The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About790023.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LAND LOCATED IN PART OF SECTION 32 , TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO OWNED BY LYLE PICRAUX. WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado , pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado held a public hearing on the 22nd day of October, 1979 at the hour of 9 :00 o 'clock a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Lyle Picraux for approval of a Unit Development Plan for commercially zoned property on the following described real estate, to-wit: A tract of land in the Southwest one- quarter of Section 32 , Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colo- rado more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 32; thence North 0°27 ' 37" East along the West line of said Section 32 a distance of 50 . 00 feet; thence South 89°25 ' 15" East a distance of 30 .00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 0 °27 ' 37" East along the East right of way line of County Road No . 3 a distance of 940 . 81 feet; thence South 89°22 ' 25" East a distance of 689.91 feet; thence South 0°27 ' 37" West a distance of 252 . 30 feet; thence North 89°22 ' 25" West a distance of 342 .91 feet; thence South 0°27 ' 37 " West a distance of 688 . 22 feet more or less to the North right of way line of Colorado State Highway No . 7 ; thence North 89°25 '15" West along said North right of way line a distance of 347 . 00 feet more or less to the point of beginning. Containing 9 . 479 acres more or less . WHEREAS, the petitioner was present, and WHEREAS, evidence was presented in support of the approval of the Unit Development Plan upon the aforementioned tract of land, and WHEREAS, Section 6 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to approve a Unit Development Plan upon a showing by the Petitioner of compliance 7-' L0 34/5 790023 with all of the requirements of Section 6 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the petitioner and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter, and having been fully informed, is satisfied that the request for approval of the application for a Unit Development Plan complies with all of the conditions set out in Section 6 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the petition of Lyle Picraux for approval of a Unit Development Plan on the tract of land set forth above be , and hereby is, granted subject to the following: 1. The Development Standards contained in the Unit Development Plan. 2 . The unit development plat being amended to show a reservation of an additional 25 feet of highway right-of-way along the South side of the property and deleting one access to the property from County Road 3 . 3. No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued on the Unit Development area until the Development Standards for the Unit Development have been placed on the Unit Development plat and said plat has been delivered to the office of the Department of Planning Services . 4. Development Standard #16 being amended to include the following sentence: Gravel base shall be used until such time that paving occurs . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the reasons for approval contained in the Planning Commission recommendations dated October 16, 1979 be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact of the Board of County Commissioners in this matter. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of October, A.D. , 1979 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LD COUNTY, COLORADO (Aye) Norman Carlson, Chairman i , fir 1 (Aye) ir Lyd) i , ;Dunbar • (a:7/i L L( (Aye) C. W. Kirby I of om-41. S. (Aye) Lenard L. Roe 1i ne K. Ste`inmark /'taut “ wvCf A)itG iWn✓ < ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Reorder and Clerk to the Board B �'j 1 1 llz,: LS:t..-- �`4 Y' ✓ -Deputy County kt"rk CIAPP O D AS TO FORM: County Attorney DATE PRESENTED: OCTOBER 24, 1979 BEFORE [HE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI : SIONERS NAME : Lyle Picraux DATE : October 16, 1979 Moved by Fred Otis that the following resolution be intro- duced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it therefore Resolved :)y tie Weld County Planning Conmission that the following be adopteJ by the Board of County Commissicners : Approval of Unit Development Plan for Commercially Zoned Property Pt . SW/SWi Section 32, T1N, R68W To be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons : 1. This request is in compliance with Section 6. 6, Unit Development Standards of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 2 . Each of the following referral entities have reviewed this request and have set forth no objections to it : a. Weld County Health Department b. Weld County Engineering Department c. Colorado Division of Highways d. Colorado Geological Survey e. Dacono Area Fire Protection District The recommendations and/or concerns of the individual referral entities are addressed in the proposed Development Standards. The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following : 1. The attached Development Standards being adopted for the Unit Development area. 2. The unit development plat being amended to show a reservation of an additional 25 feet of highway right-of-way along the south side of the property and deleting one access to the property from County Road 3. 3. No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued on the Unit Development area until the- Development Standards for the Unit Development have been placed on the Unlit Development plat and said plat has been delivered to the office of the Department of Planning Services. 4. Development Standard #16 being amended to include the following sentence: Gravel base shall be used until such time that paving occurs. Motion seconded by Jerry Kiefer Vote : For Passage Abstain Against Chuck Carlson Jerry Keifer Fred Otis Betty Kountz Bob Ehrlich Th Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy of this Resolution he forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commi •,sioners for further proceedings . CERTIFICATION OF COPY Acting I , Thomas E. Honn. , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado . r'opted on October 16, 1979 and re- corded in Book No . VI of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . _ Dated the 17t day of c be 19 79 Acting Secr tart' PICRAUX COMMERCIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 . The permitted uses on the hereon described property within the Commercial Unit Development shall be those uses as listed in the Commercial Zone District of the Weld County Zoning Resolution adopted by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners . 2 . Agricultural production may be permitted. If agricultural production is not pursued on all or any portion of the Commercial Unit Development that portion not in agricultural production shall be maintained in a manner so as to prevent fugitive dust, erosion, growth of noxious weeds , and non-ornamental ground cover shall not exceed 12 inches in height. 