The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20133029.tiffPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE DATE RECEIVED: RECEIPT # /AMOUNT # 1$ CASE # ASSIGNED: APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED: Parcel Number 2 0 7_ 3 0- 2 _ 0 4 0 p 2 (12 digit number - found on Tax La information, obtainable at the Weld County Assessor's Office, or www.co.weld.co.us) (Include all lots being included in the application area. If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet.) Legal Description Lot 2 Block 2 Seemore Heights , Section 38 , Township 3 North, Range 68 West Property Address (If Applicable) 13941 Elmore Road, Longmont Existing Zone District: R1 Average Lot Size: 4.03 Proposed Zone District: PUD Total Acreage: 4.03 Proposed #/Lots 1 Minimum Lot Size: 4.03 Proposed Subdivision Name: Proposed Area (Acres) Open Space: Are you applying for Conceptual or Specific Guide? Conceptual I I Specific ri FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY (If additional space Is required, attach an additional sheet.) Name: Ann Elizabeth Nash and Jonathan R. Scupin Work Phone # (303) 818-3520 Home Phone # Email Address aenash@gmail.com Address: 13941 Elmore Road City/State/Zip Code Longmont, CO 80504 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Below: Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent) Name: Matthew Crowther Work Phone # (970) 304-0075 Home Phone # Address: 916 10th Street City/State/Zip Code Greeley, CO 80631 UTILITIES: Water: Long's Peak Water District Email Address mcrowther@counselcolorado.c Sewer: Septic Gas: Xcel Energy Electric: United Power Phone: Vonage DISTRICTS: School: St. Vrain Fire: Mountain View Post: Longmont I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Change of Zone for the above describjd-unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: (b Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date "7- SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Component One — environmental impacts. The PUD development will plan for and accommodate the following impacts as follows: 1. Noise and vibration. There will be no additional noise or vibration. 2. Smoke, dust and odors. There will be no additional smoke, dust, or odor. 3. Heat, light and glare. There will be no additional heat, light, or glare. 4. Visual/aesthetic impacts. There will be no additional visual or aesthetic impact. S. Electrical interference. There will be no additional electrical interference. 6. Water pollution. There will be no additional water pollution. 7. Wastewater disposal. There will be no additional wastewater disposal. 8. Wetland removal. There will be no additional wetland removal. 9. Erosion and sedimentation. There will be no additional erosion or sedimentation. 10. Excavating, filling and grading. There will be no additional excavating, filling, or grading. 1 11. Drilling, ditching and dredging. There will be no additional drilling, ditching, or dredging. 12. Air pollution. There will be no additional air pollution. 13. Solid waste. There will be no additional solid waste. 14. Wildlife removal. There will be no additional wildlife removal. Rather, there will be additional wildlife rehabilitation. 15. Natural vegetation removal. There will be no additional vegetation removal. 16. Radiation/radioactive material. There will be no additional radiation or radioactive material. 17. Drinking water source. Drinking water will continue to be supplied by the Long's Peak Water District. There will be no additional need for drinking water. 18. Traffic impacts. There will be no additional traffic impacts. Component Two — service provision impacts. The PUD development will plan for and accommodate the following impacts as follows: 1. Schools. There will be no additional school impact. 2. Law enforcement. There will be no additional law enforcement impact. However, absent approval, the Colorado Reptile Humane Society ("CoRHS") would be forced to cease operations on the property - 2 subjecting law enforcement to additional burdens associated with managing unwanted reptile pets and injured Colorado wildlife. 3. Fire protection. There will be no additional fire protection impact. 4. Ambulance. There will be no additional ambulance impact. 5. Transportation (including circulation and roadways) — A description of the functional classification, width and structural capacity of the street and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD Zone District. If the street or highway facilities providing access to the PUD Zone District are not adequate to meet the requirements of the proposed district, the applicant shall supply information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capability to upgrade the street or highway facilities in conformance with Sections 22-3-60 through 22-3-190 of this Code. This shall be shown by submitting, with the PUD application, a separate improvements agreement describing the proposed road improvements and method of guaranteeing installation of said improvements in conformance with the County policy on collateral for improvements. The agreement shall be used for the purposes of review, evaluation and compliance with this Section. No additional traffic is anticipated. Vehicular traffic circulation will continue to be provided by Elmore Road which connects the proposed PUD to Highway 66 approximately 250 ft. and 400 ft. to the north respectively of the current access points. The currently existing internal driveway system will allow quick conveyance of traffic to and from the external roadway accesses. 6. A traffic impact analysis prepared by a registered professional engineer competent in traffic engineering shall be provided by the developer, unless specifically waived by the Department of Public Works. Waived by the Department of Public Works. 7. Storm drainage — All development within a PUD Zone District shall adhere to the storm drainage design and technical criteria regulations in Section 24-7-130 of this Code. The historic stormwater drainage patterns and runoff amounts will be maintained. The developer will be required to submit a detailed engineering study, from a Colorado licensed engineer, that shows both the undeveloped and developed drainage patterns. The drainage study shall track the route of off -site discharge until it reaches a natural drainage course such as a creek or river. Off -site discharge shall not damage downstream property, roads or bridges. The developer will be required to mitigate any downstream impacts caused by said development. The stormwater drainage study may be waived by Public Works based upon the proposed impacts and intensity of the PUD. Waived by the Department of Public Works. 3 8. Utility provisions — A description and statement from the representative of the provider of the utilities which demonstrates that there are adequate utility provisions available to serve the development. See attached. 9. Water provisions — A description of the water source and system and a statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity are sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD Zone District. See attached. 10. Sewage disposal provisions - A description of the sewage disposal facility. If the facility is a public sewer system, a statement from the representative of the provider of the sewer system utility which demonstrates that the disposal system will adequately serve the uses within the development. The property is served by an existing septic system. A copy of the septic permit is attached. 