The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20091167& A p )§ (O O, 04O NINO >- 11 \\\Win uj { S 5- ( ) § a 12 ti3 h h S a} | |\ !i! I, R (||);(i| 1 . Elt ■ ■ /2»» r .} 43/c47 kS & _ ALlY3d11005 :0y30140 _ „ �L /77-7‘} 2009-1167 MCCA..3000. WO n Pr. ,. K. WM ORm00,00 - 0,N WO M rOpl. CO *MO "\\‘,.\,,,,:\l, SIC V1//////// / /f3'/ / 0 IP n m z ID r Csl M N Q00 � J o W V =ter sr I - Li m < z� m~'U oc0Z- sti 8� t a 1511 AL1Y31LLL03S OVOo1^V lOB0-ALlY3B11005 ON BOP Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle, Don Dunker Friday, May 01, 2009 3:33 PM Michelle Martin Don Dunker USR-1667 - Brinkman Per the site visit April 27, 2009 the applicant has addresses all of the Public Works issues and can record the plat. Thanks, Don Dunker, P.E. Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street Greeley, CO 80631 phone: 970.304.6496 ext. 3749 fax: 970.304.6497 ddunker@co.weld.co.us ecrnii c9a9/ - //Z' ,DL /2 S; •- . . _ MI • ' ..- • '- -w - •} _• rte •1 S w . •'.• ��, /'- -.. .r . • fir. •• A .. ^ ill, A w •• ��. `• - •i• ,•, 6:::•* ..::: el.. eel; •-1:•:, I."; Sir' . a. Ter 1 . .0 aware — • ell?W- O- It* e� I ' . -/k... at; 4 • ‘ .... '.' . • �. •t t• - • • w > i / _ J_ . w• ♦ ��rt'� 1. V ^ _ ,p .. A ` w 1-... . aa r= �� " A dr •1► ♦ • Will' it . -r 40 P ride- . `• a.r . nr▪ N - • • '• .- . "Li.• • p •00 "ch... Itraa51.1 ' ;I': tl ef, 1 e - to - 4 fill - Pa • 7rg in r ' �y ,,..'/ A ` w r' 1�• a... y A .. `. f �,�impgr- /' .� �• •. - Ix �- - •��•• '�1�. •• ^ �. rte- O ' . c. a ..• L• /r ,• •- r 014-1 - •• • Q.;.. -r. t•i : t' i_ . �Jr- - •.. . -..T. • •4.00 : 1 .." 7.1: i-. tip- . •. ' . ii. 4: T. 4 1: :? ..: ..I (.-ki: ' - :. . 1 44t, __a,: 4..... -- -: A: art `_ - .' , . •,• • 4 "- ". 1. A _ —•_ ?' . el ♦ •' 1,``'' • _-•• _ - ,- • ..r • • - •� - r_ ,. - / • .. •. "3 - r••. . .• .4.� It. .• ,_ tie • •r' ' \ • Is �. - 4 1 - . - ... r i.ri.• \ t• • . •. Y r ` S. l • 1 rte• f r-•'. • •-;. •.• X Its~.t.'ia'-• $ / '*s• }.t 'areAs. ! - 1 �1, r `, l • _ c �� - •- y ~ wr. ••. s "� ~ ► allI .iti • .� •' �.. • • '� ' y .. t• _. r"` • •- • -•\tat • •' ~� -"�� 'r r�,�.� •may, ': ..± _?C- .•, am. ..� R�.` .1r �•y, ��.• I��•.' , . �. ••,•S.- II-*.� t • . '•• .!Jr.•,+• '. •1� � t`` • c Os b • r 1 ♦4 •• ♦ • ` • .r . •.I - • u• . _ -1. /.:. \ r•114" •• ♦ t �. r4• I = • �, .` °_.. • 1 `/• -•' 0• ; '. . r v ..i. • _ • .; r. 2....7%.u.: . • ' >, ♦... ,\... f'•-' "l • tt f n •.• A •�!• -• •� .t .y_ I .n� .\ .. ` • t!AL • - y f•. .•1 .`- .; . {IAi`(it • ••C. ,•'" 6 -I.= . K -• .I• • • •^• ' �q. • - .•, 'q w, •S •- ,,• .. it -�.F- - •" .-. i - • - ' • • •, • ' a. �/ 11 • • 41 • • •.1' f. �'- L. '• — I+• t• - rA +. 'IV y - . . •4 ,• • -I • A dir •I , 7 • --t a •-• !'- 4.: •• •• -. • • ,-• ._.,r - - •tt a.6....I• •. "IP •it "•r." • WI I. J `' • • ._ •.ice`" yam' I ♦'4 •••* • 4 • • Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:04 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Fwd: USR 1667 9500 hwy 392 Hey Michelle - Here is the e-mail back from Gloria. Hopefully this works. Nate Caldwell Forwarded Message From: "Gloria Hice-Idler" <Gloria.Hice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US> To: "foothillslandscape@comcast.net <foothillslandscape@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:05:55 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: RE: USR 1667 9500 hwy 392 20' is fine. That's the minimum for a CDOT access. Gloria Hice-Idler Permit Supervisor CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:52 PM To: Hice-Idler, Gloria Subject: USR 1667 9500 hwy 392 Gloria We need to get approval from CDOT on the access/Turning Radius to our property.On our plat they have it listed at R=20' will that be acceptable? I know we have spoke before on this; If you have any questions please call me to discuss. Thanks Nate Caldwell FLM 970 556-0292 4/16/2009 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Subject: FYI Michelle Martin Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:05 AM 'foothillslandscape@comcast.net' FW: USR-1667 'V ditches Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: Don Dunker Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:04 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: USR-1667 'V' ditches Michelle, The 'V' ditches shown on the plat are fine and will have the correct water quality volume if built as shown, 750 ftA3. Thanks, Don Dunker, P.E. Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street Greeley, CO 80631 phone: 970.304.6496 ext. 3749 fax: 970.304.6497 ddunker@co.weld.co.us 1 • • Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Lauren Light Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:45 AM To: Michelle Martin; foothillslandscape@comcast.net Subject: USR-1667 All conditions for USR-1667 have been met to the satisfaction of Environmental Health Services, Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment. Lauren Light, M.B.S. Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6415 Ext. 2211 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) 4/13/2009 • Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Leon Sievers Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:11 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: USR 1666 Michelle I completed my research of this property and it seems that in 1958 a deed was given to Weld County for road right of way. It was a deed, not a dedication which means that the north line of the property is not on the section line. The deed line is 46.6' on the west side of the property and is 45.5' on the east side of the property. Again, I must stress that this was a deed, not a grant of right of way, but an actual deed. We own it. The deed was found in Book 1345 at page 156. I have spoken with Nate on this matter and he is aware that the USR will need to be revised Leon 4/8/2009 • • Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:08 AM To:Tooth illslandscape@comcast.net Subject: usr-1667 Nate, I have reviewed the paper plats that were submitted based on the number of corrections I am recommending a second set of paper plat be submitted. You can pick up the red line at the SW building Monday - Thursday 7:30 am - 11:30 and 12:30 - 4:30 pm. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http www.co.weld.co.usi departments planning comp improve comments.cfin 4/6/2009 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle, Don Dunker Friday, April 03, 2009 4:09 PM Michelle Martin Leon Sievers; Don Dunker USR-1667 Brinkman The following items need to be included or corrected on the USR-1667 Plat. The surveyor shall check the following book 1345, pages 155, 156, and 157 to research what right of way CDOT has along this property on State Highway 392. The correct CDOT right of way and property boundary shall be shown on the plat. Along with the shown V -ditches a cross-section detail shall be shown include the total volume of the storm water the ditch will hold for a water quality feature. Please include standard maintenance notes for the V -ditch on the plat too. Label the radii at the access per CDOT's minimum allowed for the type of access and volume of vehicles using the access for this USR. Please have the applicant submit an improvements agreement per resolution 1. Prior to recording the plat: C. Contact Rich Hastings for additional information about the improvements agreement (970) 304-6496. How will 1. Prior to recording the plat: I. be verified? Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Don Dunker, P.E. Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street Greeley, CO 80631 phone: 970.304.6496 ext. 3749 fax: 970.304.6497 ddunker@co.weld.co.us Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lauren Light Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:19 AM foothillslandscape@comcast.net Michelle Martin RE: USR-1667- septic checklist Hi Nate, The condition states the following regarding the septic system: "As the applicant intends to utilize the existing septic system at the home, for employee use, the septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment. In the event the system is found to be inadequately sized or constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current Regulations." We need a review by a registered engineer not a septic pumper. The engineer will have to crunch numbers to figure out the flow needed. You can find an engineer from the list on our website. Lauren Light, M.B.S. Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6415 Ext. 2211 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net (mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:50 AM To: Michelle Martin; Lauren Light Subject: USR-1667- septic checklist Hey Guys - I attached the septic review and checklist that was done yesterday. At the bottom you will see that the inspector wrote that "Mark will put risers on today". That was done and exceeds the requirement(they are level with the surface). The inspector also agreed tat the system looks great and should be perfect for the proposed use. Let me know if you need anything else to satisfy this part of the referral requirement. Thanks a bunch - Nate Caldwell FLM 1 Page 1 of 4 Michelle Martin From: Leon Sievers Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:40 AM To: Michelle Martin; foothillslandscape@comcast.net Subject: RE: USR-1667 Nate After talking with you, things just didn't "feel" right about the right-of-way we spoke of, so I went back to check some old files. I found three deeds for additional right-of-way in the NE1/4 of Section 22. Those deeds are found in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder at Book 1345 at pages 155, 156 and 157. I'm not sure which one covers your property exactly so you'll probably need to look at each one. The deeds are actual deeds and conveyed property to Weld County as part of the CDOT road improvement project. I did not draw them out to see how much property was taken or from where exactly, but I do know that some right-of-way was given. So, then I checked the deed of the present owner to see if this additional right-of-way was removed from there property and it wasn't. Because of this (these) deeds, I believe the north property line of this property is not the section line, as shown on the USR and described in the deed of the present owner, but instead should be where these deed lines put it. To help clarify this let me explain. When Weld County gets right-of-way we get it through dedications on plats and by dedications by deed (Deed of Dedication). These deeds do not convey but instead dedicate to the public, just as a dedication statement on a plat does because these deeds do not have a conveyance clause in them. However, the deeds I found actually had the words of conveyance, meaning that Weld County obtained ownership of that deeded area (additional right-of-way). So, it's very possible that the original right of way of 60', 30' on either side of section line in 1871 was a dedication, as was all petitioned roads are and as such the land owner still has the underlying ownership interest in the property, but the additional right-of-way was conveyed by deed and granted ownership. This would mean that there is a separation of ownership with Weld County owning a strip of land between the original right-of-way of 30' and the remaining parent parcel. I would want to review this again after the deeds have been plotted on the USR to see where they fit in the scheme of things. We may have to ask for a Quit Claim Deed for the 30' of dedicated ROW just to keep from having that separated from the parent parcel. Perhaps the Title Company needs to be notified and they should question the existing owner's deed in that it does not take this right-of-way deed into account because it still shows ownership to the section line. If you have any questions, please contact me. Leon Sievers PLS, SR/WA Right -of -Way Agent/Surveyor Weld County Public Works 970-356-4000 x 3785 From: Michelle Martin Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:13 PM To: Leon Sievers Subject: FW: USR-1667 4/1/2009 Page 2 of 4 FYI Michelle Martin Planner 11 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http '/www.co.weld.co.us'departments/planningicomp_improve_comments.cfm From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:16 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: USR-1667 Michelle, I spoke with Leon Sievers and he said he can not find a deed number and asked for you to refer to the 30 foot easment either side of the section line per road record #8 July 3, 1871. Let me know if you need anything else, Thanks Nate Original Message From: "Michelle Martin" <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:54:33 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: RE: USR-1667 Nate, The county attorney is working on finalizing the corrected resolution with the Board of County Commissioners. You can contact the County Surveyor (Leon Sievers) to see if they have any information on the deed for the highway right of way. His phone number is 970-304-6496 x 3750 Unfortunately the building permit will remain on zone hold until all the conditions are complete and the plat has been recorded. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planninglcomp improve comments.cfm 4/1/2009 Page 3 of 4 From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:30 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: USR-1667 Hey Michelle - Just wanted to touch base with you and see how everything is going... Also, I copied you on an email that was sent to me from the CDOT on the deed number. I have looked, but not sure how to proceed in getting the needed info. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Frank P. with the county has been getting the building permits processed and says they are with "zoning". Appreciate all of your help... Nate Caldwell FLM Original Message From: "Michelle Martin" <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:02:32 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: RE: USR-1667 Nate. If you could sign the letter and bring it with you when you drop off the plat and fire agreement that would be great. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720)652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 2:19 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: USR-1667 Hey Michelle - I am attaching the letter in reference to the Landscape Referral. I think this is what you are after. Let me know. If you need to send it to Kim go ahead, or I can do it I will have the preliminary plat in my hands in the am. Can I drop it off to you with the copy of the fire agreement as well? Thanks Nate Original Message From: "Michelle Martin" <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:42:15 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: USR-1667 4/1/2009 • • Page 4 of 4 Nate, Bruce Barker (County Attorney) spoke to the Board of County Commissioners and it looks like we will need to add FML as an applicant to the resolution. But before we can proceed I will need a signed statement from all parties involved (Mark Brinkman, Nate Caldwell, Shane and any other owners of FML) that they agree to this change. Please mail or drop off a copy of the signed statement in addition to the statement I will need articles of corporation for FML which outlines who has the legal authority to sign for FML. If you have any question please don't hesitate to contact me. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.usldepartments/planninq/comp improve comments.cfm 4/1/2009 • Page 1 of 5 Michelle Martin From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 2:42 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Fwd: Highway 392 ROW plans- usr1667 Forwarded Message From: "Darren Shanks" <Darren.Shanks@DOT.STATE.CO.US> To: "foothillslandscape@comcast.net" <foothillslandscape@comcast.net> Cc: "Carolyn Motzkus" <Carolyn.Motzkus@dot.state.co.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 2:19:14 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: Highway 392 ROW plans Nate, Hello. After reviewing our records, I cannot find a recorded deed for the right of way for Parcel 12. I am attaching the plan sheets 5 and 6 for this original right of way take for your information. This Project No. is S0034(2) & S0057(1). Parcel 12 also shows that there was an easement (E-1) that was taken as well. In order to accurately see what was deeded and also given to CDOT for easement, you will have to obtain a recorded copy of the deed for the right of way from Weld County. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks 3/26/2009 600Z/9Z/£ • • SJoZaged 600Z/9Z/£ • • S 30 b a5Ed • Page 5 of 5 Important —Please read The maps and data available for access from the Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT) are provided "as is" without express or implied warranty of any kind. COOT disclaims any and all responsibility for the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the maps and data. The burden for determining accuracy, completeness, timeliness, merchantability and fitness for or the appropriateness for use rests solely on the user accessing this information. For the definitive description of real property, consult the deeds recorded in the appropriate County Clerk and Recorder's Office. STATE OF COLORADO Department of Transportation Region 4 Right of Way Darren P. Shanks, L.S.I. II 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Office (970) 350-2154 Fax (970) 350-2178 E-mail: darren.shanks@dot.state.co.us [image/jpeg:S0034(2)&S0057(1)Sht5.jpg] [image/jpeg:S0034(2)&S0057(1)Sht6.jpg] 3/26/2009 NijkDSCAPE MA/. (FLM) �P ORT COLLINS, COt-O To: Michelle Martin and Town of Windsor RE: USR 1667- Referral and Plans to proceed 3/23/09 The following letter is to provide so background and insight into our intent to move forward with USR-1667. The Town of Windsor provided a Memo dated August 15, 2008 that detailed their recommendations for the proposed USR. We attended a Windsor Planning Commission meeting in which they voted against the proposed use. We again met with Windsor to attempt a dialogue that would allow the project to proceed while meeting the needs of all parties. The meeting was unsuccessful in that Windsor stated there was no allowance for any discussion or negotiation that would facilitate an agreement. FLM elected to proceed with the USR without the approval of the Town of Windsor. USR-1667 was approved by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. The intent of FLM is to move forward with the proposed use as outlined in the resolution and the plat map. It was unfortunate the Town of Windsor and FLM were not able to reach an agreement in the use, however it is not ruled out in the future. Nate Caldwell CO -owner/ USR applicant Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC 970-556-0292 �,�y$ `p,NDSCAPE MA/HT o 4% FLM) T RCOLLINS, GO�'O�PO To: Michelle Martin and Kim Ogle RE: USR 1667- Landscape Referral 3/23/09 The following letter is to provide follow-up information and documentation to the Landscape Referral dated July 21, 2008 by Kim Ogle. After reviewing the referral we feel we can sufficiently meet the recommendations of the referral and show the necessary items on the plat. I will address the sections of the referral in the order they appear on the referral letter. Parking requirements will be met and shown on the plat. We have addressed the issues of street access and that all referring agencies have agreed the our proposed use. It is shown on the plat the modifications that will be made to the entrance to the property. The required yards setback and offset shall be maintained as outlined. The trash collection area will be shown on the plat. Outside storage will be sufficiently screened as requested. The property will be maintained within the county standards. The property will be maintained by Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC. Our commercial pesticide applicators license has already been supplied to the county is on record. The proposed signage is listed on the plat. Hopefully this answers and provides documentation to the overall compliance to the Landscape Referral date July 21, 2008. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns. Nate Caldwell CO -owner/ USR applicant Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC 970-556-0292 • • Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This agreement will be entered into and agreed upon by Nate Caldwell & Shane McCoy, address 9500 Hwy 392, Windsor, CO, and Windsor -Severance Fire District, address 100 7th Street, Windsor, CO, the address of the proposed new facility and subject to this agreement shall be 9500 Highway 392, Windsor, CO. The above named individuals want to develop a commercial storage facility at the above stated location. Currently there is not sufficient water supply to support fire protection requirements. Due to the cost of supplying sufficient water flow, reasonable alternatives of fire protection have been agreed upon until a permanent water supply source is available. Additionally, said plans must be submitted and approved by the district prior to installation. The alternative fire protection method for proposed buildings on site will require a NFPA 72 compliant alarm system. This alternative method will be for life safety protection considerations only. This alternative method must be in place prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Progress to this end will be reviewed at the 24 month and 30 month period. From the date of the Certificate of Occupancy issuance, Mr. Caldwell & Mr. McCoy will have 36 months to comply with the below listed permanent requirements of the 2006 IFC: I. Hydrant on site capable of delivering 1500 GPM per 2006 IFC Appendix B (as amended) requirements. On or before the 24 -month date the progress of the project will be reviewed. Should the aforementioned requirements not be met, the following actions may be taken: Obtain 1: The occupancy permit may be withdrawn until the compliance is met. Obtain 2: If it is shown circumstance beyond Mr. Caldwell's and Mr. McCoy's control has prevented the completion of the requirements, a new compliance date may be negotiated. Nate Caldwell /27 % have McCoy 7/In bc\ Date ph ..)-1) l!)h • Ix 9I) 680`)Ii_'i s IIN ` oh Mike Davis Fire Marshal cc-. cc Datc YUiSU • qA AN Iridsn1-NUV trill( C(Iic. 01'{' Caring for Northern Colorado's beautiful landscapes since 1999 March 20, 2009 RE: USR-1667 - Additional Applicants 9500 Highway 392 Windsor, CO 80550 To Whom It May Concern: All parties involved agree to add Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC and FLM Asset Management, LLC as applicants to the resolution. Attached you will find the Articles of Organization for these entities which are owned by Shane McCoy and Nathan Caldwell. If you have any further questions, please contact us at 970-472-0690. cCoy, FLM Co -Owner Nathan Caldwell, FLM Co -Owner Mark Brinkman, Property Owner Foothills Landscape Maintenance www.flmcolorado.com 970-472-0690 6908 Barbuda Drive foothillslandscape@comcast.net Fort Collins, CO 80525 ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF FOOTHILLS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, LLC ORIGINAL 1, the undersigned natural person, of the age of 18 years or more, acting as organizer of the limited liability company under the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act, adopt the following Articles of Organization for such limited liability company: Name and Principal Place of Business. The name of the limited liability company is Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC a Colorado limited liability company ("Company"), and its principal place of business is 6908 Barbuda Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525. 2. Duration. The period of duration of the Company is perpetual, unless sooner dissolved by the members or as provided by statute. 3. Purpose. The Company is organized primarily to engage in any legal and lawful purpose pursuant to the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act. 4. Registered Agent and Registered Office. The name and business address of the registered agent for service of process is: Nathan J. Caldwell 6908 Barbuda Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 5. Management. The management of the Company is vested in members rather than managers and the name and business address of the members are: Nathan J. Caldwell 6908 Barbuda Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Shane D. McCoy 6908 Barbuda Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 6. Indemnification. The members of the Company shall be entitled to indemnification from the Company in all matters and for all amounts in which indemnification is permitted under the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act set forth in Title 7, Article 80, of the Colorado Revised Statutes, or any amendment thereto. Organizer. The name and address of the organizer is: Nathan J. Caldwell 6908 Barbuda Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 8. Rights of Members to Contract with Company. Any of the Members of the Company shall not, in the absence of fraud, be disqualified from his/her office from dealing or contracting with the Company, either as vendor, purchaser or otherwise, nor shall any firm, association, or corporation of which he/she shall be a member, or in which he/she may be pecuniary interested in any manner be so disqualified. No director, officer, member or manager, nor any firm, association or corporation or entity with which he/she is connected as aforesaid shall be liable to account to the Company or its Members for any profit realized by him/her from or through any such transaction or contract, it being the express purpose and intent of this Article to permit the Company to buy from, sell to, or otherwise deal with partnerships, firms or corporations of which the Members and Manager of the Company, or any one or more of them, may be members, directors, or officers, or in which they or any of them may have pecuniary interests; and the contracts of the Company, in the absence of fraud, shall not be void or violable or affected in any manner by reason of any such position. Furthermore, Members of the Company may be counted for a quorum of the Members of the Company at a meeting even though they may be pecuniary interested in matters considered at such meeting, and any action taken at such a meeting with reference to such matters by a majority of the disinterested Members shall not be void or voidable by the Company in the absence of fraud. 9. Continuity. In case of the death, retirement, resignation, expulsion, bankruptcy or dissolution of a Member or the occurrence of any other event which terminates the continued membership of a Member in the Company, then the Company shall terminate and cease to exist unless the then -remaining Member(s) of the Company unanimously elect after such termination to continue the business of the Company. 