The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20100681.tiff Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. 11010 Prairie Lakes Drive Suite 350ER i Eden Prairie, MN 55344 — OSA X • PO Weld County Dept. of Planning Services Weld County Planning Department Attn: Chris Gathman 1555 N. 17th Ave. GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 OS USA 48:151:12101 'iAN 711111 RECEIVED IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'1111III1I11111II111III111I1I1I11I1Ittlttll This document vas brought to you by CertificatesNor and Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. in Eden Prairie, MN. If you have questions regarding the content of this document, please contact the Producer/Agent listed on the certificate of insurance. The data included in this notice and in the attached document is confidential to ConfirmNet and Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. cc: The data included in this notice and in the attached document is confidential to Ebix BPO and the party responsible for bringing you this information. 2010-0681 1:4 Certificate Delivery by CertificatesNow-www.ConfirmNet.com-877.669.8600 l s e'44 I 'rt ;A 4. i t C' ® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMIDDMY 1COR0 12/28/09 PRODUCER 1-952-944-8885 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 11010 Prairie Lakes Drive ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Suite 350 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Carol Weber 952-918-3990 INSURED INSURER A:EMPLOYERS INS OF WAUSAU 21458 L G Everist Inc INSURER B:WAUSAU UNDERWRITERS INS CO 26042 PO Box 5829 INSURER C: INSURER D: Sioux Falls, SD 57117 I INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADEN_ POLICY NUMBER DATE((MM/DDPOLICY C TIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR irYYY) DATEJMWDD/YYYY) LIMITS LT AD'L TYPF OF INSURANCE A GENERAL LIABILITY TBCZ91506891050 01/01/10 01/01/11 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 DAMAGX COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISE TO RENTED S(Ea occurrence) $300,000 CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONALBADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 POLICY n JFC LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ASCZ91506891140 01/01/10 01/01/11 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT X ANY AUTO (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per Person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ X NON.OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ A EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY T:CZ91506891070 01/01/10 01/01/11 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10,000,000 X I OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000 $ DEDUCTIBLE $ X RETENTION $ 10,000 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION01/01/11 X WCSTATU- OTH- B WCJ291506891080 01/01/10 TORY LIMITS FR AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETORREXECUTIVE Yri E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICE W EXCLUDED?MEMBER EXCLUDED9 (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yea,describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS USA-1326 Lohman Sand 6 Gravel Mine. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN Weld County Dept. Of Planning Services NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL Attn: Chris Gattman IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR 1555 N. 17th Ave. REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Greeley, CO 80631 /, �� I USA ar w_ //-w- // w"']'G"i ACORD 25(2009/01)ashitminn ©1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. 13968864 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s),authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25(2009/01) 3:4 Client#: 14162 LGEVERIST A/ CORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE ; 8/O DNYYY) PR(7DUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION WAUSAU SIGNATURE AGENCY w AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE wield County Planning Departmert HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 2854 Hwy 55 GREELEY OFFICE ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. EAGAN, MN 55121 651 365-8053 JAN 0 3 d0313 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A: Employers Insurance Company of Wausa 21458 L G EVERIST INC [/" L /ED INSURER B. Wausau Business Insurance Company 26069 300 S PHILLIPS AVE STE 2 2 INSURER C SIOUX FALLS,SD 57117 INSURER a INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSH AUU'L POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR NSRC TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY TBCY91506891058 01/01/08 01/01/09 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $300,000 CLAIMS MADE n OCCUR MED EXP(My one person) $10,000 PERSONAL B ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 nPOLICY n 78i n LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ASCY91506891148 01/01/08 01/01/09 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT X ANY AUTO (Ea accident) $1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ A EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY THCY91506891078 01/01/08 01/01/09 EACH OCCURRENCE $10,000,000 X I OCCUR n CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $10,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE X RETENTION $10000 $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WCKY91506891088 01/01/08 01/01/09 XI WCSTATU- I IOTH- EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY TORY LIMITS ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $500,000 II SPECIAL PES de PRObe PROVISIONS E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $500,000 PROVISIONS below OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS USR-1326 LOHMANN SAND&GRAVEL MINE CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION WELD COUNTY DEPT OF PLANNING SERVICES DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL , 10 DAYS WRITTEN ATTN: CHRIS GATHMAN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 1555 N 17TH AVE IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR GREELEY,CO 80631 REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE kieWik 'M""`L ACORD 25(2001/08)1 of 2 #S486099/M486030 � LT2 © ACORD CORPORATION 19813 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25-S(2001/08) 2 of 2 #S486099/M486030 L.G. • L•G EVERIST, INC 1_I CORPORATE OFFICE '�■ 300 S.PHILLIPS AVE.•SUITE 200 P.O.BOX 5829 SIOUX FALLS,SD 57117-5829 ■�\• PHONE 605-334-5000 FAX 605-334-3656 MOUNTAIN DIVISION 7321 E.88TH AVENUE•SUITE 200 Weld County Planning Dept, HENDE some R600N,COLORADO 80640 FAX 303-289-1348 May 30, 2001 JUII 4 2001 RECEIVED Don Carroll • Weld County Department of Public Works P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Traffic Impact Study, Lohmann Sand and Gravel Operation, USR-1326 Dear Mr. Carroll: We respectfully submit the enclosed Traffic Impact Study to the Weld County Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Study was conducted by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc., for L.G. Everist, Inc.'s Lohmann Sand and Gravel Operation. Submittal of this Traffic Impact Study is required under Condition 2,C, for USR-1326. Once this Study is approved, we would like to begin work on the Road Improvements Agreement, which is required under Condition 3, H. Please feel free to call with any questions. I can be reached at 303-287-4656, extension 18. Si erely, ynn E. aver Regul ory Manager cc cover letter & Study: Sheri Lockman, Weld County Planning Cover letter only: Alex Ariniello, LSC R. A. Everist, L. G. Everist, Inc. Dennis Fields, Andesite Rock Company LM/LOH-traffcstudy-welddc-053001 -via Certified Mail 1$7000 0520 0019 0618 8401 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. - C . 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 FAX (303) 333-1107 E-mail: lsc@lseden.com Web Site: http://www.Iscden.com TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. May 23, 2001 Ms. Lynn Mayer L.G. Everist, Inc. and Andesite Rock Company 7321 E. 88th Avenue Henderson, CO 80640 Re: Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit Weld County, Colorado (LSC # 010340) Dear Ms. Mayer: We are pleased to submit our report of the traffic impacts of the proposed Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit in Weld County, Colorado. This study first provides a summary of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed site. It then provides estimates of the amount and directional distribution of traffic that will be generated by the proposed operation as well as estimates of existing plus project-generated traffic volumes on the surrounding road system. In light of the 15-year life of the operation, estimates of Year 2015 background and total traffic are also provided. Finally, the impacts of the project's generated traffic are evaluated and recommendations are made regarding roadway improvements. The remainder of this report presents out findings concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed development. Site Location and Proposed Use The site is located about seven miles east of the City of Longmont and four miles north of the Town of Firestone, Colorado, south of Weld County Road (WCR) 26. All access is planned at a single access point onto WCR 26 about one-half mile east of WCR 13. Proposed uses include gravel mining, aggregate and concrete production, and storage of aggregate materials. Existing Roadway Characteristics Figure 1, enclosed, illustrates the site location relative to the nearby roadway system. This site is within the jurisdiction of Weld County, Colorado, and this report has been prepared in accordance with its requirements. Figure 2 illustrates the existing lane geometry and traffic control at the intersections of State Highway (SH) 66/I-25 SB Ramps, SH 66/I-25 NB Ramps, SH 66/WCR 13, WCR 26/WCR 13, and WCR 24/WCR 13. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 2 May 23, 2001 SH 66 is currently a two-lane roadway with east/west continuity through Weld County. I-25 is a four-lane interstate highway with north/south continuity throughout the State of Colorado. There is an existing diamond interchange at the intersection of SH 66 and I-25. WCR 13 is a paved, two-lane, north/south county road with continuity between 168th Avenue on the south and WCR 62 on the north. WCR 24 is a paved, two-lane, east/west county road with continuity between WCR 23 on the east and 1-25 on the west where it becomes SH 119. WCR 26 is an unpaved east/west county road with continuity between WCR 31 on the east and WCR 11 on the west. All intersections in the study area are north/south Stop controlled except for the intersections of WCR 26/WCR 13 which operates under east/west Stop control and WCR 24/WCR 13 which operates under four-way Stop control. Figure 3 shows lengths for deceleration lanes, acceleration lanes, and tapers at the I-25 and SH 66 interchange. Due to the fact that the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit site-generated traffic will consist of 85 percent heavy vehicles, it is important that the deceleration and acceleration lengths at this interchange be sufficient for these heavy vehicles to safely enter and exit the freeway. Therefore, required lengths according to the State Highway Access Code are also provided. As shown, the northbound and southbound deceleration lanes and their respective tapers exceed the State Highway Access Code standards. However, the acceleration lane lengths do not meet the 1,380 foot requirement. The northbound acceleration lane length is approximately 1,250 feet while the southbound acceleration lane length is approximately 1,230 feet. Therefore, both lengths are approximately 150 feet too short. However, the taper lengths of 590 feet and 460 feet for the northbound and southbound acceleration lanes, respectively, exceed the 300-foot standard. Therefore, the longer taper lengths compensate for the shorter acceleration lane lengths and as a result no improvements are necessary. Due to recent improvements, the I-25 and SH 119 interchange deceleration lane, acceleration lane, and taper lengths were not analyzed due to the assumption that they were done according to the State Highway Access Code standards. Existing Traffic Figure 4 illustrates existing peak-hour intersection turning movement traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit at the intersections of SH 66/I-25 SB Ramps, SH 66/I-25 NB Ramps, SH 66/WCR 13, WCR 26/WCR 13, and WCR 24/WCR 13. Volumes at the intersections of SH 66/WCR 13 and WCR 26/WCR 13 were obtained from counts by CounterMeasures, Inc. in March 2001. The intersection of WCR 24/WCR 13 was counted by CounterMeasures, Inc. in February 2000 and adjusted by an annual growth factor discussed later in this report. Volumes for the SH 66 intersections with the I-25 ramps were taken from LSC's September 27, 2000 report for the I-25/SH 66 Commercial development and also adjusted by an annual growth factor. Figure 4 also shows ADT volumes. As shown, SH 66 currently carries approximately 6,580 vehicles per day, WCR 24 carries 6,420 vehicles per day, and the ADT volume on WCR 13 is approximately 2,040 vehicles per day. Truck percentages used on SH 66 were approximately nine percent, while WCR 24, WCR 13, and WCR 26 assumed a truck percentage of ten percent obtained from truck classification counts performed by CounterMeasures, Inc in April 2001 on SH 66, WCR 24, and WCR 13. Truck percentages on WCR 26 in the vicinity of the site were assumed to be the same as WCR 13. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 3 May 23, 2001 Printouts of all count data are enclosed. The I-25 and SH 119 interchange was not counted and included in the capacity analysis due to the assumption that the ramp intersections would operate at good Levels of Service due to recent improvements. Year 2005 and 2015 Background Traffic In 1999, a study performed by Felsburg, Holt, and Ullevig (FHU) contained future daily traffic projections for area roadways in the Year 2020. In light of the expected life of the Lohmann/ French Sand Gravel Pit, growth factors for area roadways were interpolated from the FHU study in order to project future background traffic volumes for the Year 2015. The resulting factors are as follows: 1.72 for SH 66 (based on an annual growth rate of 1.037), 1.45 for WCR 13 (based on an annual growth rate of 1.027), 1.88 for WCR 24 (based on an annual growth rate of 1.046), and 1.71 for WCR 26 (based on an annual growth rate of 1.039). Year 2005 background traffic volumes were also determined because this is the year in which the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit is expected to be at full operation. The growth factors used to determine Year 2005 background traffic were were 1.16 for SH 66, 1.11 for WCR 13, 1.20 for WCR 24, and 1.17 for WCR 26. These growth factors were applied to the existing turning movement volumes to calculate Year 2005 and Year 2015 background volumes. The resulting Year 2005 and Year 2015 background traffic volumes are illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. Heavy vehicle volumes are also shown. In addition, traffic generated by the proposed I-25/SH 66 Commercial development was also added to the background traffic to accurately depict future conditions at the interchange. These background traffic volumes are the future traffic volumes on the area roadways without the expected traffic generated by the site and form the basis for evaluating the impacts that traffic generated by the proposed Loh- mann/French Sand Gravel Pit will have on the surrounding roadway system. Estimated Traffic Generation Based on information supplied by the applicant, the following peak daily traffic generation activities are projected: • Haul Trucks: 156 one-way trips; • Concrete Trucks: 80 one-way trips; • Light Vehicles: 40 one-way trips. Further breakdown of morning and evening peak-hour trip activity was based on trip distributions at an existing L.G. Everist, Inc. and Andesite Rock Company site. A copy of the distribution graph is included. The resulting trips generated are shown in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit is projected to generate a total of 276 vehicle-trips, or 138 vehicles entering and 138 vehicles exiting the site during a work day. Of these, 31 would enter and 15 would exit in the morning peak,while eight would enter and 24 would exit in the evening peak. Of the morning entering and evening exiting vehicles, about 23 total are projected to be heavy vehicles while all of the morning exiting and evening entering vehicles are projected to be heavy vehicles. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 4 May 23, 2001 Estimated Traffic Distribution and Assignment Based on estimates from the applicant, about 52 percent of the traffic generated by the Loh- mann/French Sand Gravel Pit would be oriented to and from the north on WCR 13, 46 percent would be oriented to and from the south on WCR 13, and two percent would be oriented to and from the east on WCR 26. Further breakdown of the traffic distribution is illustrated on Figure 7. Application of these percentages to the peak-hour generation estimates of Table 1 yields the intersection traffic assignments shown on Figure 8. The resulting heavy vehicle volumes are also shown. Finally, Figures 9 and 10 illustrate Year 2005 and 2015 total traffic volumes which are the combination of background (Figures 5 and 6) and project-generated (Figure 8) traffic. Again, heavy vehicle volumes are indicated for affected movements. Capacity Analyses A. Assumptions In order to assess the impacts of the proposed Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit, related capacity analyses have been performed which compare existing and future background traffic operating conditions (Figures 5 and 6) with those reflecting the addition of project- generated traffic (Figures 9 and 10). The methodology used is that presented in the 2000 edition of the nationally accepted Highway Capacity Manual published by the Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with "A" being a relatively free-flow condition and "E" representing the "capacity" of a given intersection or traffic movement. The capacity analysis for the SH 66 and I-25 interchange for the Year 2005 was performed using existing traffic controls and lane geometry. However, due to the large growth in background traffic, the Year 2015 capacity analyses assumed that the interchange would be improved. The traffic controls and lane geometry used were those taken from Figure 13 of LSC's September 27, 2000 report for the I-25/SH 66 Commercial development. Table 2 summarizes the results of our Level of Service (LOS) analyses. Computer print- outs containing output from the Synchro 5.0 software are enclosed. B. 2005 Traffic Impacts Year 2005 is when the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit is expected to be at full operation. In the Year 2005 traffic scenario, the SH 66 intersections with the I-25 ramps are expected to operate at Level of Service "F" for the morning and evening peak-hours, with or without site-generated traffic. This is due to large delays at the northbound and southbound off-ramps. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 5 May 23, 2001 The intersection of SH 66/WCR 13 is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "A"in the morning peak-hour, with or without site-generated traffic. In the evening peak- hour, the intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service"C"with background traffic and Level of Service"D"with background plus site-generated traffic. However, the north- bound and southbound approaches are expected to experience large delays ranging from 25 seconds to more than 50 seconds per vehicle. With Year 2005 background traffic, the intersection of WCR 24/WCR 13 is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "A" for the morning peak-hour and a very good Level of Service "B"for the evening peak period. The addition of site-generated will result in no changes in the Levels of Service during both the morning and evening peak-hours. At the Stop controlled intersection of WCR 13 with WCR 26, all movements are expected to operate at LOS "B" or better with or without the addition of project-generated during both morning and evening peak periods through the Year 2005. The site access onto WCR 26, to be built as part of the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit development, is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "A" for both the morning and evening peak-hours. C. 2015 Traffic Impacts Under the Year 2015 background traffic scenario, the improved I-25 and SH 66 inter- change intersections are expected to operate at LOS "B" during the evening peak period with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. During the morning peak period, the two intersections are expected to operate at Level of Service "C" with background traffic. With the addition of project-generated traffic, the overall intersection LOS for the SH 66/1-25 NB Ramps intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS "C" while the SH 66/1-25 SB Ramps intersection LOS is expected to decline to LOS "D". The intersection of SH 66/WCR 13 is expected to operate at a Level of Service "F" in both the morning and evening peak-hours, with or without site-generated traffic. This is the result of large delays at the northbound and southbound approaches. However,the inter- section is expected to meet signal warrants by the Year 2015. By the Year 2015, the intersection of WCR 24/WCR 13 is expected to operate at a Level of Service "B" for the morning peak-hour and Level of Service "D" for the evening peak- hour,without site-generated traffic. With the addition of site-generated traffic, the Levels of Service are not expected to change and overall intersection delay is expected to increase by less than two seconds/vehicle. At the Stop controlled intersection of WCR 13 with WCR 26, an excellent Level of Service "A" is expected with or without the addition of project-generated traffic during both the morning and evening peak periods through the Year 2015. In addition, all movements are expected to operate at LOS "B" or better. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 6 May 23, 2001 The site access onto WCR 26 is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "A" for both the morning and evening peak hours. Average Daily Traffic Impacts Figure 11 shows the average daily impacts due to the project-generated traffic including the daily number of heavy vehicles generated by the proposed Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. The average daily impacts are minimal, indicating that by Year 2015, it is estimated that the project-generated traffic will be accountable for less than 61 percent of the daily traffic on WCR 26, less than five percent of the daily traffic on WCR 13, less than one percent of daily traffic on WCR 24, and less than one percent of the daily traffic on SH 66. Gravel roads with average daily traffic volumes exceeding 400 vehicles per day are generally considered good candidates for paving. WCR 26 west of the site will exceed this threshold. Truck Impacts on Pavement Condition The destructive effect of repeated wheel loads is the major factor which contributes to the deterioration of roadway pavements. Since both the magnitude of the load and the number of repetitions are important, provision is made in pavement design procedures to allow for the effects of the number and weight of all axle loads expected during the design period. CDOT uses pavement design procedures which convert traffic data to 18 Kip equivalent single-axle load applications (18K ESAL). Eighteen Kip or 18,000 lbs is the maximum legal load allowed on a single axle. CDOT uses the following load equivalency factors for flexible pavement design: 1. passenger vehicle: 0.003 2. single-unit trucks: 0.249 3. combination trucks: 1.087 The latter category includes most of the concrete trucks, dump trucks, and tractor trailer combinations that would be hauling materials to and from the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. Eighteen Kip ESAL's have been calculated for the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit on WCR 26 and WCR 13 using the CDOT load equivalency factors and assumptions regarding the breakdown of traffic into the various vehicle classifications. Based on these assumptions, the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit will generate about 355,580 ESALs over the life of the project. On WCR 26 west of the site access, the total number of ESALs will be about 358,680 while the total number of ESALs on WCR 13 south of WCR 26 will be about 351,360. In addition, WCR 13 north of WCR 26 will have a total number of ESALs of 371,590. As a result, over the life of the project the traffic generated by the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit will account for approximately 97 percent of the total number of ESALs on WCR 26 from its inter- section with WCR 13 to the entrance to the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. Additionally, the traffic generated by the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit will account for approximately 47 percent of the total number of ESALs on WCR 13 south of WCR 26 and about 50 percent of the total number of ESALs on WCR 13 north of WCR 26. The results of the ESAL analyses are contained in Tables 3, 4, and 5. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 7 May 23, 2001 Access Recommendations In order to efficiently accommodate the traffic generated by the development, the following recommendations are made: 1. WCR 26 should be paved from its intersection with WCR 13 on the west to the site access on the east according to Weld County specifications. 2. The intersection of SH 66/WCR 13 should be monitored and signalized when MUTCD warrants are met. However, the signalization is expected to be warranted by back- ground traffic and not traffic generated by the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. Conclusions Based upon the foregoing analyses, the following conclusions can be made concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit: 1. The Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit is expected to generate a total of 236 heavy vehicle-trips and 40 passenger vehicle/pickup trips on an average work day. During the morning peak-hour, about 31 entering and 15 exiting vehicles (15 entering and 15 exiting heavy vehicles) will be generated while during the evening peak-hour eight entering and 24 exiting vehicles (eight entering and eight exiting heavy vehicles) will be generated. 2. About 52 percent of the traffic generated by the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit would be oriented to and from the north on WCR 13, 46 percent would be oriented to and from the south on WCR 13, and two percent would be oriented to and from the east on WCR 26. 3. The intersection of WCR 26/WCR 13 is expected to operate at LOS "A" with or without the addition of project-generated traffic during the morning and evening peak periods through the Year 2015. The intersection of WCR 26/Site Access is also expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "A" during both the morning and evening peak periods through the Year 2015. 4. Over the life of the project,the traffic generated by the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit will account for approximately 97 percent of the total number of ESALs on WCR 26 from its intersection with WCR 13 to the entrance of the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. 5. WCR 26 should be paved from its intersection with WCR 13 on the west to the site access on the east according to Weld County specifications. 6. The traffic impacts of the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit can be accommodated by the existing roadway system with the improvements recommended herein. Ms. Lynn Mayer Page 8 May 23, 2001 We trust that this information will assist you with further planning for the proposed develop- ment of the Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit. Please call if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. By: /L.-�`'e-t�C.i. ,S4S)% k Alex J. Arin lo, P.E. x.44 R r•_ AJA/BP/wc \; t t^ Enclosures: Tables 1-5 Figures 1-11 Traffic Counts L.G. Everist, Inc. and Andesite Rock Company Trip Distribution Graph Capacity Analyses \\Server\d\LSC\Projects\2001\010340\f lo fr.wpd M CO N J 0 a7 d a' E a) N C LO co O CO U L 0 L o) J - v o m 0 NCl) C d 6 - C v 0 0) N O F EU O d U o U Y ct U d r -2. OM m o � a) ._ El: > A oo v v, d o 0 0 0 0 m m m N Q Ca A d E v E d om m o a C E 2 c w y Cr 7 d — 00O 6y W to o (o m e a C N 1_ .. C A c N it N 2 O N N - v w O] O) O N > Li. CO v O N W a) C 20 00 0 ) 0 a N O00 W " C J •a E Y 0 0) O' F- o 1° U J a C mho EN 'S � _ oov EXTD a 000 c a) '- E c o o r) C C T O O O to s In o o N. a) J U co G N 0 n o N "` .= E w D N -o45 W °'N C 4 c d 6o m a`) a) E c N C co a) co 2 o Y U' d a O N ` N C 41 4) O a V Y I— V a H N ?r N ` w N 'C 0a)N N 0 F- N > F N (O tta) C. C L 6. W W' 112 It 2 0J I— •----- • Table 2 Intersection Levels of Service (1) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit Weld County, Colorado 2005 2005 2015 2015 Background Traffic Total Traffic Background Traffic Total Traffic Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Intersection Service Service Service Service Service Service Service Service Intersections Control AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM 1. SH 66/1-25 SB Ramps Unsignalized a)Westbound Left B B B B - - - - b)Southbound Approach F F F F - - - - Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) 932.7 374.7 984.1 387.2 - - - - Intersection Level of Service F F F F - - - - SH 66/1-25 SB Ramps Signalized a)Eastbound Right - - - - A A A A b)Eastbound Through - - - - D C D C c)Westbound Through - - - - A A A A d)Westbound Left - - - - E D F D e)Southbound Right - - - - A A A A f)Southbound Through - - - - C A C A g)Southbound Left - - - - F B F B Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) - - - - 33.6 18.8 36.3 18.8 Intersection Level of Service - - - - C B D B 2. SH 66/1-25 NB Ramps Unsignalized a)Eastbound Left A B A B - - - - b)Northbound Approach F F F F - - - - Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) 768.0 759.9 993.2 - - - - Intersection Level of Service F F F F - - - - SH 66/1-25 NB Ramps Signalized a)Eastbound Through - - - - D A D A b)Eastbound Left - - - - D C 8 C c)Westbound Right - - - - A A A A d)Westbound Through - - - - C C B C e)Northbound Right - - - - A A A A f)Northbound Through - - - - B B B B g)Northbound Left - - - - D C D C Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) - - - - 26.8 14.9 26.9 15.0 Intersection Level of Service - - - - C B C B 3. SH 66/WCR 13 Unsignalized a)Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A b)Westbound Left A A A A A A A A c)Northbound Approach D F E F F F F F d)Southbound Approach D D D D F F F F Intersection Delay(secJveh.) 7.1 20.3 7.9 26.6 57.6 78.6 Intersection Level of Service A C A D F F F F 4. WCR 26/WCR 13 Unsignalized a)Eastbound Approach B B B B B B B B b)Westbound Approach A A B B B B B B c)Northbound Left A A A A A A A A d)Southbound Left A A A A A A A A Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) 0.9 0.5 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.6 1.7 1.3 Intersection Level of Service A A A A A A A A 5. WCR 24/WCR 13 Unsignalized a)Eastbound Approach A B 8 B B E C E b)Westbound Approach A A A A B B B B c)Northbound Approach B B B B B C B C d)Southbound Approach A A A A B B 8 B Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) 9.8 11.5 10.0 11.7 13.6 27.2 14.2 28.5 Intersection Level of Service A B A B B D B D 6. WCR 26/Site Access Unsignalized a)Westbound Left - - A A - - A A b)Northbound Approach - - A A - - B A Intersection Delay(sec./veh.) - - 1.8 5.7 - - 1.5 5.4 Intersection Level of Service - - A A - - A A Notes: (1) Using 2000 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)methodology and Level of Service(LOS)definitions. Delay exceeds 1000 seconds. m ¢ V V V Q ? V Q V V V CO K V' V V 0 CO co 0 0 0 tD O CO O t0 CO 0 0 0 tD w J O) r' a M M M M M M M M M M M M M On co N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V w M M CO- M M en- M M M M Cr.; M M M M N NNNNNNNNNNNNNCNN <"0 C V o M co on on CO M M CO M M M M CO M M CO ° U lfJ N N LU LU LO LU LinLi) in LU LO U) N LU LU C N ~ N d it E 'E is 0 o 0 co N N v :0 to o co c0 CO co M N CO M CO N CO CO M c0 C 0 O r N- IN N N r r r r h h N- IN IN N- N - .9 1.0 > Ol T 0) f N 'O co d C o) in c a) x m o 0 3 N o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 CO Cr) o O) on 0) o C V CD U o M M CO CO M CO CO CO CO M on CO CO on on Lin en .o N t VIn X CD U to 0 y J r N ✓ CO 0 o E 0. to Q t LL to B d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0« C N N r IN N N N n N N IN N IN IN N IN N E a. F NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN > ° CD 0 C O L- 0 > Q 0 N U' 0 J m 0) o 3 C c 23 a co 0 01 CO 0 0 co W V ¢ — r N N N N N N N N N N N N N «0 U 0 0 J O E U < N t w o rn 0 t m F V C 7 W o > 0) OLL 0 ` U JD N `0 0 C Q r M )N[) N 0 N V N OM) N on On M Lr) co C N r Y N N ) n D CoCO LU LO LU LO Ln COt0 0 0 n N r m m N N C > E 3 .y w 6 •— O J ea 0 T £ 0 N U o V X re Q CO ° — no 0 > li > X w O J ro C s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `? m CO D >, ._. 0 a 0 0 o r ° E c a W oc o ~ o w D O 3 O` E-0- S .- o _a m u) j a) o o) E cx co o 0 m 0 to y o Q E 0 C o 0 C m m o CO 0 U r DO CO U• N "C Y a C o o !n 0 r r r N N M M Q V LO f0 o N r Q in C O N 0 O 9 0 0 .� X a > > o N E = CO .. o 0 O o d F- 0 0 5 o n E co m c ° co d E c) Oo I� .. U m r w o b 0 C a ° 0 L 0 l6 - cc 3 0 d ° rn c o m o •V C N d o N O CM M 0 " N O N O un o L0 r r O co U o O E 2 L 03 V O On Cn D7 O O r N N M M V V LU LO 0 criN U 0 y 0 a ix ≥+ L U) I• Un o O @ 0 ° N X d .° N N > =_ U> L O o 0 p n . C N ~O O o a 3 > O@ C O 2 O N N CD O , o N K) M o a 0 O c0 a Ol o d `§ ri O > T' N N O O r N N M M d- in Lo cot0 r 0 N >+ r N IT' >` re FE m 3 ¢ Lo v o 0 0 o >01 U cu 0 co 0 f0 0) — O N -5 .J U >, 'O o O) o N• Q 'Sr 't n L ^ COO cO0 N 00') M M M M CO 0) tor) M M M N co C C O C Q w H a 30 N 00000000000000 E CO U N O ) , J J T CO N V 0 Q Q o 0C1 co CC ¢ ¢ aadic.) zwwwo 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 r N co Q L0 r N C) V LU O n c0 0 r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C') CO CO CO CO CO CO Cr) Cl CO VI CO CO c+) C') w n J O) 0) 0) 0)) 00)) 00)) 0 0) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 N m r W 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co C w o CNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N a V N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r CO CO J c ~ N 5 - It E 'E CD) U N N m vr w o r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r C Y CO CO C) C) CO M C7 CJ C) CO CO CO CO CO CO ✓ O 0 CDw • N ~ N 00 a0) 0) )C C_ > O O o 3 9 o co co CO CO 03 N CO m CO GO 0 OJ CO CO W 0 m o) U N c U) L r X N CD 0 w w > in CO 0 C a. En U 7 LL fN 0 d -O- c r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r C L C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 co 0 O• > O cll E 0 CO > c t 10 'O 0 Q 0 '- 7 (7 J U L CO T I- CI 9 Q w s W C 0 b 0 m Tr pir (mU -�`- aco d n tb J W cn O r r N COV LLC) CO V- W 0 0 r "C Cow N 0 a_ IX L w>ct ❑ N N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0) O) C) V V 2 N L CC U F U C W o 0 > ` O 0 U 0 0 U - L Y) LL 'a r J co v r m r v 0 in O N CO r 0 C) O « C N C Co 0 0 N V h n o m r CO 0 CO N V d' 0 n 0 N C d Co N CO CO r V' r O ? r O V r r N C) N C > E w to W 6 0 0 r N N N in Cr; M v v v - c M > n x CC Q 0 E o a u J m > x ^ o `0 CO O co o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 CU 9 .. W 9 w o o w m w a m o o F L a E c O• v C )' o w w O N S O L w O w > 02 0 0 D J O Q c 0 mco U co o o w'E 0 A 9 CD N N W J 9 0 C la v Y o V O LO N. co a CO M O I-- d- r 0 r 0 w C O 0 Cn o_ ❑ ` 0 N N N N N N N N N CO N N CO N N E c o 0 0 V N J C C two [T ~ r o w w a on n N ca co c r c w v E c 0 11 ._. o CO r J o a o c 9 a) — 0 w L• O C c w n)w C O w N J `EU v as m o O) CO O) N N N CO N r 0 in 0 0 0 X 0 0 E 2 to C V O CO W V') Om) O O LO r r N N CO O CO CO 0 CCOO 2 C) a 3 0 0 T E W • 0 N m r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N w U 0 — CO K -Q -) 0 CO w > L U s o t° 613 o n a 3 > m wow o O C >ii L i Op , Cp 0 N v CO W CA CO CO V V-- N N r r O) co CO r--- -c- W O L d tO > w N O in r r C) (P CO N m t0 CO 0 0) o r w 3 E O ,- N W' F- O O r N NCO CO dt 0 N CO PL OJ OJ O) CO O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 Q E Y C C 0 U) O N _ L ( a r 0 0 > C m > > C) w U w a rn m « o co 'o Q a O '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNC CO 0 N N a CC )j J J. R, W m w m E Q Q r • CC Q Q R CO N U Z CO 000 0 ta5 t- N CO V N CO r N OD O r N CO V0 y 0 00000000 r N CO OO 0 r 030) 0- N N N N N 0000000000 m av v v v v o v o v a v v v v v 0 co co CO CO Co co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO co Co W r ¢ o m o o m m m m o o m m 0 m m v v) NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN co LLI N N N N N N N N N N N Ni N N Ni- Co C O V N Co m m co CO Co Co CO Co m CO co Co Co CO 0 O cl0 H r N n .. E 0 aa) U 3 7 Co N c c s o a Cr v v v a V V 7 a V Cr V V a N D 0 O U ` O T m H N m a C0) 0 0) TO C > m `0 5 N 0 N V 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LO C al a % N 0 m r N c A N ce m 0 m V LL n c7) a C m co co M M M co M M M Cl M M M M M m V O N m Cr V R a V Cr V Q of or or or or or 0 m @ T O > O E re I—r U O m c L € v O ?