11. Structural Road Improvements Plan - Adjacent roadways shall be designed to meet the full typical section specified by the Department of Public Works and Chapter 24 of this Code. Improvements may include the construction of travel lanes, shoulders, bike lanes, medians, curb, gutter and sidewalks, for example. Required improvements may also include the acquisition of right-of-way and construction easements that will be dedicated to the public. Improvements attributed to the development shall be consistent with the direct impact a particular development has on the County road system as determined by a professional transportation study. The road improvements agreement and roadway construction plans shall be considered by the Board of County Commissioners. (Weld County Code Ordinance 2001-1; Weld County Code Ordinance 2003-10) No structural road improvements are necessary. Component Three — landscaping elements. The grounds are landscaped with numerous xeric perennials, eight deciduous trees, and one pine tree. Native grasses have been cultivated on the property and noxious weeds removed. No additional planting or other amenities are proposed. Component Four — site design. The applicant submits the following information: I. A statement describing any features unique to the site, such as topography and irrigation ditches. There are no significant unique features present on the site. 4 2. A statement which demonstrates how the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the goals and policies of Chapter 22 of this Code. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22. As stated in the preamble to the Weld County Charter, the goal of the charter — including Weld County Code, Chapter 22 — is to allow the citizens of Weld County to: avail [them]selves of self-determination in county affairs to the fullest extent permissible under the Constitution and laws of the State of Colorado...to provide uncomplicated, unburdensome government responsive to the people, and...to provide for the most efficient and effective county government possible. The requested change of zone of the subject property allows that goal to be realized by availing the property owners of self-determination and allowing governmental control in a way that is responsive to the will of the people. Specifically, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the purpose of the Weld County Code because it would allow the property owners to continue to operate the CoRHS a Colorado nonprofit corporation whose mission is to continue to improve the lives of reptiles and amphibians in captivity and in the wild through education and action. As acknowledged by Weld County Code § 22-1-120(A): One (I) of the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, which it continues to preserve, and Weld County upholds, is the right of citizens to own and utilize their property. Private property rights are not unlimited rights but, rather, rights balanced with the responsibility of protecting community health, safety and welfare. It is the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to promote opportunities for County citizens, while protecting private property rights. Allowing the property owners to rezone their land as requested promotes opportunities for citizens in the community by allowing them to enjoy rehabilitated wildlife and adopt rehabilitated pets while simultaneously protecting the property owners' interest in continuing to utilize their property in the way that they intend. Such rezoning is in balance with the community's interest in protecting its health, safety, and welfare because it maintains the status quo ante with regard to actual present land use, poses no new or additional threats, and encourages the humane treatment of animals. The Weld County Code recognizes that the rezoning process must be fair and equitable to all parties providing an open process to facilitate public information and input, maintain consistent requirements coupled with flexibility within the implementation criteria, and allow for approval when all written criteria of the land use regulations are met. Weld County Code § 22-1-120(C). In this case, the specific location of the subject property is technically in a subdivision named Seemore Heights First Addition which was created in 1981. There is unanimous community support for the property owners' proposed rezoning within that subdivision and broad community support for the same in the neighboring Seemore Heights subdivision created in 1963. More than half of the residents of Seemore Heights have signed written statements supporting that entire subdivision's rezoning if necessary. Upon information and belief, none of 5 the remaining minority are opposed to the property owners' independent rezoning of their own parcel within Seemore Heights First Addition. Under such circumstances, there is little reason, if any, why the property owners' application should be denied. This is especially true considering the Weld County Code's goal of maintaining consistent written requirements coupled with flexibility within the implementation criteria. All subdivisions are not created equally. As more fully described in Weld County Code § 22 -I - 120(D): The County's nearly four -thousand -square -mile area is diverse geographically, demographically, culturally, socially and economically. Therefore, land use policies must be flexible to adapt to the specific location and circumstances of each proposed land use change. It is also important to weigh the cumulative impacts that specific land use changes will have. Neither the Seemore Heights First Addition subdivision nor the Seemore Heights subdivision bear much resemblance to the modern day, cookie cutter suburban neighborhoods described by the same term. Indeed, Seemore Heights bears little resemblance to its own original plat of 20 approximately one acre parcels that had, until that time, been used for agricultural purposes. As property owners purchased land in Seemore Heights — usually as part of larger land purchases encompassing contiguous lots — many of them continued their land's agricultural use. As a result, many such uses continue today as historic uses despite the fact that they would otherwise be prohibited. As any potential purchaser of land in the Seemore Heights or Seemore Heights First Addition subdivisions would soon realize, neighbors in those subdivisions and on the entirety of Elmore Road have vastly different tracts of land that they utilize in vastly different ways. A review by address indicates that more than 50% of land owners in this area operate businesses from their properties including real estate, knitting, trucking, lawn maintenance, a machine shop, a dentist, a sewer clean -out business, and an auto maintenance business. Under such circumstances, the cumulative impact of the property owners' proposed rezoning will be minimal indeed. This is especially true considering the lack of a homeowners association and the fact that residential properties immediately adjacent to the subject property to the east on Elmore Road are not even part of the subdivision. In at least one case, one of those properties — the Whittern residence, a one acre agriculturally zoned parcel with an essentially residential use — has been approved for a use by special review dental office by the Planning Department. Against this backdrop, the language of Weld County Code § 22-1-120(D) indicating that land use policies must be flexible is particularly applicable and the importance of not to