Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140250.tiff BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC MEETING IN RE: CONSIDER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - BASE TACTICAL DISASTER RECOVERY The above-entitled matter came for public meeting before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on September 23, 2013, at 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado, before Susan Brown, Deputy Clerk to the Board, and TRANSCRIBED by Esther Gesick, Deputy Clerk to the Board and Notary Public within and for the State of Colorado. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached transcript is a complete and accurate account of the above-mentioned portion of the public meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD OUNTY, COLORADO d�C Esther E. Gesick Deputy Clerk to the Board 2014-0250 1-a7-aa9 2 APPEARANCES: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS William F. Garcia, Chair Douglas Rademacher, Pro-Tem Sean P. Conway, Commissioner Mike Freeman, Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Commissioner WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Bruce T. Barker ALSO PRESENT: Susan Brown, Acting Clerk to the Board Monica Mika, Director of Finance and Administration Don Warden, Director of Budget and Management Analysis Trevor Jiricek, Director of General Services 3 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 CHAIR GARCIA: Ok, item number 8 . Consider 4 Professional Services Agreement, authorize Chair to sign - Base 5 Tactical Disaster Recovery. 6 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Mr. Chair, in light of the work 7 session we had this morning, I would move we continue this 8 matter, um, until tomorrow. 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I thought we were doing it 10 this afternoon at 4 : 30 . 11 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Well, we can approve it . I 12 mean, I'm continuing this to tomorrow morning for consideration 13 - for action. You want to approve it today, before the meeting? 14 MR. BARKER: You can continue the - your meeting today 15 to 4 : 30 and then consider it at that time. So that would be - 16 that would be your motion. 17 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Alright, that' s my motion - to 18 continue this matter until 4 : 30 this afternoon. 19 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Second. 20 CHAIR GARCIA: Ok, there' s a motion to continue this 21 matter to 4 : 30 this afternoon, by Commissioner Conway and 22 seconded by Commissioner Rademacher. Any further discussion? 23 Hearing none; all those in favor signify by saying Aye. 24 UNANIMOUS : Aye. 4 1 CHAIR GARCIA: Those opposed say nay. Motion carries 2 unanimously. 3 [End of discussion/action on Professional Services Agreement 4 with Base Tactical Disaster Recovery during 9 : 00 meeting. The 5 following segment was conducted during a special 4 : 30 meeting. ] 6 7 CHAIR GARCIA: All right, we' ll reconvene the Board of 8 County Commissioners meeting for Monday, September 23, 2013 . It 9 is 4 : 35 in the afternoon. 10 CLERK: Sean Conway? 11 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Here. 12 CLERK: Mike Freeman? 13 COMMISSIONER FREEMAN: Here [via telephone conference] 14 CLERK: Barbara Kirkmeyer? 15 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Here [via telephone 16 conference] 17 CLERK: Doug Rademacher? 18 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Here . 19 CLERK: Bill Garcia? 20 CHAIR GARCIA: Present . We have all five 21 Commissioners present, with both Commissioners Kirkmeyer and 22 Freeman available by telephone this afternoon. And, we have one 23 item on our agenda, and that is a matter that was continued from 24 this morning. And, that is : Consider Professional Services 25 Agreement, authorize Chair to sign - Base Tactical Disaster 26 Recovery. Who' s going to start us off? Monica are you starting 27 us off? 5 1 MS . MIKA: Sure. 2 CHAIR GARCIA: Toby? Trevor? 3 MS . MIKA: Well, we wanted to thank you for the 4 opportunity to really be able to do some more due diligence and 5 look at some of the different firms in relation to engagement . 6 We looked at information for four different firms and, under the 7 guidance from the Board, we were looking at one firm that were 8 could primarily contract with to do both the FEMA engagement, as 9 well as the public infrastructure damage assessment and really 10 take us through the whole process . We, we really broke it down 11 into two top firms, and, Trevor? Do they have the spreadsheet 12 in front of them? 13 MR. JIRICEK: They do not . 14 MS . MIKA: Um, ok I' ll be happy to send this 15 spreadsheet to you. 16 MR. JIRICEK: Why don' t you keep talking and I' ll send 17 it . 18 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: So we' re getting it by email? 19 MS . MIKA: We' ll send it by email. 20 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Thank you. 21 MS . MIKA: We, um, we just finished our review just a 22 few minutes ago, and looked at two candidates that would 23 provide, we think, services that would meet the Board' s 24 objective in looking at a -- um, disaster recovery services . 