The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About780228.tiff ORIGINAL FILE AT MISSILE SITE . ARCHIVE BOX MISSING AS OF 12/ 19/2017 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OIL RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL SITE FOR STAN RECH, FORT LUPTON, COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado held a public hearing on the 12th day of April , 1978 at the hour of 2: 00 o 'clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners for the purpose of hearing the application of Stan Rech, 15267 Weld County Road 18, Fort Lupton, Colorado for a Special Use Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site on the property described below: That part of the West one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Ivbridian, Weld County, Colorado, described as: Beginning at the Northeast corner said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence S00°04'13" W on an assured bearing along the East line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 792.00 feet; thence S89°49'25"W parallel with the North line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter a distance of 330.00 feet; thence N00°04'13" E a distance of 792.00 feet to a point on the North line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence N89°49'25"E along said North line a distance of 330.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 6.00 acres more or less. WHEREAS, the petitioner was present, and WHEREAS, evidence was presented by the petitioner and other witnesses in support of the grant of this Special Use Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site on the above described property owned by the petitioner, and WHEREAS, Section 3. 3 (E) of the Weld County Zoning Resolution authorizes such a use in an Agricultural District and upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado heard all the testimony and statements of those present, including testitmony by a respresentative of the Weld County Health Department, has studied the request of the petitioners, the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the /9/ 6 )/fix ..l 780228 �.r Exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and having been fully informed and satisfied that the request for a Special Use Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site on the above described pro- perty will conform to the standards and purposes of Section 3. 3 (E) of the Weld County Zoning Resolution upon compliance with the con- ditions imposed below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the applicaton of the petitioner for a Special Use Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site on the above described tract of land, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the development standards contained in the Special Use Permit and also subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Nearby water wells will be sampled for water quality at six (6) month intervals to determine if any degradation of water quality is ocurring from the permitted operation. 2. This Special Use Permit shall be subject to revocation upon adverse findings from the water quality tests conducted by the Weld County Health Department required above. 3 . The Special Use Permit Plat may not be recorded until proof of access from County Road 31 across property owned by Adolph Anderson is submitted by the applicant. 4 . Conditions 1 and 2 shall be development standards shown on the Special Use Permit Plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that it expressly overrules the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Commission for denial of this Special Use Permit on the grounds that the permitted operation will be an improvement over the current disposal methods used by the oil industry in the area and that a test of such a method is necessary and will be in the best interest of the County. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of April, A.D. , 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ({,n ,. 7Zt41n t;ti WELD COU Y, COLORADO ` Weld County lerk and Recorder u- �- e- ancy-Clerk to the Board - ' il beputy Count Clerk L n- -�APP VED AS TO FORM: _ �-�-�" o-- - C ICJ County Attorney Date Presented: May 22 , 1978 Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Land Use Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioner's of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Loth .Street, Greeley. Colorado, at the time ,specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Special He I'ermil are regnestol to attend and may he heard . BF IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning, Commission may be examined in the Office of the Clerk to -the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, 'Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 78-71 Stan Rech Box 303 Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80620 Date: November 29, 1978 Time: 2 : 09 P.M. Request: Amendment to Special Use Permit -#345, Oil Ti21d Disposal Site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the West one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section .22, Township 2, North, -Range -66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, 'describe- as : -Beginning at the Northeast Corner said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence S00°04' 13"W on an assumed bearing along the East -Line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter, -a distance of 792. 00 feet; thence 589°49 ' 25"W parallel with the North Line s-aid West one- half Southwest one-quarter a distance of 330. 00 feet; thence ND0m04' 13"E a distance o₹ 7-92. 00 feet to a point on the North Line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence N89°4: '25"E along said North line a distance of 330. 00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 6 . 00 Acres, more or less . THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN -WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy DATED: October 23 , 1978 PUBLISHED: October 26 , 1978 and November 16, 1978 in the Johnstown freeze �N ` r/ cc: resolution granting SUP RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c' (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE Stan Rech STREET AND NO. 1527 Weld Co. Rd. 18 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Ft. Luton, Co. 80621 5/22/78 (.t OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 'St RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 („(`r. 2. Shows to whom,date and where deli 850 ' SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 864 _ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 600 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required Z PS Form 3000 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other rick) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ncvo:isvao-ssl-ass 8 a v v % 'n u ,. mn Z to it e g3C 9 vy 9 •• d_ ! 1 s 1 to < o ^iwr i 3 >•. : s x a 4 e �9fel n9 c o s ig 3 is Al .89 02QC1 a v ° w1/40 $I 1 tn n1 [ IIL.I .J ire 4 P8 Form 6811,Nov.1978 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED. INSURED AND CERTIFIED NAIL April 12, 1978 I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated March 6, 1978, duly published March 9, 1978 and March 30, 1978 in the Port Lupton Press, a public hearing was held on the request of Stan Rech far a Special Ilse _Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site. This SUP had been recommended unfavorably to the Board of Commissioners by the Weld County Planning Commission. Mr. and Mrs. Rech were present to make their application. Testimony was also received from the audience and from John Hall of the Weld County Health Department. There was no one in the audience opposed to the granting of the SUP. After discussion, Commissioner Jacobucci made a motion to approve the SUP subject to the site being monitored by the Weld County Health Department on a six month basis according to standards drawn up by said Department and agreeable to Mr. Rech. Commissioner Roe seconded the motion. Upon recommendation of the County Attorney, and without objection by the other Commissioners, Commissioner Jacobucci included in his motion that the SUP be subject to revocation upon the finding by the Health Department of adverse conditions. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Staff, read the development standards into the record and requested that they be included in the-motion. It was agreed to do so. Discussion then centered around access to the site. -The Planning Staff asked that the Commissioners also include in the motion that the SUP Plat is not to be recorded until Mr. Rech files with the Planning Office evidence of an easement to said site having been recorded. This was also added to the motion and further it was noted that all of the above conditions would be listed as development standards -on the SUP plat. The vote was taken and the motion, with amendments, was approved unanimously. According to the Weld County Charter, each Commissioner proceeded to Explain why he did not abide by the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. All five -commissioners were in attendance for the hearing. Chairman Board of County Commissioners 1. }Meld.Chunty, Colorado Attest: /�f7}ua4�Afl „ _]U► Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the -Board y. n i ) Docket #72-15 By: ' "' n-2,12 Tape #78-36 & 37 ,, C 1 �: ; AN) I. .1c::� rir. : STAN RECH a ; Il:lf.r�' 78-15 APRIL 15, 1978 !"''Irrt' ; SUP, Oil Recycling & Disposal NAME (1-4 • • 1 • r • • • • • I _ NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Land Use Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Special Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Dffice of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th _Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. -Docket No. 78-15 Stan Rech 15267 Weld Co. Rd. 18 B't. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Date: April 12, 1978 Time: 2:S0 P.M. • Request: Special Use Permit, Oil Recycling and Disposal Site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the West one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, described as: Beginning at the Northeast corner said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence SOO°04'13"W on an assumed bearing along the East line said West one- half Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 792.00 feet; thence S89°49'25"W parallel with the North line said West one-half -Southwest one-quarter a distance of 330.00 feet; thence NOO°04'13"E a distance of 792.00 feet to a point on the North line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence N89°49'25"E along said North line a distance of 330.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 6.00 acres more or less. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND rTFRK TO THE BOARD BY: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy DATED: March 6, 1978 PUBLISHED: March 9, 197-8 and March 30, 1978 in the Fort Lupton Press `- a w k. e a ra �a k '--.w�w+ , ar w „RR Y k4 S Hwy. 4. J�ll + - id 4, ' .Lip,0o ° + r, @ 1078T.A` '' �sr ,ter. m a� u I.DESCRIPTI,DN: :., wool pp80O�01l�04a"-; Wsuto �ax ilia ,,t, c « +:. .92.Nor h 11 wal , Bo l§,y,, �p M , :line R ' ;,.° ... ro WELD BY:MANTA y 1 IN. IM1 r AND CLERK +t � BY:Rita JgKummer JHputy DATED:.MA(O I,ta8r78 tan": dd ".rchv 100, x/677? Cc-CJ NoT I :E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Land Use Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. A] 1 persons in any manner interested in the Special Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 78-15 Stan Rech 15267 Weld Co. Rd. 18 Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Date: April 12, 1978 Time: 2:00 P.M. • Request: Special Use Permit, Oil Recycling and Disposal Site ?,FOAL DESCRIPTION: 'That part of the West one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, described as: Beginning at the Northeast corner said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence S00°04'13"W on an assumed bearing along the East line said West one- half Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 792.00 feet; thence S89°49'25"W _parallel with the North line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter a distance of 330.00 feet; thence N00°04'13"E a distance of 792.00 feet to a point on the North line said West one-half Southwest one-quarter; thence N89°49'25"E along said North line a distance of 330.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 6.00 acres more or less. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSI'LIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy DAPL'D: March 6, 1978 PUBLISHED: March 9, 1978 and March 30, 1978 in the Fort Lupton Press WO Da I � k . Ma ` +ate xa edP'At thls, e. t at. be re- 0� l Docket ro, 7Vl-16.•, to.r16rad*:db 'P.M. k piu1~d o mulakt.DflCR4,PTIOt1: xi 041W erg letY` .;+w .,+ 1 .i t - a sited - .4e of r '+Cv°3MF 1P 1^ yy T -.MBE f ' 'y. 2 Ask YtY. lltaJo nier,Deputy DAYS:MINIl 8,'taid° PWllehed in tna Port Lupton pMarche 1triB ion: ptarch 30, Zell m-aanco ea, om mo � ,yZtoaomcosypr. c - cE ° m c o••ecoogeobo so c �rtI _ II vq -tS 0p b zoo g4« Bc 3Sit a ii«e•m .z �¢ '- , -$ $ jIa 35 88 bu RSo E 'i Elk 2— °gel it 3 y ct -2o X34 p �p�E o`O ¢ #t :c� Q -•+ i '� dr2qq Tot ce l-0+ �a i ~ ` x �ni—y e - AveI is '� .r � . .. x 1 t-¢f$ < ` Sao r� sg� w? p m w m n�Ei'n;a w ti-iq`�` "Zoo 'd> .moo "'`o ism-$ 3 y < N bibg6WO1 007C 0. 8tin 3m..=omzn°.z$z-`.m o aEYi.- c ° ° E ° tea A •"a 'E " N w° F, � a ° « o `5 a 3 Ca m )a ° Fa Rts 04 g Sal °O • ° b Z cl,, b ▪ E▪ C 5 w u. 4-I y y w y °°, rp >' F W, .5 A a a ° t a., ° m m ti a ° ° > G a, a r- "N\ a v a U �''ti.11 W d « ai m v « ° `"' C N � a :� ti Cdr L ry �\� \ ro 'd• 05 05 .} 7 0 C , L ,2 yr a F w s '.y a, 8 ° 3 u 'n ,E t 7 a c - ) 0 ,0 --- 0 0 v w '° Z o r n c°, t v ° ,° a « u et c ,QA 0 « r/,' .. E \ z Al) 3 { oc.i ° L C O 9 1�`y- M , ti • 3 E O . y, ro ° uy % a g m 0 -.� a. macCaac e _ 50 -a m3 a JJa g ° -' a O ., .. F % v N x v °' E o « G c°i F '" a, :° a i �� 3 '�k '" w.I C o '� ".. O c r o , o v c a) G f a o v .« m a c , c°,- o , • e U` r 'ca C .°° ° w y " '.°� ; a 3 E ° n v v G ° i .E o m o � d 4 Y (=-. >`1' m c ° b 7.d ex gY croi ) E Pi . a - 7 Cu ., N▪ '7 O 'EE 3 W C C 'O t+ m q ° 3 `I ?g c. \ p D. o >, .. F E Ea w6 -E c �' a ro a ° m m , rota « ° C T. t N `° 74 O m ro v a ° o m a; ° E to a) y �' E y w' a, � ro b « N p ai 0 0 G t y' N N G A O N o m 1.C , - Cri, m I.-" .- r-:Id ', 1/'', u C O C u C G N ce a� « {:) .= c�', O ai o (� `'i E O C� ro t v ° ' ro0 0 • v a a d ,o [-� R m 7 a .C. A .° �. �(\ v: -� ''z 3 '5 ' J « a 8 ,F,'" . a 5 f 3 c, LE 5 E 4 <, En -^°, m .°', 1 'o00oo 2004,• co _ �p 3'+'- ~a` " .`Y l t g a3 ' ottce$e£aoii'—ono COO �Q zY p r c m 11 4 ic 'a 3 9 n is rt e of • .ei wT � ,.OAL. N.•'�' !EiL �! iTtItMi ., fe„ g st � J I—Zt•, MM I a t,. -.. LL LL =ap Qn J Ci rgy�'r - '[ U :¢ D6 o m aco 0121 -' p dFS E 6 ..' '$omg° ' = t +-`ag ,E p-'a yflj -¢c a'53o'tci�t tiaFmmac m fCa PF 6 W °� mo o.ec1306,0neic+8 31 m• t °° ` 2 �n J `o ¢LLCQ 3rg3 eti_omzr.z$z_£m D LLo.LLT° 4 ° �, 'tom ao a - 3wwo i ° « 03 a3 q rte' o n v c ° ar £ C '� w W •-• 4 t, N 0 a' c ,. ,u '''i TS V i F b ai ro w " ° ., .d R 5.-y U % R, t.7 N m Rey •� C 5 :J 5 .`�., ° a ti h � a, R T ° d ro P N Y .C.> - P. ° C .. i't', v� �_ J F Y w j p �' w e .c ° a v N .. ° a ° gZ '' ' v rn K a :01 .$ o — ' m 'cd m C,} ,� a ,� K m.c a o v G x a, C ° o °' 3 ° .o m a ° W ro \\ O au °' a ro a s x_ R o ,d b a x a+ c P ° ,a, .c, m ? r ".... E \ z 0444 " t C a ,G Q. K .C 0.[ L y c r N O O r >. U C ro ,C .C ` w O may,_ 'J' R P m a X 0 m 4 0 0 05 >v) a v iy c,..,' GCli ,i. R �. -\ d -1 "' a a r4 c ro e -- C 3 h - oa o 3 Z '11 v p .. „ E. '°c "of e Cr0Ca X x c ° d F o :° vim 3 �- e o ^� 0 y.. ,�S./ ��LL w r o ° a, K G y o K " G v IZI s a' 2 ID a .p T u a°i , ° U , v x p ro '� E W .4 m UF. 7 v w ro m ., c i m M k -� o w C t �. �l, > dr5 o a, o ba 'O u y �i o ° m F a ° c 3 ' `�^ C 5 - ,�a N N 414 ° 6 ;C ate ,tN)/ w w\ ° " cJ C v .Cy U - 'O P' qN N td y �n Rv 4-i N z .C CJ t6 �, ._° N G ° ° ,6 , E 'd an N u — q z dl N rC RJ m �! ,' L u R .C N v_ C £ P a ° ° ,n O ,...`1-15.) ,E, r• P C �(�} G U[� ~ � N i >' cOi O .. c. R N a C ro '< ." _, ' H 'i. N « p v b = P c n C N b Pa o .°O •F ,1 .o .y o a ` o % A .2 ti"+ _ : 3 '_ � ., _ . ra VI -i r - -� - C a F C r u G C a F d rR -�, °AIM l ebrua. ' 28 , 1978 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners : If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing s for the 12th of April, 1978 at 2 : 00 P .M. Henry & Tillie Carpio 3 . 2% Beer License El Ranchito Cafe (On and Off the Premises) Gill , Colorado Stan Rech SUP, Oil Recycling & Disposal Site 15267 Weld Co. Rd. 18 Ft. Lupton, Co. 80621 OFFICE OF THE CLERK TS THE BOARD BY: jirHa y}r j - Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1 ti ' <\_) / C 4‘ swIttst, OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE: 1303) 356-4000 EXT. 200 P,O. BOX 758 OGREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO February 21, 1978 Mr. Stan Rech Box 303 Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Rech: Your request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT for an oil recycling and disposal site has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Weld County Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is part of the W', SWn, Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Pnard of County Cammmissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottcn of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedure will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing twice in the legal newspaper, which expenses must be paid by you before the hearing day. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by March 13, 1978. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Ed Dunbar, Chairman rjk I wish to have a hearing on this matter with the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising as noted above. ech BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No . SUP-348 : 77 :22 Date : February 21, 1978 APPLICATION OF: Stan Rech ADDRESS : 15267 Weld County Road 18, Ft . Lupton , Colorado 80621 Moved by Ben Nix that the following Resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of an Oil Recycling and Disposal Site covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado , to wit : LEGAL DESCRIPTION ; That part of the Most one-half of the Southwest -on-e xivarter of Section 2: North, -Range 66 WIst of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, del Beginning at the Northeast corner said West one-half _Southwest one-quarter; II SOO°04' 13"W on anlasssmed bearing along the East id-ne said West one-half Soutl a distance of 792100 feet; thence SB9°49'-25-"W parallel -with the North line sic Southwest one—quatter a distance -of 330.00 feet; thence NOO°04' 13"E a diatancc to a point on thelNorth line -said West one-half Southwest one--quarter; thence along -said North ire a distance of 330.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains _6.Op Acres more or less. i of Water Resources , letter dated January Z0, 1978,. actually being used? 5. Which direction does -the surfac-e water and groundwater flow in this area? 6. What is the possibility of contaminating the Fox Hills Sand- stone -aquifer? 