getting caught up in uncodified minutia is highlighted. As recognized by Weld County Code § 22-1-120(F), land use policies have a significant impact on economic conditions in the County and should be structured to encourage economic prosperity and economic growth. Land use policy favors the continued operation of the CoRHS — an entity that has remained an economically viable ongoing concern since 1999 — because that entity alleviates the financial costs associated with governmental management of unwanted reptile pets and injured Colorado wildlife. Without the CoRHS, such costs would necessarily 6 shift back to Weld County taxpayers and inhibit their economic prosperity in derogation of the Weld County Code. The Weld County Code specifically recognizes the fact that reduced fish and wildlife habitat is a significant problem facing the County. Weld County Code § 22-5-10(A). The perpetuation of nonprofit organizations like the CoRHS is integral to the effective management of species forced into increased human contact and resultant injury. Through such perpetuation, the officials of the County, as well as each individual citizen, are afforded an improved ability to take appropriate action and an active role in preserving the well-being of such threatened species as envisioned by Weld County Code § 22-5-10(B). In sum, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan adopted by Weld County, is supported by the goals that plan endeavors to pursue, would aid the county economically, and would help assure the continued viability of threatened wildlife populations. The uses allowed by the proposed rezoning (PUD- with Estate use to allow Kennel USR Permit) would preserve the status quo ante. The property owners have been operating the CoRHS on the subject property since 2001 without issue until a recent anonymous complaint/inquiry triggered an investigation in late January 2012. Upon information and belief, no neighboring landowners made complaints or inquiries regarding the operation of the CoRHS on the property during that 11 year time period. The land uses of the properties immediately adjacent to the subject property to the north, south, and west are labeled residential, although, as discussed above, those properties' actual uses vary widely. The land use of the property immediately adjacent to the subject property to the east is labeled agricultural, though these parcels do not meet criteria for such zoning. The subject property is in a predominantly agricultural area with an Estate zoned subdivision not more than 450 feet to the east. Further, the uses allowed by the proposed rezoning will help conserve prime agricultural land. The subject property is designated as "Prime" by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. The property owners' proposed rezoning will allow the property to continue to be used in much the same way that it has been used for the last 11 years — ensuring the continued maintenance of its productive capacity. 3. A statement which demonstrates how the uses allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD Zone District. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses within the PUD Zone District are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with the performance standards. The proposed PUD rezoning would adopt an Estate use in order to qualify the applicants for a Use by Special Review kennel permit. Such use would not create any perceivable conflict within the PUD Zone District. 4. A statement which demonstrates how the uses allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD Zone District, including a detailed description 7 of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD Zone District will be avoided or mitigated. As discussed above, the proposed PUD is located within Seemore Heights First Addition. The Seemore Heights subdivision and the entirety of Elmore Road have vastly different tracts of land that are utilized in vastly different ways — primarily for agricultural, residential, and small business purposes. A review by address indicates that more than 50% of land owners in this area operate businesses from their properties and there is an Estate zoned PUD not more than 450 feet to the east. The limited Estate use allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD Zone District 5. If the proposed change of zone is located within a Flood Hazard, Geologic Hazard or Airport Overlay District, as identified by maps officially adopted by the County, the applicant shall submit information which documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the County Supplementary Regulations concerning floodplain and/or floodway, geological hazard and/or airport overlay districts. The proposed change of zone is not located within a Flood Hazard, Geologic Hazard or Airport Overlay District. Component Five — common open space usage. N/A Component Six — signage. No additional signage is proposed. Component Seven — RUA impact. N/A Component Eight — intergovernmental agreement impacts. A. Intent. Efficient and orderly land development directs PUD developments to locate where urban services exist or can more easily be provided, such as in close proximity to municipalities and within the RUA. Currently, the County and many municipalities are cooperating in joint planning efforts to achieve a consistent vision for land surrounding municipal boundaries. This coordination is achieved through intergovernmental agreements. B. Duties of the Department of Planning Services. When an application is proposed in an area included in an intergovernmental agreement, additional standards and criteria for review will apply. These standards are intended to carry out the intent and goals of the intergovernmental agreement with the affected municipality. The Department of Planning Services will review PUD proposals for development influenced by an intergovernmental agreement area in conjunction with the applicable standards set forth in the agreement. (Weld County Code Ordinance 2009-8) 8 The proposed PUD is within the Longmont Intergovernmental Agreement District boundary. As indicated in the attached notice of inquiry, the City of Longmont has no objection to the proposed rezoning. 9 Gerald L Jorgensen Anne B. Jorgensen Todd A. Brownell Rebecca M. Pepin Matthew A. Crowther Robert G. Hancock Brian J. Laurence Jorgensen a lair firm Erowneii wwwr.CDu'selcol.orado.com February 4, 2013 Kim Ogle, Planner III Department of Planning Services Planning Division 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Ogle, 900 South Main Street Suite 100 Longmont, CO 80501 Tel: 303.678.0560 Fax: 303.678.1164 I am in receipt of your correspondence dated January 4, 2013, in which you suggest that my clients and I schedule a meeting with you to familiarize ourselves with the PUD Subdivision application procedure and discuss the referrals attached to your letter. To date, we have participated in telephone conferences with Mary Evett of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment and Donald Carroll of the Weld County Department of Public Works. Ms. Evett has provided amended language regarding her department's suggested note on the change of zone and final plat in email correspondence directed to me and you and dated January 14, 2013. Such language is acceptable to my clients and the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has no other concerns at the moment regarding my clients' application that they are aware of. Mr. Carroll indicated that we must label both of my clients' approved