Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20092499COUNTY OF WELD 2010 PROPOSED BUDGET MESSAGE PRESENTED TO: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS William F. Garcia, Chair Douglas Rademacher, Pro -Tern Sean P. Conway, Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Commissioner David E. Long, Commissioner BY THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION DONALD D. WARDEN September, 2009 (1:„uk,) '‘ ezi1w),,,) -ra`'i , oo9-ayCy9 FiDo yo TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD 1 BUDGET MESSAGE 3 ABOUT WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 13 STRATEGIC PLAN 16 2010 BUDGET PLAN 44 2010 BUDGET CALENDAR 49 POINTS OF ISSUE AND POLICY MATTERS: Explanation of Overview of Budget and Management System 51 Overview of Budget and Management System 53 Hierarchy of Budget Information 54 Budget Process 55 2010 Guidelines 56 2010 Special Budget Instructions 58 2010 Program Issues 60 Significant Changes in Policy from Prior Years 61 Budget Policies 62 Long Range Financial Policies 63 Revenue Policies and Assumptions 65 Specific Revenue Assumptions of Significant Revenue 66 Major Revenue Historical Trends and Analysis 68 Policy Directions 69 Explanation of Individual Funds 71 Significant Budget and Accounting Policies 74 Capital Improvement Policy 76 Investment Policy 78 Fund Balance and Reserve Policy 79 Organizational Responsibility for Budget Units 80 Policy Matters/Points of Issue with Fiscal Impact 84 EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND BENEFITS: Salary and Benefit Recommendations 85 2010 Other Benefits 87 Position Authorization Changes Due to 2010 Budget 88 SUMMARY OF FUNDS: Graph - - All Funds Revenue 91 Graph - - All Funds Expenditures 92 2010 Summary of Fund Balances 94 2010 Summary of Major Revenues and Expenditures 96 2009 Estimated Summary of Major Revenues and Expenditures 98 2008 Actual Summary of Major Revenues and Expenditures 100 PAGE SUMMARY OF FUNDS (CONTINUED): Governmental Funds - 2008 - 2010 Summary of Estimated Financial Sources and Uses 102 2009 Assessed Values to be Used for 2010 Budget 104 Net Program Cost 105 Summary of 2008 Allocated Costs Applicable for 2010 107 Seven Year Trend Data: Beginning Fund Balance 108 County Expenditures 109 Weld County - Organizational Chart 110 Summary of County Funded Positions 111 GENERAL FUND: Graph -- General Fund Revenues 115 Graph -- General Fund Expenditures 116 Seven Year Trend Data: General Government 117 Public Safety 118 Health and Welfare 119 Narrative Fund Summary 120 Summary of Revenue 122 Summary of Expenditures 124 Office of the Board 126 County Attorney 128 Public Trustee 130 Clerk to the Board 132 Clerk and Recorder: Recording/Administration 134 Elections 136 Motor Vehicle 138 Treasurer 140 Assessor 142 County Council 144 District Attorney: Seven Year Trend Data 145 Budget Unit Summary 147 Juvenile Diversion 150 Victim/Witness Assistance 151 White Collar Crime Task Force 152 Finance and Administration 153 Accounting 155 Purchasing 157 Human Resources 159 Transportation 162 Planning and Zoning 164 Buildings and Grounds 170 Information Services 172 Geographical Information System 175 Capital Outlay 177 Printing and Supplies 178 PAGE GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED): Sheriffs Office: Seven Year Trend Data 180 Budget Unit Summary - All Departments 181 Sheriff Administration 200 Sheriff Operations 202 Traffic Enforcement 204 Sheriff's Contract Services 206 Sheriff's Office Ordinance Enforcement 208 Regional Forensic Laboratory 210 Victim Advocate Services 212 Multi -Jurisdictional Drug Task Force 214 North Jail Complex 216 Centennial Jail 218 Contract Jail Space 220 Office of Emergency Management 221 Communications - County Wide 223 Communications System Development 226 Criminal Justice Information System 227 Coroner 228 Pre -Trial Services 230 Community Corrections 233 Building Inspection 235 Noxious Weeds 238 General Engineering 240 Parks and Trails 242 Airport 243 Senior Programs 244 Waste Water Management 245 Developmentally Disabled 246 Mental Health 248 Child Advocacy Center 249 Transfers: Retirement 250 Human Services 251 Health Department 252 Economic Development 253 Building Rents 254 Non -Departmental 256 Retiree Health Insurance 257 Community Agency Grants 258 Extension Service 260 County Fair 262 Veteran's Office 263 Island Grove Building 265 Contingency (Salary) 266 iii PAGE PUBLIC WORKS FUND: Graph -- Public Works Revenues 267 Graph -- Public Works Expenditures 268 Graph -- Seven Year Trend Data 269 Narrative Fund Summary 270 Concerning Local Accountability for Money Used for Highway Purposes 271 Construction Bidding for State -Funded Local Projects 272 Summary of Revenue 273 Summary of Expenditures 274 Administration 275 Trucking 277 Motor Grader 279 Bridge Construction 281 Maintenance Support 283 Other Public Works 285 Mining 287 Pavement Management 289 Grants -in -Aid to Cities and Towns 291 Non -Departmental Revenue 292 Contingency (Salary) 293 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND: Graph -- Social Services Revenues 295 Graph -- Social Services Expenditures 296 Graph -- Seven Year Trend Data 297 Fund Narrative 298 Summary of Revenue 302 Summary of Expenditures 303 Summary — All Departments 304 County Administration 310 Non Program Revenue 312 Other Programs 313 Child Support Administration 315 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families 317 Aid to Needy Disabled 319 Child Care 320 Old Age Pension 322 Child Welfare and Administration 324 Core Services 326 LEAP Program and Administration 328 General Assistance 329 iv PAGE PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT FUND: Graph -- Health Fund Revenues 331 Graph -- Health Fund Expenditures 332 Graph -- Seven Year Trend Data 333 Narrative Fund Summary 334 Summary of Revenue 336 Summary of Expenditures 337 Budget Unit Summary - All Departments 338 Non -Program Revenue 347 Administration 348 Health Communication 350 Community Health Services 352 Environmental Health Services 354 Public Health Preparedness 356 HUMAN SERVICES FUND: Graph -- Seven Year Trend Data 359 Narrative Fund Summary 360 Summary of Revenue 361 Summary of Expenditures 362 Summary — All Departments 363 Head Start Program 364 Migrant Head Start 365 Preschool Fund 366 Job Service (Wagner/Peyser) 367 Summer Job Hunt 368 Consumer Navigator 369 Employment First 370 WIRED Grant 371 Assistance to Needy Families 372 Workforce Investment Act - Administration 373 Workforce Investment Act - Adult Program 374 Workforce Investment Act - Youth Program 375 Multi -Disciplinary Youth Assessment 376 10% Incentive Grant (CIMS) 377 Workforce Investment Act - Statewide Activities Grant 378 Workforce Investment Act - Dislocated Worker Program 379 Educational Lab 380 AmeriCorps Program 381 Tight Corp Program 382 Pillars of Successful Independence 383 AAA Administration 384 AAA Support Services 385 AAA Congregate Meal 386 AAA Home Delivered Meals 387 AAA Health Services 388 AAA Elder Abuse Grant 389 AAA Special Ombudsman 390 AAA Single Entry Point 391 v PAGE HUMAN SERVICES FUND (CONTINUED): AAA (NMCM) 392 AAA (VALE) 393 AAA (State Funds) 394 Part E Family Caregiver Support 395 Supplemental Foods 396 Community Services Block Grant 397 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: Narrative Summary of Special Revenue Funds 399 Conservation Trust Fund: Summary of Revenue 400 Summary of Expenditures 401 Budget Unit Summary 402 Contingency Fund: Summary of Revenue 405 Summary of Expenditures 406 Budget Unit Summary 407 Emergency Reserve Fund Summary of Revenue 408 Summary of Expenditures 409 Budget Unit Summary 410 Solid Waste Fund Summary of Revenue 411 Summary of Expenditures 412 Budget Unit Request Summary - Code Enforcement 413 Budget Unit Fund Summary 414 CAPITAL FUNDS: Graph - - Seven Year Trend 417 Narrative Fund Summary 418 Summary of Revenue 419 Summary of Expenditures 420 Budget Unit Summary 421 Long Range Capital Projects Five -Year Plan 422 PROPRIETARY FUNDS: Narrative Summary of Funds 461 Paramedic Services Enterprise Fund: Summary of Revenue 462 Summary of Expenditures 463 Budget Unit Summary 464 vi PAGE PROPRIETARY FUNDS (CONTINUED): IGS - Motor Pool Fund Summary of Revenue 467 Summary of Expenditures 468 Budget Unit Summary - Motor Pool Administration 469 Budget Unit Summary - Motor Pool Equipment 471 IGS - Health Insurance Fund: Summary of Revenue 475 Summary of Expenditures 476 Budget Unit Summary 477 IGS - Insurance Fund: Summary of Revenue 479 Summary of Expenditures 480 Budget Unit Summary 481 IGS - Phone Services Fund: Summary of Revenue 483 Summary of Expenditures 484 Budget Unit Summary 485 Weld County Finance Authority: Budget Unit Summary 487 GLOSSARY 489 vii VIII GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Distinguished Budget Presentation Award PRESENTED TO Weld County Colorado For the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2009 President Executive Director 1 Afti Wilk AO, fliRt COLORADO September 1, 2010 Weld County Board of Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Board Members: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION PHONE (303) 356-5000, EXT.4218 FAX: (303) 352-0242 915 10TH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 The Weld County 2010 proposed budget for operations and capital outlay totals a gross amount of $174,968,155, with a net of $171,395,994 when interfund transfers are excluded. The Internal Service Funds total an additional $22,503,664. The budget has been prepared in accordance with your directives developed during the budget process. The budget is funded with revenue estimates of $106,660,230, anticipated fund balances of $39,315,927, and the maximum allowed property tax under Amendment One (TABOR) and the Weld County Home Rule Charter of $97,108,137. FINANCIAL PLAN ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK As we approach 2010, we stand more than a year into a grave economic crisis with a projected federal deficit of 13% of GDP. That is more than twice the size of the next largest deficit since World War II. This projected deficit is the culmination of a year when the federal government, at taxpayers' expense, acquired enormous stakes in the banking, auto, mortgage, healthcare and insurance industries. In the short term there are worries of deflation until the economy recovers, but in the long term high inflation may well become a major problem. With the crisis and the ensuing economic downturn, the unfunded liabilities of federal programs, such as Social Security, federal pensions, Medicare and Medicaid, are all over the $100 trillion mark. With U.S. GDP and federal tax receipts at about $14 trillion and $2.4 trillion respectively, such a debt all but guarantees higher interest rates, massive federal tax increases and eventually partial default on government promises in the long term. 3 With the fiscal picture the country faces and the monetary policies that have and will follow, we can expect rising prices and higher interest rates over the next four or five years. With the state tax limitations and Weld County's own five -percent property tax limitation, the inflationary pressures from rising prices could make the financial challenges for Weld County very difficult, much like the late 1970's and early 1980's. However, prior to facing those financial challenges we all must weather the current economic crisis of slow economic recovery and growing unemployment. The current economic crisis has taken its toll on the State of Colorado and Weld County. Historically, the Colorado economy has fared better than many other states during nationwide recession periods. Such decreased volatility in Colorado is attributable largely to the rather diverse nature of the Colorado economy. Both the national economy and broader global economy are in a state of disorder due to an unprecedented series of shocks to financial systems worldwide. The resultant difficulties posed by the current national recession have adversely impacted the Colorado economy and Weld County's economy. However, economic conditions in Colorado and Weld County are still generally expected to be more favorable than conditions nationally in 2010. Weld County, like the rest of Colorado, has experienced job losses as consumer and corporate confidence dropped. This resulted in slower sales and significant corporate profitability losses that led to reduced production and ultimately to further job losses — continuing the downward cycle. While experiencing unemployment approaching 7.5-8.0%, Weld County is adding jobs in some industries, with the renewable energy economy being the prime example. Weld County has two Vestas wind blade manufacturing plants that will be open by the beginning of 2010 with over 2,000 new jobs, and Abound Solar, Inc. recently expanded into Weld County with 300 plus new jobs. An area of major slowdown has been the construction industry in Weld County. The annual growth rate of three plus percent the last few years came to a stop in 2009, and is not expected to recover for at least two or three years as inventories of homes and commercial space are absorbed once the economy begins to recover. This has caused declines in revenues in the county on the negative side, but has also given the county a time to catch up in dealing with the past rapid growth which has already occurred. The slowdown in the economy has also resulted in the local energy industry slowing down in the areas of exploration and production. This, coupled with the decline in energy prices, will adversely impact the county's assessed value in 2011. Plans have already been implemented in 2009 to deal with this problem in 2010-2011. Details of the response are in the 2010-2014 Budget Plan section of this document. The State of Colorado government's budget woes will also impact Weld County government. As the recession causes a reduction in sales tax and income tax revenues, the state struggles to balance its budget. With many county programs tied to the finances of the state, the Weld County budget is always in jeopardy when the state begins to look for places to cut its budget. This problem will persist through 2010 and perhaps longer. Even if the economy rebounds, analysts are warning that income taxes from capital gains from sale of assets may lag several years due to the dramatic drop in the prices of equities and real estate. The portion of state and federal income tax from capital gains is significant. 4 The current recession has posed unprecedented challenges to policymakers and corporate leaders alike. As difficulties from the financial crisis persist nationally, consumer confidence, credit availability, and labor market disturbances will likely persist in Colorado. A recovery of the Colorado economy will be closely correlated with improvements in the national economy, and improvement in the national economy is contingent upon a variety of volatile factors. Anticipating the effects of future monetary and fiscal policy actions is quite difficult. Additionally, the overall effect of the enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 remains unknown, as does the lag between the legislation's implementation and consequent benefits. FOR THE FUTURE The main purpose of county government is to be able to continue providing essential public safety, health, welfare services, and a county transportation system. The national and international economies are struggling under unprecedented uncertainties and challenges. With indicators of housing market performance dropping to depths that haven't been seen in years, volatile energy and commodity prices, and slow economic growth, many local governments are feeling financial pressures. Fortunately, Weld County is weathering this storm better than many other local governments thanks to our past prudent and conservative financial management. Over the years Weld County has taken a number of steps to restrict spending and safeguard taxpayer dollars. However, despite these sound fiscal practices, Weld County will not escape some of the consequences of the economic downturn and economic turmoil around it. As Weld County policymakers and managers face the next three to four years, it will take extra efforts on everyone's part to deliver conservative and balanced budgets in fiscal years 2010- 2014. Based upon some reasonable projections of future assessed values and demand for services, it will be essential to develop budgets that tighten county government's belt, focus on critical services, and reflect the needs of the citizens of Weld County. While weathering these economic times over the next few years, the budget must continue to deliver essential services and also make strategic investments in human capital management, as well as the county's infrastructure, so that our county is well -positioned for a strong economic rebound when the downturn becomes an upturn. The main issue facing Weld County is the impact that the drop in housing prices and the volatility of the price and production of oil and gas will have on Weld County's assessed value, which generates nearly 70% of the property taxes to support nearly 40% of the county's budget. With a reappraisal year in 2009 for the 2010 budget, residential property in Weld County dropped as much as 15-30% with an average impact of over a 9% reduction. This drop is more than offset by the rise in oil and gas assessed value in the same year. The problem will come in configuring the 2011 budget, because with the drop in oil and gas prices in 2009 the oil and gas assessed value may well drop back to 2007 levels. In doing a reasonable forecast of assessed values due to the drop in housing values and volatility of oil and gas values, the structural and cyclical problem of the property tax revenues for the next three years must be dealt with as one budgetary issue, and not left to be dealt with in the individual years — thus creating a major problem for 2011 and 2012. Hopefully, by 2013 the assessed values will begin to stabilize. Another area of concern is the continued State of Colorado budget crisis with the drop in sales tax and income tax resulting from the economic slowdown. Many of the county's programs are dependent upon our funding partnership with the state. As the state seeks to balance its budget the county can expect cuts to state programs impacting the county until the economy and state revenues improve. 5 Challenging fiscal times test the strength of an organization's backbone, but they also provide an opportunity to review and strengthen policies, enhance the analytical knowledge of the organization, and inspire fresh perspectives. It is an opportunity for departmental -level reviews and analysis. It is a time to align strategies and programs to maximize the positive impacts on services to the county's residents and find innovative ways to reduce costs and leverage resources. A major challenge or crisis can provide impetus to innovate and make changes that would nearly be impossible in better times. As someone once said, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste." Prioritizing services is essential in the dealing with the budgetary challenge. Services cannot be provided as they always have been. There is probably some fat that can be trimmed from the existing service mix, but more likely Weld County will have to do more with less, do less of, or simply stop providing some services to concentrate on a more limited number of high priority programs. GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Revenue for general government functions including General, Special Revenue, Capital Expenditures, Internal Service, and Enterprise Funds total $203,768,367 in 2010, an increase of 7.07 percent over 2009. The amount of revenue from various sources and the changes compared to 2009 are shown in the following tabulation: Revenue Sources Property Taxes Other Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenue Charges for Service Paramedic Fees Miscellaneous Revenue Fee Accounts Internal Service Charges TOTAL 2009 Amount $ 76,642,132 7,475,000 1,893, 900 57,304,370 5,153,111 5,692,558 8,214,875 7,425,300 20,507,205 $ 190 308 451 2009 Percent of Total 40.3% 3.9% 1.0% 30.1% 2.7% 4.3% 3.0% 3.9% 10.8% 1000% 2010 Amount $ 97,108,137 7,030,000 1,860,400 52,996,235 5,266,865 5,791,647 5,699,419 7,262,000 20,753,664 2010 Percent of Total 47.7% 3.4% 0.9% 26.0% 2.6% 2.8% 2.8% 3.6% 10.2% $ 203.768.367 100.0% Increase - Decrease from 2009 $ 20,466,005 - 445,000 - 33,500 - 4,308,135 113,754 99,089 - 2,515,456 - 163,300 246,459 $ 13,459,916 6 Expenditures by function for the General, Special Revenue, Capital Expenditures, Internal Services, and Enterprise Funds total $193,899,658 for 2010, which is a decrease of 5.53 percent from 2009. The amounts by function and the decrease from 2009 are as follows: Expenditure Sources General Government Social Services Road and Bridge Public Safety Human Services Health Capital Public Works Contingency Miscellaneous Culture and Recreation Auxiliary Paramedic Services Internal Services 2009 Amount $ 27,255,421 24, 724,150 29,213,402 38,675,080 14,681,871 8,217,130 16,400,000 2,489,227 12,400,000 1,202, 367 948,026 483,895 5,692,558 22,257,205 2009 Percent of Total 13.3% 12.1% 14.3% 18.9% 7.2% 4.0% 8.0% 1.2% 6.0% 0.6% 0.5% 0.2% 2.8% 10.9% 2010 Amount $ 27,155,634 24,491, 500 26,604,640 38,411,709 13,583,359 8,562,014 10,000,000 2,235,967 12,400,000 829,329 935,834 394,361 5,791,647 22,503,664 2010 Percent of Total 14.0% 12.6% 13.7% 19.8% 7.0% 4.4% 5.2% 1.2% 6.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.2% 3.0% 11.6% Increase - Decrease from 2009 $ - 99,787 - 232,650 - 2,608,762 - 263,371 - 1,098,512 344,884 - 6,400,000 - 253,260 0 - 373,038 - 12,192 - 89,534 99,089 246,459 TOTAL $ 204,640,339 100 0% $ 193 899 658 100 0% $ - 10 740 674 Enterprise Operations: The County's enterprise operation is comprised of the Paramedic Service. The Paramedic Service is a county -wide advanced life support emergency medical service. The program is totally supported by fees. The operation anticipates nearly 14,425 calls in 2010 and generated revenue of $5,791,647. Capital Expenditures Fund: The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2010 program is funded at $10,000,000, with $7,300,000 from property tax, $100,000 from capital expansion fees, $2,000,000 from Energy Impact Grants, $500,000 from a federal criminal justice grant for the crime lab, and $100,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $5,000,000 for a Regional Crime Lab Building, $250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities, and $100,000 for special projects. A carry-over beginning fund balance of $2,500,000 is anticipated, and $7,150,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2010. Debt Administration: In 2006, the county continues to have no bonded indebtedness. With the passage of HB1579 in 1981, Section 30-35-201, C.R.S., Weld County is now allowed the debt ceiling to be three percent of the assessed valuation of the county. Thus, Weld County maintains over a $173 million allowable debt capacity in accordance with Colorado State statute. The 1997 Certificate of Participation Bond Issue for the construction of the Correctional Facility was paid off on the call date of August 1, 2007. Weld County currently has no debt of any type, one of only a few local jurisdictions which can make that claim. Cash Management: Cash temporarily idle during the year will be invested in time deposits ranging up to 180 days to maturity. Interest earned on investments of cash held by the County Treasurer will be recorded as revenue in the General Fund, with the exception of interest attributed to the Insurance Fund, Capital Expenditure Fund, Health Insurance Fund, Trust Funds, and the interest earned on certain deposits held for other taxing authorities. The amount of interest anticipated in 2010 is $2,538,000. 7 The county's investment policy is to minimize credit and market risks while maintaining a competitive yield on its portfolio. Accordingly, deposits are either insured by federal depository insurance or collateralized. All collateral on deposits is held either by the government, its agent or a financial institution's trust department in the government's name. Risk Management: During 2010, Weld County will continue to be a member of Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool, therefore, all casualty insurance coverage is being provided via pooling with other Colorado counties. The pool offers full safety and risk management programs to minimize losses. Losses are funded on a self-insurance option basis. Worker's Compensation will be provided via a state approved self-insurance program. Mill Levy: The mill levy will be 16.804, unchanged from last year. The assessed value for the 2010 Budget is $5,778,870,341, which is up $1,217,924,611 or 26.7% over last year. All classes of property increased in assessed value for the year, except vacant land, which is down $10.9 million, or 9% and residential property, which is down $110.9 million or 9%. The major increase is in oil and gas due to price and production being higher. Oil and gas is up $1,158.0 million, or 68%; natural resources is up $0.7 million, or 4%; agricultural property is up $3.2 million, or 4%; industrial is up $66.1 million, or 31%; commercial property is up $56.4 million, or 9%; and State assessed property is up $51.2 million, or 11%. There is an actual value increase of new construction of $347.2 million. Employee Compensation Pay: For the 2010 budget it is recommended not to provide any salary increase to Weld County employees. This is the first time in over 30 years this has happened, but is justified based upon the economic conditions, lack of turnover, labor market conditions, and salary survey data. Health insurance rates are anticipated to go up 9% for 2010. It is recommended that the county absorb the full rate increase, so employees do not have a reduction in net take home pay in 2010. Fund Balances: County fund balances continue to remain very healthy, with an anticipated $39,315,927 to begin 2010. This remains at one of the highest levels in many years. The strong fund balance figures have been sparked by a strong local economy the last few years, and the high assessed value from oil and gas revenues from the high prices in 2008. The ending fund balances are projected at $49,184,636. However, the ending fund balance is actually understated because the Contingency Fund and Emergency Reserve Fund are appropriated, thus not showing up in the ending fund balance figure. These two amounts are not anticipated to be spent in 2010, and if no emergencies or unforeseen events happen, the amounts should be in the ending fund balance. There is no fund balance earmarked in the 2010 budget. All other fund balance amounts are undesignated. With the above projection, ending fund balances should be $61,584,636. MAJOR FACTORS IMPACTING THE 2010 BUDGET The major factors impacting the 2010 budget are related to the economic slowdown. Revenues that are sensitive to the economy such as new construction, housing sales, car sales, and interest rates are all down. On the expense side the economic slowdown is impacting service demands in Planning and Building Inspection as growth slows. In addition, health and human services programs are seeing a rise in service demand as more citizens need assistance to cope with the economic conditions and job losses. As cited earlier, another area of concern is the continued State of Colorado budget crisis with the drop in sales tax and income tax resulting from the economic slowdown. Many of the county's programs are dependent upon our funding partnership with the state. As the state seeks to balance its budget the county can expect cuts to state programs impacting the county until the economy and state revenues improve. 8 The General Fund is funded at the level of $72,712,006, down $1,565,336. The budget for general government functions is down $99,787, even with an increase of $441,101 in election costs since 2010 is a general election year with general and primary elections. Information Services increased $265,488 in costs due to the contract cost -of -living, transfer of a GIS employee to the contractor's payroll, and added capital costs. GIS is down $112,477 due to the transfer of the position to the contractor's budget. The District Attorney's budget is down $40,592 due the elimination of a clerical position as the office moves more towards paperless filings. Victim Witness is up $25,709 from additional grant resources for staffing. The Building and Grounds budget has been reduced by $256,939 because of lower energy costs. The Assessor reduced one Office Tech III, two Data Collector positions, and one Residential Appraisal position for a savings of $154,406, plus a reduction of $60,300 in postage, printing, and other professional services, for a total reduction of $214,706. Capital equipment was reduced $50,000. Planning is down $140,261 with the elimination of a Planning Tech and Long Range Planner position due to the department's workload being down. Other departments are stable or down only slightly. Public safety functions are down $263,371. An Investigator position for the White Collar Crime Task Force ($84,567) was reduced. An additional 0.5 FTE for a school resource officer was added, but the additional costs will be reimbursed by Mead High School. Three SO Deputy II positions were eliminated in the Traffic Enforcement unit ($216,621). In the North Jail budget significant costs have been deferred by opening only 64 of the remaining 122 secure confinement beds in the new jail wing. The added cost to open the 64 beds was approximately $645,000 with the addition of six Correctional Officer positions, however, part of this cost was offset by eliminating two Commander positions. Inmate census trends during the seven month period prior to the development of this budget indicate the 683 bed capacity should be adequate in 2010. The approximately $900,000 in deferred jail cost is not a permanent cost savings as additional staff and capacity will be needed in the future. The Centennial Jail budget reflects the transfer of two entire programs, Pre -Trial Services (PTS) and In Custody Alternative Placement Program (ICAPP) to the newly created Justice Services Department in the amount of $453,072 across all budget categories, including four FTE's associated with those programs. Personnel services in the Centennial Jail was reduced an additional $106,946 by the elimination of two client manager positions in the Work Release Program. The utilization of Work Release has declined reflected further by reduced revenues from client participation fees. On June 29, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners created the Justice Services Division. The proposed budget for the new Justice Services Division is $478,821 for a savings of $83,977. Even with this savings the resources budgeted allow for funding of the Director of the Division, three Pre- trial Client Managers, Pre-trial Services Supervisor, and a Criminal Justice Planner. The creation of this division should allow for improved pre-trial services that will positively impact public safety and more cost effectively deal with clients in the criminal justice system to minimize the need to incarcerate the clients in the county jail. The addition of the Criminal Justice Planner position will allow for a position to do system -wide analysis of the entire criminal justice system in Weld County and the 19th Judicial District to maximize its efficiency for all parties, while still protecting the public's safety. Pest and Weed is down $251,347 as the department transferred prairie dog control and tree removal responsibilities back to Public Works. Communication costs are down $111,784, primarily due to the new funding formula and E911 picking up overtime costs. Other significant changes include Engineering, which is down $253,260 due to consultant contracts and lower engineering costs for projects. The General Fund's subsidy to the Public Health Department is down $538,570 due to reduction in programs as part of the budget review process done in 2009. Transfer to the Retirement Fund of $250,000 was eliminated in the 2010 budget since no cost -of -living will be granted to retirees in 2010. Extension Services were 9 Finally, $153,371 is included for health insurance rate increases for 2010. No employee pay increases are funded in the 2010 budget due to economic conditions. In the area of Public Works the Motor Grader budget supplies are up $69,000 for additional dust palliative chemicals, and motor grader lease costs are down $13,672. In the Bridge budget, $175,000 for tree trimming has been included, steel costs for bridge construction and repair are down $100,592. The Other Public Works budget is down $1,773,450 based on the Capital Improvement Plan. Strategic Road improvements are down $1,073,200. Contract Payments decreased $615,750 to $295,000 based on the capital improvement plan, and due to more of the work being done in-house. Right -of way purchases are down $84,500 at $50,000. Mining includes $300,000 for gravel purchases. Pavement Management is funded at the current year level, but with the drop in the costs of petroleum products more projects will be able to be done for the same cost. On the revenue side of the budget, property taxes are budgeted at $97,108,137, the maximum amount under the Weld County Home Rule Charter's 5% property tax limitation and TABOR. Revenue from interest earnings are down $807,000 at $2,393,000 for 2010. Oil and Gas Royalties are up $175,000. Fines are up $70,000 from traffic enforcement. Planning and Building Inspection fees are unchanged due to the slowdown in development and residential construction. Charges for services are up $150,090. The Treasurer's fees are anticipated to be up $400,000 due to the volume of activity and conservative estimates in the past. Clerk and Recorder's fees are down $400,000 due to slowing motor vehicle sales and slow down in recording fees from new construction and mortgage refinancing activities. Intergovernmental revenues are up $154,053. Recovery of indirect costs to grant programs is up $200,735. Other revenues are stable or only slightly changed. In Public Works' revenues specific ownership tax is estimated to be $6,330,000, down $445,000 due to car sales being lower. Regular HUTF is down $360,000 at $8,040,000 due to people driving less and more fuel efficient vehicles. However, with the passage of SB 09-109 Weld County will receive $1,490,000 from the added HUTF revenue resulting from this new legislation. Grant revenue is anticipated at $1,759,300 with $1,275,000 from Energy Impact, and North Front Range MPO grants of $140,000 for design work on the intersection of WCR 23 at SH 392, and $344,300 for intersection improvements at WCR 7 at WCR 54. Other revenues include $150,000 from transportation impact fees. Permit revenues are down $45,000 at $325,000 due to less oil and gas drilling activity. The Social Services Fund is funded at $24,491,500. As consumer costs for fuel, utilities, and food continue to rise, and as homeowners face mortgage foreclosure situations, more Weld County citizens are being placed in a position of requiring assistance. Food Assistance, Medicaid, and LEAP caseloads have experienced significant increases in the past year. Quality day care, at an affordable cost, will continue to be a challenge for working families to obtain. The Department continues to develop methods of increasing the rate paid per child/per day to providers who undergo trainings and assessments to enhance the quality of the care provided. The demand for Child Welfare services continues to expand in Weld County, as it has throughout the state. The Department is continuing to seek out and encourage the provision of services, with their associated costs, early in the involvement with families, in order to avoid the need for more costly services as the involvement continues. Human Services is funded at $13,422,348 for 2010, which is up $352,053 from the previous year primarily in the area of Headstart ($222,761) and Job Programs ($99,102). In the 2010 budget process all county programs underwent a detailed examination by management and the Board of Commissioners to better understand the needs and value of 10 In the 2010 budget process all county programs underwent a detailed examination by management and the Board of Commissioners to better understand the needs and value of programs. A priority process also identified what actions the county should take. This process identified programs that needed to be added, eliminated, restructured, or left unchanged. Together with the review, a re-examination of what Weld County's mission statement should be, core values, core strategic goals, and how each department and office tie their individual goals into the overall county mission and strategic goals to best serve the citizens of Weld County was accomplished. The 2010 Proposed Budget contains adequate resources to provide a level of service similar to 2009. The county will continue to focus on improving service and communication with our citizens within our resources. Demands in many areas continually exceed resources available. To serve the growing needs in the county, we will continue to explore possibilities for improved efficiency while maintaining excellence in service. Many uncertainties face county governments like Weld County, as we all deal with the worst economic conditions in a generation. Many tough decisions associated with implementation of programs, and how they are to be funded, must be dealt with by the Board of County Commissioners with citizen input. Hopefully, this budget document has allowed the Board to make those difficult decisions to maximize the value of the tax dollars of the citizens of Weld County. As a final note, I want to acknowledge again the hard work and spirit of cooperation manifested by the elected officials, department managers, and employees in recognizing the problems and issues confronting the county and responding with creativity and understanding. The county, as a whole, also recognizes the Weld County taxpayers and consumers of county services who provide the economic resources to the county, and we pledge our commitment to continue to provide the best in county services possible. Copies of all budget documents are available for the public at 915 10th Street, Room 317, Greeley, Colorado. More information can be found on Weld County's website at www.co.weld.co.us. Very truly yours, Donald D. Warden, Director Finance and Administration 11 WI�YG a iiti COLORADO 12 ABOUT WELD COUNTY Weld County covers an area of 3,999 square miles in north central Colorado. It is bordered on the north by Wyoming and Nebraska and on the south by the Denver metropolitan area. The third largest county in Colorado, Weld County has an area greater than that of Rhode Island, Delaware and the District of Columbia combined. The climate is dry and generally mild with warm summers, mild winters and a growing season of approximately 138 days. The land surface is fairly level in the east, with rolling prairies and low hills near the western border. Elevations in the county range from 4,400 to 5,000 feet. The South Platte River and its tributaries, the Cache la Poudre, Big Thompson, Little Thompson, Boulder, St. Vrain, and other smaller streams, flow into Weld County from the south and west, leaving the county on the east. POPULATION There are 31 incorporated towns in Weld County. The county seat and principal city, Greeley, is located in the west central part of the county and contains almost half the county's population. Generally, most of the remaining population resides within a 20 to 30 miles radius of Greeley; the northeastern part of the county is sparsely populated. HISTORY Major Stephen H. Long made an expedition to the area now known as Weld County in 1821. He reportedly said that the region would never be fit for human habitation and should remain forever the unmolested haunt of the native hunter, bison and jackal. In 1835 a government expedition came through the general area; the next year a member of that party, Lt. Lancaster Lupton, returned to establish a trading post located just north of the present town of Fort Lupton. In about 1837 Colonel Ceran St. Vrain established Fort St. Vrain; Fort Vasquez was built south of Platteville about 1840. The latter was rebuilt in the 1930's by the State Historical Society. The U.S. Congress took parts of the Territories of Nebraska, Kansas, New Mexico and Utah to create the Territory of Colorado in 1861. All parts of Colorado lying east of Larimer County and north of the present Adams County were in the original Weld County, one of 17 counties established by the first territorial legislature in September, 1861. Weld County was named for Lucius Weld, the first territorial secretary; St. Vrain became the first county seat. During the first 16 years of Weld County's history the county seat was moved from St. Vrain to Latham (three miles east of the present Greeley) to Evans, to Greeley, to Evans again, and finally in 1877, returned to Greeley. A large segment of the Weld County region was settled by people of German descent who migrated from Russia in the early 1900's. Originally they came as railroad workers; many soon worked in the productive beet fields and eventually became prosperous landowners. Weld County's Spanish -surname population began to arrive during the mid 1920's as laborers for the sugar beet industry. 13 Weld County's sugar beet industry began with the building of sugar factories in Greeley and Eaton in 1902. In 1903 another was built in Windsor, followed in 1920 by one at Fort Lupton and another at Johnstown in 1926. LIVABILITY Weld County's livability is just one of the features that make it a better place to be. Abundant Colorado sunshine, low humidity, cool summer nights, and mild winters provide a climate people appreciate. Recreational opportunities are almost endless. Much of Weld County is within an hour's distance of the majestic Rocky Mountains. Sports fans don't have far to go to cheer for their favorite professional teams in Denver. Weld County's cultural assets include Centennial Village, an authentic recreation of pioneer life on the Colorado plains. The Meeker Museum in Greeley is a national historic site. Fort Vasquez, in southern Weld County, has an exciting history as an early Colorado trading post. The Greeley Philharmonic Orchestra is the oldest symphony orchestras west of the Mississippi. The University of Northern Colorado's Little Theatre of the Rockies is one of America's premier college dramatic organizations. North Colorado Medical Center is a leading public medical facility and the Northern Colorado Oncology Center is a major cancer treatment facility in Colorado. EDUCATION Education has always been an important part of life in Weld County where twelve school districts offer educational opportunities which have earned a reputation for quality. Greeley is the home of the University of Northern Colorado, a 4 -year university offering bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees to 11,000 students. Aims Community College is a 2 -year liberal arts and vocational college in Greeley with a second campus in Fort Lupton. With 4,004 square miles within its borders and a population of over 180,000, Weld County has plenty of room for growth. Its thirty-one incorporated towns offer a variety of lifestyles from urban to rural. To make certain Weld County maintains its quality of life, a Comprehensive Plan has been developed and implemented. The Plan, simply stated, puts the right things in the right places. The result is that Weld County provides an ideal location for corporations, industries and businesses. Most importantly, it's a nice place for people. RESOURCES Fertile fields of green can be found in every part of the County, which ranks as the third leading agricultural area in the United States. Weld County is Colorado's leading producer of cattle, grain and sugar beets. 14 An abundance of water has been important to not only the agricultural community, but also to industrial development. Greeley's water supply, for example, includes reserves estimated at 100%. Future supply is equally impressive with such developments as the Windy Gap Project. Weld County is the second leading area in Colorado in the production of oil and gas. The County's many abundant resources provide a sound economic base and a secure future for the area. One of Weld County's most valuable resources is its labor force. The human resources provide a healthy labor climate for any corporation or industry. OPPORTUNITY Weld County offers unbounded opportunity for both employers and employees. The available services, recruitability, location, resources and livability make Weld County a desirable place in which to work and live. Weld County has one more important ingredient, as well, a positive attitude toward growth. We love being here and we'd love having you here, too. INDUSTRY Numerous industrial sites are located throughout Weld County. Fully developed rail and non -rail parks; undeveloped parcels, many zoned and with rail utilities adjacent to the property; a variety of industrial and commercial sites; and availability of both new and renovated prime office space are indicative of this area's attitude toward growth. Convenient access to every type of supply artery facilitates the industrial possibilities in Weld County. Major employers who already call Weld County "home" include: BURRIS COMPANY, INC. HARSH INTERNATIONAL HENSEL-PHELPS CONSTRUCTION KODAK METAL CONTAINER CORPORATION NORTHERN COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER OWENS-ILLINOIS PLATTE VALLEY STEEL ROCHE CONSTRUCTORS RR DONNELLEY NORWEST STARTEK SWIFT FOODS VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS 15 fiAtri "Mk COLORADO 16 STRATliGIC PLAN? Weld County is a changing and diverse community. Our strategic planning process will provide a methodology to achieve a consensus of what is needed for the future. As such the strategic plan provides Weld County policy makers, managers and employees with a game plan or blueprint that guides decision making towards our shared priorities and a rationale for resource allocation. These plan priorities provide the measuring stick we need to determine if Weld County is fulfilling its responsibilities. Strategic planning also provides for government accountability and continuous improvement. 17 OUR PRIORITY STRATEGIC THEMES These themes guide Weld County towards our vision of the future. • Operate in a fiscally responsible and stable manner • Improve the quality life for all residents • Protect the safety and quality of Weld County • Develop and maintain an effective transportation system • Continuously improve the performance and capabilities of Weld County operations by maximizing technology, fostering innovation, and increasing access to and information regarding services • Promote a healthy economy through business development and economic diversification • Promote responsible and comprehensive policy development through effective planning for land use, transportation, and growth management • Protect and preserve our unique environment • Promote cooperation and coordination among all government services 18 OUR VISION FOR THE FUTURE This vision statement reflects our citizens' expectations for Weld County government into the future. 19 OUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES These guiding principles are the basic values of every level of Weld County government. They guide the way we make our decisions and carry out our actions every day. ► Ensure long-term fiscal stability for the county ► Customer -focused and customer -driven ► Accountable and responsible to the public ► Provide and develop leadership, cooperation, and collaboration aimed at improving service ► Focus on viable solutions that improve the quality of life ► Provide the necessary knowledge, skills, and resources to county employees to carry out our mission and fulfill our vision 20 TRENDS IMPACTING WELD COUNTY We identified the trend and events that may impact our ability to provide and improve services. Analyzed the strengthens and weaknesses of Weld County government to meet these challenges. The major trends affecting Weld County are: • Growth And Its Impact • Transportation • Changing Economy • Demographic Changes • County Government Financial Trends Growth and Its Impact One of the defining characteristics of Weld County over the last decade has been the significant growth that has occurred in southern Weld County and in the Greeley -Windsor area. The growth has posed considerable challenges to Weld County. Managing the land use allocation issues associated with the growth has had to be balanced with maintaining the historical quality of life and rural charter of the county. The growth has strained services in the area of health and human services and public safety. However, the most significant services impact has been to the transporation system as the county has attempted to maintain the road and bridge system primarily designed for farm to market roads, but now must be developed into a transportation system to deal with the urbanization of the county. The growth adds strains to the services and the finances of the county, especially with the fiscal constraints of TABOR property tax and revenue limitations, and the Weld County Home Rule Charter 5% property tax growth limitations. The paradox of growth is that although growth adds demands for services, continued growth and economic development is essential for the long term viability of Weld County government and its citizens. Although the pace of growth has slowed with the cuurent economic conditions, Weld County must position itself to be able to handle the anticipated growth once the economic recovery begins. 21 TRENDS IMPACTING WELD COUNTY Changing Economy The impacts of the credit crisis, housing bubble, and recession are adversely impacting Weld County and all other units of government in the U.S. The consensus among most economists is that the impacts from the credit crisis, housing bubble, and recession will probably take four to five years at a minimum to stabilize the financial and economic system. This will translate into Weld County having four to five years of difficult financial planning and budgeting to meet the needs of the Weld County Citizens. Weld County has many positives going for it in these tumultuous financial and economic times to deal with the challenges we will face, such as no long term debt, a healthy fund balance, and a diversified local economy and tax base. Weld County is in excellent financial condition compared to most other local governments because for many years Weld County has been fiscally conservative in its approach to budgeting and funding its services and capital programs. With the difficult economic conditions being faced probably for the next four or five years, Weld County managers are going to have continue to find ways to reduce costs and increase program productivity. Weld County government's trends of being more creative and innovative to make better use of resources -- human, financial, and technological -- must continue. It is only through improved practices and approaches that services are maintained and public confidence in government is enhanced. Weld County's budget strategy for the next five years must continue to use the proven methodologies which have allowed the county to successfully deal with past budgets. Looking at future strategic approaches must continue as Weld County is challenged by these new economic times. 22 TRENDS IMPACTING WELD COUNTY Demographic Changes As growth has occurred the demographics of Weld County have changed. The Weld County population is much more diversified than it was even a decade ago as in migration has added to the ethnic diversity with the growing Latino population, and even recently a large community of Somalia immigrants. Weld County's changing demographics are evident in the shift from a rural charter to a more and more urbanized population. The age of the population is shifting in Weld County, as it is nationwide with aging baby boomers. All these demographic changes impact the kind of services provided, the manner in which they are provided, and the service levels. It will fall upon Weld County's elected officials and managers to find more creative and innovative solutions to better use the limited resources of the county to maximize delivery of services to the more diverse citizenry of Weld County. County Government Financial Trends The main purpose of county government is to be able to continue providing essential public safety, health, welfare services, and a county transportation system. The national and international economies are struggling under unprecedented uncertainties and challenges. With indicators of housing market performance dropping to depths that haven't been seen in years, volatile energy and commodity prices, and slow economic growth, many local governments are feeling financial pressures. Fortunately, Weld County is weathering this storm better than many other local governments thanks to our past prudent and conservative financial management. Over the years Weld County taken a number of steps to restrict spending and safeguard taxpayer dollars. However, despite these sound fiscal practices Weld County will not escape some of the consequences of the economic downturn and economic turmoil around it. As Weld County policy makers and managers face the next four to five years, it will take extra efforts on everyone's part to deliver conservative and balanced budgets in fiscal years 2010-2014. Bases upon some reasonable projections of future assessed values, and demand for services it will be essential to develop budgets that tighten county government's belts, focus on critical services, and reflect the needs of the citizens of Weld County. While weathering these economic times over the next few years, the budget must continue to deliver essential services and also make strategic investments in human capital management, and the county's infrastructure so that our county is well -positioned for a strong economic rebound when the downturn becomes and upturn. 23 TRENDS IMPACTING WELD COUNTY Transportation Growth in the county has put an ever increasing demand on county services and the county's infrastructure. The growth has increased the use of county roads and created congestion on several county roadways that need to be mitigated. Although the county has made tremendous progress the last twenty-five years in improving the over all condition of county roads and bridges, the growth is adding a whole set of new problems. The character of many county roads in the Greeley -Windsor area and Southwest part of the county have changed from rural roads to urbanized roads due to traffic volume demanding a higher capacity and level of services. Even though the county has increased funding in this area and imposed a traffic impact fee in these areas, additional investments will have to be made in the future to keep the transportation system at an acceptable level. 24 Weld County's Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges Identified STRENGTHS • Fiscally responsible and constrained • Visionary and proactive • Growing emphasis on strategic management and planning • Provide good and effective services to citizens • Effective use of technology to provide services • Committed to being a responsive government • Responsible and accountable to the citizens • Quality of life • Coordinated efforts inside and outside the county WEAKNESSES • Rapid urban growth changing service needs • Enhanced communication with public • Growing transportation and infrastructure needs • Geographic diversity of county • Growing demand for services • Economic recession driven demands for services 25 Weld County's Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges Identified OPPORTUNITES • Attractive area for new growth • Poised to promote economic development • Great workforce • Regional cooperation and coordinated efforts • Using technology to provide service improvements • Located on the northern edge of Denver metropolitan area • Business friendly environment • Proximity to three major universities CHALLENGES • Economic recession • Drop in housing prices • Volatility price and production of oil and gas • Increase demand for infrastructure and services • Demographic changes • Urbanization • State and Federal budget cut and mandates • Balancing citizen expectations with limited resources • State and Federal environment policies 26 STRATEGIC AREA PLANS OVERVIEW The following pages provide an overview of each strategic area plans, including the mission statement for each strategic area, the goals and desired outcomes, strategies to achieve the goals, and performance objective/key performance indicators. The strategic area are: *Public Safety *Human Services *Health Services *Transportation +Economic Development *Land Use and Planning Services *Enabling Strategies: Financial and Operational Support 27 STRATEGIC AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY 28 STRATEGIC AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY • Mission Statement: Promote and enhance public safety; seek justice; and respond in an efficient and compassionate manner. o Goal PSDA1: Systematic reduction of gang violence in our community. (District Attorney) o Goal PSDA2: Systematic reduction of traffic fatalities in Weld County. (District Attorney) o Goal PSDA3: Reduction of recidivism of charged offenders. (District Attorney) o Goal PSDA4: Increase communication with the public and other customers of the District Attorney's Office. (District Attorney) o Goal PSDA5: Reduction of paper files and duplicated data entry efforts. (District Attorney) o Goal PSPSB1: Adopt progressive solutions to deter crime and reduce the fear of crime unitizing community oriented policing methods. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSPSB2: Strengthen community programs and foster additional community partnerships. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSPSB3: Acquire sufficient personnel and equipment to support the growing needs of the County. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSPSB4: Increase personnel effectiveness and efficiency through improved use of communications and technology. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSPSB5: Enhance traffic safety measures and reduce impaired driving related traffic accidents. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSPSB6: Enhance professionalism and promote department excellence. (Public Safety Bureau) o Goal PSOSB1: Lawfully hold prisoners in a safe and humane environment. (Offender Supervision Bureau) o Goal PSOSB2: Maintain a continuum of effective jail alternatives that offer a range of sentencing and pre -adjudication options to secure custody. (Offender Supervision Bureau) o Goal PS1: To answer 100% of 911 calls within 15 seconds. (Weld County Regional Communications Center) 29 o Goal PS2: To provide a responsive, proactive, medico -legal investigation in an efficient and compassionate manner. (Coroner) o Goal PS -3: Provide safe, constructive and less expensive alternatives to use of jail and prisons; promote an accountable, coordinated justice system that focuses on present and future needs of Weld County. (Justice Services Division) 30 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES 31 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES • Mission Statement: Provide innovative, comprehensive and responsive human services to the Weld County community. o Goal HHS1: To continuously strengthen services and support innovation that leads to a culture that empowers people to improve their quality of life. o Goal HHS2: Develop and deploy consistent performance management approaches across the Human Services Department. o Goal HHS3: Establish a systematic structure to effectively communicate inside and outside of the Human Services Department. o Goal HHS4: To prepare for the future by identifying appropriate actions to opportunities and challenges that may impact the Department of Human Services. o Goal HHS5: Assist in providing veterans access to eligible state and federal benefits to meet their needs. 32 STRATEGIC AREA: HEALTH SERVICES 33 STRATEGIC AREA: HEALTH SERVICES • Mission Statement: Preserves, promotes and protects the health and environment of the residents of the Weld County community. o Goal HS1: To improve the health of our diverse communities by assuring individuals, families, and communities gain greater control of factors that influence their health. (Public Health and Environment) o Goal HS2: To assure dignified access to necessary, appropriate, affordable, continuous, and timely health care, including wellness and prevention services. (Public Health and Environment) o Goal HS3: To lessen adverse public health impacts of chronic and communicable diseases, land use developments, and disasters. (Public Health and Environment) o Goal HS4: To enhance our organization's effectiveness by continually monitoring our performance and evaluating our programs. (Public Health and Environment) o Goal HS5: Maintain and improve billing/collection process to ensure operating revenue as Enterprise Service. (Paramedic Service) o Goal HS6: Provide < 9 minute emergency response times 90% of the time or greater within the City of Greeley; provide < 20 minute emergency response time 90% of the time or greater in rural Weld County. (Paramedic Service) o Goal HS7: Provide < 20 minute routine response times 90% of the time or greater to all areas of Weld County. (Paramedic Service) o Goal HS8: Provide hospital door to intervention times of < 90 minutes to all cardiac alert patients within Weld County. (Paramedic Service) 34 STRATEGIC AREA: TRANSPORTATION 35 STRATEGIC AREA: TRANSPORTATION • Mission Statement: Design, build and maintain safe and economical roads; bridges; buildings; and other public facilities for the safe and efficient use by the citizens of Weld County and others. o Goal TT1: Maximize the use and efficiency of the existing transit system on a County -wide basis. Transit o Goal TPW1: Provide effective and efficient administrative and managerial support and supervision to the Public Works Department. (Public Works Administration) o Goal TPW2: To perform mining, crushing, and screening of aggregate materials and recycled asphalt. (Public Works Mining) o GoalTPW3: To repair and replace bridges, construct capital improvement projects, assist with snow removal on road system and county parking lots, install and replace culverts and cattle guards and perform tree removal/trimming in county rights of way. (Public Works Bridge) o Goal TPW4: To provide for the maintenance of 2,500 miles of gravel roads. (Public Works Grader) o Goal TPW5: Haul all material needed for gravel roads, RAP (recycled asphalt) roads and asphalt road construction and overlay projects. Clear paved roads of snow and ice. (Public Works Trucking) o Goal TPW6: Assure safe travel for the general public by maintaining clearly marked and signed roads and bridges; assist in plowing of snow from county parking lots and roads; install and maintain snow fence in selected areas of the county. (Public Works Maintenance Support) o Goal TPW7: Provide pavement management to include pavement testing, paving, patching, crack sealing, and sweeping. Contract administration of concrete curb and gutter, seal coat, aggregate, and other contracted services as assigned. (Public Works Pavement Management) o Goal TPWB: Provide engineering services, including design, development, inspections, and all phases of highway engineering, bridge engineering and construction inspection and testing. (Engineering) o Goal TPW9: Implement and monitor Colorado Weed Management Act (noxious weed control) on County property and assist land owners with compliance with the law through public education and assistance. (Noxious Weeds) 36 STRATEGIC AREA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 37 STRATEGIC AREA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Mission Statement: Establish a region with a healthy and sustainable economy that creates wealth, preserves the quality of life, and improves the standard of living for area residents. o Goal ED1: Encourage the expansion of existing businesses and the location of new industries that will provide employment opportunities in Weld County. o Goal ED2: Support and facilitate public and private economic development efforts that are consistent with the goals and policies of Weld County. o Goal ED3: Structure land use policies and regulations so they encourage County -wide economic prosperity and economic growth. o Goal ED4: Recognize and promote specific places and resources in Weld County that can uniquely support economic development. o Goal ED5: Maintain relevant economic data that is specific to Weld County and which complements other sources of similar information. o Goal ED6: Expand economic opportunity for local residents, businesses and governments by building and diversifying the primary job base in Southwest Weld County. 38 STRATEGIC AREA: LAND USE 39 STRATEGIC AREA: LAND USE • Mission Statement: Ensure harmonious, well -planned development and orderly growth in Weld County. o Goal LU1: Increase effectiveness by maintaining regular communication with the public, outside agencies, County departments, the County Planning Commission, and the County Commissioners - - providing information about land use issues and responding to requests for research. o Goal LU2: Plan for the long-term development of the County to ensure efficiency of services, to promote economical infrastructure investments, and to promote positive connections to community among citizens. o Goal LU3: Develop and maintain fundamental land use tools, for use by the Planning Services Department, the County at large, and Weld County citizens. o Goal LU4: Provide consistent, quality, well planned rural and urban planning and development, and transportation development services. o Goal LU5: Ensure safe construction throughout unincorporated Weld County. o Goal LU-6: Increase knowledge and understanding of adopted codes to citizens, homeowners, contractors, and builders through education. o Goal LU7: Maintain quality, professional and timely site inspections. 40 STRATEGIC AREA: ENABLING STRATEGIES 41 STRATEGIC AREA: ENABLING STRATEGIES • Mission Statement: Provide expertise and resources to support and facilitate excellent public service delivery. o Goal ES1: Enable County departments and its service partners to deliver quality customer service. (Office of the Board) o Goal ES2: Enhance community access to reliable information regarding services and County government issues. (Office of the Board) o Goal ES3: Ensure the County Attorney staff is meeting the needs of elected officials and department heads. (County Attorney) o Goal ES4: To improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater information access and exchange between the County Commissioners and the citizens of Weld County. (Clerk to the Board) o Goal ES5: Ensure statutory requirements and regulations governing the recording, indexing, imaging and electronic archiving. To be accountable and responsible to the public's needs. Ensure that the citizens receive professional, timely and quality service at all times. (Clerk and Recorder — Recording) o Goal ES6: Ensure that every eligible voter is given the opportunity to vote either through Vote Center voting, Mail -In Ballots, Early voting or Provisional voting. Register all voters that have a desire to vote and allow them to cast a ballot at the time of the election. Provide a Vote Center that is organized, safe and free of influence. Maintain a staff of highly -trained professionals who have the responsibility for the administration of the election office and all duties charged to the office. (Clerk and Recorder - Elections) o Goal ES7: Ensure every motor vehicle is properly titled and registered according to current Colorado laws. To be accountable and responsible to the public's needs within the guidelines of the law. Ensure that the citizens receive professional, timely and quality service at all times. (Clerk & Recorder - Motor Vehicle) o Goal ESB: To provide County treasury and tax collection services in the most accurate, efficient and cost-effective manner possible. (Treasurer) o Goal ES9: Correctly discover, list, value and defend values for property taxes for Weld taxing authorities. (Assessor) o Goal ES10: Ensure the financial viability of the County through sound financial management practices. (Finance and Administration) o Goal ES11: Deliver on promises and be accountable for performance. (Finance and Administration) o Goal ES12: Ensure the financial accounting of County funds is accurate (Accounting) 42 o Goal ES13: Ensure the timely acquisition of "best value" goods and services while maintaining integrity and inclusion (Purchasing) o Goal ES14: Attract, develop and retain an effective diverse and dedicated team of employees. (Human Resources) o Goal ES15: Plan, construct, and maintain well -designed County facilities in time to meet the needs of Weld County. (Building & Grounds) o Goal ES16: Capitalize on technology to improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater information access and exchange. (Information Services/GIS) o Goal ES17: Deliver timely, high quality, and cost-effective printing and supply services to County departments (Printing and Supply) o Goal ES18: Capitalize on phone technology to improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater phone access and exchange. (Phone Services) o Goal ES19: To provide quality, sufficient, and well -maintained county vehicles to county departments. (Motor Pool) 43 2010-2014 BUDGET PLAN The main purpose of county government is to be able to continue providing essential public safety, health and welfare services, and a county transportation system. The national and international economies are struggling under unprecedented uncertainties and challenges. With indicators of housing market performance dropping to depths that haven't been seen in years, volatile energy and commodity prices, and slow economic growth, many local governments are feeling financial pressures. Fortunately, Weld County is weathering this storm better than many other local governments thanks to our past prudent and conservative financial management. Over the years Weld County has taken a number of steps to restrict spending and safeguard taxpayer dollars. However, despite these sound fiscal practices Weld County will not escape some of the consequences of the economic downturn and economic turmoil around it. As Weld County policy makers and managers face the next three to four years, it will take extra efforts on everyone's part to deliver conservative and balanced budgets in fiscal years 2010- 2014. Based upon some reasonable projections of future assessed values and demand for services, it will be essential to develop budgets that tighten county government's belt, focus on critical services, and reflect the needs of the citizens of Weld County. While weathering these economic times over the next few years, the budget must continue to deliver essential services and make strategic investments in human capital management and the county's infrastructure so that our county is well -positioned for a strong economic rebound when the downturn becomes an upturn. The main issue facing Weld County is the impact that the drop in housing prices and the volatility of the price and production of oil and gas will have on Weld County's assessed value, which generates property taxes to support nearly 40% of the county's budget. Residential property is approximately 20% of the total assessed value and oil and gas production is 49%, for a total between the two classes of property of 65% of the total county assessed valuation. With a reappraisal year in 2009 for the 2010 budget, it is anticipated that residential property in Weld County could drop as much as 15-30% with an average impact of over a 9% reduction. This drop should be more than offset by the rise in oil and gas assessed value in the same year. The problem comes in configuring the 2011 budget, because with the drop in oil and gas prices in 2009 the oil and gas assessed value may well drop back to 2007 levels. In doing a reasonable forecast of assessed values due to the drop in housing values and volatility of oil and gas values the structural and cyclical problem of the property tax revenues for the next three years must be dealt with as one budgetary issue, and not be left to deal with in the individual years, or a major problem will be created for 2011 and 2012. Hopefully, by 2013 the assessed values will begin to stabilize. The assessed value situation is a combination of a structural and cyclical budget problem. Based upon an assessed value forecast for 2009, residential property is dropping due to the housing market's bubble bursting which will result in a projected 9% drop in average housing prices in Weld County. Then, as the cycle corrects itself, the values should be stable or slightly recovered for the 2011 reappraisal year which will positively impact the 2012 budget. However, one must be cautioned that commercial property values most likely will drop with the 2011 reappraisal. Hopefully, after 2013 residential property values and new construction will return to more historic stable and predictable levels. 44 The assessed value for oil and gas that is 49% of the county's assessed value in 2010 is extremely volatile. Oil and gas is a more challenging class of property assessment to predict. Based upon the high energy prices in 2009, the oil and gas assessed value for the 2010 budget up over 68% with oil prices averaging nearly $98 a barrel for 2008 versus $66 a barrel in 2007 or a 48% increase in price, plus the added productions. Natural gas was up as well and productivity may be up since new pipelines came online in 2008 versus 2007 when pipelines were shutdown. As we look forward to 2009 and 2010 the oil and gas assessed value could fall back to 2007 levels. However, falling prices have caused many oil companies to limit their investments in new exploration projects, which could result in another supply shock after the economy picks up. The global financial crisis has dramatically reduced the availability of speculative financing. Since this type of financing is essential to the energy industry, both locally and globally, there has been a reduction in the amount of energy development -- not a reduction in production, but rather a reduction in the future growth of production. In addition, the global decline in economic demand has reduced the demand for Colorado energy products, which has resulted in a decline in the price of existing and continuing Colorado production of natural gas, oil, and coal -- the big mineral in Colorado this decade is natural gas. The current and continuing decline in natural gas prices is incorporated in this forecast, as well as a multi- year pause in the growth of the quantity of gas production and a slowdown in development activity (rigs and permits). Longer term price projections anticipate continuation of price cycles with natural gas markets. As most of Colorado's natural gas must be transported to distant markets, Colorado natural gas producers face the additional constraint of pipeline "take-out" capacity. While pipelines are currently near capacity, new pipeline capacity expansion projects are in limbo -- this again is due to dependency on speculative financing. Therefore, Colorado natural gas production quantity is now projected to be relatively flat for a number of years until these pipeline expansion projects can be re -financed, built, and brought on line in 2012 and beyond. The net budgetary effect is that Weld County may be not be able to count on the continued growth in oil and gas assessed values that have allowed the mill levy to drop from 22.038 to 16.804 or 5.234 mills in recent years. Given all this information the assessed value could support the revenue from property taxes in 2010 at 16.804 mills, being up over $20 million from 2009, although in 2011 the assessed value may drop to levels that at 16.804 mills may be less than 2009. In 2012 the assessed value at 16.804 mills may be only $2.2 million over the 2009 property tax amount. There are three solutions to this budgetary problem: 1. Under the Weld County Home Rule Charter, the Board can raise an additional 5% in property tax revenue over the preceding year, even if the mill levy has to be increased. TABOR restricts raising the mill levy without voter approval, but Weld County has "banked' or taken a tax credit each of the years the TABOR limitation exceeded the Weld County Home Rule Charter limitation to the point of having a tax credit of 5.234 mills; therefore, the Board could increase the mill levy to 22.038 mills without voter approval. The "banking" of the tax credit was done in anticipation of the volatility of oil and gas assessed values, which is the situation we find ourselves in now. The public policy and political issue is, do you raise the mill levy in hard economic times? 2. Due to the drop in housing values and volatility of oil and gas values, the structural and cyclical problem of the property tax revenues for the next three years must be dealt with as one budgetary issue and not left to be dealt with in the individual years, or a major problem will be created for 2011 and 2012. Hopefully, the assessed values will begin to stabilize in 2013. Therefore, a strategic and tactical approach to deal with the budget 45 challenges facing Weld County must be developed with the goal of stabilizing the financial condition of the county during this economic downturn, while still providing essential services to the citizens without a mill levy increase. 