Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100680.tiff (lit a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Greeley Planning Office liD 918 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us E-MAIL: kogle@co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3549 FAX (970) 304-6498 COLORADO June 29, 2009 Scott and Loren Cockroft Cockroft Dairy Farms, LLLP 27906 County Road 388 Kersey, CO 80644-9608 Subject: Use by Special Review# 1327 Dear Messrs. Cockroft: The Department of Planning Services is contacting you regarding the approval of USR#1327 through action of the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on August 1, 2001. This land use permit was conditionally approved pending action by either Cockroft Dairy Farms, LLLP or your representative, AgPRO of Longmont, Colorado. Review of the case file finds sporadic activity after the August 1, 2001 public hearing. From the case file correspondence, one item appears to be outstanding. Electronic mail correspondence dated September 28, 2007 indicates plat was to be updated and evidence of Environmental Health approval was to be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. This action has not occurred. This office finds no other activity on this case. It is important to state that Section 23-2-200.E provides timelines for completing the requirements associated with this case. For reference, the citation is as follows: "If the Use by Special Review has not commenced within three (3)years from the date of approval or is discontinued for a period of three (3) consecutive years, it shall be presumed inactive. The COUNTY shall initiate an administrative hearing to consider whether to grant an extension of time to commence the use or revoke the Use by Special Review. If the Use by Special Review is revoked, it shall be necessary to follow the procedures and requirements of this Section in order to reestablish any Use by Special Review." eer/r it uiGGL 2010 0680 - o70/1" AZ /573 At the Commissioners hearing, representatives for Lucerne Commons requested 90 days to record the USR#1327 plat. The date for providing the required documents and submitting the Improvement Agreement, Collateral and recording the plat has passed. The Department of Planning Services is aware of the difficulty and associated delays in meeting the Conditions of Approval normally associated with land use cases; and this office is willing to work with you.At this juncture,this office is requesting a letter from you indicating that the project has not been abandoned and that it is the intention of Cockroft Dairy Farms, LLLP to complete this project, addressing and meeting all of the conditions of approval in a timely manner. Should a written response on letterhead not be received by July 15, 2009,this office will take the appropriate action. Should you have additional questions or require clarification on any of the points presented, please contact this office. Thank you. (Since ly, ./.1;1,71/ Kim Kim Planning Services Enclosures pc: S.Arries,Attorney's Office T.Honn,Director A.Siron,Compliance File: USR-1327 Page 1 of 1 Chris Gathman From: Dusty McCormick[dmccormick@agpros.com] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 8:51 AM To: Trevor Jiricek; Pam Smith; Donald Carroll; Chris Gathman Cc: Olivia Rickert S ject: USR 1327 t� Weld Dept. Reps; I believe that we are finally nearing the end of the Cockroft Dairy USR 1327 Process. The septic system for the parlor is finally under construction. According to the last notes in our file, this was the last outstanding condition, prior to recording the plat. Now that the proposed improvements have been built, we will update the plat to reflect the actually buildings and layouts as they exist today. Hopefully the revised plat will be submitted next week for its review and corrections. Is there anything else outstanding that we need to provide to your department, to be able to record this plat? Cordially, Dusty McCormick Planning and Building Coordinator AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Hwy. 66 Longmont, CO 80504 Office-970-535-9318 Ext.-109 Fax-970-535-9854 Cell-303-877-7747 09/28/2007 Sheri Lockman From: Tom Haren [tharen@agpros.