accesses with "AP#12-00410" and "paved" on the plat and designate a low area of the property where water naturally flows as "WQCF". My clients are amenable to Mr. Carroll's suggestions and are unaware of any other concerns that the Weld County Department of Public Works may have with PUDK12-0004 at this time. None of the other agency memoranda supplied by you in your January 4, 2013, correspondence seem to necessitate further action by us at this time. Please let us know as soon as practicable if that is not your understanding. Application of Weld County Comprehensive Plan Contrary to the position you outline on behalf of the Weld County Department of Planning Services, my clients' proposed rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22. As stated in the preamble to the Weld County Charter, the goal of the charter — including Weld County Code, Chapter 22 — is to allow the citizens of Weld County to: avail [them]selves of self-determination in county affairs to the fullest extent permissible under the Constitution and laws of the State of Colorado...to provide uncomplicated, unburdensome government responsive to the people, and...to provide for the most efficient and effective county government possible. The requested change of zone of the subject property allows that goal to be realized by availi the property owners of self-determination and allowing governmental control in a way that is responsive to the will of the people. Specifically, the proposed rezoning is consistent with 916 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Tel: 970.304.0075 Fax: 970.35 .8421 1 purpose of the Weld County Code because it would allow the property owners to continue to operate the Colorado Reptile Humane Society (CoRHS) — a Colorado nonprofit corporation whose mission is to continue to improve the lives of reptiles and amphibians in captivity and in the wild through education and action. As acknowledged by Weld County Code § 22-1-120(A): One (1) of the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, which it continues to preserve, and Weld County upholds, is the right of citizens to own and utilize their property. Private property rights are not unlimited rights but, rather, rights balanced with the responsibility of protecting community health, safety and welfare. It is the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to promote opportunities for County citizens, while protecting private property rights. Allowing the property owners to rezone their land as requested promotes opportunities for citizens in the community by allowing them to enjoy rehabilitated wildlife and adopt rehabilitated pets while simultaneously protecting the property owners' interest in continuing to utilize their property in the way that they intend. Such rezoning is in balance with the community's interest in protecting its health, safety, and welfare because it maintains the status quo ante with regard to actual present land use, poses no new or additional threats, and encourages the humane treatment of animals. The Weld County Code recognizes that the rezoning process must be fair and equitable to all parties providing an open process to facilitate public information and input, maintain consistent requirements coupled with flexibility within the implementation criteria, and allow for approval when all written criteria of the land use regulations are met. Weld County Code § 22-1420(C). In this case, the specific location of the subject property is technically in a subdivision named Seemore Heights First Addition which was created in 1981. There is unanimous community support for the property owners' proposed rezoning within that subdivision and broad community support for the same in the neighboring Seemore Heights subdivision created in 1963. More than half of the residents of Seemore Heights have signed written statements supporting that entire subdivision's rezoning if necessary. Upon information and belief, none of the remaining minority are opposed to the property owners' independent rezoning of their own parcel within Seemore Heights First Addition. Under such circumstances, there is little reason, if any, why the property owners' application should be denied. This is especially true considering the Weld County Code's goal of maintaining consistent written requirements coupled with flexibility within the implementation criteria. All subdivisions are not created equally. As more fully described in Weld County Code § 22-1- 120(D): The County's nearly four -thousand -square -mile area is diverse geographically, demographically, culturally, socially and economically. Therefore, land use policies must be flexible to adapt to the specific location and circumstances of each proposed land use change. It is also important to weigh the cumulative impacts that specific land use changes will have. .� 2 Neither the Seemore Heights First Addition subdivision nor the Seemore Heights subdivision bear much resemblance to the modern day, cookie cutter suburban neighborhoods described by the same term. Indeed, Seemore Heights bears little resemblance to its own original plat of 20 approximately one acre parcels that had, until that time, been used for agricultural purposes. As property owners purchased land in Seemore Heights — usually as part of larger land purchases encompassing contiguous lots — many of them continued their land's agricultural use. As a result, many such uses continue today as historic uses despite the fact that they would otherwise be prohibited. As any potential purchaser of land in the Seemore Heights or Seemore Heights First Addition subdivisions would soon realize, neighbors in those subdivisions and on the entirety of Elmore Road have vastly different tracts of land that they utilize in vastly different ways. A review by address indicates that more than 50% of land owners in this area operate businesses from their properties including real estate, knitting, trucking, lawn maintenance, a machine shop, a dentist, a sewer clean -out business, and an auto maintenance business. Under such circumstances, the cumulative impact of the property owners' proposed rezoning will be minimal indeed. This is especially true considering the lack of a homeowners association and the fact that residential properties immediately adjacent to the subject property to the east on Elmore Road are not even part of the subdivision. In at least one case, one of those properties — the Whittern residence, a one acre agriculturally zoned parcel with an essentially residential use — has been approved for a use by special review dental office by the Planning Department. Against this backdrop, the language of Weld County Code § 22-1-120(D) indicating that land use policies must be flexible is particularly applicable and the importance of not to getting caught up in uncodified minutia is highlighted. As recognized by Weld County Code § 22-1-120(F), land use policies have a significant impact on economic conditions in the County and should be structured to encourage economic prosperity and economic growth. Land use policy favors the continued operation of the CoRHS — an entity that has remained an economically viable ongoing concern since 1999 — because that entity alleviates the financial costs associated with governmental management of unwanted reptile pets and injured Colorado wildlife. Without the CoRHS, such costs would necessarily shift back to Weld County taxpayers and inhibit their economic prosperity in derogation of the Weld County Code. The Weld County Code