3. A combination of the above two options is a third option, and may have to be considered if the Commissioners and management do not want to make Draconian cuts in the expenditure side of the budget. Option one is the easier of the options to mange and allows business as usual for the county in most cases. However, in a financial down turn, it is not just government that feels financial pressure. Citizens cannot afford new or increased taxes, while certain services like public safety or health and human services become ever more costly. Further, certain segments of the population may be particularly vulnerable and even less able to bear tax increases or service cuts than others. A budget and management strategy must be developed with full knowledge of how the proposed course of action will affect the citizenry. Not only is this important for short- term political support, but it is necessary for building trust with citizens, which is crucial for ongoing financial sustainability. A consideration that must not be overlooked, however, is that in 2010-2011 the average residential property taxpayer in Weld County will most likely experience an average 9% reduction in his or her property tax bill due to the drop in housing prices and the reappraisal. Option two is a much bigger challenge and more difficult to implement for policy makers and managers. This approach would mean that, with a projected 2.5% inflation rate over the next three-year period, county expenditures would need to be reduced more than 7% over the next three years and, at the end of three years (2012), the property tax base would be less than three percent higher than 2009. This could create financial stress on the county and would not position the county to be well prepared to deal with growth in times of economic recovery beyond 2012. Challenging fiscal times test the strength of an organization's backbone, but they also provide an opportunity to review and strengthen policies, enhance the analytical knowledge of the organization, and inspire fresh perspectives. It is an opportunity for departmental -level reviews and analysis. It is a time to align strategies and programs to maximize the positive impacts on services to the county's residents and find innovative ways to reduce costs and leverage resources. A major challenge or crisis can provide impetus to innovate and make changes that would be near impossible in better times. As someone once said, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste." The challenge of option two is also an opportunity to involve employees in helping examining what is best for the operations of the county by getting their input and ideas. While the purpose of government is to serve the citizens, the most effective and efficient organizations recognize the value of employees in providing that service. During tough economic times, employees, just like all other citizens and residents, are facing increased costs and potential financial issues of their own in the downturn. A strong human capital management strategy and program is essential to retaining good employees when changes are taking place in the workplace. And, remember when the economy turns around, the county will want to be in a position to recruit and retain the best employees possible to deal with the new challenges of growth and economic expansion. Prioritizing services is essential in the dealing with the budgetary challenge. Services cannot be provided as they always have. There is probably some "fat" that can be trimmed from the existing service mix, but more likely, Weld County will have to do more with less, do less of, or 46 simply stop providing some services to concentrate on a more limited number of high priority programs. To accomplish a review of programs and a priority process, it is proposed that from February - May, 2009, all county programs undergo a review by management and the Commissioners. Together with the review, a re-examination of core values, core strategic goals, and how each department and office tie their individual goals into the overall county mission and strategic goals to best serve the citizens of Weld County should be completed. It is recommended that the review of all county departments and the priority process be completed in early 2009 in anticipation of the 2010 budget. Through this process the Commissioners and managers can ascertain what the service and program consequences are, and whether the county approaches the next three budget years with the goal of no mill levy increase versus an alternative approach such as the 2010-2013 Assessed Valuation Analysis, which allows a 4.9% mill levy increase in 2011, thus allowing an average 2.5% property tax revenue growth equal to inflation over the next three years. It would also position the county to be prepared to deal with growth in times of economic recovery beyond 2012. Note, however, if oil and gas prices return to higher levels than 2007 in 2009-2010, a mill levy increase may not be necessary to accomplish an average property tax revenue growth equal to inflation over the next three years. As stated above, it is recommended that all county programs undergo a detailed examination by management and the Commissioners in the next three months to better understand the needs and value of programs and a priority process that identifies what the county should be doing. This process may identify programs that need to be added, eliminated, restructured, or left unchanged. Together with the review, a re-examination can be accomplished of Weld County's mission statement, core values, core strategic goals, and how each department and office tie their individual goals into the overall county mission and strategic goals to best serve the citizens of Weld County. The process should start with an all -day session on January 29, 2009, with the Commissioners, elected officials, and department heads doing a re-examination of Weld County's mission statement, core values, and core strategic goals. Beginning in February, it recommended that the major portion of a day per week be set aside by the Commissioners and Finance and Administrative staff, to meet with individual department heads and elected officials to review the departments and offices programs and priorities. Determinations will be made about what changes in programs should be made in the respective areas. Then, as departments or offices prepare their 2010 budget, they can tie their individual goals and budget requests into the overall county mission and strategic goals. The process that is recommended in developing Weld County's Strategic Plan, and program priorities for resource allocation through the budget process are: • Our Vision: What is our best possible future? • Our Mission: Why are we in business? • Guiding Principles/Core Values: How do we do business? What are our values? • Countywide Trends • Priority Strategic Themes: For example health, human services, economic development, public safety, transportation, land use, etc. • Strategic Area Missions: Strategic areas of service delivery. • Strategic Area Trends 47 • Departmental Goals: Where do we want to be? • Strategies: How do we get there? • Objectives: How do we know we arrived? • Implementation: Getting there. • Performance Monitoring and Outcomes? Did we get there? • Feedback: Do we need new strategies? Based upon the results from the above process, the budget development will allow for resource allocation that focuses on programs, priorities, goals, and performance measures consistent with the strategic plah and priorities as directed by the Commissioners. For the departmental reviews, department heads and elected officials should be prepared to identify the programs they operate, costs of the programs, goals and objectives of the programs, to prioritize the various programs they have within the department, need or value of the programs, changes in the programs that the department may suggest, how the program may be changed to operate more efficiently, consequences of eliminating the program or reducing it, identify whether the program is mandated, and ways to maximize revenue generation from the program. A schedule will be developed to allow managers time to prepare for the reviews. Although this process will take time and effort, it continues Weld County's long time tradition of Weld County's elected officials, managers, and employees demonstrating a commitment to meet or exceed the community's highest priority expectations of service at the lowest possible costs to the citizens. 48 2010 BUDGET CALENDAR May 2 Board review of 2010 budget plan. May 20 June 26 June 26 June 26 Director of Finance and Administration discusses target budgets and 2010 budget plan with department heads and elected officials. Elected officials and department heads submit requests for Buildings and Grounds special projects to Finance. Elected officials and department heads submit PBX phone service requests to Phone Services. Elected officials and department heads submit new position requests and any reclassification requests to Human Resources. June 26 Elected officials and department heads submit requests for information services requests to ACS. July 10 Submit budget request to Finance. September 22 Early warning budget work session. July 11 - September 21 Finance office review. September 22 Budget Message to Board and transmit Proposed Budget to Commissioners. October 27 and 29 Budget work session hearings with Commissioners and elected officials and department heads. November 20 Publish notice of final budget hearing. October 29 - December 13 Prepare final budget. December 14 Public Hearing to adopt mill levy. December 14 Public Hearing on Final Budget, 9:00 a.m. 49 Atr. lURe. COLORADO 50 EXPLANATION OF OVERVIEW OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Budgeting, at best, is an inexact science. It can be both precise and unyielding as numbers tend to be, or as flexible as priority changes dictate. In the end, the goal of Weld County's budgeting process is to produce a "user friendly" document, designed to enhance policy makers', managers', and citizens' understanding of major issues, resource choices, and impact of the total budget. The budget is not only a financial plan, but a policy document, operational guide, and communication device. As a financial plan, Weld County's budget includes all funds, presents a summary of historical and projected revenues and expenditures, describes major revenue sources, underlying assumptions and trends, and includes projected changes to fund balances. As a policy document, the budget includes a budget message articulating strategic priorities, describes budget and financial policies, and addresses long-term concerns and issues. As an operations guide, the document includes an organizational chart(s), provides authorized personnel schedules, describes departmental services or functions, and includes goals and objectives. As a communications device, the budget includes a summary of budgetary issues, trends, and resource choices, explains the impact of other plans or planning processes, describes the preparation, review, and adoption process, includes a demographics or community profile section, and contains a table of contents and glossary of terms. The budget and management system begins with community assessments that take the form of formal assessments, such as those done by the Health Department and Social Services, surveys, town meetings, citizen input, and various forms of input from citizen advisory boards. Based upon the community assessments, policy formulation is done by analyzing community needs, developing county -wide goals, assessing prior year program performance, reviewing policy alternatives, establishing priorities, and fiscal policy. A spin off of the policy formulation is the creation of a capital improvements plan and long range plan. Program planning at the department level follows policy formulation. All departments assess their programs, explore alternatives, design and define existing and new programs, develop program objectives, and relate present operations to the programs planned. The budget is then based upon the program, performance, and periodic program review. This process allows for the allocation of resources by program area and multi -year projections. The programs are then evaluated on an on -going basis through program analysis, review of performance, and an examination and evaluation of alternatives. This input then cycles into the policy formation process for a new budget cycle. 51 The budget and management system is supported by the Banner Accounting System, fiscal control and cost accounting by program, and workload and performance management systems and reports. In summary, Weld County's budget process is virtually a year -around process, combining months of planning, analysis, program and policy review, and constant monitoring. The adopted budget asserts Weld County's commitment to meet or exceed the community's highest priority expectations at the lowest possible cost to citizens. In the end, the budget represents a balance between the political process represented by citizen input, policymakers, county departments and offices, and teamwork. The following two pages show the process graphically. 52 OVERVIEW OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY FORMULATION Community Assessment PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Analysis Review Program Performance Examine and Evaluate Alternatives Service Delivery Analyze Community Needs Develop County -Wide Goals Assess Prior Year's Performance Review Policy Alternatives Establish General Priorities Establish Fiscal Policy SUPPORT Accounting System Fiscal Control Cost Accounting by Program Performance Measurement Systems and Reports BUDGETING BASED ON PROGRAMS, PERFORMANCE, PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW Allocate Resources by Program Area Develop Multi —Year Projections Schedule Action Long Range Planning Capital Improvements PROGRAM PLANNING ssess Program Alternative Design Program Define Program Objectives Relate to Present Operations Revise as Necessary 53 HIERARCHY OF BUDGET INFORMATION STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Budget Budget Revenue Policies Process Policies Policy Directions Accounting Policies Investment Policies Capital Improvement Policies Budget Guidelines Allocation of Resources Implementation and Results of Strategic Objectives Major Program Goals Specific Revenue Assumptions Policy Matters/ Points of Issue Workload Data Department Objectives Significant Changes DEPARTMENT BUDGET UNITS 54 BUDGET PROCESS OBJECTIVES: 1. Identify the cost of existing activities within the county. 2. Analyze new or expanding services, using common criteria for justification, aimed at identifying mandated and optional programs. 3. Rank, in priority order, all new and existing services which fall within a marginal range of funding. 4. Aggressively analyze major revenue sources. 5. Eliminate procedures which were not fully utilized in the decision making process of the budget. 6. Identify optional programs and service levels which may be reduced if necessary. 7. Continue refinement of the budget process with the key aspects of planning, evaluation, priority setting, rational resources allocation process, and creative management approaches. 8. Utilize the target budget approach. 9. Initiate a strategic planning process. 55 2010 GUIDELINES > There will be no recommended increases in personnel in the recommended budget to the Board. Increased workload should be absorbed by existing personnel wherever possible through increased productivity. > Resources for new activities should come from increased productivity and termination of existing activities wherever possible. No new non -mandated programs should be proposed without proportionate cutbacks in other programs. Any new programs will be highlighted as a policy issue for the Board. > All newly mandated program costs should be clearly identified for the Board. > Unless a change is legally mandated, the county's share of partnership programs should not be increased, the share should be decreased wherever possible. > Methods to maximize manpower avoidance or substitution should be encouraged by all departments through automation, productivity improvements, or cost cutting strategies. > Capital outlay expenses for equipment should only be recommended when the need has been fully justified, the useful life of equipment cannot be extended, and it has been determined that salvage equipment is unavailable for use. Vehicle replacement must be recommended by the Motor Pool Contract Administrator for consideration in the budget process. > Budgets are to be prepared on a program basis with submission in a program format, as well as in the normal line item format like 2009's budget presentation. > Salaries should be budgeted at the 2009 level. Any salary increase for a class unique to a department must be absorbed in target amounts. > All user and service fees should be examined and recommendations made for increases or other adjustments to match the cost of providing such services. > Those areas where increased personnel productivity has shown gains in services and/or reductions in cost should be identified. > Target budget amounts will be provided to each department and office. Any amount exceeding the target base will be competing for a small amount of unallocated funds during the budget hearing process in October. Therefore, all offices and departments should make concerted efforts to put together realistic programs and efforts within the target budget base amount, since the ability of the Board to fund beyond that level will be substantially restricted. Ranking forms will begin at 85% of target, and must be completed by each department. 56 > In reviewing the 2010 budget request, Finance will use criteria developed in the Budget Manual to develop preliminary recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. Finance will ask the same basic questions that, hopefully, each of the departments asked regarding the evaluation of their program activities. These questions concern need and purpose, objectives, departmental priorities and rank, achievements and benefits expected, means, if any for measuring results, consequences of not implementing the request, impact on other agencies or departments, alternative approaches or service level, resources required, means of financing, and whether or not all cost cutting and revenue generating strategies have been applied. > Unless a significant organizational change has occurred, upgrades of specific positions that were requested but denied in the last two years will not be reconsidered in the 2010 budget process. > Use the following budget population data for performance measures: YEAR POPULATION 2008 (Actual) 233,400 2009 (Estimated) 243,750 2010 (Projected) 267,938 > Interns: Any department planning on using interns in the next fiscal year must include any costs associated with the interns in the budget request. Costs should include any salaries, equipment (vehicle), service and supplies (e.g., mileage). No mid -year intern position requests will be approved that have a cost that is not already budgeted in the final budget. 57 2010 SPECIAL BUDGET INSTRUCTIONS The following are special budget instructions to be used in conjunction with your Budget Manual for submission of your 2010 budget. 1. All budgets (including Enterprise and IGS) must be submitted by July 10, 2009. 2. All departments are requested to submit, on or before June 26, 2009, the following items that will be part of your 2010 budget: a. Special Project Request for Building and Grounds projects estimated to be over $5,000. b. Any additional position requests or reclassifications, to allow Human Resources to assess the need. c. Phone Service Requests for phone changes in 2010. Unplanned moves will only be done if absorbed in the 2010 budget. d. Information Services requests for computer hardware, software, system upgrades or system study. 3. Salary and fringe benefits will be budgeted at the 2009 level. Any anticipated increase over 2009 level must be absorbed in target amount. 4. For budgetary purposes, please use the 530 per mile reimbursement rate in developing your 2010 budget. 5. Any requests for equipment should be submitted as part of your departmental budget request. Once a determination has been made as to whether or not the Board of County Commissioners will approve your request for equipment purposes, the total amount will be moved to a Capital Outlay budget unit as has been the practice in the past five years. 6. Motor Vehicle IGA rates should be ascertained from the Controller for budget purposes. This is necessary because of the varying rates for unique kinds of vehicles, such as ambulances, patrol cars, etc. Fuel costs should be budgeted as follows: unleaded $2.50/gallon; diesel $2.50/gallon; and E85 $2.00/gallon. 7. Any new or replacement vehicles should be discussed with the Controller and a Vehicle Request Form completed. Vehicles being replaced must be identified on the Vehicle Request Form and will be turned in when the replacement arrives in 2010. 8. Postage costs are anticipated to remain 440 in 2010. 9. The target budget amount provided to your budget unit(s) can only be adjusted after discussing it with the Director of Finance and Administration in order to coordinate the overall target amounts. 58 10. Any amount in excess of the 85% target amount must have an Appropriation Request Exceeding Target Budget Level Form and be ranked on the Budget Unit Ranking Form for the regular budget. 11. Any budget unit with project account codes should prepare a worksheet summarizing each account with total comparison to 2009. See Finance for exact format. 12. Any 2010 position classification upgrades will be treated the same as a new position request in the budget process, with the department funding any requests within the target amount. Unless there has been a significant organizational change, reclassification requests made in the last two years and denied by the Board will NOT be reconsidered in the 2010 budget process. 13. Early Warning Budget Hearings will be held in September. 14. As revenues are budgeted, each department should examine whether credit cards should be implemented at the point of sale for the specific service being offered. If credit card services for payment are an option, discuss with the Director of Finance, the manner in which the credit card service fee can be recovered or absorbed in the fee structure in compliance with all legal and credit card service provider requirements. 15. A worksheet showing each line item with five years' history is being provided to show historical expenditure patterns. 16. INTERNS: Any department planning on using interns in the next fiscal year must include any costs associated with the interns in the budget request. Costs should include any salaries, equipment (vehicle), service and supplies (e.g., mileage). No mid -year intern position requests will be approved that have a cost that is not already budgeted in the final budget. 17. The training budget for your department should be delineated in the format per the attached instructions in conjunction with the Human Capital Management Strategy. If, in the development of your budget request, you determine that there are unique requirements or unique situations in your department that affect your budget presentation, please do not hesitate to contact the Director of Finance and Administration at extension 4218 to answer questions, or to get approval for variation to the normal procedures outlined in the special instructions above or in the Budget Manual. 59 2010 PROGRAM ISSUES + Continue Implementation of Human Capital Management Strategy. ♦ Implement the new Strategic Plan approach. + Construct and open a Community Corrections facility. + Implement Criminal Justice Planner strategy to coordinate the Criminal Justice System in the county. ♦ Implement the new Pre -Trial Services Program. + Identify technology uses to improve services and cost-effectiveness of services. + Implement a Master Gardner Program in Extension Office. + Continue implementation of e -government strategy. ♦ Open up additional 64 beds in North Jail. ♦ Construct a new Regional Crime Lab. ♦ Continue to explore revenue and operational options to keep the Paramedic Services a viable and affordable service to the citizens. ♦ Continue to develop plans for the County for bioterrorism and emergency preparedness. ♦ Cope with growing inmate population. + Implement the fourth year of the five-year Support Healthy Marriages Grant. 60 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN POLICY FROM PRIOR YEARS • Continue Implementation of Human Capital Management Strategy. Continue to enhance the public health infrastructure to improve local emergency preparedness and responsive to bioterrorist events. Create a Justice Department for all jail alternative programs. Construct and open a Community Corrections facility. Implement the new strategic planning process. • Construct a Regional Crime Lab for Northeastern Colorado. > Continue implementation of the Support Healthy Marriages program. • Open additional 64 beds in the North Jail. > Add a Criminal Justice Planner to help coordinate the Criminal Justice System. • Implement the new Pre -Trial Services Programs. > Implement a Master Gardner Program in the Extension Office. > Modify the Weld County Retirement Plan for new hires. 61 BUDGET POLICIES The basic budget policies of Weld County are stated in the following forms: • Budget Process • Program Policy Changes/Impacts • County Strategic Objectives • Revenue Policies and Assumptions • Policy Directions • Significant Budget and Accounting Policies • 2010 Budget Guidelines The overall County budget policies are reflected at the program level on each of the "Budget Unit Summary" sheets. The "Budget Unit Summary" sheets describe how the policies impact operations, service levels and/or finances at the program level. In addition, comments on the summaries explain implementation issues and provide objectives and workload data for monitoring purposes. The "Budget Unit Summary" has been structured as follows to accommodate the governing board and public reader: • Department Description • Resources • Summary of Changes • Objectives • Workload Measures • Staff Recommendations NOTE: In accordance with Article IV, Section 4-2(6)(b), the Director of Finance and Administration shall cause the policies adopted or approved by the Board of County Commissioners to be implemented in the county as required by the Board of County Commissioners and insure that the activities of the departments are consistent with the policies determined and set by the Board of County Commissioners. 62 LONG RANGE FINANCIAL POLICIES Balancing the Operating Budget: The State of Colorado's constitution requires all local governments to adopt a balanced budget annually. Balanced budget means expenditures cannot exceed available resources. No debt financing of the operational budget is permitted. Weld County's policy is that under no circumstances will Weld County adopt a budget that is not balanced, even if the constitutional requirement is lifted. Long Range Planning: The Board of County Commissioners will adopt countywide strategic goals. The recommended budget shall, to the extent possible, based upon available resources, be consistent with the goals and objectives of the county's strategic goals. The process shall involve identifying several critical areas which have or are expected to have an impact on the financial condition of the county over the next five years. Once the critical issues are identified, specific goals and objectives will be developed along with an implementation plan by impacted departments. Asset Inventory: An inventory of capital needs will be maintained by the Director of Finance and Administration. The inventory shall include the identified needs, a list of projects, their cost estimates, and project timetable for funding, acquisition or construction. The recommended budget shall include a capital budget and a five-year capital plan with a balanced financial base for renewal, replacement, and new projects. The capital budget shall be adequate to maintain capital assets at a level sufficient to protect infrastructure and minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. Revenue Diversification: Weld County encourages a diversity of revenue sources in order to improve the County's ability to handle fluctuations in individual revenue sources year to year and long term. Due to the high percentage of oil and gas assessed values, Weld County also encourages the diversification of revenues for long range planning to minimize the dependence of the County's budget on oil and gas revenue fluctuations in production and price, and long range depletion of the resource in the County. Fees and Charges: Unless fees or charges are established by state law or contractually, Weld County will establish fees for goods and services at full cost recovery, including direct and indirect costs, where the user of the goods or services has the ability to pay. All fees will be reviewed periodically to insure that they are still appropriate. Fees will be available for the public and adopted by code in public meetings. Use of One -Time Revenues: Weld County has a policy discouraging the use of one-time revenues for ongoing operational expenditures. The highest priority for one-time revenues will be to fund assets or other non -recurring expenditures, or to put the one-time revenues in a reserve fund. 63 Debt Capacity, Issuance, and Management: To the extent possible, Weld County will pay cash for major projects rather than borrowing. Any existing debt will be retired at the earliest possible time during the life of the debt unless circumstances change significantly. Weld County's debt level per Weld County's Home Rule Charter and state law cannot exceed three percent of the current assessed value of the county. The current debt capacity is over $173 million. Stabilization Funds: Weld County maintains a prudent level of financial resources in the form of contingent and emergency reserves, plus adequate fund balances for cash flow, to protect against the need to reduce service levels or raise taxes and fees due to temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted one-time expenditures. See fund balance policy in policy section of the Budget Message for more details. Operating/Capital Expenditure Accountability: A budgetary control system will be maintained by Finance to ensure accountability and adherence to the budget by restricting the expenditure of funds above the amount appropriated for the spending agency. Monthly financial reports will be available on-line through the accounting system for elected officials and department heads, detailing the progress towards budget compliance. These reports will, at a minimum, compare the current budget and year-to-year revenues and expenditures by department. Contingency Planning: Weld County supports a financial planning process that assesses the long-term financial implications of current and proposed operating and capital budgets, budget policies, cash management, and investment policies, programs and assumptions that will permit Weld County to deal with future contingencies in a reasonable and responsible way without adversely impacting County citizens. 64 REVENUE POLICIES AND ASSUMPTIONS The following budget. revenue policies and assumptions have been used in the preparation of the 2010 Wherever possible, those receiving the benefits of a government service should pay for what they receive in full through current fees, charges, and other assumptions. 2. Continual search for new sources of revenue shall be made to diversify the County's financing plan. 3. The County shall seek the establishment of a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter the County from short run fluctuations in any one revenue source. 4. Estimated revenues are conservatively projected. 5. Proposed rate increases are based upon: A. B. C. D. Fee policies applicable to each activity. Related cost of the service provided. The impact of inflation in the provision of services. Equitability of comparable fees. 6. Programs funded by state and federal revenue sources shall be reduced or eliminated accordingly if state or federal revenues are reduced or eliminated. Local funding will be substituted only after a full study by the Board and if the program has a high priority to satisfy a local need. 7. Revenue targeting for a specific program shall only be utilized whenever legally required and when a revenue source has been established for the sole purpose of providing a specific program. 8. Revenue from intergovernmental sources with a specific ending date shall not be projected beyond the date. 9. Assume a slowdown in the local economy similar to 2009 with little recovery of residential development. Assume interest rates averaging 2.25 percent throughout 2010. 10. Property taxes are based upon the maximum allowable under Amendment One (TABOR) and the Weld County Home Rule Charter limitation. 11. Assume that unless there is proven evidence to the contrary, federal and state categorical and entitlement grants will continue at the current level of funding. 65 SPECIFIC REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS OF SIGNIFICANT REVENUE Property Tax: Levy with maximum allowable, per Weld County Home Rule Charter and Amendment One (TABOR) limitation, unless the assessed value is less than 5%. Specific Ownership Tax: Personal property tax on vehicles (SOT) is anticipated to be down in 2010 due to slowing vehicle sales. Building Inspection and Planning Permits: Based upon continuation of 2009 land use and construction activity level with 2010 rates applied, with little recovery of residential construction anticipated in 2010. State and Federal Grant Revenue: Budget at signed contract level or anticipated funding level provided by state or federal agency. Police Service Contract: Based on signed contractual agreements. Charges for Services: Charges to special districts and other public entities are based upon signed contracts. Drunk Driving Fines: Based on $30 per offender at anticipated level of 1,020 with two percent waiver rate. Earning on Investments: Calculated on an average earnings rate of 2.25 percent on estimated average daily balances. Royalties: Based on analysis of oil and gas leases active on 40,000 plus acres of mineral interests owned by Weld County. New lease bonus activity is estimated at $10,000 for 2010. Rental: All rental income is based upon signed leases. Overhead/A-87 Cost Plan: Revenues based upon the 2008 Indirect Cost Plan approved by the Department of Health and Human Services that result in federal revenue allowable from grants. County Clerk Fees: Calculated on the historical level of activity. Treasurer's Fees: Based upon historical level of activity for fees, which have been relatively constant. Highway Users - Special Bridge: Revenue based upon signed state and federal grant contracts. Motor Vehicle Registration Fees: Based upon a drop in the historical level of activity for fees, due to slower car sales. 66 Highway User's Tax: Based on State Department of Highway estimates from gas tax less three percent reduction that Weld County has historically experienced. With the passage of SB09-109, revenues will go up $1,490,000 in 2010. Social Service Revenue: Based on anticipated caseload as discussed under each program plus state and federal funding formula for each program. Health Grants: Based upon contracts signed July 1, 2009. Health Fees: Based upon historical patient/client caseload with 2010 rates applied. Human Resource Grants: Based upon contract funding level as of October 1, 2009. State Lottery: Funded at the current level, with no anticipated legislative changes. Solid Waste Fees: Ten percent surcharge applied to historical waste volumes and input on projected volume from landfill operators. Paramedic Service Fees: Calculated based upon 2008 - 2009 call volume plus 6.0 percent rate increase. Internal Service Fund Revenues: Revenues for each IGS Fund equal funded anticipated expenditures in user departments' budgets. Work Release Inmate Fee: Based upon average of 200 work release inmates per day. 67 MAJOR REVENUE HISTORICAL TRENDS AND ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Property Taxes $64,636,463 $70,575,408 $75,033,756 $76,642,132 97,108,137 Other Taxes 6.410.000 6.710.000 7.030.000 7.475.000 7 030.000 Fees 7,827,000 7,330,000 6,902,500 7,425,300 7,262,000 Intergovernmental 43,117,355 50,899,664 56,366,866 57,304,370 52,996,235 Licenses/Permits 3,002,400 3,470,900 2,211,400 1,893,900 1,860,400 Charges for Services 5,301,937 5,169,059 4,606,876 5,153,111 5,266,865 Internal Services 16,345,526 17,416,155 16,788,922 20,507,205 20,753,664 Paramedic Fees 4,315,459 5,228,287 5,444,053 5,692,558 5,791,647 Miscellaneous 5,054,178 5,403,378 6,383,444 8,214,875 5,699,419 TOTAL REVENUES $156 010318 ram $180 767317 S19030841 $ 203 768367 TREND ANALYSIS Property Tax: Increases will track with the Home Rule Charter and TABOR tax limitations, which are growth in actual property value, plus cost -of -living. Other Taxes: Primarily, specific ownership taxes that tracks with car registrations. Decrease due to drop in car sales. Fees: Fees have been increased and new fees added, due to growth in area. However, in 2010 fees are projected to decline due to slow down in construction activity. Intergovernmental: State and federal revenues have been growing at about 7% per year. However, in 2010 dropped to 7.5% due to lower human services funding levels. Historical trend should resume in 2011. Licenses/Permits: Permit revenue will slow in 2010 due to slow down in residential construction activity. Charges for Services: Revenue is predictable based on contracts for service and reimbursable projects. Trend with inflation and growth (2.2% in 2010). Internal Services: Predictable revenue based on stable usage. Paramedic Fees: Fees are down due to volume of calls, but have slight increase due to 6% rate increase. Very predictable. Slightly higher percentage in 2010 (1.75%). Miscellaneous: Revenue predictable, even though some variation in specific years. Interest revenue is found in this category and is down due to rates for 2010. Public Works contracts are over $2.5 million. 68 POLICY DIRECTIONS Incorporate Guiding Principles, Mission Statement, and Strategic Goals into the budget submission. Continue revenue maximization policy to support County services to users. Continue policy of identifying ways to minimize the reliance upon property tax funding. Advocate legislative positions. Recommend a revised compensation pay plan based upon annual salary survey data to keep County compensation competitive with the labor market. Examine County programs on a continual basis to maximize productivity and maintain current service levels with current or reduced workforce. Examine County programs and services to prepare Weld County for continuing financial uncertainties and future limitations. Utilize cost cutting/revenue raising strategies to hold down costs and support County services. This may be accomplished by: Organization assessment Contraction in services Productivity improvement Reprivatization and contracting Automation Energy conservation Administrative reorganization Innovation/technological transfer Continue position sunset review process to assess the need for any vacated positions. Utilize a target budget approach with the following features: Identifies County's resource capacity All can see the targets and related reductions Identify proposed non -funding early Allows time to accommodate reductions (employees) Offers support to managers to eliminate marginal services, less productive employees, etc. Allows board discretion in allocating funds to unfunded programs in critical service areas Targets all offices, departments, and outside agencies Better reflects County priorities Since limits are known, allows planning of alternative expenditure levels six months before fiscal year begins Constrains growth in existing levels, so high priority requests can be granted while lower priority projects are cut 69 Examine all user and service fees and make recommendations for increases or other adjustments to match the cost of providing such services. This is a follow-up we have been doing the last three years. Clearly identify all newly mandated program costs for the Board. Continue the County's share of partnership programs, unless a change is legally mandated, and decrease the share wherever possible. Maximize manpower avoidance or substitution methods for all departments through automation, productivity improvements, or cost cutting strategies. Recommend capital outlay expenses for equipment only when the need has been fully justified, the useful life of equipment cannot be extended, and it has been determined that salvage equipment is unavailable for use. Vehicle replacement must be recommended by the Equipment Service Manager for consideration in the budget process. Continue to examine priorities, which services to provide, best way to deliver services, and most cost effective way to provide services within the constraints of TABOR. Minimize levels of management for departments within the County by flattening the organization and empowering employees to the maximum extent possible. 70 EXPLANATION OF INDIVIDUAL FUNDS GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES: Funds generally used to account for tax -supported activities. General Fund The General Fund accounts for all financial transactions of the County that are not properly accounted for in other funds. Ordinary operations of the County such as public safety, County administration and other activities financed from taxes and general revenues are reflected in this fund. Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes or other earmarked revenue for the County which finance specified activities as required by law or administrative action. Public Works Fund: The Public Works Fund records all costs related to Weld County road and bridge construction and maintenance. This fund is also utilized for allocation of monies to cities and towns for use in their road and street activities. Social Services Fund: The Social Services Fund accounts for the various public welfare programs administered by the County. Conservation Trust Fund: The Conservation Trust Fund accounts for revenue received from the State of Colorado to be used for the acquisition, development and maintenance of new and existing conservation sites within Weld County. The funds are derived from the Colorado State Lottery. Contingent Fund: The Contingent Fund records any property tax revenue levied by the Board of County Commissioners to cover reasonably unforeseen expenditures. Emergency Reserve Fund: This fund was established in accordance with State Constitution Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992. The reserve can only be used for true emergencies as defined by the amendment. Funding level must be one percent of fiscal spending in 1993, two percent in 1994, and three percent in 1995 and fiscal years thereafter. Public Health Fund: The Weld County Public Health Department provides health services to County residents. The fund reflects revenue and expenditures for health care, health education, health monitoring and other related activities. 71 Human Services Fund: The Human Services Fund accounts for various Federal and State human service grants. Primary funding agencies are DOL, HHS, and CSA. Solid Waste Fund: This fund accounts for revenue received from a surcharge on dumping fees at solid waste disposal sites for the purpose of combating environmental problems and for further improvement and development of landfill sites within the County. Capital Project Funds Capital Project Funds are established to account for financial resources used for the acquisition or improvement of the capital facilities of the County. Capital Expenditures Fund: This fund accounts for various capital improvement projects on County property as required by Section 29-1-301, C. R. S., 1973. PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES: Funds that focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net assets (or cost recovery), financial position, and cash flows. There are two different types of proprietary funds: enterprise funds and internal service funds. Internal Service Funds Internal Service Funds are established to account for goods and services provided to other departments of the County on a cost -reimbursement basis. Motor Vehicle Fund: This fund accounts for the revenue and costs generated by equipment and vehicles rented to the Public Works Fund and to various departments of other County funds. Insurance Fund: This fund accounts for all insurance costs for the County. The program is a combination of insured risks and protected self-insurance risks. Phone Services Fund: This fund accounts for all phone costs provided to the County and other outside agencies on a cost -reimbursement basis. Health Insurance Fund This fund accounts for the self -insured health, dental, and vision plans offered County employees. Weld County Finance Corporation Fund: This fund accounts for the lease/purchase of county facilities. There are no active leases. The last lease was paid off on August 1, 2007. 72 Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are established to account for operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises -- where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purposes. Paramedic Services Fund: This fund accounts for all the rescue unit fees and costs associated with the operation of a County -wide paramedic service for the citizens of Weld County. 73 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING BASIS: The Weld County budgetary procedure uses the following Basis of Accounting. Basis of Accounting refers to when revenue and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of Accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The governmental funds and expendable trust funds utilize the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method revenue is recorded in the year in which it becomes both measurable and available as net current assets. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. Revenue susceptible to accrual, that is, measurable and available to finance the County's operations, or of a material amount and not received at the normal time of receipt, primarily consists of 1) state highway users tax; 2) property taxes, assessed in 2009 payable in 2010, and 3) various routinely provided services (ambulance and health department). Unbilled charges for services are recorded in the appropriate funds at year end. Expenditures are generally recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. Proprietary funds follow the accrual Basis of Accounting whereby revenue is recognized in the year in which it is earned and becomes measurable. Expenses are recorded when liabilities are incurred. Due to Colorado legal requirements, capital expenses are budgeted and appropriated in the Proprietary Funds. BUDGET ADOPTION: An annual budget and appropriation ordinance is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with the Colorado State Budget Act and Weld County Home Rule Charter. The budget is prepared on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles for all governmental, proprietary and expendable trust funds. The accounting system is employed as a budgetary management control device during the year to monitor the individual departments (level of classification which expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations). All annual appropriations lapse at year end. The Director of Finance and Administration is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts within departments of each fund. Any revisions that alter the total appropriation for each department must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners through a supplemental appropriation ordinance. 74 AMENDMENT TO BUDGET PROCESS: Section 29-1-111.5, C. R. S., provides that, if during the fiscal year, the governing board deems it necessary, in view of the needs of the various offices or departments, it may transfer budgeted and appropriated monies from one or more spending agencies in the fund to one or more spending agencies in another fund and/or transfer budgeted appropriated monies between spending agencies within a fund. Section 29-1-111.6, C. R. S., provides that, if during the fiscal year, the governing body or any spending agency received unanticipated revenue or revenues not assured at the time of the adoption of the budget from any source other than the local government's property tax mill levy, the governing board of the local government may authorize the expenditure of these unanticipated or unassured funds by enacting a supplementary budget and appropriation. Supplementary budget and appropriations require a two-thirds majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners. PROPERTY TAXES: Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied no later than November 15 and are payable the following year in two installments on February 28 and June 15, or in full on April 30. The county, through the Weld County Treasurer, bills and collects its own property taxes as well as property taxes for all school districts, cities and towns and special districts located within the county. In accordance with Section 14-7 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter, all ad valorem tax levies for county purposes, when applied to the total valuation for assessment of the county, shall be reduced so as to prohibit the levying of a greater amount of tax revenue than was levied from ad valorem taxation in the preceding year, plus five percent (5%), except to provide for the payment of bonds and interest. The Board of County Commissioners may submit the question of an increased levy to the County Council and, if in the opinion of a majority of the County Council, the county is in need of additional funds, the Council may grant an increased levy for the county in such amount as it deems appropriate, and the county is authorized to make such increased levy. Any one capital project requiring a capital expenditure out of funds procured by ad valorem taxation equal to a three mill levy for three years shall be prohibited unless approved by a majority vote of the qualified electors at a general or special election per Section 14-8 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. With the passage of Amendment One (TABOR) effective November 4, 1992, the mill levy cannot be increased above the prior year mill levy, except by a vote of the people. In addition, the growth of property tax revenue cannot exceed the prior year amount plus inflation plus net new construction, without voter approval. 75 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICY 1. Capital Improvement Plan - A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of several years (normally on a five year cycle) setting forth each capital project and identifying the expected fiscal year for each project and the anticipated revenues to finance those projects. 2. Capital Improvement Staff Committee - The Director of Finance and Administration develops a Long Range County -wide Capital Improvement Plan for all major capital expenditures within the County after surveying County -wide needs with program managers. The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for approving capital improvement policies, as well as approving capital improvement programming as a part of the annual budget. 3. Capital Assets - Capital assets are defined as land, improvements to land, easements, buildings, building improvements, vehicles, machinery, equipment, works of art and historical treasures, infrastructure, and all other tangible or intangible assets that are used in operations and that have initial useful lives extending beyond a single reporting period. 4. Capital Projects - Capital projects are defined as those major, non -recurring projects that have a time interval of at least three (3) years between such expenditures and have a total cost of at least $10,000. Purchases of real property and selected equipment may be exempted from these limitations. Examples of capital projects include: A. New and expanded physical facilities. B. Large scale rehabilitation and replacement facilities. C. Major equipment which has a relatively long period of usefulness. D. The cost of engineering or architectural studies for services related to a major public improvement. E. Acquisition of land and/or buildings. 5. Annual Action Program - Those capital improvement projects from the plan which have been identified by the Director of Finance and Administration and approved by the Board of County Commissioners for funding and implementation for each fiscal budget year. 6. Relationship Between Capital Funding and Operating Budget - Capital assets, which include property, plant equipment, and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges and similar items,) are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type funds. Capital assets are defined by the County as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $5,000 and a useful life of more than one year. All fixed assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. 76 The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. All reported capital assets, except for gravel roads, are depreciated. Improvements are depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the related capital assets. Depreciation on all assets is provided on the straight-line basis (asset value divided by years of useful life) over the following estimated useful lives: Buildings Improvements Infrastructure - Bridges Infrastructure - Roads Equipment Heavy Equipment 20 - 50 years 20 years 50 years 20 years 3 - 5 years 10 - 20 years GASB Statement 34 allows an alternative approach which would reflect a reasonable value of the asset and the cost incurred to maintain the service potential to locally established minimum standards in lieu of depreciation. To elect this option the County must develop and implement an asset management system which measures, at least every third year by class of asset, if the minimum standards are being maintained. The County has elected to use this alternative approach only for gravel roads. 77 INVESTMENT POLICY On March 5, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a comprehensive investment policy. A copy of the detailed investment policy can be obtained by contacting the Weld County Treasurer at (970) 356-4000, Extension 3260. The following is a brief overview of the investment policy: The County Treasurer is responsible for the investment of all available monies. The statutes defining legal investments for Colorado counties are Sections 24-75-601 and 30-10-708, C.R.S. Investment priorities are (1) safety, (2) liquidity, and (3) yield. In compliance with statutes, deposits/investments are made only in "qualified" financial institutions, i.e., those which are federally insured by either FDIC. or FSLIC. Further, any deposit/investment amount in excess of $250,000 may only be made at institutions that are designated as public depositories by the state bank or savings and loan commissioners, Sections 11-10-118 and 11-47-118, C.R.S. Such designation occurs when acceptable collateral is pledged to secure the total deposit. Deposits/investments shall be made in the name of the treasurer in one or more state banks, national banks having their principal offices in this state, or in compliance with the provisions of Article 47 of Title 11, C.R.S. 1973, savings and loan associations having their principal offices in this state which have been approved and designated by written resolution by a majority of the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners can designate, by resolution, an average annual rate of interest income to be paid to a specific fund or funds. All other interest income is deposited to the county general fund for the purpose of supplementing the county mill levy thus reducing the amount of revenue required from property tax. The County maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds except the Pension Trust Fund. Several of the County's funds also hold investments on their own account. The cash and investments of the Pension Trust Fund are held separately from those of the other County funds. Deposits: At year end, the estimated carrying amount of the County's deposits is over $110 million. Of this amount, approximately $1 million will be covered by Federal deposit insurance, and the remainder was collateralized with securities held by the pledging financial institution's trust departments or agents in the County's name. Investments: Statutes authorize the County to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, agencies, and instrumentalities, commercial paper, and repurchase agreements. The Pension Trust Fund is also authorized to invest in corporate bonds and mortgages. Interest revenue is projected on the basis of an average interest rate of 2.25 percent in 2010. 78 FUND BALANCE AND RESERVE POLICY Weld County considers maintenance of adequate operating reserves to be a prudent management tool and important factor in providing financial flexibility to the County. A financial reserve may be used to address unanticipated revenue shortfalls and unforeseen expenditures. The reserves provide a first line of defense against deficit spending and help maintain liquidity when budget downturns become inevitable. The appropriate size of such fund balance reserves depends on the potential viability of the County's revenues and expenses, as well as its working cash needs to handle seasonality of revenues or expenditures. At a minimum as required by Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, Weld County will maintain an Emergency Reserve Fund to assist with the expenses of unforeseen emergencies in the amount which shall be no less than three percent of the fiscal year spending limit. The County will budget a year-end fund balance in each fund, other than the Contingent and Emergency Reserve Fund, sufficient to reduce the likelihood of its having to enter the short-term debt market to pay current operating expenditures. Annually, the County will, in total, maintain satisfactory levels of fund balance reserves and contingent/emergency reserves to insure a continued strong financial position within the County. The actual fund balance and reserve amounts will be reviewed and set annually by the Board of Weld County Commissioners at the time of the adoption of the annual budget. In formulating the fund balance reserve levels the County has considered the two most frequent methods of determining a public entity's adequate reserve level by allocating enough money to cover a specific number of days of operating expenses, or allocating a flat percentage of operating revenues. As a prudent financial standard in the former case, a minimum of one to two months of operating expenses should be considered and in the latter instance, a minimum level of five to ten percent should be targeted. In addition, the reserve should be defined as only the unreserved or undesignated portion of the fund balance, not the total fund balance that includes receivables, accrued items, encumbrances, inventories, and subsequent year's expenditures. The unreserved or undesignated fund balance is totally liquid and has the most financial flexibility. With the above guidance Weld County has adopted the target reserve fund balance to be in the range of eight to twelve percent of the budgeted expenses of the annual operating and capital funds in total, excluding internal service funds. The reserve in 2010 will approach twenty percent due to the volatility of the oil and gas assessed value, and the potential impact of the State of Colorado's budget crisis over the next three to four years. 79 ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR BUDGET UNITS BUDGET UNIT RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL General Fund: Office of the Board Chairman, Board of County Commissioners County Attorney County Attorney Public Trustee Public Trustee Planning and Zoning Director, Planning Services Clerk to the Board Director, Finance and Administration Clerk and Recorder Clerk and Recorder Elections Clerk and Recorder Motor Vehicle Clerk and Recorder Treasurer Treasurer Assessor Assessor Maintenance of Building and Grounds Director, Public Works County Council Chairman, County Council District Attorney District Attorney Juvenile Diversion District Attorney Victim Witness District Attorney White Collar Crime District Attorney Finance and Administration Director, Finance and Administration Accounting Controller Purchasing Director, Administrative Services Printing and Supply Director, Administrative Services 80 BUDGET UNIT RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL Personnel Director, Administrative Services Computer Services Director, Finance and Administration Geographical Information System Director, Finance and Administration Capital Outlay Director, Finance and Administration Sheriff Sheriff Crime Control and Investigation Sheriff Municipal Contracts Sheriff Regional Forensic Lab Sheriff Drug Task Force Sheriff Traffic Enforcement Sheriff Communications - County -wide Director, Finance and Administration Criminal Justice Information System Director, Finance and Administration Communications System Development Director, Finance and Administration Coroner Coroner Centennial Jail Sheriff North Jail Sheriff Justice Services Director, Finance and Administration Community Corrections Chairman, Community Corrections Board Building Inspection Director, Planning Services Office of Emergency Management Sheriff County -wide Animal Control Sheriff Pest and Weed Control Director, Public Works 81 West Nile Virus Program Director, Finance and Administration Economic Development Director, Finance and Administration Waste Water Management Director, Finance and Administration Engineering Director, Public Works Extension Service Extension Agent Veteran's Office Director, Public Works Airport Director, Finance and Administration Mental Health Director, Finance and Administration Child Advocacy Center Director, Finance and Administration Developmentally Disabled Director, Finance and Administration Seniors Program Director, Finance and Administration Missile Site Director, Public Works Parks and Trails Director, Finance and Administration Building Rents Director, Finance and Administration Non -Departmental Director, Finance and Administration Community Agency Grants Director, Finance and Administration Island Grove Building Director, Finance and Administration County Fair Extension Agent Public Works Fund Director, Public Works Social Services Fund Director, Human Services Health Fund Director, Public Health and Environment Human Services Fund Director, Human Services Conservation Trust Fund Director, Finance and Administration 82 Contingency Fund Director, Finance and Administration Emergency Reserve Fund Director, Finance and Administration Solid Waste Fund Director, Finance and Administration Capital Expenditure Fund Director, Finance and Administration Paramedic Fund Director, Paramedic Services Motor Pool Fund Controller Insurance Fund Director, Finance and Administration Phone Services Fund Director, Administrative Services Health Insurance Fund Director, Finance and Administration 83 POLICY MATTERS/POINTS OF ISSUE WITH FISCAL IMPACT FUNDING District Attorney: Upgrade Office Tech III to Office Tech IV mid -year Victim Witness Assistance: Add .25 FTE Victim Witness Assistance (Grant) Juvenile Diversion: Grant Planning: Pre -application Fee Sheriff, Operations: Investigator for White Collar Crime Task Force Traffic Enforcement: Eliminate 3 Sheriff Deputy II positions North Jail: Eliminate 2 Commander positions Add six Correctional Officers INCLUDED EXCLUDED $ 5,907 13,475 - 57,085 378,381 $ -20,000 84,567 216,621 165,603 Centennial Jail: Transfer ICAPP and Pre -Trial Programs 453,072 Justice Services: Pre -Trial Program Criminal Justice Planner Building Inspection: Ag Exempt Building Fees 237,512 68,733 Developmentally Disabled: Envision 39,206 Economic Development: Upstate Colorado Economic Development 81,750 Extension: Master Gardner TOTAL GENERAL FUND Paramedic Services Fund: Rate Increase 6% TOTAL PARAMEDIC SERVICE FUND 31,228 -5,000 133,019 18,250 0 $ 799,107 $1,046,132 $ - 347,498 0 $ - 347,498 $ 0 NOTE: • Policy matters are changes in current policies. • Points of issue are items where the Director of Finance and Administration has a different recommendation than the budget unit's department head/elected official. 84 2010 SALARY AND BENEFIT RECOMMENDATIONS Weld County has always strived to pay competitive and equitable salaries and benefits. To maintain this competitive position, Weld County participates in various salary surveys. Salaries are set by the Board of County Commissioners after full consideration is given to: • Present pay rates compared to labor market competitors. The competitive job market may vary by job classification or specific job. The comparison is to beginning salary and middle level salary. Weld County does not compare to maximum salary range amounts. • Ability to pay and the sustainability of the pay long term. • Benefits and supplemental pay policies. • Supply/demand situations for personnel needs. • Supply/demand situation in the labor market. • Employees' expectations. • Retention of career employees. • Taxpayers' perceptions of pay and benefits. • Economic conditions locally and nationally. Anyone who regularly reads a newspaper or listens to the news knows that the economy is still stumbling, unemployment is still rising and public services, from school programs to public safety to road repairs, have taken a hit. Practically every industry has been affected by some kind of cutback. A Washington Post -ABC Poll published in early May, 2009, found that more than a third of Americans have had their hours or pay cut or know someone who has. On May 4, 2009, we learned that Social Security recipients are likely to go without a benefit increase for the first time in 24 years. Against this backdrop, government officials need to steer away from raising taxes or imposing new ones, especially to pay increased salaries or benefits for government employees. Before asking residents to dig deeper into their pockets, governments need to look at all costs, especially the costs of payroll and benefit packages. Particularly in difficult economic times, governments need to be sensitive to the fact many residents are losing their jobs, taking pay cuts, or being furloughed. In light of the economic conditions and Weld County's own financial situation as we look forward over the next 3-5 years, the following recommendations are being made: • For the 2010 budget it is recommended to not provide any salary increase to Weld County employees. This is the first time in over 30 years this has happened, but is justified based upon the economic conditions, lack of turnover, labor market conditions, and salary survey data which does not support increases. 85 • In a detailed write up it is recommended that the Weld County Retirement Board amend the retirement plan so that no additional contribution to the separate retiree COLA fund shall be made until the retirement plan is 75% funded. • It is recommended that the Weld County Retirement Plan be amended to go to a third tier for employees hired on or after December 16, 2009. The third tier would be a Retirement Share Program. • It is recommended that the Board of Weld County Commissioners consider eliminating the Retirement Health Savings Plan permanently and, at a minimum, not funding it until Weld County's property tax revenues stabilize in 3-5 years. Annual cost is $300,000+. • Health insurance rates are anticipated to go up 9% for 2010. It is recommended that the county absorb the full rate increase, so employees do not have a reduction in net take home pay in 2010. • All other benefits are recommended to remain the same for 2010. 86 OTHER BENEFITS VISION PROGRAM: > COVERAGE FOLLOWS HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE FOR BOTH SINGLE AND FAMILY PLANS > MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAID FOR SINGLE $300/YEAR OR FAMILY $600/YEAR > NO DEDUCTIBLE > 50% OF COVERED EXPENSES INCURRED > EXAMINATION, LENSES, AND FRAMES LIMITED TO ONE EACH YEAR DENTAL PROGRAM: The County offers three dental plans: • County Plan • Alpha Dental Plan • Companion Life Dental Plan LIFE: Three times annual salary up to $600,000 at $0.185/$1,000/per month DISABILITY: $.33/$100 compensation EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: Program offered by APS LifeLink. WELLNESS: Wellness program will be enhanced for all County employees with the addition of a Wellness Coordinator and new wellness resources. EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN: Elected Officials and Chief Deputies have a direct benefit plan for health purposes. MILEAGE: Indexed two cents below IRS mileage allowance rate. RETIREMENT BENEFIT: County Retirement Plan - (9.0 percent of gross salary for County and employee contribution.) PERA - (13.7 percent of gross salary for County contribution and 8.5 percent of gross salary for employee contribution.) 87 POSITION AUTHORIZATION CHANGES DUE TO 2010 BUDGET FUND AND DEPARTMENT 1000-11100 1000-13100 1000-13100 1000-13100 1000-15100 1000-15100 1000-15200 1000-15300 10-16100 1000-16400 1000-17100 1000-17100 1000-17350 1000-17600 1000-21200 1000-21210 1000-21220 1000-24410 1000-24410 1000-24410 1000-24420 1000-24420 1000-24420 1000-24100 1000-24100 1000-24100 1000-24100 DEPARTMENT NAME Clerk and Recorder Assessor Assessor Assessor District Attorney District Attorney Juvenile Diversion Victim Witness Finance Human Resources Planning Planning GIS Printing & Supply Sheriff Operations Traffic Enforcement Contract Services North Jail North Jail North Jail Centennial Jail Centennial Jail Centennial Jail Justice Services Justice Services Justice Services Justice Services OLD POSITION 1.5 Office Tech II Residential Prop. Appraisers Office Tech III Data Collectors (2) Office Tech III Office Tech III Interpreter 20 hours/wk .75 FTE VW Assistant None Director, Admin Services Long Range Planner Planning Tech GIS Tech .5 FTE Courier Investigator Sheriff Deputy (3) None Commanders (2) None None Pre -Trial Staff (2) ICCAPP Staff (2) Client Managers (2) None None None None NEW POSITION None None None None None Office Tech IV Interpreter 10 hours/wk 1.0 FTE VW Assistant Director, Budget and Mgmt. Analysis None None None None .75 FTE Courier None None .5 Resource Officer None Correction Officer III (2) Correction Officer II (4) None None None Division Director Pre -Trial Client Mgr. (2) Pre -Trial Client Supr. Criminal Justice Planner 88 FUND AND DEPARTMENT OLD NEW DEPARTMENT NAME POSITION POSITION 1000-24200 Comm. Corrections Correction Chief None Grade 56 2000-32300 Trucking PW Service Worker II None (3) 2000-32700 Motor Graders None PW Service Worker II (3) 2520-41210 PH Communication 11.75 FTE 10.75 FTE 2530-41300 Community Health 45.60 FTE 43.41 FTE 2560-41400 Environmental Health 25.25 FTE 24.25 FTE 2580-41500 PH Preparedness 2.5 FTE 3.0 FTE 89 Wilk#0 cf# t COIOAAOO 90 ALL FUNDS REVENUE $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Other Taxes lntergovernme Licenses/Permits Chg for Service Miscellaneous Fund Balance Internal Services 2010 Revenue Total $243,084,294 (2009 $229,609,951) Internal Services, Fund Balance, $20,753,664, 9% $39,315,927, 16% Miscellaneous, $5,699,419, 2% Chg for Service, $5,266,865, 2% Licenses/Permits, $1,860,400, 1% Paramedic Fees, $5,791,647, 2% Intergovernmental $52,996,235 22% Paramedic Fees Property Tax, $97,108,137, 40% Other Taxes, $7,030,000, 3% Fees, $7,262,000, 3% 91 ALL FUNDS EXPENDITURES $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 — $5,000,000 $0 • oey e c°a act �a\ air `ac� ;or acs b0 \• c ooe oey ee 0e\ �o c�a J+. GaQ �a �a (se", tcca ��� e� ace e� co ee4 ay a'oOo Goc�. P J���o eQ'ao G°,e aaV a y e°a\\ aay ear cpoo Q Q �w°� sa Q -o of tces aF G° Chace �c ie 2010 EXPENDITURES Total $193,899,658 (2009 $204,640,332) Contingency $12,400,000 6% Public Works $2,235,967 1% Social Services 13% $24,491,500 Paramedic Service 3% $5,791,647 Internal Services 12% $22,503,664 Miscellaneous $829,329 0% Human Services 7% $13,583,359 Road & Bridge 14% $26,604,640 Auxiliary $394,361 0% Capital $10,000,000 5% Health $8,562,014 4% Public Safety $38,411,709 21% Culture/Recreation 0% $935,834 General Governmenl 14% $27,155,634 92 #Attirr Ellie COLORADO 93 2010 BUDGET SUMMARY OF FUND BALANCES FUND 1000 General Fund SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 2000 Public Works 2100 Social Services 2200 Conservation Trust 2300 Contingent 2400 Emergency Reserve 2500 Health Department 2600 Human Services 2700 Solid Waste CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: 4000 Capital Expenditure ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 5000 Paramedic Services GROSS TOTALS INTERFUND TRANSFER NET TOTALS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 6000 Motor Pool Operating 6200 Health Insurance 6300 Insurance 6400 Phone Services 6500 Weld Finance Corp NET TOTALS - I S FUNDS GROSS TOTALS - ALL FUNDS 2009 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,645,617 14,285,892 1,066,642 239,991 7,450,927 5,000,000 785,805 972,878 228,694 2009 MILL LEVY 11.84 1.61 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2010 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 3,000,000 10,650,000 1,400,000 240,000 7,450,927 5,000,000 800,000 900,000 200,000 2010 2010 MILL PROPERTY LEVY TAXES 9.352 $ 54,052,194 1.273 1.067 0.000 3.588 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7,354,938 6,166, 333 0 20,734,672 0 0 0 0 0 1.75211 2,500,000 1.263 7,300,000 0 $ 40,676,446 0 $ 40,676,446 898,283 3,602,862 0 926,723 0 $ 5,427,868 $ 46,104,314 0.000 16.476 0.000 16.476 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.32 16.80 0 $ 32,140,927 0 $ 32,140,927 1,000,000 4,000,000 1,250,000 925,000 0 $ 7,175,000 $ 39,315,927 0.000 0 16.544 $ 95,608,137 0.000 0 16.544 $ 95,608,137 0.000 0.000 0.260 0.000 0.000 0.260 $ 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 16.804 $ 97,108,137 94 ASSESSED VALUATION: $ 5,778,870,341 2010 INTERGOV'T REVENUE $ 3,339,196 2010 OTHER REVENUE $ 17,100,055 $ 2010 INTERFUND TRANSFER 0 2010 AVAILABLE FINANCING $ 77,491,445 11,849,300 7,405,000 0 37,259,238 18,325,167 0 0 25,891,500 430,000 5,000 0 675,000 0 0 0 28,185,599 0 0 0 5,000,000 3,733,185 1,158,019 3,559,810 9,251,014 12, 819, 387 590,610 12,351 14, 322, 348 0 660,000 0 860,000 2,500,000 200,000 0 12,500,000 0 $ 52,996,235 0 $ 52,996,235 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 52,996,235 5,791,647 $ 32,910,331 0 $ 32,910,331 8,204,100 10,962,564 330,000 1,257,000 0 $ 20,753,664 $ 53,663,995 0 $ 3,572,161 - 3,572,161 $ 0 5,791,647 $ 217,227,791 - 3,572,161 $ 213,655,630 0 9,204,100 0 14,962,564 0 3,080,000 0 2,182,000 0 0 $ 0 $ 29,428,664 $ 0 $ 243,084,294 2010 TOTAL APPRO- PRIATIONS $ 72,712,006 26,604,640 24,491,500 435,000 7,400,000 5,000,000 8,451,014 13,422,348 660,000 10,000,000 5,791,647 $ 174,968,155 - 3,572,161 $ 171,395,994 8,204,100 10,962,564 1,830,000 1,507,000 0 $ 22,503,664 $ 193,899,658 2010 ENDING BALANCE $ 4,779,439 10,654,598 1,400,000 240,000 20,785,599 0 800,000 900,000 200,000 2,500,000 0 $ 42,259,636 0 $ 42,259,636 1,000,000 4,000,000 1,250,000 675,000 0 $ 6,925,000 $ 49,184,636 95 2010 BUDGET SUMMARY OF MAJOR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 BEGINNING PROPERTY INTERGOV'T OTHER INTERFUND FUND BALANCE TAXES REVENUE REVENUE TRANSFER 1000 General Fund $ 3,000,000 $ 54,052,194 $ 3,339,196 $ 17,100,055 $ 0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 2000 Public Works 10,650,000 7,354,938 11,849,300 7,405,000 0 2100 Social Services 1,400,000 6,166,333 18,325,167 0 0 2200 Conservation Trust 240,000 0 430,000 5,000 0 2300 Contingent 7,450,927 20,734,672 0 0 0 2400 Emergency Reserve 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 2500 Health Department 800,000 0 3,733,185 1,158,019 3,559,810 2600 Human Services 900,000 0 12,819,387 590,610 12,351 2700 Solid Waste 200,000 0 0 660,000 0 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: 4000 Capital Expenditure 2,500,000 7,300,000 2,500,000 200,000 0 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 5000 Paramedic Services 0 0 0 5,791,647 0 GROSS TOTALS $ 32,140,927 $ 95,608,137 $ 52,996,235 $ 32,910,331 $ 3,572,161 INTERFUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 -3,572,161 NET TOTALS $ 32,140,927 $ 95,608,137 $ 52,996,235 $ 32,910,331 $ 0 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 6000 Motor Pool Operating 1,000,000 0 0 8,204,100 0 6200 Health Insurance 4,000,000 0 0 10,962,564 0 6300 Insurance 1,250,000 1,500,000 0 330,000 0 6400 Phone Services 925,000 0 0 1,257,000 0 6500 Weld Finance Corp 0 0 0 0 0 NET TOTALS - I S FUNDS $ 7,175,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 20,753,664 $ 0 GROSS TOTALS -ALL FUNDS $ 39,315,927 $ 97,108,137 $ 52,996,235 $ 53,663,995 $ 0 96 2010 AVAILABLE FINANCING $ 77,491,445 2010 PERSONNEL $ 45,018,743 2010 SERVICE/ SUPPLIES $ 27,581,452 $ 37,259,238 9,336,413 17,268,227 25,891,500 15,618,500 8,618,000 675,000 0 435,000 28,185,599 0 7,400,000 5,000,000 0 5,000,000 9,251,014 5,931,209 2,519,805 14,322,348 7,318,085 6,104,263 860,000 0 660,000 12,500,000 5,791,647 $ 217,227,791 $ -3,572,161 $ 213,655,630 $ 9,204,100 14,962,564 3,080,000 2,182,000 0 $ 29,428,664 $ $ 243,084,294 $ 0 4,393,072 87,616,022 $ 0 87,616,022 $ 0 0 0 158,837 0 158,837 $ 87,774,859 $ 2010 CAPITAL 2010 TOTAL APPRO- PRIATIONS 111,811 $ 72,712,006 2010 ENDING BALANCE $ 4,779,439 0 26,604,640 10,654,598 255,000 24,491,500 1,400,000 0 435,000 240,000 0 7,400,000 20,785,599 0 5,000,000 0 0 8,451,014 800,000 0 13,422,348 900,000 0 660,000 200,000 0 10,000,000 1,388,575 76,975,322 $ -3,572,161 73,403,161 $ 8,189,100 10,962,564 1,830,000 1,033,623 0 22,015,287 $ 95,418,448 $ 10,000 10,376,811 0 10,376,811 15,000 0 0 314,540 0 329,540 $ 10,706,35' 10,000,000 5,791,647 $174,968,155 $ -3,572,161 $171,395,994 $ 8,204,100 10,962,564 1,830,000 1,507,000 0 22,503,664 $ $193,899,658 $ 2,500,000 0 42,259,636 0 42,259,636 1,000,000 4,000,000 1,250,000 675,000 0 6,925,000 49,184,636 97 2009 ESTIMATED SUMMARY OF MAJOR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FUND 1000 General Fund SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 2000 Public Works 2100 Social Services 2200 Conservation Trust 2300 Contingent 2400 Emergency Reserve 2500 Health Department 2600 Human Services 2700 Solid Waste CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: 4000 Capital Expenditure ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 5000 Paramedic Services GROSS TOTALS INTERFUND TRANSFER NET TOTALS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 6000 Motor Pool Operating 6200 Health Insurance 6300 Insurance 6400 Phone Services 6500 Weld Finance Corp NET TOTALS - I S FUNDS 2009 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,645,617 14,285,892 1,066,642 239,991 7,450,927 5,000,000 785,805 972,878 228,694 2009 PROPERTY TAXES 2009 2009 2009 INTERGOV'T OTHER INTERFUND REVENUE REVENUE TRANSFER $ 54,012,194 $ 3,185,143 $ 15,030,871 $ 7,354,938 5,775,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,000,000 0 $ 40,676,446 0 $ 40,676,446 898,283 3,602,862 0 926,723 0 $ 5,427,868 GROSS TOTALS -ALL FUNDS $ 46,104,314 $ 76,642,132 10,540,000 19,653,417 420,009 0 0 3,064,405 13,803,005 0 2,500,000 10,343,050 0 5,000 0 0 1,146,850 590,610 660,000 400,000 0 38,400 8,559,799 $ 75,142,132 $ 53,204,379 $ 36,736,180 $ 0 0 0 $ 75,142,132 $ 53,204,379 $ 36,736,180 $ 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ $ 53,204,379 $ 8,516,500 10,530,000 1,580,000 1,378,982 0 22,005,482 $ 58,741,662 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,915,471 12,351 0 0 0 3,927,822 -3,927,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 2009 AVAILABLE FINANCING $ 82,873,825 2009 PERSONNEL $ 44,429,407 2009 SERVICE/ SUPPLIES $ 34,304,619 $ 42,523,880 8,604,690 23,269,190 26,495,059 15,180,500 9,659,559 665,000 0 425,000 7,450,927 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 8,912,531 6,060,614 2,051,917 15,378,844 7,460,236 7,018,608 888,694 0 688,694 10,900,000 8,598,199 $ 209,686,959 $ -3,927,822 $ 205,759,137 $ 9,414,783 14,132,862 3,080,000 2,305,705 0 $ 28,933,350 $ 234,692,487 0 4,310,174 86,045,621 $ 0 86,045,621 $ 0 0 0 158,837 0 $ 158,837 $ $ 86,204,458 $ 2009 CAPITAL 2009 TOTAL APPRO- PRIATIONS 1,139,799 $ 79,873,825 2009 ENDING BALANCE $ 3,000,000 0 31,873,880 10,650,000 255,000 25,095,059 1,400,000 0 425,000 240,000 0 0 7,450,927 0 0 5,000,000 0 8,112,531 800,000 0 14,478,844 900,000 0 688,694 200,000 0 8,400,000 4,038,025 81,455,612 $ -3,927,822 77,527,790 $ 8,414,783 10,132,862 1,830,000 971,868 0 21,349,513 98,877,303 250,000 10,044,799 0 10,044,799 0 0 0 250,000 0 $ 250,000 $10,294,799 8,400,000 8,598,199 $177,546,032 $ -3,927,822 $173,618,210 $ 8,414,783 10,132,862 1,830,000 1,380,705 0 $ 21,758,350 $ $195,376,560 $ 2,500,000 0 32,140,927 0 32,140,927 1,000,000 4,000,000 1,250,000 925,000 0 7,175,000 39,315,927 99 2008 ACTUAL SUMMARY OF MAJOR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FUND 1000 General Fund SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 2000 Public Works 2100 Social Services 2200 Conservation Trust 2300 Contingent 2400 Emergency Reserve 2500 Health Department 2600 Human Services 2700 Solid Waste CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: 4000 Capital Expenditure ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 5000 Paramedic Services GROSS TOTALS INTERFUND TRANSFER NET TOTALS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 6000 Motor Pool Operating 6200 Health Insurance 6300 Insurance 6400 Phone Services 6500 Weld Finance Corp NET TOTALS -1 S FUNDS GROSS TOTALS - ALL FUNDS 2008 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 6,422,528 2008 PROPERTY TAXES $ 51,614,173 17,192,136 7,354,938 2,348,677 5,750,780 197,987 0 5,452,261 2,000,000 5,000,000 0 1,050,358 0 662,249 0 888,223 0 272,790 5,993,871 2008 INTERGOV'T REVENUE 2008 OTHER REVENUE 2008 INTERFUND TRANSFER $ 4,375,301 $ 24,617,944 $ 11,416,258 18,345,008 430,795 0 0 3,383,343 13,648,357 0 0 8,092,855 0 0 0 7,877 0 0 0 0 0 713,575 3,646,734 836,251 117,351 713,402 0 1,690,518 1,892,015 0 0 0 77,120 7,600,608 0 $ 39,487,209 $ 72,713,762 $ 53,366,700 $ 44,474,527 $ 3,764,085 0 0 0 0 -3,764,085 $ 39,487,209 $ 72,713,762 $ 53,366,700 $ 44,474,527 $ 0 1,461,784 3,533,618 0 1,320,020 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 $ 6,315,422 $ 1,500,000 $ 45,802,631 $ 74,213,762 0 8,118,602 0 7,952,493 0 995,544 0 1,332,868 0 0 $ 0 $ 18,399,507 $ $ 53,366,700 $ 62,874,034 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 2008 AVAILABLE FINANCING 2008 PERSONNEL 2008 SERVICE/ SUPPLIES 2008 CAPITAL 2008 TOTAL APPRO- PRIATIONS $ 87,029,946 $ 42,536,543 $ 32,980,881 $ 866,905 $ 76,384,329 44,056,187 8,511,740 26,444,465 13, 994,605 636,659 0 7,452,261 0 5,000,000 0 8,794,010 5,698,359 15,264,208 6,802,008 1,601,625 0 9,849,194 0 21,258,555 11,169,013 396,668 1,334 0 2,309,846 7,489,322 1,372,931 0 29,770,295 214,205 25,377,823 0 396,668 0 1,334 0 0 0 8,008,205 0 14,291,330 0 1,372,931 0 9,849,194 9,849,194 7,677,728 4,142,635 3,285,093 250,000 $ 213,806,283 $ 81,685,890 $ 80,263,643 $ 11,180,304 -3,764,085 0 -3,764,085 0 $ 210,042,198 $ 81,685,890 $ 76,499,558 $ 11,180,304 9,580,386 11,486,111 2,495,544 2,652,888 0 $ 26,214,929 $ $ 236,257,127 $ 7,677,728 $173,129,837 $ -3,764,085 $169,365,752 $ 0 8,682,103 0 8,682,103 0 7,883,249 0 7,883,249 0 2,495,544 0 2,495,544 166,703 995,851 563,611 1,726,165 0 0 0 0 166,703 $ 20,056,747 $ 563,611 $ 20,787,061 $ 81,852,593 $ 96,556,305 $ 11,743,915 $ 190,152,813 $ 2008 ENDING BALANCE $ 10,645,617 14,285,892 1,066,642 239,991 7,450,927 5,000,000 785,805 972,878 228,694 0 0 40,676,446 0 40,676,446 898,283 3,602,862 0 926,723 0 5,427,868 46,104,314 101 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 2008 - 2010 REV Summary of Estimated Financial Sources and Uses ACTUAL PROJECTED ENUES 2008 2009 Taxes Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Miscellaneous Fees Charges for Services Total Estimated Financial Sources EXPENDITURES Current: General government Public safety Public works Public health and welfare Human Services Culture and Recreation Miscellaneous Capital outlay Contingency / Reserves Total Use of Resources Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balance at Beginning of Year Fund Balance at End of Year - without Unspent Contingencies / Reserves Contingencies / Reserves Appropriated but Unspent Fund Balance at End of Year - with Contingencies / Reserves $ 80,182,212 2,089,925 53,289,580 10,571,062 7,845,617 8,898,865 $162,877,261 $ 27,464,065 37,874,959 29,770,295 34,377,018 16,282,222 960,069 5,108,868 9,849,194 1,334 $161,688,024 1,189,237 39,487,209 40,676,446 0 $ 40,676,446 $ 32,140,927 $ 82,717,959 1,993,900 53,165, 979 6,293,556 7,462,500 4,850.598 $156,484,492 $ 26,023,284 37,875,570 34,373,880 33,207,590 16,064,297 947,069 8,415,970 8,112,351 0 $ 165,020,011 - 8,535,519 40,676,446 32,140,927 0 BUDGET 2010 $102,638,137 1,860,400 52,996,235 5,699,419 7,262,000 5.266.865 $175,723,056 $ 27,155,634 38,411,709 28,840,607 33,053,514 13,583,359 935,834 1,223,690 10,000,000 12,400,000 $ 165,604,347 10,118, 709 32,140,927 42,259,636 12,400,000 $ 54,659 636 102 PROPRIETARY FUNDS 2008 - 2010 Summary of Estimated Financial Sources and Uses ACTUAL PROJECTED REVENUES Taxes Intergovernmental Fees Charges for Services Total Estimated Financial Sources EXPENDITURES Paramedic Services Motor Pool Health Insurance Insurance Phone Services Weld Finance Corp Total Use of Resources Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balance at Beginning of Year Fund Balance at End of Year - without Unspent Contingencies / Reserves Contingencies / Reserves Appropriated but not Spent Fund Balance at End of Year - with Contingencies / Reserves 2008 $ 1,500,000 77,120 7,600,608 18,399,507 2009 $ 1,500,000 38,400 8,559,799 22,005,482 $ 27,577,235 $ 32,103,681 $ 7,677,728 8,682,103 7,883,249 2,495,544 1,726,165 0 $ 8,598,199 8,414,783 10,132,862 1,830,000 1,380,705 0 BUDGET 2010 $ 1,500,000 0 5,791,647 20,753,664 $ 28,045,311 $ 5,791,647 8,204,100 10,962,564 1,830,000 1,507,000 0 $ 28,464,789 $ 30,356,549 $ 28,295,311 - 887,554 6,315,422 1,747,132 5,427,868 5,427,868 7,175,000 0 0 - 250,000 7,175,000 6,925,000 0 $ 5,4?7 668 $ 7 175.000 $ 6 925 000 103 2008 83% 17% WELD COUNTY TOTAL TAXABLE PROPERTY 2009 ASSESSED VALUES TO BE USED FOR 2010 BUDGET Class Vacant Residential Commercial Industrial Agricultural Natural Rsc Oil & Gas State Assd Total Value: Less TIF Value Net Total: 2008 Assd Value $ 125,609,000 $ 1,258,374,790 $ 654,957,800 $ 216,214,910 $ 97,874,960 $ 14,996,920 $ 1,709,997,160 $ 487,797,900 $ 4,565,823,440 $ (4,877,710) $ 4,560,945,730 Class 2008 Total Real $ 3,780,454,010 Total Personal $ 785,369,430 Percent of Value Real Personal f 124 122 120 118 11e 114 112 110 108 2009 August Cert $ 114,753,370 $ 1,147,452,920 $ 711,373,330 $ 282,321,520 $ 101,029,170 $ 15,670,120 $ 2,868,050,190 $ 539,042,900 Change $ Change $ (10,855,630) $ (110,921,870) $ 56,415,530 $ 66,106,610 $ 3,154,210 $ 673,200 $ 1,158,053,030 $ 51,245,000 $ 5,779,693,520 $ 1,213,870,080 $ (823,179) $ 5,778,870,341 $ 1,217,924,611 2009 August Cert Change $ $ 4,931,921,990 $ 1,151,467,980 $ 847,771,530 $ 62,402,100 2009 85% 15% -9% -9% 9% 31% 3% 4% 68% 11% 26.6% 26.7% Change % 30% 8% Change 3% -3% Weld Assd Value By Type 2009 Total Personal 15% ill 104 NET PROGRAM COST ALLOCATED NET COST SUPPORT TOTAL MANDATED: CHARTER/STATE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES OFFICE OF THE BOARD PUBLIC TRUSTEE CLERK & RECORDER ELECTIONS TREASURER ASSESSOR COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHERIFF CORONER CLERK TO THE BOARD TOTAL $ 690,487 0 (1,421,779) 1,651,555 (1,798,513) 2,230,357 55,141 4,445,552 1,271,294 633,240 265,529 $ 8,022,863 $ 3,697,587 $ 11,720,450 $ 241,636 6,419 565,039 106,477 0 358,049 9,698 554,421 1,682,991 106,026 66,832 $ 932,123 6,419 (856,740) 1,758,032 (1,798,513) 2,588,406 64,839 4,999,973 2,954,285 739,266 332,361 MANDATED:STATE/FEDERAL COUNTY COST NORTH JAIL CENTENNIAL JAIL CONTRACT JAIL SPACE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SOCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLIC HEALTH TOTAL $ 16,747,694 1,751,339 0 0 6,166,333 12,351 3,051,901 $ 27,729,618 $ 4,287,425 $ 32,017,043 $ 1,512,436 $ 18,260,130 416,692 2,168,031 0 37,000 957,215 665,752 698,329 0 37,000 7,123, 548 678,103 3,750,230 CRITICAL •• NON -MANDATED COUNTY COST CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFO SYSTEM CRIME LAB POLICE SERVICES (LEVEL) SHERIFF CONTRACT SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS -COUNTY -WIDE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM DEVEL OFFICE EMERGENCY SERVICES DRUG TASK FORCE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT TOTAL $ 858,111 $ 187,737 6,650,265 (31,255) 1,446,306 20,000 0 165,260 677,610 2,329 51,523 134,686 0 0 0 31,901 1,090 18,656 $ 860,440 239,260 6,784,951 (31,255) 1,446,306 20,000 31,901 166,350 696,266 $ 9,974,034 $ 240,185 $ 10,214,219 105 NET PROGRAM COST ALLOCATED NET COST SUPPORT TOTAL LOCAL DISCRETION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ZONING/BLDG INSP ANIMAL CONTROL/CODE ENFORCEMENT NOXIOUS WEEDS EXTENSION SERVICE VETERAN'S OFFICE AIRPORT MENTAL HEALTH MISSILE SITE PARK COUNTY FAIR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SENIOR COORDINATORS VICTIM ASSISTANCE JUVENILE DIVERSION VICTIM ADVOCATES WHITE COLLAR CRIME WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A KID'S PLACE GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM COMMUNITY AGENCY GRANTS PARKS AND TRAILS ISLAND GROVE BUILDING RETIRMENT TRANSFER TOTAL GENERAL ASSISTANCE: PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING TOTAL CAPITAL: EQUIPMENT BUILDINGS TOTAL SUPPORT FUNCTION COUNTY ATTORNEY BUILDING & GROUNDS FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNTING PURCHASING HUMAN RESOURCES PBX/PHONES INSURANCE NON -DEPARTMENTAL BUILDING RENTS INFORMATION SERVICES PRINTING & SUPPLY TOTAL $137,167 $ 196,912 1,262,635 485,101 355,066 9,461 501,530 42,873 324,630 169,014 65,357 7,172 1,974 18,406 111,000 0 67,206 7,555 58,653 2,345 39,206 0 10,625 0 297,819 23,160 21,396 11,966 65,554 0 0 0 11,367 12,596 89,250 0 7,025 0 126,071 22,416 14,905 0 32,000 0 91,500 0 0 0 $ 334,079 1,747,736 364,527 544,403 493,644 72,529 20,380 111,000 74,761 60,998 39,206 10,625 320,979 33,362 65,554 0 23,963 89,250 7,025 148,487 14,905 32,000 91,500 0 $3,691,936 $1,008,976 $4,700,912 $ - $ $ 7,354,938 $ 2,235,967 $ 9,590,905 $ 1,453,063 $ 11,043,968 1,398,684 $ 8,753,622 54,379 2,290,346 $ - $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 0 8,000,000 - $ 8,000,000 $ 704,073 4,823,722 470,528 608,499 144,485 563,256 0 1,500,000 512,500 0 3,166,488 57,455 $ 12,551,006 $ (12,551,006) $ (704,073) $ (4,823,722) (470,528) (608,499) (144,485) (563,256) 0 (1,500,000) (512,500) 0 (3,166,488) (57,455) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 106 CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOCATION PLAN SUMMARY OF 2008 ALLOCATED COSTS APPLICABLE FOR 2010 DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE BOARD PUBLIC TRUSTEE ELECTIONS ASSESSOR COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHERIFF CORONER JAIL COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS GRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICE SOCIAL SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH POLICE SERVICES (LEVEL) ANIMAL CONTROL REGIONAL FORENSIC LAB AMBULANCE OFFICE EMERGENCY SERVICES PLANNING & ZONING/BLDG INSP TOTAL ALLOCATED $324,094 8,609 142,812 480,233 13,007 743,616 2,257,309 142,207 2,587,439 49,626 30,065 1,283,863 892,938 936,633 180,648 12,689 69,105 337,647 42,787 650,641 DEPARTMENT TOTAL ALLOCATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PEST & WEED CONTROL EXTENSION SERVICE VETERAN'S OFFICE AIRPORT MISSILE SITE PARK CLERK TO THE BOARD COUNTY FAIR COUNTY CLERK JUVENILE DIVERSION VICTIM ASSISTANCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING TASK FORCE SOLID WASTE TRANSPORTATION COURTS -COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY OTHER $25,022 57,504 226,690 9,619 24,687 10,133 89,638 3,145 757,858 16,049 31,063 3,124 1,875,982 72,936 1,462 16,894 264,108 811,365 0 1,350,766 $16,834,013 The above costs are the result of a consolidated County -wide cost allocation plan for the year ended December 31, 2008, prepared in accordance with Federal Management Circular FMC 74-4. The allocation is applicable to fiscal year 2010 and represents indirect costs to the departments in addition to the direct costs appropriated in each budget unit. The allocation plus the direct costs represent the total cost of specific County programs for 2010. 