HomeMy WebLinkAbout20091354.tiffBEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Tom Holton, that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning
Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: USR-1697
APPLICANT: Wade & Shannon Lutz
PLANNER: Chris Gathman
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a
Kennel (up to 40 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of RE -2560; located in the S2 SE4 of Section 26, T10N, R67W of the
6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 112 and west of and adjacent to CR 23.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 23-2-260
of the Weld County Code.
It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section
23-2-220 of the Weld County Code as follows:
A. Section 23-2-220.A.1 -- The proposed use is consistent with Chapter 22 and any other
applicable code provisions or ordinance in effect.
Section 22-2-20 A.Goal 1 states, "Respect and encourage the continuation of agricultural
land uses and agricultural operations for purposes which enhance the economic health
and sustainability of agriculture."
Section 22-2-20 A.Goal 9 states: "Reduce potential conflicts between varying land uses in
the conversion of traditional agricultural lands to other land uses."
The parcel on which the Kennel facility is located is a Recorded Exemption lot created in
1999 and consists of approximately 20 acres. There are existing improvements: the
Lutz' residence, a shop building and a barn. Existing improvements and the proposed
kennel building are located in the southeastern portion of the property. Development
standards and conditions of approval (such as requiring dogs to be kept indoors during
nighttime hours) will ensure compatibility with adjacent residences.
B. Section 23-2-220.A.2 -- The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the A
(Agricultural) Zone District. Section 23-3-40.K of the Weld County Code provides for
Kennels as a Use by Special Review in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
C. Section 23-2-220.A.3 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with the
existing surrounding land uses. The proposed site is located within a rural (dryland/
agricultural) area. The proposed kennel facility is located approximately 500-600 feet
north of an abandoned residence to the south and approximately 1/3 of a mile from an
existing residence to the north and approximately 1/3 of a mile from an existing residence
to the west. Development standards and conditions of approval (such as requiring dogs to
be kept indoors during nighttime hours) will ensure compatibility with adjacent residences.
D. Section 23-2-220.A.4 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning and with the
future development as projected by Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code and any other
applicable code provisions or ordinances in effect, or the adopted Master Plans of
affected municipalities. The site is not located within a 3 -mile referral area or
Intergovernmental Agreement area of a municipality. The application states that water for
commercial use (for use by the dogs) will be provided to the site from the Town of
Wellington. Staff has contacted the Town of Wellington and they have confirmed they will
provide water. Additionally the applicants have indicated that bottled water will be provided
for customers.
2009-1354
Resolution USR-1697
Wade & Shannon Lutz
Page 2
•
•
•
E. Section 23-2-220.A.5 — The application complies with Section 23-5 of the Weld County
Code.
The site is not located within any overlay districts.
Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to
adhere to the fee structure of the County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11)
Effective August 1, 2005, Building permits issued on the subject site will be required to
adhere to the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact Fee and the
Stormwater/Drainage Impact Fee. (Ordinance 2005-8 Section 5-8-40)
F. Section 23-2-220.A.6 -- The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve
prime agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. The site is located
in land designated as "High Potential Dry Cropland" and "Prime if Irrigated" according to
the according to the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Map, dated 1979.
G. Section 23-2-220.A.7 -- The Design Standards (Section 23-2-240, Weld County Code),
Operation Standards (Section 23-2-250, Weld County Code), Conditions of Approval and
Development Standards ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of
health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County.
H. Section 23-4-400 — The attached conditions of approval and development standards will
ensure that the kennel will be operated according to the supplementary kennel
requirements outlined in this Section of the Weld County Code.
The site is currently in violation (ZCV-08-00404) if this Use by Special Review application is approved and the
plat is recorded the property will be in compliance. If approved, this will correct the violation. If denied, the
Violation case will proceed accordingly through a violation hearing and possibly district court.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the
applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities.
The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following:
1. Prior to recording the plat:
A. All plat sheets shall be labeled USR-1697. (Department of Planning Services)
B. The plat shall be amended to delineate the following:
1. The attached Development Standards. (Department of Planning Services)
2. County Road 23 is designated on the Weld County Road Classification Plan as a
local gravel road, which requires 60 feet of right-of-way at full build out. There is
presently 60 feet of right-of-way. All setbacks shall be measured from the edge of
future right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the
documents creating the right-of-way. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall
be dedicated. This road is maintained by Weld County.