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:19 AM To: Trevor Jiricek; 'Lauren Light'; Sheri Lockman Cc: 'Derek Godsey'; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings Trevor, That's fine. I'd like to wait also so we don't do things twice. We're probably talking about 4 to 6 sites. As long as the County can wait, we will too. Except we may need to resolve situations where the operator may be held up on a building / septic permit or something. Lauren / Derek - do we have anybody in that situation? Thanks. Original Message From: Trevor Jiricek [mailto:tjiricek@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10 :41 AM To: Tom Haren; Lauren Light; Sheri Lockman Cc: Derek Godsey; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings Tom, I think each situation is unique. It would be my preference for us to have a bit more patience and let the state get their process worked out. I don't believe that the County would be interested in pursuing these few facilities as violations knowing that they are waiting on the state to get some kinks worked out. How many facilities are we talking about? Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Tom Haren [mailto:tharen@agpros.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4 :43 PM To: Trevor Jiricek; 'Lauren Light' ; Sheri Lockman Cc: 'Derek Godsey' ; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings Trevor, I 'm just getting copied and in on the discussion. I don't know if they are dying to get their plats recorded. But planning and Bethany go through those and let us know ones that are out there a ways. Could we modify the conditions from "obtain a permit" to "submit an application" . Then the applicants have fulfilled their obligations and then the responsibility lies with the State from that point on. Just a thought. Original Message From: Trevor Jiricek [mailto:tjiricek@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2 :31 PM To: Lauren Light; Sheri Lockman Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings I just spoke with Ron Jepson who thought they may be able to begin issuing 1 permits in the early summer - apparently all dependent upon EPA evaluation of the draft NMP template. I'll discuss with Lee M. In the mean time can you get me a list of facilities that are being affected by this. Just off the top of my head I think each of these facilities has unique circumstances. For example, Cockroft doesn't have an option to not get a permit because of their past discharges . Are folks dying to get their plats recorded? Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Lauren Light [mailto:llight@agpros.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2 :11 PM To: Sheri Lockman; Trevor Jiricek Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren Subject: plat recordings I hear there are some issues with some Livestock USR plats not being recorded yet, like Cockroft. The reason the dairies can't record is that the health department put a condition to obtain a CAFO permit from the state. The state has changed their CAFO application and the final CAFO application has not yet been approved. Consequently no CAFO permits have been approved since the application change. When these conditions were given to the USR' s, CAFO permits were required by the state. A new ruling came out that CAFO's permits are no longer required. The state is now giving each facility the choice if they want to obtain their permit or not. So the applicants are stuck. Can Health Dept. remove the condition for all the USR' s that are affected by the CAFO condition? Does the County need to get Lee Morrison involved? Should the Health Dept. go to the Board to explain the new ruling and the need to remove the conditions from livestock plats so they can get recorded? What does Planning and the Health Department want applicants to do? Maybe staff can talk about this tomorrow at your staff meeting. Anyway let me know what you decide. For specific questions about CAFO's talk to Derek Godsey in our office as he handles all the livestock issues. Thanks you guys ' ' I ' I Derek Godsey and Lauren Light AG and LANDPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80504 970-535-9318 303-485-7838 (metro) 303-870-0013 (cell) 970-535-9854 (fax) llight@agpros.com 2 Sheri Lockman From: Trevor Jiricek Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:41 AM To: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: plat recordings I 'm with you. . . Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Sheri Lockman Sent : Thursday, January 12, 2006 4 :02 PM To: Trevor Jiricek Subject: RE: plat recordings As far as I can tell they have completed 3 conditions, Dust Abatement Plan, Fly Control Plan and Odor Control Plan. Most of the other conditions are from the Health Department and I haven't been given any evidence that they have complied. It may take them until summer to complete the other conditions as well. Have they even submitted a cafo permit? I would rather wait for the State to review their permit so that if we have to go back to the BOCC we can easily recommend denial. Original Message From: Trevor Jiricek Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3 :36 PM To: Sheri Lockman Cc: Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings Are there more conditions that need to be addressed or just the cafo-related conditions? I spoke with Lee this p.m. and he suggested that we probably should agree not to enforce on those CAFO related conditions until the state has the ability to issue permits (probably happen this summer?) . There is no reason that they shouldn't be addressing non- cafo conditions - is there? Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Sheri Lockman Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3 :23 PM To: Trevor Jiricek Subject: RE: plat recordings In the case of Crockroft, our department has been waiting for years for them to finish. We finally said finish or we are going to take you back to the BOCC for revocation. If we need to wait a few months we can. But we want to see that they are at least trying to complete these conditions . 1 Original Message From: Trevor Jiricek Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2 :31 PM To: Lauren Light; Sheri Lockman Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Eaten; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings I just spoke with Ron Jepson who thought they may be able to begin issuing permits in the early summer - apparently all dependent upon EPA evaluation of the draft NMP template. I ' ll discuss with Lee M. In the mean time can you get me a list of facilities that are being affected by this. Just off the top of my head I think each of these facilities has unique circumstances. For example, Cockroft doesn't have an option to not get a permit because of their past discharges. Are folks dying to get their plats recorded? Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Lauren Light [mailto:llight@agpros .com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2 :11 PM To: Sheri Lockman; Trevor Jiricek Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren Subject: plat recordings I hear there are some issues with some Livestock USR plats not being recorded yet, like Cockroft. The reason the dairies can't record is that the health department put a condition to obtain a CAFO permit from the state. The state has changed their CAFO application and the final CAFO application has not yet been approved. Consequently no CAFO permits have been approved since the application change. When these conditions were given to the USR' s, CAFO permits were required by the state. A new ruling came out that CAFO' s permits are no longer required. The state is now giving each facility the choice if they want to obtain their permit or not. So the applicants are stuck. Can Health Dept. remove the condition for all the USR' s that are affected by the CAFO condition? Does the County need to get Lee Morrison involved? Should the Health Dept. go to the Board to explain the new ruling and the need to remove the conditions from livestock plats so they can get recorded? What does Planning and the Health Department want applicants to do? Maybe staff can talk about this tomorrow at your staff meeting. Anyway let me know what you decide. For specific questions about CAFO' s talk to Derek Godsey in our office as he handles all the livestock issues . Thanks you guysi ' iii Derek Godsey and Lauren Light AG and LANDPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80504 970-535-9318 303-485-7838 (metro) 303-870-0013 (cell) 970-535-9854 (fax) llight@agpros.com 2 Sheri Lockman From: Trevor Jiricek Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:31 PM To: Lauren Light; Sheri Lockman Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren; Troy Swain; Lee Morrison Subject: RE: plat recordings I just spoke with Ron Jepson who thought they may be able to begin issuing permits in the early summer - apparently all dependent upon EPA evaluation of the draft NMP template. I ' ll discuss with Lee M. In the mean time can you get me a list of facilities that are being affected by this. Just off the top of my head I think each of these facilities has unique circumstances. For example, Cockroft doesn't have an option to not get a permit because of their past discharges. Are folks dying to get their plats recorded? Trevor Jiricek, M.A. Director, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-304-6415, ext. 2214 (office) 970-304-6411 (fax) Original Message From: Lauren Light [mailto:llight@agpros.