� ¢ v 'T 0 0 12 J x Co 0 0 n CO N r (n T Co N N m O o o- r N M of �O CO n CO O 0 r0 CO CO CO CO CO CO co CO co CO CO or or 0 N U CC CO () CC ill 01 s. C m ~ > N O a o 0 5 Vl C '0 v Q m or n Co r ? o 10 O N l0 r o M o n a o in C d U N N N r or N O O CO O a N CC)r LO m N C > E C to ca E 3 W O O O N N N Mai co- Q Y rm co C C M 0 of X CC a 0 E m 0 ci J 0 > a 15 J it > x o m O W v m j o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0t co E , a ^ o F n z m 0 'a E O a N O N > Ol E •'� co 01 m U 01 0 3 0 OO n 0" C en CO CO 0 0 0 o .E al m a m N 0 m no 0 C i l0 C Y o O 0 ONco N C O m (O 0- V = Z 00 N N N N N N or N LC) N N 1-- N N on E Y@ " N o U in 0 f-- 0 U) C N n Ctr. _m C N -.-., cc) m E m O LL A U V! r 'EOM o C D 0 a 0 U v N aa) 0 O co O N LO r m 10 n O LO r 0 0 O C R Inc O CO E a o cl 0 00 an W OO OOl 0 ap r 0 N N M d0' c0 to coO 0 0 M a 0 X .1 LO 0) 0 a) O r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N al K u N K 9 J co m >. L_ U a O m al O 0 > O N G O O C O O O T s 8 O 8 O co N M m m M M or N N CO n n O M O r m 0 _ 0 '3 .0 m > t j V O 0O r M O CO N O CO CO m m CY F- 0 0 N N CO co or i0 0 m n CO m O m E F _N y E m U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N/ N >. ¢ V Y "E C al N co t0 ¢ '0 T O• > m C OI j > 0 M co (0 m ... O m — 0 O T "O O 0 te N 0" 0" E- d " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E � m dl n ¢ W c tog a U � u_ ¢ ¢> 0 O W 0 Z w w o - N CO or �l CO r Co O 0 r N CO or LO N M V N <p n W m m 000000000 } N 000 N N 000000 N N N N N 00000 $11 68 \ / Approximate Scale Scale C'-2,300 1,1 CR 25 SITE/ / N CR 24 I Figure 1 Site Location April,2001 Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) WC IC I\ ± t SH BC 71 Approximate Scale t Scale f=2500 Cf.4.--+ ±\ /1?54%i CH 24\ ( Figure 2 LEGEND: Existing Traffic Controls and = Stop Sign Lane Geometry ttlet, May,nevi Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) TAMS,INC. 7 ',l Taper 385' i/ 590' Taper 300' Taper t i • iApproximate Scale j Scale-l"-5W' i I Taper 300' • ¢I • ro 1,380' Required Existing 1,330' s h 1,250' Existng Accel Decel N Accei Lane/Ramp Lane/Ramp Lane/Ramp x Required 800' w Decel Lane/Ramp SH 66 f i ) i in 800' Required N I 1 Decel f Lane/Ramp Existing 1,230 ) 1,210' Existing Accei r Decel Required 1,380' Lane/Ramp 1 Lane/Ramp Accel Lane/Ramp • i • 300' Taper 1 • t • I e Taper 460' / 500' Taper Taper 300' 1 Figure 3 Existing and Required Acceleration/Deceleration Lengths Nfay,2001 tk. Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) c 6,575 / f 6H ee \ no Approximate Scak 233 l 72 125 Scale:1-2,300' 353 4)P 366 (1 338 46 II1� U 71 186 8 81 91 10 11 198 286 J4_, L2 24:..j �]5 15 I I LT 2 656 _ 384 161 473 565 1981 X234 389 404 32-1 E51 251 A �I 10 K. 145 48 — 52 13 4 )5 7 i;..11l; 2 7J L2 2 27 14 0 j2±)-0-1 ) r5 0 2 3 -- \N [1 (-22 1 _) 59 1 1)fi CR 26 SITE u /J1 B 5 12 18 z3M 11 41751 1_ 1 �20 89 135 181 lf C 5 fi4 111 151 113 1 L0 1 2,043 // ea ro CR 24\\ ( 6,421 / Figure 4 7 LEGEND: Existing Traffic tk, 26 _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic Volumes 31 PM Peak—Hour Traffic May,2001 6,¢21 = 24—Hour Traffic Volumes Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) mw2xnwrs avc (( \ f SH 66 170(15) 969 Approximate Scale ,00 63(25 ___556'50) Scale:( 25OO 564f51) ))l I ( ]736f66) 232(31)101 378(34) Jti) 1 1I(1) �)2�](2II 26224)j�a� \ 1�51�1�;1 1`11' 2 65 ti 011.) 661 611`1` 442 40 191(1]) 473 43) 76 0(68)r �fi0(2�62 464(42) 268 26) 3 2(3) 51 5) .V\9:1,1 2)825 52)fr 111)) 13 5) 141;1) 4J 15) evo 1 III 5 1 I +` n2 ET-0_ �2 2 221.3) 1411.) 2 0 I -1r5 0 KThn �)51) 1 202(20) CR 26 \SITE/\ 66 J) ee 7_, 49(5) 12 I) I8d�8 JI L1111 48(5D 1 1 ' 189 B9) -i f 1Jfi 8) 1)113) if r 5 1 9\ 15 12) O8ID) 2 51 5) 59 ) /\ ( 9R 24 Figure 5 Year 2005 LEGEND: Background Traffic 170(15) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) May,2001 278(25) — PM Peak—Hour Troffic(Heovy Vehicles) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) J INC. A SH 06 \ f 250(23) 17916) Approximate Scale 4(10(37) 322 29) Scale l=2,SW' 769(60))1 r� 925(63) 216(19) 0 46 342(31) 0 537(48) 10.0(9) 290261 tT) 32(3) 12(3) 397(35) 1 18336) 21 2)9 JI(_1) 3 1729(66 299�II)11)1 1 4 3166]��6B) 11,07]197)) -. 911(62) 654(59) — 40 3J) 1 293(26) 358(32) 363) 4 8)- 78 J) 6 2) 120 11) 126 [20r JJ L2101) 3 2 J k_3 3 401) 21(2) 3 5 1-111) 2-1 0 11\\ ____H -1r23S) 63 6> 265(29) /// W26 / 1.2 SITE l99 1log1o) 5 a I I L1 1l6�) J1(') IJJ++` 35`4) 1J]13) -� � 302(20) 28✓�8) ~- 113TH) ,35(1,�irr 95(20) ]117) 0 14N15) 766(9�) eZ9) CR 24 ((I Figure 6 Year 2015 LEGEND: Background Traffic 122C11 _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) May,2001 -- 278(25) PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) T 'pc } 0 40% \ 5% 2% 1 f� SN 88 H / 5 Approximate Scale Scale:1=2500' 52% 98% 2% CR 25 SITE/ 46% 39% 2% CR 21 / 5% ii Figure 7 Directional Distribution of LEGEND: Site-Generated Traffic Percent Directional May,2001 46% Distribution Lohmano/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) 1 me i f SH 88 \ 11 L9 3 Approximate Seale Scale I—2,50U 1 IR --- — II T1; 12O1 ---1 la L 3O) ! _ _ m 14(711 i n i IA mr- 10 77--- l'r LL(4)8.0) C2(5) (--I-17Pd) \:::!:311()I°7 I- K 18 K CR 28 /SITE r614) 14P ± 11O) 211L1 5 / 2(2u k_o Nt1 t cR 24 Figure 8 Assignment of LEG EN D: i Site-Generated Traffic .k 2170O 5) = AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) May,2001 ' 78(25) PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) SH 66 1 J0((15 104 15) Approximate Scale 278(25 �1(26)(( )) Scale:P=2,50O 758154))))146( ) 1r2-47(22) r ( J39(6J) 232(31) a 378(34) JR J) 8( ) 11A(1 121) R ) 262(24)°I l Bs i5) Rt 2) 1l 11) 1 l J�� 9T21} fib 62 4453((41 1911(17) .n 473 443) J6 1 0 2fl 1160(2])0 IC 44114) 464(42) 286(26) 199 16) 276(25 KC11 11 1)C9) 13 1(9) 61 5) 01,4 12) r / 8 ) \ 1 //// 1 2t B) \ 54 isou ,t'414 5) 2 2 21) 1E I) 2 r 4 K-Ilr-K 88 l t 403)I 0 24) 3 510) 202(20) CR 25 JfiJR((B�) 5 (J)V57,6) 12 1) .1 R9jB)J_I 1._ t2i) 5 J) 1 e 2) 135 O14) Jfi B) 9 9p 1 275 131T11341-22 I 1 ) 0 9610) 2 6) 80 J) CR 24 Figure 9 LEGEND: Year 2005 no(t5) = AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) May,2001 Total Traffic 278(25) PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) T INC SH 66 250(23) 165 22) Approximate Scale 410(37) 331 33220 j Scale !`=2,57 JJ2721)- - 926(84) 216(1H)1 4I 1 507 46 342(31) 0 537(48) 1010_0) 2 290(26) 0 4 (L4) 182) 12812))I 161) 367(35) J L06 12) 21 1121 1T-1) ] 1,326 120)_ 730(67) 26_9(224) 1, O3 1667(60)j 1,077 96) 912(82) 654(59) 407(]7) 3B3041 I 110(36) 59 113 J2 6) 293(26) 356(32) 19(10) 701''r 1 ) 41E,0, 11 2) 981 95 ) 1B 3) $2) f(2)3%) 01 21) 23 12) 2 I262 9) ii 2 2J 1 L.4 ta(B) r --------N. 3 2 5) 3 40a) 2f?) K____ 7Ir 1]) fii6715 � 0 2 2 B) 53 819) 295(29) CH 26 /1 /SITE 12) 999(10) I (I )7) 41) 1 �5 4) 133 13) 202 20) 262 28) �— 113 11) ]5 4_ r� 195(20 ll 171)l7)I �0 2 14 15) 4 J 9) B6 10) Cfl 24 Figure 10 LEGEND: Year 2015 SIM2T170(15) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Total Traffic 278 25 May,2001 h.':1--- ( ) PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) cowviawrr,INC. / 124(106)/11,430/12,000/ SH B6 \ / Approximate Scale Scale.-1 2,500' 143(122)/3,100/10,000 / 270(231)/440/5,000 127(109)/3,090/10,000 6(5)/180/5,000 / \ 108(92)/12,160/12,000 CR 24 LEGEND: Figure 11 Site— Heavy \\ Total Roadway 124(106)/11,430/12,000 = Generated (Vehicles f/Traffic Capacity Year 2015 Average Traffic Daily Traffic Impacts May,2001 -- - Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit(LSC#010340) TAVrs INC Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type Report Page 1 data File : D0409001 .PRN Station : 000000040934 Identification : 000000040934 Interval : 60 minutes Start date : Apr 9 , 01 Start time : 23 : 00 Stop date : Apr 11, 01 Stop time : 01 : 00 :ity/Town County : WELD Location : COUNTY RD 24 W\O COUNTY RD 13 k****************************************************************************** Lanes 1-2 are West/East Combined ion - Apr 9, 01 lehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST SA-MT 6A-MT 1A-MT None Other Total 14:00 0 0 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 rue - Apr 10, 01 11:00 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:00 0 0 15 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 12:00 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 72:00 0 0 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 03:00 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 03:00 1 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 04:00 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 05:00 0 0 11 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 35:00 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 06:00 0 0 7 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 07:00 0 3 196 6 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 329 07:00 4 9 38 3 83 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 154 08:00 3 3 228 3 167 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 423 08:00 2 6 74 9 128 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 241 09:00 5 7 30 7 106 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 189 10:00 8 15 39 9 100 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 207 11:00 10 7 82 13 84 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 225 11:00 5 12 35 12 85 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 30 183 12:00 6 7 70 7 105 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 223 12:00 8 12 47 5 99 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 209 13:00 7 5 76 4 97 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 217 13:00 4 17 66 7 115 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 251 14:00 7 6 77 8 86 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 220 14:00 8 7 67 4 109 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 240 15:00 6 2 71 5 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 196 15:00 5 7 64 9 107 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 230 16:00 3 4 120 10 138 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 299 16:00 5 4 108 6 155 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 310 17:00 1 2 119 7 126 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 269 17:00 8 6 154 7 177 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 381 18:00 1 2 121 5 120 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 257 18:00 5 8 171 5 201 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 413 19:00 0 1 116 2 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 201 20:00 1 0 64 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 119 21:00 0 0 36 0 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 69 22:00 0 0 22 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 22:00 0 0 54 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 23:00 0 0 27 0 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 24 Hr Totals 113 152 2454 156 2928 11 0 35 9 0 0 0 2 0 561 6421 Percentages 1.8 2.4 38.2 2.4 45.6 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 1 ******************************************************************************* Data File : D0402001 .PRN Station : 000000040234 Identification : 000000040234 Interval : 60 minutes Start date : Apr 2, 01 Start time : 13 : 00 Stop date : Apr 3, 01 Stop time : 13 : 00 City/Town County : WELD Location : CR 13 S/0 CR26 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Northbound - Lane 2 is Southbound Mon - Apr 2, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SO 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 14:00 Lane 1 0 33 15 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 2 0 30 20 0 7 4 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 72 Row Totals 0 63 35 1 7 5 0 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 5 126 15:00 Lane 1 0 40 24 0 S 3 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 2 0 30 28 0 4 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 77 Row Totals 0 70 52 0 9 7 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 154 16:00 Lane 1 2 47 25 0 6 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 87 2 0 82 37 0 6 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 136 Row Totals 2 129 62 0 12 4 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 4 223 17:00 Lane 1 3 45 22 0 9 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 86 2 2 71 33 0 6 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 119 Row Totals 5 116 55 0 15 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 205 18:00 Lane 1 3 53 18 0 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 86 2 0 51 19 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 74 Row Totals 3 104 37 0 6 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 160 19:00 Lane 1 1 26 23 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 58 2 1 27 7 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 Row Totals 2 53 30 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 96 21:00 Lane 1 0 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 2 0 17 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 Row Totals 0 39 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 55 22:00 Lane 1 0 10 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 0 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Row Totals 0 21 12 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 ftARAtllk#kt*****it#tklk}Akkl*****dtRkkkfRkktk#tlkt******ktlttlk1fk11t1ltti*****kflkfklktl#k4f#tY1***********t►tlkl#l3tlt*****t4t3k Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 2 Data File : D0402001.PRN Station : 000000040234 Identification : 000000040234 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Northbound — Lane 2 is Southbound Non - Apr 2, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-NT 7A-NT None Other Total 23:00 Lane 1 0 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Row Totals 0 16 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 24:00 Lane 1 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Row Totals 0 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Tue - Apr 3, 01 01:00 Lane 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Row Totals 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 02:00 Lane 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Row Totals 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 03:00 Lane 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row Totals 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 Lane 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 Row Totals 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 05:00 Lane 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Row Totals 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 06:00 Lane 1 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 0 27 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 Row Totals 0 39 8 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 53 ****t**********************t*tt*t**t****MMM*M*****t*****t*****M*****************M t*************************************M********* Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 3 *****************************************************************************,tic Data File : D0402001 .PRN Station : 000000040234 Identification : 000000040234 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Northbound — Lane 2 is Southbound rue - Apr 3, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-NT 7A-MT None Other Total 07:00 Lane 1 0 36 23 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 2 2 62 22 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 98 Row Totals 2 98 45 0 8 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 161 08:00 Lane 1 0 36 21 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 2 1 72 32 0 9 4 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 6 131 Row Totals 1 108 53 0 12 6 0 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 6 194 09:00 Lane 1 0 32 16 1 6 2 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 67 2 1 44 35 2 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 Row Totals 1 76 51 3 15 2 0 5 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 165 10:00 Lane 1 0 24 11 0 1 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 0 26 22 1 4 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 62 Row Totals 0 50 33 1 5 4 0 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 11:00 Lane 1 2 17 21 1 6 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 58 2 0 23 25 0 4 6 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Row Totals 2 40 46 1 10 7 0 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 121 13:00 Lane 1 0 28 13 2 5 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 56 2 1 24 12 1 5 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 56 Row Totals 1 52 25 3 10 4 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 112 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk#kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk**kk*kkkkkk*kkkkkkk*k*kkkkkkkk Station Data Suinary Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total Grand Totals 19 1115 570 10 126 44 0 35 68 6 0 0 0 0 50 2043 Percentages 0.9 54.6 27.9 0.5 6.2 2.2 0.0 1.7 3.