3 . The minimum setback of buildings and the maximum height of buildings shall be in compliance with the requirements of the Commercial Zone District as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 4 . The installation of signs shall conform to the specifications and requirements of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. Applicable permits shall be obtained prior to installation. 5 . Use of property shall comply with all County and State Health Standards and Regulations pertaining to air quality, water quality, noise emission, and sanitary disposal systems . 6 . The unit development area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust and the growth of noxious weeds. 7. Access to the site shall be limited to County Road 3 . Access to the unit development area shall be limited to a total of three. All accesses shall have the approval of the Weld County Engineering Department . All accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations and/or requirements of the Weld County Engineering Department. 8. As shown on the unit development plan, additional 25 feet of right-of-way shall be reserved along the south side of the unit development area. 9. All construction, plumbing, and electrical work shall be done in accordance with the Weld County Building Code . 10. Prior to construction of any structures within the unit development area a soils and foundation investigation shall be conducted by a qualified soils engineer to determine proper foundation design on the site. The soils and foundation investigation report shall be submitted to the Weld County Building Inspection Division with the building permit application . 11 . Drainage design of the unit development area shall be in compliance with the Hydrology Study for Lyle Picraux, dated July 18, 1979 prepared by D. K. Rice and Associates, Inc. which is hereby made a part of the Development Standards . Said study is in the office of the Department of Planning Services . 12 . It is intended to use the retention pond area both as a storage area for drainage and as a reservoir for fire protection. The retention pond area shall maintain a minimum amount of 25 , 000 gallons of water storage for fire protection. All fire protection facilities , including hydrants , shall be located in accordance with the recommendations of the Dacono Area Fire Protection District as defined by letters from such District dated December 1 , 1977 and September 29 , 1979 and on file with the Weld County Department of Planning Services. 13 . Adequate off-street parking shall be provided by the developer for customers and employees in accordance with the parking requirements as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution . 14 . The developer shall also provide adequate paved space for the circulation of traffic in the parking areas, which shall not be a part of the off-street parking. 15 . Adequate off-street loading and maneuvering space shall be provided for individual use requirements. 16 . All off-street parking, access drives, and loading areas shall be paved and properly graded to assure proper draining. Gravel base shall be used until such time that paving occurs . 17. Exterior lighting may be maintained for security purposes provided it does not obscure the vision of highway traffic or create a nuisance for adjacent properties. 18. A minimum of 15% of the total lot area shall be maintained as landscaped area (not covered by buildings or asphalt) . The developer shall be responsible for constructing and maintaining any greenbelts, natural buffer zones, or any other landscaped areas. The landscaping plans shall include provisions for the re-seeding to natural grasses of all areas upon which the natural ground cover is removed by construction that are not otherwise covered. Said re-seeding shall be commenced upon completion of construction, but in the event such construction is completed after October 1 of any calendar year, not later than May 1 of the following year. The landscape development, having once been installed shall be satisfactorily maintained. 19. The unit development plans shall be limited to the plan submitted and governed by the Development Standards stated above and applicable Weld County regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment to the Unit Development Plan by thePlanning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes form the plans and/or Development Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. Comments : 1 . The Longmont Soil Conservation Service did not respond to the referral sent to it. 2 . The Erie Planning Commission ' s negative response to this request addresses the issue of rezoning amd not the unit development issue. A copy of its letter is in the attached materials. 3 . To date, our office has not received any opposition to this request from surrounding property owners. Date : October 16 , 1979 CASE NUMBER: N/A NAME : Lyle Picraux REQUEST: Approval of Unit Development for Commercially Zoned Property LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. SW4 SW4, Section 32, T1N, R68W LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of Colorado Highway 7 and County Road 3 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1 . This request is in compliance with Section 6 . 6, Unit Development Standards of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 2 . Each of the following referral entities have reviewed this request and have set forth no objections to it: A. Weld County Health Department B. Weld County Engineering Department C. Colorado Division of Highways D. Colorado Geological Survey E. Dacono Area Fire Protection District. The recommendations and/or concerns of the individual referral entities are addressed in the proposed Development Standards . The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following : 1 . The attached Development Standards being recommended and adopted for the Unit Development area. - 2 . The unit development plat being amended to show a reservation of an additional 25 feet of highway right-of-way along the south side of the property and deleting one access to the property from County Road 3. 3 . No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued on the Unit Development area until the Development Standards for the Unit Development have been placed on the Unit Development plat and said plat has been delivered to the office of the Department of Planning Services. Dacono Area Fire Protection District 9-29-79 1r, ke Ir. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Planning Dept Greeley, Colorado Sir: Enclosed please find your form letter showing our approval of the Lyle and Betty Picraux unit developement. Enclosed also is a copy of the letter I have previously sent to Mr Picrau:r. regarding the need to use the drainage water for a holding pond for fire protect- ion. For the present anticipated builders supply yard and buildings, we feel that the lake if properly lined will hold water in sufficient supply for the first phase of his planned construction. We also asked for a dry hydrant to be installed in the pond. This will be accomplished by Mr. Picraux with our assistance to make it usable. We would ask that the minimum water storage in the lake or pond on a year round basis be no less than 25,000 gallons of water to cover the possible needs for the enclosed proposal. We have explained to Mr. Picraux that later additions will result in the need for additional water supply and distribution systems. SPE 2 lie W. Fuss fire Chief ft h RECE-: `'i js '�1 LQa DACONO, COLORADO 80514 6t14.-1 D cceu Area C-Et) V'r,c .c3tio f District ( \ December 1, 1977 �s c' J Mr. Lyle Picraux % Lyle Const. Co P 0 Box 70 Lafayette, Colo Sir; As per our conversation regarding your developement, known as Picraux Unit Developement, located at Weld County Road 3 and Colo State Highway'7, I am sending this letter for your advise and assistance in the planning of • fire protection for your developement. We discussed the construction of a holding pond or lake in the south- west part of the developement, and you indicated that the drainage of the • ground in the developement would be utilized to keep the pond filled. I feel if the pond can be constructed to hold the water on a year around basis, it would be satisfactory. I would then ask that you install a dry hydrant as we discussed, the bottom of the hydrant not less than 18 inches from the bott- 2 om of the water and the top or outlet not more than 10. feet above the intake. This hydrant would be of 6 inch size, with a strainer or perforated pipe on • the bottom and outlet to be fitted with 6 inch pipe threads. We discussed the amount of water to be available for our use at the site, and as I told you we would be satisfied with a storage capacity of not less than 50,000 gallons for units 1, through unit 4 of your plan. As I stated, our pumpets could be hooked directly to the dry hydrant and then supply the vehicle fighting any fire that may occur. We could also utilize our tanker system in the event that more water is needed or for initial attack. Mien you begin the construction of unit 5 of your plan, I would then ask that a water supply be constructed, so that a wet hydrant would be avail— able near the shopping part of the unit, and that the wet hydrant have a continuous water pressure of not less than 40 psi, and capable of flowing 750 gallon of water per minute. This would not be required until unit 5 of • your plan is started. Possibly by the time unit 5 is begun, you may have access to a water supply on which to tie in. As I advised, you are in the Dacono Fire Protection District,. and we will provide you with any assistance we can and are prepared to give you the necessary fire protection. If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call me. �\� 1145---� 1919 'i /�iJe 0CS a - ., e ct , REGE1v�D iW 7etdCoontY z /Jose i W. Fuss c� toils of `� ec/DAFPD file Fire Marshal �" �3°°°g L Weld Cty. Planning Dacono Area Fire Prot. Dist"&6)_) ZSb2�-t'L� Dacono, Colorado '- DACONO, COLORADO 80514 Re X G-A LICATIGN .ASE # : 1 r A Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch' d By : `p,(�.. Date Rec ' d: AUG 281979 915 10th Street App. Fee : Receipt # : NA I Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record . Fee : %Q.0O Receipt # : q55 `7"Q 3g Phone : 356-4000, Ext. 404 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado : LEGAL DESCRIPTION : P2, 5 14, Pi/ Sire 7/ / 3 z 774e. H6 B (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available) : PRESENT ZONE C PROPOSED ZONE L" - ad TOTAL ACREAGE 9. 4" "V , . OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING : Name: L 4',( E F TTy /,'" e/i14.1))/ Home Telephone gyp : 065 4/04/Y Address : /o p, 70 Bus . Telephone #: AG , 33ff nit,— credo„16 Name : Home Telephone #: Address : Bus . Telephone # : Name: Home Telephone #: Address : Bus . Telephone # : Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) : Name : Sang E Home Telephone #: Address : Bus. Telephone # : Owner(s) of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor ' s Office : Name: Address : Name : Address : Name: Address : I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all state- ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) 7 � /� ,-:%(/' "� % tiji-c�� T Signat'ur ` Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this ___ day of %AA , 191\ . SEAL ... O, NOTARY P LIC� My commission expires : 1 )\&..).„\A„ \%, \O 3j X . PROPOSED COVENANCE OF PICRAUX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT ARTICLE I BUILDING SITE AND PROPOSED DEVELOPEMENT a. ) P.U.D. Planned Unit Developement shall consist of 9.48 acre tract of land in the southwest on quarter of Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the sixth principal meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. b. ) Proposed Developement in its preliminary phases will allow for construction of a builders supply yard, conditions for adequate office space, and en— closed storage units. Porposed terms of the developement shall include all construction and work necessary to condition a building site for occ— upancy for a permitted use under all local codes within the P.U.D. re— quirements, and shall include, but not limited to grading, drainage, errosion control, buildings, parking areas, access roads, loading areas, signs, utilities, fences, easements and landscape. ARTICLE II PERMITTED USES Shall be in agreement with the conditions of P.U.D. and within the re— strictions set forth by the developer of said P.U.D. building sites shall not be used for any purpose not permitted by the zoning resolution of the County of Weld, nor shall anything be done thereon which is in violation of any Federal, State, or Local law or ordinance, or regulation lawfully promulgated thereunder. A description of proposed operations in sufficient detail to permit judgement of Whether or not they are permitted uses under the terms of then existing zoning ordinances shall be made available by developer. ARTICLE III BUILDINGS Shall be located in compliance with zoning set backs easements and right of ways established by the county. All permanent structures must meet all required building codes set forth by the County of Weld. The developer shall be respon— sible for site and engineering analysis, showing location and design of buildings. Density control shall limit allowable building area to accomodate no more than fifty percent of the usable land proposed in the P.U.D. . Height regulations shall be within zoning regulations and the owner's discretion. Provisions for controlling the architectural and aesthetic impact of the buildings shall be enforced by the developer. It shall be noted that all buildings should maintain a certain architectural similarity within the confines of materials used in construction, architectural changes shall be approved by the owner as tends may allow changes to occur in order to meet aesthetic values. Con- struction or alteration of all buildings in P.U.D. shall meet the building