The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20113121.tiff Kim Ogle in: Jay Pointer [jprmh@skybeam.coml nt: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 1:39 PM • Kim Ogle ubject: USR11-0015 Kim Ogle Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17 Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Kim, My wife ,Susan and myself have been discussing the events that have transpired surrounding the Weld County Planning Commision meeting yesterday November 1, 2011 case # USR11-0015. Since there seems to be no record of our concerns about AC trucking, I want my concerns to be considered. I want a complete review of AC truckings request for 24/7 operations. Susan has made numerous phone calls to Bethany in Weld County Planning over the last year concerning Ely Alcantar and his buinsness violations, as will as his consitent and complete disregard for rural lifestyle. I find it ridiculous that Susan and myself would not have concerns about AC Trucking let alone a request for 24/7 operations after the phone conversations between Bethanty and Susan. We discovered the Weld County Planning hearing dates from the yellow sign posted on the property in question. We received a (one)Application Review Notification Card post marked October 14, 2011 on October 21, 2011. essing some of the commisioners questions to Ely at the hearing yesterday; after I had sat down and could no longer ress the commisioners; I want the following background information added to the record. Mark Lawley suggestion to Ely to keep the lines of communication open with his neighbors. I have this response. Ely came to our home in the spring of 2009 . He asked me if I would care if he operated TWO semi trucks and trailers from his Weld County Road property.Ely stated that his brother and himself would be the operators. After some discussion , Ely assured me that they would drive slowly, operate from sunrise to sunset, and be "good neighbors." My response was that we all have to make a living and I truly appreciated him coming to our home to discuss his intentions. Within a week, Ely was operating FIVE semi trucks as well a variety of end dumps from his property. Within two weeks the truck traffic was running after 11:00 PM. Susan and myself both spoke to Ely about his truck count and hours of operation. Ely assured us that the situation was temporary and he apoliged. The following Friday morning at 3:00AM we were awoken by the sound of a backing signals. Two semi trucks were backing up and hooking on to trailers at the property in question. At 6:00AM that morning, I approached Ely on his property. I told him that he had not been honest with me abouth the number of truck or the hours of operation. Ely got defensive, and told me that there had not been any trucks on his property later than 9:00PM for the past two weeks. I told him that Susan had been in contact with Weld County the previous day and that she had been informed that AC Trucking did not have a permit to operate from his property. I told Ely to get his trucks off the property. Ely did remove the trucks but returned intermittenly with two semi trucks and trailers. He periodically left trailers on the property for several days at a time as well as performed some truck maintenance on the property. This practice ceased after several phone calls to Bethany. Ben Hansford question to Ely about sound deadoninig devices on his equipment. I noticed it took Ely a couple of sentences to say "no" he did not have this equipment on his trucks. I have this response. After Ely initially removed the trucks from the property he (and I assumed his brother) would make periodic returns to the property as I have stated above. Ely (and I assume his brother) would make it a point when leaving his property in one of his semi's, drive west past our house shifting as many gears as they could in a span of approximately 800 feet, and then turning on the Jake is ake at our gate a letting the semi slow down until the Jake Brake disengages at the intersection of CR 21 and CR 31, roximately another 800 feet. AC Trucking does not have Jake Brake mufflers and has no reserve in using them when completely unnecessary. They did this repeateldly with or without trailers. This practice ceased after Susan made a ne call to Bethany in planning. . 2011-3121 1 . Jason Maxey's question to Ely about hours of operation. Ely's response left the impression that truck traffic would occur at shift changes at 6:00AM and 6:00PM. I have this response. This would only be true if Ely ran a static water hauling operation. By Ely's own discription of his buisness, AC Trucking also provides solid material handling as well other trucking for the oil field service industry. An AC Trucking employee may not haul water his entire shift. That employee only haul one load of water and then need to return to AC Trucking to unhook the water trailer and hook up a belly dum trailer. The idea that truck traffic will be held to a minimum is folly. I witnessed his operations first hand for two weeks. I can assure you that truck traffic will be steady past our home. Our concerns about Ely Alcantar and his trucking buisness are numerous. Not only has he lied directly to me, Ely has repeadly ignorned Weld County demands to cease operating at his CR 20 property. He repeatedly resumed sporatic operations at the property until an phone call was made to Weld County. We respect a property owners rights to operate a buisness, however 24 hour a day operations is not acceptable. Regards, Jay and Susan Pointer 5104 WCR 20 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 I 3 2 • Weld County Commissioners 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 December 7, 2011 Response to USRI 1-0015 Submitted by: Jay and Susan Pointer 15104 WCR 20 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Susan and I would like to address the issues that we have with USR11-0015,and AC Trucking LLC. At the November 1, 2011 preliminary hearing for USRI 1-0015 Kim Ogle, Planning Services stated the county did not receive any contact concerning conflict with USRI1-0015. We never received a post card two to four weeks prior to the preliminary hearing. We received a post card just a few days before the preliminary hearing which did not give us time to prepare for the hearing. We actually discovered there was a hearing about the 15294 WCR 20 hearing on the yellow sign posted at the site on October 24, 2011 • Susan works part time as a physical therapist at Longmont United Hospital. She volunteers one day a week at our daughter's school,and has two private care patients. I own and operate my own construction business. I train a couple of horses as well as consult with pure bred cattle breeders on their genetic programs. We also have a 6 year old daughter. Like a lot of people,we have a full schedule. I sent an email addressed to Kim Ogle on November 2, 2011. Kim said that the email had been added to the file for USRI 1-0015. The email gave some background to the issues that we have had with Mr. Alcantar and AC Trucking. We would like to expand on this background information. First, in the November 2, 2011 email,the year stated was 2009 when the issues with Mr. Alcantar started. The year should read 2010. That was a typo on my part. In addition to the issues mentioned in the email, seventeen phone calls were made between us and Bethany Salzman, Weld County Zoning Compliance Officer II, between May 21, 2010 and August 2, 2011 concerning Mr. Alcantar and his business practices. Personal phone records show the times and dates the phone calls were made to Weld County. These phone calls mainly concerned Mr. Alcantar's continual use of the 15294 WCR 20 property as a trucking yard. There were also some inquires about the construction work being performed at the property without any county—a ® permits. Some of the violations are documented by Weld county as well as the county's actions to the violations. Our inquiries were simple; how can Mr. Alcantar operate a trucking company out of this property at all hours of the night and day without any recourse?How can Mr. Alcantar make construction improvements on the property without any permits or accompanying inspections? In addition to the information in the November 2, 2011 email mentioned, Susan called Mr. • Alcantar on July 5, 2010 to comment about his employees. The employees were driving semis past Susan while she walked on County Road 20 with our daughter. Our daughter was 4 years AN I • old at the time. The drivers were not slowing down as they went past,throwing gravel on her and our daughter and creating a large amount of dust. Mr. Alcantar's comment to Susan was "I have no control over my guys",and ended the phone conversation. As mentioned at the November 1, 2011 preliminary hearing our daughter suffers from asthma. We had to put our daughter on a nebulizer because of the dust irritating her lungs. Susan stopped taking her early evening walks with our daughter for some time because the walk was not worth risking their safety and our daughter's health. Safety concerns: Due to our daughter's asthma condition, a major concern of ours is the particulate matter and toxic diesel exhaust emitted from truck engines. According to the American Medical Association, children breathe 50 percent more air per pound of body weight than adults. The EPA quotes this statistic throughout much of its information on diesel exhaust emissions.—..gDot,, , In the 669 page EPA publication Health Assessment Document For Diesel Engine Exhaust(1) diesel engine exhaust(DE)is defined as a contributor to asthma-like symptoms in short term �J exposure to a carcinogen in long term exposure. An independent study done by the Clean Air Task Force published Diesel And Health In America: The Lingering T'hreat.(2)This 2005 study estimated over 400,000 asthma attacks a wt-. year is associated with fine particle emissions from diesel exhaust. The publication also states that diesel exhaust poses a cancer risk 7.5 times higher than all other air toxins combined. This _to 1k • study also concludes that children and seniors are at the greatest health risk when exposed to ( (P 1 diesel exhaust. The study goes on to define the chemical composition of diesel particles. Page 1 b of this study shows the list of cancer-causing elements in DE and the EPA's carcinogen status of 0 each. In the mammoth I-70 East Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS) (3)which was done in the Denver area, 6 (MSAT) mobile air source toxics identified with diesel exhaust are - categorized as shown on page 5.10-15. The overwhelming conclusions of published data on diesel exhaust are that diesel exhaust is highly toxic and detrimental to a person's health,particularly children's health. The Colorado Department of Health and Environment felt strongly enough to include the Fort Lupton area into the area of the vehicle emissions. The page 6 map from the CDHE public —si hearing dated March 18, 2010 shows the new inspection and maintenance(I/M) area. Weld County Road 20 is now the north boundary in the Fort Lupton emissions inspection area. Obviously,there is a concern with the state of Colorado over air quality in the area. The following table is the Front Range air quality measurements with a summary page. The summary page shows for 2011 (264 days)there were 75 moderate days and 6 days unhealthy for sensitive groups to date. The percentage breakout for unhealthy days(to date) is 2%of the year. Moderate and unhealthy days combined are 30%of the year to date. In an area where there is a itTE): concentration of diesel exhaust this statistic does not complete the picture. The following photos—a> show how diesel exhaust can accumulate in an area where there is a concentration of diesel engines. Additional trucks in an area like these only compounds the problem. The request of AC Trucking to allow different types of trailers on the property further demonstrates the increase in truck traffic as well as diesel exhaust. For example a driver may • start their driving shift with a tanker trailer but then may be required to haul other material to a site. The driver would then return to the WCR 20 location to unhook and re-hook to a different • trailer. This would create an increase in the truck traffic,noise,and exhaust emissions. Mr. Alcantar also demonstrated this when he operated his trucks out of the WCR 20 property prior to county approval. I personally witnessed the same tractor hooked and unhooked as much as three times in a day. Additional Safety concerns A big part of our family time is riding horses together. We feel that this family activity will be greatly diminished due to our safety concerns over increased truck traffic, noise,etc. With 24/7 operation there will be an unacceptable level of risk with our daughter riding her pony with ---> 1}3cAtS. Susan and myself. With the increased truck traffic will come the explosive sound of compressor valves releasing, exhaust brakes, and truck noise. All of this noise does not create a safe environment to ride horses in or around. These surprising noises could spook the horses but more importantly could spook our daughters pony while she is riding. This of course could lead to a serious injury should she get thrown off. Susan and I train a few horses but as anyone who has ever been around them can tell you, there is no truly perfectly trained horse. The above scenario applies to Susan and me and our safety as well. Mr. Alcantar stated at the November 1,2011 preliminary hearing to commissioner Hansford, AC Trucking does not have exhaust brake mufflers or other noise dampening equipment on his trucks. Mr Alcantar stated that he will"talk to employees regarding noise concerns". As Mr. Alcantar stated to Susan last ssummeer he has no control over his employees. Given Mr. Alcantar's past history of ignoring accepted business • practices, we put no value in his statement to the commisioners. Additional Concerns Our house sits 249 feet west of the shared property line with Mr. Alcantar, and 168' from our North property line. According to the site plan provided with the USR application for 15294 WCR 20, the grade at .may 10 the semi turn area(97) is six feet higher than the grade at the West property line(91). I shot the grade at our home using a Spectra LL 300 self leveling laser. The laser is accurate to 1/16t of an inch in 800 lineal feet. The photos show the laser and the grade at the shared property line. The R4 grade difference between our property line and our house is 33 inches. The tops of our windows are just shy of 9 feet above the house grade. A good average for headlight height on semi tractors is 30 inches. The maximum headlight height in Colorado is 44 inches according to the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. As a driver begins their parking turn on the 15294 WCR 20 property the headlight center will be approximately 2.5 feet over the height of the existing wood privacy fence. The light from the semis headlights would shine in all the windows on the east side of the house. This includes the master bedroom. The existing wood fence is not adequate to block headlight lighting. 