The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20101465.tiff f 0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 Ili 1 1 • 1 I DRY CREEK RUA 'is I el. MRiIS 1 SsISlfii as wSIrISIIIIV NMIMIS a a a sib. • .,1.- i# .---- .2i � �Waftenhet • I lei WELD COUNT , COLORADO I - -.14\c,x\0 .- i . HS <S°Ill . /tit d O ! 14 F 1 asue' 1- �y ! . ' an** nbb9E'nh. x't - itilit iltit II%*1►ss winos 4 • 1 1 1 1 .,. 1 t i • - 1 . L. T-. 0 MS ---ler 2010- 1465 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver,CO 802 (303)333-1 FAX(303)333-110 E-mail: Isc@Iscdenver.com Web Site: http://www.lscdenver.com TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. July 30, 2009 • _ Mr. Roger Hollard Equinox Land Group, Inc. 9055 E. Mineral Circle, Suite 100 Centennial, CO 80112 Re: Dry Creek RUA Weld County, CO (LSC #080970) Dear Mr. Hollard: We are pleased to submit our Traffic Impact Study for the proposed Dry Creek RUA develop- ment located in Weld County, Colorado. This study first provides a summary of the existing roadways and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed development and a summary of planned improvements to the roadway system. Next, estimates are made of future traffic volume forecasts in the vicinity to evaluate the impact of the new development on the future roadway system and, where appropriate, to make recommendations for the required roadway infrastructure and traffic control improvements. We trust that our findings and recommendations will assist in the planning for the proposed Dry Creek RUA development. Please call us if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. a Rt3Q�• nulua,4. s aoP �c .0, ?/3° o1 35827 Ei, S r• By: /AO ::.... . :enj. •' T. Waldman, P.E., PTOE BTW/wc G:\LSC\Projects\2008\080970\Report\TOC Dry Creek RUA.wpd • Traffic Impact Analysis Dry Creek RUA Weld County, Colorado • Prepared for Equinox Land Group, Inc. 9055 E. Mineral Circle, Suite 100 Centennial, CO 80112 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 July 30, 2009 • (LSC #080970) TABLE OF CONTENTS 41 Section Description Page A Introduction 1 B Existing Conditions 5 C Travel Demand Forecasts 12 D Future Traffic Projections 19 E Trip Assignment and Traffic Volumes 12 F Transportation Network Recommendations 22 G Conclusions 26 Appendix A: Existing Traffic LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Description Page 1 Vicinity Map 4 2 Existing Conditions 10 413 Existing Transit Routes 11 4 Base Model Roadway Functional Classification Assumptions 14 5 Modified Model Roadway Functional Classification Assumptions 15 6 Base Model TAZ's 16 7 Modified Model TAZ's 17 8 Year 2035 Daily Traffic Volume Projections 20 9 Year 2035 Peak-Hour Traffic Volume Projections 21 10 Recommended Roadway Classifications 24 11 Recommend Traffic Control 25 LIST OF TABULATIONS Table Description Page 1 Estimated Traffic Generation 18 SECTION A • Introduction The proposed Dry Creek Regional Urbanization Area (RUA)is located north of the Denver metropolitan area and west of the City of Brighton in Weld County, Colorado. The 2,192- acre area is proposed to have mostly residential development with a small amount of commercial space. The boundary and location of the proposed Dry Creek RUA are shown in the vicinity map depicted in Figure 1. The approximate 2,192-acre site is generally bound by Weld County Road (WCR) 2 and vacant land on the south, Quebec Street on the west, WCR 6 on the north, and vacant land on the east. The area is currently undeveloped. This report is written in support of amending the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in order to create a new Regional Urbanization Area of approximately 2,192 acres. Preliminary planning envisions the construction of approximately 4,900 single-family • dwelling units and 100,000 square feet of retail space on the site. Access to the site is proposed from Weld County Road (WCR) 2 (E. 168`h Avenue), WCR 4, WCR 6, WCR 17 (Quebec Street), and WCR 19 (Yosemite Street). This study first provides a summary of existing traffic conditions within the vicinity of the site. It then provides estimates of the Year 2035 traffic projections for the area. Finally, recommendations are made regarding future roadway classifications and traffic control for the roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the site. Specific steps taken in this analysis process are described below: • A review and analysis of present roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site and an analysis of the proposed improvements that have been planned for roadways providing access in the general area. • A projection of future traffic volumes on the adjacent street system (for the Year 2035) which provides a basis for estimating future impacts. • A determination of street and access improvements that will be necessary to accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed development. • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Project Purpose and Need Due to the fact that the Dry Creek RUA is not currently within the Weld County Urban Growth Area, the regional transportation model developed by the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) does not assume significant development in this area. Therefore, no detailed analysis has been conducted to determine the transportation infra- structure needed to accommodate traffic expected to be generated from potential develop- ment in the area. Major regional roadways in the vicinity of the Dry Creek RUA include I-25, located