Cc: Don Warden Subject: Notes for our meeting on Tuesday Don, Here is my list of topics I am looking forward to discuss with you. I am sure there are others you have but this will be a start. See you tomorrow. 1. Siren grant update '�� 2. CDBG grant for Bella Romero 3. CDBG grant for E-911 software and or other idea(,-) 4. Pro/Con for CR 74 project C 5. Comments about CR 49 grant&Cb 6. Discuss other quarterly updates 7. Tier III Crime Lab and Communication tower possible grants 8. Other Monica_ J D r�) V r)\'.. vokl i �x n C _G K\ L H4/ v I�\ 0 r 4 OI J c. 7 ,1 1C / COOL I 6/23/2009 • Departme a, _ • cal Affairs • Se:arrivelotr � `,eammaseette0 SB-09-232 State Financial Assistance to Finance Local Government Capital Construction Projects July 8, 2009 Purpose • $17 million one time budget allocation available to assist local government communities most directly and substantially impacted by production of energy resources on Federal Mineral Lease land. Priority • Application submitted jointly by multiple local governments; or • Application seeking funding for a project that is a multi - jurisdictional project or that requires a substantial amount of funding. • • Process Assumptions 1. Letter of interest submitted by local government applicants. 2. Pre -application and selection. 3. Selected pre -applications will submit a full application. 4. Minimum of at least two local governments as part of an application. 5. Enforceable intergovernmental agreements part of full application. 6. Collaboration among local governments is a requirement in planning, costs and benefits. 7. Minimum 25% aggregate local government match which can be from cash, gift, grant and/or loan. 8. Maximum four-year construction completion time frame. 9. No traditional Tier I or II funding applications to support SB-09-232 projects. 10. No supplemental funding for SB-09-232 projects. 7/9/2009 1 5%c Department of Local Affairs Srr yatAta, euln,cz(o e at • • Grant Program AVAILABILITY of FUNDS Energy Impact Assistance Fund (EIAF) Grant Program FY 2009-2010 The Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) and the Energy Impact Advisory Committee are committed to the transparency of the grant and loan program. DOLA in consultation with the Advisory Committee announces annually the amount of grant funds available for each of the two funding cycles with application deadlines. The decline of Severance and Federal Mineral Lease (FML) revenue and a reallocation of $31 million by the General Assembly to support the General Fund resulted in fewer dollars available for the Energy Impact Assistance Fund (EIAF). When statutory changes are implemented by the General Assembly, they affect the amount of revenues available for grants. In the most recent legislative session, the General Assembly enacted legislation that reallocates FML revenue from the program to the General Fund resulting in fewer grant dollars for the program. The total energy impact funds available for grants for the FY 2009-10 are $47,075,000. The EIAF program will have two grant cycles and they are comprised of two tiers according to size of award: • Tier I - 20% of the total funds available, $9,415,000 are allocated for awards of up to $200,000 (any unused dollars in Tier I, reallocated to Tier II). • Tier II — 80% of the total funds available, $37,660,000 are allocated for awards of greater than $200,000 - $2 million. The total dollars available in each cycle as well as the application deadlines are listed in the table below: Application Deadline August 1 December 1 Tier I* $4,707,500 $4,707,500 Tier II $18,830,000 $18,830,000 *Any unawarded Tier I dollars will be reallocated to Tier II Tier I and II grant applications are accepted each cycle. Local government may request a Tier I and a Tier II in each cycle or multiple applications of Tier I and II. However, the local government must prioritize their applications. Revenues to the EIAF fund are derived from a portion of the state severance tax proceeds and federal mineral lease (FML) royalties. Revenues to the fund are highly variable, and the fund balance fluctuates dramatically from year to year, due to such factors as production levels and commodity prices. For further information, contact Tony Hernandez at (303) 866-4988 or tony.hernandez@state.co.us. 7/9/2009 Impact Policies July, 2009 Background The Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Program's general legislative directive is to provide financial assistance to communities socially and economically impacted by energy and mineral development for purposes of planning, construction and maintenance of public facilities, and for public services. DOLA's intent in administering this grant and loan program is to promote sustainable community development and increase livability of communities through strategic investments in asset -building activities. Some investments support provision of services to strengthen community governance, such as support for enhanced electronic records management for assessors' offices or law enforcement agencies, support for community strategic plans or development codes, and similar activities. However, the major portion of funding is for investments in the development of capital assets. DOLA is reviewing its history of partnering with grant recipients and assessing how to improve the strategic nature and long-term benefit of the capital investments we support. The following policy guidelines are presented to assist potential applicants in improving chances of success in achieving funding in an increasingly competitive environment. These guidelines represent efforts to improve the strategic nature of investments, as discussed above. The policies also reflect recent changes in the availability of alternative funding sources for community development projects. 