standards of the County of Weld in effect at the time such construction or alteration is performed. ARTICLE IV OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING a. ) Adequate off-street parking shall be provided by the developer for customers and employees. b. ) The developer shall also provide adequate paved space for the circulation of traffic in the parking areas, which shall not be a part of the off- street parking. c. ) Adequate off-street loading and maneuvering space shall be provided for individual use requirements. d. ) All off-street parking, access drives, and loading areas shall be paved and properly graded to assure proper draining. e. ) All of the above requirements must meet the minimum standards as required by applicable governmental regulations in effect at such time as a building permit for any improvement applied for. The amount of ground cover sub- kected to parking and circulation shall not exceed eighty-five percent of the total usable land proposed by the P.U.D. . The subjected ground cover proposed shall be in final phase concrete and asphalt with gravel base used only as an interim. ARTICLE V ERROSION CONTROL Run off control shall be handled by the developer in accordance with the requirements of Weld County and approved engineering practices subjected to concentrated run off control. A water retention pond shall be sized and built by the developer and maintained in accordance with the applicable governmental regulations. ARTICLE VI SIGNS AND ADVERTISING SPACE a. ) Shall be erected and maintained within the sign regulations.of Weld County, or any applicable State or Federal regulation. tivt/AX p'4 b. ) All proposed plans for signs to be erected, including retails, location size, height, color and lighting shall be subject to approval by the owner of the P.U.D. . ARTICLE VII LANDSCAPING AND MAINTAINENCE a. ) Landscaping of building sites shall be in accordance with P.U.D. plan submitted and approved by the County of Weld for zoning approval. Such plans shall include provisions for the re-seeding to natural grasses of all areas upon which the natural ground cover is removed by construction that are not otherwise covered. Said re-seeding shall be commenced upon completion of construction, but in the event such construction is completed after October 1 of any calendar year, not later than May 1 of the following year. b. ) The landscape developement, having once been installed shall be satis- factorily maintained. c. ) The developer shall be responsible for constructing and maintaining any greenbelts, natural buffer zones, or any other landscape procedures provided under the P.U.D. and required by the County of Weld or other applicable governmental regulations. d. ) The approved plan for landscaping the sit may not be altered without approval of the owner. e. ) The owner shall be responsible for keeping the premises, buildings, im— rovements and appurtenances in a safe, clean, neatm wholesome, condition, and shall comply in all respects withh all government, health, and police requirements subjected by the P.U.D. . The owner shall be responsible for removal of rubbish or trash of any character which may accumulate on the property, at owner expense. f. ) Irrigation to condition proposed landscaping in P.U.D. shall meet with applicable governmental regulations. The developer shall be responsible for choosing proper landscape to be maintained easily within allowable irrigation criteria. •[` rrl . X .. --) REFERRAL LIST En H APPLICANT Lyle Picraux H 2 CASE # N/A -Cross Reference Z/312: 78 : 16 REFERRALS SENT OUT ON: September 11 , 1979 cn O' Z W�W W REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY October 1, 1979 H o4 2 o o O W H al aH o wo �( Z w z REFERRALS RECEIVED * County Attorney (plat only) ?. ' County Health � x► . . 4 I ,'ocT inn * County Engineer ' * Erie Planning Commission q� , , _ c/o Gary West P.C. - 9/20/79 :Fisk X 44 ` SEP $1-1979 Circuit Town Manager 828-3843 ' . , f Erie, Colorado 80516 a : ._r , -' * State Highway Department "" ' - 1420 2nd Street s,u, X : ��q' t-. Anil-72;407a. i 1979 - Greeley, Dolorado 80631 * Colorado Geological Survey Dave Shelton . SEP 21 1979 1313 Sherman Street .t,' 8 J sti X Room 703 . Denver, Colorado 80203 fH i r 1 , i s * Longmont Soil Conservation S=rvice °F }A, % ,t �; 1228 Main Street i �� ` < :° Longmont, Colorado 80501 -' M " a Dacono Area Fire Protection District: I: ``` Fire Chief„O....p-,,--3-- ,* � Joe Fuss, 1,..,_..";";„...,.O-, , -, �`� 5- P.D. Box 40"_,' . tx ,: i Dacono, Colorado 80514 *Hydrology Report and Map "- , 4. �f',, TO: i"0.vt iA . - �� '-�� „ U / 41, : Cku u Cc6,IA ( `-(CC 3 56 j8 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES N2 A- `9t, PHONE 1303)356-4000 EXT.404 ' OCT 1979 915 10TH STREET REGENE0 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 7 Caenq -A Wed ® `z, ,9„ %an.Commis., ASE NUMBER Z-312 :78 : 16 S• Cross Reference COLORADO ��£W LZar'o\ September 11, 1979 REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Lyle Pirraux for a Approval of Commercial Unit Development Plan ' The parcel of land is described as Pt . Sw4 Sw4, Sec. 32 , T1N, R68W The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been • submitted is Northeast corner of the intersection of U.S. Highway 7 and County Road 3 This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- • tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. • Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by October 1 , 1979 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 3 . X Please refer to the enclosed letter.Signed dam 'L Agency (A ) c• /-/-/...1) Date /t7q/ 7 n ti rt 4 IN ! I 0/IN v_e_A7,_ _. .4...4,...odkiz.,),_,ri, _. Assistant Zoning Administration '�'* it . �` 1� //� BOARD OF HEALTH Weld County Il'eulth tJepartinent ['AVID Kirrw ; Gi Iry FR�N D YODER MD MPH Wilt'AM 131 if Rogq,' Direclor ISIF III)SPII AI FIND DOW' DIFFKE (Pr Iry GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 A M POAaN.un IR J D C Print ANNE TTI M (c'I17 r r'•v (30313530540 F RANK My[RS M P H VV o• HERsf.DF I PIIEI PS JR MD Or mlry KATHLEEN S5HAUGIIN[SSV. MEN Anil September 25, 1978 ARTHURG WATSON Palleville Gary Fortner, Director Planning & Zoning 915-10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The request for a Change of Zone from "A" to "C" as requested by Lyle Picraux has been reviewed by Environmental Health staff and the following comments are submitted: 1 . The sewage disposal system will require an engineer design as this is a commercial operation. 2. The sewage disposal system will require approval of the State Water Quality Control Commission if it (the system) discharges more than 2,000 gallons/day or serves 20 or more daily inhabitants. 