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 Lane 1 2 Total Grand Totals 903 1140 2043 Percentages 44.2 55.8 fkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkk*kkkk*kkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 1 Data File : D0402003 .PRN Station : 000000040235 Identification : 000000040235 Interval : 60 minutes Start date : Apr 2, 01 Start time : 14 : 00 Stop date : Apr 3 , 01 Stop time : 14 : 00 City/Town County : WELD Location : SH66 W/O CR13 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Eastbound — Lane 2 is Westbound Non - Apr 2, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 15:00 Lane 1 0 130 56 0 2 5 0 5 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 209 2 3 219 79 0 7 2 0 5 19 1 0 0 0 0 1 336 Row Totals 3 349 135 0 9 7 0 10 28 2 0 0 0 0 2 545 16:00 Lane 1 6 139 56 1 22 4 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 6 246 2 2 298 89 2 12 3 0 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 426 Row Totals 8 437 145 3 34 7 0 5 24 1 0 0 0 0 8 672 17:00 Lane 1 1 142 51 0 27 7 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 0 11 247 2 2 350 121 0 9 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 490 Row Totals 3 492 172 0 36 10 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 12 737 19:00 Lane 1 4 252 56 0 5 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 322 2 3 134 52 1 18 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 219 Row Totals 7 386 108 1 23 2 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 541 20:00 Lane 1 3 106 36 0 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 155 2 0 106 26 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 142 Row Totals 3 212 62 0 6 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 297 21:00 Lane 1 1 62 14 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 86 2 1 66 19 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Row Totals 2 128 33 0 6 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 175 23:00 Lane 1 1 67 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 2 0 31 10 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Row Totals 1 98 22 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 24:00 Lane 1 0 49 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 2 1 13 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Row Totals 1 62 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Tue - Apr 3, 01 kkkk*kkkkkkkk*******k*k****************************k**********************************k************k****k****************k********* Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 2 ******************************************************************************* Data File : D0402003 .PRN Station : 000000040235 Identification : 000000040235 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Eastbound — Lane 2 is Westbound rue - Apr 3, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 01:00 Lane 1 2 15 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Row Totals 3 23 6 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 02:00 Lane 1 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 1 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 Row Totals 1 23 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 03:00 Lane 1 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Row Totals 0 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 04:00 Lane 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 Row Totals 0 21 3 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 05:00 Lane 1 0 20 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 2 33 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 54 Row Totals 2 53 17 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 84 06:00 Lane 1 0 33 21 0 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 2 1 142 73 1 2 2 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 236 Row Totals 1 175 94 1 2 3 0 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 07:00 Lane 1 3 295 113 1 25 4 1 2 18 2 0 0 0 0 10 474 2 0 155 65 0 6 6 0 3 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 249 Row Totals 3 450 178 1 31 10 1 5 30 3 0 0 0 0 11 723 08:00 Lane 1 3 284 118 3 27 7 0 4 17 3 0 0 0 0 20 486 2 0 120 51 2 5 3 0 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 203 Row Totals 3 404 169 5 32 10 0 12 29 3 0 0 0 0 22 689 09:00 Lane 1 1 172 72 3 22 4 0 5 16 1 0 0 1 0 10 307 2 0 91 55 0 8 4 0 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 Row Totals 1 263 127 3 30 8 0 10 28 1 0 0 1 0 10 482 tt#tRk**********tlktl!#iktfAkAAkAktkkkki*********t+fAft**********l:Ftm**t4Ak}k+klkfl#+if#1************1ktf At4#+t******t*******Ak** Counter Measures Volume by Vehicle Type by Lane Report Page 3 Data File : D0402003 .PRN Station : 000000040235 Identification : 000000040235 ******************************************************************************* Lane 1 is Eastbound — Lane 2 is Westbound Tue - Apr 3, 01 Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-NT None Other Total 10:00 Lane 1 1 121 48 1 15 4 0 3 11 3 0 0 2 0 2 211 2 1 108 46 1 15 2 0 5 21 1 0 0 1 0 6 207 Row Totals 2 229 94 2 30 6 0 8 32 4 0 0 3 0 8 418 12:00 Lane 1 7 88 47 2 18 4 0 5 14 3 0 0 0 0 11 199 2 2 103 50 0 17 2 0 2 14 1 0 0 0 0 4 195 Row Totals 9 191 97 2 35 6 0 7 28 4 0 0 0 0 15 394 14:00 Lane 1 5 81 38 2 16 7 2 4 16 2 0 0 0 0 10 183 ******#**R*t*k*3***k!****i*fA******k}ktfAftAtlkttkkAktkkfkk*****#kki:Tkl4kktlktRA#lftf4f*********************************f AA#1kk***R Station Data Sunary Vehicle Type Cycle Cars 2a-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total Grand Totals 58 4098 1525 22 303 84 3 79 263 21 0 0 4 0 115 6575 Percentages 0.9 62.3 23.2 0.3 4.6 1.3 0.0 1.2 4.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.7 Lane 1 2 Total Grand Totals 3422 3153 6575 Percentages 52.0 48.0 1kAYYRtkktfi*****************:F****tk11k#*****lAtkkklklkfAkfAA1tk51ttf*****k+iktA**********fkAkkf#Ak1kA***** *****fflf}I************ Counter Measures ite Code : PAGE: 1 IS STREET; CR-13 FILE: cr13c124 /W STREET: CR-24 Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/24/00 ire From North From East From South From West Vehicle egin RT TARO LT RT TORO LT RT TIRO LT RT TURD LT Total 6:30 11 14 6 4 20 0 0 8 18 11 24 4 120 6:45 18 18 1 3 24 5 0 9 21 21 24 4 148 IR TOTAL 29 32 7 7 44 5 0 17 39 32 48 8 268 7:00 AM 7 10 4 0 19 2 0 4 17 18 19 5 105 7:15 6 15 4 3 21 1 0 12 26 16 27 1 132 7:30 14 15 3 2 35 2 0 9 21 26 13 4 144 7:45 11 17 1 2 28 1 0 11 28 16 18 6 139 IR TOTAL 38 57 12 7 103 6 0 36 92 76 77 16 520 8:00 AM 9 11 2 2 27 0 0 10 19 16 15 4 115 8:15 6 13 6 2 13 2 0 16 19 20 17 3 117 Break 4:00 PM 7 13 3 0 14 0 0 25 20 19 33 7 141 4:15 5 18 4 3 14 0 1 19 11 17 43 12 147 4:30 4 22 6 5 8 1 3 14 18 16 33 15 145 4:45 4 16 1 2 13 0 0 16 21 20 27 15 135 iR TOTAL 20 69 14 10 49 1 4 74 70 72 136 49 568 5:00 PM 6 12 2 5 14 0 1 11 26 24 38 14 153 5:15 5 19 0 2 14 0 1 13 13 19 48 15 149 5:30 6 14 3 3 20 1 0 11 17 29 41 6 151 5:45 5 9 2 9 14 0 0 13 24 35 28 4 143 RR TOTAL 22 54 7 19 62 1 2 48 80 107 155 39 596 DAY TOTAL 124 236 48 47 298 15 6 201 319 323 448 119 2184 Counter Measures site Code : PAGE: 1 FJS STREET: CR-13 FILE: cr13cr24 VW STREET: CR-24 Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/24/00 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:45 AN 0.78 45 58 12 115 39 50 10 East 7:15 AN 0.79 9 111 4 124 7 90 3 South 7:15 AM 0.87 0 42 94 136 0 31 69 West 6:45 AM 0.91 81 83 14 178 46 47 8 Entire Intersection North 7:15 AM 0.84 40 58 10 108 37 54 9 East 0.19 9 111 4 124 7 90 3 South 0.87 0 42 94 136 0 31 69 West 0.92 74 73 15 162 46 45 9 CR-13 N W--f—E S 40 58 10 L___ 9 108 245 CR-24 124 111 L 15 4 73 162 CR-24 :a 3•.. J 74 135 7 94 42 0 1 6 • CR-13 Counter Measures ii.e Code : PAGE: 1 i/S STREET: CR-13 FILE: cr13cr24 3/W STREET: CR-24 • Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/24/00 PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAR HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.80 20 69 14 103 19 67 14 East 5:00 PM 0.85 19 62 1 82 23 76 1 South 4:00 PM 0.82 4 74 70 148 3 50 47 West 5:00 PM 0.92 107 155 39 301 36 51 13 Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.86 22 54 7 83 27 65 8 East 0.85 19 62 1 82 23 76 1 South 0.86 2 48 80 130 2 37 62 West 0.92 107 155 39 301 36 51 13 CR-13 N VI—HE S 10fi '; 22 54 7 '• •,.. ;: 3: . 1.64 ::::::, 83 19 ::::::::::::::::::::::,:::,8,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,......:........„.............:....:.x.......::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::.:„......„........................................................... r ..............., ?: CR-24 82 62 39 --1 1 155 301 CR-24 J107 130 ;t2 :6: ;;;:'t 80 48 2 CR-13 Counter Measures i►.e Code : 00000002 PAGE: 1 -S Street: CR-i3 PILE: CR13CR26 -W Street: CR-26 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3/20/01 ime From North From East From South From West Vehicle egin RT THRO LT RI THRO LT RT THRO LT RI THRO LT Total 6:30 0 36 0 0 0 1 5 17 0 0 0 0 59 6:45 1 38 0 2 1 1 7 9 0 0 1 0 60 R TOTAL 1 14 0 2 1 2 12 26 0 0 1 0 119 7:00 AM 0 32 2 3 0 1 7 10 0 1 0 0 56 7:15 0 22 2 1 1 1 0 15 0 0 1 1 44 7:30 0 29 2 0 0 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 46 7:45 1 26 1 1 0 1 1 14 I 0 1 0 41 R TOTAL 1 109 1 5 1 4 8 53 1 1 2 1 193 8:00 AM 1 20 1 2 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 41 8:15 2 18 2 0 1 0 2 13 0 0 1 0 39 Break 4:00 PM 2 17 0 1 0 2 1 26 0 0 0 1 50 4:15 0 15 1 0 1 0 0 35 0 0 0 2 54 4:30 0 25 1 1 0 0 2 30 0 0 0 0 59 4:45 0 20 1 1 0 0 1 51 0 1 0 2 17 IR TOTAL 2 77 3 3 1 2 4 142 0 1 0 5 240 5:00 PM 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 54 0 0 0 2 73 5:15 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 36 1 0 0 1 54 5:30 I 25 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 1 0 2 64 5:45 0 23 0 1 0 1 0 26 0 1 0 0 52 IR TOTAL 1 79 0 2 0 2 0 151 1 2 0 5 243 )AY TOTAL 8 377 13 14 4 11 26 401 2 4 4 11 875 Counter Measures lie Code : 00000002 PAGE: 1 I-S Street: CR-13 FILE: CR13CR26 -W Street: CR-26 • Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3(20(01 • PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:30 AM 0.85 1 128 4 133 1 96 3 East 6:30 AM 0.75 6 2 4 12 50 17 33 South 6:30 AN 0.80 19 51 0 70 27 73 0 Nest 6:30 AM 0.50 1 2 1 4 25 50 25 Entire Intersection North 6:30 AM 0.85 1 128 4 133 1 96 3 East 0.75 6 2 4 12 50 17 33 South 0.80 19 51 0 70 27 73 0 Nest 0.50 1 2 1 4 25 50 25 CR-13 N W+E S 58:?2 1. 128 4 ::`::;3:;•::: 133 6 CR-26 12 2 ...... 1 L 4 2 4 CR-26 ir: J1 70 >; 133:;.:.;: 0 51 1.9 CR-13 Counter Measures site Code : 00000002 PAGE: 1 f-S Street: CR-13 FILE: CR13CR26 -W Street: CR-26 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3/20/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.79 2 17 3 82 2 94 4 East 4:00 PM 0.50 3 1 2 6 50 17 33 South 4:45 PM 0.82 1 116 1 178 1 99 1 West 4:45 PM 0.75 2 0 1 9 22 0 78 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.75 1 76 1 78 1 97 1 East 0.75 2 0 1 3 67 0 33 South 0.82 1 176 1 118 1 99 1 West 0.75 2 0 7 9 22 0 78 CR-13 N W.-1--E S i85:.. 1 76 1 78 2 ....:::::.::::::::::::.:::::::...........:::::„..x.....................................................„:. ::::::::::::::::3i ei:::::.::.:i: CR-26 3 0 7 L1 ../......i.........i. x...................., 0 9 CR-26 2 i r 178 f 1 176 1 CR-13 Counter Measures lice Code : 00000024 PAGE: 1 I-S Street: CR-13 FILE: CR13S866 ;-W Street: SN-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3/20/01 'ime From North From East From South From West Vehicle login RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total 6:30 20 21 5 0 136 13 3 2 6 10 46 4 266 6:45 13 18 3 0 95 9 2 2 2 4 42 3 193 iR TOTAL 33 39 8 0 231 22 5 4 8 14 88 7 459 7:00 AM 26 11 1 0 80 15 2 4 8 9 36 4 196 7:15 20 12 1 2 101 7 4 3 6 5 42 2 205 7:30 20 14 1 3 93 12 3 3 9 7 33 1 199 7:45 14 12 4 1 66 8 8 3 6 5 40 8 175 lR TOTAL 80 49 7 6 340 42 17 13 29 26 151 15 775 8:00 AM 13 8 0 1 65 6 2 4 8 8 36 5 156 8:15 10 7 3 1 46 4 2 4 9 5 42 2 135 Break 4:00 PM 7 3 0 6 63 5 6 15 11 8 63 12 199 4:15 5 7 1 1 50 5 9 15 11 14 62 14 194 4:30 2 7 0 0 39 2 10 16 5 11 91 13 196 4:45 4 4 2 1 49 2 21 19 8 12 87 20 229 RR TOTAL 18 21 3 8 201 14 46 65 35 45 303 59 818 5:00 PM 3 3 3 1 81 2 14 26 17 9 93 11 263 5:15 6 6 1 4 67 2 5 19 13 15 126 25 289 5:30 5 7 0 2 54 4 12 10 10 11 98 18 231 5:45 11 0 2 3 45 1 3 15 10 12 83 18 203 HR TOTAL 25 16 6 10 247 9 34 70 50 47 400 72 986 DAY TOTAL 179 140 27 26 1130 97 106 160 139 145 1020 160 3329 Counter Measures lite Code : 00000024 PAGE: 1 I-S Street: CR-13 FILE: CR13SH66 :-W Street: SH-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3/20/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:30 AM 0.82 79 62 10 151 52 41 7 East 6:30 AM 0.77 2 412 44 458 0 90 10 South 7:30 AN 0.90 15 14 32 61 25 23 52 West 6:30 AM 0.86 28 166 13 207 14 80 6 Entire Intersection North 6:30 AN 0.82 79 62 10 151 52 41 7 East 0.77 2 412 44 458 0 90 10 South 0.79 11 11 22 44 25 25 50 West 0.86 28 166 13 207 14 80 6 CR-13 N W--I-E S :2.6:.. 79 62 10 151 J 2 ::•.5.13... r .::::iwie:::.:Ki:.:::::::3::::.:::::::-..was.::::.::::::Ei .............:.:.:.:: SH-66 458 412 L 13 44 166 207 SH-66 18`. ::=.. J 28 p44 7 ::::::::::::„:„:::::::::::::::.K:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„:::.:,::::::::: ::::::::: ..i.::::::::.:::::::.8::EK:i:Kf:::;::.::K:.5.5.::i:K:i:K.....:K:ii:::K:::x:x::::.:K:i 22 11 11 134 CR-13 Counter Measures ;i+.e Code : 00000024 PAGE: 1 f-S Street: CR-13 FILE: CR13SH66 -W Street: SH-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 3/20/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 5:00 PM 0.90 25 16 6 47 53 34 13 East 4:45 PM 0.80 8 251 10 269 3 93 4 South 4:45 PM 0.76 52 74 48 174 30 43 28 West 4:45 PM 0.79 47 404 14 525 9 77 14 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.85 18 20 6 44 41 45 14 East 0.80 8 251 10 269 3 93 4 South 0.76 52 74 48 174 30 43 28 West 0.79 47 404 74 525 9 17 14 CR-13 N W—J—E S 156 18 20 6 44 8 SH-66 269 251 L 74 10 404 525 SH-66 47 174 • ••••-••••••••••••••- 48 74 52 77 CR--13 L.G. Everist, Inc. and Andersite Rock Company Trip Distribution Lohmann/French Sand Gravel Pit Weld County, Colorado Percent of Gravel Percent of Concrete Starting Hour Trucks per Hour Mixers per Hour 06:00 AM 6.99% 8.54% 07:00 AM 13.68% 9.76% 08:00 AM 10.64% 9.76% 09:00 AM 11.85% 8.54% 10:00 AM 8.81% 12.20% 11:00 AM 9.42% 9.76% 12:00 PM 7.60% 10.98% 01:00 PM 9.42% 9.76% 02:00 PM 9.42% 7.32% 03:00 PM 9.12% 7.32% 04:00 PM 3.04% 6.10% Source: L.G. Everist, Inc. and Andersite Rock Company I Figure 1 Distribution of Truck Trips 14.0% -. _. _r , 10.0% -// -. _ , �i d — F 60%-1- -1- ._ _ _ 4.0%- 2.00/ } __ I I _ 1.-----�I 0.0"i L I 1 I 06:00 AM 08:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 02:00 PM 04:00 PM Time (h) -.- Gravel Trucks -b-- Concrete Trucks HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & 1-25 SB Ramps 5/1/2001 f ~ 4\ t / ' 1 I Lane Configurations )a 4 4 r Sign ontrol ,. : . tree Free Stop. . :,Stap . . Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/hjgr , ,0 ti6&1A 260 _`260_ "442 0:h- , 0 0 _ .'0,.c, 187..:,, ;,,1, + 196 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Pereet 8)ackage -._ _ v . t Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC;contTctingv4lume ,r :480 1023 214,1 ,19 7 .'102 ..2068.' 4130 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 caM va) , tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tG 2 stage (S) ,F tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 `.:100 t00 k'#..0`.;! 06 , ,:;63 cM capacity(veh/h) 1047 } 652 14 36 336 32 29 571 Volume Total 1023 763 204 213 Volume Right 283 0 0 213 Volume to Capacity 0.60 0.43 6.43 0.37 Control Delay (s) 0.0 11.0 Err 15.0 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 11.0 4903.0 A toech 1 S � ¢ J pY.. w�.. Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.4% ICU Level of Service G Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & I-25 NB Ramps 5/1/2001 Lane Configurations 4 1, } 4 r Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% V`olu fne(vetl//hXia;w, , 170 ,_ 700 ,_ , 0 0. '555 , '$a 2.. 4 ' W. 247 :iPb > .(0 '1. 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houtky,flowhrate(veh/h), ,,185 , 761: . .,., 0.,mw ` 0 ::¢04 107 r 1159 AC ,;268,.' . .3,0. ,;`,,,4,0 0 Pedestrians �� ° _,.. _ _ ., . ._a.-. x . Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) t t -'"+4:1 s„a�ii "h sI s.: i s NQ a T1 c* " �g6�e��Y��,xn�� .�«._.��.»t , _.. _„� ,��,�,« x�.us,t.- ,. ��: .,_ a� n e..,�. ,� >.�IIHone,. �, . Median storage veh) HCa contbctingvalume , 711, 761 :' . .... . 1788 4184.1.. ,751.N 2057,`x"1788 .,'.658, vC1, stage 1 conf vol Y ate. tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 /.2 6.6 6.3 tC, 2 stec(e,(e2,, ,a. . 1 `.r* . a . .. ,.r.�:,n tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 .. _:100 cM capacity (veh/h) 857 820 50 57 394 10 61 452 Volume Total 946 711 159 268 Voluml1•1OMM Y.., X185 `0 Volume Right . 0 107 0 268 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.42 3.14 0.68 Queuexle04O:ft) 0 Control Delay (s) 5.3 0.0 Err 31.5 Approach Delay (s) 5.3 0.03734.4 pq.r l. tir e i x T^i ..i""y t r l M q, ' { .4 -3 , 4 .�+s+k- . . .w x+z R' , >; t Y "s ,.{{'¢x f!„;: tE' f ] �' fRasr � -aa as a .f 's.J- �: S -.Y .3 '� 4if �" a fr3 .e:..�n_L ., Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.3% ICU Level of Service F cxii..ui . ..