24/7 operations with up to 12 semis and 24 employees would obviously be a constant night time nuisance. Additionally, exterior building lighting would pose a continual night time problem. • • Susan and I both work more conventional work schedules. We are concerned about our lively hoods if we are awoken continuously through the night. I operate equipment and drive a vehicle daily. Susan takes our daughter to and from school daily. Susan's work at Longmont United Hospital is with patient's who are recovering from various forms of orthopedic surgery. This work requires her complete focus. There is no question that lack of sleep through nightly interruption affects motor skill,brain function and the ability to perform effectively. Compatible USR's in the area operate on a reasonable schedule of 7am to 7pm or 6am to 6pm six days a week. The following are examples of this work schedule USR11-0002 USR11- 0009 USR11-0010 USRI 1-0013 In addition, other oil field service companies in the area and their work schedule: Suacedo Oil Field Services; 15336 County Road 20; 7am-7pm six days a week JB Services; 14494 Weld County Rd 22; 7am-7pm six days a week At the November 1, 2011 preliminary hearing Mr. Alcantar stated he had to run a 24/7 schedule because it is stated in his "contract' with A&W Water Service, Inc. I made a personal visit to A&W Water Service in Fort Lupton. The company representative I spoke with, explained how trucking sub contractors work with A&W. A&W Water Service, Inc does not have written contracts with any trucking sub contractor. The sub contractors are on a call list. The sub • contractor has the ability to accept or decline the work. AC Trucking LLC has no written contractual obligation to A&W Water Service, Inc. Therefore, we see no reason for AC Trucking to be extended the ability to operate a 24/7 schedule from the WCR 20 location. Susan and I have lived at our WCR 20 home for over 11 years. We scrimped, and saved and sacrificed to purchase that property. We purchased the modular from a veterinarian that I worked for 13 years. Susan and I gutted the modular and worked many late nights and weekends, (with a generator as our only power source), to refinish it. These facts hold no bearing on the commissioner's decision 17 Susan and I recognize the need for growth and opportunity in Weld County. County economics should be an important factor in USR decisions. However, the commissioner's decisions should not be at the expense of the counties residents' health and well being. So what of our property rights? Susan and I chose to move here. We chose not to live in town. We chose to live a rural lifestyle. We purchased the property for the exact reasons of not living next to a 24/7 truck stop.Now our health, our safety and our lifestyle are being challenged. Requests: We feel with all the trucks that are now present within 500 feet of our home that 12 more semis • cross the threshold of reasonability. • We request that AC Trucking house 2 semis and up 4 trailers at the WCR 20 property. Should Mr. Alcantar wish to operate more than 2 semis,that he operates them out of his current commercial location west of the railroad tracks, adjacent to the La Familia restaurant in Fort Lupton, or from any number of commercial properties in and around Fort Lupton. Should the commissioners feel that more than two semis can operate out of the WCR 20 property, we request an earthen berm be constructed on the west property line of 15294 WCR 20. We request the berm to be no less than 10' tall and vegetated with shrubbery and trees. The berm, along with its vegetation, will aid in lessening noise and light issues. We request that all diesel powered vehicles operating from the 15294 WCR 20 site have exhaust brake noise suppression systems installed before operations are allowed to begin from this site. We request that the magnesium chloride application on CR20 be extend from the intersection of CR 31 and CR 20 and run east to the entrance at 15294 WCR20. Option: To avoid possible future conflicts an option would be for AC Trucking to buy our property outright. In closing, Susan and I are very vigilant with our daughter's health. Should her health deteriorate • after AC Trucking begins operations we will consult legal counsel as to her well being. Thank you for your time. We would be happy to answer any questions from the commissioners. (1) http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ (1)http://www.epa.gov/otaq/standards/index.htm (1)1http://www.epa.gov/otaq/toxics.htm (2)http://www.catfus/resources/publications/files/Diesel Health in America.pdf (3)http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/down/NorthEmi ssionsProgram.pd f Note: The A&W Water Services representative was not named due to the fact that A&W is not directly involved with USR11-0015. • d (4(444 • oP MIS 09)v bcrY sbc) ‘-pou,„ / bAser ' • • At I'age: 15 01'18 Billing Cycle Date: 05/07/10 -06/06/10 Account Number: 803157920 • /tail (Continued) 303-726-9348 1ne:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER ,e FN9N=FTNTNUNLIMITED :riod cPDi UT=Daytime.NW=Nwknd ,e.VM=VoiceMail,CW=Call Wailing . Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'l Tots ,em Day Date Time Min Code Pd tore Charge Charge Cha 411 05131 6:32PM 56 FN9N DI - 412 05.31 7:31 PM 1 FN9N DT4:10 413 TUE 06.'01 7:24AM 5 FN9N DT 414 06/01 8:40AM 1 -FN9N .DT 415 06/01 8:41AM 8 FN9N DT 416 06/01 8:50AM 3 FN9N UT 41 41. 419 06/01 9:04AM 970-353-6100 GREELE CO • • 0.00 423 0 0.00 424 0. r- rig 1.®. 0.00 425 06.01 7:14P • FN9N DT 0.00 1426 06/01 7:40PM FN9N DT 0.00 1427 06/01 8:06PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 428 06/01 8:21PM 7 FN9N DT 0.00 429 06/01 8:28PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 430 06/01 8:29PM <4 FN9N DT 0.00 431 06/01 9:02PM 36 FN9N NW 0.00 432 06;01 9:38PM 1 FN9N NW 090 433 06!01 10:35PM 1 FN9N NW VM 0.00 434 WED 06/02 8:40AM .3 FN9N DT 0.00 435 0&'02 8:43AM 7 FN9N DT 0.00 I406/02 8:49AM 19 FN9N DT 0.00 4 I- 06/02 9:18AM 9 FN9N DT 0.00 438 06/02 9:28AM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 439 06/02 9:31AM 5 FN9N DT 0.00 440 06/02 9:37AM 9 FN9N DT 0.00 441 06/02 9:48AM 32 FN9N DT 0.00 442 06/02 10:52AM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 443 06/02 12:16PM 6 FN9N DT 0.00 444 06/02 12:23PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 445 06/02 12:26PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 446 06102 12:27PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 447 06;02 12:28PM 23 FN9N DT 0.00 448 06/02 5:39PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 449 0602 5:49PM 14 FN9N DT 0.00 450 06/02 6:40PM 36 FN9N DT 0.00 451 06/02 7:30PM: 4 FN9N DT 0.00 452 06/02 7:36PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 453 06/02 8:01PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 454 06/02 8:05PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 e 455 THU 06/03 7:48AM • 2 FN9N DT: VM 0.00 456 06/03 7:51AM 25 FN9N DT 0.00 457 06/03 8:20AM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 458 06/03 9:34AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 459 06/03 9:51AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 460 06/03 9:53AM 15 FN9N DT 0.00 461 06/03. 10:11AM :9 FN9N DT 0.00 462 06/03 10:25AM 13 FN9N DT 0.00 463 06/03.. 10:46A 14 FN9N DT 0.00 464 06/03 11:01AM t FN9N DT 0.00 law Nom. • +' f ; k; 1n ..°=1. t p-t Pa$e: 13 of 15 CA`OC` Billing Cycle Date: 06/07/10 -07/06/10 Account Number: 803157920 •Detail (Continued) 303-726-9348 User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code,FN9N=FTNTNUNLIMITED Rate Period(PD):DT=Daytime,NW=Nwknd Feature:VM=VoiceMail,CW=Call Waiting ,. If*, Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'/ Total Item Day Date Time Min Code Pd ture Charge Charge Charge 300 06/30 9:29AM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 ! 301 06/30 932AM 2 l EN9N UT 0.00 ii 3u02 06'30 9:33AM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 06 30 941AM L 2 FNSN DT 0.00. 0630 9 43A ! 2 FN9N DT 0.00 06.30 9:47AM . • 1 `..FN9N DT 0.00 5 FN9N DT 0.00 _=,/;= _620 0.10A 0.00 - - a 10:10AM - 2 FN9N DT 7 ; 10:1BAM 9 FN9N DT 0.00 -- 4.12Ptlt' \ - ''11 FN9N DT 0.00 .,... .r,.+Mr4M .6 �_ 00 _-- -- 5'2QPM 10 FN9N DT 30PM -1 FN9N DT. 0.00' 30 6:13PM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 3- FN9N UT 000 56.30 633PM 0,00. €6-30 633PM 11 FN9N DT ..-._ ,.-.. a ' . 0;00 317 THU t 01 9 '.., -70-353-6100 • 5 FN9N DT V - 0.00 320 07/01 9:41AM i 2 FN9N DT 0.00 321 07/01 3139PM 1 :RAIN DT s. VM 0 00 322 07/01 `428PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00! 323 07/01 ; 437PM i a FNaN PT 0.00 3 07/01 4.40PM I '- 3 FN9N UT 0.00.. 3 07/01 `:4:43PM ': 2 FN9N DT 0.00'.. 3 07/01 4:44PM ' I 11 FN9N DT 0.00 , 327 07/01 4:57PM 8 FN9N DT 0.00 328 07/01 5:49PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 1 329 07/01 5:51PM 9 FN9N DT 0.00 t 330 07/01 7.20PM 1 FN9N DT VM 0.00 331 07/01 7'47PM ':: 3 FN9N DT 0.00'. 332 FRI 07/02 "-803AM 't. 2 -FNON DT 000 333 : 07102 9.4244 1 FNSN I .DT 000 334 ...:. 07/02 9:43AM 2 FN9N DT 600 335 07/02 'r 9.47AM a FN9N Dr ! ..0.00: 336 07/02 9:56AM 11 FN9N UT 0.00 337 07/02 10:23AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 338 07/02 11:28AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 339 07/02 11.35AM 10 FN9N DT 0.00 340 07/02 2:00PM 12 FN9N DT 0.00 341 f: 07/02 ! 3'59PM is 8 FN9N DT 0.00': 342:-'. 07/02 i_ 4'14PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 343 07/02 4:17PM 12 FN9N DT 0.00. 344 07/02 4:30PM I FNON PT 0.00 345 07/02.is 4:32PM 4 FNON DT 000 346 07/02 5:04PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 347 07/02 5.32PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 348 07/02 5:37PM 7 FN9N DT 0.00 349 07/02 5:47PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 350 07/02 6:55PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 351 ?I 07/02'`. 8.59PM ?. 3 'FNSN DT 0.00: 352 07/02 ';: 8.33PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00' 353 07/02 10-36PM ' _ - 1 F:FN9N NW.' � 0.00 • 9r at&t Page: 7 of 17 s Billing Cycle Date: / 07/07/10 -08/06/10 W Account Number: 803157920 ilge Charge Details (Continued) 303-7 • User Name:SUSAN ST. • - - ' • ' ' KB/MB Msg/Min/ Msg/Min/ Summary of Included KB/MB KB/MB Billed Total Wireless Data In Plan Used Billed Rate Charge i Text Msg Pay Per Use - Text/Instant Mses Incoming 1 1 $O.2O/Msg 0.20 - Text Instant Msgs Out 1 1 $0.20/Mssg 0.20 DATA PAY PER USE - Data Access Sub_:__. TI_ - _ -. C, - - 303-726-9348 User Name:S vYS�',A 3 1GH-P II Tlaits,404", 4.: . . ytray, Rate Code:F189N---1�TNUNL'I"M'II ED Rate Period(Pf1:DT=Daticst NWTNwkndN,. „:$ ..qt , . Feature:VM-VdlceMail,'C all Waiting Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'I Total Item Dal Date Time _ in Code Pd ture Charge Charge Charge 1 WED 07/07 :` 8:37. 2 ..FN9N DT 0:00 2 07/07 8:38A 1 22 FN9N DT 0.00 ED07'07 9:05A 3 .FN9N DT _ 000 0707 907A 3 :FN9N DT - 000' 07,07 9:10A 15 .FN9N DT 000 6 07/07 10:40A- 2 FN9N DT VM 0.00 _ 7 07,07 10:41. 1 FN9N DT 0.00 8 07/07 10:41A 14 FN9N DT 0.00 9 07/07 1:09P 3 FN9N DT VM 0.00 10 07'07 1:1W - 2 FN9N DT 0.00 11 07'07::: 1:13P 13 gFN9N AT ': Q00 12 07/07-:. 1;38P 3 ,:FN9N OT " 000 13 07.07 4:56P 2 :::FN9N DT 900. 14 07/07 5:03PM 14 z:FNSN AT 0.00 15 07/07 5:55PM. 2 -':FN9N DT .4 0.00 18 07/07 7:23PM 10 FN9N DT 0.00 17 07/07 7:39PM 17 FN9N UT 0.00 18 07/07 8:56PM 23 FN9N DT 0.00 19 THU 07/08 8:15AM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 20 07/08 9:09AM 1 FN9N DT VM 0.00 ■ 3 008 1'10:28AM X970-3 3 •1.' GREELE CO:. 5 SFNDN DT 0.00. •0 26 07/08 10:42AM - 17 FN9N 0T 0.00 27 07/08 1:16PM - 2 FN9N DT VM 0.00 28 07/08 1:17PM 13 FN9N DT 0.00 29 07/08 2:26PM 12 FN9N DT 0.00 30 07/08 2:38PM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 31 07/08 'r: 2:43PM 7 ':FN9N DT 000 32 i'. 07/08 " 3:05PM`'. 22 FN9N DT :0.001 ■ a a`p_} Page: 15 of 16 `OCl Billing Cycle Date: 09/07/10 - 10/06/10 Account Number: 803157920 11111 Detail (Continued) 303- '348 User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code:FN9N=FTNTNUNLIMITED Rate Period(PD):DT=Daytime,NW=Nwknd Feature VM=VoiceMail,CW=Call Waiting Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'/ Total Item Day Date Time Min Code Pd ture Charge Charge Charge 443 10/04 2:06PM;' 1.'.'FN9N DT 0.00 444 10/04 2:d8PM 2: FN9N DT 0.00 445 10/04 2:58PM 6 : FN9N DT 0-00 446 10/04 3:30PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 447 10/04 3:48PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 448 10/04 4:11PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 449 10/04 4:44PM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 450 10/04 4:56PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 451 TUE 10105 7.42AM 1 FN9N. DT 0.00 452 10/05 7:48AM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 453 10/05 7:51AM 1: FN9N' DT 0.00 454 10/05 8:12AM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 455 10/05 8:14AM 5 . FN9N DT 0.00 456 10/05 8:19AM 21 FN9N DT 0.00 457 10/05 2:57PM 5 FN9N DT 0.00 458 10/05 3:30PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 459 10/05 4:25PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 460 10/05 4:51PM 7 FN9N DT 0.00 461 10/05 511PMt 2 FNBN DT 0.00 462 10/05 518PM: 6 FN9N DT 0.00 4 q.. 1l/ . ::, ' 1- -.1ir - L • ftl - 0.00 467 10/06 8:07AM 970-353-6100 GREELE CO 5 FNSIN DT ,/ 0.00 111. • I- -. 1 1 - • 1.4.1 I - 0.00 I 1 1t/+• 3:II' •71-353 •1i' G' ELEC• 7 FN N--.7..mmilliffir.Agi r 1. Totals 0.00 Data Detail - 303-726-9348 User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code:TMI1-Text Msg Pay Per Use Rate Period(PD):AT=Anytime Feature:SMH=SMS per msg$0.20 MO/MT-PPU • 1t: MI ME .;rz.si , - --__;. I Totals s 0.40 i 1. at&t Page: 7 of 15 Billing Cycle Date: 10/07/10 - 11/06/10 Account Number: 803157920 'e eless Line Summary For: (Continued) 303-726-9 User Name: SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Government Fees & Taxes CO Stale l elecom Tax 2.40 - - _ I Usage Charge Details 303-726-9348 User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Minutes Summary of Included Minutes Billed Billed Total Usage Charges In Plan Used Minutes Rate Charge FTNTN UNLIMITED Daytime 1,666 1,666 0.00 0.00 359 359 0.00 KB/MB Msg/Min/ Msg/Min/ Summary of Included KB/MB KB/MB Billed Total Wireless Data In Plan Used Billed Rate Charge Text Msg Pay Per Use ext./Instant Msgs Incoming 4 4 $0.20/Msg ext/Instant Ms s Out 5 5 $0.20/Ms�g_ I Call Detail 303-726-9348 User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code:FN9N=FTNTNUNLIMITED Rate Period(PD):DT-Daytime,NW=Nwknd Feature:CW=Call Waiting.VM=VoiceMail Number Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'I Total Item D ' Date 'ii Called Call To Min Code Pd t , , • • ' • 1 M• 2 r:. THV YD/07: 7.35AM :'.97035 -6100 ?; GR ..,f.E.CO _4 I'FN9 DT !•. - 0.00' I 10/03; 821AM :::573-. N8µ f31• 0,00 1 6 10/07 8.30AM 303-7 N9N DT 0.00 7 10/07 9:42AM 303- N9N UT 0.00 8 10/07 5:20PM 303- N9N UT VM 0.00 9 10/07 5:33PM 303- 9N DT 0.00 10 10/07 5.36PM 720 : •N DT 0.00 11. 10/07 542PM '217- 12 10/07; 5:48PM 217- 13 10107 5:49PM >217- e- -J 0 MINIM ataa Page: 104413 *' Billing C)r!e Date: 01/07/11 -02 06 1i t +: .account Number: 80315792O Detail (Continued) 303-726-93 Us Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code:FN9N-Nation Unlimited Rate Period IPD):NW=Nwknd.DT=Daytime Feature:CW=Call Waiting.VM=VoiceMait Number Rate Rate Fea- .airtime l.D/.Add'I Total Item Day Date Time Called Call To Min Code Pd time Charge Charge Charge 177 01/25 2:55PM 573-3.• • ALL W: 6 FN9N DT CW 0.00 178 01/25 3:02PM 2 17 FN9N DT 0.00 179 01/25 3:30PM 3i 1 FN9N DT 0.00 • 180 01/25 3:41PM 2' 1 FN9N DT 0.00 181 01/25 3:42PM 2 8 FN9N DT. . 0.00 182 01/25" 3:55PM ' :2. FN9N DT 0.00 183 01/25 4:28PM 5 B : FN9N DT 0 00 184 01/25 7:10PM` :34 1 FN9N DT VM.. 000 185 01/25_: 7:11PM : 3i • 1 FN9N DT 0.00 186 01125 7:11PM 3i 2 FN9N DT 0.00 187 WED 01%26 8:12AM 3i 2 FN9N DT 0.00 188 01/26 8:12AM ' 7 FN9N DT CW 0.00 189 01/26 8:19AM 3i 6 FN9N DT 0.00 190 01/26 8:24AM I 1 FN9N DT 0.00 191 01!26 9:44AM,:: 3 ..FN9N dT ' : . . . 0.00 192 01/28. ..12:37PM:.. ,, 1 FN9N. DT.—... ..: ` :.::. . . .. ' 0.00 193 01/26 _12:40PM , 4 FN9N DT: 0 00 194 01/26 12:44PM ` I 195 01/26 12:49PM i I FN9N DT. 0.00 196 01/26 3:40PM ' 3 FN9N DT 0.00 197 01/26 3:43PM 21 4 FN9N DT 0.00 198 01126 4:26PM r 18 FN9N DT 0.00 199 01126 4:44PM 3 I 1 FN9N DT 0.00 200 THU 01/27 821AM 31 4 FN9N DT a 0.00 201 01/27 8:30AM 3' r 2 FN9N DT ... 0.00 01/27 ' 4:38PM .3+ .. 2 FN9N DT 0.00 01/27. 5:10PM 9.+ 5' FN9N .DT .0.00 V .01/27' 6:31 PM... ! 2 FN9N DT .0.00 205 01/27 6:42PM 5 8 FN9N DT. 0.00 --" 206 01/27 6:47PM 57 25 FN9N --DT 0.00 - 207 FRI 01/28 7:19AM 3' 1 FN9N DT 0.00 208 01/28 7:27AM 97i 4 FN9N DT 0.00 209 01/28 7:31AM 303 1 FN9N DT 0-00 210 01/28 7:34AM 303 3 FN9N DT 0.00 211 01/28 7:40AM :303 ' 3 FN9N.': DT 0.00 212 01128 .....1:43AM 303: .._• '2 .:FN9N . DT 0.00 213 011 '. 8:56AM :i r 27 FN9N :.:DT 0.00 216 ` 01/28 11:33AM 970-353-6111 - . a 19 FN9N D 0.00 217 01/28 3:03PM 970-353-6100 GREELE CO 2 FN9N DT 0.00 218 1/ 01/28 3:18PM 970-353-6100 INCOMI CL 2 FN9N DT 0.00 19 01/28 3:36PM 970-353-6100 INCOMI CL 21 FN9N DT 0.00 .. . 222 01/29 9:09AM. 14 "FN9N :.NW 0.00 223 0129 10:01-AM. 35. FN9N. NW 0.00 224 01129 "11:08AM. 7 FN9N NW 0.00, 225 01/29 2:38n4 1.. FN9N NW 0.00 226 01/29 2:43PM 7 FN9N NW 0.00 227 01/29 4:20PM 1 FN9N NW 0.00 228 01129 5:47PM 3 FN9N NW 0.00 229 01/29 6:24PM 2 FN9N NW 0.00 230 01/29 6.35PM 3 FN9N NW 0.00 5023.002.015678.05.07.0000000 YN VNN\1"115709.115709 MENNE III -ta «l Page: 7 of 13 • 0.00 Billing Cycle D 06/07/11 -07/06/11 Account Num 803157920 Si Detail (Continued) 6-9348 . User Name:SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER Rate Code.FN9N=Nation Unlimited. Rate Period(PDI:DT=Daytime,NW=Nwknd Feature:VM=VoiceMail,CW=Call Waiting Number Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LD/Add'I Total Item Day Date Time Min Code Pd tore Charge Charge Charge 41 06.14 4:22PM:^ 5: 20 FN9N DT 0.00 42 06.14 5:35PM -.3r 14 FN9N DT 0.00 43 06/14 557PM ': c 15 FN9N PT ` 0.00 44 06,14 627PM: I 2 FN9N DT VM 0.00 45 06.14 6:29PM - 0 6 ':FN9N 0T-" 0.00 46 0614 8:13PM 30 26 FN9N DT 0.00 L47 WED 06/15 7:53AM 34 6 FN9N UT 0.00 48 06/15 8:04AM 5 9 FN9N DT 0.00 H49 06;15 8:22AM 3t 1 FN9N DT VM 0.00 50 06,15 8:23AM 21 3 FN9N DT 0.00 51 06'15 8:26AM 3r 5 FN9N DT 000 52 06/15 4:37PM -1 3<FN9N DT 0.00 53 - 06/15 449PM c 31 I 3:: FN9N DT 0.00 54 —06'15 4:57PM at 3 ' FN9N DT 0.00 55 0615 5:00PM 3o 8 FN9N DL 0.00 56 06/15 5:07PM 21 7 FN9N DT 0.00 57 06/15 5:16PM 21 6 FN9N DT 0.00 _ 58 06/15 6:40PM 303 2 FN9N DT 0.00 14 FN9N UT 0.00 59 06/15 6:42PM 217 0.00 60 06/15 6:57PM 309 2 FN9N DT 61 06/15 7:01PM :720. 3 1 FN9N DT - 0.00. 62 - 0615 7.07PM ,303. 1- FN9N DT 0.00 63 06,15 7:44PM C-303. 9` FN9N UT'- 0:00 64 THU 06/16 6:23AM. `303 1,. FN9N DT: VM 0.00. 5 06/16 800AM -217 2 3' EN9N DT 0.00 iiiii06116 8:02AM 303- 9 FN9N DT 0.00 06:16 8:26AM 573- 6 FN9N UT 0.00 68 06/16 12:57PM 303- 2 FN9N DT 0.00 69 06/16 1:02PM 303 1 FN9N DT 0.00 70 06/16 1:03PM 303- 4 FN9N DT 0.00 71 - 06/16 4:30PM `:303-. 1' FN9N DT VMVM 0:00 72 .06/16 4:30PM-`303- :2 FN9N 0T' 0.00 73 06/16 4:35PM '(720- 2 FN9N DT t -.0.00 74 06/16 4:37PM s.720 2 FN9N DT'. 0.00 75 06/16 4:39PM .720-- 1- FN9N DT'. 0.00' 76 06/16 4:43PM 720-. 2 FN9N DT 0.00 77 06/16 4:50PM 303- 1 FN9N DT 0.00 78 06/16 5:04PM 303- 3 FN9N DT 0.00 79 06/16 5:47PM 303- 3 FN9N DT VM 0.00 80 06/16 5:50PM 970- ' 2 FN9N DT 0.00 81 06/16 6:14PM 303- 4 FN9N DT: 0.00 82 06/16 6.18PM "309- 2 FN9N UT' 0.00 83 06/16 620PM ..720-: 7 FN9N DT 0.00 84 06)16 628PM 720-. 4 FN9N DT. 0.00 ' 85 06/16 632PM-:217- 1 FN9N OT- _. 0.00 86 06/16 6:39PM 303-: 2 FN9N DT 0.00 ` 87 06/16 7:42PM 217-3 I 10 FN9N DT 0.00 88 06/16 9:50PM 303- 2 FN9N NW VM 0.00 89 FRI 06/17 9:52AM 303- 1 FN9N UT VM 0.00 0.00 92 / 06/17 11:52AM 970-353-6100 GREELECO '2 FN9N DT 0.00 93 06/17 1153AM 970.353-6100 PREELE CO 25 FN9N DT 000 ... .�tt II nrt.. n1 Cltflt nT '.n nn gel NI • 1 R .1 at&Y Page: 1 of 14 • - Billing Cycle Date: 07/07/11 -08/06/11 Account Number: 803157920 lila11 Detail (Continued) 303-7 .48 a SUSAN STAMBAUGH-POINTER RateUser CudNr:me:FN9NN8tiOn L4iliniited Rale Period(PD}:DT-Daytime.NW=Nwknd Feature:VM=VoiceMail.CW Ca11 Waiting Number Rate Rate Fee- Airtime LD/Add'/ Total item Day Date Time C led 'all To Altn Code Pd tore Charge Charge Charge 245 .: .07!22 5:47PM t FN9N DT. :..: 0.00,. 