specifically recognizes the fact that reduced fish and wildlife habitat is a significant problem facing the County. Weld County Code § 22-5-10(A). The perpetuation of nonprofit organizations like the CoRHS is integral to the effective management of species forced into increased human contact and resultant injury. Through such perpetuation, the officials of the County, as well as each individual citizen, are afforded an improved ability to take appropriate action and an active role in preserving the well-being of such threatened species as envisioned by Weld County Code § 22-5-10(B). In sum, contrary to your position, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan adopted by Weld County, is supported by the goals that plan endeavors to pursue, would aid the county economically, and would help assure the continued viability of threatened wildlife F.. tie a. 3 populations. The uses allowed by the proposed rezoning (Estate) would preserve the status quo ante. The property owners have been operating the CoRHS on the subject property since 2001 without issue until a recent anonymous complaint/inquiry triggered an investigation in late January 2012. Upon information and belief, no neighboring landowners made complaints or inquiries regarding the operation of the CoRHS on the property during that 11 year time period. The land uses of the properties immediately adjacent to the subject property to the north, south, and west are labeled residential, although, as discussed above, those properties' actual uses vary widely. The land use of the property immediately adjacent to the subject property to the east is labeled agricultural, though these parcels do not meet criteria for such zoning. The subject property is in a predominantly agricultural area with an Estate zoned subdivision not more than 450 feet to the east. Further, the uses allowed by the proposed rezoning will help conserve prime agricultural land. The subject property is designated as "Prime" by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. The property owners' proposed rezoning will allow the property to continue to be used in much the same way that it has been used for the last 11 years — ensuring the continued maintenance of its productive capacity. Response to Specific Concerns Outlined by Department of Planning Services Your January 4, 2013, correspondence makes specific reference to your department's perceived failure by my clients to "address the compatibility of a commercial interest in an older residential subdivision." As discussed above, a majority of the land owners in the subdivision already utilize their property for a commercial or semi -commercial use. As recently as May 2012, your department approved a commercial use dental practice at 13876 Elmore Road (right across the street from the property at issue) in USR12-0010. The following commercial uses are also currently being conducted in the neighborhood: Address Business name 13987 Elmore Assemblies ... Soon as Possible 13975 Elmore K & K Machine, Colorado Dimensional Art 13941 Elmore CoRHS 13930 Elmore 4003 W 14th St Rd, LLC 13909 Elmore Associated Appraisers of CO 13876 Elmore Dental Aspects 13835 Elmore MCT Concrete Work 13801 Elmore Klug Trucking 13794 Elmore Ben's Electric 13776 Elmore Heil Enterprises 13761 Elmore Paxknits of Longmont 13715 Elmore Ken's plumbing, Snake Masters Sewer Service 13688 Elmore The King's Speed Shop 13687 Elmore Quantum Innovations 13662 Elmore Healthy Spectrum Holistics Inc 13617 Elmore Sky Hawk Realty 4 13600 Elmore Tim Poole Appraisers 13581 Elmore Nitrogreen 13580 Elmore Pristine Home Cleaning 13550 Elmore Robert Crouch Trucking Your correspondence indicates that "the circulation patterns and access within this proposed PUD consist of two residential scale driveway's (sic), both gated, and without an adequate circulation pattern, effectively a dead end road on private property." Initially, of note is that the Weld County Department of Public Works apparently does not share your department's concerns as none of them are referenced in their November 19, 2012, memorandum. It is also perplexing that your department now appears to be utilizing the fact that my clients' application took the form of a single parcel PUD at your department's suggestion against them in an effort to portray the proposed PUD as a red herring. As you know, my clients initially attempted to undertake a straight Change of Zone (COZ) of their property from R1 to E by filing a pre -application request with your office on or about April 17, 2012, and did not endeavor to frame their application as a PUD until your department suggested that they do so in written correspondence authored by you, dated September 5, 2012, and emailed to me on September 7, 2012. Although no part of the Weld County Code prohibited my clients' proposed COZ application, your department indicated that a change of zone of a single lot within a subdivision was frowned upon. Later, with the assistance of our surveyor, Robert Thomas, when we discovered that my clients' property was actually not technically in the Seemore Heights subdivision, but was instead one of two lots in Seemore Heights First Addition, we contacted the other property owner in Seemore Heights First Addition and discussed with him potential rezoning of both lots to Estate in an effort to accommodate the existing use of the CoRHS and bring my clients' property into compliance with the Weld County Code as outlined in the Zoning Compliance correspondence associated with ZCV12-00040. That property owner, Steven Jordan, had no objection to said rezoning. If it is now your department's opinion that a straight change of zone of both lots in Seemore Heights First Addition would be better supported by the Weld County Code than the PUD application currently being submitted for my clients individual lot, please let us know that so that we can resume pursuit of that avenue of attempted compliance instead. Finally, your correspondence indicates that: only with the down zone of the property from R-1 Low Density Residential to E — Estate, would such a use [continued operation of the CoRHS] be permitted, perhaps to the detriment of the adjacent and surrounding property owners who enjoy the rural low density lifestyle. The current zoning affords this rural lifestyle without the intensity of a use associated with the more liberal PUD with Estate uses. Again, as indicated above, the only purpose of my clients' proposed PUD with Estate use and subsequent application for Use by Special Review (USR) kennel permit is to allow the continued operation of the CoRHS (ongoing without any documented neighbor complaint since 2001) and bring it into technical compliance with the Weld County Code thereby avoiding penalty in ZCV 12-00040. My clients have no desire to, in any way, alter the "rural low density lifestyle" that you mention. The property owners welcome any proposed PUD language from your 5 40-,14 department that would appropriately restrict their use of the property to that purpose and prevent other uses that might otherwise be legally pursued on the property in an unrestricted Estate zone. Meeting to Discuss Next Steps Please contact me and let me know a convenient time when my clients and I can meet with you and your staff to discuss these issues and your department's recommendation with regard to how it wishes my clients to proceed in this matter (i.e. to schedule a meeting regarding next steps in the PUD or COZ process). My clients are dedicated to bringing their property and the CoRHS into full compliance with the Weld County Code and welcome any other input your department might have to that end. Sincerely, Matthew A. Crowther, Esq. cc: clients, Bethany Salzman 6 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R4780486 Assessed To Parcel 120730204002 SCUPIN JONATHAN R 13941 ELMORE RD LONGMONT, CO 80504 Legal Description ISH2-2 L2 HLK2 SEEMORE HEIGHTS 1ST ADDN Sites Address 13941 ELMORE RD WELD 000000000 Year Charges 2012 Tax Billed Payments Balance $1,532.71 $766.36 $766.35 First Half Due as of 05/16/2013 Second Half Due as of 05/16/2013 $0.00 $766.35 "fax Billed at 2012 Rates for Tax Area 2325 - 2325 Authority WELL) COUNTY SCHOOL DIST REIJ NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NC ST VRAIN LEFT HAND WATER (S MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2012 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 16.8040000* 53.5000000 1.0000000 0.1840000 11.7470000 3.2610000 Amount Values $297.77 $948.02 $17.72 Actual Assessed SINGLE FAM.RES.