HomeMy WebLinkAbout20131836.tiffSUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
u A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County
Administration Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to
order by Chair, Jason Maxey, at 1:30 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
Absent/Excused: Bill Hall
Also Present: Kim Ogle, Diana Aungst, and Tiffane Johnson, Department of Planning Services; Don
Carroll, Heidi Hansen, and Jennifer Petrik, Department of Public Works; Mary Evett, Department of
Health; Brad Yatabe, County Attorney, and Kris Ranslem, Secretary.
L' Motion: Approve the June 18, 2913 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Robert
Grand, Seconded by Joyce Smock. Motion passed unanimously.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PLANNER:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION:
USR13-0021
SHUPE FARMS, LLC
DIANA AUNGST
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY
USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (STORAGE OF DRY FEED FOR DELIVERY
TO LOCAL CUSTOMERS) PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT
IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF
A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS
CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LOT A REC EXEMPT RECX12-0084; PART SW4 SECTION 17, T6N, R65W OF
THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO HWY 392; ABOUT 900 FEET EAST OF CR
39.
Diana Aungst, Planning Services, presented Case USR13-0021, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
• Don Carroll, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and the
requirements on site.
Mary Evett, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
12 Jay Pier, Build West Construction, 606 Elder Street, Kersey, Colorado, stated that this is a proposal
for a commodity shed. He stated that he understands there is a concern regarding the access from
Highway 392 and added that he visited with CDOT about widening the access. He added that there
shouldn't be a problem with the traffic and the destinations that they will be going to and coming from.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Co tau a ono
7-15-13
2013-1836
Motion: Forward Case USR13-0021 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Jordan Jemiola, Seconded by Robert Grand.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
D CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PLANNER:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION:
USR13-0022
NOBLE ENERGY INC
KIM OGLE
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, OIL AND GAS
SUPPORT AND SERVICE, INCLUDING, STORAGE OF PIPE AND
PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, AND ANY LNG RELATED USE PERMITTED AS
A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN
THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICT; AND A TRUCK
PARKING AREA IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LOT B REC EXEMPT RECX12-0069 LYING WITHIN E2NW4 SECTION 26,
T6N, R64W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. PART LOT B
REC EXEMPT RECX12-0069 LYING WITHIN W2NW4 SECTION 26, T6N,
R64W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 66 SECTION LINE; EAST OF AND
ADJACENT TO CR 57.
D Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR13-0022, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Heidi Hansen, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and the
requirements on site.
D Mary Evett, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
Vince Harris, Baseline Corporation, 700 12th Street #220, Golden Colorado stated that this is a
proposed storage yard for Noble Energy. The storage facility will receive, store and dispatch oil and gas
equipment. A LNG facility will also be located on site. The facility acts as a mobile refueling station and
will be operated by Encana.
Mr. Harris requested that the screening plan not be required. He stated that it will be a fenced facility and
added that they would rather have an open fence for security reasons.
In response to Commissioner Grand's inquiry, Mr. Ogle stated that no comments have been received
from surrounding property owners. Mr. Grand said from a security standpoint he understands the request
from the applicant. Commissioner Lawley stated that screening doesn't necessarily mean fencing but
that it could be landscaping. Commissioner Maxey asked Mr. Harris if he has visited with the nearest
residences. Mr. Harris said that they have not approached the residences. Mr. Grand recommended that
the applicant visit with the residences and then meet with staff to work out the screening requirement.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this
application.
Wilbur Stringer, 31349 CR 57, stated that he lives across from this facility. He is concerned with the
possibility of an explosion at this facility. He said that they should look at paving County Road 64.5 from
Gill to County Road 59 as well as County Road 57 from Highway 392 to Highway 263.
Ms. Hansen said that they did have a high number of trucks proposed for the water depot; however it is a
phased facility and the improvements agreement has triggers outlined for dust control and paving
requirements. Ms. Hansen said that if a report is made that they are using the wrong haul route they
would perform an investigation and if they are found utilizing other roads they would be in violation and
would need to appear before the Board of County Commissioners.
E> Mr. Harris said that he recalls several trigger numbers in the improvements agreement for dust
control and paving requirements.
Mr. Maxey inquired about the possibility of explosion. Dan Summer, Noble Energy, 1625 Broadway,
Denver, Colorado, stated that he is not aware of any blast containment plan for this facility but that they
would be prepared to do that before the Board of County Commissioner's hearing.