3. An Emission Permit (fugitive dust) shall be applied for through the Weld County Health Department. Sincerely, ' tg4.1—e, hn G. Hall , M.P.H. , Director nvironmental Health Services JGH:dr St mAn®um rEbDe. To Chuck Cunliffp Date September 28, 1979 COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, Fngineering Manor Subject: Lyle Pirraux C.II.D. The Engineering Department has reviewd the application and has one comment. The Unit Development Plan shows (4) entrances onto Weld County Road 3. For future traffic safety and maintenance reasons, we suggest entrances to be limited to (2) . One could be at the auto sales area and the other by the builder's supply office. Drew Scheltinga Engineering Manager DS:sar riS1.12 3 QS Vic,, • 6> (c\' \IED o r, ft v DELodi ::;or \c(`, %AM Curt �c . 0 1126181 L‘y\t)+ -fir_ of coo Nom ; '��ol COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ;� ,„, * DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Weld County * 1876 * SH 7 September 28, 1979 Picraux C.U.D. NE Corner of Co. Rd. 3 & SH 7 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe DOH FILE 45100 Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: We have reviewed the Lyle Picraux Commercial Unit Development Plan, and we have the following recommendations. 1 . As we have commented in earlier reviews of this property, the existing right of way on State Highway 7 is not adequate to meet projected needs. An addi- tional 25 feet of right of way should be protected along the south boundary of this property by reservation, setback, or dedication (preferably the latter) as local zoning laws and regulations permit. 2. It is indicated in the Hydrology Study that this development will consist of two phases. Phase 1 will probably not generate sufficient traffic by itself to warrant acceleration/deceleration lanes at County Road 3. However, if an "intensive commercial/retail complex" is built in Phase 2, it is likely that such improvements would be warranted. Consideration should be given to pro- viding access to Phase 2 through an internal roadway system connecting to County Road 3. 3. We do have concern with regard to the planning and transportation implications of this development, as we have indicated in our previous reviews. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the State Policy on Human Settlement in Colorado encourage that new development be directed toward existing developed areas. Thank you for the opportunity to review this plan. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER ("1 / /,- t T cl<-r- � �.Z Albert Chotvacs :1/. Assistant District Engineer AC:da ��,�%2g3�34 �'\ cc: D. M. Bower D. N. Fraser (2) 'N., OOTlsis, �s; File: Crier-Jacobson via Rames-Finch-Graham 'Rail, RECE,V�D �{ w/encl . on�", Han geld Connry ne c� C Commissi ,�Z� \1, P.O. BOX 850 GREELEY, CO 80632 (303) 353-1232 629 1,4. -,..2-1 . .w ilk bite', 110411S90111 of CO thra ICS= Q RICHARD O. LAMM *?y )yY * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR ♦ ♦ Director * 1846 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING—1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)839-2611 September 19, 1979 Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Department Members: RE: CASE NO. 7-312:78:16 PICRAUX PLANNED DEVELOPMENT We have reviewed the site plan and supporting documents for the proposed Picraux Planned Development. Swelling soils are known to exist in this area, and special foundation design will probably be necessary to prevent damage to proposed structures. Therefore, we recommend that soils investigations be conducted by a qualified soils engineer prior to construction so that the engineering properties of the soils can be determined and proper foundation design criteria formulated. No other geologic hazards nor serious constraints are known or suspected to exist on this property. Sincerely'' / N. Price James N Engineering Geologist JNP/gp cc: Land Use Commission SfP 19Ig �. ',ell Ep ti Piano Cauey O areg Camaisyyej �U GEOLOGY 4' STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE S ' i OWN OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 645 HOLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT 828-3200 BOX 98 828-3232 ERIE. COLORADO 8O516 828-3843 449-3O85 September 21 , 1979 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator eld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Commercial Unit Development Flan Lyle Picraux Dear Mr. Cunliffe ; The Erie Planning Commission has reviewed your referral and has the following comments to make with respect to the proposal ' s impact on Erie : 1 . Conflict with Comprehensive Plan a. The Flan advocates planned industrial parks and commer— cial areas within its municipal jurisdiction and dis— courages scattered, isolated developments of this nature . b. Town boundaries were established in part to maintain Erie as a distinct municipality, physically separated from other jurisdictions through the use of greenbelts and other appropriate uses. It is Erie ' s policy to encourage development to take place within municipalities rather than unincorporated Weld County. c . This proposal would conflict with the Plan in that it would not be "financially, socially or visually benefic— ial to the Erie Community" e .g. a residential area would be in full view of it . 2. Other Impacts on Erie : a. Traffic congestion — proposal would impede smooth flow of traffice b. Creation of precedence for this type of -development along major highway — re : encouragement of strip developments. c . Zoning incompatible with adjacent land. 01��232'�'5z6c7c, SEP 1979 RECEIVED 4 tin *Rena `y,. K tE Ft:,c 2 :r. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator ';geld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Commercial Unti Development Plan Lyle Picraux In addition to these comments, the Planning Commission notes that that this proposal was disapproved by them in the past ( see en— closed copies of letters from the Planning commission of Octo— ber 6, 1978 and the Board of Trustees of October 11 , 1978) and were not notified of the second hearing wherein Commercial zoning was granted to the applicant . The Planning Commission of the Town of Erie remain in complete opposition to this proposal and urge you to take action to stop any additional expansion on this property. Sincerely Gayle Packard—Seeburge� Circuit Rider Planner cc encl GP—S/cd TOWN OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 645 HOLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT Ese•3Eoo Box E8 828-3232 ERIE, COLORADO 60516 828-3543 448-3085 October 11, 1978 • Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: At a regular meeting of the Boa was of rrustees esd held on October 9, 1978, m unanimuously approved to recommend to the Weld County Planning Services that the application made by Lyle Picraux for a change of Zone from "A" Agricultural Zone District to "C" Commercial Zone District with a Planned Unit Development be denied. Sincerely, - Glennie Sleight Tot-tn Clerk S ,F. TOWN OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 645 HOLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT 828-3200 BOX 98 828-3232 ERIE, COLORADO 80516 828-3843 449-3085 Octol I_- . , 1 '. fJll .ILI.ty Lepartrncr-t .. - rvlccs 915 10th Gtre_,t Greeley, ''olorado ?0n1 Gentlemen: At a rimula.r .flert . n;: Octl,l .1• r , 1 °?'