Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100282.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2009-36.A RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#1694 FOR A HOME BUSINESS (STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - KEITH THOENE A public hearing was conducted on March 10, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Douglas Rademacher, Chair Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Pro-Tern Commissioner Sean P. Conway Commissioner William F. Garcia Commissioner David E. Long Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Jennifer VanEgdom Assistant County Attorney, Cyndy Giauque Planning Department representative, Michelle Martin Health Department representative, Lauren Light Public Works representative, Don Carroll The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated February 23, 2010, and duly published February 25, 2010, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Keith Thoene for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1694 for a Home Business (storage of construction materials) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Cyndy Giauque, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Michelle Martin, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal and entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. She stated the site is located west of County Road 49 and south of County Road 6, and there is currently a single-family residence and pole barn located on the property. She clarified the pole barn is where the majority of the materials will be stored, and any outdoor storage will be appropriately screened. She indicated the residence is served by a domestic well and a permitted septic system, and there are nine surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the property. She briefly described the surrounding area, which includes residences, agricultural uses, and a landscaping tree farm. She indicated the site is located within the three-mile referral area for the Town of Hudson and Adams County; the Town of Hudson indicated no concerns in a referral response, and Adams County did not respond the referral request. She confirmed the property is currently in violation, for the storage and business uses on the site without the proper permits; however, approval of this USR application will correct the violation. She indicated thirteen referral agencies reviewed the application materials, with ten providing comments which have been addressed within the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. She clarified no response was received from the West Adams Soil Conservation District, Adams County, or the Box Elder Irrigation Company, and she displayed photographs of the site and surrounding area. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Martin clarified the Hudson Fire Protection District is requesting that the applicant provide a detailed list of the 2010-0282 PL2019 / HEARING CERTIFICATION - KEITH THOENE (USR#1694) PAGE 2 materials to be stored within the pole barn. She further clarified the applicant will be required to apply for a Change of Use permit for the barn, which will require a letter of approval from the District. Don Carroll, Department of Public Works, stated the site access is located on County Road 49, which is an arterial road, and the most recent traffic count is approximately 48 vehicles per day. He stated County Road 6 is a local gravel road, with a traffic count of approximately 56 vehicles per day. He clarified the applicant has agreed to close and abandon an existing access at the southeast corner of the property, and only the new access on County Road 49 will be utilized. He indicated the applicant has provided the required water quality feature to catch runoff, which is located in the southeast portion of the property. He confirmed there will be a minimal amount of traffic to the site, and the applicant has indicated a pick-up truck with a trailer may access the site approximately once per week. Lauren Light, Department of Public Health and Environment, stated water is provided to the site by a domestic well, and as long as there are no additional employees or customers at the site, the well is not required to be re-permitted. She confirmed the septic system is adequately sized for the residence, and dust control measures will be required since the access drive is surfaced with gravel; however, there will be a minimal amount of traffic to the site, therefore, dust is not a big concern. She indicated there will not be any waste generated on the site, as the applicant is storing recycled metal doors and security components, therefore, a Waste Handling Plan is not required. She confirmed the applicant has satisfied many of the Conditions of Approval, which may be deleted from the Resolution. Keith Thoene, applicant, stated he is part-owner of Sierra Detention Systems which is a company that provides electronic security equipment for jails and detention centers, etcetera. He indicated he purchased the property in the year 2007, and during that year, the company was scheduled to complete a job for the City and County of Denver detention center. He clarified the proper permit of the parking of the trucks and equipment was not able to be secured, therefore, he diverted the trucks to be temporarily parked on his property since it was a large acreage. He explained he now understands the ten trucks full of metal doors created an eyesore for his neighbors, and it was at that time the violation on the property was initiated. He clarified he began the process for the USR permit at the same time be began the process of building his residence, and