HomeMy WebLinkAbout20122325.tiff Front Range Dairy
Weld County, CO
Preliminary Waste System
Design
Prepared by:
AG
PRO
4350 Highway 66
Longmont, CO 80504
970-535-9318
5/14/2012
Summary
This analysis covers the preliminary design recommendations for a waste management
system for the Front Range Dairy in Weld County, Colorado. The proposed facility will
consist of an approximate 2000-3000 head dairy and a 5000-6000 head dairy heifer
feedlot. There will be an approximate 8000 total animal units housed in this proposed
facility which will therefore be considered a Confined Animal Feeding Operation
(CAFO). Therefore, the facility is subject to the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment(CDPH&E)regulations. This preliminary design meets the
requirements set forth in those regulations.
Project Description
The site is located in Weld County approximately 1.3 miles north and 3.5 miles east of
the town of Frederick, Colorado. The facility is located in the Northeast '/4 of the of
Section 22,Township 2 North, Range 67 West of the 6th Principle meridian. The site,
which is approximately 150 acres of production area, will include approximately 83 acres
of runoff containment area.
Design Objectives
The waste management plan for Front Range Dairy will consist of constructing 3 waste
and process generated water storage ponds on the east, south and west edge of the
property in down gradient areas of the topography. These ponds will be constructed to
contain runoff from the open lot and commodity storage areas. The new ponds will be
dewatered to farm ground owned by the dairy as well as to adjacent property owners as
needed. Water will be applied to cropped fields at agronomic rates as a fertilizer
according to a nutrient management plan that will meet State requirements.
Hydrology and Hydraulics
This waste management system is designed to contain the 25-yr, 24-hour or 10-year, 10-
day storm event(ponds vary on design requirement) as determined from the TAPS
weather data. The required capacity was determined using the spreadsheet 313Pond.XLS
"RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS"
developed by John Andrews,NRCS State Conservation Engineer for Colorado. The
spreadsheet uses a monthly balance approach accounting for precipitation inputs, as well
as evaporation and pumped draw-downs during the summer irrigation season for the
outputs.
All waste water will be generated from the lot area, feed and commodity area and paved
lot areas. Calculations include water that falls directly onto the ponds. All precipitation
AgProfessionals, LLC Page 2 of 5 Front Range Dairy
that does not fall directly on these areas will be diverted away from the containment area
and will flow into the natural depressions.
The 25-year, 24-hour storm event for Greeley, CO is 3.40 inches. Using the NRCS
runoff curve numbers of 90 for earthen lots and 97 for paved lots, the following
information was generated:
For the East pond drainage basin of 38 acres, 8.00 acre-feet of runoff is generated. The
storage requirement for the 4 months of winter is 0.05 acre-feet. The designed pond can
contain 10.55 acre-feet of water. For the Feed Area pond drainage basin of 10 acres, 2.17
acre-feet of runoff is generated. The winter storage requirement is 0.02 acre-feet, and the
designed pond volume is 2.68 acre-feet.
The 10-year, 10-day storm event for Greeley, CO is 4.21 inches. Using the NRCS runoff
curve numbers of 81 for earthen lots and 94 for paved lots and an area of 35 acres, 8.27
acre-feet of runoff is generated in the South Pond drainage basin. The winter storage
requirement is 11.7 acre-feet, and the designed pond volume is 29.74 acre-feet.
Storage Pond
The ponds are rectangular in shape and will be lined with a compacted clay liner. An
emergency spillway will be installed to comply with Regulation 5 CCR 1002-
61.17(5)(c)(ix)(C). Spill protection will be installed in all pond inlets to ensure that the
flow of water into the pond does not erode and compromise the integrity of the pond
liner. The system is designed to be dewatered frequently during the summer of each year
and dewatered as low as possible prior to each winter. The ponds have been designed to
handle the normal runoff and process water and still maintain capacity for the design
storm. The water level must be kept below the working depth marked on the staff gauge
to ensure adequate storage capacity for runoff from the design storm.
Diversions and Conveyances
All diversions will be sized and constructed to handle flows from the design storm event.
Conveyances will be in place to the pond to allow for transfer of water from the parlor.
All conveyance structures will be sized to handle the projected flows.
Geotechnical Recommendations
The soil survey indicated that the site is underlain predominantly by sandy soils. The soil
survey also indicates that the soils are an Olney loamy sand and Vona loamy sand (0 to
9%slope) where the proposed pond site will be located.
Subsurface explorations have been conducted. The pond design allows for a 4 feet
setback from ground water to the bottom of the liner to comply with Regulation 5 CCR
AgProfessionals, LLC Page 3 of 5 Front Range Dairy
1002-81.8(6)(a)(i)(b). The bores have been made into piezometers and the groundwater
levels will continue to be monitored over time.
This subsurface exploration indicated that the soils in the proposed pond area consisted of
coarse soils over top of a heavier soil. This heavier soil has been analyzed for its
suitability as a compacted clay liner and found adequate.
Land Application
The proposed waste storage pond will be dewatered to farm ground owned by the dairy
as well as 3`I party application sites. All wastewater will be applied at agronomic rates as
defined in the facility's Nutrient Management Plan. Average water production estimates
were generated from the spreadsheet 313Pond.XLS "RECTANGULAR WASTE
STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS". This takes into account process
wastewater generation at a rate of 33,000 gallons/day when milking 2,100 cows. In an
average year, 43.12 acre-feet of wastewater will be generated. The amount of irrigated
crop land needed to utilize this wastewater in a conservative manner is 145 acres of
alfalfa and 284 acres of corn silage. In order to utilize the 18.4 acre-feet of runoff
generated in the design storm event, 62 acres of sprinkler irrigated alfalfa and 121 acres
of corn are needed. Waste water will be dewatered to dairy owned farm ground as well
as adjacent landowners as needed. Approximately 31,724 tons (46% DM as applied) of
manure will be generated annually. This manure will be given away to local farmers for
use in their cropping operations.