approximately four miles to the west, US 85 located approximately two miles to the east, State Highway 7 located approximately one mile to the south, and E-470 located approximately three miles to the south. Several other two-lane (one lane in each direction) rural county roads exist adjacent to and within the Dry Creek RUA, but these roadways do not have sufficient capacity for the traffic expected to be generated by the development proposed within the Dry Creek RUA. The focus of this report is to develop future traffic forecasts and an appropriate roadway system for the Dry Creek RUA and surrounding area. . Planning Principle and Policies The following is the stated Goal of the transportation and circulation plan for the Dry Creek RUA: Create a transportation network serving the Dry Creek RUA that unifies and coincides with state and other surrounding county, city and community trans- portation systems. The transportation network should be an integrated system of streets, sidewalks, trails and bikeways that provides for optimal movement of people, bicycles and automobiles within the community to and from adjacent streets, developments and uses. This report focuses on the transportation system necessary for the optimal movement of automobiles to and from the proposed Dry Creek RUA. Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 2 Study Process • The major task of this study effort is to develop future traffic forecasts and a roadway system for the Dry Creek RUA and surrounding area. This effort requires modifying the DRCOG 2035 regional transportation model with updated land use information for the Dry Creek RUA and the proposed roadway network within and immediately surrounding the area. • • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 3 S c ≥ Q O -off ° � x -• �°° U oro PS4� 1* 411 U to + • f I < 4 w.w f 9r _ ,p, - - •w� -Y 4-1 cc -• N 1 `� k ' ` ti✓ Yrow ,a.^, ' liE''*•i' U :° 1 WCa275 o !! i /P., � .�I It t .'• St a F _ , O : tc. � 41 . 4 si _ ._ pp t incl . ril 2'p� �.. it • Siall ` Wit Ihr=.' �7r1, = Rt. r Y - -• 4 . - "x 7 4.1 • .was - ..... . , Havana Stret, . ,,,,__..4_ - I ■ : 1k !!� r ii i. itiiiint ... )4 -""41111Mier '� a IArr e le •1 It•‘ .... i i ' /' 4 Ile t I.• lit.: si. WI T ri, r, iI , , rI : er , jitlirill* p„ 1 r ,„ti ; -.... » '.i i c _ ?gm 1. 1 ^ thy~ w Ri � I SC f 54. / . WC .e Y 111" ^ „,..., tfig_.- . , , '7 . . `�I f ' lc,. ell I is k_ r e. Vi• it II 4111 - k 4 , lilir‘ Ns a- -It *--• a 4•11/411it: gt e .. .•i - ili — ,' t ! 1, s w,.....-a- . 1 r 3 , sr ` )j - r ui 2F` , �' V4 e 8 9 .` r4) 4• '' • Z • , 1 . 7 ,>< ' .� 'I Mar— 4 et 1 �' ' 1 'id t interstate 25 ' S 4i. r Ill y '� 4 t . ''' - i :... SWIMS ill . . TRANSPORTi1TTON CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 4 SECTION B • Existing Conditions Area Roadways Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are shown in Figure 2 and are described below with a brief discussion of anticipated future roadway improvements. • I-25 is an Interstate Highway located approximately four miles west of the Dry Creek RUA with north-south continuity throughout the State of Colorado. I-25 has recently been widened from the Denver metropolitan area to State High- way 52 (north of the site) to six lanes (two lanes in each direction) plus acceleration and deceleration lanes for on- and off-ramps. I-25 provides for both regional and local travel demands throughout the Colorado front range. Recent traffic counts by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) indicate that the section of I-25 north of State Highway 7 currently carries about 92,000 trips per day. There is currently a direct interchange with E-470 and full-diamond interchanges with SH 7 and Perry Street (WCR 8). A new interchange is proposed between SH 7 and Perry Street south of WCR 6. It was first identified in the 1-25 Sub-Area Plan by the City and County of Broomfield, November, 1999 and is also shown in the City and County of Broomfield • Comprehensive Plan, October, 2005 and the Town of Erie Comprehensive Plan, December 2005. However, this proposed interchange is not shown on the Draft North 1-25 EIS, (December, 2007) and is not a federally approved interchange. Furthermore, there is currently no public or private funding identified for the construction of this interchange and a construction date has not been identified. Due to the fact that this is an Interstate Highway, an Interchange Feasibility Study would have to be completed and approved by CDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) prior to construction of this proposed inter- change. It will take a minimum of two years to complete such a study. • E-470 (Northwest Parkway Toll Road) is a four-lane (two lanes in each direction with acceleration and deceleration lanes at interchanges) expressway toll facility located approximately three miles south of the Dry Creek RUA with east-west continuity from 1-76 on the east to US 36 on the west. East of I-76, E-470 continues to the south and eventually loops to the west to I-25 where it continues on as C-470 to the west, eventually looping to the north to west I-70 near Golden, Colorado. There are currently full-diamond interchanges at E-470's intersections with Colorado Boulevard and York Street. There is also a full-diamond interchange planned at the E-470/Quebec Street intersection. The Parterre Development is a large mixed-use development that is proposed by the Carlson Development Company. This proposed development surrounds the proposed E-470/Quebec