107 SEVEN YEAR TREND 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Beginning Fund Balance 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 N N NI T N1 108 SEVEN YEAR TREND County Expenditures $60 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 El Gen Gov O Public Safety ❑ Roads & Bridges O Health/Human Srv/Soc Sry 109 WELD COUNTY HOME RULE GOVERNMENT T a) C O O O Elected Members Office of Emergency Management c o Q 03 N C h "O E O U O a) U E n in O ns w) c E `o o U U 0 cp CCD U al E g -t (9 L- ad w a) O Environment a) L- c • Oo -N N a E oo U • U • 0 j a c ^` C L HP co a) U a 8 c U a) c as 3 -o co o my g d9 • 2 m Lou) m g m x E x 1 N O ten 13,0 N 0 0 02 cc C N m • N• 1-• O, w m m y c m 0 m w 0 •E W (0 0 w Health Director Paramedic Services Extension Director a) C O O U a Ii Administration 0 y O 0 T C§ (J fJ a E o y o g p b .y 0 5 c O o E e w a rn vZ g S o m m ryry'c c c. o w 2 H N 0 d OI U z w 2 Vl ❑ C Jl Ea C pC UJ Ld C(/% g o§=22g 'atZ° 2? g u m E M u 2 C E'€ 22 m U 5 d N x= HU K cN >o.� v 110 SUMMARY OF COUNTY FUNDED POSITIONS 2010 DEPARTMENT LAST ACTUAL YEAR 2008 CURRENT YEAR 2009 REQUEST BUDGET 2010 RECOMMEND BUDGET 2010 CURRENT TO RECOMMEND CHANGE GENERAL FUND: Office of the Board 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 County Attorney 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 Planning and Zoning 17.000 13.000 11.000 11.000 - 2.000 Clerk to the Board 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 Accounting 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500 Finance and Administration 1.500 1.500 2.500 2.500 + 1.000 Clerk and Recorder 45.000 45.000 43.500 43.500 - 1.500 Elections 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 Treasurer 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 Assessor 37.500 37.500 33.500 33.500 - 4.000 Human Resources 6.000 6.000 5.000 5.000 - 1.000 Buildings and Grounds 24.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 Victim Witness 10.375 11.375 11.750 11.750 + 0.375 Juvenile Diversion 3.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 Office of Emergency Management 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Purchasing 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 District Attorney 57.375 60.375 58.375 58.375 - 2.000 Coroner 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 Centennial Jail 32.000 38.000 32.000 32.000 - 6.000 North Jail 199.000 200.600 204.600 204.600 + 4.000 Sheriff 16.000 16.000 16.000 16.000 Victim Advocates 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Crime Lab 1.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Drug Task Force 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 111 DEPARTMENT LAST ACTUAL YEAR 2008 CURRENT YEAR 2009 REQUEST BUDGET 2010 RECOMMEND BUDGET 2010 CURRENT TO RECOMMEND CHANGE Sheriff Contract Services 3.000 7.000 7.500 7.500 + 0.500 Building Inspection 16.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 Police Services 71.750 72.750 71.750 71.750 - 1.000 Traffic Enforcement 12.000 12.000 11.000 9.000 - 3.000 Community Corrections 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 Pest and Weed Control 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Transportation 0.000 8.500 8.500 8.500 Justice Services 0.000 0.000 6.000 6.000 + 6.000 Extension Service 10.750 10.750 10.080 10.080 - 0.670 Veteran's Office 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Missile Site 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 General Engineering 23.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 Printing and Supply 2.000 2.000 2.750 2.750 + 0.250 Fair 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 Geographical Info. System 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 - 1.000 Animal Control/Code Enforce. 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 649.050 662.650 653.605 651.605 - 11.045 PUBLIC WORKS: Maintenance Support 10.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 Administration 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 Motor Graders 43.000 43.000 46.000 46.000 + 3.000 Trucking 36.000 36.000 33.000 33.000 - 3.000 Bridge Construction 26.000 27.000 27.000 27.000 Pavement Management 9.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 Mining 11.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 142.000 137.000 137.000 137.000 0.000 112 DEPARTMENT LAST ACTUAL YEAR 2008 CURRENT YEAR 2009 REQUEST BUDGET 2010 RECOMMEND BUDGET 2010 CURRENT TO RECOMMEND CHANGE HEALTH DEPT FUND: Administration 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 Health Communication 15.000 11.750 10.750 10.750 - 1.000 Environmental Services 25.950 25.250 24.250 24.250 - 1.000 Health Preparedness 2.500 2.500 3.000 3.000 - 0.500 Public Health Services 43.650 45.600 43.410 43.410 + 2.190 TOTAL HEALTH DEPT FUND 92.100 93.100 89.410 89.410 - 3.690 SOCIAL SERVICES 246.500 263.000 263.000 263.000 PHONE SERVICES 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 51.000 51.000 55.000 51.000 GRAND TOTAL 1,185.650 1,208.750 1,196.015 1,194.015 -14.735 113 114 GENERAL FUND Revenue Changes $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 ❑ 2009 ❑ 2010 'c 2'4 }ey Cty tai `N. oe Bey os) C4Qi 4:z> ooJ e S evi .i' a°0 a\a t°Qe O"re ePo �e�c ey\ 0�5 ��°� , * Q ie `q, eCy e 1 fey �.y �J N0 �.o ra<c� 4.. G 2010 Revenue Total $77,491,445 (2009 $76,978,208) Property Tax, $54,052,194, 71% Fund Balance, $3,000,000, 4% Miscellaneous, $5,020,819, 6% Other Taxes, $100,000, 0% Fee Accounts, zr—$7,162,000, 10% Intergovernmental, $3,339,196, 4% Licenses/Permits, $1,145,000, 1% Charges for Services, $3,437,236, 4% Fines/Forfeitures, $235,000, 0% 115 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE CHANGES $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 Public Safety General Gov. Health & Welfare Human Serv. Misc. Auxilary Public Works Culture/Rec. 2010 Expenditures Total $72,712,006 (2009 $74,277,342) General Gov., $27,155,634, 37% Public Safety, $38,411,709, 53% Health & Welfare, $3,162,901, 4% Human Serv., $173,362, 0% Misc., $677,238, 1% Auxilary, $394,361, 1% Public Works, $2,235,967, 3% Culture/Rec., $500,834, 1% 116 SEVEN YEAR TREND General Government $30 $25 $20 $10 $5 $0 2004 i 2008 i 2009 2010 117 SEVEN YEAR TREND Public Safety $45 $40 $35 $30 ti $25 z O J J_ $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 i i I 2008 2009 2010 118 SEVEN YEAR TREND Health & Welfare $60 $50 $40 0 Z j $30 J m $20 $10 $0 2004 2005 2006 I 2007 2008 I 2009 119 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY The General Fund is funded at the level of $72,712,006, down $1,565,336. The budget for the general government functions is down $99,787, even with an increase of $441,101 in election costs since 2010 is a general election year with general and primary elections. Information Services increased $265,488 in costs due to the contract cost of living, transfer of a GIS employee to the contractor's payroll, and added capital costs. GIS is down $112,477 due to the transfer of the position to the contractor's budget. The District Attorney's budget is down $40,592 due the elimination of a clerical position as the office moves more towards paperless filings. Victim Witness is up $25,709 from additional grant resource for staffing. The Building and Grounds budget has been reduced by $256,939 because of lower energy costs. The Assessor reduced one Office tech III, two Data Collector positions, and one Residential Appraisal position for a savings of $154,406, with an additional reduction of $60,300 in postage, printing, and other professional services, for a total reduction of $214,706. Capital equipment was reduced $50,000. Planning is down $140,261 with the elimination of a Planning Tech and Long Range Planner position due to the department's workload being down. Other departments are stable or down only slightly. Public safety functions are down $263,371. An Investigator for to the White Collar Crime Task Force ($84,567) was reduced. An additional 0.5 FTE for a school resource officer was added, but the additional costs will be reimbursed by the Mead High School. Three SO Deputy II positions were eliminated in the Traffic Enforcement unit ($216,621). In the North Jail budget significant costs have been deferred by opening only 64 of the remaining 122 secure confinement beds in the new jail wing. The added costs to open the 64 beds were approximately $645,000 with the addition of six Correctional Officer positions. Part of this cost was offset by eliminating two Commander positions. Inmate census trends during the seven month period prior to the development of this budget indicate the 683 bed capacity should be adequate in 2010. The approximately $900,000 in deferred jail cost is not a permanent cost savings as additional staff and capacity will be needed in the future. The Centennial Jail budget reflects the transfer of two entire programs, Pre -Trial Services (PTS) and In Custody Alternative Placement Program (ICAPP) to the newly created Justice Services Department in the amount of $453,072 across all budget categories, including four FTE's associated with those programs. Personnel services in the Centennial Jail was reduced an additional $106,946 by the elimination of two client manager positions in the Work Release Program. The utilization of Work Release has declined reflected further by reduced revenues from client participation fees. On June 29, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners created the Justice Services Division. The proposed budget for the new Justice Services Division is $478,821 for a savings of $83,977. Even with this savings, the resources budgeted allow for funding of the Director of the division, three Pre -trail Client Managers, Pre-trial Services Supervisor, and a Criminal Justice Planner. The creation of this division should allow for improved pre -trail services that will positively impact public safety and more cost effectively deal with clients in the criminal justice system to minimize the need to incarcerate the clients in the county jail. The addition of the Criminal Justice Planner position will allow for a position to do system -wide analysis of the entire criminal justice system in Weld County and the 19th Judicial District to maximize its efficiency for all parties, while still protecting the public's safety. Pest and Weed is down $251,347 as the department transferred prairie dog control and tree removal responsibilities back to Public Works. Communication costs are down $111,784, primarily due to the new funding formula and E911 picking up overtime costs. Other significant changes include Engineering which is down $253,260 due to consultant contracts and engineering costs due to lower projects costs. The General Fund's subsidy to the Public Health Department is down $538,570 due to reduction in programs as part of the budget review process done in 2009. Transfer to the Retirement Fund of $250,000 was 120 eliminated in the 2010 budget since no cost of living will be granted to retirees in 2010. Extension Services were reduced $75,870 with the new Memorandum of Understanding with Colorado State University. Funding to outside agencies was cut $108,125. Finally, $153,371is included for health insurance rate increases for 2010. No employee pay increases are funded in the 2010 budget due to economic conditions. The available resources to the General Fund are $77,491,445 compared to $76,978,208 in 2009, up $513,237. Property taxes are budgeted at $54,052,194. Revenue from interest earnings are down $807,000 at $2,393,000 for 2010. Oil and Gas Royalties are up $175,000. Fines are up $70,000 from traffic enforcement. Planning and Building Inspection fees are unchanged due to the slowdown in development and residential construction. Charges for services are up $150,090. The Treasurer's fees are anticipated to be up $400,000 due to the volume of activity and conservative estimates in the past. Clerk and Recorder's fees are down $400,000 due to slowing motor vehicle sales and slowdown in recording fees from new construction and mortgage refinancing activities. Intergovernmental revenues are up $154,053. Recovery of indirect costs to grant programs is up $200,735. Other revenues are stable or only slightly changed. The beginning fund balance is anticipated to be $3,000,000 for 2010. An estimated ending fund balance of $4,779,439 is projected for year-end. The fund balance amount serves as an additional contingency amount during the fiscal year. In addition to the regular Contingency Fund is the Emergency Reserve Fund, amounting to $5,000,000, as required under the TABOR Amendment, which passed in 1992. This fund balance amount is consistent with the anticipated ending fund balances for the last few years. It is prudent fiscal management for Weld County to maintain an anticipated fund balance of this level to respond to unforeseen needs of the citizens of Weld County in 2010 and future years. 121 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 1000 90100 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 1000 90100 4150 TOBACCO PRODUCTS TOTAL TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS 1000 90100 4215 LICENSES, LIQUOR/DANCE 1000 17100 4221 PERMITS 1000 25100 4222 BUILDING 1000 25100 4224 ELECTRICAL 1000 25100 4226 PLAN CHECK TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1000 90100 4318 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 1000 15100 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1000 21210 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1000 24410 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1000 15100 4340 GRANTS 1000 15200 4340 GRANTS 1000 15300 4340 GRANTS 1120 15300 4340 GRANTS 1130 15300 4340 GRANTS 114006 15300 4340 GRANTS 1000 16500 4340 GRANTS 1000 21300 4340 GRANTS 1000 24200 4340 GRANTS 116009 24220 4340 GRANTS 116509 24220 4340 GRANTS 116998 24220 4340 GRANTS 1000 96400 4340 GRANTS 1000 90100 4352 THORNTON 1000 21200 4354 CITIES AND TOWNS 1000 21300 4354 CITIES AND TOWNS 1000 24410 4354 CITIES AND TOWNS TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 10200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 10400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 11200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 15100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 16500 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 17350 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 17600 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 21100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 21200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 21220 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 24410 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 24420 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 26100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 54,012,194 54,052,194 54,052,194 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 54,112,194 54,152,194 54,152,194 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 1,145,000 1,145,000 1,145,000 0 1,750 2,000 2,000 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 123,497 100,090 100,090 0 63,934 57,085 57,085 0 165,276 187,334 187,334 0 35,418 35,418 35,418 0 91,300 107,383 107,383 0 14,947 14,972 14,972 0 143,000 153,000 153,000 0 74,268 74,268 74,268 0 77,740 77,740 77,740 0 0 1,943,523 1,943,523 0 0 104,878 104,878 0 1,943,523 0 0 0 2,400 2,400 2,400 0 29,890 29,890 29,890 0 0 31,040 31,040 0 8,200 8,200 8,200 0 315,000 315,000 315,000 0 3,185,143 3,339,221 3,339,221 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 57,120 50,941 50,941 0 230,000 100,000 100,000 0 50,000 40,000 40,000 0 366,863 422,500 422,500 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 250,859 300,000 300,000 0 60,000 145,287 145,287 0 305,696 317,260 317,260 0 561,733 648,173 648,173 0 319,000 329,200 329,200 0 915,000 892,000 892,000 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 122 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title 1000 50100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1000 90100 4420 PARKING 1000 13100 4430 SALE OF SUPPLIES 1000 15100 4430 SALE OF SUPPLIES 1000 17100 4430 SALE OF SUPPLIES 1000 17600 4430 SALE OF SUPPLIES TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES FINES AND FORFIETURES 1000 21210 4510 FINES 1000 90100 4510 FINES TOTAL FINES AND FORFIETURES MISCELLANEOUS 1000 90100 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 1000 22100 4624 RENTS FROM BUILDINGS 1000 90100 4624 RENTS FROM BUILDINGS 1000 90100 4640 OIL AND GAS 1000 90100 4650 OVERHEAD 1000 21200 4670 REFUND OF EXPENDITURE 1000 21260 4670 REFUND OF EXPENDITURE 1000 26200 4670 REFUND OF EXPENDITURE 1000 23200 4680 OTHER 1000 96200 4680 OTHER 1000 15400 4690 DONATIONS TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS FEES 1000 12100 4720 ADVERTISING FEES 1000 10300 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 11100 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 12100 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 13100 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 15100 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 24410 4730 OTHER FEES 1000 90100 4740 FEES, CABLE FRANCHISE TOTAL FEES TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 1,375 1,375 1,375 0 26,500 28,500 28,500 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 65,000 80,000 80,000 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 30,000 34,000 34,000 0 3,287,146 3.437.236 3,437.236 0 115,000 165,000 165,000 0 50,000 70,000 70,000 0 165,000 235,000 235,000 0 3,200,000 2,393,000 2,393,000 0 56,200 56,200 56,200 0 70,000 369,136 369,136 0 575,000 750,000 750,000 0 789,265 990,000 990,000 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 117,960 115,383 115,383 0 47,100 51,400 51,400 0 700 700 700 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 5,171,225 5,020,819 5,020,819 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 4,400,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 0 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 2,500 2,000 2,000 0 195,000 195,000 195,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 7,162,500 7,162,000 7,162,000 0 74,226,208 74,491,470 74,491,470 0 123 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1000 10100 OFFICE OF THE BOARD 1000 10200 COUNTY ATTORNEY 1000 10400 CLERK TO THE BOARD 1000 11100 COUNTY CLERK 1000 11200 ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION 1000 11300 MOTOR VEHICLE 1000 12100 TREASURER'S OFFICE 1000 13100 ASSESSOR 1000 14100 COUNTY COUNCIL 1000 15100 DISTRICT ATTORNEY 1000 15200 JUVENILE DIVERSION 1000 15300 VICTIM WITNESS 1120 15300 VICTIM WITNESS 1130 15300 VICTIM WITNESS 114006 15300 VICTIM WITNESS 1000 15400 WHITE COLLAR CRIME 1000 16100 FINANCE 1000 16200 ACCOUNTING 1000 16300 PURCHASING 1000 16400 PERSONNEL 1000 16500 TRANSPORTATION 1000 17100 PLANNING OFFICE 1000 17200 BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS 1000 17300 INFORMATION SERVICES 1000 17350 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM 1000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 1000 17600 PRINTING AND SUPPLY TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 691,187 690,487 690,487 0 753,399 704,073 704,073 0 327,286 316,470 316,470 0 834,780 839,814 839,814 0 1,310,454 1,751,555 1,751,555 0 1,723,407 1,738,407 1,738,407 0 867,617 851,487 851,487 0 2,520,063 2,305,357 2,305,357 0 64,871 55,141 55,141 0 4,768,734 4,728,142 4,728,142 0 85,245 78,481 78,481 0 475,552 485,153 485,153 0 35,418 35,418 35,418 0 91,300 107,383 107,383 0 14,947 14,972 14,972 0 20,000 0 0 0 288,565 470,528 470,528 0 608,499 608,499 608,499 0 144,485 144,485 144,485 0 763,442 563,256 563,256 0 657,197 712,667 712,667 0 1,569,064 1,428,803 1,428,803 0 5,080,661 4,823,722 4,823,722 0 2,901,000 3,166,488 3,166,488 0 259,178 146,701 146,701 0 50,000 0 0 0 349,070 391,455 391,455 0 27,255,421 27,158,944 27,158,944 0 PUBLIC SAFETY 1000 21100 SHERIFF ADMINISTRATION 1,421,581 1,416,581 1,416,581 0 1000 21200 SHERIFF'S OPERATIONS 7,228,984 7,043,565 7,043,565 0 1000 21210 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,117,476 1,005,050 857,610 0 1000 21220 MUNICIPAL CONTRACT SERVICES 539,063 616,918 616,918 0 1000 21230 ORDINANCE 88 ENFORCEMENT 460,029 440,066 440,066 0 1000 21260 REGIONAL LAB 308,275 303,120 303,120 0 1000 21300 VICTIM ADVOCATES 149,022 148,022 148,022 0 1000 21410 DRUG TASK FORCE 165,260 165,260 165,260 0 1000 22100 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 1,656,696 1,502,506 1,502,506 0 1000 22200 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 1000 22400 CRIMIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 815,705 858,111 858,111 0 1000 23200 COUNTY CORONER 633,940 633,940 633,940 0 1000 24100 JUSTICE SERVICES 0 478,821 478,821 0 1000 24200 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS 170,287 77,740 77,740 0 116008 24220 THE RESTITUTION CENTER 1,943,523 0 0 0 116009 24220 THE RESTITUTION CENTER 0 1,943,523 1,943,523 0 116509 24220 THE RESTITUTION CENTER 0 104,878 104,878 0 1000 24410 NORTH JAIL COMPLEX 17,018,137 17,606,894 17,606,894 0 1000 24420 CENTENNIAL JAIL 3,210,795 2,643,339 2,643,339 0 1000 25100 BUILDING INSPECTION 894,457 880,526 880,526 0 1000 26100 WEED AND PEST 762,877 511,530 511,530 0 1000 26200 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 158,973 158,759 158,759 0 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 38,675,080 38,559,149 38,411,709 0 PUBLIC WORKS 1000 31100 ENGINEERING 2,489,227 2,235,967 2,235,967 0 CULTURE & RECURATION 1000 50100 MISSILE PARK 1000 50200 PARKS AND TRAILS 1000 56100 AIRPORT TOTAL CULTURE & RECURATION 72,081 68,681 68,681 0 32,000 32,000 32,000 0 15,000 1,974 1,974 0 119,081 102,655 102,655 0 124 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 1000 56110 1000 56120 1000 56130 1000 56140 1000 56150 1000 56160 1000 60200 HEALTH AND WELFARE SENIOR PROGRAMS WASTE WATER DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED MENTAL HEALTH A KID'S PLACE COUNTY CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE MISCELLANEOUS 1000 90100 NON DEPARTMENTAL 1000 90150 COMMUNITY AGENCIES GRANTS 1000 96100 EXTENSION 1000 96200 FAIR 1000 96400 VETERANS 1000 96500 ISLAND GROVE BUILDINGS 1000 99999 SALARY CONTINGENCY TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 12,500 12,500 10,625 0 11,367 11,367 11,367 0 46,125 172,225 39,206 0 104,599 111,000 111,000 0 8,750 7,025 7,025 0 3,852,822 3,064,252 3,064,252 0 4,036,163 3,378,369 3,243,475 0 105,000 105,000 89,250 0 606,000 512,500 512,500 0 103,530 123,030 14,905 0 400,500 324,630 324,630 0 318,945 308,945 308,945 0 68,395 67,757 67,757 0 100,000 91,500 91,500 0 0 153,371 153,371 0 1,597,370 1,581,733 1,473,608 0 74.277,342 73,121,817 72,715,608 0 125 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Office of the Board - - 1000-10100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Statutory head of county government. Each major department is overseen by one Commissioner, with each Commissioner serving as an assistant in another area, on a rotating basis each year. Statutory duties also include sitting as the Board of Equalization to hear appeals on tax assessments; sitting as the County Board of Social Services; and filling, by appointment, all vacancies in county offices except the Board of Commissioners. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 570,514 $ 566,837 $ 566,837 $ 566,837 Supplies 8,451 450 450 450 Purchased Services 104,584 123,900 123,200 123,200 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 683,549 $ 691,187 $ 690,487 $ 690,487 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 683,549 $ 691,187 $ 690,487 $ 690,487 Budgeted Positions 6 6 6 6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Other purchased services were reduced by $700. No other changes. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 126 OFFICE OF THE BOARD (CONTINUED) 1000-10100 Efficiency Measures ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 0.246 0.225 $2.93 $2.58 FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.257 Per capita cost (county support) $2.83 Goal ES1: Enable County departments and its service partners to deliver quality customer service. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES1-1: Clearly -defined performance expectations and standards Citizen satisfaction feedback for service delivery departments High High High ESI-2: Conveniently accessed and easy -to- use services ES1-3: Unity of County service delivery ES1-4: Satisfied customers Resident and visitor satisfaction feedback with County services High High High Goal ES2: Enhance community access to reliable information regarding services and County government issues. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES2-1: Easily accessible information regarding County services and programs (priority outcome) Community satisfaction with information availability Customers awareness of services provided by Weld County government High High High High High High ES2-2: Positive image of County government Percent of residents with a positive image of Weld County government N/A N/A 90% 127 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COUNTY ATTORNEY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Attorney -- 1000-10200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Renders opinions on constitutional questions. The County Attorney defends any lawsuits against Weld County and brings civil actions for enforcement of county regulations. Of three full-time assistants, two share the responsibilities of the County Attorney, while one enforces child support obligations and handles dependency neglect cases. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 545,196 $ 569,094 $ 569,094 $ 569,094 Supplies 6,760 2,000 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 95,137 182,305 132,979 132,979 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 647,093 $ 753,399 $ 704,073 $ 704,073 Revenue 8,548 3,000 3,000 3,000 Net County Cost $ 638,545 $ 750,399 $ 701,073 $ 701,073 Budgeted Positions 4 4 4 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is down $49,326 due to a reduction in the purchase of legal books and publications that are now accommodated by West Law's on-line services. The amount for these publications and subscription services were also over budgeted for in 2009, which makes the savings larger than just the saving from actual 2009 costs versus the budgeted amount. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 128 COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) 1000-10200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED for legal assistance 425 health cases 53 77 450 450 55 55 115 120 0.164 0.149 $2.74 $2.62 185 185 # of new requests # of new mental # of new code violations Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.171 Per capita cost (county support) $2.99 Number of agenda requests/D&N/mental cases per FTE 179 Goal ES3: Ensure the County Attorney staff is meeting the needs of elected officials and department heads. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES3-l: Efficient and effective legal representation of Weld County Client satisfaction of elected officials and department heads N/A 95% 99% 129 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PUBLIC TRUSTEE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Public Trustee -- 1000-10300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Performs the duties of public trustee in the county as prescribed in C. R. S. 38-37-101 et. seq., 1973. County General Fund provides supplies only, salaries and operating costs are funded by public trustee fees outside of county budget. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 222,370 200,000 200,000 200,000 Net County Cost $ - 222,370 $ - 200,000 $ - 200,000 $ - 200,000 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change. Per Section 37-37-104(3), C.R.S., all expenses of the office are to be paid from Trustee fees prior to payment to the County Treasurer. Excess funds are to be maintained in a special reserve fund until one year's operating costs are accumulated. It is anticipated that excess revenue, in the amount of $200,000, will be transferred to the General Fund in 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 130 PUBLIC TRUSTEE BUDGET 2010 INCOME Release income after Recording Fees Foreclosure income from Statutory Fees Interest Earned on Balances Total Income EXPENSES Personnel: Public Trustee Salary Staff Salaries FICA Contribution SUTA Taxes Retirement Plans Medical Insurance Education/Training Misc./Other Total Personnel Operating Expenses: Accounting/Auditing/Legal Services Building/Office Rental/Storage Dues and Meetings Equipment Maintenance/Rental Insurance/Bond IT Support Office Supplies Postage Telephone/Utilities Travel/Mileage Total Operating Capital Outlay: Computer Hardware Purchases Total Capital Outlay Total Expenses NET FUNDS PAYABLE TO PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALARY FUND $ 182,371 789,861 48,297 $ 1,020,529 $ 71,826 182,697 20,369 618 16,272 44,609 1,245 3.000 $ 340,636 $ 123,899 27,532 5,632 7,319 1,162 10,300 13,343 20,461 16,514 5.246 $ 231,408 $ 9,687 $ 9,687 $ 581,731 $ 438,798 131 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Clerk to the Board -- 1000-10400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Clerk to the Board records all meetings and hearings of the County Commissioners, retains all records of the Board, and processes liquor licenses. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 272,909 $ 311,897 $ 301,081 $ 301,081 Supplies 37,307 13,500 13,500 13,500 Purchased Services 14,028 13,092 13,092 13,092 Fixed Charges -10,055 - 11,203 - 11,203 - 11,203 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 314,189 $ 327,286 $ 316,470 $ 316,470 Revenue 60,948 57,120 50,941 50,941 Net County Cost $ 253,241 $ 270,166 $ 265,529 $ 265,529 Budgeted Positions 6 6 6 6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The net county costs are down $4,637. Personnel Services are down $10,816 with a phased retiree paid at a lower rate and no retirement contribution. All other expenditures are the same. Revenue from the charge to Phone Services for the switchboard function is down $5,179 due to the personnel costs for the switchboard operator being lower. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 132 CLERK TO THE BOARD (CONTINUED) 1000-10400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of meetings transcribed 230 230 230 Number of documents optically scanned 4,750 5,000 5,000 Number of BOE hearings scheduled 50 500 50 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Cost per meeting/hearing 0.257 $1.00 $1,018.99 0.246 $1.09 $1,174.63 0.224 $0.99 $1154.47 Goal ES4: To improve between the Count) service, increase efficiency and provide greater information access and exchange Commissioners and the citizens of Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES4-1: User friendly government information and services Percent of users (residents, visitors, employees, etc.) satisfied with services and information N/A 95% 95% 133 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CLERK AND RECORDER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Recording/Administration -- 1000-11100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Recording Department records, scans, retrieves and reproduces copies of legal documents, and issues marriage licenses. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 637,901 $ 643,021 $ 648,055 $ 648,055 Supplies 75,110 74,404 74,404 74,404 Purchased Services 64,635 102,355 102,355 102,355 Fixed Charges 10,958 15,000 15,000 15,000 Capital 35,144 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 823,748 $ 834,780 $ 839,814 $ 839,814 Revenue 4,299,369 4,400,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Net County Cost $ -3,475,621 $ -3565,220 $ -3,160,186 $ -3,160,186 Budgeted Positions 10 FTE Recording 3 FTE Admin. 10 FTE Recording 3 FTE Admin. 8.5 FTE Recording 3 FTE Admin. 8.5 FTE Recording 3 FTE Admin. SUMMARY OF CHANGES: 1.5 Office Tech Ill were reduced and the 9% health insurance increase was included. One of the positions was vacant and unfunded in 2009, but eliminated in 2010. All other expense line items are unchanged. Revenue is down $400,000 due to legislative changes concerning sales tax vendor fees, and car sales being lower. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 134 RECORDING/ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 1000-11100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Out. uts recorded produced licenses issued ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 71,138 69,266 76,193 647,273 628,032 690,835 1,633 1,392 1,531 0.56 0.53 0.43 $3.53 $3.43 $3.13 7,144 6,927 7,619 Number of documents Number of copies Number of marriage Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita — Recording Per capita contribution Number of documents recorded per FTE Goal ES5: Ensure statutory requirements and regulations governing the recording, indexing, imaging and electronic archiving. To be accountable and responsible to the public's needs. Ensure that the citizens receive professiona , timely and quality service at all times. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES5-1: Receive documents for recording and electronic recording 100% accuracy with indexing and verification 99.5% 99.5% 99.5% ES5-2: Educate citizens on the research process Posted educational signs Website updates 14 4 15 4 15 4 ES5-3: Provide access for copies Customer satisfaction 6 complaints 4 complaints 0 complaints 135 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CLERK AND RECORDER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Elections -- 1000-11200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Elections Department conducts primary and general elections every two years, conducts voter registration, maintains records alphabetically and by precinct, conducts schools for election judges, provides supplies for elections, issues certificates of registration for proof of age and citizenship for international travel, services municipal clerks, school districts, special districts, and conducts special elections each November in the off year. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 662,135 $ 539,606 $ 721,828 $ 721,828 Supplies 771,668 448,820 721,490 721,490 Purchased Services 239,595 312,128 298,337 298,337 Fixed Charges 2,860 9,900 9,900 9,900 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,676,258 $ 1,310,454 $ 1,751,555 $ 1,751,555 Revenue 96,177 230,000 100,000 100,000 Net County Cost $ 1,580,081 $ 1,080,454 $ 1,651,555 $ 1,651,555 Budgeted Positions 4 5 5 5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budgeted expenses have been increased $441,101 to support a Primary and General Election in 2010. Some legal changes regarding mailing of ballots and notices will cause the cost of the elections to exceed even a Presidential Election year. This budget assumes that current election equipment can be used in 2010. Revenue is estimated at $100,000. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 136 ELECTIONS (CONTINUED) 1000-11200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of voter transactions 378,961 358,286 442,886 Revenue generated from elections $96,177 $230,000 $100,000 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.215 0.205 0.187 Per capita cost (county support) $6.77 $4.43 $6.54 Transactions per FTE 75,792 71,657 88,577 Goal ES6: Ensure that every eligible voter is given the opportunity to vote either through Vote Center voting, Mail -In Ballots, Early voting or Provisional voting. Register all voters that have a desire to vote and allow them to cast a ballot at the time of the election. Provide a Vote Center that is organized, safe and free of influence. Maintain a staff of highly -trained professionals who have the responsibility for the administration of the election office and all duties charged to the office. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ES6-1: Opportunities for every eligible registered voter to conveniently cast a vote 100% of vote centers are ADA compliant 100% 100% 100% ES6-2: Votes counted and reported accurately and in a timely manner 100% accuracy between votes cast and votes reported 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% ES6-3: Integrity of voter records maintained 100% accuracy between votes cast and votes reported 100% 100% 100% ES6-4: Educated voters Measured by the percent of voter turn -out 91.6% 60% 75% ES6-3: Voter Press Releases 9 8 8 Outreach Direct Mailings 7 3 8 Website announcements 4 4 4 137 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CLERK AND RECORDER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Vehicle - - 1000-11300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Motor Vehicle collects registration fees, specific ownership tax, sales tax, and files chattel mortgages on motor vehicles, processes title applications, maintains files on all titles and license plates issued in Weld County, and provides law enforcement agencies with vehicle registration information. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,524,398 $ 1,567,166 $ 1,567,166 $ 1,567,166 Supplies 12,451 14,720 14,720 14,720 Purchased Services 147,476 140,521 155,521 155,521 Fixed Charges 29 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,684,354 $ 1,723,407 $ 1,738,407 $ 1,738,407 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1,684,354 $ 1,723,407 $ 1,738,407 $ 1,738,407 Budgeted Positions 32 Full-time 4 Part-time 32 Full-time 4 Part-time 32 Full-time 4 Part-time 32 Full-time 4 Part-time SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Postage was increased $15,000 due to postage rate increases. No other line item changes. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 138 MOTOR VEHICLE (CONTINUED) 1000-11300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of titles/registrations issued 493,544 479,330 527,263 FORT LUPTON BRANCH OFFICE: Number of marriage licenses issued 172 108 119 DEL CAMINO BRANCH OFFICE: Number of marriage licenses issued 258 202 222 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita — DMV 1.37 1.31 1.19 Per capita cost $7.22 $7.07 $6.49 Number of titles/registrations issued per FTE 15,423 14,979 16,477 Goal ES7: Ensure every motor vehicle is properly titled and registered according to current Colorado laws. To be accountable and responsible to the public's needs within the guidelines of the law. Ensure that the citizens receive professional, timely and quality service at all times. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES7-1: Receive documents for titling and registering 100% accuracy with indexing and verification Customer satisfaction 98% 5 complaints 99% 2 complaints 99% 0 complaints ES7-2: Educate customers (public, dealers, banks, title clerks, etc.) Press releases Website updates Posting of educational signs I 4 15 4 4 15 4 4 15 139 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: TREASURER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Treasurer - - 1000-12100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Treasurer takes custody of county funds, such as property taxes, and disbursing funds collected for the state, county school districts, municipalities and special districts. The Treasurer deposits county funds in banks in the county, and invests reserve funds as allowed by statute and approved by the Board of Commissioners. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 571,788 $ 601,055 $ 567,920 $ 567,920 Supplies 322,581 36,700 36,700 36,700 Purchased Services 205,874 229,862 246,867 246,867 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 8,440 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,108,683 $ 867,617 $ 851,487 $ 851,487 Revenue 2,384,738 2,250,000 2,650,000 2,650,000 Net County Cost $ -1,276,055 $ - 1,382,383 $ - 1,798,513 $ - 1,798,513 Budgeted Positions 10 10 10 10 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Salaries were reduced by $33,135 through retirements and moving a full time position for collections to part time. Contract services for banking charges are up $17,005. Expenses overall are down $1,692. Revenues from Treasurer fees are up $400,000. Net county costs are down $416,130. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 140 TREASURER (CONTINUED) 1000-12100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 276M Collected 64M 97M 285M 330M 64M 64M 97M 98M .410 .375 $3.55 $3.18 Property Tax Collected Miscellaneous Revenue Investments Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .440 Per capita expenditure $3.53 Goal ES8: To provide County treasury and tax collection services in the most accurate, efficient and cost- effective manner possible. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES8-1: Effective and cost-efficient County tax collection Cost per tax bill Number of tax bills per FTE Redistribute certain inefficient seasonal work to existing staff $5.14 17,333 $5.13 17,333 $5.13 17,400 ES8-2: Investments that are safe, liquid and deliver the best yield possible — in that order Return on investments 2.42% 2.40% 2.40% 141 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: ASSESSOR'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Assessor's Office - - 1000-13100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Assessor's Office discovers and lists all real and personal property in Weld County; maintains accurate public records, including ownership history, parcel values and parcel maps; completes appraisals of all real and personal property using statutory mandates and mass appraisal techniques; completes statutory reports and certifications for Weld County taxing authorities for use in the property tax system; and completes and delivers an accurate tax warrant to the Treasurer for collection of property taxes. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,031,634 $ 2,225,267 $ 2,070,861 $ 2,070,861 Supplies 505,376 61,296 61,296 61,296 Purchased Services 120,513 233,500 173,200 173,200 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,657,523 $ 2,520,063 $ 2,305,357 $ 2,305,357 Revenue 85,183 75,000 75,000 75,000 Net County Cost $ 2,572,340 $ 2,445,063 $ 2,230,357 $ 2,230357 Budgeted Positions 37.5 37.5 33.5 33.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Assessor reduced one Office Tech III (Grade 15), two Data Collector positions (Grade 15) and one Residential Appraisal position (Grade 25). The net savings is $154,406. Due to 2010 not being a reappraisal year, Purchased Services were reduced $60,300 in postage, printing, and other professional services. Net county costs are down $214,706. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 142 ASSESSOR (CONTINUED) 1000-13100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of parcels (including personal property and SA) 196,743 199,405 203,377 Telephone Calls Answered 30,000 30,000 30,000 Number of administrative updates to database 148,000 140,000 140,000 Number of walk-ins requesting assistance 2,500 3,000 2,500 Number of Property Inspections 8,000 8,000 8,000 Sales Verification 11,000 8,000 8,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Cost per parcel Parcels Per FTE 1.65 $10.14 $13.07 5,246 1.53 $9.12 $12.26 65,318 1.25 $8.32 $10.97 6,877 Goal ES9: Correctly discover, list, value, and defend values for property taxes for Weld County taxing authorities. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ADJUST ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES9-l: Effective County property valuation Complete submission of the tax warrant by the January 10th statutory date Compliance with all statutory deadlines and requirements Successful report on the annual study audit for Assessors Done Done Done Done Done Done Planned to Achieve Planned to Achieve Planned to Achieve ES9-2: User friendly e- government sharing for assessment and property data Percent of users satisfied with electronic/technology access to services and information Percent of operations, services and programs available through website access N/A N/A N/A N/A 95% 95% 143 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COUNTY COUNCIL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Council - - 1000-14100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Weld County's Home Rule Charter provides for a five member unsalaried County Council chosen in non-partisan elections. Major responsibilities of the Council are setting salaries of all elected officials, filling vacancies in the Board of County Commissioners, reviewing county government and making periodic reports to the citizens, and authorizing an increased levy in ad valorem taxes if requested by the County Commissioners. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 10,210 $ 21,001 $ 21,001 $ 21,001 Supplies 428 400 300 300 Purchased Services 3,118 43,470 33,840 33,840 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 13,756 $ 64,871 $ 55,141 $ 55,141 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 13,756 $ 64,871 $ 55,141 $ 55,141 Budgeted Positions 1 PT 1 PT 1 PT 1 PT SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Reductions were made in office supplies ($100) and professional services ($9,730) for a total reduction of $9,830. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.043 0.041 0.037 Per capita cost (county support) $0.131 $0.266 $0.206 144 SEVEN YEAR TREND District Attorney 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 145 SEVEN YEAR TREND District Attorney Local Cost 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 N 2 0 2.5 J 2 1.5 0.5 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 t 2009 2010 146 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: District Attorney - - 1000-15100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Prosecutes crimes upon complaints of citizens or investigation and complaint of law enforcement agencies; answers all criminal complaints of the people; handles such civil matters as juvenile actions, and non-support actions; serves as attorney for all county officers except the County Commissioners; handles consumer fraud and welfare fraud complaints. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,071,344 $ 4,407,734 $ 4,382,342 $ 4,382,342 Supplies 104,774 75,000 75,000 75,000 Purchased Services 199,397 286,000 270,800 270,800 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 4,375,515 $ 4,768,734 $ 4,728,142 $ 4,728,142 Revenue 185,893 300,997 282,590 282,590 Net County Cost $ 4,189,622 $ 4,467,737 $ 4,445,552 $ 4,445,552 Budgeted Positions 57.375 60.375 58.375 58.375 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services include the elimination of one Office Tech III position in the Investigation Unit. A request to upgrade an Office Tech III to Office Tech IV is included to maintain parity with other positions. A Chief Deputy District Attorney position was on the manning document, but not funded. That position has been taken off the manning document. In 2008 the DA secured a federal grant in the amount of $223,587. The grant funds a Chief Deputy District Attorney position in charge of gang prosecutions which was added in 2009. The grant will pay $100,090 of the $127,570 for the position in 2010. The county will have to decide in the 2011 budget process whether to continue funding the position 100% with county funds in 2011. Reductions were made in vehicle expenses ($8,200), and travel and meetings ($7,000). In the Motor Pool budget unit a new replacement vehicle for an investigator is recommended. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The upgrade of the Office Tech III to Office Tech IV is recommended to maintain parity with other like positions. BOARD ACTION: 147 DISTRICT ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) 1000-15100 Goal PSDA1: Systematic reduction of gang violence in our community. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSDA1-1: Increase incarceration for identified gang members 80% of identified gang members will receive sentences which include incarceration Gang Chief will take to trial 8-10 gang cases Goal implemented in 2009 89% 85% PSDA1-2: Increase public awareness of court successes against known, tracked gang members Press releases will be completed in every case where a gang member is sentenced to lengthy incarceration Press releases will be completed in every case where a gang member is convicted of an offense at trial Goal implemented in 2009 6 12 PSDA1-3: Educate the judiciary on defendants who are known, tracked gang members Gang sentencing motions will be filed in all cases where sentencing is left to the discretion of the court Goal implemented in 2009 7 15 Goal PSDA2: Systematic reduction of traffic fatalities in Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSDA2-1: Obtain incarceration for identified persistent drunk drivers 100% of identified persistent drunk drivers will receive sentences which include incarceration 100% 100% 100% PSDA2-2: Increase public awareness of court successes against persistent drunk drivers Press releases will be completed in every case where a persistent drunk driver is sentenced to incarceration Goal implemented in 2009 5 15 PSDA2-3: Educate the judiciary on defendants who are habitual traffic offenders Motions will be filed in all cases where sentencing is left to the discretion of the court detailing the defendant's driving history Goal implemented in 2009 Defendant's Driving History presented to the court in 100% of cases 100% PSDA2-4: Active participation in Weld County and statewide DUI task force Identification of all HTO defendants in Weld County for targeted enforcement Suggest on -going legislative changes necessary to accomplish the above goals DUI Intern identified all known HTO defendant in Weld County Effort is ongoing through the Weld and Statewide DUI task forces Continued efforts through DUI task forces 148 DISTRICT ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) 1000-15100 Goal PSDA3: Reduction of recidivism of charged offenders. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSDA3-1: Reduction of juvenile offenders before and after adjudication 20% reduction in recidivism by juvenile offenders within 1 year 96% 95% successful completion of Juvenile Diversion 95% successful completion of Juvenile Diversion PSDA3-2: Reduce DUI recidivism rates 10% reduction in DUI recidivism within one year Statistics not available Statistics will be available through the DUI court beginning at the end of 2009 Statistics to be compiled through the DUI court, whose implementation is pending PSDA3-3: Increased sentences for habitual offenders The District Attorney's Office will identify and prosecute 10-12 habitual criminal cases annually 3 cases concluded, 6 still pending 2 completed, 14 still pending 10 Goal PSDA4: Increase communication with the public and other customers of the District Attorney's Office. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSDA4-1: Increased community awareness of information resources Increased level of community satisfaction with information sharing and accessibility of information NA NA NA PSDA4-2: Reduction of complaints regarding lack of timely communication Elimination complaints regarding communication NA NA NA Goal PSDA5: Reduction of paper files and duplicated data entry efforts. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSDA5-1: Elimination of "paper files" in lieu of electronic files All new files will be in electronic form by the end of 2010 Goal implemented in 2009 Division A files will be electronic by the end of 2009 All files to be electronic by the end 2010 PSDA5-2: Consolidation of data entry and scanning support staff functions Elimination of one FTE by consolidating support staff functions Goal implemented in 2009 One FTE eliminated NA —Goal Completed 149 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Juvenile Diversion -- 1000-15200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Reviews and recommends charges in juvenile cases to reduce the juvenile caseloads for the Courts and Probation. Counseling component provides supervision, counseling, apology letter to victim, restitution payments, community service hours, and a variety of groups and other services to juvenile offenders who would otherwise be prosecuted through the Courts. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 116,233 $ 82,245 $ 75,231 $ 75,231 Supplies 1,288 2,000 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 450 1,000 1,250 1,250 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 117,971 $ 85,245 $ 78,481 $ 78,481 Revenue 72,857 63,934 57,085 57,085 Net County Cost $ 45,114 $ 21,311 $ 21,396 $ 21,396 Budgeted Positions 3.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Spanish language interpreter position has been reduced from 20 hours/week to 10 hours/month. Grant funding has been reduced to $57,085. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Concur with reduced hours for the interpreter. The State of Colorado may reduce the grant funding for this program due to its budget situation. If the state reduces the funding it is recommended that the county reduce the program accordingly. The loss of the program will impact the courts more than the DA with approximately 120 cases per year. BOARD ACTION: GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See District Attorney goals at the end of budget unit 1000-15100. 150 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Victim Witness Assistance -- 1000-15300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides services for victims of crime through the Federal Victims of Crime Act, Victim Assistance Law Enforcement, Crime Victim Compensation and the Victims Rights Amendment. The program provides services to all victims/witnesses involved in cases being prosecuted through the District Attorney's Office. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 517,793 $ 580,082 $ 608,791 $ 608,791 Supplies 4,774 15,000 12,000 12,000 Purchased Services 44,150 22,135 22,135 22,135 Fixed Charges 911,253 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,477,970 $ 617,217 $ 642,926 $ 642,926 Revenue 1,220,260 306,941 345,107 345,107 Net County Cost $ 257,710 $ 310,276 $ 297,819 $ 297,819 Budgeted Positions 10.375 11.375 11.75 11.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Additional VALE grant dollars allow for a Victim/Witness Assistant position at 30 hours per week at Grade 24, Step 1 to move to full time at Grade 24, Step 2. Increased health insurance costs are also included. Small items of equipment were reduced by $3,000. No other changes. Revenue for the program comes from the following: VALE grant ($107,383); VOCA grant ($35,418); VAWA grant ($14,972); VALE administrative funds ($104,164); and COMP administration funds ($83,170). Total revenue is $345,107, up $38,166. Net county costs are down $12,457. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval, including the movement of the Victim/Witness Assistant position to full-time. BOARD ACTION: GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See District Attorney goals at the end of budget unit 1000-15100. 151 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: White Collar Crime Task Force - - 1000-15400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Task Force focuses on white collar crime committed by individuals against employers, businesses, banks, and individuals. The program is supported through donations from the banking industry. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 14,740 $ 18,500 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 19 1,500 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 14,759 $ 20,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 20,000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 14,759 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was supported through donations from the banking industry. The banking industry is no longer in the position to support the White Collar Crime Task Force and this program will be discontinued as of September, 2009. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Concur with discontinuing program, since donations not longer support it. BOARD ACTION: GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See District Attorney goals at the end of budget unit 1000-15100. 152 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Finance and Administration - - 1000-16100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides financial and administrative support to the Board of County Commissioners. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 308,885 $ 279,855 $ 461,818 $ 461,818 Supplies 2 250 250 250 Purchased Services 3,858 8,460 8,460 8,460 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 312,745 $ 288,565 $ 470,528 $ 470,528 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 312,745 $ 288,565 $ 470,528 $ 470,528 Budgeted Positions 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the transfer of the Director of Administrative Services position to Finance and Administration. The Director of Administrative Services position will become the Director of Finance and Administration in 2010. The current Director of Finance and Administration will move to a part time position (Director, Budget and Management Analysis) with reduced hours doing only the budget and special projects. All other line items remain unchanged. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The personnel changes discussed above are consistent with the succession plan to replace the current Director of Finance and Administration in 2010. BOARD ACTION: 153 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 1000-16100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Excess revenue over expenditures .0 02% 3.0% 3.0% Budgeted fund balance vs actual variance 6.1% 3.0% 3.0% Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 0.064 $1.34 0.062 $1.18 0.093 $1.76 Goal ES10: Ensure the financial viability of the County through sound financial management practices. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 10-1: Sound asset management and financial investment strategies Number of audit exceptions Return on investments I 4.5% 0 3.0% 0 3.0% ES10-2: Plan necessary resources to meet current and future operating and capital needs (priority outcome) Percent of cash reserves 14.9% 17.0% 15.0% Goal ESl I: Deliver on promises and be accountable for performance. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 11-1: Alignment of services provided with community's needs and desires Percent of strategic plan outcomes with appropriate performance indicators Community satisfaction with value of County services for tax dollars paid N/A N/A 90% 90% 100% 90% 154 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Accounting - - 1000-16200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Is in charge of all general accounting functions. Must maintain and produce accurate records for departments' use to allow proper budgetary control. Maintains records for grants in the county, and assists in the annual audit by an independent auditor. Issues county warrants and provides budgetary control by processing supplemental appropriations, etc. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 466,397 $ 475,299 $ 475,299 $ 475,299 Supplies 144,079 97,000 97,000 97,000 Purchased Services 35,807 36,200 36,200 36,200 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 29,884 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 676,167 $ 608,499 $ 608,499 $ 608,499 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 676,167 $ 608,499 $ 608,499 $ 608,499 Budgeted Positions 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 155 ACCOUNTING (CONTINUED) 1000-16200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of Account Payable warrants issued 20,159 18,000 19,000 Average number of employees paid 1,515 1,500 1,500 Number of employees trained on General Ledger 140 200 Total County federal funds $49.0 $47.0 $46.0 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .278 .267 .243 Per capita cost (county support) $2.90 $2.50 $2.27 Account Payable warrants per week per NP FTE Employees paid monthly per Payroll FTE 1,449 1,450 283 269 200 300 1,500 Goal ESI2: Ensure the financial accounting of County funds is accurate. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ESI2-1: Compliance with financial laws and generally accepted accounting principles, etc. Government Financial Officers Association awards Complete submission of CAFR to required agencies by July 15° Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Planned Planned ES 12-2: Cohesive, standardized County -wide financial systems and processes Annual external audit has no major issues Achieved Achieved Planned 156 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Purchasing -- 1000-16300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Department is responsible for all purchases whether by formal bid, telephone proposal, or quotation; maintains vendor bid list for a I types of bidding; and seeks approval from the Board of County Commissioners on all bids. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 133,266 $ 137,041 $ 137,041 $ 137,041 Supplies 272 1,550 800 800 Purchased Services 7,569 5,894 6,644 6,644 Gross County Cost $ 141,107 $ 144,485 $ 144,485 $ 144,485 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 141,107 $ 144,485 $ 144,485 $ 144,485 Budgeted Positions 2 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change in total budget. Line items have been reallocated to match expenditure patterns. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: BOARD ACTION: Recommend approval. PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Dollar value of Purchase Orders placed Dollar value of purchase cards Number of purchase cards issued Number of formal bids Number of Purchase Orders placed Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Cost per Purchase Order ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED $40 million $3 million 115 200 1,500 0.085 $0.605 $94.07 $40.5 million $3.5 million 100 195 1,200 0.082 $0.593 $120.40 $40 million 3 million 100 200 1,200 0.075 $0.539 $115.00 157 PURCHASING (CONTINUED) 1000-16300 Goal ES13: Ensure the timely acquisition of "best value" goods and services while maintaining integrity and inclusion DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 13-1: Streamlined and responsive procurement process 95% of internal users satisfied with overall service 90% of internal users satisfied with quality 95% of internal users satisfied with overall service 95% of internal users satisfied with overall quality 95% of internal users satisfied with overall service 95% of internal users satisfied with overall quality 98% of internal users satisfied with overall service 98% of internal users satisfied with overall quality ES13-2: Full and open competition Approximately $30 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research and/or change in the economy Approximately $30 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research Approximately $32 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research Approximately $35 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research E513-3: "Best- value" goods and services (price, quality, terms and conditions) Approximately $30 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts, results of market research, and/or change in economy. Approximately $30 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research Approximately $32 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research Approximately $35 million value or percent of cost savings from prior contacts and/or results of market research 158 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Human Resources -- 1000-16400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Created by the Home Rule Charter. This department is responsible for setting up employment policies, rules, job classification and compensation. Recruiting efforts managed by Human Resources, with assistance given as needed. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 581,243 $ 581,042 $ 380,856 $ 380,856 Supplies 45,781 127,250 127,250 127,250 Purchased Services 133,611 55,150 55,150 55,150 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 760,635 $ 763,442 $ 563,256 $ 563,256 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 760,635 $ 763,442 $ 563,256 $ 563,256 Budgeted Positions 6 6 5 5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the transfer of the Director of Administrative Services position to Finance and Administration. All other line items remain unchanged. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Transfer of the Director of Administrative Services to Finance and Administration is consistent with the succession plan to replace the current Director of Finance and Administration in 2010. BOARD ACTION: 159 HUMAN RESOURCES (CONTINUED) 1000-16400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Out. uts ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED positions (FTE'S) 1,440 1,420 terminated 180 14% 1,450 1,425 1,430 1,400 195 140 13.5% 10% 0.246 0.187 $3.13 $2.10 242 286 Authorized County Occupied FTE'S Number of employees Turnover Rate Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.257 Per capita cost (county support) $3.26 Personnel served per FTE 231 Goal ESI4: Attract, develop and retain an effective diverse and dedicated team of employees. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ESI4-l: Provide departments with best qualified personnel Using reporting system, days to fill positions, and time between advertisement and hiring of individuals N/A Less than 21 days. Less than 21 days. 14-2: Retention of excellent employees Using report system, show retention stats Lower staff turnover Employee Satisfaction Survey Participation in Weld County Wellness/Safety programs increased Health insurance costs lowered due to employees activities in Wellness/Safety programs Training programs developed leadership development programs available County -wide Full time support as needed. County -wide Full time support as needed. Turnover estimated at 13.5% Turnover — under 10 % 160 HUMAN RESOURCES (CONTINUED) 1000-16400 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 14-3: Workforce skills to support County priorities (leadership, customer service, fiscal problem - solving, etc) Track training employees receive Use system to tract competencies achieved Not currently Tracked Can use Excel or Access based database (to be developed) to track all training. Currently looking at PeopleSoft for this feature. ES 14-4: Achievement of performance targets Performance evaluations for all staff done timely Overall rating of employee performance increased each year Approx- 70% full time employees completed Not currently tracked Anticipate 90% completion first year w/new system to be tracked through PeopleSoft. Average 3.0 — 3.5 average, with the average actual performance improving year to year, causing average performance to actually be improved each year (meaning an employee who is an average employee currently and does not train or improve they may be below average the following year because the bar is always raised. ES 14-5: Human Resources to become "Value Added" to each department in the County Employee satisfaction increased Become the "go to" department Delivery of services increased and given on a timely basis Not currently tracked Measured through increased contact by employees and departments Needs of employees/managers, etc being met consistently Improved VALUE ADDED. 161 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Transportation - - 1000 - 16500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide minibus service to citizens throughout Weld County through a contract with the City of Greeley. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 393,597 $ 393,597 Supplies 0 0 26,500 26,500 Purchased Services 0 657,197 201,939 201,939 Fixed Charges 0 0 90,631 90,631 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 657,197 $ 712,667 $ 712,667 Revenue 0 509,863 575,500 575,500 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 147,334 $ 137,167 $ 137,167 Budgeted Positions 0 8.5 8.5 8.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The 2009 budget was developed anticipating contracting out the service with the City of Greeley, which did not happen. As a result, the 2010 budget reflects the budget requirements to do the program in-house. Salaries and fringe benefits of $393,597 fund 8.5 FTE's. Computer costs are $26,500. Contract transportation services for Medicaid clients total $12,000, vehicles costs are $101,139, depreciation is $84,000, miscellaneous items total $4,800, and county indirect costs are $90,631. $27,139 is the chargeback from Building and Grounds for supervision of the program. Revenues from CDOT are $153,000 and charges for services total $422,500. Net county costs are $137,167. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 162 TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) 1000-16500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Miles tracked Hours of service Efficiency Measures Per capita gross cost Per capita net cost 188,000 163,000 13,200 13,520 $2.696 $2.660 $0.604 $0.512 Goal TTI: Maximize the use and efficiency of the existing transit system on a County -wide basis. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Tl-l: Safe and reliable transit services and transit vehicles Improvement in rate of schedule adherence Increase in passenger satisfaction N/A N/A 95% on time Satisfaction Rating of 90% 95% on time Satisfaction Rating of 95% 163 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PLANNING AND ZONING BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Planning and Zoning - - 1000-17100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides the Weld County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners with research and recommendations regarding land -use decisions in relationship to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, issues permits, and administers zoning and subdivision ordinances. Assists Weld County citizens and jurisdictions with land use decisions and community development activities. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,047,129 $ 1,018,802 $ 850,033 $ 850,033 Supplies 30,096 30,200 25,400 25,400 Purchased Services 599,900 610,111 643,419 643,419 Capital 0 0 0 0 Contra Account - 90,948 - 90,049 - 90,049 - 90,049 Gross County Cost $ 1,587,076 $ 1,569,064 $ 1,428,803 $ 1,428,803 Revenue 367,389 355,000 355,000 355,000 Net County Cost $ 1,219,687 $ 1,214,064 $ 1,073,803 $ 1,073,803 Budgeted Positions 17 13 11 11 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Board eliminated GIS/Planning Tech position in April, 2009 for a savings of $57,680 in personnel costs. In August, 2009 a vacant Planner III position was eliminated through the sunset review process for a savings of $88,322. The Long Range Planner will pick up the caseload of the Planner III position and was reclassified as a Planner III position. Due to drop in activity there were reductions made in supplies ($5,237), postage ($2,000), printing (41,315), Southwest Administration Office phones ($3,000), vehicle costs ($4,000), training ($1,000), and meeting expenses ($2,000). Added revenue from a pre -application fee in the amount of $20,000 is not included in the budget since the Board has not approved the fee. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The reductions in positions and expense line item are appropriate due to the drop in activity. The pre - application fee is a policy issue for the Board. BOARD ACTION: 164 PLANNING AND ZONING (CONTINUED) 1000-17100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Current Planning Work Outputs Number of total applications submitted Number of administrative land use cases Long Range Work Outputs Special Projects Number of Intergovernmental Agreements Code Revisions Comp Plan Amendments Technical Support Work Outputs Total Public Hearings Average length of hearings Compliance Planning Work Outputs Number of site visits Number of violations issued Number of violations to County Attorney Average number of District Court hearings Number of Community Clean-ups Liquor License Files 3.5 hours 950 350 115 30 2 50 350 277 250 275 230 200 12 12 5 4 3 2 4 2 12 4 2 2 120 100 108 2.5 hours 1.5 hours 800 300 120 30 1 50 960 376 110 30 2 50 Goal LUI: Increase effectiveness by maintaining regular communication with the public, outside agencies, Court departments, County Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners - - providing information about land use issues and responding to requests for research. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU1-1: Improved community access to land use trend information and services A re -designed long range planning home page on the website, with annual revisions Meet requests from the public to speak about county land use trends or policies n/a 90% of speaking engagements are accepted n/a 90% of speaking engagements are accepted 100% 90% of speaking engagements are accepted 165 PLANNING AND ZONING (CONTINUED) 1000-17100 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LUl-2: Increased participation in annexations by unincorporated county citizens Minimum of one formal agreement for an enhanced notification process is established with a municipality n/a 1 1 LUl-3: Strong relationships with municipal planning departments and excellent knowledge of current regional issues Minimum of 8 group meetings with municipal planning staff occur throughout 2010 n/a 8 8 LU1-4: A well- informed and prepared Planning Commission Minimum of 3 Planning Commission training sessions throughout 2010 3 3 3 LI I-5: Adequate decision making tools At least one set of Code changes based on Commissioner direction are completed in 2010 100$ of special projects requested by the Board are completed 2 100% 1 100% 1 100% Lll-6: Recognition by the public that Weld County is an active and appropriate leader in regional land use The Weld County Annual Summit takes place Yes Yes Yes 166 PLANNING AND ZONING (CONTINUED) 1000-17100 Goal LU2: Plan for the long-term development of the County to ensure efficiency of services, to promote economical infrastructure investments and to promote positive connections to community among citizens. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/ICEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU2-l: Increased landowners' input into federal land management policies and better understanding of land use influences in the Pawnee Buttes area of the county County Commissioners adoption of the completed Pawnee Buttes Sub -Area Plan n/a 50% 100% LU2-2: Mitigation of the negative political, economical, and environmental effects of water migration Completion of at least one meeting with water providers during the year 1 I 1 LU2-3: Updated Regional Urbanization Area Plans Completion of any Comprehensive Plan amendments related to RUA's 3 1 1 LU2-4: Continued and expanded use of existing railroad infrastructure for industrial uses Completion of the North Greeley Rail Corridor of Sub -Area Plan Coordinate with GIS to complete a resource map by December 2010 50% n/a 100% n/a n/a 100% LU2-5: Limited impact on surface landowners from mineral resource extraction and exploration Revision to state laws concerning drill window management Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing 167 PLANNING AND ZONING (CONTINUED) 1000-17100 Goal LU3: Develop and maintain fundamental land use tools for use by the Planning Services Department, the county at large, and Weld County citizens. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU3-l: Useful population and development information Population and Development Report posted on the county website with data not older than six months at any given time n/a n/a 100% LU3-2: An up -to- date Urban Development Map Data relating to 100% of municipalities has been updated or verified one time in 2010 n/a n/a 1 LU3-3: Fair, equitable and adequate development impact fees Department's review of a fee analysis report completed by June 2010. Revised fee schedule, in relevant A report comparing impact fees among regional jurisdictions, compiled by December 2010 n/a n/a n/a n/a 100% 100% LU3-4: An updated Recreational Transportation Facilities Map Coordinate with Weld County Public Works, Live Well Weld County, and the Trail Advisory Group Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing LU3-5: Zoning and subdivision regulations that are improved in effectiveness and clarity At least one set of Code changes based on staff review are completed in 2010 Attendance by at least two staff members at a land use regulations web seminar or conference 2 2 2 2 2 2 168 PLANNING AND ZONING (CONTINUED) 1000-17100 Coal LU4: Provide consistent, quality, well planned rural and urban planning and development, and transportation development services. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU4-1: Increased infill development, located where public infrastructure is available Decrease urbanization of agricultural lands Support new non -agrarian development to occur within intergovernmental agreement area and urban growth boundaries Greater than 65% ratio of development within UGB, IGA, RUA vs. non -urban areas County Code to better specify this performance objective 1 9/40 USR 22.5% 13/13 SPR 100% 0 2/290 USR 10% 3/3 SPR 100% 4 10% 100% SPR LU4-2: Protect economically productive and viable agricultural lands (irrigated and dry land), riparian corridors (river and stream), and environmentally sensitive lands (Pawnee Buttes) Retain agricultural lands and related businesses in agrarian locations Maintain setbacks from environmentally sensitive areas and riparian corridors 3/40 USR 7.5% 9/40 USR 100% 0 PUD 2/20 10% 100% 0 25% 25% 3 PUD 169 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Buildings and Grounds -- 1000-17200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Maintains all county buildings and grounds in the fields of air conditioning, heating, plumbing, carpentry, painting, electrical, lawn and grounds care, furniture moves, snow removal, etc. Performs cleaning tasks in Courthouse, Centennial Complex, Head Start, Human Services Building, Social Services, South County Services Building, Public Works Headquarters, Ambulance Buildings, North County Jail, Health Building, Training Center, Southwest Weld Administration Building, Public Safety Administration Building, Alternative Programs Building, Community Corrections Building, and Weld Business Park Administrative Buildings. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,494,954 $ 1,534,608 $ 1,534,608 $ 1,534,608 Supplies 1,010,860 614,800 619,300 619,300 Purchased Services 2,191,413 2,989,253 2,759,953 2,759,953 Fixed Charges 13,533 17,000 17,000 17,000 Contra Account - 80,724 - 75,000 - 107,139 - 107,139 Gross County Cost $ 4,630,036 $ 5,080,661 $ 4,823,722 $ 4,823,722 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 4,630,036 $ 5,080,661 $ 4,823,722 $ 4,823,722 Budgeted Positions 24 26 26 26 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is down $229,800. In Supplies uniforms and clothing have been increased $4,500. Purchased Services are down $309,300 with a reduction of $239,000 in utilities with the drop in energy prices; a $300 reduction in printing; and a $70,000 reduction in repair and maintenance. $80,000 was added for the utilities and maintenance costs for the Community Corrections Building that will open in mid -2010. Rental revenue from the Community Corrections program is in the Non -Departmental budget unit 1000-90100 in the amount of $252,636. Charge backs to departments have been increased by $5,000 to $80,000, plus $27,139 was added as a chargeback to Transportation (budget unit 1000-6500) for the supervision done by the manager of Building and Grounds for a total of $107,139. In 2010 the department will maintain approximately 1,007,459 square feet of buildings at an average cost of $4.79 per square foot, which is very good by industrial standards. Most entities are in the $7.50 to $10.00 per square foot range. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 170 BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS (CONTINUED) 1000-17200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of square feet maintained 925,458 965,458 1,007,459 Number of preventative maintenance work orders (PMs) Number of tracked repair work orders Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Cost per square foot 475 500 1,500 525 1,600 1,700 1.03 1.07 $19.83 $20.84 $5.00 $5.26 0.97 $18.00 $4.79 Coal ES15: Plan, construct, and maintain well -designed County facilities in time to meet the needs of Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES15-1: Safe, convenient and accessible facilities planned and built ready to meet needs Percent of projects completed within budget 100% of facilities meeting ADA requirements N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ES15-2: Worker friendly and worker functional facilities 90% of internal customers satisfied with functionality of County facilities 90% of department users satisfied with quality and timeliness of facility management services N/A N/A 85% 85% 90% 90% ES15-3: Well maintained facilities 90% of citizens satisfied with functionality of County facilities N/A 85% 90% 171 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Information Services - - 1000-17300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Information Services provides data processing support services to Weld County and a few outside agencies via a contract with Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (ACS). RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Supplies $ 789,197 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 3,165,039 3,126,000 3,316,488 3,316,488 Fixed Charges 358 0 0 0 Contra Account - 835,231 - 1,225,000 - 1,400,000 - 1,400,000 Capital 617,997 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Gross County Cost $ 3,737,360 $ 2,901,000 $ 3,166,488 $ 3,166,488 Revenue 567,212 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 3,170,148 $ 2,901,000 $ 3,166,488 $ 3,166,488 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: On February 6, 2008, Weld County entered into a new seven year contract with ACS beginning January 1, 2009. The contract calls for a cost -of -living adjustment (COLA) based upon the Consumer Price Index with a floor of 3.5% and a ceiling of 6.0%. Therefore, there will be a 3.5% COLA increase of $109,410 for 2010 for a total of $3,235,410. In mid -2009 ACS assumed a GIS position in the contract for an additional cost of $81,078 in 2010. The total ACS contract will be $3,316,488. In addition, $1,250,000 in the 2010-2014 Information Services Capital Plan will be budgeted for software and hardware that will be allocated to 2010 projects by the IT Governance Board as a recommendation to the Commissioners. Chargeback to reimbursable departments total $1,400,000. The net county cost will be $3,166,488 which is up $184,410 from the current year's budget when the costs of the GIS position are taken into account. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 172 INFORMATION SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-17300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Number of Personal Computer systems supported Number of Personal Computer systems installed/replaced Number of staff trained Number of applications supported Number of applications upgraded Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1200 1,095 1,125 150 300 300 220 220 220 218 220 225 110 110 120 0.9426 0.9026 0.8580 $13.58 $11.90 $11.82 Goal ES16: Capitalize access and exchange. on technology to improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater information DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 16-1: Expansion of e - government delivery Increase in "hits" on the website Less phone calls to offices Less traffic in offices 8,700,000 8,900,000 9,100,000 ES16-2: County processes improved through information technology Imaged and electronically stored documents are more secure and safe from loss through fire and other disasters Savings from use of less paper and printer supplies Savings in staff time when data is readily and easily available Increased efficiency of staff Approximately 5,000,000 documents imaged Automated water sample and food inspection reporting Approximately 3,000,000 additional documents imaged PeopleSoft Employee Self Serve and automated Time and Labor Approximately 3,500,000 additional documents CTB Web module provides access to documents on the internet 173 INFORMATION SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-17300 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES16-2: (Continued) (Continued) Remote access to state immunization records Banner imaging (Continued) e -Discovery for DA Provide printers in Courtrooms e -Citations New Law Library Bar coding evidence from substations Online Burb permits Online health forms for clients (Continued) Accela Citizen Access Automated Phone Services Billing Accela Document Imaging Automated citizen complaint filing in Decade Web access of emergency notification system ES16-3: Easy meeting setup and electronic presentations Facilitate display of presentations in all County meeting rooms Eliminate time spent adjusting presentations and electronic equipment Hours were not tracked in 2008 Currently tracking and will report at year end Will track and report quarterly ES16-5: Responsive IT service deployment 90% of projects completed on time and on budget 75% of IT critical problems resolved within 4 hours 75% of routine problems resolved within 24 hours This information was not tracked in 2008 Currently tracking and will provide compliance reports at year end Will track and report to governance quarterly 174 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Geographical Information System - - 1000-17350 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Geographical Information Systems (GIS) provides the technical support for the development and maintenance of the Weld County geographical information system that serves the entire county and some outside entities via a contract with the ACS Corporation. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 57,856 $ 59,568 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 69,073 82,120 78,200 78,200 Purchased Services 112,040 58,800 12,451 12,451 Fixed Charges 0 15,391 13,550 13,550 Capital 0 43,299 42,500 42,500 Gross County Cost $ 238,969 $ 259,178 $ 146,701 $ 146,701 Revenue 29,553 20,000 20,000 20,000 Net County Cost $ 209,416 $ 239,178 $ 126,701 $ 126,701 Budgeted Positions 1 1 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The position in this budget last year was contracted with ACS mid - 2009. The costs of the position are included in the Information Services budget unit 1000- 17300 for 2010. The budget includes $42,500 for hardware, $66,800 for software, $13,500 for training, $11,400 for office supplies, $1,560 for phones, $600 for postage, and $291 for mileage. $10,000 is budgeted to participate with DRCOG on imagery update of that portion of Weld County in the DRCOG planning area. Due to the lack of development since the last mapping of the rest of the county no funds are included for imagery updates other than the DRCOG area. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. GIS staff and GIS Governance are in concurrence that new imagery beyond the DRGOG area is not warranted due the lack of development. BOARD ACTION: 175 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (CONTINUED) 1000-17350 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs # Parcels in Database 122,000 124,000 125,000 # Parcels Updated 2,800 2,500 1,600 # Available Coverage (Layers) in GIS 2,217 2,227 2,325 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.171 0.164 0.000 Per capita costs (County support) $0.90 $0.98 $0.55 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: GIS is a division of Information Services, see goals for Budget Unit 1000-17300. 176 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CAPITAL OUTLAY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Capital Outlay - - 1000-17500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central account for capital outlay items. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 50,000 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This central account for capital outlay items in the General Fund is no longer needed, since all equipment capitalized must be $5,000 or more in value the funds are being budgeted in the Capital Expenditure Fund. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 177 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Printing and Supplies - - 1000-17600 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides printing and supply support and courier services to the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 131,005 $ 120,470 $ 153,655 $ 153,655 Supplies 130,048 104,900 134,500 134,500 Purchased Services 62,596 123,700 103,300 103,300 Fixed Charges 625 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 324,274 $ 349,070 $ 391,455 $ 391,455 Revenue 329,287 280,859 334,000 334,000 Net County Cost $ - 5,013 $ 68,211 $ 57,455 $ 57,455 Budgeted Positions 2 2.5 2.75 2.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The gross county cost is up $42,385, but the net county cost is down $10,756 or 15.8%. Personnel costs are up $33,185 to move the courier position to 30 hours per week to accommodate the courier needs with the restructuring of the county transit system, and the added costs of health insurance. The increase in services and supplies is primarily attributable to a $32,000 increase in the cost of goods, printing and duplication ($15,000), and vehicle costs of $6,600. These increases are offset by a reduction in repair and maintenance for copiers by $44,000 with the costs shifted to printing and duplication and the savings from the new equipment. The added costs for cost of goods sold and printing are recovered through revenues from user departments. Sales of supplies are up $4,000, and charges for services are up $49,141 for an overall net decrease of $10,756 in net county costs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Increases are in response to user demand for more services, and are offset by added revenues. BOARD ACTION: 178 PRINTING AND SUPPLIES (CONTINUED) 1000-17600 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Print Orders Mail Pieces Supply Orders Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per Capita cost (county support) 2,400 2,500 2,750 640,000 670,000 700,000 1,400 1,450 1,450 0.085 0.103 $ - 0.021 $0.280 0.102 $0.214 Goal ESI7: Deliver timely, high quality, and cost-effective printing and supp y services to County departments. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES 17-1: User friendly printing services to meet expanding user needs 98% of users satisfied with quality and timeliness of services N/A 98% 99% 179 SEVEN YEAR TREND Sheriffs Office Local Costs $35 $30 $25 $20 U, z O J J_ $15 $10 $5 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 180 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary All Departments DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual budget units. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY (2008) BUDGETED CURRENT FY (2009) REQUESTED NEXT FY (2010) RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 22,985,548 $ 24,923,924 $24,612,869 $24,485,687 Supplies 1,393,501 880,458 788,967 788,967 Purchased Services 6,359,548 5,901,046 6,008,260 5,988,002 Fixed Charges 13,400 25,667 25,667 25,667 Capital 159,829 46,500 111,811 111,811 Gross County Cost $ 30,911,826 $ 31,777,595 $31,547,574 $31,400,134 Revenue 3,629,617 3,113,957 3,452,211 3,452,211 Net County Cost $ 27,282,209 $ 28,663,638 $28,095,363 $27,947,923 Budget Positions 349.75 357.35 359.85 357.85 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See individual budget units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See individual budget units. BOARD ACTION: See individual budget units. 181 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS STRATEGIC AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC SAFETY BUREAU Goal PSPSB1: oriented policing Adopt progressive solutions to deter crime and reduce the fear of crime unitizing community methods. DESIRED OUTCOME S PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/REY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PSPSB1-1: Reduce the number of repeat offenders arrested for the same or similar offences Minimum of twice a month crime pattern reports from the crime analyst Study past one year, six month, three month and one month patterns Assign team members to track sex offenders on two month basis The first two objectives are currently being done. The last objective will need to be worked up as a task for each district To continue with the projects and to assign them last task to members of each district This is an ongoing project and is evaluated monthly and revised as needed. The last task will be assigned and reviewed monthly and should start by the end of 2009 PSPSB 1-2: Enhance intelligent gathering Each Investigator will work with the crime analyst to track known offenders, probation and paroles in their area Work with the Drug Task Force on intelligent sharing The first objective is Currently being worked on with the crime analyst. The last objective is a hit and miss item The last objective will be assigned to the commanders to get updates for crime trac and to report there as part of their crime prevention measures. To have it up and running by the end of 2009 PSPSB1-3: Enhance the relationships between the community and the Deputies on patrol in an effort to build the community involvement and trust Minimum of one meeting per officer in their perspective districts per year All district officers are to be involved CRO's to be active in the planning of town and community functions and keeps documentation as to that activity To be done within the officers regularly scheduled work time Officers aren't currently working on this project but the CRO's have been working on these objectives for the past year. Will need to have training and expectations worked out for the officers to get them up to speed on this objective CRO's currently work on these objectives monthly. The patrol officers will be trained and knowledgeable in this area by mid 2009 182 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB 1-4: Reduce the number of false alarms within the county which will reduce the amount of time spent on responding to false alarms. Will allow time to be spent on enforcement issues. Crime analyst will run a monthly report indicating the addresses with 3 or more false alarms in a month. Deputies will meet with those responsible for educational purposes. Looking other methods that agencies are using to handle false alarm calls Look at other agencies polices for handling false alarms and implement any ideas that will work for our agency Nothing has been done in this area. Will need to work on procedures for accomplishing this area. This project will need several areas addressed and a determination for some type of reprisal for continued alarms. Project set to be running by mid 2010 PSPSB 1-5: Reduce the number of incidences of bullying among the 12 to 18 year of age population, and increase the self reliability of 12 to 18 year olds Development of a train the trainer program for CRO's and Victim Advocates 10% reduction in incidences of reported bullying by 12 to 18 year olds Currently there is no project set up for these objectives This will be a matter that the CRO's will need to train and work with the schools to implement To have this up and running by the end of the 2010 school year. PSPSB 1-6: Reduce the number of criminal episodes occurring on church properties; increased self reliance by the faith based community in case of a man made or natural disaster Development of training materials to assist the faith based community with becoming safer and prepared for an emergency 30% of all churches in the county implementing a emergency plan This project is currently being implemented. There is currently a commander that has taken this project and is in the process of addressing the receptive churches in the county. This is a complicated project and needs to have the cooperation of the churches. There is no real date for completion but is more of an ongoing project. PSPSB1-7: Increased the amount of available space need in an emergency; allow churches to work as information kiosks during emergency situations to disperse information to their communities Implement Memorandum of understandings with churches to utilize their buildings Develop information sharing strategies to the churches and out to their communities and memberships Same as above Same as above Same as above PSPSBI-8: Materials will be designed to notify individuals victimized by crime by their rights and the resource available to them 100% of the individuals victimized by crime will receive the brochure This is currently and expectation but is not implemented in all situations Will work on getting all patrol officers trained annually on the changes and updates on this objective This is a current expectation and is currently being address for 100% compliance. 183 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSBI-9: Crime will be reduced because those individuals involved in the most criminal activity will receive additional scrutiny The targeted individuals will be placed in the computer dispatch system 100% of officers will be aware of the flags and its meaning This has been implemented in several districts but is not agency wide at this time This project is being implemented by several districts and the impacts are being studied. The success of this project will indicate the need to have it implemented in other districts. Should have all officers and districts compliant by mid 2010 PSPSBI-10: Crime will be reduced because those individuals involved in the most criminal activity will receive additional scrutiny Constant scrutiny be law enforcement officers will interrupt the career criminals ability to commit crime Same as above Same as above Same as above PSPSBI-11: The establishment of a Regional Forensic Laboratory for Northern Colorado Brings standardization to how casework is done in Northeastern Colorado improving the efficiency Will provide necessary statistics as to what casework is capable of being done and where we need personnel and equipment This project is currently in the works with agencies in Northern Colorado currently sharing space and officers to accomplish most of the lab work There is currently a task force working on the budgetary issues as well as the cooperative agencies that will work out of the lab. The projected date depends on grants and other funding from the associated agencies. The projected date would be the end of 2010 or beginning of 2011 PSPSB l-12: The establishment of a Regional Forensic Laboratory for Northern Colorado Brings a full -service forensic approach to cases in Northeastern Colorado furthering our effectiveness Cases that are generated in Northern Colorado can remain here to be analyzed Same as above Same as above Same as above PSPSB1-13: The establishment of a Regional Forensic Laboratory for Northern Colorado With all disciplines being done under one roof, the shared resources will further help to increase productivity and efficiency Same as above Same as above Same as above 184 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB 1-14: OEM will coordinate quarterly Currently The plans are To have the Maintenance of the meetings for the LEPC being worked ongoing and initial documents County Local on by the ever changing. and committees Emergency Planning OEM will keep current records on OEM and This will in place by the Committee Tier II facilities. This information associated require updates end of 2009 will be updated annually agencies yearly Increase facility inspections from 8 to 16, this will be accomplished by the assistance from fire district personnel Comply will all SARA Title 3 and CERCLA Regulations from EPA PSPSBI-15: Provide reports to first Responders This is This project will This project Complete all NIMS at Chiefs and EMS council currently a continue to should be implementation meetings on NIMS implementation project that evolve given the ongoing given requirement for Weld and training the OEM requirements the issues County Government; coordinator the Federal mentioned. There ensure all agencies Schedule NIMS training classes has been Government is a requirement countywide are based on All- Hazards training, working on sets down each to have this NIMS compliant; Increase attendance of Human for the past year. It also completed by and Services Department personnel two years. It requires any certain levels of institutionalization changes each new personnel training with through the use of Attend training updates for NIMS year with or elected certain level of NIMS in exercises instructor certifications personnel as personnel to personnel. It has and actual events well as complete each changed in the All exercises will meet the HSEEP requirements year with the past two years Standards from the ongoing but the dates federal Government. changeover with personnel. were end of 2010 Goal PSPSB2: Strengthen community programs and foster additional community partnerships. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) PSPSB2-1: Better utilization of our volunteer's within Investigations Cold case unit Partnering with advocacy groups NIBRS Runaways Have more volunteers assist with the cold case unit Have investigators work more closely with advocate groups to develop a closer relationship Have the volunteers assist with runaways and NIBRS reporting 185 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB2-2: Better utilization of our volunteer's posse, and reserves officers within the police services area Scheduling of events such as town functions, community functions and county functions where the volunteers could augment the regular force Have reserve officers that are qualified to ride as a second officer or even as a single unit doing selective enforcement and selective call responses Call up list for volunteers so that activations for emergencies are quick and easy to get to activate Look into having a part time volunteer coordinator that can oversee these functions on a daily basis so that there is consistency in the application and utilization of volunteers Keep the volunteer coordinator involved in tracking the activities and reporting their involvement to the agency Volunteer coordinator efforts in bridging the gap between the full time officers and the volunteers so that there is more acceptance and buy in by each side PSPSB2-3: The ability to interact with more citizens in the communities through public venues where there are high concentrations of our public Set up store front locations within the malls and shopping areas of the county to facilitate community contacts with the public as well as the employees/staff on educational issues with crime prevention To contact and interact with a high volume of citizens Able to hand out and explain information on crime prevention programs and have one on one communication to answer concems or questions CRO's would document the hours and contacts either by verbal communications or hand outs PSPSB2-4: Better community involvement in crime prevention programs Establish citizen mobile patrol programs Conduct new neighborhood watch programs Conduct Citizen Academies Patrol programs to focus on the Hill & Park community Gauge the success of this program with the lower crime stats in the community Establish 8 new watch programs a year Hold 2 citizen academies a year PSPSB2-5: The Sheriff's Office will become an intricate part of these communities assisting them with emergency planning and training That the communities the Sheriff's Office is involved with become more self reliant, greater resources for the county and information distribution networks Identify communities within the county such as the individual business parks, faith based, home owner associations, schools, etc... and work with them to provide training to members, emergency planning, crime prevention, and contact lists The Community Resource Unit will establish 40 community network groups throughout the county 186 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB2-6: The Sheriff's Office and other government services will be able to provide specific information to community groups about issues affecting them Build e-mail routing groups for communities so that emergency, urgent and general information could be distributed quickly and economically The Community Resource Unit will establish 40 community network groups throughout the county, each with the capability to communicate electronically PSPSB2-7: Provide current information regarding chemical industries, and other sites of particular interest to Fire agencies and citizens Keep up to date records on all EMS facilities and current Risk Management Plans Work with the state CEPC on planning and training for EHS facilities and RMP's Provide training for first responders to incorporate the RMP of EHS facilities in their jurisdictions Maintain current records and review CAMEO reports on an annual basis Attend CEPC meeting to stay current with industry trends and changes to EPD regulations Attend CEPC Annual conference Schedule Hazmat awareness training for first responders to include updates on WMD PSPSB2-8: Cooperation with the Northeast All Hazards Homeland Security Region in identifying and assessing risks of critical infrastructure Work with the Northeast All- Hazards Region in the development of a CIPP for the region and Weld County Identify critical infrastructures in Weld County Develop a CIPP for Weld County Government by 2012 Recommend a CIPP for industry and work with industry to adopt the national standards PSPSB2-9: Encourage communities to complete vulnerability and risk assessments that identify their top three hazards Provide work sessions for communities to develop Risk and Vulnerability assessments Work with the Division of Emergency Management for grant funding for assessments Attend Mayors meeting, and Chief s meeting to discuss assessment needs Schedule Opportunities for local jurisdictions to participate in risk assessments briefing PSPSB2-10: Perform a risk assessment on the evacuation of special needs populations, including hospitals, care centers, nursing homes, and the home -bound Provide training to citizens for preparedness based on risk assessments Provide information to citizens about multiple warning systems in their community Work with ESF 6 to develop evacuation and shelter plan for special needs populations Work with ESF 6 to identify Shelter locations and needed equipments for shelters Provide training opportunities for Communities in Weld County on Preparedness and Planning Provide information on NOAA weather radios/ All Hazards Radios to citizens Provide Grant information to Communities to obtain finding for radios Coordinate with ESF 6 working group to develop a Special needs evacuation and shelter plan for Weld County by 2011 Work with Red Cross and the ESF 6 working group to identify and sign MOU's for special needs shelters by 2011 Work with Citizen Corps Programs and schedule training classes to communities on preparedness and planning Provide documentation on Grant opportunities and assist with the application process for communities and agencies that want to acquire All -Hazards Radios 187 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS Goal PSPSB3: Acquire sufficient personnel and equipment to support the growing needs of the County. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) PSPSB3-l: Remain current with manpower needs as well as relocation of Investigators to keep pace with the growth and crime rate Conduct manpower studies relevant to population and criminal statistics that are compared to national studies and allow for allocations Annual review would justify the need additional personnel to investigation or would relocate assignment deal with the issue PSPSB3-2: More efficient distribution of work load White collar unit Target enforcement unit Deal with the increasing number of white collar crime that takes large amount of time. This would free up other investigators. This would help reduce crime and help make the unit more effect PSPSB3-3: Become more efficient and effect in surveillance, to help reduce target crimes and criminals Different investigation vehicles By obtaining different makes and models of vehicle to would make the investigation unit more effect and efficient during hard surveillance PSPSB3-4: Remain current with manpower needs as well as district reallocations to keep pace with the growth and crime stats Conduct current studies that address compensation issues for all positions in order to fairly compensate employees and maintain a strong and experienced workforce. Pay benefits to be competitive with surrounding agencies. Conduct manpower studies relevant to population and criminal statistics that are comparative to national studies and allow allocations Develop a succession plan and hiring procedures to insure proper and timely replacement of personnel to maintain functional leadership Develop a plan to educate and encourage department personnel that promotes their professional image within the agency and the community Annual studies would justify the addition of personnel to the Public Safety Division along with indicating whether realignment of districts is needed rather than more personnel The annual studies are an ongoing project used to justify the needs of a growing community 188 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB3-5: Develop a Mead High School and Middle School SRO To place a full time SRO in both the New Mead High School and the current Middle School that will handle both schools as one SRO To have a percentage of the salary paid for by the St. Vrain Valley School District, Mead Town and Weld County Sheriff's Office The SRO would be a resource for the schools as both security, educational and backup officer for the Mead Contract officer The Mead High School opens fall of 2009 with a freshman and sophomore student body Have the SRO in place by 2010. Coverage until 2010 could be split with the District 2 CRO and the Mead Town Contract car until 2010. The SRO could be assigned town contract duties during summer months when school isn't in session PSPSB3-6: Insure that the appropriate personnel are performing to the highest level of effectiveness Combine the resources of multiple agencies under one roof for each of the disciplines currently done in Northeastern Colorado (e.g. Chemistry, Latent Prints, and Digital Evidence analysis) Increase the desired capabilities of each discipline by identifying equipment needs and implementing an equipment improvement schedule Brings standardization to how casework is done in Northeastern Colorado improving the efficiency Will provide necessary statistics as to what casework is capable of being done and where we need personnel and equipment With the appropriate tools in place, the effectiveness of each discipline will be maximized PSPSB3-7: Insure that the appropriate personnel are performing to the highest level of effectiveness Based on caseload, determine where any additional personnel are needed. The immediate as well as future personnel needs should be budget for appropriately Caseload dictates personnel. We want to continue to be effective to our service organizations by maintaining a turn - around time of one-two months at a maximum. This can only be done with appropriate man -power. PSPSB3-8: Remain current with manpower needs as well keep pace with the growth and crime rate Conduct manpower studies relevant to population and criminal statistics that are compared to national studies and allow for allocations Annual review would justify the need for additional personnel to the SWAT team Using the other Agency involved with the SWAT team to help supplement the manpower needs PSPSB3-9: Obtain mission critical equipment Conduct a study to ensure at the SWAT team /CNT team has all the Mission critical equipment needs are met Ensure that current equipment is sufficient to support the mission requirements Annual review of equipment to ensure it meets the needs and requirement of the SWAT/ CNT teams needs Obtain equipment to ensure that critical missions are met in a safely and effective manner 189 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB3-10: Remain current in all training and trends regards to SWAT and Homeland security Conduct training review Ensure that NIMS requirements are meet Conduct a training review ever two year from an outside source Conduct yearly training reviews from team leaders Review and ensure NIMS training is update and completed Send trainer to instructor level training to bring back to the SWAT Team PSPSB3-11: Obtain working agreement with agency from outside the county to enhance manpower needs Develop GIA's and MOU's with surrounding agency By the End of 2010 have either GIA's or MOU's signed by other SWAT teams outside the county to ensure critical mission capabilities are also met. This will also meet the Presidential directive (HSPD-19) PSPSB3-12: Develop mutual aid agreements and intergovernmental agreements with local, state and neighboring jurisdictions Working with local and state agencies to develop IGA's and MOU's for response to disaster emergencies Coordinate with State of Wyoming and Nebraska for MOU and IGA's for response to terrorism and disaster incidents Complete MOU's and IGA's in accordance with NIMS requirements and standards 9-30-2010 Work with the Office of Homeland Security in Wyoming and the Department of Emergency Management in Nebraska for the development of MOU's and IGA's that are NIMS compliant 9-30-2010 PSPSB3-13: Work with the Northeast Colorado All -Hazards Region, participation with the Eastern Colorado Incident Management Teams among the 11 counties with the ability to deploy to local, regional, statewide, or national emergencies In coordination with the NEAHR and the NCEM respond to incidents within the region based on the statewide IGA for emergency response Develop MOU's and IGA's as identified from planning meetings Respond to incidents when requested by the State for assistance as EM or LSC Develop MOU's based on long term planning needs all MOU's for the County will be filed with the OEM PSPSB3-14: Work with all EFS working groups to complete MOU's and AIG's for Alternate Care Facilities, Shelters and COOP planning Work with EFS groups to develop needed MOD's and IGA's that are NIMS compliant Meet on a regular basis with ESF groups for the development of NIMS compliant MOU's and IGA's Review current MOU's IGA's for updates by 9-30-2010 Goal PSPSB4: Increase personnel effectiveness and efficiency through improved use of communications and technology. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) PSPSB4-1: Obtain the ability write search warrant and arrest warrant from outside the Sheriff's Office Obtain lap tops computers for all investigators Air cards for the lap tops This will decrease the time spend on writing warrants and will be more effective than sending one Investigator to the Sheriff's Office to write the warrant while another controls the scene 190 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB4-2: Obtain the ability to read and view email and photographs while away from the office Black berry's This would enable Investigator to view email and other items while away from their desk. This would give them more time to contact suspects and victims. PSPSB4-3: Continued educations and training Excel training Internet tools This training would improve the ability of the investigator's to track large case and search suspect out PSPSB4-4: Keep Public Safety employees trained in the latest technology and information Continue to monitor the budget to make sure that there are adequate funds to send Officers to current and new training Develop a system for tracking and monitoring all officers training to make sure required training is current and any new or necessary training is aligned with the correct personnel Continue to test and evaluate new technology in the continuing search for the best product for the officer Training coordinator will monitor new training that comes out that is relevant, realist and required for officers A training tracking system will be monitored and updated by the training administrative assistant Indicate and list out those that have specialty areas of training so future reference PSPSB4-5: Continue to equip the Public Safety employees with the latest technology in both personal safety equipment as well as IT software and hardware Move towards equipping all patrol units with air cards so that emails with important information such as photos can be sent to the units in the field Continue to look at technology that allows reports to be sent car to car so that officers can send reports to supervisors for immediate review and corrections Develop funds to assist in the purchase of sharing records information between agencies, i.e. COPLINK Find effective methods for utilization of the Meth Grant funds which will enhance awareness of the Meth problem Keep all projects and requests current on the governance committees so that they are reviewed for completion dates or reminders for future projects PSPSB4-6: Strengthen external and internal relationships to provide the best forensic services that we can to the law enforcement community Research and establish a formal standard operating procedure for how each discipline currently communicates with their user agencies in Northeastern Colorado (e.g. how Chemistry, Latent Prints, and Digital Evidence analysis contact law enforcement and DA's) Utilizing the developed internal operating procedures for each discipline, establish and implement quality control procedures that will serve as an overall quality assurance program Effective communication with our user agencies will get them the product that they need in the most efficient manner. This will instill confidence in the analysts' competency. The use of standardized communications and technologies throughout the laboratory disciplines will increase our ability to give our user agencies the desired product and make it more uniform between the disciplines 191 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSSPB4-7: Insure that the appropriate personnel are performing to the highest level of competency Increase the desired capabilities of each discipline by identifying training needs and implementing an appropriate training schedule Based on caseload, determine where any additional training is needed. The immediate as well as future training needs should be budgeted for appropriately. Staying current in the latest trends and technology will increase our analysts' capabilities Highly trained analysts will provide the most competent and effective service Disciplines and analysis that currently have to be shipped out to another laboratory decreases effectiveness by increasing turn -around time. Striving for a full -service laboratory is the ultimate goal. PSPSB4-8: Maintain an Coordinate with State DEM for any Attend NECM and the NEAHR meeting All- Hazards emergency updates and changes to the State EOP to stay up to date on any changes or management plan and recommendations to emergency planning annexes consistent with the Hold annual update meeting with ESF state planning standards Working Groups for updates to the County Coordinate ESF meeting with County promulgated by CDEM EOP Departments/ Organizations to meet update schedules Coordinate with local communities to develop an All -Hazards EOP that meets the Attend quarterly Mayors meeting to State and Federal requirements provide information on emergency and All -Hazards planning for small communities PSPSB4-9: Provide Plan exercises with county departments Coordinate with LEPC and local exercises to fully test and and local agencies communities to plan exercises to meet evaluate the County annual required testing of plans Emergency Operation Exercises will test portions of the County Plan, Emergency and local emergency plans Exercises will test at a minimum; NIMS Operation Center Plan, NIMS Standards and the After action Reports will be developed standards, EOC operations and County Hazmat Plan. All exercises will be Continuity of Operations after the exercises to identify needed HSEEP compliant. Plan during a disaster changes to County plans response AAR's will be developed post exercise. The AAR will include an Improvement Plan to identify who and how the changes will be made. AAR's will be available 90 days after exercise. 192 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS Goal PSPSB5: Enhance traffic safety measures and reduce impaired driving related traffic accidents. DESIRED STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) PSPSB5-1: To reduce Continue to be an active participant in the Train 50% of all traffic and patrol impaired driving related Weld County DUI Task Force deputies in impaired driving related skills traffic accidents and tactics (i.e.: SFST training; Develop and present standardized annual Intoxilyzer Operator training; Drugs that training on topics related to impaired driving prosecution in conjunction with the Impair Driving; etc.) Weld County DUI Task Force Offer or host above training to smaller outside agencies within Weld County Conduct agency and multi -agency sobriety checkpoints Conduct/participate in a minimum of 6 agency or multi -agency sobriety Conduct agency and multi -agency sobriety saturation patrols checkpoints per year Increase public awareness on the dangers Conduct/participate in a minimum of 9 of impaired driving agency or multi -agency sobriety saturation patrols per year Overall reduction of DUI related accidents by 10% Work with PIO on press releases in conjunction with sobriety checkpoints and saturations patrols emphasizing the dangers of impaired driving Assist coalition partner, Weld County Drive Smart, in conducting a minimum of 8 High School PARTY Programs Assist Community Resource Officers (CRO's) and Victim Services in conducting "Every 15 Minutes" program at a county high school annually 193 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB5-2: Increase and enhance effectiveness of Traffic Deputies Train traffic deputies up to Traffic Accident Investigation (Level I) Train traffic deputies up to Advanced Traffic Accident Investigation (Level II) Train traffic deputies up to Traffic Accident Reconstruction (Level III) Obtain specialized training for qualified Level III traffic deputies Ensure that all traffic deputies have attended Traffic Accident Investigation (Level I) training Ensure that all Level I traffic deputies attend Advanced Traffic Accident Investigation (Level II) training Ensure all Level II trained traffic deputies attend Traffic Accident Reconstruction (Level III) training Determine and select Level III trained traffic deputies for specialized training (i.e.: Level IV training; Auto-Ped Reconstruction; Motorcycle Reconstruction; Auto -Bike Reconstruction; Articulated Vehicle Reconstruction, etc.) PSPSB5-3: Enhance Reduce the number of active 2007/2008 Reduce the number of Weld County traffic safety by outstanding DUI related warrants for Weld resident active DUI warrants by 25% removing repetitive County residents dangerous drivers from Build and assign outstanding warrant roadways packets to be issued to traffic deputies monthly Monitor outstanding DUI warrants for repeat offenders Work with District Attorney's Office to identify repetitive offenders, as well as Habitual Traffic Offenders, and targeting them PSSPB5-4: Maintain Meet requirements set by Division of Fire Attend instructor meetings and training NIMS Instructor Safety and FEMA for NIMS instructor held by Division of Fire Safety annually Certification through certifications Colorado Division of Instruct a minimum of three NIMS classes Fire Safety Meet NIMS training requirements as updated by NIMS Integration Center for county and local agencies Stay NIMS compliant Participate in the State Training and with updated required training from NIMS integration Center Exercise Planning Meetings Complete required NIMS training classes (NIMS 5 year plan) 194 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB5-5: Maintain Logistic Section Chief Certification with State of Colorado and Eastern Colorado Incident Management Team Meet training requirements for Logistics Section Chief Provide training opportunities for ECIMT Participate in Deployments with ECIMT Attend scheduled team meetings and training Host requested training classes for the ECIMT Attend the Colorado Wild land Fire and incident Management Academy in January and train with the Logistics Section Respond to deployments request by the State as needed PSPSB5-6: Obtain Meet training requirements for certification Complete required training classes to Certification as meeting Certification requirements Emergency Manager Meet application requirements for through Colorado Certification Publish articles in Emergency Emergency Managers Management Publications Association Teach Classes in Emergency Preparedness and Planning on annual basis PSPSB5-7: Comply with Meet required training for Homeland Attend required training for Homeland training requirements for Security Planning Security Grants with State and NEAHR State and Federal Grants Meet required training for Emergency Attend required training at FEMA Management Program Grant Emergency Management Institute Meeting required training for Energy Complete required online classes through Impact Grant EMI Independent Study Coal PSPSB6: Enhance professionalism and promote department excellence. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) PSPSB6-l: Provide the highest level of comprehensive Forensic Laboratory services Research and establish a formal standard operating procedure for each discipline currently done in Northeastern Colorado (e.g. Chemistry, Latent Prints, and Digital Evidence analysis) Standardizing how casework is analyzed will improve the efficiency of the discipline and will instill confidence in the analysts' competency PSPSB6-2: Provide the highest level of comprehensive Forensic Laboratory services Utilizing the developed internal operating procedures for each discipline, establish and implement quality control procedures that will serve as an overall quality assurance program Standardization throughout the laboratory disciplines will provide the ability to give accurate statistics and results. This, in turn, will provide increased confidence in the laboratory's quality. PSPSB6-3: Nationally recognized excellence in Forensic Laboratory Services Pursue individual certification for analysts in the areas of Latent Print and Digital Evidence Analysis In the eyes of the court and to other agencies, this will ultimately lend the most credence PSSPB6-4: Nationally recognized excellence in Forensic Laboratory Services The current ASCLD-LAB accreditation for local Chemistry Lab will be pursued for the full service Regional Lab ASCLD-LAB accreditation is a standard that must be met and should be an immediate goal to begin striving for 195 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS PSPSB6-5: Nationally recognized excellence in Forensic Laboratory Services Support the goal of employees sitting on national and regional boards This provides national trends and access to the latest techniques of analysis PSPSB6-6: Nationally recognized excellence in Forensic Laboratory Services Support the goal of employees teaching at the national and regional level With a highly trained staff, we can promote our abilities by having them train others PSPSB6-7: Receive funding from the Emergency Management Program Grant to support OEM Budget Continue to work with the OEM for guidance on funding of the EMPG Comply with all requirements of the EMPG Review annual program paper with DEM Regional Field Coordinator for compliance Complete application and receive funding of EMPG Complete all reporting documents each quarter Increase or maintain funding level of EMPG PSPSB6-8: Receive funding form Homeland Security Grants for Operational Equipment for OEM and Sheriff's Office Continue to apply for Homeland Security Grants Continue to work with the NEAHR Continue to work with NCEM Attend all homeland security grant meetings Coordinate all Homeland Security Grant application for Weld County Comply with all requirement for reporting and equipment use Attend all NEAHR and NCEM meetings for planning of Homeland Security Grants PSPSB6-9: Receive Grant Funding from other available grants to support EOC operations Continue to work with the Division of Emergency Management and DOLA to seek funding for grants to upgrade and enhance Weld County EOC Research other Federal Grant opportunities that meet the need for Weld County EOC operations Apply for grant funds from the State that allow for EOC operation advancements Apply for Funding from DOLA after disaster incidents to support EOC efforts Research and apply for Federal Grants that will help support EOC operations and advancements Identify technology that will enhance EOC operations 196 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS OFFENDER SUPERVISION B UREA U Goal PS OSB 1: To accept and lawfully hold prisoners in a safe, humane and wholesome environment that returns people to the community better, or no worse, than they arrived. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS OSB 1-1: Violence is managed effectively Reduce the rate of serious inmate rule violations for fighting, intimidation, threat of violence by 5% from the prior year Analyze and tabulate worker compensation reports to determine the frequency of staff injuries directly resulting from inmate acts during the next 12 months .339/inmate 10 .339/inmate 14 .322/inmate 14 PS OSI3 1-2: No incidents of inmate -on -inmate, inmate -on -staff, or staff -on -inmate sexual victimization 100% of sexual assault incidents are reported and investigated 0 infraction reports for serious rule violations related to sexual contact or sexual harassment 0 incidents of staff sexual misconduct 100% 33 2 100% 22 0 100% 20 0 PS OSB 1-3: No inmate deaths from suicide, self abuse or criminal behavior of another 0 inmate deaths from suicide, self abuse or criminal behavior of another 0 0 0 PS OSB 1-4: Living conditions afford adequate shelter, sanitation and basic essentials of life Establish program of regular unit health and safety inspections by June 1 2009 Improve health sanitation and safety inmate responses from prior year Reduce the rate of inmate grievances related to living conditions by 3% None 3.18/5 .107/inmate 85% 3.3/5 .096/inmate 100% 3.4/5 .093/inmate PS OSB 1-5: Activities and rehabilitative programming are available Increase work days time deductions by 5% over prior year Increase offender participation in the GED program by 5% over the prior year Develop release plans for 100% of inmates who are gravely disabled or have an identified special need 4829 days 36 100% 5374 days 38 100% 5643 days 40 100% 197 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY - ALL DEPARTMENTS OFFENDER SUPERVISION BUREAU DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS OS13 1-6: Staff is 100% of officers attending basic training well trained and developing professionally receive Aims College credits Staff receive a minimum of 16 hours in-service training annually 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% of officers have current CPR and First Aid cards 100% of officers meet PPCT proficiency standards 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% PS OSB 1-7: Staff are trained in jail vulnerability threat Facility is prepared for disaster and/or mass casualty event assessment by June 30 2009 Conduct two tabletop exercises annually None None 100% 100% 100% 100% Conduct one full drill annually None 50% 100% PS OSB 1-8: Collaborate with Buildings and Grounds to Provide necessary and appropriate technology, buildings and develop written building and equipment maintenance schedule by June 30 2009 Repair orders completed within 48 hours None 50% 100% equipment to deliver quality essential services Develop and maintain future 60 month secure bed need model and distribute to policy makers 50% 70% 90% every six months None TBD TBD Coal PS OSB 2: Maintain a continuum of effective jail alternatives that offer a range of sentencing and pre -adjudication options to secure custody. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS OSB 2-1: Complete snapshot analysis of jail bed 04/2009 01/2010 Secure county jail utilization quarterly to identify any change 10/2008 07/2009 04/2010 beds are available 10/2009 07/2010 for offenders who are a risk to community safety, likely to rccidivate and/or flee the jurisdiction Enhance role of the Weld County Criminal Justice Advisory Committee Conduct education/training with prosecutors and judges annually and individually for new appointees during interim Report jail occupancy percentage monthly 95.1% IN PROGRESS IN PROGRESS 94.6% 10/2010 96% 198 SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUMMARY- ALL DEPARTMENTS OFFENDER SUPERVISION BUREAU DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS OSB 2-2: Complete objective client assessment for 100% of Participants successfully comply with community clients Audit client supervision files monthly to insure 26.6% 37.4% 50% supervision without regression to secure jail custody minimum of 90% contact and supervision standard compliance 25% 50% 90% Report successful completion rates for each PTS-90% PTS-96% PTS- N/A program and the basis for regressions quarterly WR - 81% WR -85% WR - 85% HD - 97% HD - 97% HD - 97% Tabulate the use of intermediate sanctions with the total rule violations quarterly Unavail In Progress In Progress PS OSB 2-3: Enhance communication with criminal justice Greater participation and diversity of programming agencies. document and report contacts quarterly Monitor and report client days by type of client Unavail In Progress In Progress available and program quarterly Unavail In Progress In Progress Alternative programs utilization is proportional with, or increasing, relative to total secure bed utilization 49.2% 45.9% 50% 199 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Sheriff Administration - - 1000-21100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget unit supports other budget units within the agency. These activities include office automation, clerical staff, training, uniforms, common office supplies, accounting for inmate funds, commissary accounting/distribution to inmates, inventory control, etc. Policy development and formulation of written directives are also key functions of the Sheriff and the staff assigned to this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY (2008) BUDGETED CURRENT FY (2009) REQUESTED NEXT FY (2010) RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,134,799 $ 1,175,298 $ 1,170,298 $ 1,170,298 Supplies 174,077 136,660 136,660 136,660 Purchased Services 90,083 103,623 103,623 103,623 Fixed Charges 202 6,000 6,000 6,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,399,161 $ 1,421,581 $ 1,416,581 $ 1,416,581 Revenue 141,058 60,000 145,287 145,287 Net County Cost $ 1,258,103 $ 1,361,581 $ 1,271,294 $ 1,271,294 Budget Positions 16 16 16 16 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The only change in expenditures line items is a reduction of $5,000 in overtime. There is a significant increase in projected income from Concealed Weapons Permits from $60,000 to $145,287. This projection is in response to the increased number of permits issued, and the fees collected for processing. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 200 SHERIFF ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 1000-21100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs (2008) (2009) (2010) Civil Process Received 9,471 9,448 9,637 Invoice/Requisitions Processed 2,975 3,000 3,000 Applicants Processed 1,776 1,918 1,500 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .686 .656 .597 Per capita cost (county support) $5.30 $5.28 $ 4.74 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Civil Process Served 8,654 8,740 8,880 Percent Civil Process Served 91.37% 92.49% 94.43% Applicants Hired 58 50 50 Percent of Applicants Hired 3.8% 2.5% 2.5% Total Miles Driven Civil Process 114,588 116,316 113,000 Average Miles Driven per Civil Process 11.5 11 11 Complaints per 1,000 Civil Process Served 0 1 0 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau and Offender Supervision Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 201 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Sheriff's Operations - - 1000-21200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides field response to reports of possible criminal activity or threat to general public safety in unincorporated areas of county and within municipalities contracting for law enforcement service. Department provides crime prevention information and strategy education, serves civil process and arrest warrants, transports prisoners, and conducts criminal investigations. Activities are frequently coordinated with municipal, other county, state and federal law enforcement and regulatory agencies. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 6,000,318 $ 5,913,473 $ 5,801,792 $ 5,801,792 Supplies 297,849 243,604 211,019 211,019 Purchased Services 983,850 1,036,907 995,754 995,754 Fixed Charges 519 0 0 0 Capital 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 Gross County Cost $ 7,282,536 $ 7,228,984 $ 7,043,565 $ 7,043,565 Revenue 438,337 350,696 393,300 393,300 Net County Cost $ 6,844,199 $ 6,878,288 $ 6,650,265 $ 6,650,265 Budgeted Positions 77.75 72.75 71.75 71.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenues have been increased $42,604 due to an increase in the volume and the adjusted rate for civil process. Salaries were decreased to reflect the elimination of the White Collar Crime Investigator ($84,567). Increased health insurance costs are included the recommended budget ($44,627). Other line items being decreased to meet the target number for the 2010 budget were overtime ($27,114), small items of equipment ($10,054), vehicle maintenance and repair ($30,590), out of town travel and meetings ($14,354), and officer training ($30,590). FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Concur with the elimination of the White Collar Crime Investigator, since the District Attorney will be discontinuing the unit as of September, 2009. BOARD ACTION: 202 SHERIFF'S OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) 1000-21200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs PartAOffenses 3,304 1,983 2,411 Part B Offenses 840 669 770 Adult Arrest 1,059 1,084 1,125 Juvenile Arrest 98 96 97 Dispatched Calls for Service 52,354 54,276 59,128 Temporary Restraining Orders Received 577 561 522 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 3.12 2.98 2.68 Per capita net cost $29.32 $28.22 $24.82 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriffs Office Summary page. 203 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Traffic Enforcement - - 1000-21210 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide traffic enforcement on county roads, and public education on traffic safety. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 902,723 $ 899,690 $ 817,943 $ 690,761 Supplies 64,446 83,455 63,455 63,455 Purchased Services 102,004 134,331 123,652 103,394 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,069,173 $ 1,117,476 $ 1,005,050 $ 857,610 Revenue 111,833 130,000 180,000 180,000 Net County Cost $ 957,340 $ 987,476 $ 825,050 $ 677,610 Budget Positions 12 12 11 9 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The requested budget reduced personnel by one Deputy Sheriff ($72,207). The recommended budget reduces staffing by two more Deputy Sheriffs ($144,414). Overtime was reduced by $9,540. Health insurance increases are included in the budget. Equipment has been reduced by $20,000, but still leaves $38,113 to maintain equipment in good state. Training and travel costs have been reduced due to increased availability and opportunity to keep personnel within the state to attend specialized training ($550). Vehicle costs have been reduced $30,387 with the reduction of three officer three cars can be taken out of service. Amount included for fines was increased based on trends and in an attempt to keep a realistic estimate of fines derived through Model Traffic Code (MTC) citations. Proposed MTC Fine Schedule change will increase some of the revenue on some specific violations. We continue to feel some reduction of revenues with deputies required to issue State citations for violations involving: Driver's license; Vehicle registration; Insurance issues; or Speeding greater than 30MPH over posted speed. These violations require state citations to be issued and there is no recouping any revenues from the Department of Revenue. Also, deputies cannot split citations (issuing a MTC citation for one violation and a state citation of those violations). 204 TRAFFIC CONTROL (CONTINUED) 1000-21210 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The Traffic Unit has done a tremendous job in reducing traffic fatalities in Weld County since its creation a few years ago. However, in the budget review process done by the Board earlier this year there were issues raised about striking a balance between Colorado State Patrol's (CSP) responsibility to do traffic enforcement and the county's. The CSP has added officers in this region at the same time the county has increased traffic enforcement officers. The issue is service level. Having the Traffic unit does create a deterrent for drivers not to break traffic laws. The consensus of the Board was that three officers could be reduced without adversely impacting service and public safety. As a result, three officers have been reduced. It should be noted that based upon manning documents, the traffic Unit has had two vacancies in traffic officer positions much of 2009. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2008 2009 2010 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs MTC Tickets Issued State Tickets Issued Accident Reports Investigated Enforcement Hours Alcohol Related Driving Arrests Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita net cost 2,555 2,575 3,174 2,099 2,150 1,839 573 504 464 15,743 27,768 25,454 277 304 304 .514 .492 .336 $4.10 $4.05 $2.49 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau and Offender Supervision Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 205 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contract Services - - 1000-21220 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides law enforcement services for contract towns, Weld Central High School and Aims Community College. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 310,600 $ 472,909 $ 538,632 $ 538,632 Supplies 184,354 0 4,182 4,182 Purchased Services 51,993 66,154 74,104 74,104 Fixed Charges 0 0 Capital 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 546,947 $ 539,063 $ 616,918 $ 616,918 Revenue 514,561 561,733 648,173 648,173 Net County Cost $ 32,386 $ (22,670) $ (31,255) $ (31,255) Budgeted Positions 3.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services is being adjusted to reflect the addition of 0.5 FTE to serve as the school resource officer for the St. Vrain School District at a school being built in the Town of Mead. Supplies are being increased by a total of $4,182. This amount is composed of $4,022 to purchase a hand held radio for the Mead school resource officer and $161 to replenish expendable office supplies consumed by unit members. Purchased Services is being increased by $7,950 due to vehicle expenses associated with the addition of the .5 FTE to serve as the Mead school resource officer. Operation of the Contract Services Unit is projected to provide a surplus of $31,255 to Weld County. The surplus helps reimburse the county for all of the capital outlay spent to establish the unit in 2007. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval, including the additional 0.5 FTE to service the high school Mead. BOARD ACTION: 206 CONTRACT SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-21220 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of dispatched calls 2,480 2,484 Number of Warnings issued 1,053 1,170 Number of Citations issued 58 52 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.34 0.27 Per capita cost (county support) $(0.09) $(0.12) GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriffs Office Summary page. 207 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Ordinance Enforcement - - 1000-21230 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides limited enforcement of Weld County Ordinance 88, as amended, pertaining to dogs -at -large. Animal control officers are only available on a limited basis. Deputy response outside the dedicated time is limited to cases where public safety threat exists. This unit is also responsible for handling all calls for illegal dumping of trash/waste within the county as enforceable by Weld County Ordinance. Animal control officers routinely collect illegally dumped items from county roadways and public property to ensure the safety of motorists traveling within the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 230,275 $ 230,055 $ 230,055 $ 230,055 Supplies 9,493 17,650 12,650 12,650 Purchased Services 208,639 212,324 197,361 197,361 Fixed Charges 0 0 Capital 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 448,407 $ 460,029 $ 440,066 $ 440,066 Revenue 1,235 0 85,000 85,000 Net County Cost $ 447,172 $ 460,029 $ 355,066 $ 355,066 Budgeted Positions 5 5 5 5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Supplies are being decreased by $5,000. This amount was a one-time increase granted in the 2009 budget for the procurement of one mobile data terminal for a vehicle and six protective helmets. Purchased services are being decreased by $14,963. This decrease is achieved by decreasing expenditures in Humane Society expenses ($11,991) and out of town expenses ($1,598). Revenues are being increased by $85,000. This revenue is received from the Solid Waste Fund. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 208 ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT (CONTINUED) 1000-21230 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of dispatched calls 4,613 3,960 4,158 Animals Transported to Shelter 954 852 895 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .2051 .2054 0.186 Per capita cost (county support) $1.89 $1.61 $1.33 Miles Driven per Call for Service 29.62 29.55 31.03 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 209 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Regional Forensic Laboratory - - 1000-21260 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The limited forensic laboratory is jointly funded by the City of Greeley and Weld County. The two entities also have agreements for services on a contract basis. The laboratory provides forensic analysis of evidence in drug and fire debris cases. The laboratory meets the stringent requirements necessary for accreditation by the American Society of Crime Lab Directors. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 115,513 $ 206,220 $ 206,220 $ 206,220 Supplies 44,975 25,000 24,200 24,200 Purchased Services 32,003 65,555 58,700 58,700 Fixed Charges 131 0 0 0 Capital 92,786 11,500 14,000 14,000 Gross County Cost $ 285,408 $ 308,275 $ 303,120 $ 303,120 Revenue 78,142 117,960 115,383 115,383 Net County Cost $ 207,266 $ 190,315 $ 187,737 $ 187,737 Budget Positions 1 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The capital purchase of an expansion of memory for the forensic server from 6.5Tb to 20Tb of storage capacity totaling $14,000 is included in the budget. Professional Services will increase from $4,855 to $10,000 to reflect a service contract for the latent print section's AFIS terminal. Training will decrease from $41,000 to $29,000. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 210 REGIONAL FORENSIC LABORATORY (CONTINUED) 1000-21260 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Cases/items completed — drugs & arson 124/329 140/290 140/290 Court Testimony 7 3-5 3-5 Hours of Lab Analysis — drugs & arson 442 360 360 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .043 .082 .075 Per capita cost (county support) $0.888 $0.781 $0.701 Effectiveness Measures (desired results Quality Audit 1 1 1 Proficiency Testing (Test Run/Errors) 2/0 2/0 2/0 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 211 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Victim Advocate Services - - 1000-21300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides service for victims of crime through Victim Assistance (VALE/VOCA) funding. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 87,681 $ 107,803 $ 107,803 $ 107,803 Supplies 16,922 6,400 6,400 6,400 Purchased Services 8,664 34,819 33,819 33,819 Fixed Charges 0 0 Capital 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 113,267 $ 149,022 $ 148,022 $ 148,022 Revenue 80,152 82,468 82,468 82,468 Net County Cost $ 33,115 $ 66,554 $ 65,554 $ 65,554 Budgeted Positions 2 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Two cars were purchased in 2009 for the Victim's Advocate Unit. Adjustments were made to cover a more realistic cost for fuel and maintenance by reducing the budget by $1,000. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 212 VICTIM ADVOCATE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-21300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of victims and witnesses served 1,539 1,288 Number of VALE grants administered 1 1 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.078 0.082 Per capita cost (county support) $0.273 $0.27 1,293 1 0.075 $0.24 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 213 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Multi -Jurisdictional Drug Task Force - - 1000-21410 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Multi -Jurisdictional Drug Task Force provides drug interdiction by overt and covert investigation throughout Weld County. This is the only drug or narcotics unit for any law enforcement agency in Weld County. Task Force personnel are directly supervised by the Greeley Police Department with policy and strategic direction from a Control Group of area chiefs and the Sheriff. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 84,157 $ 95,012 $ 95,012 $ 95,012 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 70,248 70,248 70,248 70,248 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 154,405 $ 165,260 $ 165,260 $ 165,260 Revenue 13,046 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 141,359 $ 165,260 $ 165,260 $ 165,260 Budgeted Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The above projected numbers reflect the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. We have been approved and are operating on the grant commencing October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. We will be requesting another grant to operate the 12 month period commencing October 1, 2009. This grant has been operating for the past several years with the assistance of less than 15% federal funding. The Weld County Task Force Board has met and discussed impacts. The goal was to be working towards self funding from all Weld County Agencies during the grant period in 2007 in preparing for the closing of the federal grant program. In 2006, Weld County increased funding to cover 50% of the assigned investigator with the goal of covering the full salary of the investigator in 2007 and this did occur. The above figures reflect the projected cost to the County to operate without grant assistance for 2010. Although there is a strong chance we will lose funding from our current grant, we are seeking additional funding from the HIDA grant. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 214 MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE (CONTINUED) 1000-21410 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Criminal Cases Opened 185 180 180 Drug Arrests 154 160 150 Search Warrants Executed 28 25 25 Cocaine Seizures (Kilos) 14.17 14.0 7.0 Methamphetamine Seizures (Pounds) 7.36 7.0 7.0 Marijuana Seizures (Pounds) 672 100 100 Meth Lab Seized 4 6 5 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita $0.044 $0.041 $0.037 Per capita cost (county support) $0.69 $0.68 $0.67 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 215 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: North Jail Complex - - 1000-24410 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The North Jail is a secure adult detention facility for offenders awaiting adjudication or serving court sentences. Colorado Statutes require the Sheriff to receive and safely keep all adult prisoners lawfully committed and hold them in a clean, wholesome, safe, and well -maintained jail. Professional jail support services such as medical care, food preparation, and facility programming are provided to meet these mandates. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 11,870,074 $ 13,227,993 $ 13,418,046 $ 13,418,046 Supplies 506,166 295,625 281,183 281,183 Purchased Services 3,467,512 3,477,652 3,827,987 3,827,987 Fixed Charges 10,926 16,867 16,867 16,867 Capital 67,043 0 62,811 62,811 Gross County Cost $ 15,921,721 $ 17,018,137 $ 17,606,894 $ 17,606,894 Revenue 1,450,381 849,000 859,200 859,200 Net County Cost $ 14,471,340 $ 16,169,137 $16,747,694 $16,747,694 Budgeted Positions 199.0 200.6 204.6 204.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Changes in Personnel Services are the net result of eliminating two commander positions, reducing budgeted overtime, and adding 6 correctional officer positions. This increases resources to expand jail capacity from 619 to 683 general population beds. The reduction in Supplies relates to the radio system being replaced last year as a one- time project that does not reoccur. Purchased Services increases reflect inmate medical service cost and food increases from both expanded capacity and general industry cost increases. Capital increases reflect the need to replace existing but obsolete fingerprinting and kitchen equipment. The small increase in budgeted revenue reflects increased jail utilization by local municipal courts. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 216 NORTH JAIL COMPLEX (CONTINUED) 1000-24410 COMBINED PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ALL OFFENDER SUPERVISION ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Avg. Secure Jail Population Daily 538 590 662 Avg. Work Release Clients Daily 182 151 198 Avg. Electronic Home Monitoring Daily 129 120 120 Avg. Pre -Trial Supervision Clients Daily 211 235 245 Total Offenders Under Supervision Daily 1,060 1,096 1,182 All Offenders Processed Into Facilities 16,108 15,950 15,975 Number of Offenders Transported to 19,967 20,813 18,000 Court Appearances New Correctional Officers Entering 30 Basic Training 60 30 Efficiency Measures Offender Supervision FTE's per 10,000 Capita 9.9 9.8 8.8 Per capita net cost $72.19 $75.75 $69.04 Avg. Medical Cost Per Inmate Daily $12.71 $12.20 $11.80 Avg. Food Cost Per Inmate Daily $3.17 $3.15 $3.03 Secure Facility Occupancy Rate 87% 95% 97% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Offender Supervision Bureau Goals on page prior to North Jail Complex (1000-24410) Summary. 217 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Centennial Jail - - 1000-24420 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Colorado Revised Statute 30-1-114(2) requires the Sheriff to assist the District Attorney and the Courts of record in the county. 94 CV 419, Div I, 19th Judicial District, August 17, 1994, ordered the Sheriff to provide security for the Weld County Courthouse. This budget unit supports the resources to comply with all of these requirements. C.R.S. 18-1.3-106 allows for the operation of jail alternative programs to be used by the court in sentencing, and C.R.S. 16-4-105 provides for the operation of a pre-trial supervision program. Jail alternative programs operate within this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,166,880 $ 2,501,274 $ 2,132,871 $ 2,132,871 Supplies 82,834 58,550 41,318 41,318 Purchased Services 876,559 648,171 466,350 466,350 Fixed Charges 1,622 2,800 2,800 2,800 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,127,895 $ 3,210,795 $ 2,643,339 $ 2,643,339 Revenue 749,074 915,000 892,000 892,000 Net County Cost $ 2,378,821 $ 2,295,795 $ 1,751,339 $ 1,751,339 Budgeted Positions 32 38 32.0 32.