AgProfessionals, LLC Page 4 of 5 Front Range Dairy
Appendices
• Pond Sizing Spreadsheet
• Proposed Drawing
• Aerial View
• USGS Topographic map
• Soils map
• Soil survey engineering properties
• Hydrologic Soils
• Manure generation table
• Land application requirements
• Subsurface exploration trip reports
AgProfessionals, LLC Page 5 of 5 Front Range Dairy
RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Project Name: Front Range Dairy Computed By MK Checked By:
Location: Feed Area Date: 5/18/2012 Date:
Climate Station: Greeley INC,ave.year •I
BASIC DATA POND DESIGN VOLUME RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS
Solids&Slurry Inflow: 0 cu.ft./day Bottom Width: 140 ft. Inside Top Width: 220 ft.
Other Liquid Waste Inflow: 0 gal./day Max Working Storage: 2.58 Acre-ft Bottom Length: 300 ft. Inside Top Length: 380 fl.
Contributing Roof Area: 0 sq.ft. Design Storm Runoff: 8.00 Acre-ft Design Depth: 8.0 ft. Total Depth: 10 ft.
Contributing Paved Lot Area: 2 sq.ft.,CN= 97 Design Requirement: 10.58 Acre-fl Freeboard: 2.0 ft. Design Surface Area: 83,600 sq.It.
Contdbuting Earth Lot Area: 38 Acres,CN= 90 Inside Slope: 4 H:1V Available Storage Volume: 10.55 Acre-ft
251r-24hr Precipitation Depth: 3.40 inches Available Storage: 100%of design Evaporation Area: 42,000 sq fl. Freeboard Volume: 3.62 Acre-ft
10yr-10day Precipitation Depth: 4.21 inches Storage Safety Factor: 1.3 Seepage Rale: 0.000 inches/day Total Volume: 14.17 Acre-ft
Annual FWS Evaporation: 45 inches lxi freeboard) Seepage Area: 45584 sq.fl.
I AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
MONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POND OUTFLOW WORKING STORAGE
Monthly Contribution to Working Storage from Precipitation Waste Inflow Total Surface Seepage Planned Total Monthly Accumulated
Precip. Earth Lot Runoff Paved Lot Runoff Roof Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Inflow Evaporation Loss Drawdowc Outflow In-Out Storage
Month (inches) (inches) I (Acre-(l) (inches) I (Acre-h) (inches) I (Acre-fl) (Acre-It) (Acre-fl) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (inches) I (Acre-fl) (Acre-ft) (Acre-fl) (Acre-f0 (Acre-11) (Acre-fl)
Jan. 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.0000 _0.35 0.0000 _0.0848 0.0000 0.0000 0.09 1.35 _ 0.1085 0.0000 0.00 0.11 -0.02 _ 1.30
Feb. 0.38 _ 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.0000 0.21 0.0000 0.0608 0.0000 0.0000 0.11 __1.58 _ 0.1265 0.0000 0.00 0.13 _ -0.01 1.29
Mar._ __1.16__ 009 0.28 0.56 0.0000 _0_95 _ 0.0000 _0.1855 0.0000 0.0000 0.47 2.48_ 0.1989 0.0000 0.00 _ 0.20 0.27 1.56
Apr. 7.81 0.35 1.11 1.12 0.0000 1.59 0.0000 0.2895 0.0000 0.0000 140 _ 4.05 _ 0.3254 0.0000 1.60 1.93 -0.52 1.04
May 2.55_ 0.77 2.45 1.80 0.0000 2.32 0.0000 0.4078 0.0000 0.0000 2.86 5.40 0.4339 0.0000 _ 1.00 143 1.43 2.46
June 180 - 0.35 1.10 1.11 0.0000 1.58 0.0000 0.2879 0.0000 0.0000 1.39 6.53 0.5243 0.0000 1.00 152 -0.14 2.33
July t42 _ 0.78 057 0.78 0.0000 1.20 0.0000 0.2271 0.0000 0.0000 0.79 6.75 0.5424 0.0000 0.00 0.54 0.25 2.50
Aug. _ 7.18 0.70 0.30 0.58 0.0000 0.97 0.0000 0.1887 0.0000 0.0000 0.49____6.08 0.4881 0.0000 0.00 __ 0.49 __0.00 2.50
Sep. 1.19 0.10 0.31 0.59 0.0000 0.98 0.0000 0.1903 0.0000 0.0000 0.50 4.50 0.3616 0.0000 1.40 1.76 -1.26 1.32
Oct. 0.89 0.03 0.08 0.35 0.0000 0.60 0.0000 0.1423 0.0000 0.0000 0.23 3,15 0.2531 0.0000 0.00 0.25 -0.03 1.30
Nov. 0.84 0.02 0.06 0.32 0.0000 0.64 _ 0.0000 0.1343 0.0000 0.0000 0.19 _ 1.80 0.1446 0.0000 000 0.14 0.05 1.34
__ __ _Dec. 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.0000 0.30 0.0000 0.0768 0.0000 0.0000 0.09 1.35 0.1085 0.0000 0.00 0.11 -0.02 1.33
Totals: 14.23 2.00 6.35 7.46 0.00 11.75 0.00 2.28 0.00 0.00 8.62 45.00 3.62 0.00 5.00 8.62
RAINFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN
Earth Areas Paved Areas Roofed Areas Pond Surface Pond Volume v. Depth
25yr-24hr Storm Event
1 day Curve Numbers.. 97 100 100% 16.000
25yr-24hr Rainfall: 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches Freeboard
-
25yr-24hr Runoff. 2.35 inches 3.06 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 14.000
Runoff Volume: 7.46 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-fl 0.00 Acre-It 0.54 Acre-ft 12.000