7. Is the proposed method of waste water disposal a reliable and effecitve method to use? Motion seconded by Irma White . Vote : For Passage : Percy Hiatt Against Passage : Marge Yost Ben Nix Chuck Carlson Abstained: Frank Suckla Jerry Kiefer Irma White The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board cif County Commissioners for further proceedings . CERTIFICATION OF COPY I , Shirley A Phi 1 upc , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado , adopted on February 21 , 1978 and re- corded in Book No . VI of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dates the 77 day of February _ 19 7R Nx Secretary mid SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Planning Commission Services Building, Greeley, Colorado FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NUMBER: PC HEARING DetTE: SEC: TWP RANGE: CC HEARING DATE: • LAND CODE: T: S: 1/4: KEY: SUB/DIV CODE: SUB BLK: LOT: KEY: REFER TO: PERMIT FEE: 2 . c�a DLO• (z�GS7� 1) DATE: APP. CHECKED BY: •'?/dot . 2) [ATE: RECEIPT NO. Ifcn�-- 3) DATE: _ LEGAL DESC. APPRVL: 4) DATE: TO _3E COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIREMENTS: Print or type only, except for necessary signatures: I, (we) the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning -a proposed Special Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use Permit is proposed: I 1,� 11 r OSC J LLP iq S e c - 0,. ' so k-ncizr. Lo-�- 2. (Z Q co�rc,�e� c�4��cu. �i�-�- �o , C-e r cuiv►n tot ,qi c a�, .s v to „ LE-rAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL US-E PERMIT AREA: (L a L. (fie. c \ pt-c_1\E J). o STfi:ET LOCATION: \ S QE„f1 (N o Q,,I 1 a zoflE PROPOSED USE: c'es\ lOO a 4 t'( t ea s 4 See G or4-ems\ i&-UT;* ." REASON: FEE OWNERS OF AREAA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE:NAME: Ayam 3;;�F��r'Yi it ADDRESS: / 'J Gt/e/j 04„, I/(�Ci )rTEL: NAME: / ADDRESS: TEL: NAME: ADDRESS: TEL: 1 I hereby depose and st-ate under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) A-4eL dig ature: Owner or uthorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this ( ,��,ti,�� day of � exit 19: NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL _ My Commission expires A f�� /s /9.j/ 1 December 5, 1977 itelci County ilammng Board Yell County Conr;i nsioners Greeley, Colo. ado Dear Sirs. 31 CA.Tdd ISPCSAI, The proposed. 31 ester li. iosal is for oil field disposal, if will be used d when a rater trick goes to a lease to suck the water out of the pit or tank on location and needs to dispose of the fluid. The disposal will only rtdqpire one erHloyee, Stan tteeh for maintanance pur roses. teen 4 tick goes to ei s_dosa.l they will dump their load into a pit which ,:111 be covered with 1" mesh nine, from there the fluid brill be iumeed late tanks where any oil which ray he in the water will be nopecated. Then the uat:r e:i1J go into a leach field, Fits with gravel and straw, LS pesCoralee d-pe and Filled in with soil.. ( On thesane order as a se ti.c tank leach field . . After the leach rield le Tut in we elan on 'Planting with grass and use the water for subhfcigation. The land now will not hold enough moisture for .seed to grow at the present ti* e. The ma.xinun number of trucks at disposal at one time will be three. host of the time there trl.l only be one truck unloading at, any given time. As for Sewage di ,, )oral, there will be no sewage to handle. The only fluid hae e ter. at the disposal will be water. Thin diseo -al is being panned to improve our land and also provide a relief to 1,1 County in the problen of orlf_ela disposal . rIe feel that our land will greatly profit fro:A the subirc _ga ion which the disposal will provide, and provide the oilfield with a service greatly needed. Thank you, Stanley L. Tech Sr. +•. Reec1E(t u let. .. .... —0'.lei;ie Iii.,, ' tiii• • ;.� • J•: -•— • e, ' Reception No.... .------••-.....»__...-- .__-_ •---..._..-- • Recorder. . ,,.w,., . •::> .19 76 .between ' ,:'•:=:J: T,I1l.^5 �NDp:N'l'[111I�y Nadu 17th day April '•." STANLEX L. RI3CI! and LINDA C, RI.C.t •+ ' whose addrean is 391 Elm, Brighton, Colorado 80601 ' ",i part ies of the first.part, and the Public Trustee of County of Welt! in the State of Colorado, party of tho second part, Witnr_asoth: 'fand Linda G. Rech :y: ' ;'.. TIIAT,ZVIiERZ.AS,The said Stanley L. !tech • iI-,y . i' ha ye executed their. promissory note ' bearing even date herewith, for the principal sum of • Dollars, •.;••••4"�;.�;"'�'.• Tr,•}'ELVE THOUSAND FIVE (HUNDRED AND 140/100. -,:-AO/100. - • r: :,� : .,iayableto'theorder of Arlolp'l Anderson:Clad Bettye B:'- Anderson, as• • -.'[...''j''.•:,:i3Joint Tenants, .., '.::,.,;..,1.„ ' �� whose address is l art Lupton, Colorado ` ` On Or before Five yeltrs • after the date hereof, with interest thereon from the date thereof }+ ••••••:;:!...11;,.•...:;:,."... at the rate of a per cent per annum,payable semi-annually together W'1t11 ° '' • ' .principal payments of $1,250.00.- First payment shall be due October 17, 1976 . „ r •,.'.,.- • and semi annually thereafter until paid in full. The makers shall have the ..'t ± •:s" ` right to p eiIlay at tiny time without penalty. f i:,•,, . - • • i : ' • AND WHIs'nrAS,The said part ies ' o£the first part' • are desirous of securing payment of the• i °:_, ≤ principal and interest of said promissory note in whose hands soever tha said note or any of them may be. . "L.:. NOW,THEREFORE,Tl.a said part i e a of the first part,is consideration of the premises,and for the purpose .`•,:•.,„,,k. . aforesaid,do hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto the'epid party of the second part in trust forever, •.•, 3' • the following described property, situate in the County of • ' Weld. , ,.State of Colorado,to wit:' ',";''' --4: The East 330 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter (WSW") of ,:6:,:''•, •. Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., known as Lot 2 of Amended Recorded Exemption No. 1309-22-3-RE77 • TO IIAVE AND TO 1101.1)the same,together with all and singular the privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging:'3a Trast • . •r;l a: : . ;' •Nevertheless,That in ease of default In the payment of veld note .., or any of'Wean,or any part thereof, or in the payment of the tntereet ..;.‘,..,,a,:,,;,...-- . thereon;according to the tenor and effect of said note '`.'or any of them. or'in the payment of any prior encumbrances, principal-are . '' interest,it any,or in case default shall be made In or in tree of violation or breech of any of the terms, conditions, covenents or agreement* c to .`�;. Herein contained:the beneficiary hereunder or the lege! holder of the indebtedness secured hereby may declare a violation of any of tha t:ovMtents t'•. herein contained anal elect to advertise raid property for rale and demand ouch sale, then, upon filing notice of such election and'dernand for , •••••. ,.. t aide with the said party of the aecord part,who shall unn,,receipt ct ouch notice of election and demand for sale cause a copy of'the soma to., �''*'�•',.•.. be recorded in the recorder's office of the county In which raid rent estate is situated,it shall and may be lawful for es-id party of the cocand 'fs:.M,;•. part to sell and dispose of the mum (en masse or in uci'nrate.pa:cls,e s the said Public Trustee may think beat),and all the right.title and in_• e'..-,:;;., i'' • tereet of Geld part ies of the fleet part, their heirs or cadges therein''at pabile auction at the East front door of the II Court oaJie, to the County of W:'id " ',mate of Colorado,or on said premises,or any part thereof as may be specifies! In the notice of said male,for the highest c:4 best pried the same trill bring in ce..rh.four weeds'public notice having been previously given of I ';:r. the time and place of such sale, by advert:moment, weekly, in some no;repapor of general circulatica at that time published in said county of -�v;;. ,•: '',... ,r • Weld , •• • a copy of which notice shall be mailed within;tcn hays from the date of the first publication thereof to the ' ' • • ',' .•••••••,:, ' ' and part Los of the first part at the address herein given and to such perion or persons appearing to have acquired a subsequent record ' interest in Gaul'real estate at the address given in the recorded instrument;where only the county find state is given es the address then such r• { netico shall be mailed to the county rrat, and to make and give to the purcha:er or purchasers of such property at such sale,a certificate or � '.',''. . . •.. I. eertificatca in writing describing such property purchased, and the sum or B01115 paid therefor,and the time when the purchaser or purchaacra 1Viiii (nr ciher pertain r-+tided thereto} shall in.rntiticd top, ticr,-d or dre'la therefor,un .es the same shall be redeemed as is provided by law; and . ., 'Gaul Puhiie.Trustee•i.ell,npun. clett;uni 1:7I•..,perion or ,•emo're iiC, nt: the seta certificate or.certificates of purchase, when said demand is' ' "'• ,',.•''. made,or upon demand i;y the perion c•atillcd to a deed io tied for the property pun-hosed, at the time push demand is made the time for re- ` -.0-"e",-.1'..-e— .' *:'' demption Laving expired, make unit execute to such person or peroon.i a dre•l er d:+.:eds to the said property purchased,which said deed or deeds . ` _ l shall be in the orclin try form of a conveynnee,and gibs!'be signed,acknowledged and delivered by the acid Public Trustee.as grantor,and shhet1 . .,..4 -• convey uud puit-clMrn to such person or p,:400:4 entitled to each deed,no grantee, tile said property purchased as aforesaid and nil the light.' _ of the first-part, their heirs and eeeigne thaeeln,and ''l'' shat c the benefit mo and equity l ch the d of the part i,(; .,,, shah recite sum or sums for which the said property wen sold and shall refer to tho power o sale therein contained, and to the giale or Bales _,,�•.::, • • made by virtue thereof;and in core of tin aseilLnment of such certificate or certificates of purchase, or in case of the redemption of sech. property, by a subsequent eneuurbreneer, inch assignment or redemption shell oleo be referred to in such dead or deeds; but the notice of• '" 4r,. '-'!:•' :,"`4t sale need not be vet nut in such deed or deeds;and the cal-i Public Trustee shall,out of the proceeds or avails of such sale, after first paying :'4,"k:,. and retaining all fees,charges and costa of making said sale,pay to the beneficiary hereunder or the legal holder of said note the'.+' principal and interest duo on said noto according to the tenor and effect thereof,and all moneys advanced by such beneficiary or legal .,,; • i:: wf holder of maid note for irri,uranea, taxes and assessments, with interest thereon at 10 peer cent per annum•rendering ttse '''' t r":,i::: overtax. if any, unto the said part iefi of the Ifnit part` their legal representatives or.assigns; which sale or saint and maid deed or • •+7.TM.,. '. ' deeds so made obeli be a perpetual bar,both in law and equity,against the e:.id part les of the first part, their ham+ ' 4"%; of the drat '"`;':::4i'' . and eschew,and till other persona cbcimin¢the enid property,or any part thereof,•by, from, through or under said part Rtes. {wt . • part,or any of them.The holder or holders of said note or notes may purchase said property or any part thereof;and it ohnot be obligatx,ryy 7...e.••,•'.e_•. upon the puretia er or purchasers at any such sale to ceo to the application of the purchase money. If a release deed be required, it is erred- .. •t°' 4 . that the part 1C3 of the first part, their heirs or'asslgns,will pay the expense thereof. ,,,e"-.• ., . r 1• tree No• ,341-A- DEED Olt TRUST—Publie Trustee— Celiac-Itece.ivet' Celiac- .tttorney's,Ikea: • --Bradford Pitbllahing Co.,1824-4G Stout Street,Denver.Colorado-2-70 .i.:}il„ • • And the said part set, of the fl sri,for "the.M0eLVOS•• .'and for their ;heirs, executors and administrators, ':• • ' covenant and agree -to and with the said early of the second part; that at the time of the cneealinC of end delivery of these ' • presents they pre wen seized of the said ian,la end tenements in fee timpie, and ha Ye good right, full power and lawful '` • • authority to grant; bargain, cen and convey the casts in manner end form na aforesaid; hereby fully and absolutely waiving and releasing all rights slid elaims th?isy • may have in or to said lends, timement;,and property as a Homestead Exemption,or other exemption, • ander and by settee of tiny act el the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, user csttting or which may !seemlier be passed in relation thereto and that the ranee aro freer Cr!; dear of nil liens and cnemisbmn.neuw what:ver, • • ; • end the above bargained property In the quiet and peaceable possession of the raid party of the second part, his successors and assigns. • t`,e. against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof,the said part lea of the first part shall :!'•Y'' ' and will Warrant and Forever Defend. ..}i C t And that during the continuance of said Indebtedness;or.any'part thereof,the'said part '« 1' �' {ea of the first part will in due steam s , ,• • all tares end plecsements levied on raid property;ail amwate due on account of es ilteipal end interest on prior encumbrances,if any;and will • llmeeall.latilaimee that may at any Unto 1..0 on Bald lands. Insured a„atnct loss by firs with extended coverage endorsement in such company or , • ' ' ', .companies aa'the holder of said note may,from time to time direct,for such sum or sums as such company or companies will insure for, ' not to exceed the amount of said indebtedness,except at the option of maid part•iCS of the first part, with loss.if any,payable to the brae.. -1 e:e ticiary hereunder. as their interest may appear, end will deliver.the.policy or policies of Insurance to the beneficiary hereunder, its•,:q t:',«:7 :'.' . �. , farther ceearity for the indebtedness aforesaid.And In case of the tenure of cede part 1es of the first part to thus insure and deliver the.'• «. - 'l ' 1' policies of insurance,or to pay such taxes or assessments or amounts due or to bcome due on any prior encumbrances, if any,then the holder. :. , of said note , or any of them, may procure ouch insurance, or pay each taxies or assessments or amount&due upon prior encumbrances,if. any,and nil moneys thus paid,with interest thereon at' 10 per centent per annum, shall become so much additional iedebtedncm, secured by this Deed of Trust, end rhali be paid out of the proceeds of the sate of the property aforesaid,if nototherwise paid by paid part Rt.S � '.- i,':' of the filet part and may for ouch failure declare a violation of this covenant and aereor•.sent, • AND THAT IN CASE OF ANY DEFAULT, Whereby'the right of foreclosure occurs hereunder, the said party of the second part or "' - the holder of said note or certificate of purchase,shall at once became entitled to the possession,use and enjoyment of the property afore• • said, and to the rents, issues end profits thereof, from the accruing of such right end during the pendency of foreclosure proceedings and the • ..-li a,....': . period of redemption, if any there be;and such possession shall at once be delivered to the said party of the second part or the holder of said note or certificate of uichaee on r'J ' D request,and on refusal,the delivery of Finch possession may be enforced by the said party of the second ;. • part or the holder of said note or certificate of purchase by any appropriate chill suit or proceeding,end the said party of the second part;or the holder of said note or certificate of purchase;or any thereof, shall be entitled to a Receiver for said property, and of the rents, itcues and profits thereof, after inch default, including the time covered by foreclosure proceedings and the period of redemption,If any there be, and shall be entitled thereto as n matter of right without regard to the solvency or insolvency of the part t,Cu of the first part " ' or of the then owner of said property and without regard to the value thereof, and such Receiver may be appointed by any court of r competent jurledlctlon upon ex parte application and without notice—notice being hereby expressly waived—and all rents, issues and profits, • •;''y;�,,: Income and revenue therefrom shall be applied by ouch Receiver to the payment of the indebtedness hereby secured, according to law and the , e ,e,. orders end directions of the court :., .'•• AND,That in case of default in any of said payments of principal or interest,according to the tenor and effect of said promissory note - aforesaid, or any of them, or any part thereof, or of a breech or violation of any of the covenants or agreements herein, by the pert des • 'c=-:•• of tho first part, their executors, administrators or assigns, then and in that case the whole of said principal sum hereby ' • e ,.;••• . godsend,and the interest thereon to the time of sale,may at once,at the option of the legal holder thereof, become due end payable, and the • said property be cold in the manner and with the name effect as if said indebtedness had matured,and that if foreclosure be made by the Public t • •,=r Trustee,an attorney's fee of the sum of P_ reasonable sum dollars for services in the supervision of said . forecll 4ure proceedings shall be allowed by the ?uhlie 4S`ustee es a pxrteof the cost of foreclosure,and if foreclosure be made through,the courts,�;,'..glee r.�,- 'a r:•-ncnal+l•:r•!.o'-i"y'e fro shall lie Meet by the court as a Tart of t':o casts of mien ecxeclesure proceedings- • ` • IN'WITNESS WHEREOF.The said part ice of the fleet part baVC - , •,hereunto set their band 0 and Neal'$;'^ -' - ; . . the der and year first above written. WITNESS! ' • • • ir,' [SEAL"! • • - ��.3TIr/jYcs'! C{: �'i �^s �, ;.(L.'', ,„ [SEAL] Lf i' a G• . Rech • ' -• f lrAl,J • • . STATE OF COLORADO The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thia • • .. •' ' County of t' D ss. y..��f7 • 7 ` ! Y 1� ..: day of... April , 10_ 6 , by----irt.,. le,,x--iia__Rexit__ •. ___lnd..Id uiia L:.lteit • My commission expires ,. .••'` 'V Itncea my hand and official seal. )t....• t. • Notary Public • i i • ' t ., h , • rat._1 • ' ••-'S;.'- r ..� . m _ a • ..r.. - .+,J`s, s!,.•- EF +M' .r� et re irl 2 . R • ! p, ixi i`. Ey r� 0. ' FI 4 a, ,s y nEl is, aLi : ' Pi fit W , 1,,.. a a,•.'. 4� H U .,y g a ?•• . ti, iri t7 0 i•;,/ r ' f-i*i'-1 i 1`i� M u Li ...\_!\1 i AN EXPERIENCED DISTRIBUTOR CAPABLE - MILCHEM O ER CLUB BLDG. DENVER,COLORADO i ..2 ENGINEERING DRILLING MUD SERVICE. PRODUCTS DRILLING MUD REPORT DATE .../.,C _ � COMPANY a/ 6t,) . j�. t CONTRACTOR REPORT FOR MR. -/ -� / REPORT FOR MR. ADDRESS ADDRESS WELL NO. LOCATION COUNTY CASING PROGRAM: Surface _in. O ft. Bit Size in. PRESENT DEPTH ft. Mud in Pits Bbl. Mud in Hole 33b1. Total Mud in System Bbl. Pumps: Size x BIb./Stroke Strokes/min. Dutput Bbls./min. Mud Cycle Min. Circulating Press. It/in2 Hydrostatic Pressure of Mud Column /in2 Calculated Annular Velocity Ft-/min. Sample Taken from: Mud Mud Mud Mud TOUR Flowline ❑ Pit ❑ Properties Properties Properties Contains TREATMENT Time Sample Taken ❑ Milgel sx Weight (lb./gal) 4 "‘ole'r.. y el ❑ Milbar sx Funnel Viscosity (1500/qt.) 127 /'{ /� ❑ Clay sx //� _ < ❑ Phosphate Ib Plastic Viscosity (cps.) ' lir t � ,. Yield Point (lb./100 Sq.ft.) /// C _D Soda Ash lb Gel Strength---Initial (gm.) ��7 '3 //� El Drilling Detergent gal Gel Strength-10 min.