HomeMy WebLinkAbout20112426.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION
RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE -ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTION
A public hearing was conducted on September 13, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present:
Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair
Commissioner Sean P. Conway, Pro-Tem
Commissioner William F. Garcia
Commissioner David E. Long
Commissioner Douglas Rademacher
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Tonya Disney
Assistant County Attorney, Stephanie Arries
Planning Department representative, Bethany Salzman
Planning Department representative, Peggy Gregory
Building Inspector, Frank Piancentino
Environmental Health Services, Mary Evett
The following business was transacted:
At the request of Planning staff, Commissioner Rademacher moved to refer the following matter
back to the department of Planning Services; ZCV #1100075, Lorenzo Rios. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously.
I hereby certify that a public hearing was conducted to consider whether to authorize the County
Attorney to proceed with legal action against the individuals named for violations of the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance. Cases were heard as follows:
BCV#1100075-SANDERS: Peggy Gregory, Department of Planning Services, presented the case
report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of various sections of
the Weld County Code, as detailed in staffs case summary. The letter advising the property owner
of today's hearing was delivered to the property owner's husband, Jeffrey Sanders, in person on
August 22, 2011. Ms. Gregory stated this violation is for the change of use of a detached garage to
a single family dwelling, further stating the garage was originally built in 2008 and was permitted.
Ms. Gregory stated the Sanders' original plan was to build a single family dwelling; however, both
Anna Sanders and Jeff Sanders lost their jobs, further stating they have been able to stock up on
some of the building supplies they will need. Ms. Gregory stated after the Sanders lost their jobs
they both felt they had no other option other than to convert the detached garage into a temporary
dwelling in order to provide a place for their family to live. Mrs. Sanders has found employment;
however, Mr. Sanders has still not secured employment. Ms. Gregory stated the Sanders do not
have a septic system, they have to empty the waste into a holding tank, taking weekly trips to a
dumping station. Ms. Gregory further stated the Sanders do have a water tank. Ms. Gregory stated
on August 22, 2011, Mr. Sanders brought the plans into the office to go over the changes that he
has made, as well as to discuss what will be required to obtain a building permit and an estimate of
fees. Ms. Gregory stated she spoke with Mr. Sanders on September 1, 2011, at which time he
stated he would try to get the septic permit as soon as he could, also stating he has a job lined up;
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 1 PL0824
however, he does not know how long the job will last. Staff recommends this matter be referred to
the County Attorney's Office but delay legal action for 60 days to allow the property owners time to
obtain and submit the required permits.
Jeffery Sanders, property owner, stated they understand they are in violation; however, they feel
they do not have any other options at this time. Mr. Sanders stated he has spoken with staff and
they are working on trying to resolve the issues. Mr. Sanders further stated finances have been
rough for his family with both he and his wife losing their jobs and having to continue to provide for
their three children. Mr. Sanders stated he does have a question for the Board regarding the road
impact fee that is on the estimate sheet that staff provided him. Mr. Sanders is concerned if they
pay the road impact fee now they may have to pay the fee again once they start building their home,
and Chair Kirkmeyer stated the road impact fee is a one-time fee and will not need to be paid at a
later date if it is paid now. Mr. Sanders stated the fees for the permits are their main concern right
now in order to come into compliance with the Weld County Code. He further stated they are in the
process of getting all the information requested and needed from the Planning Department in order
to convert the garage to a home or a temporary housing situation, until they can come up with the
money to build the home they would like to. Mr. Sanders stated if the job he is supposed to start
lasts longer than a couple of months, they hopefully will be able to pay the permit fees and move
forward.
In response to Commissioner Rademacher, Mr. Sanders stated he does have work lined up with a
previous employer but it is not intended to last long; he is hoping it will last through the end of
November, 2011, or the beginning of December, 2011.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Mr. Sanders stated they do not have the money right now for
all the permit fees; however, they are working on it. Mr. Sanders stated they could possibly come up
with some of the money for the permit fees, but not all of it at this time. Mr. Sanders stated they
understand they are going to have to fix the septic system; however, they do have a vault in the
ground that the waist goes into, and not that often. Mr. Sanders stated he can make that work for
them for now with the amount of water that also goes into it, which on an average is about 400
gallons a week; he then hauls the waste off to the dumping station. Mr. Sanders stated he
understands one of the requirements for a residential home is the requirement of a septic permit.