interchange. The E-470 Toll Authority has indicated that the E-470/Quebec interchange will be development-funded and construction will not move forward until the Parterre development moves • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 5 forward. In addition, the City of Thornton has indicated that buildout of the Parterre development is dependent on the construction of the E-470/ Quebec interchange. The Parterre development was annexed and zoned in the City of Thornton in 2008. Construction on their first phases of development was proposed to begin in 2009 - 2011 . However, due to recent events with the economy, construction is currently on hold and it is not known when this development will move forward. • US 85 is a four-lane (two lanes in each direction with acceleration and deceleration lanes at interchanges) regional highway located approximately two miles east of the Dry Creek RUA with north-south continuity from the Denver metropolitan area to north of the Colorado/ Wyoming state border. US 85 currently has a full-diamond roundabout interchange at its intersection with State Highway 7. The SH 7/WCR 2 and SH 7/ WCR 6 intersections are currently full movement intersections with traffic signal control. The section of US 85 east of the site is classified as an expressway (EX) in the State of Colorado State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule, October 2007. The US 85 Access Control Plan, December 1999, shows two future grade-separated interchanges on US 85 at WCR 2 and WCR 6. However, neither of these interchanges is currently funded. Furthermore, there is not currently a proposed construction date for either interchange. • State Highway (SH) 7 is an east-west state highway located approximately one mile south of the Dry Creek RUA with continuity between the City of Boulder on the west and the City of Brighton on the east. In the vicinity of the site, this roadway has a rural two-lane cross-section plus auxiliary lanes at major inter- sections. It has a posted speed limit of 60 mph east of Colorado Boulevard. The City of Thornton Transportation Plan, February 2006, shows SH 7 as a four-lane principal arterial in their 2030 roadway plan and a six-lane principal regional arterial in their buildout roadway plan. There is currently a traffic signal at the Colorado Boulevard/ SH 7 intersection. All other intersections between I-25 and US 85 are currently stop controlled with stop signs on the north-south approaches. • WCR 17 (Quebec Street) is a two-lane roadway with north-south continuity from Riverdale Road on the south to the Adams/Weld County line at WCR 2. Quebec Street is currently paved from Riverdale Road to just south of E-470 and from SH 7 to WCR 2 . There is currently an offset intersection (the north approach is approximately 400 feet west of the south approach) at the WCR 2 / Quebec Street intersection. However, Weld County is in the process of evaluating an alter- native alignment at this intersection which will eliminate this offset. There is no funding source at this time to pay for WCR 17 (Quebec Street) Dry Creek RUA (LSC #080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 6 this realignment project. The portions of Quebec Street between E-470 and SH 7 and WCR 17 north of WCR 2 are not currently paved. The City of Thornton Transportation Plan, February 2006, shows Quebec Street as a four-lane principal arterial in the 2030 roadway plan and a six-lane principal arterial in the buildout roadway plan. The Dacono Transportation Plan shows WCR 17 as a two-lane minor arterial. In addition, if and when the Parterre development moves forward, it is required to improve the portion of Quebec Street adjacent to the development (from 152nd Avenue to south of 144th Avenue) to a four- lane arterial roadway and, depending on the result of further traffic studies, possibly to a six-lane arterial roadway. • WCR 19 (Yosemite Street} is a two-lane roadway with north-south continuity from just north of E-470 on the south to one mile north of WCR 8 on the north. There is currently an offset intersection (the north approach is approximately 400 feet west of the south approach) at the WCR 2 /Yosemite Street intersection. , However, Weld County is in the process of evaluating an alternative alignment at this intersection which will eliminate this off- set. There is no funding source at this time to pay for this realignment project. Yosemite Street is currently paved from its WCR 19 (Yosemite Street) southern terminus to SH 7 and WCR 19 is • currently paved north of WCR 2 to WCR 8. The portion of Yosemite Street between SH 7 and WCR 2 and the portion of WCR 19 north of WCR 8 are not currently paved. The City of Thornton Transportation Plan, February 2006, shows Yosemite Street as a four-lane principal arterial in the 2030 roadway plan and a six-lane principal arterial in the buildout roadway plan. The Dacono Transportation Plan shows WCR 19 as a two-lane minor arterial. • Havana Street is a two-lane paved roadway with north-south continuity from within the Todd Creek development just south of SH 7 on the south to SH 7 on the north. The Dacono Transportation Plan, May 2003, shows Havana Street extending to the north and connecting to WCR 21 at WCR 2 . WCR 21 is shown as two-lane minor arterial roadway in the Dacono Transportation Plan. • Colorado Boulevard is a two-lane paved roadway with north-south continuity from the Denver Metropolitan area on the south to north of Weld County on the north. IL Colorado