(gm.)/ /' ❑ Caustic Soda lb pH strip❑ ' El Dispersant lb Fluid Loss (cc. in 30 min.) . Cake Thickness(32nd) ❑ Mil-starch lb P—Alkalinity (Pf) ❑ Driscose-CMC Ih Chloride—ppm ) CI oil bbl - Z.,."4%. 4 '6,-,;(_,,,Calcium—ppm CTS / C ❑ Hulls lb / L1 ❑ Fiber Ib Solids Content (%by Vol.) S.----) 1J -1 ifal�_ Sand Content (% by Vol.) Flake lb Oil Content (% by Vol.) ❑ *Suggestions and/or Recommendations:— ,/ To be followed at operator's discretion. ,,..-....:iDaily Warehouse Engftlee� V Phone Cost $ �G'� T'�+ Cumulative Phone AdOseSs Cost $ —a J In consideration of the furnishing of this report and oral suggestions,it is agreed that PLAN MUD COMPANY \// PM.100 ttev 7`. shall not be liahie for any damage resulting from sarr.r: end it is to be held harmless. PETITION SUPPORTING ::;M!CIAL USE PERMIT Hoard of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Court House Greeley, Colorado 6entlemen: Le, the undersigned owners of property located within 500 f-eet of the property described in the application submitted by _f] . 2[-` C,„ L , hereby petition you to grant -this request for i_ ?2. u-sE. Signature Mailing Address Description of Property �� f��i "_�;!. .•T� '� .i frf / t �` ;;x goet, �� -r ! .ter, 0�; 6102_1 4 / / 1 1 ter w-aTER D/sPosnt > . 72- x'oz 3 Shew�, X70 1 Sec. £2 - 7-2 1-/- R6G7J I r C77 1:1, -Vona loamy sand 0 to 3 percent slopes 1- c pp 1 .,.d f'! ��F',-I\ ja7. l CQ-JLS•-_ �F� This is a deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on gentle plains I'� and high terraces at elevations of 4600 to 5200 feet. It formed in eolian or alluvial deposits. Included in this unit are some leveled areas. Also included are some soils with loamy substratums and some soils that are noncalcareous to depths of 60 inches. Typically the surface layer is a grayish brown loamy sand about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is a brown to light yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 22 inches thick. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is a sandy loam or loamy sand. CPermeability is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow and erosion hazard is low. Where irrigated this soil is suited to the commonly grown crops in the area. However, perennial grasses and alfalfa or close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of the time. Close grown crops and pasture can be irrigated with contour ditches and corrugations. Furrows, contour furrows and cross slope furrows will work on row crops. Sprin— kler irrigation is also recommended. Minimum tillage and crop residue utilization will help control erosion. Fertility maintenance is important. Crops grown on these soils respond to fertilizer applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. Y In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, barley and sorghum. Most of the area is devoted to winter wheat which is alter- nated with summer fallow to allow moisture accumulation. Normally, precipitation is too low to make beneficial use of fertilizers. Good cultural practices such as stubble mulch farming, strip cropping and minimum tillage are needed to combat wind and water erosion. Terr- acing may also be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation on this site is dominated by sand bluestem, sand seedgrass and blue grama. Needle and thread, switch- grass, sideoats grama and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Po- tential production ranges from 2200 pounds per acre in favorable years to 1800 pounds per acre in unfavorable years. When range condition deteriorates, sand bluestem, sand reedgrass and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil should he based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is advisable if range is in poor condition. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switch- . grass, sideoats grama, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, a clean, firm, sorghum stubble-prepared seedbed and grass -drill should be used. Early spring seeding has proven most successful. KR rl. M'es) Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well suited to this soil. Blowing sand and low available water capacity is the principal hazards to establishing tree and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees need to be planted in shallow furrows and maintain vegetative cover between the rows . Supplemental irrigation may be needed to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Rocky Mtn. juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine and Siberian elm. Shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac and Siberian peashrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use, with these soils best suited for openland and rangeland wildlife. In cropland areas, habitat favorable for ring-necked pheasants, mourning doves, and many non- ( game species can be developed by establishing wildlife areas for nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, the inclusion of undisturbed nesting cover is vital and should be included in plans for habitat development; this is especially true in areas of intensive agriculture. Rangeland wildlife, exemplified by the pronghorn antelope, can be assisted and encouraged by development of livestock watering facilities, proper livestock grazing management, and range reseeding where needed. This Vona soil has good potential for urban and recreational develop- ment. Lawns, shrubs and trees; when once established, will do well. The primary limiting soil feature is the rapid permeability in the substratum and the hazard of contamination of ground water from sewage lagoons. Recreational development may be hindered by the soils suscepti- } C bility to wind erosion. Capability subclass IIIe irrigated IVe nunirrigated d N 1 5 -Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes '7'. is This is a deep, excessively drained soil on gentle plains at elevations of 4650 to 5100 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in this unit are some soils with lime above 40 inches. Also included in mapping were some soils with sandstone between 40 and 60 inches. Typically the surface layer is brown sand about 6 inches thick. The underlying material, to a depth of 60 inches is brown sand. Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. Effect- ive rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow and erosion hazard is low. ( The potential vegetation on this soil is dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, needle and thread, little bluestem and blue grama. Potential production ranges from 2500 pounds per acre in favorable years to 1800 pounds per acre in unfavorable years. When range condition deteriorates, sand bluestem, switchgrass,. sand reed- grass, sideoats grama and little bluestem decrease and production drops. Sand sage increases, undesirable weeds and annual plants invade and "blow- out" conditions can occur as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is advisable if range is in poor condition. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, Indian- ` grass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, little bluestem and blue grama are { suitable for seeding. Due to the wind erosion susceptibility of this \\\ soil seeding should be done with an interseeder or in a firm, clean • sorghum stubble-prepared the growing season prior to seeding with a grass drill. Early spring seeding has proven most successful. Brush management can also help improve deteriorated range. Windbreak and environmental plantings are generally not suited to this soil. On-site investigation is needed to determine if plantings are feasible. Wildlife is an important secondary use for this soil . Rangeland wild- life, exemplified by the pronghorn antelope, can be assisted and en- couraged by development of livestock watering facilities, proper live- stock grazing management and range reseeding where needed. This Valent soil has a fair potential for urban development. The primary limiting soil features are the rapid permeability and susceptibility to wind erosion. Septic tank absorption fields will function properly, however, the proper filtering effect may not be achieved by the sandy substratum. Sewage lagoons would require sealing. Lawns, shrubs and trees, for beautification, when once established will do well. Capability subclass VIe irrigated VIe nonirrigated Deep sand range site i til1 —Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes 7a-Ah`i 3- A -.. i3-$ Caah . pur,,,) This is a deep, excessively drained soil on gentle plains at elevations of 4650 to 5100 feet. It formed on eolian deposits. Included in this unit are some soils with lime above 40 inches. Typically the surface layer is brown sand about 8 inches thick. The underlying material, to a depth of 60 inches is brown sand. Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. Effect- ive rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow and erosion hazard is low. This soil is suited to limited cropping; intensive cropping is hazardous C_ because of erosion. The cropping system should be limited to close grown crops such as alfalfa, wheat and barley. The soils also are adopted to irrigated pasture. A suitable cropping system would be alfalfa 3 to 4 years followed by corn and small grain for 2 years and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. Close grown crops may be irrigated from closely spaced contour ditches or sprinklers; Contour furrows or sprinklers should be used for new crops. Applications of barnyard and commercial fertilizer will help maintain good production. The potential vegetation on this soil is dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, needle and thread, little bluestem and blue grama. Potential production ranges from 2500 pounds Cper acre in favorable years to 1800 pounds per acre in unfavorable years. \ When range condition deteriorates, sand bluestem, switchgrass, sand reed- grass, sideoats grama and little bluestem decrease and production drops. 1 t r t '. .- ' _ F ,„-a°' ..`b . t"�� ,� 'r' mow. Sand sage increases, undesirable weeds and annual plants invade and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is advisable if range is in poor condition. Sand bluestem, sand reed— grass, Indiangrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, little bluestem and / blue grama are suitable for seeding. Due to the wind erosion suscepti- bility of this soil seeding should be done with an interseeder or in a firm, clean sorghum stubble-prepared the growing season prior to seeding- with a grass drill. Early spring seeding has proven most successful. Brush management can also help improve deteriorated range. ( Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well suited to this soil. Blowing sand and available water capacity are the principle hazards to establishing trees and shrubs. The soil is so loose that • trees need to be planted in shallow furrows and maintain vegetation cover between the rows. Supplemental irrigation will be needed to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Rocky. .., Mtn. juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine and Siberian elm. Shrubs • best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac and Siberian pea shrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use, with these soils best suited for openland and rangeland wildlife. In cropland areas, habitat favorable for ring-necked pheasants, mourning doves, and many non-game species can be developed by establishing wildlife areas for nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, the inclusion of undisturbed nesting cover is vital and ` (\ should be included in plans for habitat development; this is especially true in areas of intensive agriculture. Rangeland wildlife, exemplified by the pronghorn antelope, can he assisted and encouraged by develop— ment of livestock watering facilities, proper livestock grazing manage— ment, and range reseeding where needed. This Valent soil has a fair potential for urban development. The primary limiting soil features are the rapi.d permeability and suscep— tibility to wind erosion. Septic tank absorption fields will function properly, however the proper filtering effect may not be achieved by the sandy substratum. Sewage lagoons would require sealing. Lawns, shrubs and trees, for beautification, when once established will do well. Capability subclass IVe irrigated VIe nonirrigated Deep sand range site 1 J 79 FIELD CHECK 0 FILING NUMBBE\R - SV`t_�� NAME b'1R _-R te- REQUEST 01 r.2.C1C\\Yn fir bkS?OSct\ titlr-° LEGAL DISCRIPTION 1 LAND USE N E k S , W � ZONING N LOCATION IVL \ r,\\-to x1064, E WA& 2 w:,Led eas 10 S , F�. LI:Aeon W ' COMMENTS : FX\Str\' ' C1/4.cc,ess SV ? area.. ao o v.o 6 wi$h # t'C - ar #1t Sub " At w4 ?\a%ns • �o sets a\Yeo& ere. c Ov,e, , \V..&. Ltst41/4‘ o \ 'bra Wa\eX `Mm x — ,, 2 v�• . - Wakeir d,ra1�,\ k saerifiv L, et; . lthekt 1 110O15 C 4-C-a\P re SO;1 e.., `CdetCLwel' U Q'ed- n4 On 1\4\0`41A1 ,eiv.c1 o ,SL KIN)'Q 'S OQY\ �1l �'2 �o•n �C�,osS -ND I � e s� Mt tow\. t h Pcrs s cl,s we" 4. '1- By 61kr& almSid-e STATE OF COLORADO , Richard D.Lamm,Governoric DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES `ptDR4 DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Jack R. erieb, Director 3 E6060 Broadway P. 0. Box 2287 rO'1'0F`P" Denver, Colorado 80216 825-1192) Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521 January 9, 1978 Weld County Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attention: Ken McWilliams Dear Mr. McWilliams: The oil recycling and water disposal pit in the Wz, SWa, Section 22, T2N, R66W, has been checked by myself on January 6. It is assumed that the filtering material , as described in the application, is in place. However, since there was no one around to fill in any details, this is only an assumption. The pit appeared to be newly constructed , but already in use. The only problem I could see, is the fact that the 1 " mesh wire was conspicuous by its absence. 0therwise,everything appears to be in order. It is our recommendation to issue the permit as soon as the pit area is protected by the 1 " mesh. Sin e ely, 2J d.A./ Don Bog rt Environmen 1 Biologist DB/ks q' , s: JAf i r' p' RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Harris Sherman, Executive Director • WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Thomas Farley, Chairman Sam Caudill,Vice Chairman • Roger Clark,Secretary • Jean K.Tool,Member • Vernon C. Williams,Member Jay K.Childress,Member • Michael Higbee,Member • Wilbur Redden,Member • EflORAflDU WIWDe o Planning Commission January 4 , 1978 Date COLORADO From Stan Rech SUP Subject: No engineering problems are anticiapted with this request . Gilman E. Olson mfm rTh Zt V/ er �EitgAlb"j40 J 8 w>l s ay co *,41,(4 RICHARD D. LAMM 111* ��,�)i P * JOHN W. HOLD GOVERNOR i*`..(ip,)4 ** Director 1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING—1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)839-2611 December 30, 1977 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Fortner: RE: STAN TECH/WATER DISPOSAL We have reviewed this report and information as submitted and recommend that this application not be approved. This is based on waste water with 12000 PPM, which exceeds state limits for water placed back into the subsurface. Other geologic constraints are minimal. Sincerely, L. R. Ladwig Engineering Geologist LRL/ba cc: LUC r(�Cre .% 7'' li;5i00 GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE ✓ MFM0 January 1:, 1978 Tn: D. V. Roger:: & J. A. McKee Fr^m: C. G. McDowell Subject: Application for use of earthen pits for disposal of liquid oilfield wastes. Mr. S. L. Poch whose address is 391 Elm, Brighton, Colorado is applying before the Weld County Planning Commission for construction of a. disposal pit for. oilfield liquid wastes. The area concerned is located in the ':T SW 22-2N-q..W, Gala County, within the Vattenberg 111el.d. Amoco's °l Anderson, a "J" Sand gas producer, is the nearest well located in the SW SW 22-2N-66W. T,.ers are rums water wells and i rri[ation canals in the area and tho to'.n of Fort Lupton ei.ng three miles to the southwest. The South Platte River lies 2', miles west, with subsurface waters flowing in a northwesterly direction, and the topographic gradient dipping gradually to the north. The Laramie formation crops out en the surface consisting of alternating layers of sand- stone, niltetone, shale, claystone and coal. The electric log of the Amoco „i Anderson indicates the shoe of the sur- face casing was set at P. depth of 202' . Below this there are several possible water zones from 350'-560' The top of the Fox Hills Sandstone is encountered at 575' with the base at 665' . Produced water from oil and gas wells in the area has a total dissolved solids (TD_,) ranging from 8,000-28,000 ppm. Water of this quality has the potential of contaminating surface and subsurface waters of the State. This is also confirmed in accordance with the Rules And Regulations of the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Water of such quality should be injected into a disposal well or system. It is recommended the application for use of this earthen pit to he rejected.. CGM:mlc ✓ 'i Vii , A v _ _ , E. -r, 4zc• �/; lV -17 40 Stan Rech SUP-348 : 77 : 22 Telephone convervation with J. A. McKee with the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission January 9, 1978 1 . In general , Mr. McKee stated that if this application had been made to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission it would not be approved. 2. Mr. McKee stated that Mr. Rech was proposing a fresh water disposal system. According to the water analysis, it is not defined as fresh water. Mr. McKee furtlfier stated that he felt that it was an incomplete water analysis. One item did not identify where the water sample was taken from. 3 . Mr. McKee felt that there was a potential for ground water contamination. 4. Mr. McKee was concerned about the quality of water being distributed into the leaching bed and whether it would actually leach out . V/ ti FORT lets J (Cttp of jort 11.upton COUNTY OF WELD 18 • 36 330 PARK AVENUE FORT LUPTON13031857-6667 `� (( P.O. BOX 158 DENVER METRO 13031 893-5404 FORT LUPTON,CO. 90621 GREELEY METRO (3031 765-6109 CotORAfl Jan. 12, 1978 Mn. Chuck CunZisse Dept. o6 PKann Lng SeAvice,, 915 - 10th St. - Gnee2ey, Coto. 80631 Dean Mn. Cuneisse, In negands to the application snom Stan Rech son. a Special' Use Permit son an Oil Recycling and D.Dsposa.2 Site, the Ft. Lupton Planning Commi2b.ion i� very concerned os the e6ect this operation may have on sunsace and/on gnaund water in the cvicea. Is there any doubt as to pollution o6 the water, the Commbsh-ion neque)stt6 the application be denied. However, there .is absotwte.2y no danger to the water nesowcces, they have no objection. S.incene.2y, Ro6e M. Bowles City Cten.h. JAM 1'U7L RECEIVED r.. „n 1 Q, INSPECTOR' S RI?PORT Name : &lam _ No : --- Legal Description of Property : 3p_c_ . 0 C2. —,� — 6 6 Date : / _. 9— 27 Time : /,'3_x /11 u uv.. Suez 2wI' I--- — v� K� WM. I — — 6 ll'4‘ ! • rr ' T., { . 