25 And, we found out that there are both pros and cons, and there' s 6 1 two different approaches to both of these firms, that we would 2 say would be our top two firms to recommend. The first would be 3 Witt O' Brien, and on the spreadsheet you' ll notice that both 4 Witt O' Brien and Base Tactical both, in a lot of regards, were 5 the same in their response times and also their experience 6 levels . There was a cost differential between Witt O' Brien and 7 Base Tactical . We also listed any other pertinent information 8 as far as just experience . We were specifically looking for 9 mitigation services/experience and we found that both companies 10 possess that ability. It really comes down, in my opinion, and 11 I' ll open it up to Trevor and the other team mates, it really 12 comes down to approach and the way that these two unique firms 13 addressed disaster recovery. Um, we were able to check the 14 referrals from both firms and we - Bruce did a lot of the work 15 on this for Base Tactical, and I believe some of that 16 information is submitted for your review. But, um, they are 17 very positive recommendations . Uh huh? 18 MR. JIRICEK: The last version I have of that was at 19 3 : 08 and I know that you' ve revised it since then. So, would 20 you mind forwarding me one? 21 MS. MIKA: Sure, I' d be happy to send that for you. 22 The other firm that we looked at was with Witt O' Brien and I do 23 have a selected reference list and, interestingly enough, I did 24 -- there' s one, two, three, four, five - there' s like ten 25 references, um names on here, and I was able to call eight of 7 1 them. And with the time difference, I wasn' t able to connect 2 with any of them, but I do have just an easy review. I do have 3 two articles that, um, do point to some concerns with prior 4 engagement for Witt O' Brien, and I' ll forward these to you guys 5 and turn it over to Trevor to comment, and Don also looked at 6 this as well . 7 MR. JIRICEK: Don, do you want to go ahead and address 8 your comments? I'm not sure where to look. 9 CHAIR GARCIA: He can' t see you anyway. [Laughter] 10 MR. BARKER: Hey Don, did you hear that? 11 MR. WARDEN [VIA TELEPHONE] : No, I'm having a hard 12 time hearing actually. 13 MR. BARKER: Ok, do you want to go ahead and, um, tell 14 them your recommendation? 15 MR. WARDEN: Um, yeah I can. After talking to the four 16 firms, I mean, one obviously was just a debris management 17 company. NCIC - I kind of eliminate, again, based on the fact 18 that it' s not really their core business . Um, it' s kind of a 19 subsidiary of a defense-type company, and um, I guess in my mind 20 it kind of boils down to Base Tactical, which is the one we 21 talked about this morning, and Witt O' Brien. Uh, when you look 22 at the cost, um Witt O' Brien would probably be about $210, 000, 23 versus around $250, 000 for Base Tactical . Um, I think - I think 24 either one of them would - could do the job. In my mind, the 25 advantage of Base Tactical is that I think they' ll be aggressive 8 1 in going after FEMA dollars and that was reinforced by Bruce' s 2 two interviews that he had with the New York City Health and 3 Hospital Corporation, where both of the people said that Base 4 Tactical was highly competent and a valuable assess . They, uh, 5 basically were instrumental in recovering a lot of FEMA dollars 6 and, basically, were very aggressive. Uh, their other advantage 7 is they' re a small firm and, uh, basically you get kind of the 8 principals; you don' t get kind of underlings that assigns . You 9 get the principals of the company and they' re the boots on the 10 ground. And, uh, the hospital both kind of reiterated that and, 11 um, they came to the hospital - um, they did six bids and Base 12 Tactical was third lowest bid but they went ahead with them. 13 They were happy with that - uh, they said New York City hired a 14 consulting firm called Haggardy and basically, they were all 15 former FEMA employees and she said it showed. That gets to Witt 16 O' Brien. Um, James Witt - whose basically the principal of Witt 17 O' Brien, basically, was under Clinton - the FEMA Director. Uh, 18 background in construction from Arkansas . Most of his employees 19 are former FEMA employees and uh, I think the one comment that 20 spoke to me - I think they thought it was a complimentary 21 comment about their firm, but it troubled me a little bit . They 22 said the dollars you get is a dollar you keep. In other words - 23 what you claim, they pretty much get reimbursed. And, uh, I 24 guess that tells me they' re probably, uh, conservative and not 25 risk takers and that would fit with their background from FEMA. 9 1 So, it boils down to I think the Board' s looking at these two 2 firms and the proof in the pudding is going to be in about 36 3 months; if you could have both of these firms working on it - 4 you was add up the chips you get from FEMA at the end of 36 5 months and see which one you get the most money for. And, uh, 6 I'm still convinced that [inaudible] this whole process would 7 have the checks add up to be the most because, I think, they' d 8 be aggressive. I think they' ll go after mitigation projects, 9 et cetera, uh, will be Base Tactical. So that' s what I 10 recommend. I could live with Witt O' Brien too. I think they 11 been on the job. I don' t think they' ll be as aggressive as far 12 as going after reimbursement or aggressive going after 13 mitigation projects . So. 14 CHAIR GARCIA: Commissioner Conway. 