Boulevard is shown as a four-lane principal arterial in the Dacono Trans- portation Plan and the Thornton Trans- portation Plan. • WCR 2 ( 168th Avenue) is a two-lane paved • roadway with east-west continuity from just WCR 2 (168'" Avenue) Dry Creek RUA (LSC #080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 7 east of I-25 on the west to just east of I-76 and the Town of Lochbuie on the east. The City of Thornton Transportation Plan shows WCR 2 as a four-lane1 principal arterial in the 2030 roadway plan and a six-lane principal arterial in the buildout roadway plan. Three is currently a two-lane bridge over the Platte River on this roadway just west of US 85 . • WCR 6 is a two-lane paved roadway with ,�, + +: ,. east-west continuity from just west of I-25 I on the west to just west of I-76 on the east. • - - WCR 6 is shown as a two-lane minor arterial in the Dacono Transportation Plan with recommendations to reserve right-of- way for a four-lane arterial between WCR 13 and WCR 17 . Three is currently a two-lane bridge over the Platte River on this roadway just west of US 85. WCR 6 ' • WCR 8 is a two-lane gravel roadway with east-west continuity from the Town of Erie west of I-25 on the west to just east of I-76 ' , 'L_ : on the east. WCR 8 is shown as a two-lane - - minor arterial east of WCR 13 and a four- lane minor arterial west of WCR 13 in the Dacono Transportation Plan. ..-. _ WCR 8 • sue • WCR 4 and WCR 2 land WCR 23 . 5 are two-lane gravel roadways within the Dry Creek RUA area. These roadways are not regionally significant roadways. WCR 23.5 • Tucson Street (WCR 23. 5) is a two lane paved roadway with north-south continuity from SH 7 to WCR 2 . North of WCR 2 , Tucson Street continues north in a meandering path as WCR 23 . 5 for about 1 . 5 miles. There is currently an offset intersection (the north approach is approximately 400 feet west of the south approach) at the WCR 2 /Tucson Street intersection. However, Weld County is in the process of evaluating an alternative alignment at this intersection which will eliminate this offset. There is no funding source at this time to pay for this realignment project. Dry Creek RUA (LSC #080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 8 • • Riverdale Road is a paved two-lane roadway which travels in a northeast- southwest direction with continuity from Yosemite Street on the southwest to SH 7 on the northeast. Riverdale Road is just west of the South Platte River and generally follows its path. Riverdale Road travels under two bridges at E-470 with a two-lane cross-section with shoulders under the E-470 bridge structures. Existing Traffic Figure 2 also illustrates recent daily traffic counts on the roadways around the Dry Creek RUA area. These volumes are based on traffic counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in December, 2008 and recent traffic counts posted on the CDOT website. A summary of the raw count data is provided in Appendix A. Existing Transit Service Figure 3 illustrates the existing and proposed transit routes for the study area. Limited transit service in the study area is provided by Regional Transportation District (RTD). The nearest bus service is provided at the US 85/Bridge Street Park-n-Ride in Brighton, east of the proposed site. Routes R and RX provide local and express service from • Brighton to Downtown Denver. Route 120 provides local service between Brighton and Broomfield along 120`h Avenue south of the site. Finally, Route 145X provides express service between Brighton and the Denver International Airport (DIA). The RTD FasTracks North Metro Corridor project will provide rail transit service to the study area and is currently scheduled to be completed in the next 10 years. Specifically, the project will provide service between Union Station in downtown Denver and a new station to be constructed west of the site near the intersection of SH 7 and Colorado Boulevard. • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 9 ni" u.o 00 a co `� s izeto �l..r . O 4 Q � 11 ' a.�C .oQ.65� w`., . � pp0 Q LL. LLI V ' O U � US 85 7.---- t- \ ' m Ce SU QCU o £ 03 ets-C O O N` C C i U 1/40 in N Tucson Street tu0 U O WCR 23.5 - ` •r., r +.+ N � Li N M;, .X r W t4E S WCR 23 0 r - be Albs_ . ■ Lima Stmt--- N op ire 3 3 Iss - ..0 � Havana Street �-- WCR 21 _ O ..\ ■ C CO ----) 1/40 0 NI 1 O Q.. \ • Yosemite Street J WCR 19 I Thsis. [>1 N O r 3 CO co41 0 ... • t . _. � . J \ Quebec Street W* WCR 17 i--- -----sae. r - - - 7. 7 N. i o U o c C in O in cz RS N B ) u ti Holly Street co . BCD WCR 15 "'f'- C 1O "O •v a a Z ci O et C CLOu o O a 3 — CC CC ~ O �; .c / W A t o v v Colorado BlvdI o Q CL O N w C71 c 5 ets C C U E � � C4U a is LL W a. N N Q C U +� r vim., ` co 9) a) v i a a; II II II II II II W ` o i W ui . - York Street -_ -r York Street L �" uso 1 uI C o 1 0 do C t113 c zI' ll 1 N IN ,., U C O N C 03 W Washington Street r Interstate 25 .-%‘) I ....:1 - I - O 1/40 TRAN RTATION CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 10 t0 � o a ,u Cut) '+...i O v - •— O co • i o cis X O r � i U • . t!) m C J m US 85 m co 0 > CUa C) r t_ m r= a) a r O Tucson Street A r WCR 23.5 r e) _Li r i L —ft --Th_,J peo nsi 1/47 eiecti r ■ Lima Street co co IL., ■ r_ . —— O ri il 7 • __Ii. Havana Street WCR 21 - - e . or Ta .•, t. I I N. S Yosemite Street Lid I War r • ,...J Len r._.______. CV • r' I cc o t W . a Quebec Street la a • WCR 17 r --- --t N n) co c > L > an C C N in V) CO r w co co to c Holly Street N a CIO x -- + - WCR 15 a-z -r W N W m s_ c L OL 0 v > L Q) 0 > it a a) > C v L > C a) v o D O C w > Colorado Blvd i� C Q C C O O t a +, -+, F i 59,_ ÷, L O tT .