The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20132552.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case USR13-0038 - CHAMBERS LOREN SR TRUSCT/SCHLEINING GENETICS, LLC Exhibit Submitted By Description A. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation B. Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 08/20/2013) C. Planning Services PowerPoint Presentation D. Richard E. Burd Letter of Concern E. AGPROfessionals, LLC PowerPoint Presentation F. Public Works Email, 1 page G. H. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. s. T. U. V. 2013-2552 Min i MD la MN t is. 4 • a-• at-alitMt IN i. cr. I. .44 >. a) C6 E O 1^.L. >- tao Co O Co Q (J t/") CO tan C V) i'! w m cc U j0 ^T a) C) O O 00 4J a) O C • 0 O a) •a. 44 ooking north on CR 39 4 , •• • ... '-It r ' •tot3-. _:~h r. ¶, a • . 4 ' , _ • • r • September 10, 2013 Weld County Commissioners Greeley, Colorado RE: Schleining Special Use Permit RECEIVED SEP 10 2013 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The purpose of this letter is not intended to deny anyone the right to make a living, however when that pursuit negatively impacts my quality of life and economic well-being then I feel compelled to respond. The following is an outline of my concerns. 1. The request is for too many cattle for the amount of land. It is unreasonable to put 7,250 head of cattle, feed storage, lagoons and a cattle handling facility on 70 plus acres of land. 2. There is a significant drainage issue, which has not been addressed, other than diverting the water onto the County Road. 3. This proposal calls for locating pens and feed handling facilities far too close to HWY 14, which has considerable more traffic on it. I have called Mr. Schleining numerous times to suggest that he stop grinding because the dust was so thick going across the highway that it was dangerous to the vehicle on the road. 4. The feed handling and cattle pens are too close to the neighboring homes. The proposal, as outlined, will have a significant impact on the neighboring property owners. a. Property values will be adversely affected due to the proximity of the pens and feed grinding operation. b. Our quality of life is being compromised due to the dust, order and flies. A more reasonable solution is: Reduce the permit to 4,000 head. (If you check you will see that this is quite a large number of animals for less than 80 acres of land.) Move the expansion west to the middle of the property. This moves the pens away from the neighbors and gets the hay grinding away from the highway and the neighbors. By moving everything to the west it also mitigates the drainage issue. The present proposal requires significant dirt work to make the water run uphill which in turn would divert the flood water onto the County Road. Moving the operation to the west is the right thing to do to protect the neighbor's property rights. The value of neighboring land should not be negatively impacted due to the proximity of a feedlot. I expect that this proposal will be amended to insure that my quality of life and property values are not adversely affected. This is a reasonable solution. To do otherwise is going to inflict unreasonable damages on the neighbors. I urge you to not just rubber stamp this request and to carefully look at the solution that I have set forth. Sincerely, Richard E. Burd USR13-0038 N • � et CI) O a4 • m•=4 U O C14 c:4 vr) p. ›, ci ,sn < 0 O cn � v mil" O Is) O co V 4..a tat) O qD cti aA O L17 Cr) d" • Request • Amended Use by Special Review Permit • Existing Chambers Feedlot (SUP -219) • 9,600 Head Feedlot • 7,725 Head Feedlot line' IMF IMlle IMIS I■I II. I•INIMMIHMI 'Ell I•I.II.ILII■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE SCHLEINING FEED YARD AMMENDED WELD COUNTY USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW _ Part of the North East y of Section 18, Township 7 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. n at COLORADO HIGHWAY 14 County of Weld, State of Colorado Kmar .rrtrs- o-�o o. \0 o r� mr sank pM �' •® � -/ ..cq aNN �� a Ira S MM ..Tr (� �y 0. _. -.{ y�p�� g MUT= TCVQ �3C- I ' I I I fir— I 111.11t013111.11t013 ,yt fl' I� n \ � \ e - - or tvtata.ilir -II I ICI 111 1 f 6,• I. fill 1 i/ I Mat '� o b � . d \ /mob 'OSED CORRALS , WM ARROW n q ° o Et: G F 8 pp ..7 v 9 '.7' Z cm J� \: / 6 • I. 7 FOXING © �emec�rnuOa a noWIInuoinnIIi O PROP0S x a It cLc it ci \� a H$iH.. a lit a \ \� r . bV �' . ' Cr.) I' l I I : j \ - I r'. , � i : d / ' .t •. \N 4p�p . ,�; ` EXISTING - PROPOSED POND PROPOSED POND troy 1 rrcit ANNA, 00.AHes 02 00•0008 . b 4 u. W Or,.4' Pb..., C.a. Aa a,4Sd .ni ds ion& nawrJ - W `sd d o... t sl gs MI ws w wab• d M.L SS a* hwllPew AM tar Y W/ ..A\ s .Aaa .M swr\.d raw ee _ °e w —aaritneigrrroannairr ' ..,� �vy,�p y�,�rtp�.