• 'h.. y Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/1/2001 Tr 4 4\ t t Lane Configurations 4. 4+ 4* 4. Grade 0% 0% <.. . 0% 0% Volume{vett/h):,. _� , '... :,15 f1�1,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 )ixz4Cty,`1o1'Cate,;lvetVlt). .;'.16ry«. 'Q8 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) --t t• a e i Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) atume' ;':516 242 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vG stage2o?Rf.uol. ;� t � . tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 78 , r95 cM capacity (veh/h)d 1015 1284 125 260 797 225 255 546 t '' i, R$Rb V ':.:: ! #,.t.aV 'WaV a giett A v:-; tteInf.Agviikk14L tw+ e ...�!raigUNii...n j`k ft ik t tea Volume Total 259 572 55 188 Volume Left ,� =15 z 55 27` ,. 12 Volume Right 35 2... 14 96.. c$H 2 x gL ,>"g. p15 _»1284 , 192 350. Nz .. ; ._:Viz;: „ Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.04 0.29 0.54 Control Delay (s) 0.7 1.2 31.3 26.6 LenenS Approach Delay (s) 0.7 1.2 31.3 26.6 16 CttL �..a.�.s+..,,..,. .:'% ,_ . .-si b .. _ .m•.�_ .._._. .. �.,,`u... ,,,zs a��.." ad;� 5{p,rt1 Y�te.� tir tF dx{' yr Yh4 j%".i) A''^g{' H k [.9'Rry d 'i7 t dbS ✓%.fiA fid 3h '1.f ,! A 6�i�vr t {:.�8y .�Ft �.�..1..«4..'NF'_gSY".� �. 3 �}� rl� WRYA��Y-.. �` '4xu9. iiuL.. ..�Jf�...�. !. fi� ..� +.r!•:.S.. i3h.� Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service" B Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSC I N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/1/2001 -• 4 4\ t t `- 1 -' yy II A w Lane Configurations Slgr Control S(opw�, . . .: Stop Free „v.- : ;,Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vf,conflrc{,in9?QIujne`_ . 256 .._'259 , _160 249' , 248 , "76;; , 161 r 88.s', vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2{stage2 corYfvttt . .__ tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 63 4.2 4.2 tF (s) 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 2.3 2.3 cM capacity (veh/h) 672 629 864 683 639 963 1371 1459 ..�.>�..a,.nu.a .,.b.z'�&�.,sx,e,.�.. ,u r.,.. _...,a„r.....°�'.k� aw..,.. ... __. .,.u,,,.,.� -x.,,.,t .: ..S:✓-... .. ..mss,.,_ ea,...m�r.2..,.�>,.wt .. Volume Left 1 5 0 5 cSH 687 790 1371 1459 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 0 0 Lane LOS B A A Approach belay'(s) 1,0.3 .9:6 . 0.0, 0 3' ., Approach LOS B A Average Delay 0.9 Intel CtrorrQapadif1„Uttlizatlon i9.3% ICU_levelof,Seivice ` R " Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/3/2001 Lane Configurations 4. 4* 4.. 4 3, Stops ..u,t ' z StoA, _,Stop Volume (veh/h) 18 89 90 5 135 11 115 51 0 12 71 49 Peak ourF,actorry ,.- ,0.92 : 6,92`,,,,0,92 0.92 0.92. 0 92 , 092u "0 92 ..092 „0,92 'x 092. Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 20 97 98 5 1\47— 12 125 55 0 13 77 53 Volume Total (vph) 214 164 180 143 Volume Lefta(uph) . 20 5 . 125<` 13 .v,tj » ., Volume Right(vph) 98 12 0 53 Departure Headway (s) 4.9 5.2 5.3' 5.0 e ree lfati x 0.29 0,2 0 27 ,:6 20 sty g Capacity (veh/h) 694 536 636 674 Control Delay:(s) `9 8 '' ':9.8 10 2 _ 9:a Approach Delay (s) 9.8 9.8 10.2 9.3 Approachh LOS ii , .... .A 061.O1,1;:r HCM Level of Service A Intersection CapacityUtilization : 443% 1 ;°ICU Level of,Seivice Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/1/2001 /--► ■ 4\ ,0 4!d�ati#@ts�€��r"x..�.: ..,,�»4:' � a�.`�":Aw'��(a� :d3�.?;sz,�' '.�"td,S.�� rt��'nw,.�..�';s�:§�.n:.•s..:. k a��.zwv.s. Lane Configurations 1. 4 Grade 0% 0% 0% Vdlurme (veh/h)'.. i;27 ,0, .J.:ik,,,,c(j.4',,,A4,ift.iiiLt Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians LanerWdth (ft) ' �.` Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent oc.Kage. V ..M . . Right turn flare (veh) gty Median storage veh) vC 1c nflictin volume . 20�' 45 x,29 vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.2 6.5 6.3 €C;2stage(s}. tF (s) 2.3 3.6 3.4 p0 queue,free% 100 r_ 190 100_ �. : cM capacity (veh/h) 1533 946 1023 �t y Volume Total 29 15 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.00 Queue Lengt# 0) ... 0 -,0 _ .0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 �is .S.•. (i 'ta1;,,.e c �v,.k sr ' 7 e* � �.r a.,..w 'R ..'«?' m+t „' a ...,.r. F�"'x :4. yl lr� F,� R: ,e.. .fi,• •a.. S`.'., x :.":. .. ..�+ r • r3 i yx ; t Na�'�." >� Average Relay 0 0 - ` Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSC I NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & I-25 SB Ramps 5/7/2001 ;.,'F }.a•+.-I ! .'#a5 `faa' sy+?&i7a'+'3. c "aS.'44"..��an." .' .'. �' 1 .: .1,R° yA:: ' ft. t6a�'� :';� . , Lane Configurations 1+ 4 4 r Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Voluine2veh(h)., �k 0 , 884 260.,. 260 443., 4.:k s,D .,. .0 0 4182, x 1 rt ,166 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H6urf f14wrate:(veh/h) ., 0 "°743; X283, (283 _482„rr 0 ,_x. ,,,,2, ,,0 0 , ,'..210` , t1,;_ 21,3 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) z ire v p � .:. Migt l tit r _ . _._ ET ,.E_. g _ ti " r ,N. None �;' ` „..t,� , Nt�n... . Median storage veh) vC,.aonfRcting v fume_. .:482 1.026 i 2148.,_`1662 .h .8@8'; 1 322' 2073',';482 vC1 stage 1 conf vol tC/1 single(s) 4.2 4.2 7.2— 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0.q ieuefree.%44. . :100 t .M 57 � ��.� 100 ,x'100 '•, 10O,._ rr, 0. ' g6. ..: 63 cM capacity (veh/h) 1046 650 14 36 334 31 29 571 A1PW.!{ ;M;,w a. ,. ..,,.:tt?,.t .Ek1,r. F 74ar:G. .W*c4.."t :. , _ ?.r .. .....c5e.b , ,v.aw3`iel .e...,.....,_rrJe.. rA. .v Sx+d:J*M Volume Total 1026 764 217 213 Volume Right 283 0 0 213 Volume to Capacity 0.60 0.43 7.07 0 37 Control Delay (s) 0.0 11.1 Err 15.0 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 11.1 5057.4 F 4 , f t `i t -ta l≤� e1 f' °.* +c � y .0 &c Awaa e� z F. i.-r3. • lists m ,x[(a�tp��{;7 i� i'�t ix�d° 1 [gyp 't�{5�_ .,'z. ! .a -s r t �'1. `I .pea G.i" § P ri„98 Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.3% ICU Level of Service G Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4 1 4 r Sign CAntrat Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC,cpnfltcting,vi?lurne , ..:718 ; 776 1808„ '1864. ,776 " 076 .r-1808 _; 662 vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 dhfvol tC, single (s) 4.2 '4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tglilat#40 -J\ tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0 queue;free°/a ; . '78 . . ° . 100 0 `100 31 ;100. 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 851 810 49 55 386 10 59 450 Volume Total 961 718 159 268 Volume Right 0 113 0 268 oSkt 851 '170.0 `49 <386 . Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.42 3.25 0.69 Control Delay (s) 5.4 0.0 Err 33.0 • 1age;t47S ... Approach Delay (s) 5.4 0.0 3735.4 APPf ....................................................... Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.6% ICU Level of Service F Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSC I N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/7/2001 } �" T 1 yrc k- '\ 1 �► Y ®gd_ _ Pik a td'E' it 'et Y .,4 x � - ;• W - a!R Lane Configurations 4+ 4* 4+ 4+ Sign:Corttrot , , � w„ :Stop. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume-(yeh/h) 15 . , 191 ` ,°<46 .w 52 473 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow cafe(veh/h) •16 ,;: 208`. , ;50"" „57. `':51,4 2:;,.., 35. ..y5 .............................................. Pedestrians LaneYdtt (f1)� Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blocks r._,., Right turn flare (veh) .qty * . None No e pp ryrypp ryry Median storage veh) vC conf icting volume.* . ,516 258 vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.2 42 7.4 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 63 tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.8 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 cm capacity (veh/h) 1015W 1267 112 252 778 220 247 546 Volume Total 274 573 64 189 Volume Leff . 16 �, k_57 35 12 Volume Right 50 2 14 99 1015 , 1267 - X165` "= 343`i Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.04 0.39 0.55 Queue°Length (ft , 1 .8 42 . 79• ,s_. . Y.. Control Delay (s) 0.7 1.2 40.2 27.7 Lane,LOS . .. ,°. Approach Delay (s) 0.7 1.2 40.2 27.7 �, .a , �t� � .� "Gs dpi w ✓ w Average'Delay . . a 7 9 " s + Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.9% ICU Level of Service B Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/7/2001 l l t 4\ T P l d Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4• 4• Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% VoI}Uite(veh/h,?._n _...,., r.: . 1` ,.='2 1 '.,12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 I1ouf lq' ratSdYehTh), ''' 1 ._ 2 ° 1 ,.,:" 1$ -2,... 16'. . 0 . :•,64r 39 `„ `23. .960. Pedestrians LWalking Speed (fUs) ,. ,r Right turn flare (veh) M60/ ❑❑. i `` 1 i [Jong .., s.K.. ,.:: None : t., .:a.it ;r:d ' j:a..'*r t . enfli itaf .,'`,",. .if .: Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 �stage2 donfvot' tC�v single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.5 6.6 6.8 4.2 4.5 tF (s) 36 4.1 3.4 3.9 4.1 3.8 2.3 2.5 .100 98°- 100. "_ cM capacity (veh/h) 608 582 864 578 596 837 1371 1291 V ri'Itx'1a tigi`.x{a FTM .t � g lai t' &fa t si 'f'" ge :+iT sr r ft' *f 4 i '">•° g2 xf °"7Ni VoIDNOI WC ti=:, '.M 4 °...;3Z , Volume Left 1 13 0 23 csk 641 690 1371 1291 Vo(ue3o a' :001 0.05 000 Queue Length (ft) 1 4 0 1 Lane LOS B B A f( proach Oelay'(s} 0;0 1.1 Approach LOS B B tk ..... 1. +v 6 ,��f� .'�u:r<.. "' v..,�x�JIX i5t.t.. . �7:s�z.."T> .u.h�;•Gd;7n.a. ...'�.4'�... a Fa44n. , r TMfia� ... 5ek�t:::�e .,,sr.ra..k.'; a� ...�s�. Average Delay 1.8 intersection Capacity'Utilization 23,7°1° ICU'Level of Service A Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSC I N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/7/2001 f l F t 4\ T � ti J ig•t ..k: .ua₹'s�U».=1141 Sk...c. kja ai9. .zro a n t`al m U i ra ajj iE :;$'" x ..... Lane Configurations 4'. 4. 4, 4. Sigr Control .' . Stop Stop; Stop _ `,` Stop Volume (veh/h) 29 89 90 5 135 12 115 53 0 12 72 55 ,0.92 A A2` q 92, .tJ 92 ": 0 92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 32 97 98 5 147 13 125 58 0 13 78 60 ®`3No a PVES...*v.5 ' ...iM `yx e "„` e=`` m ... a"' e''`ytiaa:1"."F6,k' 'i�a' a: �g21 Volume Total (vph) 226 165 183 151 Volume Right(vph) 98 13 0 60 Departure .: s. (s) 50 ,r .. a_ . Depart Headway 5 0 5 2 5 4 5 1 Degree t.tti ization X'`c*0.31 A 0.24 a_� Capacity (veh/h) 680 531 626 659 Control Delay.,.(s) , _ a ;10 Approach Delay (s) 10.2 9.9 10.4 9.6 �" Delay"s x x �� ;, Fib 10.0 "as i ., . l g gn HCM Level of Service B IntefSettbri:P.P0094,Ptilization 51 6% ICU Level of Sefvice E%+, r, Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 5 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/7/2001 - ► c ~ 4 P 0 xilli k..igl .€tKIW,`W a, iff ij,Pan _l6 . .,"` tx."s *,iD i " ws.,.l i>: gr f.a,'�.x N41;i`+;E . Lane Configurations is 4 Y Si a onfrot z., 4 _,Free .Free." .Stop _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hou ow,rate{veh/h) s�29 33. 15 .16 0- Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockag1,. Right turn flare (veh) Mediantype-. 1"s`a... 9 Median storage veh) vC onflicting volute,. �� 62 ;.' 63 46 ` ' vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2i_etage 2,cant vol ' tC, single (s) 4.1 7.4 7.2 tF (s) 2.2 4.4 4.2 po queue free Pk .. `. .. cM capacity (veh/h) 1554 746 803 �)�py x�,�uq ��E��Wi�� :�:',�°��,�y^�f�° �'.,�'.�..w�".�� r e ��s ' '`J•t� � `��s.�:ems- ' , Volume Total 62 16 16 Volume Right 33 0 0 ., 3_L,;l�ds_., s.»• .r,._Yht d.c.... ._ .. r � Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.02 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 9.9 Lane OS A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 9.9 v 4 ` q Lai V eRFa t23!ti�2' ; A gh£c iS.2CiggEiga vigi ltiii' '♦Ye t 5Mr ¢ F 3;r..7i4 Avewage['elay` ,"d . . 1 6 " ` Intersection Capacity'Utilization 13.5% ICU Level of Service A Year 2005 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & 1-25 SB Ramps 5/1/2001 t '4, }T of `► 1 Lane Configurations 14 4 4 r Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft)s) Right turn flare (veh) r& Median storage vet)) v0,l'Conf(icttngvolume .,, ;754 . .. 1042: 2573 2289":934 4289xu'2397 „', 754 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,;stagey2 conf vol r.... xV a uY . � .y ti P .•` S F }u��1 tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tG,2stage(s) � ., u tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0 queue,free% , cM capacity (veh/h) 825 641 3 20 313 17 17 398 2.477 Volume Total 1042 1054 90 285 Volume Left :.0 300 .';90 0 Volume Right 216 0 0 285 Volume to Capacity 0.61 0.47 5.40 0.72 QueueLength,(f ,v 0 X62" v Err " 136 Control Delay (s) 0.0 13.7 Err 33.8 Lariea:,0s i,=s. 8:' F'..;: 'D ... . . . . _ .: . _ .. Approach Delay (s) 0.0 13.72431.2 re17 9Y; F 94 j2resi;e�t' ° 2 x� a , i ps Average Detay 374 7 `,. _,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.9% ICU Level of Service H Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/1/2001 -1 -• - i ~ 4- 4\ t t ti 1 r tl V: a Fif n .+� t ! t �` ryar ' S>f&JQ`Ye�q.,` ,e29 F ^C Gt 1Y' At' ... .tt` ,VEV J 0a s,. >rl d°�€.. ... _:.:~<t.,. . ,.. ;,'..N ,„.� �..YS...�-wta.Xs::r.,�,�,na.,.ea:._�.»n�rrE.�'t�R=aEk r. ^��ta�� .:' xmr._ o 3+�.�.sa,�.�.. Lane Configurations 4 1 4 r Srgn Conttok,#" M TM ,v , Free': ` Free .a , rc, '. Sta ..it. • . '„Stop p Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 1Zolume(vehth) rc' : . ,. ;278 • ,534=„ 0 0 738 •. 252 .2 2 12 ...1378. ',. 14:9 .. �`..6 . i• : 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly:;fto*Ate:(veh/(1) "=302 613 0... :,,_O. . 802 ,' 274:r252. ::.i 1,3 4,. 4,11;t.. ;., 1M4,1O ... .:.0 Pedestrians//pp LaneWidt( f), ..,. _.. t .� `�:'`` b '3 w. _. Walking,�} Spee�yd,y}(�pft/s) f�asr'a thB�'k`F^tl�.. �r r : t` - ^� Mg� ., .._..,,a Y.. ,..._ter .,.rc { . i"` ...-. ...t.vn._. n §C �. ...»...� @ r ,�r en.rr b' .'� cv :�43+.xe i � �"� kq:' i.. Right turn flare (veh) Mecilan y UZ'i , t 1 ,t .:;.... NQnq a" ig'a;'t4 nP ._. Median storage veh) yG .Conflrctmgvelµmej .1076 " 613... ,y' 2157 2293 013. 2574 `•,12157... . 939 vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2:stage 2,&ogf;vo1 ftett tC, single (s) v ox 1. 42 4.2 72 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 a..,f.,(tp'ge(s) .s�� n.. .,S .i F Y.3 t ^:i .. i.... `ry :. tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 41 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 pc queue fr0.0. ' ` '51 100 :' °• 0 "32 ,r 1+14 ,;'�00 '_;;X100 ' 190 cM capacity (veh/h)y 622r 933 20 19 480 1 23 311 �ilr t') x 11 '"r.:.:, Ct"C y;n1,; t ilig pp,`ak y 'ia c423. >S-4 kk. k _.;�Yi x§ " :.:. , lli u.t.. 44 ,/a.rR. .._,,..e.e.�,;...n., a,„i.u.... .d°.y...w,a.M.e..'..Q)..,Z,e7t��.s�.w �,r,u ti,..�1 x:�r ,..P .. >~ �,.alu..,�u.dte. x� Volume Total 915 1076 265 411 . . 2'52, 0 volume Le ' 4` f 352 (3� Volume Right 0 274 0 411 oSH ` *_.r ,.. , .nz , !,22 ,1700= 20:':Q_r480 k:= - , . Volume to Capacity 0.49 0.63 13.08 0.86 QueueLe 0thjfk.) _..r , -66 °0' Err. ):221 ..'5_., 4._... _ , _. t` __.. Control Delay (s) 13.5 0.0 Err 42.9 i LarteF,Lb5. .,,.., ‘: B_ F . , :.E_ . . ; ._ 2i __r u «1;. �.,r t.; =. i. ,�,_..._. Approach Delay (s) 13.5 0.0 3948.5 f,.`v (gpv Mt0yy ia. iVI l005 4 t 4.. 4 Y:... 7 Yh'r'< i'.i :it tee.x..e ,>:rcrc o-r,.t.a.'9a .+. ...>*" .m,?5.:3r Intersection Capacity Utilization 132.5% ICU Level of Service H Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/1/2001 f 1 f 4y 4- `�\ Y1et �P '► j I it,+ gfu.'illj V;i1 :1. ',..2V,i � !in11 ,ili".s..# 10 ... A ,Y»},/�N u�� 21,',n'3ik.�m"d'lie n1�`-�: 441-i e . .t^nt' i. ' ≥ Lane Configurations 4. 4'+ 4+ 4, Sign Control ,, ::. Free, `~ . ,. , u Free, , ' Stop $, ,r, , Stop., Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% V4lurtlgr(veh/h1: _., -, .. :85,,,":464 54 11 288 9„ 55.. .; 85, 6i3,.., 7,.= 26.j. 21, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rote;(veh/h) .'F.,= Q2 4,504`74 59y.,A:_12 , „3'1,3 „x 10'*„`,_8b ., z:ag2 , ;6 f, t $w; . 25 „ 23 Pedestrians LaneYytetI1.(ftr z.. ., "'f;,-...11-.-,'''''`,..f:'!., �..__, Walking Speed (f/s) PerkBio a ,a �� " i" ,._. . _ ._ . _ . o� . _`!^PAL, .-. .�. _ . . , _ , zY _ _. . ,� _ �� .�.. . - �... . ` Right turn flare (veh) Medlar 'pe ` t nw4ka s x f t-.,..x e NN_ope',__' EI , None j,Z25i, Median storage veh) vC,confllcttrig volume ,323 , ' `, 563, ''. 19967,1 085, '534 1172 i'1090::- ;318 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage,27cohj_t.vo1 ,. , tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 1° tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0.queue free°/u ` "..- -"•.9.Z:::- 99_ yr: 60I, '.:13-: a. . : 88.' . .. 91 `, .87 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1199 974 150 197 533 85 191 707 Volume Total 655 335 217 55 votur=rte left 92 -12 60 „ 8 ,. „k . 4'. , "` fin Volume Right 59 10 65 23 dSt54 ,. t am' r 1199 . 974 220 x•'.219 ' ,, r. Volume to Capacity 0.08 0.01 0.99 0.25 Queue Length:(ft) . 6 i,1 222 2A , . ... .r., '.i-. . _, i.a ,.,., _. . _. . . Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.4 104.2 26.9 LaneL , A .A F.. `W D :=,zi s, ._, . , Approach Delay (s) 2.0 0.4 104.2 _26.9 OprdaCt. LC?SE"a , . _. ,F i;: =rD _ -.2ix . ?._.-. i1.. rsr,.. tiR 14;: '..f.�e fAniiigtiq :5_,. S.rc. :,4 i.. c ...71ifiRs,.. L ,1F1:6zu ,.a'4.".enc aret6L ftn ..n l iii AV CageDelay „ ., _ . '1_,_!. .. ., ^ r: ii x;: ... r _ �. x , 203 .1s ��`. �. <a:.� ._ �: Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service D ti Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/1/2001 J -, f 4— 4 4\ T Lane Configurations 4. • 4* 4, Sign_Control ._. , , . . Stop` . , . % Stop Free4 Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H48UVflow.rate,(veh/h)' ,,.ry Pedestrians r Walking Speed (ft/s) Right a turn r flare (veh) Mec(CotYaa' � .,.�._+ Median storage veh) vCr,`cont)jcttngvolume „„322, ,; 320; „ 95 '.,:322 :.`320. :,224._ n `96.,A =22.1n vC1 stage 1 conf vol £a :� - tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 4.2 4.2 tF (s) 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 34 2.3 23 cM capacity (veh/h) 614 583 940 614 583 800 1449 1303 94..m S��✓nni...~t4 v ..,,�}.. v.b,X.x..