10. Effective Date. These Articles of Organization shall become effective as of the date of recording with the Secretary of State. Nathan .1. Caldwell Organizer STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF ( I ) I, Nathan J. Caldwell, being first duly sworn upon my oath, depose and state that I am the organizer of Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC; that I have read the foregoing Articles of Organization of said limited liability company; and that the statements contained in such Articles of Organization are true and correct and constitute my free and voluntary acts. �,�r Nathan thJ. Caldwell r ��`� �� Subscribed and sworn to before me thisa��day of t t `t,xCt-• , 2005, by Nathan J. Caldwell. `lll'nrr'sl WjtIZI'd official seal. ••'a` OTA llllll m �% fitly earlrnission ex�iret �'�& O3 1 0 0 0 aktAmyS • (illriL "ro .o i �'•, UB1.v • 111 otary Public sus, o 41JW0sly 2 CONSENT TO APPOINTMENT OF REGISTERED AGENT The undersigned, as the initial registered agent of Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC, hereby consents to being appointed as said agent. Effective Date: February 1, 2005. Nathan J. Caldwell Registered Agent 3 ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF FLM ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC I, the undersigned natural person, of the age of 18 years or more, acting as organizer of the limited liability company under the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act, adopt the following Articles of Organization for such limited liability company: 1. Name and Principal Place of Business. The name of the limited liability company is FLM Asset Management, LLC ("Company"), and its principal place of business 9500 Hwy 392, Windsor, Colorado 80550. 2. Duration. The period of duration of the Company is perpetual, unless sooner dissolved by the members or as provided by statute. 3. Purpose. The Company is organized primarily to engage in any legal and lawful purpose pursuant to the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act. 4. Registered Agent and Registered Office. The name and business address of the registered agent for service of process is: Shane McCoy 9500 Hwy 392 Windsor, Colorado 80550 5. Management. The management of the Company is vested in members rather than managers and the name and business addresses of the initial members are: Nate J. Caldwell 9500 Hwy 392 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Shane McCoy 9500 Hwy 392 Windsor, Colorado 80550 6. Indemnification. The members of the Company shall be entitled to indemnification from the Company in all matters and for all amounts in which indemnification is permitted under the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act set forth in Title 7, Article 80, of the Colorado Revised Statutes, or any amendment thereto. 7. Organizer. The name and address of the organizer is: Shane McCoy 9500 Hwy 392 Windsor, Colorado 80550 • • 8. Rights of Members to Contract with Company. Any of the Members of the Company shall not, in the absence of fraud, be disqualified from his/her office from dealing or contracting with the Company, either as vendor, purchaser or otherwise, nor shall any firm, association, or corporation of which he/she shall be a member, or in which he/she may be pecuniary interested in any manner be so disqualified. No director, officer, member, nor any firm, association or corporation or entity with which he/she is connected as aforesaid shall be liable to account to the Company or its Members for any profit realized by him/her from or through any such transaction or contract, it being the express purpose and intent of this Article to permit the Company to buy from, sell to, or otherwise deal with partnerships, firms or corporations of which the Members of the Company, or any one or more of them, may be members, directors, or officers, or in which they or any of them may have pecuniary interests; and the contracts of the Company, in the absence of fraud, shall not be void or violable or affected in any manner by reason of any such position. Furthermore, Members of the Company may be counted for a quorum of the Members of the Company at a meeting even though they may be pecuniary interested in matters considered at such meeting, and any action taken at such a meeting with reference to such matters by a majority of the disinterested Members shall not be void or voidable by the Company in the absence of fraud. 9. Continuity. In case of the death, retirement, resignation, expulsion, bankruptcy or dissolution of a Member or the occurrence of any other event which terminates the continued membership of a Member in the Company, then the Company shall terminate and cease to exist unless the then -remaining Member(s) of the Company unanimously elect after such termination to continue the business of the Company. 10. Effective Date. These Articles of Organization shall become effective as of the date of recording with the Secretary of State. ane McCoy Organizer STATE OF COLORADO )ss. COUNTY OF WELD I, Shane McCoy, being first duly sworn upon my oath, depose and state that I am the organizer of ELM Asset Management, LLC; that I have read the foregoing Articles of Organization of said limited liability company; and that the statements contained in such Articles of Organization are true and correct and constitute my free and voluntary acts. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13" day of February, 2009 by Shane McC Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: I /id zit l Z Notary •ublic 2 • • CONSENT TO APPOINTMENT OF REGISTERED AGENT The undersigned, as the initial registered agent of FLM Asset Management, LLC, hereby consents to being appointed as said agent. Effective Date: February 13, 2009. Shane IVIcCOy Registered Agent 3 • • Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:42 AM To:'foothillslandscape@comcast.net Subject: USR-1667 Nate, Bruce Barker (County Attorney) spoke to the Board of County Commissioners and it looks like we will need to add FML as an applicant to the resolution. But before we can proceed I will need a signed statement from all parties involved (Mark Brinkman, Nate Caldwell, Shane and any other owners of FML) that they agree to this change. Please mail or drop off a copy of the signed statement in addition to the statement I will need articles of corporation for FML which outlines who has the legal authority to sign for FML. If you have any question please don't hesitate to contact me. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how were doing: lute +t t+v .Cl, +Cld co u, dcparinients planning comp nfprm c comment, C Irn 3/18/2009 • I Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Subject: Bruce Barker Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:39 PM Michelle Martin; Kim Ogle; Thomas Honn RE: USR for Mark Brinkman Looks like we got 3 Commissioners for this procedure. We need Brinkman and Caldwell to understand that we are going to take care of their dilemma via a Corrected Resolution to make the applicants Brinkman and FML. Need to make sure they agree to that. Michelle: please contact them and explain. Have them call me if they are in need of further explanation. Original Message From: Sean Conway Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:34 PM To: Bruce Barker; William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Subject: Re: USR for Mark Brinkman I am ok with option 1 if other commissioners agree with your recommendation. Original Message From: Bruce Barker To: William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Sent: Tue Mar 17 16:09:29 2009 Subject: USR for Mark Brinkman Recall that on February 4th, the Board heard the USR application for Mark Brinkman for a landscape business named "Foothills Landscape Management, LLC," near Windsor. The Board approved the application with the following Development Standard #3: 3. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property, and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. Come to find out that FML was never a formal applicant to the USR. Also come to find out that Brinkman was intending to sell the property to FML, with the property being transferred prior to recording the plat. I am still uncertain if Brinkman has any ownership interest in FML (the Secretary of State's documents do not reveal any such ownership). Attached is a letter from FML co-owner Nick Caldwell explaining a financing dilemma. Obviously the problem is that this should have been taken care of before the signing of the resolution that makes Brinkman the sole applicant and restricts transferability. So, what to do now? I see 3 options: 1. Do a Corrected Resolution, designating the applicants as both Brinkman and FML. 2. Do a Corrected Resolution, with a corrected DV #3 that allows a 1 time transfer from Brinkman and the applicant to FML. 3. Have a letter go from me, the Board or Planning to Brinkman stating that a transfer of the property to FML will not be considered by the County to be a violation of DV #3, because of the explanation set forth in Caldwell's letter. The cleanest will be Option #1. FML was, for all intents and purposes, the applicant, because they answered all of the questions both in writing and at the hearing. It would be "in keeping" to make them a formal applicant, too. • • Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: William Garcia Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:26 AM Sean Conway; Bruce Barker; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin RE: USR for Mark Brinkman I agree with option 1 Bill Original Message From: Sean Conway Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:34 PM To: Bruce Barker; William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Subject: Re: USR for Mark Brinkman I am ok with option 1 if other commissioners agree with your recommendation. Original Message From: Bruce Barker To: William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Sent: Tue Mar 17 16:09:29 2009 Subject: USR for Mark Brinkman Recall that on February 4th, the Board heard the USR application for Mark Brinkman for a landscape business named "Foothills Landscape Management, LLC," near Windsor. The Board approved the application with the following Development Standard #3: 3. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property, and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. Come to find out that FML was never a formal applicant to the USR. Also come to find out that Brinkman was intending to sell the property to FML, with the property being transferred prior to recording the plat. I am still uncertain if Brinkman has any ownership interest in FML (the Secretary of State's documents do not reveal any such ownership). Attached is a letter from FML co-owner Nick Caldwell explaining a financing dilemma. Obviously the problem is that this should have been taken care of before the signing of the resolution that makes Brinkman the sole applicant and restricts transferability. So, what to do now? I see 3 options: 1. Do a Corrected Resolution, designating the applicants as both Brinkman and FML. 2. Do a Corrected Resolution, with a corrected DV #3 that allows a 1 time transfer from Brinkman and the applicant to FML. 3. Have a letter go from me, the Board or Planning to Brinkman stating that a transfer of the property to FML will not be considered by the County to be a violation of DV #3, because of the explanation set forth in Caldwell's letter. The cleanest will be Option #1. FML was, for all intents and purposes, the applicant, because they answered all of the questions both in writing and at the hearing. It would be "in keeping" to make them a formal applicant, too. Let me know your thoughts. Bruce. 1 • • Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Sean Conway Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:34 PM Bruce Barker; William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Re: USR for Mark Brinkman I am ok with option 1 if other commissioners agree with your recommendation. Original Message From: Bruce Barker To: William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Sent: Tue Mar 17 16:09:29 2009 Subject: USR for Mark Brinkman Recall that on February 4th, the Board heard the USR application for Mark Brinkman for a landscape business named "Foothills Landscape Management, LLC," near Windsor. The Board approved the application with the following Development Standard #3: 3. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property, and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. Come to find out that FML was never a formal applicant to the USR. Also come to find out that Brinkman was intending to sell the property to FML, with the property being transferred prior to recording the plat. I am still uncertain if Brinkman has any ownership interest in FML (the Secretary of State's documents do not reveal any such ownership). Attached is a letter from FML co-owner Nick Caldwell explaining a financing dilemma. Obviously the problem is that this should have been taken care of before the signing of the resolution that makes Brinkman the sole applicant and restricts transferability. So, what to do now? I see 3 options: 1. Do a Corrected Resolution, designating the applicants as both Brinkman and FML. 2. Do a Corrected Resolution, with a corrected DV #3 that allows a 1 time transfer from Brinkman and the applicant to FML. 3. Have a letter go from me, the Board or Planning to Brinkman stating that a transfer of the property to FML will not be considered by the County to be a violation of DV #3, because of the explanation set forth in Caldwell's letter. The cleanest will be Option #1. FML was, for all intents and purposes, the applicant, because they answered all of the questions both in writing and at the hearing. It would be "in keeping" to make them a formal applicant, too. Let me know your thoughts. Bruce. 