Mr. Sanders' concern at this time is that by the time he gets the permit and has everything put in
place it will add approximately another$3,000.00 to the already above mentioned fees. He stated
they would like some time to get all the required permits; however,the fees that he has estimates for
are going to be roughly $7,000.00, and without knowing how long he will have work, it is hard to
make sure his family is provided for and to obtain the needed permits.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Frank Piacentino, Building Inspection, stated he has not had
the opportunity to conduct an inspection of the site as of yet; however, staff has done a site review
of the property. Mr. Piacentino further stated he has spoken with Mr. Sanders extensively in the
office and feels it will be possible to convert the garage into a house, if that is what they choose to
do.
Mr. Sanders stated he does have the plans for the garage in its original existence and the current
plans of the work that has been completed to date. Chair Kirkmeyer stated at this time the Board
does not need to go over the plans, but Mr. Sanders can meet with staff and discuss the details.
Commissioner Conway stated he is willing to have this matter referred back to the Department of
Planning Services and have staff work with Mr. Sanders on detailing what needs to be done and
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 2 PL0824
what steps to take in order to resolve the current issues. Commissioner Conway understands
Mr. Sanders is trying to come up with the money to obtain the proper permits and fees, but also has
to think of his family.
Commissioner Rademacher asked if there is a fee or payment schedule for people that cannot pay
the fees up front. Tom Parko, Department of Planning Services, stated staff does not have any fee
schedule of this sort.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Stephanie Arries,Assistant County Attorney, stated the code
provision allows for no flexibility in regards to the road impact fees. Ms. Arries further stated the
difficulty staff has when the Board refers a situation back to the Department is how long to give the
property owner to remedy the situation, and do they then take the matter back before the Board or
refer it directly to the County Attorney's office for legal action. She further stated staff and the
County Attorney's Office do also take into consideration if the property owner has been working
toward a common goal or if there is no progress being made.
Mr. Sanders stated the detached garage they are currently living in was an existing structure and is
to only be temporary housing until he can find steady work and move forward on getting the home
that was intended to be built, built on the property. He further stated he would like the Board to
consider waiving the road impact fee until his home is built and the fee can then be assessed.
Ms. Arries stated she believes the road impact fee is imposed even when a mobile home is allowed
as a temporary dwelling unit pending construction. She further stated it is part of the living
arrangements of temporary housing pending a permanent residence on the property. In response to
Chair Kirkmeyer, Mr. Sanders stated he cannot give a time frame of when they will start to build their
home, it will all depend on the economy and what kind of work he can find. He further stated he has
the plans drawn up so he can start building the home, but as he stated earlier, it all depends on the
economy and the work that he can secure.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Commission Rademacher stated if the Board does decide to
allow Mr. Sanders to pay the road impact fee when he starts to build his home,the fees may actually
go up. He further stated he believes the Board is willing to give Mr. Sanders some time to remedy
the violation, and in doing so, Mr. Sanders will be able to put money aside in order to pay for the
fees.
Commissioner Long stated given the circumstances that have been brought to the Boards attention,
he is willing to give Mr. and Mrs. Sanders 120 days to resolve the matter, taking into consideration
there are no health and safety issues, and it has really become a timing issue of the current
economy. He further stated he believes Mr. Sanders is honestly trying to work towards something
and not trying to avoid the issues that have been presented by staff today.
Commissioner Conway asked Mr. Sanders if given the 120 days, does he believe he can
accomplish the things discussed at today's hearing. Mr. Sanders concurred,further stating the home
is their primary focus.
Commissioner Conway asked both staff and the County Attorney's Office to make the effort to work
with Mr. and Mrs. Sanders in this matter. He further stated he does acknowledge both do already go
above and beyond to work with property owners that are putting forth the effort to right the wrongs,
and thanked them for this.
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 3 PL0824
Commissioner Long moved to refer BCV#1100075 against Anna Sanders to the County Attorney
for legal action,with the instruction to delay action upon such referral until January 13,2012,to allow
adequate time for the property owner to obtain the proper permits, submit all required
documentation, and have all fees paid; allowing the use of the detached garage as permanent
housing or to begin the construction for their permanent residence. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Conway, and it carried unanimously.