- $32,240 $2,570 LAND SINGLE FAM.RES- $190,268 $15,150 IMPROVEMTS $3.26 Total $208.16 $57.78 86.4960000 $1,532.71 $222,508 $17,720 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1, REAL PROPERTY - AUGUST 1. Weld County Treasurer • P.O. Box 458, Greeley CO 80632 • 1400 N 17th Ave. Greeley CO 80631 - (970) 353-3845 ext. 3290 January 4, 2013 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Planning Division 1555 N. 17 Avenue GREELEY, CO 80631 kogle@weldgov.com PHONE: (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3549 FAX: (970) 304-6498 Ann Elizabeth Nash Jonathon Scupin 13941 Elmore Road Longmont, Colorado 80504 Matthew Crowther Jorgensen Brownell & Pepin, P.C 7915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Subject: PUDK12-0004, Sketch Plan for a one lot PUD with (E) Estate Zone District uses located within the Seemore Heights residential (R-1 Zone District) subdivision, described as Lot 2 Block 2 Seemore Heights First Addition, being part of the NW4 of Section 30 T3N R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Ms. Nash, Messrs. Scupin and Crowther: The Department of Planning Services staff and various referral agencies have reviewed your Sketch Plan application. Comments made during the Sketch Plan phase of the Planned Unit Development and agency referral responses may not be all inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application processes. Copies of the following referral agency comments are enclosed with this letter: Weld County Department of Public Works, referral received November 19, 2012 Weld County Department of Zoning Compliance, referral received December 14, 2012 Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment, referral received December 14, 2012 Weld County Department of Building Inspection, referral received December 14, 2012 Colorado Department of Transportation, referral received November 6, 2012 Long's Peak Water District, referral received November 13, 2012 Mountain View Fire Protection District, referral received November 21, 2012 Weld County Sheriffs Office, referral received November 7, 2012 City of Longmont referral received November 8, 2012 Colorado Department of Transportation referral received November 6, 2012 Banner/ NCMC Paramedic Services referral received November 6, 2012 1 The Department of Planning Services' staff and referral agencies have reviewed your application for a sketch plan on the above described parcel. Planning staff comments are based upon consistency with the Weld County Code, Chapters 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27 and any adopted intergovernmental agreements, or master plans of affected municipalities. APPLICATION AND REFERRAL OVERVIEW The site under review was zoned R-1 Low Density Residential in May 1965 and is located west of and adjacent to Elmore Road and approximately 1,200 feet east of County Road 1. Lot 2 Block 2 Seemore Heights First Addition is 4.03 acres in area with improvements consisting of the family residence and two utility buildings. The applicant is proposing to create a single parcel that is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) for E — Estate Zone District uses to accommodate the existing Colorado Reptile Humane Society rescue and kennel. The Weld County Zoning Compliance Officer states "Upon review of my case files and computer, an active Zoning Violation (ZCV12-00040) was noted. This violation was initiated due to the operation of an animal rescue operation (thus exceeding the allowable number of Household Pets and a few Exotic Animals) without first completing the necessary Weld County Zoning Permits. This case has not been presented to the Weld County Court Magistrate through the Violation Hearing process. . The parcel of land under review is located within the Intergovernmental Agreement area for the City of Longmont, the City in their Notice of Inquiry response stated that the City has no objections to the application. Formal comments will be generated at time of referral. The City's referral dated November 8, 2012, indicated that the application was reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. The findings and review of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, the following citations are applicable to this proposed down zone: Section 22-2-110.F states "Rural residential developments are characterized by larger lots, limited urban amenities, limited livestock and/or other non -urban components." Section 22-2-120.C. R.Goal 3. "Consider the compatibility with surrounding land uses, natural site features, ... and general residential growth trends when evaluating development proposals. Section 22-2-120.F. R.Goal 6. 1. R.Policy 6.1 "Internal roadways that are rural in character, and yet adequately serve the intensity of the development, are encouraged." Section 22-2-120.F. R.Goal 6. 1. R.Policy 6.2 "Access from residential developments onto perimeter roadways should be encouraged to share roads spaced according to County policies." Section 22-2-100.E. C.Goal 5 "Minimize the incompatibilities that occur between commercial uses and surrounding properties." Section 22-2-100.E. C. Goal 5 1. C.Policy 5.1 "Consider the compatibility with surrounding land uses and natural features." Section 22-2-100.E. C.Goal 5 2. C.Policy 5.2 "Support the use of visual and sound barrier landscaping to screen from residential uses or public roads." Section 22-2-90.E states "Neighborhood commercial development provides locations for uses that supply conveniences, goods and services for residents of the immediate area." The applicant is proposing to effectively down zone the property utilizing the PUD land use application process. The single parcel PUD appears to not address the compatibility of a commercial interest in an older residential subdivision. The circulation patterns and access within this proposed PUD consist of two residential scale driveway's, both gated, and without an adequate circulation pattern, effectively a dead end road on private property, The Department of Public Health and Environment, in their referral received December 14, 2012, indicated the applicant has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regards to water service. A letter from Longs Peak Water District indicted that the existing tap is adequate. Sewer is provided by an existing individual sewage disposal system (permit G19732314). The septic permit indicates the system is sized for a 3 bedroom residence or 6 people. The application materials indicate that the reptile rescue is operated by the