7onin Inspector Note : Attach this sheet to the complaint report pertaining to this zoning I violation . I of COZ d � R 9 � m O 9 Yy t �rr** J.D. MacFarlane 1826 Attorney General David W. Bobbins UAW �„)+tate of Lnlnraln STATE SERVICES BUILDING Deputy Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street,3rd. FI. Edward G. Donovan DEPARTMENT OF LAW Denver,Colorado 80203 Sol icrini (Mum al OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Phone 839-3611 &839-3621 February 16 , 1978 Weld County Planning Commission Attention: Chuck Cunliff 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commission: I am writing this letter as counsel to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission and Water Quality Control Division . We are greatly concerned about the oil recycling and disposal site proposed by Stan Rech. He may need a National Pollution Dis- charge Elimination System Permit or a subsurface disposal permit . We recommend that you deny the application until he has come to the Division for a determination of whether the permits are needed. This is particularly important because of the possibil- ity of violation of State law by seriously polluting the ground- water . We are greatly concerned about this proposed activity so please inform us if you approve it or if he conducts the activity without approval . If we can be of any further help please contact myself or Ken Webb with the Water Quality Control Division . Sincerely , Marcia M. Hughes Assistant Attorney General MMH rs cc: Ken Webb FEB 1078 RECEIVED ism Nig Ranniax 6eak:bulec Vv OF COG Ar RICHARD U. LAM Q --��j- C.J. KUIPER y 0 State En ineer w Govenr 8 INi6 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Depar towel of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Sheet - Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Minims('❑llnn (303) 892 3581 Giound Wahl (303) 892-358/ January 20, 1978 Mr. Ken McWilliams Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Rech Special Use Permit Application (31 Water Disposal ) Dear Mr. McWilliams: This is to acknowledge receipt of material pertaining to the above referenced Special Use Permit Application. While we would normally not object to construction of a leach field, we must point out that this operation will be using the leach field to dispose of water which may be of extremely poor quality. Disposal of this water could easily cause contamination of the shallow aquifer system, and we recommend that you contact the Colorado Department of Health concerning state standards for this disposal operation. Our records indicate that there are at least 45 wells within one mile of the site which utilize shallow groundwater for domestic water supply. Most of these wells are located to the south of the site and are apparently down gradient. Due to the possibility of contamination of the shallow aquifer, we cannot recommend approval of the Rech application unless the developer submits additional material which proves that the disposal of oil field water will not affect the shallow aquifer quality. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Dr. Jeris A. Danielson Dep ty State Engineer JAD/GDV/pjl cc: W. G. Wilkinson, Div. Eng. Reiner Haubold •., ov co .COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 388-6111 Anthony Robbins, M.D., M.P.A. Executive Director 363 Jefferson, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 (493-1177) February 6, 1978 --8 res O ,(f 1,i Department of Planning Services �1 c�\�E� i Weld County Centennial Center 4 �Lwtr�o��ary 915 10th St. .c r,anI"° . :4/ Greeley, CO 80E,31 '�c; II\a0��ni, :-L+; t re: Special use permit for treatment and disposal facilities' ci*�V6t, --" +• waste water from oil production operations (Stan Rech)- Weld County Dear Sirs: Based on the information made available to this office regarding the proposed operation for which the above special use permit has been requested, it appears that the methods proposed for treatment and disposal of the waste water are inadequate considering the quality of the water involved. It is therefore the recommendation of this office that the special use permit be denied. If the special use permit is granted, Mr. Rech should be informed that a subsurface disposal permit must be obtained from the Colorado Department of Health for a system of the type he is proposing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, i i, c Boyd D. Hanzon, Dist. Eng. Water Quality Control Div. BDH/rae cc: Weld County Health Dept. Colo. Dept. of Health Bob Shukle, CDH p y,.tr .,.µ w r,�y„:2t by �."AO r'VW" , Ar44fr: r • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE - P.O. Box 487 - Brighton, CO. 80601 anus t_M SUIUI ( I Special Use Permit - Stan Rech MU 1/31/78 31 Water Disposal 10: Weld County Dept. of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th St. Greeley, m, 80631 The following comments are made after reviewing the above application: +tI awes 1. It appears that the "skim pit and "settling pit" will be located on the Valent Sand soils. These soils have a very rapid permeability and, due to this factor, there could be a chance that the materials could leach into the soil before they are pumped into the separation tanks. This could especially be true if the pumps were electric and there was a power failure. With this in mind, it may be necessary that these be lined with an imperveable material or substance. 2. It appears that this facility will be installed on fairly high ground. This being the case, it would be very imperative that all contaminants be removed before the water reaches the leach field. This would be particularly true with the highly developed area to the south. This area is also lower in elevation than the site of this facility. If there are any further questions, please feel free to call on me. Sincerely, Norman J. Wells, Jr. } Range Conservationist NeMi W¶�� 1' VW /_/ a {1 ♦ a BOARD OF HEALTH eld County Health Department DAVID MAKING DOS. Greeley FRANKLIN D YODER MD. MPH RALPH AAH. Greeley Director 1516 HOSPRN. ROAD MILL IAM DLIGK Ror gen GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEFFKE Greeley 1303)S53 assn DONALD HERGLRI Windsor ANNET IF M LOPEZ, (9rn9gy HI RFGILL PHELPS. JR . M D , Greeley KATHLEEN SHAUGHNESSY Attic JOE STOCKTON Gilcresr February 16, 1978 Mr. Gary (Fortner, Director Planning Commission 915-10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN: Based on information available to this office, the oil wastewater recycling operation as proposed by Stan Rech, appears to be - unsatisfactory for the following reasons : 1. Future build-up of salts in the soil would be detrimental to most flora. 2. Adjacent domestic wells are subject to contamination due to the possibility of lateral migration of salts in the soil. It is, therefore, the recommendation of this office that the special use permit as currently proposed be denied. Sincerely, J n C. Hall, M.P.H. , Director Environmental Health Services JCH:dr /rC�"y 7U li J r. FLIS 7i)1 r 0 RECEIVE;: w Weld Count 1,, S, Planning Cmt1,37A a6 1, • • Weld Health BOARD OF HEALTH e u County Y Yealth Department DAVID WPRKING. DDS Greeley FRANKLIN D YODPR MD, MPH RAI PH AAD Greeley Dlreclor 15'6 HOSPITAL ROAD VOL LIAM RUCK, Ro ggen GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEFFKE Greecy DONAI D HERGE RT. Windsor 13031 03 OSnU ANN FT if M LOPEZ_Greeley HI In.:10 r PHIL I'S JR M D Grc lop PA MLLE N SHAUGHNESSY A,jlr JOE STOCKTON. Gecresl .January 23, 1978 Weld County Planning Commi.ssioner Cary Fortner 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Attention Mr. Gary Fortner TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Regarding the Special Use Permit (SUP) as applied for by Stan Rech, the enclosed lab reports are submitted for your information: The following questions at this time remain to be unsolved: 1. What impact will 2. 7 tons of total dissolved solids have on the soil on a daily basis? (51,200 gallons of this water contains approximately 5325 lbs. total dissolved solids. ) 2. The ultimate destination or disposal of the above mentioned solids cannot be determined based on available data. Please feel free to contact this office for any further information. Sincerely, • Jon C. Hall, M.P.H. , Director EdVfi,ronmental Health Services JGII: tra It Ai141, G. .//,?-:,99 -c-•,1 •- •"( 424 ( 1 ? - 1 j U (,)) - 7 0 ., /l r..,, '.)4 , ✓ 9..) L 11 ' . I, \. 1 )oo o II /?O id - JA-- 0 , l O '/ / IA 0 1600 f �:' / c)s/1 i �� CIS, , . 'a ,, _ t ? o( *. 1 . G l /� j DS a_, 7per,' / ;) ' '�i /��ll_ i , li,jr 4; I l, .l U U I _ Cp.) ./II i 3 .(je °! / l ., .I r/ iiii l ♦ n REF. N0. )C - iO4--- 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD SAMPLE NO.-11- 283 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 <r7 WATER UTILITY: , COLLECTED BY:-..,1 /a_..L I , DATE .TAKEN cy/z17� DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE AND SOURCE: // AL// 6_ C, QUI i ;_e_S c _CLIo I t S L5 RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: DATE /-/d - /7 , TIME /'%n11 , B71 �'1,91 DATE COMPLETED 1--- 13" R O _ MAIL REPORT TO: �--La y Pe C_ L\ ANALYSTCIA ADDRESS : Mandatory Mandatory Non-Mandatory Suggested Parameters Limits Results Parameters Limits Result: Turbidity 1 TU Color 15 Cobalt Units Arsenic 0.05 mg/1 Total Hardness as CaCO3 Barium 1. mg/1 Calcium as CaCO3 Cadmium 0.010 mg/1 Magnesium 125 mg/1 Chromium 0.05 mg/1 Sodium Fluoride 2.4 mg/1 Chloride 250 mg/1 LC/ /Q Lead 0.05 mg/1 . Sulfate 250 mg/1 Mercury 0.002 mg/1 Phenolphthalein Nitrate as N 10 mg/1 hie() Alkalinity Selenium 0.01 mg/1 Total Alkalinity Silver 0.05 mg/1 Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 1 3 C1( J Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Specific Pesticides Conductance M icromhos /cm 4J 306i Endrin 0.0002 mg/1 Lindane 0.004 mg/1 Iron 0. 3 mg/1 Methoxychlor 0. 1 mg/1' Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 Manganese 0.05 mg/1 Herbicides Copper 1.0 mg/1 2,4 - D 0. 1 mg l 2,4,5, - TP 0.01 mg/1 Zinc 5.0 mg/I Radioactivity Molybdenum Gross Alpha pCi/1 Ammonia as N Gross Beta pCi/1 c (4--Fhaspimte ran C 1 H ' 6 Fc'ci5 k: Radium226 pCi/1 ISzschn Strontium 90 pCi/1 _ pi/ 6), T , c 17, LI Less Ilion Tritium pCi/1 i H t , , L. L, Stan Rech SUP-348 : 77 :22 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS January 4, 1978 A. M. and Catherine Sprague 8592 County Road 24 Ft . Lupton, Colorado 80621 Jesse E. and Dolores C. Frank 4429 Pearl Street Denver , Colorado 80216 Adolph and Bettye R. Anderson Route 1 Ft . Lupton, Colorado 80621 Daisy Lee Tidball Route 1 Collyer, Kansas 67631 Michael A. and Helen S. Krzyiak c/o Johseph J. Krzyiak Route 2 3106 North Huron Road Pinconning, Michigan 48650 Robert Cecil Allee, Jr. Route 1, Box 255X Ft . Lupton, Colorado 80621 Barbara L. Allee Route 1, Box 255X Ft . Lupton, Colorado 80621 Mack M. and Johnnie F. Jones Route 1 , Box 225D Ft . Lupton, Colorado 80621 Phyllis J. Williams 14496 East 26th Avenue Aurora, Colorado 80011 Thomas P. Tidball c/o R. N. Thomas, Guardian Collyer, Kansas 67631 V IS NN C N V s C) C Y i[� ry I • .. w C Z m < rt— WI- 0 t N C NO �. y J H 2 si it m a fi RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30{• (plus postage) I Z t $ w • SENT TO S v< 's PHYLLIS WILLIAMS • PORDATEK z r • t .0• � g ii STREET AND N0. --- --- 11 w �' E 9 u �' La / 14496 :. 2nthzwE Io aflU POSTATEANDZIPCODE Z ¢ tt, •` W e n J OP I NAL SERVICE FOR ADDITIONAL FEES -- 3/97 S I W V e " �� J E O RETURN 1. Shows to whom and Oate delivered 15¢ p En W'1%iz p~C t`85Q W F . u SPECIALDELIVERY 502 U Q, at tV\ p z 1� (extra foe required) — - _. --- - ` 01 .443 1 drip ,.."....,° J IT--t PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— ,._ 1-4 Apr. 1971 3600 < NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) r. O •a Yf u cro -ors ,�-ssi-asa INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED,I.RECEIPT FDR CERTIFIED MAIL— SENT TO (plus postage) THOMAS SIDBALL POSTMARK OR GATE STREET AND NO R. N. THOMAS, ZUARDIAN } P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE COLLYER KANSAS 4,--: __ ___OPT_AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES —I 3/978 0 RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered ..- RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only -. 150 �. SERVICES 1. Shows to-whom,date and where delivered 652 i — With delivery to addressee only .. 85e I O DELIVER TO ADDRE_SBEE ONLY ...... - SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regm red) 50Q tl]iSlO3d '1d1303M NtlOl3tl 9161'A°N'lief uuo3 Sd -PS Form NO INSURANCE -COVERAGE PROVIDED- 30 Apr. 1971 3800 a z p ,� • NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) D T m d CA > "1 � �❑ �, a avo: lova o-av-nsr o' m 0 H a a RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED e > " e) n " (r yC N01 F ° m SENT TO MAI1--30S, (plus postage) I"' o °2 E s °s o2` C STAN — a. n e 2 E7 O wa o $ o l0.3 STREET AND NO. POSTMARK I O 9 ~ n 2, LUillj. xN = e H 9 : st,v u pr.,' w r", NAl IC N AOV{(7�dCA 4`4- n $ cm O C �•� �- �' ' '`A2('77Y7 a RETURN 1. Shows ttl whom and-date delivered — — 15¢_. 3�9/7B 'q ep,'< -9- a . Cjv RECEIPT -With deliver 2 Shows Y to addressee only............ 650 SERVICES to whom_date and where delivered.. 350 DELIVER i-- With delivery to addressee p 0 ADDRESSEE ONLY,., only .. 85't SPECIAL DELIVERY .. 502 Y soj�. (extra NS A J ~ O~; 1 E quires p s PS Form -- Apr. 1971 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— D '� �z �T,' -NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) W • . __ o ll 2 y acm: reya o-5st-ssa h >0 y RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED �, $� MAIL- z • —a F. BENT To 30s` (plus postage) h a MACK & JOHNNIE JONEc POSTMARK OR DATE W w z x • H o c 3�STREET AND N0. H W �2T r 2 ; a fi„ m _f ___ 22SD cc P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE ` Z ¢ �' ppw e m O ay O V lS7 p b� W , • • W Fes' us in i • _ > V< W y r-� W h ,� C N. ,,• > 1 p W—.__� OPTIO A SER ICES FORJIOOTC16 FEES 39/78 y I O O S Zf� �w ro O n„ RETURN I. Shows to avhom and date delivered js - r 0� I-� �5.y RECEIPT With delivery SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, ata andrwhere delivered' .. 35Q W 'y' W w ° W D W OELIVEq 70 ADDRESSEE—ONLY With-deliver to addressee onl Q J ' '� 3 rc ' J SPECIAL DELIVERY ._Y. ..........__......__ 502 �' FG C U-I- .<. > < 4 1'o i G 2 Z (extra fee required).....:......-.: _ ¢ �' Apr. 1971 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED_ "' "I-*F `" °'� U \mil " i° NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (s°° ether side) °°°"n'+e 0-ssi-4sa RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED-AND CERTIFIED MAIL I 7,--;;t:^7.7 rrrrT 707 _r -_, -_ ___Q CERTIFIF' MAIL-30¢ (plus postage) o • j" _ IC POSTMARK 1. ~ I � •• ‘• AT.M. & CATHERINE SPRAGUE OR DATE , W cr- SLREEr AN/ NO. cc J 8592 CO. R.D 24Th i e s. 'O„T(lE AND ZIP CODE - _ Q. = .13 1;0 7 , FT _ LUPT0N, CO , 80021_ I ' t v—H ii OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 3/9/78 L d € C O I.T•IRJ Shows to whom and date delivered z t C • o 1.'.CEIFT With delivery to addressee only 65¢ I . < D 5 X .1 E D ' Z. Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 y w • V _ V(r, JLRVCES With delivery to addressee only 85¢ S. a u ° - `••-t Ill LIVER 13 ADDRESSEE ONLY --- 502 ti — ,I 4+• n#ti bR>. \ 0 si MAL )ELIVERY (extra fee required) -- - �,�1,�w. 'd Y. Z P5 Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— -01 `fitlol` (See other side) _ A 1T71 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (-GPO, 5iv 1574 0-551-444 � MN1HS Ttl15Da JESSE & DOLORES FRANK POSTMARK _!`— — OR DATE i.....____ :TPEET AND N0. _ -- 4429 PEARL ST Cr.) \ °0 TTTE 4ND 21P CODE ------ DENVER, CO 80621 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR_ ADDITIONAL FEES_ --- 3/9/78 ('' IILTURIJ 1 4haws t6 wM1om antl tlate delivered • ENDER: Complete items I.2,and 9, RLCLIPT With deliver 15p Add your address in the 'RETURN TO"Y to addressee onl reverse. space n SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date antl where delivered.. 35¢ 9 CE_IVEI? With delivery to addressee only 85 1. The service is requested (check one). '0 ADDRESSEE ONLY 4 — F-1 SPEC:Al DELIVERY .,. 50Q n Show to whom and date delivered 25¢ (extra fee regw red) — -- PS Form O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 452 Av. lyy, 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (v CPO: 1574 0-551-454 NOT other side) ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. stwr , Show to whom and date delivered 852 O ADLPH & BETTYE; H1NUmnora ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom,date,and address of delivery ..$1.05 STREET AND NO. l(Eees shown are in addition to postage charges and other RT 1 ees). C\., P 0STATE AND ZIP CODE ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: LI} FTLUPTOA? CO 80621 3/9/78 JESSE & DOLORES FRAL?K .,—y _OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN ii 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 15¢ �--' With delivery to addressee only 65¢ �7_ RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 35¢ HOC 78-15 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 85¢ . ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY __ 502_ 6401 O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) 4 EGISTERED NO. 640]CERTIFIED NO. NSURED NO. PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) 53 Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO: 1474 0-551-444 (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent)Ilhave received the article described above. ruiMAKK GNATURE t DAISY TIDBIIJJ DR DATE I ❑ Addressee Authorized agent STREET AND N0. RT 1 DATE OF DELIVERY ` T9-4 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE POSTMARK In __C_OLLYEB NA 67.6_31- 3/9/78 T /- / DRESS (Complete r--y OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES � � Pbta only it requested) • C RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered IS¢ ‘C.71/ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 65¢ SERVICES ID2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 35¢ II((E� With delivery to addressee only 85¢_ UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE:CL. DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50¢ CLERK'S SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)- I INITIAT.S- Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) L'. L \, -W I.' / 4" _ i 3800 Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL CPO_nog O-551-454 t'i' GOP:le)fi-7-243-058 IeHAEL & HELLEN .NnL4i..•••• -JOSE -11--KR7YTA?t siWT A3ID ND3106 N. Huron RD l.` P.O. STATE AND ZIP CODE �IDICONNIT?G, MICHIGAN 48650 3/9/78 I i.1• --- - - ,4_, OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL.FEES__ _.. I ----., pETURN 1 Snows to wnom one Cafe Celivernl 650 With delivery to atldressee only 65¢ RECEIPT y, Shows to wnom,dale antl where tlelivered 1 j550_0: 5¢ !i C• SERVICES Witn delivery to atldressee only 5 d P DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY — — - — SPECIAL DELIVERY ( tra fee required) Z PS Form Q1nANCF I nVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) *pr. 1971 ... 38k ^GPo- lean o-541-asa Pn------ - 3.RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED Al) f:E-�R�IKiED_____ RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL—30c, (plus postage) rt SE abERT ALLEE, JR POSTMARK z E a � 'frig y " m r, w In m m o O o g? o ST*1 ANf;M.Box 2 5 5". a $ -D �' m y o a o^ � S x g o^ Al. >n or: P.O. STATE AND ZIP CODE y n a I'—' m v ,`. FT LUPTON, CO 80621 3/9/78 �a p" mD t ig m � 6 g a g 2 � .