The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About780178.tiff RESOLUTION RE: DENIAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - ERIE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, P. O. BOX 386 , ERIE, COLORADO 80516 . WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, held a public hearing on the 18th day of October , 1978 at the hour of 2 : 00 o' clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners, for the purpose of hearing the application of the Erie Water and Sanitation District, P. O. Box 386, Erie, Colorado 80516, for a Special Use Permit for a wastewater treat- ment plant on the following described property: A tract of land lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, more particularly descrihad as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 68 West, thence South 00°04'32" West, 2646.31 feet to the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of said Section 6; Thence South 88°44'39" East, 1532.86 feet along the South line of said Quarter section to the True Point of Beginning; Thence fran True Point of Beginning proceed South 88°44'39" Fast along the South line of the North- west Quarter of said Section 6, 300.00 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; Thence North 22°55'13" East, 962.63 feet along said railroad right-of-way; Thence North 88°44'39 West, 673.81 feet; Thence South 00°04'32" West, 894.82 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Said described tract containing 10.00 acres, more or less. WHEREAS , the petitioner was present, and WHEREAS, evidence was presented by the petitioner in support of the grant of the Special Use Permit, and WHEREAS, evidence was presented by surrounding property owners urging denial of the Special Use Permit, and WHEREAS, Section 3. 3.E. 4.h. of the Weld County Zoning Resolu- tion authorizes such uses in an Agricultural District upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners after finding that the proposed operation conforms to the requirements of Section 3. 3.E. 2 . of said Zoning Resolution, and 780178 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the petitioner, the comments of sur- rounding property owners, the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and having been fully informed and satisfied that the request for a Special Use Permit for a wastewater treatment plant on the heretofore described real estate, does not conform to the purposes of Section 3. 3.E of the Weld County Zoning Resolu- tion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of the petitioner for a Special Use Permit for a wastewater treatment plant on the aforementioned tract of land, be and hereby is denied as failing to satisfy the requirements of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLFED by the Board that the reasons for denial contained in the Planning Commission recommendation dated August 15, 1978 be, and hereby are, incorporated as the findings of fact of the Board of County Commissioners in this matter. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of October, A.D. , 1978. 4.-- ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ` '-1,,A, � i "-�'u,,J��-4.--Lr1/ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to I /t�h,;e �Boaard 1 GG v ��llJC )` '/�illC( 1 s i 2 1 i Deputy Count Clerk �� APIBROVE AS TO FORM: � �� /4 County Attorney Date Presented: October 25, 1978 ILBEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date August 15, 1978 Case No. SUP#367: 78 :19 APPLICATION OF Erie Water and Sanitation District ADDRESS P.O. Box 386, Erie, Colorado 80516 Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the appli- cation for site approval ofWastewater Treatment Plant covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: ,' Description . °" f I I A of lance:I'l in 14 'the NW h ' c " I1 tract Y �xbf" '5e 6, ' T,IN R68W 'bf !thr� '6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado, maltte a ticularl described as,r fO,l lows ;' ' I Commencing a t, the ;I I ,d. S 00°P4 ' ,32" W, 2 Q�? n r of,l�s,a See, �; Pl 4,' R68W-' thence'" I thence S gi8°4'4$39" fr132 1r t6 theJSW ' iotneiir of "said NW � of said ;Sec. 6 • ! . 86 ,�fecak:I � 6,0 the south line of se 4d rr I 'section to the True 1 1a Its g I;'I, ,, . 1 ' e , c�ircr } 13ec�inn� n 1 thence from True. 'Po,i4t fIB 1,iynir'' ,- ! 4rg 1,� ,p""ed 5 88°4 4;' 39" ; along the south 'line of 'the tvW;' ?� afi'sa�.d � Sec., ,' �,30D.Ob felt �t�`' they nc�' hw "r1 ht-.of-wa :' �I '' e8ter1y 9;% „b Y 1 thence N 2u of 'thc. uz i'nclnri J17px'kt1�:ri2 'ftaalro�td J `r .i thence N 'SHb4�d �� " .w'0 ,6' 3181' fiE.e4lt '1+.tte�i sa Pi,1 r,c).u1 O,aJh,t-d f1-w�4,,• ; , ' ! ; t id I ! ' thence S 00°0q,12" ;W f; .Q94',y82 14ci:t tFl �tho '1`�'u+! ' P irrlt of + e said- des i ec3 ,,t,radti ac�t�t,�l,rt ,lp, 9 g riir g, c+ ;i1� ,! y i.n+3,., ;,bU ) ,sores,. '; S r2 • . I ,Ii' ' I I i I H' ;{I ' ;� Paragraph 4.1, Criteria Used in the Review of Waste— water Treatment Facilities published by the Colorado Department of Health in June, 1973, states : Motion seconded by Percy Hiatt Vote: For Passage Chuck Carlson Against Passage 1 w [_ - _ -•- Jerry Kiefer ' - ' I' Percy Hiatt II �4_v I J I"�" /;II� P Bette Kountz Irma White The Chairman declared the Resolut+on passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Shirley A. Phillips , Record'ng Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Color- ado, adopted on August 15 , 197.8 and recorded in Book No. VI of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. rated the 16 d*/ of August , 1978__- Secretary — -- — --- -• Erie Water and Sa ;ation District SUP-367:78:19 P.C. RECOM(ENATI ON August 15, 1978 ". . .a sewage treatment plant site should be as far as feasible from any present built-up area or any area which will probably be built- up within a reasonable future period." Therefore, we respectfully propose another site be selected with emphasis on separation from existing and proposed residential development." This recommendation is also based on testimony of the neighbors and the applicant that it is not compatible with the surrounding area and in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. BEFORE Tilt WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING uuMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date August 1, 1978 Case No. SUP# 367:78:19 APPLICATION OF Erie Water and Sanitation District ADDRESS P.O. Box 386, Erie , Colorado 80516 Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the appli- cation for site approval of Wastewater Treatment Plantovering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: See attached Continued to Planning Commission meeting August 15 1978 be Kai gliMiXW ia aXililr3XI II)2a.,, Xc3 igKEttaw x Motion seconded by Irma White Vote: For Passage Chuck Carl SOX Against Passage Ben Nix Jerry Kiefer___ Frank Suckla Percy Hiatt Bette Kountz Irma White The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Shirley A. Phillips , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Color- ado, adopted on August 1 1978 and recorded in Book No. VI of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. hated the 11 — day of g:„st —_— , 19 78_. Secretary r The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on August 15 , 1978, at 1: 30 p.m. in the Weld County Centennial Center County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, 915 10th Street , Greeley , Colorado. Roll Call was as follows : Chuck Carlson Present Jerry Kiefer Present Percy Hiatt Present Bette Kountz Present Irma White Present Frank Suckla Absent Ben Nix Absent Also present were : Gary Z. Fortner, Director of Planning Tom Honn , Zoning Administrator Chuck Cunliffe, Assistant Zoning Administrator Kay Norton , Assistant County Attorney As a quorum was present , the meeting proceeded as scheduled. The minutes of the August 1, 1978 , meeting were approved unanimously. APPLICANT: Erie Water and Sanitation District CASE NUMBER: SUP-367: 78 : 19 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SE NWn, Section 6 , T1N, R68W LOCATION: 1 miles north of Erie SUBJECT: Wastewater Treatment Plant APPEARANCE : Jim Smith DISCUSSION: This application was continued from the last Planning Commission meeting on August 1 , 1978. Jim Smith of Ray and Associates Inc. briefly brought the Planning Commission members up-to-date regarding what is being proposed and why this site was selected. There being no questions at this time , Tom Honn read the staff ' s comments regarding the application . Chairman Carlson then asked for comments from the audience . Mr. Wong, attorney representing residents of Westview Subdivision , expressed their concern regarding odor from prevailing winds , potential health problems with regard to contamination if a flood occurs , devaluation of properties , the distance sewage would have to be pumped, and why this particular site was selected next to a subdivision . Other property woners expressing concern with the proposal included Benny Bruntz, Walt Morris , Olive Martin, and Don Meechum. Mr. Meechum asked why the present disposal site cannot still be used . Mr. Smith later remarked that it has been condemned by the EPA, is located too near the 208 service area, and is located in a floodplain . George Montano expressed concern also as did John Hefner. Mr. Wong read a letter from Mountain Bell to Mr. Sam Little which stated that they felt it was economically unfeasible to increase utility service in Erie. These above concerns were basically answered at the first hearing, but Mr. Smith stated in answering these concerns that the site is isolated from the floodplain , the building is enclosed so there would be only a musty odor, does not feel properties would be devaluated in comparing this proposal to the plant in Boulder, and pumping is for internation circulation only as it is a gravity fed system. Discussion followed regarding the 208 plan and the boundaries involved with service. Mr. Hiatt asked for clarification of where the outfall line is proposed . Mr. Smith responded it would either go north on County Line Road to 52 and then west to Boulder Creek or from the end of the service at County Line Road diagonally to Boulder Creek. Discussion followed regarding the discharge permit and Later quality. John Hall of the Weld Planning Commission lutes Page 2 August 15, 1978 A County Health Department clarified the difference between the recommendation of the State Health Department and the negative recommenation of the Weld County Health Department . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend denial of the application based on the recommendation of the Weld County Health Department and also because of testimony received from the surrounding property owners and the applicant . that this is not compatible with the area and in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. Seconded by Percy Hiatt . A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Jerry Kiefer , Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White. Motion for denial carried. f APPLICANT: Jay Steinberger CASE NUMBER: Z-305 : 78 : 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . El SE4j Section 25 , T7N, R66W LOCATION: 1 mile north of Eaton on west side of U.S . Highway 85 SUBJECT: Change of Zone from "E" Estate Zone District to "C" Commercial Zone District APPEARANCE: Jay Steinberger DISCUSSION: Mr. Steinberger' s business is a Ford franchise dealership which is presently located in Eaton . Because of its present inadequate size additional property was purchased one mile north of Eaton in order to expand. This property has not been used agriculturally since approximately 1963 which is the time the 4 lane highway was put in in that specific area. There are curb cuts presently on the property and room for a deceleration lane coming from the north to the south in the south bond lane which makes it natural for turning from the southbound lane into the proposed dealership facility . At this time Chuck Cunliffe read the staff ' s recommendation for approval . No further discussion . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners based on the staff ' s recommendation. Motion by Irma White, seconded by Percy Hiatt . A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White . Motion carried. APPLICANT: Robert D. Bliss CASE NUMBER: Z-306 : 78: 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 , SE* SW*, Section 9, T5N, R65W LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of East 18th Street and Balsam Avenue SUBJECT: Change of Zone from "E" Estate Zone District to "C" Commercial Zone District APPEARANCE: Jerry McRae DISCUSSION: This application and the Johnnie Bernhardt application followin were both presented at the same time by Mr. McRae as the properties are close to each other. Mr. Bliss desires to have a produce storage building and office and Mr. Bernhardt desires to have mini warehouse storage units if the requests are granted. No water will be necessary on the properties to operate these businesses. There being no questions at this time, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff' s recommendation for denial . Mr. McRae then presented a map showing where the properties are located and what areas are presently zoned Commercial . General discussion followed. Chairman Carlson then asked for comments from the audience. William Bearer at this time then spoke in representing; residents of East 19th Street Road, Basswood Avenue , and Balsam Avenue who are in opposition to the proposal . ' ' Planning Commission lutes Page 3 August 15, 1978 These area residents are opposed because the area is already established for residential with some light businesses permitted; devaluation of properties ; taxes have already doubled ; increased traffic would not only be a problem but a hazard; noise and dust ; better sites are available ; and water taps are not presently available. Don Hungenberg also stated he felt this area should be kept in Estate zoning as people enjoy living there where they can have a few horses , etc. on small acreages and would prefer it be left that way. Earl Steel and Linda Reed also expressed opposition to the request . Mr. Bernhardt then stated that he needed no water for his request . He is requesting the change of zone so that he can make his property work for him. The land is not big enough to farm and the taxes are going up on it . Mr. Bliss also stated that he would need no more water for his operation 'and would not cause a strain on the sewer system. There would also be very little increased truck traffic--probably small farm trucks only . Discussion followed. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to continue the application to September 5, 1978, for a field trip and further testimony . Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Irma White. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Jerry Kiefer , Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Johnnie Bernhardt CASE NUMBER; Z-307: 78 : 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, NEi SW , Section 9, T5N, R65W LOCATION: 569 East 18th Street , Greeley SUBJECT: Change of Zone from "E" Estate Zone District to "C" Commercial Zone District APPEARANCE: Jerry McRae DISCUSSION: Please refer to previous application by Robert D. Bliss MOTION; Be it therefore resolved to continue the application for a field trip and further testimony to September 5 , 1978. Motion by Bette Kountz, seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Jerry Kiefer , Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White. Motion carried. Request from Phillip Becker for a building permit under Section 13 .C. (1) of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SW , Section 35 , T4N, R66W LOCATION : 1 miles south and 1 mile east of Gilcrest APPEARANCE : Ivan Gilbaugh DISCUSSION: Mr. Gilbaugh, representing Mr. Becker, explained that Mr. Becker had purchased the 4. 4918 acres with a 25 ' easement with the under- standing that he could obtain a building permit . It was not until he applied for the building permit that he was told he could not build on the property. He is proposing to eliminate the 25 feet to enlarge the parcels . Tom Honn went into a great deal of explanation in this regard. There being no comments at this time, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff 's recommendation for denial . George Becker stated that he tried to work with Mr. Lorenz, owner of Parcel C, so they could get a recorded exemption on the property, but Mr. Lorenz would not cooperate . This is the only alternative Mr. Becker has. Discussion again followed . • Planning Commission lutes Page 4 August 15, 1978 MOTION: Be it therefore resolved that this request be approved. Motion by Percy Hiatt , seconded by Jerry Kiefer. There was a vote of "aye" cast by Percy Hiatt and Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "no" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Bette Kountz, and Irma White . This motion failed on a 3 to 2 vote. Gary Fortner at this time stated that the Weld County Building Trades Advisory Committee has been formed and to-date has been working out quite well . The following proposed amendments to the Weld County Building Code has been thoroughly studied and reviewed by this committee and fully support the amendments . Joe Jarvis , Building Inspection Director, then briefly discussed the following items with the Planning Commission members. Adoption of standards for energy conservation and amending the Weld County Building Code to provide energy conservation requirements. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette KOuntz , and Irma White . Motion carried. Proposed amendment to Section II .A. 4. of the Weld County Buidling Code . The amendments pertain to standards for the inspection of plumbing systems . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Percy HiatL . A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White. Motion carried. Proposed amendment to Section III .P. of the Weld County Building Code. The proposed amendment would make provision for approval of deviations from the Weld County Building Code by the Director of Bulling Inspections at his discretion whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of the code. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Percy Hiatt . A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Percy Hiatt , Jerry Kiefer, Bette Kountz, and Irma Whote. Motion carried. There being no further business , the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Shirley A. Phillips Planning Commission Secretary /sap The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on August 1 , 1978, at 1 : 30 p.m. in the Weld County Centennial Center County Commissioners 'hearing Room, first floor, 915 10th ;Lrcet , Greeley, Colorado. Roll Call was as follows : Chuck Carlson Present Ben, Nix Present ;Percy Hiatt Present ' Jerry Kiefer Present Prank Suckla Present Bette Kountz Present Irma White Present Also present were : Gary Z. Fortner, Director of Planning Tom Ilonn , Zoning Administrator Chuck Cunliffe , Assistant Zoning Administrator Kay Norton , Ai .;istant County Attorney As a quorum was present , the meeting proceeded as scheduled. The minutes of the July 18, 1978, meeL ' srg were unanimously approved. APPLICANT: 'l ati; on Paving Company CASE NU'.:3I il: SUP-365 : 78: 16 LEGAL DESCRIeTIO\: SE NE , Section 3O, and S3V4 NW :, Section 29, T2N, R68W LOCATION: 3 miles north and 1 mile east of Erie SUBJECT: Addition of Asphalt Plant and a Concrete Batch Plant Amending SUP-260 APPEARANCE : Ed McDowell and Mike hart DISCUSSION: This application was continued from the Planning Commission meeting on July 18 , 1978, for any Further information to be presented. There was concern at the last meeting regarding compatibility with the surrounding area. Michael Hart stated in this regard that there is a parcel of land on the south side of Road 16l and on the west side of Boulder Creetc that is zoned Industrial. There was also concern about the potential impn."t of the mini,, operation and the difference of the impacts rega: ding air quality of the area. Dr. George McVeel then gave an extensi\ report of his investigation of the air quality as it now exists in the arca and what the effects would be of the sand and gravel alone. llc stated i-to t as the operation exists now the air quality is relatively good at the present tiai: with the exception of some particul ate Latter such as dust and small amounts of other pollutants from oil and gas ' c, l 1 s in the are•i and from automobiles . The impacts of the sand and €'- rave. operation alone will produce some particulate matter as will tin, asphalt and concrete plant . He stated that the impacts wi 1 I be -r,:' I 1 in the long-run and on the average there will actually be a redus � io❑ of the amount of particular released into the air. Discus.