Ms. Hansen reviewed the improvements agreement with all of the traffic triggers in place.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
E> Motion: Forward Case USR13-0022 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Robert Grand, Seconded by Benjamin Hansford.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION:
USR13-0019
BIRKIN MARK
PLANNER: TIFFANE JOHNSON
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A WINERY (CIDERY AND TASTING ROOM); BED AND
BREAKFAST FACILITY; AND A USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN
ACCESSORY USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL
OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (EVENTS CENTER), PROVIDED THAT
THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED
SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO
ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE
A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT.
PARCEL B REC EXEMPT RE -41; PART E2SE4 SECTION 5, T2N, R67W OF
THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
APPROXIMATLY 0.5 MILES NORTH OF CR 24; WEST OF AND ADJACENT
TO CR 17.
Tiffane Johnson, Planning Services, presented Case USR13-0019, reading the recommendation
and comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Ms. Johnson noted that
Condition of Approval 1.A has been met as she received a letter from the Fire District stating that they
worked out their concerns with the applicant.
D Don Carroll, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and the
requirements on site.
D Mary Evett, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
Adam Grove, 11455 CR 17, Firestone, Colorado, stated that Ms. Johnson did a great job explaining
their proposal. Mr. Grove said that they do not have all of the state licenses yet, but once approved they
will start production.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
D Motion: Forward Case USR13-0019 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Robert Grand, Seconded by Nick Berryman.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PLANNER:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION:
USR13-0028
KERR-MCGEE GATHERING LLC
KIM OGLE
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND
SERVICE, INCLUDING OIL AND GAS PROCESSING FACILITIES AND
RELATED EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EIGHT (8)
COMPRESSORS ASSOCIATED WITH GAS PROCESSING OR WHICH
COMPRESS GAS TO ENTER A PIPELINE FOR TRANSPORT TO MARKET,
AND ONE (1) SEVENTY-FOOT IN HEIGHT COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN
THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
PT NW4 SECTION 14, T2N, R67W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 22; 0.5 MILES WEST OF CR 23.
D Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR13-0028, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Jennifer Petrik, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and
the requirements on site.
Mary Evett, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan. Ms. Evett stated that Development Standard 9 should be
amended to replace "industrial" with the "non -specified" noise level.
Motion: Amend Development Standard 9 as stated by staff, Moved by Benjamin Hansford, Seconded
by Nick Berryman. Motion passed unanimously.
I> Nathan Keiser, Anadarko Petroleum, 1099 18t" St, Denver Colorado, stated that this location fits in
with the rest of their gathering system and helps to reduce traffic in the area. The nearest inhabitable
structure is approximately 800 feet from this facility and they feel their noise abatement plan takes this
residence into consideration.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Motion: Forward Case USR13-0028 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Jordan Jemiola, Seconded by Benjamin Hansford.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
The Chair called a recess at 2:58 pm and reconvened the hearing at 3:10 pm.
D CASE NUMBER: USR13-0024
APPLICANT: ROBERT EHRLICH, C/O JEFF CHILDS
PLANNER: DIANA AUNGST
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A KENNEL (75 DOG BOARDING KENNEL AND 25 DOGGIE DAY
CARE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 100 DOGS) AND ANY USE PERMITTED AS A
USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN
THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS, (VETERINARY
CLINIC, DOG GROOMING, AND RETAIL SALES OF DOG FOOD, SUPPLIES,
AND TOYS), PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN
APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A
MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS
CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PT W2N2N2NW4 SECTION 20, T3N, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD
COUNTY, COLORADO.
LOCATION: SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 32; EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 3.
✓ Diana Aungst, Planning Services, presented Case USR13-0024, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. Ms. Aungst noted that staff received 13 letters of opposition from surrounding
property owners. These letters cite concerns regarding traffic, noise, odors, compatibility and decreasing
property values. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the
attached conditions of approval and development standards.
• Jennifer Petrik, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and
the requirements on site.
Mary Evett, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
• Jeff Childs, 6425 Seaside Drive, Loveland, Colorado, stated that he is proposing a dog boarding
facility as well as his own residence on this 20 acre site. The facility will provide for 50 inside climate
controlled stalls for overnight boarding. Mr. Childs stated that the veterinary services provided will be for
the general health care and shots for the dogs. Any other care will need to go to a veterinary clinic. He
added that the building will be fully insulated to mitigate any noise issues. The dogs will have a run and
play area outside of the facility and there will be landscaping and fencing to mitigate the noise concerns.