+ of L'^e 1-tannins Commission of the Town Il} .t• Ic , tilt Colnrll :_..ioters lanarri Ieu:`l;; vot`.6 to recommend to thu Fl ann i r:<- r.oRlm. J.,1 L:n of -:e r, flounty to Reny the rezoning of land UWneii l,;, Ly } c TYIi : lama is 11rinenl.l,y neci A,1Ii ,rultur. l ❑.nlll "c. T�icr,aux 'rvr:ul.d like to have the zoning changed to C' mcun•ci al . 'NH, Town oi' i-,r•i e has Thl the ssi, I (lentli'icHH thchu ;t a:;e 4)1 thisarea :Is IIC'inr' rc:;identi :ll . r Therefore , the '1awvn of Fr-le Flannin Conmi , ,.ion }na.i voted to deny this re<il_:est, -f'cr cl'an2:e r,i' onin,;. ;incerely , Carolyn �E'C Y'I't'1 ! , 1'11:.YIa9'111r: Comrµi nip on Lyle Picraux Cross Reference Z-312 : 78 : 16 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS September 13, 1979 Thomas and Deborah Jenkins 9911 Pecos Street Denver, Colorado 80221 Kenneth Pratt and Karen Landers 2745 Grinnelt Drive Longmont, Colorado 80501 Trustees of Wheaton College c/o James B. Daley 1900 1st National Bank Building Denver-Colorado---8D202 H. Sol Cersonsky and Jack Feuer 820 Clermont Street #100 Denver, Colorado 80220 ♦,a r 4. Ali'SiDK Rice & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5604 KENDALL COURT SUITE B ARVADA COLORADO 80002 303-421-2162 HYDROLOGY STUDY { PICKRAUX DEVELOPMENT BONANZA DRIVE AT COLORADO HIGHWAY 7 LAYFAYETTE, COLORADO PREPARED FOR LYLE PICKRAUX P.O. BOX 70 LAYFAYETTE, CO 80026 JULY 18, 1979 tp f[i `t TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PURPOSE & GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1 AREA HYDROLOGY 1 HISTORIC RUNOFF 1-2 DEVELOPED RUNOFF 2-3 DETENTION FACILITY DESIGN 3 SUMMARY 4 RAINFALL DATA 5-7 CALCULATIONS 8-11 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCT INFORMATION 12-14 PURPOSE AND GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the historic storm runoff to the projected storm runoff following development of the site in question. In most cases the runoff created, following development of the property, exceeds the historic rate. The excess runoff must be held on the site until after the peak storm passes. For the purposes of this report, the historic runoff will be estimated using the existing characteristics and a 5 year storm return period while the developed runoff will be computed using a proposed development plan and a 100 year storm return period. This report will use the concepts, information and techniques as set forth in the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual " 1969, by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers as prepared for the Denver Metropolitan Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. AREA HYDROLOGY The proposed development occupies the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The site is within the tributary boundaries of Coal Creek. The 100 year flood plain of Coal Creek does not impact the proposed development. (See Vicinity Map). The property and surrounding area currently has an agri- cultural use with some light commercial uses. To the northwest, the Erie Air Park serves Weld County. HISTORIC RUNOFF The historic runoff can be divided into two minor drainage basins. The main drainage basin roughly occupies the southern 2/3 of the property, while basin #2 comprises the remainder of the site. (See Figure 1 ) . Basin #1 (1 ) lezo' 5190 t 5190 'I CC f I a' �.a AC. iN +-,zoo I .520,, I I 520 + • Ix- x '- 5z �C. wrxs.�WiP- x IZ 11 * (aeaar.L) C=0.5 c µ BASIL) ; ~ 22.5 r1c, .r/ • c orr O' � / �` I �4 a (ACaF1Cl�L'NPAL) I / / I h51K 1 110O �-? °/G s 7C r I' n.;4 ' 9no��— t5i?5 x .—.- 5209 _ y I________„,-1 HWY 7 PICKRAUX DEVELOPMENT FIIgTD21C Pa&UJK° 01=zcO' FIGURE 1 drains to the southwest and westerly along the north Right-of-Way of State Highway 7, and into a large natural storm channel that connects to Coal Creek. Basin #2 drains northward to another channel that also connects to Coal Creek. Using a 5 year storm intensity of 1 .5 inches per hour, drainage area of 225 acres, and a runoff coefficient of 0.35, the runoff rate in Basin #1 is estimated to be 11 .8 cu. ft. per second. This historic rate will be the maximum outlet rate allowable for the developed site. Basin #2 utilizes the same storm intensity, drainage area of 15.3 acres and an undeveloped agri- cultural runoff coefficient of 0.3. This runoff rate is estimated to be 6.9 cfs. (See calculation section) . DEVELOPED RUNOFF The PICKRAUX PLANNED DEVELOPMENT will ultimately be developed in two phases. Phase 1 will consist of constructing additional offices and storage areas on the western portion of Basin #1 . (See Figure 2) . Development of this area will cause a slight decrease in the drainage area of Basin #2. Approximate building sizes and pavement locations are shown in Figure 2. Using this proposed development plan, a 100 year storm intensity of 2.1 inches per hour, a total drainage area os 24.1 acres and a composite runoff coefficient of 0.45, the developed runoff rate is estimated to be 28.5 cfs. Basin #2 is estimated to be 10.9 cfs. It should be noted that the majority of Basin #2 will remain in its historically undeveloped, agricultural char- acter and will not require any detention facilities. Phase II of this development will consist of an intensive commercial/re- tail complex on the remaining portion of Basin #1 . The northern 330 .feet of the property, which lies in Basin #1 , will remain undeveloped as mentioned above. (2) I tz9i I 1 I /64elcJLTuef. (co.3)3) o cc y lI d II _ -------- -- Z Yi--ir-"li� ii/1 Ii -- ii r t *2 o J.-i//i i�i_.l S i li / r..--' 7 2E�/I°�>rD E-'.51►J _ . m 1'3.6 Ac. =7-7-.•'77--- _ v77 Co✓EeGO s7oR.AyE (C=o.4) iv T//// / l/.-"I rTfTrn/ /1 ti • __LI, 1Z�1. i / l/4 --1 g43' \ LI �: f 5To E J r / 5-LIMY 7A y t• c=a.G) .,4cl2JC(JL1 i e.E. -i] jeE�lr5E.6 EA5In �'I . �/.i! 1 • �4 1 AK: i ��' 1 C�o:a) - �' f�L oN - _ i OffICE5 - s9 o I/ .QJ ..,l':,..,,;"."' (C_o3) .V___________ vI' • N-7 �/ 94si 1 HWY7 PICKRAUX DEVELOPMENT PI-10,5E. I _KJJcf-F- . di-it-i!sTipki BA5Id AP_E,& FACTO 9.G Ac, a7 I r 14.5 Ac. O.3 FIGURE 2 =2c� 2 13.S Ac. O. 37.9 Ac Using an area increase to 27.9 acres, a time of concentration of 30 minutes, an intensity of 3.2 inches per hour, and a composite runoff co- efficient of 0.85, the ultimate runoff rate is computed to be 91 .1 cfs. Again, the maximum permissable outlet rate will remain 11 .8 cfs. (See Figure 3). DETENTION FACILITY DESIGN Detention facilities for this site will consist of a detention pond and outlet tower with a permanent ponding capacity of 6,684 cubic feet. The maximum ponding capacity shall be 134,952 cubic feet. Maximum ponding depth will be 6 feet. Storm flow in excess of the 100 year maximum will exit the pond through a wier in the earthen dike in the southwest corner of the pond. Overland flow will carry this excessive runoff across Bonanza Drive to the existing runoff channel . The outlet structure will consist of an ARMCO 101-C slide gate attached to the easterly end of an 18" diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) . Welded to the western end of the discharge tube shall be a steel plate with a 11 " diameter circular hole cut at the base. This will meter the storm runoff to 11 .8 cfs. Attached vertically to the discharge pipe near its entrance shall be 2.5' x 18" cmp. This will cause the water to permanently pond at 4 feet. At the entrance to this standpipe shall be an open metal grate, the openings of which should not exceed 2" x 4". The combination of these gates and metering plates will allow the manual drainage of the pond at a rate not in excess of 11 .8 cfs. (See detention pond detail ) . (3) AAWCJLTUQL .VI5E.0 Bh911.1#2 (c=o.3) lac Ac. fLk` o j _• 0 Le- Ca L29/etC.P 51 - 'E. (C=o.4) .