residents, and there are no plans to expand. In the event the applicant intends to utilize the existing septic system at the home, for employee or client use, an engineer review of the existing septic system will be required. If the septic system is found to be inadequately sized or constructed the system must be brought into compliance with current Regulations. "The Department recommends that language for the preservation and/or protection of the absorption field envelope be placed in the development covenants. The covenants should state that activities such as landscaping (i.e. planting of trees and shrubs) and construction (i.e. auxiliary structures, dirt mounds, etc.) activities are expressly prohibited in the designated absorption field area." Future applications shall address the requirements of the Department of Public Health and Environment as stated in their referral dated December 14, 2012 in the change of zone and final plat applications. The Department of Public Works has several requirements, as stated in the referral dated November 19, 2012, to be addressed pertaining to this application. The applicant shall address the concerns and requirements of Public Works prior to submitting the Change of Zone application. The applicant shall include with the Change of Zone application a copy of an agreement with the property's mineral owners stipulating that the oil and gas activities have adequately been incorporated into the design of the site, or show evidence that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate their concerns. Building Permits are required and the requirements of the Department of Building Inspection shall be addressed prior to construction (if any new structures or buildings are going to be constructed, altered, or additions added to the site). The following referral agencies did not return a response: ➢ Boulder County ➢ Town of Firestone ➢ Town of Frederick ➢ Town of Mead ➢ Department of Parks and Wildlife r Weld School District RE -1J The applicant shall address the County Road Impact Fee Program (Ordinance 2011-2) at time of building permits and adhere to the fee structure, or any adopted fee structure in place, as required per this Ordinance. Building permits issued on the subject site will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the County Facility Fee and the Drainage Impact Fee. (Ordinance 2011-2) APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to retain an existing use, which is in violation of current land use regulations, for the operation of an animal rescue operation, thus exceeding the allowable number of Household Pets and a few Exotic Animals in a established residential subdivision. Under the existing zoning, a Kennel is not an allowed use, and only with the down zone of the property from R-1 Low Density Residential to E — Estate, would such a use be permitted, perhaps to the detriment of the adjacent and surrounding property owners who enjoy the rural low density residential lifestyle. The current zoning affords this rural lifestyle without the intensity of a use associated with the more liberal PUD with Estate uses, After reviewing the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan proposal, it is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services that the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan proposal is not supported by the Weld County Code, as previously discussed. If you choose to proceed with the Planned Unit Development application process, the next step is to address the concerns of the referral agencies. When the concerns are addressed a Planned Unit Development Change of Zone application may be submitted; unless it has been determined that substantial changes from the submitted Sketch Plan would warrant the need to submit a new Sketch Plan application. Subsequent submittals associated with this proposed Planned Unit Development must address all issues discussed in the enclosed referrals, as well as the questions and concerns of the listed referral agencies. Further, where stipulated, written evidence of approval by the referral agency is required prior to submitting the Change of Zone application. Please review the enclosed materials and then call me to schedule an appointment after January 7, 2013. The purpose of the meeting will be to familiarize you with the PUD Subdivision application procedure and discuss any problems or concerns identified in the referrals associated with this letter. We also recommend that you meet with the Department of Public Works and the Department of Public Health and Environment to discuss their referrals. If you choose to proceed with a change of zone application a pre -application request form shall be submitted and pre -application meeting shall be held prior to submittal of the change of zone application. Please note, staff comments made during the Sketch Plan phase of the PUD application procedure and agency referral responses may not be all inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application process. Sincerely, Kiln gle Planner Ill Planning Services Enclosures: Case Referrals File: PUDK12-0004 Weld County Public Works Dept. 1111 H Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: (970)304-6496 Fax: (970)304-6497 Applicant Name Matthew Crowther ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Property Owner (If different than Applicant) Name Jonathan Scupin & Ann Elizabeth Nash Company Jorgensen, Brownell & Pepin, P.C. Address 13941 Elmore Road Address 7916 10th Street City Longmont State CO Zip 80504 City Greeley State CO Zip 80631 Phone (303) 818-3520 Business Phone (970) 304-0075 Fax (970) 351-8421 E mail mcrowther@counselcoloradocom Parcel Location & Sketch The access is on WCR 30 Nearest Intersection: WCR 30 & WCR 1 Distance from Intersection 1/2 mile Parcel Number 1207-30-2-04-002 Section/Township/Range NW30/3N/68W Is there an existing access to the property0YES NCO Number of Existing Accesses 2 Road Surface Type & Construction Information Asphalt Gravel Treated Other Culvert Size & Type Materials used to construct Access Construction Start Date Finish Date Proposed Use ©Temporary (Tracking Pad Required)/ $75 ()Small Commercial or Oil & Gas/$75 °Field (Agriculture Only)/Exempt Fax E-mail aenash@gmail.com ♦= Existing Access A= Proposed Access T N WCR 3O WCR 0 Single Residential/$75 0 Large Commercial/$150 © Industrial/$150 o Subdivision/$150 Is this access associated with a Planning Process? ONo OUSR ORE PUD DOther Required Attached Documents - Traffic Control Plan -Certificate of Insurance - Access Pictures (From the Left, Right, & into the access) By accepting this permit, the undersigned Applicant, under penalty of perjury, verifies that they have received all pages of the permit apprcation; they have read and understand all of the permit requirements and provisions set forth on all pages; that they have the authority to sign for and bind the Applicant, if the Applicant is a corporation or other entity; and that by virtue of their signature the Applicant is bound by and agrees to comply with all said permit requirements and provisions, all Weld County ordinances, and state laws regarding facilities construction. Signature Printed Name Pi\g"4-111.