The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20130374.tiff40 Lucknow Court CORPORATION Bardstown, KY 40004-2113 Formerly Sam Nally Shop, Inc. E-mail: info@armagcorp.com www.armagcorp.com Phone: 502-348-3987 Toll Free: 800-443-9994 Fax: 502-348-4801 Type 2 Class ABC ATF spec 3" -lined magazine is constructed of: • 'A" exterior steel plate • Lined with (3) - 1" layers of hardwood throughout with additional 1/8" plywood on walls and ceilings • %" AC plywood over hardwood on floor • secured with aluminum fasteners • Additional vertical and horizontal standoff lattice strips on walls to prevent blocking of ventilation • All non sparking interior • Top mounted lifting attachments • mounted on two 6" - 20# beam skids with 5"openings each end • vent openings are double screened with expandable metal and aluminum bug screen • exterior shielded with'/."steel plate • Doors are constructed of Vs" steel plate • reinforced with 3/8" x 2" stiffeners • lined with 3" hardwood and additional 1/8" plywood overlay • (2) 14" greasable welded hinges each door with 1 %" x 1 Yd' hinge • side security pin behind each hinge • door opening is framed with 3" x 3" x'/<" angle • door has top drip edge to prevent leakage • each door has grounding bonding straps across one hinge • magazines with double doors are secured with additional lockable cam closure on active door and internal top and bottom aluminum cane bolts on secondary door Unit has (2) 'A" steel lock covers with side angle iron protection (2) ATF spec padlocks (7/16" hardened shackle, 5 tumbler keyway) • Commercially sandblasted • urethane exterior coating, approx. 8 mils DFT, color: WHITE **We certify our magazines to meet or exceed ATF specifications" .1 C7 - Ronnie Clark Sales Manager ARMAG Corporation Small Commercial Buildings— W1d County, Ccioratio, Northern Part b a 51'70 517000 517070 517140 517 10 517 50 517350 40'47 55' 40. 42' 35" 515930 51 000 51 070 b e $ N A Map Sine: 1:3,010 4 printed on A tee (5 5" x 11'1 sheet Melon 0 25 50 100 150 0 100 200 400 F.M 600 40' 42 55' 40'47 35' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/24/2012 Page 1 014 j 9 s 1 i MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND HI j 1 Pi • i ? hi p ii I jf"ip R i .; [ill iii oh' i itg i I! !Ulf Ai di 'Islip 1 1 nil 1 a Ii 013 d i gal N . 1 Small Commercial Bulldings-WS County, Colorado, Near Pert Small Commercial Buildings Small Commercial Buildings by Map unit — Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part (Co617) Summary Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (numerk values) Acme In Ad Percent of AC( 1 Allan Sna sandy NM limbed loam, 0 r 6 percent slopes Totals for Area of Intent Alvan (9S%) 3.9 Si 190.9% Small Commercial Buildings— Summary by Rating Value Rating NM MSS Totals for Area of Interest Acres NAOl 2.9 5.9 Percent of Act 100.0% 100,911 aNatural Resources Conservation hrvlce Web Sell Survey $/24/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Small Commercial Buildings —Weld County. Colorado. Northern Part Description Small commercial buildings are structures that are less than three stories high and do not have basements. The foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or et the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load -supporting capacity include depth to a water table, pending, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential), and compressibility (which is inferred from the Unified classification of the soil). The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include flooding, depth to a water table, pending, slops, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. The ratings are bent verbal and numerical. Rating class teams indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. "Somewhat Ambled" indicates Maths soil hes features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor perfonnence and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative lamed on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Date Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsits investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 8/24/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 Farmland Classification —Weld County. Colorado, Northern Part b a 40'4755' 40' 47 35" 51'30 51T'' 517070 517140 517 10 Y I Y 51:•30 517000 51 070 b N Map Scale 1 301 4 pasted on Ante (5 5" x 11') sheet Meters 0 25 50 100 150 0 100 200 400 Feet 600 40'4755' 40'4735' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 8124/2012 Page 1 of 3 Aii II n,. ,r , ; i! 14 111 AI h ovi jig I Jn f,1! t p1! I. a 11 Farmland Classficabon-Weld County, Colorado. Northern Part Farmland Classification Farmland ClassMutton — summary by Map 1Ml—Weld Camay, Colorado, Nesttem Part (CO•77) Map unit symbol I Map unit name Rating I Aerie In ACI I haoen* se ASO 1 Altvan tine sandy loam, 0 Farmland of statewide Importance to 6 percent slopes Totals ter Area et Interest Description 3.e 3.e Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, 19711. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie -break Rule: Lower 100.0% 10e.e% gm Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 6/24/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 013 Corrosion of Concrete —Wean County, Colorado, Northern Part b a 40' 47 55" 40' 47 35" 516930 517000 51 070 51 140 51 210 51 Ie0 51 50 b ; 515930 517 517 70 517140 517 10 517 W 517 50 Map Scale 1'.3.010 a printed on A sae (85" x 111 sheet Meters 0 25 50 100 150 0 100 200 400 Feel 500 I- ti eV 47 55 40'17 35 USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Web Soil Survey 8/24/2012 Page 1 of 3 E E a MAP INFORMATION �I <1 it I thipil Fs 101 N R s Ji 1 Corrosion of Concrete -Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part Corrosion of Concrete Com mIon of Conan— Summery by Map Unit— Wald County, CWsra4a, NowUMre Port (COMM Mop unit symbol I Map oak an Rating I Awn In ACM I Porant of POI 1 Albion Snit sandy loam, 0 to Low 6 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest Description 3.$ 3.e "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil -induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens concrete. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or "high." Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff.' None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher 100.0% 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 8/24/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Corrosion of 8te44—Wrttl Canty, Cabrado, Northam Part b e 10'1755' 518930 517000 517'70 517140 51 10 51 y i d 4 F b N A 516930 517000 51 070 Map Scale. 1.3,010 / 01300 on A.Re (8 5' x 11') shaft Meters 0 25 50 100 150 0 100 200 /00 Feel 800 40'1735' USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soli Survey Web Soli Survey 8124/2012 Page 1 of 3 sj 1 MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND r X01 'loom N � iL�l! i I ill Corrosion of Steel -Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part Corrosion of Steel Corrosion of 111sol— $unary by Map Unit — Wald County, Colorado, Nude Part (C0sfp) Map sank symbol I Map unit nano I Rang I Acres M Ad I Pima of Ad 1 Alvan One sandy loam, 0 Moderate to 6 proem dopes Totals for Area of Inrreat Description 3.0 5., "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil -induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle -size distribution, acidly, end electrical conductivity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the stool in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or "high." Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher 100.0% 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 8./21/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Northern Prat b 3 40.47 55• 40.42 35" 516930 51 000 51 070 51 140 51 10 51 280 b w N A 510830 517000 517070 517140 Msp Sc.:n1'.3 010 N prnbd on A sae (6 5' v 11") sheet Meters O 25 50 100 150 O 100 200 400 FM 500 517 so 517350 517350 w a 40. 47 55• C42 35' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/24/2012 Page 1 of 3 Pi i Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Sunemry by Map Unit — Wild County, Colorado, Northern Pat (COII17) Map me symbol I Map unit nana Rating I Acres In AOI I Percent of AOI 1 Man fine sandy loam, 0 to B 8 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest Description 3.9 3.9 Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United Stales are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher 100.0% 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 8/24/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Leal Roads and Streets —Veal County, Colorado, Northern PM b a 40'47 55" 40' 47 35' b $ N A 516830 617000 518930 51 000 517,70 517140 Mep Sae'. 13,01011 milled on A see (85" a 11') shoot Meters 0 25 50 100 150 Feel 0 100 200 400 000 40' 47 56' 40" 47 35' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey &24/2012 Page 1 014 I I I MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND 'II �s41 tuft It: I rifi"cm III § I P.>. Jt t, f ig Pi III I d 1 OH 14 sr is II gil r j �j E 1®❑ � tI h j C 2 Nt4 ii Y t I N Loral Raad MM IYNp-Ws1d County, Cents. NOMorn Pan Local Roads and Streets Local Roads and Stream— Summary by Map Unit — Weld County, Colorado, Northern Pan (C0117) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (mmmk values) Acres In AOI Peasant of AOI Arran Ana eery lesew%M Milted Wm, Iles II WWI aims ? Mla Mr Area of Int.eeal Raven OHO Pnast aason (SAS) 3. IS' 9l.M% Local Roads and Street.— Summary by Rating Value Riding IlleentSMI MAN bNN an As of nsreet Acres In AOI l 3.5 SA Portent of AOI USDA Natural Rsaau nn MaM Conservation Smite Web Soil Survey 8/241012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of t Local Roads and SVsets—Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part Description Local roads and streets have an ale -weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fiN soil material; a base of gravel, crushed rock, or soil material stabilised by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible material (asphalt), rigid material (concrete), or gravel with a binder. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic -supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect the traffic -supporting capacity are soil strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number), subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential), the potential for frost action, depth to a water table, and ponding. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. "Somewhat limited" Indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They Indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher i Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 5124/2012 National Cooperative Soil Survey Pape 4 of 4 Hello