-,n.... �.,.s;:: _n„-.,. ..G _. .ffsi...... . ...... '.,.,. . ^.}. ., tS_..L`,:vi ru ... ..>rl ;��110[ t Y $ I F Y 11 .' iYA1 ':iSJ'3vV�r A y 4O+� Py £:is�i � +•{} a SpN W, d 4J' V'C I s} 5 ,yp., §N3 a. Volume Total f f 1 h '22/ry,' 97 3" s Volume Left 9 1 1 1 cSH 659 726 1449 1303 Volyiile to,Capacity , , =:0.02 , p.90 0.0Q:l,' Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 0 Lane LOS B A A A Approach Delay{s)'. .;10.6 1x0:0 0,0 01 Approach LOS B A Average Delay 0.5 Intersecbot Gapaoity",Utilization . .`: 21,8°/a;' ;`,' ICU:Level of Service, "A Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/3/2001 1 c ~ k- t p gyp'► r .GR.. S! Wi aa� 'mp Lane Configurations 4, 4+ 4D 4) Volume (veh/h) 48 189 131 1 76 23 98 59 2 9 66 27 Peak Hour Factor",, . 0.92 '0.92; . 0.92 . 0.92. ` 0.92 0 92" 0.92 9:92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 52 205 142 1 83 25 107 64 2 10 72 29 Volume Total (vph) 400 109 173 111 Volume Right(vph)% 142 25 2 29 Departure Headway (s) 4.8 5.2 5.6 5.4 Degree lizat�¢n' • 0`53 .,.0.1£' ,0.27 017°�, "' x4� z ,d °` ', , Capacity (veh/h) 721 508 600 612 Control Delay(s 1� t. .9.1= 10 6 `9 Approach Delay (s) 13.1 9.1 10 6 9.5 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.8°lo IOU Level of"Service , ",; "r,"` Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/1/2001 l F I— 4\ /* V '?"'`4 i u td^ '..tlt: �'" � TY '� a ill-i l...i c $ %vgi g G't u 4". �&. s y/�f1, :�.f _ - .::,-j y x:�...s' .<'%,.�,.�:!'�.;�^.`'��sP.��"�:.+�'Y n�.�t. _�a.,.."F.�.': A�s.a^-.,a...+!h�"m ..�.�`Sa..-�A s'E�'"w'�k#aka _�.._.�ur .�-.�S'�,.. �s: Lane Configurations 1' 4 V n �J ;;, s Sign' ontfol , .'. Free , �Pree =Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Voturne(ve(t/h); 2 ,_.:.: 0 .01:,.ts4 4 i ,. <: Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HourlttlQw rat(veh/f) 44? 0 r.. 0` 4 ,i':6:' 0 >4 - .z .,'-.�..ws Yt„ . Pedestrians Lane'Width.(ft) .J , ,:°I _ . , ,� . "s , Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent BioQkage ` Right turn flare (veh) M dia tl/p k f , ., ?. ._ ..:None sx .._,_. 4:.` .ii i x Median storage veh) 2 . 7 ,. �,•.: yt'i��gonAictingwolurne. � ,�, ;.- � � , . , . ��' ,. : _.. : vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage2cw fat _` .-_ 0 9 9g.?! w . .•r. tC single (s) 4.2 6.5 6.3 tC i,Z.:&tage(s) t tF (s) 2.3 3M 3.4 p0 queuefreer% , . . = 100 2100 ; 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1569 994 1059 � i + +S,,: �t p ':. ; S'/ tA' ':, a + s'u 4 Pi:k Nnir ai c X.. r.., a :.int to igl $i:''?H.1: ls��) A,'. .�,�� '� �,,,` . ��$ 5. :�* �� . a,sit.�+s°,�ti.rsr ��r�s>_F� ,�'a�t 5. .� Volume Total m 2 4 0 Vo lumeLett ,,.0 0 0 . .... i. Volume Right • 0 0 0 c$f I wa4, ' ;� .. 1700 1669 ` 1700 .- . . . Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 Qui$e'Length(f ,. Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0 0 Lane t:,9,S w s: .,- A , . :..N' Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 ftpprgach LOS :: : . ;' .A :: •:• I' , .. 11 t i ga'f'GL' t,1.,,$d.A U.d3 - agia:.J',= ta as t ..3nw'ta l As it .°%°e:lta g ° .d. li '2a.'a, , ., tk.a Average belays,r"#:! '04 ' ✓ 11,.e � rt. k b a .x ,..i'x ki Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & I-25 SB Ramps 5/7/2001 Lane Configurations '. 4 4 r Sign Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 262 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians ?-r. .�'Ld_l 11wrb'uti a .Sta.:`, tax .... rAAIs. {kI _ Mxat r q:. Ag.&.`+. 'Afe._ Ai.E i4..,. ,.m., Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC, co f1icting.yp)ume 755., 1042,,. .; 2574 . 2290.. .,934 n2290 2398 }`755 vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 36 4.1 3.4 p0'queueffeaj? k,. ..." 10Q _ ", ' s;, 53. „:;:. 100 1QQ .100 wx� = ,100 ., 28 cM capacity (veh/h) 824 641 3 20 313 16 17 397 ••�r�''qq pp, w c # r .: KY( s-.t '+s k >¢+} h a .," sFw__ x 5 .ye� °+ Volume Total 1042 1055 93 285 Volr�e Left 0,,. Q` Volume Right 216 0 0 285 474Q Volume to Capacity 0.61 0.47 5.77 0.72 Control Delay (s) 0.0 13.7 Err 33.9 Lane; 9S F Approach Delay (s) 0.0 13.7 2496.6 n,t Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.2% ICU Level of Service H Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4 1+ 4 r P Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (fUs) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) v ;co otinjvo1urne 10$7, 638 al$$.,.;2329 -538 2506,_,2188.,. 945 vC1, stage 1 conf vol ve2,';stageA,coi f"vot ._ tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 � - tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 41 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 pb queue free*°,tq, . 51 100. :. cM capacity (veh/h) 616 913 19 18 464 0 22 308 Volume Total 940 1087 265 411 Votg86e Left fi °_ ,;302 0` -252. .,0 .. �,., „ . . _..•_Volume Right 0 284 0 411 oSI ta ,;f1S 1700 19 Volume to Capacity 0.49 0.64 13.86 0.89 Que"St0 tertglfi(.ftX ; l:66 `0 Err`, '238 Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 Err 48.2 Lane:LOS B F E m, `� _ Approach Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 3951.7 pp1111 FaaGhl.OS ..y . �, ,.; �' ?•r3 ;w.w. t ax7 .; a -.i ° .'R w w ,.: r r Intersection Capacity Utilization 134.5% ICU Level of Service H Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4+ 4. 4 4+ Stg Stop ),; n,CoRtroG � f � �, . .; � Frees ,4 �Fr2ey St©Prv.t ;? <,::�, , Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volurpe(10001), -t , 85 ,464; 57 , .1'1 q.4 288 .,r 9:'Y.. 65. 86 x.61 , � t ' '. .241 . 21' Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyi!ow-rates(veh/h1 s- 92 504' 62 : '`12' . 313 1 :::: ?1. ?.;' 93 , 66 . F 8, 26 ,= 23 Pedestrians Walking Speed (fUs) Right turn flare(veh) Meth y4Ag r % l: i One - .�`,: :� ' `lane h �P: . ,,,.,,tu,r��rvcu..s, .._a° .. k., ,. ,.s=_ of%-,.s..,,,r�,> ..x.a.� median storage veh) v_G1,cgn^f, C 0.04.4 11e 1 -.,.323 } 666 ;`•,.. ;:, 109$,`"1067 535, 1175 : 1093 ' .4,318 vC1, stage 1 conf vol YC2$sfage26CQnttvol, `, ` '" x H x: tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tc j stage(sl. ift4 ,:w w a.. tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 PO ggeue.fieg1°A _'w ,&',Cd::: 92.. 98 ‘;s_ l.,. fit ,'' 52 t„_ 8, 91L. 86 , 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1199 972 146 196 532 84 187 707 { Volume Total 659 335 230 57 Y4100 Lef rv:_ .r _ 492 . 12, 71 ` 8 r�: .ti. - -, 1 :k .v. '.N.. ! 4 Volume Right 62 10 66 23 c$HMEACOi v... . 1;199 ' 972 212 -,: 15 " .rv: Volume to Capacity 0.08 0.01 1.09 0.26 Queue Length(ftl 6.;.; : 1' ,..263 25 ;_ _ ,. =< . ._ ,_ Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.4 135.0 27.6 Latie-LOS A' A'. !, F D ` , - Approach Delay (s) 2.0 0.4 135.0 27.6 A $chLOS,I ; Z _ 6ilt i.:. .�i, ., .. Pytyry :_. .r �c:::i ' nF ar i-t f t w,xs h i ayaxti K. r. _i. n€�2 :1}14Y SS 1t 't i S n ,.: r 5 .:.� a � mss.., L. Ave M aef it �. na, *��.4 �� 6 6 :.: r c� , � x q�. Via.`. t y " 2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.7% ICU Level of Service D Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 { 5/7/2001 ��ty�,z' q {+,,, " d. .Fy:g �4'S°+ ^., . . 1,,,�.:m$. .2 Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4. 4t Sipri Contrdl . . ,Stop r,. Stop Free , r . . Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H,04741q rate;(veh/h), 9 0: .. :2 ; . 74..,, 0 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC;.confitctting_y01ume ,. °1345 :15'132 95, 332 ; 330 222 96 _ , „ , ,. ,._.; 2 ?°.,. .. . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, %tie 2 oorif vol ;.. tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.3 6.6 6.6 4.2 49 tC 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.6 4.1 34y 3.7 4.1 3.6 2.3 2.9 p05{'ue9&ffee °1 ,,., ; =98 ,100' 100 98 100, 98 100 °.3 . `"' 99 CM capacity (veh/h) 579 571 940 579 572 740 1449 994 ,y t : s y. F Y ".3K } t - g# "₹.�t':S ^. y '.£ 2c. K' w c _.,,w ,,,a r,ya$'e" �� -°�'r l P! !f:. + S A ₹₹�k K:t k '� � a .. � "�` r '4 a a �nin"� .� �� .�tVr �X �' "5r. v aG `.:L'f� um .M v c Volume Left 9 14 1 5 cSH 628 653 1449 994 Queue Length (ft) 1 4 0 0 CantrgJ Lane LOS BB A A APPG C$,Ret41.0) ( _ 10 8 , 10: ' Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.4 IntQrseuttonaJacityTltilization 220°(° ,:;';', ICUCeyel,o#Service:w: ,., A, .,,, ,(, ., . ,, Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/7/2001 —* ,r 4- t 4\ t '* 1 d y ,_ —;�' t"F'a a,;. § ti"' ' .�k ." '• �n iR a,ws 1';, p x h, . Lane Configurations 4 4+ 4+ 4+ Sign Control ' ,. Stop! P . ' i. Stop ;` Stop; Volume (veh/h) 50 189 131 1 76 23 98 60 2 10 67 37 Peak t ofu Facfor ,., .,.' 0.92 ..,4 92: 0 92;,.>0.92 ;0 92,e :0;92' 0 92 4 92 : 4.92 0 92 "0.92 -0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 54 205 142 1 83 25 107 65 2 11 73 40 Volume Total (vph) 402 109 174 124 107 11 Volume Right(vph) 142 25 2 40 s 0 0.0 . 03 �a . . "Departure Headway (s) 4.9 5.2 5.6 5.5 Capacity (veh/h) 713 496 594 609 Control Approach Delay (s) 13.5 9.2 10.7 9.7 u . . LY11, § m, . M 3 x' @ �.:. hx�€`��'��"" �,3�Sa;�-a�..vr. trd.i,' .a+ Pled ly= .. 4_ _r HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity=Utilization 52.0% ICU Level of Service �A a Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 5 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/7/2001 c II— `\ Lane Configurations j. 4 t* Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H4vr "Aq r4020h/h >_ 2 :-.;9 Pedestrians L.007S=Wwd t (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Mettlatrtype a=�f.t..d -h:tyti- . '. Orle r,r :3"vi ..n. . xMa r, :e.v a - Median storage veh) VC,;conflietinka!ume 11 � ,.. r' 1 7u vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2''sta a 2 onf voi tC, single (s) 4.1 6.7 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.8 3.3 .. . .-_;� - s- ? t y Y p0queue free°la:. ;. � -� 100 . : 97 1d0"�x ..x,i �� : ��_ Y -_.� . ..,� cM capacity (veh/h) 1622 934 1082 Volume Total 11 4 26 yo( rrte #t Volume Right 9 0 0 _1 00 4622 934::::S Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.03 Queu Length:Cft) �: % 0 r. 0 2 ` , Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.0 L.arte .PS q .,., . Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.0 Averaq „,'Delay;:1; ;,� Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Year 2005 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & 1-25 SB Ramps 5/1/2001 1, .:kn,6z, ,. .a....>:€ .,,x ,.:: ),tilt1. ,.,„:,„ „ .? .-v..::*.Nr>r, .a°8,i�2.+� `al .:�n"ti`2`.F..>� .� . �a� ', aor6. `.sa` �r��'. ,, 11 Lane Configurations tt r vi tat R 4, 1 IIdeal Flow(vpl),pl).., .; '1900, '1900, 1900 v3900 T 1900_;,1800.4 1 900 1900 ' 1900 , 1900.,;:1900, "1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lang l)ttl 5:4* x,..i v.0 95.. }.00x,:!PV..,AOO.a . i. ,., egi,;„, .f a.lis {10 100 1;00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 F'itProtected N' ,.. 1,00: „ 1.001.r 095x. {14.09.., . 4 ;'w'., ,,. : .f- 0915 ,, t00x3 .1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1656 1743 1482 FltPerT itte,,4+a YY.�i. R,a° ..` _f10 ,=1 , 00©a ,t?.95V 1.00 <.. 5., , f r :>, .095 100°,x,. 00 r� Satd. Flow (perm) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1656 1743 1482 Volume(v > r0 1324 f' 4 3831 y729. so . 0,`.<.k. 0te:1x0 418 ik 2 ,;290 Peak-hour factor, PH? 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 AdJ Bk*.tvph) _ x 0 ° 1439 4416 `u a` 54 X792 .i n,0,.;,r:' -.0 e:a. r ir'rr"4543 ;, `2 . 315 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1439 416 454 792 0 0 0 0 454 2 315 Heavy Vehicles(°I°}.;"`I" `9%.{ `;;9% 9% 4 9°1°, 9% .-9° 9°l°. = yMip'4sr9°lo igt9%a' ; 9%.. ; 9% Turn Type Free Prot Perm Free Prote`etedPhases`z ,24 '.;;3. . x °0 `i . a. 'A; ., ,, 6 . Permitted Phases Free 6 Free Actuated.Green,G(s) 47.0'° 100 0::'.1,4 03 <M470t ` , . , s,; ,.. . ww .27-0 427 0y x100.0 Effective Green, g (s) 47.0 100.0 14.0 47.0 27.0 27.0 100.0 ActuatedgiC Ration r ,,, 0 47` . 1 00 ="0 14 0.47 '.` > r,b 27^ .027.. 1 00 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L.an G.rp Cap:(vp )1 . ,. ,r-, x,1557=;...1482 450 ,1557x,,f .. ' ,k s: . t t�4 i47 3 471 ,1,482 v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.14 0.24 0.00 vls Ratio Perm a ' X4.2$`, '; t' W r s ,a 5 , 0 27 v 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.28 1.01 0.51 1.02 0.00 0.21 Uniform Delay_d1 ,.., . -..3_', .24:6.: K p,.0 2. :43 0,_ 18.6.. .., _ ' :,38 6 2..0,:::::,..1,2 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.48 1.o0 1 00 1.00 Increme0,tal Delay d2 ._. 10,7: 4 0 5 ,39 6 0 9 _, _', ' . z ,<,N, 'u f,s46.6. `` 0 0 `,0.3 Delay (s) 35.6 0.5 72.6 9.8 83.1 26.7 0.3 Level'ef Service .. ",,: D' . . A w1 ._ ? . „ ,, v. . r ` c,II,,n G - A Approach Delay (s) 27.7 32.6 0.0 49.1 eachLC53: . ,vw. . « g F ga r,Gh .5. ,.., z .._.. �'`'_ ' e ' u= �,__..__. D_, W ��]o. :(t os v a�'f + Y�'Y nw fis >r o ( fi"° 9 +'+ r 5} p , .E..1<§ a �' � a s$t ' .� k, f13 r,..,$ a a::. ,.5•a..�;,.._ (u�✓ L4+a acxLa .2 a Lu HCM. Vera ontfol Delay r 33 6 HCM L evel of Service ® l . .r,w ..e..:':: HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s)_,' , '100 0 Sum of lost tirrie:(s) 12.0 , ,,, . ,,,„' ` . ., Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service D c 'Critical LaneGroup ::-F, . = . , <. . '` a:<,. Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 N CCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/1/2001 ± } i --. i '-y k- 4\ t t� `► 1 4/ ® f 9? 11 ."Z, �w.'_ d, "+.1 r i&"�.'w a MlEte:&r'�r; t I Y T '`p' : ` ra il.,r ' t;1?:i t.x ie.ii a :. :.it ham. Lane Configurations ►)) tt 14 r "f_ tr Ideal Flow(ypfipl) ,,,;' 1900' .:1900 „1900 1900„ .1900; :1.9Q07!"190() 1,90,0 1900 . 1900° w1900,:1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane:Util,Factor.: `: t 0:97_.,. 095rr , `; . .. :0.95_ ,.100q;< 100.s„ :_,. ,ti,`1.00 : ,. Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 FItProtectedy.. `' 0.90,:,'1.00 1.O 100Vd 095 " ` '100 ., " r -, Satd Flow(prof) 3213 3312 3312 1482 1656 1482 Fit ?ermitted. .. .095 ...100_w,., . .. _; .,..100..."1.00 0.95_ ,_k�.. 1.0.0,,, = u ,- . .. Satd. Flow (perm) 3213 3312 3312 1482 1656 1482 Volume(vph). .` ,. . 2,50 , '1492-fill .. 0g, F*0 `f932„ 179fia.,,`216 . , s, 0..11507.A wx, 0 : . 0 r 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad}. Flow(uph)_ k ' 272 „1622 , , .0%'se>�0 a 1,01`3 _t195 ki`,235 0. 55.1.... -0 rwd 0r. <j: °0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 272 1622 0 0 1013 195 235 0 551 0 0 0 HeavytVehicles'(%) ? ' 9% :,,Oya:: 9% .7'9% '`.+',9%a ,"9°Io'` 9% , `'9% ':9%e, k:pird= . 9% 9% Turn Type Prot Free Perm Free Protected,PhaseC a. 7 ,. 4':- . p , 3 , ;n8 ,. 2 Permitted Phases Free 2 Free Actuated Greens G(s). 14 0 47.0`. � , 47.0 100)0 ' 27 0. ,'_ 10Ot? ,n x, Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 47.0 47.0 100.0 27.0 100.0 Actuated /£ Ratio :0 14 . 047„ t., 0.47 , 1.00 0 27 .,.. .1 '1,00' , ., ' ..n , . .. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,=, .450 :1557; 1557 ,,1482 ' 447,E „ 1 82 Lape„�tlYP.eep,�t`/J1h) � . - . .;: „ �.h�,_= , _., .. � �a4, , ._ . ";uN ,_.z , n . . _. v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.49 c0.31 v,/sRatio Perrp,.`r'c k ., `, .,. : , .. „F_ 0..13„ F0 14ta.» .V r. .0 3 . r,f. .- .`., . :... v/c Ratio 0.60 1.04 0.65 0.13 0.53 0.37 Uniform Delay dl 404 ., 26.5- 20.2. ; 90 ' 31. 1., 0.0 , ... . Progression Factor 1.11 0.43 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 , x.`.2 0 25.8 f 2'1 02 4.4 '0,7 OF =i, ...x, , . _,_ .. i Delay (s) 47.0 37.0 22.4 0.2 35.4 0.7 Level::gf;Service ,. ._ D =, . D`. C A'; D , _ A , Approach Delay (s) 38.5 18.8 11.1 0.0 APProach Lf75 . .,,__-, l _, �.r:.!_.n�. ,a^ hd s..Q� u�*B ...fin , .lr,_ai�. i..i'.' :_ , .xk 1:,�,�..�.i rcb e.me9��d ₹,.?'�3,�`9bJ��f ..�..;�. 3a tez. s ., x..,3aiz ,s... �i.l:lfr ,S a zK.dr 'S .n ln 9. ;::..O�.A` C . verawControl Delay ::,, 26 8 HCM Level of Service ` ' k' t=fi `a HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle,Len'gtts.(s} : ,,.100 0 Sum of lost.time?(a) _- `. v ,:e,0,` . _. h... Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service B c :Critical Lane;GrouP :. Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/1/2001 f 1 C 4-- L 4\ t P ti d ovy:Amiii .-_ ,t._.. .ai.ji jV.:_a .. k', zliz n?.c6''iXtnf ke s"; -J,+6h .#q Yii e:;',ki ..�' .tt.ti::..;`4` a..'r:R .ar'x'a-..t.:.. Lane Configurations 4.) 4* 4) 4+ Sign,Gorltrol '__, . ' . ._°:; . . Free; ,."__•Free .' `StoP '. . . .. 'Sto Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vofunie,(veh/h1, ., µ21 "x269::;. ,45 '. 71 _ .`667 8„v , $6, ";18• '. :18 . 1.6.: t;'1Ap ,,, 128 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hogrlyflowlate(Veh/hj- :.:23 ,292: 49 x 'i.77 , .725 3,;++, 38. `2Q,_.._ 20 , ,�7 ;_1oa -1:39 Pedestrians Lars 1Y,Nt ftre2�_.., � _ - ,.x .�. ,. Walking Speed (ft/s) PerceptBfockag&2�,. , ..�- . . _. .-�„_ �,,. __ 1 a. . . .. .. W h.: S ^R,�i�ght turn flare (veh) lYi.^ YS`7.M ,.ku�xi'»wi ,.,uf.x'�+- }r2.'a .v.. ..m<.:.._......._v _F;i.:.... ,s,if .a f.. i..a .,,. , '•'44`.+La.....,rla.,.,. .,.> N,afi..:Nb(10,&.<ro.+a.... Median storage veh) vC, 0:14iettng,Vo;lume , , 728 r; "341 . : " 1437- ;1245 ,x317 `1273 '1288 ;727 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2r `slage2 confvot tC, single(s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 66 6.3 tCr2Jtage_(s) ,; :4,- t .. _ . _. i,- .,I.` ., tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0gueC1effee ? t_ .,.. 97. . , - , 93 0 . . 87 :., 97 h 86.x;:'. 27 u.�'66 cM capacity (veh/h) 844 1180 f 27 153 708 114 148 413 155� .$ Y ttil x t !. ° (;Y/ 4..t ;).cr.i ';.taw Ia"#"S. atiitt tifi .c ritfla-iiiiti M��^ -iiii-M s .. -t £: : Volume Total 364 805 78 265 Votume(gft' . , . 23 i. 77' 39 ": 17 ' ... . _. ,, , . . .SJ ::__.. _ '. Volume Right 49 3 20 139 5,.'H itiSie a. "�„na ,.<. . ' „t:844' 1180: 49. > 217. �'.,t.,, . .y,:_. ".+: ,.x . Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.07 1.61 1.22 QMeuettth9th(ftji.. 2 :' -:5 189 X336 ,. , sa r°..- :, ._,.v Control Delay (s) 0.9 1.6 484.5 179.2 lane' C?6,h A A F F ,'--,-.:-., : . ;;,. Approach Delay (s) 0.9 1.6 484.5 179.2 C _= u APPadl}LCT$I .._ ._e h-.. _.. F F es` ._ Vi ,u . ... .., j a_�4 ._.. _ x ,. Average'Dejaye ..