he cleaned up the property and was able to get all of the equipment hauled off of the site. Mr. Thoene explained the company recently bought a piece of land within Adams County, approximately six acres in size, and the company is in the process of constructing a new office building. He indicated any excess materials and equipment will be stored at the new office building site, and his personal site will only be utilized for storing older equipment pulled out from the jobsites where new equipment is installed. He confirmed he will not be storing any toxic products on his site and the majority of the equipment will be 400-pound metal detention doors. He clarified he likes to hang on to the old equipment in good working order and he tries to recycle as much of it as possible, especially for smaller agencies which cannot afford brand new equipment or technology. He further clarified some of the materials sit in storage for a long amount of time before he is able to find a place where it may be reused, and deliveries and pick-ups at the site are very infrequent. He clarified the recent traffic at his property is related to the construction of his personal residence and the landscaping of the property, and he confirmed everything that is currently located on the site is his own personal 2010-0268 PL2019 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KEITH THOENE (USR#1694) PAGE 3 property. He indicated his cheapest option for storage of these materials was to build a large barn within an agricultural area, which is why he pursued this site for his residence and storage needs. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Thoene confirmed there are no manufacturing activities on the site, and the only construction activities are in relation to his residence, which was recently completed. Further responding to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Thoene stated the hours of operation are listed as the hours when a potential purchaser could come to the site to pick up materials, and he concurred daylight hours may be more appropriate. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Mr. Thoene indicated it is his intention not to utilize any outdoor storage; however, if it becomes necessary, the outdoor storage area will be appropriately screened. He clarified he has the desire to make his residence and property as visually appealing as possible, and he confirmed he currently has a horse trailer and an old vehicle located on the property, which will be screened. He reiterated all of the materials will be stored within the barn, and in response to Commissioner Garcia, he confirmed he will screen with a wooden fence, if necessary, and he will find adequate screening for the outdoor storage uses, if necessary. Cecil Neill, surrounding property owner, expressed his concerns about the condition of the applicant's property in the past, and confirmed he does not want to look at a messy property in the future. He clarified he is not opposed to allowing the applicant to store materials on the site; however, the materials should not be visible to adjacent properties. He indicated he concurs with a screened area for outdoor storage, so that the property does not appear trashy and disorganized. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Neill clarified his property is located to the east of the applicant's and he is not opposed to the hours of operation being daylight hours. He clarified, several months ago, a semi-truck full of construction materials pulled up to the site during the middle of the night, and stayed parked until the morning, and the noise and lights from the truck disturbed his sleep. He indicated his overall hope is that Mr. Thoene will be committed to being a good neighbor, and he does not object to the proposal as long as Mr. Thoene keeps the materials inside the barn. He clarified there used to be a pond at the southeast corner of the applicant's site; however, Mr. Thoene has since made modifications to the area, and he questioned what Mr. Thoene ultimately intends to do in that area. Chair Rademacher expressed his appreciation to Mr. Neill for attending today's hearing. Mr. Thoene explained the truck situation described by Mr. Neill happened before he was living on the site, while the residence was being constructed, and he confirmed it will not happen again. He clarified any trucks hauling materials for the business will be directed to unload at the office and storage facility currently being constructed. He further clarified there should be no more commercial trucks to his property, unless he receives a load of landscaping material this coming Spring. He reiterated the pick-up truck and trailer coming to the site to retrieve or deliver materials will be less than once per week, and most likely will only be once per month. Responding to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Thoene confirmed a small pond used to exist in the southeast corner of the site; however, the water stunk and the area harbored mosquitoes. He clarified he hired an architect who indicated to him that the area did not contain a good drainage pattern, due to the type of soil and depressed area. He confirmed the area was excavated, which exposed the sandy bottom layer and the area will now adequately drain and should not harbor mosquitoes anymore. He indicated he intends to plant some rough grass in the area, which should grow and provide ground cover, and he does not intend to create another pond on the property. Further responding to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Carroll confirmed the plat indicates the area as "wetlands" and he concurred that the area should