�-, c t� L O1 N C CD O1 '11: O �`i L m m � I i to +tmmelttit m—wi ttt► I I o I 0 I w York Street X N x a i York Street 'c LK tY r _1 L �- /- CU (1) a) a) O O O O K II II II II Washington Street Interstate 25 p �'\ IIII �1 i _1 TRANS RTATlON CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 11 SECTION C Travel Demand Forecasts In order to identify potential improvements to the transportation system in and around the Dry Creek RUA, it was necessary to modify the latest regional transportation model developed by DRCOG to reflect the land use and roadway network changes proposed by the Dry Creek RUA plan. This was accomplished by modifying and/or adding roadway links and changing the land use of several Traffic Area Zones (TAZ's) and adding several new TAZ's in the vicinity of the site. Roadway Classification and Lane Assumptions Figure 4 illustrates the initial roadway network facility type assumptions for the roadways in the study area which are modeled in the 2035 DRCOG regional transportation model (Base Model). Roadway lane assumptions in the Base Model are as follows: • Freeway facilities are modeled as six-lane roadways (three lanes in each direction); • Expressways are modeled as four lanes (two lanes in each direction); • Principal Arterial roadways are modeled as four-lane roadways (two lanes in each direction) except for SH 7 east of Colorado Boulevard and Quebec Street north of SH 7 which are modeled as two-lane roadways (one lane in each direction); • Minor Arterial and Collector roadways are modeled as two-lane roadways (one lane in each direction). Figure 5 illustrates the roadway network facility types and lane assumptions for the regional transportation model that was modified to represent the addition of the Dry Creek RUA land uses and proposed roadway network (Modified Model). The following summarizes the changes that were made to the roadway network in the Modified Model: • Quebec (WCR 17) was extended to the to the north to WCR 8 and classified as a principal four-lane arterial; • WCR 6 was extended to the east to US 85 and classified as a principal four-lane arterial; • WCR 19 was changed from a collector to a minor two-lane arterial; • WCR 21 was added as a minor two-lane arterial from WCR 2 to WCR 6; • A collector road system was added to the Dry Creek RUA site as shown. Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 12 Land Use and Trip Generation • Figure 6 illustrates the Traffic Area Zones (TAZ's) that are modeled in Base Model. As this figure shows, the area that includes the Dry Creek RUA site was modeled with three large TAZ's. Figure 7 illustrates the TAZ's that were modeled in the Modified Model. As this figure shows, the three large TAZ's that were originally modeled by DRCOG were divided into several smaller TAZ's to better reflect the proposed site layout and land uses. Table 1 shows the land use and trip generation estimates for the TAZ's that comprise the Dry Creek RUA. As this table shows, the Dry Creek RUA is proposed to include 4,900 single-family dwelling units and 100,000 square feet of commercial space. For this analysis we have assumed that all of the commercial space will be shopping center due to the fact that the trip generation rate for shopping center is higher than other commercial uses and will give a conservative result. As shown in Table 1, on an average weekday, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 50,756 external vehicle trips(25,378 entering and 25,378 exiting). Of these, approximately 975 entering and 2,794 exiting trips are expected to occur during • the AM peak-hour and 3,280 entering and 2,008 exiting trips are expected to occur during the PM peak-hour. The land use in the TAZ's representing the Dry Creek RUA was adjusted in an iterative process in order to model the trip generation entering and exiting the TAZ's predicted by ITE rates as shown in Table 1. In addition, approximately 1,000 production/distribution employees were added to TAZ number 2796 to better reflect the jobs expected to be created by the Vestas Wind Turbine Manufacturing Plant which is proposed east of the site. • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 13 v (1) o a cc ,n >tto o OnR, V x `� CO et cLid..0 1 ?s. t_. cl.cf) liri.. cc z J ni US 85 Q D Q C � , 0 v m Q Q_) wa v. r vv p C1) ct V m ....... nal Apo Z ■ &a/&i,D • rr ci • 7 Zco c rea- 1 ■ • r . Li WCR 19 r . ...i in ■ N I 41 L I U 1_, NIQuebec Street 1 ii Holly Street O L N >. < Q) Q Colorado Blvd. l o co a a o L. U 4) O N a c - a L x -� O c li W 11 U CD II II II II II en 05 a, York Street aw _____ ill York Street ll Washington Street I Interstate 25 ------ h.,... ...w ._ __ .. I N CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 14 v _ c. -. Z r � V a E ao • - Li at * Q ‘ � Q US 85 Iv _ �• J ,---- . . + ` 141 W N O .) E 7 Q m ' '1..+ LJ ---�_ Q U -O 1 Ct Aeo Z 03 ■ . 7 U V IftLait ■ p r ■ a ■ i a • F . J voyemdo_... ' JCR 19 „ Street : N CC \ I L . _ . . -d Quebec Street N. co 3 t rn m B Holly Street m •I 3 3 _ C) Q Q) Colorado Blvd, 3 L_ A u) a Q O 0 CO N U 0 c N Q C a' t_ w d m o in L co II II II II II Ili York Street York Street sic 0 z W CD W Washington Street A Interstate 25 - ill 1 H NS ill - 71" ;re': AT/ON CONSUL ANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 15 o cc Q.) in O `., N ,� aP. -.0 tt OJ Q D cc S v US 85 O I I I ren N 1/4•OI w VVN. li Ls . .. . 