-,ion followed regarding how many employees would be involved with the operation . There will be approximately 15 persons involved according to Ed Mclowell . Mr. Kiefer asked if the material mined five miles upstream isbrought to the plant or will the asphalt and concrete plant use only the material that is on Fite. Mr. McDowell stated that the material is hauled back to Boulder and is processed further upstream in an asphalt plant there and used in Boulder. The concrete plant in Boulder l:r s2ntly has it,, own source of material where it is located . No ma rtal _from these .sites would be hauled to the proposed ' Planning Commissic Minutes I Page 2 ' August 1, 1078 plants and would be very uneconomical . Discussion followed where the majority of the material will be processed. Torn I? • aer then expressed his opposition to the proposal by stating that Lh( non-particulate emissions would be trapped because the proposal is in a valley and there would also be an increase of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons because of the increased traffic and dust . Helen Bryant stated that her father owned the property that is zoned industrial and had no intention of having an industrial operation on the land. At this time the slide presentation was again shown for the benefit of Mrs. Kountz that was prepared by surrounding property owners opposed to the proposal. Mrs. Kountz was not present for the previous Planning Commission hearing. Other persons expressing opposition because of incompatibility with the area , dust , noise , and pollution included : Ken Neuens , Dale and Lynn Johnson , John True, Mike Shaw, Carol Bultaup , Howard Rasmussen , Sandy True , Mrs. Saudee and Doris Saudee. Lucy Stromquist , also a surrounding property owner, was concerned about the possible decrease of food production and Helen Nelson read some statistics which stated that there is 44 miles of surrounding property of which 1. 75 miles and 4101 acres represent those opposing the site and 2', miles and 960 acres which represent those who have no oUjection to the proposal . Mr. Nix raised the concern of the possible conflict of intc rest in knowing Mr. Milton Nelson„ No member on the Board felt it necessary for Mr. Nix to abstain from voting. Tom llonn then read the conditions that were to be subject to the staff ' s tcconamendation into the record. Chairman Carlson asked for clarification as to whether it was County Road 3 or . A . Toga Henn stated that the memo from ; .ic' County Engineer ' s Office refers to it as County Road 3. Discussion followed regarding alternate routes. It was decided the County Commissioners should make this final decision . MOTION: be it thereFore resolved to recommend approval with the Development Standard - using County Road 3 as the alternate route to the Board of County Commissioners with the County Commissioners to make the final dccis ?o, ) riling alternate routes . Motion by Frank Suckla, seconded by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Frank S.,ckla , Percy Hiatt and Bette Kountz. A vote of "no" was cast by Jerry Kiefer and Irma White. Motion carried 5 to 2. Each ,number v :ms then requested by John ,:outchens regarding clarification of hy each Planning Commission member voted the way they did -which each member did as requested. APPLICANT: Char',Charle Igobday CASE N UMI;L l t : Z-301 : 78 : 8 LEGAL DESCUIPT1ON: E ', E NE; , Section 6; Pt . SE , Section 20, and Pt . E , Section 31, T2N, R65W LOCATION : 2', miles' wes t of Hudson SUBJECT : Change of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "B"' Business District APPEARANCE : Don Drawer DISCUSSION: This application was tabled from the Planning Commission meetin-, on July 5 , 1978, for a field trip and further information regarding the history of what has occurred to date. Chuck Cunliffe also brought the Planning Commission up-to-date as to what has occurred Planning Commissic Minutes Page August 1 , 1978 to date. Discussion followed regarding what had happened at various points of time. Mr. Kiefer asked if there was a time table at all . Mr. Drawer responded there was not. Mt's . While stated she was not convinced the proposal was feasib: e with no water and no assurance it will ,be carried out . Mr. Kiefer asked if there was a certain time table to carry this out and have everything in order. Mr. Drawer responded there was not . Mr. Drawer also commented in regard to the staff ' s recommendation that he felt this would be of benefit to the county. Also stated that Mr. and Mrs. Earl Riley were opposed to this because they thought County Road 16 would be an access road, but Mr. Drawer assured them they do not want it to be an access. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to deny the application based on the staff ' s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners with the deletion of the Last quoted paragraph and Reason rt72 of the staff ' s recommends ion and the last sentence of the recommendation . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Irma White. .', vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, an .l Irma White. Mocion carried. APPLIC. :T: Rric Water and Sanitation District CASE NUMBI,R: SUP-3G7 : 78: 19 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Pt . SE? NW , Section 6 , T1N, 86819 LOCATION: i ' miles north of Erie SUBJECT : Wastewater Treatment Plant APPEARANCE : Keith 13,11 DISCUSSION, : This proposal is to serve the community of Erie and is ,t designed to accommodate the anticip' ted future growth of Erie and to \ meet the effluent standards of the Weld County Health Department , the e Colorado i)c:partnuent of health and the '',PA. The plant will employ a ‘ maximum of three persons. The noise level will be relatively low for ; the type of equipment which will be used and will be housed within the tl building. fhe activated sludge process is being utilized to minimize ti odors . There will be some odor, but will be very slight . This ; particular sight was chosen because of gravity flow, is not subject to floodng, is isolated from housing, and is down wind of prevailing \ winds . Liscussio . ,hen followed rc :,rdin€; the selection of the site . 1 Tom Honr rc : d the :staff' s fecommendation to continue t 'he hearing to I August. 13 , 1J78. Crai rman Carlson then called for comments from the audience. At this time Virginia Thurman asked who will be served if ' the proposal is granted and requested more information regarding the odor. Joyce Roes expressed concern regarding the potential for 1, flooding , :ird also staled that she had received a let ter from the Town Clerk of Fie w'hi c,1 stated there was gravel at the site . Mr. Bell later con„r..e„ted there was no gravel at all at this site. Carol Bultha;rp \\\.expressed concern with odor, Shirley Koch expressed concern about flooding as dtd Russell Rees. Mr. Bell stated that the 500, 000 per hallo per day plant will serve a population equivalent of 5, 000 people. However, this is approximate because the water will also serve industrial uses , schools , restaurants , etc. I)i Scussion followed regarding the configura ien of the land and the number of houses invovled along Colorado 52. No further discussion . ' Planning Commissio linutes Page 4 August. 1, 1978 • I MOTION : Be it therefore resolved to continue the meeting to August 15,\L 1978 , based on the staff 's recommendation. Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Irma White. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma ,White. Motion carried. i APPLICANT: Terry Bird CASE NUMBER: CUP-33 : 78 :2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SW , Section15, T6N, R67W LOCATION: mile east of Windsor on the north side of Colo. Highway 52 SUBJECT: Church APPEARANCE : Terry Bird DISCUSSION: This proposal is for a church and a residence on the site. Mr. Bird explained that the residence will be used for temporary worship for approximrtely one year and then if they have adequate membership a sanctuary will be built on the south side of the residence. The residence no ' is almost, complete with the exception of inside work yet to be uonf_ . Thu ground around the home has been raised to 24" with adequate drainage for irrigation water and surface water onto a tile covered area south of the location . There being no questions at this time , Chuck Cunliffe "cad the staff ' s recommendation for approval and the Dr,velopment Standards. Chuck Carlson asked what septic system would be used. Cluck Cunliffe responded it would be an engineering design( d system de , igned with the bproval of the Weld County Health Department , John Ihail confirmed this by stating that the system is an evapotranspiration sealed system and has been approved by the Weld County Health Departi ,ort . Mr. Nix expressed concern with how close the water table was to the surface . Mr. Bird responded it was about 4 feet . No further discussio'i . MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval based on the staff ' s recommendat ' on with the Development Standards to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Irma White , seconded by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" was cast. by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Matt , Bette Kountz , and Irma White. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Roger Vermeer CASE NI'Y3i : SLP-36d : 78 : 18 LEGAL DESCItIPTIC;; : Pt . N'I , Section 6, T8N, R67W LOCATION: 8 mil( ,:cyst of Nunn adjacent to Larimer County Line SUBJECT: Hog GPOrai. i on APPEAI<<10E : Roger Vermeer DISCUSSION: Mr. 'vormeer stated that he presently owns a hog operation in Minnesota and has been looking for some Lime to find an area more conducive ; o raising hogs than Minnesota as Minnestota gets a lot or snow and aipL .o% I . ,.itrly six months of winter. They have now found this area which is salted to their operation and situation and is relatively isolated. 51 acres are im,olved and will probably be for feeder pigs only- unless there is a demond for finishing them. 200 sows are presently proposed. There is a well on the property and a permit for a second well has been received. There being no questions or comments at this time, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff ' s recommendation for approval with the Development ;tat rtarcis . No further di ;cussion. MOTION : 13e it therefore resolved to recommend approval with the Develop- ment Standards to 4e Board of County Commissioners based on the staff ' s recommendation . notion by Percy Hiatt , seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote Planning Commissio [inutes Page 5 August 1, 11)78 of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried. APPLICANT: James Bishop CASE NUMBER: S-138 :77: 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SEA- , Section 30, T3N, R68W LOCATION: 3 miles south and 2 miles west of Mead immediately north of Union Reservoir (Calkins Lake) SUBJECT: Final Plat - Calkins Lake Subdivision APPEARANCE : James Bishop DISCUSSION: This proposal was begun approximately one year ago to create six 2 to 3 acre sites facing the lake. Longs Peak had given Mr. Bishop a water commitment , but since the drought occurred last year they with- drew the com,nitmen An alternate source was sought for water. A commercial well permit was then issued to him by the stale temporarily. The County Planning Staff preferred to have a permanent well permit . An augmentation plan was then filed with the State Court and received final approval for the well and the augmentation plan . A problem has now arisen with the Weld County Health Departmen regarding the water source and supply . The Health Department prefers zo have the developer . - 7ide the \,'.r;.ter reatment center rather than on an individual basis . [ is,',ol: will have this hcanged ' n the plat . Water quality must be appro%a l r • both th State and Coici .y Health Departments. There being no questice- ac, ;his time, Tom Hone read the staff ' s recommendation for continuing Lee bearing. Mr. Bishop then stated that the water testing system for water quality is quite expensive, however they will proceed with this if necessary, Mr. Bishcu is quite anxious to get approval as this final plat process has taken a year 's time, John Hall stated he can do nothi .,g until approval is received by the State Health Department. Discussion lolluwed. MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to continue the hearing based on the staff ' s re. o' nendation . Motion by Len Nix, seconded by Jerry Kiefer. A vote of "a.,. e" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer , Percy Hiatt , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried. APPLICANT : Lyle Picraux CASE 1NLMT3ER: VI-72 : 77 :20 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1., . SW?1, Section 32 , T1N, R68W LOCATION: 3 miles west of I-25 on the north side of Colorado State high' ay 7 SUIIUECT : Builder ' s supply yard and office in the Agricultural Zone District APPEARANCE : Lyle P l c;rn ux DISCUSSION: Cathy Ca . t ';r, Zoning Violation Inspector, read the report on the property hr eging the Planning Commission up-to-date regarding what has occurred so Or. Mr. Picraux stated that he has an applica; 1O11 for a change of . one ,d also has new drawings made for t th cs property to meet the requi ruct;ea ; h) c the original change of zone request . This applie- t_ion Lad been denied at a previous Planning Commission meeting. Chuck Cuni , t fe states{ he was not aware that Mr. Picraux was working on a new npLl r c'iLion .:s neither l-,c or Tom llonn had spoke with Mr. Picraux. Mr. Picraux thee said that his office personnel had contacted the office and requested that an application form be sent which was done. Mr. Cunliffe also stated that he would suggest that Mr. Picraux be given 30 days to submit the chan;:;u of zone application and if not received by • Planning Connnissio linuLos Page 6 August 1 , 1975 September 1 , 1978 , the matter would be taken to the County Commissioners for legal action . Mr. Carlson said he felt this was reasonable. MOTION : Be it there fore resolved h,, recommend that Mr. P i craux be given 30 days to submit a change . . ,aic application to Lhe Planning Office by September 1 , 1978. If not received by that date the matter will be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for legal action. Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" was cast bY _Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix , Jerry Kiefer, Frank Suckla, Percy Hiatt , Irma ihite , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Larry and Carol Nelson CASE NUMBER: VI- 7 : 78 : 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . NW , Section 30, T3N, I168W LOCATION: 2 miles south and 2 miles west of Mead SUBJECT: Construction yard in the Estate Zone District APPEARANCE : Charles Saxton DISCUSSION : Cathy Carter, Zoning Violation Inspector, stated that some very recent developments had occurred since her report was prepared for the meeting_ `:tie did read the report into the record regarding tale violation to bring the Planning Commission up-to-rate. Subsequent to this report being prepared, Cathy Carter received a phone call from Mr. Chuck Saxton , attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Larry Nelson . Lr.. Nelson has this date hand del ivered a copy of the October, 1972 letter referred to in Cathy Carter 's Summary Report . Cathy Carter indicated that Bob 1,.ams , '.ho wrote the October, 1972 , letter was present and available for gno;;1 ions regarding his recollection of this matter in the past . Copic s of said 1eti cc were handed out to the Planning Commission members . Cathy Carter further stated that several letters have been ceived in i ne Planning Office by i he( resi dents of Seemore Heights that are in favor of Mr. and Mrs . Nelson oo' ration . A phone Gall was received jai- t prior to this hearing by Cu c.hy Carter from a complain inn person in :emore Heights who stressed their concern about this excavating OUs iness continuing. Chuck Saxton, at this time said that witnesses are pre,-'c:nt at this meeting who can testily to the fact that Mrs . Neson Nn:; given assurance in 1972 that the present use of the property was within the law and they could core; inue it . There were also several persons in attendance who do not thin ; the use of the proper: 1 , obno•;ious to their use of the property , Negotiations have been made ; L h i u time . Kay Norton then stated t '.a ,- in a meeting with Mr. Bob Adanis of the Planning Department Mr. Adams did in fact tell the Nelson ' s in 172 they could operate their business as a family operated business ender 'c, home occupation section of the Zoning Resolution . At tl.i -. point .ir . Norton sag,rested that the best settle- ment would be to got precise inioimation on the operation as it is now and to ar- e that he operation will not be changed or expanded in any duality or (I suit i y I rote this day forward. Mr. Nelson stated that there would probably not be any equipment there if it were not for vandalism when the equipment : stored elsewhere. Cathy Carter suggested that the documentation o , equipment at present by the Nelson ' s be very well itemized and sut^.nitted to the Planning Office so t 'aat it does not increase ant1 they can keep track of it . Mr. Sant,. . stated that it would be submitted within two \reeks. sq Planning Commissior lnutes Page 7 August 1 , 1978 MOTION: Be it therefore resolved that the use be allowed to continue as it exists as of August 1, 1978 , and that: Mr. Nelson will submit an agreement between Wu 1d County and the Nelson 's to include an inventory and full description of the operation and will not be allowed to expand or change it iii any way . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Percy Hiatt , Jerry Kiefer, Frank Suckla, Irma White , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried. After some discussion among the Planning Commission members regarding re-hearing the Lee Wieck change of zone application , it was decided they would '1u: in hear the change of zone application. Motion by Frank Suckla , secon:lc.1 by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Bon Nix, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Frank Suckla, Irma White and Bette, '(,)untz. Motion carried. There being no further business , the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submi led, Shirley A . , h ill t ra Planning Commission Secretary /sap ^ c .�1 ' Date: _ -',ugust 15, 1978 CASE NUMBER: SUP-367: 78: 19 NAME: Erie Water and Sanitation District REQUEST: Wastewater Treatment Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SE* NW*, Section 6 , T1N, R68W LOCATION: 14 miles north of Erie The Department of Planning Services staff is unable to reach a recommendation on this request . The basis for the staff ' s inability to formulate a recommendation is that we are not fully satisfied that the proposed use will or will not be compatible with the surrounding area and is or is`not in harmony with the character of the neighborhood and existing agricultural uses. In addition , the staff is unable to determine what effect the proposed use will have on the immediate area. Section 3. 3.E.2. and 3 . of the Weld County Zoning Resolution states : "The Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners s'_iall consider the following in making their determination in approving or denying a special use permit : Compatibility with the surrounding area, harmony with the character of the neighborhood and existing agricultural uses, need for the proposed use, its effect upon the immediate area, its effect on future development of the area and the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the county. " "Before a permit for a special use is issued, the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners shall determine through public hearings, that the following plans, methods and studies, which shall accompany the application for a special use permit , provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. " Erie Water and Sanil ion District SUP-367: 78 : 19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION August 15, 1978 The following information which incorporates referrals and staff ' s evaluation to date is provided to aid the Planning Commission in consideration of this request. 1. The proposed site location of the wastewater treatment plant is located within the service area defined by the 201 Waste- water Facilities Plan and the defined land use plan map on the Erie Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Town Board of Erie has recommended approval of this request . 3. The Colorado Water Conservation Board has indicated that the nucleus of the proposed wastewater plant facilities will be protected from the inundation of the 100-year flood. 4. The Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District has set forth no objections to this request . 5. The Colorado Department of Health has set forth no objections to this request . They have recommended that the design of the plant should include sufficient capacity to accept septic tank pumpings from the area. 6. The Colorado Geological Survey has set forth no objections to this request . They have indicated, with regard to the mineral resources underlying the site, that it is apparently not economically viable and find it difficult to justify the conservation of these gravels. 