Total 24hr-25yr Event Runoff Volume: 8.00 Acre-ft
_ Chronic Storm(10 day event) a.10.000 ! Desig olume
_ 10 day Curve Numbers: 81 94 100 100%
10yr-10day Rainfall. 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.21 inches ' -,4
8.000
10yr-10day Runoff. 2.28 inches 3.54 inches 4.21 inches 4.21 inches 1 6.000
Runoff Volume: 7.21 Acredt 0.00 Acre-It 0.00 Acre-ft 0.67 Acre-11 5
Total 10yr-10day Event Runoff Volume: 7.88 Acre-ft > 4.000
Average Monthl Runoff Contribution fo Working Storage I in Volume
30 day Curve Numbers: 77 1] 93 II 98 100% 2.000 (start pumping)
Monthly Runoff: (see computations in monthly mass balance table above) 0.000
Average Annual Rainfall. 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 8.000 10.000 12.000
Average Annual Runoff: 2.00 inches 7.46 inches 11.75 inches 14.23 inches
Runoff as%of Rainfall. 14% 52% 83% 100.0% Depth,feel
co313pondxls/re 8O nova i
RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Project Name: Front Range Dairy Computed By: MK Checked By:
Location: Feed Area Date: 5/18/2012 Dale:
Climate Station: Greeley uflo,ave.year •••
BASIC DATA POND DESIGN VOLUME_ RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS
Solids 8 Slurry Inflow 0 cu.fl./day Bottom Width: 151 fl. Inside Top Width: 215 fl.
Other Liquid Waste Inflow: 0 gal./day Max Working Storage: 0.48 Acre-It Bottom Length: 86 fl. Inside Top Length: 150 fl.
Contributing Roof Area: 0 sq.It. Design Storm Runoff: 2.17 Acre-It Design Depth: 6.0 fl. Total Depth: 8 fl.
Contributing Paved Lot Area: 0 sq.It.,CN= 97 Design Requirement: 2.66 Acre-It Freeboard: 2.0 ft. Design Surface Area: 32,250 sq.ft.
Contributing Earth Lot Area: 10 Acres,CN= 90 Inside Slope: 4 H:1V Available Storage Volume: 2.68 Acre-ft
25yr-24hr Precipitation Depth: 3.40 inches Available Storage: 101%of design Evaporation Area: 12,986 sq.It. Freeboard Volume: 1.35 Acre-ft
10yr-today Precipitation Depth: 4.21 inches Storage Safety Factor: 1.5 Seepage Rate: 0.000 inches/day Total Volume: 4.03 Acre-ft
Annual FWS Evaporation: 45 inches {,y/freebox,d) Seepage Area: 14456 sq.tt.
AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
MONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POND OUTFLOW WORKING STORAGE
Monthly Contribution to Working Storage from Precipitation Waste Inflow Total Surface Seepage Planned Total Monthly Accumulated
Precip. Earth Lot Runoff Paved Lot Runoff Roof Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Inflow Evaporation Loss Drawdown Outflow In-Out Storage
Month (inches) (inches) I (Acre-fl) (inches) I (Acre-It) (inches) I (Acre-h) (Acre-fl) (Acre-It) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (inches) I (Acre-It) (Acre-fl) (Acre-it) (Acre-ft) (Acre-fl) (Acre-ft)
Jan. 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.12 00000 0.35 0.0000 0.0327 0.0000 0.0000 0.03 1.35 0.0335 0.0000 0.00 0.03 0.00 _ 0.40
Feb. 0.38 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.0000 _ 0.21 0.0000 0.0234 0.0000 0.0000 0.04 1.58 0.0391 0.0000 _ _
0.00 0,04 0.00 0.40
Mar. 1.16 0.09 007 0.56 0.0000 0.95 0.0000 00716 0.0000 0.0000 0.15 2.48 0.0615 0.0000 0.00 006 0.09 0.48
Apr. _ 181 _ 0.35 0.29 1.12 0.0000 1.59 0.0000 0.1117 0.0000 0.0000 0.40 4.05 0.1006 0.0000 0.70 0.80 -0.40 0.09
May 2.55 0.77 0.65 1.80 0.0000 2.32 0.0000 _0.1573 _0.0000 _0.0000 0.80 5.40 0.1342__ _
0.0000 0.30 043 0.37 0.46
June 1.80 - 0.35 _0.29 1.11 0.0000 1.58 0.0000 0.1111 0.0000 0.0000 0.40 6.53 0.1621 0.0000 0.30 046 0.06 0.39
__ July _ 1.42 _ 0.18 0.15 0.78 0.0000 1.20 0.0000 0.0876 0.0000 0.0000 0.24 6.75 0.1677 0.0000_ 0.10 0.27__ 0.03 0.36
Aug. _1)18__ _0.10 0.08 0.58 0.0000 0.97 0.0000 0.0728 --atom 0.0000 0.15 608 0.1509 0.0000 0.03 0.18 -0.03_ 0.33
Sep. 1.19 010 0.08 0.59 0.0000 0.98 0.0000 0.0734 0.0000 0.0000 0.16 4.50 _ 0.1118 0.0000 0.00 0.11 0.04 0.38
-.------
Oct. 0.89 0.03 0.02 0.35 0.0000 0.68 0.0000 0.0549 0.0000 0.0000 0.08 3.15
_ _ 0.0783 0.0000 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.38
Nov. 0.84_ 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.0000 0.64 0.0000 0.0518 0.0000_ 0.0000 0.07 1.80 _ 0.0447 0.0000 0.00 0.04 _ 002_ 0.40