0 ni ••• im •m •il 0 iti ■ • r • .._ d I I k I I ■ IL I r ■ ill M Mil flIll • OM II IN=MIIN IM 11711 WCR 19 as is N ii i• I U _ i ' to is immil • I II tN t\ Holly Street N N I ! 3 m a' II CO CO in I Colorado Blvd. 15 22 U I a) a - York Street illiVaTRANSRTATION CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 16 au . ro o tN. T. O A2 v as ,u N O1 $ t C k v �i �1:3 00 Q�ill O icC tY S N N L U US 85 ria--- ,,-, I I N. 00I I r- CN --,AO1Ln I N CO I .. N I IIII 60 N `mri sr: . all • I co CO N N ./ L .I - - rim all minioniml 1 r ■ WCR 19 Yosern.te Stn � I I M CO ‘1- 0 II N CC cal ' ..s N i I i ler II CA et O1 �O N. IN. Holly Street N N I � I ico a. a IL ! Colorado Blvd. z c m Q ot • . ui `— York Street TRANSPORTAT70N CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 17 O) 0 CO r 0) CO 0 r N L 10 0 CO 0 CO N N M r O N N CO (O O N N ` N 0 N N r N V N 0 O O N 2 O[ 0 • ON OOL0N r CO 0) CO MNMr 0 al . a) a Cr) r V' CO r r CO CO I--.- CO O CO m 2 c � a — C CD CU 7 � CO LC) N Nr a N °r' NMI (0 0) y O j CO Co co t0 N r M N r v N _ 2 F s O 0 (O CC) O CO O ( M W 0N NMO0) O LO r U a r r r N r 0) L 2 c Q O CO m r (0 0) 00 m r 0 0 ,- 0) in T (O co (0 CO N CO r N N N CO a CO CO N co N N (0Y CO V 0 L1 Cr) O) a N (0 (Or v (Oa r o w iO o N N O 7 r N co- a O Q j r (n r co r r co r r r r tor- to a O O M O M p) co co O) CO CO CO M 0) CO 0) 0 TO O r O r O O r O O o O r 0 H F s as a) a a o a o v v o v v - v o v o r C co w (O CO CD (O co CD CD CD CO C? (O CO.0_ o - o r o o r o 0 0 o r o0 0) Z O C N -co — O (0 0 (0 0 CO CO O CO (0 0 CO O CO O O C 0 0 (0 y N a N N 7 LC) (0 N N V (O a r K T . 2 CD O O O O6 O O O O O O o O O W V O co s a, Z E N a) (a 0 C a W < O , N a p) M m M m O) M O O) O) O) CO 0) M .- IX• O 0 (O m e r (0 r (0 r r (O r r r r (p r (O a) y 1 0 Y O n Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C aLL �� ~ .EU o , L 0) N F I- a"u O (0CD ([ ONO N N m (rO N N N 0) co 0) a) t1 C o G V > 0 Oi O co ,t. of O) 7 CD Oi 07o V o) a C O a J ¢ n w 2 .c P —(n r co N W •- DWDWDDWDDDDWDW DO) 0 t.• O Y O Y O O Y O O O O Y O Y ❑ Y C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) W C7 M6 (o 0 0 iri 0 000 N6 066 c c (0r 00 ICr ar N (COr yr mo C c v o 0 m2 r )0 O 0 N (1 L N a O Cr)• 0 F (2a N F O N C p ? a) co O) O) co 0 a 0 O) co a) E C) C C CC CCCC C J O 0) To •N 1) ) W W O) 15 N ._ LL C_ O• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O- 2 I 22 2222 2 C O) p O o 0 0 0) 0 0 0) 0) 0 C U) N N L t C r .c L r r L O i , a) i0 0 N (0 N 0 0 co co (5 i0 o o u- O a) a) N d a) a) a) 0) 0 a) N woo N o 0 o 0 o o 0 O o o O 0 O 0 C "c 0 • T T T T T T T T T a) oo o z 3 z Q m •E 0 E0 E E 0 E E E E 0 E 0 a a) 0) a) m N (0 CT m O 0) N n) C0 (0 M (0 (T (0 CT co .- N O • LL C LL C_ LL LL c_ LL LL LL LL C_ LL C_ F D - D 0 0 N O. N 0- (V N a N N N N a N a c m O O a. a 6 a- a- a .. D a) a r C L C = C C L O C C C L C S U CO O ii J ii F- NN (O Nfn (O In (/) (O (n (/) (O (O (O 5 LL O in O W V) N H in F Y of co) (0 M M CO) CO M 7 V N r ry CO )n Q CO co COcp MC000m 0 0 " F N N NN NNNN N Z July 30, 2009 Page 18 SECTION D Future Traffic Projections Figures 8 and 9 illustrate estimates of daily and peak-hour traffic projections for Year 2035. These traffic projection estimates were taken directly from the Modified Model results. These traffic projections represent expected Year 2035 conditions assuming buildout of the Dry Creek RUA and the surrounding area. Note that all roadway links for which traffic volumes are not shown on Figures 8 and 9 are projected to have daily traffic volumes of less than 2,000 vehicles per day and peak-hour traffic volumes of less than 200 vehicles per hour. • • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc. Page 19 o O v a, c C�j dl ;, 3k MS p � a - ii Q U of Q CD rtiQ4.� et°� U 0CZ Ln 0 > CD Q CV 0 zce O S . . O ....N... 0o U U o I in 06 _ NZ/ O / U O o 47 o \ ._ 0 O O O O 0 co' o N O tt o N N Nken' LoLn' o N/ C O \ ) ' Q 0 0 0 N WCR 21 NI II 0 C3 O 0Z if) 0 0 0 0 0 O w M c� ‘q* �/I M N W Ni M M 777 J 0 O C O0 00 O O O O 0 0 0 In LC M O O 0 O O O N Cr)rn o 1--- �; � o Ln NI, d. a `n 2 \ /oseetreet i I WCR 19 0 Yosemite St. 0 0 0 0 Cr) / / Q M C13 \-\:°6 M0 0CC Nt. 7 J N CI 0 / ) 0 0 rt 0 0 Ott 0 0 0 0 `0 O O L d= o 0 0 0 in \ /O O o M IN0 ` L N N d M / 2 WCR 17 / Quebec St. U �0 U O O% O 0 o IRAN RAT?CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 20 o O) L• V) O � � v Z r3 Ji • -or _----....> O lialt E --- q� 1 CU O riCip U O cu J M O Q N J 22 I 3/43/4.N..... 0 U U 0 c \ kt. S. N O 0 u Cr) w O K F`— O 0 4.......N.... O I 0 0 \ ° CO C O O Orn 1/4O 1 N Cl N N H ) - \ a) II O O N WCR 21 Z O o O NO o 7777 CCD r= N 1/40 Cl O w ill J O Co OO o o o o � � �' O O O in N Cr) Inc N Cr) O in p rn in o I o / O7 I I Yosemite treet J WCR 19 _ ,.....00'essese---\— Yosemite St. 0 in O O Cl Q in /� O o o' Cl 777 0 0 / o4 N. ) oCe 1 O o O Coo O p O ClIN N o� Cl O I 2 Cl\ ---)— 2 WCR 17 \ \ (ID Quebec St. O it • : o 0 in in T SPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 21 SECTION F Transportation Network Recommendations Based upon the daily and peak-hour traffic volume forecasts presented in this report, Figure 10 illustrates the recommended roadway network and classification for the road- ways within and adjacent to the proposed Dry Creek RUA. Roadway classifications were determined based on a combination of daily traffic forecasts, roadway continuity, connectivity, relative trip length of traffic utilizing the road and approximate spacing of parallel facilities. Arterial roadways should generally be more continuous than collector or local roadways and parallel