==2:7-==[ ti lei i 43' rt % �E '31 C arc,E W4 PAZKAiq (c-0.9) 0 - stiffly YAW o ( c-ac.) PZTAIL v 3 � • / 27.9 Ac. — (c.o.a) Q OFFICES \ pfrAlL(c.a.9) G tdse-LT cc-at) II PE• E.Ir �1 i Bade cizall BELT Ca-a>„) X47' 94 HWY 7 PICKRAUX DEVELOPMENT 114,5E. 31 V.A.511I ACEA FACTO I 9.4 Ac. 27 IS.9 Ac. 0.9 I =267 2 IO.O Ac.. O.'� FIGURE 3 • 811 9;EEL 4TH IWELD TO If'1'CHp .i IIII „, ,,,,,„ J A-A, (h.E:,,, '^.ATE) +1 71 WORD WALE (9dy4EsjE0) ARF1CO 101-C GATE I WITCH Of 41 TZAPAZOIOAL wia 7 I BEAoJl A4JiCO -7.'C IS I*/ v �I ca . 4F<awALL !11 ,1-0-2le°ck cHE I.A.L E2v1oVI5 cITE 5J.LFZ ri I ve • 4d Ml . 41 e Qf- II >4'V DETENTION POND DETAILS SUMMARY Development of this agricultural site into a commercial complex will cause the historic runoff to increase from 11 .8 cfs to 28.5 cfs. To slow this runoff rate, a detention pond with an engineered outlet system should be constructed in the southwest corner of the property. All runoff should be channelled into this detention/retention pond and exit under Bonanza Drive to the existing storm runoff channel . Proper construction of this facility will insure that the excess runoff will be controlled during peak storms while at the same time creating an aesthetically pleasing pond to complement the commercial development. REF: "Urban Storm Drainage D. K. RICE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Design Criteria Manual " on lting Engineers Urban Drainage and Flood Control District "Handbook of Hydraulics" Horace King "ARMCO Construction Products- Catalogue G-10575" ARMCO David K. Rice, Jr. Steel Corporation PE-LS 7338 ,,,,,...,,,Ric,,,,at'* a 7338 -le; 1* N - . :;YGINEE�L..'. • F 0 o, OF C0\-.0*� (4) RAINFALL DATA CO CL LO 41 a ° a a v) a M N — o N U I I W C 0 t _n -4- — 0g JW 2 co c, Z i Q Zcr. 0 > � 2 j �� I-7 CD i S C ) _ w 2 2 V) ( 0 ti W 9 a 'I W + o= >- e I I z .-, a 3 61 w `° 0 1ii — I SO 1 g a z o cl"w g I• IZ S ro Z ml Z c — o 0 Z I I I I O w1.7 io � $ N < cr m I A $^ � H ^ S W Er Er i S w 1 N f 0 i C m 2 0 W 1 14) a 1 11 I Kt U r '2 zP ,1 A I y 0 3 + in N OM , a I .- 0 J • I LO. } o 0 3 S3HONI NI H1d30 '1-IVANIVa 1V.101 6:i,..., '' w z 0 10 N — 0 ..-.. Q' c w f > Z S3HONI NI H1d30 "1'1VVNIVii 1V101 in 9 TIME- INTENSITY- FREQUENCY CURVES 8 7 j 6. 0 2 CC W a 5 /DD Mt STp,≥M 4 \\ • IC 72 5T-0.ei---/ —. yL / :< K 3 • 2 S7v.er, • Sradery 0 i0 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES (6) i\ct. ., W W 2 U W 2 iii ---J P V 0 z ,-- Z o 0 a 9 J 0 o NV \` Z N 1 ``1 l a W CO 11) \ Z W \\,... K.N. 2 4 in N V tN O m to a N O m c a N O N N Al N Pe(F X Pal Zigm)dsONf1M (7) CALCULATIONS • Page 8 4DK Rice PAGE /o� 3 JOB N & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE BY //4 CH'K CONSULTING ENGINEERS CUSTOMER R-4-v1< Pi° 5604 KENDALL COURT. SUITE B ARVADA. COLORADO 80002 SUBJECT ,176"..6"...e-c2 4 G) 7' S7�.o,..)" 303-421-2162 1I . BA1_ s),,v . see , cIr. / 6 V S7 t _,a. - } - f ' / I ✓ Ti• 'e- .Z H' • --7/7.e e .c LIt _eilt--. oNs • Q• or 1e cw L/�eTi��b : ,QI= CA Q e- / o (O..3 s) X. ,Z . ) - g. S ,f5F B AEI z f ara%•y = /5.3 A I 7 .+. - d m Hi , li ' / 5 • / - Li CT- K.1off . , _ ' ', = / o C 030) /-.5 65T3 1 4 • 9 C CS 1 .Zr ge-1/5-icyowp .euvoft CP 45. 6- /) A . iet_ i;v/ l* / ( .ate 6 ,e , z ) _ J'o ) ?-e ,5-70,c.", /4/4 = !4'. / .fic I G . 6.0 ,47.;7 I I f = 2 ./ ----/Ait- I r 7-• O . 16 . 1 _Q fl, %. 5 (a. ) ./ C 24. /) t 28 .5 �e f, - , I Page 9 4opicRice PAGE Zer 3 JOB NO. & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE BY CH'K CONSULTING ENGINEERS CUSTOMER 5604 KENDALL COURT. SUITE B ARVADA COLORADO 80002 303-421-2162 I SUBJECT Gi) 4.; ied/A*, Co INFRolp I ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ 11.1114.. ti a *�ei s ' I ,4- ; i 8 11111111111 lilltiinikii11111111111111111111 ■■ ■ t■■ 1111■ ■■■11■■■■■■■1 1111■ 5 ( . 3) z Q�� - - !41■■n niimmou , implimiummun gra i rAloi„k.-- ,07,worErasin 11■■■ - ?! ?_ a■■■■■■■■■■ F ■1111 III (AM. - ./43 ■■■N■■ ■■ niuii ■1■■■■■■■ ■ ■ _ • ♦ ‹',t .2■ ■ 111111111 ► ■111■■■ ■ 1111■ ■■■ n■■1■EMIIM E■`' MZE EIIIM .1■■■ n■■■s■■ ■■■ ■■m■1 17.• AA. . s��1■r■ 111111111111MM 1111111111 1■■■■■■■■■■■11�■11 i i 1111 ■■ v■■■■■il■■■■■i� ■■■ I i ■■■11.11 84-32Nrimmuirizangummmommonno ■■■!E -■■ ■■■■■■■■■ 1■ ■ ■■■! +. 8 5■ 1111■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■i► =KM.. I�R1■' r '�' ■ ■ 111 ■■■■■■■■ ■ mom 11■■■ _ ■■■■I■■■ Room _ . - / 6 co. o.s : 7. - . g, AAA Page 10 DK irr& ASSOCIA Rice S, INC. PAGE 3 f 3 JOB NO. TE DATE BY CH'K CONSULTING ENGINEERS CUSTOMER 5604 KENDALL COURT. SUITE B ARVADA. COLORADO 80002 303-421-2162 SUBJECT n■■ ■■R■■■ ■ i■■■■■ IIMEEMMER MEN" 1111■ ■ ■■1111■■■- 1111®■ I I ■■ ■■ 1111■ ■■■■ ■ ■■■ � ■■■■■■■■■■■ WA De 'e-Az o Vex r./ i I- , sE / 1111■■■1111■■■ 11111■■■■■ 1111 ■ 1111■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ III ■ �� _ 1 1111 I I L ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ i■ ■ ■11 n- ■■vnN mmEMMOOMMEMEMIMEM- AMWEEMWMEMAI n 1111■■ A.■ MU■■ E■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■■11■■mm■ ■lu 1111■ ■m s O17 s - - o■ : ' - ► ■■11 ■ ■ 1111■■■ mommommimmimmumm ►I ryfrai s r=m i✓a L 4- E -- -7' 1111■■■ III e 111 .0I 461 : - - I 111 I.. ■ 1! .II i■■■■■■■■ ' 1111■11■■ ■■1111■■riI■■■F■■■■�. 1111■ 1111 1111■■■■ 1111■■■ a /NW o w _- 3 b- - h 11111 MEMMEMEMBRAIII O = A ■■■ ■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■ .■■■■■ ■ 1111MIIIIMIMMINEEMIr o .• AIIESEJ■■■■ ■ ■■1111■■■11 ■■n■■11■■■■ ■f111■■■11■■ umninumuommonumil ■■■■■■■■■1111 ■■■r ■■11111111 ■11■■■■■ 1111 1111111 ■■■■■■■■■11 ■■■■■■nn■ II ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■11 1111■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■1111■■ ■1111 ■■■■11 ■■ ■1111■■■■■■■■■1111 1111■■ ■ MUM ■■1111■ ■_ IIIMMEME EL ■■ 1 -age 464P1RCCeS, INC. PAGE /Op / JOB NO. 790i- DATE BY _ CH'K CONSULTING ENGINEERS CUSTOMER 5604 KENDALL COURT. SUITE B ARVADA. COLORADO 80002 I SUBJECT ,ee/CTU 303-421-2162 I I I p 1 1 , ® 4' _ I , i r 2 I I I li © $5' I6) 157 bI o I- --F_47:V O'12'1.*-1/ I r- ir:4. 4.4 I I 1 I Jr z1 lay 17-4 ! ! I 1 Lb .L' tos ,ef t 18 + 1 .9 V2: i 1 ' (I2) 2.-2_ - y !—i I 8. ZS {tV pc_ I -E. ra.+4,.z.41. et .„. ---- -pi 1 yi, * e 7 fr. , , _ r 76 r -63 , v,it • „N-,- 8.2f+i e, = 0 -lr s 8.39 +",. ' -I 040i ;____.:4)1t/51_ , I I 32.2 zC3z,2J l t• 21. f:) •*r• 6J 34 I z.Z Vs-4 i1101lyllI I T li I Z ( 2.a I VAL)7 1 9. 5 flifSeC. . 644.. ' 6 _ I4,e)tof Pit leic/- 1(-,--11 1 V Citir , I it I -'� VA 19.; _ �, C4,__4: - - I _- __ r __-�" � I I SAS //oil- .