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the transfer of two entire programs, Pre -Trial Services (PTS) and In Custody Alternative Placement Program (ICAPP) to the Justice Services Department, in the amount of $453,072 across all budget categories; including four FTE's associated with those programs. Personnel Services was reduced an additional $106,946 by the elimination of two client manager positions in the Work Release Program. The utilization of Work Release has declined reflected further by reduced revenues from client participation fees. Decline in use is due to the high rate of unemployment making it more difficult for clients to find jobs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. See Justice Services (Budget Unit 24100) for discussion on the transfer of the PTS and ICAPP programs. Board approved the reorganization of PTS and OCAPP on June 29, 2009. BOARD ACTION: 218 CENTENNIAL JAIL (CONTINUED) 1000-24420 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Included in North Jail Complex (1000-24410) Summary. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Offender Supervision Bureau Goals on page prior to North Jail Complex (1000-24410) Summary. 219 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contract Jail Space - - 1000-24440 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide contract jail space for inmates in other counties' facilities due to the overcrowding of Weld County's jail. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 430,286 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 430,286 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 430,286 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Resources o expand on -site 'ail capacity have been requested in the next fiscal year. Assuming there are no additional unforeseen impacts on jail utilization in 2010, current projections do not indicate a need for contracted jail space to supplement on -site jail capacity. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES: See North Jail budget for details. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Offender Supervision Bureau Goals 220 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Office of Emergency Management - - 1000-26200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Develops, plans, coordinates emergency planning in case of either natural or other disaster on county, state, and federal level. Coordinates emergency response exercises for participants to evaluate effectiveness and improvement. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 82,528 $ 94,197 $ 94,197 $ 94,197 Supplies 12,385 13,514 7,900 7,900 Purchased Services 37,707 51,262 56,662 56,662 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 132,620 $ 158,973 $ 158,759 $ 158,759 Revenue 51,798 47,100 51,400 51,400 Net County Cost $ 80,822 $ 111,873 $ 107,359 $ 107,359 Budgeted Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Changes to the OEM budget for 2010 include an increase to the EMPG revenue from $47,100 to $51,400. Reductions were taken in small items of equipment and out of town travel. Due to the addition of the Mobile Command Bus and identified maintenance for existing equipment, $3,500 was added to the vehicle expense line for maintenance and fuel for the bus, trailers and ATV's and $3,900 more for depreciation of the vehicles. The overall OEM budget has been reduced based on reduction in estimated costs and increases to grant funding - - the EMPG covers 32% of the OEM budget. The EMPG funding will cover up to 50% of the OEM budget, if the OEM budget is reduced this will affect the ability to meet some of the training requirements of the grant. The EMPG grant has increased each year since 2005. The added revenue and drop in expenses results in a $4,514 reduction to the net county costs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 221 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED) 1000-26200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of drills and exercises 6 6 6 Number of people participating in drills 500 1,100 500 Number of inspections and/or reports 12 12 12 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .042 .041 .041 Per capita cost $0.47 $0.46 .45 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Public Safety Bureau Goals following Sheriff's Office Summary page. 222 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COMMUNICATIONS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County -wide Communications - - 1000-22100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides dispatch services for 22 law enforcement agencies, 18 fire departments, 2 rescue/ambulance departments, plus local government including public works. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 3,895 0 0 0 Purchased Services 1,966,925 1,651,896 1,502,506 1,502,506 Fixed Charges 6,000 4,800 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,976,820 $ 1,656,696 $ 1,502,506 $ 1,502,506 Revenue 324,713 56,200 56,200 56,200 Net County Cost $ 1,652,107 $ 1,600,496 $ 1,446,306 $ 1,446,306 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: On May 3,1993, Weld County entered into a contract with the City of Greeley to operate and maintain the Weld County Regional Communications Center, criminal records management, and Criminal Justice Information Center. Starting in 2009, user agencies all pay according to their use of the center. The county pays for the first $10,000 of each agency's usage. Once the user agency exceeds $10,000 in usage, the agency must pay the difference by paying one-third of the overage in 2009, two-thirds in 2010 and the full amount over $10,000 in 2011 and thereafter. The county's share for the formula in 2010 will be $1,451,006 for the Weld County Regional Communications Center (WCRCC). The $1,451,006 was determined as shown on the following page. 223 COMMUNICATIONS (CONTINUED) 1000-22100 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (CONTINUED): WCRCC Total Expenditures City of Greeley 2007 Base Maintenance of Effort E911 Payment of Six Dispatchers Other Users' Share Under New Formula Total County's Share Under New Formula 911 Payments for Overtime Greeley Salary Adjustment Radio Maintenance Contract Phone Line for T-1 $3,256,717 - 1,547,508 - 328,146 - 46,800 $1,334,263 - 92,500 - 8,980 181,277 36,946 Total County 2010 WCRCC Charge $1,451,006 Phone costs of $50,000 and motor pool costs of $1,500 are included in the budget outside the contract. Effective in 2010 Weld County will no longer contribute $19,000 per year to CCNC for the maintenance of the state 800 MHz controller system. The County receives cost reimbursement from tower rental ($56,200). With the new formula, costs will begin to flatten out over time; and in the long run, relieve the county of the historical burden of supporting the WCRCC along with the City of Greeley. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The new formula in the long-term will lessen the county's burden of supporting the WCRCC, especially as the population and service demand growth occurs throughout the county. Agencies that have population and service demand growth will pay for the growth versus the county shouldering the whole load. Due to the City of Greeley's budget issues the salaries for staff in the WCRRC may be less than shown in this budget, so there will be a final adjustment in the Final Budget. BOARD ACTION: 224 COMMUNICATIONS (CONTINUED) 1000-22100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs E-911 Calls 95,383 95,364 97,000 Non -911 Calls 368,894 248,000 250,000 CAD Incidents for Law and Fire/Ambulance 358,194 372,880 375,000 EMD Calls 14,854 16,286 16,500 Criminal Justice Records, Total Case #'s Issued 30,000 32,000 33,000 ARS Documents Transcribed 57,500 58,650 55,000 Warrants Processing Activity 25,300 28,122 29,000 Citations Processed 34,000 39,100 40,000 Phone Calls into Records 71,000 72,450 75,000 Computer Service Requests 18,500 21,500 20,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000 per Capita 1.79 1.92 Per Capita Cost - Operating Budget $7.08 $6.86 EMD Call per FTE 314 363 CAD Incident per FTE 7,600 7,967 Total Telephone Calls to Center per FTE 9,200 9,765 ARS Document transcribed per FTE 2,300 2,346 1.75 $5.60 351 7,978 9,752 2,200 Goal PSI: To answer 100% of 911 calls within 15 seconds. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS1-01: Improved customer service in the most critical component of emergency dispatch services Percentage of calls answered within 15 seconds 93.80% 99.07% Through May 99.00% 225 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COMMUNICATIONS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Communication System Development - -1000-22200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Capital outlay for development of the county -wide communications system. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 4,136 0 0 0 Purchased Services 27,402 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 Gross County Cost $ 31,538 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 31,538 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change. Budgeted level will accommodate the minimal capital needs of the communications system in 2010. If the county is successful in getting an Energy Impact Assistance Tier III grant for the nearly $8 million upgrade and enhanced simulcast radio system, a supplemental appropriation will have to be made mid -year 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 226 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COMMUNICATIONS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Criminal Justice Information System - - 1000-22400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides a comprehensive, integrated criminal justice system serving multiple public safety agencies, including computer -aided dispatch, criminal records management, jail records management, and prosecution system. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Supplies $ 17,726 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Purchased Services 770,825 715,705 758,111 758,111 Gross County Cost $ 788,551 $ 815,705 $ 858,111 $ 858,111 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 788,551 $ 815,705 $ 858,111 $ 858,111 Budgeted Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget includes $100,000 for enhancements to Tiburon and $758,111 for computer maintenance costs, for a total of $858,111. The budget includes one FTE dedicated to the Weld County Sherff's Office for Tiburon support. The change from last year is Tiburon software maintenance costs are up $95,983 with the county's share of offsetting reduction from eliminating a Records C erk ($22,340) and one IT Technician ($31,237). Net increase is $42,406. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs ARS documents transcribed 14,522 10,000 9,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $3.38 $3.37 $3.20 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: Same as Budget Unit 1000- 22100. 227 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CORONER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Coroner - - 1000-23200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Responds to all unattended deaths in Weld County. Autopsies are performed in all cases of suspicious death or at the discretion of the Coroner's or District Attorney's Office. State laboratories are available in Denver; however, Weld County's Coroner usually employs the registered pathologists and laboratory facilities of North Colorado Medical Center and McKee Medical Center. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 391,016 $ 375,940 $ 380,366 $ 380,366 Supplies 23,198 12,000 13,000 13,000 Purchased Services 225,255 246,000 240,574 240,574 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 639,469 $ 633,940 $ 633,940 $ 633,940 Revenue 774 700 700 700 Net County Cost $ 638,695 $ 633,240 $ 633,240 $ 633,240 Budgeted Positions 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel costs are up $4,426 including the increased health insurance costs for 2010. Supplies are up $1,000 due to usage. Travel has been reduced $5,426. No change in net county costs for 2010. In the Motor Pool budget a new vehicle has been recommended. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 228 CORONER (CONTINUED) 1000-23200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of cases Number of inspections Number of full autopsies Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Cost per autopsy/inspection 1,009 1,050 1,050 424 450 450 158 160 160 0.214 $2.74 $878 0.246 $2.60 $904 0.206 $2.36 $904 Coal PS2: To provide the highest quality medico -legal investigation in an efficient and compassionate manner. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS2-1: 100% of investigative staff members to be certified in death investigation through the State of Colorado and The American Board of Medico -legal Death Investigators or other national certifying agency. Percent of investigators with valid Colorado and valid national certification 40% 60% 60% PS2-2: Achieve and maintain departmental accreditation through the National Association of Medical Examiners (The NAME) A completed self -assessment and action plan Percentage indices of necessary changes Conference of accreditation from The NAME 20% Completion Of Self Assessment 100% Completion Of Self Assessment Achieve NAME Accreditation Within Three Years. 229 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: JUSTICE SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pretrial Services — 24100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Pretrial Services personnel gather and present information to the Court about newly arrested persons entering the jail, offer recommendations on possible safe release options of these persons. They also provide supervision methods for selected defendants released from jail before trial in order to decrease any unnecessary and costly pretrial incarceration, to assure that they will appear and answer before the Court and to reduce any future criminal acts. The division also provides for criminal justice system's planning functions. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 415,971 $ 415,971 Supplies 15,500 15,500 Purchased Services 47,350 47,350 Gross County Cost $ 478,821 $ 478,821 Gross Revenue 0 0 Revenue 0 0 Net County Cost $ 478,821 $ 478,821 Budgeted Positions 6 6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: On June 29, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners created the Justice Services Division. Further and in collaboration with the Sheriff, the Commissioners authorized the transfer and oversight of Pretrial Services (and divest ICAPP services) to the Justice Services Division effective on or about January 1, 2010. The budget was created by transferring the four positions and budgeted resources from the Sheriff's Office's ICAPP and Pre-trial programs in the amount of $453,072, and the Director's position and budgeted resources from Community Corrections in the amount of $109,726. The proposed budget for the new Justice Services Division is $478,821 for a savings of $83,977. Even with this savings the resources budgeted allow for funding of the Director of the division, three Pre -trail Client Managers, Pre-trial Services Supervisor, and a Criminal Justice Planner. Beside funds for support services and supply accounts there is $30,000 funded for client services to subsidy client needs for home monitoring, drug testing, etc. to facilitate pre -trail services. 230 PRETRIAL SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-24100 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The creation of this division should allow for improved pre -trail services that will positively impact public safety and more cost effectively deal with clients in the criminal justice system to minimize the need to incarcerate the clients in the county jail. The addition of the Criminal Justice Planner position will allow for a position to do system -wide analysis of the entire criminal justice system in Weld County and the 191h Judicial District to maximize its efficiency for all parties, while still protecting the public's safety. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Out. uts ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1100 (est.) .187 Pretrial Services Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Goal PS -3: Provide safe, constructive and less expensive alternatives to use of jail and prisons; promote an accountable, coordinated justice system that focuses on present and future needs of Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PS3-1: Community Corrections - Provide safe, community based correctional placement for eligible adult male and female offenders who are ordered by the Courts and/or Department of Corrections. Ensure offenders are given opportunities & access to community resources; treatment and employment services, while living in staff -secure correctional setting Cost savings by providing a less costly alternative jail and prison incarceration for adult convicted offenders; Recidivism rates for offenders, completing the Community Corrections Program is substantially lower after release than offenders either released from prison or placed directly on parole. All offenders participate in some form of educational and/or vocational programming. Receive, manage, and process all community corrections funds from the State; Cost avoidance/savings ratio of Community Corrections Programs to County. 132 residential; 147 non- residential 2% 279 $2,021,263 $6,100,000 (est.) 132 residential; 147 non- residential 2% 279 $2,021,263 $6,100,000 (est.) 152 residential; 147 -non residential 2% 400 $2,021,263 $8,700,000 (est.) 231 PRETRIAL SERVICES (CONTINUED) 1000-24100 PS3-2: Cost avoidance/savings by helping 214 214 defendants 300 defendants Pretrial Services- manage overcrowding and high expense defendants (average daily (average daily Reduce cost of pretrial incarceration. of operating the jail; (average daily population) population) population) Pretrial release & supervision services assure Potential cost avoidance Low failure to appear rate for court $4,686,000 8.5% Failure $4,686,000 8.5% Failure $6,500,000 8.5% Failure to court appearances and reduce new crime commission appearances and re -arrest of defendants under pretrial supervision; to Appear 4% to Appear Appear by defendants Commission 4% 4% released on bond. of new crime Commission of new crime Commission of new crime Personnel/Program Costs. $453,000 $453,000 $453,000 PS3-3: Increase efficiency and effectiveness of local criminal justice system. Create Criminal Justice Planning function --develop best practice programs, analyze crime trends, and improve fiscal well being, coordination and cooperation among justice system and community entities. 0 0 TBD 232 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: JUSTICE SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Corrections - - 1000-24200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Community Corrections Boards in Colorado are authorized under Title 17, Article 27 of the Colorado Revised Statute to administer funds allocated by the Colorado legislature through the Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ) for administration and placement of offenders into community corrections programs. The Weld County Community Corrections Board, under the authority of the Board of Commissioners of Weld County, sub- contracts with selected vendors to provide residential and/or non-residential supervision services of adult felony offenders sentenced directly to these programs or in lieu of or as a transition from prison. The Division provides administrative assistance and guidance to the Community Corrections Board with establishing and enforcing standards of operation of the sub -contracted programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 59,821 $ 104,962 $ 37,179 $ 37,179 Supplies 888 900 900 900 Purchased Services 1,678,737 1,989,723 2,061,101 2,061,101 Fixed Charges 28,910 18,225 26,961 26,961 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,768,356 $ 2,113,810 $ 2,126,141 $ 2,126,141 Revenue 1,768,356 2,021,263 2,126,141 2,126,141 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 92,547 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 1 2 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Corrections Board selected Intervention Community Corrections Services, Inc. (ICCS), as the new community corrections vendor. They assumed transfer of services on June 30, 2008. Temporary housing of offenders was made available at the North Jail Complex through a Lease Agreement. Construction of a new county community corrections facility and administrative offices was also approved. The new county community corrections facility should be completed by mid -year 2010. 233 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS (CONTINUED) 1000-24200 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (Continued): The Master Contract with the State and subsequent sub -contract with ICCS was renewed for FY 2009/2010. Funding allocations from the State remain stable at $1,143,333 for Residential Diversion placements, $125,209 for Non - Residential Diversion supervision, $619,879 for Residential Transition placements, $55,100 for Residential Condition of Parole placements and $77,740 for county administration of the community corrections board/staff. The Department of Corrections Intensive Supervision Program (ISP) sub -contract was renewed with BI Inc. and Rocky Mountain Offender Management Systems LLC, with an increase in State funding to $104,878, with approximately $2,097 retained for county administration of that program. The Director position has been budgeted in the newly created Justice Services Division (Budget Unit 1000-24100) reducing this budget by $109,726. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Program is fully funded by State DOC contracts. See Justice Services Division (Budget Unit 1000-24100) for discussion of the reorganization of this department. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs The Restitution Center (beds): Parole 9 9 9 Residential Transition 44 44 83 Diversion Residential 85 65 49 Diversion Non/Residential 68 60 67 Independent Living (3/4 House) 0 0 0 Residential Treatment Center 32 32 32 Specialized Services 16 16 16 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .043 0.082 0.037 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Justice Services goals at the end of budget unit 1000-24100. 234 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PLANNING AND ZONING BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Inspection 1000-25100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Building Inspection administers building codes; makes on - site inspections during each phase of construction to insure minimum requirements are met. The department also assists Weld County Citizens in understanding and applying the International Building Code for utmost construction safety. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 910,860 $ 637,306 $ 645,051 $ 645,051 Supplies 65,637 53,300 51,300 51,300 Purchased Services 95,557 113,802 94,127 94,127 Fixed Charges 100,603 90,049 90,049 90,049 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,170,657 $ 894,457 $ 880,527 $ 880,527 Revenue 1,623,687 790,000 790,000 790,000 Net County Cost $ - 453,030 $ 104,457 $ 90,527 $ 90,527 Budgeted Positions 16 9 9 9 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services costs include the heath insurance rate increase. Supplies were reduced by $2,000 due to lower activity level. Vehicle expenses were reduced $15,550 due to lower fuel costs and fewer vehicles with past staff reductions. Travel for the ACCELA Conference was reduced $4,125. Revenues were left at the 2009 level. The $5,000 added revenue for the optional fee for agricultural exempt buildings was not included, since the Board has not acted on this fee. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The optional fee for agricultural exempt buildings would raise an additional $5,000. Approval of the added fee is a policy issue for the Board. However, when weighing the loss of the long held tradition of exempting agricultural buildings from building inspection fees in Weld County against the added revenue of $5,000, it may not be wise to approve the fee. BOARD ACTION: At an August 17, 2009, work session, the Board decided to eliminate a Plans Examiner position and hire a Building Official. The change will add $12,305 to the Final Budget. 235 # of major plan reviews # of minor plan reviews Technical Support Work Outputs # of building permits processed Incoming calls BUILDING INSPECTION (CONTINUED) 1000-25100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Field Inspection Work Outputs Number of inspections performed Number of stop work orders issued Avg. # of inspections per building permit 17,000 17,280 17,280 75 86 86 15.5 15.5 15.5 Plans Examiner/Inspector-On-Call Work Outputs) 238 240 240 1,178 1,180 2,056 2,836 2,000 3,000 1,180 2,000 3,000 Goal LU5: Ensure safe construction throughout unincorporated Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU5-1: Maintain quality customer service with existing staff levels Attend 3 ICC classes Number of complaints received regarding quality of inspection 12 N/A 18 50 18 25 Goal LU-6: Increase knowledge and understanding of adopted codes to citizens, homeowners, contractors, and builders through education. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED LU6-I: To ensure current and updated information is available to the public on handouts and website Ensure inspectors have more handouts in the field for a non -technical audience Keep handouts and website current and up- to-date Revise handouts and update website quarterly Host/attend two Building Trades Advisory meetings per year Plans examiner present to the Building Official any new/updated changes to code quarterly 100% 2 2 100% 2 4 100% 2 4 236 BUILDING INSPECTION (CONTINUED) 1000-25100 Goal LU7: Maintain quality, professional and timely site inspections. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) LU7-1: Maintain a record of permit expirations and inspections to ensure permits are current Percentage of current inspections 1% 1% 1% Ensure timeliness of entering inspections and appropriate follow- up Maintain proficiency in Accela to ensure information is updated and available 75% 80% 90% 237 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Noxious Weeds - - 1000-26100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Responsible for noxious weed control and enforcement in the County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 281,941 $ 255,209 $ 273,970 $ 273,970 Supplies 49,899 58,250 57,350 57,350 Purchased Services 147,470 449,418 180,210 180,210 Fixed Charges 10,660 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 489,970 $ 762,877 $ 511,530 $ 511,530 Revenue 6,772 10,000 10,000 10,000 Net County Cost $ 483,198 $ 752,877 $ 501,530 $ 501,530 Budgeted Positions 2 FTE 3PT 2FTE 3PT 2FTE 4PT 2FTE 4PT SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services was increased $18,261 for one full-time Lead Worker position formerly funded from the Other Public Works budget and $500 for outerwear reimbursement for two full-time employees which is now reported as taxable income. Budget includes a full time Division Supervisor, a full time Lead Worker, two Weed Spray Tech II for 6.5 months, and two Landowner Specialists for 10 months per year. Supplies decreased $900 because Uniforms and Clothing reimbursement is now funded from the salary line item. Purchased Services decreased a total of $269,208 as three services will now be funded from other budgets. These are prairie dog control in the amount of $32,000 now being funded from the Mining Division budget; the elimination of the Phreatophyte Program which reduced this line item $50,000; and tree trimming in the amount of $175,000 being funded from the Bridge Division budget. Vehicle Expenses was decreased $12,208 largely due to the anticipated lower cost of fuel for next year. No change in revenue. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Board decided not to start the new Phreatophyte Program in March, 2009 due to budget constraints. BOARD ACTION: 238 NOXIOUS WEEDS (CONTINUED) 1000-26100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs All operations will meet established codes, polices, and procedures 100% 100% 100% Attendance at all safety meetings 95% 95% 95% All PPE equipment used as required 100% 100% 100% Lane miles mowed annually 2,500 2,500 2,500 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) .10 $2.07 .10 $3.09 .10 $1.88 Goal TPW9: Implement and monitor Colorado Weed Management Act (Noxious weed control) on County property and assist land owners with compliance with the law through public education and assistance. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW9-1: Weed operations will meet established codes, policies, and procedures. 100% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW9-2: Mowing Operations 95% accuracy 100% of the time 95% 95% 95% TPW9-3: Roads spot treated for noxious weeds 95% accuracy 100% of the time 90% 90% 90% 239 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: General Engineering - - 1000-31100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides engineering services for bridge designs; development referrals; field survey operations to establish line and grade control; administrative and inspection work in utility and subdivision construction; performs laboratory tests to determine soil properties, construction and materials quality; all phases of highway engineering, bridge engineering, design and construction inspection. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,578,178 $ 1,648,263 $ 1,773,500 $ 1,773,500 Supplies 32,335 79,250 78,500 78,500 Purchased Services 233,163 1,289,940 970,316 970,316 Fixed Charges 11,936 0 0 0 Contra - 544,724 - 528,226 -586,349 -586,349 Gross County Cost $ 1,310,888 $ 2,489,227 $ 2,235,967 $ 2,235,967 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1,310,888 $ 2,489,227 $ 2,235,967 $ 2,235,967 Budgeted Positions 23 20 20 20 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased $125,237 to fund the unfunded Transportation Planner position that was not funded in 2009 due to the difficulty in finding a qualified person in the prior year, and the reclassification of Eng Tech I positions to Eng Tech II, and to fund outerwear reimbursement for 20 full-time employees. Supplies decreased a total of $750. Purchased Services decreased $319,624 based on the following: Printing and Duplicating decreased $1,000 based on anticipated needs; Memberships and Registration Fees decreased $200 based on anticipated costs; Advertising and Legal Notices decreased $5,500 as all positions have been filled; Engineering and Architectural decreased $200,000 as water rights services were moved to the Other Professional Services line item; Data Processing Services increased $50,000 based on historic costs; Vehicle Expense decreased $9,624 based on anticipated lower fuel costs; Travel and Meetings decreased $1,000 based on anticipated needs; Training decreased $2,300 based on anticipated training needs; Strategic Roads decreased $150,000 based on costs for the Weld County Road 13 project. The Contra Account increased $58,123 based on Planning's share - back costs. 240 GENERAL ENGINEERING (CONTINUED) 1000-31100 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of designs completed 6 Number of construction projects completed 5 Number of plats reviewed 449 6 4 434 5 4 450 Goal TPW8: Provide engineering services including design, development, inspections, and all phases of highway engineering, bridge engineering and construction inspection and testing. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW8-1: Capital 95% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% Improvement 99% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% 95% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW8-2: 95% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% Construction Testing 99% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW8-3: 99% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% Development Review 99% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW 8-4: Five Year Plan 90% accuracy 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% 241 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Parks and Trails - - 1000-50200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Development and maintenance costs of County trails and future park projects. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 Budgeted Positions SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget includes $32,000 for the joint maintenance and administration, with Windsor and Greeley, of the Poudre River Trail. This is the same as last year. The Board agreed in April, 2004 to fund the County's share. A new IGA was developed in 2006 that includes full maintenance and administration of the trail with each party paying one- third of the costs. The City of Greeley actually does the maintenance and administration through their Parks Department. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. This budget unit consolidates all spending on trail maintenance and development, as well as any new park development. Recommend the $32,000 for maintenance of the Poudre River Trail. No other projects have been requested for 2010. BOARD ACTION: 242 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Airport Transfer - - 1000-56100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: County support for capital improvements to the Greeley - Weld County Airport. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,903 $ 15,000 $ 1,974 $ 1,974 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 4,903 $ 15,000 $ 1,974 $ 1,974 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 4,903 $ 15,000 $ 1,974 $ 1,974 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Gree ey-Weld County Airport plans to undertake the first phase of a multi -year rehabilitation of fail ng pavement throughout the hangar areas around the airport. This project has been part of the airport's Capital Improvement Program for a number of years. Failing pavements throughout the hangar areas pose a direct operational and safety related threat to aircraft operations and aircraft passengers. The local share of this project as matching funds toward the FAA grant for the project is $3,947, of which the county's share is $1,974. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 243 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Senior Programs Transfer - - 1000-56110 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Weld County's financial support to the sixteen senior centers throughout the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 12,500 12,500 12,500 10,625 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 10,625 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 10,625 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The 2010 request is for $12,500, which is the same level as the current year. The recommended budget includes a 15% reduction or $10,625. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the budget be reduced by 15% in accordance with what is being asked of all county departments. BOARD ACTION: 244 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Waste Water Management - - 1000-56120 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: County assessment for North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association for waste water management, and Little Dry Creek Watershed Group. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 9,191 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 9,191 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 9,191 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 $ 11,367 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This budget is the same as 2009. This Budget Unit includes dues for the North Front Range Water Quality Planning Organization ($9,867) and membership for the Little Dry Creek Watershed Group ($1,500). No funding for the Big Thompson Watershed Forum or Cache la Poudre Watershed project is included, since no requests were made for 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend continued membership in NFRWQPO and Little Dry Creek Watershed Group. BOARD ACTION: 245 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Envision - - 1000-56130 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Weld County's financial support of Envision, formerly Centennial Development Services, Inc., which provides services for the developmentally disabled citizens of the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 46,125 $ 46,125 $ 172,225 $ 39,206 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 46,125 $ 46,125 $ 172,225 $ 39,206 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 46,125 $ 46,125 $ 172,225 $ 39,206 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Envision has requested the county fund $172,225 to meet its budget challenges. Significant budget changes at the federal and state levels have resulted in less income and the change to a fee for service model has taken away Envision's flexibility to set local individual rates and to direct funds to clients according to their needs. The changes have caused Envision to incur significant monthly losses for over a year. As a result Envision is asking the county to fund the agencies administrative functions excluded in the changes to the federal and state funding mechanism. The current funding level is $46,125. The recommended 2010 funding level is $39,206, which is a 15% reduction, like all other outside agencies. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Finance does not dispute that Envision has a major financial challenge, but it is not recommended that the county provide additional funding to go towards solving the problem. Envision is going to have to change its programs and business model to adapt to the new funding methods of the state and federal government, like the county often has to do. 246 DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED (CONTINUED) 1000-56130 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (Continued): In Envision's request it states that Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 27-10.5-104 that established the Community Centered Board system in Colorado, contains the intent that state funding should be supplemented by local funds. Finance disputes that claim in light of the 2008 amendment to CRS 27-10.5- 104 (7) (a). Prior to 2008 the statute stated that there should be five percent local funding. With the 2008 amendment to CRS 27-10.5-104 (7) (a) the local funding reference was removed and only references state and federal funding, except for certain required local school district funds specified in the statute. With the 2008 amendment there is no requirement for local funding from the county, not even the $39,206 recommended. Envision has the option of asking the voters of Weld County for a dedicated mill levy, up to one mill. The ballot issue seeking a mill levy failed a few years ago. BOARD ACTION: 247 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: MENTAL HEALTH North Front Range BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Behavioral Health - - 1000-56140 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Weld County's financial support of the North Front Range Behavioral Health which provides extensive mental health services to citizens in Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 101,062 104,599 111,000 111,000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 101,062 $ 104,599 $ 111,000 $ 111,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 101,062 $ 104,599 $ 111,000 $ 111,000 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget request includes $111,000 for North Front Range Behavioral Health (NFRBH), which is a 15% decrease from the current combined funding level for NFRBH and Island Grove Regional Treatment Center (IGRTC). On July 1, 2008, NFRBH and IGRTC merged to form one entity and service delivery system to address the comprehensive behavioral health needs (mental health, substance use disorder, and co- occurring disorders) to the citizens of Weld County. IGRTC will no longer be funded in the Community Agency Grant budget unit 1000-90150. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 248 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: A Kid's Place - - 1000-56150 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds a facility for interviewing and providing services to young victims of child abuse and non -offending family members. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 11,500 16,500 9,775 9,775 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Contra Account - 2,750 - 7,750 - 2,750 - 2,750 Gross County Cost $ 8,750 $ 8,750 $ 7,025 $ 7,025 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 8,750 $ 8,750 $ 7,025 $ 7,025 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The base contract amount of $11,500 has been reduced by 15% to $9,775. Human Services will not fund A Kid's Place ($5,000) to provide Mandated Reporter Training, instead it will be done by Human Services' staff. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval as requested. BOARD ACTION: 249 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Retirement Transfer - - 1000-56160 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central budget unit for the transfer of administrative costs for retiree health benefits. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 241,193 250,000 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 241,193 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 241,193 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This unit is for the transfer to the Retirement Fund for the administrative costs of the program. The Board agreed in 2007 to resume paying the costs to free up funds for retiree cost of living adjustments in the Retirement Fund. At the Retirement Board's May, 2009 meeting they suspended cost of living funding for retirees until the retirement plan is 75% fully funded. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 250 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: TRANSFERS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Human Services Transfer - - 1000-56160 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: General Fund contribution to Area Agency on Aging Program (Human Services Budget). RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 297,441 12,351 12,351 12,351 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 297,441 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 297,441 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The transfer to the Human Services Fund of $12,351 is for the Area Agency on Aging administration match. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: WORKLOAD MEASURES, GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services Fund. 251 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: TRANSFERS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Department Transfer - - 1000-56160 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: General Fund contribution to health Department operations. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 2,409,267 3,590,471 3,051,901 3,051,901 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,409,267 $ 3,590,471 $ 3,051,901 $ 3,051,901 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 2,409,267 $ 3,590,471 $ 3,051,901 $ 3,051,901 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See Health Fund for details. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: WORKLOAD MEASURES, GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health Fund. 252 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Economic Development - - 1000-60200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: General Fund Department used to fund the county's economic development program through the Upstate Colorado Economic Development, a public/private non-profit organization. Starting in 2009 the county began contributing to the Small Business Development Center, in addition to Upstate Colorado Economic Development. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 100,000 105,000 105,000 89,250 Gross County Cost $ 100,000 $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 89,250 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 100,000 $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 89,250 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Upstate Co orado Economic Development is requesting the same funding level of $100,000. The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is also requesting the same funding level of $5,000 for 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The recommended budget includes only 85% of the prior year's funding level for both entities to be consistent with the funding level of all outside agencies in 2010. The funding level of Upstate Colorado Economic Development may need to be revisited prior to the final budget adoption depending upon what the City of Greeley does with their contribution level. Historically, the county and City of Greeley had parity in their contributions until the City of Greeley dropped to the level of $85,000 and the county maintained the $100,000 funding level for the last three years. If the City of Greeley reduces their contribution the county may need to reconsider its funding level. BOARD ACTION: After the June 18, 2009, work session the Commissioners decided to leave the total budget recommendation the same, but fund SBDC in the amount of $7,500, and Upstate $81,750. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See County's overall Economic Development goals in the Strategic Plan Section of the Budget Message. 253 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Rents - - 1000-60300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: General Fund Department used to fund lease/purchase contracts from Correctional Facility and the Administrative Building for building rents. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects the county's debt service on any long-term debt and/or lease purchase debt in any given year. With the payoff of the correctional facilities' Certificates of Participation (COP) as of August 1, 2007, Weld County has no long-term debt or long-term lease obligations. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 254 LEASE -PURCHASE AGREEMENTS The following supplemental data regarding lease -purchase agreements involving real property is required under Section 29-1-104(2)(d), C. R. S., 1973: A. The total amount to be expended during the_ ensuing fiscal year for payment obligations under all lease -purchase agreements involving real property B. The total maximum payment liability of the_ local government under all lease -purchase agreements involving real property over the entire terms of such agreements, including all optional renewal terms C. The total amount to be expended during the_ ensuing fiscal year for payment obligations under all lease -purchase agreements other than those involving real property D. The total maximum payment liability of the_ local government under all lease -purchase agreements other than those involving real property over the entire terms of such agreements, including all optional renewal $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- 255 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non -Departmental - - 1000-90100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central budget unit containing county -wide costs that are not allocated to program budgets, e.g. training, audit fees, etc. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 145 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 273,565 95,500 85,500 85,500 Purchased Services 543,909 360,500 305,000 305,000 Fixed Charges 121,518 150,000 122,000 122,000 Gross County Cost $ 939,137 $ 606,000 $ 512,500 $ 512,500 Revenue 61,809,410 58,909,599 58,839,720 58,839,720 Net County Cost $ -60,870,273 $ -58,303,599 $ -58,327,220 $ -58,327,220 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: On the expense side of this budget a 15.4% reduction ($93,500) can be achieved with a reduction in small equipment ($10,000), copier costs ($40,000), postage ($500), printing ($2,000), medical services ($5,000), travel ($12,000), training ($15,000),and miscellaneous expenses ($13,000). Phone costs have been increased $4,000. The $25,000 for the picnic is in the recommended budget amount, pending a Board decision on other options. Revenues are down $369,015 over the current year. Property taxes are up $40,000 with a $700,000 increase from the Capital Fund for opening of an additional jail pod, and $660,000 reduction transferred to the Social Services Fund for a total of $54,052,194. Interest earnings are projected to be down $807,000 with rates projected to remain low in 2010. Rents from Buildings are up $299,136 for a total of $369,136 from Social Services ($70,000), PS Trophy ($15,000), Ft. Lupton Buildings ($31,500), and the Community Corrections building ($252,636). Oil and gas leases are projected to be up $175,000, recovery of indirect costs are up $200,735, and other minor revenues are up $2,250. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: There are no consequences to the proposed reduction, except the county picnic ($25,000). The county picnic has grown from under $5,000 to $25,000 with the shift to having a Weld County Day at the Independence Stampede where the county buys family tickets and a dinner. The Board has asked department heads to survey staff for opinions and options to the county picnic and its costs. Revenues are recommended as presented. BOARD ACTION: 256 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Retiree Health Insurance - - 1000-90120 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central budget unit to account for the costs for retiree health benefits. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Beginning January 1, 2007, in accordance with GASB 45, employers must account for the actuarial cost of post -employment benefits paid to retirees. Weld County's only program outside of the retirement program is the payment of health insurance benefits to retirees. Under GASB 45 an estimated actuarial amount is needed to be reserved to recognize the cost of the benefit in periods related to when services are received by the employer (Weld County). However, with the changes described below, no funding is needed in this budget unit. Based upon the reserve amount in the Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) Trust and the amount paid out each year for active retirees in department budgets the reserve requirement is being met. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The Board has stopped the OPEB retiree health insurance plan, as of January 1, 2009, except for employees born prior to January 1, 1957, or any employee born prior to December 31, 1958, who will have 30 years of service prior to reaching the age of 62. Employees meeting the criteria will be grandfathered and will remain eligible for continued benefits under the retiree health insurance program adopted December 16, 2002. The plan for employees employed prior to October 1, 2005 and born after January 1, 1957, or any employee born prior to December 31, 1958, who will have 30 years of service prior to reaching age 62 that would have been eligible for contributions to a Retirement Health Savings (RHS) plan was abolished in 2009 by Board resolution. As a result of the Board's action no funding for this program is required. BOARD ACTION: 257 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: COMMUNITY AGENCY GRANTS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Agency Grants - - 1000-90150 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Weld County's financial support to community agencies that do not fit under a specific county program. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 131,530 103,530 123,030 14,905 Gross County Cost $ 131,530 $ 103,530 $ 123,030 $ 14,905 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 131,530 $ 103,530 $ 123,030 $ 14,905 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funding is included for the following community agencies: AGENCY IGRTC Promises for Children Convention & Visitors' Bureau 211 Information and Referral Juvenile Assessment Center Audio Information Network Interagency Oversight Group Total PRIOR YEAR $ 26,000 10,000 5,000 25,000 30,030 7,500 0 REQUEST $ 0 10,000 4,250 21,250 30,030 7,500 50.000 RECOMMEND FINAL $ 0 0 4,250 4,280 0 6,375 0 $103,530 $123,030 $14,905 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: This budget unit consolidates community agencies with requests that do not fit under a specific program. The following are the recommendation for each agency: Island Grove Regional Treatment Center (IGRTC). On July 1, 2008, North Front Range Behavioral Health (NFRBH) and IGRTC merged to form one entity and service delivery system to address the comprehensive behavioral health needs (mental health, substance use disorder, and co-occurring disorders) to the citizens of Weld County. IGRTC will no longer be funded in the Community Agency Grant budget unit, but will be funded as part of the NFRBH budget in budget 1000-56140. 258 COMMUNITY AGENCY GRANTS (CONTINUED) 1000-90150 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (Continued): Promises for Children. The Board, in May, 2004, made a commitment to fund this program along with other partners in the community. A request for $10,000 was made, but only $8,500 is recommended or a 15% reduction. This request was funded by Human Services with Low -Income Child Care Assistance contract in June, 2009 for 2010. Therefore, no funding is needed in this budget unit for 2010. . Convention & Visitor Bureau has requested $4,250 this year for visitor guides. This is a 15% reduction over 2009. Recommend approval. 211 Information and Referral has requested $21,250 for the 211 information and referral system operated by United Way. This amount is 15% less than the current year. $16,970 of this request was funded by Human Services with Low -Income Child Care Assistance contract in June, 2009 for 2010. Therefore, only $4,280 is recommended for 2010 funding in this budget. Audio Information Network of Colorado (formerly Radio Reading Service of the Rockies) has requested $7,500 again this year to provide radio reading services for the visually impaired in Weld County. Only $6,375 is recommended due to a 15% reduction. Recommend approval. Juvenile Assessment Center has requested the same funding level as the current year, $30,030, as Weld County's share of law enforcement support. Due to the availability of a fund balance from 1451 incentive dollars in reserve at the JAC/IOG it was recommended by the county that those excess funds be used in 2010 to fund the JAC/IOG programs to provide financial relieve to all public agencies supporting the programs, since all are experiencing budgetary constraints due to the economic downturn. The JAC Board agreed at their June 4, 2009, meeting to the recommendation. Interagency Oversight Group (IOG) was funded last year in the amount of $50,000 to cover the contribution to the lOG for Human Services, Health Department, and District Attorney. Human Services paid the amount in 2009, so no General Fund dollars are required. The lOG merged with the JAC in July 2008 to better coordinate the efforts of the two agencies. Like the JAC's request it was recommended by the county that the 1451 excess funds be used in 2010 to fund the JAC/IOG programs to provide financial relieve to all public agencies supporting the programs since all are experiencing budgetary constraints due to the economic downturn. The JAC Board agreed at their June 4, 2009, meeting to the recommendation. BOARD ACTION: 259 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EXTENSION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Extension - - 100-96100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide adults and 4-H youth with unbiased, research -based education for agricultural, environmental and consumer issues. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 315,469 $ 317,903 $ 272,130 $ 272,130 Supplies 8,530 9,300 9,300 9,300 Purchased Services 48,756 73,297 43,200 43,200 Fixed Charges 110 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 372,865 $ 400,500 $ 324,630 $ 324,630 Revenue 1,600 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 371,265 $ 400,500 $ 324,630 $ 324,630 Budgeted Positions 10.75 10.75 10.08 10.08 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the negotiated new MOU done in 2009. In addition the budget includes a Horticulture Program Associate (Master Gardener) adding $27,928. Support costs for the Master Gardener include $1,800 for supplies and $1,500 for travel. The CSU employees anticipate a 2% increase of $1,390. Budgeted positions include 2.75 grant funded position (EFNEP 2.0 FTE and FANE 0.75 FTE). FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The budget is consistent with the new MOU, the addition of the Master Gardener, and the grant funded positions previously agreed to by the Board. BOARD ACTION: 260 EXTENSION (CONTINUED) 1000-96100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs 4-H enrollment Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 1,003 1,047 1,151 .431 .413 .376 $1.39 $1.33 $1.21 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: This Budget Unit's goals and objectives are part of a separate CSU Extension's published document available through Colorado State University. 261 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EXTENSION SERVICE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Fair - - 1000-96200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: To organize, plan, and administer the annual county fair. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 13,967 $ 13,950 $ 13,950 $ 13,950 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 304,997 304,995 294,995 294,995 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 318,964 $ 318,945 $ 308,945 $ 308,945 Revenue 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Net County Cost $ 68,964 $ 68,945 $ 58,945 $ 58,945 Budgeted Positions 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Purchased services were reduced by 15% or $10,342. No other changes. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Exhibits registered 7,503 7,836 8,571 Exhibitors registered 2,4251 2,351 2,584 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0.251 $0.240 $0.218 262 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Veteran's Office - - 1000-96400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides all types of services to Veterans of Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 59,803 $ 62,107 $ 62,107 $ 62,107 Supplies 37 300 300 300 Purchased Services 3,810 5,988 5,350 5,350 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 63,650 $ 68,395 $ 67,757 $ 67,757 Revenue 2,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 Net County Cost $ 61,650 $ 65,995 $ 65,357 $ 65,357 Budgeted Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Purchased services were reduced by $638 based upon historical usage. All other revenues and expenses remained the same. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 263 VETERANS' OFFICE (CONTINUED) 1000-96400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Active files Office visits Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support 725 795 825 3,200 0.044 3,500 3,000 0.043 0.037 $0.2760 $0.2641 $0.2439 Goal HHS5: Assist in providing veterans access to eligible state and federal benefits to meet their needs. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HHS5-1: Insure all veterans seeking assistance receive all eligible benefits Percentage of served veterans receiving all eligible benefits 95% 95% 95% 264 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Island Grove Building - - 1000-96500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Maintenance for the Island Grove Park Community Building. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 97,764 100,000 91,500 91,500 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 97,764 $ 100,000 $ 91,500 $ 91,500 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 97,764 $ 100,000 $ 91,500 $ 91,500 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The estimated cost for the building in 2010 is $330,983, with offsetting revenue of $148,000. The net loss of the operation will be $182,983 or, split with the City of Greeley, $91,500. Revenues are up due to more usage of the meeting rooms. The result is an 8.5% reduction over 2009. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 265 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency - - 1000-9999 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds to cover reasonably unforeseen expenditures. In the proposed budget, this includes appropriations for points of issue. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 153,371 $ 153,371 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 153,371 $ 153,371 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 153,371 $ 153,371 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects a 9% increase in health insurance costs that will be entirely paid for by the county. No salary increases are recommended. There are no other benefit changes. This amount only reflects a portion of the departments. Those departments with other personnel cost changes include the health insurance increase in the recommended amounts of the specific budget units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 266 PUBLIC WORKS $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 - $4,000,000 - $2,000,000 - $0 ‹ee+ey Jy eeg siA Revenue. Changes MIL aye �a+ +ey `tee eay a e 0a aye t Qaaa rye°a`a O" Feee <S`yye 2010 Revenue Total $37,259,238 (2009 $42,726,488) Fund Balance, $10,650,000, 28% Licenses/Permits, $325,000, 1% Property Taxes, $7,354,938, 20% Severance Tax, $600,000, 2% Other Taxes, $6,330,000, 17% Federal/State, $2,009,300, 5% Miscellaneous, $460,000, 1% Highway Users Fee, $9,530,000, 26% 267 PUBLIC WORKS 2010 EXPENDITURES Total $26,604,640 (2009 $29,213,402) $7,000,000 $6,000,000 Motorgrader 21% $5,668,871 Bridge Construction 15% $3,956,967 Municipalities 6% $1,631,677 Maintenance Suppfr ruck$3,303,404 5% $1,422,8 12% Mining $1,164,719 4% Adminstration $681,032 Pavement Mangemenl 3% Public Works 12% $3,306,072 22% $5,469,045 EXPENDITURE CHANGES n N 65 $5,000,000 - $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 N O m LU O 69 h 0 ci v 60 CO us r— ill OD O N Q5 O co 0 m CO to • co Co n ✓ (0 O al N ▪ (ID o 69 60 m co m 0 co to m L17 - co (0 C9 CO (0 0 w V ❑ 2009 ❑ 2010 0 CO M 69 0) (O V N N O m 69 69 cn M Lc) co ON 0 m P etc Works Pavement Municipalities Bridge Mangeme 1 Construction Molo,greder Maint nace m Tking Mining Atlmin tration Support 268 SEVEN YEAR TREND Public Works $40 $35 $30 $25 $15 $10 $5 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 269 PUBLIC WORKS FUND SUMMARY The Public Works Fund records all costs related to Weld County road and bridge construction and maintenance. This fund is also utilized for allocation of monies to cities and towns for use in their road and street activities. The resources for 2010 total $37,259,238, of which $10,650,000 is fund balance, in addition to the revenue shown in the budget. Property tax is set at $7,354,938, the same as 2009. Specific ownership tax is estimated to be $6,330,000, down $445,000 due to car sales being lower. Regular HUTF is down $360,000 at $8,040,000 due to people driving less and more fuel efficient vehicles. However, with the passage of SB 09-109, Weld County will receive $1,490,000 from the additional HUTF revenue resulting from this new legislation. Grant revenue is anticipated at $1,759,300, with $1,275,000 from Energy Impact grants; North Front Range MPO grants of $140,000 for design work on the intersection of Weld County Road 23 at State Highway 392; and $344,300 for intersection improvements at Weld County Road 7 at Weld County Road 54. Other revenues include $150,000 from transportation impact fees. Permit revenues are down $45,000 at $325,000 due to less oil and gas drilling activity. Other revenues are stable and unchanged. The budgeted appropriations for Public Works in 2010 total $26,604,640. Municipal share back is funded at $1,654,918. No salary increases are proposed, but $99,587 is budgeted to cover the increase in health insurance costs. The major savings in all Public Works budgets is from the reduction in anticipated fuel costs for 2010. The total fuel cost savings is $1,376,369 In the Motor Grader budget supplies are up $69,000 for additional dust palliative chemicals, and motor grader lease costs are down $13,672. $175,000 for tree trimming has been budgeted in the Bridge budget, steel costs for bridge construction and repair are down $100,592. The Other Public Works budget is down $1,773,450 based on the Capital Improvement Plan. Strategic Road improvements are down $1,073,200. Contract Payments decreased $615,750 to $295,000 based on the capital improvement plan, and due to more of the work being done in- house. Right -of way purchases are down $84,500 at $50,000. Mining has included $300,000 for gravel purchases. Pavement Management is funded at the current year level, however, with the drop in the costs of petroleum products, more projects will be able to be done at the same costs. The 2010 Public Works Capital Improvements Plan is available on the county web site at http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/public works/index.html. 270 CONCERNING LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MONEY USED FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES In accordance with Section 29-1-110, C. R. S., 1973, at a public hearing on the budget, Weld County must discuss the proposed use of its allocation of highway users tax fund monies and the County Public Works Fund and provide an opportunity for any elector to be heard on the expenditure of such monies for the current year and for the fiscal year governed by the proposed budget. The proposed use of the 2010 allocation of highway users tax fund monies and county road and bridge fund are as follows: Maintenance of Condition Administration Maintenance Support Trucking $ 5,667,040 676,169 1,418,468 1,768,323 TOTAL $ 9,530,000 271 CONSTRUCTION BIDDING FOR STATE -FUNDED LOCAL PROJECTS In accordance with Sections 29-1-701 through 707, C. R. S., as amended, cities or counties of 30,000 persons or more are required to bid projects of over $150,000. Local governments are required to bid competitively among private contractors for projects using Highway Users Tax Fund money (state funded projects), and are prohibited from dividing projects into two or more projects to evade provisions of the act. "State -funded public project" means any construction, alteration, repair, demolition, or improvement by any agency of local government of any land, structure, facility, road, highway, bridge, or other public improvement suitable for and intended for use in the promotion of the public health, welfare, or safety and any defined maintenance project which is funded in whole or in part from the highway users tax fund and which may be reasonably expected to exceed one hundred fifty thousand dollars in the aggregate for any fiscal year. "Defined maintenance project" means any project that involves a significant reconstruction, alteration, or improvement of any existing road, highway, bridge, structure, facility, or other public improvement, including but not limited to repairing or seal coating of roads or highways or major internal or external reconstruction or alteration of existing structures. "Defined maintenance project" does not include routine maintenance activities such as snow removal, minor surface repair of roads or highways, cleaning of ditches, regrading of unsurfaced roads, repainting, replacement of floor coverings, or minor reconstruction or alteration of existing structures. Based upon the above definitions, Weld County's Public Works 2010 budget would be allocated as follows by the above categories: Bridge Construction Maintenance of Condition Maintenance Support Trucking Mining Administration Pavement Management Municipalities Public Works: R -O -W Miscellaneous Strategic Roads Part-time Contract TOTAL TOTAL $ 3,956,967 5,668,871 1,422,852 3,303,404 1,164,719 681,033 5,469,045 1,631,677 50,000 79,000 2,172, 000 710,072 295,000 HUTF STATE $ 0 5,668,871 1,422,852 2,438,277 0 0 0 0 LOCAUOTHER $ 3,956,967 0 0 865,127 1,164,719 681,033 5,469,045 1,631,677 0 50,000 0 79,000 0 2,172,000 0 710,072 0 295,000 $26,e_04.640__$1.530O,O4,640 Based upon the above allocation, Weld County is not required to competitively bid any service. However, it is anticipated that Weld County will bid out $3,059,950 in asphalt purchases and contracts for overlays, and reconstruction, chip and seal of $1,353,000, for a total of $4,412,950 in bid projects for 2010. A major portion of the $1,817,000 earmarked for Strategic Roads may also be contracted, which raises the potential bid project amount to $6,229,950. Maintenance of effort requirement was eliminated by the 1994 State Legislature, effective with the 1995 budget; therefore, it is not demonstrated in this budget document. 272 PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title 2000 90100 4112 2000 90100 4130 2000 90100 4140 TAXES CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES SEVERANCE TAXES TOTAL TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS 2000 90100 4221 PERMITS 2000 90100 4312 2000 90100 4316 2000 90100 4318 2000 90100 4334 2000 90100 4338 2000 90100 4340 INTERGOVERNMENTAL MINERAL LEASING GRAZING ACT PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES HIGHWAY USER MOTOR VEHICLE REG GRANTS TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISCELLANEOUS 2000 90100 4680 OTHER TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 2009 Budget 7,354,938 6,775,000 600,000 14,729,938 370,000 200,000 80,000 20,000 8,400,000 340,000 1,500,000 10,540,000 2010 Request 7,354,938 6,330,000 600,000 2010 Recommend 7,354,938 6,330,000 600,000 14, 284, 938 14, 284, 938 325,000 150,000 80,000 20,000 9,530,000 310,000 1,759,300 325,000 150,000 80,000 20,000 9,530,000 310,000 1,759,300 11,849,300 11,849,300 2010 Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,598,050 150,000 150,000 0 28,237,988 26,609,238 26,609,238 0 273 PUBLIC WORKD FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2000 30100 ADMINISTRATION 2000 32100 TRUCKING 2000 32200 MOTORGRADER 2000 32300 BRIDGE 2000 32400 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 2000 32500 OTHER PUBLIC WORKS 2000 32600 MINING 2000 32700 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 2000 56200 CITIES AND TOWNS TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 677,959 681,033 681,033 0 3,969,981 3,303,404 3,303,404 0 5,870,839 5,668,871 5,668,871 0 4,005,858 3,956,967 3,956,967 0 1,421,918 1,422,852 1,422,852 0 5,071,194 3,306,072 3,306,072 0 990,216 1,164,719 1,164,719 0 5,550,519 5,469,045 5,469,045 0 1,654,918 1,631,677 1,631,677 0 29.213.402 26.604.640 26,604.640 0 274 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Administration - - 2000-30100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Directs the activities of Public Works as necessary; coordinates complaints; and maintains cost accounting records on projects. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 503,403 $ 520,593 $ 520,843 $ 520,843 Supplies 107,052 51,250 48,500 48,500 Purchased Services 307,205 106,116 101,270 101,270 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 917,660 $ 677,959 $ 670,613 $ 670,613 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 917,660 $ 677,959 $ 670,613 $ 670,613 Budgeted Positions 7 7 7 7 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased by $250 to fund outerwear reimbursement for one full-time employee which is now reported as taxable income. Supplies decreased $2,750 as the $250 outerwear reimbursement was moved to the salary line item and Other Operating Supplies decreased $2,500 based on anticipated costs. Purchased Services decreased a total of $4,846 based on the following: Other Purchased Services decreased $1,200 as pagers were eliminated and replaced with cell phones; Phones increased $6,715 to fund additional cell phones; Vehicle Expense decreased $5,311 based on anticipated lower fuel costs; Repair and Maintenance Other decreased $5,050 as the Konica copier is now owned and we do not need to pay a monthly lease. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 275 ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2000-30100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Accurately monitor and report activities of the department according to current reporting methods and performance standards Perform administrative duties with less than1% error Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 90% 90% 90% .30 $3.93 .28 $2.78 .28 $2.51 Goal TPW1: Provide effective and efficient administrative and managerial support and supervision to the Public Works Department. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW1-1: Accurately monitor and report activities of the department Perform duties with less than 1% errors, 90% of the time 100% 100% 100% 276 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Trucking - - 2000-32100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Conducts snow removal operations and provides loading and transportation of materials and equipment to all job sites, gravel roads, aggregate pits, stockpile sites, and capital improvement projects with 33 full time employees, 14 assigned truck tractors and trailers, 4 loaders, 6 dump trucks and 3 water trailers. Responsible for organizing and supervising the County Community Service Work Program and operational supervision and management of the trucking contract. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,994,109 $ 2,118,281 $ 1,998,459 $ 1,998,459 Supplies 14,135 16,100 7,100 7,100 Purchased Services 1,711,398 1,835,600 1,265,878 1,265,878 Fixed Charges 10,530 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,730,172 $ 3,969,981 $ 3,271,437 $ 3,271,437 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 3,730,172 $ 3,969,981 $ 3,271,437 $ 3,271,437 Budgeted Positions 36 36 33 33 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services decreased $119,822 as the Salary line item was decreased $128,072 for three Service Worker III positions transferred to the Grader Division and it was increased $8,250 for outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees which is now reported as taxable income. Supplies were decreased $9,000 as Uniforms and Clothing reimbursement was moved to the Salary line item. Purchased Services decreased $569,722 as three water tankers were transferred to the Grader Division so Vehicle Expenses decreased by this amount. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 277 TRUCKING (CONTINUED) 2000-32100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 1.54 1.48 $15.98 $16.29 1.24 $12.21 Goal TPW5: Haul all material needed for gravel roads, RAP (recycled asphalt) roads and asphalt road construction and overlay projects. Clear paved roads of snow and ice. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW5-I: Operate within budget limits 95% of the time operate within established budget guidelines; emergencies, e.g. weather, etc. excepted Yes Yes Yes TPW5-2: Complete annual gravel plan 100% of scheduled gravel plan accomplished annually 100% 100% 100% TPW5-3: Respond to calls for service within 24 hours 100% of service calls responded to within 24 hours 100% 100% 100% 278 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Grader - - 2000-32200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Fleet of 40 motor graders, 31 grader zones, 20 grader stations, one fugitive dust team, and two roving maintenance teams, responsible for the upkeep of gravel roads in Weld County (approximately 2,500 miles). RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,543,244 $ 2,685,089 $ 2,824,661 $ 2,824,661 Supplies 140,986 565,450 623,700 623,700 Purchased Services 2,253,840 2,376,500 1,961,514 1,961,514 Fixed Charges 179,967 243,800 230,128 230,128 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 5,118,037 $ 5,870,839 $ 5,640,003 $ 5,640,003 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 5,118,037 $ 5,870,839 $ 5,640,003 $ 5,640,003 Budgeted Positions 43 43 46 46 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $139,572 which includes three Service Worker III positions transferred to this division from the Trucking Division for $128,072, and $11,500 to fund outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees which is now reported as taxable income. Supplies increased $58,250 for Uniforms and Clothing which was reduced $10,750 for outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees now funded through salaries. Other Operating Supplies increased $69,000 based on anticipated costs for dust palliative and anti - icing chemicals. Purchased Services decreased $414,986. Utilities increased $50,000 to fund propane deliveries for the grader stations. Vehicle Expense decreased $468,486 due to anticipated fleet costs and fuel; Repair and Maintenance Other increased $3,500 based on anticipated needs; and Fixed Charges decreased $13,672 for Machinery and Equipment Rental based on actual costs for ten leased motor graders. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval, including transfer of positions. BOARD ACTION: 279 MOTOR GRADER (CONTINUED) 2000-32200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 1.84 1.76 1.84 $21.98 $24.09 $21.05 Goal TPW4: To provide for the maintenance of 2,500 miles of gravel roads. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW4-l: Spread gravel per annual gravel plan 100% of gravel plan accomplished annually Yes Yes Yes TPW4-2: Perform surface maintenance on gravel roads 80% of surface maintenance schedule accomplished annually Yes Yes Yes TPW4-3: Respond to keep Department of Defense roads open during snow, construction events 100% of Air Force road maintenance done annually Yes Yes Yes TPW4-4: Respond to service calls within 5 days to acknowledge concern for the caller 95% of the time. Contact or resource commitment will be made. Yes Yes Yes 280 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Bridge Construction - - 2000-32300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This unit consists of 26 full time employees and 14 seasonal positions with over $5 million of reportable equipment. It is organized as a Bridge section, Construction section, and Drainage section which perform a variety of tasks in those areas. This unit also supports snow and ice control and conducts tree removal on county rights -of -way. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,643,573 $ 1,737,868 $ 1,743,557 $ 1,743,557 Supplies 980,589 1,100,550 960,058 960,058 Purchased Services 1,075,421 1,077,540 1,100,367 1,100,367 Fixed Charges 80,814 89,900 100,900 100,900 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,780,397 $ 4,005,858 $ 3,904,882 $ 3,904,882 Revenue 3,374 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 3,777,023 $ 4,005,858 $ 3,904,882 $ 3,904,882 Budgeted Positions 26 27 27 27 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $5,689 as Uniforms and Clothing for full-time employees was added in the amount of $6,750, since it is now reported as taxable income, and Overtime decreased $1,061 based on anticipated work hours. Supplies decreased $140,492 based on the following: Road Construction Supplies decreased $23,800 as less recycled asphalt and Class 6 material is anticipated for next year; Uniforms and Clothing was reduced $5,600 for outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees; Other Operating Supplies decreased $10,500 based on anticipated needs; and Cost of Goods Sold decreased $100,592 due in part to a reduced cost for cattle guards and anticipated needs for next year. Purchased Services increased $22,827 based on: Contract Payments was decreased $5,000 as dust detour miles were reduced; Other Professional Services increased $151,500 because tree trimming was moved from the Weed budget (1000-26100) to this budget line; and Vehicle Expense was reduced $123,673 due to anticipated lower fuel costs. Fixed Charges increased $11,000 due to additional crane rental costs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 281 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (CONTINUED) 2000-32300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) $16.18 $16.43 1.08 $14.58 GoalTPW3: To repair and replace bridges, construct capital improvement projects, assist with snow removal on road system and county parking lots, install and replace culverts and cattle guards and perform tree removal/trimming in county rights of way. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Complete all construction projects by the end of the year or as scheduled 100% of construction projects completed by the end of the year with 75% of them completed within established timelines Yes Yes Yes Respond to service calls within 24 hours of receipt 100% of the time service calls will be responded to within 24 hours 97% 98% 99% Maintain bridge system with less than 10% restricted bridges 100% less than 10% restricted bridges, 100% scheduled critical repair of bridges within one year of discovery Yes Yes Yes Snow removal from county parking lots in business park and Human Services 100% of the time accomplish task. If task cannot be accomplished due to the amount of snow or other conditions, provide information to decision makers. 