arterial roadways are generally spaced further apart than collector or local roadways. In addition, arterial roadways tend to serve larger activity centers than collector or local roadways and the relative trip length is typically longer along arterial roadways than collector and local roadways. WCR 6 and WCR 17 (Quebec Street) have daily traffic volume forecast of greater than 7,000 and are therefore recommended as four-lane principal arterial roadways. For WCR 17 (Quebec Street) daily traffic volume forecasts are near the capacity of a four-lane arterial and therefore we recommend that right-of way be reserved for a six-lane arterial to allow for future widening in the event that unanticipated development occurs. WCR 19, WCR 21 and WCR 2 are recommended as two-lane minor arterial roadways because of their continuity, connectivity and spacing relative to other arterial roadways. All other roadways internal to the site are recommended as either collector or local road- ways. The preliminary recommendations for intersections that will require either a traffic signal or roundabout for traffic control are shown in Figure 11. As Figure 11 illustrates, a total of 12 intersections is recommended to have either traffic signal or roundabout traffic control. All of these intersections are located around the perimeter of the site on arterial roadways. The spacing of these intersections is generally approximately 1/2 mile. All inter- sections internal to the site will likely operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS "D" or better) with either stop sign or roundabout traffic control. The traffic control recommendations shown in Figure 11 are preliminary and these intersections will be Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 22 further analyzed once specific site plans are developed for each analysis area. Each of • these site plans will have multiple site access points which should disperse the traffic so the analysis presented in this report represents a worst case scenario and the recommendations presented in these figures will provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the traffic expected to be generated by proposed Dry Creek RUA and the surrounding development potential. • • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 23 o Z3 .�` 4) • O Crl o � � oho �j ft CO Q. � E LiZ U 4 vi U tJ U < � a U Ct C (� c cn 0 J N O N � V tJ t L O < O OL 0 _ L • o II II II ZI I WCR 21 W CD W O (2, Yosemite Street WCR 19 Yosemite St. •0 (0 O N-) U cp off WCR 17 cc Quebec St. z L T• PORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC July 30, 2009 Page 24 o o0 , o CI) L, oco • v a O E U U � O Q Q v v •I -a-+ O _o O "D C 7 O - O O D C C, -O5 U r.. ° WCR 21 F- 0 II w I 0 W • O m 0 WCR 19 Yosemite Street Yosemite St. • m 0 JAS • o� cc U -O0 CS- . J WCR 17 Quebec St. • cc 0 TRA N TAnON CONSULTANTS, /NC July 30, 2009 Page 25 SECTION G Summary and Conclusions Based on the analysis presented in this report, the following conclusions can be made regarding the proposed Dry Creek RUA: 1. The location of the proposed Dry Creek RUA is shown in the vicinity map depicted in Figure 1. The approximate 2,192-acre site is generally bound by Weld County Road (WCR) 2 on the south, Quebec Street on the west, and vacant land on the north and east. The area is currently undeveloped. 2. Access to the site is proposed from Weld County Road (WCR) 2 (E. 168th Avenue), WCR 6, WCR 4, WCR 17 (Quebec Street) and WCR 19 (Yosemite Street). 3. The Dry Creek RUA is proposed to include 4,900 single-family dwelling units and 100,000 square feet of commercial space. As shown in Table 1, on an average weekday, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 50,756 external vehicle-trips (25,378 entering and 25,378 exiting). Of these, approximately 975 entering and 2,794 exiting trips are expected to occur during the AM peak-hour and 3,280 entering and 2,008 exiting trips are expected to occur during the PM peak-hour. 4. Figure 10 illustrates the recommended roadway network and classification for the roadways within and adjacent to the proposed Dry Creek RUA. The following is a summary of the recommendations: • WCR 21 (Quebec Street) is recommended as a four-lane principal arterial roadway with right-of-way for a six-lane principal arterial to allow for widening in the event that unanticipated development occurs in the future. • WCR 6 is recommended as four-lane principal arterial roadway. • WCR 2, WCR 19 (Yosemite Street) and WCR 21 are recommended as two- lane minor arterial roadways. • All other roadways within the proposed Dry Creek RUA are recommended as two-lane collector/local roadways. 5. Preliminary recommendations for the location of traffic signals are shown in Figure 11. As Figure 11 illustrates, a total of 12 intersections is recommended to have either traffic signal or roundabout traffic control. All of these inter- sections are located around the perimeter of the site on arterial roadways. All intersections internal to the site are expected to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with either stop sign or roundabout traffic control. Dry Creek RUA ILSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc. Page 26 6. Traffic impacts associated with the proposed Dry Creek RUA will be significant • but can be accommodated with the roadway network and traffic control recommended in this report. • Dry Creek RUA (LSC#080970) July 30, 2009 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 27 APPENDIX A , Existing Traffic r co i o co r a -hi 8 Nm« 00 • m 0 16 m o m. •, o mmO.