-. i hole 077 fa'4 44//1 me'Tf er /18c s . MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCT INFORMATION AR_ S�O db...ery possible. Also available the Model 101 C provides a 5-inch- iM 1 is Model 101 C meter gate de- deep head angle to give greater TURNOUT scribed on Page 10-5. strength and eliminate the need Balanced Design for gussets, knee and tie braces. GATES The Model 101C has been re- All frame angles are fabricated of designed and improved over the galvanized carbon steel. Heavy Model 1010 years to make it one of the most equal leg angles are used. If bind- reliable and durable gates in its ing action is encountered during Slide Gate class. Its heavy cast iron seat and gate operation, the extra strength slide are machined to a close tol- of the heavier gate frame reduces erance on seating faces to give the possibility of damage. • Seating heads from 7 to precision control. The heavy gal- Spacers are cast as a part of 20 feet vanized angle iron frame and the gate seat and are machined • Round opening head angle resist corrosion re- to the correct height for spacing Variable frame heights suiting in longer gate life. They the angles to guide the slide dur- • also resist damage when a long ing its operation. These cast-in- • Spigot or flat back length of two by four or other place spacers increase corrosion • Side wedges "cheater" is inserted in the hand- resistance, reduce maintenance • Cast iron seating surfaces wheel to apply extra pressure in and in the event of gate disassem- • Rising stem opening or closing the gate. bly cannot be lost or reassembled • Easily attached to corru- this is not the most in the wrong location. steel pipe economical construction from an The Model 101C gate is self- gated P P initial cost standpoint,Armco's 70 contained with the handwheel lift years of experience as a turnout mounted directly on the head an- Applications gate manufacturer has proven gle or on the pipe pedestal exten- Armco Model 101C Gates are that long years of service with sion. The handwheel lift is cast used widely for outlet gates, lat- minimum maintenance is impor- with a solid, smooth rim and with eral gates for canals and similar tant to our customers. Lighter an arrow indicating the direction uses where economical, sturdy frame angles with paint instead of opening. The lift nut has ma- construction and ease of opera- of the galvanizing may slightly re- chine-cut threads and is normally `- tion are important. A new simpli- duce the cost of manufacture but of cast iron, however it can be fur- 1i fied design now offers even more greatly shorten the useful life of nished in bronze at a nominal in- ® ?` efficient service, greater corro- the gate. crease in price. r sion resistance and makes faster Armco's improved design for MODEL 1010 GATE SPIGOT BACK GATE FLAT BACK GATE MINIMUM MAXIMUM SIZE FRAME STEM TYPE WORKING e (DIA) A B C D B C 0 HEIGHT(FT) DIA. LIFT HEAD WT) 6 9.37 4.37 4.12 2.50 4.37 4.12 2.50 2 %s H1-10 20 8 11.37 5.12 3.37 1.75 5.37 4.12 2.50 2 %s H1-10 20 10 13.37 6.12 3.37 1.75 6.37 4.12 2.50 2 %s H1-10 20 12 15.37 7.12 3.37 1.75 7.37 4.12 2.50 2 %s H1-10 20 15 18.37 8.62 3.37 1.75 8.87 4.12 2.50 3 % H1-10 20 18 22.87 10.50 3.37 2.25 10.75 5.12 3.12 3 1'/s H1-14 20 21 25.87 12.00 4.25 2.25 12.25 5.12 3.12 4 11/s H1-14 16 24 28.87 13.50 4.25 2.25 13.75 5.12 3.12 4 11/s H1-14 12 30 35.87 17.37 5.12 3.00 17.12 5.87 3.75 5 1'/s H1-14 10 36 41.87 20.37 5.75 3.00 20.12 6.50 3.75 6 111/2 H2-24 8 42 47.87 23:62 5.75 3.00 23.12 6.50 3.75 6 11/2 H2-30 8 48 53.87 26.75 5.75 3.00 26.12 6.87 4.12 7 1r/2 HB-24 7 ARMCO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES IN DIMENSIONS WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE 2 } 1 Model 101C Slide Gate I Ile— A 1 THREADED STANDARD WEIGHT GALVANIZED E CAST CAPS ''ENDS DED BOTH mil'®�' -0. I I GALVANIZED i....----ANGLE BRACE - : . u� i . u FRAMES ° 12 FT. I' ° THROUGH ° 20 FT. ANGLE FRAME I, D O12 FT R LESS D �� Y ICI VIII CI_ C 3 Stems or lift rods are of ample ase in price and extended and ... The spigot back is rec- diameter to insure positive clos- delivery. ommended for attaching to cor- ure of the gate under normal op- On frame heights greater than rugated steel pipe. It also can erating conditions.Threads are of 12 feet and up to 20 feet, an be embedded in concrete but this the "double" type with two indi- 8-foot-long standard weight gal- is not recommended since the vidual threads wrapped around vanized pipe pedestal frame ex- seat is easily warped during plac- the (� stem. This insures fast oper- tension is used. The pipe is ing of the concrete. An improved {� �/ ation since the gate slide travels threaded at both ends for cast connection now makes it possible twice as far for each handwheel iron adapters.One of these adapt- to attach both annular corrugated rotation. This feature is an im- ers is threaded to each end of the and HEL-COR Steel Pipe by inser- portant advantage for operating pipe. The handwheel lift bolts to ti on inside of the gate seat. personnel having to adjust the the top adapter and the bottom Connection can be made to the gate opening, especially when one is attached to the head angle. customary 2-foot length of pipe they have many of these gates to All angle iron frames are in the fabricating plant, but pref- regulate. punched to permit field adjust- erably is made in the field to full Standard Frame Heights ment of the frame height in in- length sections of pipe. When Full height angle iron frames with crements of 3 inches. Five factory properly installed, a special mas- head angle are furnished in punched holes on 3-inch centers tic between the end of the pipe heights through 12 feet. Standard near the top of the guide angle and the inside of the spigot frame heights within this group permit lowering of the head angle makes the gate connection prac- are 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10 and 12 feet. on the frame by moving it down, tically watertight. This mastic has The table on page 2 shows the bolting it in place, and cutting low flow characteristics and thus minimum frame height that can off the excess length of stem remains in position under a full be used with each gate diameter. and guide angle at the top. All head of water. With the attach- Angle frames for 3, 4, 6 and 8 stems are threaded with the nec- ment connecting the gate to the feet are most commonly used and essary extra lengths to permit this end of HEL-COR Pipe with a rolled are carried in stock for quick de- field adjustment. end and with the elimination of livery. Other full angle frame the customary band 2 feet in back heights can be furnished. How- Seats of the gate seat, the entire ever, these have to be made up Model 101C is supplied with two gate installation can be made . per order, necessitating an in- different types of seats: spigot practically watertight. SEALANT i. Li ° ._ i�, i. ROD vi SEATING ° Ih o I4 FACE A 'Lki I HOOK BOLT CLIP 'i: 1 SPIGOT BACK WITH PIPE ATTACHED �. ICI I I 1,1 (I ANCHOR GROUT , FACE � , V - 6 FLAT BACK ATTACHED TO CONCRETE }' . " I ® CD . 4 Hello