98% 99% 100% 282 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Maintenance Support - - 2000-32400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Performs all traffic control maintenance, management of signs, barricades, construction project signing, and roadway striping county -wide. Replaces and maintains all cattle guards and conducts routine and sustained snow removal operations as needed. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 607,562 $ 596,918 $ 599,168 $ 599,168 Supplies 437,483 558,000 555,450 555,450 Purchased Services 199,398 267,000 257,142 257,142 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,244,443 $ 1,421,918 $ 1,411,760 $ 1,411,760 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1,244,443 $ 1,421,918 $ 1,411,760 $ 1,411,760 Budgeted Positions 19 9 9 9 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased by $2,250 for outerwear for full-time employees which is being funded from the Salary line item since this is now reported as taxable income. Supplies decreased $2,550 for outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees moved to Salaries. Purchased Services decreased a total of $9,858 as Vehicle Expense decreased $21,858 based on lower anticipated fuel costs, and Machinery and Equipment was added in the amount of $12,000 to fund the purchase of one mobile, truck -mounted variable message board for traffic control with the painting operation. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 283 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT (CONTINUED) 2000-32400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) .43 $5.33 .37 $5.83 .36 $5.27 Goal TPW6: Assure safe travel for the general public by maintaining clearly marked and signed roads and bridges; assist in plowing of snow from county parking lots and roads; install and maintain snow fence in selected areas of the county. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW6-1: Respond to service calls within 24 hours of receipt 100% of service calls will be responded to within 24 hours 100% 100% 100% TPW6-2: Respond and place temporary stop signs 100% of the time 100% 100% 1005 TPW6-3: Replace warning advisory and regulatory signs 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW6-4: Schedule road line painting Centerline Shoulder line 100% of the time 100% of the 50% 100% 100% 100% 284 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Other Public Works - - 2000-32500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Reserve/Temporary employees for seasonal work. All contract payments for bridge grants and road construction projects are included in this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 762,851 $ 701,744 $ 701,744 $ 701,744 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 4,211,659 4,369,450 $ 2,596,000 $ 2,596,000 Fixed Charges 95,732 0 0 0 Capital 830,000 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 5,900,242 $ 5,071,194 $ 3,297,744 $ 3,297,744 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 5,900,242 $ 5,071,194 $ 3,297,744 $ 3,297,744 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Purchased Services decreased $1,773,450 based on the following: Contract Payments decreased $615,750 based on the capital improvement plan; Strategic Roads decreased $1,073,200 based on the capital improvement plan; and Right -of - Way Purchases decreased $84,500, also based on the capital improvement plan. See the 2010 Work Plan on the County website at www. co.weld.co.us. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 285 OTHER PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) 2000-32500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Bridge Abutments Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 16 14 14 0 0 $25.28 $20.80 0 $12.31 286 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Mining - - 2000-32600 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Responsible for mining, crushing, and screening of gravel in county -owned quarries. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 380,799 $ 331,632 $ 331,172 $ 331,172 Supplies 200,458 160,879 456,056 456,056 Purchased Services 894,602 495,905 396,567 396,567 Fixed Charges 38,100 1,800 1,900 1,900 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,513,959 $ 990,216 $ 1,185,695 $ 1,185,695 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1,513,959 $ 990,216 $ 1,185,695 $ 1,185,695 Budgeted Positions 11 5 5 5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services decreased $460 as Salaries was increased $1,250 for outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees, now reported as taxable income, and Overtime was decreased $1,710 based on anticipated needs. Supplies increased $295,177 based on the following: Road Construction Supplies increased $298,371 for gravel purchases; Uniforms and Clothing decreased by $1,250 for outerwear reimbursement now funded from Salaries; and Other Operating Supplies decreased $1,944 based on anticipated needs. Purchased Services decreased $99,338 based on the following: Other Purchased Services increased $15,000 for prairie dog control which was moved from the Weed budget (1000- 26100) into this budget; Utilities increased $576 based on costs for port -o -lets; Other Professional Services increased $535 based on anticipated costs; Vehicle Expense decreased $116,249 based on decreased fuel costs; Repair and Maintenance Other increased $800 based on anticipated needs. Fixed Charges increased $100 to reflect costs for Machinery and Equipment Rental. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 287 MINING (CONTINUED) 2000-32600 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) .47 $6.49 .21 $4.06 .20 $4.43 Goal TPW2: To perform mining, crushing, and screening of aggregate materials and recycled asphalt. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW2-I: Complete scheduled crushing and screening requirements 100% of scheduled production Yes Yes No TPW2-2: Follow Mining Safety and Health (MSHA) guidelines and directives 100%, provide detailed explanation of any write-ups or discrepancies No No Yes 288 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pavement Management -- 2000-32700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Performs paved road maintenance involving asphalt patching, potholes, and paving operations. Responsible for pavement testing, concrete curb and gutter, crack fill, seal coat, and gravel shoulder improvements, as well as snow removal operations as needed. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 575,468 $ 614,309 $ 616,809 $ 616,809 Supplies 2,838,268 3,092,550 3,046,800 3,046,800 Purchased Services 1,547,562 1,843,660 1,804,392 1,804,392 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 4,961,298 $ 5,550,519 $ 5,468,001 $ 5,468,001 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 4,961,298 $ 5,550,519 $ 5,468,001 $ 5,468,001 Budgeted Positions 9 10 10 10 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased $2,500 to fund outerwear reimbursement for ten full-time employees, which is now reported as taxable income. Supplies decreased $45,750 based on the following: Road Construction Supplies decreased $50,250 based on the capital improvement plan; Uniforms and Clothing decreased by $2,500 as outerwear reimbursement for full-time employees is funded through Salaries; and Other Operating Supplies increased $7,000 for the purchase of an asphalt saw and wet pavement tape. Purchased Services decreased $39,268 based on: Vehicle Expense was reduced $49,268 due to anticipated lower fuel costs; Machinery and Equipment Rental was reduced $2,000 based on anticipated needs; and Machinery and Equipment was added in the amount of $12,000 for the purchase of one new vehicle message sign board. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 289 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED) 2000-32700 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 0.39 0.41 $22.26 $22.77 .40 $20.41 Goal TPW7: Provide pavement management to include pavement testing, paving, patching, crack sealing, and sweeping. Contract administration of concrete curb and gutter, seal coat, aggregate, and other contracted services as assigned. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED TPW7-1: Respond to calls for service 100% of the time to repair or schedule 100% 100% 100% TPW7-2: Perform scheduled paving and milling operations 100% of schedule met or explained 100% 100% 100% TPW7-3: Prepare assigned contract bids and documents 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% TPW7-4: Assure paved roads are maintained and evaluated in accordance with established GASB standards and reporting requirements Maintain following standards for paved roads: 70% rated good 25% rated fair 5% rated poor 73%G 26%F 1%P 70%G 25%F 5%P 70%G 25%F 5%P 290 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Grants -In -Aid to Cities and Towns - - 2000-56200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: In accordance with Section 43-2-202, C. R. S., 1973, 50 percent of the mill levy collected by the county on assessed values within incorporated municipalities to maintain county roads is paid to municipalities. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 1,681,179 1,654,918 1,631,677 1,631,677 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,681,179 $ 1,654,918 $ 1,631,677 $ 1,631,677 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1,681,179 $ 1,654,918 $ 1,631,677 $ 1,631,677 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget is based upon the final assessed value of the municipalities with the 2010 mill levy applied. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 291 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PUBLIC WORKS FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non -Departmental Revenue - - 2000-90100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Revenue generated by Public Works Fund. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 28,223,520 28,237,988 26,609,238 26,609,238 Net County Cost $ -28,223,520 $ -28,237,988 $ -28,609,238 $ -26,609,238 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The resources for 2010 total $37,259,238, including a fund balance of $10,650,000, in addition to the $26,609,238 revenue shown in this budget unit. Property tax is set at $7,354,938, the same as 2009. Specific ownership tax is estimated to be $6,330,000 down $445,000 due to car sales being lower. Regular HUTF is down $360,000 at $8,040,000 due to people driving less and more fuel efficient vehicles. However, with the passage of SB 09-109 Weld County will receive $1,490,000 of additional HUTF revenue resulting from this new legislation. Grant revenue is anticipated is $1,759,300 with $1,275,000 from Energy Impact grants, North Front Range MPO grants of $140,000 for design work on the intersection of Weld County Road 23 at State Highway 392, and $344,300 for intersection improvements at Weld County Road 7 at Weld County Road 54. Other revenues include $150,000 from transportation impact fees. Permit revenues are down $45,000 at $325,000 due to less oil and gas drilling activity. Other revenues are stable, and unchanged. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 292 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PUBLIC WORKS FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency - - 2000-99999 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds to cover recommended salary increase amounts. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 99,587 99,587 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 99,587 99,587 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects the added costs for health insurance premium increases of 9%. No salary or other benefit increases are recommended for 2009. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 293 itict Mac COLORADO 294 SOCIAL SERVICES Revenue Changes $20,000,000 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 ■ 2009 ❑ 2010 ii g Property taxes Federal/State Fund Balance 2010 Revenue Total $25,891,500 (2009 $25,728,417) Fund Balance, $1,400,000, 5% Federal/State, $18,325,167, 71% Property taxes, $6,166,333, 24% 295 SOCIAL SERVICES 2010 Expenditures Total $24,491,500 (2009 $24,724,150) Core Services 1% $360,000 TANF $3,080,000 13% Miscellaneous 7% $1,765,500 AND $104,000 0% Day Care Child Support 4% $1,090,000 Admin $2,645,000 11% $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 s s $2,000,000 $0 e5 e ra p° G Child Welfare 46% $11,200,000 Administration 17% $4,050,000 LEAP $197,00C 1% Expenditure Changes Pa�c o 0/ O 296 SEVEN YEAR TREND Social Services $30 $25 $20 $10 $5 $0 2004 2005 2006 I 2007 I 2008 2009 2010 297 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SUMMARY Weld County Department of Human Services continues to face challenges created by the economic downturn and the infusion of dedicated funding received through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The acceptance of this funding has been contingent on the submission of mid -year funding requests, often with little time to fully develop a plan to spend the dollars in a coordinated manner to best serve the needs of the Weld County community. As we move through 2010, we will be refining the projects that have been initiated, in order to ensure that they meet their intended objective. The total Social Services Fund budget is $24,491,500. The programs are funded by property tax of $6,166,333, and state and federal funds of $18,325,167. The Department continues to pursue innovative programs to avoid, or reduce the duration of, clients' need for services. While this may, in some cases, drive greater costs in the current year, it is anticipated that these measures will enable the Department to avoid costs in future years. As consumer costs for fuel, utilities, and food continue to rise, and as homeowners face mortgage foreclosure situations, more Weld County citizens are being placed in a position of requiring assistance. Food Assistance, Medicaid, and LEAP caseloads have experienced significant increases in the past year. The department anticipates growth in OAP over the next decade due to the number of citizens that are reaching retirement age. The Department has increased the amount of resources dedicated to detecting client fraud. The major challenge associated with fraud is the difficulty of establishing the true household composition. CBMS continues to impact the productivity of staff and create delays in the delivery of payments and benefits for Food Assistance, Medicaid, Colorado Works, and State -Only Programs. Many of the inefficiencies creating these delays are being resolved. However, the inefficiencies that remain continue to impact the time required to process cases and the number of cases in pending status. There are efforts underway to modify the Medicaid eligibility determination functions of CBMS, in order to streamline the application process. Weld County will support these efforts only if they do not negatively impact those seeking to apply for this assistance. New legislation enacted in the 2008 Legislative Session placed restrictions on the amount of TANF County Reserve counties are allowed to maintain. Weld County continues to maintain a County Reserve balance well within the statutory guidelines, and has acquired other counties' reserves, in an effort to adequately fund our programs and assist the other counties in complying with this legislation. Quality day care, at an affordable cost, will continue to be a challenge for working families to obtain. The Department continues to develop methods of increasing the rate paid per child/per day to providers who undergo trainings and assessments to enhance the quality of the care provided. Other efforts have been, and continue to be, implemented to ensure that funds are being used to provide services to best serve the citizens of Weld County. The demand for Child Welfare services continues to expand in Weld County, as it has throughout the State. The Department is continuing to seek out and encourage the provision of services, with their associated costs, early in the involvement with families, in order to avoid the need for more costly services as the involvement continues. Working with the Interagency Oversight Group, the Department has moved toward a policy of utilizing local placement options 298 for children, whenever possible, to increase parental involvement and to decrease caseworker travel costs. The need for Supervised Visitations has become a significant issue in recent years. The Department continues to participate in State-wide discussions regarding the potential of amending the method used to allocate available Child Welfare appropriations among counties. The current discussion involves some fairly minor changes to the allocation model, itself. The emphasis is on providing counties with a better understanding of the model, so that we may use this knowledge in making programmatic decisions in such a way that they both provide high quality services to the citizens of Weld County and maximize our opportunity for available funding. 299 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES ESTIMATED REVENUE 2010 County Administration Other Programs Child Support Administration TANF - Colorado Works Aid to the Needy Disabled Child Care Old Age Pension Child Welfare Core Services LEAP General Assistance Sub -Total Federal/State Reimbursement Claims Collection Incentives TANF Adjustment Child Support Incentives Use of Deferred Revenues Sub -Total Revenue County Property Tax/Penalties Total Revenue FEDERAL AND STATE $ 3,750,000 1,200,000 1,815,000 1,594,917 0 525,000 153,250 7,400,000 200,000 197,000 105,000 COUNTY TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 4,050,000 220,000 1,420,000 830,000 2,645,000 1,485,083 3,080,000 104,000 104,000 565,000 1,090,000 8,750 162,000 3,800,000 11,200,000 160,000 360,000 0 197,000 78,500 183,500 16,940,167 $ 7,551,333 $ 24,491,500 16,940,167 50,000 800,000 250,000 285,000 18,325,167 6,166,333 24,491,500 300 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES MANDATED FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAMS Assistance Payment Programs: Most assistance payment programs are mandated by the federal or state government. Consequently, local government is limited as to what can be done to reduce costs from these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Aid to the Needy Disabled Low Income Energy Assistance Old Age Pension General Assistance` X X X Optional X X X X Optional * State law allows counties the option of having a general assistance program and, if established, to determine the benefit level. Social Service Programs: Social service programs administered by the department are mandated by federal or state law; however, local governments have a higher degree of managerial flexibility with these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Child Protection - Casework Services Youth Services - Casework Services Administration: Costs associated with administration also include compensation for direct services through caseworkers, technicians and support staff. In addition, overhead such as rent, utilities, travel, supplies, and equipment are funded through administrative allocations. The State establishes administrative allocations and reimburses at various rates depending on the type of expenditure and program. Expenditures greater than allocation are not guaranteed to be reimbursed. Generally, they are at least partially reimbursed through the use of transferred TANF funds, surplus distribution, or Federal pass-thru revenues. 301 SOCIAL SERVICES SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 2100 42111 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2100 42700 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2100 42110 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42111 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42115 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42200 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42365 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42375 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42380 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42410 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42415 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2100 42610 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 5,775,000 6,166,333 6,166,333 0 105,000 105,000 105,000 0 3,560,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 0 1,435,000 1,385,000 1,385,000 0 1,790,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 1,873,100 1,815,000 1,815,000 0 1,709,917 1,594,917 1,594,917 0 575,150 525,000 525,000 0 153,250 153,250 153,250 0 6,900,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 0 0 200,000 200,000 0 152,000 197,000 197,000 0 18,253,417 18,325,167 18,325,167 0 24.028,417 24.491.500 24.491.500 0 302 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2100 42110 ADMINISTRATION -REGULAR 4,450,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 0 2100 42115 OTHER PROGRAMS 1,857,500 1,420,000 1,420,000 0 2100 42200 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION 2,735,000 2,645,000 2,645,000 0 2100 42365 COLORADO WORKS 3,195,000 3,080,000 3,080,000 0 2100 42370 NEEDY AND DISABLED 104,000 104,000 104,000 0 2100 42375 DAY CARE &ADMINISTRATION 1,085,150 1,090,000 1,090,000 0 2100 42380 OLD AGE PENSION 162,000 162,000 162,000 0 2100 42410 CHILD WELFARE & ADMINISTRATION 10,550,000 11,200,000 11,200,000 0 2100 42415 PLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE CARE 250,000 360,000 360,000 0 2100 42610 LEAP ADMINISTRATION & OUTREACH 152,000 197,000 197,000 0 2100 42700 GENERAL ASSISTANCE 183,500 183,500 183,500 0 TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES FUND 24.724.150 24,491.500 24.491.500 0 303 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary - - All Departments - - Fund 2100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 13,994,605 $ 15,180,500 $ 15,618,500 $ 15,618,500 Supplies 270,960 807,150 476,000 476,000 Purchased Services 2,663,289 2,910,500 2,653,000 2,653,000 Fixed Charges 6,645,043 6,086,500 6,004,500 6,004,500 Contra Expense - 496,142 - 515,500 - 515,500 - 515,500 Capital 214,205 255,000 255,000 255,000 Gross County Cost $ 23,291,960 $ 24,724,150 $ 24,491,500 $ 24,491,500 Revenue 18,345,008 18,974,150 18,325,167 18,325,167 Net County Cost $ 4,949,952 $ 5,750,000 $ 6,166,333 $ 6,166,333 Budget Positions 246.5 263 263 263 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See Individual Budget Units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See Individual Budget Units. BOARD ACTION: See Individual Budget Units. 304 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES Goal HHSI: "To continuously strengthen services and support innovation that leads to a culture that empowers people to im ' rove their quality of life." DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) 141(1-1:Increase quality Implement continuous improvement Develop methodology to gather statistics in of work system to accomplish the following: order to establish baselines against which Analyze current processes to determine performance will be measured in future years. if they are achieving expected Continuous improvement system designed and outcomes; develop remedies and implemented within DHS improvements; deploy follow up Initial improvement teams launched addressing tracking system measuring the effectiveness of improvements; reduce the duplication of services provided to customers requiring wrap around services four key opportunities for improvement Goal HHS2: Develop & deploy consistent performance management approaches across the Human Services Department DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS2-I: Increase retention of quality staff Identify existing performance management approaches within Human Services to include individual department approaches, County approaches, and different performance management philosophies & styles within Human Services Statistically valid retention baseline developed - used to gauge realistic and appropriate retention levels within DHS HHS2-2: Increase fulfillment of promotion opportunities Research Baldrige Category 5 (Workforce Focus) and implement "best practice" concepts to include factors affecting employee satisfaction and engagement, staff development, supervisory development, employee safety and well-being, morale, motivation and teamwork. By the end of 2010 all employees will have professional development plans incorporated and addressed within their formal evaluation system 305 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES (Continued) DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS2-3: Viable Assess capacity and staffing levels to Upper level DHS organizational structure succession plans created across the department administer system evaluated and assessed Develop & deploy follow up tracking system measuring the effectiveness of the Human Services Department Human Capital Management efforts Define how employees are measured Fully implement new county performance management system Implement and perfect performance appraisal system Train supervisors and staff on how to use the new performance appraisal system HHS2-4: Team culture Develop and deploy continuous Increase employee core knowledge of all developed across the training and job sharing opportunities departments across DHS (no wrong door) board within the that connect to organizational Department of Human knowledge, job performance and core Services values. Goal HHS3: Establish a systematic structure to effectively communicate inside and outside of the Human Services Department. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS3-l: Improved Implement the best methods to Improved information based website customer and communicate with clients, stakeholders developed and launched stakeholder access to and other agencies to include using the DHS program intranet; newsletter; web page; email or information and services newsletters. Implement the best methods to review policy with the county commissioners; communicate with county departments; the best methods to communicate with the rest of the county 306 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES (Continued) DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS3-2: Ensure all DHS Create team backups from each division to Top five internal communication methods staff are fully engaged in the communications loop maintain continuity for DHS identified and validated Form staff driven improvement teams Train team members on project management and process improvement methodologies that will be used during the process Conduct research around the following: The 5 most important methods to communicate info in HS; Communication methods that are currently working and methods not working; The best way to attain the voice of all staff Goal HHS4: To prepare for the future by identifying appropriate actions to opportunities and challenges that may impact the Department of Human Services. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS4-1: Increased preparedness to handle future contingencies Develop & assess budget Formulate program projections based on increased demand Identify mandatory program commitments Identify discretionary programs Forecast shell created through identified reports and data that predict future trends and needs DHS revenue generating sources compiled Continuity of Operations Plan formulated HHS4-2: Increased flexibility and agility in meeting future customer demands Explore ramifications of child welfare 90/10 to 80/20 switch Conduct scenario planning addressing the following: What can be cut first; the consequences; the potential alternative funding strategies and the business case in supporting individual programs compared to others Identify "big ticket" items that must be supported HHS4-3: Enhanced DHS emergency preparedness Form staff driven Continuity of Operations project planning team Develop and deploy Continuity of Operations Plan 307 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES (Continued) Goal HHS5: To develop a means to clearly and effectively communicate the value of Human Service programs to any person inside and outside of the organization on a continuous basis. DESIRED OUTCOMES STRATEGIES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS5-I: County Commissioners and other stakeholders understand the tangible value that Weld County Human Services provides to the local community Increase awareness of DHS programs and services Enhance image of DHS programs and services Individual DHS division education and promotion plans developed Organizational report card shell designed DHS stakeholder and customer perception baseline established HHS5-2: High level connections can be demonstrated from the services that each team provides to any family Analyze coordinated services within a targeted group of customers and identify what everyone is gathering Expand coordinated service analysis after targeted group analysis and construct ethics guidelines regarding the information used in conjunction with the coordinated service analysis HHS5-4: Effective stewardship of the taxpayer dollar Build organizational report card: Benchmark Adams County; Incorporated "Return on Investment" language into report card based on outcomes that can justify current department activities Validate the report card with stakeholders Publish report card on a routine basis 308 STRATEGIC AREA: HUMAN SERVICES (Continued) Goal HHS6: To develop and reinforce "best customer service" standards and commitment within all employees and partners of the Weld County Department of Human Services DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS6-l: Increased Ensure that customer goals are embedded customer satisfaction within employee performance standards Individual DHS division customer levels satisfaction assessment tools developed Test the feasibility in monitoring phone calls to test for quality customer service Develop multiple methods to assess the quality of customer service (staff, partners, boards, etc.); identify the meaning of "respect" mean in the eyes of all customers? Determine key requirements of all HS customers - as well as their priorities (ease of use, quality of contact, quality of service, etc.) Overall DHS customer satisfaction index designed Offer ongoing training to all staff to improve basic customer service skills Offer advanced customer service skills training Offer training for managers on the nuts and bolts of reinforcing customer service standards Initial DHS customer satisfaction baseline Ensure partner accountability to Human established Service customer service standards through contract language that can be developed to drive a closer alignment and assisting partners by communicating standards, training, and reinforcement Develop strategies to quantify intangible aspects of customer service (focus groups) 309 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Administration - - 2100-42110 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Expenditures for Staff Compensation and Operations, attributable to Food Assistance, Medicaid, Adult Protection, and Common Support programs. The State establishes an allocation that limits the reimbursement for administrative expenditures. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,919,354 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 Supplies - 272,738 - 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 Purchased Services 862,481 1,300,000 900,000 900,000 Fixed Charges 73,842 0 0 0 Contra Expense - 19,727 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 Capital 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Gross County Cost $ 2,763,212 $ 4,450,000 $ 4,050,000 $ 4,050,000 Revenue 3,782,748 3,560,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 Net County Cost $ - 1,019,536 $ 890,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Budget Positions 99 104.5 104.5 104.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Many of the productivity issues surrounding the implementation of CBMS have been dealt with. However, the inefficiencies that remain continue to impact the time required to process cases and the number of cases in pending status. Food Assistance and Medicaid caseloads continue to increase, dramatically. As the economy weakens, and as Federal stimulus funds have been directed toward these programs, more Weld County citizens are being placed in a position of requiring and requesting assistance. Unfortunately, this also creates a greater possibility of clients obtaining benefits greater than the amount they are legally eligible to receive. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 310 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42110 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Out . uts Case Load (Average) 16,000 16,640 16,640 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 3.750 4.153 3.900 Per capita cost $ - 4.38 $4.70 $1.12 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 311 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non -Program Revenue - - 2100-42111 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Property Taxes, Claim -Collection Incentives, Parental Fee Incentives, TANF Adjustment, TANF MOE Reduction, and Miscellaneous Revenue Sources. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 1,001,020 1,460,000 1,385,000 1,385,000 Net County Cost $ 4,949,952 $ 5,750,000 $ 6,166,333 $ 6,166,333 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Property tax is budgeted at $6,166,333 for 2010. The difference is a combination of special revenue from various department programs. Child Support Federal Incentives are no longer received as direct revenue, but rather as a reimbursement of expenditures, so they are reflected in Budget Unit 2100-42200. The Child Support TANF- Retained Incentive has been increased from one-half to the full amount of the State Share, estimated at $250,000. Federal Stimulus funds, however, have been appropriated to provide temporary additional funding, within the Child Support appropriation, to make up the additional Federal funds originally lost due to the Deficit Reduction Act. The County Contingency appropriation has been abolished, and re -funded to the County Tax Base Relief Fund, from which Weld County will not likely receive revenues. Parental Fee Incentives earned are estimated at $140,000, the TANF Adjustment is $800,000 and the TANF Work Participation Bonus is estimated to be earned at $145,000. Incentives earned as the result of claim collections for Food Assistance, Medicaid, TANF, and State -only Programs are estimated to be $50,000. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 312 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Other Programs - - 2100-42115 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget unit was established for minor or temporary programs for the Department of Social Services. It includes Employment First, Medical Exams, Fraud, Food Stamps Refunds, House Bill 04-1414 (IV -E), AFDC Retained Collections, Collaborative Management, and Building Healthy Marriages. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 106,477 $ 683,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Supplies 2,658 0 0 0 Purchased Services 15,828 7,500 20,000 20,000 Fixed Charges 1,844,950 1,167,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,969,913 $ 1,857,500 $ 1,420,000 $ 1,420,000 Revenue 1,766,490 1,790,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Net County Cost $ 203,423 $ 67,500 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 Budget Positions 4.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Collaborative Management Incentive funds previously managed, fiscally, by the Department of Human Services will be managed, instead, by the Juvenile Assessment Center (JAC), per the direction of the Board of Weld County Commissioners and the Collaborative Management Executive Committee. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 313 OTHER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) 2100-42115 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 2,000 2,000 2,000 .188 .472 .429 $0.87 $0.44 $0.82 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 314 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Support Administration - - 2100-42200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program is designed to obtain and enforce child support and medical support for dependent children to offset part of the TANF and foster care costs. In addition, child support and medical support are enforced for non-TANF clients based on court orders. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,014,481 $ 2,145,000 $ 2,145,000 $ 2,145,000 Supplies 55,015 200,000 100,000 100,000 Purchased Services 326,007 300,000 350,000 350,000 Fixed Charges 34,340 90,000 50,000 50,000 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,429,843 $ 2,735,000 $ 2,645,000 $ 2,645,000 Revenue 1,816,013 1,873,100 1,815,000 1,815,000 Net County Cost $ 613,830 $ 861,900 $ 830,000 $ 830,000 Budget Positions 29 29 29 29 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 315 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 6,500 1.208 $3.63 6,500 6,500 1.190 1.082 $3.54 $3.10 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 316 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Temporary Assistance to Needy BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Families and Administration (TANF) - - 2100-42365 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance payment grants for eligible recipients of the TANF program. This budget unit also has administrative funding for TANF staff and operating costs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,466,930 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 Supplies 34,204 45,000 45,000 45,000 Purchased Services 144,208 65,000 150,000 150,000 Fixed Charges 1,301,157 1,700,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Contra Expense - 6,757 - 20,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 Capital 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 Gross County Cost $ 2,939,742 $ 3,195,000 $ 3,080,000 $ 3,080,000 Revenue 2,179,958 1,709, 917 1,594, 917 1,594,917 Net County Cost $ 759,784 $ 1,485,083 $ 1,485,083 $ 1,485,083 Budget Positions 11 11 11 11 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. CBMS continues to impact the productivity of staff and create delays in the delivery of payments and benefits. Many of the inefficiencies creating these delays are being resolved. New legislation enacted in the 2008 Legislative Session placed restrictions on the amount of Reserve counties are allowed to maintain. Weld County is not currently in danger of forfeiting any of its Reserves due to this legislation. We are, however, researching means of accessing the funds forfeited by other counties to the State-wide Reserve funds, in order to improve services to clients. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION; 317 TANF ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42365 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Loads (Average) Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 500 520 520 .458 .451 .411 $3.26 $6.09 $5.54 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 318 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Aid to Needy Disabled - - 2100-42370 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance grants for eligible disabled and Medicaid benefits for SSI clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Fixed Charges 143,475 144,000 144,000 144,000 Contra Account - 70,824 - 40,000 - 40,000 - 40,000 Gross County Cost $ 72,651 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 72,651 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 2,600 2,700 2,700 $0.31 $0.42 $0.39 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 319 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Care - - 2100-42375 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provision of day care services for children from TANF and "income eligible" households. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 574,549 $ 634,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Supplies 12,687 51,150 20,000 20,000 Purchased Services 10,660 25,000 20,000 20,000 Contra Expense - 2,351 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 Fixed Expense 450,713 425,000 500,000 500,000 Gross County Cost $ 1,046,258 $ 1,085,150 $ 1,090,000 $ 1,090,000 Revenue 579,803 575,150 525,000 525,000 Net County Cost $ 466,455 $ 510,000 $ 565,000 $ 565,000 Budget Positions 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Colorado Department of Human Services intends to implement a new provider payment system, to replace the current CHATS system, for tracking and reimbursing Child Care services being provided. This new system, if fully implemented as envisioned, could have the impact of better identifying requests for payment which are not allowable. It should provide us with much better tracking reports to manage the resources available to the county in this program. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 320 CHILD CARE (CONTINUED) 2100-42375 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 650 675 675 .229 .226 $2.00 $2.10 .226 $2.05 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 321 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Old Aqe Pension - - 2100-42380 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides money payments to eligible seniors who meet income, resource and age tests. Program costs are reimbursed 99.5 percent by the state. Administrative costs are reimbursed 80 percent and are included as part of the Social Services Administrative budget. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 101,419 $ 133,500 $ 133,500 $ 133,500 Supplies 6,066 9,000 9,000 9,000 Purchased Services 12,751 11,000 11,000 11,000 Fixed Charges 13,279 10,500 10,500 10,500 Contra Expense - 4,772 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 Gross County Cost $ 128,743 $ 162,000 $ 162,000 $ 162,000 Revenue 116,159 153,250 153,250 153,250 Net County Cost $ 12,584 $ 8,750 $ 8,750 $ 8,750 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 322 OLD AGE PENSION (CONTINUED) 2100-42380 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) 2,200 2,300 2,300 $0.05 $0.05 $0.03 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 323 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Welfare and Administration - - 2100-42410 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Placement of children in substitute 24 -hour care family foster homes, group homes, residential treatment centers, and residential child care facilities. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 7,575,381 $ 6,850,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 Supplies 430,845 700,000 500,000 500,000 Purchased Services 1,156,594 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Contra Expenses - 391,711 - 350,000 - 350,000 - 350,000 Fixed Charges 2,479,115 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Capital 14,205 50,000 50,000 50,000 Gross County Cost $ 11,264,429 $ 10,550,000 $ 11,200,000 $ 11,200,000 Revenue 8,364,314 6,900,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Net County Cost $ 2,900,115 $ 3,650,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 Budget Positions 89 93 93 93 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The demand for Child Welfare services continues to expand in Weld County, as it has throughout the State. The Department is continuing to seek out and encourage the provision of services, with their associated costs, early in the involvement with families, in order to avoid the need for more costly services as the involvement continues. The Department is participating in State-wide discussions regarding the potential of a new method of allocating available appropriations among counties. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 324 CHILD WELFARE AND ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42410 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Average Case Load Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 1,100 1,100 1,150 3.542 3.815 3.471 $12.43 $14.98 $14.18 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 325 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Core Services - - 2100-42415 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program designed to avoid placement of children into the foster care program primarily through counseling and parental education. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 58,584 $ 0 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 303,155 250,000 300,000 300,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 361,739 $ 250,000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 Revenue 190,997 0 200,000 200,000 Net County Cost $ 170,742 $ 250,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 Budget Positions 3 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. Core Services will continue to be used to limit and shorten the number of foster care placements and to meet the demands of the Drug Court and associated programs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 326 CORE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2100-42415 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) 150 160 160 $0.73 $1.03 $0.60 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 327 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Low Income Energy Assistance Program BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: and Administration - - 2100-42610/42620 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administration of the Low Income Energy Assistance Program. This program is 100 percent federally funded. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 177,430 $ 135,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Supplies 2,223 2,000 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 12,033 15,000 15,000 15,000 Fixed Charges 1,017 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 192,703 $ 152,000 $ 197,000 $ 197,000 Revenue 174,556 152,000 197,000 197,000 Net County Cost $ 18,147 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Case Load (End of Program) Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 4,500 5,000 5,000 .229 .225 .205 $0.08 $0.00 $0.00 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 328 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: General Assistance - - 2100-42700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Temporary and emergency assistance for applicants for Federal/State categorical assistance programs and help for some medical indigents. Totally funded by county. Expenditures from this program are not covered by TANF, OAP, AND, etc. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 122,727 187,000 187,000 187,000 Contra Expense 0 - 3,500 - 3,500 - 3,500 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 122,727 $ 183,500 $ 183,500 $ 183,500 Revenue 0 105,000 105,000 105,000 Net County Cost $ 122,727 $ 78,500 $ 78,500 $ 78,500 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Expenditures for dental, vision, prescriptions, and in -kind services have remained fairly stable over the last few years. The State budget problems have created a stronger need for General Administrative funds. Below is a breakdown of the amounts requested for the different categories under General Assistance: Dental $ 17,000 Vision 22,000 Shelter 40,000 In -Kind 5,000 Prescription 5,000 Burial 78,000 Shelter Care Management 20,000 Refund -3.500 Total $183,500 329 GENERAL ASSISTANCE (CONTINUED) 2100-42700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load excluding shelter (Average) Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) 80 80 80 $0.53 $0.32 $0.30 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 330 HEALTH FUND Reveflue changes $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 a> o o 0 to tr fl C Fn ❑ 2009 ❑ 2010 O 0 0 ,n in ro S 0 o O O O o O O 69 Solid Waste Chg for Federal/State Licenses & Miscellaneous Fund Balance General Fd Trfs Trfs Services Permits 2010 Revenue Total $9,251,014 (2009 $8,812,531) Licenses & Permits, Federal/State, $390,400, 4% $3,733,185, 41% Chg for Services, $724,119, 8% Solid Waste Trfs, $507,909, 5% $3,051,901, 33% Miscellaneous, $43,500, 0% Fund Balance, $800,000, 9% 331 HEALTH FUND 2010 Expenditures Total $8,451,014 (2009 $8,112,531) Health Communications, $1,328,935, 16% Administration, $191,450, 2% Envirnmental Health Services, $2,429,649, 29% $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 Community Health Services, $4,119,729, 48% Health Preparedness, $381,251, 5% CD 0) N N I-- r Oi Expenditure Changes:: e��G . ��c'e • ea GI' eC za�� o�ee e �e •eea\ z G 332 SEVEN YEAR TREND Health Subsidy 4 3.5 3 2.5 1.5 0.5 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 333 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY The 2010 budget for the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment represents a significant decrease of $538,570 (15%) to net county cost from the 2009 approved budget. These projected reductions decrease county per capita support of health programming from $14.73 to $11.39 and FTEs per 10,000 population from 3.84 to 3.34 in 2010. The reductions were made more difficult because the department faces increased costs for insurance and retirement funding for employees. The decrease in funding necessitates a reduction in public health infrastructure with FTE investment projected to decrease in 2010 for the second year in a row to 89.41 from 95.09 actual in 2008. Achieving targeted reductions of 15% cannot be achieved without reducing the department's workforce even further in 2010. In preparing the 2010 budget, the department has worked diligently to cut costs while maintaining the ability to provide essential public health services to an ever growing number of residents of Weld County. The conundrum for health -focused businesses is that difficult economic times for communities lead more people and families to seek needed health services in the public sector just at a time when infrastructure is reduced to control expenses. Projected increases of $877,053 in non - county general fund revenues for 2010 (mostly from new grants and some increases in fees to recover program operating costs) help mitigate reductions in workforce and programming. The 2010 budget, as presented, is vital to support achieving our strategic goals and priorities, allow for the provision of the ten essential public health services, enable core public health functions to be fulfilled on behalf of the residents of Weld County, and maintain a fundamental readiness and ability to respond to health emergencies that might occur in 2010 (e.g., novel H1N1 pandemic influenza). The 2010 budget for the Administration Services Division projects increased insurance costs and a 0.9% increase in County -funded contributions to PERA, resulting in an actual increase of $17,322 in personnel services. Despite significant growth in the county's population, added complexity of grant reporting requirements, and a greater dependence on billing third -party payers for services rendered, the FTE commitment in this division has remained unchanged since 2007. The division proposes a decrease of $14,500 in purchased services for 2010. Revenue from the sale of copies of birth and death certificates is expected to decrease by $23,550 as compared to the budgeted amount for FY2009. The Health Communication, Education and Planning Division of the department (formerly known as Health Promotion Section) projects a net decrease in county support for its programs of $44,527 when compared to 2009. To achieve targeted reduction goals for 2010, the division proposes to eliminate 1.0 FTE of a county -funded Health Communication Supervisor position. Overall, division Personnel Costs for FY2010 decrease by $60,484; this reduction adds to reductions in Personnel Services of $103,609 in 2009. Over a two-year period FTE's will have been reduced from 15.0 to 10.75 leaving the division no choice but to limit vital health education programming directed at increasing healthy behaviors in residents of Weld County. To more accurately track activities related to Emergency Preparedness, the Personnel expenses of 0.5 FTE BT Health Planner will be transferred in 2010 from this division to the Division of Public Health Preparedness (supervision of this staff person will remain with HCEP). Supply costs are projected to increase by $67,866, largely due to a new grant -funded program (LiveWell). Purchased Services are projected to increase by $165,978 due to programming in three primary grant -funded programs: LiveWell, Cancer, Cardiovascular and Chronic Pulmonary Disease (CCPD), and Tobacco Education and Prevention Program. Revenue for the division is projected to increase in 2010 by $265,347 due to grants. 334 The Public Health Services Division (formerly known as Community Health Services) 2010 budget request includes a projected decrease in net county cost of $269,559, or 14.1%. A significant portion (39%) of this projected decrease is related to reductions in Personnel Services ($104,688). FTE's are projected to decrease by 2.19 to 43.41 from 45.60 in FY2009. Supply costs are projected to increase by $78,776 as a result of two grant programs (Colorado Family Planning Initiative and Women's Wellness Connection). Purchased Services expense is anticipated to increase by $139,164 largely related to the same two programs -- CFPI and WWC. Revenues are projected to increase by $397,164 for 2010 as a result of the department being awarded additional contract funding in Women's Wellness Connection and Colorado Family Planning Initiative, a new Juvenile Assessment Center program, and increases in fees and donations for clinical services. The Environmental Health Services Division 2010 budget submission proposes a decrease in net county cost of $215,155, or 16%, when compared to the 2009 budget. The division's Personnel Services are projected to be reduced by $34,690, despite an increase in insurance costs and PERA contributions, through the elimination of 1.0 FTE Environmental Health Specialist. This position is being eliminated in response to the projected loss of a contract to perform storm water inspections and a reduced request for services in the ISDS and Land Use Programs. The division projects a 1% increase ($2,775) in Supplies for 2010. Purchased Services are proposed to increase by $21,069 primarily as a result of budgeting for temporary staff in 2010; the hiring of temporary staff may be necessary to complete work assignments as a result of the proposed elimination of the EH Specialist position. Despite the anticipated loss of revenue in the ISDS Program ($7,900) and other revenue decreases in the Storm Water ($9,000) and STD ($11,825) Programs, revenue generated by this division is projected to increase in 2010 by $234,569. The increase is due primarily to the additional appropriation of $182,909 from the Solid Waste Fund, an increase of $56,600 from retail food establishment fees authorized by the State of Colorado, and an increase of $24,000 in the division's Air Quality Monitoring agreement with CDPHE. The Public Health Preparedness Division 2010 proposed budget projects a decrease in net county cost of $8,185. Personnel costs are projected to increase by $49,843; this projected increase is due mostly to the transfer of a position from another division (HCEP is transferring the BT Health Planner position to this division in FY2010), but also to anticipated higher insurance expenses and PERA contributions. Supplies and Purchased Services are projected to increase minimally ($9,948) in 2010; these increases will be directed at activities anticipated to be necessary to control the spread of H1N1 influenza. Accounting for the transfer of a position (0.50 FTE) to this division, FTE dedicated to emergency preparedness and response activities is projected to remain the same in 2010. The Department of Public Health and Environment remains challenged by keeping pace with the demand for services as Weld County continues as one of the fastest growing regions of Colorado. In addition, the complexity of the work and the intermittent surges in activity in the area of Public Health (e.g., bioterrorism readiness, disease control and investigation of West Nile virus infection, Pertussis, rabies, Q -fever, influenza, and other communicable diseases endemic to our region, H1N1 readiness, etc.) create unique staffing issues that add to routine functions. The department's 2010 proposal includes a 15% reduction in county revenue, and attempts to judicially and conscientiously reduce the public health infrastructure available to preserve, promote and protect the health of residents of Weld County and their environment for future generations. While reductions in services and surge capacity will be necessary, the budget will provide the Department the minimum resources needed to carry out its essential services and core functions in support of Weld County's goals and objectives. 335 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final LICENSES AND PERMITS 2560 41400 4210 LICENSES 2560 41400 4221 PERMITS TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2530 41300 4321 MEDICAID 2560 41400 4321 MEDICAID 2530 99900 4321 MEDICAID 2530 41300 4322 MEDICARE 2530 99900 4322 MEDICARE 2530 99900 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2500 41100 4340 GRANTS 2530 41300 4340 GRANTS 2535 41300 4340 GRANTS 2560 41400 4340 GRANTS 2580 41500 4340 GRANTS 2520 99900 4340 GRANTS 2530 99900 4340 GRANTS 2560 99900 4340 GRANTS 2580 99900 4340 GRANTS 2500 41100 4356 COUNTIES TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTA. CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2500 41100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2530 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2560 41400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2530 99900 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS 2560 41400 4510 FINES 2560 41400 4680 OTHER 2530 99900 4690 DONATIONS 2560 41400 4730 OTHER FEES TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER 2560 41400 712700 TRANSFER TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH FUNC 110,800 167,400 167,400 0 230,900 223,000 223,000 0 341,700 390.400 390,400 0 48,300 48,300 48,300 0 17,800 16,000 16,000 0 203,188 214,056 214,056 0 4,000 8,000 8,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 42,000 42,000 42,000 0 412,171 413,315 413,315 0 0 21,731 21,731 0 94,659 0 0 0 12,225 3,360 3,360 0 6,000 0 0 0 509,535 774,882 774,882 0 1,399,825 1,844,460 1,844,460 0 80,800 104,800 104,800 0 232,902 241,281 241,281 0 3,590,471 3,051,901 3,051,901 0 6,654,876 6,785,086 6.765,086 0 215,000 191,450 191,450 0 181,780 182,369 182,369 0 274,875 261,500 261,500 0 88,800 88,800 88,800 0 760,455 724.119 724,119 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 18,000 28,000 28,000 0 8,000 11,000 11,000 0 30,500 43,500 43,500 0 325,000 507,909 507,909 0 8,112.531 8,451,014 8.451,014 0 336 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2500 41100 ADMINISTRATION 2520 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 2520 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 2530 41300 NURSING 2530 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 2535 41300 NURSING 2560 41400 ENVIROMENTAL 2560 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 2580 41500 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 2580 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 215,000 191,450 191,450 0 629,567 566,303 566,303 0 478,548 762,632 762,632 0 940,956 797,598 797,598 0 2,915,324 3,322,131 3,322,131 0 135,844 0 0 0 2,307,434 2,327,508 2,327,508 0 102,801 102,141 102,141 0 125,976 141,160 141,160 0 261,081 240,091 240,091 0 8,112,531 8.451,014 8,451,014 0 337 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary - - All Departments - - Fund 2500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 5,698,359 $ 6,063,906 $ 5,931,209 $ 5,931,209 Supplies 601,696 418,398 573,065 573,065 Purchased Services 1,581,819 1,625,481 1,941,890 1,941,890 Fixed Charges 554,549 649,554 605,157 605,157 Contra Expense - 550,078 - 644,808 -600,307 -600,307 Capital 14,156 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 7,900,501 $ 8,112,531 $ 8,451,014 $ 8,451,014 Revenue 5,231,577 4,522,060 5,399,113 5,399,113 Net County Cost $ 2,668,924 $ 3,590,471 $ 3,051,901 $ 3,051,901 Budgeted Positions 95.09 93.10 89.41 89.41 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See individual units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See individual units. BOARD ACTION: See individual units. 338 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs See individual budget units Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) 4.07 3.84 $12.59 $14.73 3.34 $11.39 Goal HSI: To improve the health of our diverse communities by assuring individuals, families, and communities gain ' reater control of factors that influence their health. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HSI-1: Key health indicators move in a positive direction Further enhance partnerships with local community media organizations In Process In Process In Process Health disparities will be diminished Utilize best practice social marketing techniques in all WCDPHE public information campaigns WCDPHE is a leader and partner with communities in addressing local health concerns and underlying causes; and is included in health - related community planning and policy making Develop Public Health Briefs on various public health issues Improve our individual and organizational cultural competence Make improvements to WCDPHE web site WCDPHE works in partnership with key stakeholders keeping our core values in mind An ongoing community assessment process including a multi- year Community Action Plan that addresses health factors and reduces disparities 339 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS1-2: Key health indicators move in a positive direction Share information across divisions and with community partners about the advocacy roles currently used by health department staff In Process In Process In Process Health disparities will be diminished Identify and define new advocacy roles for staff and community partners WCDPHE is a leader and partner with communities in addressing local health concerns and their underlying causes Work with community health providers to expand their capacity to accept Medicaid and other government reimbursements WCDPHE is included in health - related community planning and policy making WCDPHE works in partnership with key stakeholders keeping our core values in mind An ongoing community assessment process including a multi- year Community Action Plan that addresses health factors and reduces disparities 340 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HSl-3: Key health indicators move in a positive direction Create new partnerships and enhance existing partnerships and collaborations that engage community members in the work of public health In Process In Process In Process Health disparities will be diminished WCDPHE is a leader and partner with communities in addressing local health concerns and their underlying causes Increase communication and enhance relationships with Federal, state, regional, and peer health department partners to better understand capacities, reduce competition, and share resources To the extent possible, use customized public health promotion messages and strategies in all of our diverse communities WCDPHE is included in health - related community planning and policy making WCDPHE works in partnership with key stakeholders keeping our core values in mind An ongoing community assessment process including a multi- year Community Action Plan that addresses health factors and reduces disparities 341 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 Goal H52: To assure dignified access to necessary, appropriate, affordable, continuous, and timely health care, including wellness and prevention services. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1152-1: Weld County will have a more integrated (public) health care system Barrier to receiving preventive services will be diminished or eliminated; citizens will have better access to care By 2009, gather information for decision making on what the direct services role of the Health Department will be in 2010 By 2010, expand, retain, or eliminate health department services as guided by community needs By 2010, enhance Southwest County service provision Over the next three years, diversify funding sources for health care and education programs by seeking new and flexible funding from Federal agencies and others Done In Process In Process HS2-2: Weld County will have a more integrated (public) health care system Barrier to receiving preventive services will be diminished or eliminated; citizens will have better access to care By 2009, increase WCDPHE's capacity to use the North Colorado Health Alliance Electronic Medical Record system for program evaluation and planning purposes By 2008, Northern Colorado Health Alliance service providers will be electronically linked to the Colorado CIIS Immunization Registry through electronic medical record system N/A Done Done N/A N/A N/A Goal HS3: To lessen adverse public health impacts of chronic and communicable diseases, land use developments, and disasters. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HS3-1: WCDPHE can mobilize an effective public health response to a public health event/emergency no matter how large or small Within three years, we will develop and strengthen partnerships with schools, worksites, healthcare providers, and community agencies to extend the work of public health; we will also expand our use of best practices in our surveillance activities and intervention capacities for chronic and communicable diseases In process In process In process WCDPHE is recognized for its preparedness work 342 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 Goal 1153: To lessen adverse public health impacts of chronic and communicable diseases, land use developments, and disasters. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HS3-1: WCDPHE can mobilize an effective public health response to a public health event/emergency no matter how large or small Within three years, we will develop and strengthen partnerships with schools, worksites, healthcare providers, and community agencies to extend the work of public health; we will also expand our use of best practices in our surveillance activities and intervention capacities for chronic and communicable diseases In process In process In process WCDPHE is recognized for its preparedness work DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS3-2: WCDPHE can mobilize an effective public health response to a public health event/emergency no matter how large or small WCDPHE is recognized for its preparedness work Over the next three years bring in national active community environment experts to educate and assist at least four Weld County municipalities/communities in their planning for active community environments Work with those municipalities/ communities that desire assistance to adopt code that promotes land use and walkable/bikable communities by 2010 Over the next three years, continue to minimize negative impacts to the environment of proposed land use developments In process In process In process HS3-3: WCDPHE can mobilize an effective public health response to a public health event/emergency no matter how large or small Continue to investigate complaints that may impact the public's health Whenever possible, work to resolve identified issues and violations through information and education and when necessary enforce applicable laws In process In process In process WCDPHE is recognized for its preparedness work 343 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS3-4: WCDPHE can mobilize an effective public health response to a public health event/emergency no matter how large or small Continue to participate in the North East All Hazards Regional collaborative association (NEAHR Pursue at least one additional Public/Private Partnership each year and continue to participate in the local Faith Based Initiative In process In process In process WCDPHE is recognized for its preparedness work Identify one new and non-traditional funding possibility Participate in emergency response, as appropriate, with other external partner organizations Develop a key contact for all identified Special Population Groups within Weld County Ensure all employees are trained to the appropriate National Incident Management System (NIMS) level Perform semi-annual site threat assessment of Health & Environmental office complex (north complex only); address at least one critical identified threat protection deficit, by removal, mitigation or minimization Complete production of the department's Business Continuity Plan and train key department staff to function in a Business Continuity Plan Conduct a Departmental Business Continuity Exercise; maintain the county's public health laboratory capacity to respond to bio-terror and other public health emergencies 344 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 Goal HS4: To enhance our organization's effectiveness by continually monitoring our performance and evaluating our pro. rams. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS4-l: WCDPHE will contribute to the evidence base of public health in Colorado WCDPHE leaders, managers, and staff will use information in a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions Program evaluation will be practiced consistently across program areas and will be integrated into the day-to-day management of most programs Monitor our progress toward achieving our strategic objectives annually in February of each year and report on our accomplishments to the County Commissioners, Board of Health, and the public By 2008, investigate performance models applicable to local public health agencies that evaluate return on investment/cost per client In process Done In process N/A In process N/A HS4-2: WCDPHE will contribute to the evidence base of public health in Colorado WCDPHE leaders, managers, and staff will use information in a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions Program evaluation will be practiced consistently across program areas and will be integrated into the day-to-day management of most programs Complete a space needs assessment of the health section of the north (Greeley) complex; year 1 Define, assess, document, and prioritize current evaluation skills, knowledge, and practice. In year 1, public health services; year 2, environmental health; and year 3, health communication, education and planning. Assess capacity of and prioritize need for existing and developing health education programs targeting community needs; year 1 Done In process Done N/A In process N/A N/A In process N/A 345 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS4-3: WCDPHE will contribute to the evidence base of public health in Colorado In conjunction with community partners, do county -wide community assessment in 2008 based on a proven approach (e.g., NACCHO MAPP) to community health needs assessment In process In process In process WCDPHE leaders, managers, and staff will use information in a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions Program evaluation will be practiced consistently across program areas and will be integrated into the day-to-day management of most programs By 2009, develop and then institute a community action plan that addresses the issues identified in the comprehensive assessment By 2010, in conjunction with community partners, ongoing community assessment and action planning efforts will be routinized HS4-4: WCDPHE will contribute to the evidence base of public health in By 2008, create an internal task force whose charge is to reduce the public health nursing staff turnover rate to less than 15% by 2010 Done N/A N/A Colorado Done N/A N/A WCDPHE leaders, managers, and staff will use information in a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions Program evaluation will be practiced consistently across program areas and will be integrated into the day-to-day management of most programs By 2008, cross train southwest county staff to fulfill day-to-day duties competently Over the next three years, offer the following workforce development opportunities: (a) cultural competence training, (b) vital statistics training, (c) evaluation 101 (i.e., logic modeling, CDC evaluation framework), (d) social marketing strategies for programs, and (e) public health nursing competency training Develop and implement a succession planning process in order to retain our workforce skills and knowledge In process In process In process 346 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non -Program Revenue - - 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non -program revenues from the State per capita health funds. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 375,315 412,171 413,315 413,315 Net County Cost $ - 375,315 $ - 412,171 $ - 413,315 $ - 413,315 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The State appropriation for per capita funding increased $1,144. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 347 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Administration Services - - 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Overall administration of Department of Public Health and Environment, including personnel, fiscal management, data and records management, procurement and facilities management. The Executive Director is the official registrar of vital statistics for Weld County. Records of births and deaths that occur in Weld County are kept and certified copies are available upon request from the deputy registrars. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 541,553 $ 581,576 $ 598,898 $ 598,898 Supplies 14,511 16,950 16,950 16,950 Purchased Services 138,902 179,018 164,518 164,518 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Contra Expense - 500,706 - 562,544 -588,916 -588,916 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 194,260 $ 215,000 $ 191,450 $ 191,450 Revenue 194,260 215,000 $ 191,450 $ 191,450 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 0 0 Budgeted Positions 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increased health insurance costs and a .9% increase in County funded contributions to PERA resulted in the administration division's personal services category increase of $17,322. The division's decrease of $14,500 in purchased services represents decreases of $3,160 in postage, $50 in printing, $9,000 in phone services and $2,290 in travel. Revenue from the sale of copies of birth and death certificates is expected to decrease by $23,550 as compared to the budgeted amount for FY2009. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 348 HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2500-41100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Birth / Death Certificates issued Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost 17,308 .354 $3.56 16,000 16,000 .33 .30 $2.15 2.20 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Summary. 349 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Communication Section - - 2520-41210 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health Communication, Education and Planning includes grant funded and county funded health promotion/prevention programs that provide resources and expertise for the department and the community. The Health Communication team serves as the liaison with the local TV/radio/newspaper media for the health department. They plan, develop and disseminate emergency communication and educational materials to the public. The Health Communication team provides support internally for producing educational materials, reports, and local health data. Health Communication partners with the community in developing and implementing programs to promote healthy behaviors. Programs include traffic safety and prevention of unintentional injuries, nutrition and fitness programs, diabetes and asthma prevention, cancer prevention, tobacco use prevention, and abstinence education for prevention of teen sex, unintended pregnancy and STI/HIV, and men's health screening. Coalitions such as Drive Smart Weld County, the Diabetes Coalition, the Tobacco Coalition, and the Weld Faith Network provide expertise to the department to address these important health issues in Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 814,564 $ 795,892 $ 735,408 $ 735,408 Supplies 56,846 53,784 121,650 121,650 Purchased Services 376,282 239,525 405,503 405,503 Fixed Charges 91,347 77,218 77,765 77,765 Contra Expense -25,013 -58,304 -11,391 -11,391 Gross County Cost $ 1,314,026 $ 1,108,115 $ 1,328,935 $ 1,328,935 Revenue 781,403 509,535 774,882 774,882 Net County Cost $ 532,623 $ 598,580 $ 554,053 $ 554,053 Budget Positions 15.0 11.75 10.75 10.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel costs will decrease by $60,484. Total FTE will decrease from 11.75 to 10.75 with the elimination of 1.0 FTE HC Supervisor position. LiveWell added a 1.0 FTE coordinator and a .25 OT Ill shifted from county funding; Tobacco reduced FTE by .5, and .5 FTE BT Planner moved to Public Health Preparedness. 350 HEALTH COMMUNICATION SECTION (CONTINUED) 2520-41210 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (CONTINUED): Supplies will increase by $67,865 with the new LiveWell grant and an increase in funding for the CCPD grant supplies. Purchases Services increased by $165,978 with LiveWell grant, CCPD and Tobacco grant increases. Fixed Charges will increase by $547. In Contra Expense a transfer of BT funding offsets the Public Information Officer (PIO) salary for PI ($11,391). There will be a decrease of $47,913 with the transfer of BT Planner position to OPHP budget. Revenue will increase by $265,347 with the LiveWell grant increase in CCPD grant. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Classes, programs, events, worksite wellness 40,300 42,000 45,000 Radio programs, blogging 600,000 650,000 700,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .46 .48 .40 Per capita cost (county support) $2.31 $2.45 $2.07 Effectiveness results Reduction in motor vehicle fatalities. 48 45 45 Reduction in teen birth rate for 15 - 17 yr. olds -- MCH data 32/1000 31/1000 30/1000 Number of obese adults -- BRFSS data 26% 25% 24% Adult Smoking rates - - BRFSS data 18% 17% 16% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Summary. 351 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Health Services - - 2530-41300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The division holds clinics for immunizations, family planning, international travel health, and Tuberculosis. It also provides immunizations, screening, counseling, communicable disease surveillance, containment, treatment, and teaching. Provides home visits for health promotion, evaluation, health assessment, and community activities. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,483,451 $ 2,777,745 $2,673,057 $2,673,057 Supplies 225,437 162,784 241,560 241,560 Purchased Services 546,363 747,272 886,436 886,436 Fixed Charges 236,600 304,323 318,676 318,676 Capital 7,980 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,499,831 $ 3,992,124 $4,119,729 $4,119,729 Revenue 2,108,450 2,081,552 2,478,716 2,478,716 Net County Cost $ 1,391,381 $ 1,910,572 1,641,013 1,641,013 Budgeted Positions 43.65 45.60 43.41 43.41 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services decreased by $104,688 due to a reduction of 2.19 FTE. There is an increase of $78,776 in supplies and an increase of $139,164 in purchased services as a result of grants from CPI and WWC. Fixed charges increased $14,353 for overhead charges. Gross county costs increased $127,605. Revenues increased $397,164 with new JAC program, CFPI, reimbursement increases with WWC, fee and donation increases. Net county costs decreased by $269,559. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 352 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2500-41300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Immunizations given Family Services ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 15,000 15,000 13,280 1.87 1.87 1.62 $7.56 $5.96 $6.12 7,000 8,000 6,080 1,500 1,800 2,000 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Summary. 353 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Environmental Health Services - - 2560-41400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The primary mission of the division is to protect and perpetuate the public health of the citizens of the county with scientific risk assessments, the development of policies, monitoring and inspections, consultation, and the enforcement of regulations designed to protect food, water, and air supplies. Services include technical assistance and consultation, monitoring and sampling, inspection and enforcement, education and planning activities. The laboratory's purpose is to process medical and water samples and aid in the evaluation of potential agents of bioterrorism events. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,650,840 $ 1,699,365 1,664,675 1,664,675 Supplies 293,318 164,530 167,305 167,305 Purchased Services 482,506 400,977 422,046 422,046 Fixed Charges 157,332 169,323 175,623 175,623 Contra Expense - 24,359 - 23,960 0 0 Capital 6,176 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,565,813 $ 2,410,235 2,429,649 2,429,649 Revenue 1,473,438 1,064,900 1,299,469 1,299,469 Net County Cost $ 1,092,375 $ 1,345,335 1,130,180 1,130,180 Budgeted Positions 25.94 25.25 24.25 24.25 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Overall, net county cost was reduced by 16%, or $215,155 when compared to the division's approved budget for fiscal year 2009. The Personnel Services request was reduced by $34,690, despite an increase to insurance costs, due to the reduction of one Environmental Health Specialist position. This position is being eliminated in response to the loss of a contract to perform storm water inspections and a reduced request for services in the ISDS and Land Use programs. Note: In an effort to realize savings in the current fiscal year, it is expected that this "reduction in force" will occur during the 3rd quarter of 2009. The request for Supplies represents a 1% increase, or $2,775 from fiscal year 2009. The request for Purchased Services represents an increase of $21,069 or 5%. The increase is primarily the result of budgeting $20,000 for temporary staff, which may be necessary to complete work assignments as the result of the reduction of an Environmental Health Specialist. 354 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2560-41400 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (Continued): Despite the expected loss of revenue ($7,900) in the ISDS program and other reduced revenue in the Stormwater ($9,000) and STD programs ($11,825), revenue generated by the Environmental Health Services Division is expected to increase by $234,569. The increase is due primarily to the additional appropriation of $182,909 from the Solid Waste Fund, an increase of $56,600 from retail food establishment fees, and an increase of $24,000 to the contract with the CDPHE for air quality monitoring. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs* Food inspections, activities, complaints 2,478 2,550 2,475 Laboratory analyses 17,801 18,000 18,000 Household Hazardous Waste Disposed 412,479 415,000 420,000 (#'s) Environmental Planning Reviews 312 288 288 I.S.D.S. Inspection, activities, complaints 312 295 295 Waste Inspections, activities, complaints 181 185 185 Biosolids Inspections, activities, complaints 171 171 171 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1.08 1.04 .91 Per capita cost (county support) $4.68 $5.51 $4.22 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Summary. 355 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Public Health Preparedness - - 2580-41500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Public Health Preparedness utilizes grants and county funding to enhance the ambient level of emergency preparedness, both internally (county organization) and externally (constituents). This unit is charged with preparing for, and responding to, incidents and events, which threaten the quality and quantity of life within the purview of health and environment; develops exercises and evaluates various plans, procedures and protocols associated with emergency preparedness; is assigned disease investigation duties and functions, along with regional bioterrorism laboratory duties and functions; houses the county wide Health Alert Network, communications and warning operations; and is engaged in local, regional, state and national collaborative efforts associated with these disciplines. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 207,951 $ 209,328 $ 259,171 $ 259,171 Supplies 11,584 20,350 25,600 25,600 Purchased Services 37,766 58,689 63,387 63,387 Fixed Charges 69,270 98,690 33,093 33,093 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 326,571 $ 387,057 $ 381,251 $ 381,251 Revenue 298,711 238,902 241,281 241,281 Net County Cost 27,860 $ 148,155 $ 139,970 $ 139,970 Budgeted Positions 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The 0.5 FTE change is not an actual increase in the overall department, only a reflection of codifying the FTE assigned to the program. Previously, the 0.5 FTE was carried in Health Communications. Supplies and Services, are increased $5,250, and $4,698, respectively, from grant revenue, and have been directed towards certain anticipated activities related to projected H1 N1 mitigation. Fixed expenses are projected $65,597 less than the previous year. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 356 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS (CONTINUED) 2580-41500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000 capita Per capita cost (county support) .11 $.12 .10 .11 $.61 $.52 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Summary. 357 358 SEVEN YEAR TREND Human Services $18 $16 $14 $12 $6 $4 $2 $0 2004 i 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 H 2010 359 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY The Human Services Fund for 2010 is projected to increase by $352,053, or 2.7%, for a total of $13,422,348. Increases are primarily in Head Start ($222,761) and Job programs ($99,102). Other programs are stable with little change. Being totally reliant upon state and federal funding sources, Human Services continues to operate in an environment of uncertainty. The Human Services Fund budget has been constructed based upon the best available information on the funding levels. It is very likely that many of the amounts will be changed between now and the actual execution of the 2010 budget. The primary programs of Human Services are associated with the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funded under the Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. This program is anticipating $2,829,217 for 2010. In addition, the Job Service contract will be $806,000, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) is funded at $738,220, primarily for training of TANF clients. The Human Services Fund is totally funded through state and federal programs with the exception of the 25% local match for the Aging program, which amounts to $12,351. Other programs of the Human Services Fund remain relatively stable programmatically with the following 2010 funding levels: Supplemental Foods Area Agency on Aging Senior Nutrition CSBG $ 1,428,630 $ 1,914,441 $ 491,560 $ 279,270 In the above programs, Weld County must continue to be responsive and reactive to federal and state administrative and budget changes in 2010. The budget includes funding for Head Start programs totaling $3,172,500, with an additional $1,615,000 for Migrant Head Start. The Pre -School Program is funded at $147,510, and all the educational programs total $4,935,010. 360 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2611 60000 4314 USDA 2617 60000 4314 USDA 2653 60000 4314 USDA 2654 60000 4314 USDA 261496 60000 4314 USDA 267695 60000 4314 USDA 2611 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2627 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2628 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2636 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2637 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2640 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2643 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2644 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2651 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2652 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2653 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2654 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2655 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2657 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2658 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2673 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 261496 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 262695 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 263907 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 265995 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 267695 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 267895 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 267695 60000 4324 VALUE OF INVENTORY 2628 60000 4340 GRANTS 2629 60000 4340 GRANTS 2632 60000 4340 GRANTS 2635 60000 4340 GRANTS 2646 60000 4340 GRANTS 2648 60000 4340 GRANTS 2665 60000 4340 GRANTS 2666 60000 4340 GRANTS 2667 60000 4340 GRANTS 2671 60000 4340 GRANTS 262995 60000 4340 GRANTS 2651 60000 711000 TRANSFER TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2617 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2645 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2646 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES TOTAL CHARGED FOR SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS 2652 60000 4690 DONATIONS 2653 60000 4690 DONATIONS TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 217,500 217,500 217,500 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 33,250 33,250 33,250 0 10,450 10,450 10,450 0 42,600 42,600 42,600 0 208,500 208,500 208,500 0 2,814,779 2,955,000 2,955,000 0 33,000 33,000 33,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 376,710 582,000 582,000 0 597,893 549,473 549,473 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 299,073 433,500 433,500 0 166,610 0 0 0 64,600 64,600 64,600 0 230,330 230,330 230,330 0 271,860 271,860 271,860 0 31,000 31,000 31,000 0 20,210 20,210 20,210 0 2,910 2,910 2,910 0 5,740 6,830 6,830 0 85,310 85,310 85,310 0 1,489,860 1,572,400 1,572,400 0 780,000 806,000 806,000 0 18,000 27,220 27,220 0 998,280 998,280 998,280 0 1,220,131 1,220,130 1,220,130 0 191,990 279,270 279,270 0 1,411,850 0 0 0 54,578 54,578 54,578 0 83,051 83,051 83,051 0 738,220 738,220 738,220 0 130,750 155,200 155,200 0 151,200 130,000 130,000 0 255,750 217,695 217,695 0 10,000 0 0 0 5,000 7,000 7,000 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 476,520 476,520 476,520 0 178,500 178,500 178,500 0 12,351 12,351 12,351 0 13,815.356 12,831,738 12.831.738 0 135,510 135,510 135,510 0 240,000 240,000 240,000 0 70,000 70,000 70,000 0 445.510 445,510 445,510 0 100 100 100 0 145,000 145,000 145,000 0 145,100 145,100 145,100 0 14,405.966 13,422,348 13,422,348 0 361 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2611 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 3,032,279 3,172,500 3,172,500 0 261496 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 1,532,460 1,615,000 1,615,000 0 2617 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 147,510 147,510 147,510 0 262695 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 780,000 806,000 806,000 0 2627 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 33,000 33,000 33,000 0 2628 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 262995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 178,500 178,500 178,500 0 2632 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 738,220 738,220 738,220 0 2635 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 130,750 155,200 155,200 0 2636 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 376,710 582,000 582,000 0 2637 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 597,893 549,473 549,473 0 2638 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 54,578 54,578 54,578 0 263907 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 18,000 27,220 27,220 0 2640 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 2642 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 299,073 433,500 433,500 0 2644 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 166,610 0 0 0 2645 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 240,000 240,000 240,000 0 2646 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 221,200 200,000 200,000 0 2648 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 255,750 217,695 217,695 0 2649 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 83,051 83,051 83,051 0 2651 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 57,321 57,321 57,321 0 2651 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 5,990 5,990 5,990 0 2651 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 13,640 13,640 13,640 0 2652 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 115,840 115,840 115,840 0 2652 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 3,860 3,860 3,860 0 2652 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 260 260 260 0 2652 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 110,470 110,470 110,470 0 2653 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 231,240 231,240 231,240 0 2653 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 2,020 2,020 2,020 0 2653 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 137,930 137,930 137,930 0 2653 60115 TRANSPORTATION COST POOL 78,920 78,920 78,920 0 2654 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 41,450 41,450 41,450 0 2655 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,180 2,180 2,180 0 2655 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 30 30 30 0 2655 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 18,000 18,000 18,000 0 2657 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 90 90 90 0 2657 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 2,820 2,820 2,820 0 2658 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 570 6,830 6,830 0 2658 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 5,170 0 0 0 265995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 45,890 45,890 45,890 0 265995 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 17,060 17,060 17,060 0 265995 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 935,330 935,330 935,330 0 2665 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 10,000 0 0 0 2666 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 5,000 7,000 7,000 0 2667 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 2671 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 258,680 258,680 258,680 0 2671 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 7,660 7,660 7,660 0 2671 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 160,180 160,180 160,180 0 2671 60115 TRANSPORTATION COST POOL 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 2673 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 42,500 42,500 42,500 0 2673 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 3,850 3,850 3,850 0 2673 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 30 30 30 0 2673 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 38,930 38,930 38,930 0 267695 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,834,481 1,422,630 1,422,630 0 267695 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 267895 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 122,000 209,280 209,280 0 267895 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 18,500 18,500 18,500 0 267895 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 51,490 51,490 51,490 0 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICE FUND 14.405.966 13,422,348 13.422,348 0 362 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary — All Budget Units in Human Services Fund DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See Individual Units. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 6,802,008 $ 7,073,472 $ 7,318,085 $ 7,318,085 Supplies 2,180,281 2,088,010 2,077,310 2,077,310 Purchased Services 3,692,099 3,905,813 4,023,953 4,023,953 Fixed Charges 5,934 3,000 3,000 3,000 Gross County Cost $ 12,680,322 $ 13,070,295 $ 13,422,348 $ 13,422,348 Revenue 12,667,971 13,057,944 13,409,997 13,409,997 Net County Cost $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See Individual Budget Units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See Individual Budget Units. BOARD ACTION: See Individual Budget Units. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 363 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Head Start Program - - 60000-2611 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Hea th, nutrition, education and day care programs for economically disadvantaged pre-school aae children. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,031,831 $ 1,836,142 $ 1,976,000 $ 1,976,000 Supplies 416,799 473,500 473,500 473,500 Purchased Services 579,944 719,637 720,000 720,000 Fixed Charges 4,775 3,000 3,000 3,000 Gross County Cost $ 3,033,349 $ 3,032,279 $ 3,172,500 $ 3,172,500 Revenue 3,033,349 3,032,279 3,172,500 3,172,500 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. The personnel cost increases are the result of ARRA- Stimulus funding made available to the Head Start program. The permanent impact of these increases will actually only result in a permanent increase of 3.06%. However, the program was also allowed a provision of a one-time, temporary, increase to workers, which will continue through Mid 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients Served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Per capita cost In -Kind Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain full case load slots 562 562 562 $13.39 $3.35 $12.44 $11.84 $3.11 $2.83 562 562 562 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 364 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Migrant Head Start - - 60000-2614 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health, nutrition and day care programs for infant/toddler and preschool -age migrant children in Northeast Colorado and the Western slope. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,433,076 $ 941,387 $ 1,015,000 $ 1,015,000 Supplies 241,351 146,600 150,000 150,000 Purchased Services 687,948 444,473 450,000 450,000 Fixed Charges 1,159 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,363,534 $ 1,532,460 $ 1,615,000 $ 1,615,000 Revenue 2,363,534 1,532,460 1,615,000 1,615, 000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: At the end of CY 2008, Weld County decided to relinquish the Western Slope portion of the Migrant Head Start Program. The personnel cost increases are the result of ARRA-Stimulus funding made available to the Head Start program. The permanent impact of these increases will actually only result in a permanent increase of 3.06%. However, the program was also allowed a provision of a one-time, temporary, increase to workers, which will continue through Mid 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Per capita cost (county support) In -kind Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain performance standards 180 180 180 $6.29 $6.29 $6.03 $1.53 $1.53 $1.40 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 365 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Preschool Fund - - 60000-2617 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Contracted Preschool slots with various school districts. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 99,046 $ 88,900 $ 88,900 $ 88,900 Supplies 25,470 36,610 36,610 36,610 Purchased Services 13,739 22,000 22,000 22,000 Gross County Cost $ 138,255 $ 147,510 $ 147,510 $ 147,510 Revenue 138,255 147,510 147,510 147,510 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Full slots maintained ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 41 41 41 $0.61 $0.61 $0.55 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 366 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Wagner/Peyser - - 60000-2626 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer all Job Service activities to the residents of Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 597,454 $ 686,400 $ 686,400 $ 686,400 Supplies 24,805 28,860 28,860 28,860 Purchased Services 50,347 64,740 90,740 90,740 Gross County Cost $ 672,606 $ 780,000 $ 806,000 $ 806,000 Revenue 672,606 780,000 806,000 806,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. We will be expending additional ARRA (Stimulus) funds on this program during the first six months of 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outauts Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Job placements ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 19,000 19,000 19,000 $2.97 $3.20 $3.01 64% 64% 64% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 367 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summer Job Hunt - - 60000-2627 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer youth employment program for the summer months. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 29,301 $ 29,300 $ 29,300 $ 29,300 Supplies 132 500 500 500 Purchased Services 3,567 3,200 3,200 3,200 Gross County Cost $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 Revenue 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 2,750 2,750 2,750 $0.14 $0.14 $0.13 515 515 515 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 368 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Consumer Navigator - - 60000-2628 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program to enhance workforce center services to the disabled of the community. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 44,737 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 Supplies 2,058 2,000 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 859 3,000 3,000 3,000 Gross County Cost $ 47,654 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Revenue 47,654 50,000 50,000 50,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Output goals maintained ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 260 260 260 $0.21 $0.19 $0.18 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 369 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Employment First - - 60000-2629 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program allows eligible Food Stamp clients to participate in various job search and development activities to retrain them for better paying jobs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 78,540 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Supplies 2,058 2,500 2,500 2,500 Purchased Services 66,918 56,000 56,000 56,000 Gross County Cost $ 147,516 $ 178,500 $ 178,500 $ 178,500 Revenue 147,516 178,500 178,500 178,500 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1,750 1,750 1,750 $0.73 $0.73 $0.67 350 350 350 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 370 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: WIRED Grant -60000-2644 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant will develop the Multi Industry System Technician (MIST) training program to provide skills necessary for employment in energy and related industries. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 48,100 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 11,100 0 0 Purchased Services 0 107,410 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 166,610 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 166,610 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This grant will be completed during 2009. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 371 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Assistance to Needy Families - - 60000-2632 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Employment/Training program for clients on welfare. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 421,432 $ 497,070 $ 497,070 $ 497,070 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 150,395 241,150 241,150 241,150 Gross County Cost $ 571,827 $ 738,220 $ 738,220 $ 738,220 Revenue 571,827 738,220 738,220 738,220 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served/month Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Meet Federal participation rates ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 330 330 330 $3.03 $3.03 $2.76 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 372 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Admin.) 60000-2635 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program tracks the administration for all of the Workforce Investment Act grants. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 142,140 $ 115,000 $ 145,000 $ 145,000 Supplies 46 200 200 200 Purchased Services 9,756 15,550 10,000 10,000 Gross County Cost $ 151,942 $ 130,750 $ 155,200 $ 155,200 Revenue 151,942 130,750 155,200 155,200 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.54 $0.54 $0.58 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 373 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Adult) 60000-2636 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training for eligible adults. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 261,055 $ 181,000 $ 260,000 $ 260,000 Supplies 24,890 25,000 25,000 25,000 Purchased Services 275,153 170,710 297,000 297,000 Gross County Cost $ 561,098 $ 376,710 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 Revenue 561,098 376,710 582,000 582,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. Additional ARRA (Stimulus) funds for this program are expected during the first six months of 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate 210 210 210 $1.55 $1.55 $2.17 86% 86% 86% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 374 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Youth) 60000-2637 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training programs for in -school and out -of -school youth. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 178,794 $ 448,420 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Supplies 540 10,000 10,000 10,000 Purchased Services 92,584 139,473 139,473 139,473 Gross County Cost $ 371,918 $ 597,893 $ 549,473 $ 549,473 Revenue 371,918 597,893 549,473 549,473 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Youth served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered Employment rate (Older Youth) Skill Attainment rate (Younger Youth) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 294 294 294 $2.45 $2.45 $2.05 57% 57% 69% 60% 57% 60% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 375 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Multi -Disciplinary Youth Assessment - - 60000-2638 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides planning and treatment plans for at - risk youth in combination with the DA, SS, North Range and Island Grove. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 42,764 $ 50,070 $ 50,070 $ 50,070 Supplies 84 500 500 500 Purchased Services 0 4,008 4,008 4,008 Gross County Cost $ 42,848 $ 54,578 $ 54,578 $ 54,578 Revenue 42,848 54,578 54,578 54,578 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain requirements of contract ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 120 120 120 $0.22 $0.22 $0.20 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 376 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 10% Incentive Grant (CIMS) 60000-2639 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: To foster the development and continuous improvements of the Weld County region workforce system. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 13,724 $ 14,220 $ 14,220 $ 14,220 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 12,546 3,780 13,000 13,000 Gross County Cost $ 26,740 $ 18,000 $ 27,220 $ 27,220 Revenue 26,740 18,000 27,220 27,220 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.07 $0.07 $0.10 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 377 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Statewide Activities Grant) 60000-2640 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the WIA programs and are used for staff training, administration, contracted services and other programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,154 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Supplies 4,920 8,000 5,000 5,000 Purchased Services 19,859 13,000 16,000 16,000 Gross County Cost $ 28,933 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Revenue 28,933 25,000 25,000 25,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.13 $0.11 $0.09 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 378 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Dislocated Worker Program) 60000-2643 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides retraining for laid off clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 220,208 $ 165,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 Supplies 25,121 23,500 23,500 23,500 Purchased Services 304,803 110,573 190,000 190,000 Gross County Cost $ 550,132 $ 299,073 $ 433,500 $ 433,500 Revenue 550,132 299,073 433,500 433,500 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. We will be expending additional ARRA (Stimulus) funds on this program during the first six months of 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 120 120 120 $1.23 $1.23 $1.62 91% 91% 91% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 379 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Educational Lab - - 60000-2645 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund covers the cost of operating the Computer Education Lab. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 130,594 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Supplies 70,128 60,000 60,000 60,000 Purchased Services 41,100 40,000 40,000 40,000 Gross County Cost $ 241,822 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Revenue 241,822 240,000 240,000 240,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) GED's obtained ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1,135 1,200 1,350 $.98 $.98 $.90 90 90 90 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 380 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: AmeriCorps Program - - 60000-2646 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Youth Corp program is the Federal AmeriCorps program for youth to receive stipends and college tuition credits for public service work. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 122,110 $ 187,428 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Supplies 16,964 15,000 15,000 15,000 Purchased Services 35,653 18,772 35,000 35,000 Gross County Cost $ 174,727 $ 221,200 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Revenue 174,727 221,200 200,000 200,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Participants in program Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients completing program ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 12 12 12 $0.91 $0.91 $0.75 6 6 6 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 381 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Tight Corp Program - - 60000-2648 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Youth Corp Program engages youth in community service and educational activities in lieu of out of home placement with the Department of Social Services. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 89,531 $ 109,295 $ 109,295 $ 109,295 Supplies 4,475 8,400 8,400 8,400 Purchased Services 99,776 138,055 100,000 100,000 Gross County Cost $ 193,782 $ 255,750 $ 217,695 $ 217,695 Revenue 193,782 255,750 217,695 217,695 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Participants Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Participants completing program 24 24 24 $1.05 $1.05 $.82 19 19 19 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 382 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pillars of Successful Independence - - 60000-2649 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: A TANF Program for foster children, ages 13-1/2 to 15 preparing them for transition to adulthood. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 27,146 $ 57,860 $ 57,860 $ 57,860 Supplies 0 600 600 600 Purchased Services 4,131 24,591 24,591 24,591 Gross County Cost $ 31,279 $ 83,051 $ 83,051 $ 83,051 Revenue 31,279 83,051 83,051 83,051 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) To enhance the ability of Foster children to gain independence. ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 15 15 15 $0.34 $0.34 $0.31 15 15 15 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 383 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Admin.) 60000-2651 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Older American's Act Grant administers the Senior programs of the Area Agency on Aging. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 51,430 $ 10,830 $ 10,830 $ 10,830 Supplies 380 0 0 0 Purchased Services 20,580 66,121 66,121 66,121 Gross County Cost $ 72,390 $ 76,951 $ 76,951 $ 76,951 Revenue 60,039 64,600 64,600 64,600 Net County Cost $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Programs administered Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) Per capita cost (other) 11 $0.05 $0.26 11 11 $0.05 $0.05 $0.25 $0.24 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 384 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Support) 60000-2652 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides several contracted services to the elderly; adult day care, ombudsman services, peer counseling, outreach, respite services and legal counseling. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 77,890 $ 91,460 $ 91,460 $ 91,460 Supplies 20 20 20 20 Purchased Services 111,250 138,950 138,950 138,950 Gross County Cost $ 189,160 $ 230,430 $ 230,430 $ 230,430 Revenue 189,160 230,430 230,430 230,430 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Outreach — Hispanic Senior Outreach 1,600 500 1,000 Adult day care 7,900 7,000 2,100 Peer Counseling 2,300 2,000 2,000 Legal consultation/representation 1,100 900 900 Homemaker and personal care 1,200 1,100 1,000 Ombudsman Services 1,600 1,600 1,600 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $.95 $.95 $.86 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 385 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Congregate Meal Program) 60000-2653 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides meals to the senior population at 21 nutrition sites around the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 145,470 $ 98,080 $ 98,080 $ 98,080 Supplies 7,800 5,890 5,890 5,890 Purchased Services 211,680 346,140 346,140 346,140 Gross County Cost $ 364,950 $ 450,110 $ 450,110 $ 450,110 Revenue 364,950 450,110 450,110 450,110 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Meals served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 52,000 52,000 52,000 $1.85 $1.85 $1.68 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 386 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Home Delivered Meals) 60000-2654 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides home delivered meals through Meals on Wheels. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 44,170 41,450 41,450 41,450 Gross County Cost $ 44,170 $ 41,450 $ 41,450 $ 41,450 Revenue 44,170 41,450 41,450 41,450 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Meals Served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained. ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 13,400 13,400 13,400 $0.17 $0.17 $0.16 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 387 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Health Services) 60000-2655 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides health services to the senior community. This grant supports the annual senior health fair. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 7,520 $ 16,490 $ 16,490 $ 16,490 Supplies 290 1,700 1,700 1,700 Purchased Services 2,070 2,020 2,020 2,020 Gross County Cost $ 9,880 $ 20,210 $ 20,210 $ 20,210 Revenue 9,880 20,210 20,210 20,210 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 450 450 450 $0.08 $0.08 $0.08 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 388 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Elder Abuse Grant) 60000-2657 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides for educational training to the community on elder abuse. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 840 $ 1,010 $ 1,010 $ 1,010 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 10 1,900 1,900 1,900 Gross County Cost $ 850 $ 2,910 $ 2,910 $ 2,910 Revenue 850 2,910 2,910 2,910 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Educated CNA, staff, NH residents/families 200 200 200 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Education of long term staff Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 389 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Special Ombudsman) 60000-2658 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds supplement the support services fund. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,500 $ 3,910 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 610 1,830 1,830 1,830 Gross County Cost $ 5,110 $ 5,740 $ 6,830 $ 6,830 Revenue 5,110 5,740 6,830 6,830 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Complaints investigated Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work outputs are maintained ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 150 150 150 $0.02 $0.02 $0.03 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 390 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Single Entry Point) 60000-265995 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides case management services to Medicaid eligible clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,500 $ 866,030 $ 866,030 $ 866,030 Supplies 0 5,710 5,710 5,710 Purchased Services 610 126,540 126,540 126,540 Gross County Cost $ 5,110 $ 998,280 $ 998,280 $ 998,280 Revenue 5,110 998,280 998,280 998,280 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with, at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Divert Medicaid Eligible clients from Institutional care to cost effective home care 1,000 $4.10 1,000 1,000 1,000 $4.10 $3.73 1,000 1,000 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 391 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (NCMC) - - 60000-2666 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 7,470 3,900 7,000 7,000 Gross County Cost $ 7,470 $ 3,900 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Revenue 7,470 3,900 7,000 7,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This is a year-to-year grant. The department will be applying for this grant again this year. No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 10 10 10 $0.02 $0.02 $0.03 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 392 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (VALE) - - 60000-2667 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 5,460 10,000 10,000 10,000 Gross County Cost $ 5,460 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Revenue 5,460 10,000 10,000 10,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 600 600 600 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 393 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (State Funds) 60000-2671 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Supplemental funding source started 7/1/2000. This department utilizes a combination of HB-1108 funds and General Fund Long Bill monies. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 91,400 $ 119,260 $ 119,260 $ 119,260 Supplies 300 1,500 1,500 1,500 Purchased Services 159,600 355,760 355,760 355,760 Gross County Cost $ 251,300 $ 476,520 $ 476,520 $ 476,520 Revenue 251,300 476,520 476,520 476,520 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Dental/Vision/Hearing Clients Served Meals served Loneliness contacts Ombudsman clients served Chore clients served Efficiency Measures Per capita cost 100 100 100 13,000 3,700 6,500 1,700 1,500 1,500 600 300 600 35 45 30 $1.95 $1.95 $1.78 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 394 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Part E Family Caregiver Support - - 60000-2673 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides support to family who are caring for relatives at home. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 27,800 $ 26,120 $ 26,120 $ 26,120 Supplies 1,030 190 190 190 Purchased Services 27,810 59,000 59,000 59,000 Gross County Cost $ 56,640 $ 85,310 $ 85,310 $ 85,310 Revenue 56,640 85,310 85,310 85,310 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Care giver Support - units of services 1,900 1,900 1,900 Grandparents raising grandkids - clients served 300 300 300 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.35 $0.35 $0.32 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain requirements of grant Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 395 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Supplemental Foods - - 60000-267695 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program distributes USDA commodities to low income eligible mothers, infants and children, and elderly of the County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,730 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Supplies 1,110,270 1,220,130 1,220,130 1,220,130 Purchased Services 220,740 198,500 198,500 198,500 Gross County Cost $ 1,332,740 $ 1,428,630 $ 1,428,630 $ 1,428,630 Revenue 1,332,740 1,428,630 1,428,630 1,428,630 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Clients served/month Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain or increase average monthly participation rate ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 4,400 4,400 4,400 $5.86 $5.86 $5.33 Yes Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 396 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Services Block Grant - - 60000-267895 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides a range of community services to the low income and elderly of the community. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 92,600 $ 65,690 $ 65,690 $ 65,690 Purchased Services 176,530 213,580 213,580 213,580 Gross County Cost $ 269,130 $ 279,270 $ 279,270 $ 279,270 Revenue 269,130 279,270 279,270 279,270 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2010. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Transportation of elderly Volunteer support Employment opportunities low-income unskilled adult labor force Efficiency Measures Per capita cost Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals maintained 5,250 6,000 6,100 1,500 2,330 $1.15 Yes 1,500 1,500 2,330 2,330 $1.15 $1.04 Yes Yes GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 397 #01ce: lURe COLORADO 398 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes or other earmarked revenue of the county which finance specified activities as required by law or administrative action. CONTINGENCY FUND: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $7,400,000. Given the uncertainty of state and federal funding and tax collections, it is recommended that this amount, coupled with the approximate $3,000,000 carry-over fund balance in the General Fund be retained. SOLID WASTE FUND: The Solid Waste Fund is funded at the anticipated revenue level of fees at $660,000. There is an anticipated beginning fund balance of $200,000. The Department of Public Health and Environment costs will be $373,127 for the Household Hazardous Waste program; $134,782 is funded for solid waste inspections and monitoring by the Health Department; $15,000 for community cleanups; and $52,091 to fund the roadside trash pickup program with Useful Public Service clients. $85,000 is funded by a transfer to the Sheriff's Office to support code enforcement for illegal dumping. CONSERVATION TRUST FUND: The Conservation Trust Fund is budgeted at $435,000 based upon the anticipated operating costs for 2010. The budget reflects funding of Island Grove Park only. EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992. The amendment requires that an emergency reserve be created to be used for declared emergencies only. It also requires each local government to reserve one percent or more for 1993, two percent or more for 1994, and three percent or more for all later years of the fiscal year spending, excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. A reserve of $5,000,000 has been established for 2010, which is greater than the required three percent of fiscal spending. 399 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title LOTTERY 2200 73700 4332 LOTTERY MS ICELLA N EOUS 2200 73700 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUNE 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 420,000 430,000 430,000 0 5,000 425,000 5,000 5,000 435,000 435,000 0 0 400 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2200 73700 CONSERVATION TRUST 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 425,000 435,000 435,000 0 TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 425.000 435.000 435.000 0 401 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONSERVATION TRUST FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Conservation Trust Fund - - 2200-73700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Accounts for revenue received from the State of Colorado to be used for the acquisition, development, and maintenance of new conservation sites within Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 396,667 401,601 405,574 405,574 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 23,399 29,426 29,426 Gross County Cost $ 396,667 $ 425,000 $ 435,000 $ 435,000 Revenue 438,671 425,000 435,000 435,000 Net County Cost $ - 42,004 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenues from the Colorado Lottery are being projected at $430,000 and $5,000 from interest earnings. Island Grove Park will have a gross cost of $497,574, less than $92,000 in revenue, for a net of $405,574, up $3,973 or less than 1% from 2009. Increase is due to increased usage raising utility costs for the building. A total of $29,426 is allocated for capital improvements to the buildings. Since 2002, the Missile Site Park has been funded in the General Fund. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Historically, the following is the amount of money received annually since the lottery started: 1983 $ 194,698 1984 195,304 1985 151,033 1986 138,069 1987 162,736 1988 154,074 1989 130,764 1990 136,726 1991 200,103 1992 220,219 1993 264,371 1994 205,534 1995 327,162 1996 $312,024 1997 356,262 1998 373,962 1999 286,971 2001 358,802 2002 391,780 2003 385,070 2004 361,926 2005 333,837 2006 453,233 2007 431,372 2008 438,671 402 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200-73700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): The funds have been used for maintenance and development of Island Grove Park and the Missile Site Park, with the exception of the following items: Entity 1983: Greeley 1984: Greeley 1985: Greeley 1986: Greeley LaSalle Ault Dacono Windsor Ft. Lupton Independence Stampede Purpose Civic Auditorium Civic Auditorium Civic Auditorium Civic Auditorium Community Center Park System Park Improvements Park Improvements Pearsin Park Sports Complex Headquarters Facility Amount $ 141,464 $ 143,000 $ 90,000 $ 51,500 10,000 7,500 3,000 6,000 10,000 5,000 Since 1987 all funds have gone to the two county parks. Beginning in 2002 only Island Grove Park has been funded. In 1984, the Board adopted the following criteria, in priority order, for the use and allocation of Weld County lottery funds. This policy remains in force today: 1. To maintain and develop the two existing county parks. 2. Projects must enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Weld County. 3. Projects must contribute to or compliment the economic development activities of Weld County. 4. Projects must have an area impact or significance. 5. Funds used for local community projects must have substantial local support. 6. Outside of existing county parks, no operating funds shall be contributed to projects. 403 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200-73700 BOARD ACTION: Due to the City of Greeley not giving employees raises in 2010, the net expenditures have been reduced to $384,962, which is a reduction of $20,612. The unallocated amount will increase from $29,426 to $50,038 in the Final Budget. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Island Grove Park Visitors Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) Cost Per Visitor 412,000 415,000 420,000 $1.74 $0.98 $1.65 $0.97 $1.51 $0.97 404 CONTINGENCY FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 2300 90300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES TOTAL CONTINCENCY FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 0 20,734,672 20,734,672 0 0 20,734,672 20,734,672 0 405 CONTINGENCY FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2300 90300 CONTINGENT TOTAL CONTINGENCY FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 0 7,400,000 7.400.000 7,400.000 0 406 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONTINGENCY FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency Fund - - 2300-90300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Contingency Fund exists to cover reasonably unforeseen expenditures or revenue short -falls. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 7,400,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 7,400,000 Revenue/Fund Bal. 1,998,666 7,400,000 28,185,599 28,185,599 Net County Cost $ - 1,998,666 $ 0 $ 20,785,599 $ 20,785,599 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $7,400,000 with a carry-over fund balance of $7,450,927, and property tax of $20,734,672. An ending fund balance of $20,785,599 is projected. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that all new 2010 property tax and any savings of property tax in the General Fund in 2010 be budgeted in the Contingency Fund for 2010 to level spending and revenues in 2011 and 2012. BOARD ACTION: 407 EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 2400 53100 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 408 EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2400 53100 EMERGENCY RESERVE TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5.000,000 5,000.000 0 0 409 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Emergency Reserve - - 2400-53100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992, which requires that an emergency reserve be established to be used for declared emergencies only, and that each local government shall reserve for 1993 1 percent or more, for 1994 2 percent or more, and for all later years 3 percent or more of the fiscal year spending, excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The emergency reserve is funded at $5,000,000, which meets the three percent fiscal year spending requirement. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that $5,000,000 be funded to comply with the TABOR Amendment requirement passed in 1992. Reserve is funded from carry-over fund balance. BOARD ACTION: 410 SOLID WASTE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title CHARGE FOR SERVICES 90200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 660,000 660,000 660,000 0 660,000 660,000 660,000 0 411 SOLID WASTE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2700 21240 TRANSFER 2700 90200 SOLID WASTE 2700 90200 TRANSFER TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 0 85,000 85,000 0 330,000 67,091 67,091 0 330,000 507,909 507,909 0 660.000 660.000 660.000 0 412 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Code Enforcement - - 2700-21240 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget accounts for code enforcement for littering, illegal dumping, and roadside trash pick-up program. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 85,000 85,000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Code Enforcement function has been combined with the Animal Control function in the Sheriff's Office. The cost of the code enforcement function is $85,000. See budget unit number 1000-21230 for a detailed discussion of the program. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval and funding of program from the Solid Waste surcharge. BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs Number of Complaints Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 800 800 800 $0.351 $0.00 $0.317 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Sheriff Public Safety Bureau (Budget Unit 1000-21200) goals. 413 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Solid Waste Fund - - 2700-90200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund accounts for revenue received from a surcharge on dumping fees at solid waste disposal sites to combat environmental problems, promote trash clean-up, provide for the household hazardous materials program, and to further improve and develop landfill sites within the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 225,554 660,000 575,000 575,000 Fixed Charges 1,147,377 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,372,931 $ 660,000 $ 575,000 $ 575,000 Revenue 713,402 660,000 575,000 575,000 Net County Cost $ 659,529 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Due to the annexation of the Erie Laidlaw landfil , the revenue from that site ($740,000 annually), have not be received since 2007. Therefore, the revenue estimate is $660,000. The Department of Public Health and Environment costs for the Household Hazardous Waste program will be $373,127. $15,000 is budgeted for community clean-ups, and $52,091 to fund the roadside trash pick-up program with Useful Public Service clients. $134,782 is funded for solid waste inspections and monitoring by the Health Department. Since the landfill sites no longer impact county roads due to being located off of state highways no funds are provided for road projects to mitigate landfill impacts. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. There are no undesignated funds in the 2010 budget to mitigate impacts of landfills, such as road access, cleanups, and transfer stations. A $200,000 fund balance also exists for the same needs if required. As indicated above, revenues have been held conservative. Due to the annexation of the second Erie landfill, the county has lost the revenue from that site. Erie will pay approximately $13,000 for Health Department inspections of the landfill in Erie, and for costs to offset the receiving of household hazardous wastes from Erie residents. BOARD ACTION: 414 SOLID WASTE FUND (CONTINUED) 2700-90200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Landfill Inspections Household Hazardous Material (HHM) Surcharge Collected Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (collected) Per capita HHM cost 45 45 45 $707,377 $335,000 $373,127 $635,000 $660,000 $660,000 $3.06 $2.71 $2.46 $3.03 $1.37 $1.39 415 Inc COLORADO 416 SEVEN YEAR TREND Capital Expenditures 18 16.40 16 14 13.21 12 10 0 z O J J_ 8 6 4 2 0 6.63 2.26 6.38 7.54 2008 10.00 2010 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 417 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND SUMMARY The Capital Expenditures Fund was established to budget for financial resources used for the acquisition or improvement of capital facilities of the county. A detailed Long Range Capital Plan for 2010-2014 is presented in this section and relates to the specifics of the 2010 capital project budget. The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2010 program is funded at $10,000,000, with $7,300,000 from property tax, $100,000 from capital expansion fees, $2,000,000 from Energy Impact Grants, $500,000 from a federal criminal justice grant for the crime lab, and $100,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $5,000,000 for a Regional Crime Lab Building, $250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities, and $100,000 for special projects. A carry-over beginning fund balance of $2,500,000 is anticipated, and $7,150,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2010. Capital projects impacting the 2010 and future years' operational costs include the additional Community Corrections facility that will be completed in mid -2010. The facility will add $80,000 in 2010 in utilities and operational costs and $160,000 in 2011. Program costs for the facility are paid entirely from state Community Corrections grants. The costs will be offset from rental of the facility to the contractor operating the facility. The Administrative Building will add $180,000 in 2013 for operational costs, the same as the District Attorney's Building in 2015. The Regional Crime Lab will add $240,000 in operational and maintenance costs in 2011; however, the participating law enforcement agencies will each pay one -eighth of the costs, so Weld County's share will only be $30,000. Court remodels are in existing space and once completed will not add to maintenance costs, and the staff are all state employees. It is estimated that the additional jail space planned for construction in 2014 will impact the operational budget by $1,210,000 in 2014, $770,000 in 2015, and $1,100,000 in 2016. Special projects and Public Works facility projects are primarily cosmetic enhancements to buildings that will not impact operating costs, but will improve the appearance and functionality of the buildings involved. 418 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 4000 17500 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL 4000 17500 4340 GRANTS MISCELLANEOUS 4000 17500 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS FEES 4000 17500 4730 OTHER FEES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 2009 Budget 2010 Request 2010 Recommend 8,000,000 7,300,000 7,300,000 8,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 2010 Final 0 0 0 0 16,400,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 0 419 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 4000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 16,400,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 16,400.000 10.000,000 10.000.000 0 420 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Capital Expenditures - - 4000-17500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Capital projects for general county use. Created in accordance with C.R.S. 29-1-301(1.2) April 5, 1984. Formerly Public Works - County Buildings Fund (Fund 33). RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Capital 11,871,635 16,400,000 10,000,000 10, 000,000 Gross County Cost $ 11,871,635 $ 16,400,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Revenue 3,582,532 8,400,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Fund Balance - 2,295,232 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 5,993,871 $ 8,000,000 $ 7,300,000 $ 7,300,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2010 program is funded at $10,000,000, with $7,300,000 from property tax, $100,000 from capital expansion fees, $2,000,000 from Energy Impact Grants, $500,000 from a federal criminal justice grant for the crime lab, and $100,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $5,000,000 for a Regional Crime Lab Building, $250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities, and $100,000 for special projects. A carry-over beginning fund balance of $2,500,000 is anticipated, and $7,150,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Budget reflects the 2010 funding level of the Proposed Long Range Capital Plan for 2010 - 2014. The actual plan is on the pages immediately following. BOARD ACTION: 421 WELD COUNTY LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE-YEAR PLAN 2010 - 2014 Presented By: Donald D. Warden, Director Finance and Administration May, 2009 422 LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE YEAR PLAN 2010 - 2014 INTRODUCTION: Section 14-3 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter provides: "The Board may require that the Director of Finance and Purchasing submit, at the time of submission of the annual budget, a five-year capital improvements program and budget. Such program shall include recommended projects, construction schedule, estimate of cost, anticipated revenue sources, methods of financing, and such other information as may be required." This five-year plan projects capital improvements for 2010 - 2014. The recommended program for capital construction is intended as a guideline to be adjusted by the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis. It represents flexible goals for organizing solutions to county program needs, and it is intended to provide the Board of County Commissioners with the perspective for making fiscal policy decisions. Annual modifications in the plan will reflect necessary adjustments and priorities, changes in programs, and readjustments of other county fiscal requirements. This report has four (4) sections: 1. Introduction 2. Financing Alternatives 3. 2010 - 2014 Five-year Plan 4. 2010 Budgetary Impact The section on financing recommends a program for funding the next five years' capital construction. This section lists the various sources of revenue currently available to the county, and the alternatives available for financing the remainder of the capital projects program. The 2009 - 2014 five-year plan section provides a list of recommended projects and the time schedule for the next five fiscal years. Additionally, it provides justification for the recommendation and attempts to enumerate problems and recommended solutions for the capital improvements program over the next five years. The project section describes each recommended project, and provides information on the existing situation, the proposed solution, and the financing plan for each project. The last section of the report provides a recommended 2010 budget for the capital construction program. It provides specific detail regarding each recommended project and the impact on the 2010 county budget. 423 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES 424 FINANCING Overview: There are a number of ways to finance capital improvement projects. Some of the most common methods are: 1. Pay as you go: Pay as you go is a method of financing capital projects with current revenues -- paying cash instead of borrowing against future revenues. Pay as you go has several advantages. First, it saves interest cost. Second, pay as you go protects borrowing capacity for unforeseen major outlays that are beyond any current year's capacity. Third, when coupled with regular, steady completion of capital improvements and good documentation and publicity, pay as you go fosters favorable bond ratings when long term financing is undertaken. Finally, the technique avoids the inconvenience and considerable cost associated with marketing of bond issues, advisors, counsel, printing, etc. However, there are practical and theoretical disadvantages to a pay as you go policy. First, pay as you go puts a heavy burden on the project year. Second, it creates awkward fluctuating expenditure cycles which do not occur with extended financing. Third, a long life asset should be paid for by its users throughout its normal life rather than all at once by those who may not have the use of it for the full term. Finally, when inflation is driving up construction costs, it may be cheaper to borrow and pay today's prices rather than wait and pay tomorrow's. 2. All borrowing policy: An all borrowing policy or a substantial reliance on debt financing is another approach. The annual available resources could be used entirely for debt service with the size of the annual resources setting the limit on the amount that could be borrowed. Capital reserve: A capital reserve plan is an approach where the annual resources available could be accumulated in one or more capital reserve funds, the amounts invested, and when any funds become adequate to pay for a proposed project, the fund could be expended. This is a good approach when a county has a capital requirement which can wait. Accumulation of the necessary capital funds over a period of time is a feasible approach, assuming a relatively stable construction dollar. HB1111 passed in 1982 specifically provides for a capital improvements trust fund for capital reserves. 425 4. Partial pay as you go policy: A partial pay as you go policy is a common approach. Some of the annual resources would be used to finance capital improvements directly, and the remainder would go for supporting a debt program. Even if a local government pursues a borrowing policy, an initial down payment out of current revenues is a possibility. A customary five to ten percent down is a limited pay as you go policy, and assures that the voters authorizing the approval will make a cash contribution so all of the burden will not be postponed. 5. Joint financing: An ever increasing number of cities and counties are benefitting from joint development of a project. The construction of a city/county office building and recreational areas are examples. This avenue of funding and planning capital projects normally is advantageous to both jurisdictions. 6. Lease/Purchase: Local governments can utilize lease/purchase methods for needed public works projects by having it constructed by a private company or authority. The facility is then leased by the jurisdiction on an annual or a monthly rental. At the end of the lease period, the title to the facility can be conveyed to the jurisdiction without any future payments. The rental over the years will have paid the total original cost plus interest. This method has been used successfully in a number of jurisdictions. The utilization of a building authority would fall under this category of financing. Numerous considerations are involved in the selection of the foregoing approaches, or some combination thereof: 1. Political realities may preclude utilization of one or more of the above alternatives. For example, the passage of general obligation bonds as a debt financing mechanism has not met recent success at the polling places in most jurisdictions. 2. The pay as you go concept has three distinct advantages. A. It provides great flexibility to the county for future periods of economic recession or depression but does not accumulate large fixed -charge costs. B. It avoids the payment of interest charges. C. It imposes upon public officials the full political responsibility for levy of the taxes necessary to pay the local share of such projects. 3. The debt financing approach has the advantage of spreading the cost over a generation of current users of public facilities, thereby imposing upon each a significant portion of the cost of each project. 4. In an inflationary period, one must take into account the extent to which prepayment for capital outlay is warranted, when the opportunity for repayment of the principal and interest in dollars that are less expensive can be arranged. 426 5. During periods of rapid rise in costs, the time delay necessary to accumulate down payments or full pay as you go resources invites higher costs which may wipe out most, if not all, of the advantages of non-payment of interest. In the five-year capital projects plan, a combination of funding methods will be recommended to finance capital construction in an attempt to balance the economy of a payment in full program with the fairness of sharing the burden among present and future taxpayers. This recommended financial program reflects consideration of many factors, including the availability of cash, anticipated interest rates at the time of construction, and projected inflationary cost increases that would result from project delays. 427 DEBT FINANCING Before discussing specific types of borrowing, it is appropriate to review some of the basic constitutional statutory provisions which generally are applicable to debt financing. Article XI, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution provides that no debt may be created by a political subdivision of the state, unless the question of incurring such debt has been approved by a majority of the qualified electorate voting. Any obligation paid, or contracted to be paid, out of a fund that is a product of a tax levy is a debt within the means of the Constitution (Trinidad vs. Haxby, 136 Colorado 168, 315 p 2d 204 -- 1957). In addition to voter approval, Article XI, Section 6 requires the debt be incurred by adoption of a legislative measure which is irrevocable until the indebtedness is fully paid or discharged. The ordinance must: 1. Set forth the purpose for which the bond proceeds will be applied, and 2. Provide for the levy of the tax which, together with such other revenues as may be pledged, will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the debt. The Constitution delegates to the Legislature the duty to establish statutory limitations on the incurrence of debt. The total amount of debt which a county may incur may not exceed 3 percent of the assessed value in the county, which is slightly over $108 million dollars in Weld County. Section 4 of Article X, Section 20 (TABOR Amendment) requires voter approval for any form of multi -year debt. It states that an election is required: "Except for the refinancing of district bonded debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing district pension plans, creation of any multiple -fiscal year direct or indirect district debt or other financial obligation whatsoever without adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocable and held for payments in all future fiscal years." In addition to the state statute, Section 14-6 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter specifies: "The incurring of indebtedness by the county and the issuance of evidences of such indebtedness shall be authorized, made and executed in accordance with the laws of the state, including the borrowing of money to fund county projects, the pledging of project revenues and repayment thereof, and the issuance of revenue warrants, or revenue bonds, or other forms of evidence of such obligations." Before discussing specific types of bonds, it is appropriate to review some of the general characteristics of bonds. Bonds mature serially, that is, a portion of the principal is retired over the entire term of the bond issue. Interest on municipal bonds is free from Federal Income Tax which is an important feature to prospective purchasers. The term or the length of time to maturity of municipal bonds can vary considerably. Generally, the last maturing bond comes due ten to thirty years from the date of issue. Normally, the longer the maturity of the bonds, the higher the yields or return on investment demanded by the market price. Thus, a bond issue that runs thirty years will pay a higher net effective interest rate than a bond issue that runs twenty years. 428 General Obligation Bonds: General obligation bonds are secured by a pledge of the full faith, credit and taxing power of the county. The county is obligated to levy sufficient taxes each year to pay the principal and interest of the bond issue. Consequently, general obligation bonds are a debt subject to the constitutional and statutory provisions discussed earlier. Because the issue of general obligation bond pledges its full faith and credit and agrees to levy the ad valorem taxes necessary to repay the principal and interest of the bond, it is generally agreed to be a more secure investment than other types of bonds. Thus, the major advantage of general obligation financing is the low rate of interest as compared to the interest of other types of bonds. The law permits general obligation bonds to have a thirty-year term; however, general obligation bond issues usually have terms of twenty years or less. General obligation bonds, in addition to being secured by full faith and credit of the issuer, may provide additional security by pledging certain available revenues. The major disadvantage of general obligation bonds is the fact that it does require voter approval prior to issuance. Voter resistance to increased taxes may prevent a successful bond election. Revenue Bonds: Revenue bonds are not a debt in the constitutional sense. They are secured by the revenue derived from the project to be constructed, not by pledge of the full faith, credit, and taxing authority of the county. Projects typically financed by revenue bonds include airports, stadiums, and park facilities. Under the TABOR Amendment, revenue bonds can only be used for enterprise funds and operations. Although it may seem possible to pledge any non -tax revenues for payment of revenue bonds, there should be a relationship between the type of revenue pledged for payment of the bonds and the project to be financed. Although revenue bonds need not comply with the constitutional statutory provisions generally applicable to a debt, there are several statutory provisions which may affect the issuance of certain types of revenue bonds and the statutes should be consulted for specific provisions regarding the issue of revenue bonds if this method is considered. Revenue bonds are considered to be less secure than general obligation bonds because of the inability of the issuer to levy taxes to assure the payment of principal and interest. Thus, there is normally a higher interest rate on revenue bonds. The term of revenue bonds is often beyond twenty years, frequently as long as thirty years. The concept of issuing revenue bonds is based on the theory that certain projects which benefit only certain individuals should be self-supporting and should be paid for by the user of that project rather than the populace as a whole. Thus, airport revenue bonds are paid for by air travelers and airlines and parking revenue bonds are paid for by users, etc. 429 In order for a county to issue a revenue bond, the system which generates the revenues to repay the principal and interest of the bond must: 1. Have a good operating history documented by audited figures 2. Reflect good debt service coverage through use of a feasibility study completed by a recognized expert in the field. In analyzing a revenue bond issue for underwriting, an investment banker will look not only at operating statistics and coverages, but also at more basic elements, such as the necessity of the service, control over competition, and delinquency procedures. Revenue bonds are becoming more popular because they do not require voter approval and do not apply in statutory debt limits. Leases: A less traditional method of financing county facilities is a lease arrangement. A lease is executed with the county, which gives the county the option to purchase the equipment or facility during the term of the lease. All or part of the lease payments may be applied to the purchase prices. A bona fide lease option agreement is not a debt; however, an installment purchase program is a debt. A bona fide lease/option agreement is characterized by two factors: 1. Annual rental payments with automatic renewal of the lease unless terminated by either party, and 2. No obligation on the part of the local government to purchase the property if the lease is terminated. Also, some court cases indicate the annual rental must be paid from non -property tax revenues to avoid the lease being considered a general obligation. Upon exercise of the option, the local government obtains full legal title to the property. Leases of this nature are distinctively different from more conventional means of financing. Of primary importance is the security which underlies the lease period. It is not a promise to levy taxes or a pledge of revenues from the system. Rather, it is usually a promise to pay only one year at a time, with an implied intention to continue payment until ownership is transferred. As ultimate security, the holder of the lease may look to the asset which is being leased in the event of a default. There is little statutory or judicial guidance in the area of leases of this type, and the obligation to continue lease payments until title transfers is a moral, rather than a legal obligation. As a consequence, the underwriting or placement of a lease is more difficult than the underwriting of conventional bonds. The term of the leases generally are short, usually from seven to ten years. Because the security underlying the lease is not good compared with conventional financing, interest rates on leases are higher. 430 Building Authority: A building authority is a non-profit corporation which generally is formed at the request of the governing body of the county or local jurisdiction, which also appoints the Board of Directors of the corporation. Weld County created such an authority in 1987 named the Weld County Finance Corporation. The directors are the Director of Finance and Administration, County Attorney, and Director of Public Works, each appointed for ten year terms. The building authority issues its own bonds to finance a facility. To achieve the same lower interest rates that traditional municipal bonds enjoy, the building authority must obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that the interest on the authority's bonds is exempt from Federal Income Tax. Such an exemption is granted if the IRS finds the authority's bonds are issued on behalf of a political subdivision, which is determined based upon the following factors as detailed in IRS Revenue Ruling 63-20. 1. The authority engages in activities which are essentially public in nature. 2. The corporation is not organized for profit. 3. The corporate income does not inure to the benefit of any private person. 4. The political subdivision has a beneficial interest in the corporation, while the indebtedness is outstanding, and it obtains full legal title to the property on the retirement of the debt. 5. The corporation has been approved by the political subdivision which has approved the specific obligation of the corporation. Like municipal bonds, bonds issued by a corporation usually are subject to registration and other requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Security Exchange Act of 1934. After receiving a favorable ruling from the IRS, a "no action" letter should be secured from the Security and Exchange Commission, exempting the authority's bonds from these requirements. The authority then issues bonds pledging the annual rental payments as security. After issuance of bonds and construction of the facilities, the authority leases the facilities to the county. Again, this must be a bona fide lease and possess all the elements discussed under Lease/Purchase. The bonds of a building authority are similar to municipal leases in the manner in which they are viewed by investors. As with a simple municipal lease, building authority bonds are less secure than general obligation or revenue bonds. As a result, bonds issued through a building authority bear higher interest than more secure issues. 431 Certificates of Participation (COP) may be issued in the same manner as bonds. As a practical matter the COP is the same as a bond, except from a legal point of view, the COP is evidencing assignment of proportionate undivided interests in rights to receive certain revenues in the form of a lease or rental amount for the purpose of providing funding for capital improvements. The lease and COP do not constitute a general obligation or other indebtedness of the county within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or home rule charter debt limitation. The lease is a year-to-year obligation. The use of Certificates of Participation (COP) has been the only debt vehicle Weld County has ever used in the implementation of its debt policy options. The only COP issued by Weld County was done in 1997, and was paid off August 1, 2007. No outstanding debt exists for Weld County. 432 BUILDING AUTHORITY FINANCE The Philosophy: Tax-exempt financing is available through a building authority with the issuance of bonds when the facilities financed are for public purposes and the benefit is to the sponsoring public entity. The Building Authority: A building authority is a Colorado non-profit corporation created by the county itself. The county adopts a resolution calling for the creation of the Building Authority and directing counsel to draw articles of incorporation and by-laws in compliance with Colorado Statutes. A board of directors is formed. The board may consist of County Commissioners or administrative personnel or individuals not associated with any public entity. The Weld County Finance Corporation, created in 1987, consists of the Director of Finance/Administration, County Attorney, and Director of General Services as directors. Tax -Exemption of Interest: Once the non-profit corporation is created, the tax-exempt nature of interest paid on the corporation's bonds must be assured. A revenue ruling is requested from the Internal Revenue Service on the non-profit status of the corporation pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, 103(a) 1 and Revenue Ruling 63-20, and on the tax-exempt status of interest paid. Such an application involves considerable work and a detailed analysis of the situation which is presented to the Internal Revenue Service. The application includes information as to public purpose, the county, the agency using the facilities, the proposed lease terms, terms of title reversion to the county and the proposed method of financing. Corporate Bonds and the S.E.C.: As corporate bonds are subject to registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a "no action" letter must be obtained from the S.E.C. In essence, the S.E.C. says that no action will be taken if the bonds of the building authority/non-profit corporation are not registered. The Purchase Contract Once the building authority is created with powers to act, it may enter into a contract to purchase the facility. The contract should be subject to: 1. A favorable revenue ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. 2. Receipt of an S.E.C. "no action" letter. 3. Finalization of financing. 433 The Bond Issue: When all legal and tax questions are answered the building authority may issue bonds for the purchase of the facility. Normally the bonds are sold directly to an underwriter who then resells the bonds to the ultimate investor. The bonds that are issued will be an obligation of the building authority only and not a debt obligation of the county. The County Lease: Upon the issuance of the bonds and the purchase of the building by the building authority, the county can lease the building from the authority. The lease would be from year-to-year with automatic renewal unless otherwise terminated. A county lease for any period in excess of one year constitutes a debt and must be approved by voters. The Bond Security: The security of the bond holders may be only in a pledge of lease revenues by the authority. The bond holders may also have a first mortgage lien on the building. The combination of the two results in a more secure bond and a correspondingly lower rate of interest. Partial Seller Financing: Depending on factors such as the seller's motivation, whether there is an existing loan on the building, and negotiations, a bond issue can be for only the amount necessary for a down payment. The sellers can carry back the balance, receiving installment sale tax benefits on the capital gains. A revenue ruling would be required; however, interest paid on a promissory note to the seller may also be tax exempt. The total cost to the county and the building authority then may be substantially lower on this basis. 