Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100727.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE -ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTION A public hearing was conducted on April 13th, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Douglas Rademacher, Chair Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Pro-Tem — EXCUSED UNTIL 10:40 A.M. Commissioner Sean P. Conway Commissioner William F. Garcia Commissioner David E. Long Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Elizabeth Strong Assistant County Attorney, Stephanie Arries Planning Department representative, Bethany Salzman Planning Department representative, Peggy Gregory Planning Department representative, Ann Siron The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that a public hearing was conducted to consider whether to authorize the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the individuals named for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Cases were heard as follows: ZCV#1000007 -MULLISON: Bethany Salzman, Department of Planning Services, presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, 23-3-40, and 23-3-40.H of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, the number of cats shall be reduced to four(4) or a Use by Special Review(USR) permit must be obtained. Ms. Salzman stated she spoke to Dorothy Mullison, property owner, prior to the hearing and she indicated she has ceased feeding the feral cats within the Town of Roggen for the past six(6)weeks, and she indicated she will also no longer provide water for the cats, since the stray cats congregate at the property because food and water have been provided at the location. She stated the State Inspector for the Pet Animal Care Facilities Act (PACFA), Jennifer Leslie, indicated if the property owners provide food and water for the cats, the property owners assume ownership of the cats, and a PACFA license is required for the property owners to have eight(8)or more cats on the property. She stated if the property owners cease to provide water and food to the local stray cats, there is no need for the property owners to obtain a USR permit or PACFA license, since the property owners have just two (2) indoor cats. Ms. Salzman recommended the case be dismissed, and she stated the property owners will be working with Divine Feline, an organization which will attempt to capture the feral cats and spay and neuter the cats free of costs, and the population of stray cats will eventually diminish. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated the feral cats will be released at the same location where the cats are captured by Divine Feline; however, the cats will be unable to breed. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman stated the number of cats present on the property has fluctuated and there were approximately 18 cats when she initially visited the site. Responding to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated this matter was brought to staffs attention as the result of a complaint, and she stated there were approximately six (6) cats on the property at the time of her last site visit; therefore, it appears the cats are beginning to leave the location, since the property owners are no longer providing food. Commissioner Long inquired as to what will prevent people from continuing to provide food and how it will be monitored. Ms. Salzman indicated she shares Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 1 C'C:Pi_ - 0/O PL0824 Commissioner Long's concerns and food bowls remained on the property at her last site visit, even though the property owners insist they have not provided food for six(6)weeks and will not provide food in the future. Chair Rademacher stated it is not humane to spay, or neuter,the cats and return the cats to the same area, without a food source. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Salzman stated she was told there is an organization within the City of Fort Lupton which will accept the feral cats. Ruth Pelton-Roby, legal representative for the property owners, stated Divine Feline will place a mobile clinic within the Town of Roggen, and trap, neuter or spay, and release the feral cats, unless the cats are ill, in which case, Divine Feline will take the cats in order to treat them. Ms. Pelton-Roby stated there has always been a large population of feral cats in the Town of Roggen, and there are several families who feed the cats, in addition to the Mullisons. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Pelton-Roby stated there will be no cost to the Mullisons for Divine Feline treating the sick feral cats, and Divine Feline will also provide free vaccinations for the healthy cats it neuters, or spays, and releases. Gary Schwartz, Weld County Animal Control, stated Every Creature Counts is the name of the organization in the City of Fort Lupton which will accept the cats; however, the cats must be transported to the facility. Mr. Schwartz stated Animal Control will provide traps free of charge to assist the Mullisons, if they would like to surrender the animals to Every Creature Counts; however, the Mullisons will be responsible for transporting the cats to the City of Fort Lupton and they will be required to sign a release form indicating they will replace any damaged or lost traps. He stated the trap and release programs are popular within the State of Colorado, and the programs are successful over a period of several years in reducing the feral cat populations. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Schwartz stated he is unfamiliar with Divine Feline's protocol; however,typically, these types of organizations spend several days at the location and attempt to neuter or spay all of the feral cats at that time, as opposed to spaying or neutering a few cats each time over many visits. Chair Rademacher inquired as to whether Divine Feline and Every Creature Counts could coordinate a situation where the cats are immediately placed at Every Creature Counts after Divine Feline has provided the spaying and neutering services, instead of attempting to recapture the cats after the cats have been released by Divine Feline. Mr. Schwartz stated Every Creature Counts will perform spaying and neutering services at its organization, in addition to adoption services; however, it charges a fee for spaying and neutering services. He further stated the trap and release organizations remove a piece of the cats'ears in order to be able to identify whether a cat has been spayed or neutered. Commissioner Conway moved to dismiss ZCV#1000007 against Steven and Dorothy Mullison. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Long and it carried unanimously. BCV #0900108 - TREJO/TREJO SIGALA: Peggy Gregory, Department of Planning Services, presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file,this property is in violation of Section 29-3-160 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance,the wood frame shall be demolished or moved to meet the required setbacks. She stated a building permit was obtained; however, through the review process it was determined the structure does not meet the required offset from the property line and no further inspections can be completed. She stated she has spoken to Benjamin Trejo, property owner, and he is willing to do what is necessary to bring the property into compliance, and he is in attendance at the hearing. Ms. Gregory recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney's Office, with the instruction to delay action for 30 days, since a permit has been obtained and the property owners are willing to cooperate. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Gregory stated the property is located within a subdivision; however, a permit is required everywhere, even if the property is agricultural exempt. Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 2 PL0824 Eduardo Marquez, translator, stated Mr. Trejo has already begun to cut the structure back four (4) feet in order to meet the setback requirements, and Mr. Trejo will call the County for an inspection when the process is complete. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Marquez stated 30 days is adequate time for Mr. Trejo to bring the property into compliance. In response to Commissioner Conway, Mr. Marquez stated after the necessary portion of the structure has been removed, the property owner will contact staff for an inspection; therefore, additional feet of the structure can be removed, if necessary, before the structure is closed. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Gregory stated staff is satisfied with Mr. Trejo's plan. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Long moved to refer BCV #0900108 against Benjamin Trejo and Benjamin Trejo Sigala, Sr., to the County Attorney for legal action, with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until May 13, 2010, in order to allow adequate time for the property owners to remove a portion of the structure to meet the setback requirements. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and it carried unanimously. BCV#1000018 - MUNOZ: Ms. Gregory presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, an application for a building permit must be submitted, the setbacks must be verified, all the fees must be paid, and the inspections must be completed. She stated the property owners visited the Department of Planning Services in order to inquire about a building permit for a pole building which was already under construction; however, an application for a building permit has not been submitted, and during a site visit the inspector observed the structure may not meet the required setbacks. She recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. Neither Maria Munoz, nor a representative, were present, and Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Garcia moved to refer BCV#1000018 against Maria Munoz to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously. BCV#1000027 -VEGA: Ms. Gregory presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. She stated this and the next case involve the same property owner. To bring the property into compliance, an application for a building permit must be submitted for the remodel of the commercial building, all the fees must be paid, and the inspections must be completed. She recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. Nancy Vega, representative for the property owner, stated Abelardo Vega, property owner, has indicated he will apply for the building permit. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Vega stated Mr. Vega is often out of town and it may take up to 60 days for him to submit an application. Chair Rademacher stated 30 days should be adequate for Mr. Vega to submit the application for a building permit. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Gregory stated Ms.Vega may complete the application on behalf of Mr. Vega; however,the fees will not be determined until the application has been reviewed. Further responding to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Gregory stated she does not have an application with her to provide for Ms. Vega; however, Ms. Vega may pick one up from her after the hearing, or she can mail Ms. Vega the application. Commissioner Long stated submitting the application is only one step of the process and he inquired as to how Mr.Vega will complete the process if he is rarely in town. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Gregory stated both of the Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 3 PL0824 cases associated with this property owner are repeat violations and there have been ongoing issues with both buildings. Further responding to Commissioner Rademacher, Ms. Gregory confirmed the sole matter being considered for this case today is the application for a building permit, and the amount of time allowed to complete the construction will depend upon the cost of the project. In response to Commissioner Long, Ms. Gregory stated the property owner will be eligible for one (1) six(6) month extension. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Gregory stated the property owner previously obtained a permit; however, the permit was vacated and the business was closed, and the business has subsequently reopened. Ken Swanson, Building Official, confirmed Mr. Vega obtained a building permit for this property; however, the construction project included additional work which extended beyond the scope of the initial permit; therefore another permit is required. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Vega stated she understands the process. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Long moved to refer BCV#1000027 against Abelardo Vega to the County Attorney for legal action, with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until May 13, 2010, to allow adequate time for the property owner to submit an application for a building permit. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and it carried unanimously. BCV#1000033-VEGA: Ms. Gregory presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, an application for a building permit must be submitted for the remodel of the commercial building, all the fees must be paid, and the inspections must be completed. She stated this building was intended to be utilized as a restaurant; however,the building permit expired and the restaurant was never opened. She stated remodeling of the building has reconvened without a building permit being obtained. Ms.Vega stated Mr.Vega will apply for the permit and pay the associated fees within 30 days. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Garcia moved to refer BCV#1000033 against Abelardo Vega to the County Attorney for legal action, with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until May 13, 2010, to allow adequate time for the property owner to submit an application for a building permit. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Long, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#0900357-ZAMORA: Ann Siron, Department of Planning Services, presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-150, 23-3-150.A, 23-3-150.B, and 23-3-150.C of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, the noncommercial junkyard consisting of automobile and tractor-trailer parts and debris must be removed from the property. Ms. Siron recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney for immediate legal action, since she has not been contacted by the property owner. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Siron confirmed after the notice of the hearing was posted on the property, there were not any phone calls received by staff acknowledging the notice; however, on April 12, 2010, she verified the notice had been removed from the door. In response to Chair Rademacher, Stephanie Arries, Assistant County Attorney, stated staff has provided adequate notice of the hearing to the property owner. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Siron stated it appears there are currently people residing on the property and she has observed vehicles being parked in different locations on the property at different site visits. Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 4 PL0824 Neither Eramida Zamora, nor a representative, were present. Commissioner Garcia moved to refer ZCV #0900357 against Eramida Zamora to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Long, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#0900365 -GARCIA: Ms. Siron presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file,this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, and 23-3-30.1 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, the noncommercial junkyard consisting of derelict vehicles, campers/trailers, automobile parts and other miscellaneous debris shall be removed, restored, or completely screened from all adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. Andrea Garcia, property owner, stated her husband is deceased and she has been ill. Ms. Garcia stated some clean-up of the property was completed last year; however, she has been ill since then, she has nobody to assist her, and she is on a fixed budget; therefore, she cannot afford to pay for assistance. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Garcia stated she has children; however, her children do not live in the area. Ms. Siron stated there are resources that will provide help for people in Ms. Garcia's situation, and she will provide the information to Ms. Garcia after the hearing. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Siron recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney, with the instruction to delay action for 90 days, in order to allow time to coordinate schedules. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Siron stated any vehicles which are not in running condition, or are not registered and licensed, need to be removed from the property, or the vehicles may be screened from all adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. Ms. Garcia stated all of the vehicles are in running condition; however,the batteries were stolen and she cannot afford to license and insure the vehicles; therefore, she will be removing the vehicles from the property. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Conway moved to refer ZCV#0900365 against Andrea Garcia to the County Attorney for legal action, with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until July 13, 2010, to allow adequate time for Ms. Garcia to coordinate the clean-up with available resources. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Long. Commissioner Garcia stated the Board does not typically grant this much time for a property owner to bring a property into compliance; however, he agrees with the proposed timeframe for this situation. There being no further discussion, the motion carried unanimously. ZCV #1000009 - CATENCAMP: Ms. Salzman presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, and 23-3-30.1 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, the noncommercial junkyard consisting of gutters, wood, tires, metal, and miscellaneous debris must be completely screened from all adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. She stated there are currently several types of unapproved screening on the property; however, one side of the noncommercial junkyard is appropriately screened. She recommended the case be referred to the County Attorney for immediate legal action, since the property owners have not contacted staff. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated the Code states the proposed fencing must be approved by staff, and the reason staff requires earth tones for the metal fencing is for reflection purposes, and neighbors have found other colors of metal fencing offensive in previous cases. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman confirmed the property is inhabited. Responding to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman confirmed she received confirmation of mail delivery of the notice on March 11, 2010. (Clerk's Note: Commissioner Kirkmeyer is now in attendance; it is 10:40 a.m.) Neither Lou Ann Catencamp, nor a representative, were in attendance. Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 5 PL0824 Commissioner Long moved to refer ZCV #1000009 against Lou Ann Catencamp to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#1000015-PRESCHER: Ms. Salzman presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, and 23-3-30.1 of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, the noncommercial junkyard consisting of derelict vehicles and miscellaneous debris must be completely screened from all adjacent properties and public rights-of-way, or the derelict vehicles shall be operational at all times and proof of the current registrations must be submitted. She stated this property has repeatedly been in violation of the Code;the property was initially in violation due to a noncommercial junkyard in the year 1996, at which time the matter was referred to the County Attorney, and the case was closed in the year 1997. She further stated in the year 2006 the property was in violation again due to a noncommercial junkyard and referred to the County Attorney;therefore, she recommends immediate referral to the County Attorney. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman stated there are two (2) derelict vehicles on the property, one (1) of the vehicles has a rear license plate; however, the tags expired in the year 2007, and the other vehicle does not have license plates. Further responding to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman stated the current owner is the same owner as when the previous violations occurred. Neither Kathy Prescher, nor a representative, were present. Commissioner Garcia moved to refer ZCV#1000015 against Kathy Prescher to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#1000005-CORONET INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC/ALTHEN: Ms. Salzman presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-2-150, 23-2-150.C, 23-2-150.L, 23-3-230, and 23-3-230.E of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, an application to modify the existing Site Plan Review(SPR) must be submitted, an application for a Use by Special Review (USR) must be submitted for an automobile salvage business/junkyard, or the derelict vehicles and miscellaneous debris must be removed. She stated there was a business on the property which was permitted through SPR#363; however, a new business has been added in the rear building on the property which appears to be an automobile salvage business/junkyard where vehicle parts are sold, and a USR is required for this type of business to be allowed on the property. She stated a representative for Coronet Investment Company has travelled from the State of Nevada to attend today's hearing, and a pre- application meeting will occur later today. Ms. Salzman recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney, with the instruction to delay action for 90 days, since the pre-application meeting will be conducted today, and taking into consideration that the representative resides out of the State. In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman stated this matter was brought to staffs attention as the result of a complaint. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman clarified the existing plan is a SPR, which will be vacated, and a USR permit will encompass the entire parcel. In response to Chair Rademacher, Kurt Althen, Coronet Investment Company, LLC, stated he is willing to follow the process. He stated the tenant had indicated he would resolve this matter; however, he has not heard from the tenant or received the rent. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated the pre-application meeting is scheduled for 1:00 p.m. this afternoon. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Althen stated he is the sole owner of Coronet Investment Company, LLC. In response to Commissioner Garcia, Ms. Salzman stated once the application for a USR is submitted, the case is placed on hold, pending the outcome of the application process. Chair Rademacher stated it may be premature to apply for a USR permit, since the tenant may not Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 6 PL0824 return and Mr.Althen may simply be removing the derelict vehicles and miscellaneous debris from the property. Ms. Salzman concurred and stated this is another reason she is requesting the 90 day delay; to allow Mr. Althen to evaluate his options. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Althen stated he has not put the property on the market; however, there is a surrounding property owner who has displayed an interest in purchasing the property. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. Commissioner Conway moved to refer ZCV#1000005 against Coronet Investment Company, LLC, and Kurt Althen to the County Attorney for legal action,with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until July 13, 2010,to allow adequate time for the property owner to submit an application for a USR permit, or remove the derelict vehicles and miscellaneous debris. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#0900371 -SCHWADER: Ms. Salzman presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, 23-3-40, 23-3-40.O, and 23-3-40.R of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance, an application for a USR permit must be submitted, or the commercial activity must cease. She stated a pre-application meeting was conducted on February 11, 2010, and she spoke with Kurt Schwader, property owner, yesterday, and he indicated he had hired Joe Ingalls after the pre-application meeting; however, he has not been able to speak to Mr. Ingalls since he hired him. She recommended the matter be referred to the County Attorney, with the instruction to delay action for 60 days, since it is unknown how far Mr. Ingalls has gotten with the USR application and 60 days is the typical timeframe allowed for the entire application process. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated when the pre-application meeting occurred, there was not a consultant present. Becki Schwader, property owner, stated she and her husband were referred to Mr. Ingalls, and they paid him a retainer, in the amount of $1,000.00, and Mr. Ingalls indicated it would cost another $1,000.00 to conduct the survey. Ms. Schwader stated she contacted Landmark Engineering to conduct the survey, and Landmark Engineering e-mailed the survey to Mr. Ingalls last Wednesday; therefore, she thought he would be in attendance today; however, he is not here. She stated Mr. Ingalls indicated he was going to request an extension from the Department of Planning Services and it would not be necessary for the property owners to attend the hearing today. She stated Landmark Engineering indicated it can facilitate the USR process; however, she does not know where Mr. Ingalls can be found and she has paid him $1,000.00. Commissioner Conway recommended that Ms. Schwader contact the District Attorney's Office regarding the matter with Mr. Ingalls. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman stated Mr. Ingalls has not contacted the office regarding the matter, and the Scwaders participated in the pre-application process without a consultant being present. Chair Rademacher provided the opportunity for public testimony; however, none was given. In response to Ms. Schwader, Tom Parko, Department of Planning Services, stated the standard USR permit application is typically $1,300.00. Ms. Schwader stated she was told the fee is now $2,500. Commissioner Kirkmeyer stated the fee may be $2,500.00 for a commercial business, since the $1,300.00 fee applies to residences, and there may be additional out-of-pocket costs if there are other types of engineering, screening, or landscaping required. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Parko confirmed the fee is due when the application is submitted. Ms. Salzman clarified the fee is $2,500.00, and it is due when the application is submitted. She stated there will be a change of use for the building;therefore, it is likely there will issues with the building; however, the additional associated costs and fees are unknown until the referral agencies respond regarding the agencies' requirements. In response to Chair Rademacher, Ms. Salzman confirmed the Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 7 PL0824 applicants must pay the application fee prior to being able to determine what the additional costs may be. Ms. Schwader stated there will not be a drainage report necessary, which will lessen the costs. Chair Rademacher stated staff will address any additional costs when it is able to and the Schwaders will not be assessed any costs which are not necessary. Commissioner Garcia moved to refer ZCV #0900371 against Kurt and Becki Schwader to the County Attorney for legal action,with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until June 13 , 2010,to allow adequate time for the property owners to submit an application for a USR permit. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, and it carried unanimously. ZCV#0900342-THOMAS: Ms. Salzman presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of Sections 23-3-20, 23-3-30, 23-3-40, 23-3-40.O, and 23-3-40.R of the Weld County Code. To bring the property into compliance,a Notice of Inquiry must be completed by the City of Longmont, an application to modify the Regional Urbanization Area (RUA) must be submitted, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application must be submitted, or the business must be closed and all the commercial vehicles and materials removed. She stated she spoke to Doyle Thomas, property owner, and he indicated it is his intention to move the business to another location; therefore, she recommends the matter be referred to the County Attorney, with the instruction to delay action for 60 days, to allow the business adequate time to be moved to an appropriately zoned location. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms. Salzman stated the property is within the Mixed Use Development (MUD) area and it is zoned residential; however, she needs to defer to a planner to explain any further details. Mr. Thomas stated he purchased the business from his father-in-law and relocated it to his father's property, it has been at its current location for some time, and it was recently brought to his attention the property is not zoned properly. He stated his property is under contract; therefore, he is waiting for the sale to be completed, in order to purchase another property. In response to Commissioner Conway, Mr. Thomas stated the property has been under contract for two(2)years. In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Thomas stated he is in the process of verifying the zoning for the new potential location of the business. Commissioner Kirkmeyer stated the case file indicates the MUD area is zoned A (Agricultural). Ms. Salzman confirmed it is zoned A (Agricultural) within the MUD; however, according to Section 23-3-340.R of the Weld County Code, Mr. Thomas must follow the PUD process. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms. Salzman confirmed when the MUD map was amended, a MUD area with A (Agricultural) zoning remained. Mr. Parko clarified the property is located within the 1-25 RUA area, previously known as the MUD area, and any property owners within the RUA must follow the amendment process. He stated there are a variety of land uses in the RUA, including commercial and agricultural and this particular property would typically be zoned PUD within the RUA. Chair Rademacher inquired as to whether the property owners would be in compliance if they applied for a Change of Zone (COZ). Mr. Parko stated staff would have to evaluate the COZ application and determine if the use is a Use by Right. Chair Rademacher suggested this matter be referred back to the Department of Planning Services staff to resolve. Commissioner Kirkmeyer concurred and stated the matter needs to be further discussed. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to refer ZCV#0900342 against Jesse and Doyle Thomas back to the Department of Planning Services. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously. Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 8 PL0824 This Certification was approved on the 19th day of April, 2010. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD e . OLORADO ATTEST: ,` . 11.3 ���, �:, 41% gl Rade p acher ' hair Weld County Clerk to the Boa L i86i i v A.1 ' i ara Kirkmeyer, •ro-Tem BY: L.L�� . •�_`J,�fa'�ls�: � /) �- Dept Clerk Jhe -o rd 'i f "; '-S� (/ Sean P. Y ., APP FORM: m . Garc n y Attorney C Ce David E. Long CD #2010-04 Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations April 13, 2010 2010-0727 Page 9 PL0824 co th fra le � � Z \ f o « cm cii \ \ \ c N as \ 2 2 \ � \ u \ w N %w t_ \� co � ? _ \ z / { . z < . J.: WZ 0 \ j • \ \ % \ \ « n co 2N. @ ) \ C \ N E $ 7 § / \ \ ce cc o 3 � ‘ / - \ z 1— (/) \ \ , } ‘ � C - . ; \ k 2 , 4',. . , -J J / Q2 Hello