1. Rolling Stock Rolling stock (road maintenance equipment, firefighting apparatus, ambulances, public safety vehicles and the like) should be routinely replaced by communities on a schedule based on an approved capital improvements program, vehicle replacement program or similar plan. Generally, these purchases should be budgeted for and financed on an ongoing basis through local revenue sources. Circumstances in which DOLA may be willing to consider funding equipment are as follows: • Disaster -related emergencies • Situations where road maintenance or emergency response capabilities directly related to energy or mineral impact activities require equipment purchases which might otherwise exhaust local financial capability and where local revenue -raising efforts are already strained. 7/9/2009 11:38:58 AM Departme I Affairs • $fieaft atiff 4'..?. ...eattagotaie4 2. K-12 School Facilities In addition to receiving state financial support through the traditional annual budget appropriation process, school districts are also eligible to apply for grant funds through the Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Program. While school districts rarely applied for these funds in the past, there has been a significant increase in such applications over the last few years. School districts have a variety of options to compete for discretionary state funds through a number of programs. Examples of discretionary funding available includes the Governor's Energy Office (GEO) for energy conservation and for the development of renewable energy sources and the BEST program administered through the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) to address capital funding needs for K-12 school facilities. CDE also has funds available for planning. In some cases, GEO and CDE program staff have suggested school district officials also approach DOLA for grant funds to supplement projects supported in part by their programs. • • Given the increased demand on limited resources available to support the broad range of local government needs (including school districts) across the state to mitigate energy and mineral impacts, DOLA's policy guidelines regarding funding K-12 facilities will be as follows: • School districts should approach CDE and GEO for funding, as appropriate, before applying for Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance funds. • DOLA will give preference to support school facility improvements which create a needed community asset that is made available for broad public use. For example, school buildings often function as community centers for social events, as recreational centers, as community libraries or as service centers for outreach assistance for the elderly or families at -risk. Collaboration with general purpose local governments (municipalities and counties) in the development of these types of projects is strongly encouraged. • Applications requesting support of capital facilities to be used exclusively for K- 12 activities (classrooms, administration buildings and sport complexes) are discouraged. • Energy and Mineral Impact Program funding for school master plans and other planning and design activities are also discouraged since other sources of funds are available. 7/9/2009 11:38:58 AM • • • Proposed concept: The first approach or simple system replacement would involve a multi -year approach initiated in 2013 to 2014 lasting through 2017-2018. The process would be the replacement of dispatch consoles in the Communications Center and a phased replacement of tower site equipment over the next 3-4 years. The Communications Center replacement is an activity that would have to be done as a single event and could not be completed in multi -year phases. The current estimated cost for this piece of the infrastructure project is 2.4 to 2.8 million dollars. The second phase of this approach would be the replacement of equipment at DTR tower sites. I he tower equipment process could be scheduled out over a 3 to 4 year cycle replacing a site a year. This portion of the project would cost approximately $1,775,000.00 with individual site costs ranging from $450,000.00 to $750,000.00 depending on the site. The total cost of this option would be approximately $4,575,000.00. It must be noted in the first approach, the effort would be directed at replacing existing equipment with new equipment as the old equipment met the end of its projected use life. This effort is not directed at a planned enhancement of the system other than the improvements gathered by the new technology in the replacement equipment. The current system issues such as in building coverage in Windsor, Johnstown, Milliken, University of Northern Colorado, or west Greeley such as Northridge High School would still exist. The interference issues along the 1-25 Corridor where Weld's infrastructure and Larimer County's infrastructure meets would still exist. Potential solutions for the City of Windsor and Northridge have been identified. C) N O O N Cost Sharing Proposal No. 2 Less 2007 Base. r T r:.) N CO r in N r Q) T ON N rt T NN t T CO r) T 857 743 733 704 652 577 CO V ct V N <; 379 264 0 N N N r N N CO T 187 0 to r "Y (0 r 102 CO O) CO C3) N a) O 6) CO CO CO co CO 'C CO r CO CO "it co N coN r r O O N 4) r N I- co N O) 713 O O) CO ' V 0 416 r (O Cr) CO CO CO N d' C) 317 0 CO N 216 1 206 V CO r CO N r 0) 0 r CO O r r 0) r C) 76 U) CO 50 CO ct 48 N 'Cl- con V sit 42 CO N (7) 't CO N 0) CO N 2009 CO co CO in Q) N N N N 220 205 132 to r r Cr) r r 0) O r r O r 0) CO 0) CO CO CO C7) LO r rS 35 CO CO 29 29 't N r N (O r 0 r 15 0 r V r r ) r ts- CO r r r) r tI) N Frederick/Firestone FD Windsor FD Evans FD [Mountain View FD Ft. Lupton FD Johnstown FD ad uospnH Milliken FD Eaton FD Platteville/Gilcrest FD U) Cll -C O La Salle FD Kersey FD Ault/Pierce FD Plattevalley Ambulance Galeton FD Nunn FD Keenesburg FD Mountain View Ambulance Prospect Valley FD 0 LL C O 0) 0) c Thompson Valley Ambulance Poudre FA New