`: OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES- p n' w ,A n 2 fri r 0 o;�CJ p rJ n. p g 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 15¢ m O = E. rz h a-tn �• ggyB i�a RETURN With delivery to addressee only 65¢ - m ' 3 F-' m P • u w g — 4 RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom,data and where delivered 35¢ e E ,p D C J� f° n SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 85¢- K SO Z o a y n. 11 6. L. DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 502 p a O E ,.< �.K = gg n A SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) O-'rp, �' m n d. a Z( PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) E w = r8 T d. opi,- $, Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPa: 1454 0-551-454 r S 4 z �. R 47 S A a as N -A >I or 0 O P `c .. , X _ 0. O M a nD i*30 se as • n LA ' ti a �`8«e ..� n�° y Ste~ « ;T E" l' I L ~ ° - :8a g� "2 5 _ o�, yydm g9_`f m - «g 3 « a� A\ R� N vE'E" _ 03' ° 3. - 1ci 5 Li! ' . E. ry°•��=J▪ ii*..ii i• 2'2,71, y r sgo" y 8 rlp,,p`11 _ u J <=y, ao� t-ri 1:: f. aged 8r .` m b `418 $ a''o� «8'" l'i 0:4.4 - I� - L F.ii sa a„-, s«..ge..3w:.os4«ao at. I- E. ot . u e= rjx ��c � r n m9 , s e1 t. r ' V ! �, % �. ` f.d �l 'a_4-\,)4 , j/( i1 _ , ,:I, `i, I yy 3� Cq i �i +;ice Z! ;.c s lo it' LIs t J°�' r rte, :t -,,-,\,.'' ,a ,,-— - ,'- r ," '` �v, /i '' ''' r `PPP, �a J4k 8 I, h 2,,„ 4.,44-., , port" z� n ', �oV" -,^� h� t Wz V0 os Zh i VZ i l'n _`__ - c ,a09'J o I,`,4 ,;-. ini sE�i �po� J '' H kLf a • "`CSC ��, �SZ^J I \b // \1 // O � N 1•tVPR C'+ F jf� p d °+ k'yi4' I vY e 7 I`1 :!4:::ahV 1 \V'x E V� � ° \ / I � Ni. N 0 ,,yA p / ..II (s) / Q v°� Aar-_\ J ,� ��f 17` , I v % j 1 v _— T .. L i ( / / /1� ti s N, ti � 5 ' h 3h wh , 1000D --6 ° CLao° PI'71, - , { ZBZ4_4.i BEFORE THE D COUNTY , COLORADO PLANNI COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No . SUP # 348: 77: 22 Date Jan. 17, 1978 APPLICATION OF Stan Rech ADDRESS 15267 Weld County Road 18, Ft Lupton , Colorado 80621 Moved by Ben Nix that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of Oil Recycling and Disposal Site ^vering the following described property in Weld County , See attached T bl d be KgaaNaigiMianKKEUMIUMIKIMRKKIXXiXIMMIRXRRXX§tXXftXRRXXIKX UNEMYKKEKKKK for the following reasons : 1. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that there is insufficient evidence available to fully evaluate this application in regard to its effect upon the immediate area, its effect upon the future development of the area, and the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the county. This is based on: a. The Colorado Geological Survey indicated in a letter dated December 30, 1977, "We have received this report and information as submitted and recommend that this application not be approved. This is based on waste water with 12, 000 PPM, which exceeds state limits for water placed back into the subsurface. Motion seconded by Jerry Kiefer Vote : For Passage Chuck Carlson _ Against Passage Frank Siiokla Irma White Ben Nix Harry Ashley Jerry Kiefer Percy Hiatt The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings . X 0 4- 44 H N 11 O 4b 0 -C4- I w •• o' 00s ••4 d1 I c0tr) •C O O 0 •N N C C -o 0 +40. 0. 3 0 49 f� tt 0 ..O 044 0 0 F— •►I U 03 4-O• 14 C 0 0 co . U 0 X 0 Z N q .C -C 0 0 N 0 +) +-) *el U 0 -o a 0 C C •, O O C O a14 Cr) 0 +1 0 • •►I 00 C o .C O) +1 'O +) 4- .►I •-1 i-+ C U O 1•r -U •,1 a1 1-4 0 0 •. C V) 0 .C.C 0 Ii C •-4 Cr 1 +) 0 44-I 4- 0 I 0 Ir W +.) O) 00 a) C O s Ia 0 C 0Z (^) 0 .A M v 0 •--1 >. +I 4) . C7-14- -6•J ++ to .C 'ct I 0 N C g 0 ++ O 0 0 O 41 3 0 C ++ O 74 .00 o C o'UJ ..C v +I •.1 I +' ••I ..I Z 44 0 Um a a 34 to 0. C .—I O u) 0 0 oN00C .C +� 4- C.-1 m +. +4 N •.4.--► -C 0 C 0 .--1 0 +1 0 0 O .C Ia (r) +i S•H I +-) o .. +) -C) a) 0 O.+. J •'4 C 0 0 .--1 0 O H OW 3 0 0 0 V) a) c 4- .C Z 4 0 q -CNO 00 s, 1 0 +3 - 0 CO '4-' 0 3 O• • O • a cAv 0 0 4- ••-I -O Co CO +) C7 • 0 0 •.i 0 O. CO CO C o .-i co 0 N 4- •r1 V) 0 V)4- 3 4- 0 •1 M 0 0 .-1 O O. Ir O) 0 -o .C 0 C U d •.4 0 1.) 1 .C C •-1 C 0 0 0 0 V +1 1, C a C C•O O O -C 0 0 0 0 U 0 ++ +1 Cl.) +) 1.1 0 -0 CO C CO O 'N _C 4-, •�..� . 1 • ff 0 +-) N) -0 +) -O ►i'O O 0 0 0 U) 34" 0 S 0 0 .C Cl 0 0 -C a 4- .44 to a) -c ►� 114 00 a) o cQ ++ t0 0 O 0 4- Z..1 o Z - 3 CN O 0 0 0 a) O O. a c.0 • 1-441 I• 44.0 .i-) C O-+-) ++sO 4 kI N O H O 4- 0 C 0 0 o 0. o o o OCOZC O Z C 0 C ••-1 L V) •4-1 0 0)C1 U -M C +-) O W d 1 C .-4 C 0 •►1 O C -C 0 O F•• o•C et 00000 (JU J _C C0 V) _C 0)V +-x ••1O •,1 +1 O C 0 Ia v,O1 a 0 W 0 00 O 0 ZC V OV) ++ 0 Stan Rech SUP-348:77: 22 P. C. RECOMMENDATION January 17, 1978 b. A representative of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has indicated by telephone that according to the water analysis submitted as part of the application, the water is not fresh water as proposed on the application form. A further concern of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is a potential for ground water contamination. It was recommended by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission that a referral be sent to the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources, for their evaluation of the proposed operation and any potential adverse impact on the ground water in the area. c. The City of Ft. Lupton has indicated in a letter dated January 12, 1978, that they do not recommend the application be approved until assurance can be made that the ground water will not be contaminated as a result of the proposed operation. d. The Weld County Health Department has not made a full evaluation or recommendation of the proposed operation • prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing on January 17, 1978. The applicant needs to resolve the concerns of the different issues raised by the referral agencies. These issues include the folloring: 1. What will be the quality of the water being disposed of at the proposed facility? 2. Does water of this quality have a potential of contaminating surface and subsurface water? 3. Is the proposed method of water disposal a reliable and effective method to use? 2. The applicant has not supplied evidence of acquiring an easement across Mr. Adolph Anderson's property for access to the Special Use Permit area as defined on the submitted Special Use Permit plat prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing as requested by the Department of Planning Services staff . 3. The Planning Commission recommends the application be tabled until the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for February 21, 1978, to provide time for the applicant to address the concerns posed by the different referral agencies and the staff and secondly, to provide time for the State Engineer and the Weld County Health Department to adequately evaluate and comment on the application. CERTIFICATION OF COPY Shirley A. Phillips , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado , adopted on January 17, 1978 and re- corded in Book No . VI _ of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dates, the 18 _ day of January _ 19 78 Secretary , The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on February 21 , 1978 , at 1 : 30 p .m. in the Weld County Centennial Center County Commissioners Hearing Room, 915 10th Street , Greeley , Colorado . Roll Call was as follows : Percy Hiatt Present Ben Nix Present Frank Suckla Present Chuck Carlson Present Jerry Kiefer Present Marge Yost Present Irma White Present Harry Ashley Absent Bette Kountz Absent Also present were : Gary Z . Fortner , Director of Planning Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator Chuck Cunliffe, Assistant Zoning Administrator Ken McWilliams , Senior Planner Kay Norton, Assistant County Attorney As a quorum was present , the meeting proceeded as scheduled. The minutes of the February 7, 1978, meeting were unanimously approved. APPLICANT: Best-Way Paving Company etal CASE NUMBER: Z-294 : 77 : 12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . NE4, Section 2 , T5N, R66W LOCATION: Northwest of the intersection of 35th Avenue and 4th Street SUBJECT : Change of Zone from "E" to "A" APPEARANCE: Robert Mathias , Tom Connell DISCUSSION: Chairman Carlson first called for the staff ' s recommendation regarding the application since presentations have already been heard from both sides . Chuck Cunliffe then read the staff ' s recommendation for denial . There being no questions by the Planning Commission, Robert Mathias answered several questions that were raised at the last Planning Commission meeting. One question was whether or not there was asbestos in the rocks . He read a report from the Asphalt Institute, 1975 , regarding the Asphalt Hot-Mix Emission Study which stated that there is no serious air pollution or employee health problems resulting from the use of petroleum-derived asphalt in hot- mixes . He also had several tests run to see if asbestos could be found in the rocks and he received responses back that there was not enough asbestos to run a test on . He also stated that gravel is used by everyone , so there is a need for it . He also discussed the water table situation and property values . Noise will not have an impact on the neighborhood and the site will not be visible because of the proposed 4 ' vegetated berm and 6 ' high privacy fence. Mr. Kiefer expressed his concern about how long the property has been owned by Best-Way . Mr . Suckla asked how many complaints had been received regarding a heath hazard because of the operation. Mr. Mathias responded by saying that to the best of his knowledge only one person has con- sistently complained about a health problem. Mr . Kiefer also questioned the difference between F-1 and `l'-1 . Tom florin responded that the F meant 1'l ooclpl ain and T meant Terrace with 1 meaning the high quality . Planning Commission minutes Page 2 February 21 , 1978 Tom Connell then read a memo from the Community Relations Committee of the Greeley Board of Realtors regarding aggregate deposits and the economic advantages of having mineable aggregate deposits in the area. Chairman Carlson then opened the floor for audience partici- pation . Kent Jackson expressed his concern regarding the value of the gravel resource and his opposition to the site . IIe went on to state that the residents in the immediate area considered their neighborhood as a valuable resource which should be protected in the years to come . IIe then presented a map entitled "Miscellaneous Investigations Series - Boulder , Fort Collins , Greeley Area, Colorado , Map I-855-D" which identified the Best-Way Paving Company 's property as having a source of low quality concrete aggregate. The map further defined large deposits of better quality aggregate in the region which currently have Agricultural zoning. He also presented a list which identified 11 other different gravel operations that are in the immediate area. Mr. Suckla commented about what effect this would have on the area after it was mined out . Gary Fortner responded by saying that it could be an asset 15-30 years after it is mined out if it is done correctly . Discussion then followed on what standards could be put on Development Standards for the operation . Jackie Foose, surrounding property owner, stated that she was concerned for children of the area and their safety. Vicki Reed stated there is a limited choice for the use of the land and after it is mined out there is no guarantee as to the future use of the land. No further discussion. MOTION : Be it therefore resolved to deny the application based on the staff ' s recommendation . Motion by Jerry Kiefer , seconded by Percy Hiatt . A vote of "aye" by Percy Hiatt , Jerry Kiefer, and Irma White . A vote of "No" was cast by Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, and Chuck Carlson. Marge Yost cast a vote of abstention. Split decision - 3 to 3. MOTION : Be it therefore resolved to approve the application . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Frank Suckla. A vote of "aye" by Frank Suckla, Ben Nix, and Chuck Carlson. A vote of "No" was cast by Percy Hiatt , Jerry Kiefer, and Irma White. An abstention vote was cast by Marge Yost . Split decision - 3 to 3 . Chairman Carlson stated this application would be forwarded to the County Commissioners as a split decision among the Planning Commission members . Included in this action is their individual comments for reaching their decision : Percy Hiatt : "I fully agree with the staff ' s recommendation here that it is the opinion of the them that the zoning was not faulty , so I will have to go along with that and let it go at that . " Ben Nix : "I think previously I have made it quite clear my feeling as regards the County Comprehensive Plan referring to mineral deposits of which we have a limited amount . Now it ' s debatable about how long these supplies can and will last , but I feel that eventhough this cannot be needed for even as long as 50 years then we ' re amiss to allow housing develop- ment or any other kind of development to develop on this particular gravel or mineral site and this is the reason for my voting the wry T have . I have a real concern for the Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 February 21 , 1978 feelings of the people living in the area. I also would like to say that I think Development Standards can be required so that these people will have to develop this in such a way as not to be a nuisance and if this couldn ' t be done then I would not be favorable , but I know it can and I think that we must preserve the minerals that are available to us in this area. " Frank SuckIa : "My reason is pretty much such as Ben Nix ' s . I believe our natural resources should be preserved whether it be gravel , coal or other natural resources . After they are depleted, this particular site could be made into a park or open space or other uses and I would like to see some strict land use put in this so it would be presentable and be a good open space for the area and my reason also--as far as noise level and health hazards, I don' t think that the health hazards from the gravel pit would be significant and the noise level--probably most homes have more noise in their homes than you have in the gravel pit . With you stereo or television going your decibels get pretty high sometimes and I would like to see some good standards put on the land use permit . " Irma White : "I have gone along with opinion of the staff. They have said that original zoning was not faulty and I believe that and I see no change in conditions that justify a new classification. I would, however--if the Development Standards had been voiced into a motion differently, I may have voted for it . I have some questions that haven ' t been answered and one of them is how valuable is gravel in our area, how much do we have? Both sides have presented evidence both ways and I haven ' t been satisfied with an answer to that . " Jerry Kiefer : "I agree, too , with the staff 's recommendation primarily I suppose on two points . One is I also have not been convinced of the need, although I understand the value of the mineral deposit . I feel that the negative impact to me on the surrounding neighborhood outweighs the benefit from the mineral deposit and part of that then, my second concern rests with the property values of the land surrounding. I feel that even with diligent care then the majority of the residents could not have been made to realize the future plans for that piece of property. " Chuck Carlson: "For myself, being in agriculture- and knowing the value of gravel in all forms of business and knowing the fact that we have good gravel in this country , knowing the fact that in 1957, ' 58 and ' 59 when I was in college we repeatedly said we would never run out of energy and that ' s not even 20) years ago and here we are looking at it straight in the face. Another thing about the gravel . It is the same difference . We are never going to run out of gravel? I just cannot be made to believe that . Another point , the asbestos point that was brought up I thought was irrelevant , didn ' t have any Planning Commission Minutes • Page 4 February 21 , 1978 foundation to it--none whatsoever because the rocks in this country around here have no asbestos particles such as that what was presented to us and I think that was not relevant to this situation. Also , I think along with the fact that the value of gravel that we have to us in this immediate area with the growth that we are facing today and with the gravel that has been asked for from this area to others , it is a very valuable thing to protect and I think it ' s something we need to look head-on into with a very clear mind and I think this can also be a great asset to this area rather than a detriment to this area because I believe that this can be dealt with through our rules and regulations , through our health and reclamation projects that it could be entirely lived with. I don ' t think the people would even know the thing was being there with the aspect that clearing the air which is very strictly controlled and patrolled by the State Health Department and this can be done . " APPLICANT: Charles Peterson etal CASE NUMBER: S-142 : 77: 15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SW I , Section 16 , T5N, R66W LOCATION: Northwest of junction of U.S . 