��p}�,,.1e�a�n p��y.L��yj�.µ, ��. �w,n No 0 a. aY i ra' * Fa Otis t iw+ Me rr e' ySte Fla .. aww.w pnww s ,A.a M Iee#N Pew 01 _ Mewl .la.; rrl w dMp' OIYIY11YalY Asii ANN 0.00 Oat Mw ISM M 004 YEA M Ile Mee —M o POLE LIGHT Dana J W01406 n0 a.0seedtles Sideµ AAaaruma, a\rr4N IMM:MY awns C00000ecw rev m SNOW Aww Oao\prre SO.M.e, s I.reba ARUM VS -ay a - W _ _ P. 1 a\ 2e>_ .�.. rb So w.e•M1 q 0000 Same LI TSA MO m. WSCaevrfab Mocked0 r Meals O�iv:no- S RR pis fe0 lift �S e�iFAII-•-ai lie Meals bawr{soPi^) • a I 1 I S I a I 3 WWI a- p�p .7 in Chas E.s� gbh OWL: ES ,flirt ST -1 au:Li r. rooe'Am Pen Density SCHLEINING FEED YARD AMMENDED WELD COUNTY USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW Pnt of else North La.t', of Crow 18. Tamp 7 Nor* Range 65 Weil of 16e 6d1 P.M t'numy of weld. Stale of Colorado main OINIMMULVI eaa411•a— Pie .,••••- ._s 'So Schleining Feedlot Pen Space&Drive Area: 33.2 acre Permitted Animals: 7725 Density: 190 sqft./head AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE • SwF ,Nh 4l • • • • • • Pen Eerisityp Area: 620:.235.84 sq ft Perimeter: 4,280.78 ft Big M Feedlot Pen Space&Drive Area: 14.2 acre Permitted Animals: 4,000 Density: 155 sqft./head IINS lelIINIINIIOMIlelMII■IIMIIWHIM lelISIMIIIMII■IICI IS!'IMIIMIINIIIMAEI IINIIMIIINIIHMISlelII. I•IMIAMI HMI 'MI I•INIIIMIlelI■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Mr OD I INp� I ID I up • • • • a Na ► Pen Density 92,T53:7U sq ft meter. 7,099.41 ft Hunt Feedlot Pen Space&Drive Area: 38.8 acre Permitted Animals: 10,000 Density: 169 sqft./head ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ miss ■ ■ ■ ■ Nino ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 155/SQ FT Pen Density Wan rai %CHLEINING FEED YARD ANSI I %Pc ON I I D C 4 NW USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW • vo'r w - a a 6.. sr" 1 ' -- Wit terti9r.tir MIT" ' v sra - 7"--- r•--_ • - -r '�t 7N3iiL�ir \I 190 / SQ FT 169/ SQ FT AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Sec. 23-2-260 A. Uses by Special Review Consistent with: 1. Chapter 22 — Comp Plan 2. Intent of District - A Zone 3. Existing Surrounding Uses 4. Future Development 5. Complies with Article V — Overlay Districts 6. Conserve Prime Farmland 7. Adequate Provisions for Health, Safety & Welfare AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Sec. 22-1-120. Comprehensive Plan guiding principles. B. Respect for Our Agricultural Tradition. Sec. 22-2-20. Agriculture goals and policies. A. Goal 1. Respect and encourage the continuation of agricultural land uses and agricultural operations for purposes which enhance the economic health and sustainability of agriculture. Policy 2.3. Encourage development of agriculture and agriculturally related businesses and industries in underdeveloped areas where existing resources can support a higher level of economic activity. Agricultural businesses and industries include those related to ranching, confined animal production, farming, greenhouse industries, landscape production and agri-tainment or agri-tourism uses. IINS lelIINIWHIM' lelI■II■II.IWHIM I■I'S'MII.II■IICI I II■II■II.IIMAEII■II■IIMI.IHMISlelII.I•IMIAMIHMI'.lI•INIII.IlelIN AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 23-3-10 A (Agricultural Zone District) Intent 1. Promote agriculture 2. Provide areas for agricultural activities 3. Provide areas for Uses by Special Review !� 4. "Livestock Confinement Operations" I 5. Zone for protection 8.R y a a T S _ a Ovisthc!s a- AGPROfessionals, LLC DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE noir i•4 "IyyMf • OP • • • • IP �, I i11 • ♦ • • • F Compatibility 1 -CR84 USR-1453 3F ID,CE AE USR-1675 SUP 48 FEED L 7800 SHEE USR-786AM ONI CR'801TINNGWSTOF? FAC SUP -2-19 FEED LOT USR-1020 RADIO TOWER -3-183 USR-199AM FEED LOT COURSE ESTABLISHMENT USR-1583 KENNEL 50 DOGS IMille' IMIIINIINIIMIlelI■IIMII•'EWE' HMI I MI IND I MI I IIINIINVMIIMO IINIIMI 'MI I■IIMIIIIINN HMI HMI 'MI INIIINI!MI I■I I■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Provisions for Protection of Health, Safety, Welfare • • Water Protection • Water Supply • Septic and Sanitation • Manure and Stormwater • Nutrient Management • Air Quality • Pest Control • Noise, Light and Traffic • Codes, Referrals, Conditions and Developments Standards line' IMF IMlle IMIS I■I II. I•INIMMIHMI 'Ell I•I.II.ILII■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Traffic • Commodity Trucks: 4 per/day • Manure: 5/day • Livestock transportation — 4/day • Rendering Truck • Employees — Daily when needed • Services, Venders, and Visitors A AGPROtessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Water Protection • Run-on Water Eliminated • Storm Event Run-off Contained • Pond Lined • Reviewed by County Health Department IS' I■II.ISIDE' I■I'MI I■II.I.IMII■I'SI■II.II■IICI HMI' I■II■II.ILII.IIMF IMlle IMIS I■I II. I.I.IMMIHMI 'Ell I•I.II.ILII■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Nuisance Management Plan Air Quality • Dust Mitigation • Odor Control Cleanliness • Pen Management • Habitat Removed • Spraying and Bait inen ssio .oninwasimnimm. .norm . AGPROfessiona1s DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Referrals, Conditions, Development Standards p • Local, state and federal referral agencies responded • Health and safety plans reviewed, approved, conditioned • 5 Conditions of Approval and 35 Development Standards A...GPROtessionais DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE =1 USR Re' uirements Sec.3-2-230 B. Uses by Special Review Consistent with Chapter 22 Consistent with Intent of District Consistent with Existing Surrounding Uses lc Consistent with Future Development Complies with Article V Overlay Districts it/Conserve Prime Farmland V Adequate Provisions for Health, Safety & Welfare AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Questions? COLORADO HIGHWAY 1 SCHLEINING FEED YARD AMMENDED WELD COUNTY USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW Pan of the North East V4 of Section 18, Township 7 North. Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. County of Weld. State of Colorado IRRIGATED FIELD Ms* MN d PROPOSED CORRALS PROPOSED POND • PROPOSED POND c T ® fa r d rAwt m..t~ lolretwl POLE LIWIT DETAIL PJ Mttl- rt Ym gaails lk .-- `_cX. e111A�__IWts ALA= sail tai-wb l+tetaAe-M r0-ia L.l• 1l 1.1E t 1fai S'M ate Mein SSW rymYllal-- MomsyawlInas) 8 Iatc NURE FEED AREA 1 rive"." ."P t=M"y Q1tia "%I ce"IleliriA1- ealei��' a 8 U., ROAM IMPAIR' ma SVILINNO 1Rtlt.tI.T NOLTutY tteWla YAM Oalill-11ot t MtROI.Mae nos mow Maas MA1r6Y MIMIC n-G®!SIMMS -ar0-l1. nlip:Vonieggsrert M -w.. w raw—ea_wr -- a an ®'air etwsa --ri. Mp-t•�M -,-irY-�tall�� AMY a- rulegb M _%, D Y ago St. LSO 07.0 -OM r- tmy Mina r I CI a — 1 Q a n ¢ it tt�7=l! U. z z fj a>II 2 t Cn l a t i SHEET ST -1 otstowioMm wasmau IInII■IlelIMIISHIM' Ile I■II■IIMIISIMIHMI IMIIIMII■IICI lelI■IIMIIMIIIMIInIIMIINC IMIIEll leisi ionin'minim's'I■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE YCMF« It IIMw br _a M um1 COLORADO HIGHWAY U 2 E ume MellIONEUT IOLIEMZY flam Witt m011a =TUC]K Mva. Ia. In flag al, IV -S= COMA Ka COMM MO B C D 3 4 I 7 J Immo r C C N Cie H SCHLEINING GENETICS FEEDYARD PROPOSED CONTOURS GR-1 MIZINIEEDCOMOLIZ From: Griffin - CDOT, Steven To: Gloria Hice-Idler - CD0T" Jennifer Petrik Subject: Re: Site plan for cattle operation east of Ault Date: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 1:10:10 PM Jennifer and Gloria, I have had a chance to look at their proposed site plan, and based on all the other available information, I don't really see any concerns for CDOT at this location based on the proposed expansion of the cattle operations. The holding pond is downgrade from SH 14 and will not outlet into the right-of-way for SH 14. If there are pre- existing drainage issues near the intersection with WCR 39, I don't see where the cattle operation would cause these issues to worsen. I also looked into any potential legal history at this site involving CDOT and the State Engineer's Office, but was not able to locate any such records. No one I spoke to here in the Region had any recollection of litigation here. Steven Griffin, P.E., CFM Colorado Department of Transportation Region 4 Hydraulics Engineer 1420 2nd Street Greeley, CO 80631 Steven.Griffinstate.co.us On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Griffin - CDOT, Steven <steven.griffin(a state.co.us> wrote: Gloria and Jennifer, I am wrapping up our review of the proposal to expand the cattle operation at SH 14 and WCR 39, the only piece of information I would like to have is the proposed site layout for the expansion, specifically the locations of the new storage ponds. Would either of you have a copy of this? I have their Preliminary Waste System Design report from May 2013, but it doesn't have a site plan with it. Steven Griffin, P.E., CFM Colorado Department of Transportation Region 4 Hydraulics Engineer 1420 2nd Street Greeley, CO 80631 Steven.Griffinstate.co.us EXHIBIT u5r&n-OO3t( Hello