BCV#1100084— MID PLAINS INVESTMENT, LLC/RICHARDSON: Ms. Gregory, Department of
Planning Services, presented the case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this
property is in violation of various sections of the Weld County Code, as detailed in staff's case
summary. Chair Kirkmeyer stated for the record there were several of the tenants in the audience
today; however,the owner of the property is incarcerated and will not be available for any discussion
until noon, if the Board feels it necessary. She further stated they can proceed with the hearing at
this time; however, they will not be able to speak to the owner of the property. Ms. Gregory stated
the property owner, Russell Richardson, is currently incarcerated at the Bent County Correctional
Facility, and was served notice of today's hearing by the Bent County Sheriff's Department on
September 2, 2011. She further stated this notice was personally served by Weld County Building
Inspection personnel to the site manager, Julie Christine Yates, on September 1, 2011.
Ms. Gregory stated this violation started as a complaint by the Sheriff's Office of five structures
without electricity, gas, and numerous building code violations. This property was formally a motel
that has since been converted into apartments to include one single family dwelling, a mobile home
and an apartment that was previously a restaurant. Ms. Gregory stated an initial inspection was
completed by staff on August 25, 2011, to determine the extent of the violation and building issues,
and on August 26, 2011, a more thorough inspection was completed with the manager on site and
additional violations were cited. Ms. Gregory stated a phone call was made to Excel Energy and
was told at the time that the tenants had bypassed the meter and were pirating power;therefore,the
meter was removed approximately three months ago. She further stated an additional phone call
was made to Atmos Energy, and staff was told the meter had been removed due to it being
tampered with, as well as non-payment. Ms. Gregory stated Mr. Richardson was also required by
Weld County to get a permit to conduct air testing on the lines to check for any leaks.
Mr. Richardson has an outstanding balance of over $3,000.00 to Atmos Energy Company. Ms.
Gregory stated the entire heating units for units one through 15 have been removed. Ms. Gregory
further stated on August 26, 2011, the manager stated she had Power of Attorney for all financial
and legal matters and she was attempting to get a loan from the owner's father to restore the
utilities, obtain the required permits, and make the required repairs; however, at this time
Mr. Richardson's parents are not able to get a loan to make the necessary repairs. Ms. Gregory
stated the Human Services Department was contacted regarding the current living conditions and
the numerous children living on the premises, staff was informed by the Department of Human
Services that there are no child protection concerns identified. On September 2, 2011, the tenants
from unit 16 came to the office and spoke with staff and explained they were trying to get the utilities
switched over into their names so that the electric and gas could be restored. Damien Combs and
April Ward,tenants of unit 16,were able to accomplish this with Atmos Energy but not Excel Energy.
Ms. Gregory stated a phone call was made to Excel Energy by the inspection personnel, as well as
Mr. Combs and Ms. Ward, and a resolution was agreed upon, pending a payment being made for
the past due amount. Ms. Gregory stated a phone call was made to staff by Mr. Combs and
Ms. Ward on September 6, 2011, stating Excel Energy did come to the site; however,there were still
concerns Excel Energy had that unit 16 was not on a separate meter, so power was still not
restored. Ms. Gregory spoke with Christine Yates, manager, on September 7, 2011, and asked her
to provide a copy of her Power of Attorney,which she did; however, she stated she was going to be
leaving town for three to five months and was going to revoke the Power of Attorney, further stating
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 4 PL0824
there is no one else on site who would be able to step in as manager. Ms. Gregory stated notices
were delivered to each tenant in person by staff, which were either signed for, or posted on the
individual doors of each unit on September 2, 2011, further stating the letters listed the contact
information for possible assistance resources. Ms. Gregory stated there was an inspection
conducted this morning by Jonathan Gesick, noting there are now tenants living in units 3,7, 11, 12,
16, 17, and 18, there are two children in unit 3, and Christine the manager has still not left town and
is living in unit 12. Ms. Gregory stated unit 16 does have electricity and gas, a separate septic
system which is permitted, and is considered safe. The tenants in unit 18 spoke with staff and
stated they are working on the electrical issues and are in the process of changing over the gas
appliances to electric appliances for heat and water, as well as switching out the appliances in the
kitchen. Ms. Gregory stated a permit will be required for those changes. She further stated units 1
thru 15 are still without power and gas. Ms. Gregory stated the Sheriffs Office has stated they still
receive approximately five phone calls a week on this property, which is considered to be
problematic.