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2 :11 PM To: Sheri Lockman; Trevor Jiricek Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren Subject: plat recordings I hear there are some issues with some Livestock USR plats not being recorded yet, like Cockroft. The reason the dairies can't record is that the health department put a condition to obtain a CAFO permit from the state. The state has changed their CAFO application and the final CAFO application has not yet been approved. Consequently no CAFO permits have been approved since the application change. When these conditions were given to the USA' s, CAFO permits were required by the state. A new ruling came out that CAFO' s permits are no longer required. The state is now giving each facility the choice if they want to obtain their permit or not. So the applicants are stuck. Can Health Dept. remove the condition for all the USR' s that are affected by the CAFO condition? Does the County need to get Lee Morrison involved? Should the Health Dept. go to the Board to explain the new ruling and the need to remove the conditions from livestock plats so they can get recorded? What does Planning and the Health Department want applicants to do? Maybe staff can talk about this tomorrow at your staff meeting. Anyway let me know what you decide. For specific questions about CAFO' s talk to Derek Godsey in our office as he handles all the livestock issues. Thanks you guys I I I l Derek Godsey and Lauren Light AG and LANDPROfessionals, LLC )47-/ CC 4350 Hwy 66 .__. Longmont, CO 80504 970-535-9318 �j4 2 303-485-7838 (metro) 303-870-0013 (cell) 970-535-9854 (fax) llight@agpros.com 1 Sheri Lockman From: Lauren Light [flight@agpros,com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:11 PM To: Sheri Lockman; Trevor Jiricek Cc: Derek Godsey; Thomas Haren Subject: plat recordings Z hear there are some issues with some Livestock USR plats not being recorded yet, like Cockroft. The reason the dairies can't record is that the health department put a condition to obtain a CAFO permit from the state. The state has changed their CAFO application and the final CAFO application has not yet been approved. Consequently no CAFO permits have been approved since the application change. When these conditions were given to the USR's, CAFO permits were required by the state. A new ruling came out that CAFO's permits are no longer required. The state is now giving each facility the choice if they want to obtain their permit or not. So the applicants are stuck. Can Health Dept. remove the condition for all the USR' s that are affected by the CAFO condition? Does the County need to get Lee Morrison involved? Should the Health Dept. go to the Board to explain the new ruling and the need to remove the conditions from livestock plats so they can get recorded? What does Planning and the Health Department want applicants to do? Maybe staff can talk about this tomorrow at your staff meeting. Anyway let me know what you decide. For specific questions about CAFO' s talk to Derek Godsey in our office as he handles all the livestock issues. Thanks you guysitill Derek Godsey and Lauren Light AG and LANDPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80504 970-535-9318 303-485-7838 (metro) 303-870-0013 (cell) 970-535-9854 (fax) llight@agpros.com 1 Pie Charts Page 1 of 1 Sheri Lockman From: Bethany Salzman • Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:09 AM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy "V1-0000309** Lee changed his mind and now has determined that the road does not negate contiguity. Therefore, as long as the Cockroft Dairy does not (or will not)exceed 1,023 cattle at any given time, it is considered to be a Use by Right in the Agricultural Zone District. So, USR-1327 can be withdrawn. From: Sharyn Frazer [mailto:sfrazer©agpros.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:05 AM To: Bethany Salzman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** Do I want to withdraw the 1. SR or record the plat? I'm confused. Original Message----- From: Bethany Salzman [mailto:bsalzman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:37 PM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** Please be advised that earlier today Lee changed his opinion regarding this issue. Therefore, this Violation has been closed. In order to avoid Sheri having to proceed with a Probable Cause to revoke USR-1327 (due to the plat not being recorded), please submit a short e-mail officially withdrawing USR-1327. Thanks Zoning Compliance Officer II 918 10th St Greeley, CO 80631 (970)353-6100 Ext. 3555 (office) (970)304-6498 (fax) bsalzmon@co.weid.co,us 1 711 t/9nnS Pie Charts Page 1 of 2 Sheri Lockman From: Bethany Salzman [bsalzman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 1:40 PM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy**VI-0000309" Sounds Fantastic.... I am off between Christmas and New Years as well. Sheri will be the one to review the plats. ThanksIIII I From: Sharyn Frazer [mailto:sfrazer@agpros.