3. County Road 112 is designated on the Weld County Road Classification Plan as
a local gravel road and requires a 60 -foot right-of-way at full build out. There is
presently a 30 -foot right-of-way north of the section line. All setbacks shall be
measured from the edge of future right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the
existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way. If the right-of-
way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated. This road is maintained by Weld
County. (Department of Public Works)
Resolution USR-1697
Wade & Shannon Lutz
Page 3
4. Show the drainage easements on the final plat. (Department of Public Works)
5. Describe and delineate on the final plat what type of surface treatment material
the existing driveway and parking area have. (Department of Public Works)
6. The dimensions of parking spaces shall be indicated on the plat. Parking shall
meet the design requirements for off-street parking outlined in Appendix 23-A of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
C. The applicant shall address the requirements of the Department of Public Works as
outlined in their referral received May 19, 2009. Written evidence of such shall be
provided to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Works)
D. The applicant shall submit a dust abatement plan (on site dust) for review and approval,
to the Environmental Health Services, Weld County Department of Public Health &
Environment. Evidence of Health Department approval shall be provided to the
Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
E. A copy of the current Pet Animal Care Facilities Act license shall be provided to the Weld
County Department of Public Health and Environment and to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
F. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan, for approval, to the Environmental
Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment.
The plan shall include at a minimum, the following:
1) A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should include
expected volumes and types of waste generated).
2) A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site.
3) The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including the
facility name, address, and phone number).
Evidence of Health Department approval shall be provided to the Department of Planning
Services.
G. The applicant shall submit three (3) paper copies of the plat for preliminary approval to the
Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services)
2. Upon completion of 1. above the applicant shall submit a Mylar plat along with all other
documentation required as Conditions of Approval. The Mylar plat shall be recorded in the office
of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by Department of Planning Services' Staff. The plat shall
be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 23-2-260.D of the Weld County
Code. The Mylar plat and additional requirements shall be submitted within sixty (60) days from
the date of the Board of County Commissioners resolution. The applicant shall be responsible for
paying the recording fee. (Department of Planning Services)
3. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance 2005-7 approved June 1, 2005, should the plat
not be recorded within the required sixty (60) days from the date the Use by Special Review
Permit was approved by the Board of County Commissioners a $50.00 recording continuance
charge may be added for each additional 3 month period.
4. The Department of Planning Services respectively requests the surveyor provide a digital copy of
this Use by Special Review. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn (Microstation);
acceptable GIS formats are ArcView shapefiles, Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files
format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif (Group 4). (Group 6 is not acceptable).
This digital file may be sent to maps(a)co.weld.co.us. (Department of Planning Services)
Resolution USR-1697
Wade & Shannon Lutz
Page 4
•
•
•
5. Prior to Release of Building Permits:
A. A building permit application must be completed and two complete sets of plans including
engineered foundation plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or
engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report performed by a
registered State of Colorado engineer shall be required. (Department of Building
Inspection)
B. A letter is required from the Nunn Fire Protection District shall be provided indicating
whether or not a fire district permit is required. (Department of Building Inspection)
6. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on
the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County
Clerk and Recorder. (Department of Planning Services)
Motion seconded by Robert Grand.
VOTE:
For Passage
Robert Grand
Bill Hall
Tom Holton
Doug Ochsner
Against Passage Absent
Erich Ehrlich
Roy Spitzer
Paul Branham
Mark Lawley
Nick Berryman
The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this
case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Kristine Ranslem, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,
Colorado, adopted on June 2, 2009.
Dated the god of June, 2009.