Frank Piancentino, Building Official, stated there have been three inspections conducted on this
property with the findings of numerous code violations for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing.
Mr. Piancentino stated electricity has been shut off from the majority of the units due to tampering
and pirating of services. Mr. Piancentino reviewed multiple photographs taken at the site of the units
and the different violations within each unit. Mr. Piancentino stated he would recommend the
electrical boxes be removed from various units, due to the open wiring, until permits can be obtained
and a professional electrician contracted to do the necessary work. He further stated some of the
tenants have attached propane tanks to the hot water heater in order to have hot water, which is a
safety hazard. Mr. Piancentino stated unit 16 did have a permit to convert a restaurant into living
quarters in 1985; the unit does have electric, natural gas, and a permitted septic system, further
stating it is his opinion this is the only unit on site that is habitable.
Mary Evett, Environmental Health Services, stated there is an open failing septic complaint for the
site. In July, 2011, Ms. Evett stated she visited the site several times and spoke with Brian Bunning,
tenant of unit 18, who stated he was the manager of the complex at the time. Ms. Evett stated there
were no specific details in the complaint that staff received. Ms. Evett stated staff has researched
the septic permits for the site and found there are several septic tanks to the north of the property
that are not permitted. The unit that is east of the property, which used to be the restaurant, does
have its own septic tank and has been permitted. Ms. Evett described and explained several
photographs of the septic tanks on the property; the lift stations, open sewage pipes, sewage
seepage, and uncovered septic areas. Ms. Evett received a phone call from Jonathan Gesick,
Building Inspection, on September 2, 2011, stating there was overflowing sewage. She further
stated when she originally went to the site there were no issues with the tanks;the main concerns at
the time were the exposed sewage pipe, no proper fitting lids, and a lift station not working.
Ms. Evett stated she inspected the site again and did notice the sewage seepage, and lids were off
the septic tanks, as well as some of them being broken. She stated one of the tenants stated there
had been a sewage pumper company at the site which started pumping but then left without any
explanation of why. The tenant did not remember the company name to provide to staff. Ms. Evett
stated a letter was sent to the property owner in August, 2011; however, the letter was never
claimed and that is when she found out Mr. Richardson was incarcerated. Ms. Evett further stated
she submitted a letter to the Bent County Jail and she received an e-mailed from the Sheriffs Office
at the Bent County Jail that the letter was served to Mr. Richardson last Friday. Staff will give the
property owner 10 days to correct the issues.
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 5 PL0824
In response to Commissioner Rademacher, Ms. Gregory stated she had contacted the Human
Services Department and they found no child protection issues, they did not speak of any building
issues, only that they did not feel there were any major issues with the children being on the
property.
In response to Commissioner Garcia, Mr. Piancentino stated unit 16 has its own septic system that
has been permitted and according to Ms. Evett the septic system was not failing at the time of
inspection.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Gregory stated staff is recommending this matter be
referred to the County Attorney's Office for immediate legal action under Section 113-2 of the 2006
International Building Code.
In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, Ms. Gregory stated staff has been told Mr. Richardson would be
incarcerated for 18 months but was unsure of when the time started or the exact date it would end.
Ms. Gregory stated she spoke with Mr. Richardson's case manager, Mr. Hernandez,who stated he
could arrange for a conference call today, at approximately noon, if the Board felt it necessary. In
response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Gregory stated Mr. Richardson did not request to speak
with the Board, only that he was willing if it was necessary.
In response to Commissioner Rademacher, Ms. Arries stated according to Ms. Gregory,
Mr. Hernandez, would not be in the office until 11:00 a.m. today, at which time they could then
arrange a time to speak with Mr. Richardson if the Board requested it.
In response to Commissioner Rademacher, Ms.Arries stated Ms. Yates will be able to act on behalf
of the property because of the Power of Attorney; however, Ms. Yates did send in a notice to staff
that she would be revoking her Power of Attorney and is unwilling to speak to the Board.