Raymer FD Berthoud FD Pawnee FD Briggsdale FR Loveland FD Brighton FD 0 IL U) C_ 0) 0) TRI Area Ambulance Poudre Valley Ambulance CO .. + t- 100% of 2011 Increase over 2007 Base $ 441.080 0 0 CO N (0 r 0 Efi 0 U) 01 N (0 (V 0 0 En 0 EA 0 rfl(A(A(A(fl 0 0 0 0 0 EAEf) 0 0 E0 0 CA 0 EA(0 0 0 C!) 0 EA(f) 0 0 €A 0 EA 0 co 0 co 0 EA 0 EA 0 U) 0 (A 0 EA 0 0 E9(A 0 0 EA 0 (A 656.559 2/3 Share of 2010 Increse over 2007 Base $ 423,714 O O op CO U) r O iA O Cfl O) coN N to 0 (f3 0 69 0 EA 0 EA 0 (A 0 (A 0 (A 0 EA 0 (A 0 EA 0 EA 0 V? 0 (A 0 (A 0 0 0 CA 000 (A (A EA 0000000000 EA (A (A (A (A CA EA EA EA 41U) O M CO N r) (D 1/3 Share of 2009 Increase over 2007 Base •7 -t CO (6 K (A CO 0 r O �) 000)0000000000000000 CA EA is.. CO N l!7 (A (A (f) EA EA EA EA (A (A (A EA EA (f) (A (A EA 000 (A to EA 0000000000 (A (A EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 U) (O Co O 0) (0 0 Credit In E A(1)00 69E6969006969696969(OA(AU) 000 0000000000 6 O % of Calls Kept Constant for All Years s • e it. L!) N . c 0000 CO CV _o C7 0 \ N 0 r N 0 T 0 h r 0 (0000cW r 0 r000000000000 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 a- CCN 0 0 0 0 a tO.6d'(COflMN 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a? 0 O a 0 O s 0 O ,o NNN 000 0 a 0 s 0 ao o�0 0000000000 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 ao 0 0 ao 0 0 ao 0 0 a\ 0 0 00 0 a 0 O 0 O Total Fire/EMS Calls Total Radio Traffic -7' 0 co N to co 01 CI) C7) r r CO O N m CO (n r V N rt r- N r N r CO N r r O O Or"- r 0 r CO r CO N O CO Ch CO to O -t to CO N `:t O) CO CO r in C7 V r Cr) co r N co CO r co N r co LC) r 10 to r O m r r r r 85 N CO N co O co 74 CO N r N O rt Cn r (O In FIRE/EMS Agencies Weld County EMS LL LL D IFrederick/Firestone FD ad Jospu!MI t J < 0 c (0 Ui Mountain View FD Ft. Lupton FD 0 IL 0 C L -)) Hudson FD Milliken FD !Eaton FD Platteville/Gilcrest FD N L_ O La Salle FD N N Y Ault/Pierce FD Plattevalley Ambulance Galeton FD Nunn FD Keenesburg FD Mountain View Ambulance Prospect Valley FD LL p) O)o cc Thompson Valley Ambulance Poudre FA New Raymer FD I Berthoud FD Pawnee FD X LL To t7) O) cm Loveland FD Brighton FD C7) Q) §- ITRI Area Ambulance Poudre Valley Ambulance (0 CO N O In (A (0 t0 N N N co O N EA to M N co C7 (A EA N O N r N COI N M to tti N- (.0 r 1 N M CI) U) N CO N In 0) O N U) t_ to U) .0 (it C 0 C 0 U CU U C to t t Cost Sharing Proposal No. 2 Less 2007 Base. V O T CO N t7) 2,110,335 T N to (7) c0 M r to $209,025 N N t0. N M r r N Ill N N (f/ to (D it tO ri CO tl9 to ($526.125) T CO TT 0 r N W $ 139.501 2,027,249 N (D In r M r $173,576 N Q ', tii C N r 'I M M Q) it $ 5,594,363 to O lf) CO N N r IN CO O (D (D tf) r M (n (D d CD $1,263,219 $122,071 E 1Funds 1222,292 CO O T O N (D gclr (A tD r (D r N M to to CO T- `Q T U) N to S 2,-136.709 Paid by contributing entities other that Weld County and City of Greeley. 4J C) W 0 o - 0.3 — C o v a) Credit + Non -Weld -County Costs Paid by Weld County Total Revenues Total communications System Cost [Variance Paid by Weld County? True Cost to Weld Cot ty N (//11 M N In M N co U) M 0 N r r M N Cr) N 0 It N (D M O M N T O N to M T C) C) d 0 15 _a C) a N to N N to N 0 O N (D (O N D N N N o C) N to N I N N N • r C 0 U _v C) 3 L a ro to N O U _T C O V C) C O Z a C) U -n 7 O (1) 3 - J @ U 0 -J 4O r CO a O co a a) L U Y co a U) v .n C O a D J a) L lL @ ▪ d L !n C a O a o E 7 Y (n — f° m M c OC 3 - -0 C m o E a) tit U E o v)o c a) c c U @ o 3 > E L a) O = a9 3 J @ [• Ud r U O a C LL C o O C OIII O) O a'_' J .O X a) L <L >, U C Ia) C) co a) Co Ct a a) N CO Un @ Loss of Revenues to Weld From Ft. Lupton. FLFD. and MVFD. Variance (280,499) o N co M N. N. t0 'V I:) in N a (O In 2007 238,845 000) 0 0 N 0 0 N N CO t() 336.524 Revenues: Ft. Lupton Ft. Lupton Fire District Mountain View Fire District ) J a 0 I- U • • • • Page 1 of1 • • • Monica Mika From: Juan Cruz [Juan.Cruz@greeleypd.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:25 AM To: David Mathis; Mike Savage; Randolph Winsett Cc: Monica Mika; Marcia Walters Subject: RE: 911 Expense Authorization Budgeted item to expand Comm. ('enter operational capabilities, approved in budget. Juan O. Cruz 970-350-9663 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of. or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by person or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: David Mathis Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 4:18 PM To: Mike Savage; Juan Cruz; Randy Winsett Cc: 'Monica Mika'; 'Marcia Walters' Subject: 911 Expense Authorization Attached is an E-911 Expense Authorization for the Dispatch computer cabinet replacement and rewiring of our computers up to our work stations. This work was performed by W.A.C. It was a budgeted line item, #6954. There is a paper invoice that I've routed to Marcia through inter -office mail. Dave Mathis, Sergeant Weld County Regional Communications Center 1950 O Street Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 356-4000 ext. 2898 6/23/2009 • Weld County - City of Greeley 06-01-2009 Motorola Products - Life Cycle & Replacement Recommendations Dispatch Consoles — Centracom Gold Elite, Stop shipments end 2011, support end 2018. No new Centracom Gold Elite systems sold expansion of existing systems ONLY. Replacement — MCC7500, IP Consoles, 14 -Position system, with NICE Digital recorder. System Budgetary Pricing Range Total $2A00,000 to $2,800,000 • • Astro Spectra Mobiles — Stop shipments end 2004. support end 2011. Replacement — XTL2500, XTL5000 700/800MHz or APX7500 VHF/700/800MHz radios. Mobile Budgetary Pricing Range per unit $2800.00 to $3700.00 each. APX, TBA. DTR Antenna Sites— Quantar 1R repeaters, as part of DTR network. End -of -life stop shipments end 2011, support end 2018. Replacement — GTR8000 800MHz Repeater package. with new antennas and line kits, removal of old repeaters and install of new equipment included. 