-4 (-4)trDate Approval or Denial will be issued in minimum of 5 days. Approved by Revised Date 6/29/10 13941 Elmore Road O O 00 tortoise area 1848 sq. ft. home o °J C 1200 gal. pond c L N ei M 864 sq. ft. steel building Zimbra Page 1 of 5 Zimbra mcrowther@counselcolorado.com RE: Utility Easement From : Kim Ogle <kogle@co.weld.co.us> Subject : RE: Utility Easement To : 'Matthew A. Crowther' <mcrowther@counselcolorado.com> Mon, Apr 22, 2013 10:23 AM 03 attachments Matthew, The email exchange is acceptable for the narrative component of the application. Please note the specific Code Section requirements for easement — see attached. Thank you. Kim Kim Ogle Planner III Department of Planning 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Direct: 970.353.6100 x 3549 Office: 970.353.6100 x 3540 Facsimile: 970.304.6498 411119 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. A Think Green - Not every email needs to be printed From: Matthew A. Crowther [mailto:mcrowther@counselcolorado.com] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:20 AM http://jjpr-mail/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=211002 4/22/2013 Zimbra Page 2 of 5 To: Kim Ogle Subject: Fwd: Utility Easement Hey Kim, Will this suffice for purposes of the utility easement information requested? Sincerely, Matthew A. Crowther, Esq. 900 South Main Street, Suite 100 Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 678-0560 (303) 678-1164 fax 916 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 304-0075 (970) 351-8421 fax www.boulderweldcriminallaw.com www.counselcolorado.com Jorgensen r, ►raw firm Brownell & Pepinp, ^,eO corn NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY The information contained in this electronic message from Jorgensen, Brownell & Pepin, P.C. and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not an intended recipient or received this electronic message or attachment(s) by mistake, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then destroy all copies of the transmission. From: "Richard J Grady" <Rick.Grady@XCELENERGY.COM> To: "Michael E Diehl'' <Michael.Diehl@XCELENERGY.COM>, "mcrowther@counselcolorado.com"<mcrowther@counselcolorado.com>, "Todd F Anderson" <Todd.Anderson@XCELENERGY.COM>, "Craig L Eicher" <Craiq.L.Eicher@xcelenergy.com> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:29:08 PM Subject: RE: Utility Easement http://jjpr-mail/zimbra/h/printmessage'?id=211002 4/22/2013 Zimbra Page 3 of 5 We do not have any electric distribution in this area; however PSCo d.b.a. as Xcel does have a 3/4 inch gas service line to the property. There also appears to be a 1 1/4 inch gas main in the road right of way. There would not be any easement for the service line to the subject property since we are there by invitation to serve the property. Rick Grady, SR/WA Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature Manager, Right of Way & Permits Electric & Gas Distribution, Gas Transmission, Minerals Management 1123 West 3rd Ave., Denver, CO. 80223 P: 303-571-3135 F: 303-571-3101 rick.grady@xcelenergy.com XCELENERGY.COM Please consider the environment before printing this email This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521. This email, and any attachments, may contain confidential, private and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments From: Diehl, Michael E Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:26 PM To:'mcrowther@counselcolorado.com'; Anderson, Todd F; Eicher, Craig L Cc: Grady, Richard J Subject: RE: Utility Easement All, There are no Public Service Company of Colorado high voltage electric transmission lines in the area of the subject address. I don't even think this is in our service territory. If it is, the question needs to be posed to our low voltage electric distribution or gas right-of-way department. Rick Grady might be able to answer Mathew's question. He is cc'd this message. Michael E. Diehl, Manager Siting and Land Rights Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80202 (Office) 303-571-7260 (Cell) 303-810-9707 (Fax) 303-294-2088 (e-mail) michael.diehl@xcelenergy.com This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521. This email, and any attachments, may contain confidential, private http://jjpr-mail/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=211002 4/22/2013 Zimbra Page 4 of 5 and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. From: Anderson, Todd F Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:31 AM To: Diehl, Michael E; Eicher, Craig L Subject: FW: Utility Easement See below Todd Anderson Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature Area Manager, Community and Local Govt. Affairs 2655 N. 63rd St. Boulder. CO 80301 P: 303.245.2285 F: 303.245.2292 E: todd.anderson@xcelenergy.com XCELENERGY.COM Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Matthew A. Crowther[mailto:mcrowther©counselcolorado.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22 AM To: Anderson, Todd F Subject: Utility Easement Dear Mr. Anderson, I am in the process of assisting two clients rezone their property. As part of that process, we are required to submit statements from utility companies regarding potential easements. Essentially, we need something on Xcel letterhead indicating that it does not have a utility easement across my clients' property if that is the case. My clients' names are Ann Elizabeth Nash and Jonathan Scupin. Their property is located at 13941 Elmore Road, Longmont, CO 80504 (Lot 2 Block 2 Seemore Heights, Weld County, State of Colorado). Please let me know if you are the person to whom my inquiry should be directed or if you have any other questions. Thanks. Sincerely, Matthew A. Crowther, Esq. 900 South Main Street, Suite 100 Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 678-0560 (303) 678-1164 fax http://jjpr-mail/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=211002 4/22/2013 Zimbra Page 5 of 5 916 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 304-0075 (970) 351-8421 fax www.boulderweldcriminallaw.com www.counselcolorado.com Jorgensen a law firm Brownell & Pepin... NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY The information contained in this electronic message from Jorgensen, Brownell & Pepin, P.C. and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not an intended recipient or received this electronic message or attachment(s) by mistake, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then destroy all copies of the transmission. GEO image002.jpg 3 KB image003.jpg 21 KB 2327_001.pdf 169 KB http://jjpr-mail/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=211002 4/22/2013 orcr; 1Pgf Notice of Inquiry Development within an Intergovernmental Agreement Urban Growth Boundary Date of Inquiry G , . , 2Q n-- Town Referred to: LOW.. Maw' Name of Person Inquiring sye_apt ut , ‘,Lif , G 're¢_ Property Owner Planner I.-6- Legal Description Lo -r - 15(404- 2. SE MeoX- t4414.44 -T5 36 rte' Legal Parcel # IA01 -6D -A-Glii-r121, Major Crossroads 514 Coq L Mom ,, Type of Inquiry V /,4 r The above person inquired about developing a parcel of land inside your designated Intergovernmental Agreement Urban Growth Boundary. This person has been referred to your community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Weld County Comments: Mc(760015 !�-[��*L Vu 6 T' L Attic, t spa � Fsr►y tU4'13 b4& f� ut ou t o� �S ilk n c2 !_4-1 Ad -4-10 0 c z- A-PN7LI 0011 t5 Town/City Comments: vc)\Q,* -1/4c„, '\ *1 cOrVv\a.\ 2\\\,_ \INI\maiEs\f • . Signet f Weld County Planner Signalure of Town/City Representative It is the applicant's responsibility to return the completed form to Weld County. White copy: Applicant: Yellow Copy: Town/City; Pink Copy. Weld County WOO County Ptanniny Department 1555 N 171P Ave Greeley, CO 80631 - (9701353-6100. ext. 3540 - (970) 304-6498 Fax Hello