246 07/22 6:37PM 4 FN9N DT 0.00 247 07/22 7:20PM • 2 FN9N DT 0.00 249 07/22 7:59PM 5 3 FN9N D f 0.00 249 SAT 07/23 9:50AM 9 8 FN9N NW 0.00 250 0723 10:50AM 2 11 FN9N NW 0.00 251 07:23 11:51AM ' 3 FN9N NW :. 0.00 ,'252 07;23 12.54PM I FN9N NW ' VM 0:00 253 D7:23 12:55PM 2 FN9N NW ..... 0.00 254 • 0723 1:55PM 1 FN9N NW 0.00 255 . 0723 2:09PM 1 FN9N NW 0.00 256 07'23 2:10PM 1 FN9N NW 0.00 ^257 07:23 5:51 PM 1 FN9N NW VM 0.00 258 0723 5:52PM 2 FN9N NW 0.00 259 07:23 8:04PM I fN9N NW 0.00 260 07:23 6:05PM I 2 FN9N NW 0.00 261 SUN 07.24• 9:05AM 1 FN9N NW VM• 0.00 . .••262 . 07/24 10:02AM i 5 FN9N NW : •'•:.: • ' ,• • : 0.00 263 07/24 .' 10:27AM- PN9Ji}:::NW 0.00 264` '. .. 07/24: 10:49AM:.::. ":: :_;:a:'r:,FN9I4 • NW. : :. '.:.-:' `;.:' -...O.O0 265 07/24 '12.13PF�j;•: • 4 FN9N NW .. 0.00 266 07/24 12:22PM 4 FN9N NW 0.00 26% 07:24 5:21PM 15 FN9N NW 0.00 28° 0724 5:38PM - 16 FN9N NW 0.00 I_'c9 u7.24 7:44PM 2 FN9N NW 0.00 07 24 8:50PM 1 FN9N NW 0.00 0724 8:51PM 8 FN9N • NW: .: . 0.00 2 MON 0725 8:33AM 3 DT.. .;.... — 0.00 273 07-25 8:41AM 5 . ;'•2: FN9N."DI • .., . ' . : 0.00 274 07:25 8:47AM 7• :.: . 7 .:FN9N ° CDT . . 0.00 275 07:25 8:53AM • :': 5 FN9N DT OW 0.00 276 07:25 4:44PM 3 1 FN9N DT VM 0.00 277 0725 4:45PM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 278 07 25 4:46PM 3 2 FN9N DT 0,00 279 0725 5:31 PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 280 0725 6:01PM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 281.' • 07/25 6:12PM 2 FN9N 01 . 0.00 282 07+25 8:27PM 2 • FN9N ' DI • 0.00 283 07125 :8:30PM 2: •FN9N DT: 0:00 284 i 07/25 :: 9i32PM i 17 FN9N •DT0.00 285 TW£ 07/26::1023AM 3 FN9N DT 0.00 286 07/26 12:44PM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 267 07/26 4:43PM DT 0.00 lI 290 •/, D 07/27 7:57• 970-304-8496 GREELE CO 8 F.•. i 0.00 293 . 07/27 8:23AM.... 1 FN9N DT 0.00 294 07/27. ' 8:24AM • I FN9N DT 0.00 295 01/27 824AM ..3 Fr81N DT _ 0.00 296 07/27 3:33PM . 9 FN9N DT 0.00 297 07/27 3:46PM 13 FN9N DT 0.00 298 07/27 3:59PM 5 25 FN9N DT 0.00 - -R MIME 0 4. aLOLL Page: 13 of 14 ` Billing Cycle Date: 07/87/11 -08/06/11 Account Number: 803157920 Aik l Detail (Continued) 303-726-9348 User Name:SUSAN STAI%IBAUGH-POINTER - - - Rate Code:FN9N=Nation Unlimited Rate Period(PD):DT=Daytime,NW=Nwknd Feature:VM=VoiceMail,CW-Call Waiting N ,+ , • Rate Rate Fea- Airtime LIYAdd'l Total Item Day Date Tin . Min Code Pd ture Charge Charge Charge' 353..:TUE 08102 ' 7:5' ' :9 :FN9N DT C.00 354 .. 08/02 AO: `::i3; :FNEIN DT COO' 355 08/02 8:09 :: 9' FN9N DT 0 CO 356 08/02 8:17 2 FN9N DT -: 357 08/02 8:21 7 FN9N DT `=� 358 08/02 10: 8 FN9N DT 47 361 T .+i ,.-.,-56PM 97+'.-.. ,?•0' .i'ERE OD : 5 FN9N DT,., :: - 364 08102.':. .4:23,FM i 18 FN9N DT 0.00 i 365 08/02. 8:25PM 4 5 FN9N DT 0.00`s 366 08102 8:36PM 3+ 2 FN9N DT 0.00 367 WED 08/03 8:16AM 3+ 18 FN9N DT 0.00 368 08/03 10:55AM 2 7 FN9N DI 0.00 369 08/03 11:02AM - 1 FN9N DT 0.00 370 08/03 3:04PM • 6 FN9N DT 0.00 2sFN9N 'DT 040 371 08/03.': 3A9Plyt '. ' 372• . 08/03- '.4:18PM.:' 373 08)03 4:22PM • 374 08/03 5:33PM _ 2 FN9N T M 0.0.0 375 08`03 5:34PM' • 2 FN9N DT 0. 376 08.'03 7:10PM : 13 FN9N DT 0.00 THU 08104 7:52AM0 4 FN9N DT 0.00 08/04 7:55AM 19 FN9N DT 0.00 0804 10:38AM 1 FN9N DT VM 0.00 380 08/04 10:39AM 7 FN9N DT 0.00 361 08104 4:18PM 4 FN9N DT r 382 . 08/04 4:45PM 2 -FN9N. DT` .. 383 08/04 5:27PM • 4 FN9N• DT' • . 0.00 384 08/04 5:30PM 2 3 .FN9N:. DT 0:00 385 08/04 r}:33PM.' 3 • 7 FN9N ,.DT 6.00 386 08/04 6:51PM 3 1 FN9N DI VM 0.00 381 08/04 7:03PM 3+ 2 FN9N DT 0.00 388 08/04 7:05PM 5 22 FN9N DT -_ 0.00 3A9 08'04 7:41 PM 7- -- 6 FN9N DT 0.00 300 03/04 7:49PM 31 11 FN9N DT 0.00 391;FRI 08105 • 2:29AM •:3r, _2�FN9N• NW ":r ---�._-.- .• ---• 392 D&05 • 8:51AM 3+ . 6: .FN9N'_ DT .' • ..- . 0.00 393 01V05 10:28AM "7 I .". :.:1 FN 1N Dl. -. '" 0 0• � o.po-I 394 • 08•'05 10:29AM 72' 1 FN9N DT 395 00:05 10-36AM -7 1-`FN9M :.DT _... .0.00 .._-.. 396 0&05 1:55PM r 5 FN9N D t 0.0u El 3JL_-.. 08:05 2:00PM 30 3 FN9N DT 0.00 13e8 G&.'05 2:02PM 30 4 l-N9N U I 0.06! _ 1399. _____ 0@•'05 2:1 1 PM 3 4 FN9N DI u.uti.•. .__ .__ J 40U 08,05 l:ibil,,1 :AY a i=viii u+ = 1 . 08/05 - 224PM 30 . . .• 2 FN9N pT - ' • 0 G0i 3 i tzu C,,T 0.00.: i't!'i Cir'(+� 2.t5i-iti ) i;viii i+i ..... -- . ;., r.T n tt:; +. 5 f'N9N • CiT — " ll.utl I1G5 _...'65 �:30PM —• 9Orne c.nnPM o, v LMWW Is. U.i.u. np V r • Page 1 of 1 r Jay Pointer • From: "Bethany Salzman" <bsalzman@co.weld.co.us> To: > Sent: onday, November 14:2011 10:44 AM Subject: 15294 CR 20 I know there are have been more phone calls,but I have records of the following phone messages. I do not document all calls received (only voice mails). Plus, I have included all violations/complaints that I can find for A C Trucking/Alcantar. I can tell you that the property was previously in violation, but it was under different ownership(Bauserman): 05/21/2010 @ 1525—Trucking operation 06/01/2010 @ 0906—Trucking operation 10/06/2010 @ 0807—Dumping dirt—ran electricity to shop 02/18/2011—typically at least 2 semi cabs and 2-3 semi trailers parked on the property County Actions 05/21/2010—Violation Initiated (ZCV10-00062) 05/24/2010—Initial letter sent 06/28/2010—E-mail received - From:actruckingllc@comcast.net Jmailto:actruckingllc@comcast.neti 06/30/2010—Violation closed 10/05/2010—Building Violation initiated (BCV10-00127)as BCR10-00242 expired 10/05/2010—Initial letter sent 10/12/2010—Building application submitted (BCR10-00902) • 10/21/2010—Permit completed 12/20/2010—Violation closed 02/18/2011—Complaint initiated (COMP11-00027) 02/18/2011—Phone call to violator and discussion with Planner processing Pre-App and 7 Day Completeness Review 09/13/2011—USR11-0015 application submitted 09/13/2011—Complaint closed Hope this helps... Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Bethany Salzman Zoning Compliance Officer II 1553 North 1741 Avenue Greeley.CO tofu Office, (970)355-6100 Ext.3555 Fax; (97x)304-6ns Web,www.co.weiacaus 1061 -2011 • 1 W) ELv 2�)0 NTY 69211-OO is at&t Page: l : Billing Accoun it III Call Detail (Continued) CID _____ User :SUSAN STAN1_____13AUGn-POINTER _ 726_yt Rate Codede FN9:FN9N=FTNTNUNLIMITED -- 'Nate Period(PD):DT=Daytime.NW=Nwknd Feature:VM=VoiceMail,CW=Call Waiting • Item Day Date Number Time Cal I Call To 354 '. 07/02 10:36P Min .dd'1 Total • 355 07/02 . 10:37P 1.. FN_ -'Ire Clru'ge 355 SAT 07/03 10:41A 13 FN9N 0 00 357 07/03 10:51AM � 10 FN9N O oU 358 07/03 4A8P �� 12 359 SUN 07/04 M FN9N NV!, ------_�0 00 r.� 3608:46AM 1 FN9N NW x.00 07/04 2:06PM 8 FN9N NW Q.00 351_ On--�4?45PM !� 1 FN9N 0.00 362 07/04 N W 363 Th.--,--40N 07/05 7:44 2 FN9N NW 0.001 364_ I i 2 FN9N NW 0.00 07/05. 7:47AM • 2 FN9N DT U00 L 6-5 07/05__7_51AM !� 1 FN9N DT 0.00 8o 0705 T56AM 2 FN9N DT 0.00 367 07/05 8:00AM !, 1 FN9N DT 6.U0 369 it?/OS 8:01AM I' 2 FN9N DT 0.00 07/05 3:02AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 368 370 07/05 3718:02AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 07/05 9iO3AM 1 FN9N DT 0.00 2 FN9N DT 0.00_ ._ _ 0.00. :g•I:MA _ .. al I`_ 9:- Fro nTnor - Ofi i 378 0 07/05 12:45P n 07/05 12:46P I 1 • 079 1 FN•N .7 to :780 Oh05 5:26' 1 FN•N .T 1n L•�` __07/05. _5:47• 8 FN9N DT tt0 __ _ 07/05. 635• 3 FN9N DT 0.00 �— .389— 07;f$ _,.6:35 14 FN9N DT 0.00 384 07/M e:S7: 1 FN9N DT 0.00 385 TUE 07/08 g;5 15 FN9N DT 0.00 385 07106 9'09• 9 FN9N DT 0.00 387 9:10, 1 FN9N 388 DT 0.00 07/06 9:14. 3 FN9N DT 0.00 389 07/06 9:19• 5 FN9N DT 0.00 •! /6 12:44' 3 FN9N t 3 1 DT '99 1.99 '• 07lG :.12:49' 5 FN9N DT 0.00 2 tZ'u 12:52' 4 FN9N DT 0.00 33 — r7/i8 .1434• 7 .FN9N DT 0.00 •• '7/I• 4: 2 FN9N OT 0.00 3•S I/i 1. 5:17• 1 FN9N DT 0.00 396 07,'06 5:18• 1 ..FN9N 397 07/06 DT 0.00 398 5.52• 34 FN9N DT 0.00 .00 07/06 5:53• 2 FN9N DT .00 399 07/06 7:29• 9 FN9N DT 0.00 400 07/06 7; 401 35• 6 FN9N DT 0.00 402' 67108 7:40• 1 FN9N OT VM 0.00 07108:'".8:22• 15` FN9N DT 0.00 403 07/06 :8:28• 1 FN9N 0.00 DT VM Subtata 3 FN9N DT 0.00 Tota16 ---__ 1936 0.00 1936 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 kila al •• Iliiii 7.08.00000 0\Y1':N\:\\Y 25085.25085 LLC • A. C. Trucking, 1592 Conestoga Trail Fort Lupton, CO 80621 •e!'=t Ely Alcantar Jackie Alcantar Owner Owner 303-435-9770 303-857-3862 (� JI^�4)•'j I, • [c/ IESEL EXHAUST IN THE UNITED STATES • e !r ac .w ' 1 't• 1 II Swim- 1 f'F 1 r Is " ' S, • tas a+ • WHAT ARE THE HEALTH EFFECTS ? • WHO IS AT RISK ? • WHAT CAN YOU DC & EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency • EXHIBIT 4 145k,1,-0or5 I. • ..., r i- �wr ut IES ' EXHAUST- rill & YOUR HEALTH • Diesel exhaust contains tiny , : . .t.i.,...CU, it, a particles known as fine particulate "' matter. These tiny or "fine particles are so small that 1 several thousand of them could` - .A fit in the period at the end of this sentence. Diesel engines are one. of the largest sources of fine particulate matter, other than natural causes such as forest fires. Diesel exhaust also contains ozone-forming nitrogen oxides and HAT CAN toxic air pollutants. OWNERS/ OPERATORS • Fine particles and ozone pose D o ? serious public health problems. f Exposure to these pollutants causes lung damage and O Turn off engines I aggravates existing respiratory when vehicles are s. :et' disease such as asthma. for ` 4. stopped more a few minutes. • Nationwide, particulate matter— , . Il i, especially the fine particles such III as those in diesel exhaust—cause © Retrofit engines 15,000 premature deaths every with pollution control year. devices and use • Diesel exhaust is thought to be a cleaner burning fuel. likely human carcinogen. WHO IS MOST AT O When purchasing RISK? new vehicles, buy the • People with existing heart or lung lowest emitting disease, asthma or other vehicles available. respiratory problems are most sensitive to the health effects of fine particles, as are children and 0 Keep engines well the elderly. W ned and maintained. • Children are more sensitive to air pollution because they breathe 50 _ © For more details percent more air per pound of body weight than do adults. visit: www.epa.gov/ otaq/retrofit or, www.epa.gov/ cleanschoolbus, or call 1 -734-214-4636. I KO 1 _ig• + mu ! : YMIWII1 , OTHER HEALTH AND `.. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS • Fine particles from diesel engine ute to , which restricts visibility. I0II _. , . _ • Diesel exhaust also contributes to ozone formation (a corn- _ ponent of:smog), acid rain, and global climate change. t 0 ° • iillliliii irt ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ifff ! ill! # y. `it, ri EDUCING' EMISSION IDLING , ll 1 • Turn the engine off if you will be idling more than a fe i minutes. Atypical heavy-duty truck can burn ap- i proximately one gallon of diesel fuel for each hour it idles generating significant amounts of pollution, wasting fuel, and causing excessive engine wear. i ' 4 r ! "`'• Vehicle owners can buy small generators or auxiliary 'il r ONE •Y -• '7...-power units that provide heat, air conditioning, and/ or power while a vehicle is parked. These devicessubstan- — • .. tally reduce fuel consumption and emissions generated during long-duration idling. • Owners of older vehicles can buy electric starting al s - 4 such as block heaters which help warm the engine to avoid _ • starting difficulties and reduce idling time during engine warm-up. Newer vehicles are designed to start easily a temperatures without idling. ' } . ' RETROFITS AND CLEANER FUELS : / . ' .% • Use ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel in combination with t.- ,,, L.. -av pollution control equipment such as particulate matter filters. Although ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel is not 4 required until 2006, it is currently available in parts of the United State • In some cases, this:s o t.,'• can reduce particulate matter emissions by more than 90 percent. Ors-; NEW VEHICLE PURCHASES WHAT TO CONSIDER . • Vehicles equipped with the mostIles 4 3 IsCi advanced emission control systems v s available. -": . i • ' • Vehicles equipped with devices that r - R�, ' '. —' - minimize idling and warm-up time k . r - automatically. " - , - $ i • Vehicles that run on cleaner fuels =. , - _ like compressed natural gas. • • • a 7 I .: . rew . t HAT IS GOVERNMENT DOING? 1.1.11,„. ... :, , C,`' Ii . • Diesel engines are a durable and economical source of power. EPA and states are taking important steps to advance cleaner diesel engines. 4. I . r--,• EPA is requiring reductions of diesel pollution from new �, ' heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses. In 2006, diesel fuel will - i contain 97 percent less sulfur. This ultra-low sulfur diesel , fuel in combination with advanced pollution control technology will mean that in 2007, new trucks and buses rolling off the production lines will be up to 95 percent '1 I cleaner than today's models. • EPA has issued emission standards for new, nonroad diesel `► ,fai engines, such as construction and farm equipment, and is Iii. working to strengthen these standards in the future. • Engines within the existing fleet will not be subject to the new regulations, yet may remain in operation for another 25-30 years. Therefore, EPA and states are working to: 1 Retrofit existing diesel vehicles with pollution controls. 2 Implement emission testing programs for diesel vehicles. 3 Create and implement anti-idling programs. • 4 Promote cleaner fuels like ultra-low sulfur diesel and compressed natural gas. EPA Standards for New Trucks and Buses+ Nitrogen Oxides Particulate Matter emissions* a.., emissions* friss 1984 10.7 , - 1988 10.7sok 0.6 11111, 1990 6 nu 0.6 Illlip 1991 5 0.25 t 1994 5 0.10 1998 4 gab 0.1. 2004 2 NU 0.10 2007 0.2 lip. 0.0i + Urban transit buses hove hod more stringent standards since 1993 • EPA's emission stondards for trucks and buses ore based on the amount of pollution emitted per unit of energy (expressed in grams per brake horsepower hour). EPA420-F-03-022 June 2003 S • A United States \ / Environmental Protection Agency Health Assessment Document For Diesel Engine Exhaust • • EXHIBIT 3- tall -Oa 6 EPA/600/8-90/057F • May 2002 Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust • National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC • 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • 1.1. INTRODUCTION This Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust(DE)represents EPA's first comprehensive review of the potential health effects from ambient exposure to exhaust from diesel engines. The assessment was developed to provide information about the potential for DE to pose environmental health hazards, information that would be useful in evaluating regulatory needs under provisions of the Clean Air Act. The assessment identifies and characterizes the potential human health hazards of DE (i.e, hazard assessment)and seeks to estimate the relationship between exposure and disease response for the key health effects(i.e.,dose-response assessment). A full exposure assessment and risk characterization,the other two components of a complete risk assessment, are beyond the scope of this document. The report has nine chapters and three appendices. Chapter 2 provides a characterization of diesel emissions,atmospheric transformation, and human exposures to provide a context for the hazard evaluation of DE. Chapters 3,4, 5, and 7 provide a review of relevant information for the evaluation of potential health hazards of DE, including dosimetry(Chapter 3),mutagenicity (Chapter 4),noncancer effects(Chapter 5),and carcinogenic effects(Chapter 7). Chapters 6 and 8 contain dose-response analyses to provide insight about the significance of the key noncancer and cancer hazards. Chapter 9 summarizes and characterizes the overall nature of the health • hazard potential in the environment and the overall confidence and/or uncertainties associated with the conclusions. 