7. The Boulder County Planning Department has indicated that this request is in basic conformance with previous plans . 8. The Weld County Engineering Department has set forth no objections to this request. 9. The Colorado Division of Water Resources has indicated that a dependable drinking water supply will be available to the site. 10. The Weld County Health Department has indicated in a letter dated July 17, 1978, the following: "Although this department concurs with the need for Erie' s Wastewater Treatment Plant , we cannot recommend approval of the proposed site due to its close proximity to Westview Estates residential area (approximately 500 feet to nearest residence) . Erie Water and Sanii ion District SUP-367: 78: 19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION August 15, 1978 Paragraph 4. 1, Criteria Used in the Review of Waste- water Treatment Facilities published by the Colorado Department of Health in June, 1973, states: . . . a sewage treatment plant site should be as far as feasible from any present built-up area or any area which will probably be built- up within a reasonable future period. " Therefore, we respectfully propose another site be selected with emphasis on separation from existing and proposed residential development . " 11 . Our office, to date, has received 7 letters and 1 petition with 51 signatures from surrounding property owners and people in the immediate area who oppose the approval of this request . ERIE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIAL USE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1. Permitted uses on the hereon described Special Use Permit area shall be a 500, 000 gallon per day wastewater treatment plant with associated maintenance and administrative facilities . Major facilities shall be limited to those as shown hereon. 2. All phases of the wastewater treatment plant facilities and operations shall conform with all applicable County, State and Federal Health Standards and Regulations and any other applicable rules and regulations of governmental bodies having jurisdiction on the premises . 3, All phases of the operation must conform to maximum permissible noise levels as stated in 25-12-103, CRS, 1973. 4. The Special Use Permit area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust and growth of noxious weeds. The site shall be maintained in such a manner as to present a neat and well kept appearance. 5, No strucutres or facilities used in the processing of sewage shall be permitted closer than 350 feet to the south Special Use Permit boundary. All structures shall comply with the minimum setback requirements as defined in Section 3 . 14 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 6. Lighting provided for security and night operation on the site shall be designed so that the lighting will not adversely affect surrounding property owners. 7. All accesses shall have the approval of the Weld County Engineering Department . All accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations and/or requirements of the Boulder County Engineering Department . 8. There shall be no discharge of wastes into any streams, other bodies of water, or adjacent drainage systems without obtaining a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit from the Colorado Department of Health. 9. All design and construction shall conform to the Weld County Building Code. ,,_ 10. The site shall be enclosed with a 6 foot high chain link fence. c 11. Signs warning the public that the site is a wastewater treatment facility shall be placed on all sides of the facility. All warning signs shall be of sufficient size to be read at a distance of 200 feet. 12. Landscaping shall be in accordance with the recorded landscape plan. Erie Water and Sanitation District shall be responsible for replacing all dead trees with a similar species of equal size and/or height . 13. The Special Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment to the Special Use Permit by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Develop- ment Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services . Date : - Igust 1 . 1978 CASE NUMBER: SUP-367:78 : 19 NAME: Erie Water and Sanitation District REQUEST: Wastewater Treatment Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SE* NW*, Section 6, T1N, R68W LOCATION: 14 miles north of Erie THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE continued FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that there is insufficient evidence available to fully evaluate this application in regard to its compatibility with the surrounding area, harmony with the character of the neighborhood and existing agricultural uses, its effect upon the immediate area, its effect upon the future development of the area, and the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the county. This determination is based on : 1. On Page 3 of the submitted application materials under Description of Proposed Operation, the applicant has stated: "The entire site will be landscaped with special consideration being given to the south boundary of the proposed site to buffer it from the area zoned for residential use. " It is the opinion of the staff that the applicant has not adequately addressed the landscaping issue with respect to buffering the site from adjacent residential uses . The Department of Planning Services staff requests clarification of the proposed landscaping and its effectiveness to buffer the site from the adjacent residential uses to the south. 2. The Weld County Engineering Department in a memo dated July 24, 1978, has indicated that no information regarding how site drainage will be handled has been supplied. In addition, the Engineering Department has stated that : "The grading plan indicates a fill to elevate the plant site above the 100-year flood elevation but no cut is shown on the plan. If the fill matter is to be acquired on site it should be indicated and care taken to avoid creating drainage problems on adjacent property. " Erie Water and Sani— ,ion District SUP-367 :78: 19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION August 1, 1978 The applicant should submit additional information to adequately address the Engineering Department ' s concerns . 3. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the submitted information in the application does not adequately explain the wastewater treatment process or types and operation of equipment . The staff is requesting a more detailed description of the activated sludge process proposed to be utilized at the site. This description should include information on wastewater treatment processing equipment and use areas including its design, its functional part of the process, and its effects in producing air and water pollution, odor, noise , glare, fire or other safety hazards. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the application be continued until the Augusut 15, 1978, Planning Commission meeting to allow the above requested info- rmation to be submitted by the applicant . The information should be submitted by August 8, 1978, to the Department of Planning Service in order for the staff to evaluate it by the above set Planning Commission date. Further, it is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the Planning Commission should conduct an on-site inspection of the proposed wastewater treatment plant prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. • If Id 6 r� } F \ ng Cc1R411 MEMOS S OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1rr-77477, n [ EP11978JjU PHONE. (303) 356-4000 EXT. 200 P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 OGREELEY. COLO. • COLORADO August 21, 1978 Erie Water and Sanitation District P. 0. Box 386 Erie, Colorado 80516 Gentlemen: Your request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT for a wastewater treatment plant has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Weld County Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is part of the Nb of Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the botton of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedure will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing twice in the legal newspaper, which expenses must be paid by you before the hearing day. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by September 11, 1978. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Ed Dunbar, Chairman rjk I wish to have a hearing on this matter with the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising as noted above. i /- 1/,"Pion i T tle: Erie Water and Sanitation District t w • SENDER• Complete items 1,2,and i o Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on ( CL��lr C�I �I_i f` ^�1HL 5 reverse. m f'-ITT:':• C:I.:UPIIG::::,::::;._;- -t-00 1. The following service is requested (check one).. ,,.�� i ; i Show to whom and date delivered 25 (Soo Rsvaras) O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 4541 it s so-TO—- - RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Erie Water & Sanitation! °i Show to whom and date delivered 85 District ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. P. 0. Box 386 Show to whom,date,and address of delivery ..$1.05 r § u (Fees shown are in addition to postage charges and other Erie, Co. —80516 fees). r,c_ s 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: ` —� c_RT-' T 1 C Erie Water & Sanitation District l' :_- , _ " ,, , m — C P. 0. Box 386 C . z �v m Erie, Colo. 80516 ;: n 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: i ri I5 ^ REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. = 1;a " =ATE i15 a xi 637400 f A'•oA SSG e a a i n ,',_.f w rn f2 - 'j,T•`!,.:0"A',J DATE uni (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) a I E - „ • 't STri tTES C zI have received the article described above. O a J` I. ^' mo SIGNATURE 0 Addressee 0 Authorized agent A +1iI= s To :ATE MD ) Irt_6ES iGTITatt.-dV Z N r - TOTAl PCSTAC:AND FEES $ m• 4. DATE OF DELIVERY �POSTMARI(r> a CC3T?AF:CC7DATC C. ?) �� 1 G 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if request ,I ,, b <I 8/21/78 Pi "' 1 c ' 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: N.'7 1CLERK S p ---)N4TTALS v SUP (Hearing Drawer) Y F— . * GOP 1976-O-203 456 , ,HI ,E ! t )I H ' HNING SERVICE PHONE 13031356-4000 EXT 40-, 015 10TH STREE f (,REELE Y,COLORADO 80631 0 tJc COL® AD•' June 26 , 1978 Erie Water and Sanitation District P.O. Box 386 Erie , Colorado 80516 RE: Request for a Special Use Permit for a wastewater treatment plant on a parcel of land described as Part of the SE4 of the NW* of Section 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th p.m. , Weld County, Colorado Gentlemen : Your application and related materials for the above described request are complete and in order. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for August 1, 1978, at 1: 30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the , County Commissioners hearing room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you; c and/or a representative be there to answer any questions the Planning e Commission might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town lying within three miles of the property in question . There- fore, I have forwarded a copy of the materials submitted to the Town of Erie for their review and comment . According to our records , the Erie Planning Commission should review and comment on your application on July 6, 1978. Please contact the Town Clerk at 449-3085 for further details on the Town of Erie Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respe tfully, - \i'a 0 .'„,. „AA,„av LAI,e,3 Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator CC:sap cc : James P. Smith ) Ray and Associates, Inc. 2950 Pearl Street Boulder, Colo t•Ddo 80:301_ y 0 SENDER Complete item; 1,2,and', "- - " ' - -„ Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on Sreverse. " _ _ - 1. The following service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered 25$ + \ ., I z ` � ~ -Show to whom,date,&address of delivery ..., Sd Yr � 1 RESTRICTED DELIVERY. 85d i '� °y\�� 1 O, Show to whom and date deliveredJ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. �o SlA7. H\'\,••C:C:J= C Show to whom,date,and address of delivery ..$1.05 '`LC )�� ' N, A (Fees shown are in addition to postage charges and other y,c', <.c fees). =,.7 C! 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: - C � ` 2 \1 "'a' Izt m m I n 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: - ' m C REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. ? „ m J i C: rn rn (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) t U 7'_ — a m I have received the article described above. 01 ' . 5 •,� C y mm SIGNATURE 0 Addressee O Authorized agent 'J_ i_''_` -_ —f cso TOTALPIILTAC^A�:DI =3 _ Z a) POSTriA�Y OR DATE `C 27 4. DATE OF DELIVERY / p6%la1ARK ., O 11 Q Y D = • a Z• 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) e a qq A v �T U F• 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: LTIALSERK'S K 0 Z D ✓ * GOP 137.-0-203-456 A IC " 4 i IA Mountain Bell I R. K.Timothy 931 Fourteenth Street President Denver,Colorado 80202 Phone(303) 624-4344 ' August 9, 1978 Mr. Sam E. Little 5263 Buffalo Road Erie, Colorado 80516 Dear Mr. Little: This is in reply to your letter which you wrote in behalf of the citizens of Westview Estates. I'm sorry to learn that so many of you are dissatisfied with your telephone service and want to promise that we will do all that we possibly can to correct it. t This will not, however, include the extension of Denver metropolitan service to your area. Let me explain why this is not possible. When we developed the service in 1965 we expected it would be of great benefit to both our customers and Mountain Bell. To be very candid, Mr. Little, it was a financial disaster for us, and we are still suffering from the effects of it upon our operations. As a result, we do not want to further expand this service. Equally important, we have been ordered by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission not to expand it, not in Denver or anywhere in the state. So this must be considered a closed issue. The alternative suggestion I have for those customers needing extended calling privileges is to subscribe to "metro pack" service. This allows 60 minutes of conversation to all of the cities and communities within a 30-mile radius for a monthly charge of $5.65. Additional minutes are charged at a rate of nine cents each. This service is available immediately and can be installed for any customer wishing it. In your area we are presently providing four-party service to all customers. If this class of service is not completely satisfactory and you or others would like a one- or two-party type service, we will be happy to see if it can be provided. Please contact our manager, Mr. Jerry Hall, 776-8340, and he will check our facilities . I'm sure you realize that there would be an increase in your monthly rate for either of these services. Mr. Sam E. Little Page Two August 9, 1978 There was an inference, though not a clear statement, that the quality of your present service is not satisfactory. We checked the records for all customers listed and found very little trouble had been reported. We are certainly capable of keeping your service in good repair. If you or any of the others have a service problem which has not been corrected or should you have troubles in the future, please notify repair service immediately by calling 494-0020. I pledge prompt and corrective action. I can't possibly explain clearly and in complete detail why we can' t serve you with the type of service you want and need. But Mr. Hall can and would welcome an opportunity to meet with you as a group whenever it is convenient. If this would be of interest to your group, please contact Mr. Hall. I can assure you he will be eager to cooperate. Thanks for serving as a correspondent for your group and for giving me an opportunity to discuss this briefly. We look forward to another opportunity to meet with you and responding in greater detail. Sincerely, '014 15 70,-,,? `,\2 co 'sLo AUG /8 �l� �� JdgImitate '�� . u % la • Ray&Associates,Inc. August 7, 1978 Mr. Gary Z. Fortner Weld County Planning Director 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re : SUP-367; 78;19 Erie Water & Sanitation District Dear Mr. Fortner: Wastewater Treatment Plant In response to the Department of Planning Services staff comments to the above referenced Special Use Application, said response dated August 1, 1978, the following supplemental infor- mation is hereby provided. 1. Landscaping. A copy of the proposed landscaping plan is attached hereto. Please note on the landscaping plan that a combination of ever- green, and deciduous plant materials have been used to screen all process basins and activities from surrounding property. Plantings surrounding the Administration/Control Building are such that the building lines will be softened and cause the structure to blend into the natural site. Please note that the landscaping is not of the continual barrier type, but rather has been planned to screen the facilities while providing a natural appearance. Plant mater- ials have been selected to provide a variety of texture and color while minimizing maintenance. The selection of plant materials has also been governed by the angles and relative elevations of the proposed facility to the surrounding properties. Lower growing more dense types of vegetation have been selected for use on the southern end of the site where the ground level is at relatively the same elevation as the site and the sight distances to the facility are shorter. On the north and northeasterly portions of the site larger species of trees have been used since the ground rises to the northeast thereby necessitating taller vegetation. In all cases more rapidly growing varieties of plant materials have been used. Mr. Gary Z. Fortne August 7, 1978 Page Two Native grasses will be used on the majority of the site in order to minimize irrigation requirements. These grasses will consist of buffalo grass for areas surrounding the treatment basins where pedestrian and light vehicular traffic are required and either crested wheat or brome in those areas which are not required to be used during normal operation and maintenance pro- cedures of the facility. Sod and plant materials requiring irrigation will be used only in the immediate vicinity of the Administration/Control Building. 2. Site Grading. The top elevation of all process basins will be constructed above the 100-year floodplain elevation. Excavation from the process basins will be used to berm up around the process basins and around the Control Building. All excess excavation from the construction will be used in this berm, however there is no inten- tion of borrowing materials from the site in order to further ex- tend the berms. In general the existing site will be left untouched as regards site grading. A site grading plan has been prepared with the final contours shown. 