-OOO rMLO.-.-ONTO iAm W NMN rON00� gOOm p W r 8t-8 ymONrQ'.rON-i,mW WiYat to.m{D tONNNO.-OO2 gOlgm O (V m' O 0 oW �/� li O U) m« i ♦ i Y Y Y « Y Y: O I 1 ujoC J G moth . re 2W?' moNrc.‘-or'.i•.mma'CW• • •: 2 8012m W z o N Z 0 • • • • :• • « • • -• s • IfYNWmf'INrONOOm Sm O w 0 m• .s • « '. • . « • cDm1DmNNNOr000 Sm ifi m H 0 1 zz i • ♦ i io U tiow 0 Z G0 ZC 7 7 o O rm« 3zcI VIEW Z a � p p p©p p p �y pppp , aTi I— tel U�Q3 $588"88'.888 88SSAS8 88.fli 5 Is DF- Q CC ...§ `2 pp Q �}sp �j Oaa8 .. sP. r-mmO.^D.? tlVOOGOG/o•-.f U {q�m cTi m Eoo�A�t�i�4o orr$AN000 • O 4'S` .AF-N N D- JUUD • • O N ¢] 0 A a. c m y 0 8 ,V m' W (fl• 0 0 Np k 0 m' W 3mN(Os-NhovuNivail)i°�or`�o allo�- (N�(n��° 0 8(°ae� O ° 0 N 9 ap pp�y(p pp p p p p p yW(O •-NQw1:12$Rl(4N386.8Irh.'_�M RI.,se48880 �♦ 0• • • k k. 0 0 V Z C LL 0 Wm, • k t • 3 O / • cno8pp?� p (p �p pp�ppp ao" �iA NtO" NtgaflN$R-• • • (p N.O(0OR 0 O 2� esi co5 Ncp O (gy p y� app p CC -LcE- 03w -N000 (DtP2g88b' • k • ._(Q 888t(i 41 iW �f 0 yy iQp p 3• • ti • k ♦ • • • • ;egg egg AA( N O�m��®001 O U 3 m• I+pp Nr+N tp'OO� 80 l7J DJ��1 '0�N co .— m, O 0 0 I? 0 m, , • . w • •1 0 p W 2 m U CO 0 z O • 0 3 L, wo2E= tea a3 vga 288$88888E8$288888888888 go B�d� 3~ a �bm �_ - EooOC I.J 8 o0 fl 0O Md oet8 oo8�t-� g e o O O a r c 4- a; h o • d w C N 0 p 0 0 o w ®m N'Y'Nv rmn r' eN boo8g84 yy �y p pp $ T,°3'OOJr[O�N KanDZ%'SI rrRS',! 4�IQttp�ON OQI $ Or m• ♦ p Q o 3 . • ! ! . ! u § cocoacteg mNW'NY 4 YNlb ROS• g�O7 CW 09,& o O y L on NU ( OC �w m°°'. mAS �N�7�• . . . • S'-8"�e8 W z w NON n nor' E m• ♦ . • ♦ • • • r ONN (�OtiN 84 N 3 srr -r sro i� 8 cr N O ✓ 3 pp �y m• • • • :• s • • • • 2Ntpp�ES'S300N §.- 8� W (O 0 Gl F? Q C p 9 O W N Z m in 3J J W N O Z 3 a &3 o S rm IZNI- rOZO� _ T - F caao Q$$$$$$$$$$$a888$$8$$$$$ogigi vO . N!gcasoo888688-rgog'g888008.- a O O m r- (.4 O 6 N n O 8 • , U m. N Z N N O Z oorrNaoco4aN'NQ oncocacOv Orvoro ` a-purro $l+) �p r'- rrr elNr <. N $(� Q o >' r v r e ymOp00OKf OI XOINV NI-QI�NfD(N._.�NIO iO NL?n 8 8 • U Zli O U) m• a f • 10 W N• Y� moors•N # CDtDP'd'NCD• • ' Fn 8,9 ci. tectw 02 wLmoB w `,2wm mopoaomwNmN.:1- ff 8 8R W z Z o 1—• o mf • ♦ • ♦ • , CI)<Ot+)NCCON.O(OtoQ._Nr0 88 N O U 3 N p NN m. ^0(N t4ON�N0 fp.N O�1 8(V Z U, m r O O 2 ¢7 p a z m Pr ea S U S 015 0 Q Q N p Z 2 Z p 7 UO 1 N E c Q8888$88,8888a88$880$ o@ >v> vo �o O p 8888 0 0 � 0 0� m g E8r3o8g 800iipr80080(�'od$'"t"' a a uo _J v��ri 4 a JG « p u I- m o w rn a r y N O m• a 0 • tJ Z .d. 0 N N O m• , w x x ,: w , ,':O Z NONO—thp7A�pthQf�m m 7lVfo WaDOONr•EVm 0pI` N n t—N � �N0th Q O ul T r cp W Op p cp p 6ZNOO rN iDm V`I7r "Ni"t"SiN"to7n 4 8mOV 3Z Ny «-C1N lV � pp (O 0 Z ti O Cl) 11J F Iw ~o z v' yQ mONOr mo,raig Ro ` • ~ g), 8Q l+1 W 09, n o re °�oo pp Sth re WM zNOOx-Nt6 En't lE `!a aV W Z o I_ Z O p p m • • , • ♦ • , (oggi4."PN O ,-CI0 8 0QaD0N (C4 O N V 3 oo� ip °D. . • • • , :♦ . • ♦ N� 8�8 pp Ih&R W 7 F Q g a SM ``f�fjj (0 m 4O a ta d I- O m• t r ( ♦ i x r It!O Z Z 8 n = U y J m. , • , t « O tJ Q 2 N O z Z I- a O w S o WZN� Or-< 0 - _cirri 0 >=CZ m ot- Q • .tt Egco"s g�"8o'�$p goo`c �s 8o� 'i�gWte~ a_s-s- NI-N N Q a 0 " Cl w- O) a. dg N o CJ m• . •- p , .d Z m• . . • .. . ♦ . •rlp 0 N y 0 0• ;0 Z NNO.-O,r<Q t0 »N NN(VNN e4“,- _ 8 €8 ¢ O a 3zp1r.-0001. .-000N. NfOiON�0U1 O � Og .��r.-r Mr IVY O Ot0 r G m p 0 U Z - W « . • x • « . . •. p • (0.9§ Q a vmiNa�a� t � 4 °Rfy°. . . •'S 8 W p° S • ere W J Z r Nr 0tag y(el Z •� y• « • s .• • • • • * • N P3 N g1 N N W N r CO. CO R N a 0 O V 3 m pp qq� pp pp m p pp' IVN��I•JN.NOJI1)Nt0 � 88 Z IN m • ( • 0 0 tV F O C m• • . s-• s . . s • y-0 oZ Z m 5 C I- Z iN p Z 0 TTT y 0 0 t S p S 'm ((((� ZNg S 0 Z .O N F . CD Q .• p N Y Y ea .. a 38O888888$8$288888888888OO �7 �� 81- %.26°t>1.1 E80008b8o�li� 8oso�oSn�$� � a a , J000 Nei- �Q a o — m y ^ W 0 to of a c`7, y N 0 U m. + • O • y m 0 0 w U) o P _or `n.r-(CIR2NNOYm* AF31 mm 8t+J81�h N n3vcvr-. cnm(Nlay-AiAi°Q`Rit' v`e3"t4RVmm 0 8W 0 0 Vw z i O n OC 0 co NY° mm�o " rrNvn • 0`� v Q 00n WO C OU • G Po_ m dn' / wfh C(V�.- M m YiaLV��N 88m • • '. 8f0 YW W O W4p((pp z R NN Sop O V v o {pp R p m• « + O 0 m � o m, •4O ▪ 0 3 z U ~ r • . + o co UQy pp W. • . x + . + .. ♦ • s m W p O Z 7 D O O J u05 + +: o Q 0 .-m• 3zmi = A Y=Y= 1 O �za 888$8"8°8°2$8$8$8$8888301-5 . 0 �~ a a ba m �'8o�8o`t�aoo8�'o�8a8agi 8t�388�*� N F c�i tJ c a • 1O I r °o 0 R w a d N O V m• . � o N 3 � 0• • • • • • • • • O ! 0 m . N o m. . 0 w ��pp((r�}} pp yy e� p�Q p{p ow m('}RNI(1Nlnttilnl(C,0n CNr W SON.-m g"'gr Q r r wr 1100 3N00 1� Nm+-GD(I(}NR In 0OO N N O m3 8488rrc-c"°"g2iglNrrr vg m ♦r 0 VW o Z v/ m. • a O IW 8 (1) °c9 Q r WrnMvzv n8i3um. . ♦ ;O 88 W p o to M o 6y W J ii ce U N . m onsNur� m#'8 $' 8 8v z l z 3 m N row Z o • . • • • :• s • 8:8 n cog ,-(11) � n r 0 K F O to H o a z W g z IIJ J CO W N W O 2 O o Ul O . 0 l-- ONN ^3 ICI-m W 2 CI oaa_`o ag8gc$$g8$g$aggg8'o4,0gggflOmo �o Et 7'om 9 E8O000'"Bo.B '-+�:gabv`cs`�a"8a8$-' r a�a� c' JIUfl a a 0 a y m o m e4 N 6 c ei m o 0 m. o • .. z yo z (� p$ p 1LNrO*mOM<�'Y:l•1git+INN �4VNCN�'G°O(0r N$N > O `^ mcpYo.-Oo NcotOuoRm Nrn.-RsY *f:Npico mog $8$* U m Z li O uJ §IL 8 () NO N.-O�tnON ro�p�yO 8t+jp� O O CC >m8M N 2Wm0 L N • F N 1.I. mV Or-OO NaD SD+R gm• • ' ♦ • • O 88 W z Z 8 I— Ill p p p m• • •. • • • • • ty sNry,tecoom'r Q! ONON O • Pm4IVtf1 k�N NM fYj p z. • . . . , . • . • «mMc"" .mi7NN mcC.m NI m ON$Y w m I? o G m. r ♦ ". a . . . . : O z z 8i 2 x m 0 z zz Dm co V x m WO EX arOz a .. H illi: a$888$e$$$88a$88$$88.$9883$3 8~• m Egoor o88a886-80'818S8os8F3""~ m m Hello