drain more adequately 2010-0268 PL2019 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KEITH THOENE (USR#1694) PAGE 4 Mr. Thoene clarified he desires to be a good neighbor, first and foremost, and he indicated that if Mr. Neill ever has any concerns, he could write him a note, or talk to him in person, and he will work to resolve his concerns. He indicated he is dedicated to improving the look of the surrounding area, and he is willing to communicate with any surrounding property owners who have concerns. Chair Rademacher concurred it is very important to act as a good neighbor. Ms. Light clarified the applicant has satisfied Conditions of Approval #1.A, #1.B, and #1.C, and Development Standard #8, therefore, they may be deleted. The Board concurred with the modifications, as proposed by Ms. Light, as well as the modification of Development Standard #3 to indicate the hours of operation as daylight hours. Commissioner Garcia questioned whether Condition of Approval #2.E, requiring an enclosure for the dumpster, is necessary for this property since the applicant is not generating waste on the site. In response, Ms. Martin indicated it was noted that the site contained a roll-off dumpster during a site inspection, therefore, staff recommended that the dumpster be indicated on the plat, and that an enclosure be constructed to screen the dumpster. Further responding to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Martin confirmed she did not check to see whether the items in the dumpster were related to the construction of the residence, or if they were discarded detention equipment items. Chair Rademacher indicated if the dumpster is only on the site for the purposes of the construction of the residence, it does not require screening; however, if the applicant will be utilizing the dumpster on an continuing basis, the dumpster should be screened. Following discussion among the Board, the Board concurred with the deletion of Condition of Approval #2.E. Responding to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Martin reiterated the applicant needs to provide a list of the items stored within the barn to the Hudson Fire Protection District, and the District has a form its representation will sign before the building permit is issued. Chair Rademacher concurred this is a pretty common requirement, and he does not have any concerns with the language as written. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Thoene indicated he has reviewed, and concurs with, the Condition of Approval and Development Standards, as modified. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the request of Keith Thoene for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1694 for a Home Business (storage of construction materials) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. Her motion included the deletion of Conditions of Approval #1.A, #1.B, #1.C, and #2.E, with the required re-lettering; the modification of Development Standard #3 to state, "The hours of operation are daylight hours, Monday through Friday."; and the deletion of Development Standard #8, with the required re-numeration. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 10:30 a.m. 2010-0268 PL2019 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KEITH THOENE (USR#1694) PAGE 5 This Certification was approved on the 15th day of March, 2010. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO .► - - ATTEST: -5i ._ _ cQuinnitki �' uglas ademac ' =r, Chair Weld County Clerk to the B!:fd ` 1 ,tR®/ rbara Kirkmeyej Pro-Tern f BY: . (1/4d Dep Clerk t. the Board L _ < EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Sean P. C wTi Willi F. Garcia -)VDavid E. Long 2010-0268 PL2019 f . Q S. v 1J W O a ;v r0 O iV 'A w N `l R m ` a c G; W N T v 0 2 a U d Q z y a) V` Cs, v D ct a niin Z LL 4- a) \ W d V F O o co a o 0 z ILI l- (I) ° O ' 11 C O N O 0 < r N- \ 1- 0 N 2 C I- d c z O C ' o N t .c C L O a o Y c • I u) • C r Q M ; L ILI et p T a a to v # a) N Z w N W 0 2 Q 2 c �.. C U z O d z VC J K 2 t • N M a M 4, cs ° V w � s S \ CL 0O r` 4-o N �\ L , Ili Q co ( �` i —\ ii d U N C C d V �' ,3 v_ 4 C\J Z Q . z r. ro �_ S a r 0 t/' i- a W O ~ E y 3 -1 �' NO < ° 03 u re z en 0 0 x K ° 3 '� � N '° a CO E &7 N F N m e c s c '5) - Z hC � O Aw < w >1 O 0 2 C c as J 1- ~ TO lo- - e0 J N 41 O `p h U. �LYYU d a J ` Q M co M co 5 r 1 C) W 000 W a CY c< 14 0: OOOO a CC' �� Q NN y NN O1 �C- ) U F F- F F W W 0 � v v C._ Z W W W W f 0 2 YYYY Q mg Q`-_ ��F c 'l < 00000 -I z .5.-- W 4Q x OOOO d _ • L M -(<2 � \,7, 4 c S \,,, ; 1 d = ' r C 4 a o Q�� ` N s `�' vim}/ �9b� N IV \ \ __L.) \i t /( W 0 y a S \\ � , ' ., re N F (� N Cr' M L,----_, ti R v ``1 w m � . N M �1 z W OO N 'a r ` r ' • -fir kl a ° C It - ` od V cj "' • O 9 13 m c � � C c. % VIS i— a c w o �" � (n ? In " ` � Q O w o Y z -z- N� `'S� o + Q 1 9 C G N O CO !" Mu' -%�. `1 1 t tCc el; 9 m et hc) �N c y \ d' , N F N o E FI u c 2 o TJ ' �\ O cc' J o a C C..1- .c - , ` • L 0 .a l� _a e 03 C J tom, Q c . ' N 1 %if? til ' , 'y o p`� o N4 4 O• OCl OO ' • z w w w w w �'� d .� , t 4 V V V w Q o C �� , z 00 00 00 a z l ' I EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case USR#1694 - KEITH THOENE Exhibit Submitted By Description A. Planning Staff Inventory of Items Submitted B. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 6/2/2009, C. Planning Commission 7/7/2009, 10/06/2009, 12/01/2009, and 2/2/2010) D. Planning Staff Certification and Photo of sign posting Memo re: Request to Refer Case back to Staff, dated E. Planning Staff 10/6/2009 E-mail re: Hearing date and Applicant address, dated F. Planning Staff 2/5/2010 G. H. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. Hello