6 channel w/MOSCAD & Channel bank: $350,000 8 channel w/MOSCAD & Channel bank: $475,000 12 channel w/MOSCAD & Channel bank: $650,000 A review of each DTR site and actual numbers of repeaters by location will be needed, coming up with final exact costs. The numbers above are valid for budgetary purposes, and will need to be firmed up as actual cost may vary depending on number of repeaters at each location. Cost Sharing Proposal No. 2 Less 2007 Base. Weld Communications Center r N C0OO V CO trJ r U) CA O O CO O co O C?) N U) on T r- f` N Nt U) Ch O 00 00 COO60 O C7 O 01 U) N N V M N r- Q) r O r U) U) CO O LC) U) N U) EA ER 2009 O O CO r r O r CD CO O CO n to CD r- O M CO I- O 01 U) 00 to M U) U) 409 2008 tO O tr) CO U) to tri to O tr) to tri U) 2007 to to O $4,980,855 00 O OD Q) 4 U) Budget Year Operating Budget Depreciation (Towers infrastructure) Total communications System Cost Budget Variance from 2007 Budget Cost Covered by Weld County r O N Credit of 510,000 was received by these agencies CO r 00 00 N- O M N to 00 r f `S 0 NY 00 r- 12,761 O r' O N r r r (D r N O c0 aD r O t0 CO 00 N- tr) O O CO to 4,276 C'7 co r r r to up CO Q) T- CO 3 5, 684 O) 0 N U) U) Q) N LU r oD N .7 N d N CO 'Kt Q) •- OD r Q) r CO r CD r CO N O r CO O N-. r N CO M r O I\ M U) r N CD N 19,558 C 0 Di -)OW 0 C 0 a Platteville Kersey Lochbuie @ Y 2¢ -co- 0) Probation _0) a) OODH a) 0 �a 100% of 2011 Increase over 2007 Base $ 1.947.535 r NT f 00 N Q) t`0 N r CO NT M N N Ch 00 I� 00 d U) N CD Q) N U) N I� to 'S vi r 'S N 'el Q) r 18,214 '7 COO to r C") 0 N Q) 0t N I- 0t N U0 00 r Q) to r O 4f) O fn O to O 609U! O r W of 00 O r'i 2/3 Share of 2010 Increse over 2007 Base (Except Greeley and Weld', Q) U) OD O op r U) OD O CO r co 00 CD U) O CD O 00 ct 10,554 r CD ,rt O N O N tl) 0 O N Q) CO 00 OD OD 0 r CO I` 0 09 0 CA 0 CA 0 Ua 0 Cn $0 O U) O U) O CA O U) 00 CO U) 0) co N 1/3 Share of 2009 Increase over 2007 Base (Except Greeley and Weld) (O 01 co r --... U) N- 00 CD CO 5,340 V CM C7 U) r N N r N 447 U)(ACAU)CA6969CAU)Cn4AU)U) I' r CD O (D N r a) U EA VI CD O O r Ui CD O O r d9 OOO O O r 09 O O r Uj O O r U) U)U)(1) U) U) U3 UDU3(f) U)Ud G9 O O a U) "./0 of Calls Kept Constant for All Years 33.44% ?I. r o O CO CO CO 0 -. M r U) 0 P T-. N V' 0 O O r NT 0 O O Q) N 2.27% 0 O CO r N 0 O (fl (:O r 0 O Q) NT r 0 O t, Nr. r 0 O I` V r 0 O O V r 0 O Cl r- 0 D U) 0 x 0 O 00 N 0 0 O M r 0 0 9 U) 0 0 0 O O 0 0 Total Law Total Radio Traffic O M - M N J' tr) N r r r 46,470 35,789 00 00 00 6) N CO N N Q) N 20,251 1.0 00 00 101004 r r CO O r CO CO CD r 10,427 V00 I` N 0 ' CO N 0 r CO CO P- O r N- U) Q) 7,297 -t 00 Q) r 939 334 O r LAW Agencies -, a) Ut Weld SO to C9 W Ft. Lupton` a) c 0 0 LL 'E)'� v, c > -- a) N LL C 3 U c L -) Dacono c YO W Platteville a) L Y a) -0 o J c 0 Y 2 --' Q a) M U) J Probation (n a) U (D L. L- n O D 1 C:\Dots and Settings\ngunderson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5E\Cost Sharing plan • co >- 0 O co W z O H Q O 2010 COMMUN O (/) r N U O W 00 r Z N LLI Q 2010 E911 ADJUSTMENT r N CY) r CJO N Co O r CO N CO C7 if) N3/4 - CO C CO ti tczr U) co C7 N O r N C3) CO r r O O CO to N N N I N CO co d) Co C3) N O CO O N O 0 O N O N O C3) r N O O N O CS) N U 'I- I' 00 Co O N O r CO O U) Co O CCo CO d N O CO N OI O 0 O co O O O O CO O1 O O O O CO CO ti O N O CO CO M O N O CO r a N 00 C3) N o Co tn O N O 00 r r O O O N O N O O CO N O O O O O 0 O O O O O O in O O O O O O O O O in O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O In O O O r O N N to N M O co et in CO r a co M to N N O co M r O N N O tO N NI41 O U o U o l IY N Cis co N N CO N N N co C, Co N CO O) co Co N CO CO O CO r d CO O r r CO CO Co r N M d' N Co CO N C7 CO CO O) co co O O O O O O N O O O 1' to C) c co o M to Zit h N OI O O O N O O N to C) co O O O 0 OI O O O O O 1O Co C7) r N O O O O O O O O O O O 1O O O O) r O N r to C) cc a c0 M Q) N N w __i v - � CO a S; d � U U d r D C-) E tpi ;2> a o Cl)co t O a)co b (n a) C C o -2 co E O a) CO C O CO V E O E : a a) O O D IY O 0 Computer Services Combined Computer Services Weld Credit for Town Cost Sharing TOTAL Communications and CJIS Adjust Out Credit Cost Sharing TOTAL PAYMENT TO GREELEY U) a) a) 0 o) C O co Cc W L o 4) U a _D E oU C C U- ♦-' C E 0 C (13 C C O C10 O C E U O c 0 Cn WCRCC Travel GRAND TOTAL C a) E a) a) CB O N c : O) C 0.)'.C^ a 115 O L U O +, -a w O r O C O r r W O L C O c N N V 0 U a) a) U N ) C O • .c *Ca. C Oco >, C 0 E .D o _ U a w a) a) ,L^ 20 a) C E U C) O O N T- r r C) 4- 0 (n cu (n a, .5 CO rn O O N Remianinq Due based on revised (MD Co oON0 0~0 r C� N CM N _ $ 45,552 } $ 72,952 r 0 T- N O O 0 O h m O C) O O CD 4f) IA 40 CO d9 Ea r COO M 0 N- N In O In CD Tit LS 233,276 M CO O ' 0) O DATE O N O 00 (n co N 00 C4 N Cl. r U) r Cn r - r co r 4o EA N e/) ata 6A - !)' W Z a CC jto Over/(Under) Original Budget T: N CO 'Ct N d' r (fl ' U) R. N CO (fl N `d O oil r U) CA M r (s CO ((QQ TT " EA V 0) u) d (A ' SO ' A r O N N U) t (7-:,-. O) CO ----. } (A (fl O CO N GO ' IA to N r r f/)) O C) r V IA (A OD CO N- (A TT O CO Ifl C�) CO O %---.." GO n' O CO IA r r O r N SO 1 (f) ' a ' to r O r N IA ' $ (55,201) 2009 Budget - NO RAISES/Actuals a 1.00 $ 27,663 $ 27,663 C0) CO 00 $ 1,314,302 CO M N- r Q1 CO N C3) O O it O O N N N Or M M r N r 01 (f) O) en $ 125,084 O 0 0 0 $ 2,412,212 } S 45,722 $ $ 30,000 $ $ 10.841 S a $ 71,194 $ $ 52,327 $ $ 18,367 $ $ 156,000 $ cAaIA(AI0, 60,088 $ 86,044 $ 55,351 $ to u3cn I (fi d d a U. Q} I LL 2009 Budget - ORIGINAL GO 1.00 $ 27,734 $ 27,734 7.38 $ 47,270 $ 348,853 0.37 $ 30,000 $ 11,200 1.50 $ 11256 $ 16,884 $ 376,937 0.50 $ 107,410 $ 53,705 2.64 $ 73,644 $ 194,420 19.71 $ 54,691 $ 1,077,960 1.00 $ 18,367 $ 18,367 0.15 $ 156,000 $ 23,051 $ 1,367,503 N -in N r CO r CA f - CO N N U) 0N co N f- CA C7) O) COCO cA t N r N U) 1.00 $ 44,307 $ 44,307 1.50 $ 62,474 $ 93,711 0.00 $ - $ - 3.00 $ 57,672 $ 173.016 M 0 r r M U) el 0 N CA (A co O) Cr) CA co cn (n C ) CA 0 0 O CJ GO $ 2,467,413 $ per FTE/Qty t aq a 1- LL