Dec. 048 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.0000 0.30 0.0000 0.0296 0.0000 0.0000 0.03 1.35 0.0335 0.0000 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.40
Totals: 14.23 2.00 1.67 7.46 0.00 11.75 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 2.55 45.00 1.12 0.00 1.43 2.55
RAINFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN i
Earth Areas II Paved Areas IJ Roofed Areas Pond Surface • Pond Volume v.Depth
25yr-24hr Storm Event
1 day Curve Numbers: 90 97 100 100% 4.500 -
25yr-24hr Rainfall. 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches Freeboard
25yr-24hr Runoff 2.35 inches 3.06 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 4.000
Runoff Volume- 1.96 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-ft 0.21 Acre-ft 3.500
Total 24hr-25yr Event Runoff Volume: 2.17 Acre•ft •
Chronic Stoma(10 day event w 3.000
10 day Curve Numbers. 81 94 100 100% 4 2.500 De ' n Volume
10yr-today Rainfall. 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.21 inches u 2.000
10yr-10day Runoff: 2.28 inches 3.54 inches 4.21 inches 4.21 inches ' E
Runoff Volume. 1.90 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-fl 0.26 Acre-It I• 0 1.500
—
Total l0yr-today Event Runoff Volume: 2.16 Acre-ft > 1.000
Average Month/v Runoff Contribution to Working Storage Orkin Volume
30 day Curve Numbers: 77 93 II 96 100% 0.500 (start pumping)
Monthly Runoff: (see computations in monthly mass balance table above) 0.000
Average Annual Rainfall: 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 8.000 10.000
Average Annual Runoff. 2.00 inches 7.46 inches 11.75 inches 14.23 inches
Runoff as%of Rainfall. 14% 52% 83% 100.0% Depth,feet
cm Ilpandxis pa 891O001
RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Project Name: Front Range Dairy Computed By: MK Checked By
Location: South Pond Date: 5)18/2012 Dale:
Climate Station: I Greeley uNc,ave.year H
BASIC DATA _ POND DESIGN VOLUME RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS
Solids 8 Slurry Inflow: 0 cu.ft./day Bottom Width: 370 ft. Inside Top Width: 450 ft.
Other Liquid Waste Inflow: 33000 gal./day Max Working Storage: 21.52 Acre-ft Bottom Length: 370 ft. Inside Top Length: 450 ft.
Contributing Roof Area: 0 sq.ft. Design Storm Runoff: 8.27 Acre-ft Design Depth: 8.0 ft. Total Depth: 10 ft.
Contributing Paved Lot Area: 0 sq.ft.,CN= 97 Design Requirement: 29.79 Acre-It Freeboard: 2.0 ft. Design Surface Area: 202,500 sq.ft.
Contributing Earth Lot Area: 35 Acres,CN= 90 Inside Slope: 4 H:1V Available Storage Volume: 29.74 Acre-fl
25yr-24hr Precipitation Depth: 3.40 inches Available Storage: 100%of design Evaporation Area: 136,900 sq.fl. Freeboard Volume: 8.97 Acre-fl
10yr-10day Precipitation Depth: 4.21 inches Storage Safely Factor 1.3 Seepage Rate: 0.000 inches/day Total Volume: 38.71 Acre-ft
Annual FWS Evaporation: 45 inches (wnreeboard) Seepage Area: 142884 sq.fl.
I AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
MONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POND OUTFLOW WORKING STORAGE
Monthly Contribution to Working Storage from Precipitation Waste Inflow Total Surface Seepage Planned Total Monthly Accumulated
Precip. Earth Lot Runoff Paved Lot Runoff Roof Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Inflow Evaporation Loss Drawdown Outflow In-Out Storage
Month (inches) (inches) I (Acre-ft) (inches) I (Acre-ft) (inches) I (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (Acre-h) (Acre-h) (Acre-fl) (inches) I (Acre-ft) (Acre-II) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft)
Jan. 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.0000 0.35 0.0000 0.2053 0.0000 3.1355 3.35 1.35 0.3536 0.0000 0.00_ 0.35 2.99 15.50
__ _ _
Feb. 0.38 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.0000 0.21 0.0000 0.1472 0.0000 3.0343 3.23 1.58 _ 0.4125 0.0000 0.00 0.41 2.82 18.32
Mar. 1.16 0.09 0.26 0.56 0.0000 0.95 0.0000 _0.4494 0.0000 3.1355 3.85 _2.48 0.6482 0.0000___ 0.00 0.65 320 21.52
Apr. 1.81 0.35 103 1.12 00000 1.59 0.0000 0.7012 0.0000 3.0343 4.76 4.05 1.0607 0.0000 10.00 11.06 -6.30 15.22
_
May __2.55 0.77 2.26 1.80 0.0000 2.32 0.0000 0.9879 0.0000 3.1355 6.38 5.40 1.4143 0.0000 _5.00 6.41 -0.03 15.19
-_ _