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Barbara Kirkmeyer Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:31 PM Bruce Barker; William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Sean Conway Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Re: USR for Mark Brinkman I agree with Option 1 Barb Original Message From: Bruce Barker To: William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Sent: Tue Mar 17 16:09:29 2009 Subject: USR for Mark Brinkman Recall that on February 4th, the Board heard the USR application for Mark Brinkman for a landscape business named "Foothills Landscape Management, LLC," near Windsor. The Board approved the application with the following Development Standard #3: 3. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property, and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. Come to find out that FML was never a formal applicant to the USR. Also come to find out that Brinkman was intending to sell the property to FML, with the property being transferred prior to recording the plat. I am still uncertain if Brinkman has any ownership interest in FML (the Secretary of State's documents do not reveal any such ownership). Attached is a letter from FML co-owner Nick Caldwell explaining a financing dilemma. Obviously the problem is that this should have been taken care of before the signing of the resolution that makes Brinkman the sole applicant and restricts transferability. So, what to do now? I see 3 options: 1. Do a Corrected Resolution, designating the applicants as both Brinkman and FML. 2. Do a Corrected Resolution, with a corrected DV #3 that allows a 1 time transfer from Brinkman and the applicant to FML. 3. Have a letter go from me, the Board or Planning to Brinkman stating that a transfer of the property to FML will not be considered by the County to be a violation of DV #3, because of the explanation set forth in Caldwell's letter. The cleanest will be Option #1. FML was, for all intents and purposes, the applicant, because they answered all of the questions both in writing and at the hearing. It would be "in keeping" to make them a formal applicant, too. Let me know your thoughts. Bruce. ! • Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Douglas Rademacher Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:24 PM Bruce Barker; William Garcia; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Re: USR for Mark Brinkman I agree option 1 would be the easiest but frankly I feel we were deceived from the onset. Perhaps we shouldn't fold so easy. Original Message From: Bruce Barker To: William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway Cc: Thomas Honn; Kim Ogle; Michelle Martin Sent: Tue Mar 17 16:09:29 2009 Subject: USR for Mark Brinkman Recall that on February 4th, the Board heard the USR application for Mark Brinkman for a landscape business named "Foothills Landscape Management, LLC," near Windsor. The Board approved the application with the following Development Standard #3: 3. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property, and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. Come to find out that FML was never a formal applicant to the USR. Also come to find out that Brinkman was intending to sell the property to FML, with the property being transferred prior to recording the plat. I am still uncertain if Brinkman has any ownership interest in FML (the Secretary of State's documents do not reveal any such ownership). Attached is a letter from FML co-owner Nick Caldwell explaining a financing dilemma. Obviously the problem is that this should have been taken care of before the signing of the resolution that makes Brinkman the sole applicant and restricts transferability. So, what to do now? I see 3 options: 1. Do a Corrected Resolution, designating the applicants as both Brinkman and FML. 2. Do a Corrected Resolution, with a corrected DV #3 that allows a 1 time transfer from Brinkman and the applicant to FML. 3. Have a letter go from me, the Board or Planning to Brinkman stating that a transfer of the property to FML will not be considered by the County to be a violation of DV #3, because of the explanation set forth in Caldwell's letter. The cleanest will be Option #1. FML was, for all intents and purposes, the applicant, because they answered all of the questions both in writing and at the hearing. It would be "in keeping" to make them a formal applicant, too. Let me know your thoughts. Bruce. 1 Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:33 AM To: Bruce Barker Subject: USR-1667 Attachments: USR-1667 attorney.doc; 20090160.tif Bruce, We spoke briefly yesterday regarding USR-1667 and its unique situation with one of the development standards. I have attached a letter from the future owner regarding their situation and a copy of the resolution with the following development standard (# 3). "The Special Use Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the prescribed property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility." The current property owner is Mark Brinkman but its been his intention to sell the property to Foothills Landscaping after they received approval from the BOCC but before the plat was recorded. Due to the economic situation Foothills Landscaping is unable to purchase the property at this time (see attached letter). They would like to complete the USR and record the plat under Mark Brinkman and then purchase the property at a later date. Do you foresee any problems given development standard # 3? Thanks for all your help. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: lute: 1%vYvlCO.1\ us departments}? fanning comp impIoye_a>mmcnt,sciin 3/5/2009 S`ptnDSCAPEM 11, ORT COLLINS, CO `O�p,O To: Weld County Attorney RE: USR 1667 3/4/09 The following letter is to provide background into USR-1667 and the current state of execution. The USR applicant is listed as Mark Brinkman (current property owner) and Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC as the USR user/executioner. It has always been understood and desired that FLM was going to purchase the property, record the plat, and begin the proposed use. Unfortunately, the current economic unsettlement has caused our financing to get held up. The bank is asking for extended time to consider their previous commitment to FLM and the property purchase. This has led us to the following proposal. FLM would like to lease the property from Mark Brinkman until we can purchase the property from him. We would have a lease with option agreement that would make FLM responsible for the USR compliance