ALMItit
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
•
•
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Wade & Shannon Lutz
USR-1697
1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Use Permit is for a kennel (for up to 40 dogs of an
unspecified breed) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, and subject to the Development Standards
stated hereon. (Department of Planning Services)
2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of the Weld
County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
3. Hours of operation shall be by appointment only Monday -Sunday. Appointment hours shall be from 8
AM till 8 PM. (Department of Planning Services)
4. The facility shall be operated by the property owners with no outside employees. (Department of
Planning Services)
5. Dogs shall be kept indoors during night-time hours (7 PM to 7 AM). (Department of Planning
Services)
6. Animal and feed wastes, bedding, debris and other organic wastes shall be disposed of so that
vermin infestation, odors, disease hazards, and nuisances are minimized. Such wastes shall be
removed at least weekly from the facility and disposed by a commercial hauler. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
7. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act,
30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that
protects against surface and groundwater contamination. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
8. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant to include
those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes
Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended. (Department of Public Health
and Environment)
9. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust,
fugitive particulate emissions, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
10. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling plan", at all times.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
11. The applicant shall comply with the Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA), Division of Animal
Industry. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
12. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shall be controlled on this site. The facility shall be
operated in accordance with the approved dust abatement plan, at all times. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
13. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Commercial
Zone as delineated in 25-12-103 C.R.S., as amended. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
14. Adequate handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for visitors to the facility. (Department
of Public Health and Environment)
• 15. Any septic system located on the property must comply with all provisions of the Weld County
Code, pertaining to Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
Resolution USR-1697
Wade & Shannon Lutz
Page 6
16. Stop blocks will be required to be installed for all employee and visitor parking where a constructed
element is not present to help prevent vehicles from rolling after being parked. (Department of Public
Works)
17. The applicant must take into consideration storm water capture/quantity and provide accordingly
for best management practices. (Department of Public Works)
18. If applicable, the applicant shall obtain obtain a stormwater discharge permit for development,
redevelopment or construction where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater
than or equal to one acre in area from the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment,
Water Quality Control Commission. (Department of Public Works)
19. Prior to release of building permits, a building permit application must be completed and two
complete sets of plans including engineered foundation plans bearing the wet stamp of a
Colorado registered architect or engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical
engineering report performed by a registered State of Colorado engineer shall be required.
(Department of Building Inspection)
20. Pursuant to Chapter 15, Articles I and II of the Weld County Code, if noxious weeds exist on the
property or become established as a result of the proposed development, the applicant/landowner
shall be responsible for controlling the noxious weeds. (Department of Public Works)
21. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere
to the fee structure of the County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11)
22. Effective August 1, 2005, Building permits issued on the subject site will be required to adhere to
the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact Fee and the Stormwater/Drainage Impact Fee.
(Ordinance 2005-8 Section 5-8-40)
23. The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State and Federal
agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
24. The property owner shall allow any mineral owner the right of ingress or egress for the purposes of
exploration development, completion, recompletion, re-entry, production and maintenance operations
associated with existing or future operations located on these lands. (Department of Planning
Services)
25. The property owner acknowledges that mineral owners and lessees have real property interests that
entitle them to surface use in accordance with Colorado State Statutes and applicable Colorado oil
and Gas Conservation Commission regulations. (Department of Planning Services)
26. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of
Section 23-2-240, Weld County Code.
27. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of
Section 23-2-250, Weld County Code.
28. Personnel from the Weld County Departments of Public Health and Environment, Planning Services
and Public Works shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure
the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all
applicable Weld County regulations.
29. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing
standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Substantial changes from the plans or
Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit
by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or
Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the
Department of Planning Services.
•
•
•
Resolution USR-1697
Wade & Shannon Lutz
Page 7
30. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing
Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be
reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners.
irp-a-C9
•
•
•
building substantially higher than it is now.
Commissioner Berryman asked that in the event of a remodel it has to be 1 foot above the base flood
elevation. Mr. Kimmi replied yes and added that it appears that there would be 3 to 4 feet of water across
that property so he would have to elevate it at least 4 to 5 feet to get above the base flood elevation.
Don Carroll, Public Works, commented that Grace Avenue and Frederick Street are locally paved roads
within Wattenburg, posted at 25 mph.
The applicant has indicated no more than 14 employees on site. The site is gated and located on the
curve of the road where the two roads intersect. Mr. Carroll commented that during their site visit they
noted that most of the traffic going out of the facility was going north from site and not going through the
town.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, commented that Wattenburg Improvement Association provides
water and there is an existing septic system sized for 13 people. Since there are 14 employees they will
need to have the septic system reviewed by an engineer for additional flow.