3. Wastewater Treatment Process Equipment and Operation. The design of the facility has incorporated that treatment process and equipment selection to reduce noise, operational traffic and odors to the absolute minimum. The treatment process is totally aerobic thereby precluding the formation of hydrogen sulfide and other gasses which produce noxious odors which are generally associated with wastewater treatment plants. The aeration system selected is that which provides that all noise generating equipment be placed within the Administration/Control Building. The process design and process basin sizing have been approved by EPA and The Colorado Department of Health as prescribed by regulations. A specific step by step description of the process and its operation is as follows . A. Headworks. The headworks includes flow measuring and grit removal equipment. The sewage enters the headworks, passes through a Parshall flume which measures the incoming flow and transmits a signal to the control room for monitoring. The Parshall flume is a continuous flow-through device with no retention of the sewage. The sewage then flows into an aerated grit chamber which washes and re- moves the grit, which would be damaging to plant equipment, from the sewage. The grit is collected and removed from the site for deposition at an approved landfill. From this point the sewage is sent to the aeration basin. B. Aeration Basin. The aeration basin has a detention time of approximately eight hours, during which time the sewage is aerated by diffused air. The diffused air is provided by blowers located in the Control Building which is blown through underground pipes to the aeration basins at which point it is passed through fine-bubble ' Mr. Gary Fortner August 7, 1978 Page Three diffusers located within the basin. Swing-arm diffusers which allow for the removal from the basin of a selected number of dif- fusers at a time preclude malfunctions which would result in shutting down of the aeration basin. Backup blowers are provided so that malfunction in equipment can immediately be corrected by shifting to the backup blower. After the sewage has been retained in the aeration basin for the prescribed time it is withdrawn on a continual basis and sent to the clarifiers. C. Clarifiers. The clarifiers are in essence stilling basins in which the activated sludge (nonliquid materials) settles to the bottom of the basin. Two clarifiers have been provided so that operation is continuous in event of a malfunction of the clarifier mechanism in one clarifier. The sludge removed from the clarifier is sent partially back to the aeration basin for re- circulation and partially to the digester with the particular per- centage split being dependent upon operational parameters. D. Digester. The digesters operate in an identical fashion to the aeration basins, but will have coarse-bubble diffusers as opposed to the fine-bubble diffusers used in the aeration basins. The sludge materials will be retained in the digester for up to 15 days under continuous aeration. The digester operation results in near total stabilization of the waste materials. The sludge will be removed from the digester periodically with the frequency of removal dependent on plant flows, weather, etc. , and will be wasted to the sludge drying beds. E. Sludge Drying Beds. The sludge drying beds are essentially sand/gravel filters in which the liquids drain from the waste sludge and return to the front end of the plant. The stabilized sludge will be air dried and removed for use as soil conditioners or wasted to an approved sanitary landfill if sludge quantities exceed the demand used for soil conditioning purposes. F. Chlorine Contact Chamber. The liquid portion of the activated sludge sent to the clarifier will pass over the effluent weir, be chlorinated and will be retained in the chlorine contact basin for 30 minutes prior to discharge to the receiving stream. G. Administration/Control Building. The Administration/ Control Building will house the laboratory, maintenance shop, garage, emergency generator, recirculation pumps and the air blowers. I believe this letter provides that information requested and addresses those comments in the previously referenced document. If additional information is required, please do not hestitate to call. p,567 Very truly yours, CU 7978 cc IV Keith L. Bell, P.E. pfd en KLB/mf (--1 nave paced�o®� Enclosures 42c' FIELD C]IECK FILING NUMBER: soap © ici DATE OF INSPECTION: `Ap11E! NAME: ., \,`(� V.�' '0 V/c , �� u' k 6 REQUEST: a,5) r- Vj` ?,`e rVVCSVtf»--t'', A-' VQ 'd,fi LEGAL DESCRIPTION. V.L 4 ‘i44. I,-) 4 t a v.l v LAND USE : N V\ .4 0 a E *If“,t_AS"r6t.% S Sk,C'Ota:AAivAc:,_,% .,‘„, 4 v(v.s.„'V ._.D k,:",\ICI G ,ZONING: N `� ,t-KA E-- LOCATION: 1 V4. a‘ E tki,-.q?1V ,. \"NbV Afl cil S - - W ,• �J COMMENTS : ke:Yrkji: or 0 a/5,;AN .,4,, I %0-0 rte\ kl,i`a-. ` Y o �[00 ' ok-e4,s ..Q 6 Su % ,,,,__ ., `sic , Vv., v,o ov,,, e--&%V s'% k_9,, 4, (US-V a%42/2,..-„,. ? n V Nc;____) VeAo,„\ efA4,14-4,,v 5_ . A- n BY: t __nr - . •ie ' 9 I riiiiir * t;l i nl U;;I, I'I Rhl l 'I gym(' FLOW SHEET APPLICANT: t��, •,)Oft1 v --- Ott c:n,SI.; //SAO) ' -- ).REQUEST: > ;% -d ;yv,\N-N ' to It v� ..3 -- — LEGAL: 14 Sr_ VW* , t;,,I 1 6 113\3 cia*ail g 6' 1., r, e60.\ 'w). : 114 r:\Um rwif-V -t DATE BY P Application Received ,�iV ��'% `` i\ 10- i7 n 11 Application Fee - Receipt # NPi. � ' ) r; Recording Fee y 1 �s �� Q 1T ,...__- Application Complete �4r �-' , ', P.C. Hearing Date: '—iwi J1 D 1 ‘q�� > C0 7,73 ` , 5\ � 6 '1-1,V') r� Letter to Applicant Drafted � �23 -, a .� Referrals Listed 6L� ;' 1', Q0-' fie_-,, Field Check by D.P.S . Staff 17A? rl9, - )\" --4 File Assembled ''..,; " , \_ Referrals Mailed ` Chaindexed Notification of Applicant (01 (911 -76 �� `` JJ Surrounding Property Owners Researched ILJI (911 -76 %,dO, Airphoto/Vicinity Map Preapred (OJ (9(0 i -7e 1J Property Owners Notified by : ,?___A b ' , Agendas Mailed by: 117_,-% 1 A (ttb ' ,-, 'I Legal Approved by County Attorney VLI 1 '1,a Referrals - Complete NI !I -' 10; * ' Preliminary D.P.S . Staff Comments 7 3' I lb \iNce Staff Conference /r c- ,V 0 t9 D.P.S . Comments _ �j1i (�� '' '�- , \�;\\�,V�_� ,\j -t.\,,-.\,,C_-..\\. s.4 -\\:t:-) -) -C, . P.C. Hearing Action : c �.� � ' . Ali I'M V-INV_- P.C. Resolution -\ ' C% Case Sent to Clerk to Board v/\(DJ12 C C - C.C. Hearing \ -\% ---\.c% Action : ' `, �, \ -\c % C C.C. Resolution Received --eV � History Card Complete % ,Cs % "5 C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting ' Drafted on Mylar Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder P.C. Minutes .\ \\� ' �.P I , •• O. NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning; laws of the State of Colorado and the •1d County Land Use Code, a public hearing will he held in the Chambers of the hoard of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial_ Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. A] 1 persons in any manner interested in the Special ti,e Permit are requested to at tend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning, Commission may be examined in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street , Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 78-63 Erie Water and Sanitation District P. O. Box 386 Erie, Colorado 80516 Date: October 18, 1978 Time: 2: 00 P.M. Request: Special Use Permit, Wastewater Treatment Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land lying in the NW4 of Sec. 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. ! Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said Sec. 6, T1N, R68W, thence S 00°04' 32" W, 2, 646. 31 feet to the SW corner of said NW4 of said Sec. 6; thence S 88°44 ' 39" E, 1, 532. 86 feet along the south line of said 4 section to the True Point of Beginning: thence from True Point of Beginning proceed S 88°44 ' 39" E along the south line of the NW4 of Section 6, 300. 00 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence N 22°55 ' 13" E, 962. 63 feet along said railroad right-of-way; thence N 88°44 ' 39"W, 673 . 81 feet; thence S 00°04' 32" W, 894. 82 feet to the True Point of Beginning; said described tract containing 10. 00 (+) acres. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy DATED: September 11, 1978 PUBLISHED: September 14, 1978 and October 5 , 1978 in the Johnstown /J/ . /4`/ Breeze - I (lit SW, ''; ---a,Y 4Sl.SC'Vail t� k oli NatiiL(F ',T Publ is •1 brsuant to Inc'is eing caws of the state of Colntanu any, the Weld i ounty Land I -a Coo' , public, PI BI It \OI l(F.---— h �_ ur , ,u'ems hearingChambers of'h, lioa_at of County NOM I. THF:BO ARIL OF COL N TY Commissioners of We,ti County, COMMISSIONERS Colot ado,Weld C'ount' a entennral i Yur�uant to thi zoning law of the WELD Cot NTY COLORADO . C'ente', 915 tuth Stre,t Greeley, Coot ado,at the Bine specified ified 11 `state of Colorado an i the Weld BY MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN et.t:n5 in ant, eain;: 'fiterests el Count,/ Land i se C'oce a public W ELI)COUNTY CLERK the Special i se 1 erruit ate hearing will he held in the AND RECORDER AND -requested ti, aid nt :�:d may be' ('hambe��of the Hoard of County CLERK TO THE BOARD heard Commissioners of Weld County Colorado Weld County Centennial BY Rita Jo Kummer Deputy BE IT ALSO KNOWN N not the text C'cot,r, 915 10th St^eet, Greeley and maps so t', oed m, the Aold Colorado at the time soecified All DATED September 11, 1978 County Planning C',rnm15suin person,in any manner interested p may be exam'red ill the Olfu e of n the Spe ial Use permit are PUBLISHED September 14. 1978 the Clerk to the Boa d of County requested to atteno and may be and October 5, 1978 in the Commissiariei: 7ac.,ted in the heard Johnstown Breeze Weld County Centennial Center. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text Co Legal 78-196-Clerk to Board 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Color ado and maps so certified 3y the Weld -- County Planning Commission Docke,No 1F-63 may he examined in the Office of Erie WL ter a'1 Sanitation I the Clerk to the Boar) of County District ' Commissioners, located in the P O Box 386 I Weld County Centennial Center, Erie,Cc.'orado 80516 915 10th Street Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado Date October 1' 1978 Docket No 78.63 Time' 2.00 P M I ( iKtcquest: SnecIol Use Permit,, Erie Water and Sanitation Wastewater T;,',tn, nt Plant Dist3ct LEGAL Db:SCltl,'Z,JN P O Box 386 Erie,Colorado 80516 A act of lard 1yy my ui the '1'3 j Date October 18, 1978 of setrc 6, TIN R6f t� of theN�S 6t0 1' M Weld County, Color ado ' Time 2 00 P M mare particut trly c,e'lcribrd as i follows. i Request Special Use Permit, q p Commencing at ti.° NW corner Wastewater Treatment Plant of'.aid Sec 6.'.)N I,-b55' thence S 00 degrees Ot ',2 ',, 2,646 31 teet to the SW con e':c:•','td',Mil of Said Sec. 6, �4 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION' thence e a+ 1 532 86 feet v ' - A tract of land lying in the NW i4 :,d Lt:ei.hc /`c: i of Sec 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th B;:tinnmg ., ''t 0; P M , Weld County Colorado, Bthrnce prat.cc ' I more particularly described as ;;) I; 'Llo'n, ft, follows ,�V,' of ,,.'c-.•' i:o • - ' Commencing at the NW corner tic rorth Tt at-,• y of said Sec 6,TiN,R63W,thence S II;.e'tor ofidh, n,i , Northe-a f 1; '00 degrees 04'32" 31 feet Rtht nc e T. ?5' to the SW corner of said NWi/4 of 9u2 63 ter' rer�ro id !said Sec 6, ileht-of w,.' thence S 88 degrees 44' 39" E thence is ,+ __ ' 44' 33' N. 1,532 86 feet along the south line of 673 dl feet said V.section to the True Point of thence Li 0'l rlcg•:,,, at' 32" W. Beginning 834 82 feet to the ftuc Point of thence from True Point of Beginning, Beginning proceed S 88 degrees 44' said desr.l shed ft:et containing '39' E along the south line of the 10 00 (plus of mini,] acres NW',, of Section 6, 3)0 00 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way THE 1.1O, T)OF COUNTY line of the Burlington Northern CO','.MISSIONERS !Railroad, WELD CC,LNT`1,COLORADO thence N 22 degrees 55' 13" E 1962 63 feet along said railroad BY:MARY ANN I I,LERSTF IN 'right-of-way, WELL)CC L'4TY CLERK thence N 88 degrees 44' 39" W, AND RE'C`ORDER AND 67381 feet CLERK TI)THE BOARD thence S 00 degi_e`; 04' 32" W, 894 82 feet to the True Point of BY-R'h' TcX-.-c_uer,L>eputr, Beginning, said described tract containing, DATED vt alenit" Li, 1978 -- i L HLISIIF 1 i `-e, ` - , 1°" a a d Or toher Joia,stown liiei" a Legal ; 'a- e i flax, ------ Pi BLI( \OI I( F I,, \OTK F: �I� Pur-uant to the zoning lat«of the stab, of Colorado and the Weld� County Land Use Code a public I hearing v.ill be held in the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Chambers bers of the Board of County, Commissioners of N,eld County Colorado,Weld Counts Centennial I ,i Center, lorado,lat the time Street i THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE per'ons in any manner interested; STATE OF COLORADO ) in the Special Use Permit are' ) requested to attend and may be SS. heard COUNTY OF WELD ) BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text I I, Eugene Thomas, do solemnly swear and maps so certified by the Weld that I am publisher of The Johnstown County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of Breeze, that the same is a weekly the Clerk to the Board of County I Commissioners, located in the newspaper printed,in whole or in part,and Weld County Centennial Center, ` 915 10th Street, Third Floor, published in the County of Weld, State of Greeley, Colorado Colorado, and has a general circulation Docket No 78-63 therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterrupted- ' I in said County of Weld for a Erie Water and Sanitation Y period of District I more than fifty-two consecutive weeks P O Box 386} Erie,Colorado80516 I prior to the firsi publication of the annexed Date October 18, 1978 legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the Time 2 00 P M United States mails as second-class matter Request Special Use Permit, under the provisions of the Act of March 3, Wastewater Treatment Plant 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that If said newspaper is a weekly newspaper LEGAL DESCRIPTION' duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of A tract of land lyin in the NWi/4i of Sec 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th I the laws of the State of Colorado P M , Weld County, Colorado,I more particularly described as That the annexed legal notice or follows advertisement was published in the Commencing at the NW corner regular and entire issue of every number of of said Sec 6,T1N,R68W,thence S said weekly newspaper for the period of Oo degrees 04'32" W,2,646 31 feet' to the SW corner of said NWi/4 of'' said Sec. 6; g consecutive insertions; and that the thence S 88 degrees 44' 39" E 1,532 86 feet along the south line of first publication of said notice was in the said L4 section to the True Point of , Beth nninegfrom True Point of issue of said newspaper dated-S--r± ,V. ence 1 Beginning proceed S 88 degrees 44'I 39' E along the south line of the, A.D. 19 71( , and that the last publication NW% of Section 6, 300 00 feet to, the northwesterly right-of-way; of said notice was in the issue of said line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; newspaper dated... S— ,A.D. 19 7 thence N 22 degrees 55' 13" E I 962 63 feet along said railroad In witness whereof I have he eunto set right-of-way, , thence N 88 degrees 44' 39" W,, 673 81 feet, my hand this 6.f)\ day of O thence S 00 degrees 04' 32" W,t ' 894 82 feet to the True Point of l b Beginning, A.D. 19 said described tract containing' „, uw-• of n.:, — i,•�.. I ,�fi�-�,� \�� Y „ ' THE BOARD ME COT NTY j- L� 'a'-- COMMISSIONERS i VV . . V.ELD('OI NTY COLORADOI Publisher F: BY MARY ANN FEI- RSTEIN ANDREl-NTYcRAND; Subscribed and sworn to before me a AND RECORDER ANt), CLERK TO THE BOARD Notary Public in and for the County of ' BY Rita Jo Kummer Deputy Weld,State of Colorado, this 6/4day DATED September 11 1978 PUBLISHED September 14 1978 of C � 4--) A D 19:Z ' and October 5, 1978 in the I Johnstown Breeze Co Legal 78-196-Clerk to Board J ,�uz-/ Notary Public My commission expires J-1- ' —6/ Eric ',dater and Sanilation District SUP-307 : 78 : 19 Jane 26 , 1078 (A) orado 1 Sur% ev Dave She I ton 1313 Sherman Street Room 703 Denver , Co I orado 80203 Sol 1 Conseri a : on Setv 10e II 1228 Ma in Si reet, Loll 0;111011i, , Colo rado 80501 I. State Li-12,-1 neer Dr Jeri :, Dan 101S )n Di on of [fat or Resourc0s Depart merit of Nat un I Resonrc � 1313 Sherman St reel Room 818 Denver , Col orado 80203 Isom Sims 7 a k Pro rare Ado ii Colorado Dcpartmen1 or lien 1th 4210 Last 11 t 0 Avenue Denver, CO1orado 80220 Percy iI1 al t Route I , 1301 1 Platt ex, iile , Colorado 80(351 Larry Lana Colorado later Conser<aI 1 ',a '->oard $23 Si a r„ r, ,, � a PHI I 0 a 1 ,11 3 , Denver , Co l o ratio 80203 1 REFERRAL LI8 ' APPLICANT Erf_e 1Yatcar nd__.aanit-a-tiyin -oist-ri--Gt-- ------ - -- CASE SW G7 _ 7&L1D REFERRALS SENT OUT ON: June 26 , 1978 REFERRALS RECEIVED County At LorEr.'Y County Health County Eng] neer Town of Erie Planning Commission c/o Town Clerk F.C . - 7/6/78 PO, Box 98 T .B , - 7/10/78 Erie , Colorado 80516 Boulder County Planning Department P. O, Box 471 13th and Spruce Street Boulder , Colorado 80302 Don E. Marvin Fare Chief Longmont Fire Protection District 9119 County Line Road Longmont , Colorado 80501 mcmoRAnDun . 11111111e. To Chuck Cunliffe Date August 10, 1978 COLORADO From Drew L. Scheltinga, Enaineerinq Department subject: Erie Water and Sanitation District S.U.P. Questions regarding this project as setforth in my July 24, 1978 memo to you, have been clarified by drawings and a narative from Ray and Associates dated August 7, 1978. I would recommend referring the entrance requirements onto County Road 1 to Boulder County. Drew L. Scheltinga Engineering Department DLS:sar 810111>> AUG 1978 a1 Cooly x mmoRAnDun1 IIIIIIk To Chuck Cunliffe Date July 24 , 1978 COLORADO From Drew L . Scheltinga , Engineering Department subject: Erie Water and Sanitation District S . U . P . The access road enters Weld County Road 1 in Boulder County maintenance section . Reference should be made to Boulder County , so their entrance and drainage requirements can be met . The grading plan indicates a fill to elevate the plant site above the 100-year flood elevation but no cut is shown on the plan . If the fill matter is to be acquired on site it should be indicated and care taken to avoid creating drainage problems on adjacent plans . The sludge drying beds should also be raised above the 100-year flood elevation . No information regarding how site drainage will be handled has been supplied . -) -, 'f'Sc Drew L . Scheltinga Engineering Department DLS : sar S : s a r ��2p�1222.�2q�s�� 1� <j o UC 1978 `N co `/ ca, [/ w Weld/ BOARD OF HEALTH !i el(Y County eal{th Department DAVID WERKING DDS Greeley FRANKLIN D YODER, MD, MPH RALPH AAB, Greeley Director 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD WILLIAM BUCK, Roggen GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEFFKE Greeley DONALD HERGERT Windsor (303)353-O540 ANNETTE M LOPEZ Greeley HERSCHEL PHELPS JR M D Greeley KATHLEEN SHAUGHNESSY Ault JOE STOCKTON Gilcrest August 10, 1978 Gary Fortner, Director Planning & Zoning 915-10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Regarding sludge disposal for the proposed Erie Wastewater Treatment Plant, the following comments from the Colorado Department of Health Guidelines for Sludge Utilization on Land are submitted: 1 . "The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 encourages recycling of sludge through agricultural production. . . " 2. "The Colorado Department of Health concluded that an environmentally acceptable alternative for solving sludge management problems is utilization of stabilized sludge on land for agriculture, silvi- culture, or reclamation purposes. " 3. "The management of sludge generated by wastewater treatment plants in Colorado is subject to the regulation promulgated by the Colorado Board of Health, the Water Quality Control Commission and the Department of Agriculture. Administration and enforcement of the regulations are handled by the Colorado Department of Health and Agriculture. " 4. ". . . In isolated instances due to economics or an unacceptable sludge, landfilling, land disposal , or other techniques may be the best alternative available. " 5. In view of these comments, the Weld County Health Department requests additional data as to sludge disposal (e.g. exact location of land disposal site and whether site can be used year-round). Sincerely, 61$ 910 Ili, ti �Ec�G 1978 �� t t'o�,F7IiF hn G. Hall , M.P.H. , irector �o° ® nvironmental Health Services � - of l`U JGH:dr c91 ti 222 BOARD OF HEALTH e1d County Health Department DAVID WERKING, DDS,Greeley FRANKLIN D YODER. MD, MPH RALPH AAB Greeley Director 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD WILLIAM BUCK Roggen GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEFFKE Greeley DONALD HERGERT Windsor (303)353-0540 ANNETTE M LOPEZ Greeley HERSCHEL PHELPS JR, M D, Greeley KATHLEEN SHAUGHNESSY Ault July 17, 1978 JOE STOCKTON,Gilcrest r TO: Gary Fortner FROM: Franklin D. Yoder, M.D. SUBJECT: Wastewater Treatment Plan , City Erie Although this department concurs with the need for Erie's Wastewater Treatment Plant, we cannot recommend approval of the proposed site due to its close proximity to Westview Estates residential area (approximately 500 feet to the nearest residence). Paragraph 4. 1 , Criteria Used in the Review of Wastewater Treatment Facilities published by the Colorado Department of Health in June, 1973, states: " . . a sewage treatment plant site should be as far as feasible from any present built-up area or any area which will be probably be built-up within a reasonable future period. " Therefore, we respectfully propose another site be selected with emphasis on separation from existing and proposed residential development. The following provisions will apply to the wastewater treatment plant regardless of its location: 1 . A fugitive dust emission permit must be applied for through this office. This permit will apply to such activities as earth moving and road building during the construction phase. 2. An emission permit must be applied for through this office for any process emitting air pollutants to the atmosphere. 3. Noise levels shall comply with those standards listed in 25-12-103, C.R.S. , 1973. 4. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit shall be obtained from the Colorado Department of Health. 5. The wastewater treatment plant shall confrom to all regulations and directives issued by the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health. Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District 1228 MAIN STREET LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 July 13, 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Weld County Planning Services Re: Special Use Permit 915 10th Street Erie Water & Sanitation District Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Chuck: A review of the above application to the Weld County Planning Department has been made, including a field trip to make visual observations, and the following comments submitted: 1 . The soils report to the planning group was a copy of one made by me and is an accurate reflection of the present conditions. It is a 10 acre parcel of Class VI irrigated land and would not be considered prime agricultural land. 2. There are no major irrigation systems affected by the project. 3. It is accurately placed in the 100 year floodplain. 4. We feel there are others more qualified to comment on the environmental effects of the plant, but the esthetics of the area could be improved in the final site grading by use of small berms and shrub and tree plantings. Sincerely, ,�131415 16p Jack Wheeler O �19.�$ `g�0 President JU 0O .r4 tS) %,:a JW:rah UD . Mtn cem� X14 �A 1E006Z%264 CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT T 2 TOWN OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 645 HOLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT 82B-3200 BOX 98 828-3232 ERIE, COLORADO 8O516 828-3843 449-3O85 July 14, 197$ Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado $0631 Attention: Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Reference: Erie Water & Sanitation District Special Use Permit for Wastewater Gentlemen: Thank you for letting the Town of Erie review the above referenced application. The Board unanimuously moved that they give approval of the Special Use Permit. Sincerely, - / Glennie Sleight Town Clerk Ali'IS 1g20471.' JUL 1978 1.1, RECEIVED VI rNa Weld Conety Q, Plank Connit ac„1 ,r, t„ _ niouu ?41 3 - I{ % July 18, 1978 • •,a'u a 4^ rtr„ng 7c:crrsr Mr. Chuck Cunliffe - Assistant Zoning Administrator Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Erie Water and Sanitation District Special Use Permit for Wastewater Treatment Works Dear Mr. Cunliffe: We have reviewed the information referred to our office and find the request in basic conformance with previous plans. Lacking in the infor- mation submitted, however, was a delineation of what areas would be served. This should be delineated to establish priorities of service. For further comments , please refer to the attached letter stating the comments of the Long Range Planning Commission concerning the "201 Wastewater Facilities Plan". If you have further questions, please contact our office. Sincerely yours, '641+4.k.,--11SUARCY\.. Steph Hanson Operational Planner SH/ps Enclosure '0.15161778, <'O o 111/4C ,�'8 w r- iltpe "44 CO jt 'TVA C>1 1E U.0, / fp!C3 n n n e a ..� o.box 4 13th and spruce sL boulder,cola.80302 441-3930 P }may. June 14 , 1976 edward a.tepe Environmental Protection Agency planning director Mr. John A. Green, Regional Administrator 1860 Lincoln Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Green: Please be informed that the Boulder County Long Range Planning Commission did conduct a public meeting on June 9, 1976 on the matter of the "201 Wastewater Facilities Plan, Erie Water and Sanitation District" and, subject to Health Department review, recommended approval with the following comments : 1. that any future review of this matter by EPA and State Health officials consider that the 201 planning area delineation be made in conjunction with Boulder County so that dockets of existing development, such as Shannon Estates , are not left without public central sewer service; 2. that the Erie Water and Sanitation District should agree to serve Brownsville, Shannon Estates, Shannon Estates South, Park Lake and Stonehenge Subdivisions should said services be requested, with terms for fair compensation to all parties concerned; 3. that the Boulder County Long Range Planning Commission has no conflicts with the proposed facility sizing of 750,000 gallons _er day. Please also be informed that concern was expressed by the communities of Louisville and Lafayette, some members of the Long Range Planning Commission, and Boulder County Planning Staff that the impacts and Regional Wastewater 208 implications resulting from the Erie Water and Sanitation 201 be studied and clarified with respect to future wastewater treatment alternatives for the Towns of Louisville, Lafayette, and Superior, as well as existing Coal Creek Water dependence on planned beneficial reuse of effluent. I ' /' S M - ' Environmental Protect 3cn Agency '•`_r:. John A. Green June 14 , 1976 _P g e Two -- I can be of any further assistance, I would be happy to meet with You to discuss matters cited above. In any case, please feel free to call me at 441-3930_ Very truly yours, Jason Brobill to Assistant Plan ing Director J3:jkb xc: City/County Health Deoartment Ray & Associates , 424,2-6 ,�G�/1'1� 112Y- 1 , �.�2 / �2�. i. 0--it' ' . /11/4--cA't 11-11' leiciv /,3 If tl? "'' • ir-i I .O 'C� RICHARD D. LAMM Governor \ C.J. KUIPER * *• O State Engineer 87B DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver,Colorado 80203 Administration(303)839-3581 Ground Water(303)839-3587 July 13 , 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning-Administrator Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Erie Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Cunliffe: We have reviewed the above referenced application for a special use permit. We feel that a dependable drinking water supply will be avail- able from the permitted well No. 97265 and we recommend approval of the Erie Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Plant. Very truly yours 4 D . Jeris A. Danielson !- •uty State Engineer JAD/GDV:mvf cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Reiner Haubold Land Use Comm. q�,��0161778/9• o JUL 1978 7,3 COC E'1 Vii A BENJAMIN F.STAPLETON FELIX L. SPARKS Chairman,Denver Director or co FREDERICK V.KROEGER ��S 'P LAREN D. MORRILL 9 Deputy Director Vice-Chairman,Durango N� \o OA JOHN H. BROWNELL *$ * Hooper * 7876 JOHN R.FETCHER ty�• ��t� b� Steamboat Springs RICHARD D. LAMM tike J Shy Governor C. )MN.aFdURNEAUX DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES JUL 197. P en RP- COLOR ADO WATER CONSERVATION B OAR D PATRICK A.GORMLEY E�C� I�ED all Grand Junction plan CDUBt V 823 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING ROBERT A.JACKSON 1313 SHERMAN STREET tP " "kh Pueblo DAVID LEINSDORF DENVER, COLORADO 80203 9S `�, '' '• Crested Butte TELEPHONE (303)839-3441 HERBERT H.VANDEMOER July 13, 1978 Sterling Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: We have received a copy of an application from the Erie Water and Sanitation District for a special use permit for a sewage treatment plant. The proposed site is located in part of the SEE NWE of Section 6, TIN, R68W, 6th PM in Weld County. Pursuant to your request of June 26, 1978, we offer the following comments or suggestions with regard to the flood hazard: 1. The proposed site is approximately 2,600 feet due east of the confluence of Coal Creek with Boulder Creek. 2. With regard to the flood hazard from Coal Creek; a. The appropriate flood hazard information is the report entitled "Flood Hazard Analyses , Coal and Rock Creek, Boulder and Weld Counties , Colorado" prepared by the Soil Conservation Service in October, 1976. This report was designated and approved by our board in January, 1977. b. We concur with the applicant's interpre- tation of the above report and statements in regard to the flood plain as stated on page 4 of Attachment A to his application. We submit for your use, our own interpretation of the 100-year flood outline based on the site grading plan as shown in exhibit P-1. 4( Department of Planning Services July 13, 1978 Page two It appears that an "island" will be created which will protect the nucleus of the proposed facilities. However, we note that the service road, sites for future facilities, and the sludge drying beds will be inundated by the 100-year flood. 3. With regard to the flood hazard from Boulder Creek: a. The report entitled "Flood Hazard Area Delineation, Boulder and Dry Creek," prepared in June, 1975 , by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District was designated by our board on September 10, 1975. b. The proposed site is beyond the Boulder Creek 100-year floodplain. If there are any further questions, please advise. Sincerely, t' Wkc C. William P. Stanton Sr. Water Resource Engineer WPS:mm Enclosure I -------; 61 ' . 61 62 63 64 Is N 88° 441 3911W 673.81 ' 64 64U 496/1 ..,..._ ) -----_ 1 4r GI 9 —--- ----- 96a2 u7 , N / / _ SLUDGE q > / r 4963 \ I \ /DRYING BEDS\ / ;962 // 4964.\-\\ le, { 66 `_ CHLORIN CONTACT — - 4963 ',ACCESS CH M©ER Cta y 'RO'OS " - V -CLARIFIERS) 1 ---_ _ R•• to L /� —I[e— {. -- _ fs. FUTURCCV I i TOP ELEV 45in 5 • I / 963 — — \ () wl7 W I W I ,��' �' / Q 49 7 Et eONTR aL- I'SI 40 e- BUILDING �1-J 1 / 9b / 67 F L LL0R— , . 4%4 1 LLEV ° •. z "O p_t w O I i TOP ELEV.4965 f r -�I 4964 3 4963 W q *Iw'I - -/[/�� - , x943 - J O w 4965 t BEAD WORKSVI u N 1 ■ TOP ELEV. 4966.0 ) - o r .. --1� 6, A9 64.9 in 49V4 `J - — C4-/ 49G6 v I ."--PROPOSED SEWER 68 p ' MAIN 4965.5 4964 n \ — \--_ , / ,\,,,...._ ` EXISTING RAIL 4966 f �g� 2�, - ____ � , • �� CROSSING 4966. __ ------ 20' EXISTING SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD X-SECTION 005 FROM OCT. 1976 \ FLOOD HAZARD ANALYSES COAL CREEK a ROCK CREE ,BOULDER \B WELD COUNTIES / 4966 7 496✓67 ,, I 69 LEGEND S 88° 44' 39"E\ �� . ^!1 - EXISTING CONTOURS �' `-` -`✓ PPOPOSED =UI--- -------------- 1I I I EVAT ION FLOOD & SITE GRADING PLAN Ate_ - rp RICHARD D. LAMM * * JOHN W. ROLD �GOVERNOR *4 , •** Director 1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)839-2611 July 28 , 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Chuck: RE : ERIE WATER & SANITATION SPECIAL-USE PERMIT I have reviewed the special-use request for a wastewater treatment plant in NW% sec. 6 , TIN, R68W and would like to offer several comments regarding gravel resources . This 10-acre tract lies on Fl flood-plain gravels along Boulder Creek, as shown on the CGS gravel resources map of the Erie quadrangle . The Ray and Associates ' report shows one ,test-hole _log that recorded 10 ft of overburden on 11- ft of gravel and sand . The thick overburden and high overburden-to-resource ration suggest that the hole was drilled very close to the eastern margin of the deposit, but I could not find the location of the test hole on any of the enclosed maps . Assuming that this log is representative of the entire tract, I find it difficult to justify the conservation of these gravels . The unattractiveness of the site is also born out in the brief economic analysis of gravel extraction, but those calculations are not a rigorous treatment of the situation. Although this site is apparently not economically viable, I think it is important to note that substantial acreage over this deposit is available yet in the rest of the NW% sec. 6 . In view of the fact that eleven gravel pits have operated within 2 miles of this tract, the probability is high that the remainder of section 6 will become an increasingly important reserve. Sincerely, it` ✓l/�&^��1I E/ozF Stephen D. Schwochow Engineering Geologist SDS/vt -\2$293031, ti JUL 1 978 (s, ireid co Cuts14 \4 GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE �`�1919L��2� OelliSetti .OF'CO p F. �d N � 0 RICHARD D LAMM * * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR * , .,� * Director 1826 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)839-2611 July 13, 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: RE: SPECIAL USE PERMIT/ EIRE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT We have reviewed the geology of the area proposed for the construction of this facility and find that it is generally compatible. The problem of building in the flood plain has been recognized and will be handled by proper design and construction. Before construction takes place, a complete soils investigation for foundation design should be performed by a qualified soils engineer. This location is outside of any recorded coal mining activity. There appears to be no geologic reason why this site cannot be used for this waste water treatment plant. Sincerely, L. R. Ladwig Engineering Geologist LRL/vt cc: Land Use Commission 417 1819,2 <k RUC 19 CD iroficoettr—t) • GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE / I�I�I'� III I or co40 • X51' • . '810 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 E. 11TH AVENUE DENVER 80220 PHONE 366-6111 EXT. 329 ANTHONY ROBBINS.M.D..M.P.A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • DATE : July 28, 1978 SUBJECT: NON-STATE ASSISTANCE REVIEW AND COMMENTS TO : Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 PROJECT TITLE : Special Use Permit for Wastewater (Sewage) , Erie Water and Sanitation District STATE IDENTIFIER: NA COMMENTS DUE BY : August 1, 1978 Yes n No ) Is this project consistent with the goals and objectives of this agency? Yes ' I No ' Is there evidence of overlapping of duplica- tion with other agencies? Yes ! I No ►J Is meeting desired with applicant? Yesi l No Li A 15-day extension is requested . Comments : Radiation and Hazardous Wastes Control: Design of the plant should include sufficient capacity to accept septic tank pumpings from the area. Dis- posal of pumpings at a treatment plant is preferable over dumping such waste at a landfill, and can be implemented economically in the design phase. 303'12346, AUG 1978 r) RECEIVED -3 coWeld toont9 Ncl LtA4t.e �' planeing Commission � A / � �"!�; �'Q' Name , Title & Phone Hsu Micki Barnes, Program Administrator SOC-3 , Feb 77 ATTACHMENT B • X • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 356-4000 EXT 400 � 915 10TH STREET fiaP' +r'' +":i "�� GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 o COLORADO June 28, 1978 To Whom It May Concern: You are receiving a copy of this notification because your name appears as a surrounding property owner owning property within 500 feet of the proposed use. The Weld County Planning Commission will review a renuest from Erie Water and Sanitation District for Wastewater (sewage) treatment works on property described as follows : Pt . SE4 , NW*, Sec. 6 , T1N, R68W location : 14 miles north of Erie If you have any suggestions or objections, will you kindly notify us in writing before July 18, 1978 . The meeting by the Weld County Planning Commission is scheduled for August 1 , 1978 This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado, at 1 : 30 p.m. If you , have any questions concerning this matter or if you would like additional information , please contact the Department or Planning Services office at 356-'1000, Ext . 404 . - n r d' Assistant 7,oning Administrator August 9, 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sir: We are writing to enter a protest against the location of the new sewer plant in Weld County. We are asking the Planning Commission to carefully consider the following points: 1 . The plant will adjoin a populated area of new or recently built homes in a part of the county which has many acres of sparsely occupied areas to locate in. 2. Westview Estates will suffer the damage to property values in order to serve an area completely isolated from them. 3. If it is true the system is designed for 5,000 persons, we feel it could soon become inadequate for that area. 4. Mr. Salazar, E.P.A. , reports this study for the location proposed is two years old. If there is doubt on the Commission's part as to the desirability of the proposed location, we are asking that the impact study be updated before you make a final decision. Also, before deliberately turning Westview Estates into a less desirable location to live or build in, should we as tax paying residents consider the revenue possibilities of letting the area develop into more tax pro- ducing neighborhoods? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, o (liC9-1°111.2 AUK, s► �Cel �8 cn Mr. & Mrs. Victor S rtz hir Cell/ 5260 Weld County Road 1 o wage„o°°°� co Erie, Colorado 80516 stq �� Phone: 828-3490 ��e9ZSl tiZ�222`tio 5263 buffalo Road Erie , Colo. 80516 -� August 6 , 1978 e3638 Q'/I AUG 1978 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe , Asst. Zoning Administrator RECEIVED s+ Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th S t. ar), Weld County Greeley, Colorado 80631 cg, Planning Commission / Dear Mr. Cunliffe: 'sc'frZEZZG We are vitally concerned with the effects of the proposed site of the Erie Sewage Treatment Plant and now know, from our experience at the August 1st Planning Commission meeting, that we have little opportunity as nervous , inexperienced public speakers to clearly present any rebuttal stating the existing conditions and facts relevant to this situation. Assuming that we can claim the same equal right to be heard , as Mr. Keith Bell representing hay & Associates , we would like to clarify some erroneous claims and assumptions made by r"r. Bell. 1 . Mr. Bell stated that information concerning the proposed sewage facility was always available and easily accessible to all interested parties . On April 18, Hr. Sam Little called Hr. Steve i.click, Chairman of the Erie Water and Sanitation Board , to inquire about the location of the proposed plant. He was told , to quote the more acceptable of the vulgar language used in Ir. Helick's reply; "To go to hell and mind his own business . " Mrs. Pattie Bruntz asked the men doing surveying work on the Bruntz property what they were doing and was rudely and crudely told that it was none of her business. We then wrote a letter to the county officials requ-sting the information that could not be obtained from the local public officials. At that time we were primarily concerned with the effects of the proposed operation on our domestic water supply since the plant was to be situated in a flood plain. We had assumed that the plant would be similar to the White Rocks treatment Plant in Boulder, Colorado with which we were familiar. Since we now know that it is not planned as a similar type of operation, we are also extremely concerned with the other undesirable aspects of this proposed operation for the treatment of raw sewage. 2. Mr. Bell stated that contact had been made with three parties owning adjacent poperty to the proposed ste . As I recall the names mentioned were the Eltings , Smiths and Martins . 2 There are more than three residences within the 500 foot perimeter of the site. Indeed, contact had been made and , in fact , was initiated by these residents some time ago stating their opposition to the plant location being considered. 3. Mr. Bell stated the the newly annexed Erie Air Park would not be using the services of the sewage plant; when Mrs . rteese suggested a southern site , close to Coal Creek and between Erie and the Air Park Development. The first permits given were for individual septic systems because of their location and size of lots. However, in the annexation agreement , it is stated that all light industry, which is already being planned and developed, will be issued septic permits only until the second filing of the Development is approved by the city. Obviously, this will only be a matter of time; 4. P'ir. Bell stated that the land was purchased without condemnation of any property involved. First of all , we question how a site could be prematurely pur- chased before official approval was given for plant construction. Dr. Beckey, former owner of this property, informed Benny and Pattie Bruntz who are within the 500 foot zone , that the property had been condemned. One of the parties , either Dr. Beckey or s'lr. Bell , must have the facts confused ode appreciate your comprehensive study of the proposal for the Erie Sewage Treatment Plant and are hoping that a fair and open hearing at the August 18th meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission will result in a recommendation for seeking an acceptable site other than the one being currently proposed . (8--9 7 AUG 1916 =�r Sincerely, F RE.CE1t(Ep Noto Lola C. Lit""tler�, •r • / .. .Lv„ ✓ y" � ,�r/tee- �e•✓ s�"e� ? is^Z-c�C_ - ,� 1-' !i`_i0iv V.' irk' _C�;.1'i1�,iv July 1 , 1978 ,:e , the propert,,y owning and tax paying resents o'' Vve:3tvj e:ti - .yet:tes end surrounding territory, stronel y oppose the or000sed construction site for the treatnent plat of rew ' sew ge for the town of -r Colorado. This site , in Weld County, is aparoximetely two riles north of ;rie , east of County Line lioad , south of riiaahuy 52 end west of the r R railroad tracks. This location, in close proxirity to our horses , has been officially design:,ted as a flood area, with frequent spring flood in from both Coal and .ioulder Creeks. :11 of the residents in this area h:•vc 7rdivicu .11y owned and mint-lined wells for their domestic water use. if the sewage clgnt were to be built in the proposed location; it would orove to be , serious ' r• , n w ec � h,.r•lth h:�z��.rd � nd s;_..it-�tior_ �ror�l::i_. nen Elope ins do:.