C 05 05 N o `5 766 Salaries Benefi coC) nn�ti CO-a�i 03 NNN- ti CD Upgrade a police Sgt. To Capt 76 76 ({ To 76 Weld Credit for town Cost Sharing Contribution Payment to Greeley IMD Commander 001-20-220-2200-000 Records and ID 001-20-220-2205-0000 Data Coordinator I Records Overtime Data Coordinator II Upgrade F-- I-- Radio Maintenance Contract (WAC) (acct 7496) Electric Gas F- Computer Services 001-20-220-2220-000 Upgrade Computer Systems Manager Systems Administrator Network/Systems Manager I- - 46 F- 0 M r OCD M OCD ON (ft 0O CO - a Total # of checks paid Total # of checks remaining Revised monthly amount (incl. Weld Credit): Revised monthly amount (excl. Weld Credit): REDUCTIONS FOR 2009: O N n to Cp 4) CT 7 m N r-- 110 C O) D W M 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co O h Overt' Credit Cost Share r 0 N C") O N a • • 2011 Estimate 2012 Estimate 2013 Estimate 2014 Estimate 2010-10% 2011-10% 2012-10% 2013-10% $5,673.73 $5,106.35 $4,595.72 $4,136.15 $12,241.78 $11,017.60 $9,915.84 $8,924.26 $17,037.82 $15,334.03 $13,800.63 $12,420.57 $18,320.79 $16,488.71 $14,839.84 $13,355.86 $98,584.20 $88,725.78 $79,853.20 $71,867.88 $21,282.76 $19,154.48 $17,239.03 $15,515.13 $51,548.77 $46,393.90 $41,754.51 $37,579.06 $25,998.58 $23,398.72 $21,058.85 $18,952.96 $1,909.11 $1,718.19 $1,546.38 $1,391.74 $6,219.62 $5,597.66 $5,037.89 $4,534.10 $341,563.66 $307,407.29 $276,666.56 $248,999.91 $583.38 $525.04 $472.54 $425.28 $8,971.11 $8,074.00 $7,266.60 $6,539.94 $30,252.66 $27,227.39 $24,504.65 $22,054.19 $7,327.54 $6,594.79 $5,935.31 $5,341.78 $9,161.47 $8,245.33 $7,420.79 $6,678.71 $13,170.87 $11,853.78 $10,668.40 $9,601.56 $14,163.78 $12,747.40 $11,472.66 $10,325.40 $9,865.32 $8,878.79 $7,990.91 $7,191.82 $22,456.66 $20,210.99 $18,189.89 $16,370.90 $410.94 $369.84 $332.86 $299.57 $1,581.78 $1,423.60 $1,281.24 $1,153.11 $3,300.97 $2,970.87 $2,673.78 $2,406.41 $16,979.20 $15,281.28 $13,753.15 $12,377.83 $8,784.22 $7,905.79 $7,115.21 $6,403.69 $36,370.04 $32,733.03 $29,459.73 $26,513.76 $569,305.20 $512,374.68 $461,137.21 $415,023.49 $1,353,065.93 $1,217,759.33 $1,095,983.40 $986,385.06 funding Mineral Impact Fund to be distributed as specified in Paragraph (IV) of paragraphy (a) of subsection (5). )paragraph (II) of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) during the fiscal year will be at least 10% less that the • • • Ault, Town of Dacono, City of Eaton, Town of Erie, Town of Evans, City of Firestone, Town of Fort Lupton, City of Frederick, Town of Garden City, Town of Gilcrest, Town of Greeley, City of Grover, Town of Hudson, Town of Johnstown, Town of Keenesburg, Town of Kersey, Town of La Salle, Town of Lochbuie, Town of Mead, Town of Milliken, Town of New Raymer, Town of Nunn, Town of Pierce, Town of Platteville, Town of Severance, Town of Windsor, Town of Weld County TOTAL FML FML Change 2010 Estimate 2008 2009 2008 - 2009 2009 - 10% 0.00 $7,004.60 $7,004.60 $6,304.14 908.55 $15,113.31 $14,204.76! $13,601.98 2,725.66 $21,034.34 $18,308.68 $18,930.91 908.55 $22,618.26 $21,709.71 $20,356.43 41,793.41 $121,708.89 $79,915.48 $109,538.00 6,359.87 $26,275.01 $19,915.14 $23,647.51 13,628.29 $63,640.46 $50,012.17 $57,276.41 1,817.10 $32,097.01 $30,279.91 $28,887.31 908.55 $2,356.92 $1,448.37 $2,121.23 908.55 $7,678.54 $6,769.99 $6,910.69 81,769.72 $421,683.53 $339,913.81 $379,515.18 908.55 $720.22 $188.33 $648.20 2,725.66 $11,075.44 $8,349.78 $9,967.90 9,994.08 $37,348.96 $27,354.88 $33,614.06 2,725.66 $9,046.35 $6,320.69 $8,141.72 2,725.66 $11,310.46 $8,584.80 $10,179.41 4,542.76 $16,260.33 $11,717.57 $14,634.30 908.55 $17,486.15 $16,577.60 $15,737.54 0.00 $12,179.41 $12,179.41 $10,961.47 1,817.10 $27,724.27 $25,907.17 $24,951.84 0.00 $507.33 $507.33 $456.60 0.00 $1,952.81 $1,952.81 $1,757.53 0.00 $4,075.27 $4,075.27 $3,667.74 13,628.29 $20,961.97 $7,333.68 $18,865.77 0.00 $10,844.71 $10,844.71 $9,760.24 6,359.87 $44,901.28 $38,541.41 $40,411.15 55,421.70 $702,845.93 $647,424.23 $632,561.34 $0.00 253,486.13 $1,670,451.76 $1,416,965.63 $1,503,406.58 Wildfire Preparedness Fund $ 3,250,000.00 each year Priority Given to Grants submitted jointly by multiple local governments OR Seek funding for a project that is a multi-juristictional project or that requires a SUBSTANTIAL amount of Bonus Payments Distributed Quarterly 50% of Bonus Payments shall be transferred to the local government permanent fund $17,000,000 shall be transferred from the Local Government Permanent Fund to the Local Government It is anticipated that the total monies that will be deposited into the mineral leasing fund pursuant to sut Page 1 of 1 Monica Mika From: Dan Huerter Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 11:48 AM To: Monica Mika Cc: Anita Scrams Subject: Severance Tax Distribution and the Value of GIS Weld County received a 2009 Severance Tax Distribution of $2,682,302.78 for 462 oil and gas employees or $5,805.85 / Oil and Gas Employee. ( I understand that the CERR's are only part of the distribution equation) Of the 462 Oil and Gas employees in unincorporated Weld County 388 were the result of appeals of erroneous addresses (i.e. reported as Greeley and the address was actually in unincorporated Weld County) determined by Charlie Vetter and submitted by Esther Gesick. If I may be so bold the appeal effort accounts for $2,252,669.80 of the $2,682,302.78. Pardon the slight exaggeration. Dan Huerter GIS Coordinator Weld County GIS 1401 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6432 9/15/2009 E 0 $ Per Employee O 'a tt c ;Ui a r0 0 _ o 3 w min a N m.6 0 CCOO N N O 9 ci c 0 ten a) O E c 0 tat pt.Ug ' Y • f O, >. p c> C U ✓ ,EJ v9 0 W W ij 000 r 0 0 N 0 0 C) 0 r Oii 2;221, oot; -0„2,22 4 ≥ c 0:0 00 0 (n e-rOr 69690 =no 0 nre m m m 19 W H nr C N C o O0 0 N 01 N!i 0! tIn r inm o n rN nnn OR NN l9 N O 0) CO; Nor N N v 0 o eo m oo o v 041)0000) 0000000 N N N 0 N 0 0 N N r N r r r H{/)Y)Y)MYIH 000000 N N m 