34 By-Pass and 71st Avenue SUBJECT: Preliminary Plan - Peterson/Alexander Subdivision APPEARANCE : Harlan Stientjes DISCUSSION: Mr. Stientjes did not feel it necessary to review again the proposal by Peterson/Alexander as previously presented to the Planning Commission on December 20, 1977 , but did state that the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission at that time have now been resolved. There being no questions at this time , Ken McWilliams then read the staff ' s recommendation for approval . Mr. Stientjes commented that he was not in full agreement with the staff regarding the method of handling the 230' stub portion of the proposed 26th Street . He desired to discuss other possible alternatives with the applicants before the County Commissioners decide on the matter. A great deal of discussion followed regarding who is to pay for the paving costs of the construction of the 230' stub portion of the proposed 26th Street and when it would occur. Commissioner Dunbar indicated it was difficult to arrive at a figure for bonds because of inflation . Joe Hastings , surrounding property owner to the east , was asked by Chairman Carlson to express his feelings regarding this matter. Mr. Hastings indicated he was concerned more with the drainage from the property , but said that at this time he does not need the access . Alice Hastings said that she felt it would be Peterson ' s responsibility to develop roads within their property to the east and they should not be held liable for the cost of the roads within Peterson/Alexander Subdivision . Planning Commissio- "inutes Page 5 February 21 , 1978 MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to approve the application with the recommendation that the method, of handling the 230 ' stub portion of the proposed 26th Street to be worked out between the applicant and the staff for a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" by Percy Hiatt , Irma White , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Chuck Carlson , Jerry Kiefer, and Marge Yost . Motion carried. NN APPLICANT: Stan Rech i CASE NUMBER: SUP-348 : 77 : 22 ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt W1 SW -, Section 22 , T2N, R66W \�� 1 LOCATION: l miles north and 2 miles east of Ft . Lupton immediately north of Artisocrat Ranchettes <o SUBJECT : Oil Recycling and Disposal Site APPEARANCE : Stan Rech t, DISCUSSION: Mr. Rech again briefly reviewed his proposal for the oil i recycling and disposal site . There being no questions at this time, Chuck Cunliffe then read the staff ' s recommendation for denial of the i application. Mrs . Yost asked if , according to the Weld County Health ' Department ' s letter, something could be done so this would not be denied. Chuck Cunliffe responded by saying that the Health Department ' sl. letter was based on information submitted by Mr. Rech . Mr. Rech indicated, however , he could change his method of disposal if ', necessary to get approval . Discussion followed regarding the depths of wells in the area. Mr. Hiatt expressed concern about contamination of wells from salts ,etc. in the Town of Platteville ' s water. John Hall of the Weld County Health Department expressed concern regarding disposal of salts and possible contamination over a period of time . Linda Rech indicated that they have been trying to get the questions answered, but at this point they do not know where to go to get any more answers . i1OTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend denial to the Board of County Commissioners until questions can be answered regarding quality of the water being disposed of, potential contamination of surface and subsurface water, whether there are active wells in the area, whether the 45 wells referred to in the State Engineer' s letter are actually being used, which direction does the surface and groundwater flow, what is the possibility of contaminating the Fox Hills Sandstone aquifer, and is the proposed method of waste water disposal a reliable and effective method to use. Motion by Ben Nix , seconded by Irma White . A vote of "aye" by Percy Hiatt , Ben Nix, Chuck Carlson , Jerry Kiefer, Irma White . A vote of "no" was cast by Marge Yost and an abstention vote was cast by Frank Suckla. Motion carried 5 to 1. Planning Commissior "inutes Page 6 February 21 , 1978 SITE APPROVAL FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS GILCREST SANITATION DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . NW , Section 27, T4N, R6GW APPEARANCE : Dick Leffler of Western Technical Services DISCUSSION: Mr . Leffler gave a brief presentation on the proposal for expansion and indicated there would be no discharge from the facility . Mr. Hiatt asked how much the horse power will be increased with the expansion . Mr. Leffler responded that it will be increased by the area capable of increasing it . Mr. Subkla asked how the water is going to be disposed of and was told the recommended use is by percolation/evaporation ponds . There being no further questions , Tom Honn read the staff ' s recommendation for approval . Chairman Carlson said he was in favor of the expansion this time , but feels Mr. Leffler should notify Gilcrest that in the future they should look for additional sites elsewhere . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "aye" by Percy Hiatt , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Chuck Carlson, Jerry Kiefer, Marge Yost , and Irma White . Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Shirley A. Phillips t The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on January 17, 1978, at 1 : 30 p .m. in the Weld County Centennial Center County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, 915 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado. Roll Call was as follows : Ben Nix Present Harry Ashley Present Chuck Carlson Present Frank Suckla Present Irma White Present Jerry Kiefer Present Percy Hiatt Present Bette Kountz Absent Marge Yost Absent Also present : Gary Z. Fortner, Director of Planning Chuck Cunliffe, Assistant Zoning Administrator Ken McWilliams, Senior Planner Kay Norton, Assistant County Attorney As a quorum was present, the meeting proceeded as scheduled. The minutes of the January 3, 1978, meeting were unanimously approved. APPLICANT: Stan Rech CASE NUMBER: SUP-348: 77: 22 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . In= SW4j Section 22, T2N, R66W LOCATION: 1z miles north and 2 miles east of Ft . Lupton immediately north of Aristocrat Ranchettes SUBJECT: Oil Recycling and Disposal Site APPEARANCE: Stan Rech DISCUSSION: Mr . Rech presented his request for an oil recycling and disposal site, that being having a water truck go to a lease to suck water out of a pit or tank and disposing of the fluid into a pit . The fluid is then pumped into tanks where any oil which may be in the water will be separated. The water then goes into a leach field. According to referrals received back in the office, this could not be allowed because the water exceeds state limits regarding water being placed back into the sursurface. There being no questions at this time, Chuck Cunliffe then read the staff ' s recommendation for tabling the application. John Hall of the Weld County Health Department was then asked to explain the analysis of the sample taken from Mr. Rech' s site, this being 12, 000 PPM. Mr. Hall stated that the test run indicated there was 12, 390 PPM total dissolved solids which is approximately 1/3 saline solution. Discussion followed regarding how this would compare to ordinary surface water. Mr. Suckla said he felt Mr. Rech' s request would be an asset for_ those concerned. Mr. Kiefer asked what the procedure would be to assure the City of Ft . Lupton that the ground water would not be contaminated and was told that documentation is all that is needed. Jim Brannon of Jim ' s Water Service indicated he feels there is very much a need for this type of proposal . Planning COmmissiou.1.7inutes Page 2 January 17, 1978 MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to table the application pending concerns posed by different referral agencies and the staff and to provide time for the State Engineer and Weld County Health Department to adequately evaluate and comment on the application. Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "aye" by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Harry Ashley, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , and Irma White. A vote of "no" was cast by Frank Suckla. Motion carried 6 to 1 . APPLICANT: Best-Way Paving Company etal CASE NUMBER: Z-294 : 77: 12 and SUP-347 : 77: 21 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NE4i Section 2, T5N, R66W LOCATION: Northwest of the intersection of 35th Avenue and 4th Street on northwest perimeter of Greeley SUBJECT: Change of Zone from "E" to "A" - Open Cut Mining Permit for Gravel Pit APPEARANCE: Bob Mathias, geologist of R. v. Lord and Associates DISCUSSION: Mr. Mathias first presented his program to the Planning Commission by use of a map presentation illustrating exactly where the site is located, which involves 45 acres proposed to be rezoned, in regard to 35th Avenue and 4th Street . Best-Way has been in operation intermittently since 1965. He then showed a slide present- ation which showed the entrance to the pit looking north across the agricultural land, Friendly Village Mobile Home Park, a church site, Johnson Subdivision and the City subdivisions on the south side of the street . He then explained in great detail the mining plan and different phases of the operation and the reclamation plan for the area. Two public meetings were held by Best-Way for surrounding property owners to explain to them their proposal and allow them to express their opinions in regard to the operation. Items of concern brought out at the meetings were that landowners want the berm removed from the southwest side of the site, they would like to have a privacy fence around the area so that the pit is not in view, they were concerned about their health regarding dust and noise pollution, devaluation of their property, and a secondary access onto 4th Street . Best-Way has agreed to build a 4 ' mound with a 6 ' fence around the area and they have no desire for a secondary access onto 4th Street . Mr. Kiefer asked if Best-Way has had a deed to the property only since March of 1977. Mr. Mathias indicated that this was correct, but that Best-Way had an unrecorded contract with Norman Ruyle since 1971 to sell the property to I$est-Way . There being no further questions from the Planning Commission, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff ' s recommendation for tabling the application . Discussion followed regarding the need to use the mineral deposits prior to development . The planning process was explained by Gary Fortner and legally by Kay Norton. Mr. Carlson then called for comments from the audience. At this time Vicki Reed presented to the Planning Commission the original petitions with 167 signatures of landowners opposed to the request which she indicated represents 80`', or the landowners. She also presented Lhe Planning Commission with a copy of C.R.S . 1973 law Section 34-1-305 which covers preservation - Planning Commissic ,, linutes Page 3 January 17, 1978 of commercial mineral deposits for extraction. She also sited several items in the Lord plan that were very vague and unclear in her opinion . Linda Vasenius also presented the Planning Commission with petitions of 54 signatures representing landowners opposed to Best-Way ' s proposal . She also pointed out the numerous health hazards that, can be associated with gravel pit. operations. Tom Hellerich, attorney for Ray Larson, landowner, said that in reviewing the application he feels there is no need for the rezoning and that the existing plant on 35th Avenue is a non-conforming use in the Agricultural zone. He also feels that a 100' wide strips on the west edge of the property carries a covenant which forbids its use for anything but residential development . Other comments by Mr. Hellerich were that he feels the plans by Lord and Associates is very vague and inadequate regarding the control of dust , where the water will come from for the operation, and drainage. Norman Ruyle, however, had no objections to the proposal and feels there would be no dust or noise problem. Several other persons, including Ray Larson , Keith Tanner, Mariana Reed, and Robert Foose also indicated their strong opposition to the proposal . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to table the recommendation pending a detailed plan for adequately buffering the two land uses, develop- ment of a safety improvements plan, submission of evidence that liability coverage has been obtained of not less than ?100, 000, clarification of the proposed use of the access onth 4th Street, method of controlling the drainage between the proposed 4 ' berm and 35th Avenue and between the 4 ' berm and 4th Street . Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Ben Nix. A unanimous vote of "aye" by Chuck .Carlson, Ben Nix, Harry Ashley, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt, and Irma White. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Rolanda Feeds, Inc. CASE NUMBER: SUP-335: 77: 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . El NEB, Section 31 , T2N, R64W LOCATION: 3 miles east and 1 miles north of Hudson SUBJECT: Chicken Manure Dehydration Facility APPEARANCE: Stanley Stolte, Anthony Zarlengo DISCUSSION: This application was tabled at the June 21 , 1977, Planning Commission meeting pending the receipt of an air pollution permit from State authorities. The permit was granted in November after Rolanda installed a $100, 000 anti-pollution scrubber. Anthony Zarlengo, representing Rolanda Feeds, briefly reviewed the application and indicated the scrubber that was installed has now eliminated odor according to State standards . The final permit was issued by the State Health Department on November 30, 1977, which states that Rolanda has passed the visual opacity test and the emissions test. Copper emissions were also of concern and cannot now be detected according to State officials. Stanley Stolte of Rolanda Feeds, Inc. stated that work was begun Lo install the scrubber on June 22 and the operation began in mid August. . An odor Lest was taken by the State the clay of the f i na I permit . Ron Stow or the Weld County Health Department eNp I a i ned Lu the Planning Commission the standards set by Planning Commissic _ Minutes Page 4 January 17, 1978 the State regarding the emissions permit in regard to the operation and the opacity test . Discussion followed regarding the frequency of the tests and complaints received. Mr. Stow was asked by Gary Fortner to read the ten conditions required by the State to operate and control the operation . There being no further discussion, Ken McWilliams then read the staff ' s recommendation for tabling. Chairman Carlson then called for audience participation. A great deal of opposition was expressed by George Shaklee, Allen Alter, Bob Fritzler, James Bell , Dorothy Gertner, Mrs. Jim Bridgewater, Bob Denning and Russell Hays. These people all represented many people also in the audience who are opposed to Rolanda' s operation. All indicated the odor was just as bad as before the scrubber was installed to eliminate odor . The odor is still just as offensive and unbearable as it was before the scrubber was installed. Those in the audience opposed to the operation asked the Planning Commission to make a decision soon so they would know what they would have to live with in the future. Chairman Carlson asked if there were any chemicals that could be used to eliminate the odor. Ron Stow indicated that there were other ways, but Rolanda chose the scrubber. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to table the application with a decision to be made on February 7, 1978. Motion by Harry Ashley, seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "aye" by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Harry Ashley, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt, and Irma White. Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Shirley A. Phillips /sap I Date : February 21, 1978 CASE NUMBER: SUP-348: 77: 22 NAME: Stan Rech REQUEST: Oil Recycling and Disposal Site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. W% SW%, Section 22 , T2N, R66W LOCATION: 1% miles north and 2 miles east of Ft. Lupton THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE denied FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that this proposed operation is not in compliance with the provisions of Section 3.3. (E) (2) of the Weld County Zoning Resolution which states: "The Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners shall consider the following in making their determination in approving or denying a Special Use Permit: Compatibility with the surrounding area, harmony with the character of the neighborhood and existing agricultural uses , need for the proposed use, its effect upon the immediate area, its effect on future development of the area and the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the county." This determination is based on the following: A. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the applicant has not demonstrated that this Special Use Permit for the oil recycling and disposal site: 1. Will not have an adverse effect upon the immediate area, 2. Will not adversely affect the future development of the area, 3. Is in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. More specifically, the applicant has not shown that the oil field water to be disposed of at the proposed facility will not con- taminate any surface or subsurface water. B. The Colorado Geological Survey indicated in a letter dated December 30, 1977, the following: "We have received this report and information as submitted and recommend that this application not be approved. This is based on waste water with 12 ,000 PPM, which exceeds State limits for water placed back into the subsurface." Stan Rech STAFF RECOMMENDATION February 21, 1978 C. The State Engineer's office, Division of Water Resources, indicated in a letter dated January 20, 1978, the following: "Our records indicate that there are at least 45 wells within one mile of the site which utilize shallow groundwater for domestic water supply. Most of these wells are located to the south of the site and are apparently down gradient. Due to the possibility of contamination of the shallow aquifer, we cannot recommend approval of the Rech application unless the developer submits additional material which proves that the disposal of oil field water will not affect the shallow aquifer quality." To date, nothing has been received in our office to indicate Mr. Rech has submitted additional information to show that the disposal of oil field water will not affect the quality of the shallow aquifer. D. A representative of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has indicated by telephone that they do not recommend approval of this request because of the potential of con- taminating surface and subsurface waters of the state. E. The City of Ft. Lupton has indicated in a letter dated January 12, 1978, that they do not recommend the application be approved until assurance can be made that the groundwater will not be contaminated as a result of the proposed operation. F. The Colorado Department of Health has indicated in a letter dated February 6, 1978, the following: "Based on the info- rmation made available to this office regarding the proposed operation for which the above Special Use Permit has been requested, it appears that the methods proposed for treatment and disposal of the waste water are inadequate considering the quality of the water involved. It is therefore the recommendation of this office that the Special Use Permit be denied." G. The Weld County Health Department has indicated in a letter dated February 16, 1978, the following: "Based on information available to this office, the oil wastewater recycling operation as proposed by Stan Rech, appears to be unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Future build-up of salts in the soil would be detrimental to most flora. 2. Adjacent domestic wells are subject to con- tamination due to the possibility of lateral migration of salts in the soil. It is , therefore, the recommendation of this office that the special use permit as currently proposed be denied." Stan Rech STAFF RECOMMENDATION February 21, 1978 H. The Office of the Attorney General , State of Colorado, as counsel to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission and Water Quality Control Division, has indicated in a letter dated February 16, 1978, the following: "We are greatly concerned about the oil recycling and disposal site proposed by Stan Rech. He may need a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit or a subsurface disposal permit. We recommend that you deny the application until he has come to the Division for a determination of whether the permits are needed. This is particularly important because of the possibility of violation of State law by seriously polluting the groundwater." 