1.2. COMPOSITION OF DIESEL EXHAUST DE is a complex mixture of hundreds of constituents in either a gas or particle form. Gaseous components of DE include carbon dioxide, oxygen,nitrogen,water vapor,carbon monoxide, nitrogen compounds, sulfur compounds, and numerous low-molecular-weight hydrocarbons. Among the gaseous hydrocarbon components of DE that are individually known to be of toxicologic relevance are the aldehydes(e.g., formaldehyde,acetaldehyde,acrolein), benzene, 1,3-butadiene,and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)and nitro-PAHs. The particles present in DE(i.e., diesel particulate matter [DPM]) are composed of a center core of elemental carbon and adsorbed organic compounds, as well as small amounts of sulfate,nitrate, metals, and other trace elements. DPM consists of fine particles(fine particles have a diameter<2.5 µm), including a subgroup with a large number of ultrafine particles (ultrafine particles have a diameter<0.1 µm). Collectively,these particles have a large surface area which makes them an excellent medium for adsorbing organics. Also,their small size makes them highly respirable and able to reach the deep lung. A number of potentially � I-1 toxicologically relevant organic compounds are on the particles. The organics, in general, range • from about 20%to 40%of the particle weight,though higher and lower percentages are also reported. Many of the organic compounds present on the particle and in the gases are individually known to have mutagenic and carcinogenic properties. For example, PAHs, nitro- PAHs,and oxidized PAH derivatives are present on the diesel particles, with the PAHs and their derivatives comprising about I%or less of the DPM mass. DE emissions vary significantly in chemical composition and particle sizes between different engine types(heavy-duty, light-duty),engine operating conditions(idle, accelerate, decelerate), and fuel formulations(high/low sulfur fuel). Also,there are emission differences between on-road and nonroad engines simply because the nonroad engines to date are generally of older technology. The mass of particles emitted and the organic components on the particles from on-road diesel engines have been reduced over the years. Available data for on-road engines indicate that toxicologically relevant organic components of DE (e.g., PAHs,nitro- PAHs) emitted from older vehicle engines are still present in emissions from newer engines, though relative amounts have decreased. There is currently insufficient information to characterize the changes in the composition of DE from nonroad diesel engines over time. 1.3. DIESEL EXHAUST AS A COMPONENT OF AMBIENT PARTICULATE MATTER DE is emitted from "on-road"diesel engines(vehicle engines)or"nonroad"diesel • engines(e.g., locomotives,marine vessels,heavy-duty equipment, etc.). Nationwide, data in 1998 indicated that DE as measured by DPM made up about 6%of the total ambient PM2 inventory(i.e., particles with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less)and about 23% of the inventory, if natural and miscellaneous sources of PM25 are excluded. Estimates of the DPM percentage of the total inventory in urban centers are higher. For example, estimates range from 10%to 36% in some urban areas in California, Colorado, and Arizona. Available data also indicate that over the years there have been significant reductions in DPM emissions from the exhaust of on-road diesel engines,whereas limited data suggest that exhaust emissions from nonroad engines have increased. 1.4. ATMOSPHERIC TRANSFORMATION OF DIESEL EXHAUST After emission from the tailpipe, DE undergoes dilution and chemical and physical transformations in the atmosphere, as well as dispersion and transport in the atmosphere. The atmospheric lifetime for some compounds present in DE ranges from hours to days. DPM is directly emitted from diesel-powered engines(primary particulate matter) and can be formed from the gaseous compounds emitted by diesel engines(secondary particulate matter). Limited information is available about the physical and chemical transformation of DE in the • 1-2 atmosphere. It is not clear what the overall toxicological consequences of DE's transformations • are because some compounds in the DE mixture are altered to more toxic forms while others are made less toxic. 1.5. EXPOSURE TO DIESEL EXHAUST DPM mass(expressed as µg DPM/m3)has historically been used as a surrogate measure of exposure for whole DE. Although uncertainty exists as to whether DPM is the most appropriate parameter to correlate with human health effects, it is considered a reasonable choice until more definitive information about the mechanisms of toxicity or mode(s)of action of DE becomes available. In the ambient environment,human exposure to DE comes from both on- road and nonroad engine exhaust. A large percentage of the U.S. population also is exposed to ambient PM2 5, of which DPM is typically a significant constituent. Although this document does not provide an exposure assessment, DE exposure information is included to provide a context for the health effects information. Exposure estimates for the early to mid-1990s suggest that national annual average DE exposure from on-road engines alone was in the range of about 0.5 to 0.8 µg DPM/m3 of inhaled air in many rural and urban areas, respectively. Exposures could be higher if there is a nonroad DE source that adds to the exposure from on-road vehicles. For example,preliminary estimates show that, on a national average basis,accounting for nonroad DE emissions adds another twofold to the on-road exposure. For localized urban areas • where people spend a large portion of their time outdoors,the exposures are higher and, for example, may range up to 4.0 µg DPM/m3 of inhaled air. 1.6. HEALTH EFFECTS OF DIESEL EXHAUST Available evidence indicates that there are human health hazards associated with exposure to DE. The hazards include acute exposure-related symptoms, chronic exposure- -- -----.��- ------ --- related noncancer respiratory effects,and lung cancer. The health hazard conclusions are based on exhaust emissions from diesel engines built prior to the mid-1990s. With current engine use including some new and many more older engines(engines typically stay in service for a long time),the health hazard conclusions, in general, are applicable to engines currently in use. As new and cleaner diesel engines,together with different diesel fuels, replace a substantial number of existing engines,the general applicability of the health hazard conclusions will need to be re- evaluated. With new engine and fuel technology expected to produce significantly cleaner engine exhaust by 2007 (e.g., in response to new federal heavy duty engine regulations), significant reductions in public health hazards are expected for those engine uses affected by the regulations. • 1-3 1.6.1. Acute(Short-Term Exposure)Effects • Information is limited for characterizing the potential health effects associated with acute or short-term exposure. However, on the basis of available human and animal evidence, it is concluded that acute or short-term (e.g.,episodic) exposure to DE can cause acute irritation (e.g.,eye,throat,bronchial), neurophysiological symptoms(e.g., lightheadedness, nausea), and respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm). There also is evidence for an immunologic effect—the exacerbation of allergenic responses to known allergens and asthma-like symptoms. The lack of adequate exposure-response information in the acute health effect studies precludes the development of recommendations about levels of exposure that would be presumed safe for these effects. 1.6.2. Chronic(Long-Term Exposure)Noncancer Respiratory Effects Information from the available human studies is inadequate for a definitive evaluation of possible noncancer health effects from chronic exposure to DE. However,on the basis of extensive animal evidence, DE is judged to pose a chronic respiratory hazard to humans. Chronic-exposure, animal inhalation studies show a spectrum of dose-dependent inflammation and histopathological changes in the lung in several animal species including rats,mice, hamsters, and monkeys. This assessment provides an estimate of inhalation exposure of DE(as measured by • DPM)to which humans may be exposed throughout their lifetime without being likely to experience adverse noncancer respiratory effects. This exposure level, known as the reference concentration (WC)for DE of 5 µg/m3 of DPM was derived on the basis of dose-response data on inflammatory and histopathological changes in the lung from rat inhalation studies. In recognition of the presence of DPM in ambient PM25 , it also is appropriate to consider the wealth of PM25 human health effects data. In this regard,the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PM25 of 15 µg/m3 (annual average concentration)also would be expected to provide a measure of protection from DPM, reflecting DPM's current approximate proportion to PM25. 1.6.3. Chronic(Long-Term Exposure)Carcinogenic Effects This assessment concludes that DE is"likely to be carcinogenic to humans by inhalation" and that this hazard applies to environmental exposures. This conclusion is based on the totality of evidence from human,animal, and other supporting studies. There is considerable evidence demonstrating an association between DE exposure and increased lung cancer risk among workers in varied occupations where diesel engines historically have been used. The human evidence from occupational studies is considered strongly supportive of a finding that DE • 1-4 exposure is causally associated with lung cancer,though the evidence is less than that needed to • definitively conclude that DE is carcinogenic to humans. There is some uncertainty about the degree to which confounders are having an influence on the observed cancer risk in the occupational studies,and there is uncertainty evolving from the lack of actual DE exposure data for the workers. In addition to the human evidence, there is supporting evidence of DPM's carcinogenicity and associated DPM organic compound extracts in rats and mice by noninhalation routes of exposure. Other supporting evidence includes the demonstrated mutagenic and chromosomal effects of DE and its organic constituents, and the suggestive evidence for bioavailability of the DPM organics in humans and animals. Although high- exposure chronic rat inhalation studies show a significant lung cancer response,this is not thought predictive of a human hazard at lower environmental exposures. The rat response is considered to result from an overload of particles in the lung resulting from the high exposure, and such an overload is not expected to occur in humans at environmental exposures. Although the available human evidence shows a lung cancer hazard to be present at occupational exposures that are generally higher than environmental levels, it is reasonable to presume that the hazard extends to environmental exposure levels. While there is an incomplete understanding of the mode of action for DE-induced lung cancer that may occur in humans,there is the potential for a nonthreshold mutagenic mode of action stemming from the organics in the DE mixture. A case for an environmental hazard also is shown by the simple observation that • the estimated higher environmental exposure levels are close to, if not overlapping,the lower range of occupational exposures for which lung cancer increases are reported. These considerations taken together support the prudent public health choice of presuming a cancer hazard for DE at environmental levels of exposure. Overall,the evidence for a potential cancer hazard to humans resulting from chronic inhalation exposure to DE is persuasive,even though assumptions and uncertainties are involved. While the hazard evidence is persuasive,this does not lead to similar confidence in understanding the exposure/dose-response relationship. Given a carcinogenicity hazard,EPA typically performs a dose-response assessment of the human or animal data to develop a cancer unit risk estimate that can be used with exposure information to characterize the potential cancer disease impact on an exposed population. The DE human exposure-response data are considered too uncertain to derive a confident quantitative estimate of cancer unit risk,and with the chronic rat inhalation studies not being predictive for environmental levels of exposure, EPA has not developed a quantitative estimate of cancer unit risk. In the absence of a cancer unit risk, simple exploratory analyses were used to provide a perspective of the range of possible lung cancer risk from environmental exposure to DE. The analyses make use of reported lung cancer risk increases in occupational epidemiologic studies, • 1-5 and the differences between occupational and environmental exposure. The purpose of having a • risk perspective is to illustrate and have a sense of the possible significance of the lung cancer hazard from environmental exposure. The risk perspective cannot be viewed as a definitive quantitative characterization of cancer risk nor is it suitable for estimation of exposure-specific population risks. 1.7. SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY Even though the overall evidence for potential human health effects of DE is persuasive, many uncertainties exist because of the use of assumptions to bridge data and knowledge gaps about human exposures to DE and the general lack of understanding about underlying mechanisms by which DE causes observed toxicities in humans and animals. A notable uncertainty of this assessment is whether the health hazards identified from studies using emissions from older engines can be applied to present-day environmental emissions and related exposures, as some physical and chemical characteristics of the emissions from certain sources have changed over time. Available data are not sufficient to provide definitive answers to this question because changes in DE composition over time cannot be confidently quantified, and the relationship between the DE components and the mode(s)of action for DE toxicity is/are unclear. While recognizing the uncertainty, for this assessment a judgment is made that prior- year toxicologic and epidemiologic findings can be applied to more current exposures, both of • which use DPM mass in air as the measure of DE exposure. Other uncertainties include the assumptions that health effects observed at high doses may be applicable to low doses, and that toxicologic findings in laboratory animals generally are predictive of human responses. In the absence of a more complete understanding of how DE may cause adverse health effects in humans and laboratory animals,related assumptions(i.e.,the presence of a biological threshold for chronic respiratory effects based on cumulative dosage and absence of a threshold for lung cancer stemming from subtle and irreversible effects) are considered reasonable and prudent. Although parts of this assessment, particularly the noncancer MC estimate, have been derived with a generic consideration of sensitive subgroups within the population,the actual spectrum of the population that may have a greater susceptibility to DE is unknown and cannot be better characterized until more information is available regarding the adverse effects of DPM in humans. Increased susceptibility, for example, could result from above-average increases in DE deposition and retention in the respiratory system or intrinsic differences in respiratory system tissue sensitivity. There is no DE-specific information that provides direct insight to the question of differential human susceptibility. Given the nature of DE's noncancer effects on the respiratory system it would be reasonable, for example, to consider possible vulnerable • 1-6 subgroups to include infants/children,the elderly, or individuals with preexisting health • conditions,particularly respiratory conditions. In developing a perspective on the possible significance of the environmental cancer hazard of DE,this assessment uses information about the differences in the magnitude of DE exposures between the occupational and environmental settings. Although an appreciation for differences in exposure is needed only at an order-of-magnitude level for this assessment, one should recognize that individual exposure is a function of both the variable concentrations in the environment and the related breathing and particle retention patterns of the individual. Because of variations in these factors across the population,different subgroups could receive lower or higher exposure to DE than those groups mentioned in this assessment. Lastly,this assessment considers only potential heath effects from exposures to DE alone. Effects of DE exposure could be additive to or synergistic with concurrent exposures to many other air pollutants. However, in the absence of more definitive data demonstrating interactive effects(e.g., potentiation of allergenicity effects, potentiation of DPM toxicity by ambient ozone and oxides of nitrogen) from combined exposures to DE and other pollutants, it is not possible to address this issue. Further research is needed to improve the knowledge and data on DE exposures and potential human health effects, and thereby reduce uncertainties of future assessments of the DE health effects data. • 1-7 - S ..... - . — lrc n•� tc� "i_ ...e-fh�trvR �F.+6�a�f.t r -. '� — se - -- --=- -..cn--- _ - - �. _ �` • - • $—mac i --•-•!,._ _, - - ..__ .. _r. .....r. .. . . axe 4r.r�:A a•'. _ — �A...L�f.eZ.rr.i�.��.�..iriw.�.....�...� +��S� -- - 9a�i9YA ese an H0 P W The Lingering Threat .i.a.....r,„ • ., ._ , ,,, . ,•_ . _ . . III! .4 . ,� ' r 1. C ni• .,,,.., Et •. . . © f - -.- 4 l i Z '' oil ill. Oil • sue„ :, i.+ � 1 ._ . I { ilinlifiksfesall Ni,...._ . ., CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE EXHIBIT N d f 5II - oOl - � Q. • Arlrl b.b.allA V.h...a.ia Diesel Soot Health Impacts le • T. i•w+Iba 1. toner _ _ Where You Live vi...ter.t4.t W.