Mr. Childs stated that there will be 24 hour supervision since he will be living on site. The dogs will be
housed at night as well as for a couple hours each day. He added that he will apply a kennel policy that if
there is continuous barking dog outside that the dog will be brought indoors. In addition, if a dog has
uncontrollable barking then he will ask the owner of the dog not to bring the dog back.
Mr. Childs sent a letter to the surrounding property owners on his proposal prior to submitting the land
use application. He indicated that he did not hear from anyone prior to submitting the land use
application; however after submitting the application he was notified of the letters that staff received. He
organized a neighborhood meeting on June 12th and added that the main concern was the noise issues
as well as decreasing property values. He researched a dog kennel by Boulder which is 0.5 miles away
from residential developments and added that their homes have continued to increase with the proximity
of the kennel. Mr. Childs said that this proposal is consistent with other surrounding land uses in the
area.
Commissioner Berryman asked how he determined the number of dogs on site. Mr. Childs said that there
will be 50 kennels and in the plan 25 percent of them will be double animals in each stall along with 25
dogs for daycare. Mr. Berryman asked if he could handle that number of dogs. Mr. Childs said that he is
confident that he could with the proposed number of employees. He added that he is making an
investment with this piece of land and needs to have that number to make it profitable.
Mr. Maxey referred to the veterinarian that will be on call and asked for clarification. Mr. Childs said he will
contract with a veterinarian to come to the site once a week or when needed for updated shots or if they
get sick. Any major illness or problems with the dog they will go to the veterinary clinic off site.
D The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this
application.
Cheryl Berthod, 14834 CR 3, Longmont, Colorado, stated that she lives adjacent to the south of the site.
She feels that this would be a negative impact to her property value and is concerned with the traffic and
noise. She said that Mr. Childs has done his due diligence and provided a good plan. Ms. Berthod said
that her property sits 15 to 20 feet above the proposed site and she will still hear the barking and look into
the kennels. She added that this is not a good fit in this environment.
Commissioner Maxey asked if the number of dogs were lowered if she would be more acceptable to this
proposal. She said that once the site is labeled as a dog kennel it wouldn't matter.
Candice Loving, 5137 Boulder, Colorado, stated that she is a real estate broker and buyer agency
for Mr. Childs. She stated that she lives next to the dog boarding facility in Boulder that Mr. Childs
referred to. She said that she started a spreadsheet identifying the price of the homes prior to the dog
kennel with a comparison after the dog kennel was established next to this residential development and
the findings were that the homes increased in value. Commissioner Berryman asked to give details with
that dog kennel in comparison to this proposal. Ms. Loving said that it is a nice facility with an outside
area and commented that she doesn't hear the dogs barking. She added that she didn't know the
number of dogs allowed at this facility.
D Sally Greff, 14445 CR 3, provided written letters to the Planning Commission from two surrounding
property owners who could not attend today. She stated that she has lived in this area for 6 months and
chose to live here because of the proximity to Boulder, Longmont, and Denver and the beautiful views.
Ms. Greff stated that this is a great commercial plan and should be located in a commercial area. Ms.
Greff cited concerns regarding traffic, noise and waste removal. She said that several of the landowners
have invested in their property and are in threat of destroying that investment.
Commissioner Berryman asked if there were any changes that would make this proposal more palatable.
Ms. Greff said that at the neighborhood meeting they discussed flipping his residence to where more of
the residences are, however Mr. Childs said that it would not be feasible to move his residence.
D Martha Schmauss stated she has lived there almost 23 years. They came from a city environment
and want the peaceful environment. She cited concerns with traffic and added that they currently have
dust and ruts in the road.
Commissioner Maxey asked if there is anything that would help mitigate these issues. Ms. Schmauss
said that traffic and dust is a big issue and doesn't want it to change.
D Joanne Benedict, 14753 CR 3, stated that she bought this land in 1971 for the purpose of having a
rural area with raising pure Arabian horses. They now lease it out for cattle grazing. Her main concern is
that this is a commercial use in a rural area. She noted that County Road 3 will hold the traffic and
referred to a guaranty that the Weld County Commissioners made to Platte River Power Authority (PRPA)
that this would remain as a farm access only. Therefore they allowed PRPA to place power poles in the
county right-of-way.
Commissioner Maxey asked if there was anything that could be mitigated. Ms. Benedict said that there
isn't and it is not an appropriate use.
D Linda Lewis 14584 CR 3, stated that she has lived there for 42 years. She cited concerns with
traffic, dust, noise, waste and decrease in value. She added that they had planned to build a new home
south of their current one; however if this is approved it will remain vacant. Ms. Lewis said that there is no
mitigation that she would be comfortable with.