10. The site shall be monitored by the Weld County Health Department on a six month basis according to standards drawn up by the Weld County Health Department . The Special Use Permit is subject to revocation upon evi- dence of adverse conditions being found by the Weld County Health Department . Stan Rech SUP-348: 77:22 STAFF RECOMMENDATION January 17, 1978 The applicant needs to resolve the concerns of the different issues raised by the referral agencies. These issues include the following: 1. What will be the quality of the water being disposed of at the proposed facility? 2. Does water of this quality have a potential of contaminating surface and subsurface water? 3. Is the proposed method of water disposal a reliable and effective method to use? 2. The applicant has not supplied evidence of acquiring an easement across Mr. Adolph Anderson' s property for access to the Special Use Permit area as defined on the submitted Special Use Permit plat prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing as requested by the Department of Planning Services staff. 3. The Department of Planning Services recommends the application be tabled until the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for February 21, 1978, to provide time for the applicant to address the concerns posed by the different referral agencies and the staff and secondly, to provide time for the State Engineer and the Weld County Health Department to adequately evaluate and comment on the application. Date : Jj -nary 17 1978 _ SUP-348 : 77: 22 Stan Rech Oil Recycling and Disposal Site uLsc 7PTION: Pt. W2, SW4, Section 22, T2N, R66W LOC ,ON: 1z miles north and 2 miles east of Ft. Lupton :E DLPA=.I NT OF :PLANNING SEEVICES STAFF RECOTIEI;DS TII!1T THIS ;Eru:'ST TE tabled FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : _1. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff _____that_there is insufficient evidence availabla_to fully evaluate ___ this application in regard to i , ff c�t upon_the immediate area, ___its effect upon the future development of the area, and the health,_ safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of h r and the county. This is based on : a. The Colorado Geological Survey indicated in a letter dated December 30, 1977, "We have received this report_ and information as submitted and recommend that this application not be approved. This is based on waste water with 12,000 PP"?, which exceeds state limits for water placed back into the subsurface. b. A representative of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has indicated by telephone that according to the water analysis submitted as part of the application, the water is not fresh water as proposed on the application form. A further concern of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is a potential for ground water contamination. It was recommended by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission that a referral be sent to the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources , for their evaluation of the proposed operation and any potential adverse impact on the ground water in the area. c. The City of Ft. Lupton has indicated in a letter dated January 12_1978, that they do not recommend the application be approved until assurance can be made that the ground water will not be contaminated as a result of the proposed operation. d. The Weld County Health Department has not made a full evaluation or recommendation of the proposed operation prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing on January 17, 1978. A j 1 Y ,--4.,.....-.7„ 7`:- \\1, DEPAR1 AIENT OF PLANNING SERVICES %_ , _, v A `:✓ "I ,:\ `-: , Il PHONE (303) 356-4000 EXT. 400 915 10TH STREET ® GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • COLORADO December 19, 1977 Stan Rech 15267 Weld County Road 18 Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 RE: Request for a Special Use Permit for an oil recycling and disposal site on a parcel of land described as Pt. of the W of the SW* of Section 22, T2N, R66W of the 6th p.m. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Rech: Your application and related materials for the above described request are complete and in order with the exception of submission of evidence of the granting of an easement across Mr. Anderson ' s property for access to the Special Use Permit area. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for January 17, 1978, at 1 : 30 p.m. Said meeting will take place in the County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you f and/or a representative be there to answer any questions the Planning ) Commission might have with respect to your application. i It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature tp ' any town lying within three miles of the property in question. Therefore, I have forwarded a copy of the materials submitted to the Town of Ft . ' Lupton for their review and comment . According to our records, the Town of Ft. Lupton will review and comment on your application on January 12, 1978. Please contact Rose Bowles with the Town of Ft. Lupton at 857-6667 for further details on the Ft. Lupton Planning Commission meeting. If you have any y questions with regard to this matter, please do not Ihesitate to contact our office. 1 Respectfully, 7 / ',en McWilliams •, ssistant Zoning Administrator ' r I:sap ar y 0 SENDER: Complete items I,2,and i. e Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on 3 reverse. 1 1. The following service is requested (check one). z- o Show to whom and date delivered 150 O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 1,50 u, RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom and date delivered '650 ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom,date,and address of deliver.850 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: JV REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. i� le 1 (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) In I have received the article described above. C SIGNATURE O Addressee ❑ Authorized agent -e:- / _2?-e_.1-_, -.--- , c 4.si �� rn DATE 9,k1plyERY "PQSTMARK 1977 i)LC . t7 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) O ), 1 1977 71 rn 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE CLERK'S ). INIT)A S F. {t GPO Is75—O-568-047 'Y y _.� t : n bus postage) faT TO — POSTPiARI( c . r _ _ OR DATE , 'S' �., r. u, S ZiL AN: ZIP CODE III �, � �R,�t . . ems,':Z 1 Cy :rI"f i,AL Q.,•'..)"_', .�_1 IIIIL'TIC,'^!. H.TS «' 1. LL:.„,J to I,.z-1 C'!d UUricC::LCCTOd , 15¢ I Ilr 51"T7 Ln., :.„,J"I ti'IV, cry to A:4r:,c:0 only .. C5 r, _I'T 2 ° .'-'7 '',.slto c-s3, CTO L'L11Vered . 35d N E,_, o:.',F,) j./ 1'1it1 L:'1, ry to address=only_.. Cad_ • DJLIVLI1 70 C�'WILSSEr 0,',LY --- CUd -CI,,. _,v-iiY (OTt^' fcc 'Ccll1rCal -- • 1°S r,__ r ��®/' - nnvsr prl•-'^^-- ref 11nn - C O OP-or ,:do) r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES y• - w PHONE (303) 356-4000 EXT 400 r 915 10TH STREET O GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 w r • t COLORADO January 24, 1978 Mr. George VanSlyke Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Stan Rech application for Oil Recycling and Disposal Site located on Pt . WZ SW*, Section 22, T2N, R66W of the 6th p .m. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. VanSlyke : Enclosed is additional information which may be of help in your evaluation on the above request which we discussed on the telephone on January 16, 1978. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully, akja• Clasi:kteud Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator CC: sap Enclosures IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR A.M. DATE TIME P.M. WHILE YOU WE ' E • UT M r OF l g PHONE NO. (''i ■ ■ •LEASE CELL TELEPHONED ■ ■ CALL AGAIN CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL ■ ■ WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH ■ -ETU•NE9 Y9 U' C, LL MESSAGE IJAA -5 - IC SIGNED CASCADE®L1-C2334 1 I I I .III ... 5,71sad' _ -k € L___.-- -- •------ _______.c':1., i,'.-J!':L.P_1._- \%: \-_ \'. - .if ic'c!cic•:; L :---_1) 1- 1,oi,:cI I)cU;(:ri pl. ion IP ,1q . Hy Application Ilr'cu i vUII 4.2/ -77 l 7:7-__/-/. .____ Application Foe - Ite-coip t T! `q 3 s _-/7 - _-- __-- = E—__-- R e c o rdi i n g F c:e —__-- �, _----__-- - /,/ -- -� App] i ca Lion Comp Ic:Lc — Sc,e f-er#)eir— --/J2 lA---------- - k- P .C. Hear ing Date : //,/7 j 7 -fir I) ,,, --- Letter to Applicant. Drafted —14/9 .--- ------//------ .—. Referrals Listed --,hV) —_. ______-,./ _— Public Notice Drafted ___.412/11 ____--� Field Cheek by D.P. S . Staff i \-31_1_?)____ —_OV-Z_---- Sign Posted by : /O4 — — i C--- File Assembled '- \ _____ ____>._ Referrals Mailed \ ______ ______5__ S 1 Legal Chock to Coun Ly Attorney \ \\ _ _ . Legal Approved by County Attorney NU!ii____ -T0.D . , 4 V ,Cbaindexed \d, \ %S- Notification of Applicant \a\ c`\___ %_Q-_ -- Public Notice Sent Out by : _____AL) . Sign for P. C. Meeting Prepared .494 I Sif�.___7- Surrounding Property Owners Researched r Airphoto/Vicinity Hap Prepared -- -____-- -- " - J F Properly (hvnc�) s N')Li I. i eel by' : // /�C5� \\� % / i Agendas ,Mail eel by : //9/ 78,-- - \ - - --�� - - I C / 4\1 11c C'Pv-C`� r Referrals - Co�:)1�-1ci.o _ Preliminary D.P. S . SL,1] f Comments _ ? _ CO !_-_i_?2_ CRC, _ -. z � � a 1 Staff Conference � �� __-�- M D.P .S . Comments � 2111_I' C � . ,,.%,,..\3J _ - P.C. Hearing Action : \ _26- = �=�1` -- ___ AC_ . ._ I P.C. Resol.ution \______ _ Q-'>k,, , l' Case Sent to Clerk to l3oard ?lbflS --_ 1 Sign Posted -A— M 1 1 � ` ____ �— D C.C. Ilearinf; 11 1B Action 41 _ — _ _ C. C. Resolution Received % History Card Complete %\ \�� .-- -----%, Q f C. C. Resolution Sent to Drafting . `_y\� -- - -\a'_-- Drafted on ;bly l al, 6 00 17 8' PFt Document Sent to Clerk Recorder P .C. Minutes -r�,- . 1._. _.._ _ _ �• " • ' / 1 b�r v-'a �.e • ,,: .--- 7 RECORDED EXEMPTION NO'•'d xemp dL, tion No . 1309-22-3�E77/ ' _ , -gnwAmendn�nt; to Recoi .� i. I� -� f S o n�2,.. i�; LGA�=�;JDESCRI!'TION . othwe5 � 'one�quartex °Mer®�iani�'�de�'d' �ft' "` "4 ;r"' . 7,ho West one-'Half of�t�ho o f•.th4. 6th PrinciPa .eginni`ng,�a't.,the• . 4...,. i � - ��Y' L'1 ' 1 i a n v ZL U ,� .. ...y}.G.�`J c r w.lJ�l. U.� Q.g 1�. Township olorado mole portico ? , {hence N00°UO O0uE of 2639 6ed ��- ,,:,•. M�. . 1*''- - - -', lar� on' ari^ 54 •. z_ 1, County, Colorado, a distance ' Southwest corner said seine°said' Section 22 Section 22 ; thence So � t bearing along the '! ' ' ,, ,;•ter corner said Sects alf Southwest one- IJc s I]orth said West one-h said feet to the i °"' line ��9 �5 � th • feet to the Northeast corner along o 4 13"!I along the .3l- 0 0 ` .-_-Nhy _ f 1370 -th©nCe SO '.r uarter a distance ° } on©-quarter; uarter a dist.anca;`of—• �,:�`�.� -� ''' :one-half Southwu J ¢. Southwes.t, one-quarter . Southwest_`::` .a ,} .�;;_. �J�st -has e said West one-ha. corner •saia .ldest -one a � id' yl�est, one=`' �,,,,;� ,;;�.;',' , ; . c��i:._1�.X►.fee t t��c' �nut��ea �. a`To'��." e.:SAuth_.� n � tr'" ' 2637.71- fe �ta` u. 4 ' 2h"W� "tier-p 1 4 -t•h thence �� er a distance of 1317. 59 feed one-quarter ; r uart t half Southwest one-quarter of beginning . 79.t�1'' acres more or less . Contains._,. . . . ____._.._...._..--.___ ._-_- ._ LocAr�ov MAP .1h C •, 11t • • t t /.,:200 \ ? ,•:'; ' e: ' '�ti f,'`13 /4 • •S. �4 6)I5-______ „„..4,....,_,—..,-- P—. 4-7—c ---: �: .'��'.t,'',° 2 #77,',,.. !•-•,,, ,,,,,Kht -, �"Cor, 'ec.22'' /V.t• Car., iN .g/Xt a. �r..—,si` '2! . .,Kr, ld<o/f( °: �, s 3 • r eN.,RGGW. sc• ^�V r ,1/, 89°49'25'E. ..L 520.8/ 330.00' , 990.81' V I ^' Section 22 m __. t.d. mica,._;,,u - .L,_._-_.td=— ,. ..,-_.._, - _.. '- .s,. "0 ,.. EC�ado _ �p t_J-�•.u...,_, - N R66i , •,r "'� ..•~. a s,•%- oo 3°0 400 a ' r *v •'t`�i�y+'•.y7:rP'~£':!,V +':• `�.• ',,I .30' y ' , . `R • �� '..:a ,; .•%.4.49(`1' i°- t . r ;uyL Sit ,..r•..',.,,!•"•-•,•'',4r•,. • ..�' .3 Scale:l:•=50 • '• , " ;.;,, •• ..,.a.r •,—.,o..w—I —^_ °o- -_"_ - .-..,_--: . . . . _ ,_—......�.�'•' •-'1'.'':." .. w+' .1'''c�'. -r,t'y;'t ; :'ft'T°°:,. '' `, - Z.''.'"9, o: - �tbpr , �. Y _ :y'C +41 • \9 I o N �'�° h� ,,, 5e e.5' ') i CI)t%1 v v N o\o, \s ZB (Colo.N v. h1l rna M c c cc MsO r� V I.. 4 I ') f +c -V - e LJ•v !•, ;i-P3=/z•` ‘..• k, c� "Q Adolph Anderson babov�tdescribc = r c. �- _ _r . e , .�.,1,,, -I, { o f. the '. = ' 's s, ....)-.......,.....-44 -,..-4,,,,_,-_,,,...4.1 ^i:-- �.. �� a Cr) ----. .' owner i n °e d a �e "rho, .,p 1 ,, „1 r` 6'-: :;,, •her'®l7y V1 ,,a. `�r .isc.S+C-11 O 4 %`::',':',A;:.',,,&:-`,:,,‘.`r•... zw :a.d,��-=..+r•re.'t,� r.4.�'Oa O� v. `..1.:¢'r 4,.z1�p ',Cy Z•ty. d o ,,.nom II .i r Pa .f,h ' a taCh P fuP, . , .h ` _ \- ' g :r,'. ° 'J''' ' ms..,.shown or. _f ; 1 ...v��J .. - .� �I .,,dam _. -" ___.. -,'M ' • � ' ,, � � � •;..; Q•.J ,, ..�. 1,., i .r .` Jt a p `r � ®rdl a'{�l�:ir�� yC _,� ,C S 't2: `C,x;�;• 'O :0-c,?.,....-., S .. t `•, �^ •.Yr; • �•••,' ;'1._•-t .:,,,;\• .. `,•, . ,�'r. ,,./r.-„,..;,•,..•:-,i a s..- -.,�.,_�. � �:�. -. .o `•.,. •_ �•�-r , ' ,�`x,� ' `"� ' � ertifica"ti4� ,P 'oJ -, r• R�- �� • e~z.� ,. -�.F-.,- .t�.�....,,,�.. '„^r., -,rho-•.f oregpa n _ rez. ��e -,- -,..15.',,,.;ha r ' owledged 'bef47, ,. ackn � � �.: , day of ExpireS�� My Commission Seal • a.,�, _ Point °t'fie.t„''rnq o My }{and & , �� • I $ Cox. $e C. "c'r �I Witness ) %�r.G(4.---(2-6111. '..---76-7'•L'6—''' ,. , ^•.a`. v`7:2N.;R•W�aia 7.590---- 330.0 -_,..-..i...,-4,—,.....:—.— „ :t..,t..tiw....e:::-r ,.� gyp„." .. +�r-6""" : C+'�r17`ti �- a�c. --/ 9, � `".„.,,,',,./..,,,S •.;J. • 4-...;11,1,..,-,,,,•1�® a y, I, ,L`e. *x-11-4'+7-:-: 1e,'.?'. ,—'`.�.I ,`), 89°4' �2^ .;� �•C,r, W i S•fr•1". ,r; . „ 'r•,'.. ,,• 'k;,, aa;;:.,, ;'j,` ,, ;--4• • ,,.�.._.. .._ C u n t y R d 18 this al_ 'was . ., ....._._. , ,...^.,..�,.q K �,. u .,;�.,.,r ,�„ Weld o that Pi • zG I hereby certify my supervision and prepared under plat is' ,accePt' that the same is correct to the filing• e and belief The accompanying best of my knowledge oved for andd,aPPr/ /,, ,�, ;, 4, .*> -yr' tL�- �. - .,• �' '� o .• Oar, -O.a.d,• OUnti�1' -� � . t e:CI; 2730 airman ° Reg. P.E• 8 L. No . Commissioners 1,79r der L County/l �j9"'d 1 • ATTEST : �:. �� :��.bte, agate a . 1/4[1, Stan Rech SUP-348:77:22 REFERRALS December 19, 1977 County Attorney Ron Miller (sent 1/24/78) Soil Conservation Service County Engineer 4302 West 9th Street Road Greeley, Colorado 80631 County Health Boyd Hanzon (sent 2/2/78) Frank Suckla Colorado Dept. of Health 4468 Weld County Road 19 363 Jefferson Street Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Ft . Collins, Colorado 80521 Rose Bowles, Secretary O - 857-6667 Ft. Lupton Fire District P.O. Box 158 Ron Schuyler (Sent 2/2/78) Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Colorado Dept. of Health 4210 East 11th Avenue Colorado Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80220 1313 Sherman Street Room 703 Denver, Colorado 80203 Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Comm. State Centennial Center 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 State Fish and Game Commission 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Rose Bowles, Clerk O - 857-6667 Town of Ft. Lupton PC - 1/12/78 1040 Hoover Avenue Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dr. Jeris Danielson State Engineer Division of Water Resources Dept. of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Soil Conservation Service (sent 1/24/78) Box 487 Brighton, Colorado 80601 I - ' :-. 1)_ ,H 1 1_N I OF PLANNING SERVICES r IN EL D COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER (- - 91510" STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 I -I C +r-^1 r. ) 17--,-, GARY Z. FORTNER N [.:1V1 DIR CTOR OF PLANNING t l .1_ k y 'h �`•-`Lh'' r_ 3r rr PHONE: 13031 .,64000• EXT 400 ..r..w E...-1 Li L .,..J./i;, COLORADO February 2, 1978 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Stan Rech for a Special Use Permit for a Oil Recycling and • Disposal Site This item ‘•iill he h^ Ird before the Weld County Planning Commission on February 211978 If you have any comments or suggestions, may we please hear from you before February 10, 1978 . The loca- 1 tion of the parcel of land for which this application has been submit- ted is pt . IV2 SW* , Section 22, T2N, R66W . I Thank you. c''' r:, 0„('‘._kit-U 0,..,,,v,,..... , r Enclosures .I i II i , il ,l. I .I, I () ,;','`,`.: Ii ;1 li', I,I I riff i I•:I I IN1me. VII I,III 1,11 ,1111 1 I I I Mir' GV1L1i{ ,',1Afd l A111 ',11N I I I'1'1,\I I I =`,r _-, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES A. �.� WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER ,A I �� 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 1 GARY Z. FORTNER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ® PHONE (303) 356-4000, EXT.400 1 COLORADO I 1 64 1 January 23, 1978 J 1 1 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 4 Enclosed is an application from Stan Rech 1 for a Special Use Permit for an Oil Recycling and I Disposal Site A This item will be heard before the Weld County Planning Commission on February 21, 1978 . If you have any comments or suggestions, may we please hear from you before February 3, 1978 . The loca- tion of the parcel of land for which this application has been submit- ted is Pt. IY. SW-1, Section 22, T2N, R66W • Thank you. f Enclosures • I WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GLENN K BILLINGS VICTOIi JACOBUCCI ROY MOSER NORMAN CARLSON IIIUI ',II INMARK -)l `••- I 11; I1.11 III ( 11 I'I AI11JIFJ( I `,I liVI(.l-`, %'':'1:\f r 1 wi I i) ( nl lfi l y ( I N l l rll lIA I f I II I I If << -',. V I'1 �r,' 111', Ilnb',flil I I 1r t,IIIIII l, lnlnlfAlini ihtl rli T 1;4i �:'.. k;* 1111 ,^ , GARY r r ()Ic I rv( li 'l�,',,fir J, 17 1 -''r• 1)1111 C 1(111 UI I'l nfiNIN w;'i•t+� $�li+1 4,2 ;1� IQr� pi tow, C II)CI 'C hi 4000, f X 1 400 �y i v 'r S�.71 tint • , re COLORADO January 4, 1978 To Whom It May Concern : The Weld County Planning; Commission wi I 1 review a request from Stan Rech for Oil Recycling and Disposal Site on property described as follows : Pt. _11A- Sl9 i Sec. 22, T2N, R66W If you have any sug;-g;esLrons or ohjecLions, wr I l you kindly notify us in writing before January 10, 1978. Tentatively , the meeting, by the Weld County Planning Commission is scheduled for January 17, 1f?78 . If you wish to attend the meeting, please call the Department of Planning Services (35J0--1000 ext . 104 ) one week prior to the tentative mooting duty , and we will be able Lo provide you with more accurate information on the date, Lime, and place O1 the meeting . • Sla- 1'(111 Jr'' rf'('(' I v I ill', ;i f'Olly o f Iii t; 111) 1 l I i (';l I l uil because your iI IIIl(` alJl)e;irn as ;i OIII'1'orrridIiIJ; property c)\\net' owning property within 500 feet u1' I he prupur;ed u . "I I It ( ( IIJI1I ',• ( f 'f ;' 11',',1' I, 11 I, , (d I III) I in, I ITT,', ill lUli i'\i ,II'I'(I I IIi 11 r',I'd II NI d lt1AiiIAf'I '1)0 II II11 I I I ''1,11;1' _ sue . % `t �e- -�� UEP�r�• I WENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ,e3; .6-!.., ^� WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER 915 10th STREET 1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 F ;, . GARY Z. F0RTNER !