-ww w..arrw i'ts • Find out about the risks QS tin lasts nem . ati of breathing diesel exhaust united states where you live: JVIN www. catf. us/goto/dieselhealth CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE 18 Tremont Street, Suite 530, Boston, MA 02108 Tel: 617-624-0234 / Fax: 617-624-0230 Credits — Written by: Conrad G. Schneider, Advocacy Director and L. Bruce Hill, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Edited by: Maria Padian Designed by: Jill Bock Design Printed by: Spectrum Printing & Graphics, Inc. This report has been printed on recycled (20% post consumer waste), Processed Chlorine Free (PCF) paper with soy inks. Acknowledgements -- The John Merck Fund, The Heinz Endowments, The Beldon Fund, The New York Community Trust, and The Turner Foundation have provided support for the Clean Air Task Force Diesel Initiative, including this report. Dana Lowell and Tom Balon of M.J. Bradley & Associates and David Schoengold of MSB Energy Associates provided technical support. Patricia Monahan of the Union of Concerned Scientists provided valuable comments. • February 2005 SIM • What are the health impacts of these dirty diesel lost work days.Together with the toll of premature vehicles?What benefits will we realize if we act now to deaths,the health damages from diesel fine particles clean them up?The Clean Air Task Force commissioned will total$139 billion in 2010. ll Abt Associates,an highly-respected consulting firm that • Nationally,diesel exhaust poses a cancer risk that is U.S. EPA and other agencies rely upon to assess the 7.5 times higher than the combined total cancer risk benefits of national air quality policies,to quantify for the from all other air toxics. first time the health impacts of fine particle air pollution from America's diesel fleet. Using this information,we were • In the U.S.,the average lifetime nationwide cancer risk able to estimate the expected benefits—in lives saved— due to diesel exhaust is over 350 times greater than the level U.S. EPA considers to be"acceptable"(i.e.,one from an aggressive but feasible program to clean up dirty cancer per million persons over 70 years). diesel buses,trucks,and heavy equipment across the U.S. This report summarizes the findings of the Abt Associ- • Residents from more than two-thirds of all U.S.counties ates study. It then reviews the degree to which diesel face a cancer risk from diesel exhaust greater than 100 vehicles increase the level of fine particle pollution in the deaths per million population. People living in eleven air we breathe,and recommends reduction measures that urban counties face diesel cancer risks greater than will save thousands of lives each year. 1,000 in a million—one thousand times the level EPA Key findings include: says is acceptable. • Reducing diesel fine particle emissions 50 percent by ■ People who live in metropolitan areas with a high 2010,75 percent by 2015,and 85 percent by 2020 concentration of diesel vehicles and traffic feel their would save nearly 100,000 lives between now and 2030. impacts most acutely.The risk of lung cancer from These are additional lives saved above and beyond the diesel exhaust for people living in urban areas is three projected impact of EPA's new engine regulations. times that for those living in rural areas. • Fine particle pollution from diesels shortens the lives of The vast majority of the deaths due to dirty diesels nearly 21,000 people each year.This includes almost could be avoided by an aggressive program over the next • 3,000 early deaths from lung cancer. 15 years to require cleanup of the nation's existing diesel • Tens of thousands of Americans suffer each year from fleet. Practical,affordable solutions are available that can asthma attacks(over 400,000), heart attacks(27,000), achieve substantial reductions in diesel risk.The only thing that stands between us and dramatically healthier air is the and respiratory problems associated with fine particles political will to require these reductions and the funding to from diesel vehicles.These illnesses result in thou- make it a reality. sands of emergency room visits, hospitalizations,and What We Must Do to Protect Public Health from Today's Dirty Diesels. Although the EPA has mandated the phase-in of cleaner legislation,or both may be needed. Funding for such new engines and fuels beginning in 2007 for highway initiatives may pose a challenge for public fleets(school vehicles and heavy equipment,EPA has limited authority to buses,transit vehicles,garbage trucks,etc.),so support for mandate emissions controls on the fleet of existing diesel expanded state and federal funding to help the cleanup of vehicles.To date, EPA has adopted a"voluntary"approach. fleets owned by cash-strapped states and cities will be Nevertheless, in order to meet the new ambient air quality necessary.Local and state budget writers will need a standards for fine particles,states and cities must require strong commitment to come up with the necessary appro- controls to reduce diesel emissions. Diesel cleanup is also priations or bonds to fund the local share. an important next step in areas that are having difficulty Particle filters combined with the use of Ultra Low meeting existing and new ambient air quality standards for Sulfur Diesel(ULSD)fuel have been found to reduce diesel ozone such as Houston and Dallas,Texas. particles and particle-bound toxics from diesel exhaust by States can enact legislation requiring diesel cleanup as up to 90 percent.Under the new engine rules,ULSD will be some,such as California and Texas, have already begun to available for highway vehicles nationwide starting in 2006. do.States should also consider measures to require early It is already available in cities in 21 states.Not all vehicles engine retirement and speed fleet turnover. For vehicles can be retrofitted with a particle filter,but there are a • like long-haul trucks,ships,and locomotives that are variety of options available for the cleanup of every vehicle engaged in interstate transport,federal regulations,federal regardless of make or model year. 3 • 100% - in 80% - 00 Y I- 0 '�. . ZZ W z 40% cc Q Median Heavy Truck aw Median Survival Rate = 28 Years Lifetime is Nearly Et 20% 30 Years28 0% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 VEHICLE AGE (YEARS) The Most Widespread Air Pollution Risk in the U . S . How Particulate Matter Kills There are few other sources of widespread pollution in our environment that rival diesel exhaust as an airborne toxin. Fine particles, known as "PM2 5", are particles less America's 13 million diesel engines release a host of harm- than 2.5 microns in diameter or 1/100th the width ful substances including fine particles, ozone smog-forming of a human hair, so small that they are often invis- • nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and a variety of toxic ible. They can be deposited deep in the lung where metals and organic gases such as formaldehyde, acrolein, they can affect both the respiratory and cardio- and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH.)29 In this vascular systems. Researchers believe that many report we focus on the respiratory, cardiovascular, and deaths caused by particulate matter are related cancer effects of diesel fine particles only.39 to cardiovascular illness. Fine particles aggravate cardiovascular disease and trigger heart attacks Fine Particles are Linked to Heart by invading the bloodstream and initiating an in- Attacks, Asthma Attacks, and flammatory response, disrupting heart rate and in- Stunted LungQ Growth. creasing blood clotting. In a recent experimental b study, diesel particles caused blood clots provid- ing "a plausible explanation for the increase in car- Fine particles have been linked to a wide variety of serious diovascular morbidity and mortality accompany- health impacts, from upper and lower respiratory ailments, "33 ing urban air pollution. such as asthma attacks and possible asthma onset, to heart attacks, stroke, and premature death, including crib death in children.31 How standards were established for fine particles in 1997.34 1 risky is breathing air polluted Health researchers have recently described serious is .- - * with particles? A study pub- health impacts of fine particles, including: r t. . lished in the Journal of the _ , • Abnormal heart rhythms and heart attacks and athero- American Medical Associa- 35 sclerosis; tion found that living in the Increased incidence of stroke;35 - most polluted U.S. cities •'-. • poses a risk similar to living • Permanent respiratory damage, characterized by with a smoker.32 Based on fibrosis causing obstruction to airflow;37 4r .r, thousands of studies corn- ■ Chronic adverse effects on lung development resulting IIIpiled by EPA, federal health in deficits in lung function.38 9 Diesel Exhaust is a Likely Carcinogen that also Impairs Immune, Reproductive , and Nervous Systems. In 1998, the Scientific Review Panel for the California Air Applying California's cancer unit risk for diesel particu- Resources Board reviewed diesel exhaust as a toxic air late matter to the national average concentration of contaminant and set a lifetime unit cancer risk from diesel directly-emitted diesel fine particles in 1999, results in a particles at 3 in 10,000 persons for each microgram of conservative estimate of 1 ,530 excess cases of lung annual average diesel exposure.39 This is equivalent to 300 cancer per year for 2005.42 An American Cancer Society in a million excess lung cancers. In May 2002, EPA issued study of 150 metropolitan areas across the U.S published its Health Assessment for Diesel Exhaust which found in 2002 supports the particulate matter cancer link.43 diesel particulate matter to be a "likely" carcinogen. EPA Other effects include: did not settle on a unit risk factor but recommended a ■ Immune System Effects — Diesel exposure is associ- lifetime cancer risk range from 1 in 1 ,000 to 1 in 100,000.40 ated with numerous immune system responses in The California unit risk falls within this range.41 humans and animals culminating in increased allergic inflammatory responses and suppression of infection- Diesel particles are carbon at their core fighting ability. These effects include disruption of with toxics and carcinogenic substances chemical signals and production of antibodies, and an attached to their surfaces. alteration in mobilization of infection-fighting cells.44 • Reproductive, Developmental, and Endocrine Toxics Effects — Diesel emissions have also been associated with reproductive, developmental and endocrine effects in animals. Specifically, diesel exposure has been Metals associated in animals with decreased sperm produc- tion,45 masculinization of rat fetuses,46 changes in fetal Secondary Sulfate development (thymus,47 bone48 and nervous system49) • and Nitrate and endocrine disruption, i.e., production of adrenal and reproductive hormones.5° Air Organic Carbon • Nervous System Effects - In addition to animal Compounds studies that have shown neurodevelopmental effects, a human study of railroad workers suggested that diesel exposure may have caused serious permanent Elemental Carbon Core impairment to the central nervous system.51 Cancer-causing Pollutants in Diesel Exhaust Diesel Emissions EPA Cancer Risk (per To of all Mobile Carcinogen million/microgram Pollutant 1996" Status in 70-yr life) Formaldehyde 52% probable 1 in a million Acetaldehyde 59% probable 1 in a million Butadiene 8% probable 2 in a million Acrolein 50% possible n/a Benzene 5% known 2-8 in a million Diesel Particulate 77% probable$3 EPA: 12 to 1210 in a Matter million; GARB: 300 in a millions' • 10 • . ., • • Children and Seniors are at Greatest Risk Health researchers believe that children • - . • SEMI. are more susceptible than adults to the • « adverse health effects of air pollution for a „ , , • rr- At a bus stop, variety of reasons.55 For example, children diesel particles measured at the are more active than adults and therefore o 400,000 a,... -- - - --. .e curb spike breathe more rapidly. Children also have - _. \too sharply from a • conventional more lung surface area compared totheir 300,000 bus running on body weight and therefore they inhale c _- , " regular diesel more air pound-for-pound than adults do. 0 ci, 200,000- fuel. Compared to adults, children also have V higher lung volume to body size, higher a 100.000 - respiration rates, and spend more active _. ° '.. time in the polluted outdoor environment. 0 i i • --Fine particles have been linked in medical 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Seconds studies to serious health impacts in children such as slowed lung function ( growth, increased emergency room visits, increased incidences of asthma and _ bronchitis, and crib death. Furthermore, _ 00. . ' ' `' I Diesel particles are virtually proximity to traffic has been linked to , , ,,.;; ,=. eliminated when increased prevalence of asthma respira- 3 400,000 _ ,. 1 I C. the bus is run on ULSD and tory infections and allergic symptoms and L -t i �. % • hl. • • / _ -1 retrofitted with • asthma hospitalizations in children.56 �, 300,000 '• a diesel Seniors are another important o i S • particulate filter. population at risk. Studies of the impacts U 200.000 SI 11.00.4 of fine particles on seniors in Boston and mI Baltimore suggest that changes in their a 100.000 heart rhythms and control mechanisms 0 _ occur when particle levels rise. In 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Phoenix, daily mortality increased in Seconds Children Exposed on School Buses CATF Study: Cabin particulate matter eliminated with retrofit emissions controls. Twenty four million students ride to school every day cabin exceeded levels in the outdoor air by as much as on yellow school buses that travel a total of four billion ten times. While idling or lined up in a schoolyard, rapid miles a year. While riding on a school bus is the safest buildup of particulate matter in the buses also occurred. way a student can travel to schools' children may be Most importantly, retrofit emissions controls worked: in- exposed to harmful pollutants, a concern since students stallation of a diesel particulate filter and the use of UI- spend an average of an hour and a half a day on school tra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) fuel and a closed crank- buses.sM A recent study undertaken by Clean Air Task case filtration device eliminated fine particles, ultrafine Force in cooperation with Purdue University investigated particles, black carbon and particle-bound PAH in the cabin air quality on school buses in three cities (Chi- bus cabin. A closed crankcase filtration system by itself cago, IL; Atlanta, GA; and Ann Arbor MI). The study demonstrated major benefits and can provide im- found that particulate matter routinely entered the bus mediate and low cost reductions in particulate matter cabin from the tailpipe and the engine through the open levels on school buses. For a comprehensive report: ifront door. At some stops, particulate matter in the bus www.catf.us/goto/schoolbusreport 11 7 5.10 Air Quality 1-70 East Draft Environmental Impact Stateme Chapter 5:Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences,and Mitigation • that people are actually exposed to those concentrations at a specific location.These difficulties are magnified for lifetime, 70-year risk assessments, particularly because unsupportable assumptions would have to be made regarding changes in travel patterns and vehicle technology (which affects emissions rates)over that time frame.There are also considerable uncertainties associated with the existing estimates of toxicity of the various MSATs,because of factors such as low-dose extrapolation and translation of occupational exposure data to the general population,a concern expressed by the Health Effects Institute(HEI). For example, consider the exposure-response relationship for alcoholic beverages.Alcoholic beverages are established causes of cancer in humans;about 3 percent of all cancers world-wide are thought to be caused by over-consumption of alcoholic beverages.There is a clear dose- response relationship for alcoholic beverages,with risk of cancer death increasing(essentially) linearly for exposures ranging from 2 drinks per day through 6-plus drinks per day. But there is neither evidence nor reason to suppose that, for example, 1 or 0.5 drinks per day also increase people's risk of cancer death. Indeed,the exposure-response data, interestingly enough, show a "3-shaped"dose response relationship, such that people consuming 1 drink per day are significantly less likely to die of cancer than those who drink no alcoholic beverages.If one were to make the standard"regulatory style"assumption about low-level exposure to alcohol,one would both vastly overestimate the cancer risk, and also miss entirely what turns out to be a low- level protective effect. In such a case, it would hardly be"erring on the side of public health"to estimate that exposures that are orders of magnitude smaller than the 2 drinks-per-day cancer- effect-level put people at risk of cancer.This is not to say,of course,that very-low-level exposures to MSAT emissions prevent cancer;nor is it to assert that such exposures are • demonstrably or obviously safe. It is only to point out that extrapolation beyond observable exposures and responses are at best an uncertain business and become increasingly uncertain the farther one strays from the empirical data. Because of these shortcomings, any calculated difference in health impacts between alternatives is likely to be much smaller than the uncertainties associated with calculating the impacts. Consequently,the results of such assessments would not be useful to decision makers,who would need to weigh this information against project benefits [name specific benefits with available supporting statistics, such as reducing traffic congestion, accident rates, and fatalities plus improved access for emergency response] that are better suited for quantitative analysis. Summary of Existing Credible Scientific Evidence Relevant to Evaluating MSATS Research into the health effects of MSATs is ongoing.For different emission types, there are a variety of studies that show that some either are statistically associated with adverse health outcomes through epidemiological studies(frequently based on emissions levels found in occupational settings)or that animals demonstrate adverse health outcomes when exposed to large doses. Exposure to toxics has been a focus of a number of EPA efforts. Most notably,the agency conducted the National Air Toxics Assessment in 1996 to evaluate modeled estimates of human exposure applicable to the county level. While not intended for use as a measure of or benchmark for local exposure,the modeled estimates in the National Air Toxics Assessment database best illustrate the levels of various toxics when aggregated