J;no Imo 0.35 1.01 1.11 0.0000 1.58 0.0000 0.6973 0.0000 3.0343 4.74 0.53 1.7089 0.0000 5.00 6.71-1.97 13.22
July 1.42 0.18 0.52 0.78 0.0000 1.20 0.0000 0.5501 _0.0000 3.1355 4.21 6.75 1.76iff 0.0000 _ 5.00 6.77 -2.56 10.66
Aug. 1.18 0.10 0.28 0.58 0.0000 0.97 0.0000 0.4571 0.0000 3.1355 3.87 6.08 1.5910 0.0000 5.00 6.59 -2.72 7.94
Sep. 1.19 0.10 0.29 0.59 0.0000 __0.98 0.0000 0.4610 0.0000 3.0343 3.78 4.50_ 1.1785 0.0000 6.70 7.88 -4,09 3.85
Oct. 0.89 0.03 0.08 0.35 0.0000 0.68 0.0000 0.3448 0.0000 3.1355 3.56 - 3.15 - 0.8250 0.0000 0.00 0.82 2.73 6.58
Nov. 0.84 0.02 0.05 0.32 0.0000 0.64 0.0000 0.3254 0.0000 3.0343 3.41 1.80 0.4714 0.0000 0.00 0.47 2.94 9.52
Dec. 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.0000 0.30 0.0000 0.1860 0.0000 3.1355 3.34 1.35 0.3536 0.0000 0.00 0.35 2.98 12.50
Totals: 14.23 2.00 5.85 7.46 0.00 11.75 0.00 5.51 0.00 37.12 48.48 45.00 11.79 0.00 36.70 48.49
RAINFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN
Earth Areas II Paved Areas Roofed Areas II Pond Surface I Pond Volume v.Depth
15yr-24hr Storm Event
1 day Curve Numbers: 90 97 100 100% 45.000
25yr-24hr Rainfall: 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches Freeboard
25yr-24hr Runoff: 2.35 inches 3.06 inches 3.40 inches 3.40 inches , 40.000
Runoff Volume: 6.87 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-h 0.00 Acre-fl 1.32 Acre-ft 35.000
Total 24hr-25yr Event Runoff Volume: 8.18 Acre-ft
x 30.000 -
Chronic Storm(10 day every) v Desi olume
10 day Curve Numbers: 81 94 100 100% C 25.000
Working Volume
10yr-10day Rainfall: 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.21 inches u
10yr-10day Runoff: 2.28 inches 3.54 inches 4.21 inches 4.21 inches E 20.000 (start pumping)
Runoff Volume: 6.64 Acre-It 0.00 Acre-h 0.00 Acre-fl 1.63 Acre-II —0 15.000
Total l0yr-10day Event Runoff Volume: 8.27 Acre-ft >1mmo
-
Average Monthl Runoff Contribution to Working Storage
30 day Curve Numbers: 77 1] 93 II 98 100% 5.000 '.
Monthly Runoff, (see computations in monthly mass balance fable above) 0.000 •-, 1 I I
Average Annual Rainfall: 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 8.000 10.000 12.000
Average Annual Runoff: 2.00 inches 7.46 inches 11.75 inches 14.23 inches
Runoff as%of Rainfall: 14% 52% 83% 100.0% Depth,feet
co313ponduru fee 89112001
i FRONT RANGE DAIRY ~
\VELD COUNTY USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW ; I
PAR OF"I 1I E NORTI TEAS I % OF SECTION 22,TO 2 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST, OF THE 6th P.M., COUNTY 01'\VELD, STATE OF COLORADO _1-. I
T
COUNTY ROAD 211 us, 1189'34'37 L 2612.IS' l�, u r or way
'�
(BASIS OF BEARING)
J—I i
J3
O s rz suaLL! cl1 I:lull Walt r s. faaalla Waal \ —� I
_� >�r n•Ivs []' 1'4:17 !.s . , Pit:1";E —: i11,": r _ lll///
i,i 1 .I c sw r a c.rr'"vl v ! mx Jl un gran 1 o`j•
1
.,..11(fl .„,n . .... 1 a .. .,a e 161
. nana a, : wl rna n I 1
3 amp .:“i.,v n.a.. 9 u•rl9 a el. In Ell. PC.),
II \f J�1
III _ u
I
•
I -,
o ir
L.
it
I '/
+"n,r's i •eC N TY.JUP sill: r-Moo'
•
.. - It : :109'.1Y 6'n }60.00' _h_
r m
IPoi III w. t w
C �— I� so9]I ILE]no.00 •.• 1iu.1 Hai
a '.:.I I,H
O L
I _ ¢.fu_� �� � \ IlIlii All I I a I] U 77
CI —
—Ea
0
e «,llz YFA o� .._�� IIJ1I m I z
t ,
it ««r os - .... L 'I[4[..i I,: l .. .....I L -
I. a a / f r o u v..e, e,,.,,trs D
L
I
2...I _ . .nil
I.
.i .d III .I ... —
� I I� 1 - 1
I I �_
btlJlTo[z619.es I se9'31'16135000'
Front /
-
RangeY Y
Dai ry -,0%; Lcro 1'Range IafYr?
Aerial with Legal
5/14/2012 Eir ;
,,4:-..: //
1 ' u CE Yom__
MM AG ROiessionals, LLC &zo,2SCO,1r
mmm. L DEVELOPERS OE R4RI[000RE Mi D7 5.5 N IY3tIfl]9'W n .w SCIO!:
Front Range Dairy
Topographic Map
5/14/2012
- r- r.( .JL
l -�
1y- �tf _
„ , J
•- I' �l .wG -r lin\\\::.\t, I ti i
\y - i l 5 . 2 r-
s?g' %. \s, _4..._ --,...-„,. \------cz, \ s,
04_
- /` / ti,J
r
C. ��AGPROfe55,°��a15' LLC
• , ri • ' f !' Uf VF111VFP5 OF L(.IIIFIIIIIIPF
Soil Map—Weld County.Colorado,Southern Part
(Front Range Dairy 2)
4 15
510400 510500 510600 510700 510800 510900 511000 511100 511200 511300
40.7'58" ._._ I I 40'7'57'.
l
L,_
A_
1 e
0
o
a t n
o
"*ems- tt.W—a ma t r
v
� . ,' _
,. ` o
a i. ir -
_.. j
7
0
v a.- t*------ v
It •i
- o
s e
_ o
- �i
_
4'. l
47f-,- --^� XX --"'7.