„ � . d. t�r; DIRECTOR OF PLANNING r: ® PHONE (303) 356 4000, EXT 400 r +''r • rr' z , c 4. COLORADO December 19, 1977 i 1 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ! Enclosed is an application from Stan Rech for a Special Use Permit for an Oil Recycling and ' Disposal Site I This item will be heard before the Weld County Planning Commission on January 17, 1978 . If you have any comments or suggestions, may we please hear from you before January 10, 1978 . The loca- tion of the parcel of land for which this application has been submit- ted is Pt . Wk, SW,, Section 22, T2N, R66WV Thank you. • '- t..-,/...60-I,1 --.2)/(:\I"Zt 1,-1/ 61(.,11?1 I Enclosures 1 1 1 1 wi If) (;))IINTY (•O MMIS`,IONI-li', t,1 ENN K lill I IN(,:, VICToll JACUIIU(.LI HOY MUS!H NOIIMAN CAH!SON III'll ,II I,lf,nlll JR n_ r n2, OILFIELD • GAS • PIPELINE • SPILL & PRODUCTION SPECIALISTS p ,'- la February 17, 1978 66 0,'#,04 Weld County Planning Board Weld County, Colorado To Whom It May Concern: At the request of Mr. Stan Rech, we are forwarding the enclosed MP 900 information that may be of assistance to the Planning Board. Our MP 900 was developed to meet the needs for a chemical treatment of accidental oil and salt water spills on land or water. MP 900 is a completely non-toxic compound that has been accepted by the U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture for use in all areas of government inspected food plants. MP 900 will take oil and convert the contaminant to a neutral, non- flammable, water soluble solution, that will cleanse the soil and help promote vegetation inthe contaminated areas. With salt water spills, MP 900 will tie up the chlorides in the chain of chemicals, thereby enabling the brine solution to go into the ground well below root level; this enables the soil to regain its productivity. After a contaminated area has been treated and seeded, there has been the reoccurance of new growth in as little time as a few weeks. l During the past few months, our Mr. Weldon ets of Certified Welders, has cleaned numerous oil spills in Weld County. Last December, several Colorado State Agency members witnessed the clean-up of an accidental oil spill in an irrigation ditch at Ft. Lupton. The enclosed photographs, catalog and literature is for your assistance. If we can be of additional service, please do not hesitate to call on us. 4 Very truly yours, , ✓- �. I --- ----- r Gerald Fishman Vice-President Encl I L______ I R.O.BOX 47532 c 8300 SOVEREIGN ROW • DALLAS,TEXAS 75247 U.S.A. • 214/630-1333 ill la II1 IIly, ge ' "A Vii 4111 IP �i t rgc'nsaile et •, t t^• .s:r 0/...o.::::..•4 '%i, a '`.*.I . . �• y i . S :r • Ate` _ zt•. • 1 , I .e- tis f , •' Ili .T- - .:.fit• -. •�.,: --y...�.�'�'�'-- : -x• _. ,,�" ,,•! .� ��.. •,- ,., t Joef I Pill41:1-- • - J a' e fr. 4 Ote .-i t'• . ....r. u i v 4 %. 1 . .. . . . . , . !• - / e R �.•jrt -- '�. • 1.. ,.. • , li f Y ,, i ,��.• t 7 a \ 1Y - . . Y". .a+ • S r r. �• - _ .. 4 l • V(y� ` • -9 4t St xu r ilk. s c : 1 h et w • y JO j 4 a Y �G • J .• pry - -:� ,, , 4 . - .' `` ' ILirF• ` r F .,.1 1 r�t . 1 : et • - t'i fjp: it 1 r Sn L I DA1� 5 AFTER _ ___ __ 1 .. . .. ,,FAI , or to: . t — 4 . Y A Nit Mr lip 4 J c.•� 1t • f Ya� fi •A , ♦ .. t o, r �nK►₹ •• fi .. 4. r , r .: • a t % 'iliti V °Ilift i• 140 r is, . A4 " ) v‘,...4". , .c.is, , : cis sost , . . 3/4.,-$ .. , . ....• . - �.•:,,,, Z•„� , t _ ,t ;. . • ,. , �, .� St fLJAYS CATE3D 2 ;Fr•' :Ir. 7. . ..4. `4, : . or ?If•ji . . A"., v ' r 13 VIP el ht.41. bi ISiit,t 0 ' "A • • •{:x er._. .. `L 1l' 1'*• , 'It: yy I..i _ +! \! ,,,--1/4- . •�' a j ,- 1. Se 1 K 11;1.-..974• 4'. .7.- _4,4--ii • e . i4 a �i '� .._. t . . ...v. •�' .tee. �LL ,f ' ! '..1A 4 :. : 4 t • * A tw' -tq• , •r . 0 rio....1. ♦ • •• -s 11t ♦ a . •r .. ` Y f,ifs f •'• r �.•. ? .. • • .�{ • •,•- •a .• • Wie if. {;•49 I ... till, . N IS 7 y. a . itillISISks. t.. ,,,, „ . i ,..H , VrRRe • •t'a . } • 100. f I • / it ` .y Y. r ow pos. r>aka :: ..:., a. ^t o :��r 2 . r \,. ••• .... .. . .... - ....• x �f..„.....„......„..ex,„:„.., .. . .,..e.. . .. ..,,,,,,.. r_tri 'Stiso., a . c. 110111111111.. , • is .. ♦. .,L 4. if a / -�� . _0.gat-V" I`t w ' :RAJ. 1 ��jjj :♦ \ ,Y .j/ �..a� r•g > � ' IV , •+ till •l 1. "•{(-1! [� .17 + 'd,I ._. .. • • Or 2Ve - tai ‘ 0.....• 't / / I l' {�,• �' •, I f l� P ' � T ��.LL. Cl4�. �•YY•yy\iid . 1. , t`' P, • "`.�. • _ �' f ^2 '�l' • Z. K".:�N;' R'.tAttivi • a` • ++,. `. •+.SKY -.n ��' _. It✓ : - .1t-.y ,.-:� -;h . M• \.'3 a L"'j'.�J.+✓ �AI � f! Y v w1R„L' �. ,. SvwA i q. l • am *a,. 'F'' •"V ..'�1�lT^ f._-� 'X ♦� t4.., • •• • ... .t.t*lJ.Y _ .'TT,T^ r f a •f a •�.. „ a ♦ w. . }• - L _. i t \rte. } >{ �� 9' Ilrli7�. ,•. '.y..:. e• ....,yt. Y :1. _t.� ... .• .... :0 • 1 .. .t.U. AilibitteNT - ..•If .. onrartill .4" •Awy•' 7... ., t. y,.Y 'N X � •A�` v f ,a• :: 7t f. .'.:.Y 1 '. Y' ..t. \ rl I a •• '�F - ),y' Sit: r {{�� I. t. y.{. ' 114-v�� •y jar. _ 'a S.•. y _ .J4 _ J"/.- .'r i,Ali• p j _ore ae= • XA{ 3CJf7 Try L� : • t a ...% . '•t• a ask Y M W.. .'lei ,iirt..,r • . • II* .. •a�► Y. • j•�yry�Q ✓ F us . . .': Y' • ....d. .000.1 - - _..' ^" T' Fes , 33. % , F Xt • 1 t I I ,rl s i Sr yr f. fI Jf _ .. aft I��. . . ,"1 _' i• •rx. r... V4CaS it"..y-' w ... .., y • • ��• k Y` r L' • w�, ` .•••C _. {{rra.y f • e qy+ t y Y •rw ..Amor.. am .: . . µ SOS A AWI. VV� :. 0 yt RIM.. .., r 1 , willtk .x.'-.::. 1111 - } Ate. - `,, ••• - -, .'-.•Y- •.. - ..art_ -4 r .-. - HI-. . r• M . Ir �►- .. A' i 4 in. I, i':'„4,. yam. 1 .J .r • RI. • r. • •A..7 ...a. .' "Iiii ire .grit' ...) .1°T 0:"4 041.1. a .,„„0-4 I4 7".:11.Y-. • fig • ... • . xy. 1' . 0 P .► V. 5 I A •It / ., it ] - . - a icy + r 0 .`�' • ' i • rI f" °t . s rr" *w ,t„i,ip �C ii r + t. '. . . .- 41- %Sid SWIM 1 re "AM P- -.�:.._ 4a -: a in !-, _ c.! ' 8 .4 �M"sr.. ." -Sr — — e_tam,_ •• • .yrw --.... "fir. .ra" �" - _ _ _ y��, .wrectillaligleSerea. SilliMilliger Y • t 4.• Wir - 4fr,r04 le _ i[ This situation can now be reversed . . . more important . it can be averted !SALT WATER & OIL SPILLS NEED NO LONGER BE A MAJOR PROBLEM • • • , Laivton's methods and maten' als are . • available to assist you . I L virt s . ty c nc • of Te SALT WATER SPILL OIL SPILLS ON LAND \' y = ' 0ottrr Tana . ..„ te.t.,,,,,pre 4 , , a . .--t, , .: ; — . , ._ • • Ip • -ergielialapill la> epit :II IrYi I 4 v 4 .. t,i4a-ie,„,:e""se 4. . 04 .N fiCiampils Lin, l'; • • • west, s ; .t • - , ' ' • , .,. .. I 1/4t-ta .., . , 4, 1 . . . . .. • , _ • r, 8,. , . - ...- $66-4•11.'Past , f ,,. ..f. tie . r' a a. • � .. Y `624 - ,rte. 1. •1. i i . = ,fir •> ;* • r . a, •j.. .+ •"III-fit I ra- L: , • • `- • is' ;-- •' i , • _y} • ,;,, •t ii 4.': f t i y11\ 9 ' w. - . . - •rz a .. s. I •. t • I i / I T. /r - -.! - i‘ it • it... ,. . d .. .:. t 4 , i le . A a . . .. The photo above shows the results of a brine water spill that When an oil spill is covered or buried , it will percolate up as occurred several days earlier. ( Note the contrasting green soon as moisture comes into contact with it. This spill was grasses in the background .) Below . . . 30 days after treating treated with Lawton's OD-1 . The clean-up ( below) was ac- the spill with Lawton 's MP900. New growth is clearly evident. complished fast and economically. The MP900 completely restored the affected land ! u 1 1 - } R i • VI t4 • as A: _ - t f I %% 1 % 4: it . ,. . .4d: ‘414 • • -, il rs . , -44 , f# - gl - 'it* 71 to , ; ' -i, - I ,.. .. . ,t istal 0 : i 5 * * 4.4111.4 cla ale 4t1/4 y1 , - • v 1 sr\ :A4s i.t ir ix. .k - 0 IWNIMIks toy • �'"" ,. A w A" - •, 4 � - .— : --—1st .�,.�•� , T al a AW�� .', oaf • to ,.. • ` • g y i * ..-� - Y y 1 On I j� f A4, . ,7Pin: . t t • ._ . all --"I"--- —par # F N 'es) s 1 1 A . lin4 , r.T i #�� Y *II. • e elms % , . - -- • rt 41.0 p V 4 .- . 44 Scurry County, Texas IE Carson County, Texas rg rA, IAI re eall Lawton 's methods and materials are available to assist you in the elri restoration of valuable lands . To date, your only other alternative for IAMB the reuse of accidental oil spill or salt water-damaged land was to NAVA remove and replace the top soil . This extremely expensive method /_� averages approximately $25, 000 per acre. In addition , you also 4. alifili destroy the areas where the top soil has been removed . MP900 and OD-1 are 100% Bio-degradable products . Our MP900 is a non-toxic water- base chemical that has been accepted by the United States Department of Agriculture for use in all areas of ill government-inspected food plants . When mixed with fresh wat ;' MP900 will tie up the chlorides in the chain of chemicals , then. i enabling the brine solution to go into the ground well below root Of ‘10X44 level . This permits the soil to regain its productivity. With a hydrocarbon spill on land , both MP900 and OD-1 will convert - the contaminant to a neutral , non-flammable, water-soluble solu- tion . The solubilization of the oil facilitates deep ground penetra- Lxas • The PROBLEM SOLVERS OIL SPILL ON WATER OIL SPILL IN IRRIGATION DITCH ref, 4 lir 11. at r. ei 1 41 a a rib .. a‘• ... - NW OW ere jib" e er Se frit ........s. p _., 14 :••• * ?- ir. -t ik irie it • 41k . ' ' . " . op. • i - - • b 10 , 01.1" • w4411 w.. IA A 10 1 , tilli I it, • . • „ . . all 4 1e , AO y �� ant '!�. - .. r �. )• Pipeline break . . . 4500 barrels of oil polluted this river. Law- An entire irrigation system was threatened by the oil spill ton's OD-1 was applied at the source of the break. This , along shown above. Some temporary back-filling was used to pre- with the river's movement , rapidly solubilized the oil . In addi- vent further spread . Clean-up was done with a combination of tion to greatly minimizing the mechanical cleanup necessary, OD-1 and MP900 . Note the reflection of the cloud in the Lawton's chemicals will not sink any oil that is on the water. resulting clear water. Y 4 - t . � R tit .�R• • w 1 e, ��. -. I%ti .. • r xE w. ti. . :r.• 'fir Y r V • ;_ .tra:gre • 4 j r it s*Sritete; ___iir-7. or ....- !i: - -se '. .* J 1 • i • Adams County, Nebraska Weld County, Colorado tion , cleansing the soil and allowing the vegetation to grow at a much faster rate than by natural biological means . On water, crude oil is not a natural food source. For the water bacteria , an adaption period is necessary . In other words , the bacteria needs another food source. MP900 and OD-1 provide this , enabling the bacteria to adapt to using the petroleum as food . . i ‘ When the results of acidizing injection or producing wells are un- satisfactory, the failure is usually due to the inability of the acid to penetrate the oil-saturated formations . MP900, used as a spearhead ;idizer, will almost insure complete, immediate and satisfactory asults. In addition to pollution control , our chemicals are successfully used as viscosity reducers , steam drive enhancers , production stimulators and water flood intensifiers . Our latest catalog is available upon request . r _ , . . . _ . , . ... ., 1 1 IN . . •. .: , Ili 1 i liti I 1 . ..1 1 .•CL Viµ` .%. .:p. 'b. •:.. •Pre ._ • , , _ A' iiy� ,.. j M'.. f. 'rTRF7t• an �• ' r s T.-. ' 4it • L +' r ,Noilicef 4C- A4r a- - ... ae 1 1 al $ • still., • gm .n•-. lLi1s i :4 -0 .. N ! Y a.. Oak• _ w ii S 1reSP. _. o x111 < � r. y * I „„ 114,14 :fiat 4 1 . a IMO ♦ ., V A k a .%. I , di . i .: x ... . .. .. ..H.,. . . , ifri . ' 11 , 5 . . • `v: v a I r 1 0 i/II I 1 .s , . .. I k IF. % sas ism1fir+.._ !f. 5... ilnalril .at lbw. • ill . .. „a.\ • - • .. 'x••51 -' �4: r!. .; a . /... . . i .. • 4. , . /.„..- • . . . .. er •,�� y� y` ��,t„ - {? 5tr1^'S'YAr i �r�•r r � b .. -4,4,.. . \ .. - •T-. .•. '• r ,. .... .,. . . 5 _ 1 '7T1�+•p•' • > i '.:w-0IJ•, a � ♦ Y r. ,V�+♦!I . p .., ' [. ` ,L.- 5ar 1 T . V ._ ' f 1e r1i^~ w �y. '.�N� -� s .. Y w -• : ♦ .1 arl'. . - x ./r,� M 5 T1Ylt 'ft' f.. ':Y i,:.l t ` ' l •. t ... . - _ . yrd".•q _l<.•��.�y''� `^'1'A+7 I - • ^�M�'y k`R�_'•- 14. .6•. . -J.Ir 1 ,1; r ,yr,� � �'�': Y_ 16,4 ..r:6T Y..� r• T.. r,• • h 11. 'T- K - v W.-\ T.W l 11*Ff` ��l.' X •. • . _•.T Seii .- y.M' 1•' �T• 1V r it T • _ yy� a This recent Colorado oil spill covered several acres . The television station and a filmed broadcast was presented that contaminated areas were cleaned with MP900 in just a few evening. hours. A reporter and camera crew were sent out by a Denver THE RESULTS SHOWN IN THE PHOTO SEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTAL SALT WATER AND OIL SPILLS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THE EASE OF CLEAN-UP, EFFICIENCY, ECONOMY AND VERSATILITY OF LAWTON PRODUCTS . Giulia 4 lads LAWTON SPECIALTY CO. , INC . OF TEXAS P. O. Box 47532 Dallas , Texas 75247 U . S .A. (214) 630-1330 Oilfield, Gas, Pipeline, Spills & Production Specialists ©1978 Lawton Specialty Co. , Inc. of Texas. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. II .• ._ • .mow j I . . . w` 0 I . . r1. . L,., A . • I. . I t 6111)S 73 Nil 1 1 f\ i t tnmaillememally. .0 . At win,. 7 1 c.„0 , , ! .t . •Z 4. s fejill . . t - „....,. a. , . , , , .* .y . . .. 1 I • ,t. Y1 . . rt.!) . . I. .: ii,, • • yy V • a. T ¶ I. \ la 7 r sI J . 1 "It en is iti N. Ii Y. r• jr a. •1 . 4 ‘-'1 av .n�— es 'k aa lE Ire } • ejl I 44 j"Thtr I t i !1` r_ , ob -f 1� � V • r• ....: •L. ... • •�, 1 f 4\QNS 1 F li \ t i I. 1 ‘SID ♦ ` i 1 {vsale,asismeamosseamosesi2. •4 ' ?rilt 3 • Cklik.all:rili 15: v H w3. . • a .. ♦ -- ..rw.a- wv.nN ra+♦aa _♦_.___y fit ` II I . le I .4 . g ._ — • �1 ,_. k * N ' 'a . iv I, is \r: `` n. ; yttikillitil:. r � T' it\ i i -tlk.it: \ i - . • 0 \ . air Nl. 44.S•r 1. NI \ 1 CO rib. N. G itif, 1 ., ,„ ..,.., . . . 4s,„,t . , , % „. . o S T s r 1. Nit • • \t a '.+ .1.' 1A Is . . . i CI ii 111/4: its N. . . ) :,„ ii,,,,,,i, . . . . %, b„isi i 4c- t... a Is rylo . , 4 .�t # Fa fk it . t p �` ' di. Y .i,- till 414 . . 4. a Vr Lilt : S lisii . :. �k ,4 f iiiMitt, . \ . . r ., . 0— \ • • 111 I!► w r " :I\ t s ' \1/4 k .• \ ,4 I-. r� j f , 0 --t,410%. (\tie ..: . . , Ili! 1 . 0 t gill P (Jrtilt I Z ` 1 ve ?topcoat Er t . pi: i) • La r' _ _ea 0, 11, 1 . . _ ,, • Alill t . 1 . irto' fs 7 es" "II.' Joe i Zit It tr. IP . . it ler y affisa 4 tor '4 r • e w', :, : _de' ear C. r 021 r D 7 7 tiqo J '; ii 0 . , y'.., ii: ,,,./ . r - ::/eT: r,� l30/ I Y 6 J 3p . .rat r * ` le, ' .: air ! 'r 1 e.! ;F ' 44 Ai" • y' AillialalliallenlaiSale Y r • . 1r -. „ r. .1 I .rte•A. its a-AS sit I• - ', r ,i; • .." 1 INSPECTOR ' S REPORT Name : keeC erg' - No : --- Legal Description of Property : c, c2 — 6C, Date : J — q-- '7/ Time : A'2o gin ‘44-4-7 K 0 K e 04f, Zoning Inspector Note : Attach this sheet to the complaint report pertaining to this zoning violation . INTEROFFICE CORRE PON®EN E 0 • h,.. a -x/ /J 2 ��c, ss.��0FFICFf ['ll�'.4. k•5741 „r ' tr. ;1 DAT Toi (2? G ,e IN RQ1 l y i'7 rr L• "V" Ay--./""e/ Y- / 4i' ....-. 7 9 /),', ! ul 7-e-ei ,L 200 t- 7-:j4.e it Kt kt. e fi.1..1.- _ ,-a - ,v_ect-, ., 1 6,./ -- ..,w,.1-6- 7-e,.?„, el, r__.,-;'.z4 ' —, /. -' L.: /:" '-' . — _,...e.,,,ZL- .'� c_.7.),2,7, __ _.,,,,,,/,,,,„ f f �4►w �6 i� ��dr,� �LIJ �"�l SL' pc-f "LU at--C k _l.(.Lit._ en,,,,,/ . CC zcc cC !c, o f CZ cc i_iir S t Iv c t ti y t'� y,' ( L Li c, ,42L000'�i, c-1L,6 ,_ GL(t_C.�7 tcc_ �j t 9 `)Zt/a /D tv 0),<_C_ Lu(_-r . u1Q-L,./- a-z.„ ` L-/� [� / /4--ttU14/(_, LtiL du a_tk_A_ --/t., 44 iy.' c: zucc.i cl.cii,z' . id / ii_e_._X Ax_e_r„-c'l' L LL-L 29 C=_C_r -67 ' 2-.-2.,71 dL c� [nom, LCt+-a4C II f //� AtesAL, `/fin , /�LL:ZQ 2 IO / G`tL CL /) (t,tt G •Ze,L-7.-pt,01 , e0 - .2_ re) „ -6-1t-, i_et„.,. _ ya-6:61,r_ i -61te,(}2. --4,,e-{ ‘1 i r I � s 4 1 7)1z1. - - -- - __- --.- -- - — '2-z--zi .(-. ___ _ _ ___ .__ -_-_— ,_-,-: _:__,..„,6;---L .(-- _______ ,_ 6-ifyi/.,6,4_ ac--e____(9 g7 _____ -- _- --- - - 7- - _- - - -- - _ __ _ — -_ a \1121,` 14p, ec JAN `��'7F =-J-1, - - - - - RE-GEW P . Fort Lupton, Colorado January 16, 1978 Mr. Stanley L. Rech Mrs. Linda G. Rech Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rech: This letter is to grant you permission of the right to use our rights in the oil field service road as constructed by Amoco Production Company over and across the West Half of the Southwest Quarter (WzSW4) of Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, until such- time as a tract of land can be conveyed by ourselves to you for the purpose of gaining access to the North end of the East 330 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter (WZSW4) of said Section 22, also known as Lot 2 of Amended Recorded Exemption No. 1309-22- 3-RE 77. Yours truly, -,410-'464 Adolph Anderson 4, , '- - -z->'172 ' .'3- Bettyt B. Anderson Subscribed and sworn to before me this /;7 day of , 1978, � 1 = L L-e Notary Public, Weld County, Colorado My commission expires 10-12-811O//em, a c- JQN - I. . �E:I v �' =1�r„�jo; nvn�y I P(2.4,\--le-Tey a. si.,1 NJ ces- a /144‘. • Sv P 7-e+7 Citr 707 , 2, 7- 66. Jo, f? _ ,._ ----K--042.24% k°% „,1 _ _ aWiS-45 6,1- /2 (#-S1 . 9.76 04;45' P '''LT. tili 1. - "‘"ThAfaN /i . \44L,,Ar/1 .[ _ 91C---11#_4(.001) *0 ‘24t1,1, 10,,L5H Lsc.,. �t1 631 s �.0 �=- 13Ar-tom, 71--1-4- 1) 'c, R . ,j , --1-1,,o,,,,,, (01-- ; :—:---a--,C,,,'„, , _ Gerki -v-te Ic-A4,-00,- .., O 6 71 OfiC.— - "(760 4) t* Q z ' AK. AnN4,1_, ca.„st A- 4., 4--fvf 4,4, s- ) 0_55.._ Z( 311.,14..k_ ic2t- _2 "3 1 O 6 N 4-hm-ertk R44 . P ii;i_c,0 1,4,1 f irV14-4,. c+F(15-0 f `\L" Cif10 44 2, I 3 lip 1? ?9_2 . 1 1 Vivo d . b .3 .,6 � !cg0 3 kiss•'OJ ;,! L IQ+ D I Q � 2.5Vh. . _ 1�.,-.` i&Lo 4 2 2_.x..76- 2711 167 4)112 1 - _3V P a CDt-c9i3 - tzea, _ ._b. tI ?s )s.'? coo ` fl . C6:0c?) CD ;diet—S.6 ;4 CaID - - 20 st'2-2 �. giesttL • - 11/44.)1 tile; da< COL c-°�� 51- Seal tnefo? ... 04 0,056-' \,,lak.,44.0,-c- ?Lit,,,,I, _ o � 2.... 3„..4.,....,......c. c 1 ( 22,'..�__.,A,z, _ _S5-0 4 2 1 -_ _ 6:-K..) . -1,_, ---1-4-71-#44.04-rip,.. R- 2,) ?n_ ►_i's'1 ) f3 I.J. I 1 11 4 Z- �. cuP �r r 4To3peicri 7-7 - ck cl u . A M_ 8G9.2 co. 20c 2-` - - Fo -_ LA,►.F - C4.o . a 2. 1 z ' loy C 42429 Psa,ti L Sf _ oLQI t -Foy+ H,-)10-% - .6062t T!D' A_LL _ Asti Lc-c. . I Co R c,v Y ► >` N/_I ick 0,1-1 A , -� ��► - 4L cE . ) z S Pt �- � •,� mac. _ L - 1 t . ) . ?w< 2 x Itvt o _m . \OLtF af i Z2 s v�- C l-o at-6CDr I ^ F . , ,S - . 616E �� ►� aO® i V-1,,- rlii. L , �- I0-4,--A-,...L_Ds. _ .(Ctz.av-t. .. ) _ ii T I ' 1-8 A-L 1_ ---re-..4cvv‘...0.,..f p % _ tg,_(\i . ---ri„O L„,...,,,, _ __ I. c„,,,,a,v ot,,AA" ,../v L. c.),.,‘,. C,E '-.) C Z i ar _c } ,,So - 1.b 12.3 .Mods Auk., _ i - -- - - t}; -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - +tj - - --- -- - - - - - - .I , - - - - t'-i - -- - - - - - - - - - I - - - It' - - _ _ ,, I I, I i I IIf _ , - H - j *.l ' , I rf} I, tfi , , , pe_z) p,flrart c.,k,..1 ,1 €-Rs ---. , i,d -'i.‘,Ni24' TeEzT. 22 'i 2 r.1 e.cb u (D113 ! 1 04...3 a! : s"'r Ai4 2C H' , Ca )_______ .7V Cb2 - 191 i Oy 03 (Pt -. 4 - - 1a - 0 023 VitiiiRk6c4 ARNAS_ irk, foi$ 1 ?P.4.1 1--tbruN 'RI vol CO4Am.•€4,:c.,.. . 4 oett. 1.... ,• .,..,,. isr,4_ s ,-, u..)13 _ _ 01(: -�2 - -- s" 04, A ° -C S.(92 % -�"' - a �'o 21 ,ru . i-3 /.3 i-Z//o Lip _0.-' le- j4ACS _C., 4 DoLre,_c C , - & - - 00 wir-r-7_e kiNfkA44.444.. N- 1, woo._ 1,JaALs1.- - O __ _ 4 DC aS Or.i A 1 r� -gc_il-c4 13 e-± I , . _ +_,,.,... 0,-,te �0(12_1 b, 30.7s 140777 02 �r�c�+4 TtetA- 1 L 1.,:A..,64.4.. 4 Q - -_ +- - 6 "-Z.1(, 7th, V 1<0? FILE CONTAINS OVERSIZED MAP PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE Hello