� occur. .ie :;sk th=:t you resconsibly consider our petition of opposition ( nc i roct the City of rie to seek an alternate site for the con- \\ str-etion of this sn---ge tr:-_•taent facility. I (�� 41 ae2 1641-1e1Ced i ''T , / ii-e-4---i--c--1?---i---- 1-c---4--.--c--4----- 1/4451-IA, 4-41-4---"—t— 6a- 6t—c---4-". -) , 72, LatAiX !,( .tea c 4-.� / „..,,-%- e'21- 1.7,,....._,;:z=6-(i,7,7,/-_ ,„.„.,______ a--„ 0 yvii..za,e, 7t,,, i A2.7. , cr, • ,,,,..„, y, GG! 6)/3 "&"-il 1QC)/-• A r y r_:?, ; ,,_ , __,_, 1 ' ,,„„ k--1/'/,'?:ci - ;',,.. , . /, ; e4/._e: .,? --L-2L-- /4-- --,,i) cce /;-- ( / / d. 4 Y'-'d 47//4: le S 1 ° & /, i, 911 :-16 eo-e , ge-ea 1e- y 6 AL4 ©,2 s f "ize (ci, c. 0,,,..„ O a S r LiJ2A O:tea re/ EjLt. e d 308 \A) -i- ,°,L, �'�J 6�o_ %crs �g- A 0,5oY' tiles/oiccc) eci ".;1 __cc)(c.) FO67.4 A-YYv,:b 6,,s_a- g�l�tte clOu e. 63,4.4423 .2377 L c'"s l(Q S026 3 £ 44•441...0 e. tose•aw mssCae 3224; _ ceiu.L (pa. (o cam►.. 0 c9/01thAvi�cw Kd Ew Co gas/G 0,07 1 •,( ,_c,„ ?Q$7 00644 51 303- c,v - -/?. &d e (03-/i (�-w. So 5 ¢f .r °_- c6 z ›e: e---eOrdfx‘ 5-3/o c..47. A94. / ,�� , G14O . go s-l 1 '03 u*--Co Rc.Q c�-a E-�l c(� , Q. � � t c 4 02 9 1- Pat 'j 1277' �9 /61-e-7• s J 379 c.61 -0 74'fy s Z 691 1,e Cc:jla gOff4 0.41A-4-Pri 14-t-e-t&(r 6 / • v tl 'j7r 00 /7 %% EA-`� �vs--4c. f-a,- MI 7 e7C�. 866/10 >f� , , r ` �� 1�' el6�. /�.� / F� ��./ . PoS / ,f . �.� '.�i°,) //I ) /,..; P ,c,-:,,,_„✓ „ I/ ' 21::(7: 7:'kr 1 C-7/'-'-'t- , f?'''' -./j -5 1 V ;1-. C'e '(-/-/ (,- /is/ e''e 1(... t V ."--? e.- l- E )(co c, 5- 3 1O (f/fr.z)U ( 6- f x ,3, , co gor1L, 0, 6 /0 rYtel 6.645- Rket-dgke-zi&zi Er /6)A) ;,6,7.,cs_ %,4, L G ('`) ' 3 v- ; .__.) cakg :0141ffil I August 7, 1978 257 Westview Rd. Erie Colo. 80516 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is written in regard to the Erie sewer plant, being proposed two miles north of Erie. It was stated at the August 1st hearing that there was no opposition from surrounding landowners. This is not true ! People ware not properly nntified. Two people in the whole Westview Estates area were notified; and I might add, not the ones closest to the plant ! 'de checked with the people who were notified to find out if they paid their own taxes, instead of the mortoage company paying them out of their escrow. The answer was no, they had their banks pay their taxes just like everyone else. It was said by the planning cnmriion office that all taxpayers in this ares were notified, if they paid their own taxes, if not, then their mortga❑e companies were notified. Isn ' t it strange that not one person received a letter from their mortnane company? 'Je are in the process of checking with our mortgage company now. We also checked to see when your EPA study was made. It's a little outdated! Over two years ago. We talked with the EPA and were tbTd it was their understanding that the homes in this area were in the thirty to fifty th-usand dollar range. You c=an 't buy a house in town on a lot for that price ! These homes are on two to five acre lots. Vice homes-you are looking at sixity to one hundred twenty thousand. I can 't belie6e the remark was made by the planning commission office, "What difference does it make if you can 't see it. " This thing will be 350 feet from my house, sitting on this large mound of dirt with a few trees planted around it, and I 'm not supposed to be able to see it. I'll just let the guy that says that buy my 53f acre lot with water rights and a brick home for $100,000 after your invisible sewer plant goes in. I'rm sure you could care less what happens to the people of Westview Estates. But some day it could be you and you will wonder how it could be happening to you. There is little justice left in our world. We are not the ignorant, uninformed people you think we are. We will fight, it 's our moral right. Any city, county or government that would sneak this kind of thing in on people; hoping they won 't find out until it 's too late, ought to crawl off in e gutter somewhere and hide. lefi,„,r1.4:4, 6524A-Z6f--- otA„,42.). eu colt 4. AUG 1978 V We/0 CO at �� CO `c �dW"oq Cow , �Cr`'e9l�Z v"G£Zti��ti Pugust 5, 197 P7g L'E stvi rw Rd. Erie, ['"Jr,. :[ 1c, To !i'hom It ;toy Concern It has erne to our attentes thEt t -r c ty ,T Erin _ p . nlcnnsns the construction, this fell, of a sego^ treatr rn is oian wi th;n 5ril feet of nor property. Le live on Lot „`1", in !_�stvic , ' tates This distresses us nre tiv. Certainly we didn 't mr yr to �.h0 country to liv,: next dc-r tc a Lou'age pl- ;t ! Le qur,stirn the wisdom of choosing this p r i cui• r si s. This area i ^ a designates, flcod pl' in. If the :-: did r: (J this plant would contaminate all thr, :ells in this - ree. Not cnl\ ,,,cs,ld that be a great inconviencr , it could el Er p rc rnt • - r_1 th hazard. ccorr-'inq to the plans that we have , enfrffluent, chl❑ri nate E, is to be. duaped into PouldEr Creak . This will kill thr fish in tho immediate area. ! 'e also feel it will corks this • nrna unfit for habitation of small game nod wild birds, L•-ich are already prs^en t. How much more private prep ry is on:nn Lr, ve to t : ennd-m^- d for the hail di nn of this plant? There re pri v:- c resident js to the west of the plant. This area would have to be used in run thr , effluent to !Mulder Creek. It cuems very likely running this water through this property, containing -ollc _,nrl leech fields fir septic tanks, could contaminate svcrythino. Lsild these resole just be asked to move? Jhet about the demr_ce to ❑tF- er n +,Jr: i resources in this are-; :' tie ere in the vicinity of natural gas and nil c0L1s. There are also gravel p1 to close at hand. Le all r UE W-1: s s as our source of water. There are small ponds in the rroa. -,1l these onuld be effected by dropping the water tsbl.e duE thE use of french drain systems. August 7, 1978 257 Westview Rd. Erie Colo. 80516 To Whom It May ConcFrn : This letter is written in regard to the Erie sewer plant, being proposed two miles north of Erie. It was stated at the August 1st hearing that there was no opposition from surrounding landowners. This is not true ! People were not properly notified. Two people in the whole Westview Estates area were notified; and I might add, not the ones closest to the plant ! We checked with the people who were notified to find out if they paid their own taxes, instead of the mortgage company paying them out of their escrow. The answer was no, they had their banks pay their taxes just like everyone else. It was said by the planning cnmmiion office that all taxpayers in this area were notified, if they paid their own taxes, if not, then their mortoaoe companies were notified. Isn ' t it strange that not one person received a letter from their mortgage company? We are in the process of checking with our mortgage company now. ' We also checked to see when your EPP study was made. It 's a little outdated! Over two years ago. We talked with the -EPA and were to d it was their understanding that the homes in this area were in the thirty to fifty thousand dollar range. You can 't buy a house in town on a lot for that price ! These homes are on two to five acre lots. Nice homes-you are looking at sixity to one hundred twenty thousand. I can 't believe the remark was made by the planning commission office, "What difference does it make if you can 't see it. " This thing will be 350 feet from my house, sitting on this large mound of dirt with a few trees planted around it, and I'm not supposed to be able to see it. 9 , i 5 cButlithaup Ranck, 2 11 .n 0 .„ 698 Highway 52 Erie, Colorado 80516 (7 miles Southeast of Longmont) LIVESTOCK BRAND July 13, 1978 ��1611 g��7 , J ,i J U L 1978 ,,g. Chuck Cunliffe ( RECEIVED "f Assistant Zoning Administrator Well GUUI 4:7' h Weld County Planning Commission Fia4Ainq Gallon �� Greeley, Colorado 80631 <1,9 4° Dear Mr. Cunliffe: I received your notice dated June 28, 1978, regarding the proposed Erie Water and Sanitation District's proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant which is to be built within 500 feet of my property. Although I have no idea exactly where the proposed site will be, it would be difficult for me to understand how any such facility would not materially reduce the value of my property, as well as the value of all other surrounding property. Having driven by other such plants, I have found the odor at times to be absolutely unbearable. Regardless of the modern treatment methods used today, I seriously doubt that anyone could guarantee me otherwise. The Town of Erie, in my judgement, has no more right to install such a facility near my property than would I to build a feed lot or waste lagoon at the southeast edge of Erie. The Town of Erie has either annexed or some arrangement south of town to take in the airpark. It would appear that there is ample space there where such a facility could be built which would not be within one mile of any dwelling. I believe the request by the Town of Erie to place such a facility within 500 feet of my property is completely and totally unreason- able. At this point, it would appear to me that the City of Erie wants to get their waste as far away from them as possible knowing the foul odor that will result. Since I don't dump my waste water on their main street, I can't imagine why they should believe that I will be any more enthused about smelling their waste. I can assure you that other neighbors of mine are totally opposed to such a plant being built. I would request that you contact us in order that we might schedule a meeting as soon as possible to personally discuss t matter. Q.,_/-z /LC_ ; C C,"G' Z/Z . Gene Bulthaup f/ i LL) L' 526 Suf fal o Road Colo. 80516 Oct. 15, 1978 County Commissioners of Meld County P.O. r3ox 758 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners : I have just returned home from a visit to Washington State to see my 85 year old ex-farmer father, and found that we were scheduled for another meeting with the county officials on October 18th. I share this with you only because of a conversation with my father and family who have al*+rays been very politically alert , intcrested and involved in government at local , county and state levels . Iiy father was amazed and gratified that in our short time of rural living north of brie , that we have been involved with county decisions at four different occasions ; as he has long maintained that the "government guts" is at county level for rural residents . He also said that we Were fortunate in having been listened to and responded to by our county officials and , of course , were encouraged to get actively involved in order to keep intact this type of government by the people through their elected representatives . Early last spring 1 wrote a hurried letter to you expressing concern about the brie sewer plant site proposed by the Erie Water and sanitation District. We were extremely frustrated because of our failure to get information about that project th- t directly affected many families in this area. In that letter i expressed some concerns and failed to cite others , which upon investigation, proved to be just as serious . I stated in the letter that the odor would not be of major concern, basing my judgement on my knowledge of the White hocks Water Treatment Plant in the city of Boulder. Since then we have contactplant operators in .Boulder and also have visited the operation on 75th Street where the -aw sewage is treated . Indeed , when the plant was big and the city was small , there didn't seem to have a serious problem but they certainly do now and so do the residents in the nearby vicinity! hxpansion and remodeling is now in the process so time will tell if this problem can be solved for those home owners . Our situation cannot even be compared to theirs as those people chose to buy :end build homes knowing a sewage treatment plant was in operation. Our families chose our home sites with no knowledge of the impending hazards of floods , chemical plants and sewage treatment plants in our backyards . I am confident that you, our elected officals of Weld County, will see this situation as being of sufficient concern to the welfare of the many families living in this area north of nrie , that you will carefully consider all the inform•-tion that was presented to the Weld County Planning Commission concerning the proposed site for the town of Lrie. We felt that the hearing was open and fair and we exhort you to con- sider the recommendations of those five representatives who studied the situation through a review of the presented facts , made an on-site visit to the proposed site and then voted unanimously to reject the location north of ,rie as being unsuitable for the erection of a plant for the treatment of raw sewage for the town of Lrie , Colorado. Sincerely, Lola C. Little l,Jiv /0AW7S/ 0201415, t� 'RECEIVED CEf VED ? < k, We►d Cooly R t: Planing Commies t . 9-,_,,,,,,,,, ,,,/ ,,,, 4,,,,62K,z,,,, • , /,_)%,,,,, , z- ,7-AN a-P17e.i?„1. 1,-6- --e,,e , , ,,Sreeic_vkta.L) ,29-x-L' ae -2)Le_.,,x_.-9 "--62- (,-:,v---x-t-. .3 --z-o Ltiii_ivU. i4e,c,c., _ .e. g,,- - /7-e, O ,2 , - ,, ,tee --e-), . e &iz,c 24,_, i y, pric e, ,- ,,,e..„., (7),,,,,2,-,....e. t i`s/4 G'-L, ,74--/e, / ,.,e_'t-i-CA Let-/-, , _ , i'V '4)-c l vim'-at- G ,h-c at-e'%--ei, „„6-,,. 7 , ,e--'•ce-a,6-/e),C.,_., .,,e,e4,4/,e€,,...7",-ey Xy. /c2_, 64.62,,,tei , /6- - c 6 "z,>-?-, "xj-c.,, _.e .3.e ‘,106L, tV ‘,4€-=-jeo--Otz-, ,,re-el-7,t . -7,,-e4e, .„e-O-6.8-e d-e..) &--,-,p/.2176,4 ,e-6-e, eit-r,) c<_}.2 ), ,,,-7 --&/:e::.,,' 4,e-e),(_, ,,6--?P.-6-- c11itL., _,Z -c. 263-e e ,e - ,L.: C- ,,..IL_. 72.., ,,r_.. .A..,) ,o2-7-6Q__A --7,-......,,,,z.e-vtet.4 .._, e•,?.., „el_‘,... ,- .-2,,_.,K Ze_e__,/ iae-tL- _ee,--O (2,get---c, ,--.6 tc--c-c,/upz--v2e . CA ,,771 .„-c-e-ejk-i?___./ ---ef G., t' .-d _-6-Ct=e41 -Zer-et-, ,,,716t, ,),,--r_ext_.rty- 2,,2 _,e,t.,.<____, L,...Aec}-e'IP ?0 de-ei)-.., 4-e-e-e-We.4.-., ,tey ,e-r-C, ,-0.___&-c,c_AS- i, • ‘ „....(2._ _,,t1A-elia-e_;t, .?1,Ot.,4,.., z- 'e, &_i-, 2_, i--4t.,_, /cet—_‹.,d-y ,e-i-L. 6I-6 --5?-e-c_' a-7-e"... .z11,-d. _24-'44 ZiAL. .„e24,--(_-ogr......--) 1,,,e- (ae$,.<, 7), (fi_,-z_ ..'e .. ----pb,_ „,...' „,-,,,,47, ii /4-2eortybt: g9._,_z-L, t.„.<2,„...e ., (4:7-eLe.„_; 4-2,---e_e....-- „„zrzti..; , O . e2-e-o-e-‘..) _Aalix-e4-eck_ 44 di ' 7 g;„-z e , ii, 9,,,..77:„.,.....,„/ -_, �,.. Z ,,--,,,,, ili Erie Water and Sanitation District SUP-367: 78 : 19 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS June 28, 1978 Donald Lee Beauchamp c/o Arthur L. Cramer 207 Westview Drive Erie , Colorado 80516 Joseph R. Becky 6500 East 6th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Bennie D. and Patricia C. Bruntz c/o Graham MTG Corporation 315 West Oak Street #112 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 H. Gene and Carolyn M. Bulthaup Route 1, Box 220 Erie, Colorado 80516 Roelf J. and Joan M. Elting Route 1 Erie , Colorado 80516 Kenneth E. and Shirley E. Koch Route 1 Erie, Colorado 80516 George R. and Elaine J. Montano Box 102 Erie, Colorado 80516 John Be and Susan M. Schultz c/o Majestic Savings 2420 West 26th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80211 Gerald D. and Jane M. Wilts 5412 Buffalo Road Erie , Colorado 80516 %, 4 's .)€, ci LsA- Tcdm€ ► ks .SUP 6 charnp aria/C/ % (LPji A). Cn /2-, Lec,, so5"i40 &Cky ) k./ ph /2 U5cn & s-/- O6 aj& )06r)ve7/(3) PO . Bkatz4z) 861-V-)/6 a 1 ic/C�,i c'. % @ ?a/? 2T77 /14 TO C'v p /5 (t). CL / i ' " //. 2. 4cp f O /// ?s) &5-2/ LL/-/-ba op) 1-1y 6ng 6)Q/ ) 0O 867/ Rodcd: Um'? .,)?, l C06. ,, SI-)//e/cy e: / Foe, , 070n-lat)c), 06-61Q96 Po e_6_(06 ck /a P12,6 , Co r-' /� I ti c111) /3, c; 1,`(L.V(/) cl/L 17 26 / k7s- CL: - £� ' Ati4, .Q) Ec i I ( 'r/ 1.1 r ) X51-i. . a z {i{ k) (_- '� �� e,()`)1(, - _fad ki )O ) ac's N + 5eci C f (1) -1 I Z676 6k3- < /,61/ -&./,/4-9.(:)& 5-c) tbD i( Jt ' L `) /7 c, (,2(' //3/� i7/ /491 /3- (.1 liecokv ,(1? ( 6D ,LAST & Ackc, DenveR, () 71/7/ 77 062/ ,/ - eci .' CFPLe '�2uz(. /Jis-1 ( s) a/6-0 - skc iz's /lo CC3- 6915717V /a9/ 77/ 73/ lag LL(2 fl ) 7:3/7/ QL /(/6. Ce 9 0/ / ,' 1.7)7T' ( r p ;\/,1 Cock -{t r� a Ilins /()6-) � / r 1 ;�� ob2. q 77/ -7q.31 /-7/4-e63 1_,(JD /`o-L /5 &rLc.0?7LZ., &r?)2/ E SArre, + S be-foRg. yi_04 /4- 470,20 737 /th58 697 (.4 'D _&4 r ) c baP7ç Dy-rth' % 0(A Le h` C-/earr)(2, ,967 L; S71'/ &) De. koi / ///// 7B/ 819//7777,2,;?() C,uD ; 1�7itv7 klc'Ur 6 7ee 13 /cam Foo ) CO 80.51( ocs 1 /8 7/06/ 7478/A44/6'71 I/JD c15 /1u/ /2) Jh 1TVLdC.-c 172, 2w O/6 ,4 LE :D)&E) oc )t)/ / y /9 /(z) -7973/ (,6,0 (/u L O, 6EIO 1 , 7z 54/, 8L-i-iccl c: Pc/ F124, Cc, t-5R( ()16- 1 - 7 /587 /e &I4h6Wp , GEnE C/P/r-04//t) /7) . R-41/ '367, C r‘ } Olif; 4 / 76/ 4:24/ r,- SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ERIE WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS PROJECT NO. 583 JUNE, 1978 PREPARED BY: RAY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2950 PEARL STREET BOULDER, COLORADO 80301 PHONE : 442-3877 Ray&Associates, Inc. la June 9, 1978 Mr. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Tom: Find attached the Special Use Permit Application and necessary submittals for the Erie sewage treatment facility in Weld County. Also included in the Application package is a copy of the Colorado Health Department Site Approval. The original will be submitted to you for the County Planning Department, and County Commissioners signatures as each approves this Application. As usual, if additional information is required, do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sinc/erely,James D. Smith, P.E. JDS/mf 0,1413 i6,j Enclosures O�►\�� 4 X14, o) JUN 1978 `a., c° RECEIVED ti co Weld Cagy ,,v Planeleg Comte ti� 2 1 j 1E0E6Z%ZL�� TABLE OF CONTENTS Page COPY SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION 1 (Original in back cover pocket) LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATION 3 WASTE DISPOSAL 3 WATER SUPPLY 4 ROADS 4 FLOODPLAIN 4 ALTERNATIVE SITES 5 RECOVERABLE MINERALS 6 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Warranty Deed Exhibit 2 Well Permit Exhibit 3 Soil Conservation Service Reply Exhibit 4 State Historical Society Reply Exhibit 5 Property Ownership Within 500 Feet of Site BACK COVER POCKET Site Flood & Grading Plan P-1 Site Plan, Vicinity May & Certificate of Survey P-2 Application for Special Use Permit Copy of State Health Department Site Approval Application f SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street PA':Greeley , Colorado 80631 O PHONE : 356-4000 Ext . 404 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : Permit Fee : CaseNumber : Recording Fee : App . Checked by : Receipt No . : TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE- MENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures . I , (we ) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Special Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use Permit is proposed : None LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AREA : Attachment A STREET LOCATION : PROPOSED USE : Wast%( i (1) REASON : To serve" x a) FEE OWNERS OF c J 0 NAME : Erie Q 0 NAME : _., w NAME : L v) E U O N V I J - -1- N ATTACHMENT A • Plant Site Description A tract of land lying in the SE4 of the NW% of Section 6 , T1N, R68W of the 6th P .M. , Weld County , Colorado , more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said NW'4 and the west right-of-way line of the Chicago , Burlington and Quincy Railroad , said point also being the NE corner of Westview Estates Subdivision as platted ; thence west 300 feet along the south line of said NW% and the north line of said Westview Estates Subdivision ; thence north 900 feet ; thence east 680 . 55 feet to the west right-of-way line of said Chicago , Burlington and Quincy Railroad; thence S . 22°55 ' 13" W. , 977 . 15 feet to the point of beginning Said tract of land containing 10 . 13 acres , more or less . -2- V/ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATION The property described in this Application has been chosen as the site for a proposed 0. 