044 N of r N o o_ O me taa 0 0IN a oil n 10 00 o a es m N 0 ow an o m om m N M a 0 Eva C E o¢ ,..N 00000 N O a Y) N re r N rrMr0 a 0) r r N O W m N N O NN W M r N• w NNww w 00N00 0 0 LOCO yO yQ N 000 N MOD N 0 a O O N .0 0 N N NN 0 f U mlts3 r L N 8 3 imN 0 aDo o ea a'r0N N N 0 0 N N r 0 1 n 434,43434, a 00 '400) N • r0 NNn O N Ne.a 0 N W 0 NNO 0010 06th erm N N r 00 0 0 --Se 01- Ce CON N 0 a et CO N m CO 1° 000 N 0 000 ere 0 N n m 0) N 0 o N 0 00 0 0Nm m roc. 0) r r OO 644 000 0 N aa N0101 m 0 0 0 0 0 Multi -County Jurisdice Y! O O 1() w mr r N on mm N O 0 m N ONa 000 N 0 N 0 000 NN N _ ]0 444343 ‘-00 N 0 a w 11,-I a 'O N O a'0 0 NH) N -NN N 00 000 t tE t ° o ;° c c °I o U F- 3 0, F,. c O° .i-6,! -- '1-e° )-;al 3Or 3°H g 3O FU c g u U~ U t~ g m r 4 ti ti w _ Fy L c° J, Z o Tn ,; N yvy t,q au t -C T e 2 1 W 'L' Q v 0 N a W ww O-LL'R U' U' 0 0SJ,YY J JS°. U r a C I2 0 0 O IC 3_ F c iii F 6 E O K m 223 3 'a z Z CDNe 0 N N Niti)(00 0 CO 0 a r m fl0 p M m h 0 C0000 0 0 0 oa 00 M U 0 0` 0 c 0 000N 0000 a a N m NROa N Q —to W N m 0i o5 Ii N 0m 0 r g r E gdiew z o -z N m $1,784,215.94 a W N 0 N co mla " wy 000 0N 000 lo n m cc = N 0 0) or49 N E w N a a O a m 0 N N 440 ^5 00 O ON CO O ON 00 N ON 4- en- c.i 69 05 rn CO M N vi 69 tW b pop r� G 734 U U o W N m Oo N O Less $10,000 per Agency Cost for 2010 is Weld County 2009 Credit 2/3 of Cost after Credit toward 2010 $10,000 Credit $ (904.76)1 $ 14,606.37 1 M O\ N N r N M ON 00 O V) 00 $ (462.70) 1 $ 1.183.69 1 V O Cl Cr, b 1/40 V N en -... 69 $ (322.87)1 $ 627.07 1 in ON 00 N 'D 69 0 -- N 4 \O 69 Cr, in M M 'D 69 < z <4 z O tN ,.D 1/4o N Cl 69 $ 14,937.63 in —4 N va M .. 69 ‘O VD V) N N 69 00 in 0< va V N 69 Vt ON N VD 00 ~ 69 N O. V N 7 69 O\ Cr, V) :b .-i 69 O O` 'D -- Cr, 69 N O` T N in 69 VD O N V O u 69 O in O N O .N..i 69 0, M —4 M ON v 49 Vt ON N O ON Vt 69 O N 00 -- O 00-D, 69 $ (7,245.00)1 7 O O N 7 69 N O 0 ON V Cr,- 69 cn 00 I-- T D1 69 Percentage Cost Per Agency for Variance O 7 M O 00 69 $ 131,218.43 O t� VD b Cl, 69 M N M O. 69 in ‘-- N 1/40 M 69 VD V N N N 69 CO tin P V 49 Lin Q. N 0 00 fH N 01 a Cl 7 69 01 lT V) b 69. O -. M CO O 69 M O O N V 69 7 Cr,in N V) a, 69 0 D, N 0, 69 .. 00 'O O 69 V1 O N ON O 69 O 00 .-. 00 01 69 $ 2,755.00 I 'D ON o N Vt 69 00 ON O O in 69 In M -- N 69 % of Calls Kept Constant for All Years o T O` M n co O N en M 4.77%J \'o C 00 O 7 0 O V \'\'.\'\'o 0 00 M N G N N N 0 00 ej N C o 01 ,- IC)en M -- \a C N N -- h O o c-1 V. -- 0 en . .-, 0 00 l� O 0 00 . O c3a e M v. O O �-. O c C O --. O G D O O Total Radio Traffic 2008 233,177 d' 00 O N N 43,627 32,704 in .-- O 00 N \O M 00 t- or M in M - 4- \O in M 00 O. V N mn M —4ON ON 00 N in 00 V 00 N O in VD- O\ Cr, M O O t-- N O, 5,373 Cr, ON in N M -, \0 M Vt 01 VD N to '.D 00 N • Cost Bil1e for Agencies 009>^ o Lyy . Weld County Evans 'Ft. Lupton $ . 5,427.97 N .. to Cil On � 49 N: N Op. � 69 Frederick $ . 2,63704 Johnstown I $ 855.88 G0> 69 0 0 d .y ^ i 'Platteville I $ - .I �Lochbuie N •�- /-y 0 Q a IProbation '� O �I�_� 3 y �, O yyD H < t E ✓ N O i S- ul .V r, N/ r'4 N In O 69 D-02-209 9:02AM FROM DOLA LOVELAND 970 679 4500 P. 1 • • posttir Fax Note 7671 oama J i s j O YYIO/V c 4 Mb. F S o/Dapt..Z hone at Ep ►honer ax* Paull August 26, 2009 The Honorable Douglas Rademacher, Commissioner Weld County 91510°' Street Greeley, CO 80632 RE: EIAF #6829 - Weld County Radio Infrastructure Project - SB 09-232 Letter of Interest Dear Commissioner Rademacher Thank you for your letter of interest in participating in the application process to receive SB-09- 232 funding. We are now ready to begin the next step of the competitive process. Please work with your DOLA Regional Manager in the preparation of the pre -application which is due to DOLA on October 2. 2009. The pre -application consists of a cover letter and a two -page form from pie lead local government No attachments other than signed statements of participation from all local government partners will be accepted. The lead local government win serve as the grant recipient and fiscal agent for the project. A sample format of the form is attached. Please use this format The form should contain the following: t _ A more detailed description of the sustainable community development project than was included in the letter of interest Include documented need and quantifiable data concerning community benefit such as number of people, etc.; 2. A description of the substantial impact from the production of energy resources on Federal Mineral Lease (FML) land; 3. Total project cost and amount of request 4. Match and status of match (committed or pending), including type (cash, in -kind, gifts, grants. etc.); 5. List of other funding partners; 6. Estimated time frame for completion of the project 7. Attached to the form should be signed statements of participation from all involved local governments. Please contact Don Sandoval at 970-679-4501 as you develop your project Sincerely, Susan Kirkpatrick Executive Director Attachments: Pre -Application format SB 09-232 Criteria and Schedule cc: Don Sandoval Regional Communications Center 2009 Budget - By Paying Agency 'Based on revised salaries as of 7.21.09 EXPENDITURES CONTRIBUTIONS Total Greeley Weld County E911.. 3,083,727 484,878 78,847 765 1,392,227 156,000 80,480 765 1,272.884 23,051 18,367 418,616 305.827 - CITY OF GREELEY BUDGET Communications -0012022022100000 (Weld - paid mthly; E911 - reimb of actual exp) Salaries & Benefits Overtime Dispatch Temp Services/Seasonal Clothing & Uniforms Total Communications 3,648,217 1 609472 1,314,302 724;443. CITY -COMB COMM - 0012022022102211 (Charges for city radios, including fire and public works) WAC Contract T1 Lines 107,043 6,991 107,043 16,991: - — Total City Combined Comm 114,034 114;034: COUNTY -COMB COMM -0012022022102212 (Pass Thru Costs) WAC Contract Electric for Towers T1 Lines 181,277 22,675 6,991 181,277 22,675 P 6;991 - Total County Combined Comm 210 943 - :210,943 E-911-0012022022102213 (Pass Thru Costs) CAD component of Tiburon 94 923 94,923:' Total County Combined Comm 94,923 94:923 Computer Services -0012022022200000 (E911 - reimb of actual exp) Salaries 8 Benefits 113,696 - 113,696 Total Computer Services 113,696 113,696. Total Costs - City of Greeley Budget 4,181,813 1,723,506 1,525;245 933,062 WELD COUNTY BUDGET Computer Systems Improvement/Replacement Funds Communications Enhancement Zone 3 Controller Share of cost paid to CCNC Comm. Center Commander Travel to Weld Buss meetings Total Costs - Weld County Budget 100,000 20,000 19,000 1,500 140,500 100,000 20,000 19,000 1,,500!. 