Chair Kirkmeyer addressed the audience to see if there was anyone to represent Mr. Richardson
and there was not. She further stated although this is not a public hearing, the Board is willing to
hear public testimony regarding this matter.
Michael Mallard, tenant, stated he would like to ask the Board for some time to find a new place to
move his family. Mr. Mallard stated he has loaned Mr. Richardson approximately$5,000.00, he has
done $1,000.00 worth of yard maintenance, and he loaned Mr. Richardson $2,000.00 to have the
gas lines inspected. He stated he was not aware of the sewer issues or that the electricity was
being pirated; he believed the bills were being paid. In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, Mr. Mallard
stated he has a year lease that he signed on July 1, 2011, and he is currently living in units 2, 3, and
4. Mr. Mallard stated he has done remodeling in the past so has worked on some of his own units.
Mr. Mallard further stated he is trying to secure a place for him and his family to move to, and in
response to Chair Kirkmeyer, believes he can have it secured within three weeks if the Board will
give him the time. Mr. Mallard stated he considers himself a stay-at-home dad and really wants to
provide for his family. In response to Commissioner Conway, Mr. Mallard stated the money he
loaned to Mr. Richardson was above and beyond his rent payments.
Damien Combs,tenant, stated he lives in unit 16 and has taken care of the violations that pertained
to his specific unit. He further stated he believes this matter should not affect the unit he lives in.
Mr. Combs stated he has been able to get the gas and electricity turned back on, he pays for his
own trash, and unit 16 has its own septic tank. Commission Conway and
Commissioner Rademacher asked Mr. Piancentino if they were correct in saying Mr. Combs is not
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 6 PL0824
affected by this violation because this particular unit is a habitable unit, and Mr. Piancentino
concurred.
Commissioner Conway stated he commended staff for being diligent on taking care of this matter
quickly, tracking down the owner, being proactive with the tenants by letting them know what is
going on, contacted Human Services, and have worked well with other departments. Ms. Gregory
stated the letters that were given to the tenants has a list of community references for them to get in
touch with and hopefully find the additional help they may need. In response to
Commissioner Conway, Mr. Piancentino stated it will take approximately $5,000.00 to bring this
property up to code.
The Board agreed there was not any reason to speak with Mr. Richardson. In response to
Chair Kirkmeyer, Ms. Arries stated they have already filed the case with the courts, and even with
the request for an immediate hearing on a preliminary injunction, Mr. Richardson has ten days to file
a response, and then a hearing is set; with that said, it will be at least three weeks before this case
goes before a judge.
Commissioner Conway asked staff to make sure all the tenants be informed of what is going on in
order for them to make other living arrangements. He stated he understands staff has already given
the tenant a letter that included information of agencies that could help in this situation.
Commissioner Conway moved to refer BCV #1100084 against Mid Plains Investment, LLC, and
Russell Richardson to the County Attorney for immediate legal action. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Garcia, and it carried unanimously.
Mr. Mallard stated he would personally take care of some of the sewage issues.
ZCV#1100045-BUROUGH: Bethany Salzman, Department of Planning Services, presented the
case report for the record and pursuant to the case file, this property is in violation of various
sections of the Weld County Code, as detailed in staffs case summary. To bring the property into
compliance, the roustabout company shall be, either, permitted or removed from the site.
Ms. Salzman stated when she spoke with Sheri Lockman, representative for David Burough, it was
her understanding that because the property is partially located in the flood plain area,
David Burough is looking for new properties to move the business to. Ms. Salzman stated they have
also purchased a property close to the City of Evans; however, it is still within the county. She
further stated this site has a Use by Special Review (USR) already in place for a roustabout
company; however, it is for a much smaller scale operation than Mr. Buroughs current operation.
Ms. Salzman stated Mr. Burough has agreed to submit a pre-application within 30 days to meet with
staff to discuss the limitations of the property he currently has, and to make sure he is in
compliance, further stating within that 30 day period he will relocate what they can to the other
property that is currently permitted through the USR. Ms. Salzman stated Mr. Burough will still have
a good portion of the business that will not fit on the USR property. Staff is recommending this
matter be referred to the County Attorney's Office, but delay legal action for 60 days, allowing the
property owner time to find a new property, and start the USR process. Ms. Salzman stated staff will
continue to work with Mr. Burough as long as he is making forward progress, and in speaking to
Ms. Lockman this morning, Mr. Burough is agreeable to this arrangement.