Dust Abatement and Waste Handling Plans are required. If the applicant will be washing any commercial
vehicles or equipment on site they will need to contain all the discharges from that.
Ms. Light commented that back in November the applicant came in and talked to one of the staff
members and indicated that there was a floor drain in the building that discharges through a pipe to the
outside and staff was suppose to receive a picture that the pipe was cemented in; however they have not
received one to date. Therefore that is a requirement of Condition 1.K.
Commissioner Ochsner clarified that since there are 14 employees the septic system needs to be
evaluated by an engineer. Ms. Light replied that is correct because the septic permit on file states it is
designed for 13 people.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
The Chair asked Mr. Zapien if he understands the requirement by the Health Department regarding the
number of employees designed for the septic system. Mr. Zapien replied that he would like to change the
number of employees to 13.
The Chair asked the applicant if he has read through the Development Standards and Conditions of Approval
and if he is in agreement with those. The applicant replied that he is in agreement.
Commissioner Holton asked how many employees the insulation company had. Staff could not answer that
but the septic permit indicated that it was installed in 1978 and was designed for 13 people.
Mark Lawley moved that Case USR-1684 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, seconded by Robert Grand.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Nick
Berryman, yes; Paul Branham, absent; Erich Ehrlich, absent; Robert Grand, yes; Bill Hall, yes; Mark Lawley,
yes; Roy Spitzer, absent; Tom Holton, no with comment; Doug Ochsner, yes. Motion carried.
Commissioner Holton commented that he is familiar with this small town. He stated that he doesn't feel it
is compatible to have that much traffic going through there with all the kids in the residential area.
The Chair read the next case into record.
CASE NUMBER: USR-1697
APPLICANT: Wade & Shannon Lutz
PLANNER: Chris Gathman
I EXHIBIT
G
OSP-- l(41
•
•
•
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION:
A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a
Kennel (up to 40 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
Lot A of RE -2560; located in the S2 SE4 of Section 26, T10N, R67W of the
6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
North of and adjacent to CR 112 and west of and adjacent to CR 23.
Chris Gathman, Planning Services, commented that originally this case was on the consent agenda; however
there are two issues that have come up as items of discussion.
This is a land use application for a kennel for up to 40 dogs of a non -specified breed. The site is located north
of and adjacent to County Road 112 and west of and adjacent to County Road 33.
Under this application, the applicant is proposing a portable toilet facility and hand washing units for customers
and water to be hauled in from the Town of Wellington. This water would be used just for the kennel only and
not the customers. Additionally the applicant has indicated that they will provide bottled water for customers
as the applicant's water from their existing well does not taste very good.
Mr. Gathman added that the issue with the water is that the Health Department has a policy that they require
permanent water and septic or at a minimum vault facilities for these types of operations. Based on that policy
there are conditions of approval and development standards included which specify that. The applicant is
requesting to receive a waiver from those requirements.
Commissioner Lawley asked to clarify if the applicants are still hauling water in although they have an existing
domestic water supply. Mr. Gathman commented that the applicant does have a well; however they use
bottled water themselves and assumes that they use the well just for an association for their lavatory. Mr.
Gathman added that the customers are on an appointment basis only.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, stated that in a case where there is a domestic well permit and if they
would use their house for anyone who comes in they can't use the water for the restroom in the house
because we are back to where the State Division of Water Resources requires them to re -permit their well
because it is for a commercial use. Typically, when the well is re -permitted to commercial no outside watering
is allowed; it is for household use only. There is also a policy that 6 months or less is considered a temporary
use which is acceptable for bottled water and portable restroom facilities; however this case is a permanent
use.
Commissioner Grand said that with a kennel particularly by appointment only, although it is a full time use it is
not an 8 hour use in the course of the day. In terms of our evaluation process, since these are small business
people, do we revisit this issue since it is not by definition a full time 8 hour day for their customers. Ms. Light
commented that in their policies they treat every business the same which is why they can ask for a waiver
from the Board.
Shannon Lutz commented that they have lived on this property nine (9) years. She raises and shows Labs.