Lynn Lewis submitted written letters to the Planning Commission from two (2) surrounding property
owners. He asked the Commissioners to consider if they would live next to a dog kennel. Commissioner
Maxey asked how the dairy affects them. Mr. Lewis said the dairy is poorly managed and is a problem as
well.
D Kermit Bohrer, 14761 CR 3, stated that he has lived there since 1985. He moved there because it
was nice and quiet. He concurred with the previous comments and concerns. In response to
Commissioner Maxey's inquiry, he is opposed to this use and doesn't believe there is anything to mitigate
the concerns.
Carolyn Grande, 14696 CR 3, stated that most of the traffic will be going past their house. She is
concerned for her safety when walking her dogs and getting her mail. She asked to keep their rural
status. She echoed the previous concerns from her neighbors.
D Ronald Grande, 14696 CR 3 stated that he is concerned with the traffic. He added that County
Road 3 is 28 feet wide and not very well maintained.
D Steve Cristanelli, 14601 CR 3, stated that he shares all the same concerns as his neighbors. His
biggest concern is traffic safety. He added that County Road 3 and Highway 66 carry a lot of traffic and
has experienced many traffic hazards.
The Chair called a recess at 4:45 pm and reconvened at 4:51 pm.
D Mr. Childs stated that he appreciated the comments and went through many of the same issues at
the neighborhood meeting. He feels that he has taken these concerns and mitigated these through noise
abatement. He agrees that traffic coming from Highway 66 is difficult and is dangerous. He said that it is
safer to come down County Road 5 and that is the route he will try to enforce his clients to use. If a
vendor is not complying with the traffic flow he will not allow them to use the facility. The retail component
is not a profitable component but rather a convenience to the clients.
Mr. Childs said that if he does not purchase this property the owner mentioned developing it for 25
homes. He said that this development will increase the traffic and they will have dogs outside
unsupervised and have uncontrolled barking.
He designed the placement of the buildings to be furthest away from the nearest residences. He stated
that the fire department is concerned that if the facility was moved to the east that they could not provide
fire protection. A new fire hydrant will be installed that will benefit the entire neighborhood. He is
confident that he can control the noise and odor and that it will remain an agricultural neighborhood.
Commissioner Berryman said that they have heard that this is a commercial business in an agricultural
neighborhood and asked why he chose this area. Mr. Childs said that it is tough to find land for sale and
added that he has done a lot of research. This site came up for sale and the acreage was the right size
for a barrier between the houses. Mr. Berryman referred to the Town of Mead's comments and asked if
he had any comments. Mr. Childs said he has not talked with them but clarified that he will not have any
outside kennels since they will all be indoors.
Commissioner Smock asked where he has determined the area of where he will draw from. Mr. Childs
said the marketing plan is a 10 mile radius of the facility and anyone along the 1-25 area. He will market
the 1-25 people as well as Mead and Longmont.
The Chair asked the applicant if he has read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that he is in agreement.
Commissioner Hansford commented that property values being affected by this dog kennel are in
the eye of the beholder. He said there is a kennel located two (2) blocks from his residence and he never
hears dogs from that kennel. Additionally, they have no problems with odor or traffic. He stated that it is
located in a housing development in an agricultural area.
Commissioner Grand said that he is concerned with safety from Highway 66 and County Road 3 but
doesn't know if he can decide on that as the sole issue. He said that the applicant has a strong, well
thought out plan and appears to be concerned with his neighbors' comments. He said that this is a tough
issue.
Commissioner Elliott understands everyone's concerns. He said that with living in the country you need
to understand that these types of operations will locate there. He added that if it is well operated it is an
asset rather than a liability.
Motion: Forward Case USR13-0024 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Robert Grand, Seconded by Benjamin Hansford.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bret Elliott, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Mark Lawley, Nick
Berryman, Robert Grand.
The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
I' The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss.
Commissioner Grand said that he did some further investigation on one of the previous cases regarding
the dairy operation. He submitted an email to the Board of County Commissioners expressing his opinion
on how the consulting firm should be addressed on how they proceed with cases. Additionally, he
doesn't feel it is proper to give staff an environment where the consulting firm feels they control what goes
on and takes a very aggressive posture.
Meeting adjourned at 5:20 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
(� Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
'f {bC11 LQ� ��. Date: 2013.07.09 11:27:59 -06'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
Hello