140,500 E911 BUDGET Clothing & Uniforms Language Line Background Investigations Emergin MSAG Software Maint UPS Maint Tiburon Intelecast Priority Dispatch Other Office Supplies Small Items of Equipment Computer Software Deep Rock Water Other Supplies Telephones Other Professional Svcs Training Equipment Capital Outlay Depreciation Contingency Emergency Reserve Total Costs - E911 Budget 10,350 26,500 6,000 3,124 4,950 5,983 39,088 8,786 20,000 12,625 148,728 39,072 900 6,291 175,608 2,100 71,989 420,000 121,000 30,000 96,000 1,249,094 10,350 26,500 &000 3,124 4,950 5,983 39,088 8,786 20;000 12625 148;728 39.072 900 6,291 175,608 2,1.00' 71,989 420,000 121;000 30,000. 96.000 ,1,249,094 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (1110.-p)-1) 5,571,407 1,723,605 30.9% 1,665,745 29.9% 2,182,156 39.2Y ( ISO I 9/16/2009 Communication Center Budget 2009 ORIGINAL vs 2010 BUDGET • All Salaries 8 Benefits at 100% per information from Finance on 7.31.09 Account Account Title ORIGINAL VARIANCE 2010 Budget 2009 Budget vs Original COMMENTS ..e.L lilYllr!.-�W711' ,i,.":, L !!I I s.��.,.., ^24000 11 REGULAR EMPLOYEES - ®glitila I® SALARIES B WAGES - SEAS. SIaMEI ® NS 276 000 0 E911 to .ick u. some costs E.Y,r�%:'f�.'''•�x�...i"'f�t''.+il !1 !1 YC5• Y f�' W..Ma;�7:Y+"^�P.."'6_t"M.....t:::2 �4i'ti�jLsk,. x.w'w 3.sr.a>tasiu��3«; f® ni®1' ® CLOTHING AND UNIFORMS ®i SSISIECIESNIIIIM ant= lEO S -S S-�i In GENERAL MAINT SUPPLIES ® 2IOUTSIDE PRINTING InPUBLICATION,SUBSCRIPDUES n -�' SI 45,000 45 000 Moved to Pro.ert el I P -S S -S ®'' 0MILEAGE S' 600 600 lin nin TRAVEL S TRAINING �i Si ECMi SISI SR S-S- altars iailJf 7496 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 7445 TELEPHONE Total City -Combined Communications 6,991 112,704 0 0 6,991 112,704 P'jilt! fir tar '11 . .;I F,TY„Y� k' .41,1 7441 ELECTRIC f iim i 'liy. tiM''.. = 23,128 29,920 .,Lev'fiiS. (6,7921 ...-. .. ..J41.,.�... >: .. 7444 GAS 0 0 7445 TELEPHONE 6,991 6,991 7496 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 188,907 188,907 Total County -Combined Communications 219,026 29,920 189,106.. ,1. 4t. 1 II.j:THER 'AL'S:17:27 . t:..�:�.14'$d ��...: ��. .+�3� 0 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES ®' -n n I Total Comm nlcabons Budget 3,685,109 3,476,110 208,999 7496 Other Purchase Services (City Comb Only) (105,713) 0 (105,713) 7496 Other Purchase Services (Comm Only) 0 (22.008) 22,008 7445 TELEPHONE 0 (45,000) 45,000 7496 Other Purchase Services (County Comb Only) (108,907) 0 (188 907) 7458/7496 E911 Purchased Services reimbursed to cn by E911r� 70321 0 70.321 I t5! r en;- n az-a^ : weld name Building Use Charge cost 14,208 14,208 0 Building and grounds surcharge 24,305 24,305 0 Liability Insurance 1,712 1,712 0 Accounting 1,151 1,151 0 Phone Lines into the Comm. center not related to E- 911Services 2,661 2,661 0 Purchasing 590 590 0 Attorney 7,492 7,492 0 Preapproved funds to repair, replace, or purchase emergency equipment to maintain system operating 100,000 100,000 0 County system users share to maintain 3rd Zone controller. 19,000 19,000 0 Travel Expenses for IMD Commander 1,500 1 500 0 Greeley indirect Costs; ' ,. t Accounting 17,734 17,734 0 Purchasing 4,052 4 052 0 Attorney 15,778 15,778 0 Human Resources 10,510 10,510 0 Other Costa:. '. .. Infrastructure Depreciation (Towers - Weld) 72,000 36,000 36,000 IMD Commander (Weld+Greeley) 84,865 81,861 3,004 Criminal justice Computer Services 122,152 123,132 (980) lower Maintenance (WAC Service Contract) 128,220 102,920 25,300 Added some new towers Total Adjustments 262,989 497,698 (234,609) Total Communications Budget- For Cost Sharing 3,948,098 3,973,708 C:1Documents and Settings\gp7033\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1945\2009 vs 2010 Comparision xls 1 N O O U N U N N C c E O -C .0 C W R E m 4-. co rC O 0 0 c r J. U rnO2 C M 'CO Y O 0 3 U N 0 >. N C) L C) v m C E O U O a !009VS2010 O O N CO N N a a CD Co O 0 0 r a to v0M M CO r e r —O a O O 43 m U3 a co 0 r a LO O CO N a O m a m N a CO In CO a m Co a a oo CO N 63 m COCO O N O O a m ; o' N w a co M M co N M a 00 M O CO CO N oo V a N N co N a M CO CO Ci a O O W co M a o r co rnr In O M D 0) Tr Co N ai a m r v CO N Co r- a r- 69 O a o v O O O N M r 01 N a M m N O N 0cm N in N<0 0 N m Co CO CO N 69- 09 a m a N a.) N a CO O M a O 0 0 Cam') LI)) CO N R O Co r a v M CO Co 0 0 a U) CO cvi O Fl N w M M O O05 O Co a t9 n Co O O 0 a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 000 r - O N N CO a CO 69 y n N CO Co M 0 N co (o a a a 0 0 O r0 u) N O N. r0 V CO a a a CO 0 M 111 N N Tr m a N O co a O M ei a r CO CO O Tr CO N LO O N a O ro a a N Co e3 Co N CO N a m a N W N a 0 V a r 0 CO O 0 n m a N N a 0 a O 0 0 0 r- 61 N N O 0 CJ re) O M w O M CO 0 CO o OOi N CO 0 N M O G a A e3 a a a m Co N tj m N C m an r r a r a Tr N co N co n a U 0000 o O O o O O O oo N v a a a a 0 O a 0 0 O O N /45. O co N O F N 030 `a u a• c m n Eo A oa � O 0 0 CO 0 N N O N N N 0 O c m N 0 a) O C 0 O U Co O a) E > 0 to U K F 0 9 O 0 N m O N a N � N 0 o O O q U C CO O U u co m N V) c a o E -' y C H 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o m m m E 0 Vii b a 0 ._ ._ ._ U O O a H N N O N 0 N N O N O E E 0 U 0 C E 0 U C 0 U N r co 0 CO O U U co a) U m m W Co O 0 0 N O N N 0 N 0 u a, (0 