to a national or state level. EPA has assessed the risks of various kinds of exposures to these pollutants and that information is • available in the Integrated Risk Information System, a database of human health effects that may result from exposure to various substances found in the environment.The following toxicity information for 6.10-14 November 2008 II IliI-70 East Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5.10 Air Qty Chapter 5:Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences,and Mitigation IIithe six prioritized MSATs was taken from the Integrated Risk Information Systemslatabase Weight of Evidence Characterization summaries.This information is taken verbatim from EPA's Integrated Risk Information System database and represents the agency's most current evaluations of the potential hazards and toxicology of these chemicals or mixtures. • Benzene is characterized as a known human carcinogen. • The potential carcinogenicity of acrolein cannot be determined because the existing data are inadequate for an assessment of human carcinogenic potential for either the oral or inhalation route of exposure. • Formaldehyde is a probable human carcinogen,based on limited evidence in humans, and sufficient evidence in animals. • 1,3-butadiene is characterized as carcinogenic to humans by inhalation. • Acetaldehyde is a probable human carcinogen based on increased incidence of nasal tumors in male and female rats and laryngeal tumors in male and female hamsters after inhalation exposure. • Diesel exhaust is likely to be carcinogenic to humans by inhalation from environmental exposures. Diesel exhaust as reviewed in this document is the combination of DPM and diesel exhaust organic gases. • Diesel exhaust also represents chronic respiratory effects,possibly the primary non-cancer hazard from MSATs. Prolonged exposures may impair pulmonary function and could produce symptoms such as cough, phlegm,and chronic bronchitis. Exposure relationships have not been developed from these studies. • Some recent studies have reported that proximity to roadways is related to adverse health outcomes— particularly respiratory problems. Many health studies use an epidemiologica approac to relate t e 'possibility of harm due to the proximity to the roadway.FHWA has concerns about reaching conclusions regarding health impacts from highway emissions based on proximity studies in areas known to exceed ambient air quality standards, such as the recent study by Dr.James Gauderman,et al., entitled"Effect of Exposure to Traffic on Lung development from 10 to 18 Years of Age: A Cohort Study".These studies do not measure specific pollutants but only roadway proximity, so any reported negative health impacts may be due to either the criteria pollutants or MSATs. Epidemiological studies suffer from the limitation that they cannot by their very nature establish causality. They may indicate statistical associations,but other confounding factors may be missed and may represent the true cause of the impact. Furthermore, not all studies show a negative impact. For example,the"Long term Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution on Mortality'(Beelen et al.,2009), only found weak associations between proximity to major roadways and health effects.This fact was also reported as a major shortcoming in health studies of this nature in, "Does Traffic-Related Air Pollution Contribute to Respiratory Disease Formation in Children?"(Jerrett, 2007). In his review, Jerrett also points out another shortcoming in recent health studies dealing with determining the effect of proximity. He points out that most of these studies utilize a basic measure of distance to roadway as a proxy of exposure; however,because of the variable nature of particles and gaseous pollutants,the true variability of air pollutants within the neighborhood scale needs to be captured to identify the health effects of specific i South Coast Air Quality Management District, Multiple Air Toxic Exposure Study-II(2000); South Coast Air Quality Management District, Multiple Air Toxic Exposure Study-III (2007); Highway Health Hazards,The Sierra Club(2004)summarizing 24 Studies on the relationship between health and air quality); NEPA's Uncertainty in • the Federal Legal Scheme Controlling Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles, Environmental Law Institute,35 ELR 10273(2005)with health studies cited therein. November 2008 5.10-15 St 0a- IIs cr► VNI g z ins= • d © o U . . C ram W. .to Pt\ I = w O 14 t o 4 c? P's E . Cr7) 5 • fIMP it t . Ct o ,MC Q : W1;74° W E him( rm..* c:::: t E I N � O • I ;••44 cc3 ��;- u 06$Ci a is C� v o 'ft-I cii) o ivm.t "%a . 4. o O • "ozo ct 0 '#. ki is CIJ O r pit E t -se , ,a4 ,.., 0 o r a . r o z la AIL ' I _ o o ;00 < ae ' pm _ C:4 =Z = ct o I (0 _ . I a V ri Q CLI O 0 N iii °I- v -----j iq cel f 1 cfi 'r �\ �Cj .-y I I R� r i .-1.-.:1:: o i q14 11 w 411. CS Iii. .c.(ncz i 1� El: �• r-. 1 y.8 ' 64 , „,,A1-1 a " —4:— a . I5 , 6L I, 0: :aiireti.t.W: ' pi- -is Y tb. la _‘__Itec4gij e6t; 1/4.\. il ..e k aLI_ - � A 3 I MP 0 .. 5 , iti, 4:1_1(�//1 \ -_� t } L 4111 l '-.J _ � �T ..r� __ �:1 .. n .F."--- oi-4,4 ti . , • N sy"___„, 7 8/1-1 IQ'of \ ci :: r . ill\'' Mil; • �EC , -_____1__Q : 1/41 i silt cu t CL t 7 O or lL ` �� . y MI IQ O4\ ,...,( 1 .---: 1 . . I lti • s.-.1 sr,: 5 4 'Ill< kritit i------/S? 2 r e O 0 N • r' ,• A t •V • rm4 E cn O _ "o • co ;.4 ;:z4 gti —5 . . c.,.. ro i ;. rd O E r9 O d- u 't 4--+ rci O Cr cn . , t tatni-4 , ;-4 CaGn IF2i ch Rd rt *-1..a o rd cu v _ xj ;-mi U in �CU O rt u v U re _ Iii.,) v fa "O ,&U rci ,.C O., bt 4-' Ca• 5 1-6 ° ge ° rc 64 v) u be Li- 4_, , -0 P"' co E • -•4 tn O : . .° . - trt ,.., c , 4 ir—t4 ti ., e.,, ;_, O _ tit V 7--+ . ,..4 v N O re co re , vel roll 0 4-"n v t17d '—' • 0 <C-i < O � CAA rt E c,. ct cll ' 5 2 o ((Ts) rri ° g. ° bti. s _i- bA u . 1-1 I U ri ° ;-4 O_ It _ O 4.., ri v CA v3 O* r0 riO • O `f) _ _ a � ,-,,j re" 1-+ i . z-4 cu — E ,-,:j tAt rt rt < < vCa Cr rt .., r-c, cu ro NB, rri u u v v O � v � � � u �, N 7:5 QJ . � M O it _ _ v bA ; _ '� � u v • � Q • v may- Q i .4...) 6 g O O (i..) r:Q re a W W ...a Q O cn re) Gm CO CA D-4 LL 0 Page 1 of I Jay Pointer • From: <Russo.Rebecca©epamail.epa.gov> To: fISINISISNISSINSIBINS Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:26 AM Attach: Greeley AQI Report.pdf Subject: Fw: Re: Number of"brown cloud"and/or high ozone days in Weld County Hi Jay, vJ I got this information from my colleague. I hope its helpful to you. Rebecca Rebecca Russo Mobile Sources Program Manager EPA Region 8 Ph: (303) 312-6757 Forwarded by Rebecca Russo/R8/USEPA/US on 12/02/2011 09:25AM To: Rebecca Russo/R8/USEPA/US@EPA From: Richard Payton/R8/USEPA/US Date: 12/02/2011 09:03AM Cc: Scott Jackson/R8/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Re: Number of"brown cloud" and/or high ozone days in Weld County In Weld County there are 4 monitoring sites: 08-123-0006 Greeley Hospital PM10, PM2.5 08-123-0008 Platteville Mid. Sch. PM2.5 • 08-123-0009 Greeley Tower Ozone 08-123-0010 Greeley West Annex Carbon Monoxide This report shows number of days each year since 2008 with good, moderate, and Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups air quality in Weld County: (See attached file: Greeley AQI Report.pdf) Summarizing: Year Good Days Moderate Days Unhealthy for Sens. Group Days 2008 300 64 2 2009 316 49 1 2011 183 75 6 (264 days total for 2011) All of those Unhealthy for Sensitive Group days but 1 was due to ozone, the one exception in 2009 was the PM2.5 associated with the "brown cloud" In the same period, Denver/Boulder/Longmont/Fort Collins/Greeley had: Year Unh. Sens. Grps. 2008 20 2009 10 2010 17 2011 26 5 of those were brown cloud PM2.5 days, while the remaining 68 were ozone days. • 4 1711,7 12/2/2011 0 N I NI WI U N •WI 01 4 W I'I m 0 C v MI C ' 0 i Mo o D 0 C 0. 0 Jy £ u z m i 19 4 y c '. o Q O o a mI F W 01 NI 04 IX 0 0 2 III .1 N H a 41 b' O 41 0 a a h Q --,I a a U a :+ UI I N .] a a '4 4 �n Q III 0 O H R= 1 C4 4C a O 4 H Z w a O I l9 an a in di t u v Q a c a 4 Iil > r,1 r N a °o la r 7 - 0 >. a a c o UO : u I a a 0 I p H I u r 0 I E O I M L I O H 0 I O 00 0 k Yy m I Ma IH I H i H m m W 0 !; €j 1 . [+ Lc) co CO E '34 Q o m I N H q a 01 0 U d ;.1 II0 41 Q N O III II41 Z .-1O � u a „,a. C ' H I O W O 0 Ca v m 'CO w 4 Q m o Km I ituE w I-1 O SC W li H I o G j I m v l m m a x vo N 0 (.1 d in a y b • "��, 'I. Ham ; u 4 0 N N U 0 • or 0 £ H 3 2 w w 0 £ H 3 2 4. rn > £ H 3 x W N O £. H 3 2 a w O £ H 3r o N to N N O m T r w N q w a a N to J1 Na N m m to N o „ , , , „ „ , N n .i r N tM to N .a V1 to to N N 0 w 0 O 9 " o N 0 Or N A O to O £ H 3 x w w 2 £ H 3 2 a to o £ F 3 x W to O £ H 3 x w to O N o z 0 N N M o M r .Y h (O N N N ✓1 N Ot N > M M M N N M N N N .r O N N -n .-. N N N rvl n n M N N o N N N N 0 2 no p m II r0 0 3 2 W fn O £ H 3 2 W 2 a £ F 3 2 W to O £ H 3 2 4. w O £ H 3 x W T O YIti N L £co O P Ot N m O w ul +t w t O w N O r. N .4 m O 6 H P P ,M N M P P N .� .y N ,N M N ,nt C M N M M M M M N P M M M N 0 o o 6 N O L 0 T G 20 n co o £ H 3 S 4. vt O £ H 3 S W un > £ F 3 2 w m O £ H 3 S W M > £ F y ry N W M co in 0 in N V] Y1 a N N N 01 P m r w r4 P tO N O O OP r ✓1 p a > N T M N N M N M M N N N M N N N N M M M M M M N M P H .i U N W T e 0 F O M a too I .2 O L•• 00 ” 30 W to 0E F-• 3 = 4.3 S 4. to O £ H 3 2 4. 00 £ H3 = 4. 00 4 , 0 ON p F N 20 Hr CC 2 O H O m w a r 0 e m m r e r m e P r M P P r w e e e e m r e e O £ W a ? ✓1 e N to o to M M M a O 41 w °I- £ C ¢ N H, X a w N 2 0 O H 3 S W w O £ H 3 2 4. w O £ H 3 2 W to O £ H 3 2 W w O £ 'rH 3 2 O1 a w Z N a N 2 H4-i0 to O P r O r P O+ I- C o N P 0 .. P p r to r r o P e w O o H r N O ' Cl. H VI to Jl b N v P m m M to to m o r n 10 o N 10 N 04 o a v 0 • a O ., CO II > •40 o O £ F 3 x W w O £ H 3 S a to > £ F 3 = [., w > £ H 3 S u. to > £ ✓ W 4 a N N in o n W o P r N J1 w M .Y P P C C N P r N C O t C v .Y e o m Vt N Ow G .� 1 (n 2 to vl M N e e C N N J1 N N Vi P a 1 41 Q. o V1 ti N to N H M N H N O o ° II 0 0 co w O 0 2 W N o x H 3 2 W m O £ F 3 2. W N O £ H 3 2 w Vl > £ H 3 2 a w T N ca F N •-• C P N P O tO P 1^ 0> N O f p 3. .3040 .0 Ot O� NC w l0 P .i r4 O N P N C r 0 .~t N P O m P M or e J1 e N M Cie C t0 r O w N N P t` O� or > Zo 4 L II a m R N o H 3 S 4. tn 7 £ H 3 2 w N O £ H 324300 £ F 3 2134102H2 w O £ H 3 t O N V rOw O t t P r P N w P Ol m O e r .i or .-r w 0 0 O O\ O 4-i0 3 T z „ , , , „ , ,, „ PJ1 P J1 tD C V1 tO t0 in J1 P Ot to N a r. ., N 0 '0 v t e T N90 N p ut 0 co £ 0 m 0 £ H 3 2 w m O £ H 3 S W w O £ F 3 2 w to O £ F 3 2 w N O £ .y N to P o N M a .n m 0 m m N 0 o trl t+t 1+1 C to M M C CP PCC P N o P C C e C C C M trl t+t P H O O M II II p 1,., to O £ F 3 S W 00 X H32430 2 W to O £ F 3 x W m O £ F 3 x W O O 0 or N p N O 0 O T p .-r N nl .0 N nl .c Vl .(1 t- m o, P A .-I tp O .e m Yl V CO.„0 ,, , , ,,, , ,,,, ,„ 0 ,„.„ 0 „ , ,, ,„ „ N , , ,, , , , , , , ,, M O W IN in N O o f 3 2 4. to O £ H 3 2 w vl O x H 3 2 to to O £ F 3 2 4. w O £ H 3 2 N 00 II 2N o 0 N .Ni to N to o N m t P o m m M w > co Q M N N r(1 N N M N N C N N Vl M M or N C N N N N C .Y r4 C M No iF II w h • a a O 2 O 0 2 Or L N 4 n t T VI H N M P in tp r m 01 O ti icv co Or to 0 in an co O .l co M or ut o r w T O 0 £ O O O O O O O O O .or .1 to .r .+ n n t N N N N N N N N N N M M 3 H 0 • 2 o < ar OIs, £ 0 Z H 2 0 N N U •0 P O H 3 x w N 0 E H 3 x w 0 0 E H 3 x w to o £ H 3 x w 0 o E H 3 x N lO M 10 .4 in P M m O 0 T N M m 0 M T H N O O ✓1 H P P O NV ID N 0 U N N N fl N N N ID rl JI N fl H rl N N P N N N M m ti N N , O O O O 0 O N m m w A O O E H 3 x h. 0 0 E H 3 T In 0 O £ H 3 x W 0 £ H 3 x W 0 '.7 £ S 0 O N 0 M H H O a CO0 rl O 6- r1 1' 0 H N 0 N M WI N fl Ii LO in CT O N CO N > N N m m N m N m m r1 P N m M rl N N H in N m m N P N N P 0 2 H w m II Q 0 424c COO E H 3 x W 0 0 £ H 3 x W 0 m E H 3 x W 0 0 £ H 32 W 0 T O w L N H £ H N 01 OD al m m N CO m m ri N N H H N 0 m M m m M .i .+ N M M N N M N m N I� A a W U m N 0 O O C I 0 T m 0 O A M ry 0 H 3 2 w N 0 S H 323m W N .'J E N 3 2 4. N U £ F 3 x W VI U E H 3 CO N '> N W N C R P C V V' P 0 tD m N m '0 P P P P E P M m m M P V' R m V' M U 4 T H 2 0 4 F 0 M 0 d o u N 0 II N 2 0 0 0 E H 3 x W 0 0 E H 3 x W 2 0 E H 3 x 4. 0 0 £ H 3 x W 0 0 £ Of m P O H N L on FH Hi It P H M H H N b 0 N 0 P IO m ul r- 0 V' C 0 4' m N M P 0 N H 0 w U O 0 P P N in N ci.r P in 0 in N P P P r M N M a 0 P m in P M m E 11. 0 41 LI w0 O £c4 2 CA 4 N N m m O W y C o 3 S w 0 2 E H 3 Z' W 0 0 £ H 3 x W 0 0 £ H 3 x W 0 D E H 3 x w y to „ N w W Q N N 1-, >-, O N LO M 0 0 PO rl 0 4' r '� a P P P V' 4 1- M ‘0 ‘.0 .1 .7r H NP n 4' H m M W „ 0 r.1 10 a m 'll Y1 P b l0 a C c N 0 lU 'll a M m 14 0 E '0 2 .F] ti h H o > C M II . j > K 02 ,-, 324.. o 0 £ H 3 S W 0 0 E H 3 x w 0 o £ E- 33 3 x win 0 £ H 4, N 2 O N In 00 0 W o m o o v o 0 a O Ni to o N N a o N Cl r IN' 0 or a- a N a a O O 0 z In p Z V' co M co N co P to 10 IO 0 0 '0 y I 0 di 41 0 H 10 H to N O M N H W H II 0 0 0l 0 w In 0 E H 3 x w In 0 £ H 3 x 4. 0 0 E H 3 x w 0 0 E H 3 2 W 0 0 £ % O L v W NC P H M r 'D M I N H C P M I^ P I- PN a m 0 H H 0 a M m m N NN O P P P 0 H a zN m C tFl C tl' N P .t0 M to ✓1 t- a M m M N N V' P Ip Ill C 0 II • 0 on 4 N 0 0 3 2 W VI 0 £ F 3 x W 0 0 £ F 3 2 w 0 0 £ F 3 5 W 0 0 E F 3 S L CO N N N rr N ,D o o' m m 'O H m P P a N P H 0 .M_I rl M a o' v v m 0 H a .n m o I a m m P P V' a m N a m m V' In M P M M 4) 0 3 9 w H a o > 0 W 1 P O• to 0 en E 0 0 E F 3 x W 0 0 E H 3 x 4. 0 0 E H 3 x w 2 0 E F 3 o w 0 0 E F H o m u o In m r ID U a o m cr o ,. N Yl m P P U N r-- N C a m P m coC , I`l m C Jl in V' ✓) P M m C '!) ✓1 P H m 0 D II ta a M O O O O 0 £ H 3 x W to 0 £ H 3 x w 0 0 £ H 3 x W 0 0 £ H 3 x W 00 Min N O M N .1 I- inN in0 P C N H C C H ID M 0 -4 0 N 0 in T 'O .-I 0 0 in 0 CO M N N N N V M N M M M M M N M N P M IFl P M N N M M M M V CO w N (O O o J. W . o• ° = 3 0 0 £ F 3 x w 0 0 E H 3 2 W 0 0 E F 3 x W 0 'J E F 3 x a vl N O J. N N !' N 'h N 0 OI N H m co N H Jl 0 0 0 C H N M N H O N H N C H m 4"' > H a to R N N N N H N N N M M N P N IO M M M N N C N m M N N Jl M N 0 ly H II 14• b O Q 'Co 0 4 2 L V 0 in en N T 2i H N m C 0 0 I� 0 M H o N N N N N N N N o H S P 0 • E O N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 H N H H H H H H H 0 N N N N N N N N N 0 M 0 x 1 4 >+ Ors. E O Z F x 40 N 4. 0 •0 0 ' Z x W 0 0 2 F 3 2 4. In o £ F 3 S W en 0 £ N 3 x w 'n O £ H 3 x 4. N 0 CO 'i 0 P 0 M P m N 0 0 r 0 in ,1 in N 0 P N ti '-I O r a o O N N m 0 U m f'1 m m on m m N m N m N m N ✓1 , N m - N P 22 : 4] 0 O 2 O 0 m m 0 N A H f F Z x G. (n O £ F 3 S 4. 0 0 £ F 3 x W 'n 0 £ H 3 x 4. 'n O £ F S CA O N `" in A1 r m .. o 2 in P N m 10 .. .r N el N O Ff N m M N N M N N (in M rl f`l N N N m N 2 N n 0 m M N M N rl t.l N Z m aII o < '+ W 0 0 2 H 3 x w 'n O £ H 3 x W 'n O £ F 3 x 4. 'n 0 £ F 3 x 4. 'n o N O r N 0 il MN in P 0 0 N M N P t0 O 0C 0 N in N M 0 14-1M M in N 4. F P M P P m P P P m M M M P M F M m m .-. P M M N 2 M "1 N O t i CO T O 0 CO 0 0 0 N Al 3 x H. 'n O S H 3 x (u M .7 £ F 3 x w 2 O £ H 3 S 4. N 0 £ F 3 2 N N N 0. m m N P O P 0 V r V 0 in 0 .0 N O P NN V m P m V i P P P V m V o 441 P 2 .0 0 it, O u O a 0 n N O II 2 O O £ H 3 x 4. m O Z H 3 x W 'n O £ H 3 a w 'n O £ H 3 x w 'n O £ H N ' 0 AY • F N ,“ N F. a T P CA 03 C r " C CO o '° P N P r P m '- 0 '" P e '^ '" V O O CO 0 ° £ W (� a U' 01i in r n n a M '0 P in M V P in M n N V in in P 11. 0 m w�y O HO £ a C N en a• t/1 a o x w 2 O £ F 3 S w 'n O £ H 3 x W 'n O £ H 3 x W 'n O £ H 3 2 4. 2 Cl CP W „ N ▪ 0 a 0 6 £ N '] 04 Z .l r 'N b V in in N V b 0 O .D 01 V N 10 r 0 20200220204222 r O ry yOj .0 'Ola 0 m0 O• 4H n �-. P ti Al ry 0 O a a 4 o • • Q' " H 3 x W 202H3 = WO O £ H 3 x W vl O £ F 3 S W 'n O £ H 3 u > 440 0 o Zi-i0 N N in C) W m n N P V O N r N N M N Ol Y. m 2 r r 01 0 n H 0 V P n m a CO C 2 en a 2 P P M V' P V C M N V 0 V V M Yl .0 O N in O. 0 Vl N I N 'n in H4 ', 4 o M T 4 0 (-III o H W O 0 O O N 'J £ H 3 .T fu N 'J £ F 3 S w VI 'J £ H 3 IS'. fu N `.O S F 2 w N 'J £ m d F N G O F"' IF in P O 01 in 0 c0 0 V0 01 m VM m O N V N V V V V V V n 2022 N O 0 '1 2F V V V V N m V N VI P V t0 M2 N in M N W ; 0 O L C42 II 0 q N o O o x w 'n O £ H 3 x W h O E F 3 x w of O £ F 3 x W 'n O £ F 3 x 4. .0 in u N v N 0 O N 'O N V O N O m V 0 .O N n NN N r V P 'q P r 0 r O N n a V in V in O a .0 m 10 V N N P '(1 ul in Iol q o 3 N O 40 4 in co 0 C Q 9 I N ON 0 en 2 H 3 x W V] O E H 3 x 4. 'n O E H 3 x 4. 'n O E H 3 x Cu 'n O E H 3 £ n o m N 40 P M O M V V CA N 'O N O CO 0 1n n co PN N '0 P P P NV F coo, m V "1 V f+l P m 2 m M "1 N N V P m P In I'f N N N M 0 a NP m m V in I1 I O O 11 `n m O £ H 3 x w 'n O £ H 3 2 W 'n O £ H 3 x W 'n 0 £ F 3 x W 'n O O N N O o T a r O P N P V in a N i M as m .y V O 0 V 0 M P N P in V in "1 V CO (n en n N in in V N N 'n M N 1'1 M n M M m N M 2 , 2222 4) W n 0 O O >iO II U w 'n O £ N 3 x 4, in o £ F x W 'n O £ N 3 x W 'n O £ F 3 x '4 'n O N J • 0 0 H a a N > > r -1 a N in N a 'O a a N N 0 V m in Ol P .Dti P a N 0 r N in 0 in 0-1 • ZZ n ,,, ,,, , FN n co n N N in N .1. , , ,, , „0 men N m in FNN 0 HN II O a • ° O a 0 O Z C ✓ 0 Q y0 N N (n n N M P ✓1 'O N 0 01 0 n N N V O. O n m V in N N 0 O' O n b' M • E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n N N N N N N N N N "1 m .N p gd >+ 0 L. E 0 Z H 2 N N a N N U • v al N O O• i 'd o O N• n T N x N O N a, N II a o £ x O 3 N H W E X O >. o y.. X N L r N CO (0 N N n N N C' i 0 a. F M fn N N .-I Q' N N N '0 U N rn O C O 4 I r0 O O A N N Hi S V) H W £ x O 3 V) H W O L. N d N .-i N N O Hi CO CO Co O co �1 Cl. N N in N ^i N N M rn z 01 a. 0 (I) .C 0 N ID a. 0 aC ,..I .i (V N Z a £ F 3 x W m O £ F 3 x 4. a O £ H 3 x W rn o £ F' 3 S U. V, o £ F S ED I Q Q, O H N .Ci-i CC N N (.., 0 O a, v N N o N a, r m N a, N r el .a a N N O a r 0 a UJ ... a m a .