Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20103016.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2010-60 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#1759 FOR A USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, ACCESSORY USE, OR USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICT (HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT- KURT AND BECKI SCHWADER A public hearing was conducted on December 22, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Douglas Rademacher, Chair Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Pro-Tern Commissioner Sean P. Conway Commissioner William F. Garcia - EXCUSED Commissioner David E. Long Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Jennifer VanEgdom County Attorney, Bruce Barker Planning Department representative, Michelle Martin Health Department representative, Lauren Light Public Works representative, Heidi Hansen The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 17, 2010, and duly published November 24, 2010, in the Fort Lupton Press, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Kurt and Becki Schwader, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit#1759 for a Use Permitted as a Use by Right, Accessory Use, or Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone District (heating and air conditioning) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Bruce Barker, County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Chair Rademacher advised the applicants, Kurt and Becki Schwader, that they have the option of continuing the matter to a date when the full Board is present. However, if they decide to proceed today, the matter will require three affirmative votes, or in the case of a tie vote, Commissioner Garcia will review the record and make the determining vote. Ms. Schwader indicated she would like to proceed today. Michelle Martin, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal and entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. She stated the site is located south of County Road 46, and east of the Interstate 25 (1-25) Frontage Road. She indicated the property is currently in violation, for the operation of a business without the proper zoning permit, and if the USR permit is approved, the violation will be closed; however, if the USR permit is denied, the matter will be referred to the County Attorney's Office. She stated the surrounding property to the south and east have been annexed by the Town of Berthoud, and to the north is agricultural land, with a single-family residence. She further stated no comments have been received from surrounding property owners, and the site is not located within an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) area; however, CC CFIi PL, 2010-3016 1 -1 - I I PL2092 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KURT AND BECKI SCHWADER (USR-1759) PAGE 2 it is located within the three-mile referral area for the Towns of Berthoud, Johnstown, and Mead. She indicated the Towns of Berthoud and Johnstown did not have any conflicts with the proposed use, and the Town of Mead did not provide a referral response. She clarified the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, and she displayed photographs of the site and the surrounding area. Heidi Hansen, Department of Public Works, stated County Road 46 is a local gravel road, requiring 60 feet of right-of-way at full buildout, which is already reserved. She indicated the main access to the site is for the commercial business, which is located on the frontage road, and the private residential access is gated and will not be utilized for the business purposes. She confirmed the activities on the site are considered to be low-impact, there will be no outdoor storage of equipment, and the Department did not require a water quality depression feature for the site. Lauren Light, Department of Public Health and Environment, stated water is provided to the site by the Little Thompson Water District, and the district has indicated that it is acceptable for the water to be utilized for the business uses. She further stated there is an existing septic system for the residence, and it must be evaluated if it will be utilized by employees. She clarified the plat indicates an additional septic system within the office building; however, the Department does not have a permit on file for that system. She indicated the Waste Handling and Dust Abatement Plans have been submitted, and the used and broken parts associated with the business are stored within a trailer, and then salvaged. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Light confirmed the septic issue is addressed within Condition of Approval #4, and it appears an additional leach field is indicated; however, the Department only has septic records for the system within the residence. Ms. Schwader stated they bought the property in 1998, and they have been running their heating and air conditioning business from the site since that time. She clarified they have had no negative incidences with the neighbors, and they would like to be allowed to continue to make a living and keep people employed within the business. She confirmed she has learned a lot through the application process, and the business provides maintenance of equipment at various residential and commercial locations. Responding to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Martin clarified the violation was initiated by the Department of Building Inspection. Ms. Schwader clarified she was informed that a Department employee was driving down 1-25 and noticed the truck and trailer on the site. In response to Ms. Schwader, Mr. Barker clarified Condition of Approval #5 indicates the applicant will be required to submit an Improvements Agreement for the required on-site improvements, and it is typical that these types of agreements require the applicant to post some type of collateral to ensure all of the improvements will be completed. He clarified once all of the improvements on the site are completed, the collateral is released back to the applicant. Further responding to Ms. Schwarder, Mr. Barker indicated the collateral may be in the form of a bond, letter of credit, or even the necessary cash amount, and staff will work with the applicant regarding the process. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Martin indicated the improvements will include some additional outdoor screening, along the north and east boundaries of the property, and for the parking of vehicles. She confirmed the screening is well 2010-3016 PL2092 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KURT AND BECKI SCHWADER (USR-1759) PAGE 3 established along the western boundary of the property by mature landscaping. Further responding to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Martin clarified the nearest residence is approximately 340 feet to the northeast of the site, and the lands within the Town of Berthoud, to the south and east, are currently in agricultural production. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Schwader confirmed the nearest residence is a rental property, which is occupied by a single dad and two teenage sons. Ms. Martin clarified staff did receive a telephone call from the surrounding property residents, questioning whether the business was expecting to expand, and no opposition was expressed during the telephone call. Chair Rademacher indicated he does not believe additional screening is necessary along the north and east boundaries of the site. Ms. Schwader clarified there is a detention pond utilized by an area farmer to the east of the site, and the property is not visible from the surrounding residence. Chair Rademacher clarified the additional required screening seems excessive, and he suggested the deletion of Condition of Approval #3 and Condition of Approval #1.F. Commissioner Kirkmeyer indicated the applicants should be required to maintain the existing landscaping on the site; however, she concurs that no additional screening or landscaping is necessary. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms. Martin suggested Development Standard #23 be modified to indicate the existing landscaping on the site shall be maintained. Further responding to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Barker indicated the Screening Plan provides a baseline for what will be required on the site, and it could be as simple as the Plan containing a sketch of the existing landscaping on the site. Ms. Martin suggested Condition of Approval #1.F be modified to state, "The plat shall delineate the existing landscaping and screening on the site.", and Development Standard #23 be modified to state, "The existing screening on the site shall be maintained." Ms. Schwader clarified the residence was built in 1889, and the landscaping on the site is very mature. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Schwader indicated the business used to employ 23 people; however, it was decided it was unmanageable at that number, and the business is able to comfortably maintain seven employees. She confirmed she has no future plans of adding more employees, and she understands the septic system requires an updated evaluation; however, she does not want to request an addition to the number of employees at this point. In response to Mr. Schwader, Mr. Barker clarified the USR permit is transferrable if the property were to be sold in the future; however, the number of employees listed within the Development Standards will have to be accommodated by the current septic system. Ms. Schwader reiterated she is not requesting any additional employees, and the limitation of seven employees within Development Standard #3 is acceptable. Further responding to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Schwader confirmed the hours of operation, listed within Development Standard #4, are adequate. No public testimony was offered concerning this matter. Upon request for clarification from the Acting Clerk to the Board, the Board concurred with the modification of Condition of Approval #1.F to state, ""The plat shall delineate the existing landscaping and screening on the site."; the deletion of Condition of Approval #3, with the required re-numeration, and the modification of Development Standard #23 to state, "The existing screening on the site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plat." 2010-3016 PL2092 HEARING CERTIFICATION - KURT AND BECKI SCHWADER (USR-1759) PAGE 4 In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Schwader indicated she has reviewed, and concurs with, the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, as modified. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the request of Kurt and Becki Schwader for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1759 for a Use Permitted as a Use by Right, Accessory Use, or Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone District (heating and air conditioning) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. He motion included the modification of Condition of Approval #1.F, the deletion of Condition of Approval #3, with the required re-numeration, and the modification of Development Standard #23. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 10:45 a.m. This Certification was approved on the 29th day of December, 2010. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST:�7 •: .IE `�� c ` Sreyer, ademach , Ch Weld County Clerk to isbB I '• CJ ��� r ���� ♦ 4e7m Deputy Clerk to the :� Q11 '� � EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Sean P. Conway EXCUSED William F. Garcia David E. Long 2010-3016 PL2092 C'- N \ i « �s, � 2 — , . -J o \ IX o a K �- » IL G 6 � y ■ N l aal Ili § 0 o / / ° ` z u t ? « 2 2 a) o 0 ® w 0 2 ) — [ >- § § w ! p / k k c \ \ \ @ V) . z Z. § - § � � i > o u- � - ce 0 �} \ o § - 0 x # § S ' k kk / m\ \ V) 2 2 2 2 w w w L a u « 2 f 2 \ w 00 _I < k I 0 0 0. r ~ EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case USR#1759 - KURT AND BECKI SCHWADER Exhibit Submitted By Description A. Planning Staff Inventory of Items Submitted B. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation C. Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 12/07/2010) D. Planning Staff Certification and Photo of sign posting E. F. G. H. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. Hello