15 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Yeah, Don. I'm famous for 16 asking this question, so Commissioner Garcia would be 17 disappointed if I didn' t . Um, in this case, you know, I think 18 you have cognizant of being penny wise and pound foolish, don' t 19 you, in many respects, based on the research that you did in 20 regards to these folks? 21 MR. WARDEN: Oh, it is and I think that' s the issue. 22 I think, and I stress again. I think we can' t forget the 23 business concept of the ever-reaching dollar. I mean, for every 24 dollar we spend, we' re going to leverage seven dollars . And, 25 uh, that dollar amount difference in their fee, if they' re 10 1 aggressive and go after, uh, mitigation projects or are a little 2 bit more aggressive on reimbursement; even if we [inaudible] uh, 3 down the road, we' re going to be money ahead. That' s kind of 4 where I am. 5 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Thank you. 6 CHAIR GARICA: Very good. Trevor? 7 MR. JIRICEK: Just to add procurement in, um. Witt 8 O' Brien and a couple of the others, actually three of the 9 consultants - we would be in a better position to guarantee 10 reimbursement because they participate in a cooperative 11 purchasing entity out of Texas that we could us with our Code. 12 So, just for full disclosure, the position - our position to 13 seek reimbursement for Base Tactical is still questionable . 14 We' d be in a stronger position with Witt . Uh, I think Don' s 15 points are well taken. 16 CHAIR GARCIA: Ok, very good. Questions? 17 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Comment . 18 CHAIR GARCIA: Comment, Commissioner Rademacher. 19 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Well, after hearing from 20 Bruce and his due diligence on Base, I am fairly comfortable 21 with a decision going forward with Base Tactical . Ok, can you 22 guys hear me? Barb and Mike? 23 COMMISSIONER FREEMAN [VIA PHONE] : Yeah, speak up a 24 little bit . 11 1 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Ok, I wasn' t in the mic, so. 2 Once again, with Bruce' s due diligence on Base and Don' s 3 recommendation, I feel pretty comfortable going with Base. 4 CHAIR GARICA: Very good. Other comments? 5 Commissioner Conway. 6 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Yeah, um, I think both - I think 7 Don has said that at the end of the day, um, we have to make a 8 determination where do we think we' ll be in 36 months . This is 9 a three-year process . And, I'm comfortable, um, I know when 10 you' re kind of comparing things, and you all know I'm used to II saying this, "Penny wise, pound foolish. " I think the fact that 12 in looking at Base, that you have a business - a very aggressive 13 small company that is going to be really - and Don? I forgot to 14 ask this question. Are they still only going to sign one or two 15 Colorado contracts from your understanding? 16 MR. WARDEN: Yes, they said they were going to do two. 17 Yeah. I think that' s all the resources they have . 18 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: So, that even makes me feel 19 better, that we' re not going to be competing against other 20 Colorado communities . That they' re not going to be trying to 21 decide, you know, do I do this for Larimer or Boulder County or 22 some other municipality. That they' re going to be working for 23 us . And so, I realize, um, in the end you can make the 24 argument, you know, we' re not talking about a few dollars here . 25 But, I think at the end of the day, I think in 36 months when we 12 1 look back at this process, hopefully, and if not you know I' ll 2 probably still be here to be held accountable, so I'm more than 3 willing to do that . Um, I think we have the right people for 4 the right job, and so I'm very comfortable with the Base 5 contract that we discussed. I don' t know if the other 6 Commissioners have anything to say. 7 CHAIR GARCIA: Very good. Commissioners Kirkmeyer or 8 Freeman, do you have any comments? 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER [via phone] : This is 10 Commissioner Kirkmeyer and, um, it' s a little difficult hearing 11 everything. I just pulled over so I could look at the emails 12 that came through. Um, after hearing Commissioner Rademacher' s 13 and Commissioner Conway' s remarks, I would agree with that . 14 CHAIR GARCIA: Anything further to say Commissioner 15 Freeman? 16 COMMISSIONER FREEMAN: Um, no, you know it' s one of 17 those things that I think, you know I respect our people that 18 know what we' re doing and with Don' s recommendation, and so 19 yeah, I'm good. 20 CHAIR GARCIA: Commissioner Conway. 21 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Yeah, I know that our County 22 Attorney had spoken to us previously, but I'm not sure he' s 23 spoken on the record. Um, Bruce, are you comfortable in terms 24 of your due diligence on Base and the recommendation that' s been 25 given to us? 13 1 MR. BARKER: I am. Um, I was concerned just by - I 2 think any time you have - and this goes even for when you' re at 3 your own house - when you have a disaster or something and 4 you' ve people showing up out of no where - 5 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Like roofers? 