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 1:39 PM To: Bethany Salzman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** It will have to be right after the holidays. I will have my CAD drafter put on the Development Standards,signature blocks,etc., I'm going on Christmas vacation next Tuesday for a week. I will get the draft plats in right after the I st for review by the Planner and then we can t'enerate the mylars. Original Message • From: Bethany Salzman [mailto:bsalzman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 1:33 PM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** Oh... That's fine then. I thought something was holding you all up from recording. If you already have everything done, you might as well go ahead and record it. How soon are you planning on being able to bring it in??? From: Sharyn Frazer [mailto:sfrazer@agpros.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:14 AM To: Bethany Salzman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** But the approved l 1SR-1 327 is for 1,350 head. I think we just need to record the plat. All of the conditions of approval have been met(all WC Pl1&E) septic requirements have been approved by Pam. We dropped the ball and never submitted the plat for recording. Original Message From: Bethany Salzman [mailto:bsalzman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:09 AM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy **VI-0000309** Lee changed his mind and now has determined that the road does not negate contiguity. Therefore, as long as the Cockroft Dairy does not (or will not) exceed 1,023 cattle at any given time, it is considered to be a Use by Right in the Agricultural Zone District. So, USR-1327 can be withdrawn. 17/16/2006 Pie Charts Page 2 of 2 From: Sharyn Frazer [mailto:sfrazer@agpros.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:05 AM To: Bethany Salzman Subject: RE: Cockroft Dairy * VI-0000309** Do want 10 withdraw the IiSR or record the plat? I'm confused. Original Message From: Bethany Salzman [mailto:bsalzman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:37 PM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: Cockroft Dairy "VI-0000309*" Please be advised that earlier today Lee changed his opinion regarding this issue. Therefore, this Violation has been closed. In order to avoid Sheri having to proceed with a Probable Cause to revoke USR-1327 (due to the plat not being recorded), please submit a short e-mail officially withdrawing USR-1327. Thanks gatm(4444, 501.40•4,1' Zoning Compliance Officer LI 918 10th St Greeley, CO 80631 (970)353-6100 Ext. 3555 (office) (970)304-6498 (fax) bsalzmon@co.weld.co.us 17/16/7005 Pie Charts Page 1 of 1 Sheri Lockman From: Bethany Salzman Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:37 PM To: Sharyn Frazer Cc: Sheri Lockman Subject: Cockroft Dairy**VI-0000309** Attachments: 0000309.doc Please be advised that earlier today Lee changed his opinion regarding this issue. Therefore, this Violation has been closed. In order to avoid Sheri having to proceed with a Probable Cause to revoke USR-1327 (due to the plat not being recorded), please submit a short e-mail officially withdrawing USR-1327. Thanks g ►. Zoning Compliance Officer II 918 10th St Greeley, CO 80631 (970)353-6100 Ext. 3555 (office) (970)304-6498 (fax) bsalzman@co.weld.co.us 1'7/1 F/-fH1S a DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 1555 17TH AVE GREELEY, CO 80631631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us ID ADMINISTRATION (970) 304-6410 III FAX (970) 304-6412 O PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATION AND NURSING (970) 304-6420 FAX (970) 304-6416 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (970) 304-6415 COLORADO FAX (970) 304-6411 Weld County Planning Department June 5, 2002 GREELEY OFFICE JUN 6 2002 Sharyn Frazer AgPro Environmental Services, LLC RECEIVED 4311 Colorado Highway 66, Suite 4 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Subject: Cockroft Dairy, USR#1327, Fly, Odor and Dust Control Plans Dear Ms. Frazer The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment (WCDPHE) has reviewed the Dust Abatement, Fly Control, and Odor Control Plans for the Cockroft Dairy. The Plans are found within a document entitled "Management Plan for Nuisance Control", dated March 2001. They were submitted to fulfill conditions of approval 2(D), 2(E), and 2(F) of Use by Special Review permit#1327. The WCDPHE has found all three (3) Plans to be adequate as submitted. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (970) 304-6415, extension 2214. Sincerely, LAY rTh Trevor Jiri , MAES Director Environmental Health Services O:\CAFO\Cockroft Dairy\approval nuisance control plan.wpd cc: Sheri Lockman, Weld County Planning Department Scott Cockroft, Cockroft Dairy Lee Morrison, Weld County Attorney Office (via email) Kit riti;t3s. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us ADMINISTRATION: (970) 304-6410 C. FAX: (970) 304-6412 PUBLIC FAX: (970) 304-6416 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: (970) 304-6415 COLORADO FAX: (970) 304-6411 May 30, 2002 Eric Dunker AgPro Environmental,LLC 4311 Hwy 66, Suite 4 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Subject: USR #1327, Cockroft Dairy Farm, Comprehensive Manure and Wastewater Management Plan Dear Mr. Dunker: The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has reviewed your letter dated April 25, 2002 and the attached replacement pages for the Cockroft Dairy Farms Comprehensive Manure and Wastewater Management Plan (the Plan). The letter and attachments were submitted in response to our request for supplemental information concerning the Plan. The Plan was submitted in accordance with Condition of Approval #2.B. of USR#1327. Based on the information provided in the Plan and the supplemental information, the WCDPHE approves the Plan. The approved Plan is dated April 24,2002. We encourage you to submit the revised Plan to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment in order to assure that they have the most recent version of the Plan. Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at (970) 304-6415, extension 2214. Sincerely, ,"\.- (I Trevor Jiricek Director Environmental Health Services cc: Ron Jepson, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (via email) Sheri Lockman, Weld County Planning Department(via email) Scott Cockroft, Cockroft Dairy Farm SHERI Lockman - COCKROFT MWWMP APPROVAL Page ' From: TREVOR Jiricek To: Dunker, Eric Date: 5/30/02 12:05PM Subject: COCKROFT MWWMP APPROVAL Eric- Attached is the approval for the MWWMP for Cockroft. I searched thru the file and did not find the dust, odor, or fly plans. Doesn't appear that they were submitted? I looked thru the original ap and the previous MWWMP's and could not find them. Also, Condition of Approval 2.1. requires the facility to apply for a discharge permit from the State. Has this been submitted. It needs to be done prior to recording the plat. Call me with any questions, etc. Thanks. Trevor Jiricek Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment tjiricek@co.weld.co.us 970-304-6415 Extension 2214 970-304-6411 (fax) CC: Lockman, SHERI 4311 Highway 66, Suite 4 Longmont, CO 80504 Office(970) 535-9318 Fax: (970) 535-9854 Weld County Planning Dept . July 31, 2001 �� D 2001 ECE, Ms. Sherri Lockman VED Planning Dept. Weld Co. Admin. Offices 1555 North 17th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Cockroft Dairy Plan Changes Dear Ms. Lockman, This letter is to address issues presented during the public testimony, comments after, and meetings since the planning and zoning hearing on June 19, 2001 regarding the location and orientation of the proposed ponds located north of the Cockroft dairy and north of WCR 388. I have had several subsequent conversations with Mr. Stow Witwer. Mr Witwer assisted us in organizing a meeting between another adjoining landowner, Mr. Jack Holman and Scott Cockroft on the morning of July 31, 2001. The result of the meeting was a compromise on the location of the storage ponds. A new map outlining the revised pond location is attached. We do not believe this is a substantial or significant change to the application. We appreciate the cooperation of the neighbors and the county to resolve this issue. Sincer 1 omas Haren Environmental Consultant Pc: Scott Cockroft, Cockroft Dairy Stow Witwer, Witwer, Oldenburg, Barry&Beddingfield, LLP Jack Holman Trevor Jiricek, Environmental Health Services, Weld County Esther Gesick, Weld County Clerk to the Board ORIGINAL POND LOCATION BOUNDARY SeUlino Pond Top-ol-Berm: 60'x 100' Total Depth: 6'Liquid Depth: 4• Inside Slope: 4:1 Capacity: 0.18 A.T. ,Win Pond Top-ol-BernL• I00'r 400• Total Depth: 8'Liquid Depth: 6' Inside Slope: 4:1 Capacity: J.0 Al, ga 0 The applicant shall submit evidence of an adequate water supply for all dairy needs to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. Should the water supply be inadequate for the proposed 1,350 head of cattle and associated dairy needs, the maximum number of cattle shall be lowered in accordance with the water supply. Hello