50 mgd wastewater treatment plant to serve the community of Erie, Colorado. It will be a modern acti- vated sludge plant designed to accommodate the anticipated future growth of Erie and to meet the effluent standards of the Weld County Health Department, the Colorado Department of Health and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The proposed plant will be automated and employ a maximum of three persons. At this time it is anticipated that the staff will consist of one full-time operator and one part-time operator. Noise generating equipment will be limited to such equipment as air blowers, compressers, pumps , emergency power generation, etc. The noise level associated with this equipment is relatively low and the equipment will be housed within the administration building; hence, the noises generated would not be audible beyond the confines of the special use area. The activated sludge process is being utilized to minimize odors. The slight musty odor associated with activated sludge would not be of sufficient concentration that odors would be de- tectable outside the special use area. In addition, the plant is located in an area of low population density with agricultural land to the north and east which is the downwind of the prevailing wind. The only nonagricultural zoning is to the south of the pro- posed plant site. A Weld County subdivision adjoins the property on the south with the nearest dwelling located approximately 700 feet to the south of the process basins . The entire site will be landscaped with special consideration being given to the south boundary of the proposed site to buffer it from the area zoned for residential use. The administration building and process basins will be located approximately 1, 600 feet off of County Line Road and should there- fore be reasonably unobtrusive. The administration building has been designed with brick and block exterior walls utilizing a false mansard roof line to result in an attractive building which har- monizes with the area. WASTE DISPOSAL The treated waste water will be discharged into Coal Creek just upstream from the confluence with Boulder Creek. An effluent permit (Permit No. CO-0021830) has been secured from the Colorado Department of Health. Other than treated waste water the major product resulting from operation of the proposed treatment plant -3- ✓ will be a biologically stabilized sludge. In addition small amounts of inorganic matter (ground bones, plastics, glass , etc. ) will be produced. The stabilized sludge is an excellent soil con- ditioner which will be available to local residents for land application subject to stringent controls as to location and in- tensity of application. Sludge in excess of that used for land application, as well as the inorganic material, will be disposed of in the Weld County land fill. This method of disposal has been approved by Mr. Glen Paul, Director of the Weld County Health Department. WATER SUPPLY No process water is required for the proposed treatment plant. Irrigation water for the site landscaping will be provided by plant effluent. A domestic well with a capacity of less than 15 gpm will be drilled on the site to provide drinking and wash water for the plant employees. A well permit from the Colorado State Engineer' s Office is included as Exhibit 2. ROADS Access to the proposed treatment plant will be via an existing private road which links the special use area with County Line Road. It is anticipated that the road will be improved to Weld County standards although it will be maintained by the Erie Water & Sanitation District. FLOODPLAIN The treatment plant site is in the 100-year floodway as shown in the October 1976 Flood Hazard Analysis prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. A cross section through the site as determined by Exhibit A-1 of said re- port is plotted on the site grading plan P-1 of this Application. As determined from said report the slope of the 100-year storm from south to north across the site is 0. 6% . The elevations of the administration/control building and those of the treatment basins, clarifier structures and head works are set above the 100-year flood elevation as shown on site grading plan P-1 . Since the site is to the extreme eastern edge of the floodway and the site grading near and around the plant works is above the floodplain elevation, there is no reason to assume a detrimental effect from flood water. -4- 1 ALTERNATIVE SITES The evaluation of alternative sites revealed that sites to the west of County Line Road were either too near existing dwellings or too deep in the Coal Creek and/or Boulder Creek floodplain. Sites to the west would also have been located up wind from exist- ing dwellings, considering the prevailing westerly to southwesterly wind. Due to the above factors, sites were evaluated which were sufficiently down grade from the existing facility to allow gravity flow of the interceptor main, but which were as high as possible in the Coal Creek/Boulder Creek floodplains. The initial site selected and core drilled was approximately one mile south of the selected site. The subsurface soil conditions on that site proved to be totally unsuitable. Sites further to the north (north of Highway 52) were also considered. It was determined that several small tracts front on Highway 52 and could potentially be developed as home sites. The land to the north of these small parcels is deep in the Boulder Creek floodplain. The selected site is the one which best meets the following criteria. 1. Separation from existing dwellings. 2 . Capable of being served by a gravity interceptor line. 3. Down wind from the prevailing wind patterns . 4 . Highest in the Coal Creek/Boulder Creek floodplain. -5- Vl RECOVERABLE MINERALS The plant site is located along the east edge of the F-2 mineral designation as shown on your records. The following page is a test hole log on the site which indicated approximately ten feet of recoverable gravel exists with eleven feet of overburden. The following shows that it would not be economical to recover this gravel. Cost to Remove Overburden The site is mall and the overburden is not suitable top soil and would therefore not have any economic value. The cost to remove the overburden could run over $1. 50 per cubic yard. 3 10 Ac. x 43 ,560 ft2/Ac. x 11 ft. x 1 yd x $1. 50/yd3 = $266 ,200 27 ft3 Cost to Remove Gravel Since the site is small and only a limited operation is possible, $1. 00 per cubic yard is again a minimal figure for removal cost. 1 yd3 10 Ac. x 43 ,560 ft2/Ac. x 10 ft. x x $1. 00/yd3 = $161, 300 • 27 ft3 Estimated Extraction Cost = $427 ,500 Other Costs : Permits, application processing, engineering $ 8 , 000 Cost of land (actual) 25 ,000 Cost of investment @ 10% ($427 ,500) * 4 ,275 *Cost of capital to mine gravel Other = $ 37 ,275 TOTAL COST OF MINED GRAVEL = $464 ,775 Market Price of Mined Gravel The current cost of pit run at plant site (per Flatirons Gravel Company) Pit run $3. 00 per cu.yd. Assuming 100% recovery $3 . 00/cu.yd. x 10 acres x 10 ft. deep = $484 , 000 /EST DOLE .C..O CI4 7W CJ /v o. lD \\_:_i------ - 1- _rJ -- '"Le —yr ffl'1tCfSks�tZtL - -- - - 46-\\ -- - ( !o_Y2¢/4-J---�'�T-►�f &t_,- &� • • ---- ------- --- -- ._ _ " _ _.gys7 -- " -_ flit clay% - �3-vr,�mt i_e„ ,�s��e J - ��N hiET, pia 5ii_ , -vGt{• / -- - - �o �Ssz - - - --- ..o• -- .qra 'efly Sa/1O/; Ave_ _;- -- 9rev4_ ,!JI----. o / -- - • h Nr�tl.a; o`•s - = -- - - --- ----- :.tard -lo S•Z•� _ _-_ --T --- - - s,11/c4 4.7 'T , o _ _ - --- --;-- -- N c:. .... rs1s t-l �zrr.tfl�' tIGslsi__'1_�� A/- - /S- ¢9547- - - --- v o i a ii,cler - 'Ai .sa-nip/c j-_IncdrumT- --- — - - - - - 9.,�vL/67. s l Sa.1/_43 /__ ;/�clay;s 5-_74 a b -- -- -•---- n N-_ ` 6 Q c�i wc/; __.l z�scs.r./,. hcsts�-_ /%z . Jig.oy._ Zo ° Y1_ f1-¢Z__ -- - .. - 4 b , -_ -d itierc'4 -/N -.Yl , tc-/ eel:/-se--/__J�C I1,4 la - _ - f)UU- - - d /a. �r� ----yrc e76,..3_`L_- nd_36.3% - - - - - -- - -/- - -- -- / -- - - _ -_ j , - - .Sa..s- 1/ShO.,r.� ; pale-. e//owit k Il-Owti __ - �' - - .- - .- (JD Y' 6./z) ---dcr .- . .u_9/ZL'YI Pd' clercc._ Summary The estimate assumed that the excavation would go straight. down at the property lines which would not be the true situation. It would more than likely be at a one to one slope which would reduce the potential recovery of gravel. It is also assumed that the gravel lens is constant throughout the site. Since the site is small the assumption is accurate for this comparison. Maximum potential profit is as follows: Market Price $484 , 000 Less cost of gravel -464 , 774 Potential Profit $ 19 ,225 or 4 .1% return on investment With the risk involved and the fact that the recoverable gravel has been calculated at its maximum possible volume a 4 .1% return would not be considered an economically feasible recovery. Land rehabilitation has not been taken into consideration but would run three to five percent of the cost of the mined gravel. -8- 61 61 61 62 63 64 N 88° 44' 3911W 673.81' 64 6465 4961 --,..) -----_ 4961.9 Da4Lc) isto-Ly- ,.., N asst / �� SLUDGE 4962.5 / - 4 963 \ 1ir DRYING BEDS116 / 1962 /77-4964 \ I ""1, CHLORINE CONTACT P 4963.1 M ACCESS /CHA ER I I COUNTY PROPOSED CLARIFIERS P LINE ROAD OUTFALL LINE / '■ i CO _ _-0 ,� FUTURE (0 _—o TOP ELEV 49 5.01/ I O / Lo I I —\ 1 _1 i o -- - -0 \ `—'W 0�WI 49637 W re 9I zJ u,w 1 0 Cr ADMINISTRA •a -I (t) 4Ct/ 4963.7 —.--a-eGN -• I 6 BUILDING r 1,, ' rJ J� '1, FLOOR) O ELEV 4965. Z I z�W I oz I 0zxl 4964.3 TOP EL 9 5A a I I I �� .. 4963 w m I �m�l ----_ l .' W J o. w 4964.3 . _ a --(0 I I 4-5 TOPDELEV K4966.0 S N Q -- ) :o CD f---.. 4964.9 LO I IPRI 4964.9 _� ----. \--- � M PROPOSED SEWER 68 /________ 0 1 MAIN 4965.5 4964 \--- (ii.) / / 4965. \\\ EXISTING RAIL 4966.1 CROSSING 20' ACCE' ROAD 4966.1 / 20' EXISTING SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD X-SECTION 005 FROM OCT. 1976 FLOOD HAZARD ANALYSES COAL CREEK el ROCK CREEK,BOULDER a WELD COUNTIES.---- 49662______ 4966.7 69 LEGEND 0 165 S 88° 4413911EN 300,00' •/67 -- EXISTING CONTOURS / 69 ------------------ PROPOSED CONTOURS 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION FLOOD & SITE GRADING PLAN P_/ EX11IBT_1 1 .,_ A BOOK 802 Recorded at 11 : 50 o' clock A.M. July 7, 077 pQ Co V Rec. No. 1723889 WARRANTY DEED JOSEPH R. BECKY, whose address is 5405 East 33rd Street, County of vz„{,ti , State of Colorado, for the consideration of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 dollars , in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to ERIE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, a governmental subdivision of the State of Colorado, whose address is P. 0. Box 386, Erie, County of Weld , State of Colorado, the following real property in the County of Weld, and State of Colorado, to wit: A tract of land lying in the NWa of Sec. 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows : Commencing 8t the NW corner of said Sec. 6, T1N, R68W, thence S 00 04' 32" W, 2,646.31 feet to the SW corner of said NWa of said Sec. 6; thence S 88°44' 39" E, 1,532.86 feet along the south line of said a section to the True Point of Beginning; thence from True Point of Beginning proceed S 88°44'39" E along the south line of the NWa of said Sec. 6, 300.00 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Ra ,lroad; • thence N 22 55' 13" E, 962.63 feet along said railroad right-of- way; thence N 88°44' 39" W, 673.81 feet; thence S 00°04' 32" W, 894.82 feet to the True Point of Beginning; said described tract containing 10.00 (+) acres. Together with an easement and right-of-way for roadway, influent- effluent pipelines and dewatering drain line and other utility purposes on, over, under and across the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the Court S 00•' thr Y a. All water and ditch rights allotted to or used in connection with subject property. b. All oil , gas and other mineral and subsurface rights , provided, however, no use of said oil , gas or other mineral or subsurface rights shall at any time interfere with, remove, limit or damage subjacent and lateral support of the subject property, including easements granted, and the owner of the oil , gas and other mineral and subsurface rights shall have no right or use of the surface of said subject and above described lands, including easements , for extraction, processing or delivery of the mineral estate or for any other purpose and shall never limit, interfere with or damage the exclusive use of the surface by the Grantee. c. An easement for roadway and access purposes , to be used jointly by Grantor and Grantee, 30 feet in width for use by the Grantor as access to and from other lands now owned by the Grantor in the Northwest Quarter of said Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 68 West and which are adjacent to the lands herein conveyed to Grantee and which lands of the Grantor lie on the other side of the right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Railroad as now located, the centerline of said easement located and described as follows , to wit: Commencing 8t the NW corner of Said Sec. 6, T1N, R68W, thence S 00 04' 32" W, 2085.62 feet; thence S 89°55'28" E, 1532.53 feet to the west line of the treatment thence ' 25.00 ther tj- • STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /71:3 day of June, 1977) .l, Q, 4:-e,e( My commission expires : My Commission Expires Oct.10,1973 Witness my hand and official sea• ) Q c-c-� Notary Public E V) Wr(J•S-Kcv. /0 a .. . ..... �. .. .. ..�. .. ._ . A.C ,... r 7 818 entennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 !I PERMIT APPLICATION FORM• . . d Application must ' C��, be complete where (X ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER applicable. Type or (X ) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ilZ /` y'� pr7ht in BLACK ' FOR: (X ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP r INK.No overstrikes �� C J or. erasures unless . ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO. ` RE��Bt initleled. . ( ) OTHER - 410 CNG�t14S� 33' / z. . r�Fj �'o tom r$tt WATER COURT CASE NO. Asp _ • -P (1) APPLICANT; mailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Cb • • NAME Erie Water & Sanitation District Receipt No. 0- 1 81 / • STREET • P. O. Box 386 Basin Dist. CITY Erie Colorado 80516 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL(State) (Zip) ' TELEPHONE NO. 828-3816 This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The . (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant . that no injury will occur to another vested water Weld . right or preclude another owner of a vested water ' County right from seeking relief in a civil court action. S.E. %of the N•W• '/,Section 6 APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 1973, 37-92-6O2(1), . (d) FOR DRINKING AND SANITARY FACILITIES ONLY Twp. 1 N Rng. 68 W 6th P.M. I IN THE OFFICE AND SANITARY FACILITIES OF THE iN.SI 1E W) TOWN OF ERIE'S WASTE WATER TREATMENT PIANT. (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA ` Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 10 gpm - Average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated (acre-feet): 1/3 ac .ft. • Number of acres to be irrigated: 0 Proposed total depth (feet). 20 ' Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: . Piney Creek Alluvium i . Owner's well designation GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ' • • (X ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) • ( 1 DOMESTIC (1) ( ) INDUSTRIAL (5) ( ) LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) ' ( 1 COMMERCIAL (4) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) ( ) OTHER (9) APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE1ON BACK IN (11) 97265 PERMIT NUMBER f) 1 . - (4) DRILLER DATE ISSUED MAR 311970 • Name licensed EXPIRAT ATE I1`!H 3 I 1;A:s Street A _ • City (STAT GI E • (State) (Zip) BY Telephone No. Lic. No. /—° �� I.D. COUNTY C .- • E-2 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATE[? BELQW • ►which the,water will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. by distances from section lines. Use.the CENTER SECTION (1 section, 640 acres) for the well location. ' f 3 000 ft. from south sec.line '. 0 + — —t— — + _ -'�-- — —t— -- + _ _d_ _ _i_ _ •+ (north or south) fi fi • rf `1 1 MILE,5280 FEET )-I I 1,600 ft. from WeSt ser,..line f' • (east or west) f• + •+ + + �Burlington Nor theJ-nLOT N/A N/A BLOCK N/A FILING * N/A I • I RJ R. I i•4. 4 • I NORTH SEC ON LINE - + _ SUBDIVISION I (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE I I I I I LOCATED Owner: Erie Water & San. NORTH Z` II — — —m + Distric — T — > + No.of acres 10 . Will this be • rn I J I 2 I t- p - i . ryri ' the only well on this tract? yes + + y I1 I 6 • (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM I I.- I I r- II Plain Casing + 3 + I — m + 1 8 in. from 0 ft. to 16 ft. I . I in. from ft.to ft. — + - I I — + — Perforated casing , • SOUTH SECTION LINE I 8 in. from 16 ft.to 2 0 ft. + -)- :1-_}.! + -I- + 4 -I- + in. from ft. to ;t. , I ' I I I I (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS give distance • and direction from old well and plans for plugging The scale of the diagram is 2 inches= 1 mile . Each small square represents 40 acres - WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figures) An acre-foot covers 1 acre of land 1 foot deep 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) . . 449 gallons per minute (gpm) A family of 5 will require approximately 1 acre-foot of water per year • 1 acre-foot. .43,560 cubic feet . 325,900 gallons 1,000 gpm pumped continuously for one day produces 4 42 acre-feet (10) LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Owner(s): N/A No. of acres: • Legal description: ' (11) DETAILED DESCRIPTION of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of disposal system to be used. Drinking water, showers , toilets , etc. for waste water treatment plant employees_ ni`sposal visa the waste water treatment plant- with n11 t Fa ll into Coal Creek. (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land, including wells Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right N/A Used for (purpose) Description of land on which used • (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS - TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. Er ' e Water & Sanitation District --1,-1/42- 227_,O.-gC-/c SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(S) Steve Melick, President 3. Use additional sheets of paper if more space is required. I EXHIBIT 3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 1228 Main Street, Longmont, CO 80501 December 8, 1977 r Mr. Steve Melick, President Erie Water & Sanitation District P. 0. Box 386 Erie, CO 80516 Dear Steve: The soils information that you requested is all of the same series; hence no map is included to show different delineations. The soil series or name is Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded. In general , these soils are found on river floodplains, are deep, poorly drained alluvium and located within the 100 year flood zone. The engineering properties are severe for shallow excavations and roadfills because of the potential flooding, wetness and frost action. An on-site soils investigation by a qualified consulting engineer would be recommended to design footings, foundations and buildings. A more complete soils report is attached. Sincerely, .t / Carrot E. Ramon District Conservationist Attachment E-3 0 Id) C 'V r 1 A Y .i U O C a M 0. .Yc w w -4 14 .G ". 0 0 Y I. ■ M 00 'O VI H O 0 — y - . v ■ V I. .....I. •.6+ J C • U Y 0 L `� q 0 A .-0 y W 04 44 C M A u 0 G •C C ..1• 1.1 141• 0 N • A •0 .+ 0 • M Y >. 0 a+ Y C I. .+ C.▪ ~ .X 0 0 .. U u ~00 w • A l0 C ■ 0 'O 6 q • 0 •p .me E .0 N U 9 .Ps .0 y 0 u . • y w (0 41 Y C u A ya C ..+ L 61 '� Y C 00 • U 60 a a u `� 4 0. "4 0 ? O 44 • a 1i wW. .� ■ M • 'O C 0 a1 .0 .0 �' 11.., • .0 • 1. ... w ++ Y W C • ' C 0 41 ? < 6.4 >, Y ..4 a O . ■ ..1 0 0 0 U M L O. .y. C '' �0 <V 2° C1 0 0 Y i0 1. 0 •I •+ 7 u +! m g P +.1 C ■ 'U '= q .. U ■ o • a. 0 u 0. C 0 6 T. u C 'O Y • 0 .. M 0 u .. C U C Y • 14 g x 00 0 •• u a a. O 6 O 0 O' 0 q 0 0 00.a T. 0 • .. 0 V c m a 6 u w .,., ..1 ..I U 0 w G C4•1 C a ■ a u 0 C m 0 '0 F C C M '.°+ .� 0 6 w ■ a 0+ a u u t-4 r ..� q ,.+ 1. a. u • '� • 0 C u a € p C 0 a 4.o m b 6 'QY a ' y 1 u ■ _ y 0 u f. 4 G G 4.1 W 6. C C b V .•.1 '0 7 a, .0 u • M V +•j M 60 U „0 Ly0i .. w 0 .L. .00 .-1 • a Y X O1 U U C y .+ w 1+ .+ •p g q ....1 1. 000 CO M Y U 6 • m 'D Y.. C O. 3 0 'O 4.1 • • 0 I. a 1•j .0 0 • u C • .. co CO C M .. 0 M ll M U '. 00 6 ■ M C �^ O M 'O ..Ca Y 1.. .0 M marls N Y U '0 M C .C Y m 1. y 1 41 00.. .1qL M U O Y Y O � -4 M r 1.. '4 M 44 Y .k Y 'O 'C 41 41 G 6 A N O. y O 6 .1 M C� O 0 V 10) y 0 ..r C 0 C .d . A U • •41 0 q • y C Y • .0 ■ U CO ▪ 0 .0. '6., a1 6 Y .0 M ■ 9 M `. 0 .-0 7 1 • i y F 0 `� 'O y W L 00 N y u 0 C C G = G .-y. •0 .0 • a. U 0 - L y V 0 M a A. M .■a W L C. 0 M 4 tto, ad ++ 00 0 O •m1 0 u ■ = y • ›. ~ — 0 6 • y O • 0 ..4 O • U Y 0 1+ M 0 • M 0. 0 ..q+ I .t. 00 0 'I 1A .0 O U U O .-a• 5 •0. >. `° '•U a 0 V •10 w 0 0 c 1 U 11.1 u 0• 7 L M 0. X Y T. 0 11 llf-11 g„1 60 1.4 0 X +'1 1A. u cr< G O C M H U 0 C .Y. M 00 • U_ a Cl a • w '0 c a '0 • c a m w C u . U C 0 01 C . m q .. y .1 C u c C. .4 +Y1 O > OC ■ ■ ✓ a e•o .0 • ■ 4 ■ • 1 .r 0. Y '0 o .+ • a le 6.60 1 .0• • a+ .2 0. ■ owl 1M H V / N b u .0 v 7 0 M e 4 C.; 4 .tt 4 V C CI '.1 w e • u ▪ > v 3- T. .0 O U .0 n CO 7 LI 4 U O > > 0 u •0 N C d m d u d u 4, M 4., C In GO U C L 00 U V C C CC In CO CO U O 3 4 0 0. C 0 3 U N 0 •O 0 4 Cr. CO •0 O u CD U 0 c c -• E 4 u u 6 u > .0 u C d 'J aJ 1. n CO co n 0. En 3 u T > 0 u 1 C .... ... rC 0 CO .fl u U U .0 .-' O. - V CO 0 U U C O. 7 0 - U CO CY CT 3 '•. 