I is.-tgt n,
4,.. M _
a T c
I
510400 510500 510600 510700 510800 510900 511000 511100 511200 511300
Map Scale.1'6960 it printed on A size 18.5 x 11")sheet.
N Meters
A 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 250 500 1,000 1.500
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Soil Map—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
(Front Range Dairy 2)
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AQl) Very Stony Spot Map Scale: 1:6,960 if printed on A size(8.5"• 11")sheet.
Area of Interest(AO') t Wet Spot The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soils A Other
Soil Map Units Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Special Line Features maps Enlargement P beyond mapping of the scale of ma in can cause
Special Point Features ti~ Gully�- misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
U Blowout
Short Steep Slope placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
® Borrow Pit "' soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Other
X Clay Spot Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
Features
ir Closed Depression Cities measurements.
•X Gravel Pit Water Features Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Gravelly Spot r,. Streams and Canals Coordinate System: UTM Zone 13N NAD83
® Landfill Transportation This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
Rails
A. Lava Flow the version date(s)listed below.
,� Marsh or swamp N Interstate Highways Soil Survey Area: Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
US Routes Survey Area Data: Version 11,Aug 27,2009
5l` Mine or Quarry
Major Roads Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 8/6/2005;7/30/2005
▪ Miscellaneous Water
ti Local Roads The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
p Perennial Water
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
�. Rock Outcrop imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
} Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
• Sinkhole
3> Slide or Slip
¢ Sodic Spot
a Spoil Area
Q Stony Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Soil Map—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Map Unit Legend
Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part(CO618)
Map Unit Symbol I Map Unit Name I Acres in AO1 1 Percent of AO1
44 1OIney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent 23.5 10.3%
slopes I
169 Valent sand,0 to 3 percent slopes 14.9 i 6.5%
70 Valent sand,3 to 9 percent slopes 16.7 I 7.3%
72 Vona loamy sand,0 to 3 percent 86.9 38.2%
slopes
73 Vona loamy sand,3 to 5 percent 28.0 12.3%
slopes 1
74 Vona loamy sand,5 to 9 percent 57.7 25.3%
slopes
i Totals for Area of Interest ', 227.7., 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
a.
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Engineering Properties—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Engineering Properties
This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering
properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area.
Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated.
Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the
fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam,"for example,
is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent
sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an
appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly."
Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification
system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004).
The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as
construction material. Soils are classified according to particle-size distribution of
the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid
limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW,
GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH,
and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of
two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML.
The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect
roadway construction and maintenance. In this system,the fraction of a mineral soil
that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1
through A-7 on the basis of particle-size distribution,liquid limit,and plasticity index.
Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At
the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are
classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection.
If laboratory data are available, the A-1,A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified
as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional
refinement,the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group
index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material
to 20 or higher for the poorest.
Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter
are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The
percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in
the field to weight percentage.
Percentage (of soil particles)passing designated sieves is the percentage of the
soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight.The sieves,
numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00,
0.420,and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests
of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in
the field.
Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity
characteristics of a soil.The estimates are based on test data from the survey area
or from nearby areas and on field examination.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
Engineering Properties—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
References:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO).
2004.Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM). 2005. Standard classification
of soils for engineering purposes.ASTM Standard D2487-00.
gig Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5114/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Engineering Properties—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Report—Engineering Properties
Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated. The asterisk — denotes the representative texture; other
possible textures follow the dash.
Engineering Properties—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
Map unit symbol and soil Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number— Liquid Plasticity
name limit index
Unified AASHTO >10. 3-10 4 10 40 200
inches inches
In Pet Pct Pct
44—Olney loamy sand, 1
to 3 percent slopes I
Olney I0-10 'Loamy sand SP-SM, A-2 0 I0 95-100 90-100 I50-75 10-30 15-20 NP-5
110-20 *Sandy clay loam,Sandy SC-SM, A-4,A-6 0 I 0 95-100 90-100 I 80-100 40-55 25-35 5-15
loam CL,CL-
ML,SC _ I_
20-25 'Sandy clay loam,Sandy CL,CL- A-2,A-4 0 I0 95-100 95-100 60-90 30-55 25-30 5-10
loam,fine sandy loam ML,
SC,
SC-SM
25-60 'Fine sandy loam,Loamy SC-SM, A-2 0 0 95-100 95-100 60-85 30-50 20-25 NP-5
fine sand,sandy loam SM
69—Valent sand,0 to 3
percent slopes
Valent 0-8 'Fine sand SM A-2 0 0 100 100 65-80 20-35 - NP
8-60 'Sand SP,SP- A-3 0 0 100 95-100 60-70 0-10 - NP
SM
70—Valent sand,3 to 9
percent slopes
Valent 0-8 'Fine sand SM A-2 0 0 100 100 65-80 20-35 - I NP
8-60 'Sand SP-SM, A-3 0 0 100 95-100 60-70 0-10 — INP
SP
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Engineering Properties—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Engineering Properties-Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
Map unit symbol and soli Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number— Liquid Plasticity
name limit index
Unified AASHTO >10 3-10 4 10 40 200
Inches Inches
In Pct Pot Pct
72—Vona loamy sand,0
to 3 percent slopes
Vona 0-6 'Loamy sand SM A-2 0 0 100 100 50-75 15-30 — NP
6-28 'Fine sandy loam,Sandy SM,SC, A-2,A-4 0 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 20-30 NP-10
I loam SC-SM
126-60 'Sandy loam,Loamy SC-SM, A-2,A-4 0 0 100 90-100 50-85 j 15-40 20-25 NP-5
sand,loamy fine sand SM !