434 COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS 2004- 2008 Requirements Total Actual 2004 Actual 2005 Actual 2006 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Centennial Complex $ 5,982,573 $ 2,457,424 $ 1,009,526 $ 21,400 $ 628,871 $ 1,865,352 Courthouse 371,722 264,443 97,969 9,310 West Annex 190,633 179,783 10,850 Downtown Greeley Future Expansion 933,046 748,333 41,879 142,834 Planning Building 495,727 495,727 Grader Sheds 560,502 151,926 180,012 228,564 Human Services 34,455 34,455 Health Department 17,576 17,576 Island Grove 1,013,824 34,717 44,627 753,445 181,035 Jail 20,069,861 265,562 269,087 8,182,712 10,991,973 360,527 North County Complex 1,909,007 1,909,007 Public Works 117,381 53,010 64,371 Social Services 3,784,910 17,546 500,923 3,266,441 Southeast Building 5,036,889 206,432 1,371,376 2,492,806 966,275 South County, Other 165,347 165,347 North Admin Bldg 2,128,789 929,713 1,199,076 Alternative Use Bldg 4,313,418 1,887,721 2,425,697 Comm. Corrections Building 81,145 81,145 Building & Grounds Headquarters 755,685 755,685 Miscellaneous 1,187,715 148,844 500,073 309,525 229,273 $49,150,205 $ 6,582,520 $ 4,497,990 $13,040,370 $16,303,073 $ 8,726,252 NOTE: Expenditures listed in year incurred. 435 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAMS 2010 - 2014 Requirements Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Capital Reserve $1,650,000 $4,650,000 $2,850,000 $4,850,000 $6,550,000 $07,250,000) Jail Expansion 20,000,000 0 0 0 0 20,000,000 Courts 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 Admin Bldg 5,000,000 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 Misc Projects 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 PW Projects 500,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 Regional Crime Lab 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 DA Building 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 5,000,000 $39,150,00C $10,000,00( $ 8,200,00( $ 6,450,00( $ 6,650,00( $ 7,850,000 436 RESOURCE CAPACITY ***************** FUNDING SOURCES ***************** CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 437 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND RESOURCE CAPACITY 2010 - 2014 2010 PROPERTY TAX $ 7,300,000 GRANTS $ 2,500,000 INTEREST $ 100,000 FEES $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 10,000,000 2011 6,850,000 1,000,000 250,000 100,000 8,200,000 2012 6,000,000 0 350,000 100,000 6,450,000 2013 6,000,000 0 500,000 150,000 6,650,000 2014 6,000,000 1,000,000 700,000 150,000 7,850,000 438 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE RESOURCES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE 2010 $ 2,500,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 5,350,000 $ 7,150,000 2011 7,150,000 8,200,000 15,350,000 5,350,000 $ 10,000,000 2012 10,000,000 6,450,000 16,450,000 1,600,000 $ 14,850,000 2013 14,850,000 6,650,000 21,500,000 100,000 $ 21,400,000 2014 21,400,000 7,850,000 29,250,000 25,100,000 $ 4,150,000 439 CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Existing Situation: The Centennial Complex Jail was constructed in 1978, and was remodeled three times to increase the capacity to 294 beds. In 1997, Phase I of the North Jail Complex was constructed with 160 beds and all the core service facilities. The North Jail Complex is currently designed for a build out of 640 beds, but the site can accommodate a 960 -bed facility. Each phase would be in increments of approximately 160 - 226 beds. Jail population continues to grow in Weld County. Phase II has been completed and opened in January, 2004. Phase II added 226 beds based upon the design. Construction of Phase II allowed for the closure of the Centennial Jail and conversion of the space to accommodate Court needs. Phase III which added 374 beds, was constructed in 2006 - 2007, and was opened in February 2008. Proposed Solution: It is proposed that additional phases of the North Jail Complex be constructed in increments of 160 - 226 beds as needed. The total project of approximately 211,355 square feet will be constructed in phases. The first phase constructed in 1997 was 125,775 square feet. It included the core service facilities, such as kitchen, administrative offices, medical detention, booking area, and lobby to accommodate 640 inmates. Phase II has 226 beds and is both maximum and medium security to accommodate the projected inmate classifications. Phase II was constructed in the 2002 - 2003 time frame and became fully operational as of 2004. Phase III has 374 beds and was constructed in 2006 - 2007. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget $20,000,000 in the 2010 - 2014 capital plan budget for 350 additional beds. Nothing will be in the Capital budget in 2010 for jail construction. Impact on Operational Costs: In 2015 it is anticipated that the new jail capacity will be opened. The use of the capacity will be phased in over a two to three year period, depending on inmate population growth. Based upon past phased openings of the jail, the estimated additional annual costs are: Item 2014 2015 2016 Staffing $ 1,210,000 $ 770,000 $ 1,100,000 Medical Costs 0 600,000 320,000 Food 0 400,000 200,000 Utilities 0 60,000 0 Maintenance 0 60,000 0 440 WELD COUNTY BUSINESS PARK Existing Situation: In 1987 Weld County acquired 160 acres located in the southwest corner of "O" Street and North 11th Avenue in Greeley. Funds for the property came from the sale of the Health Building. Proposed Solution: The property is large enough to allow for future consolidation of county facilities in one area. The utilities and site improvement were developed in 1988 at an estimated cost of $1,750,000 with the aid of a $630,000 EDA Grant. The first facilities, completed in 1989, included a 15,000 square foot building for Human Services and a county motor vehicle shop. Fifty to 60 acres have been developed for building and storage sites and approximately 60 acres can be mined for gravel and reclaimed in an attractive way. The new correctional facility is located on this site, as well as Human Services, Health Department, Household Hazardous Waste Building, Training Center, Motor Pool, Public Works, Law Administration, Buildings and Grounds, Alternative Programs Facility, and two administrative buildings. A portion of the property was made available for commercial development and offered at no cost or low cost to private parties for economic development incentives. A PUD was approved for land use purposes in 1989. Financing: Development, using future years' funds, is programmed into the long-range plan under specific projects, which include a correction facility ($20,000,000), and Administrative Facility ($5,000,000). Impact on Operational Costs: See individual projects for cost impacts. 441 GRADER SHEDS / STORAGE BUILDING Existing Situation: The county currently has 18 grader sheds throughout Weld County, to accommodate road maintenance functions in all sectors of the county. The grader sheds are in various conditions, ranging from good to needing replacement. Seventeen have recently been replaced -- Nunn (1981), Gwonda (1982), Vim (1983), New Raymer (1984), Mead (1985), Rockport (1986), Kiowa (1987), Severance (1987), Gilcrest (1989), Ault (1989), Briggsdale (1991), Keenesburg (1994) Stoneham (1994), Dacono (1995), Fort Lupton (2000), Gill (2001), Galeton (2003), and New Raymer (2004), Rockport (2007), and Kersey (2009). In addition, four ice control storage buildings were constructed in 2001- 2003. An additional storage facility at the Public Works Headquarters was built in 2003. A new Buildings and Grounds facility was built in 2007, and the old facility was converted to a storage garage for emergency vehicles. An additional storage facility was purchased in 2009. Proposed Solution: An analysis of existing grader sheds determined which are required for the operational functions of the road maintenance operation in Weld County. In the process some have been sold, others consolidated, and some identified for replacement. In cases where existing grader sheds will accommodate the maintenance function, it is suggested that attention be given to those sheds that need maintenance or major improvements. Where necessary, replacement sheds have been identified. Financing: The county, since 1982, has totally reconstructed and upgraded all grader and road maintenance facilities. The county should continue a sound maintenance and replacement program, so the buildings do not fall into the disrepair condition they were in prior to 1982. The funding mechanism should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund. Funds in the amount of $250,000 per year in 2010 - 2011 are included for other Public Works facilities. Impact on Operational Costs: Since the old grader sheds are being replaced with new sheds, the county's experience is that there is approximately a $1,000 per year savings on the utilities due to the use of radiant heat and improved insulation. Staffing is unchanged. 442 JUSTICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Justice Center includes the Courthouse, Court Annexes, and Centennial Center buildings. It provides for the space needs of the 19th Judicial District. Under state law the county is obligated to provide and maintain the facilities for court related activities. The Courthouse was built in 1917 and is maintained on the Federal Register of Historical Buildings. After many remodels and upgrades it still functions as the main court facility for Weld County. In the mid - 1980's two buildings across the street from the Courthouse were acquired and remodeled to house the Probation Department. In 2001, the West Courthouse Annex Building was acquired to house the District Attorney Juvenile Division. As the population grows and court related activities grow the space requirements continue to expand. Four courtrooms were added in 2008. Proposed Solution: With the growing needs of the courts it will require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail, to courtrooms and court -related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail, the Centennial Jail was closed and remodeled into court -related space in 2004. All Sheriff's office administrative functions, along with Communications and Records, were moved to the new Public Safety Administrative Building next to the North Jail in 2003. Over time the entire Centennial Complex will become court -related space, as well as the two annex buildings to the west and east of the Courthouse. In 2004, three additional district courtrooms were created, a juvenile courtroom, and one additional county courtroom, and in 2007 four additional court rooms were built. These courtrooms will supplement the current vacant district courtroom and the visiting judge courtroom to accommodate four anticipated additional judges through 2011. The first floor of the Centennial Jail has been converted into courtrooms. The second and third floors of the jail are being remodeled for additional court and office facilities. First floor Centennial offices were converted into office space for the Clerk to the Court. The space in the Courthouse occupied by the Clerk to the Court was converted into a district courtroom. Space occupied by the Weld County Commissioners and administrative functions will be converted to court -related space after these functions move to a new administrative building sometime after 2012. Financing: The county can accommodate court related activities in the space of the Justice Center for several years. In addition, the block to the southeast of the Centennial Complex has been acquired by the county and converted into a parking lot. In the future when the need arises, that block can serve as a site for court building expansion and a parking garage structure to accommodate court space needs. Also, in the next decade it may be necessary to have court facilities in the southern part of Weld County where the population is growing at a rapid rate. The funding mechanism for all court facility needs should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund. The following page is a schedule of proposed conversion of Justice Center space. 443 CAPITAL PLAN FOR JUSTICE CENTER YEAR CURRENT USE NEW USE COST 2008 Vacant Work Release (30,000 sf) $ 4,275,000 2008 Second Floor Old Jail 2 Courtrooms $ 1,500,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release 2 Courtrooms $ 1,500,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release DA Offices $ 1,000,000 2011 Vacant Administrative Bldg. $ 5,000,000 2012 Planning Probation $ 100,000 2012 Third Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 1,200,000 2012 First Floor Centennial 1 Courtroom $ 200,000 2013 Vacant DA Building $ 5,000,000 2014+ Third Floor Centennial (DA) 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2014+ Second Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2014+ First Floor Centennial (DA) Court Offices $ 200,000 Impact on Operational Costs: Under Colorado law, county governments are required to provide space for the courts and maintenance of the facility, but all personnel and other operating expenses are paid for by the State of Colorado. The estimated additional building maintenance costs by year are: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 $ 0 160,000 0 176,000 0 444 ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS BUILDING Existing Situation: Alternative programs are currently housed in the old jail and in the West Courthouse Annex. As jail crowding becomes more and more of a problem, the alternative programs, such as work release and pre-trial programs, are used more and more by the Court. The programs currently occupy approximately 20,000 square feet. The space that the programs occupy is needed for courtrooms and Probation office space. Proposed Solution: To accommodate the space needs of the alternative programs and allow for growth in the programs, a 30,000 square foot building is proposed. The facility will be constructed in the Weld County Business Park. This puts the facility in closer proximity to the jail for support services. Financing: The new 30,000 square foot Alternative Programs Building was completed in 2008. Impact on Operational Costs: Impact of additional costs on the 2008 budget was $156,300 for utilities and maintenance. Staffing costs were unchanged, since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building. 445 LAW ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Existing Situation: Growing needs of the courts require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail, to courtrooms and court -related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail, the Centennial Jail will be closed and remodeled into court -related space. In addition, all Sheriff's office administrative functions, along with the Communications and Records, were relocated in 2004 to accommodate the courts. Proposed Solution: Since the entire jail operation was moved to the North Jail there are logistical advantages to relocate all Sheriff office functions near the jail site. To accommodate the space needs of the Sheriff's Office, a 22,000 square foot office building near the North Jail site was constructed in 2002. The building houses the Sheriff's office functions, Communications, and Records. This allows for the consolidation of all criminal justice functions at one site with the exception of patrol substations. Financing: The new Public Safety Administration Building was constructed in 2002. Funds in the amount of $2,500,000 were budgeted in 2002 for the construction of a 22,000 square foot office building. In 2009, the Records Unit will be moved from the Law Enforcement Administration Building to the former Human Services Building to free up space for the Sheriff's Office. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be no impact of additional costs on the 2010 budget for utilities and maintenance since the space has been maintained in the past. Staffing costs are unchanged, since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building. 446 REGIONAL CRIME LAB Existing Situation: Currently the county has a crime lab located in the basement of the Centennial Complex. The space is inadequate to meet the size and program requirements. Weld County is taking the lead to create a regional crime lab for Northern Colorado that would house approximately 40 crime lab staff members from various law enforcement agencies and CBI. The crime lab will be located on the University of Northern Colorado Campus in order to offer classes and internships for UNC students wanting crime lab experience and education through the criminal justice program. Proposed Solution: The proposed regional crime lab facility will consist of two floors (10,000 square feet per floor), for a total of 20,000 square feet. It will be located on the University of Northern Colorado Campus and will contain private and open office areas, waiting areas, lobby space, meeting/conference rooms, elevator(s), complete laboratory and forensics discovery area. It will be fully fire sprinkled. Building construction will be similar to those county facilities recently constructed at the Weld County Business Park. The construction will also incorporate some of the elements of the design criteria for the University of Northern Colorado. Financing: The new regional crime lab will be constructed in 2010 on the UNC campus. Land has been donated by UNC. An Energy Impact Grant in the amount of $2,000,000, a Federal grant in the amount of $500,000, and $2,500,000 in county funds, will fund the construction portion of the project. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2011 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $240,000. However, seven participating agencies will pay approximately 87.5% of this cost, or $210,000 for a net county cost of $30,000. Staffing costs are unchanged, since personnel will be transferred from the old crime lab to the new building. 447 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FACILITY Existing Situation: The Community Corrections program has been operated by private contractors since its inception in Weld County in the early 1980's. The facility that the contractors have used is the site known as The Villa, which is old dormitories on the UNC campus. UNC has encouraged the Community Corrections Facility to move off campus due to the facility housing convicted felons that are returning to the community from the Colorado Department of Corrections. Recently, there have been problems with the contractor that owns the facility providing the community correction services. The county realizes that without a county -owned community corrections facility it limits the county's choices for a contract provider of the service and the option of the county operating the facility itself through the Sheriff's Office. Proposed Solution: The Board of Weld County Commissioners, in May 2008, made the decision that the county should construct its own Community Corrections Facility in the Weld County Business Park. The site will be at the entrance of the park at the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and H Street. A 30,000 square -foot building will be constructed in 2009 to accommodate the program. Financing: The new Community Corrections Facility will be constructed in 2009 in the Weld County Business Park. An Energy Impact Grant in the amount of $400,000 along with $4,600,000 in county funds will fund the project. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2010 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $160,000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from state contracts with the State Department of Corrections through a lease to ICCS, which is the sub -contract operating the facility. Currently, the program services are provided by a private contractor (ICCS). 448 DOWNTOWN GREELEY PARKING AND LAND Existing Situation: The Courthouse and Centennial Center are located in the center of downtown Greeley. The future plans are for these facilities to be the judicial center for the 19th Judicial District that serves Weld County. Parking has been a long time problem in the area for citizens using the facilities. In addition, as Weld County looks to the future there will be a need to have land to locate future court facilities. The court administration is insistent upon having a centralized location, since other jurisdictions have had logistical problems attempting to split court facilities into more than one location. As a result, there is a need to acquire land adjacent to the current location to accommodate future court facilities. Proposed Solution: In July, 2003, the county purchased a portion of an adjacent block of property to the Centennial Complex and Courthouse to allow for surface parking in the immediate future, and to provide future building sites for future court facilities. Opportunity existed to purchase approximately 100,000 square feet adjacent to the current facilities in 2003. The parking was developed in 2004, and needed facilities can be constructed on this site in the future. Financing: In 2003, fund balance from the General Fund in the amount of $1,500,000 was transferred to the Capital Expenditure Fund to acquire the site and put money aside for the parking improvements in 2004. Approximately 250 parking spots have been developed to serve the area. As portions of the site are needed for court building sites, a parking structure can be built to accommodate added parking needs or land to the east or south of the site can be acquired for surface parking. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operation costs are anticipated. 449 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING Existing Situation: The long term plan with the development of the Weld County Business Park was for the eventual move of all administrative functions of the county to the business park. All of the functions were housed at the Centennial Complex in 1976. In 1990-91 the Assessor, Treasurer, Clerk and Recorder, and Planning were relocated to the business park. With the future space demands of the courts it is anticipated that the remaining county administrative functions at the Centennial Complex will need to be relocated to the Weld County Business Park within the next 10 years. This will leave the Centennial Complex as a justice and law enforcement center exclusively. Proposed Solution: In order to accommodate the court's space needs and the county's administrative functions it will be necessary to construct a new administrative facility at the Weld County Business Park in the next 10 years. To accommodate the space needs of the existing administrative functions and plan for future growth it is anticipated that a building comparable to the new Health Building will be required. Financing: It is recommended that in the Capital Improvement Plan that the county begin to accumulate funds in a reserve for the future construction of a new administrative building. Estimated costs for the facility will be $5,000,000. In the ten-year Capital Improvement Plan $5,000,000 is reserved for 2011. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2012 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $180,000. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $50,000. 450 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING ANNEX Existing Situation: The Social Services Building was acquired in the 1970's and in the mid 1990's an annex was added. In 2005, additional land was purchased, adjacent to and south of the two existing buildings. The additional land will accommodate another 20,000 square foot building and parking. Proposed Solution: It was proposed that a new 40,000 square foot building be constructed in Greeley on the Social Services site in 2009. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion and consolidation of the Human Services and Social Services Departments. Financing: The building was constructed in 2009. Funds in the amount of $5,000,000 were budgeted in the 2008 budget for the 40,000 square foot building. Additional parking was constructed in 2007, in the amount of $300,000. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2010 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $210,000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from grants from the State Department of Social Services. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. 451 SOUTHWEST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southwest County Service Center was developed in 2000 - 2001. With the growth in the area, additional facilities will be required to house all the County functions required to service the area. Proposed Solution: It is proposed that an additional 20,000 square foot building be constructed on the Southwest Weld County Service Center site in 2013. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion of services in the area. Financing: The building will be constructed in 2017. Funds in the amount of $4,000,000 are budgeted in the 2017 budget for the 20,000 square foot building. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2018 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $120,000. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $30,000. 452 SOUTHEAST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southeast County Service Center was acquired as a used building in the early 1980's from the City of Fort Lupton. With the growth in the area, the building was no longer large enough for the functions located in the building, and the building was in need of remodeling. Proposed Solution: In 2006, a new 20,000 square foot building was constructed in east Fort Lupton on a five -acre site. The building accommodates the historic services provided, plus Probation and increased Social Services. The location of the building in east Fort Lupton will better accommodate not only Fort Lupton residents, but also residents from the Hudson and Lochbuie areas. Additional space may be added to the site in 2016 or beyond. Financing: The building was constructed in 2006. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 453 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Existing Situation: Each year there are several small projects to update or renovate county facilities, provide for new county programs, and remodel to accommodate changing programs or meet new legal standards. An approach which provides miscellaneous funds of this nature can prevent postponing necessary remodeling of facilities and, thus, avoid added cost or delay of potential savings to the county and taxpayers. In addition, such an approach can also make better utilization of existing facilities in order to avoid the acquisition of new space and facilities. Carpet replacement should be included in this category. Proposed Solution: It is recommended that an amount of $100,000 per year be set aside for such projects in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan. Financing: It is recommended the county budget $100,000 in each future year. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 454 ACCUMULATIVE CAPITAL OUTLAY/CONTINGENCY Existing Situation: If Weld County is to embark upon a number of ventures in capital projects over the next five years, it is suggested the county proceed very cautiously and very conservatively in the area of financing. To do this, it is suggested that a contingency be set aside each year on a pay as you go basis to accommodate unanticipated cost increases or emergency situations which cannot be foreseen at this time. If the contingency amount is accumulated over the next five years, it can be used as a reserve for the capital projects program in future years, or it can be used as a funding mechanism in years beyond 2014. The primary reserve would be for a future correctional facility or other facilities at the North County Complex and southwest and southeast County administrative office sites. Proposed Solution: Budget any carry-over amount each year on a contingency basis that ultimately could be used to meet any contingency or emergency situation, or could be used as an accumulation of capital outlay funds for funding of projects beyond 2014. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget fund balance carry-overs in the capital fund each year as a contingency. Impact on Operational Costs: None. 455 MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS 456 AIRPORT Existing Situation: The Weld County Board of County Commissioners, with approval of the Airport Master Plan, committed to participate in certain enhancements at the Airport facility, especially those enhancements that will ensure the safety of airport operations. If the Board decides to continue to participate in the joint funding of the Greeley/Weld County Airport Authority with the City of Greeley, funds should be provided for in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan to accommodate the FAA ADAP program during the next five years. Funds can also be made available to maintain FAA constructed facilities. Proposed Solution: In the Long Range Capital Projects Plan for 2010, funds are included to accommodate capital improvements at the Greeley/Weld County Airport. If funding is provided, it should be for projects that emphasize safety features and other essential enhancements to the current operation. Financing: Funding, in the amount of $1,974 is required in the Airport's 2010 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Airport Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the Airport CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the Airport CIP for Weld County government. 457 SIX YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) WORKSHEET 8 C E rc N m O a L 0 0 U a 6 a It CD N O CO 0 U N N N 0 N 0 O a V a 8 0 Ori 8 oh 0 CD a 8 8 O J CO 0! GA Entitlement Fed. Diemen. ¢8 8 o5 m N 8 03. 8 co n n 8 8 7 c 8 8 R t 8 8 3 N co 8 8 e 8 8 g 8 3 HI 8 M 8 8 N N O M 86 6- 0 6 6i a8 8 O1 O 8 8 8 8 g Co g cci 8 Co 8 Co 8 8 S N 8 8 i- 8 8 ra e 6 en - 8 S 8 8 A 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Apron Rehab Phase I Total Yes 2010 cn a co co O co aL 6 w Total Year 2011 d N a c 0 a E y O J 2 Total Year 2012 d L a a c re 0 a Total Year 2013 Total - Year 2014 Pavement Fog Seal 8 0 O N 8 0 458 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND Existing Situation: With the passage of SB119 (The Colorado Lottery), 40 percent of the proceeds of the lottery are earmarked for Conservation Trust Funds in local governments. The earning potential of the lottery is anticipated to be $420,000 per year. The funds must be used for "the acquisition, development and maintenance of new conservation sites or for capital improvements or maintenance for recreational purposes on any public site". (Section 29-21-101, C. R. S.) With the passage of Amendment 8 (GO COLORADO) these funds should stabilize at $420,000 per year, plus lottery sales growth. See Conservation Trust Fund for detailed discussion. Proposed Solution: The Board has the option to use the funds in the following ways: 1. Maintain and improve Island Grove Park. 2. Maintain and improve the Missile Site park. 3. Acquire and maintain open space. 4. Develop and maintain trails. 5. Other project requests from throughout the county. Financing: In addition to Conservation Trust Funds, it is recommended that the county finance parks and recreation projects at a level of $32,000 in the General Fund from property taxes. Funds from 2010 forward are uncommitted. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 459 ISLAND GROVE Existing Situation: Weld County and the City of Greeley currently have certain joint ventures and commitments to develop the Island Grove Park facility. Some discussion has been held regarding the creation of an Island Grove Park Authority for development and management of the facility. Proposed Solution: If the Board of County Commissioners decides to continue participation in the development of the Island Grove facility, it is recommended that Conservation Trust Funds from the lottery be used to the maximum amount prior to use of county general tax funds. Financing: It is recommended that the county finance any Island Grove enhancements with Conservation Trust Funds resulting from the lottery to the maximum amount possible prior to use of general county tax funds. Beginning in 2003, $100,000 per year in General Fund dollars has been committed to the maintenance of an indoor arena facility. Also, in 2000 the County contributed $1,500,000 towards the construction of the indoor arena facility, known as the Island Grove Community Building. The facility was constructed and will be maintained jointly by the City of Greeley, Farm Show, and Weld County. $250,000 was included in the 2004 General Fund budget to add air conditioning to the Island Grove Community Building. The county paid $1,500,000 in 2006 for the Island Grove Park Master Plan that covers improvements to the park for the next 10 - 20 year period. Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Island Grove Park Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the park's CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the park's CIP for Weld County government. In most cases, the new park facilities planned will generate revenues to support the additional operating costs. 460 PROPRIETARY FUNDS SUMMARY Proprietary funds include both Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. Internal Service Funds are established to account for goods and services provided to other departments of the county on a cost -reimbursement basis. Enterprise Funds account for departments providing services primarily to third party payers. PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND: The Paramedic Service is funded totally from 2010 projected fees of $5,791,647 with no county subsidy. Total expenditures include $4,393,072 for salaries, and the remainder for services and supplies. The budget for new vehicles is $382,000. MOTOR VEHICLE FUND: The Motor Vehicle Fund accounts for the revenue and costs generated by equipment and vehicles rented to other county departments. The gross operating budget amounts to $8,204,100 in 2010, with $1,859,500 budgeted for new capital equipment. The budget reflects the continuation of the contract fleet management approach adopted by the Board in August 1984. Depreciation is $2,800,000 for new equipment purchases, plus sale of surplus items of $504,100. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND: The Health Insurance Fund reflects the cost of Weld County's self-insurance program which includes health, dental, and vision coverage. Details of the program and coverage are found under the specifics of the fund summary. In 2010, the county will continue with only dental and vision being self -insured. Health coverage will be provided by a private company on a partially self -insured basis. INSURANCE FUND: The Insurance Fund accounts for all insurance costs for the county. The program is a combination of insured risks and protected self-insurance risks. Gross budget costs are $1,830,000 in 2010, with a property tax levy of $1,500,000. Details of the program are provided under the specifics of the fund summary. PHONE SERVICE FUND: Budget reflects total consolidation of phone service costs of $1,507,000 in Weld County. Funding is at current level and reflects capital upgrades of $250,000. WELD COUNTY FINANCE CORPORATION: Budget contains the funding for the Weld County Finance Corporation, which accounts for the lease purchases of county buildings. As of August 1, 2007, there are no longer any active leases. Weld County has no long-term debt. 461 PARAMEDIC FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5000 23100 4340 GRANTS 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 38,400 0 0 0 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 5000 23100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 15,436,771 18,141,195 18,141,195 0 5000 23100 44101 MEDICARE/MEDICAID ADJUSTMENT -6,876,972 -7,104,119 -7,104,119 0 5000 23100 44102 BAD DEBT ADJUSTMENT 0 -5,245,429 -5,245,429 0 TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 8,559,799 5,791,647 5,791,647 0 TOTAL PARAMEDIC FUND 8,598,199 5,791,647 5,791,647 0 462 PARAMEDIC FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Orq Expenditure Function 5000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 5000 23100 AMBULANCE TOTAL PARAMEDIC FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 0 382,000 382,000 0 8,598,199 5,791,647 5,791,647 0 8.598.199 6.173.647 6.173.647 0 463 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Paramedic Service - - 5000-23100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Paramedic Service responds to both routine and emergency calls for the county. It is an advanced life support (paramedic) provider. Personnel and vehicles are stationed in Greeley, Evans, Windsor and Fort Lupton. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,232,634 $ 4,310,174 $ 4,393,072 $ 4,393,072 Supplies 326,880 313,000 282,600 282,600 Purchased Services 842,451 755,555 730,800 730,800 Fixed Charges 267,490 303,829 375,175 375,175 Capital 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 Gross County Cost $ 5,669,455 $ 5,692,558 $ 5,791,647 $ 5,791,647 Revenue 5,542,557 5,692,558 5,791,647 5,791,647 Net County Cost $ 126,898 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 51 51 51 51 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel costs reflect the increase in health insurance costs, and the elimination of the salaries costs to backfill for an EMT to go to paramedic training. Supplies are down $30,400 in medical supplies ($20,000), uniforms ($10,000), and food supplies ($400). Services are down $24,755 mostly in vehicle costs. Revenues are projected with a 6% rate increase and volume being flat for 2010. In the vehicle replacement budget unit (5000-17500) $382,000 is budgeted for three new vehicles. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The 6% rate increase is below the medical cost trend rate of 9%. The budget has been restructured to have bad debt as a bad debt allowance under revenues versus as an expense to avoid overstatement of the budget and to show true operational profits or loss in the budget document. BOARD ACTION: 464 PARAMEDIC SERVICES (CONTINUED) 5000-23100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Total Calls For Service 13,832 # Patients Evaluated / Treat / Air Transport 1,022 # Transported Patients 9,214 Total Transport Mileage 78,390 # Dry Runs: No Patient / Cancelled 2,824 / 772 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Receipts/Charges Ratio w/contractual Receipts/Charges Ratio w/o contractual 2.26 $0.54 30% 62% 14,523 1,073 9,675 88,000 2,965 / 819 2.26 $0.00 30% 62% 14,425 1,572 9,374 75,898 2,540 / 939 2.09 $0.00 36% 69% Goal 1155: Maintain and improve billing/collection process to ensure operating revenue as Enterprise Service. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS5-l: Maintain bill charges to collection percentage Percentage of charges to collection Unadjusted 35.70% Adjusted 68.60% Unadjusted 36% Adjusted 68% Unadjusted 36% Adjusted 68% 465 PARAMEDIC SERVICES (CONTINUED) 5000-23100 Goal HS6: Provide < 9 minute emergency response times 90% of the time or greater within the City of Greeley; provide <20 minute emergency response time 90% of the time or greater in rural Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS6-1: 90% or better response times of less than 9 minutes on emergency calls for service in Greeley Percentage of response times less than 9 minutes 92% 92% 90% HS6-2: 90% or better response time of less than 20 minutes in rural Weld County Percentage of response times of less than 20 minutes 73% 73% 75% Goal HS7: Provide < 20 minute routine response times 90% of the time or greater to all areas of Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS7-1: 90% or better response times of less than 20 minutes on all non -emergency calls for service in Weld County Percentage of response times less than 20 minutes 88% 90% 90% Goal HSS: Provide hospital door to intervention times of < 90 minutes to all cardiac alert patients within Weld County. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED HS8-I: Emergency Room door to Cardiac Catheterization Lab time of less than 90 minutes Percentage of cardiac alert patients less than 90 minutes 100% 100% 100% 466 MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6000 96300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS 6000 96300 4680 OTHER 6000 96300 4810 GAIN LOSS ON SALE TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 5,500,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 0 2,500,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 0 516,500 504,100 504,100 0 3,016,500 3,304,100 3,304,100 0 8,516,500 8,204,100 8,204,100 0 467 MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 6000 17550 6000 96300 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT COUNTY SHOP TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 2,331,700 1,947,500 1,859,500 0 8,516,500 8,204,100 8,204,100 0 10.848.200 10.151,600 10,063,600 0 468 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Administration - - 6000-96300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Centralized motor pool support for Weld County. Contract for fleet maintenance is included in this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 3,118,607 3,032,000 2,432,000 2,432,000 Purchased Services 2,845,483 2,853,500 2,838,500 2,838,500 Fixed Charges 2,977,714 2,616,000 2,918,600 2,918,600 Capital 17,634 15,000 15,000 15,000 Gross County Cost $ 8,959,438 $ 8,516,500 $ 8,204,100 $ 8,204,100 Revenue 8,608,602 8,516,500 8,204,100 8,204,100 Net County Cost $ 350,836 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Cost of Goods Sold, which accounts for the sale of fuel, is down $600,000. With the drop in fuel costs the account has been return to its historical level of $2,400,000. Depreciation is up $300,000. Data processing services are funded at $15,000. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 469 MOTOR POOL ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 6000-96300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of work orders issued 7,100 7,200 Number of service/maintenance orders per technician Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Work orders issued per FTE 895 900 .48 623 .45 600 Goal ES19: To provide quality, sufficient, and well -maintained county vehicles to county departments. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES19-1: Safe and reliable vehicles ready to meet needs 90% of department users satisfied with the quality and timeliness of fleet management services N/A 90% 90% ES19-2: Worker- friendly and functional vehicles 90% of internal customers satisfied with county vehicle N/A 90% 90% ES19-3: Cost effective vehicles Cost (acquisition, operating, resale value) within prescribed industry standards N/A 95% 95% ES19-4: Fuel- efficient/ environmentally - friendly vehicles 90% of internal customers satisfied with county vehicle N/A 90% 90% 470 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Equipment - - 6000-17550 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Use of funded depreciation to acquire vehicles for county use. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Capital 3,415,393 2,331,700 1,947,500 1,859,500 Gross County Cost $ 3,415,393 $ 2,331,700 $ 1,947,500 $ 1,859,500 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 3,415,393 $ 2,331,700 $ 1,947,500 $ 1,859,500 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See listed equipment on next page. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval BOARD ACTION: 471 IGA EQUIPMENT Request Recommend Approved Sheriff: Patrol Vehicles Mid size Sedan SUV District Attorney Full size sedan Buildings & Grounds 1/2 ton pickup 1/2 ton pickup 4X4 SUV Coroner 1/2 Ton pickup ext 4X4 2 46,000 0 3 63,000 21,000 1 30,000 30,000 1 23,000 23,000 1 18,000 18,000 1 20,000 20,000 1 30,000 30,000 1 25,500 25,500 Noxious Weed 15 ft mower deck 2 33,000 33,000 15 ft mower deck & wet blade 1 32,000 32,000 Public Works See Basic List 1,627,000 1,627,000 Total $1,947,500 $1,859,500 $0 472 2010 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - PUBLIC WORKS Trucking Graders Bridge Maint-Supt Mining Pvmt Mgmt Admin 1 Motor Grader w/Front Assist 1 Motor Grader w/Front Assist & Rippers 1 3/4 -ton 4X4, Extend Cab Pickup 1 3/4 -ton 4X4 Reg Cab Pickup 1 Single -Drum Steel Wheel Roller $145,000 1 Tandem Truck w/Plow and Sander $40,000 2 1/2 -ton 4X4 Extend Cab Pickups 1 1 1 1 1 -Ton Crew Cab w/Service Body IfIRMS_ Attachment for Existing JD Rubber -Tired Backhoe Attachment for Existing JD Track Excavator Pintle Hitch 3 Axle Tilt Bed Trailer NO NEW EQUIPMENT NEEDED 2 10" Diesel Pumps 1 3/4 -Ton 4X4 Pickup, Club Cab w/Service Body 1 Power Broom 4444400,00404 1 Tandem Truck w/Plow and Sander 1 Small Front -Wheel Drive Car $18,000 Sub -Total $210,000 $220,000 $24,000 $24,000 $140,000 $7,000 $8,000 $30,000 $130,000 $43,000 $1,627,000 $230,000 473 2010 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL FUND TOTALS Weeds 1 15 1 Ft Mower Deck Alone (OPTION A) $16,500 ux, 15 Ft Mower Deck & Wet Blade Assembly (OPTION B) $32,000 tat 15 Ft Mower Deck Alone (OPTION A) $16,500 Engineering NO NEW EQUIPMENT NEEDED 474 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final MISCELLANEOUS 6200 93400 46902 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 10,530,000 10,962,564 10,962,564 0 TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 10,530,000 10,962,564 10,962,564 0 475 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 6200 93400 DENTALNISION 2009 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend 10,530,000 10,962,564 10,962,564 0 2010 Final TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 10,530,000 10.962.564 10,962,564 0 476 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Insurance Fund - - 6200-93100/93400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides for the costs associated with Weld County's self - insured health program. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 66,209 181,000 181,000 181,000 Fixed Charges 9,592,090 10,349,000 10,781,564 10,781,564 Gross County Cost $ 9,658,299 $ 10,530,000 $ 10,962,564 $ 10,962,564 Revenue 9,727,542 10,530,000 10,962,564 10,962,564 Net County Cost $ - 69,243 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the cost of self -insuring the dental and vision reimbursement plan ($220,000), and wellness program ($181,000). In addition the budget, in 2005, started to include the self -insured health program offered county employees through Great West Healthcare, now CIGNA. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Budget anticipates a 9% county contribution increase, which is the same as the cost increase of medical care. Weld County will utilize CIGNA, with a hybrid universal health PPO/HMO plan as the health insurance provider in 2010. It is recommended that the county absorb the entire 2010 rate increase, so employees' take home pay remains the same in 2010, since no salary increases are recommended. In 2005, the county moved its health insurance plan to a consumer driven plan that combines a high deductible PPO insurance policy along with an HMO component for preventative care, with a $20 co -pay and low cost prescriptive drug program. The high deductible policy protects the insured from catastrophic losses, such as prolonged illness, hospitalization or simply an unexpected period of poor health. The plan is a partially self -insured program with stop loss insurance. The goal is to make the employees aware of the true cost of health care, with a program that will encourage employees and their families to make more judicious spending decisions in return for paying lower insurance premiums and lower health care costs. The health plan is being offered through CIGNA. In 2008, the county moved to a universal health care option that has lower employee premiums and higher co-insurance and out-of-pocket costs. A comprehensive wellness program was also implemented in 2008. 477 IS - HEALTH INSURANCE (CONTINUED) 6200-93100/93400 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): The county will benchmark the county's contribution to a mid -range PPO plan. In future years, the county contribution will increase with the cost -of -living increase for health care, and not be based upon a combination of cost -of -living of healthcare and utilization, since utilization will be controlled by each individual and their family. The 2010 program is calculated with current participation as follows: Single Coverage: 981 Dependent Coverage: 464 AXED COSTS: Health Insurance Administration/Wellness/EAPCosts = Fixed Costs: $ 1,296,564 181,000 $ 1,477,564 LOSS FUND: Medical $ 9,265,000 Dental = 150,000 Vision = 70.000 Loss Fund Costs $ 9,485,000 GRAND TOTAL - COSTS $10,962 564 REVENUE: Health Premiums DentalNision BOARD ACTION: TOTAL REVENUE PERFORMANCE MEASURES $10,742,564 220, 000 $10,962 564 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Single coverage 645 580 517 Family coverage 340 454 464 478 INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title TAXES 6300 93300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6300 93200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS 6300 93300 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 6300 93300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 1,830,000 1,830,000 1,830,000 0 479 INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 6300 93200 WORKERS COMPENSATION 6300 93300 LIABILITY TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 1,197, 300 1,199, 300 1,199, 300 0 632,700 630,700 630,700 0 1,830,000 1,830,000 1,830.000 0 480 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Insurance Fund - - 6300-93200/93300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central fund to provide county -wide insurance coverage. This fund is administered by Finance and Administration unit in the General Fund. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 2,826 500 3,500 3,500 Purchased Services 39,190 31,700 41,700 41,700 Fixed Charges 2,453,528 1,797,800 1,784,800 1,784,800 Gross County Cost $ 2,495,544 $ 1,830,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 1,830,000 Revenue 997,008 330,000 330,000 330,000 Net County Cost $ 1,498,536 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is structured with Weld County remaining a member of CAPP, but using the self -insured option under the insurance pool for a fixed cost of $355,700. Effective January 1, 1992, Weld County became self -insured for workers compensation. Workers Compensation includes excess insurance and bonds costing $350,000, claims administration costs of $40,000, and a loss fund of $809,300. A loss fund for all other insurance coverage is budgeted at $275,000. Unemployment insurance is being charged directly to departments. The program is supported by property tax ($1,500,000), charges for service ($250,000), interest ($40,000), and compensation for losses ($40,000). No fund balance reserves are anticipated to be needed to support the loss fund in 2010. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the insurance program as outlined above in the summary of changes. In accordance with Section 8-44-204, C.R.S., it is recommended that a mill levy be used to fund the insurance program for local county activities and a charge back mechanism be used only for programs funded by state and federal funding sources. Weld County, through CAPP, has reduced limits of coverage and placed reliance on sovereign immunity to stay within the budgeted amount. The legislative changes in 1986 strengthened the county's position in the use of sovereign immunity limits in Colorado cases. In addition, the county can levy up to 10 mills per year to discharge any judgment against it. Continuation of the self -insured program for workers compensation is recommended, which should result in cost savings, plus no shared risks with other counties. Unemployment costs are recommended to be charged directly to departments for revenue raising strategies and departmental accountability for costs. 481 INSURANCE FUND (CONTINUED) 6300-93200/93300 BOARD ACTION: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of training sessions 36 36 36 Number of workers compensation claims 123 110 110 Dollar amount of prop/casualty claims paid $426,069 $325,000 $350,000 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.044 0.041 0.037 Per capita cost (county support) $6.42 $6.15 $5.60 Cost per claim processed $243.90 $227.27 $228.75 482 PHONE SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2010 Fund Org Acct Account Title CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6400 17400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 2009 Budget 2010 2010 Request Recommend 2010 Final 1,130,705 1,257,000 1,257,000 0 1,130,705 1,257,000 1,257,000 0 483 PHONE SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2010 Fund Org Expenditure Function 6400 17400 PHONE SERVICES TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 2009 2010 2010 2010 Budget Request Recommend Final 1,380,705 1,507,500 1,507,500 0 1.380.705 1.507.500 1.507,500 0 484 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Phone Services - - 6400-17400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide phone services to Weld County and the Court system. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 166,703 $ 158,837 $ 158,837 $ 158,837 Supplies 19,564 14,500 14,500 14,500 Purchased Services 786,594 762,178 824,264 824,264 Fixed Charges 189,693 195,190 194,859 194,859 Capital 563,611 250,000 314,540 314,540 Gross County Cost $ 1,726,165 $ 1,380,705 $ 1,507,000 $ 1,507,000 Revenue 1,207,373 1,130, 705 1,257, 000 1,257,000 Net County Cost $ 518,792 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Budgeted Positions 2 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Phone line charges are up $69,120 because of the internet bandwidth increase from 6 meg to 30 meg, the Verizon frame relay circuit for Paramedic Services, and the increase in cellular phones, including aircards and blackberries. Maintenance is up $11,215 due to the additional equipment installed. Two capital projects included in the 2010 budget are upgrade the old Rolm phones at current Human Services building when the new tenants move in, as well as Clerk and Recorder, Assessor, Treasurer, Training Center and Motor Pool ($60,000) and replacement of floor jacks at the Training Center ($4,540). In addition, $250,000 in capital will be budgeted for upgrade of the county's voice and data network as outlined in the Information Services 2010-2014 Capital Equipment Plan. Contract services are down $16,749 for charge backs from Clerk to the Board for switchboard coverage. Overhead is the same. Revenues are up $126,295. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 485 PHONE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 6400-17400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Incoming calls Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita Per capita cost (county support) Annual cost per call 6,100,000 0.086 $6.77 $0.18 6,300,000 6,400,000 0.082 $7.39 $0.19 .075 $5.62 $0.24 Goal ES18: Capitalize on phone technology to improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater phone access and exchange. DESIRED OUTCOMES PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED ES18-I: User friendly phone services Percent of users (residents, visitors, employees, etc.) satisfied with phone access to services and information N/A 99% 99% 486 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: WELD COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Weld County Finance Authority - - 6500-17700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides funds to cover the lease/purchase of county buildings. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST FY BUDGETED CURRENT FY REQUESTED NEXT FY RECOMMEND NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget ref ects the county's debt service on any long-term debt and/or any lease purchase debt in any given year. With the payoff of the correctional facilities' Certificates of Participation (COP) as of August 1, 2007, Weld County has no long-term debt or long-term lease obligations. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: 487 488 GLOSSARY ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES All processes which discover, record, classify, and summarize financial information to produce financial reports and to provide internal control. ACCRUAL BASIS The basis of accounting under which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. ACCRUED EXPENSES Expenses incurred but not due until a later date. ACTIVITY A specific and distinguishable line of work performed by one or more organizational components of a government for the purpose of accomplishing a function for which the government is responsible. For example, "food inspection" is an activity performed in the discharge of the "health" function. ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to the specific lines of work performed by organization units. For example, "sewage treatment and disposal", "garbage collection", "garbage disposal", and "street cleaning" are activities performed in carrying out the function of "sanitation". The segregation of the expenditures made for each of these activities constitutes an activity classification. ALLOCATE To divide a lump -sum appropriation into parts which are designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for specific purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOCATED COSTS Indirect costs distributed to programs or departments via a cost allocation plan. ALLOCATION A part of a lump -sum appropriation which is designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for special purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOT To divide an appropriation into amounts which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period. ALLOTMENT A part of an appropriation which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period. ALLOTMENT PERIOD A period of time less than one fiscal year in length during which an allotment is effective. Bi-monthly and quarterly allotment periods are most common. 489 ANNUAL BUDGET A budget applicable to a single fiscal year APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION BILL, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, or ORDER ARRA APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURE A legal authorization granted by a legislative body to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and as to the time when it may be expended. A bill, ordinance, resolution, or order by means of which appropriations are given legal effect. It is the method by which the expenditure side of the annual operating budget is enacted into law by the legislative body. In many governmental jurisdictions, appropriations cannot be enacted into law by resolution but only by a bill, ordinance, or order. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This is the economic stimulus legislation passed in 2009 to stimulate economic growth. An expenditure chargeable to an appropriation. Since virtually all expenditures of governments are chargeable to appropriations, the term expenditures by itself is widely and properly used. ASSESSED VALUATION A valuation set upon real estate or other property by a government as a basis for levying taxes. AUTHORITY A government or public agency created to perform a single function or a restricted group of related activities. Usually such units are financed from service charges, fees, and tolls, but in some instances they also have taxing powers. An authority may be completely independent of other governments or partially dependent upon other governments for its creation, its financing, or the exercise of certain powers. AUTHORIZED POSITION A position (job) authorized by the Board of County Commissioners as part of the annual adopted budget. BOND An interest bearing promise to pay with a specific maturity. 490 BUDGET A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing them. Used without any modifier, the term usually indicates a financial plan for a single fiscal year. The term "budget' is used in two senses in practice. Sometimes it designates the financial plan presented to the appropriating body for adoption and sometimes the plan finally approved by that body. It is usually necessary to specify whether the budget under consideration is preliminary and tentative or whether it has been approved by the appropriating body. BUDGET DOCUMENT The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating body. The budget document usually consists of three parts. The first part contains a message from the budget -making authority, together with a summary of the proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. The second consists of schedules supporting the summary. These schedules show in detail the information as to past years' actual revenues, expenditures, and other data used in making the estimates. The third part is composed of drafts of the appropriation, revenue, and borrowing measures necessary to put the budget into effect. BUDGET MESSAGE A general discussion of the proposed budget as presented in writing by the budget -making authority to the legislative body. The budget message should contain an explanation of the principal budget items, an outline of the government's experience during the past period and its financial status at the time of the message, and recommendations regarding the financial policy for the coming period. BUDGETARY ACCOUNTS Accounts used to enter the formally adopted annual operating budget into the general ledger as part of the management control technique of formal budgetary integration. BUDGETARY COMPARISONS Governmental GAAP financial reports must include comparisons of approved budgeted amounts with actual results of operations. Such reports should be subjected to an independent audit, so that all parties involved in the annual operating budget/legal appropriation process are provided with assurances that government monies are spent in accordance with the mutually agreed -upon budgetary plan. BUDGETARY CONTROL The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. 491 BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES BUDGETED FUNDS CALLABLE BONDS CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL OUTLAY CAPITAL PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND CAPITAL RESOURCES CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) CONSERVATION TRUST CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT Decreases in net current assets. In contrast to conventional expenditures, budgetary expenditures are limited in amount to exclude amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Due to their spending measurement focus, governmental fund types are concerned with the measurement of budgetary expenditures. Funds that are planned for certain uses but have not been formally or legally appropriated by the legislative body. The budget document that is submitted for Board approval is composed of budgeted funds. Bonds which are redeemable by the issuer prior to the maturity date at a specified price at or above par. A plan of proposed capital outlays and the means of financing them. Expenditures for equipment, vehicles, or machinery that results in the acquisition or addition to fixed assets. A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet capital needs arising from the long-term work program or otherwise. It sets forth each project or other contemplated expenditure in which the government is to have a part and specifies the full resources estimated to be available to finance the projected expenditures. A fund created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds, Special Assessment Funds, and Trust Funds). Resources of a fixed or permanent character, such as land and buildings, which cannot ordinarily be used to meet current expenditures. Form of financial instrument similar to a bond to facilitate lease/ purchase agreements. Not a debt of the County. State of Colorado lottery funds remitted to the County for parks and recreation use. A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise included in the budget. 492 CONTINUING APPROPRIATION An appropriation which, once established, is automatically renewed without further legislative action, period after period, until altered or revoked. The term should not be confused with INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION. COPS UHS Federal community oriented policing grant. COST ALLOCATION PLAN Identification, accumulation and distribution of costs relative to the provision of those services, along with the methods used. C. R. S. DA DEFAULT DEFICIT DEPRECIATION DIRECT COSTS DURATION Colorado Revised Statutes District Attorney Failure to pay principal or interest when due. Defaults can also occur for failure to meet nonpayment obligations, such as reporting requirements, or when a material problem occurs for the issuer, such as a bankruptcy. (1) The excess of the liabilities of a fund over its assets. (2) The excess of expenditures over revenues during an accounting period; or, in the case of proprietary funds, the excess of expense over income during an accounting period. (1) Expiration in the service life of fixed assets, other than wasting assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration, action of the physical elements, inadequacy, and obsolescence. (2)The portion of the cost of a fixed asset other than a wasting asset which is charged as an expense during a particular period. In accounting for depreciation, the cost of a fixed asset, less any salvage value, is prorated over the estimated service life of such an asset, and each period is charged with a portion of such cost. Through this process, the entire cost of the asset is ultimately charged off as an expense. Costs that have a clearly identifiable beneficial or causal relationship to the services performed. The weighted maturity of a fixed -income investment's cash flows, used in the estimation of the price sensitivity of fixed -income securities for a given change in interest rates. EDAP Economic Development Action Partnership. 493 ENCUMBRANCES Obligations in the form of purchase orders, contracts or salary commitments which are chargeable to an appropriation and for which a part of the appropriation is reserved. They cease to be encumbrances when paid or when an actual liability is set up. ENTERPRISE FUND A fund established to finance and account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of governmental facilities and services which are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges. The Paramedic Services operates as an Enterprise Fund. ESTIMATED REVENUE The amount of projected revenue to be collected during the fiscal year. The amount of revenue appropriated is the amount approved by the Board. EXPENDITURES FISCAL PERIOD FISCAL YEAR FIXED ASSETS FTE (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT) FUNCTION FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Decreases in net financial resources. Expenditures include current operating expenses which require the current or future use of net current assets, debt service, and capital outlays. The unmodified use of the term expenditures in this text is intended to mean budgetary expenditures. Any period at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. A 12 -month period to which the annual operating budget applies and at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. Assets of a long-term character which are intended to continue to be held or used, such as land, buildings, improvements other than buildings, machinery and equipment. Numeric equivalent of one person occupying one employment position for one year (equivalent of 2,080 hours or 52 forty -hour weeks). A group of related activities aimed at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program for which a government is responsible. For example, public health is a function. Expenditure classification according to the principal purposes for which expenditures are made. Examples are public safety, public health, public welfare, etc. 494 FUND FUND BALANCE GAAP (GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES) GENERAL FUND GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) GRANT HIGHWAY USER TAX (HUTF) INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Fund balance is the excess of assets over liabilities and is therefore also known as surplus funds. Standards for financial accounting and reporting. The fund used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. A municipal bond secured by the pledge of the issuer's full faith, credit and taxing power. A computerized data base of all land attributes within the County. The "base map" contains the least amount of common data which is supplemented by attribute overlays. A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function. Grants may be classified as either categorical or block depending upon the amount of discretion allowed the grantee. Revenue that is derived from the state gasoline tax, and restricted for Road and Bridge activities. An appropriation which is not limited either to any definite period of time or to any definite amount. A distinction must be made between an indeterminate appropriation and a continuing appropriation. In the first place, whereas a continuing appropriation is indefinite only as to time, an indeterminate appropriation is indefinite as to both time and amount. In the second place, even indeterminate appropriations which are indefinite only as to time are to be distinguished from continuing appropriations in that such indeterminate appropriations may eventually lapse. For example, an appropriation to construct a building may be made to continue in effect until the building is constructed. Once the building is completed, however, the unexpended balance of the appropriation lapses. A continuing appropriation, on the other hand, may continue forever; it can only be abolished by specific action of the legislative body. 495 INDIRECT COSTS INTERFUND TRANSFER INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND LINE -ITEM BUDGET MANDATE MATURITY MILL LEVY (TAX RATE) MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS Costs associated with, but not directly attributable to, the providing of a product or service. These costs are usually incurred by other departments in the support of operating departments. Amounts transferred from one fund to another. Revenue received from another government for a specified purpose. In Weld County, these are funds from municipalities, the State of Colorado, and the Federal Government. Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to another department on a cost reimbursement basis, for example, the Printing and Supply Fund and the Computer Services Fund. A budget that lists each expenditure category (salary, materials, telephone service, travel, etc.) separately, along with the dollar amount budgeted for each specified category. Any responsibility, action or procedure that is imposed by one sphere of government on another through constitutional, legislative, administrative, executive, or judicial action as a direct order or that is required as a condition of aid. The date when the principal amount of a security is payable. Rate applied to assessed valuation to determine property taxes. A mill is 1/10th of a penny, or $1.00 of tax for each $1,000 of assessed valuation. The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental fund type Spending Measurement Focus. Under it, revenues are recognized when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period". Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred except for: (1) inventories of materials and supplies which may be considered expenditures either when purchased or when used; (2) prepaid insurance and similar items which need not be reported; (3) accumulated unpaid vacation, sick pay, and other employee benefit amounts which need not be recognized in the current period, but for which larger -than -normal accumulations must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements; 496 (4) interest on special assessment indebtedness which may be recorded when due rather than accrued, if approximately offset by interest earnings on special assessment levies; and (5) principal and interest on long-term debt which are generally recognized when due. All governmental funds and Expendable Trust Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. NET BUDGET NON -DEPARTMENTAL OBJECT OPERATING BUDGET OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING GRANTS OPERATING INCOME OPERATING TRANSFER ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT ORGANIZATION UNIT CLASSIFICATION The net budget eliminates double -counting in the budget, such as fund transfers, and thus represents the true level of programmed spending in the budget. A category established to account for expenses not associated with any specific department, but all departments or many, within a fund. As used in expenditure classification, this term applies to the article purchased or the service obtained (as distinguished from the results obtained from expenditures). Examples are personal services, contractual services, materials, and supplies. Plans of current expenditures and the proposed means of financing them. The annual operating budget (or, in the case of some state governments, the biennial operating budget) is the primary means by which most of the financing acquisition, spending, and service delivery activities of a government are controlled. The use of annual operating budgets is usually required by law. Even where not required by law, however, annual operating budgets are essential to sound financial management and should be adopted by every government. Proprietary fund expenses which are directly related to the fund's primary service activities. Grants which are restricted by the grantor to operating purposes or which may be used for either capital or operating purposes at the discretion of the grantee. The excess of proprietary fund operating revenues over operating expenses. Routine and/or recurring transfers of assets between funds. A responsibility center within a government. Expenditure classification according to responsibility centers within a government's organization structure. Classification of expenditures by organization unit is essential to fixing stewardship responsibility for individual government resources. 497 OVERHEAD PROGRAM PROGRAM BUDGET PROPRIETARY FUND RATINGS RECIDIVISM REGISTERED BOND Those elements of cost necessary in the production of an article or the performance of a service which are of such a nature that the amount applicable to the product or service cannot be determined accurately or readily. Usually they relate to those objects of expenditure which do not become an integral part of the finished product or service such as rent, heat, light, supplies, management, supervision, etc. An organized set of related work activities which are directed toward a common purpose or goal and represent a well defined expenditure of county resources. A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on programs of work and secondarily on character and object class. A program budget is a transitional type of budget between the traditional character and object class budget, on the one hand, and the performance budget, on the other. A fund used to account for business -type activities in government. The activities are usually financed with user fees that are directly related to the services received. There are two types of proprietary funds - enterprise and internal service funds. Designations used by credit rating agencies to give relative indications of credit quality. A relapse into criminal habits after punishment. A bond whose owner is registered with the issuer or its agent. Transfer of ownership can only be accomplished when the securities are properly endorsed by the registered owner. 498 REIMBURSEMENTS RESERVE RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER REVENUE REVENUE BOND SOURCE OF REVENUE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND SUBACTIVITY SUBFUNCTION (1) Repayments of amounts remitted on behalf of another party. (2) Interfund transactions which constitute reimbursements of a fund for expenditures or expenses initially made from it which are properly applicable to another fund -- e.g., an expenditure properly chargeable to a Special Revenue Fund was initially made from the General Fund, which is subsequently reimbursed. They are recorded as expenditures or expenses (as appropriate) in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of the expenditure or expense in the fund that is reimbursed. (1) An account used to earmark a portion of fund balance to indicate that it is not appropriate for expenditure. (2) An account used to earmark a portion of fund equity as legally segregated for a specific future use. Non -recurring or non -routine transfers of assets between funds. (1) Increases in governmental fund type net current assets from other than expenditure refunds and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1, general long-term debt proceeds and operating transfers -in are classified as "other financing sources" rather than revenues. (2) Increases in proprietary fund type net total assets from other than expense refunds, capital contributions, and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1, operating transfers -in are classified separately from revenues. A municipal bond payable from revenues derived from tolls, charges or rents paid by users of the facility constructed with the proceeds of the bond issue. Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin. A fund used to account for revenues legally earmarked for a particular purpose. A specific line of work performed in carrying out a governmental activity. For example, "cleaning luminaries" and "replacing defective street lamps" would be subactivities under the activity of "street light maintenance". A grouping of related activities within a particular governmental function. For example, "police" is a subfunction of the function "public safety". 499 SURPLUS TABOR (TAXPAYERS BILL OF RIGHTS) TABOR RESERVE The use of the term "surplus" in governmental accounting is generally discouraged because it creates a potential for misleading inference. An amendment to the Colorado Constitution approved by the voters in November 1992. The Taxpayers Bill of Rights has been incorporated in the State Constitution as Section 20 of Article X. The amendment limits growth in both state and local government revenue and expenditures, makes provision for annual elections, and requires voter approval for tax increases. Term applied to a reserve which is required by the TABOR Amendment. Starting in 1995 this reserve is 3% of "Fiscal Year Spending" excluding bonded debt service. This reserve is for use in declared emergencies only. TANF Temporary Assistance to Needy Families TAXES Compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefits such as special assessments. Neither does the term include charges for services rendered only to those paying such charges as, for example, sewer service charges. TAX LEVY The total amount to be raised by general property taxes. TAX RATE TAX RATE LIMIT TAX ROLL TRADITIONAL BUDGET The amount of tax stated in terms of a unit of the tax base; for example, 25 mills per dollar of assessed valuation of taxable property. The maximum rate at which a government may levy a tax. The limit may apply to taxes raised for a particular purpose, or to taxes imposed for all purposes, and may apply to a single government, to a class of governments, or to all governments operating in a particular area. Overall tax rate limits usually restrict levies for all purposes and of all governments, state and local, having jurisdiction in a given area. The official list showing the amount of taxes levied against each taxpayer or property. Frequently, the tax roll and the assessment roll are combined, but even in these cases the two can be distinguished. A term sometimes applied to the budget of a government wherein expenditures are based entirely or primarily on objects of expenditure. UNC University of Northern Colorado 500 UNINCORPORATED COUNTY WELL PROGRAM WORKLOAD MEASURES WORK PROGRAM WORK UNIT YIELD Those portions of the county that are not part of a legal entity such as a city or some towns. Wellness health program provided as a fringe benefit to employees. Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed as an objective of the department. A plan of work proposed to be done during a particular period by the administrative agency in carrying out its assigned activities. A fixed quantity which will consistently measure work effort expended in the performance of an activity or the production of a commodity. The annual percentage rate of return earned on a security. Yield is a function of a security's purchase price and coupon interest rate. NOTE: Most of the above definitions were taken from Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting, GFOA, Chicago, 1980, Appendix B. pp. 53- 77. 501 istiti: IfIlk COLORADO 502 Hello