•i a' 0 £ W o O ' a all r u� u) in a r a r a r a a' rn a In a .n r iv u" m O .p r a r 9O r a, O D N p E ¢ .O' >" 0 cL, N 0 v 4 N W (n o £ H Z x W U) ) E H 3 x W t!) O £ F 3 x a. V) O E F 3 3 W y O N '4 4-' >., = o N N N o m r m N N a N a a r r m o a n O .i a r .-i r- o .-i D r a m Q 04 Z H to .) a N U) U) a LI) b .o .0 .f) r .p a .p V7 0 O a, O V7 .p r a) to co u-)) N a r r N .-, N N N >J Z j H h > pT o • • CA Q ^i 3 x w In O £ F 3 S W to O .E F a x E. co O £ H 3 x W (n O £ F 3 s � II 'Z a d N 4) 0 O W i°� r a, 0 N N N a N (n N a a N N N a m a, m .O CO a a .p m a r r r CO C .i Z ��., Z a in V) .n N O .o Cr fn U) .p Ul .n r N CD Ul a a el a O ap 0 U) .o a r UJ a N ) .D U N Ed N NHi F 4 7 14 O N A aN H O 11 m N ▪ O £ H 3 T 4. V) O E H 3 x G. a) O X H 3 T [a. N D E H 3 0) W 1n a E H T VI O o al W N v ? H a r o 01 a al co O O N ,c r (4Ei N Cr r N) N C hi N r In .o O r N N r N r .., Hi ,Z )i a a !) C a V o a'. to ) a, to o r^, fn . to a a M N a• a 'a' a a a fn o a. Cr) (-- )o tp 4 O Hi 41 O C H a C 7 N C No 4. In O E F 3 S W V) 0 8 1. '3 Z W V) o £ H 3 x W V) 0 T F 3 x 4. to O t CO N v r O CO N) O r O r v) O a r r N N r N O al r a a N O ,O CO o, N N N o •� N a m a to a a a .n a a .n .r, a' a a' u) a a rn a' rn .n .p Cr a a .n a r a a u 3 ftl >. P. lr O .P) N a Q 4) ) r >' O .r) f] N Y1 £ O• F 3 x W N O E H 3 3 4. V) O £ H S 3 (4 V) O E F 3 x 4. 0 O £ H 3 T Ea N LI 0 0 N a) N O U'1 CO N 'D U', ,f) N r rn r o, m Cr CO a c-I N N .p r .r1 rn N N U', O N as rn a N) N n Naa ( a a a a re) a ) a a a a a N N a a a ro a a a M f"" S N o N II N O a In fn o F 3 x W rn O £ H 3 x 4. 1n O £ H 3 x W to 00) F 3 x W U) a £ O N m a 0 N 0 O N a CO N to Cr .n a N N r r U) .-I 4 rn .o N a a .:D m a' O N .p ON Co Cr. T (Cl a (^) N N) r•) N) rn N N a HI HI N in a a (n M N) el a s r7 rn a n N) V N A Ea U. CO N O .I >. 4.1 4 U G 1/1 ' T F 3 z IL) N O .' h '3. T 4, m O Z f-- 3 3 4. V) O E H 3 Z W In O E ON PG >. N 'd >. ,I a Coo co r in N U) N N O a, .O N N CO a lfl .o VJ N (fl inn N N m N (n rn to 0 > H. H rn Q) Z N In N N r N N N N N r N N Vl N N) fn N N rn in N Nl el N) nil in in N N a II ? Z „ O t d U t N y 0) a -.-4 .C >, CO N N M a U) .o r CO a1 O N N N Cr .r) .o r CO O1 O N N M a VI .o r CO a) O ,-I 3 b, !p E coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N In M ..i In T0. A .C >+ 0 w E 0 Z [N x • - -=-r•,e a ri;t:1O SA S ! S —_a. M!!rf L.-item .h ; ._ - _ • _ f ON I Rai Nil I. la It.f...r. z k ..�. _ are► 1 me _. r. a € IMI6 11116.11 11 sim--------i i."- ---liAj .t. C INV 44, .A._a i a Nam .._ _____,,,„........ — "'lrif• roe ..: -f _fir -- � Ceitatr_imi ,��, +! , .. W 1 = i n_ .r te_ F .._�, W". a ta _- _I_ c..... „ar, Jo.. aimi..--- arm.in _ _o • 1\ I' i -.1-." - 1 ! i .j}.... ..tr.. — ' -1,_, - " . „ ..aitti : :41 * a' ,.:it " ...' : � . , 1 /, „ s.,p .. t I tilbale ' e" , i ) 1 • •• !' t: • 'i!rNw• a t i lairs Vie ,�� t. �� •., 1' '1/ ''�',1� . t gift -4.• A , ,,, • i \ i , A of „en 0 •P�1`r t f / '` •��r'�fi fl�'� Fr i fig. ,) :,�`.,- .! 44R�. II+,h,.:.,;. , , A,;‘,....,, A,¢A: .1\ ii ii,Ne id + r i•l • i• �� ' .- JI f? .y. - ' je,dti r •1k1 . „I �• ' 0.�.,� �` � }ref �► • EXHIBIT as • ,... , • el . r • 0 g 4 ...._ , __: ,, . „a: , , ,, , . - p rlam........� ..: _ _. • • • c - T -. . 1' - • *la Pk -C- - 4.Q. . _ ' . '-.' 4\44.:41.1:\ ..r - . - " -- • . )a . AI I. A - 1 :: : i. r"" '-‘ : ., - / - IP t* 1pri II ,, `. - ... . :.• k, \. t` 1 ter _z_ }_ _ / • --a••••^x pl - OF ' - ... tS0 r J1 - .-+ _ i — - - ` ,` , { . `.+ _ _ - -^. ,,,.&.- - _ ,lam'do. .. n r !v _ f III 9:par s ., ..- ..:..,-;Cis' .0 ___4? .., — _ • : 1 : , E 2 r a. a _ — _ . r _ _ -"� - alla _- _ 0 SeILL , _0 • .>-.__ _ - - ._ .ter • i -. 1 I . 1. All 4 •1 I \ M 1 L l 0 I I Alliiiii 11 =4 I . h. CZ •J( -I' — =1 ` ' a... .. 1a 1 1 'Q r ,i . I I I I 1 =6 ri 1 1 i.r _ • -6 ' 1 I • • I te I I i i ii I i Ii• I 8 Y , • _6 I. • _ _', f i. 1 ~� Vase' 4.11, nri .rte , * 'i .�'��.�.��.; fa yl _ r3 ire C •', f • • ifs . ti _ Nr:'V I r • irtagor— ___ _ , • '1 ,Iils , _ ._ . , \ . \ I . . .,, __ _ , . il_ fir • • I 1 l 0 SIP a ad.f MIIIIIIIIIIII a c s s • I Wir 1- • _ J �- mss__iiiti - - .., ti 1, i J it • _ 1 ill , ik . 1. ill .... . 4 a __-S ► a i / . Y 0 0 lid l`,, ,k *�` Fiji .I.1- t illini.es elllealle Imo'' _we 0 II I 1 i fir r i if a I i ti C 4 • -4 N. 0 a t 4 IN"boll I ill klia0IIIIIMIIS Au I • • / i s ' . „,'-3:1. '..s'it:-%PH.'1:-a a• r _ 1 1 - • , .' , - ter. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW(USR) APPLICATION • FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE DATE RECEIVED: RECEIPT#/AMOUNT# S CASE#ASSIGNED: APPLICATION RECEIVED BY 22 SL S/1�PPLAAN,N�EERASSItIGLN_GED: Parcel Numbdigit er /nJ O on Tax obtainable the _ County Office,or vnay.co.vrottl.co.usl Legal Description ri PIE 2A/IA/y �1 G ,Section=Township Z North,RangIt West /— Zone Distncf:it lcvt h Total Acreage: 7, 6 Flood Plain: NO ,Geological Hazard: Ake) , vr Airport Overlay District: FEE OWNER(S)OF THE PROPERTY: Name: 1 d f tikin 4 e L ( Work Phone#3)435.977!) "Home Phone# Email seStectSrei Address: / 4 a 4N 14/ R 20 Address: City/StateTp Code ,t7 Lug Iv Co ?O/e 31 Name: Work Phone it Home Phone# Email Address: Address: City/State/Zip Code Name: • Work Phone# Home Phone# Email Address: Address: City/State/Zip Code APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(See Below:Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent) Name: E/.SPn A /CAA'fir Work Phone#3)4,25-H770 Home Phone# 3)90 7 1170,3 Email etAleJekai9 lee LC wevy#,e/ Address: Address: J5-9a mncsf»9a het_ City/State/bp Code FT. I r�jyr 9O. flat 1 PROPOSED USE: 3 .e. ArrAaHlitAir I(We)hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements,proposals,and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my(ourjknowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs,a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be Included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner,notarized evidence must be included indicating that the signatory has to legal authority to sign for the corporation. PI * to, & t R-2q 1loi( Signature:Owner or uthed Agent Date Signature:Owner or Authorized Agent Date • } • II-OD • SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ' ' ''y SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE Suhriit r_ _ _ rig LLC 1. The site will be used for an oil field support and service facility for water haulers and excavating services. 2. This proposal is consistent with The Weld County Code Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan as Land to the south has a permitted oil and gas support and service facility (Saucedo)there is a residence to the West and numerous oil and gas facilities in the general vicinity. All surrounding properties are currently used for either business and or residential. Section 22-2-20.G A.Policy 7.2. of the Weld County Code states: "Conversion of agricultural land to nonurban residential, commercial and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region." Section 22-2-20 I.A.Goal 9.of the Weld County Code states: "Reduce potential conflicts between varying land uses in the conversion of traditional agricultural lands to other land uses." • The applicant is proposing to park a total of 12 trucks and 12 trailers.The Department of Planning Services is requiring a Screening Plan be submitted to screen the vehicles and trailers. 3. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Chapter 23 as the site will used as described in Section 23-3-40.A.2 of the Weld County Code provides for an Oil and Gas Support and Service Facility including parking and maintenance for a Water Hauling Company, and excavating services doing business as AC Trucking, LLC as a Use by Special Review in the A (Agricultural)Zone District. 4. The surrounding property are rural in character and have business and or residential purposes 5. Details: a. Number of people who will use the site: Currently 5 drivers and one person for office and dispatch duties, in the long term up to 12 drivers and up to 12 support personnel. • • b. Number of employees proposed to be employed at the site long term estimat: 12 drivers and 12 support personnel for a total of 24 persons. c. Hours of operations: 24X7X365 d. Type of structures:There is an existing building permitted as a commercial structure approximately 1840 SF in size which will be expanded to 5000 SF in size to be utilized as a large Truck Hanger/Shop. The Alcantar Residence,to be constructed Number of structures:two structures plus one additional structure with unknown dimension which may be construction at a future date. e. Animals on site: Not Applicable f. Vehicles will access the site 24X7. i. (15)Domestic Vehicles: 16ft,70001bs, ii. (12) Semi-Trucks:20ft Long, 18,000lbs iii. (2)End-dumps:42ft Long, 18,000lbs, iv. (5) Empty Tankers:60ft Long,12,000lbs, v. (5)Belly-Dumps:42ft Long,18,000 g. Fire protection will be provided by the Fort Lupton Fire Department. • h. Water source on property will be provided by water well.Well permit No.74761 I. Sewage disposal system on property will be by Commercial ISDS septic FOR THE BUSINESS AND RESIDENCE j. Types of items stored Semi-Truck Spare parts:tires,windshields wipers, lubricates, 6. Proposed landscaping will consist of fendng the property as well as decorative rock, trees and some sod. a) Gator Trash Removal: P.O.Box 39 Henderson CO 80640, (303)655-0710,Account No.6734 b) All other maintenance of vehicles is done off premise 7. Reclamation procedures:The property can be reclaimed easy and converted to a Residential property with garage. 8. Storm water drainage will be directed to a water quality feature,refer to Engineering Report from High Plains Engineering 9. IMMEDIATELY WITH SITE IMPROVEMENTS,INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS TO MOVE FORWARD WHEN FINANCING ALLOWS. 10.Storage will be handled as indicated. Outside Storage of vehicles and associated equipment will utilized a six(6)foot opaque fence at the perimeter of the property. . • / 2 Weld County Public Works Dept. --` 1111 H Street ACCESS PERMIT r7 CSI P.O. Box 758 • G-r...,..e., Greeley,CO 80632 APPLICATION FORM 49,-..--/C 14•-, Phone: (970)304-6496 T Fax: (970)304-6497 Applicant Property Owner(If different than Applicant) Name A (' rEvC'Eir9 /l1' Name /1'Stir ,7l/jl;,/≥? ' Company Address /5<',,.-2 /'4 S ; C /AY' ' /i Address P O 7:1)()„,‹ y c5'9 City r7. 1 L ' lK7 State .Zip 3.1(..--\/:;-)/ / p >le,&.0/ Phone 3) 'y.3 rj- (/ %•7C..,. City /CT./(12 -77 State it.../Zip Business Phone ) 4/3 c"3. 67-7 77.) Fax 3r - • 17Zo)'.3/v1)- Fax .2) ) P I? / (5'.y E-mail .(/lf`c..(tLiy lCC<(c.:/t.,/,,e?5//)c-/ E-mail- 7(' 7,R11('/"iceif i C 'mac..y,(2.--1 7)11 A=Existing Access A= Proposed Access Parcel Location&Sketch The access is on WCR ? C Nearest Intersection:WCR 2 c' &WCR •3 I WCR zc A , Distance from Intersection 6. V.{.- %r' I I J Parcel Number /36 Cf' -�' �y,. 'C,Lj(x M Section/Township/Range :� — — lie L- `y'(,>i- T a cr I • Is there an existing access to the property? ES NO N 3 3 'Number of Existing Accesses / Road Surface Type&Construction Information Asphalt Gravel_ Treated _ Other - WCR Culvert Size&Type Materials used to construct Access Construction Start Date Finish Date Proposed Use =Temporary(Tracking Pad Required)/$75 )Single Residential/$75 7. Industrial/$150 Small Commercial or Oil&Gas/$75 = Large Commercial/$150 Subdivision/$150 Field(Agriculture Only)/Exempt Is this access associated with a Planning Process? ❑ No 'USR RE ❑PUD 72 Other Required Attached Documents -Traffic Control Plan -Certificate of Insurance -Access Pictures (From the Left, Right,& into the access) By accepting this permit,the undersigned Applicant,under penalty of perjury,verifies that they have received all pages of the permit application;they have read and understand all of the permit requirements and provisions set forth on all pages;that they have the authority to sign for and bind the Applicant,if the Applicant is a corporation or other entity;and that by virtue of their signature the Applicant is bound by and agrees to comply with all said permit requirements and provisions,all Weld County ordinances,and state laws regarding facilities construction. 41) , ; - 71 /t I Signature '` ._� :/ 'r Printed Name — �SLC' //711/'<?.i 7'0/ Date 5)-6 -// Approval or Denial will be issued in minimum of S days. Aporoved by Revised Dale 6/29/10 �� HIGH PLAINS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, LLC • 721 4th STREET,SUITE D,FORT LUPTON,CO 80621 • PHONE:(303)-857-9280• FAX:(303)-857-9238 August 3, 2011 A.C. Trucking, LLC P.O. Box 489 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 RE: To provide an onsite wastewater system design for the proposed commercial site at 15294 WCR 20, Weld County, CO Job # 10-2273 SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN DATA;. The percolation test for the site performed by High Plains Engineering & Design, LLC (Report No. 10-2273) had an average percolation rate 50.9 minutes per inch (mpi) at a standard depth of 36-inches below grade. A clay limiting laver was found at a depth of 4.0 feet below grade so the system will have to be raised above existing grade. An open hole observation is required by this firm following removal of the topsoil and scarify the existing grade but prior to placement of fill material. The absorption bed components are required per County Code to maintain a • 4' separation from the limiting layer. A truck shop and office is planned for the site. We will plan for up to 12 full time employees (FTE), 12 drivers that report to the site and leave for the day, and 12 visitors at the site per day. ABSORPTION AREA FOR BED 12 FTE @ 20 GPD = 240 GPD 12 Drivers @ 5 GPD = 60 GPD 12 Visitors @ 5 GPD = 60 GPD TOTAL FLOW (Q) = 360 GPD FOR WELD COUNTY (bed): A = Ox1.5x1.3xd T A = 360x1.5x1.3xi55 = 1488 Square Feet 3.5 3.5 4 f Rock & Pine) Design: One RAISED bed is required (24' X 64'), with 4 rows of perforated pipe in a "Rock and Pipe" absorption field. The pipe will be encased in 3/a" to 2-1/2" gravel per governing specifications and backfilled • with sandy soil as detailed in the cross section. • The 12-inch layer of aggregate shall consist of clean, washed, graded gravel or rock to range in size from 3/4 inch to 2-1/2 inches with an average size of 1-1/2 inches. The rock shall extend from 2 inches above the top of the pipe, level across the bed, to 6 inches below the bottom of the pipe. The top of • the rock shall be covered with landscape fabric to prevent the gravel from becoming clogged by earth backfill. Shredded tires are an approved alternate for the rock in this type of system. Contact this firm to discuss suppliers and/or specifications. Alternate 460 STANDARD Q4 INFILTRATORS: 4 ROWS OF 15 EACH IN A 24' x 64' RAISED SEPTIC BED installed per the attached detail. A 10 MIL. (min) PLASTIC LINER WILL BE REQUIRED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BED WHERE FINISHED GRADES ARE FILLED ABOVE EXISTING GRADES (Typical). COOL SEASON FESCUE GRASS SHOULD BE PLANTED ON THE ENTIRE ABSORPTION FIELD TO CONTROL EROSION AND AID WITH EVAPOTRANSPIRATION. NOTE: The Engineer and Health Department will inspect the site when perforated pipe or infiltrators, distribution box, rock or shredded tires and septic tank are in place. A final inspection may be made when the system is completed. • SEPTIC TANK SPECIFICATIONS: 360 GPD X (30HRS/24HRS) X 1.5 = 675 GALLONS Install a 1000-gallon septic tank with two (2) compartments or units in series. NOTES: 1. Provide a minimum of five (5) feet between the distribution box and the septic tank or any building. 2. Provide a minimum of five (5) feet of solid pipe between the distribution box and the laterals. Installer to provide schedule 80 pipe when trenching below road or driveway. The absorption "bed" area shall be isolated from all vehicular travel, parking, grazing and storage areas. A lift pump will be required for this system since the minimum specifications of 1/8" per foot of fall between the office, septic tank and the distribution system cannot be met (refer to lift pump detail). • All construction is to be in accordance with Weld County Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Individual Sewage Disposal IDSystem Regulations. Certification: I hereby certify that the septic system shown on this plan was made by me or under my direct supervision nd is accurate to the best of my knowledge or belief. 9 RE sCHRds.1 2_. „o°a,. Bbl v -33548 1 Todd M. Schroeder; PE 4 /�/lr ,.0 Attachments: Profile Hole Log Figure 1: Rock & Pipe and Chamber bed section views Figure 2: Lift pump detail Figure 3: Septic system site plan • 'Profile Hole Log 0 - _ 1 SANDY SILT(SM) - 2 CLAY WITH MEDIUM PLASTICITY (CL) - 4 CLAY WITH LOW PLASTICITY (CL) LIMITING LAYER(CH) 5 - 6 - 7 CLAY WITH HIGH PLASTICITY (CH) 10 13 • t I • 6 I a •OO > I jI U a' F ° "a WIC F. :5 I 5 • X14 I la CD '. S I x v ° H °D I = V] � T /� r I F z Q °D • � ° I} �y � - , _,c 15 r`ShJ ct cc ' u•Z - ff Co M.y I- Ca r$00 <' I W xo2u ICri • 0 W al wI <°u I r:4 N taw«Oa I U II W � Oc,-O 0 Z oc3OF a Z S °f l OO I lxi ITE1z a zo<6 y_ J X -I I � 0 a , I W z >.5 I a «Z ca d I ay p„4 m s° <F I "o 0 a 'J u x F a I a 4 a Ill L. I U d '` 0 MIS - N • C t I ��// W F W :la uCO ~i OII\ \ \ m tiE. U' Wa# Q I r � 44 ,9) ( rt, En I 'NUN. 13dld 113aNfl HJ.d3a.9 a_a i. I I F- co .e 40talz F w F- I O {o I • o w t o I 0 I I • 8 8 ck § O ■I 0 / E 0 �' E OO OI U § / , ki § 14 ImP4 § § N---,.. ; pia. Z• / ^ I O C, ]-J -co 2 2 � 00 � � \ ( {< iJ Cl) Co � � Q O ) 2 B ; m - I �� U k `2( PA Czi / (..1 I Z § § ~ I q 2 ) 1 2 (§ I m ) \ & Cd )_) I / / 7 < ( I a � O 0 \ I - o K • Z@ I H , d fsi ( � ° B i 4! _ , m-§ i . . C. 2B_ I $ w I ��$ \§ I Q f a§§o ' q \ !