HomeMy WebLinkAbout20131700.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
Case USR12-0063 - MURDOFF HOLDINGS, LLC
Exhibit Submitted By Description
A. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation
Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 06/04/2013)
C. Planning Services PowerPoint Presentation
Gordon Murdoff Letter to Planning Department
Zada Steidl Letter/Photos in Opposition
Gordon Murdoff Withdrawal Letter
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
V.
W
2013-1700
•
Q
3
o:
r
L ),G! 1_ CfntC
h
I
I
•
if
a
X
r
Qj bio
nj
0'-
0.0
O ti
co cc
iL
Q
%/J.
r �
/ /
F
-Q -41Imi ; -
-
1
•
��3-or.00;00W
6 foot Cedar
•
•..1
ririr
e Art/
•
stji
CU
V
i
1
•
icant's proposed screening — chai
May 22, 2013
Weld County Planning Dept.
1555 N 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Attn: Diana Aungst Planner
Ref; USR 12-0063 Murdoff Holdings LLC
Property 34018 WCR 15 Windsor, CO 80550
Past history summary of property:
Property purchased by Kurt & Loree Kelly ( daughter & son in-law ) year of 2000. At
that time Irrigation system for this property and surrounding properties was in place since
the early 1930's. Kurt & Loree Kelly moved to the Western Slope of CO fall of 2006.
Zada Steidl & Florence Spratt purchased surrounding property spring of 2007. Summer
of 2007 without permission Zada Steidl destroys Irrigation system on the Kelly property,
by removing 386 11 of concrete irrigation ditch, to make the irrigation system a high
pressure system, which the old free flow system worked very well since its existence.
Kelly's tried to settle dispute with Steidl & Spratt with no results.
Gordon Murdoff purchased property from Kelly's June of 2010, tried to make settlement
on Irrigation issue with no results until Murdoff brought Suite against Steidl & Spratt.
Murdoff offered two (2) resolutions to restore Irrigation to property along with Steidl &
Spratt to purchase Irrigation Water Right Shares, they did the later. Now Murdoff has no
water and property is growing weeds.
This property is located one mile north of Windsor on Cty. Rd. 15 and is an excellent
piece of ground for storage that I am proposing.
I have received the letters from Steidl & Spratt, and find the accusations mostly false.
Photos are available for rebuttal if you choose to see them.
Respectfully submitted:
Gordon A. Murdoff
Murdoff Holdings LLC
EXHIBIT
,3
(r5TL Z -
Esther Gesick
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
ZADA STEIDL [Rbluesky8@msn.com]
Tuesday, July 02, 2013 11:09 PM
Esther Gesick
Case USR 12-0063 - Murdoff Storage Lot
Murdoff County Commissioners.docx; Aerial View of Property.jpg; View from inside My Home
overlooking Storage Lot.jpg
Dear Ms. Gesick,
Below is a letter stating our
objectionsto the proposed project and I would appreciate it if it could be given to theCommissioners along
with the attached pictures in two files showing the closeproximity of the project to our home.
33901 N. Hwy 257
Windsor, CO 80550
July 2, 2013
Board of Weld County Commissioners
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Sirs:
Re: USR 12-0063, Murdoff Holdings, LLC
The proposed Trailer/Boat/Motorhome, etc. Storage Lot borders our farm on three sides and is only
125 feet from our home. We are adamantly opposed to this use of land in a beautiful area with beautiful
views located within the Windsor Urban Growth Management Area and between two major subdivisions. The
area is changing rapidly and will soon all be within the city. Windsor owns a park on the west side of the
proposed project and has requested denial along with Windshire, a large subdivision just to the south and
west. Windshire has many beautiful homes within eye view and this use is very incompatible with everything
in the immediate area. Due to the negative impact on all surrounding property values, all adjoining
landowners who are also Weld County citizens oppose this use.
It will create a huge visual eyesore, a safety and road hazard, a dust and noise nuisance, and extreme
light pollution with all-night burning halogen lights. It will not be supervised nor attended. The owner does
not live in the area and never has. There is no security and a very undesirable cheap chainlink fence with
plastic slats is proposed for the south side facing my home. A 6' fence will not hide motorhomes or trailers.
The fencing on the other sides is open wood rails and will only invite vandalism and theft, plus encourage
trespassing upon our property. This use will attract people who do not live in the area and create a safety
issue for my 93 -year -old mother who lives in our home just to the south. Our windows on the north and east
will overlook the trailer lot and our views will be destroyed.
All storm run-off water could contain hazardous petroleum products and antifreeze which will ruin our
fields and irrigation water. Heavy rains and snowmelt will run out onto our land and crops.
1
This area does not need or want this use nor is it necessary. Windsor has existing storage facilities
already within a couple miles. The Weld County Planning Commission recommended the project ask Windsor
for annexation. All three adjoining landowners have stated that they do not want a storage lot on this
property. This is such a disturbing and completely unacceptable use and is simply not an appropriate place for
a trailer lot.
I respectfully request that you do not approve it.
Respectfully,
Zada A. Steidl
2
O
1.1
I
I
ihra
by
2
FJ
a,
t
c
Esther Gesick
r-nn1:
it:
o:
Subject:
Diana Aungst
Wednesday, September 04, 2013 3:31 PM
Esther Gesick
FW: Meeting at 9am on 9/30/13
From: FMURDOFF@aol.com [mailto:FMURDOFF@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Diana Aungst
Subject: Re: Meeting at 9am on 9/30/13
Hello Diana My decision for my project USR12-0063 is, that I will be canceling out on this project. (Withdrawing)
Reason being after the July 3, 2013 meeting, we were the last party on the docket, when everyone was leaving the room I
approached Ms. Zada Steidl to see if we could discuss my project. This did not go well .
Immediately she flew off the handle. There is no sense in arguing with a person that will not listen. I see a mediation
meeting getting very ugly. She knows very well what has transpired in the past was her wrong doing. I not only have her
against my project, but the city of Windsor also. The stress is not worth it at this time.
Sincerely,
Gordon A. Murdoff
In a message dated 9/3/2013 2:34:24 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, daungst@co.weld.co.us writes:
1
Hello