She indicated that it is on rare occasion that they have people come out to the property. The dogs stay for
breeding and showing purposes which fall into the commercial end of this.
Ms. Lutz stated that they cannot re -permit their well because she has horses and livestock. In the 9 years they
have done this they have not had anyone ask to use their restroom. She indicated that typically when
someone comes to the site they are there five or ten minutes. She requested that this condition be waived.
She added that they have checked into having their septic system enlarged; however it will not meet the
standards that the county requires it to have people using it all the time. Ms. Lutz expressed that she cannot
afford to do it as she has tried to obtain a small business loan and couldn't get one.
Commissioner Holton asked how many people come in a month. Mrs. Lutz said that possibly five or ten
people at the most as it varies depending on the number of shows or litters.
Commissioner Holton asked how deep the well is. Ms. Lutz said that they hit water at 34 feet and stopped at
42 feet. She added that they are able to have up to three taps and it is a good well. Mr. Lutz commented that
they considered using one of the taps for the commercial end but was unsuccessful.
7
•
•
•
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
Commissioner Holton stated that he believes that requiring the commercial well permit is an undue burden
considering the use. He added that he would like to eliminate the conditions for the well and septic system.
Commissioner Hall agreed with Mr. Holton and added that when you have guests at your home it typically
would be greater than the amount of customers. He understands staffs position as they have to abide by
regulations; however their job is to allow variances for these specific cases.
Commissioner Holton asked staff if amending conditions of approval 1.G, 1.H and deleting Development
Standards 16 and 17 cover their intentions. Ms. Light suggested adding "(portable toilet)" after "facilities" in
Development Standard 15. Ms. Light suggested deleting the first sentence in Development Standard 16 but
keep the remaining language so that way if they sell the property in the future it notifies the new buyers that if
they do anything to the septic system they have to get a permit.
Mark Lawley moved to delete Conditions of Approval 1.G, 1.H, Development Standard 17, and the first
sentence in Development 16, seconded by Robert Grand. Motion carried.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and Conditions
of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Tom Holton moved that Case USR-1697 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
amended Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's
recommendation of approval, seconded by Robert Grand.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Nick
Berryman, yes; Paul Branham, absent; Erich Ehrlich, absent; Robert Grand, yes; Bill Hall, yes; Mark Lawley,
yes; Roy Spitzer, absent; Tom Holton, yes; Doug Ochsner, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chair called a recess at 2:26 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 2:36 pm.
The Chair read the next case into record.
CASE NUMBER: 2ND AMUSR-897
APPLICANT: Aggregate Industries WCR Inc (Riverview Resource)
PLANNER: Kim Ogle
REQUEST: 2nd AmUSR-897- A Site Specific Development Plan and Second Amended
Use by Special Review Permit for Mineral Resource Development, including
Open Pit Mining and Materials Processing, including Concrete and Asphalt
Recycling, and a Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant facility in the A
(Agricultural) Zone District.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The W2SW4 and Part of Lot A of RE -247 being part of the E2SW4 Section
29, T6N, R66W. All that part of the N2 and the N2S2; A portion of the
E2NE4 of Section 32, T6N, R66W together with a parcel in the SW4 NW4 of
Section 33, T6N, R66W also known as Lot B, RE -1539; together with a
parcel in NW4 SW4; and Lots A and B of RE -978 being the NW4NW4 of
Section 33, T6N, R66W; part of the NE4 of Section 32, T6N, R66W; and a
parcel of land in the SE4 NE4 of Section 32, T6N, R66W all in of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: North and south of CR 64, East of CR 27; South of the Union Pacific
Railroad.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that this application is for 2nd AmUSR-897 for open pit gravel mining and
materials processing including concrete and asphalt recycling, and a concrete and asphalt batch plant facility
in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. The applicant's are Connie Davis and Mike Refer, represented by Barb
Brunk of Resource Conservation Partners, LLC, consultants.
The site is located generally east of and adjacent to County Road 27 (83rd Avenue); north and south of and
adjacent to County Road 64 ("O" Street); west of County Road 29 (71s1 Avenue) and north of the Cache La
8
Hello