i
73—Vona loamy sand,3
to 5 percent slopes I
Vona I0-6 'Loamy sand SM A-2 0 0 100 100 50-75 15-30 — NP
6-28 "Fine sandy loam,Sandy SC,SC- A-4,A-2 0 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 20-30 NP-10
loam SM,
SM
28-60 'Sandy loam, Loamy SC-SM, A-2,A-4 0 0 100 90-100 50-85 15-40 20-25 NP-5
sand,loamy fine sand SM
74—Vona loamy sand,5
to 9 percent slopes
•
Vona f0-6 'Loamy sand SM A-2 0 0 100 100 50-75 15-30 — NP
6-28 'Fine sandy loam,Sandy SC-SM, A-2,A-4 0 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 20-30 I NP-10
loam SM,SC
28-60 'Sandy loam,Loamy SC-SM, A-4,A-2 0 0 100 90-100 50-85 15-40 20-25 NP-5
sand,loamy fine sand SM I
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part
Survey Area Data: Version 11, Aug 27, 2009
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
(Front Range Dairy 2)
510400 510500 510500 510700 510800 510900 511000 511100 511200 511300
Fi
40°]'58" c - -if - at 1 . I
74
f
j I Fr
P 4� I
1
Itto, , r 1
S .. .. i, ICI
t}
•
E tit
f--
t
o
8 '• i
S 4;
v R. v ii".. v -. - I 40']'10 c 40°710..
510400 510500 510600 510700 510800 510900 511000 511100 511200 511300
Nap Scale.1.6 960 d panted on A s¢e(8 5'x 11')sheet.
N Meters
A 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 250 500 1.000 1.500
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
(Front Range Dairy 2)
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOl) Map Scale: 1:6,960 if printed on A size(8.5" x 11")sheet.
I Area of Interest(AO') The soil your comprise surveys that AOI were map
ped at 1:24,000.
soils
Soil Map Units Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Ratings Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
U A misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
® ND soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
® B Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
n B/D measurements.
n C Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
® C/D Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 13N NAD83
n D This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
Not rated or not available the version date(s)listed below.
Political Features Soil Survey Area: Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part
• Cities Survey Area Data: Version 11,Aug 27,2009
Water Features Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 8/6/2005:7/30/2005
r. Streams and Canals The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Transportation compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
J Rails imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Interstate Highways
N US Routes
Major Roads
N Local Roads
MCA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Weld County,Colorado.Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Hydrologic Soil Group
Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part(CO618)
Map unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating I Acres in AOI I Percent of AOI
44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 B 23.5! 10.3%
percent slopes
69 Valent sand.0 to 3 percent A 14.9' 6.5%
slopes
70 Valent sand,3 to 9 percent A 16.7 7.3%
slopes
72 Vona loamy sand,0 to 3 B 86.9 38.2%
percent slopes
73 Vona loamy sand,3 to 5 B 28.0 12.3%
percent slopes
74 Vona loamy sand,5 to 9 B 57.7 25.3%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 227.7 100.0%I
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Weld County,Colorado.Southern Part Front Range Dairy 2
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation,are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D)and
three dual classes(ND, B/D, and C/D).The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly
wet.These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands.These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when
thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B/D, or C/D),the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
SiNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/14/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
Table 4: Solid Manure Produced and Associated Nutrients
ASAE D384.1-Dec 2001 Moisture Manure Manure TS VS Nitrogen Prosphorus Potassium
Number of Wt./hd, (lbs./day/ (ft3/day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/
Animal Type Hd lbs. Total Wt.,lbs. (%) 1000#) 1000# 10008) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#)
Milk Cows 2,153 1,500 3,229,500 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.29
Dry Cows 315 1,200 378,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.29
Springers 159 1,000 159,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.29
Heifers 5,373 750 4,029,750 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.29
Totals 8,000 7,796,250
Total Daily Production 670,478 10,915 93,555 77,963 3,508 733 2,261
Total Annual Production 244,724,288 3,983,884 34.147.575 28,456,313 1,280,534 267,489 825,233
Manure produced w/moisture content of 86.0% 122.362 tons
Manure as hauled w/moisture content of 46.0% 31,724 tons
Compost produced w/moisture content of 40.0% 28,551 tons
AGPROfessionals, LLC
Land Application Requirements for 25-)ear,24-hour Storm Event
25-year,24-hour storm volume( 18.4 A.F.),gallons 5.978.958
Total Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. 23.916 "Total-N= 4.0 ibaJl,WO gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. 11,958 '•NH3N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. 11,958 Ogartc-N= 2.0 ono aaO gal
Ammonium-Nitogen available after inigation.lbs. 6,577 45.0%SpNt&imgationbsa"
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year.lbs. 5.620 47%Egtitblun mineralization rate forogaicN"
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr..lbs. 12,197
Soil Organic Matter.% 1.0
Irrigation Water NO3 content.ppm 5.0
Residual soil NO,(2 ft).00m 20.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain.Bulacre:silage.tons/acre) 6 25 Based onCSu E,dMebn
N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,&hr.WaterNOs(Iblacre) 198 101 Buletin4538 a eases
Acres reg.if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 62 121
'MWPS-is Section 1
'Taken from CSU's BWIaW No.5684 Best Manaaemem FYadires kr Msrua UNI>afkn
Land Application Requirements for Average Years'Stormwater B Process Water-Sprinkler Applied
Maximum pumping requirement( 43.1 A.F.),gallons, 14.049,738
Total Nitrogen contained In liquid.lbs. 56,199 "Total-N• 4.0 ba11,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. 28.099 "NH3-N= 2.0 bs/1.000gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. 28,099 OrgwicN= 2.0 ae11,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation,lbs. 15.455 45.0%Spdrider-logaton boa"
Organic-Nitrogen available 3ro year.lbs. 13.207 47%Equtbiun mlrNresretlonratefororgarcN"
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr.,lbs. 28.661
Sall Organic Matter,% 1.0
Irrigation Water NO,content,ppm 5.0
Residual soli NO,(2 ft),ppm 20.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain,Su/acre;silage,tons/acre) 6 25 Based on CSU Etlembn
N req.w/listed O.M..soil N.a Ire Water NO,.(lb acre) 198 101 Orbit 1538540.585
Acres req.if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 145 284
'MWPS-18 Section 1
"Taken from CSU's Bulletin No.5644 Best Manaw.mem Pracs1 .4 Manua tflh/ n
Land Application Requirements for Avers a Years'Stormwater&Process Water-Flood Applied _
Maximum pumping requirement( A.F.).gall Total Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. - "ToliN= 4.0 lbs./1,000ga
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid.lbs. - "NH3N= 2.0 tsll.Om gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. - OrgartoN= 2.0 bs/1.000ga
Ammonium-Nitrogen available after inigation.lbs. - 22.0%Flood-lnlgaton bss"
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year.lbs. - 47%Egritbnan min aataaaonralefororgwicN"
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr..lbs.