_i ! I % e I .XE) I { w. . a§(\ I / / Ca«■ I kr\ ) § i • I 41. • 11 Q ce a WW 00 H OU �Z c > a oO J O. 0 Q > U. o 0 a2 I- oa F- Y O Z ^ 4 I I--or • Z UN OW W OR u YO V Z CO aT u N� Uoo,y� O O mWW JO OJ I.. . O Zl-�K �E UI Y 0 C U U U I 4 V I J Li W JO JU Z --KJ Li— c tna j a4.JG -Ih ii-). La 0 KY0 ¢n O N2 Ib KV.Z.3 qo W3 Q JN O O KS Z I-- OJN 20 ¢ Um¢ i-a u 0- J IJ l- N w 8 t .6 CC J Z W W O D~ CL 2 W W CI- U fL ¢O O DUI NM L_ D ``Z¢ Z f1J Qo JO0. su 'aw a L o t 0.5X c �Il�il m JJm Va L _ 1- m> o z-o 1- t fl�Il yZ0 ov �� r)o J I--W il--11- ¢O U c Col: IW-0 IJj Wee Z UJ 71�I ' QUW I ¢ J C1� W6 N .II O N W¢ II-1 y-<2 u 3V Oct -Jr UlIP 2 rIA0LI¢'. W m z z vJi 0 -ILI¢J `II f�I' U r v et ta- J 2 3 o i. �� W i u u s Iz IIsi ?�W u�VI W F O cu en z CO W 1=11=, ix u 3 •v...In ¢ r i 1�JIvl .- 4 S 0� �r't ; I al W X JO H m J W CY 0 :1 Is 0 • • SITE MAI' 15294 Weld County Road 20 Weld County, CO WELD COUNTY ROAD 2O x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x n rn N x (*ft X X X 4 ROWS OF 4' PERFORATED PIPE IN A DISTRIBUTION BOX ROCK L PIPE SYSTEM X BACKFILLED WITH x APPROVED GRANULAR SOIL LIFT PUMP OF NEEDED) • X ' X x NEW 1000 GALLON MIN.) SEPTIC TANK X A X I X j 6.• X X )• TO PERC PRANIL PROPO5tD X 1 BUILDING X X X EXISTING X DARN I SHOP X X '^k x x x x x x x x x x x x x x FIGURE 3 LEGEND All locations shown above are based on specific information 0—Percolation Test Hole furnished by others or estinates made in the field by High Plains Engineering L Design personnel. The locations, distances, X-Percolation Profile Hole erections, etc. are not the result of' a property survey but are approximations and are not warranted to be exact. It is A-Soil Profile Hole the owner/builder's responsibility to define property - boundaries and ensure all onsite improvements are located SHE—Fence within the platted site and out of inappropriate easements. All distances are to be verified prior to excavation. Weld County Health Department 6/22/2011 Percolation Test and Soils Data • Get P S SI ,LAC 721 4th STREET,SUITED.FORT WPTON,CO 80621•PHONE(303)-857-9280•FAX(303)-857-9238 FILE NO. 10-2273 I Property Addross 15294 WELD COUNTY ROAD 20 Legal uescrPtlec WELD COUNTY,CO Contact Information Name A.C.TRUCKING,LLC Sheet P.O.BOX 489 City,State,Zip FORT LUPTON,CO 80621 Phone(303)304 4487 Saturation ana swemng t Groundwater Smeared Surfaces Encountered at I GREATER THAN 13 feet Removed:YES Sand or Gravel Added:NO Estimated depth to maximum seasonal water table if not Date and Time Presoak 6/16/2011 date encountered In profile: Water Added: 11:00 time • Amount of Presoak Is area believed to be subject to Water Added: 15 gallons seasonal fluctuations which could Date and Time result in a seasonal water table within Percolation Test 6/17/2011 date 8'of surface? Started: 9:30 time Mops Detemtnat(on in Absorp7t on Area Did Water Remain In Hole After the Overnight SwellIng 1.6 Period? to the NORTHWEST direction Hole 1 NO Hole 2 NO Bedrock Hole 3 NO Encountereda TOREATER THAN 13lfeet Hole 4 NO Hole 5 NO Estimated depth if not encountered in Hole NO profile: Yett61atr6A Kate rer :dwr(ofn Deep in Rate(min/in) Hole 1 36 55.56 Type of Bedrodc:1 Hole 2 36 41.67 Hde 36 55.56 Hole 4 36 55.56 Is bedrock fractured or weathered? Hole 36 41.67 Hole 36 55.56 is bedrock believed to be permeable Average 50.93 (perc rate<60 min/in)? 'LIMITING LAYER AT A DEPTH OF 4 FEET. • Weld County Health Department 6/22/2011 Percolation Test and Soils Data • Profile omn(coot.) �I Note:SoilsHole mustInf ber classedatio using unified system ASTM D2487 If Profile Hole Log 0 - 1 SANDY SILT(SM) •• 2 CLAY WITH MEDIUM PLASTICITY(CL)u 3 Ia 4 CLAY WITH LOW PLASTICITY(CL) o • LIMITING LAYER(CH) -5 - 6 - 7 CLAY WITH HIGH PLASTICITY(CH) -8 — -10 • — 13 (Certification I certify that the above information is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and that all tests were performed in the accordance with the provisions of Weld County Health Department individual sewage disposal regulations by myself or under my supervision. nO REG/`Ii j/iffir ? ; High Plains Engineering Signature i ` ' 33548 & Design LLC 721 4th Street, Suite D Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-9280 Date • • Ar• 51TE MAF 15294 Weld County Road 20 Weld County, CO WELD COUNTY ROAD 20 x x K x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x n x x x x x x • x x O 0 x o o O 0 x x x x x x rinsnuc x 9ARN/5H x x Mc x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x LEGEND Alt locations shown above are based on specific infornation o-Percolation Test Hole furnished by others or estimates made in the field by Ffigh Plains Engineering & Design personnel. The locations, distances, X-Percolation Profile Hole directions, etc are not the result of a property survey but are approximations and are not warranted to be exact. It is • A-Soil Profile Hole the owner/builder's responsibility to define property - boundaries and ensure all onsite improvements are located *X-Fence within the platted site and out of inappropriate easements. All distances are to be verified prior to excavation. Apr 1211 10:02a AC Trucking LLC 3035023188 P.7 • AUG-06-2006 TIE 04:37 P11 N O ENV RONIENTAL HELM FAX N. 970 304 6411 P. 01 • • • • FAX TRANSMISSION.. •SADO • CD paten'CEPARIMV4r or PUnts Mr0L3N • NW DIVIROM14a(r • I SiS MOq w 17•wt. ateasr.co 00031 • raft 070304-0416 • newts. 0704046410 • two tow sle*II Nampo • rot: soo.so em e e n 07oao46'Ia0 • IMMMaNMhNTM.MCYM • nu: 070-3044144 I nose: 67o-304e4 • t S • • To: He4ka t. ct't s f Fax: 3 o3 Sod,-i\fie Pate s ?bona: • From: 1•-1f1 VA1J L C W I • SnbJeCtSaPf e- I tit in-N:i- o R !cal 4• c2 .ago COMICITS: cs'Os r fro .,ri 5 Das f�7 .6rn I t; y.,. Iq PPs -+�FJ �I C t'L�.p f oti �H� ,� id>1r 'sh-r 1� .2a -i-y1� • A&\ S'^$ y14a:44 -1-f.(1k. . -'k. tCs F0 . -1 o vZ re c��c 1);(44 tv\isH &IL ns ►9 S I0..no.% .; �,, „��St °-f s r 'Io-v& S`(S-tom,►, This fmimile is intended g ilvAor the me of the m&r idtulffi catty!to which it is addressedaye . n av ooaaivtntonnition tEl t is wild"exempt from disclosure mdc ,aplicabie law, If the trade •of this facsimile is net the Seeded recipient nor the employee or agent rapaw3b for fag the fia:amdle m the inumded recipient,you we hereby notified that any dissamdmdon,disc bunon,or.aepying*tibia communication is stricdy prohduited. If you have tceved this teat umicatloet in eta,please nodiYus inane lately by telephone and return the origmat menage o us at the above eddies via the U.S.Paa}al Service. Thank you. 'poi 00 9-84 Apr 1211 10:03a AC Trucking LLC 3035023188 p.8 JUL-23-2008 UED 03:00 PM II C ENV RU111IENTAL HEALTH FAX NO. 078411 0 304 P. 02 _ i WELD i GOUTY OEPARTid•NT OF P4 MUC set 00000' PERMIT• tear I AND WWIRONMENT 14 MO N. if"£VltMS • iT-1 .-ICOM LOAN, • nos• O1a07 to FAX: t 70)3044411 STATE4IE a OF EXISTING FOR SEPTIC SYSTEM (PLEAS I FILL OUT IN BLACK INK ONLY) PAWS i;0510Z-OO4n CatFit e w PRaenna i3o31 857- 2112. worm TOR Lott M orm Amiss to sty t 1cR 31 ,>;+ Lt,t, ee • C O 8062 l City UP ar,SCR1 1 or BUILDING(a• be.a tabsedmboa them oduler *MO 4►nuyt SITS/LOCATION ADDUSS 1O S' 1'( W C R f I sn l Eta.I nftPnOpi rr St rr N'U y s n .ice_ asps GEJA- SUBDIVISION CE USTRACT LOT SUDDACRES o N gWl'17AL ISSINO NEDMIIIR ow ei 1+is_i_. Bs THIS YULi. 3/4___ In WATER SUPPLY• ) NAME WELL/CISTERNS PRIVATE jatitig WffiL !NQ SYSTEM Slag sepia tab materiel is s.a Mled of od M1 . / SA,paws Iq� • 8ffiLDr Traub 40O mere far er Bed_ spare fat YEAR INSTALLED Yo*are*OW to draw a diagem or m spats as ile anne dde deb form]W et Si.,rtn sad indicate baton,kapb,ova and Meows Abe deg. The amdw'Rt►ed r-i—ti owner hereby oeda*that Ube above described septic spites b b flat iiatelled,as described, =sits at tide time astithe pared of g sad Madded by theebow descr>Dtiea and Nether Was Wet*septa Is geed working order ad to W beet of i W her l awbige to moms properba tarter soierdnd tiny ►or mbrepremaMka any ma la saeosebs.5ny percale pasted band apes tie barman booby submitted Is legal Min Myr�perjar7-/a m1 by law. lei.a llitf TURK - s.losgibul sod ter=n trefore me 14 day of- I rt.4Gr�r�h . *D!¢.+ e by es-h1tk Fin V g t ll . •----- Witness ad ofiti seed. /M�y co--- om 2/44 t9( DA 1 .� NOT ' ' e5rnA STATEMENT OF IDOSTWG M ION REVIEWED BY J' '.l kilt P )1 h l TRSWCIALIBT DAT • ' Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER caws 2s coLompp131 If L?Z, OAF Denver. TER SOURCES 818 ContemnsI mug., EX T •(303)060.3581 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 74781 -F _-- DIV 1 VVD2 DES.BASIN MD OVEO I LOCATION WELD COUNTY NE 114 NW 1/4 Section 22 0Township 2 N Range 88 W Sixth P.M. A TRUCKING LLC AANCES FROM SECTION UNES P O BOX 4200 Ft.from North Section Line FT LUPTON,CO 80821- 1500 Ft.from West Section Line (303)887-3882 labigggaqtriarialbithilligiletatibgfial Easting: Northing: T ISSUANCE OF THIS PEratigRMIT DOES A WATER RICi 1) This well shall be used In such a way as to cause no material Mato adding ester rights. The issuance of the peak does not ensure that no w4urywa occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner divested water right from seeking relief leaden court action. 2) The con budbn of this well shall be in compilence with the Water Wen Construction Ryles 2 CCR 402-2,unless approval deviance hes been granted by the state ens or Examiners of Water wait commotion and Puree Ins albtion CoMrador$in°0 "be nth Dale. 3) ACW'oved pursuant to CRS 37#137(4)and the findings deb State anginas/dated January 21.2011. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to inlpatioe•domes*.and commercial use including a 5,000 square ft.garage and buds depot she P• 5) The pumping rate of his well shell not exceed 15 GPM. • casing(4) Proms t e installed ns to the d grouted de to Hills aquifer of loaded water from other aquifer*and movement of Wound fest below land surface and extends to a depth of 905 feet. e between man youted prevent water ecrrh zones koaNabN 7) The depth to The top of heLmas-FoxHIS aquifer isappradmab. Toenwrateexdwbnofpoor iaehutnhiumbsad above the aquifer,plain casing and grout shall extend through the k wemmet coat ardor carbonaceous shale porton of the aquifer. 8) The allowed average annul amount of grata water to be%Marsala togged as required by 1 acaBfoOt.e 9 of the Statewide Handbag Ground War Rubs prior to g) The ends length dMe hole shed be geophys N installing wing with well peal oaaber(t)•name of the aquifer,and court case number(*)a 10) The owner shell owner well ain e necessary means and prams o preserve these markings. a1 eel*. The owner constructed triorot necessary 11) Themwasafrohe meter not more on nt is0eastndm location Wedgedin permit. of all diversions must be 12) Ammons by meter must be installedtbest annually)maintained in dod working ubmitted to eo tension Engineer upon request. nrsu Pursuant by 0 was 1 (r000d the a lostSeano mars than 28%olds nmMtdal7 ground water withdraw annually she 13) be consumed to and n37-90-137(9)(b)the nowner and demonstrate the reasonable esofadilon of the State Engineer that to more then 08%d he water be wen she damasbm ~awn wig be caromed•whose owners in the same aquifer,Steal b not owned by the applicant, 74) This we shall be al bat least 0s0 feet from any sMkgb wet (2)(b)000) Notice was sent to the owners of penult no(s).229983 excluding those weltowners were ladedpursuant and 94214-F and no response was received. no.7 �. 15) The Nsuaoe of this perdt hereby cancels permitltail amount 7 deafer from this non-renovate puller may be less Mark the 100 yen NOTE:The they of this wellw to n the aquifer b allocated.due to anticipated water level declines. upon :To the mead d m productive should be est through rho enem producing bWval of NOTE:To ensure a madam are of this wan,perforated Gagne Witapproved zone or aquifer indicated above. APPROVED • JLV Mats DA UED 1-21- 011 I N DATE 01-21- 12 • ORDER OF THE STATE ENGINEER IN THE MATTER OF WELL PERMIT NO. 74407-F LOCATION: NE Y.,of NW Y.,of Sec.22,Twp.2 North, Rng. 86 West,6th P.M. APPLICANT: A C TRUCKING LLC THE STATE ENGINEER FINDS: The well permit was Issued on August 18, 2010, pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-137(2) with an expiration date of August 16,2011. On December 22, 2010,evidence that the existing well would not be used pursuant to permit number 74407-F was submitted. The evidence submitted is as follows: The applicant submitted an application to change the use of the existing well for permit no. 74407-F. The well permit is hereby cancelled and is of no further force or effect. Dated this 22nd day of December 2010. • Dtdc ., P. . Director• Jolene Water R g Prepared by:pm ca Division 1 • Do- II EE i 94 I I :i I P, 1I Bitsel �4y ! YSt I I i i IC) L�4 z ]iO2 tt J PI Ii , iiI I 3a B ,00'S96 — 3 ,£l ,50 0 00 N — '"0._t . 44c CI —II—EIV 4y d • §i ` \`} aI .r 9\ . ; § o I , . _w its- 3 _ r yy Y Q o 04 ' I N d3 �I .01 I At V in 3 4 eta & '�. t er t z :I 4 ,si __ ____ ___ �°•' a ME.Uau}�� j ,00'S94 - 3 .£Z ,S0 000 N • .014 III II Inn Nil III'MINI UlanIIII Mean name etas Weld Co*.CO p 1 0%1 ft 6.00 D11.50 Stove Morn*Clerk 8 Recorder • III I I IN�I�IIII IIII STATE DOCUMENTARY FEE Date: Jena 05. 20017 6 11.50 WARRANTY 11115 DEED. Nab on this by of Jove 05. 2008 , between UM LAND AND CATTLE LLC. A COLORADO LI ITID LIABILITY OOIOMIY of the Canty of ad State of CO , of the Orantor(s), and A.C. TRUCEING, LLC, A COWIADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMMIT ne54D 4 I . -- 512. CnOOIl� Pose legal widens is tt r^-^I rd. "aro of the Carl'of s State of GGGVVV 7NNIAAAnWWV e [ •Grntsets): WTi'NE88, that the paaor<s>. for and in consideration of the ewe of ( 8119.000.00 w•One Hundred Fifteen taasard end 00/100 DOLLARS the receipt and sufficiency of Mick is hereby alnnlsd*ed, Is.granted, berpind, sold Nd conveyed, end by time presents dos grant, bergein, all, came/end cent ins unto the Gratieta), their heirs and assigns forever, not in tenancy in coma St In Joint tenancy, all the real prsprty, together with bira,nnte. If any, situate , lying and teens in the testy of WELD and State o1 Colerdo, described es follows: LOT A, RECORDED OEMPTI0N NO 1309-32-2 RE 2609, RECOIDWO NAY 4s 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2769931, LOCATED IN Tits S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTE, RANCE 66 NEST OF THE 6TH FAG., COUNTT OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO also known as street label 15394 WO 20 FORT LUPTON CO 80621 TOOEllRR with all and singular ad harditnits ad am WNna ces thereto belmging, er In anywise appert.inine and the reversion end reversiaa, ramtaler std reminders, rents issues and profits thereof:f:ad to it the above estat e. risht dw title interest, claim a des Matseever d the Grentor( ), Piker in la or equity, prodses, with the hefdltsaants and eppmtawlca; note the Grenteele>, TO NAVE AUDIO HOLD the said premises above bNmeineMaMdeescr�withappurtenances, bee canteens, grant, their heirs end mists forever. The Grnter(s), for personal representatives, bream, ad agree to and with the Grantee(s), their Min end assigns, that at the tire of the aaealtag end delivery of these presents, he is well seised of the praises shove conveyed, has god, sure, perfect, Solute and indefeasible estate of lrANltace, in law, in fee staple, and has good ripe, full power and Imfut authority to pant, hatpin, salt and crony the um in war and farm as aforesaid, and that the sees are free and clear from all former and ether pants, bargains. sales, lips, tint, assessments, stctabrNNfs and restrictions of whatever kind or nowt newer, • a.Sj.et to petrel eas tar the ear Sae and raw apatite awpalon d.wrlad by cetera.. se reamdd trees.a refuted La the nue Mmate emayted by m.ateew la aeeeedw•Na/.eels a. (slaw.Salsa et are Pardee to Soy ad Sill sal Sawa irolaain to no non Senna.. of Slab taw. .ltl.aly dawdle anal sm menses utiag mime d algae et ad panne atom by the babnl e oiSe nlab er ae« nit /has enema pe ksadadje W.des eon woven er esmw(el be deawdsee da asst..a fatten on Yam by en nNSe m..SrJ ad settee at fenny epNw) it this danpda Pay mad its dIstrict: wed, lb.hematite ad acdeaa of ay Manta rennin to the elan elhod sal papaw iendd deelwciii red paamlm N the neportyit dab set erael party wall (s)shall it ill eel can • the ession of hell ate will his MT e a n e,/tag the all a d bargained premises In tae lawfully alfr and paiming t sr any pit N ere f. theesin kir Mla rd lain. .the p all , e wore plural th ppwus , d claiming the ends or ay pit thereof. Ike singular tuber shell Inlub the post, ad the plural the singular, end the w N my gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Or...torts)has executed this deed on the Ste set forth above. Lam IS anal West, a asoam Walla•••a 'a awst lea( L.A.SHE.ATS SIM I or Cana )so. NOTARY PUBLIC Casty of ems ) STATEE OF CCILORADO M/Cpnaneentnu.v Feu21.YJIO The fenpiag instrument ors ieknie.wledgd before me on this day of .see ea. seem by Mar Wrens. mmam m m Ym ale Minn in. W wanaa y camldeien expire. elens ss hand air of/legal seat. Notary Public Nam ad Ideas of Panty Creating Newly Created Legal Description( 79.55.106.5. C.R.G.) boreal uR90S2d 1 Men snorted Man to: A.C. TMyim, ILC, a COLORADO 11x!1®1.1.61LITy • )itld /129082631 )1529W R 2p fRT LWTRCarkin , CO W621 rare PS 88/29/84 Pal walMNTI DIM (Joint Tenants) primed: helot 94, 2006 (6672476) SKLD LG SKL1O422 WE 3559332-2008 .001 • a ter service, inc A Complete Energy Services Company December, 2011 To Whom It May Concern: AC Trucking is on a 24 hour 7 day a week schedule exclusively with A&W Water/Complete Production Services. His company is dispatched day and night to have trucks available to haul water to our many job sights and locations. AC Trucking has been working with A&W Water for 11 years Sincerely, • Ben Montoya A&W N Night Frac Manager • cam Hello