and execution. FLM would be responsible to comply with the Use Standards that apply to the USR. FLM would make the necessary improvements to the property allowing the plat to be recorded and our proposed use to begin prior to our purchase date. Mark Brinkman will likely have to record the plat as the current deed holder. However, one of the USR Guidelines is that the USR plat is not transferable to other owners, technically voiding the USR when our purchase would become final. We do fully understand the reasoning and principles behind this item. We would ask that an exception or understanding be reached being that the end user of the USR and property would always be Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC even if the plat would have to be recorded by Mark Brinkman while FLM obtained financing for purchase. We want to reaffirm that we are not trying to in any way maliciously manipulate Weld County or the USR approval. If FLM is unable to lease and use the property while financing is once again secured, it is could terminate the whole deal. Hopefully the above information sheds light on the situation and you can help us continue on with this process. Please contact us with any questions, concerns, or to set up a meeting. Thank you for your time and consideration Nate Caldwell CO -owner Foothills Landscape Maintenance, LLC 970-556-0292 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lauren Light Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:17 AM foothillslandscape@comcast.net Michelle Martin RE: USR 1667 follow-up The only item you need to complete is the septic review per the condition that states: "As the applicant intends to utilize the existing septic system at the home, for employee use, the septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment. In the event the system is found to be inadequately sized or constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current Regulations." Please provide me with the review from a registered engineer. Thank you. Lauren Light, M.B.S. Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6415 Ext. 2211 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net[mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:57 AM To: Lauren Light Subject: Re: USR 1667 follow-up Hello - I added some info to the previous letter I submitted. Let me know what you think. Hopefully this helps. 1. Waste Handling Plan- estimated on site waste production and amount Engine Oil- 5-10 quarts month Normal trash, paper, bags, ect- one/two dumpsters per month Some of the chemicals that may be stored on site and their peak amounts include: Engine Oil/ Lubricants- 1-2 cases at any given time Fertilizer- 1-3 pallets at any given time during the three fertilization times Ice Melt- 1-2 pallets on hand in winter months Turf Pesticides (glyphosate and 2,4,D products)- 5-10 gallons on site at any given time. Stored in original containers Gas Cans- 10-15, 5 gallon cans Cleaning Supplies- 1-4 residential size bottles We will dispose of any waste responsibly and with a trash removal contractor (Gallegos 1 Sanitation). There has been no contract signed with a trash Temoval company as of yet. Yard waste is disposed of at Hageman Earth Cycle at 3501 E. Prospect Rd. in Ft. Collins. Their phone number is 970-221-7173. We have an agreement with Water Valley Golf Course in Windsor to take them all of our used oil. Their location is 1625 Pelican Point, Windsor, CO 970-686-5828. They are going to heat their clubhouse with it. The attachment is the letter itself... Nate Caldwell Original Message From: "Lauren Light" <llight@co.weld.co.us> To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:53:47 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: RE: USR 1667 follow-up Hi Nate, I need to have the names, addresses and phone numbers of the places where any waste will be disposed of. We want to make sure that waste is going to appropriate facilities. For example, where is used oil going? We need details on items like that. We do not want anything to get into the groundwater or the soils. Go ahead and send me a document that corresponds with the numbers identified under number 2 of the referral from me. Does this make sense? Thanks. Lauren Light, M.B.S. Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6415 Ext. 2211 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 3:49 PM To: Lauren Light Subject: Re: USR 1667 follow-up Hello - Thank you for all of your help in getting us dialed in here. What do you need from us to improve or complete or waste handeling portion of the referal? You stated it was incomplete... If it is someting I can get started on, I might as well do it. Thanks a bunch - Nate Caldwell FLM Original Message From: "Lauren Light" <llight@co.weld.co.us> To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net Cc: "Michelle Martin" <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2009 9:29:20 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: RE: USR 1667 follow-up 2 Conditions of approval 1 (dust abatement plan), 4 (commercial applicators license) and 5 (no washing will be done on site) have been completed. The septic system has not been reviewed by an engineer and the waste handling plan is incomplete. These items can be resolved after the County Commissioners meeting and can remain as conditions. Lauren Light, M.B.S. Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 970-304-6415 Ext. 2211 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net [mailto:foothillslandscape@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 10:57 AM To: foothillslandscape@comcast.net; Lauren Light Subject: Re: USR 1667 follow-up Hello - I just wanted to take a minute to see if you had a chance to look at the letter and information I sent earlier this fall in regards to USR-1667. We have an upcoming meeting with the County Commissioners and a resolution to this issue is on agenda. Please let me know if your concerns have been addressed. Much appreciation. Nate Caldwell Original Message From: foothillslandscape@comcast.net To: llight@co.weld.co.us Sent: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: USR 1667 follow-up Hello Laren - Thank you for the time you have already spent reviewing our USR. Also, thank you for your quick reponse to my call. I am writing you in regards to the memorandum you returned to Michelle w/ Planning Services. We have typed up a brief letter that hopefully addresses the recommendations you made. The letter is attached. Please advise us of aany changes you would need to keep the project headed in the right direction. • • I also have hard copies of our Pesticide Applicators License and the septic inspection that I will send if I can get your prefered mail address from you. Thank you very much - Nate Caldwell FLM Hello