0 a a c l� v a .0 C E.. CO ✓ CO CU .Y .C 'C . u • V • C 00 C w CO 00 C 00 I -. • 4 > d d 0 u d G 0 4 0 ..-' 0 .. tl CO n CO 7 u tl 00 1 d ••' 0 u 4 C T 0 C.. CU .C -• CO d CO •O d 0. > 0 w d q1 d .0 •" C n u .0 -U O. > -• d L 0 Cr 3 > .0 a 7. n n 0C •O d •N ••• d d H tl fI 4 0 3 CO 4 CO CO 4 40 L n -• ++ CO CO -' .0 U F •0 ,C 4 U E u L ". > .C .0 0 4 u N w 0 U 0 .0 d 0 0 .•1 1. 00 CO •r +' u u .0 0 d 4 0 U C a' - u w 4 +' .+ 0 4 44 .41 •0 4 4 E n C tl I. ■ 4 O U w w 0 00 C U C N - d '+ U O 0. 4 -C d 0 0 u CO Si 4 0 CO .r M Y 4 0 d tl • G n 0 I. • .0 WY G p + 0 0 F .0 d d w D. v 4 CO C .0 00 n 0 E 4 7 T d tl 4 0 U .-. 4 0 F .-C CO 0. w 7 .0 4 4 d C }• ..-.. 44 U COCCO .a 4 1 O 4 d CO u T9 4 O w > V CC u 4 7 r•• I •C 4 .C •••', b ••'• 0 41 > 0 d C. CJ C .0 ••• CC u 7 u 14 u .0 a ■ C .w a0 O 4 •0 a, 0 3 u 0 .0 u 4 0 -' CO O U C 0. G U Cn CO d d d CO O 0. 4 0 .0 0 C U d .0 U 4 4 .0 uq .Ni 0 0 u .0 .+ Y C u y 0. u .7 v 3 •-• • 961 C "0 -.4 .4 x 0 ••' O 00 C 0 . d C d CO d ••' tl .•a 4 u 7 0 e •.4 > O n n 7 0 u 0 C .0E 0 u to d a 7 C U 0 +• a V 0 U 0 d U N tl V 4 4 O -+ 0 .0 u U tl tl •O •"• g C) C O H CA U 0. •0. C'1 C7 C) CO U U U 4 d d .C • 1. R 0 n w 0 4 - d d .fir .0 C d d w O C :L ..4 0 C .r Enp, 44 •" 0 3 .0 •d CO d 'O V • 4. .V 0 4 7 ••• d d 0 .4 O > • 3 d 0 .0 .7 G e0 d n 0. 0. 4 L 4 •p 0 4 .0 0 •r .. 4 4 u to u 0. d .0 O u 4 3 d 4 d > U C O U CO w •0. - _ •O tl u 0. 0 4 E L 0 4 .) 4 r 'O .0 7 n 03 CO G CU EE d . 3 u u 4 .0 0. 0. Y 0. G C0 u C.C CO CO U 4. C -.a >. d .C u 3 U •0 A' 0 'O H 7 �: 0 tl C IQ c64 n E w d 4 7 u 4 tl .0 •4 CO >. 7 .0 u CO C u CO •O 17 b •'• .0 3 4 4 -' .0 0 E 4 4 ++ 4 3 0 4 •0 O C Cy d 4 0 4 +• O u 4 4 0 U S 4 > 0 .0 C u 0 W O tl U 4 C 0 4 4 d7-. V 41 'Ca +• 0 3 u .C 00 ..C 4 •�' d 7 4 C'+ 0. 0. d 44 w F • 4 U u u tl tl .. E 00 w ■ al O. '0 C 4 w O u 0 - •.• w C tl C d G. U .0.1 u 0 4 .0 •O •O WI d 8 . O 00 d .0 U 3 d d 0 M e 0 tl v - 0 V - .C ^' U - C u 00 44 u u O F O a F W 0. 0 •O O C •3 V tl U d 0 .-• UN •0 U O 4 0 N •.• ..' .. u 4) 4 'O > w0 S 4 O •••' 0 U w CM .-• qE� M .� •r .� M 7 '•• O u E U O 1 - 3 is 4 0 ' 10 -' C .C .0. O t el 0 i. 0. U C 0 41.4 4 0 w • u .. tl w s tI u ..0 W ) e u C 4 .C 0. •a tl 4 O +• 00 4 4 3 u 4 n a n e eC C tl - +•• Yr 4 u .0 .4. 3 C 4 C .Y CI FF4! .0 1- ION 0 4 C U 0 •4 s O 0 3 �• 0 4 if 00 ++ 0 0 ++ C kC U 0. • 0 6 00 00 4 4 U N u -0 .0 C ."'•-• 44 4 3 6 4 • .i4 V r .+ 7 u 4 C C 4 0 _ •� GI tl CO 0 C C .. 0. tl 4 u 4) 4 .'' ••' a I. C 0 C a C ea ii H C 4 M V > w 0 4 O D. .r w u 3 O d U C 4 b d Q 4 O 00 0 u 4 V 0 'C O .0 C > O U CO d C .C .0 0 0. d 4. O > 7 4 0 _ •.+ ' v S, - 4 C. > 3 H• . 0 ? 0. 3C 4 . 4 4 0 C 4 — E XI I I 13I L' /4 FECEIVEO JAN t 1977 3 - 3 THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF COLORADO Colorado State Museum, 200 Fourteenth Avenue,Denver 80203 January 3 , 1977 Mr. Keith L. Bell Project Engineer Ray & Associates, Incorporated 2950 Pearl Street Boulder, Colorado 80301 RE : Erie Water and Sanitation District 201 Facilities Plan Dear Mr. Bell : Thank you for your letter of 27 December 1976 further docu- menting the absence of architectural or historic properties other than the Cherokee Trail/Overland Stage Route and the First Rural Public School within the proposed project area. Since neither of these properties will be affected by the proposed facility, we concur with your determination of no effect upon architectural or historic properties . Therefore, the Environmental Protection Agency has fulfilled its re- sponsibilities to identify and consider architectural and historic properties as prescribed by 36 CFR Part 800 for this project. We would appreciate notification if any other cultural properties are found in the project area during development. The office of the State Archeologist should also be contacted concerning the existence and significance of archeological properties in the project area. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in dealing with this project. Please contact Michael Quinn at 321-7265 or at the above address if we can be of further assistance. FOR THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER in erel es Edward ar mann Curator, Historic Preservation cc: Philip H. Schmuck, State Clearinghouse E-4 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 5 ERIE WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SITE SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION OWNERSHIP WITHIN 500 FEET OF SITE (See vacinity map for location) Parcel/Lot Owner Address A Becky, Joseph R. 6500 E. Sixth Ave. Denver, Colo. 80220 B Elting, Roelof S. & Rt. 1, Joan M. Erie, Colo. 80516 C Bulthaup, H. Gene & Rt. 1, Box 220 Carolyn M. Erie, Colo. 80516 15 & 16 Walters, Harry & Box 265 Westview Estates Esther Frederick, Colo. 80530 17 Bennett, Olin T. & c/o Fish Creek Park Inc. Westview Estates Ellsworth Jacke P. O. Box 5841 Denver, Colo. 80217 • 18 Shultz , John & c/o Majestic Savings Westview Estates Susan 2420 W. 26th Ave. Denver, Colo. 80211 14 Beauchamp, Donald Lee c/o Arthur L. Cramer Westview Estates 207 Westview Road Erie, Colo. 80516 E-5 4/ 8 0 2 , 8 C '1 a 'C. 'G Vl Zu 4 20 Vl V'\ Vl O .y' - - -I� - . _ a • . . O Z \� YQ \_. a ;��O '�I:,`�AI'��°E CO,._:!t2�;'R®�°I� E�— p,c o ' `'1 ` 3)76'' ¢ T FO[ 10Eii;.a>'L��:�A?MAIL 4 w C -0 1 Z '/ o v N IJ I v_ N (See Reverse) '' 'O z , >'� (. SLNT t,; o v -y o °u m 4 �. s,Rr x+TD1�iCJ'z- - - z :v ° 2 v oo E v ¢ \\ ii `f u v . . .6, ', O O y c P O,STATE AND ZIP CODE---- .'C. v, L 'o y 'J+-cC A' Z ■ U Z w N cn C b fYr'O Ri-cy O p S U Q �, - p. .v. W .v+ W ❑ w b ,_, w < POSTAGE - u y .a a �;'...-4 O « y y w ICErTIFIED FEE Et 'v a W C W ca ;d O Z W C., 'P ' l' o m - - - ---. m u ca '� Q as (�'o ..iy w O U {b m•D y e w 'SPECIAL DELIVERY G aa.u v o l�Q'� .1.1.1 C co < \' n J . }RESTRICTED DELIVERY G Ea a s l� a s vCC V y0 \+ J E w ell o'• " 0 1 O b w O O ,ILI,I ¢- SHOO TO V+HO'1 AND DATE G a 2O x 9 a 2 N ;1,1 C Z o ..>. \` O U O I� 5 5 DELI'JERED o a a HaHaCO o \1 w - - - W ,o a w w W 6 U w \, O co uo 6N L., A o c W {f�x.�� 0 H 3 o w W €n e n SHOO TO 1'JHO'1,DATE AND Z U En W cn g e y O Ha 0 w < 7 ., Or CO a- I— ADDRESS OF DELI'V'ERY G v F H F- to 0) Q O •< E- "'❑❑ ❑ v ., < w < r, x CZ7 < SHOW TO V,HO'1 AND DATE a 41 cri ►r (� ui tD DELIVERED 15,TH f+ESTRICTED G an ® DELIVERY PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL CJ SHOT)TO 060'1 DATE AND W ADDRESS OF CELIVERY WITH G c LRESTR.CTED DELIvERY •6- TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ o ,r, v-, -c, 0. u ww :9-, a POSTMARK OrR DATE v N �' W st3 U Z Oil i•CC MM.' Q'' .a �" W H li° a ^o a w_ o c�'d w ' "�� V ` co 4�1 H �' to N ,l 1 CO0. g a., h' .?. v IA r• j p 1L i u aP 00 .!C v u • A o •> . c aV' ° o v s b Q o tl t v v o v 4 OS 4t❑ i e -- - - — - - - a" v .b ^o Lob W'O $ w O 'O aJ < ..� ,. 1 I- s �J C O y ro W W C y N \ `- W — rV v kl , cd › . . 0 w v w / ?V m - r�- �`� ! --.t y -o C wb w . H- z w . •� o Y `o -,ir_CL PT [-OR CERTIFIED IFIED MAIL E A ai . -o q ,9 Q o v w d¢ i a 1•,;2 _ IG aCL Cc _ ['ROME— t.,'' f.. P. [Qs1 a �.' fA C ≥ a W 1.»L FO I,f��.I-.i R.�•�I ��'.s 11 Tu w 2 2 F•+.2' -1-[ — K t/U1 's a O O (S.^,e Reverse) "tot c a a uaua c~d O0 NE-I 1 W Z O C'1 a U O S. \T':: U< 'a S ° ° wo 0 < 0 O a 'Uw \� Ow y w �q/�l7�7��T o a a Z a s w w w d z w —1 •'L(LV .ly� — — cG O O u�x..�� o tWry O O ,� J C ; y., O ,W a co S.-REET AND NO A cn cn N.cn �i U] w U ,T,' V Fw •- I— ' a < p Z 1= < V) F E❑ O v h < Q C7 V, < P O STATE AND LIP CODE-- — 0J W PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL POSTAGE — I CEA ',PIED FEE — G w' !SPECIAL DELIVERY G RESTRICTED DELIVERY G — —1 i 10-I<' H !3 e' I H ' I ® .--, SHOO TO\fW0'+ANN DATE G Q i II I ,, -DrLIvERED cA cc I Od w cn SHOO TO WHO' DATE AND G ,I , -- ¢ s•-I ADDRESS 1,',c...ERL, L -_C. I C\I i 'f , I Q ¢ I ~� l o~ !•- G SHOW ED G'T D O R CTED 4 >-II I 'A.:. L- W' w c_� ® DELIVERY - — S.? I o I w w b sc I c� SHO'!TO 1',n^_' DATE AND I O > ❑ _ - 0 1 e-) Lm 'ADDRESS OF DELlaRY ViITH G Ua w o —0 o o�> o c G '21RESTRCTED DELIVERY iu L; b� oc o � Ls (� Q I4 I TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ �� O LL a ¢ I v='— .2 ' -'"-',,',"•, t ¢ r^ n. ;,,r, IO. ill - ,. I—lz IIF w FIN [ill 33IAF13S bd1133L1 NOUN o a I' 1'OSTOARIC OR DATE H' < ,w I s3OIAms ltl��DI1dD — h ' -I ? O ,7 m I° ° S33�DDS�1B1StlGdASD�1��osraDa i-' 0- -, o 9L6-1 zdv`UO',E c'is c' I G _ __ S II L '.-'., " 'i ;m _ � 1 rq . Z bC W o:M -� o - ',TIF't D kiAIL a • , b ca < w F a w c o 9- N vZ N. i„'.1 ,',I i:,- - - PROV;Q P.— Ov 4' y v 7 e y.4 tim o „7t FOr.11.I,T_._,^ ,v6 'i ---- i4� O v c"a Z o p �v� (See RE.S',iO) v .b kJ go td SE N' 5 -o in .D ¢ I ' ` 53 KOCH a ... Ur, v 4 h v o t �� a S.-Rt E-AND NO n 5 .n v v ›•�v 7ia a' Z • x I 4 = CD -- .a a^o ru 0 W v r4 c O 0 M Y b -"t ° U PO STATE AND ZIP CODE v h 3S , C ti ,--I v N _.1 W =C Nv 6 ay .a v•o a z z o ,r; . r m POS'AL-F $ Em •� b Aca A'b -b W ID O U �] T. b } F w TGTPTIFIE EJ FEE C uoL� v O o [s A[s.1I 0 [A[.zz.1I 0 [, to M C .C¢ `/Y p J an SPFC.AE ^._. .ER, C La o.Tu ' .C .G F-'x H'° IX 0: ❑ J E W " - 6.0 a s c. U a y 0 10 O a b ' ' w 0 0 RESTRICTED DE.E'ER' 1 C U< a 2 2 w o ° al Q rri co D Z o/1 (� 0 U p ® _ } --- a h F C [� O Di 'a, LL N !!a t`u` SHO�1 Tr iv"Et't AYl GATE t c a' a O O W� j O 0 La J H J K ; .a. re - v p W J WI t,I = ,DF_.' r A ° � 0) 0)) 0/D v I-1 U v S � ►�- Cr CO IW - 4 Z a z H O P w > < �o o Z • ,• u, I � auE,a" „" ' ^ 'E ANC vWi F ❑❑ ❑ w < W Q < w ,-I Fri a Lei to< O & i 6 ADDRESS DF�E.:FRI —e- 6 -tSn:':1'O i,�' I A',J DATE PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL - = DELI:FPEJ:'"rESTR,CTED ® 0ELI:ERr E ma TO 1,HO" DATE AND s., WI I ADPESS OE JE_IvERY MTH FIESTI,r'ED CE..FRY O v ea v CD w L o ,n vv v\ CD ') LT,' a TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES s u N `C DD .r 'C to to rh —1-- u O O iv Y YJ N ^v -- -- -- - — -- o •• . 'ti Z — a < Cr— ¢ o POSTE?AM(OR DATE y f di a • C w v -ci- F U? p >".' 0 N yp _ - O F" C u oo y ti'4 4 O O Ea .0 C.i Z O O.C a b • u TA 7 _ „ _ o • W C ,., v @S ,� G EW—i : cu H U - .. C vQ. av .a 6_9 o u a m F?ECLF. 1 FLi', '..;_.).i.'. :L,_ :1 L a g a v.4 b v o _o w it } c o `tilt,+ _ :C.=_:_:C' Ficut'tc:°— S 6.N• 's~ 6 A 6 A ro y U 1.1" a ¢ w o ≥ i:CT E=®i li. c,' +S i "1AL.�T' a''''t y c° x a c .c w a w (See Reverse) 6•a a a V a 4 mp V C a 'U0 W o 0 1j� C O O O O M o co W Z 0 c 0 () 0 SEN' O ��7�77//++ 0 I-• IN G W 0 o W 0 c0 O 0 .J W C ; •� 0 Cr y W S—BEET AND NC A v vl ai vl W Vim) — U V F < y f I- o CO - — Zh ❑❑ ❑ -- ¢ O O = - v > < p 0 or P O SATE AND ZIP CODE wv < x (� < w x � ^ < « ci m ce "' rn a Eri co POSTAGE PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL ;E RTI IEEE rF i C SPEC A: Dr-. EP, C , I I U I J t T ty I tr I t = I rESTRICTF D DE,",,E RY C i QJ , I I� ,.0 La1ti,,:,Y" ^'t„,DATE C n -, , t "" � 5' LU ra. I I , - I ' 1 l%I� SHOO TO i,HC•' DATE AND W �� ▪ ...4 i r,. AD0%ESS OF CE:'::Rf C v } D..- SHJ:1"J,, AS0 DATE , a- .J E---,"rm Q) I w , _ _ _ MI = d I DELWEIIED i,Pn CtSTRICTED C R I CI DELIUERE' .s > •'w aJ =J H ' ill • _�,a ❑ zbt'` __ _� -, I'd S "d'. t GATE AND • Cn [C raI` e P-I, '_ u ❑ oN r l- a I- eo Ey r^F„-c"'E.. ,Y'" ( C O QJ n-4 rl4 C ❑ I LL I -I I U r:.., oo ;w LS,� lJ et ° �1i I! J L- x t Z ❑ CJ IL'H te,,_, l Ca 4__m" , ~ 0 T TOTAL POSTAGD AND FEES S r' ^a 4 a w F ,Q 330Ai13S AdY]- llunl�ru Q - - POSTMARK OA DATE -' -- �'�'w u, a I w' s33IArl3S 1nra0Iado a • ',nn 'I - t:) —-- - -- ° I SHd noA u3ASnw1Sod fnsraoa - VI — - -- 9LB i `df' clo' - E C? Et 0.; I I 0 In o r ,r, O 4J • J N ' 1 I1 .1 rRl bra} a .0 O Z bc ca < W y - , : W • b f OZ, _, _ ,; ' ., '‘=RT IF I ED MAIL H c > z o o yt !,III FOR cia E aEYo L f.A:L �° -o — (See Reverse) E4y 'o o v N ti< SENT '0 v ° •° ti a❑ BECKY -- b o a, D 'a O Z 4 u ,11 y STREE'AND NO --- -vs L' '" b ,'Yi'v >+Ica a' ,--I • ai 0' p - --F0 _ 'O W W[ W_ M c 'd c� _ a P 0 S-ATE-AND ZIP CODE .-, .a ri :---1"i 6. F- Z K w 00 5 o or E b A A'n b W O r « W POSTAGE _ -- - - $— — — _ �b C > .°1, a U1 M U N d j a J �CEP_TIFIED FEE C 'O • v o o AW a A�a o y co W an - - --— - - aT., _o x F 4 t-,.4 Y>: I O O a -❑ w o 0 ': 'SPECIAL DELIVERY C E.O a s a U U a pO O i� Z O > F I 'RESTRICTED DELIVERY O"a O O O O p h IL U) ® ✓— C pii• O W y x< O O `n o v) o o H Ct ; OJ j W W m = w SHOJI TO I HD'1 AND DATE - -- W o .C ..C -Z tYi.4 N U '? UOW ≤ I- I- p Q b I DEL'rEuED C y '� N^ F Q O U) A Z O Q Z QIs w - w F le❑0 O v < „ , Q Q a ,G C7 I an SHOP!TO WHO-I,DATE AND-- - ar vd IX ■., ( Ti ui ADDRESS 0 CEL'JERY C • .-• W w N 63 Q _— --- - 6aA PS Form 3811,Nov 1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL SHOJI TO I'd-In--AND AI,D DATE I e�, G DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED C I c DELIVERY i j ___ 6 I E 1 SHIM TO Wd0."1 CATS AND - s' ADDRESS Or DELIJER+WITH C I` 1 'W I RESTR,CTED DELIVERY I . - o o , "n O x < U) I S m TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES N •c' W '-I C O aa' Y '- Se< 1}N,, • -- ` 0 Z eq E a W— i ,. POSTI:1ARK OR DATE y C W ? .a F F;J' I i;Z V m O E. ; t. ? 6 3 V v." ; y o D ar cn Z O O.C ?c,.., 'a o " o m 7 p, w dJ 'b "" W N 'fl d `�� U) 41 b y w PG .vi ,O, Oy 4 4 O y ,O❑ N'- w 0- - .a y O ti b O ti, Z • 'C ,� 7 y —— __—� - —_--_ T__ - —_ — s. Cr n t.'",J ->7 roN w o w,I b O W M O 'U al Q 1 /� H C lU ,y VI > ,ti CO li ,--I 7 J in co ..'s, '^� J 'I �'J W'a W to Z Li CO 1'.,^CJ O w -o A Ca Q'a b ww O Li N ; o.a , z > I-'ECl_ -'I FOIR. CE-!?1IFIED MAIL AWQQd ,d y Cr) a a MQ ` > , c ;I,1 r y Tu •v 0 ,c E-4.4 o Iz1 0 .5 w �, c- O .� W E o "� li.3T FOR INT4.li�tAYi�;;RL�.7'AILo. L 0-.- c 0 0 0 0 M ° w Z n.4 a .> ° (See Reverse) a< 0 O I—I O a '1)2 a W w cn z ;w CU U V O w J SLNT TO » o -c,,,- : y v a tJ �_ F ≤ > F ��``H c CO �EATJCHAMP .0 .„ y , K `-) O H- cn Z �- 1 O p j S-REST AND NO - of �'+ l_5[1 l I .1 y Q ,-. Q Q C7 ,C (7 ///!v\\\ a - --- - — • G 1 (-Hs HS xi py C H i.�/ ,ri ko P O,STATE AND ZIP CODE ' ' PS Form 3811,3%4 �4-4 7 1 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL POSTAGE JERTIFIED FEE I. an — —---- - _I y' I a I d i I �. I I L.5., SPECIAL DELIVERY C — I G , !RESTRICTED DELIVERY C I I ® r r`0 I I , cl I I.0 SHOD!TO WHO'1 AND DATE �' cs>I I u> 6a' ' ' JDEL'VERED C r fpCG w V [JP 04 TO WHO" DATE AND C e,.9�� a I I ADDRESS OF DEL VERY x E-a _ — THI III q` v d 4- I w I I ¢ J W wC'n a �•I L 0 I SHOW TO 1',H0 I A',D DATE J is rJ Yr I o w w = - u. ' • t . c DELIVERED 15 TH TESTR,CTED C OO CC �� cy 0 ❑ o _— _oo A Iw us ® 9ELIJERY — — O (%j N I w o ' _ I2 .E""c 'I o ' L¢ I Q b I I a I SHOW TO WHO'1 DATE AND �I LL ry N,O ❑ LL I Q U ' .? p ,5== L4 I° I ADDRESS OF DELIJERI V,ITH C E I;z z ❑ ° , o Qa- Q RESTRCTED DELIJERY rn 6Mil a w i a w ail{!I{2S JId G333U NW113�] `�' I TOTAL Ll, .7 w F (< w7 ¢ ,n Q I a c I POSTAGE AND FEES �? () �+` FE '� Iu , 0 SNIALI31S 1M101.1d0 a I F I POSTMARK as SATE %: ° ° S331 F10r i31Stt�1bS®�l l��S��m9 a n°. — Ia a Y 0 9L6T zdV'00'46 uz0g Sri ;j m E 0 0 U) R, II I i ' U i ...1 Z, A I y • SENDER Complete item; 1,2,and i. a (n I ts> I c Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on - ti� ti I a __�_ U) reverse. Cn ^- `7 2i' Iz Kgit o 1. The following service is requested (check one). r,1— u 12 Show to whom and date delivered 250 7--I .- I _ > z - I o In z . W c LL o `2.-1:- w 5 ❑ Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 450 :u c > W .21-6-, LL cm _ --!7. i' EI c- . - ' _ 6 W. n I9 ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. a r---' ti5 i R , _ F2 r1.-- _ W o °' Show to whom and date delivered 850 �_I ,c " 13 o z . ? P ,,- I `,o I =o i h a cc ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. W t, a v. —1 I W— ° Show to whom,date,and address of delivery ..$1.05 '•>I�3 z '- a . 33111113S ldl33311 minim Q Q i _ -- H ,a c n_ Q (Fees shown are in addition to postage charges and other Sta • I.,W w '' a y� ' S3�IAt13S ytl\lOIldO a fees). :27 —v 'a f F $333 VOA1131SVGdlSQd 1101SNO3 oI-- n 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 9L61 AN ,,',,1,"nog Sd ' q ERIE WATER & SANT DIST I C MI Z P121 DOC 78-63 e -t, -a, 1..› ,� ti y Fn) 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: v ,o. CV 'd W q ,-y NV! m REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. • sf},b Z tY: K x< g', O O < cc— . Y m 280137 O v 0o D N I- U? vO—i (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) z 7 q -i d o 'v 4o u) N o a z I have received the article described above. d v z o ..� m0 SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee O Autboriz a ent v O e m Q r / /`� n, .v.v O z, 0 v N •p / . 'f L / /Idj' -.a �a�l .4J 4 v v, C 'O A ❑ N C 4. -/ v-�:-i'�.�' V�" ,� l/� o v 'C o c y v >+ >-i-Ft +� Z o a iiicn DATE OF DELIVERY 1 POSTMARK' a 7 'O p, 4-O ix, O O tI) p a) a 0 .. ea .O .y C li y H U _ ,) ' w a ,.1[ W v4'" I- z W H w o m 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested? d W u v A 'b O m ° v s n a T u v ° o [A�o A o c W M U N «Q w a ≥ m �_ Ev °Q a a y, a u a °: o Lo V C a V❑ w c o m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S V< a o o ''-' o o C Q z „ O U O O INITIALS W O o O U) O tr)W O O J ,7-1 l` W W 3 •u W WO in W D 0 .,..'7:3 co co 4 co 4 En •y O rr N U W v I» 7 F ce C0i r- Q • 1', ❑❑❑ ❑ „,--- a, W o m y Z ///\. O Z GOP 1976-O 203-456 • W vel< W Q < W .q ii) M PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL e -c, c. v V\ '- LP, o v- v1 ,� O -v m N `I" 00 ,--i '� o Y ,'� N k;-(1,.. -__ Nh „ .v Z '3 < w T • q W Y .b f .I1 Jz\� 16 0 a, y ? a N ' o v 0 N , z O > O \T. ' �'- cv _ it N ^d p 1.1 Y Aid ��. �� W v v p v y W N -O Q �� L W a, tn tn v . E .0❑ \� a o O •C cr co 7 v 4v >-'„,v o 0 0 •9 0 O' v lil u w q • id co ` v t a 0 `° M > M > `" o O W H s ar N W � � u' Wvy :-1 � ►' Z � Oww c m E v� v ❑ - A a W-u 74 O O ° W t7O 5 0 v y ae. re v. m mA W U Nb �v to yQ � c uo'5i r, o 0 o A o c_ W W er z e 1 > n w a a a a o o ri $ v❑ �I W o O z o u o v O �< 0 8 8 Fagg [ a U o O A .� � W y v W O O W X �.C p J P -I o: 3 P. EC 7 W W -I A 4 Vl cn h c> - I- R d F?- 4,i_ K m IL, P� W .C re) PS Form 3811,Nov.1976 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MA, MI ti f' � -- (7—\--� i 1 � 0 °— 0 ' ' c...... r ,...., �I , ,_ ,,,,,, c„, t , , uc„. 1 Y • Li_I W a • SENDER Complete items 1.2,and i c-•e.� L � U, � T Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on gut r j reverse. 5 �+ LI. ! m 1. The following service is requested (check one). L .--'emery - a Show to whom and date delivered 250 �o` L, Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 450 u t� N ❑ RESTRIC 1 ED DELIVERY. ." „° ti PI °i Show to whom and date delivered 85t "- Q,,, o 3 Z H O RESTRICTED DELIVERY. "S C1 _ r:4 N Show to whom,date,and address of delivery 1.05 yy ..$ \ t / p (Fees shown are in addition to postage charges and other 0o fees). H124 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: I OOH 0 = U to U c BEUNTZ xi U x z a o Z m nnr� 7R-f;3 0 H rn 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: aREGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. H3 0 280134 o ,Z in (Always obtain signature of addresses or agent) • Z U m I have received the article described above. (A 010 M A# M SIGNATURE 0 Addressee 0 Authorized agent 2 I 4. DATE OF DELIVERY POSTMARK m 0 a ® 0 5. ADDRESS (Complete only 1f requested) c ®,'�,t;� m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLEINIRK'S ®�o/®� `JV I'_ ; ,64Z * GOP 1976- 203-456 0 4�� o„ op n,n ' el cm 8 O „, ,:„ j 00 0 ® cD 5 Jyd�v� ;l> � 8 ® ti�d�, � U 7 u '1 8o U a Z a 0 two h `1/4 ` 'Cr C `e N O H O N P LCD A Q0 00 11' • 0 U •r-I cd cd O c) O cd•H f 4-I-) F-i Fi Fi N O +' O N H a U 4.) 000 -0 Eicd cxdu � O H"A cad W Ocn •r0-I C7U \ w 0 N -I-) U 0 0LCDri P w W Uc] W co CD // z z O Q 4 *4 ....41 4*.• 10' t... 4./ ".._•kr l.,.3' az g O co a 4o Q p _ ,\o a w = QT cJv /43 O • Q J l alt?‘47$#. Olli);7DOt) LE908 OOVld0100'A3133a0-13381 ya0L SL6 "' • SENDER Complete items 1 2,and 3 Crr ; aryT; t�✓* �+Ar, o Add your address in the RETURN TO space on v reverse N0!NSURAULE Ginn 1r Fl F.;i 1-2- O. NO T FOR INTE"3I ::nL irn'1 - 1 The following service is requested(check one) (Seo,Rcverca) G Show to whom and date delivered (C SENT TO , - 2 ❑ Show to whom,date,and address of delivery (C N LiRESTRICTED DELIVERY STREESTREET • o Show to whom and date delivered C T 4 m G RESTRICTED DELIVERY •^O STATE NO ZIP COO:- M Show to whom,date,and address of delivery $ ` % � c (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) POST/-,C :',Oz \2 ARTICLE AD�n}RESBED T,O _ (.1 C::4T,,,O ,, d iL a c a=.,, i Dr--V-'," 7.T -A .�.-'z-—' ��-\.ti IJ t � r-1,u , •,,a,_, I 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION !_� ;I? m REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO <( i' '?r----- - - - o --cl rs p G3 '�.i0"J 10 t7Ha`1 A'.D CATr - II (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) n DFLIVtIL0 THCEST7C-r-u C o n [1:- I have received the article described above n 0 ,IVFRv a. Z sHc)To V,410+Dar AND Z SIGNATURE G Addressee G Authorized agent p ADDCESS or DFLI.LRY V,TH g U cz RtSIR,CTEDDE'IVcRV C 7 ' ';/� TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ m4 C / -`� ,C--, .. W POSTMARK OR DATE D DAT OF DELIVE Y ,,,4 PO TM w Z Oc' Q '?%., ) C) 5 ADDRESS(Complete only if reque d) i. A \ \ ,\% DJ \9 8 G' m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE 'S rn w I S T D F *GPO 19 - -249-595 \% \-\" \ D `\\\\ Hello