E E U 0 F O N N N N N N 0 N O O co. N m C 6 m 1 i E o wE U N N V) ? T - C CO Z d E C V) 9 IS O Z 0. IN n S 2 -o N c c E LL CO v U m E U a O9; U m O g a o m -0 a -01 > 0 E C O U ~ m y O U U a "co m E mE Ne '13t E N O W N O 0 y 0, d U 13 S h S00W M0 C C y d 4' U U 0 Ems) E U (.6000 0 0 N $ 2,607,913 Total Weld County -Wide Comm and CJIS CO En 0 O 0 a O co 0 0 0 C 0 M m 0) U T U a) co O O U) O 0 O m Nm z¢ • I TO: Jerry Gamer, Chief of Police FROM: Captain Mike Savage DATE: June 1, 2009 SUBJECT: Budget Proposals As discussed in our budget meeting on May 28th with Don Warden and Monica Mika; I am writing to provide a list of budgetary revisions that could be made as we confront the 2009 and 2010 Police Department budget. As you recall the purpose of the combined meeting was to ensure that those revisions discussed would be mutually agreed upon by both Weld County and the City of Greeley. The adjustments discussed included the following: • It was agreed to leave vacant the open data coordinator I position in the Records Unit. The vacancy would provide the City of Greeley with $26,226.00 reduction and Weld County with a $22,340.00 reduction. • It was agreed to postpone the Tiburon system upgrade scheduled for 2010. The postponement would provide the City of Greeley with a reduction of $122,248.64 and Weld County with a budget reduction of $203,103.69. The E911 fund would also defer $170,328.67. The E911 savings could be applied to other suggestions which follow. • With the upgrade being postponed, the System Administrator position that recently became vacated would be filled with a current employee allowing that employee's current salary to be saved. The vacated system administrator's position is 100% funded by E911. We would move a current employee into that position. The position that the current employee would leave is a shared systems administrator with the City of Greeley paying 50% and Weld County paying 50%. This action would provide the City of Greeley with a reduction of $31,237 and Weld County the same. • We also proposed a shifting of the Communication's overtime costs to the E911 Authority. We have consulted with the E911 Board Chair and examined the E911 2009 Budget and proposed 2010. It is our opinion that a transfer of this overtime cost could occur without augmenting the E911 operational budget. Our recommendation is that this alternative be used as a short term remedy for 2009 and 2010. This action would require a request and presentation to the E911 Board. E911 currently budgets for dispatcher overtime incurred by training. This action could potentially save the City of Greeley $78,000.00 for 2009 and $92,500.00 for 2010. Weld County would save $78,000.00 for 2009 and $92,500.00 for 2010. • • • If all of these suggestions were implemented at the estimated dollar amounts, the City of Greeley would potentially save $350.211.64 and Weld County would save $427,180.69 for a combined savings of $777,392.33. In closing I hope that these suggestions meet your needs, if you have questions concerns or additional direction, please do not hesitate to contact me. 9/16/2009 Communication Center Budget 2010 BUDGET * All Salaries & Benefits at 100% per information from Finance on 7.31.09 Account ®If91 PPti tr 7111 7112 7121 7314 7325 7329 7344 7362 7426 7432 7445 7461 7469 7478 7496 7631 Account Title REGULAR EMPLOYEES SALARIES & WAGES - SEAS. OVERTIME -REGULAR BENEFITS Fl OFFICE SUPPLIES/MATERIALS CLOTHING AND UNIFORMS OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINT SUPPLIES SMALL ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE PRINTING PUBLICATION, SUBSCRI P, DUES TELEPHONE MACH, VEHICLE, EQUIPMENT OTHER RPR MAINT SERVICES TRAVEL & TRAINING OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES RENT Total Communications TOTAL BUDGET 2,272,515 47,002 208,973 $753,803 .14 765 3,283,058 IJ 7496 7445 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES TELEPHONE Total City -Combined Communications 105,713 6,991 112,704 7441 7444 7445 7496 ELECTRIC GAS TELEPHONE OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES Total County -Combined Communications 23,128 6,991 188,907 219,026 aBb ii1`Y=o I. 7458 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVCS $ - 7496 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES $g 70,321 I! F"1_''. n4,.11tG et?` �' ��i!ii .., t Yw_r<1 C��Y Total E911 $ 70,321 Total Communications Budget 3,685,109 C:\Documents and Settings\gp7033\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1945\DANELLE FILE - Comm Center Budget 2010_FINAL_#2.xls 1 9/16/2009 Account Account Title pig {c Sc[€tc(rrl ?z e�5„r,C-.c `l C..�a°pCe� TOTAL BUDGET --,- Ett-'Kr ri r�` -{may 7496 Other Purchase Services (City Comb Only) $ 105,713) 7496 Other Purchase Services (County Comb Only) $ (188,907 7458/7496 E911 Purchased Services (reimbursed to ci by E911) $ 70,321) s '1.-4-Wild,ndi osts . "' m Building Use Charge cost $ 14,208 Building and grounds surcharge $ 24,305 Liabili Insurance $ 1,712 Accounting $ 1,151 Phone Lines into the Comm. center not related to E- 911Services $ 2,661 Purchasing $ 590 Attorney $ 7,492 Preapproved funds to repair, replace, or purchase emer.ency equipment to maintain system operating $ 100,000 County system users share to maintain 3rd Zone controller. $ 19,000 Travel Expenses for IMD Commander $ 1,500 G`reele :Indirect C₹astsc` . Accounting $ 17,734 Purchasing $ 4,052 Attorney $ 15,778 Human Resources $ 10,510 `t£th`rerOosts Costs ?‘' Infrastructure Depreciation (Towers - Weld) $ 72,000 IMD Commander (Weld +Greeley) $ 84,865 Criminal justice Computer Services $ 122,152 ower Maintenance (WAC ervice Contract) $ 128,220 Total Adjustments $ 262,989', Total Communications Budget - For Cost Sharing $ 3,948,098 C:\Documents and Settings\gp7033\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1945\DANELLE FILE - Comm Center Budget 2010_FINAL_#2.xls 2 Hello