�# 57 6 �{ 9 ��Y...,.( x _, _.-Y.. b ;:$' r :.kL Y' ...rzn .un ..-....I.. . Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service E Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/1/2001 i - ' I ~ t 41 t P ti r Lane Configurations 4'+ 4. 4 4_. SignControl , , Stop, . :: ,,' Stop , : , a :,Free,.. =i ree -`. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% VOlumg(veh/h) :- , __... ' 2. r '3: '' 6 ,A3 10 . 0.,._,"83 ,31 : & 207 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyf(ow yate.(veh/h).. s 2 . .3 2 . " 7 a''`_3 A 11,' ,..0 A ':'-i9:0',,JA,34 7 ` 225 2 Pedestrians ,a 10,M1 {t 3. r } I. z ..._.. Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent 81oc1cage `. , s.. . _. . ._. . Right turn flare (veh) None , �r�_ None � ��.≥�.. : ,.��r{ v� _,4:=e 6Ae��'?,tYR�. _ � ,�s _ _ . z Median storage veh) vQt cohf igting'volume ':35g , 363 226 ;'35Q 347 ."147At,E 2Z7 . ., ., r. a.. +124 r c vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 `stage 2 corif v0I „ , . tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 4.2 4.2 tCa 2' tage(S) tF (s) 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 2.3 2.3 p0.gueuelfres°Io': +°100..f..,99. 100',=:.,-.99 ; _'99 , ,99, y100 1 ._ 00: '-. cM capacity (veh/h) 571 550 794 584 561 926 1295 1415 a . ' I gffilI .y, .' f "�f`*n ° !) „ ffit. r , 5":li sq u -j+ . s, �` '+ 'Dx�- y., , FPM"" �.�` its"YtY YD� * "a "'!.` `r�.t1„•�is: kal +;`� . } K..�� :e' a ad's r 'S_"T' . .'-py Volume Total ' c;Y•, .,. : 8` 211Z4.,, 234. '`.... r ""` Volume Left 2 7 0 7 Volume Right,.. , .'.. . , 2 11 .. 34'. :' . 2 . ,w:'r _ :,,..z: " ' . . cSH 610 719 1295 1415 Volume to,C , ,aci 0.01 0.03 0 00 :0.00'?5 ty. , :.: Queue Length (ft) 1 2 0 0 Cpntrq belay(s) -, 11.0 ,, 10;2 , . 0,0; :r 0.2.^ .,, Lane LOS B B A Approach Delay.(s) ` . ' `17 0 10.2. :" 0,0.. ` 02 - t ,., Approach LOS B B c..,. y r .,Y,i r;uv * w�w,xa §. ^qr. *a.Plg "o-'. 9t "T""; i 4 "^ .=��,�g 3" ".,'„,i„si"Y t s&r<f„�`.�, w'�._ ,r„.. :..:w'^,.° 3.v.":a5, .�,�*,. ..,veh.' .r" �h:�s., a:.I tt.'� ,r.:��.t"- '+4' �..., `. Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization , 23 4% _ ICU"Cevel ofSe + e ;,:i Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/3/2001 -' C f— k` h t P ti 1 r,s - r `t'A2r4! ri .e alo _ =af Lane Configurations 4, 4., A A top., e' Volume (veh/h) 27 133 135 7 202 16 171 76 0 18 106 73 Peak Hour Factor. 0 92,'; 0.92'"t,°:0.92" 9 92 °0,92 0.92 #b 92 x,0 92,, 0,92 , 0„92 rv_=0 2 x 0 92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 29 145 147 8 220 17 pk 186 83 0 20 115 79 € t i' s {kttrw .4#R; 9 � h$ksyds o, ry Volume Total (vph) 321 245 268 214 � kill. Volume Right(vph) 147 17 0 79 Q Departure Headway (s) 5.7 6.1 6.2 6.0 Capacity (veh/h) 596 485 539 565 Approach Delay (s) 14.3 13.3 14.3 12.2 ,, To .4-*." .7� . mJ a£c. .°dae..° t +4 6 4# ,e;a..+.. , 4 ��;5�.� � e�`�"��g^��: :� nsv�sa�ar ��`,�+�+ri'�- ,�..5�a;* v, ..x' & 3 . HCM Level of Service B Inteisection,Capacity Utilization'-, X69.1%y,` .. ICU Level of Service 3 , , , -, Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/1/2001 O 4— 4 Lane Configurations t. 4 V Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Le;VWttith (ft).. „ . Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blocky en ._ Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC, onfliut}ng volume „ 43 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vvGa:tag14;con(vot tC, single (s) 4.2 6.5 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 3.6 3.4 cM capacity (veh/h) 1515 919 1004 Volume Total 43 23 0 Votut»e i efts° _.. Q I ., .0 Volume Right 0 0 0 . 1700 1515, 170Q . , Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.00 0.00 Queue.Lea th fit) 0 0 Q _„ Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane1O5 . , , A-, Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach L S A 5 '�"e vr."�"aee..//;;� xti•k 3' `}' 'a�,ris:'"*t r e, q. '�.W-iS i'''.`r,F4^�'�d^5 '�Y9a�,u°�,° f ^:.0 r.is?t �.a�" '�a�` Y�' . Aver` £,D to Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A I,Ir u, r Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & 1-25 SB Ramps 5/7/2001 p� t —fr ��r I 4— t- `\ t t \*yq 1 r larDY:VirlailLane Configurations +t r 'i' Tf ) f r IdealFlow(vphpl) E.,'.. ':.1929<,,,.,:1900 1900„ .1900 '1900; 1900,d? 1900 900 "1900, 1900_.;1900} ;1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util F'ac`to f pr` 0.95;, 1.00 'x;;0 97 =X0.95 :;. . . , :-. , 1 00 , .1,00 .h„1:00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 FItPrate,ted 1.00; t 00 ".195 1 00 _ , , . . , , vt:, .: .i' 095,i fi,100 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1641 1743 1482 FitPermittada„,..d.,..,.,_ ` '1 00 100.._'0,95 1 00 . ". .. _kt4 C..° .r `._0,95 _®11 00".' ,1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1641 1743 1482 Volume w h , 0 132e'' 383 il 418 730 0 :: 0 0 :0 430 r 2, =290 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 b.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adl,Flow(yph iklitf n., ::0 .: 1441 _ 416 -5454 .793K,. ,30r,..�. 0 , :' 0„�.ux p , 467 .,s,x.�. 2,. r X15 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1441 416 454 793 0 0 0 0 467 2 315 Heavy Vehicles(%/m), 9% , `9%` 9%0` `"9% `9% 9% ,9% t.9% ;;:9%n 10%;``;.9% :` ;,:9% Turn Type Free Prot Perm Free )?-1c1414 : 4' !8 Permitted Phases Free 6 Free Actuated Green, "(s) ,52.0' 110.0', x.15 0 57.0,. 3'1,0, 31 0''.' 10,0, Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 110.0 15.0 57.0 31.0 31.0 110.0 ActutedgbC,Ratio,..i.. 0.47 100 „014~."0,52 028.4-=028 x1.00 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1'566; ".1482 4 438 ;`1716 ,. . ` `4 , �. .. , ;4 62. F.491 .'1482 LaLie Grp CaA�(vl�h)..� .. �. ` . . ., v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 c0.14 0.24 0.00 v/s,f atio Perm ,. P 028 � i - 1 „0.28 u ,0;21 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.28 1.04 0.46 1.01 0 00 0.21 Uniform belay d1 .,, "_ _ . 27.1' , 0 0 =47 5 115 a" 39.5,n�28 4 9.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,'d2 . ,. ' 10.3; _ 0 5,, "48 8 . '.0 . _.w ,. , ...44.6. 0.0. s 0.3 Delay (s) 37.4 0.5 88.6 9.4 84.1 28.4 0.3 1-evelofService , .., :::1;;:::±T,D _ .Rk F 'A K ,, . ... . F.` C -',,A Approach Delay (s) 29.1 38.3 0.0 50.3 Approach LOS .: 'D d ;.`- A D Iily .� Fo-. i ,. w� �. xc z , ,� .tea 4,i .�l�-"��1�tkm.4F Fd c'�'au� :.rrs3,��a'�'�""y��a.5 �.,�` �.an' s�'i °nw:�8.�0 " a .y ,d� " u � 4 e MOM Average,Control_Delay '`36 3,`:{ ,. HCM;Level of,Service . : =t), k cr¢eA HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length(s) ' 110 0` ;;Sum or lost ti=ne(s) ti ,.12,:0`°``1 1-F ,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.7% ICU Level of Service D c Critical Lane Grou "tii`'�` r. ,.,n f, ... Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/7/2001 _ /- T • 4— 4 4\ 1 t \* l r ! r,- a ,, ": :7;:r1 .d L rilxi al iti.l<ts, ta,.l... "^e cat ?fly ' '. . . < .:,i r.„ " Lane Configurations ' ft ft r ii 1' r Ideal Flow(vphpl)„ 1900:"+1900' '1900 1900 1900 `1900 1900%.-1909, ,1900'. 1900';£1900`. '1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor!, r .0.97 .0.95} ,0.95_ 1 00 '149-, . .t.:1',.,,, 1,00,?v,.4;„,4.,,,,,...4.::,:::,,,,,,4 , Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 00 0.85 Flt Protected,_ 0.95„i,'1.00 `; 1.00 1.00 0 95 , 1,00 ,x,, `" Satd. Flow (prot) 3213 3282 3312 1404 1656 1482 Fit Permitted y . 0,13'--,:.-:1,00: -; L.,' 1.00 1:00 t'',, 095 „ '1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 447 3282 3312 1404 1656 1482 Volume v h „'250. , 1506 a 0 f :'' 0 933 a X18 216 , , A T 507,, fir) 0 0 0 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.lFlaw(yph), , . xTm272x, 1637,d„`r~°0 i';. ,0 10;1..4 , 201 354 ,, ._0..,'551,. a` .,x rf ta?t.._:.' 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 272 1637 0 0 fl 1014 201 235 0 551 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle`s°(%) `:'9%`1.10%" . .`9% ' = 9% `9% ,. 15%.2-..-:-.9% ', 9% l'4,7.9% ; 9%".:1'9% . :9% Turn Type pm+pt Free Perm Free Protected Phases 7 `" ' ' s A. , Permitted Phases 4 Free 2 Free Actuated Green £3(s) ;,'52.0 , 52.0. . . , 57.0 110.0'1,-::,31;,0 110.0 ''..7.'.'7',.`1/4,.': , , Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 52.0 57.0 110.0 31.0 110.0 ActuatedglcRatq , Or47 ,0.47= 1,0.52 1,00 ;., 0.28 ,,-1:00,37;,..„,.- . ,.._.:,, Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LaneGrp.,Cap'(vph) -:=463"1551 °.1716 1404`:- 467 ' ',: i1.4,82- 1,,-'- ' v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.50 c0.31 v/s.Ratio Perm '`v '0.22 'I': - 0,14%,,„0-14 , 0.37 '.. a "' . v/c Ratio 0.59 1.06 0.59 0.14 0.50 0.37 Uniform,Delay,:dl 19.9.'1/4'7'29.0 '1 p.4 0.0 33.1" ' ,`Q(7 Progression Factor 0.72 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay_,d2 .,1.9 31.0 1.5 0.2,; 38 47„ w . Delay (s) 16.1 43.7 19.9 0.2 36.9 0.7 LevelofService' ..:r . B D , :. . - B ;;A,.V ,D'' :, .v._:Air, . . Approach Delay (s) 39.8 16.6 11.5 0.0 Approach LOS , ,, , D . .. . `�B '' u .' .I'„,,,, K , ,Ar _, e r i-> s , '�'"fr:d' ' r}Ur,:::`/;11-..''?�Y 1l'• ors,?' ad' rr , 'fi"'`,e it r�,/u ". -, °�ou.:L�akd, ��e�#R rx.''.`,:-.'"'":".?..":!.;:.1e,' fr� ,�" r ,ex *'1 .Ewty 'c sS .4� ss �� 9 .w�fi HCM'Average Control Delay . ' ,269 ,,HCM Level of Service ° .,`,F`r , ` l'�O�t,t`. ,, ; ... ' r. '-f-= HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 79 Actuated Cycle Length(s)" ' 110.0; Sum of losttime(s) ,-.7,-8,0,...-v,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 64 9% ICU Level of Service B c Critical Lade-Group ',:7.---1: ,. Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/7/2001 Lane Configurations 40 4., 4, 4, Stgn.Contrgl ,., ,` ;mow. Free',:;,',iiii, < Free Stop. A'`k, .<. . 4 Stop, .'.: Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Voume (Veh/h) 21 ;269:; 59 72 -667 43 .- .43 . • '18 ,=18 16 101.,, :128 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly'flpW,rate{vehih) :X23 ;v 292: 64 ';' 78 ',. 725, 3 47 s. 2 t . 2o* s '(7 ' 11© k,Y13$ Pedestrians LaneWidth,(8),. : . .._ ,s _ t Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) MedianIty e5 ii,�+ �.. ` ,x.7::::tt4 'None j '.. : done _ Median storage veh) vG„conflrbting.votume ..:.728 i . 357 ':' ' 1447 ,1255 X4 324 u1283, 1205., „. 727 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vt2 stage,2 oo f vol tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.3 6.7 6.4 7.2 6.6 6.3 tC,2r;stage_(5) . : tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.7 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 po.queue free°!o`l ` . U i97 ` . < -,' :' 93 0 86 . ,,'97'r_„ 84,,, .24 ° :'66 cM capacity (veh/h) 844 1159 23 146 685 111 144 413 y mry�«Y 5< "v .A ...,ir t .. ( N5 h 5 .S.�' 1 F.'S. S.. ........ �r<..:.. f.. w.F ... .:;... . . :t,... ..9ki -'t '7�...'.'�:StM15 �z.�°� €". 3..<�rs�'?.�+ .� < .... ��.� F. ,�`; r §6 a $ t� x.�.. :`r n. Volume Total 379 807 87 266 Volume i efts, % ;_23- 78 47 17 "`i3 + ' ' Volume Right 64 3 20 139 1844 1159 , . 39 .?:212 �- a{Vl��t� .... d s.. < r.�...i:.a r ... :i nt.... Y. t �. i 5. .....¢_'i h}L %i;,,R . .w .. Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.07 2.22 1.26 Queue Lengtfi'(ft)_�,.. 2 _ '-,'i5 it: 236 .349 iii i.. v, Control Delay (s) i 0.9 1.7 778.3 193.7 LaneI:QS ,a A A .. . ..:F '7z- F ,. y u k Approach Delay (s) 0.9 1.7 778.3 193.7 Appr4@eh_,iQ,SW .:. C C,,' ... T ,. �,+.. _.. ¢ . .a ¢� ,mar � Average',o. koy.i",: �.. t 76 V, + s x k. y4v,:inf3tY. ...";<:ar .. 0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.4% ICU Level of Service E F Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/7/2001 -• 'i C .— k- 4\ t t ' 1 4/ Lane Configurations 4. 4• 4. 4. Sign Control. Stop;= Stop Free r. Free, , Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate{veh/h) 2, 2 2' .'14 3 , , 20 0 , .90 49 24. ', 225 2 Pedestrians f r Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC, nflicting volume :.410, 413, . ,226 392,^ „390. „115 ', 227, ';. ,. 139 . , ,.. u,_ vC1co stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.7 6.6 6.7 4.2 4.5 tF (s) 3.6 41 3.4 41 4.1 3.8 2.3 25 poqueuefree°lug . 100. 99 100 ' '97 ,w.^J9 - 98y 100 98 .�, cM capacity (veh/h) 515 507 794 463 523 823 1295 1260 f ry i Volume Left 2 14 0 24 cSH 568 610 1295 1260 Volume t©Capacity , ` 0.01 0.06. 0,00' ,'0.02 Queue Length (ft) 1 5 0 1 Control Delay:(s'}za`,„ - _.11.4 11 3 0.0 : 0.9 ' r:' . Lane LOS B B A roach . 11.4 ` 11.3 0.0 Approach LOS B B �.44y-,tw i,lt,t4.,A wt.`'�.�64t.x..,nx::.,...-. ,t.,:. .S.,,�aiYsr W.. ..C, 1_5t.ae.Ya, ,^�'.cx w�., ,......._ ., trt.F_? 3:_ _..,.�'•suJ..sti.. u:,_vrb Average Delay 1.7 Irite`rsectionyCapacity,Utii iation' :,` 29.9% ICU,Level of Service. TA S, '. Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/7/2001 1 r,.T`s ,4c xv Lane Configurations 4+ 4. 4 Sign C ntrol Stops Stop Stop Stop Volume (veh/h) 38 133 135 7 202 17 171 78 0 18 107 79 P.eakHourF;actor F.,. a_ 092 ,. 092 0,92 :0,92 0.92 ,q92:=;.0,92,. .0.92 092, , 092 , 492 ; 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 41 145 147 8 220 18 186 85 0 20 116 86 Volume Total (vph) 333 246 271 222 Volume Right(vph) 147 18 0 86 gm ,0,o t+adt��x x� t Departure Headway (s) 5.8 6.2 6.3 6.1 Degree-UtitiY t o Capacity (veh/h) 587 479 532 554 ControlYDela 15.2 13 6> 14 X2 7 .. Approach Delay (s) 15.2 13.6 14.7 12.7 C::' .. . HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity`Utilization 72,5% ICU Level of Service.° 4 Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 5 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/7/2001 rrqq�� - r "s STf ,"' -a.� � s '-p•. }) F ,i`.L .':; ii P L'$ k ,. ',J . ' ," r ¥ -..� �"ijr3, s:k ��f2.6.ti,.`.a'_.,�,,.. ....�r�:.;.. ,m,ad.,.. ., . „ ...i'3ki.�„�r.tis.:u:#�. ,�.;r,*P".•J<aa.,a�;ca:.,.�",Ms a. $5�ti:�a..._,..'sa�: sr€i!%w..J.i3.f`:..₹:+ Lane Configurations 1. 4 V Sarknf[oi Fee ,^„ :, rye Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% yoruime(veh/hL t. , . . 4 40 30'4.., I i '24 .. 15. 0' .. , . .;i Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Howiyft0wyrate.(veh/h) 43: 3'; 1 23 `°; 16 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockeger_ , , �. . _.. Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC,'cpnflicttng lrelume r vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2;sfage:12tcopf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 7.4 7.2 tF (s) 2.2 4.4 4.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 1536 723 787 , ₹ .'.. ."'Yk.y .; 'bad .art'........3 T..a.E%'A4.,'.m... .. ;: , : i ,aJw ,.4w,s. o.at4r..kt`�,. >frs_�.:sh..s<r +�.,a, Volume Total 76 24 16 Valumsx eh 0 ., 'r 1B Volume Right • 33 0 0 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.02 QueUi I4ecgth(ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 10.1 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 10.1 Apppr a�h,LQS • 1 .< . . , .a �� .... .. --. ai Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.3% ICU Level of Service A Year 2015 AM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & I-25 SB Ramps 5/1/2001 t --• c t 4\ t t 1 d j4IrrkiVAI 'K a `.M sc `3 q -I lr iPi kid+ YUEto ig, Lane Configurations tt r VI 44 II ? r Ideal Flow(yphpi)' „ .1900 , 1900- 1900. 1,900, :1900 1900 :1,900:,. 1900`:1900 ,1900. ;1900 1'900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Lifal Facto[ti .1. .x.},095 1{70, - 097 0,98 . 100 �...... 1 00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected .;.=v:. 1.00::..,.'110 , 095 iC 't*fE2.i . i, . 1 0 96 su . .1:00 Satd Flow(prof) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1656 1482 Fltte,":01 l at-ki „ .u.ii 100-: 1o0W: ;p,95ri.0Q g. ., i„::..,, ,... . .:. . .,.,.ro 0J5 n,. '1;,00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1656 1482 V41,[trtt'011 Ph J 1 L f _.,0 ,t 1077 _'1293 t�3 ,_ 971 , 0:1 t i0 `..k "�0.. :4 , ;'}03.= , 7. _, 367 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.'92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92' 0.92 0.92 �y( /y gI:� a .x -.`-. "}4771 31s "",:387 g . 0"<F .0 ..;: 0 ' .-U; °1a2.'a .O 421 �dTI `i ��T`��ti..ve�i`�}I ^g.h4,: �. '~ :' k aiSK. d'4af. L d'4ro�J ° +GL 3 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1171 318 387 990 0 0 0 0 112 0 421 HeavyVVhic1es:(%}` .a9%":Hc 9%_ 9% `�?.9°la >..';9°f° „ Aw.!:: 9%, °':9% +;9%.n_9%,," 9% :9% Turn Type Free Prot Perm Free Pfeteeted Phaae'% , _.. 4 36 r., Permitted Phases Free 6 Free Actuit 6 Green, (s)�_ 23,0x 600, ': 8 0 '22:0 .._ A` , ' : . 1.' 1}, ` .. .,° `50.0 ..Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 60.0 8.0 22.0 17 0 60.0 Acfuate Ga'o 0:,38` ,100 x.013_,..0`37 _.. ' ,�, t , 028 1:00 �9( _0, _ Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.40- l0rpp-gti hlI 1270 .14B2428ii 1214,", .., .. J . i. { X469 .ins —v/s vtsRetioFe(rlil:'"1,w._, . :;w ::. 021 } - _., 007 ° 026 v/c Ratio, 0.92 0.21 0.90 0.82 0.24 0.28 Urn[oP 3e 40, .W v. : 17,6. 0 0 '25 6 177 2 '' . f��_ ... ' „ 4.r 1 5 Nr n d 0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.08 0.36 1.00 1.00 Inor ,filAatl)etay02... `_ , 124 fl_$ I158 13:4 ,f 'fzug`.,, 'f :fl5 Delay (s) 30.0 0.3 43 5 9.7 17.7 0.5 400.(of cewjce ° G A , 0 ('':',42,1,!!;i1:;}-2:: . Approach p�� ac Delay (s) 23.7 19.2 0.0 47i Ck' '1 C : u... - k t ACQ �� u4ab v,. .,�, .. .: .. �.I"�tir..._��:..._ .�.B s�' .:.."�1 �.�..>.".!::m��'�,x.i9.Gt.„,>a�.a..t�:,Fa-2 a t:i; N 4 -al ! t " t''t l t d f.. i ) f i s a- '1 a r w l7ry tIQ #'e 9e>Co °I Delay t 15 8.`.1_ x HCM"LeVO4:01 NlCt,,, t _ n.`4 5'c f, . `lr._ , ....... HCM Volume to Capacity ratio U.67 6lcfif died Cy9te L'er79th (s),. 60 0.'rr . 3 Sum iif lgsttime (s) Z ' '„ , Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service A c ethical Lane roup . :.. Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & I-25 NB Ramps 5/1/2001 l -Cf�_ Cie ^ ,} z .a. t s g p vYY p#(. 7'z by: C t'^'' z ),;6, �tlj " � u 'T t? si` .��-L I° <. V#,w.ai� t...^� �IIuwzr�8S tu. �-.� t�a ^�wa� kka.rau�J,� � �sf.,++t..��R=a. Lane Configurations t Ic IdealFI_ow(vphp , , 00 7 O0'1900..{1900_` 1000 , 1900.1,19 0„ 1900 y;1900 x`1900, `1900. _1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane t!til Factorx x„ .. ,i'0 97 0 95., ` v.. .. 