Soil Organic Matter,% 1.0
Irrigation Water NO,content,ppm 5.0
Residual soil NO3(2 ft),ppm 20.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain,Bu/acre;silage or grass,ions/acre) 6 25 Based on CSU Extension
N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,&er.WaterNO,,ob./acre) 198 101 Btaetn4538&10.565
Acres req.If effluent applied via flood irrigation •
IMPS-18 Sec ion r
"lobe ban CSU'a Buo&No.36S4 BenA hoot ilstke NMmue Uimmrwl
Land Application Requirements-Solid Manure
Nitrogen produced annually, 100%teed.rest ever 1.280,534
Nitrogen loss during storage&handling.lbs. 512.214 40%bst asammorla
Total Nitrogen In manure before application.lbs. 768.320
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in manure,lbs. 295,803 'NH4N- 38.5%of total N In sold mamas
Organic-Nitrogen contained in manure,lbs. 472.517 'Organic-= 61.5%of WWI N Weald mane
NH4N available after spreading(no incorporation).lbs. 229.248 'NH,N toss= 22.5%v4fln 4 days of apptcamn
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year,lbs. 259.884 55%Equtblun miremkmtbnrab fororvereaa'
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr..lbs. 489,132
Sal Organic Matter.% 1.0
lmgaeon Water NO,chat ppm 5.0
Residual soil NO,(2 ft).ppm 20.0 Com Stage
Expected Yield(tons) 25 Based on CSU Extension
N req.w/listed O.M.&residual soil N.Iblacre 101 Boon 1538
Acres req. 4.843
'Talmo 6vn CSU§Buletin No.568A Best Manaaemm/Practices for Mamie IdillnlePa
Land Application Requirements-Compost
Nitrogen produced annually. 100%used.rest giver 1,280,534
Nitrogen loss during storage&handling.lbs. 512.214 40%bates anmora
Total Nitrogen in manure before composting.lbs. 768.320
Total Nitrogen In compost after composting.lbs. 537,824 30%total N lostdubg mmpostrg
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in manure,lbs. - 'N114N- 0.0%of total iaotdmaare
Organic-Nitrogen contained in manure.lbs. 537.824 •OganvN= 100.0%of totalling sold manure
NH4N available after spreading(no incorporation).lbs. - 'NH4-N bum 0.0%wlWn 4 days of application
Organic-Nitrogen available 4rd year,lbs. 225.886 42%Equtbhm mdreme:Mien rate brogaicN•
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after4 ..lbs. 225.886
Soil Organic Matter.% 1.0
rogation Water N0,mnerd.ppm 5.0
Residual soil NO,(2 ft).ppm 20.0 Com Silage
Expected Yield(tons) 25 eased on CSU E#embn
N req.w/listed O.M.&residual soil N.lb./acre 101 eteetn dice
Acres req. 2,236
'Taken from CSUs BWleffn No.566A Beg Manammad Practices 6r Mature Uldlidibn and 5531!612024-2030 20003
AGPROfessionals,LLC
Dehaan Groundwater Exploration
on April 9, 2012
Hole#1 West side of property
Depth (ft) Description of Material USCS*
0-1 Silty Sand SM
1-5 Clayey Sand SC
5-9 Clay CL
9-13 Clay CL
13-15.5 Clay CL
No ground water encountered
Hole#2 East side of property
Depth (ft) Description of Material USCS*
0-2 Silty sand SM
2-5 Clayey Sand SC
5-7.5 Clayey Sand SC
No ground water encountered
SE corner of property
BH#3 Description of Material
Depth(ft) USCS*
0-3 Clayey Sand SC
3-7 Clayey Sand SC
7-11 Clayey Sand SC
11-14 Clayey Sand SC
14-17 Clayey Sand SC
No ground water encountered
SE corner of property
BH#4
Depth(ft) Description of Material USCS*
0-2 Silty Sand SM
2-5 Silty Sand SM
5-9 Clayey Sand SC
9-13 Clayey Sand SC
13-17 Clayey Sand SC
17-20 Clayey Sand SC
No ground water encountered
Page 1 of 2
Hello