In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Salzman stated she does not know if 60 days is truly
enough time for Mr. Burough to find a location for the business and move it; however, as long as
staff sees Mr. Burough is making forward process, they are willing to continue working with him.
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 7 PL0824
Ms. Lockman stated Mr. Burough has worked hard to try to bring the property into compliance.
Ms. Lockman stated she believes one of Mr. Burough's main issues is that he has two parts of the
business, one being the roustabout, which he originally located at a site that he was leasing in the
City of Evans. That building burned down, forcing Mr. Burough to move his business to his home
site, which is when the violation began. Ms. Lockman stated he now has a contract on the leased
property and is trying to get the building rebuilt. Ms. Lockman stated once the building is rebuilt, he
will then move a part of the roustabout back to that location; however, the business is big enough
that the site will not house the entire business, but feels he can work within the numbers of the
existing USR. She further stated they are going to try and get this taken care of within 30 days,
further stating there are things that have to happen that will not be in his control, such as the banks
than may prolong the outcome of this project. Ms. Lockman stated the other part of the business is
the painting of oil and gas equipment. She stated he would be further along; however, there was a
misunderstanding when he went through the pre-application process. Ms. Lockman stated when
Mr. Burough went through the pre-application, process he was told he would have to get a flood
hazard permit, which Mr. Burough did not have a problem with. She further stated the
misunderstanding came when Mr. Burough realized he could not have outdoor storage or outdoor
painting on a site in a flood plain area, even with a flood hazard permit,which made this site useless
for this part of his business. Ms. Lockman stated since Mr. Burough hired her to help find sites for
the business, she has discovered it is almost impossible to have an outdoor painting facility.
Ms. Lockman stated Mr. Burough has contacted a realtor and has had her look at a couple of sites
to see if they would work for the business. She further stated his family also owns some property
that Mr. Burough is looking into to see if any will work with the type of business he operates, and if
so, they will be able to move forward. She further stated they are asking for as much time as the
Board will allow, they are just unsure of how soon everything will fall in place.
David Burough, property owner, stated he does not have any problem with doing what he needs to
do and doing it in the correct manner. Mr. Burough stated he had to move his business after the
fire, and his intentions after the fire was to rebuild quickly; however, it is taking longer than expected.
He further stated the building permit was issued two weeks ago and the building is now framed,they
still need to install installation, sheeting, and electrical;further stating, as fast as the contractors are
willing go he can go as well. Mr. Burough stated as soon as the building is complete, the transfer of
the business will take place which will satisfy that part of the violation. Mr. Burough stated he had
every intention to get the USR for the painting portion of the business and had no idea that the flood
plain would disqualify the USR; however, he does understand that now. He further stated he does
not have a problem finding another property to conduct the painting from and is doing everything he
can to find another property. He stated he has five different realtors looking for properties; he is also
meeting with the fire district this afternoon. Mr. Burough stated he cannot guarantee he will have
everything resolved within 90 days but he is doing his best to take care of the violation issues.
Ms. Lockman stated Mr. Burough does have his state permits for the painting portion of the
business, entered in as "Exhibit A", so there is no issue on the state side.
Chair Kirkmeyer discussed the option of referring this matter back to the Department of Planning
Services and the Board concurred.
Commissioner Conway moved to refer ZCV #1100045 against David Burough back to the
Department of Planning Services. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Rademacher, and it
carried unanimously.
There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 11:04 a.m.
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 8 PL0824
This Certification was approved on the 19th day of September, 2011.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:�,c,�..��'-� �
rba � L . i Cc c/x
B irkmeyer, C a
Weld County Clerk to the Board
,/ p Sean P. Conwa , Pro-Tem CO
BY: l�.S,�vyy�R / /��
Deputy C k to the Board (/t,�]l/ -'
Wil F. G rcia Of
AP O FORM: r .vJ
Davi E. Lon
/_ice �•��+.. r ��
unty Attorneya as l 'il ,� lw. ..ti.-1
D uglaWRademach0.MI tCD#2011-9 ;r 'µms- a
f fi rt
Hearing Certification, Zoning Violations
September 13, 2011 2011-2426
Page 9 PL0824
Hello