6 MR. BARKER: Like roofers [laughter] . Um, you know, 7 it' s always good to do some due diligence and I'm glad that, um, 8 we had the time to be able to do that . Because the people I 9 talked to, from New York City, were very complimentary of Base 10 Tactical . And, I also double-checked the, uh - to make certain 11 that in fact, um, with CU, because they had mentioned that they 12 were going to be going. And in fact the Chancellor' s Office 13 there said that, Yeah, in fact they had been talking to the risk 14 manager, um, an insurance division manager at CU, and CU hasn' t 15 chosen anyone yet, but they' re looking at a variety of different 16 firms - one of them being Base Tactical . So that confirmed what 17 he had said, so, I feel comfortable with that . I think with 18 those two things I feel pretty good about it . 19 CHAIR GARCIA: Commissioner Rademacher. 20 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Thank you Mr. Chair. And I 21 think we' d be remiss if we didn' t thank our staff for following 22 up on the references . And it took it some time to do so, but 23 thank you guys for doing that . 24 CHAIR GARCIA: Commissioner Conway. 14 1 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Yeah, I just want to ditto what 2 Commissioner Rademacher said. Um, I want to thank Monica and 3 Bruce and Don for all their due diligence in terms of following 4 up with this - and Trevor, sorry, I wasn' t leaving Trevor out . 5 Um, in terms of this, I think we feel - I at least feel a lot 6 better making this decision predicated on that research and I 7 appreciate you, on a very tight time frame, I think we only had 8 this discussion at 9 : 00 a.m. on Monday, and here we are at 4 : 51 9 on Monday, and so that' s very quick turnaround. The other think 10 I will add for the record is, I did my own due diligence, based 11 on the articles that were forwarded to me by Monica, um, 12 concerning Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and some of the issues raised in 13 some of the newspaper articles, and I am comfortable, in talking 14 with government officials out there, that the explanation that 15 was given to us regarding some of the concerns that were raised 16 out there in the news media, um, I'm completely confident, or 17 comfortable with the explanation that Mr. Levy gave us in that 18 meeting on Friday. That what he told me, just like he told us 19 the other things, are true and accurate and that means a lot - 20 that, uh, we weren' t - that he was being straight forward with 21 us . And, I feel that that even strengthens my opinion that this 22 is going to be a good working relationship as we move forward to 23 recoup those funds that we' re going to exert on behalf of our 24 taxpayers, to get as much of that back. So, I just wanted to 25 put that on the record. 15 1 CHAIR GARCIA: Very good. Any other comments? 2 Hearing no comments, is there a motion? 3 COMMISSIONER RADEMACHER: Mr. Chair, I' ll make a 4 motion that we approve the Professional Service Agreement and 5 authorize Chair to sign - Base Tactical Disaster Recovery. 6 COMMISSIONER CONWAY: Second. 7 CHAIR GARCIA: Motion to approve by Commissioner 8 Rademacher; second by Commissioner Conway. Any further 9 discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor signify by saying 10 aye. 11 COMMISSIONERS UNANIMOUS : Aye. 12 CHAIR GARCIA: Those opposed say, Nay. Motion carries 13 unanimously. 14 15 [End of discussion/action on Professional Services Agreement 16 with Base Tactical Disaster Recovery during 4 : 30 Special 17 Meeting. ] 18 16 1 CERTIFICATE 2 3 STATE OF COLORADO) 4 ) ss 5 COUNTY OF WELD ) 6 7 I, Esther E. Gesick, Deputy Clerk to the Board and 8 notary public within and for the State of Colorado, certify the 9 foregoing transcript of the digitally recorded proceedings, In 10 Re : Professional Services Agreement and authorize Chair to sign 11 - Base Tactical Disaster Recovery, before the Weld County Board 12 of County Commissioners, September 23, 2013, and as further set 13 forth on page one . The transcription, dependent upon recording 14 clarity, is true and accurate with special exceptions (s) of any 15 or all precise identification of speakers, and/or correct 16 spelling or any given/spoken proper name or acronym. 17 Dated this 19th day of November, 2013 . 18 19 b ��`s4, 20 Esther E. Gesick, Notary 21 ORIGINAL (x) 22 ESTHER E. GESICK CERTIFIED COPY ( ) NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO 23 NOTARY ID 19974016478 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 29, 2017 17 1 INVOICE 2 (Recording/Transcribing) 3 4 WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD 5 c/o Esther Gesick, Deputy Clerk to the Board 6 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 7 ( 970) 335-7215 X4226 (970) 352-0240 (fax) 8 egesick@co .weld. co. us 9 10 Date : November 19, 2013 11 12 RE: Transcript of 09/23/13 Special Meeting concerning 13 Professional Services Agreement and authorize 14 Chair to sign - Base Tactical Disaster Recovery 15 16 1 . 5 hour staff time (11 : 30 - 1 : 00) 17 @ $60 . 00 per hour - - $90 . 00 18 16 pgs . @4 . 00 - - - - - - - $64 . 00 19 TOTAL, due on receipt, please - - - - $154 .00 Hello