0 95..n100 ' 1.00, r.,. „ .1.00 i6 , . .4„a,m W_ .. Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 00 0.85 Flt`Prpte e O,','' F, 0 95 1.0b ,*,`j, _�`r,;_i., �1 00 �t 00a 0 95',, ' .'*,1-00 ,., _r, � . „�. . .. Satd. Flow rot 3213 3312 _ 3312 1482 1656 1482 Fit rmittsdjif. ", 0.95, °1.00' ._ ... 1.00 .. "t.00':=YQ95 , ef,i„1.0(721Eitt€x�r:_ 1` . : ;) Satd. Flow(perm) 3213 3312 3312 1482 1656 1482 Voitime`(vph) •, ° `t 410 769 , 0 fl 925 s 4.taV 342".k . 0 5374 0_ 0, ;'0 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad P'lo u h :I y� ' r 7446 . 836 . 0 l ' �a. ,.1005, .m aI350 70, ., 0 t. 584 �„°- .0 ` ` 0 t , `.0 J� roup o vp ) 4 Lane Group Flow (vph) 446 836 0 0 1005 350 372 0 584 0 0 m0 HeavyVehicles'(%)2'. .-c7i9°% ,9% 9°% t ;` 9% '"°',9% 9%'`';' `9% . 9°✓0% %;.:T,49% Y`s'9°�°'"t;9% Turn Type Prot Free Perm Free Protected P, Oes22* a.' 7 . 4 S:.".r-' .. , $ '. ' . , , t.',Egeliffir . _ _ Permitted Phases Free 2 Free Actuated reen, (s), ily;:9-4):::t.;. 3,11:14,;< ;,^a*.fr. . . 22.0 • 600 17,0 . t 2.,.60.0:11f {- , .•nro .. .. Effective Green, g (s) 9.0 23.0 22.0 60.0 17.0 60.0 Aetu tedugIC Ratio . ,,..0:15,. 038 (:., .>.. ) 0.37 E1.00 ,0.28 . S_. 1. ..n. 00 s 1aig _ a„ _. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2 # 69 482r""f' ate Leyne rpxteptuph)� `�;482 '�12?Os _ � ,,. 1214 49 ,s�`1 , .�. . LL >>1, ,��,k� ,�m„�aat .,i v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.25 c0.30 t : i "sax v�¢Rd0��F� ,`�� . :_�_., �� °�'� i:`� I �,�0.�4:� 0�2.� �`� , �,0 3 ��. �f=�r '2.l v..... v/c Ratio 0.93 0.66 0 83 0.24 0.79 6.39 Uniform{Delay_ d1 H. . ,, 2s 2, ..•15,3 y' .17.3 0 0 19 9 z', ..,. „OD .s,ll,a�.. .F . Progression Factor 0.48 0.29 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 Incremental belay,d2 =r .152 .g.3 , .,, 06,< 3 6 6 a30 4 ; 12 9 .1.,.h' ", .0.8 a` ' .. .n Delay (s) 27.3 5.7 23.9 0.4 32.8 0.8 Level ofrServree C A C A,` C, A Approach Delay (s) 13.2 17.8 k13.2 0.0 p u sti r 4 r a, y m " ": g +t;:it fs+�' 3' Uzi i4 a r x ,p �a ek: n :1;'..v /L'1 'P �" ilt� 'r hk- .H n a� ��r Pc zi �°. � ,�xd� .v'a�i' �.'� � ,� .W,e'",� -� .'�,�a_ ax,_.. �s. �.. HCM Average Conttrrol Delay_ ` . 14 9 at HCM Level of ervice ,u. xV#x h , r"...,E . t. .. ", ..t r{ ._ at HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Ac'tuated,Cyelto Capacity (s) 60 0 i :Sum of lostttime(s)mr ,.,. , 12.A tr ��_ t� ',if,, ,.,_.:•'l 'kki .. � h . ..,nw r,.w r� 1 'y • Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C c "Critical Lane Group • 4 _ . . Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/1/2001 f 7 C 4— s- 4\ t Lane Configurations 4 4. 4 40 $�gnCoatro4[ free;; . Free,. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% V4�utne(veh/11 120 x 654,' _16au „1„6 ` 407 ' 13;4. ,73, .120, .l, 84 xf, a .il,323_ 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 tiour,I pWTate(veld/t1O , ';{130 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Ise Blockage° „ �` Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC cogflictrtg,yplurrte '457 ;;793 . . I54fi 4504 ,752„J654_ `1539.... :,449 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2�s1aai2Lcoinfy41 _ K tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0 queue free°'/n :.;' ' r . 88 98 r 3 0 Oww"' 77 0 4 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 1068 797 55 101 399 0 96 595 Volume Total 924 474 307 77 gt . >}bid} h v �» s.,130 }17: <,X35„4 11 "z' ,3 $1 . . `.; ,., a ';i a 1ibla ta.ii. Y��C�Y"�ai`.rS.i�5�31.� Y` k,.•1 I, Volume Right 83 14 91 32 , , : - u."1068 797'. , 100 '' 0 r dS _ s � ,. , Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.02 3.07 Err r ' Co ntro l Delay (s) 3.0 0.6 Err Err Approach Delay (s) 3.0 0.6 Err Err a `:t61 60,:14011:M .rW s. N k +yni y R . y.. `'Pr E ' m .t .Atha _ V.. � 4n.r_ .", x' � fT'� a. .s' �: � ,�'ry '�",�'� _ z....�g- k4. 'kmd Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.5% ICU Level of Service F .' )' a .,r .,... Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/1/2001 J( �t >f><,t+ -3_1 r c':�x�--� .- '? it` �P,_�.�,i.. f"..� '. �ts':'�: �4�4 , s?^i,.` • ''d,,..'.�Fx,... 0 �a f,.,.` Lr.s` `?'�.k` Lane Configurations Sign_Control 4. ... r Stop::, , , Stop} Free. , .Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 3,`'4 -0.92 2 J ` 123 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 _ 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 —0;92 '3 - . .2 310 2 °iii--134 '�, 2 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Perce1 Bloc ag Ie� ..� .. _ ,,,.�. . ..`_ `wr- J xh,, ..#�>.>•.., ,w- .,.. ° ,..: �._ ..,.. Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC` :O011, iV.ola!ex,,x`_ 458,. , -455; .u.135,4 4603 .. 455 ,,. 311 .i .8x,,. s Ar ( 'I?.:;r:= ig 0.,.. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vtr2,wstage2conf,'dot y..; tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 63 42 4.2 tC,2 stage(s`)''l x. ,. +s }, cr,_ . :. y, ', .. ,ea . s tF (s) 36 4.1 3A 3.6 4.1 34 23 2.3 OPAOue free°10 100 ._.:9$. . 100.: . p0.. :1A0 "1,00, 21P( ` „ .,AAD , F -. cM capacity (veh/h) 497 488 893 487 488 711 1400 1204• 7f C 'fi ` .s.� � I 1 e-rv'�e:. et` � � `' '. Volume Left 2 2 2 2 .r n �Y,i�Ai. ,.��.._�.+:.a"?• ,I uo cSH 489 601 1400 1204 Volume to`Ca ac 0.03 0.01: Queue Length (ft) 2 1 0 0 Lane LOS BB A A ApproachDelay:(s), Approach LOS B B t - r 1' 6 Sf-fi'�1- f mk q xa, a 5.c9•-ve .p:? r .Y ' ...e,.�. '? ' , , .� �v i "r`, �, Average Delay 0.6 Intetsection Capacity Utilization_ ,,`_.; 27.1% :" ..:., ICU.Level of Service ',1, ,.,:v Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/3/2001 Lane Configurations 44 4, 4, 43 Sign`,Control Stop:.; Stop, . Stop r. . .Stop.. ._ I''. Volume (veh/h) 71 282 195 2 113 35 146 87 4 13 98 40 0.92. 0 92 0 92, Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 77 307 212 2 123 38 159 95 4 14 107 43 '.�.4�w. t±43.��...aew.�, „s„„3• =r�t�naa't)?�'��G��",ia�.�;aa .,�A��af,��'=_, . ` ,��.�'.�ex.,�m.e�.v' .?.waa.a �?�:... ' Volume Total (vph) 596 163 258 164 Volume Lefft(vph) r;- 77 i2 ' 159,E .r 14 . . _ ' , ".. , . Volume Right(vph) 212 38 4 43 Departure Headway (s) 5.5 6.3 6.6 6.6 Degree Utilisation, x til . 07.91 0'28 A 47, ',0,3, . .h Capacity (veh/h) 644 446 509 514 Approach Delay (s) 40.6 11.7 15.4 12.4 S U B x a x�`n"(`3 1 a 3 �.. n '".&.yk w��"``$y .Rik •,o-= .tit -��.°,.i ,a.tir .a'.'°" rK�af ' T a� r.� HCM Level of Service D Intersection,Capacity Utilization ,' . '78.6%', '.,, ICU Level of Service '; C Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/1/2001 7 { I-- 4\ /* Lane Configurations I. '>x,1 "` t .y Grade 0% 0% 0% 40.92 ::•. .,.. F'y ._,. in t r(n'{t a . .. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 «0 92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) M040tt5!EA-7Wiake r, .$. Ngi1ea .;: V ,4Pw WwM2_, gakf, .s... Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol vcI2cxste cone vot tC, single (s) 4.2 6.5 6.3 tF (s) 2.3 3.6 3.4 100 1 0".2100:7 x cM capacity (veh/h) 1568 991 1058 tt 4,IH" Volume Total 3 5 0 r w Volume Right • 0 0 0 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 laia�;t4� A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 ..v,t e a.«o. .t'. .. .v,. #. .art..... - ........ .. . v .._ + t t ° s,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A II:II Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Background Synchro 5 Report Ban Przybyl Page 6 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SH 66 & 1-25 SB Ramps 5/7/2001 -/ 7 I k- `\ t P '► j r iea e a ItErU £ t.-_° i I $: eil Ip 4 i4\ ;I <N.0.r.,ie., 1( rk p?i S ki$. .. 1 9 +':.:tTa.fit.,t; Lane Configurations TT4 r '5'I 14 ) + r Ideal,Ftow,k,:eplY3 _",, .1900 . 1900 "1,900 u=1900 190,0 ;1900.;;. 1900 ,.-'1900 1900 19,00 ;` 19110 1800 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Larae:Utii Eapior.. _,. : `` , 0;95,; 100 097,1,0:95 , A, _ : < .._tO0 . u °., fix, i;o0 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 FIt erotected y. , s:.; 100 m. 1.00 0 95a00 . ., . s>.. , . ..,,r, 0 954,'". 1.:00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1626 1482 FIE PernXl tafflat: ., , . O ^1.00: 1 00 0 95..,ts 1.00; . _w'.;: 1, 0,95 .x..,.100 Satd. Flow (perm) 3312 1482 3213 3312 1626 1482 Vc1ume(vph ' `'r , 0 ,107'7; 293 ;:356 u912 0' . k 0 S ;r0 trots . 106 „ ', 0. .'387 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 AFILLFA M(ynl3) t ,.__; .' 0 „11171 x318h :f3 , $7 A$g>1 1F�0 uwx0 6n E 0.0 1�: dsw.421 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1171 318 ” 387 991 0 0 0 0 115 0 421 FieaW Vehtdess(°44 ?:W'9% - 9% 9% 9.% *."M% . 9010;'; 910,. 'Eni,,, " `9%,`' "11:% , ; 9% i 9% Turn Type Free Prot Perm Fre e m PrbtectadPhgses `) ,.: acs " •,@ : E 1 _ 0° : _. _: Permitted Phases Free 6 Free 23;01 60 0 : 8 0 ,.=22;0 r ;,: 17 0 .60;0 Acts)ated"green;G(s). ., . .. � ' ,. Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 60.0 8.0 22.0 17.0 60.0 Actuated gl0 Ratio ,_ 0.38 1100 0,13 :`0: ., :' . . .,. .p:4:1 : 0 28 ; 1;00 0 4 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 1482 Lan&spCap.„(vph) :.;:. .._ 1270' 1482. 4228 1214 '.`: ,._: 461_,..:., v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.12 c0.30 vls.RatioTprm ,, > .. U 21 '$r sw. 4 0,,07;i -1 4:28 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.21 0.90 0.82 0.25 0.28 Unifdrmgetayrdl., . ; _ .. 17:6;" "'0.0 `2.56 17<2 .. _,... , ... ,;166 >, s-;0,0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.08 0.36 1.00 1.00 Inc(0.0119,! iPelay,d2 12.A. , <0.3,. '15 8 :3':4, 'r . , i 13,- _,, , ,, 0 5 Delay (s) 30.0 0.3 43.5 9.7 17.9 0.5 Levetpf S,ervicali xC� ,: A' D.. ; :`A ?: : B >. Approach Delay (s) 23.7 19.2 0.0 4.2 APpraoch LOS C., , B „ . , ,. ,...a6.. ...... rtt.l t sa YF C v 14. :, s .Ars1 t : . 7; d, 4 S 4 4.: HC(utll fate lnteot Delay. '„ , 18.8 _ HCMLevel of erylce x. .. .� ic e' `_. . r,,. ' `,_.. ' ..: HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 67 Actdated Gycle Length"(s) '.", : pap:',:,-;4;4;::!:,$10 of lost time(0) 80 _ ._. ;: n, - Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service A __v c ;`Critical Lane Group Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 1 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & 1-25 NB Ramps 5/7/2001 —. ♦ ~ !- `1 t t ,� 4/ rW'=_t of Lane Configurations VI Tat tit r ) t r IdealFlow'(vpt)pl) . . .1900 :,1900``1900 '1900 ;:1so0 " 19,00 1940 1;900,. '1900 1 '1900„ X900 ,,...1,900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Line Utll Factor- ,,u 0.97 f-',:--,0.95 , . :„r. 0.95" , 1,.00 1.00 , ".' X1.00 i - ' . Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 FIt Protected, . .0 ,_... 9:,95 , 1r 00 ,; `,1:00 1.00 095,. `." ,. ;1.09. . . ZI ,:a t ..r Satd. Flow (prot) 3213 3282 3312 1468 1656 1482 FltPer.0.110d 1 0`95 1.,00'._. F1.00, '100; ,095„ "! . itte h t .0 . <, �s x r 5 � Satd. Flow(perm) 3213 3282 3312 1468 1656 1482 Volume3(v"ph) ' ' .t 4101 172s ,, II k 0." ,;926 `:„331 342 M" 't 0 . 537, < 0 `n "' a_., 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92- 0.92 Adj.Flow,(vph,) 446 833<: a,.w 0 ' ;, .;p:: 1007 -360:;'x$ 37 . ` 0,a +. , WEk:0 ...„ 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 446 839 0 0 1007 360 372 0 584 0 0 0 Heavy:Vehlcles(%) ."5 .'9% , 10% ". 9°I° '="-9% , <�9% .10°l°'i :9% 9% =«''9W.54.9°l°`, 9% '9% Turn Type Prot Free Perm Free Protected,PhaSes t F 7 '..>..-. 1:-..-.4./ ;C-'.',8, T''' 1:.°:::15.':,f ., 2 _`f ., ` ,., , . Permitted Phases Free 2 Free Actuated Green, (s) ';.,� :9„.0..--:-,23:0::., 22.0 , 60.0 .7`17„0 ; -f:,60.0 ,a _._ . Effective Green g (s) 9.0 23.0 22.0 60.0 17 0 60.0 Actuatedr9/C,.Ratio . .. 0.15.: 0.38 0.37 1.00 e 0.28 1.00 .,_ v .' yS Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane rp Cap(vph) r 482-,t 1258 1214' .14681 469 ! 1482 , r v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.26 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm < ."0.25 0.22 .: . . . O 39 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.67 0.83 0.25 0.79 0.39 Uniform Delay,;;d1„ a , 2.0.2 15.3 - 17.3 0.0 19.9 1140 a c:. _...:,. .. Progression Factor 0.48 0.29 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Incrementalpoiay,'d2 ,152 4 "1-4 , . 6.6:., -.. ,0:4....-:12.9.:T ,$10.8rR , =..xr s .. s ' Delay (s) 27.4 5.8 23.9 0.4 32.8 0.8 Level of service , .°.. , C : v`"A C A: C 'A r . Approach Delay (s) 13.3 17.7 13.2 0.0 Approa ch L ? a1 t�, , rn . ,...-k,8;:-,C,',':','::.1:L'.1,1:,.,,,.,, .'e n • _:. .,_7 9 s..j l Fr�.t x iar ._ pp r.rt ±:1 u- Z' rt $tii t .fir r+ rri x 4r '': 't-b x. ( �aro'. Y A°4f��t3W'r;» s �x"vakx. .s3'm&� �'f5iiwt.s 1 �},v� " l } fY �3@rh HCM Svera9e Control:Delay = 15 0 HCM Level of,Service '.:. " ,_ .,L.`{ a._ :'a 'p"_ w HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated'Cycle Length(s) 60.9.1,7; : Sum of lost time(s) y ., 12 0 „ Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C c:"...,,"Critical LaneGroupw_ ,t;" ., Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SH 66 & CR 13 5/7/2001 ..r. §� -/ -• 'i. I .- t 4\ t P b 1 d MST' 'N_i5;:.« teifiiliti b *,r.la 41-iisri .?1281 ilfi Yr`BL.N iati itii '.1-11.0ei xiv' tliiig"..a rill.l :'tl frttg,:`u'ts"bii k Lane Configurations 4+ 4, 4. 4' SignControt ,v. .. . Free. Free '.s;Stap, o, Y, ,. t stop . - . Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume'„,(veh/hj .;. 120 =654, 79 „v 96 ,,'407 .,13 = 88 ,.,'121 85 10, , 33 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hr 44,0i:flow rate(yeh/h?, 130 '71.1 86. 117 '442 14'' 98 '`132 e2 f 'n 13 dL�.h.36 , „_ 32 Pedestrians r Lane\Mdth (f X Walking Speed (ft/s) RercentB lockagex ,* . . . .. i. _. . „ .r . _,c w ,__t AX .. k` NN Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vG, ,cgnfllctlrlc0,vol,me .ru 457, . , ,; 797 1548 1506 , 7$4 U t 16 7, :1542 , 449 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vG csetDroe2 4nf voi :„In ., .• 17 , tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.2 6.6 6.3 y� /{fir_ 0, \ ,., : :: . .. :,_. ,: - tCj 2:Stae>(s}.�.',.. .. ,a __ .. -- r ',: sc tF (s) 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 p0`eici.`e frea,Je s , 2 88 t :, t ,i 98., E ..0 .,+10. x °'77 . . w.0. ,..6? x'95, cM capacity (veh/h) 1068 795 52 100 398 0 94 595 a =p.,. ₹':j ecra4.4 a F' V49 n V w,�t .."'Y .1 t" ;' .. itiiit 15� .N ih� i1S5 x F d}x �'^��.3R�'`�, x ..'v. `e'a`'i`i '`t.1 �tl 6..,yf�i:Rr'� ]��,t;.., E of>.sR°Y kP«„.ti"1.luf"'Sa x✓. ..Bs:fJ'^� ..x.dCd,. �y�,.`, � .. Volume Total 927 474 320 78 VotoicLeftego:«..,, . . ;130 17 96:<,; 1,t_ _. _, , '`a`. .�Ht. *,."°iz« _ t Volume Right 86 14 92 32 068 '"795 =95•' '0 0 - I 'g ' Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.02 3.38 Err Queue• 0:ttgthAfty, _ 10, ',- Err r .<Err _.� ... .. t ,, � a Control Delay (s) 3.9 0.6 Err Err LeneLOS .,, ..:1 , .,a� _ ._. . : Approach Delay (s) 3.0 0.5 Err Err QC48C ",*y`w ! ,a-P "X 7 ... .,,Fzn ..s F_... a .,.. ..«.. fif..:, -«.. ,i.,_ .:.m...,�.�......,+",.. a`r:.r.` -,. y t 1 ., -7 [ fth. H . i 4"1< { a ?, R r i.',f % `` -'i.uu. u1a zz: s, �+&h w'. `�. da'y, ry w H.� x `y ' Ave 0 [telayE N :�.. Fn f' I i ..: r-" r ettik 'il a,:i x, Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.5% ICU Level of Service F Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: CR 26 & CR 13 5/7/2001 t Z f ~ & 4\ T f d Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4+ 4+ SigriCont#ai„ :' .- stop.._ `..- ..' , ..Stop .. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% V6Wutt10'.(yehlWAr' W, 2T 11 .: .r 0„E 'yrt 14-a .':;0 1& 2 y 285.. P g : t F "l'"_t23 .... >2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians t_a Width! Walking Speed (ft/s) P4.(00—B(6ckage ................................ .. Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol VC„21-00470:746607,OUZ tC, single (s) 7.2 6.6 6.3 7.3 6.6 6.5 4.2 4.8 tQ 2 stages t�, tF (s) 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.7 4.1 3.6 2.3 213 cM capacity (veh/h) 468 478 893 461 479 661 1400 954 ' a fi In ,"�*�a'ws r_ ,._.. ,,- a rtk art j 1 to at ¢. my ` }} V4ltit 0 tc . `..14 _ 32= ,317„ *b 142 -., -v' . .,v, lrag... Volume Left 2 15 2 7 cSH 476 547 1400 954 Queue Length (ft) 2 5 0 1 Lane LOS B B A A Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.3 In#eisaCti0n, apacity,tJfilizafion " 27,3% . ICU Level Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 4 LSC I NCCS2-5T51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: CR 24 & CR 13 5/7/2001 f ~ t h t Lane Configurations 4+ 4* 4 4* Sign C ntrol Stop �s Stop �°Stop Stop Volume (veh/h) 73 282 195 2 113 35 146 88 4 14 99 50 Peak Hour Factor .. 0.52 0 92 . 0 92 , 0,92,,. 0.92 0 92; 0 92, ,0.92 0 92� ..,0 92 60,92 ,0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 79 307 212 2 123 38 159 96 4 15 108 54 Volume Total (vph) 598 163 259 177 Volume Right(vph) 212 38 4 54 m: s Departure Headway (s) 5.6 6.3 6.7 6.6 Capacity (veh/h) 638 445 506 514 Control Approach Delay (s) 43.3 11.8 15.7 12.8 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity_Utilization 79 6% -ICULevel of Service ..-:,i7,-.T;. . Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 5 LSCI N CCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR 26 & Site Access 5/7/2001 4— h p Lane Configurations 1+ 4 M Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockagg �w y .__u ._Right turn flare (veh) Metan1yp@ o' ail W,_ . r, � ,u,>rrr� Median storage veh) vC conflict n voju a 12 13 8 {, vC1 stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.7 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.8 3.3 100 _ 97 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1620 932 1080 Volume Total 12 5 26 Volume Right 9 0 0 cSN ..,, 1700, ;16,20 . 932 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.03 Qyeu Le.ngth. ft), 1 . . 0 0:. 2 ;:_ Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.0 Lane=LO�S,I rx, 4.. A r s Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.0 Approach 4,03 , 0er00,t;elay .,"+f Y.. n :- _ -~!: '5.4"70,,. .,%14..b . a. 1 - : a n.. .. U ,. .. + , ,.. . ' Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Year 2015 PM Peak 4/30/2001 Total Synchro 5 Report Bart Przybyl Page 6 LSCINCCS2-ST51 Hello